WEBVTT - NFC North Preview 

0:00:04.910 --> 0:00:08.330
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to NFL Daily, where we're ready to talk about

0:00:08.350 --> 0:00:11.130
<v Speaker 1>the best division in football. I'm Greg Rosenthal. I'm in

0:00:11.150 --> 0:00:13.650
<v Speaker 1>the Chris Wesseling podcast studio for the first time in

0:00:13.670 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a minute with Jordan Rodrigue. It is nice to be

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.700
<v Speaker 1>here together. It is nice to reach the end of

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the road on our division preview series. Do you agree, Jordan?

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.820
<v Speaker 1>With me positing this is the best division in football.

0:00:29.140 --> 0:00:31.580
<v Speaker 2>I think it is because, like I mentioned, there's no

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.150
<v Speaker 2>dangling participles of teams here.

0:00:34.190 --> 0:00:37.729
<v Speaker 3>There's no sort of just like, and then there's this team.

0:00:37.790 --> 0:00:40.410
<v Speaker 1>There's like... I mean, you can say the name Arizona Cardinals.

0:00:40.430 --> 0:00:41.290
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or Raiders.

0:00:41.470 --> 0:00:44.970
<v Speaker 1>Or Raiders. I think the other options would be the

0:00:45.170 --> 0:00:46.030
<v Speaker 1>Western divisions.

0:00:46.070 --> 0:00:46.330
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:00:46.470 --> 0:00:50.180
<v Speaker 1>Those would be the three best divisions. But... Maybe the

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>NFC West has the best teams at the top. When

0:00:52.300 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I say best division, I want quality like you're saying throughout.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Any team could finish first. Any team could finish fourth.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.860
<v Speaker 1>Could any one of these teams make the Super Bowl?

0:01:02.220 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll dive into that later. Jordan Rodriguez says she has

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a surprising division winner. And I don't know who that

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:08.740
<v Speaker 1>would be.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I already forgot.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:11.910
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at the end of the show, you're going

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to remember. Here's what we do. Every division preview.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.170
<v Speaker 1>And this is our eighth. 12 minutes on the board.

0:01:17.569 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Bunch of different categories. And at the end of the preview,

0:01:21.260 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we will pick the order of the division. Let's start

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Chicago Bears alphabetically by city. They haven't moved

0:01:28.540 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>cities yet. Gary would come in third alphabetically or second alphabetically,

0:01:34.220 --> 0:01:36.830
<v Speaker 1>but Chicago is first. What is bringing you joy about

0:01:36.850 --> 0:01:37.470
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears?

0:01:38.340 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Self-awareness, Greg.

0:01:40.420 --> 0:01:44.390
<v Speaker 2>And that is the self-awareness of head coach Ben Johnson,

0:01:44.530 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>who might seem a little scary and Terminator-like at times,

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>but he's very, very self-aware.

0:01:49.540 --> 0:01:50.390
<v Speaker 3>His comments..

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.740
<v Speaker 2>About being the quote unquote top regression candidate were not

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.830
<v Speaker 2>just a rebuttal to Liam Cohen's beef of the week.

0:01:57.430 --> 0:02:00.230
<v Speaker 2>It was actually a nod to how splash moment or

0:02:00.290 --> 0:02:03.550
<v Speaker 2>high leverage moment that the Bears were actually dependent on

0:02:04.150 --> 0:02:07.570
<v Speaker 2>throughout the 2025 season and why playing sustainably is going

0:02:07.590 --> 0:02:10.620
<v Speaker 2>to be more into what they need to do in 2026.

0:02:10.620 --> 0:02:13.299
<v Speaker 2>I liked how self-aware he was. It wasn't even like a...

0:02:13.900 --> 0:02:16.339
<v Speaker 2>you know, oh, I'm into the analytics or anything like that.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.460
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe he reads the FTN Almanac, which was

0:02:18.500 --> 0:02:22.690
<v Speaker 2>a great publication that is released every summer. But for me,

0:02:22.950 --> 0:02:25.470
<v Speaker 2>it was like, oh, yeah, no, you're very clear on

0:02:25.510 --> 0:02:27.490
<v Speaker 2>what needs to happen for this team moving forward.

0:02:27.910 --> 0:02:31.790
<v Speaker 1>I love an offseason priority. That makes sense. Because this

0:02:31.810 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 1>has been the message from him from March on, specifically

0:02:36.139 --> 0:02:38.980
<v Speaker 1>with Caleb Williams, that, you know, we need to start

0:02:39.020 --> 0:02:41.750
<v Speaker 1>hitting the singles. We need to start playing better in

0:02:41.770 --> 0:02:44.370
<v Speaker 1>the first and second quarter so we don't need the drama.

0:02:44.889 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet, where you say self-awareness, you could flip it

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and read your colleague Dan Pompei's article with Ben Johnson

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.660
<v Speaker 1>and say bravado. I mean, he also wants to be

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.140
<v Speaker 1>the best offense in NFL history. I mean, who doesn't?

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>It's okay to have goals.

0:02:59.960 --> 0:03:02.900
<v Speaker 1>Sure. But the way he's saying it is like, I

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.900
<v Speaker 1>don't just want to be the best offense. I want

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the best offense in history. I know what

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.570
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are. I know that it's not just total points.

0:03:09.669 --> 0:03:12.750
<v Speaker 1>I want to beat them in points per game. I mean,

0:03:12.770 --> 0:03:15.850
<v Speaker 1>they got some issues, but to have that kind of chutzpah,

0:03:17.010 --> 0:03:21.489
<v Speaker 1>I would say we've got the division leading amount of

0:03:21.510 --> 0:03:24.530
<v Speaker 1>chutzpah among the head coaches. We've got the two teams

0:03:24.550 --> 0:03:26.990
<v Speaker 1>that lead the league in fourth downs, like in terms

0:03:27.010 --> 0:03:29.690
<v Speaker 1>of going for it. I think LeFleur and Kevin O'Connell,

0:03:29.710 --> 0:03:33.109
<v Speaker 1>plenty of chutzpah there, but yeah, I love the bravado.

0:03:33.230 --> 0:03:33.690
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:03:33.790 --> 0:03:35.810
<v Speaker 2>I love that all of these guys ended up in

0:03:35.850 --> 0:03:37.790
<v Speaker 2>the same division together and they all have to play

0:03:37.810 --> 0:03:40.690
<v Speaker 2>each other because it's like now Sean McVay and Kyle

0:03:40.710 --> 0:03:43.670
<v Speaker 2>Shanahan are like, oh, we're friends, da, da, da, da, da,

0:03:43.810 --> 0:03:47.910
<v Speaker 2>in the NFC West. But this is like, no, I

0:03:48.190 --> 0:03:50.780
<v Speaker 2>would prefer to chop that guy's head off in the

0:03:51.100 --> 0:03:51.620
<v Speaker 2>NFC North.

0:03:51.660 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's one of the things that's bringing me joy.

0:03:53.820 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Most important non-quarterback. I'll go first with Colston Loveland.

0:03:57.850 --> 0:04:00.150
<v Speaker 3>Dang, that's who I wrote. And then I put something else,

0:04:00.210 --> 0:04:01.220
<v Speaker 3>but yes, continue.

0:04:01.940 --> 0:04:03.580
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Well, that's good that you put something else. Cause

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want, that's the only reason I took it

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.540
<v Speaker 1>first is because that's the one I really wanted. You know,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.980
<v Speaker 1>when he says the goal of, of being the best

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 1>offense ever, that seems crazy. When like Khalif Raymond or

0:04:18.180 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>rookie Xavion Thomas is your third receiver. There's pretty major

0:04:21.380 --> 0:04:26.339
<v Speaker 1>questions at left tackle at center and You want Caleb

0:04:26.380 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to get better. The talent doesn't speak to that level

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of play. But Ben Johnson's play calling and the ascension

0:04:32.580 --> 0:04:35.219
<v Speaker 1>of his young players could make it happen. But all

0:04:35.260 --> 0:04:38.339
<v Speaker 1>those receivers are put down in the order because Colston

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.330
<v Speaker 1>Loveland is the one. And for them to reach the

0:04:41.370 --> 0:04:45.290
<v Speaker 1>levels that I think Ben Johnson needs to hit. I

0:04:45.330 --> 0:04:48.390
<v Speaker 1>think Colston Loveland has to be, if not the best

0:04:48.450 --> 0:04:51.729
<v Speaker 1>tight end in the league, like right there in that conversation.

0:04:52.450 --> 0:04:55.010
<v Speaker 1>And he is the guy I think they're building the

0:04:55.110 --> 0:04:58.810
<v Speaker 1>offense through other than Caleb Williams. He showed down the

0:04:58.850 --> 0:05:01.089
<v Speaker 1>stretch last season for a rookie tight end. He can

0:05:01.110 --> 0:05:03.190
<v Speaker 1>handle that. I think he was almost at that level.

0:05:03.230 --> 0:05:04.990
<v Speaker 1>It's really just doing it again and building on what

0:05:05.010 --> 0:05:05.590
<v Speaker 1>he did a year ago.

0:05:05.730 --> 0:05:09.529
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I love it too, because they've declared their intent

0:05:09.630 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>really with the Also, how they went out and drafted

0:05:13.260 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to have as many tight ends as

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>possible up because they're going to build the plane out

0:05:18.420 --> 0:05:20.729
<v Speaker 2>of Colston Loveland in the run and the pass game.

0:05:20.750 --> 0:05:22.510
<v Speaker 2>And so I love that because this is one of

0:05:22.529 --> 0:05:25.010
<v Speaker 2>the few teams in the NFL who I think could very,

0:05:25.050 --> 0:05:29.390
<v Speaker 2>very capably move between those 11, 12 and 13 personnel

0:05:29.430 --> 0:05:32.050
<v Speaker 2>packages when he's talking about wanting to be the best

0:05:32.150 --> 0:05:34.529
<v Speaker 2>offensive all time and the most productive ever. If you

0:05:34.610 --> 0:05:38.190
<v Speaker 2>can't basically blow the playbook wide open in this way,

0:05:38.390 --> 0:05:41.060
<v Speaker 2>you are limited in some fashion and maybe wouldn't have

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:42.620
<v Speaker 2>that much of a chance to do it. This is

0:05:42.940 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>gone are the days where you're going to be sticking

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.220
<v Speaker 2>in 11 the entire time or even 12 the entire time.

0:05:48.260 --> 0:05:50.540
<v Speaker 2>Like this is a team led by Colston Loveland, who

0:05:50.660 --> 0:05:53.940
<v Speaker 2>I suspect is going to be one of those, you know,

0:05:54.180 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I would call it in my educational experience, the F

0:05:57.380 --> 0:06:01.490
<v Speaker 2>player team. for example, which basically can flip between multiple

0:06:01.529 --> 0:06:05.650
<v Speaker 2>positions along the receiving surface and multiple positions along the

0:06:05.710 --> 0:06:09.750
<v Speaker 2>running surface. And basically all of your strength of plays

0:06:09.850 --> 0:06:12.150
<v Speaker 2>is dictated by wherever that person is on the field.

0:06:12.510 --> 0:06:15.070
<v Speaker 2>To me, that is Colston Loveland. And he's one of

0:06:15.089 --> 0:06:17.190
<v Speaker 2>the most exciting young players we have in football right now.

0:06:17.330 --> 0:06:19.980
<v Speaker 1>Good backup in Cole Comet. Third round pick you alluded

0:06:20.020 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to at tight end and Sam Roush. So it's a

0:06:22.740 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>deep room, but he's the most important guy. If we

0:06:25.180 --> 0:06:28.310
<v Speaker 1>were doing preseason all pro teams, You know, maybe he's

0:06:28.350 --> 0:06:31.830
<v Speaker 1>my second team tight end behind Trey McBride. I can't

0:06:31.850 --> 0:06:34.220
<v Speaker 1>take out McBride right now, but we'll see. Who's your

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>most important non-quarterback?

0:06:35.350 --> 0:06:37.170
<v Speaker 3>Whoever the hell is playing left tackle.

0:06:37.470 --> 0:06:37.710
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:06:37.930 --> 0:06:41.010
<v Speaker 2>And really, to me, it's still a huge question mark.

0:06:41.070 --> 0:06:43.190
<v Speaker 2>And it's a problem that it's still a huge question mark.

0:06:43.510 --> 0:06:46.870
<v Speaker 2>They have four guys currently competing. And if and when

0:06:46.970 --> 0:06:50.330
<v Speaker 2>Ozzy Trapilo ends up coming back from this injury after

0:06:50.610 --> 0:06:53.029
<v Speaker 2>he's practicing in a very, very limited capacity.

0:06:53.150 --> 0:06:55.550
<v Speaker 1>Second round pick who is believed to be the future.

0:06:55.610 --> 0:06:55.830
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:06:56.050 --> 0:06:57.630
<v Speaker 3>And played well when he got in the game.

0:06:57.670 --> 0:07:00.850
<v Speaker 2>But now they've got so potentially by October, they'll have

0:07:00.950 --> 0:07:04.270
<v Speaker 2>up to five guys competing for this left tackle spot.

0:07:04.690 --> 0:07:06.940
<v Speaker 3>You know, Braxton Jones, I would think, would have.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.060
<v Speaker 2>To be like the leader in the clubhouse, but it

0:07:09.100 --> 0:07:11.740
<v Speaker 2>hasn't looked great for any of these guys. And the

0:07:11.780 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 2>fact that it's still such an open battle is very,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.390
<v Speaker 2>very concerning for me. But that becomes so, so important

0:07:18.430 --> 0:07:22.330
<v Speaker 2>because that player, the run game, the pass game, all

0:07:22.370 --> 0:07:24.450
<v Speaker 2>the things that Ben Johnson says he wants to do,

0:07:25.950 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going to really be a factor of whoever that

0:07:28.650 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>guy is going to be. So I make him the

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:31.980
<v Speaker 2>most important right now.

0:07:32.180 --> 0:07:35.580
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that totally makes sense to me. And it's easier

0:07:35.620 --> 0:07:38.260
<v Speaker 1>to hide one guy on your offensive line than it

0:07:38.340 --> 0:07:42.130
<v Speaker 1>is to. So if Garrett Bradbury, who's their center, can

0:07:42.370 --> 0:07:45.660
<v Speaker 1>hold up. And there's questions about him or their second

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.580
<v Speaker 1>round pick, Logan Jones, who might eventually be at center.

0:07:49.060 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're going to be he's between two great

0:07:51.140 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>guards and Joe Tooney and Jonah Jackson. You have a

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.900
<v Speaker 1>great young right tackle. You gave huge money to like

0:07:55.940 --> 0:07:59.070
<v Speaker 1>they have real pieces. Then maybe you can cover up

0:07:59.310 --> 0:08:01.270
<v Speaker 1>one spot. If it ends up being two spots, then

0:08:01.370 --> 0:08:03.970
<v Speaker 1>then the offense has a problem. Scheme dream. I always

0:08:04.850 --> 0:08:07.860
<v Speaker 1>let you go first, except for when I don't, because.

0:08:08.550 --> 0:08:11.010
<v Speaker 1>This is just where you feel the most joy.

0:08:11.850 --> 0:08:12.310
<v Speaker 3>It is, yeah.

0:08:12.380 --> 0:08:15.020
<v Speaker 2>Run game in year two for me. The two-back system

0:08:15.060 --> 0:08:17.740
<v Speaker 2>in DeAndre Swift and Kyle Menungai, it took a couple weeks.

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.020
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Menung dude, as.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:19.660
<v Speaker 1>We like to call him.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>It took a couple weeks for it to come to

0:08:22.820 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>fruition the way that they wanted it to. Once it

0:08:25.460 --> 0:08:27.350
<v Speaker 2>did and once it started rolling, it was like one

0:08:27.380 --> 0:08:29.610
<v Speaker 2>of the most fun and most productive run games we've

0:08:29.650 --> 0:08:33.370
<v Speaker 2>seen in like 2020 onward. And I think that that's

0:08:33.390 --> 0:08:35.069
<v Speaker 2>going to be really fun when you think about what

0:08:35.110 --> 0:08:37.270
<v Speaker 2>you talked about in terms of Colston Loveland and your

0:08:37.309 --> 0:08:43.170
<v Speaker 2>most important player. in just creating and moving different gaps

0:08:43.220 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and attack points for the defense with a two-back system.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.060
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just that you're throwing all of this

0:08:49.179 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 2>pre-snap and at-snap movement and changing assignments at the defense

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.900
<v Speaker 2>in a system that on paper looks like it should

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 2>be simple, but because Ben Johnson likes to throw these

0:08:59.260 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>little wrinkles into it.

0:09:00.179 --> 0:09:03.170
<v Speaker 3>Is not simple at all. Plus features really good players.

0:09:03.830 --> 0:09:07.370
<v Speaker 2>And then now you're throwing multiple players to prepare for

0:09:07.530 --> 0:09:10.950
<v Speaker 2>and multiple, um, skill guys also involved in it to

0:09:10.990 --> 0:09:12.910
<v Speaker 2>prepare for. I just think this is going to be,

0:09:13.429 --> 0:09:15.929
<v Speaker 2>I cannot wait to see your two of a run

0:09:15.990 --> 0:09:18.969
<v Speaker 2>system like this is usually when it fully like, you know,

0:09:19.250 --> 0:09:21.150
<v Speaker 2>reveals itself for what it's going to be. And I

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.510
<v Speaker 2>think they have a chance to be dominant.

0:09:23.020 --> 0:09:23.579
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Swifty?

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:25.060
<v Speaker 3>I am a Swifty.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:25.580
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Swifty.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You like DeAndre?

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.820
<v Speaker 3>I'm a Swifty, yes. And I also am a Monong

0:09:28.860 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>dude as well.

0:09:30.059 --> 0:09:30.260
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.870
<v Speaker 1>Swifty. DeAndre Swift. What a come up that Ben Johnson

0:09:34.910 --> 0:09:37.130
<v Speaker 1>believes in him. I think at this time a year ago,

0:09:37.490 --> 0:09:39.929
<v Speaker 1>I did not believe in him. And he looked really

0:09:39.950 --> 0:09:42.910
<v Speaker 1>good in this offense. And he's a guy. I did

0:09:42.929 --> 0:09:45.339
<v Speaker 1>my one and only fantasy draft on Monday night. And

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I was like, when he got taken near me, I

0:09:47.100 --> 0:09:49.180
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, I would have liked DeAndre Swift. I'm

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.729
<v Speaker 1>going to go things go wrong. if the defense like

0:09:52.790 --> 0:09:55.550
<v Speaker 1>looks as bad as it looks, they are projected to

0:09:55.590 --> 0:09:59.390
<v Speaker 1>be the worst defense in the league, according to DVOA,

0:09:59.550 --> 0:10:02.860
<v Speaker 1>like in terms of efficiency. And that's because they were

0:10:02.910 --> 0:10:06.780
<v Speaker 1>great on third down last year and terrible on first

0:10:06.820 --> 0:10:09.020
<v Speaker 1>and second. And that tends to not be sticky at all.

0:10:09.380 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>They turn the ball over like crazy. That tends to

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be not as sticky. Although Dennis Allen's had a pretty

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>good career with having defenses that turn the ball over.

0:10:20.700 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But they lost Jaquan Brisker. They lost Nashawn Wright. They

0:10:23.140 --> 0:10:26.460
<v Speaker 1>lost Kevin Byer. They lost Chauncey Gardner-Johnson. And then all

0:10:26.500 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the guys that are supposed to replace him. And this is,

0:10:28.179 --> 0:10:33.460
<v Speaker 1>you know, such a nickel-heavy, man-heavy defense. Kyle Gordon's hurt.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Stevenson's hurt right now. Elijah Hicks, they said that

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.260
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a serious injury. He's been out a month. And

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>then their big safety addition, who's Stacey Dales, our friend

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>said Kobe Bryant was taking charge of that defense. That

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.540
<v Speaker 1>literally he was going to be their leader, their appointed leader.

0:10:48.940 --> 0:10:51.350
<v Speaker 1>captain on the back end. He's out for the season.

0:10:52.110 --> 0:10:54.589
<v Speaker 1>And so you're asking like a rookie Dylan Thienemann to

0:10:55.410 --> 0:10:57.230
<v Speaker 1>carry a lot of weight. And just in general, I

0:10:57.250 --> 0:10:59.750
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if they have the players, that linebacker either.

0:11:00.230 --> 0:11:02.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And the other thing they didn't do was change

0:11:03.030 --> 0:11:06.340
<v Speaker 2>their front structure very much. They're basically saying we're going

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.300
<v Speaker 2>to roll with the guys that we have along this

0:11:08.340 --> 0:11:11.260
<v Speaker 2>defensive line and trust that they continue to take a

0:11:11.300 --> 0:11:13.910
<v Speaker 2>step forward. Well, one thing that goes unsaid in all

0:11:13.929 --> 0:11:18.150
<v Speaker 2>of that commentary is that they were built back to front.

0:11:18.530 --> 0:11:20.969
<v Speaker 2>They were really built, even though they let those defensive

0:11:21.010 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>backs go and free agency and sign elsewhere and brought

0:11:24.340 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in new players, they still were built back to front.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Allen was predicated. His system is predicated on like

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.990
<v Speaker 2>what I mentioned at the top high leverage plays where

0:11:34.010 --> 0:11:37.110
<v Speaker 2>you're taking, where you're taking away the ball. Um, they

0:11:37.150 --> 0:11:40.670
<v Speaker 2>were explosive to, or excuse me, they were susceptible to

0:11:40.710 --> 0:11:43.850
<v Speaker 2>explosive pass plays, but they led the league in drives

0:11:44.010 --> 0:11:46.790
<v Speaker 2>ending with turnovers and had the highest turnover rate of

0:11:46.830 --> 0:11:48.970
<v Speaker 2>the 2020 so far. That's for our friends at the

0:11:49.050 --> 0:11:53.410
<v Speaker 2>FTN football almanac. And so they're masters of the big moment, right?

0:11:53.530 --> 0:11:56.550
<v Speaker 2>My things go wrong. If is attached to yours in

0:11:56.610 --> 0:12:00.570
<v Speaker 2>that way. if that does not sustain a little bit better,

0:12:00.630 --> 0:12:02.670
<v Speaker 2>if they're not better on first and second down, if

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>they're not better against the run, if they're not so

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.780
<v Speaker 2>dependent on specifically turnovers in on the defensive side and

0:12:09.820 --> 0:12:12.700
<v Speaker 2>then also on the offensive side, they were built around

0:12:12.740 --> 0:12:15.179
<v Speaker 2>the big moment on offense as well. And I loved

0:12:15.250 --> 0:12:17.630
<v Speaker 2>how good their run game really came along and looked.

0:12:17.970 --> 0:12:21.250
<v Speaker 2>But in the passing game, we all remember the end

0:12:21.290 --> 0:12:25.650
<v Speaker 2>of the game heroics and the flash stuff that really

0:12:25.670 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>was exciting to watch. But getting more sustainable down-to-down play,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.540
<v Speaker 2>staying more efficient down-to-down. One thing I appreciated about what

0:12:34.660 --> 0:12:36.939
<v Speaker 2>this coaching staff and the players are doing is focusing

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.990
<v Speaker 2>more on end-of-half management, too. All of these things are very,

0:12:42.050 --> 0:12:45.069
<v Speaker 2>very important to making sure you're not so dependent on

0:12:45.450 --> 0:12:47.270
<v Speaker 2>splash and you can hit more doubles.

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And you just need guys who can win. And up front,

0:12:50.300 --> 0:12:53.890
<v Speaker 1>that's a big concern. So it's Montez Sweat rushing the passer.

0:12:54.010 --> 0:12:56.890
<v Speaker 1>And Bears fans could argue, and they're right. They're still

0:12:56.910 --> 0:13:01.950
<v Speaker 1>built back to front. Jalen Johnson is a great in-his-prime cornerback.

0:13:01.970 --> 0:13:03.770
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Gordon, they just need him to be healthy. You

0:13:03.809 --> 0:13:06.670
<v Speaker 1>have a first-round pick in Thienemann. Stevenson, I don't think

0:13:06.690 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a long-term injury. So there's still hope that they

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.300
<v Speaker 1>can be a good secondary, but they're going to have

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.460
<v Speaker 1>to be because I don't think the rest of the defense...

0:13:13.650 --> 0:13:16.670
<v Speaker 1>I never gave a scheme dream. I just forgot. And

0:13:16.700 --> 0:13:18.819
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of like, what's next level for Ben Johnson?

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.740
<v Speaker 1>You talked about the end. But they were third in

0:13:20.780 --> 0:13:23.300
<v Speaker 1>pace last year. They were second in the league in

0:13:23.340 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>going for it on fourth. It's improving Caleb's accuracy. Just like,

0:13:27.260 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>what's the next step for Ben Johnson? Let's get to

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.980
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling and the floor as we wrap up every team.

0:13:33.740 --> 0:13:35.380
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this team can make the Super Bowl?

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.180
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:13:37.340 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I think their ceiling is repeat winners too, of the

0:13:41.100 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 2>NFC North. That, that would be the ceiling for me. Um,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.380
<v Speaker 2>I think the floor is third in the NFC North. Uh,

0:13:47.460 --> 0:13:49.740
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they could have, to me, they're too

0:13:49.820 --> 0:13:52.580
<v Speaker 2>well coached and too talented now in key areas and

0:13:52.620 --> 0:13:57.100
<v Speaker 2>particularly loaded on offense to where they could really stumble

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.469
<v Speaker 2>far enough to finish last in the division. But I

0:14:00.530 --> 0:14:03.270
<v Speaker 2>do think that their schedule is doing them obviously no favors.

0:14:03.290 --> 0:14:04.969
<v Speaker 2>And that's one of the things that Ben Johnson was

0:14:05.030 --> 0:14:07.870
<v Speaker 2>pointing to is I'm not usually like, oh, but the

0:14:07.910 --> 0:14:10.989
<v Speaker 2>schedule kind of a thing before the guys actually are

0:14:11.030 --> 0:14:14.350
<v Speaker 2>on the grass. But this is a tough schedule. It's

0:14:14.390 --> 0:14:16.410
<v Speaker 2>the toughest schedule in terms of strength of opponent.

0:14:16.910 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It is a division where I'm going to pull a

0:14:20.270 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Jordan and say, I think the floor of every one

0:14:22.620 --> 0:14:24.830
<v Speaker 1>of these teams is last in the division. I mean,

0:14:24.850 --> 0:14:26.430
<v Speaker 1>which isn't even that hard to take when you see

0:14:26.470 --> 0:14:27.990
<v Speaker 1>how close the division was last year.

0:14:28.010 --> 0:14:29.270
<v Speaker 3>The old Rodriguez.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:34.220
<v Speaker 1>Right. That I, I think, I think you could conceivably

0:14:34.300 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>see any direction of this team. I don't think they're

0:14:38.500 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like the floor could fall out, but I think they

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>could fall down to eight or nine wins. And maybe

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.490
<v Speaker 1>that's last place in this division. Like an eight win

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.090
<v Speaker 1>team might, might come in last place. In this division.

0:14:47.290 --> 0:14:50.430
<v Speaker 1>It's possible. The schedule, you're absolutely right. They could all

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.980
<v Speaker 1>end up clustered in the middle. Let's get to the Lions,

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.780
<v Speaker 1>who I think hit their four last year. They only

0:14:56.820 --> 0:15:00.510
<v Speaker 1>won nine games after winning 15 the year before. How

0:15:02.610 --> 0:15:04.710
<v Speaker 1>about just Dan Campbell with a chip on his shoulder?

0:15:04.750 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That's bringing me joy. You know, we got a little

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.980
<v Speaker 1>bored with the Lions on some level. Like we understand

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that story. It was a bummer to see them take

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>such a big step back. He knows the Ben Johnson

0:15:16.420 --> 0:15:19.930
<v Speaker 1>divorce went bad. A lot of the things we attributed

0:15:19.970 --> 0:15:23.430
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Johnson, like the trick plays and the total aggression,

0:15:23.470 --> 0:15:26.270
<v Speaker 1>like they cranked it up last year in Detroit. If anything,

0:15:26.290 --> 0:15:29.970
<v Speaker 1>they did it more to varying degrees. you know, degrees

0:15:30.010 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of success, their problems were really on the defense. So

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I just like Goff, Campbell, this group, which has been

0:15:37.380 --> 0:15:39.340
<v Speaker 1>together so long, just having a little bit of FU

0:15:39.860 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>energy to them this year. They're no longer the darlings.

0:15:42.460 --> 0:15:45.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I like having a little bit of the

0:15:45.330 --> 0:15:47.610
<v Speaker 2>carrot at the end of the stick for a group

0:15:47.670 --> 0:15:49.350
<v Speaker 2>like this too, where.

0:15:49.630 --> 0:15:52.660
<v Speaker 3>They're not really... Of course, the goals are Super Bowl

0:15:52.740 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and all of these things.

0:15:54.500 --> 0:15:57.580
<v Speaker 2>They're a little bit more battle-scarred, and I think the

0:15:57.620 --> 0:16:01.610
<v Speaker 2>goal for them isn't just winning more, but also respect

0:16:02.110 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and making sure..

0:16:03.110 --> 0:16:03.910
<v Speaker 1>They've seen some things.

0:16:04.150 --> 0:16:04.850
<v Speaker 3>They've seen some things.

0:16:04.870 --> 0:16:05.750
<v Speaker 1>They've had some heartbreak.

0:16:05.810 --> 0:16:06.850
<v Speaker 3>They've seen some things.

0:16:07.430 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>And Dan Campbell has really felt the, what did he say...

0:16:12.370 --> 0:16:14.410
<v Speaker 2>it was a Nietzsche reference. First, you must burn to

0:16:14.610 --> 0:16:18.690
<v Speaker 2>ash and walk through the other side. And I was like, Oh,

0:16:18.870 --> 0:16:20.890
<v Speaker 2>so he's really going through some stuff.

0:16:21.010 --> 0:16:23.850
<v Speaker 1>He's an emotional guy. And it means so much to him.

0:16:24.430 --> 0:16:27.460
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me a little of what you documented so

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>well with Sean McVay back a few years. Like if,

0:16:29.630 --> 0:16:32.239
<v Speaker 1>if they struggle, like he, he's going to feel it,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.580
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they necessarily will. What's bringing you joy?

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.740
<v Speaker 2>Well, you kind of mentioned it. They're a feel your

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.740
<v Speaker 2>feelings team. And I love that. I love when we

0:16:39.780 --> 0:16:43.970
<v Speaker 2>get these rare, uh, hard on their sleeves type of

0:16:44.610 --> 0:16:47.250
<v Speaker 2>organizations and efforts. And I think that's what the Detroit

0:16:47.290 --> 0:16:50.650
<v Speaker 2>Lions is. it's part of how they captivated the country

0:16:50.830 --> 0:16:53.590
<v Speaker 2>as much as they did early on in the Dan Campbell,

0:16:53.610 --> 0:16:56.550
<v Speaker 2>Brad Holmes era. And I think they still are that

0:16:56.650 --> 0:16:58.790
<v Speaker 2>team and they still are capable of these things. And

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea of being a big feel your

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.580
<v Speaker 2>feelings group without having the weight and the heaviness of

0:17:04.660 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>expectations on them and the looming specter of what had

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>just happened to them the year before.

0:17:10.180 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And they weren't as bad last year as people think

0:17:12.100 --> 0:17:14.500
<v Speaker 1>when you dig, like they could have easily been an

0:17:14.500 --> 0:17:18.230
<v Speaker 1>11 win type of team. Let's go to the most

0:17:18.290 --> 0:17:22.130
<v Speaker 1>important non-quarterback. To me, I had two offensive options because

0:17:22.150 --> 0:17:26.870
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I think it's an offensive team. Do you have

0:17:27.020 --> 0:17:30.060
<v Speaker 1>either Blake Miller or Sam Laporta as one of your picks?

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:30.740
<v Speaker 3>No, I do not.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.100
<v Speaker 2>But I see you, Blake Miller or Sam Laporta, and

0:17:34.140 --> 0:17:38.830
<v Speaker 2>I raise you, Hank Fraley. the offensive line coach. It's

0:17:38.890 --> 0:17:40.770
<v Speaker 2>not really cheating. You said we could, you said we

0:17:40.810 --> 0:17:42.010
<v Speaker 2>could pick. So I went over.

0:17:42.070 --> 0:17:44.470
<v Speaker 1>I've done like an offensive line coach in the past.

0:17:44.650 --> 0:17:47.970
<v Speaker 2>I'm going, I'm going overarching because I think that we

0:17:48.010 --> 0:17:50.270
<v Speaker 2>know we don't even have to say it at this point.

0:17:50.470 --> 0:17:52.110
<v Speaker 2>It's like, we are, we all know this, but just

0:17:52.150 --> 0:17:53.830
<v Speaker 2>to repeat it, Jared Goff is one of the best

0:17:53.869 --> 0:17:55.780
<v Speaker 2>passers in the NFL when he's not pressured, when he

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.260
<v Speaker 2>is pressured, it falls off a cliff. So I feel like,

0:17:58.340 --> 0:18:00.619
<v Speaker 2>first of all, this, this offensive line, the way that

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>it is with Panay Sewell moving back over to the

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.090
<v Speaker 2>left side, Blake Miller, the rookie playing on the right side,

0:18:06.410 --> 0:18:09.250
<v Speaker 2>obviously he's one of your most important players. And then

0:18:09.550 --> 0:18:12.909
<v Speaker 2>making sure that juice Scruggs, who seems to be the

0:18:12.970 --> 0:18:17.220
<v Speaker 2>lead off option at center here, um, because Cade Mays

0:18:17.260 --> 0:18:19.139
<v Speaker 2>is already hurt and is not expected to be back

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>until maybe October, if not a little bit later, that

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.700
<v Speaker 2>was their big free agent signing, um, to replace Frank

0:18:25.740 --> 0:18:28.060
<v Speaker 2>Ragnow after Frank Ragnow retired. So like a lot has

0:18:28.100 --> 0:18:31.060
<v Speaker 2>happened to this group, um, over the last several months,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.460
<v Speaker 2>and they were below expectation of what we're used to

0:18:34.500 --> 0:18:37.780
<v Speaker 2>seeing from them last season. And so Hank Fraley coming

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 2>into this role, but then also doing some of the

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>run game coordination as well. All of this is so, so,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.090
<v Speaker 2>so important because when this team runs the ball well,

0:18:47.430 --> 0:18:50.350
<v Speaker 2>and when it protects Jared Goff, they are damn hard

0:18:50.369 --> 0:18:50.750
<v Speaker 2>to stop.

0:18:51.290 --> 0:18:53.830
<v Speaker 1>Blake Miller, you mentioned, was the first round pick. He's

0:18:53.850 --> 0:18:56.850
<v Speaker 1>going to play right tackle. If he's a solid starter

0:18:57.590 --> 0:19:00.380
<v Speaker 1>and Sewell... takes to the transition well. I mean, that's

0:19:00.420 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a great way to start your offensive line. And the

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.540
<v Speaker 1>optimist case would be the offensive line wasn't that good

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.330
<v Speaker 1>last year. And they were top five in giving up

0:19:10.369 --> 0:19:13.810
<v Speaker 1>pressure rate on early downs last year. And so there's

0:19:13.850 --> 0:19:16.210
<v Speaker 1>room to improve. And their offense was still pretty good

0:19:16.270 --> 0:19:20.610
<v Speaker 1>despite the offensive line problems. I'll go quickly on Laporta,

0:19:20.650 --> 0:19:24.740
<v Speaker 1>who already has a hip injury. similar to my argument

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.659
<v Speaker 1>with Colston Loveland. He's not as dynamic, I don't think,

0:19:28.700 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the running game, but he has improved. But I

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.820
<v Speaker 1>think the offense, like in Chicago, these two teams really

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>mirror each other in a lot of ways, needs to

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.909
<v Speaker 1>be special. And I think Jamison Williams at wide receiver

0:19:40.950 --> 0:19:43.330
<v Speaker 1>can take another step up. We know who Amon Ross St.

0:19:43.350 --> 0:19:46.629
<v Speaker 1>Brown is. We know who Jameer Gibbs is. I think

0:19:46.670 --> 0:19:50.180
<v Speaker 1>they need Laporta to get to special, They can still

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.220
<v Speaker 1>be really, really good, but that's an injury that's now

0:19:53.260 --> 0:19:55.730
<v Speaker 1>been lingering for a long time. He's missed some time

0:19:55.790 --> 0:19:58.230
<v Speaker 1>as a pro. He might not be ready for week one.

0:19:58.310 --> 0:20:00.750
<v Speaker 1>I just think he puts them over the top where

0:20:00.770 --> 0:20:03.449
<v Speaker 1>they could be top three, top five offense. I don't

0:20:03.470 --> 0:20:06.660
<v Speaker 1>think they make sense as a team anymore. in terms

0:20:06.700 --> 0:20:08.460
<v Speaker 1>of what they want to do, unless they're a top

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.540
<v Speaker 1>five offense. You go first on scheme dream. Yeah. As usual,

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you're always batting lead off.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.149
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's nice that you set me up in a,

0:20:15.310 --> 0:20:18.389
<v Speaker 2>in a positive way there, Greg, because Sam Laporta becomes

0:20:18.430 --> 0:20:21.030
<v Speaker 2>really crucial to specifically what Drew Petzing likes to do

0:20:21.090 --> 0:20:23.350
<v Speaker 2>and what he wants to do as an offensive coordinator.

0:20:23.369 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Drew Petzing is the former offensive coordinator in Arizona. What

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:27.899
<v Speaker 2>do you really like to do? And he's of the

0:20:28.180 --> 0:20:31.730
<v Speaker 2>Kubiak specific tree. So there's some crossover between Kubiak, Gary

0:20:31.750 --> 0:20:36.090
<v Speaker 2>Kubiak and Mike Shanahan. There's all these like, you know, replicas.

0:20:35.609 --> 0:20:37.629
<v Speaker 1>Of all the, they all kept hiring each other and

0:20:37.650 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>working for.

0:20:38.540 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Each other and having kids. And then those kids would

0:20:40.900 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 2>hire each other and.

0:20:41.859 --> 0:20:45.660
<v Speaker 1>Not with each other. That's medically impossible. Sure. Like biologically.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.940
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for that. Very important clarification. Um, I don't

0:20:48.980 --> 0:20:51.250
<v Speaker 2>think that our listeners would have found that to be

0:20:51.290 --> 0:20:52.949
<v Speaker 2>as obvious unless you really explain that.

0:20:52.970 --> 0:20:53.570
<v Speaker 1>You could adopt.

0:20:54.109 --> 0:20:59.660
<v Speaker 2>Um, so, so, Drew Patsing is of the Kubiak system.

0:20:59.700 --> 0:21:03.619
<v Speaker 2>And so he really appreciates tight ends and running the

0:21:03.700 --> 0:21:06.620
<v Speaker 2>offense through focal points at tight end or heavier personnel.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.390
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of 12 personnel, two tight ends or

0:21:09.390 --> 0:21:12.310
<v Speaker 2>13 personnel, three tight ends when they were in Arizona

0:21:12.450 --> 0:21:16.710
<v Speaker 2>and then really establishing bits and bobs at receiver kind

0:21:16.750 --> 0:21:18.710
<v Speaker 2>of around all of that. But those guys are the

0:21:18.750 --> 0:21:22.690
<v Speaker 2>focal point. So without Sam Laporta, that becomes obviously very concerning.

0:21:22.710 --> 0:21:24.900
<v Speaker 2>And then he has to change and evolve a little

0:21:24.940 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>bit because Amon Ra is as skilled as they come.

0:21:28.020 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe they treat him maybe like a hybrid

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.700
<v Speaker 2>tight end or like a power slot, like our friend

0:21:32.940 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Nate Tice likes to see. I think that Drew Petzing

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.670
<v Speaker 2>is a really good fit for what Jared Goff likes

0:21:39.710 --> 0:21:42.770
<v Speaker 2>to do. Some of the longer bootlegs and the keepers,

0:21:43.010 --> 0:21:46.149
<v Speaker 2>some of the, a ton of the play action that.

0:21:46.030 --> 0:21:47.330
<v Speaker 3>Will still remain the same.

0:21:48.130 --> 0:21:50.530
<v Speaker 2>And I think that it's really a good thing that

0:21:50.570 --> 0:21:52.790
<v Speaker 2>the Lions have an experienced play caller again.

0:21:52.869 --> 0:21:54.430
<v Speaker 3>Those are the main.

0:21:54.510 --> 0:21:57.010
<v Speaker 2>Benefits in the ads to me that I think are

0:21:57.050 --> 0:21:58.750
<v Speaker 2>positive in terms of my scheme dream.

0:21:58.910 --> 0:22:02.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wanted to just believe in Dan Campbell's ability

0:22:02.070 --> 0:22:04.250
<v Speaker 1>to hire last year because he's been so good. But

0:22:05.150 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at great coaches that they're not all home runs.

0:22:07.690 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't work out last year. And it was

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.780
<v Speaker 1>as big a deal as everyone was making it out

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.659
<v Speaker 1>to be in the offseason. It took some time to

0:22:14.700 --> 0:22:17.139
<v Speaker 1>get that offense going. My scheme dream is how much...

0:22:17.970 --> 0:22:22.390
<v Speaker 1>does Kelvin Shepard, the defensive coordinator, evolve? They're a very

0:22:22.690 --> 0:22:26.530
<v Speaker 1>dramatic team. They love to rush three. They love to

0:22:26.570 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>rush six. Like, nothing in between. Like, big blitzes, top

0:22:29.900 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the league. Only rushing three and dropping everyone back

0:22:34.100 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>into coverage, most in the league. They have three linebackers

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>on the field, most in the league. They don't have

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>three good linebackers right now, so that's a little worrisome. Like,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.230
<v Speaker 1>they're starting Devin White right now. That gets into my

0:22:45.250 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>things go wrong if. Certainly, they don't play... nickel date,

0:22:48.780 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>which is means five defensive backs on the field. They

0:22:50.859 --> 0:22:53.570
<v Speaker 1>play that the least they love to have a big,

0:22:53.590 --> 0:22:56.050
<v Speaker 1>you know, stack the box, stop the run. It's, it's

0:22:56.090 --> 0:22:59.889
<v Speaker 1>just dramatic. And I think it's risky kind of like

0:22:59.910 --> 0:23:02.690
<v Speaker 1>a Dennis Allen defense. Again, these teams are mirrors.

0:23:02.750 --> 0:23:03.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:03.590 --> 0:23:05.300
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's a boom or bust type

0:23:05.340 --> 0:23:07.980
<v Speaker 1>of defense. So how does Kelvin Shepard year two calling

0:23:08.020 --> 0:23:10.580
<v Speaker 1>plays play? Evolve, I think, is big. And that gets

0:23:10.619 --> 0:23:12.419
<v Speaker 1>into like the things go wrong if for me, which

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>is just the back seven of this defense linebacker and

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.429
<v Speaker 1>the secondary getting absolutely flamed on paper. This is a

0:23:20.310 --> 0:23:24.109
<v Speaker 1>rough looking linebacker in defensive back group until the safeties

0:23:24.130 --> 0:23:26.369
<v Speaker 1>get healthy. I would posit if you were just drafting

0:23:26.450 --> 0:23:31.619
<v Speaker 1>talent and you go linebacker and and definitely the secondary

0:23:32.460 --> 0:23:34.850
<v Speaker 1>before Joseph and you know, Branch get back. I mean,

0:23:34.869 --> 0:23:36.330
<v Speaker 1>it's a bottom five group.

0:23:36.550 --> 0:23:36.790
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:23:36.950 --> 0:23:40.250
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge concern to me because Kirby Joseph and

0:23:40.270 --> 0:23:42.630
<v Speaker 2>Brian Branch, they might miss into week one.

0:23:42.690 --> 0:23:43.750
<v Speaker 3>We don't know. We don't really.

0:23:43.790 --> 0:23:45.949
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think so. Yeah. The hope is that maybe

0:23:46.530 --> 0:23:48.580
<v Speaker 1>Branch in September, Joseph, who knows?

0:23:48.650 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 3>We don't have like a real timeline.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And obviously because of his legal situation, Terry and Arnold,

0:23:53.580 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>who was depth at this point was released and he

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>was more, you know, playing corner.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.100
<v Speaker 3>But it's for me, you cannot.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>This this is incongruous of a group based on where

0:24:05.330 --> 0:24:08.220
<v Speaker 2>football is right now. Like, They found this out and

0:24:08.260 --> 0:24:11.490
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Shepherd even talked about this, this spring where they

0:24:11.530 --> 0:24:14.469
<v Speaker 2>found out that you cannot play base the way that

0:24:14.510 --> 0:24:17.970
<v Speaker 2>they played base defense. So the three linebackers on the field,

0:24:18.250 --> 0:24:20.830
<v Speaker 2>you cannot play it this way when your division has

0:24:20.970 --> 0:24:24.540
<v Speaker 2>such good tight end play. When so many players are

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.859
<v Speaker 2>in these mismatches coming either out of the slot and

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>they're the tight end, or they are the gigantic receiver

0:24:30.940 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 2>or the mismatch receiver placed in the slot.

0:24:33.260 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 3>You can't play that way.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.050
<v Speaker 2>What a lot of teams around the league are going

0:24:36.070 --> 0:24:39.169
<v Speaker 2>to be doing this year is maybe staying in base

0:24:39.270 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to defend the run which is the two linebackers but

0:24:41.780 --> 0:24:44.580
<v Speaker 2>they will also then put a buffalo nickel or a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>star player so a larger safety usually a safety who

0:24:48.420 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>can cover in the slot so when they're saying it's

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.340
<v Speaker 2>base what they're really doing is playing base nickel so

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.300
<v Speaker 2>really what they have to be doing is loading up

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 2>their defensive backfield with those players the problem greg that

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.379
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned and i know our listeners are screaming it

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>into their phones right now.

0:25:04.350 --> 0:25:05.750
<v Speaker 3>They don't have enough guys.

0:25:06.470 --> 0:25:08.610
<v Speaker 2>They don't have enough guys because you really want like

0:25:08.650 --> 0:25:11.050
<v Speaker 2>a Brian branch to play that position for you. And

0:25:11.070 --> 0:25:13.810
<v Speaker 2>they are not healthy enough to play defense the way

0:25:13.890 --> 0:25:16.540
<v Speaker 2>that they should be playing defense right now, particularly in

0:25:16.580 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this to compete in this division. And so I am very,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 2>very concerned about this because I think Kelvin Shepard has,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.140
<v Speaker 2>has all the talent in the world, but those, those

0:25:26.180 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 2>types of adjustments had to have happened. And then injuries

0:25:28.740 --> 0:25:31.270
<v Speaker 2>are preventing them from maybe getting into the adjustments that

0:25:31.690 --> 0:25:33.290
<v Speaker 2>that they really feel like they want to. And even

0:25:33.330 --> 0:25:35.590
<v Speaker 2>when they go up against like a Minnesota, for example,

0:25:35.650 --> 0:25:38.010
<v Speaker 2>which I think we'll get to this, we'll just live

0:25:38.050 --> 0:25:40.609
<v Speaker 2>in 11 personnel, like which feels like a throwback at

0:25:40.630 --> 0:25:44.410
<v Speaker 2>this point. You still need to be in sub packages

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.910
<v Speaker 2>more of the time to defend that kind of a look.

0:25:46.970 --> 0:25:49.659
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm really, really concerned about this. This is

0:25:49.700 --> 0:25:52.220
<v Speaker 2>my big time red flag. Things go wrong if, because

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.420
<v Speaker 2>I love what they're doing up front and their guys

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.580
<v Speaker 2>that have come along and Aiden Hutchinson is obviously a superstar,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.220
<v Speaker 2>but the secondary is so concerning to me.

0:26:01.350 --> 0:26:05.390
<v Speaker 1>The optimistic point of view is that Branch and Joseph

0:26:05.450 --> 0:26:09.050
<v Speaker 1>are hopefully full go like back to who they are

0:26:09.150 --> 0:26:11.689
<v Speaker 1>by the time games really matter for the Lions. This

0:26:11.750 --> 0:26:14.100
<v Speaker 1>is a team where it's about the playoffs. They have

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a solid cornerback in DJ Reed who they gave a

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.300
<v Speaker 1>lot of money to, but we're a little disappointed by

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.189
<v Speaker 1>how he was last year. You know, after that, it's

0:26:21.210 --> 0:26:23.030
<v Speaker 1>like Rakia Sin and Christian.

0:26:23.050 --> 0:26:24.290
<v Speaker 3>Roger McCreary's back there.

0:26:24.369 --> 0:26:27.550
<v Speaker 1>He's there. It's some like names you recognize. Avante Maddox.

0:26:28.050 --> 0:26:31.350
<v Speaker 1>They just need to coach it up. But on paper,

0:26:31.470 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not the best looking group. For my lanyard, sometimes

0:26:35.660 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we do just like a little extra if we have time.

0:26:38.570 --> 0:26:41.010
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lacey is starting for this team at Edge. We

0:26:41.050 --> 0:26:43.070
<v Speaker 1>had talked about like the Edge battle coming into camp.

0:26:43.550 --> 0:26:46.660
<v Speaker 1>He was like a waiver pickup from Jacksonville originally. Right now,

0:26:46.740 --> 0:26:49.380
<v Speaker 1>he's playing ahead of DJ Wanham and their second round pick,

0:26:49.420 --> 0:26:51.500
<v Speaker 1>Derek Moore, who's reportedly looked pretty good. So they're a

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>little deeper, but some surprising news there. And then also,

0:26:55.540 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to point out their win total. And

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.830
<v Speaker 1>this brings us right to the ceiling floor of the

0:27:00.850 --> 0:27:05.170
<v Speaker 1>Dan Campbell era. Just here are their total wins since

0:27:05.190 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he's coached. Three, nine, 12, 15, and then nine. So

0:27:13.980 --> 0:27:18.110
<v Speaker 1>at no point in this run has any season that's

0:27:18.190 --> 0:27:22.010
<v Speaker 1>followed been within three wins of the season before. You know,

0:27:22.050 --> 0:27:25.939
<v Speaker 1>it's plus six, plus three, plus three, minus six, If

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.169
<v Speaker 1>this was like a SAT problem, like what would, what

0:27:29.190 --> 0:27:31.870
<v Speaker 1>would be next? Minus three. Either way, if they keep

0:27:31.910 --> 0:27:34.190
<v Speaker 1>this up, they're either winning 12 games or they're winning

0:27:34.250 --> 0:27:35.350
<v Speaker 1>six games. I hope that doesn't.

0:27:35.369 --> 0:27:37.830
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say it's all multiples of three too.

0:27:37.850 --> 0:27:40.570
<v Speaker 2>So for me, I would, I probably, I'd say their ceiling,

0:27:40.609 --> 0:27:41.050
<v Speaker 2>I would go.

0:27:41.010 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Back to 12. 12 feels right.

0:27:42.430 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>And honestly, like, again, I hate that I became this

0:27:45.100 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 2>person doing this exercise because I hate talking about the

0:27:47.940 --> 0:27:51.699
<v Speaker 2>schedule before games are actually played. But the Lions are

0:27:51.740 --> 0:27:54.340
<v Speaker 2>set up pretty nicely for this season. schedule in terms

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.180
<v Speaker 2>of strength of opponent and i i i picked them

0:27:57.220 --> 0:28:01.210
<v Speaker 2>to finish first in the nfc north as their ceiling

0:28:01.530 --> 0:28:04.230
<v Speaker 2>i think feasibly i could see that and i think

0:28:04.270 --> 0:28:07.030
<v Speaker 2>we've already seen what their floor is it's nine wins.

0:28:07.410 --> 0:28:10.929
<v Speaker 1>I agree i think the ceiling is yeah winning the

0:28:10.950 --> 0:28:14.710
<v Speaker 1>division can this team make it to the super bowl

0:28:14.850 --> 0:28:19.929
<v Speaker 1>with this defense in this conference It's tough, but I

0:28:19.970 --> 0:28:24.210
<v Speaker 1>think so. I do think somehow they could find a way,

0:28:24.310 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but it feels more likely that their ceiling is like

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a division winner and like a conference title winner. And

0:28:30.619 --> 0:28:33.500
<v Speaker 1>as it goes to the schedule, look, that's the benefit

0:28:33.619 --> 0:28:35.220
<v Speaker 1>of losing those games down the stretch. They got the

0:28:35.260 --> 0:28:37.379
<v Speaker 1>last place schedule, so a couple of their games are

0:28:37.420 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>different than the other teams in their division. And I

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know the numbers say... that even like the Bears, they

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.510
<v Speaker 1>do have a harder, like those couple games are tough.

0:28:46.970 --> 0:28:50.010
<v Speaker 1>But out of division, this division has the AFC South.

0:28:50.070 --> 0:28:52.930
<v Speaker 1>I mean, NFC South, that's great. And they have the

0:28:53.030 --> 0:28:56.230
<v Speaker 1>AFC East, which has two of the teams that you

0:28:56.270 --> 0:28:59.900
<v Speaker 1>would be expected to be favored against. So this entire

0:28:59.940 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 1>division does have a chance, I think, to do what

0:29:01.980 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they did a year ago, which is get close to

0:29:04.340 --> 0:29:07.020
<v Speaker 1>having everyone over 500. Last year, it actually happened. That's

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.540
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, but I think it could happen for all

0:29:09.580 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>four of these teams.

0:29:10.340 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.220
<v Speaker 2>Can I actually tell you my lanyard? I know we're

0:29:14.310 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>out on time.

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.730
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no. Oh, wow.

0:29:17.830 --> 0:29:18.930
<v Speaker 3>It's a hashtag noticing.

0:29:19.010 --> 0:29:19.410
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:29:19.850 --> 0:29:22.290
<v Speaker 2>I am hashtag noticing that a lot of their offensive

0:29:22.330 --> 0:29:25.610
<v Speaker 2>line depth is not homegrown depth. It's a little bit

0:29:25.630 --> 0:29:29.170
<v Speaker 2>of a drafting red flag to me, and they've had to...

0:29:29.390 --> 0:29:32.210
<v Speaker 2>If you're drafting, you have to continue to funnel guys

0:29:32.270 --> 0:29:35.730
<v Speaker 2>in there... Um, even if you are like a pretty

0:29:35.770 --> 0:29:38.190
<v Speaker 2>top heavy team, I mean, you, we sort of joke

0:29:38.210 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 2>about this when the 49ers sit there and they don't,

0:29:40.850 --> 0:29:43.470
<v Speaker 2>They don't end up being able to play like their future,

0:29:43.510 --> 0:29:45.670
<v Speaker 2>their left tackle of the future for X amount of years,

0:29:45.710 --> 0:29:47.580
<v Speaker 2>but they still went out and got them. And so

0:29:47.930 --> 0:29:51.980
<v Speaker 2>it's like juice Scruggs and Ben Barton and Seth McLaughlin,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>who's the backup backup center. And, and Larry Borum is

0:29:55.900 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>backing up right. It's it's guys that they've gone out

0:29:58.420 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>and acquired and that's fine, but I am hashtag noticing

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.140
<v Speaker 2>that there's not a lot of draft and develop depth

0:30:04.330 --> 0:30:06.450
<v Speaker 2>along the offensive line. And when we look at the team,

0:30:06.470 --> 0:30:09.670
<v Speaker 2>like the Los Angeles chargers, for example, that bit them

0:30:09.690 --> 0:30:11.550
<v Speaker 2>in the butt in a big way last year.

0:30:11.570 --> 0:30:15.390
<v Speaker 1>A lot of misses for Brad Holmes. A lot of

0:30:15.430 --> 0:30:18.550
<v Speaker 1>hits and misses in terms of the recent drafts. Eric,

0:30:19.050 --> 0:30:21.229
<v Speaker 1>as we go to break here, I just want you

0:30:21.290 --> 0:30:25.290
<v Speaker 1>to adjudicate. You know, the buzzer had already gone off.

0:30:25.430 --> 0:30:27.910
<v Speaker 1>We've been pretty loose with that, but going back to

0:30:28.090 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>another category to talk backup offensive linemen, yay or nay?

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Is that okay?

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:33.940
<v Speaker 2>Freedom!

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:35.020
<v Speaker 1>I had my finger on that.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.030
<v Speaker 4>The Canadian geese honking horn button, but I felt mean.

0:30:40.050 --> 0:30:42.630
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've gone eight division previews. I've had to

0:30:42.650 --> 0:30:43.170
<v Speaker 1>hit it once.

0:30:43.250 --> 0:30:45.990
<v Speaker 2>We kind of just, we've been like long haul truckers.

0:30:46.010 --> 0:30:48.030
<v Speaker 3>You just got to give me the cup of coffee.

0:30:48.070 --> 0:30:50.670
<v Speaker 2>I would have felt mean to be honest.

0:30:50.690 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Just throwing it at Jordan. Eighth division preview. And all

0:30:53.700 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden I'm like, Hey, nope, too much.

0:30:56.380 --> 0:30:59.660
<v Speaker 1>I'll let the listeners decide what they think. We will

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be back in, in yes, the best division in football.

0:31:03.030 --> 0:31:06.620
<v Speaker 1>And we will be talking about the Green Bay Packers

0:31:06.700 --> 0:31:11.540
<v Speaker 1>after the break. This could have happened like 90 seconds ago.

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, sorry you lost that 90 seconds.

0:31:20.310 --> 0:31:23.970
<v Speaker 1>Back on NFL Daily. The Green Bay Packers are a

0:31:24.020 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>team that's already given joy to Jordan Rodriguez in this

0:31:27.220 --> 0:31:29.820
<v Speaker 1>month because she got to visit them, to hang out

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:36.510
<v Speaker 1>at Lambeau, to talk to Jordan Love. What specifically, I guess,

0:31:36.570 --> 0:31:39.790
<v Speaker 1>are you going to highlight here about this team as

0:31:39.830 --> 0:31:42.670
<v Speaker 1>we see the legend Steve Weiss coming back?

0:31:42.750 --> 0:31:43.390
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Famer.

0:31:43.410 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We are working on securing him as our designated QB

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:52.790
<v Speaker 1>Island hitter. We're returning on Kibi Island soon.

0:31:52.990 --> 0:31:53.430
<v Speaker 3>Can't wait.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>What is bringing me joy about the Green Bay Packers

0:31:57.180 --> 0:32:00.460
<v Speaker 2>is Jordan Love. Honestly, because I think he is so

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:05.100
<v Speaker 2>poised to have. a truly incredible season. I think that

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.060
<v Speaker 2>as the season continues and if everybody stays healthy, which

0:32:08.100 --> 0:32:10.580
<v Speaker 2>is our big caveat here, he will be talked about

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.540
<v Speaker 2>as an MVP candidate. And I just have to say,

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>like being around him, I could really understand why people

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.380
<v Speaker 2>in that building talk about him the way that they do.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.220
<v Speaker 2>He is so calm and, but it's not, it does

0:32:24.260 --> 0:32:27.340
<v Speaker 2>not come without an edge. He reaches every person in

0:32:27.380 --> 0:32:31.510
<v Speaker 2>that locker room. He has a, just this incredible poise

0:32:31.610 --> 0:32:35.469
<v Speaker 2>and confidence. And it's like, it's not a, um, it's

0:32:35.510 --> 0:32:38.190
<v Speaker 2>not a demeanor that is maybe a pushover and it's not,

0:32:38.290 --> 0:32:41.330
<v Speaker 2>it's very, it's of himself, very sure of himself. And

0:32:41.450 --> 0:32:43.930
<v Speaker 2>I think that that has had a positive effect on

0:32:44.090 --> 0:32:47.750
<v Speaker 2>everybody in that building. And it certainly has impacted the

0:32:47.870 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 2>receiver clarity that we're now seeing. We'll get to that

0:32:50.170 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, but he absolutely is going to be

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite players to watch all season. I

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>hope he has the season that I am expecting him

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.700
<v Speaker 2>to have because I think he's poised for truly great

0:32:59.740 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>things this year.

0:33:00.500 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he plays like he presents as a person, which

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.490
<v Speaker 1>is just a cool cockiness. I mean, he's always played

0:33:07.530 --> 0:33:10.030
<v Speaker 1>with crazy confidence in what he is willing to try.

0:33:10.330 --> 0:33:12.870
<v Speaker 1>But I love that we have made it to this

0:33:12.970 --> 0:33:16.650
<v Speaker 1>moment in his career where it does feel like all

0:33:16.670 --> 0:33:19.350
<v Speaker 1>the learning under Aaron Rodgers, all the experience now that

0:33:19.370 --> 0:33:22.260
<v Speaker 1>he's had over the last few years. Statistically, you know,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.210
<v Speaker 1>he was there with the top five quarterbacks in the

0:33:25.270 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>NFL last year on a rate basis. And yet, I

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.180
<v Speaker 1>do think they're going to need to crank him up

0:33:31.220 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, rely less on the running game, and

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.290
<v Speaker 1>to stay that efficient while just passing more. I mean,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:39.390
<v Speaker 1>when I looked at his final numbers last year, I

0:33:39.410 --> 0:33:42.490
<v Speaker 1>was kind of shocked at how little he threw the ball.

0:33:43.010 --> 0:33:46.270
<v Speaker 1>And yet, my most important non-quarterback. He's going to be

0:33:46.290 --> 0:33:48.410
<v Speaker 1>a man by the name of Luke Butkus. Not a

0:33:48.470 --> 0:33:51.980
<v Speaker 1>lot of heat for their offensive line coach, Luke Butkus,

0:33:52.220 --> 0:33:55.340
<v Speaker 1>even though he's done a great job over the last

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.340
<v Speaker 1>few years and his name is Butkus.

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe you gave me crap for having an

0:33:59.900 --> 0:34:03.250
<v Speaker 2>offensive line coach when one team later, you also had

0:34:03.270 --> 0:34:04.290
<v Speaker 2>an offensive line coach.

0:34:04.390 --> 0:34:06.990
<v Speaker 1>I did refer to the fact I think I've had

0:34:07.050 --> 0:34:09.030
<v Speaker 1>an offensive line coach at some point in the process

0:34:09.090 --> 0:34:12.060
<v Speaker 1>and You know, this was it.

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Listeners, this is a little slice of life for me

0:34:14.460 --> 0:34:15.739
<v Speaker 2>and Greg Rosenthal right now.

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.410
<v Speaker 1>Consistency. I need to work on that. They have done

0:34:19.430 --> 0:34:22.230
<v Speaker 1>a great job of like, they'll figure it out. Every

0:34:22.270 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>year there's questions about, okay, who's here? Who's there? This group? Oh,

0:34:26.140 --> 0:34:27.779
<v Speaker 1>and then in the end, it's greater than the sum

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.219
<v Speaker 1>of their parts. They are second, and this is from

0:34:31.260 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the team, so of course it's going to be favorable,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's just a fact. Since they hired Luke Buckus,

0:34:36.260 --> 0:34:37.620
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't get a lot of pop as one of

0:34:37.660 --> 0:34:40.690
<v Speaker 1>the top offensive line coaches, they're second in the NFL

0:34:41.110 --> 0:34:44.910
<v Speaker 1>in sack percentage allowed, sacks high allowed last season, very

0:34:44.969 --> 0:34:48.210
<v Speaker 1>high in percentage of explosive runs and passes. That's been

0:34:48.230 --> 0:34:50.609
<v Speaker 1>a little more up and down while he's been there.

0:34:50.630 --> 0:34:54.629
<v Speaker 1>So they've always managed to figure it out, and yet, like,

0:34:55.090 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you like... Zach, uh, Baco Morgan, uh, Baco, uh, I

0:35:00.660 --> 0:35:03.529
<v Speaker 1>should have written it down. That was from memory. So I'll,

0:35:03.810 --> 0:35:07.450
<v Speaker 1>I'll accept any criticism there at right tackle the former

0:35:07.489 --> 0:35:09.390
<v Speaker 1>Zach Tom. And then Sean Ryan is a guy who

0:35:09.410 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>had never played center before, but they loved what they

0:35:11.420 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>saw and gave him a long-term contract.

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:35:12.980 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>There's two spots that you feel pretty good about after that.

0:35:16.610 --> 0:35:18.930
<v Speaker 1>It's trying out their former right, you know, left tackle

0:35:19.530 --> 0:35:21.549
<v Speaker 1>first round pick Jordan Morgan for the first time at

0:35:21.570 --> 0:35:23.370
<v Speaker 1>that position as a, as a pro. It's a lot

0:35:23.410 --> 0:35:25.710
<v Speaker 1>of questions. It's a battle at guard. They might have depth, like,

0:35:25.750 --> 0:35:27.830
<v Speaker 1>but they're figuring it out. They're figuring it out.

0:35:27.910 --> 0:35:30.350
<v Speaker 3>Jagger Burton is going to probably take that guard spot.

0:35:30.430 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>That's, that's one of the spots that's open and it's fine.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.460
<v Speaker 1>But I just think to your Hank Fraley point before,

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>like he, they've kind of relied on having a top

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>10 offensive line and on paper, like my guy, Luke

0:35:43.580 --> 0:35:44.299
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of work to do.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.259
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It's going to be a huge part of what

0:35:47.300 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 2>they do. It kind of goes hand in hand with

0:35:49.020 --> 0:35:52.780
<v Speaker 2>my most important non quarterback. As we see Andrew Siciliano

0:35:52.860 --> 0:35:55.100
<v Speaker 2>now outside the glass, this is fun.

0:35:55.140 --> 0:35:56.219
<v Speaker 3>We have everybody visiting us.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.740
<v Speaker 1>The season's about to start. Yeah. By the way, Luke Buckus,

0:35:59.060 --> 0:36:01.630
<v Speaker 1>nephew of Dick Buckus, not the son, not the grandson,

0:36:01.650 --> 0:36:03.650
<v Speaker 1>but the nephew of Hall of Famer Dick Buckus.

0:36:04.190 --> 0:36:04.470
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:36:04.489 --> 0:36:05.569
<v Speaker 1>Just wanted to get that in there.

0:36:05.590 --> 0:36:06.410
<v Speaker 3>Big shoes to fill.

0:36:06.830 --> 0:36:09.010
<v Speaker 2>Um, in terms of some of the things you mentioned

0:36:09.030 --> 0:36:11.170
<v Speaker 2>with the run game, it was funny in talking to

0:36:11.190 --> 0:36:14.460
<v Speaker 2>Maliflor at Packers camp. It was like, he sort of

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 2>was sarcastically self-aware about how much he ran the ball,

0:36:18.500 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe overly ran the ball last year.

0:36:20.660 --> 0:36:23.870
<v Speaker 3>He's like, well, and you know, I do tend to

0:36:23.890 --> 0:36:24.569
<v Speaker 3>run the ball a lot.

0:36:24.590 --> 0:36:27.819
<v Speaker 2>And I go, you know, and, and that's what one

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:29.410
<v Speaker 2>thing that they're going to have to really think about

0:36:29.450 --> 0:36:31.540
<v Speaker 2>this year. It goes into my, one of my most

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>important non-quarterbacks slash even things go wrong. If, and talking

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.900
<v Speaker 2>about Marshawn Lloyd, for example, the running back, um, who

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.860
<v Speaker 2>has not been hurt or has not been healthy for

0:36:42.020 --> 0:36:45.140
<v Speaker 2>multiple years now, who they've had high expectations and the

0:36:45.180 --> 0:36:49.009
<v Speaker 2>expectation of really a large level of productivity for them,

0:36:49.410 --> 0:36:51.569
<v Speaker 2>but has just, hasn't been able to get on the

0:36:51.610 --> 0:36:54.450
<v Speaker 2>field and had a clean training camp and an exciting

0:36:54.489 --> 0:36:58.450
<v Speaker 2>training camp with Josh Jacobs still going through the process of,

0:36:58.590 --> 0:37:02.290
<v Speaker 2>of potential suspension for some really, really serious legal issues.

0:37:02.810 --> 0:37:06.210
<v Speaker 2>This is really, really important because he's also not just

0:37:06.350 --> 0:37:09.850
<v Speaker 2>crucial depth for them. but he is their best. I

0:37:09.870 --> 0:37:12.290
<v Speaker 2>would say their best zone runner that they have on

0:37:12.330 --> 0:37:16.210
<v Speaker 2>this roster. And the way that Matt LaFleur likes to

0:37:16.250 --> 0:37:18.810
<v Speaker 2>run his offense, the wide zone and the zone run

0:37:18.870 --> 0:37:22.450
<v Speaker 2>specifically are directly tied to what they call their transportation schemes,

0:37:22.820 --> 0:37:25.570
<v Speaker 2>which are the sweeps and the screens and all of

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.140
<v Speaker 2>the misdirection things that they like to do in order

0:37:28.180 --> 0:37:30.620
<v Speaker 2>to make everything look like it could be either run

0:37:30.820 --> 0:37:33.820
<v Speaker 2>or pass. So it's a huge element of their playbook.

0:37:34.570 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 2>that is really predicated on a, to your point, the

0:37:36.780 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 2>offensive line doing what it needs to do. And also

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.100
<v Speaker 2>this running back who they are taking a gamble on,

0:37:43.739 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>even though he has not been healthy, um, for, for

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.060
<v Speaker 2>several years. And so to me, it's a lot of

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.380
<v Speaker 2>things at once it's scheme dream. It's most important on quarterback.

0:37:52.500 --> 0:37:54.700
<v Speaker 2>It's offensive line, like you mentioned, but that's kind of

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.890
<v Speaker 2>the Packers for you. Their questions that they have are big,

0:37:57.950 --> 0:37:58.630
<v Speaker 2>big questions.

0:37:58.950 --> 0:38:01.210
<v Speaker 1>They are Marshawn Lloyd's been a guy who hasn't been

0:38:01.250 --> 0:38:04.190
<v Speaker 1>able to stay healthy and I've watched every one of

0:38:04.230 --> 0:38:08.250
<v Speaker 1>his preseason carries. He's kind of picking and choosing. He's

0:38:08.310 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>had good holes to run through. I think he needs

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a little more decisive. I do wonder if

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they will look for a veteran or if they're confident

0:38:18.300 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in Josh Jacobs, who hasn't been healthy. Josh Jacobs faces

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>five criminal charges, including strangulation and suffocation. It was a

0:38:25.380 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic disturbance initially. It's complicated how... whether they're charged and

0:38:31.900 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in investigation and allegations, but these are the initial charges, battery,

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.380
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse, critical damage to a property, domestic abuse, disorderly

0:38:39.420 --> 0:38:41.260
<v Speaker 1>kind of, it was a lot intimidation of a victim

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and whether the NFL waits for that legal process to

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:47.259
<v Speaker 1>wait out. I kind of hate that we're back in

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the place of the NFL that like if a video

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.140
<v Speaker 1>came out that showed Josh Jacobs, it would be the

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.299
<v Speaker 1>Ray Rice thing all over again. But because we don't

0:38:54.460 --> 0:38:58.460
<v Speaker 1>see a video that, it doesn't get mentioned too much

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.420
<v Speaker 1>and that they're of course just going to play him. Um,

0:39:01.739 --> 0:39:03.940
<v Speaker 1>but I think, I think it's fair to have some

0:39:03.980 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>criticism of the Packers just being like, okay, that's fine. Uh,

0:39:06.980 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to move on from that. And also

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.210
<v Speaker 1>he just hasn't been healthy. So it's a complicated football

0:39:12.390 --> 0:39:14.810
<v Speaker 1>and off field issue for Josh Jacobs, but that makes

0:39:14.850 --> 0:39:20.509
<v Speaker 1>me think they should get another player in there either way. Just,

0:39:20.670 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just get it either way. My scheme dream. I'll go

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.670
<v Speaker 1>first this time. I say, it every time. Well, just

0:39:26.710 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>how aggressive is Jonathan Gannon? What is Jonathan Gannon in 2026?

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.700
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Gannon was the Cardinals head coach last year. He

0:39:33.780 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>came from Philadelphia where he went back and forth based

0:39:38.580 --> 0:39:40.739
<v Speaker 1>on the talent that he had of like, I'm just

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going to sit back and let everything happen and and

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>hopefully let my offense cook. And then sometimes he was aggressive,

0:39:47.100 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly in Arizona, he would, him and Nick

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Rallis were very creative. I think he's going to have

0:39:52.380 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to provide an advantage because you've mentioned on the show,

0:39:56.620 --> 0:39:59.100
<v Speaker 1>they might have a pre Micah Parsons plan and a

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.819
<v Speaker 1>post Micah Parsons plan. Micah Parsons, their best player is

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>coming off, you know, that serious ACL. And he had

0:40:06.140 --> 0:40:09.700
<v Speaker 1>said week six, I believe it is against the Cowboys is,

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is probably the earliest he could get back. The schedule helps.

0:40:13.330 --> 0:40:16.570
<v Speaker 1>early in the season at Minnesota at the jets versus

0:40:16.630 --> 0:40:20.620
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta at the bucks in terms of offenses you face,

0:40:20.700 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like that's manageable for the defense. I'm not saying it's

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all easy overall teams, but you could survive that early

0:40:27.219 --> 0:40:29.690
<v Speaker 1>portion of the season, but. On paper, they're going to

0:40:29.730 --> 0:40:32.149
<v Speaker 1>need their coach to be coaching because I don't really

0:40:32.190 --> 0:40:32.910
<v Speaker 1>see the pass rush.

0:40:32.969 --> 0:40:37.210
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's such a dire situation to the level that

0:40:37.550 --> 0:40:40.490
<v Speaker 2>they've already shown some of what they're going to rely

0:40:40.610 --> 0:40:42.890
<v Speaker 2>on in the preseason. You don't see them playing as

0:40:42.930 --> 0:40:45.060
<v Speaker 2>vanilla as some of these other teams in the preseason.

0:40:45.100 --> 0:40:47.820
<v Speaker 2>You're seeing Jonathan Gannon blitz. He doesn't really like to blitz.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I say, he hasn't tendencies, has not had tendencies

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.380
<v Speaker 2>towards blitzing too much. Now, what they have loved to

0:40:54.420 --> 0:40:58.029
<v Speaker 2>do is have moved players. And so the combination of

0:40:58.110 --> 0:41:00.529
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing pressure is going to be really, really important. And

0:41:00.739 --> 0:41:03.900
<v Speaker 2>when I was at training camp was incredible. It was,

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.460
<v Speaker 2>it was a significant uptick in anything I'd ever seen

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 2>from them, uh, in this era and anything I'd seen

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.140
<v Speaker 2>from Jonathan Gannon in his coaching style either. And then

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>also leaning on the three safeties that they're going to start,

0:41:17.700 --> 0:41:21.180
<v Speaker 2>which Evan Williams, Xavier McKinney, and Javon Bullard and Javon Bullard,

0:41:21.620 --> 0:41:23.310
<v Speaker 2>who I just talked about the importance of like a

0:41:23.370 --> 0:41:24.770
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo nickel or a star.

0:41:25.540 --> 0:41:26.700
<v Speaker 3>To me would be that player.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Although Evan Williams and Xavier McKinney can move around to this,

0:41:30.420 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 2>to me, accidentally sets them up in the perfect, uh,

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.180
<v Speaker 2>meeting of the moment of where they need, how they

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.470
<v Speaker 2>need to be covering teams. Anyway, it just stinks for

0:41:38.489 --> 0:41:40.170
<v Speaker 2>them that their pressure isn't going to be there right

0:41:40.190 --> 0:41:43.629
<v Speaker 2>away unless it's manufactured. So for me, having those three

0:41:43.670 --> 0:41:46.089
<v Speaker 2>safety looks and then keeping edge Cooper on the field

0:41:46.150 --> 0:41:49.050
<v Speaker 2>in that quote unquote base nickel that I just talked about,

0:41:49.430 --> 0:41:52.489
<v Speaker 2>that's their money plan to me because, and certainly their

0:41:52.510 --> 0:41:55.569
<v Speaker 2>pre Micah Parsons plan because edge Cooper, uh, even though

0:41:55.590 --> 0:41:58.529
<v Speaker 2>he'll play off ball, will still rush the passer. And

0:41:58.570 --> 0:42:01.430
<v Speaker 2>then they'll have the extra defensive back to either cover

0:42:01.530 --> 0:42:04.470
<v Speaker 2>or defend the run like they want to be able

0:42:04.530 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to do without having to overcomplicate it. Some of the

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 2>pressure will be more complicated than we've seen when it's

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:11.420
<v Speaker 2>being designed.

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 3>But I think this is such a.

0:42:12.860 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Simple solution to what is a huge problem for them.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And I would hope that they don't overthink it or

0:42:18.060 --> 0:42:18.860
<v Speaker 2>overcomplicate it.

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my things go wrong if is just asking a

0:42:21.380 --> 0:42:28.049
<v Speaker 1>couple rhetorical questions. who is their best defensive lineman? It's

0:42:28.090 --> 0:42:32.230
<v Speaker 1>like Devante Wyatt. They gave a contract to, so I

0:42:32.250 --> 0:42:35.390
<v Speaker 1>guess he's probably it right now. You know, the other

0:42:35.489 --> 0:42:39.770
<v Speaker 1>options would be Lucas Van Ness, Baylin Terrell. And then

0:42:39.810 --> 0:42:42.750
<v Speaker 1>the other, the other question would be who is their

0:42:42.770 --> 0:42:43.469
<v Speaker 1>best cornerback?

0:42:44.410 --> 0:42:44.750
<v Speaker 3>Sissy.

0:42:45.770 --> 0:42:47.330
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cissé, second round pick.

0:42:47.390 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Like, I say it wrong every single time.

0:42:49.580 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>A very boom or bust prospect, like who may or

0:42:52.940 --> 0:42:55.299
<v Speaker 1>may not start, you know, it probably is starting.

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:56.859
<v Speaker 3>If he's healthy, he's going to start, I bet.

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, like if you're counting on a second round

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>rookie to be your best cornerback.

0:43:00.780 --> 0:43:02.529
<v Speaker 3>No, they have huge, huge issues.

0:43:02.770 --> 0:43:03.089
<v Speaker 1>It's trouble.

0:43:03.310 --> 0:43:05.210
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you brought that up because they do have

0:43:05.430 --> 0:43:07.870
<v Speaker 2>huge depth issues. And that's again, why I think they're

0:43:07.890 --> 0:43:10.089
<v Speaker 2>just going to lean. They're going to totally funnel this

0:43:10.130 --> 0:43:14.110
<v Speaker 2>entire plan through the safeties because they are really strong

0:43:14.530 --> 0:43:17.790
<v Speaker 2>there and really depend on at least one of those

0:43:17.830 --> 0:43:20.260
<v Speaker 2>players being a move player, like how I had mentioned,

0:43:20.900 --> 0:43:22.580
<v Speaker 2>you know, back when I was reporting on this, that,

0:43:22.700 --> 0:43:25.690
<v Speaker 2>that they use the Gannon use Buddha Baker, for example, um,

0:43:25.850 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>which is not going to fix everything. but you can't

0:43:28.260 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 2>expect to fix everything before Micah Parsons returns. And even

0:43:31.540 --> 0:43:33.500
<v Speaker 2>then you might not be able to fix everything because

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>corner to me is a huge, huge concern where I'm

0:43:36.739 --> 0:43:40.149
<v Speaker 2>not as concerned anymore is at their receiver position. Yeah.

0:43:40.330 --> 0:43:42.790
<v Speaker 2>Because not only did I see clarity in that group,

0:43:42.830 --> 0:43:44.989
<v Speaker 2>but it also is showing up in the preseason as well.

0:43:45.110 --> 0:43:47.410
<v Speaker 2>What clarity they have with Matthew Golden in a more

0:43:47.450 --> 0:43:51.430
<v Speaker 2>defined role with Christian Watson playing the role that he

0:43:51.489 --> 0:43:54.489
<v Speaker 2>seems very, very equipped and built for. I think Sky

0:43:54.550 --> 0:43:57.549
<v Speaker 2>Moore makes this team. I mentioned the transportation schemes. And

0:43:57.590 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 2>then I really actually appreciated what I saw from Savion Williams,

0:44:02.219 --> 0:44:05.860
<v Speaker 2>who's been hurt, but he's big, he's fast, he's strong.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.010
<v Speaker 2>I just think he could really contribute to this group

0:44:09.090 --> 0:44:09.609
<v Speaker 2>if he's asked.

0:44:09.810 --> 0:44:13.030
<v Speaker 1>Jaden Reed, still in the mix. The defined roles, like

0:44:13.130 --> 0:44:14.989
<v Speaker 1>their route to being as good as they want to

0:44:15.030 --> 0:44:19.790
<v Speaker 1>be is a... extremely efficient, and I think higher volume

0:44:19.989 --> 0:44:23.129
<v Speaker 1>passing attack. They've already been efficient and love just being

0:44:23.170 --> 0:44:28.790
<v Speaker 1>like an MVP candidate. Now going through the exercise, these

0:44:28.810 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three teams at the top of the division, if we're

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.060
<v Speaker 1>considering Minnesota in terms of looking at Vegas in terms

0:44:36.100 --> 0:44:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of the odds are expected to come in fourth, they're

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all so similar. They all just need their defense to

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be good enough. I think the Packers have higher hopes eventually,

0:44:45.820 --> 0:44:50.380
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. They might all just cancel each

0:44:50.420 --> 0:44:52.980
<v Speaker 1>other out a little bit where the ceiling is more of, yeah,

0:44:53.020 --> 0:44:54.969
<v Speaker 1>they can win the division. It's a little hard to

0:44:55.010 --> 0:44:57.270
<v Speaker 1>see this team making the Super Bowl. And the floor,

0:44:57.310 --> 0:44:59.410
<v Speaker 1>I do think, is last place in this division, which

0:44:59.450 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would cause some real soul-searching for this organization. I..

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:08.500
<v Speaker 2>Think that their biggest weak spot is no longer going

0:45:08.540 --> 0:45:11.469
<v Speaker 2>to be a weak spot in October when Micah Parsons

0:45:11.530 --> 0:45:14.489
<v Speaker 2>comes back. And I think that with Micah Parsons and

0:45:14.530 --> 0:45:17.650
<v Speaker 2>then someone who we didn't mention but absolutely should, Tucker Kraft,

0:45:18.230 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 2>being back in the mix on this offense, this to

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:25.650
<v Speaker 2>me is one of the most high ceiling teams in

0:45:25.690 --> 0:45:27.970
<v Speaker 2>this division. And certainly one of the most high ceiling

0:45:27.989 --> 0:45:30.310
<v Speaker 2>teams in the NFL. That doesn't mean that they, that

0:45:30.350 --> 0:45:31.260
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that they have.

0:45:31.500 --> 0:45:33.420
<v Speaker 1>So you think they have a higher ceiling than the bears?

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:45:34.500 --> 0:45:37.939
<v Speaker 1>And then the, how about the lions? Uh, About Tide.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:38.740
<v Speaker 3>About Tide.

0:45:38.860 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's why this division is hard. But that's the thing.

0:45:41.180 --> 0:45:43.950
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't mean they don't have glaring weaknesses. It's just

0:45:43.969 --> 0:45:46.770
<v Speaker 2>that I think that their best players are so much

0:45:46.810 --> 0:45:50.950
<v Speaker 2>better than so many other best players. And with the quarterback,

0:45:51.030 --> 0:45:54.570
<v Speaker 2>that to me makes them Super Bowl potential once everybody's back.

0:45:54.870 --> 0:45:59.230
<v Speaker 1>I buy that. It's one of those divisions, like I said,

0:45:59.330 --> 0:46:03.730
<v Speaker 1>you could tell me anything. Matt LaFleur has provided such

0:46:03.770 --> 0:46:06.290
<v Speaker 1>a high floor for this team. I think that's underrated.

0:46:06.410 --> 0:46:10.859
<v Speaker 1>Just contending each and every year, eventually figure that they'll

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>break through. Then they really haven't, you know, they haven't

0:46:13.460 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>had the real down year. And so I don't expect

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. I think this is a playoff team,

0:46:18.820 --> 0:46:21.540
<v Speaker 1>but I think that about the first three teams. And

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I know when we get to the end of this

0:46:24.780 --> 0:46:28.009
<v Speaker 1>month and are picking like our playoff teams, like it's

0:46:28.030 --> 0:46:30.689
<v Speaker 1>hard to squeeze three teams from the same division unless

0:46:30.710 --> 0:46:33.130
<v Speaker 1>you're keeping like the Seahawks or the Rams out, you know,

0:46:33.210 --> 0:46:34.150
<v Speaker 1>you could do it. You could find a way to

0:46:34.170 --> 0:46:34.270
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:46:34.290 --> 0:46:36.930
<v Speaker 3>What about the ultimate X factor? Trace Mack.

0:46:37.340 --> 0:46:40.420
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah. Trace Mack. Talk about a gamer guy that

0:46:40.460 --> 0:46:42.060
<v Speaker 1>was struggling in practice. You put them out there in

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.180
<v Speaker 1>the preseason and he looks like a Brandon Aubrey part two.

0:46:45.420 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Love it. Minnesota Vikings. Like I said, In Vegas, the

0:46:51.510 --> 0:46:53.580
<v Speaker 1>odds are pretty close in this division, but they are,

0:46:53.860 --> 0:46:55.900
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of the big three. And then

0:46:56.140 --> 0:46:59.129
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, what is bringing you joy about this team?

0:46:59.830 --> 0:47:01.690
<v Speaker 3>Brian Flores' contract extension.

0:47:01.850 --> 0:47:02.850
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay. I like that.

0:47:02.870 --> 0:47:05.460
<v Speaker 3>Which is a kind of a deep, winter throwback.

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:06.859
<v Speaker 1>I forgot it ever happened.

0:47:06.900 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.140
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say it really, really went under

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the radar and was sort of forgotten about. It was

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the best hires a team could make in

0:47:14.020 --> 0:47:17.050
<v Speaker 2>the moment. And it has remained that because this, this group,

0:47:17.070 --> 0:47:20.110
<v Speaker 2>which like doesn't let you down, like where you're supposed

0:47:20.150 --> 0:47:23.370
<v Speaker 2>to think about, um, regression or things not being sticky,

0:47:23.450 --> 0:47:26.129
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote, for, for defenses and certain things that like

0:47:26.430 --> 0:47:31.379
<v Speaker 2>high volume pressure, uh, versus more, uh, conservative play, like

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.100
<v Speaker 2>things that are, are high variance versus not like Brian

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:38.750
<v Speaker 2>Flores just says, uh, Maybe we'll regress between like week

0:47:38.830 --> 0:47:41.430
<v Speaker 2>seven and nine and then we're fine again. Like he

0:47:41.469 --> 0:47:45.029
<v Speaker 2>really does not give a hoot about your regression.

0:47:45.130 --> 0:47:48.030
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Not a word I think Brian Flores

0:47:48.050 --> 0:47:49.029
<v Speaker 1>would use. Yeah, right.

0:47:50.010 --> 0:47:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm working on the live calling. I'm working on not

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 2>swearing as much.

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.980
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. I think it's good for Eric

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:57.339
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:47:57.380 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:47:58.150 --> 0:47:58.450
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:47:58.590 --> 0:48:01.669
<v Speaker 2>So, um, but I, I just think it was such a, again,

0:48:01.690 --> 0:48:03.029
<v Speaker 2>it went under the radar. I wanted to bring it

0:48:03.090 --> 0:48:05.390
<v Speaker 2>up here. He has been such an asset for this

0:48:05.430 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 2>group and he's going to have his work cut out

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 2>for him this year with a couple of big personnel questions.

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 3>On that side of the ball.

0:48:10.219 --> 0:48:13.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. He, he is part of my things go wrong.

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.060
<v Speaker 1>If like him, not just being spinning some magic, but

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:21.570
<v Speaker 1>in terms of joy, it's just Justin Jefferson with a quarterback.

0:48:22.989 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's, that's, You know, a little bit of hope

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:30.340
<v Speaker 1>is built into me saying that. I believe that Kyler

0:48:30.420 --> 0:48:32.469
<v Speaker 1>can feed him the ball, that Kyler can do enough.

0:48:32.530 --> 0:48:37.270
<v Speaker 1>And if Kyler doesn't perform as well as Vikings fans want,

0:48:37.350 --> 0:48:38.550
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's going to be a lot of

0:48:38.610 --> 0:48:44.740
<v Speaker 1>highlights with Justin Jefferson. When Kyler... has had like real

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.620
<v Speaker 1>deal receivers. And he really hasn't that often in his career.

0:48:47.660 --> 0:48:48.940
<v Speaker 1>If you look back, cause it was like the end

0:48:48.980 --> 0:48:51.910
<v Speaker 1>of Fitzgerald, just like one year, he had that 1400

0:48:51.910 --> 0:48:54.109
<v Speaker 1>yard year with Deandre Hopkins. And then Hopkins got hurt

0:48:54.170 --> 0:48:56.529
<v Speaker 1>and kind of was never the same again. When Trey

0:48:56.550 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>McBride emerged, it was catching 111 passes from Kyler. So

0:49:01.540 --> 0:49:03.820
<v Speaker 1>he is not afraid to go to his best players.

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about Kyler's career and look at

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>those Cardinals team, it is easily the deepest group of

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:13.609
<v Speaker 1>weapons and that he's ever had. And he's someone that's

0:49:13.700 --> 0:49:16.490
<v Speaker 1>not afraid to throw it. So I think he's receiver friendly,

0:49:16.969 --> 0:49:19.970
<v Speaker 1>whether like he's reading the defense and getting all the operations.

0:49:20.350 --> 0:49:22.390
<v Speaker 1>and not making mistakes that's kind of what's going to

0:49:22.430 --> 0:49:24.510
<v Speaker 1>determine if they win or lose but from a pure

0:49:24.630 --> 0:49:28.340
<v Speaker 1>numbers and like enjoying watching on sunday i'm just happy

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to have the best receiver in football justin jefferson with

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.700
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback and yes that was uh you know just

0:49:35.739 --> 0:49:38.900
<v Speaker 1>like the mildest of shots to Jamar Chaser and any

0:49:38.940 --> 0:49:40.899
<v Speaker 1>other receiver that wants to believe that they're the best.

0:49:41.020 --> 0:49:42.100
<v Speaker 1>I still stick with Justin.

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:43.500
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just can't wait to see him do his

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.900
<v Speaker 2>thing the way we know he can and not sort

0:49:45.940 --> 0:49:50.110
<v Speaker 2>of have to bandaid over certain things that they struggled with. J.J. McCarthy,

0:49:50.750 --> 0:49:53.410
<v Speaker 2>you know, at the at the wheel last season for me.

0:49:54.010 --> 0:49:55.910
<v Speaker 2>this kind of goes into my, a little bit of

0:49:55.950 --> 0:49:56.730
<v Speaker 2>my scheme dream.

0:49:56.890 --> 0:49:57.890
<v Speaker 1>Go for it. Just do it.

0:49:58.410 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 2>I have just my hot take about this group is

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.820
<v Speaker 2>that every other team in this division is going to

0:50:02.860 --> 0:50:04.739
<v Speaker 2>load up and play heavier personnel all the time. And

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings should not, they should not do that. And

0:50:07.140 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they want to based on looking at

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.890
<v Speaker 2>their roster construction. It's Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, and Juwan Jennings.

0:50:13.410 --> 0:50:15.250
<v Speaker 3>Like is this sneaky one of.

0:50:15.250 --> 0:50:18.489
<v Speaker 2>The best three receiver groups in the NFL when you

0:50:18.510 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 2>think about how high Justin Jefferson's ceiling is.

0:50:22.020 --> 0:50:25.030
<v Speaker 3>And Juwan Jennings is a really, really solid receiver, too.

0:50:25.050 --> 0:50:26.669
<v Speaker 1>It could be the best.

0:50:26.730 --> 0:50:29.149
<v Speaker 2>A good to great one. And Jordan Addison, we've seen

0:50:29.290 --> 0:50:33.230
<v Speaker 2>big potential from him, too. They will be and should

0:50:33.270 --> 0:50:36.370
<v Speaker 2>be one of the rare teams that does live in

0:50:36.370 --> 0:50:39.310
<v Speaker 2>11 this year and actually bodes well for them because

0:50:39.350 --> 0:50:41.810
<v Speaker 2>every other defense in the league is preparing for an

0:50:41.950 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 2>onslaught of heavier personnels. And so getting the speed and

0:50:45.980 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the mismatches with these players is going to be, to me,

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of a little bit of a secret weapon. And

0:50:50.420 --> 0:50:52.779
<v Speaker 2>it's where Kevin O'Connell wants to live there, too. He

0:50:52.820 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 2>loves playing in 11.

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:58.140
<v Speaker 1>It's slept on how loaded this offense is if Kyler

0:50:58.180 --> 0:51:02.130
<v Speaker 1>can deliver. I think Jordan Addison is very underrated. He's

0:51:02.670 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>made some knuckleheaded decisions off the field with the speeding

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and everything like when he was young. And yet like

0:51:09.219 --> 0:51:11.739
<v Speaker 1>he is better than his numbers say he is one

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:14.069
<v Speaker 1>of the better number twos in the league. I think

0:51:14.110 --> 0:51:16.739
<v Speaker 1>Jennings is one of the better threes. They've said they've

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>loved this camp from Miles Price, who is like an

0:51:19.580 --> 0:51:21.259
<v Speaker 1>undrafted free agent, who I think is going to be

0:51:21.300 --> 0:51:22.779
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a factor. They even had, you know,

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:24.900
<v Speaker 1>they had Ty Felton third round pick a year ago

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.220
<v Speaker 1>is improving. And then TJ Hawkins is a year healthier.

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.219
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully he's obviously not as very peak, but him and

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.700
<v Speaker 1>Josh Oliver are a good combination when you need, want

0:51:33.739 --> 0:51:37.580
<v Speaker 1>to use. the receivers. So like the tight end at receiver.

0:51:37.620 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So I like all that. And my scheme dream is

0:51:40.100 --> 0:51:43.330
<v Speaker 1>the running side with Frank Smith. Actually, we've hit Frank

0:51:43.370 --> 0:51:45.270
<v Speaker 1>Smith and their zone running. They want to do so

0:51:45.310 --> 0:51:47.529
<v Speaker 1>much in the camp. I'm going to go back to

0:51:47.570 --> 0:51:51.630
<v Speaker 1>Flores and just say it's rare to have so much continuity.

0:51:51.710 --> 0:51:54.190
<v Speaker 1>I know they've lost some players. They got rid of

0:51:54.510 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Grenard because of finances. Harrison Smith retires. We'll see if

0:51:58.300 --> 0:52:01.219
<v Speaker 1>he comes back. But it's pretty rare to have like

0:52:01.580 --> 0:52:04.739
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is now has so many of his

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:09.300
<v Speaker 1>guys just year after year since he took over Flores

0:52:09.969 --> 0:52:12.150
<v Speaker 1>and they were 24th in efficiency when he took over.

0:52:12.150 --> 0:52:15.390
<v Speaker 1>11 third second. I mean, this is an elite defense.

0:52:15.450 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And so his guys, I would include Josh Metellus, the safety,

0:52:18.489 --> 0:52:21.180
<v Speaker 1>Byron Murphy, the cornerback, Andrew Van Ginkle. These are all

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:24.720
<v Speaker 1>guys they brought in. Blake Cashman. I mean, Eric Wilson

0:52:24.780 --> 0:52:28.489
<v Speaker 1>is a linebacker. Flores is great identifying talent that's going

0:52:28.510 --> 0:52:30.089
<v Speaker 1>to work because I think he's big on bringing these

0:52:30.150 --> 0:52:32.810
<v Speaker 1>players in. They're not stars, but they get his system

0:52:33.150 --> 0:52:34.390
<v Speaker 1>and they're all back together again.

0:52:34.820 --> 0:52:37.860
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I even trust him to make the most

0:52:37.940 --> 0:52:40.400
<v Speaker 2>with some of the personnel shuffling that they've had to do,

0:52:40.460 --> 0:52:43.569
<v Speaker 2>because I loved the identification and wanting to bring in

0:52:43.590 --> 0:52:45.819
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Jamal Adams, who if you're going to

0:52:45.860 --> 0:52:48.740
<v Speaker 2>be a guy who is blitzing a lot and you

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:51.810
<v Speaker 2>are going to come only do that essentially for a defense,

0:52:51.870 --> 0:52:54.470
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be the Brian Flores defense. And obviously

0:52:54.790 --> 0:52:57.370
<v Speaker 2>he got hurt. So that was really unfortunate, but I

0:52:57.489 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 2>always pay attention to, especially my colleague, Alec Lewis and

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.779
<v Speaker 2>some of the, the camp reports, because Alec is really

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 2>good at saying the thing without overtly saying the thing,

0:53:05.300 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 2>because PR would, you know, you know, What a lot

0:53:08.300 --> 0:53:10.090
<v Speaker 2>of people don't know is the condition of the credential

0:53:10.110 --> 0:53:12.430
<v Speaker 2>is you can't report certain scheme things if you're a

0:53:12.450 --> 0:53:15.129
<v Speaker 2>beat writer, but you can hint at it. And Alec

0:53:15.170 --> 0:53:17.009
<v Speaker 2>is so good at it. And he just has these

0:53:17.030 --> 0:53:20.170
<v Speaker 2>little hints, sprinkles of players who it is very clear

0:53:20.230 --> 0:53:23.170
<v Speaker 2>they are Flores guys. And it's this kid, Jacob Thomas,

0:53:23.250 --> 0:53:25.810
<v Speaker 2>an undrafted free agent out of James Madison.

0:53:25.850 --> 0:53:26.270
<v Speaker 1>Let's go.

0:53:26.310 --> 0:53:29.270
<v Speaker 2>It was basically like running the show at safety at

0:53:29.290 --> 0:53:31.630
<v Speaker 2>a certain point and commanding all the rotations of the

0:53:31.670 --> 0:53:34.380
<v Speaker 2>funky stuff that they like to do. And I'm looking

0:53:34.430 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 2>at James Madison and the history of that defense and

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:38.810
<v Speaker 2>how they overachieved. And I'm sitting there and I'm like..

0:53:38.900 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The Dukes.

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh, duh. Of course he's a Brian Flores guy.

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.140
<v Speaker 2>And I sit there and I love this about Brian

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:49.390
<v Speaker 2>Flores is that he can basically ID exactly what will

0:53:49.430 --> 0:53:50.850
<v Speaker 2>work specific to his thing.

0:53:51.130 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And nobody..

0:53:52.420 --> 0:53:54.420
<v Speaker 2>Else even knows what the hell that is because he,

0:53:54.860 --> 0:53:57.740
<v Speaker 2>he has no tendencies. He's so hard to predict because

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 2>he loves five man fronts or six man fronts. He

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:03.529
<v Speaker 2>loves dropping everybody. He loves blitzing on early downs or

0:54:03.550 --> 0:54:06.670
<v Speaker 2>then sometimes not like it just, it's, it's fantastic. I'd

0:54:06.690 --> 0:54:09.629
<v Speaker 2>like to see them continue to improve up front as well.

0:54:09.650 --> 0:54:11.970
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like Dallas Turner is having an awesome camp.

0:54:12.030 --> 0:54:14.450
<v Speaker 2>I know you love your guy, big citrus as well.

0:54:14.830 --> 0:54:17.370
<v Speaker 1>Um, Dominique orange. I have Turner as my most important

0:54:17.410 --> 0:54:17.990
<v Speaker 1>on quarterback.

0:54:18.010 --> 0:54:18.430
<v Speaker 2>Okay, great.

0:54:18.510 --> 0:54:21.330
<v Speaker 1>Cause I just think he, you know, he's a ascending

0:54:21.430 --> 0:54:24.150
<v Speaker 1>third year pass rusher and they've had a history of

0:54:24.210 --> 0:54:27.400
<v Speaker 1>really great pass rushes and they're thinner than they've been

0:54:27.420 --> 0:54:30.540
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And so can he get to, I

0:54:30.580 --> 0:54:32.379
<v Speaker 1>think he can definitely get to a Jonathan Grenard level.

0:54:32.420 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Can he get to like a, a Daniel Hunter back

0:54:36.100 --> 0:54:38.340
<v Speaker 1>in the day type spicy type level where you're a

0:54:38.380 --> 0:54:40.089
<v Speaker 1>top five to 10 passer? I don't know, but he's

0:54:40.110 --> 0:54:41.730
<v Speaker 1>been an ascending player and I think they need him

0:54:41.770 --> 0:54:43.350
<v Speaker 1>to be great. Yeah.

0:54:43.989 --> 0:54:46.030
<v Speaker 3>I think, My things go wrong.

0:54:46.250 --> 0:54:49.459
<v Speaker 2>If unfortunately has a lot to do with the position

0:54:49.500 --> 0:54:53.259
<v Speaker 2>that somewhat ironically is always the biggest question with this team,

0:54:53.300 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 2>with the head coach that has talked so much about

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:59.620
<v Speaker 2>developing quarterbacks and working with quarterbacks. And that is Kyler Murray.

0:54:59.780 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 2>If we get a streaky Kyler Murray season.

0:55:02.850 --> 0:55:04.490
<v Speaker 3>But it's not just Kyler.

0:55:04.550 --> 0:55:06.730
<v Speaker 2>And I, and I appreciate what we've seen with them

0:55:06.770 --> 0:55:09.670
<v Speaker 2>from the off season that they are working on rebuilding

0:55:09.730 --> 0:55:12.989
<v Speaker 2>this run game with Aaron Jones, with Jordan Mason, who

0:55:13.090 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Jordan Mason is still a little bit underrated

0:55:15.300 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 2>and this type of system, he can really thrive in it.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:21.060
<v Speaker 2>But for me, trying to lift the floor as much

0:55:21.100 --> 0:55:23.879
<v Speaker 2>as possible with a better run game and then adding

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Kyler to the mix as a runner is a really,

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:30.100
<v Speaker 2>really exciting concept. Not that he's going to be taking

0:55:30.300 --> 0:55:32.839
<v Speaker 2>off on these zone reads all the time, but the

0:55:32.969 --> 0:55:35.690
<v Speaker 2>threat of him taking off is so significant because of

0:55:35.750 --> 0:55:39.569
<v Speaker 2>what he still can do. My biggest concern and question is,

0:55:39.730 --> 0:55:41.590
<v Speaker 2>is he, if he's streaky, if we get eight or

0:55:41.650 --> 0:55:44.830
<v Speaker 2>nine really, really good games, really good Kyler games, and

0:55:44.870 --> 0:55:48.350
<v Speaker 2>then we get streakiness or potential injury, the rest of it,

0:55:48.430 --> 0:55:51.390
<v Speaker 2>because if he's just there for, as of now of

0:55:51.570 --> 0:55:55.270
<v Speaker 2>one year, they are going to push hard to try

0:55:55.350 --> 0:55:58.819
<v Speaker 2>to maximize what he does. And I have concern about

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 2>that on his body. Um, but we'll see, we will see.

0:56:02.260 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And I just, I really want to run more.

0:56:04.489 --> 0:56:04.669
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:56:04.790 --> 0:56:06.670
<v Speaker 2>And I, but I really want to see this. I

0:56:06.710 --> 0:56:09.129
<v Speaker 2>really want every, I want this to be a best

0:56:09.170 --> 0:56:11.870
<v Speaker 2>case scenario because it's more fun for us. Because how

0:56:11.950 --> 0:56:14.100
<v Speaker 2>fun would that be to see him extend plays and

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:16.500
<v Speaker 2>just like throw the ball the hell down the field

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:19.819
<v Speaker 2>to like a Justin Jefferson or Jordan Addison? Like there's

0:56:19.900 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so much fun potential in what this offense can be.

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:25.140
<v Speaker 2>He's going to align from everywhere. It's just going to be,

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:27.299
<v Speaker 2>it's exciting to think about and I hope they can

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:28.060
<v Speaker 2>meet the potential.

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:33.110
<v Speaker 1>Huge year in his career. It's really, what direction is

0:56:33.130 --> 0:56:34.989
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your career going to take year for

0:56:35.030 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 1>him and possibly KOC? Because KOC, you know, things go wrong.

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:41.299
<v Speaker 1>If for me is like, if it's all just like

0:56:41.340 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 1>a little too much, the, the natives are a little

0:56:43.890 --> 0:56:46.569
<v Speaker 1>restless there in Minnesota and just there, there could be,

0:56:47.489 --> 0:56:50.590
<v Speaker 1>can he handle any negativity? Can Kyler handle if, if

0:56:50.670 --> 0:56:54.650
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't start great, I could just, it's such a

0:56:54.710 --> 0:56:58.009
<v Speaker 1>tough division. I could just see things spiraling a little

0:56:58.050 --> 0:57:01.530
<v Speaker 1>and being dramatic, but no, I like that Kyler. I

0:57:01.570 --> 0:57:03.450
<v Speaker 1>was trying to think who's had a career like Kyler.

0:57:03.610 --> 0:57:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And like, this is like, The inflection point. The best

0:57:06.900 --> 0:57:08.580
<v Speaker 1>I could come up with while you were talking was

0:57:08.660 --> 0:57:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palmer. Nice to know you were paying attention. No,

0:57:11.900 --> 0:57:14.020
<v Speaker 1>I was listening, but I'm also thinking of like Kyle.

0:57:14.140 --> 0:57:16.220
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with what you're saying. Yeah. Because it's

0:57:16.260 --> 0:57:19.780
<v Speaker 1>not Sam Darnold. Sam Darnold was more prototypical of what

0:57:19.940 --> 0:57:22.660
<v Speaker 1>KOC wanted, but also like he hadn't been that guy

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 1>before Minnesota. Kyler Murray is a number one pick is

0:57:25.220 --> 0:57:27.700
<v Speaker 1>produced at a really high level and had MVP streaks

0:57:27.890 --> 0:57:29.850
<v Speaker 1>in him, which is similar to Palmer for me. But

0:57:29.890 --> 0:57:31.830
<v Speaker 1>think how much different we think of Carson Palmer because

0:57:31.850 --> 0:57:34.890
<v Speaker 1>of the Arizona days. Can Kyler Murray have kind of

0:57:34.930 --> 0:57:38.610
<v Speaker 1>his act two Arizona days where actually this turns into

0:57:38.650 --> 0:57:41.930
<v Speaker 1>a three or four year really productive big number run?

0:57:42.050 --> 0:57:42.990
<v Speaker 1>I think he has that in him.

0:57:43.170 --> 0:57:45.670
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's if we're talking about floors and ceilings,

0:57:45.830 --> 0:57:49.290
<v Speaker 2>I think that's Kyler's ceiling. And, you know, I just

0:57:49.430 --> 0:57:51.270
<v Speaker 2>I hope that he stays healthy because I would like

0:57:51.330 --> 0:57:53.470
<v Speaker 2>to see what he can do and how he's learned

0:57:53.530 --> 0:57:56.430
<v Speaker 2>to maybe mitigate some of that streakiness he's run into

0:57:56.750 --> 0:57:59.830
<v Speaker 2>that's not injury related. And what he can do when

0:57:59.850 --> 0:58:02.430
<v Speaker 2>he has a great supporting cast. And like I mentioned,

0:58:02.990 --> 0:58:04.939
<v Speaker 2>a higher floor. This is the one time a team

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:08.220
<v Speaker 2>is like, we're redoing our run game where I actually

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 2>believe it.

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I truly do believe.

0:58:10.220 --> 0:58:12.700
<v Speaker 2>That this, you know, including Kevin O'Connell, he said it

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.340
<v Speaker 2>for like three years and then it never quite took off.

0:58:15.780 --> 0:58:17.140
<v Speaker 2>This is the year that I actually..

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:19.180
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be different even if it doesn't work.

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:23.180
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully it works. A little landing up here. The James

0:58:23.220 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Madison Dukes. I strongly considered going to James Madison at

0:58:26.620 --> 0:58:31.910
<v Speaker 1>one point because my main... criteria was a warm city

0:58:33.370 --> 0:58:34.930
<v Speaker 1>and that's not really a city there so that would

0:58:34.950 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that that hurt but i just wanted somewhere warm mostly

0:58:38.020 --> 0:58:41.020
<v Speaker 1>was like the south i wasn't really thinking california but

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:43.020
<v Speaker 1>i thought i thought hard on james madison.

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 2>You could give me 60 guesses and i wouldn't be

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 2>able to guess where james madison is.

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:48.830
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even totally sure right now somewhere in virginia

0:58:48.870 --> 0:58:51.830
<v Speaker 1>though for sure you think that's warm oh it's i

0:58:51.850 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>mean compared to massachusetts pretty big difference yeah Where is it?

0:58:56.180 --> 0:58:58.490
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm really... It's sad that at one point I

0:58:58.570 --> 0:59:07.510
<v Speaker 1>obviously knew it well. The college. Big, big school. Harrisonburg. Harrisonburg, Virginia.

0:59:07.810 --> 0:59:09.350
<v Speaker 1>Of course it's warm. What are you talking about?

0:59:09.730 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't... I thought it snows in Virginia.

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:14.290
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it like you have, you have a winter

0:59:14.470 --> 0:59:18.170
<v Speaker 1>compared to certainly New Orleans or LA, the places I

0:59:18.350 --> 0:59:21.070
<v Speaker 1>ended up. Ceiling floor, but it's still warmer.

0:59:22.500 --> 0:59:24.500
<v Speaker 2>Uh, this is, this is not a team that I

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:27.220
<v Speaker 2>thought now I love their skill guys, but this was

0:59:27.260 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 2>not a team that I thought, oh yeah, it's a given.

0:59:29.820 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I could totally see this team in the Superbowl. That

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:34.110
<v Speaker 2>was the one, this was the one that was a

0:59:34.150 --> 0:59:36.870
<v Speaker 2>little sticky for me. Now I still, what's funny is

0:59:36.930 --> 0:59:40.570
<v Speaker 2>I still see their ceiling as in the mix too much.

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Be leaders in this, in this.

0:59:42.820 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's, that's not getting on the, you know,

0:59:45.780 --> 0:59:47.790
<v Speaker 1>in the mix to be leaders. There's a lot of

0:59:47.850 --> 0:59:48.770
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers there.

0:59:48.910 --> 0:59:50.270
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's, I love, I love those.

0:59:50.290 --> 0:59:51.050
<v Speaker 1>Put a number on it.

0:59:51.230 --> 0:59:51.830
<v Speaker 3>I love those.

0:59:51.990 --> 0:59:53.170
<v Speaker 1>So you think they can win the division?

0:59:53.230 --> 0:59:53.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:59:53.430 --> 0:59:54.450
<v Speaker 1>Like that's their ceiling.

0:59:54.470 --> 0:59:54.890
<v Speaker 3>I could see it.

0:59:55.010 --> 0:59:56.570
<v Speaker 2>And if, again, if all the things we're talking about

0:59:56.590 --> 0:59:58.910
<v Speaker 2>go right, like I could see it because they'll be

0:59:58.930 --> 1:00:01.419
<v Speaker 2>able to do something different on offense than everybody else.

1:00:01.980 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Biggest variance team in this division to me could, I

1:00:04.980 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think they could make the Superbowl. I mean, it would

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be surprising, but I, I think their ceiling is quite high.

1:00:11.060 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the offense could be dramatically improved. And then

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if the defense is anywhere close, I do think the

1:00:18.620 --> 1:00:22.540
<v Speaker 1>defense at some point, like it's, it's a risky type

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:24.260
<v Speaker 1>of defense. They could have a bad year. One of

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:26.940
<v Speaker 1>these years, like we've seen it with these types of coaches.

1:00:26.900 --> 1:00:28.380
<v Speaker 3>That I'll believe it when I see it.

1:00:28.460 --> 1:00:28.660
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:00:29.000 --> 1:00:30.620
<v Speaker 1>But if they had a bad year, then this team

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:34.050
<v Speaker 1>could be seven and 10, you know, certainly, um, I

1:00:34.070 --> 1:00:34.630
<v Speaker 1>like the Vikings.

1:00:34.780 --> 1:00:35.820
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of one of those things.

1:00:35.930 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>If I'm willing to believe that they're going to fix

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the run game after saying it so many years, I

1:00:43.140 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>am also willing to believe, and in probably more enthusiasm,

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:52.050
<v Speaker 2>that Brian Flores is not going to have a bad year.

1:00:52.070 --> 1:00:56.550
<v Speaker 1>Okay. I like that. And that probably would indicate you

1:00:56.570 --> 1:01:00.490
<v Speaker 1>don't have them in last place. So I mentioned the odds.

1:01:01.850 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The odds are a little surprising. Just checked them. I

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:08.060
<v Speaker 1>think they're quite schedule related, but the Lions are the

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:11.110
<v Speaker 1>favorites in the division. The Packers are second. The Bears

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:14.870
<v Speaker 1>are third. And they're kind of equally spaced out, not

1:01:14.970 --> 1:01:17.290
<v Speaker 1>that that close to each other. And the Vikings are

1:01:17.550 --> 1:01:20.209
<v Speaker 1>not a distant fourth, you know, better than most fourth

1:01:20.230 --> 1:01:22.650
<v Speaker 1>place teams. But there is a big gap, at least

1:01:22.730 --> 1:01:25.050
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the odds. I will have you go

1:01:25.110 --> 1:01:26.550
<v Speaker 1>first picking this order.

1:01:26.810 --> 1:01:28.770
<v Speaker 3>One, two, three, four. I love picking so much.

1:01:30.150 --> 1:01:32.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this might surprise you actually, Greg, because I put

1:01:32.810 --> 1:01:33.870
<v Speaker 2>the Lions first.

1:01:34.070 --> 1:01:35.710
<v Speaker 3>Okay. I put the Packers second.

1:01:35.730 --> 1:01:37.890
<v Speaker 1>You said you were going to surprise me. I don't

1:01:37.910 --> 1:01:40.410
<v Speaker 1>know if the Lions surprised me. You're right. I guess

1:01:40.450 --> 1:01:41.860
<v Speaker 1>if I had to guess, I thought you were going

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to go Packers.

1:01:42.940 --> 1:01:44.900
<v Speaker 3>No, I put the Packers second. I put.

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:50.820
<v Speaker 2>The Bears third. And I put the Vikings fourth. Now,

1:01:51.140 --> 1:01:53.930
<v Speaker 2>that said... The first three teams I could see being

1:01:53.950 --> 1:01:54.510
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl.

1:01:55.290 --> 1:01:57.530
<v Speaker 1>I know. I like the Bears, and yet I feel

1:01:57.550 --> 1:02:01.470
<v Speaker 1>like I need to spice things up a little bit. Like,

1:02:01.510 --> 1:02:03.870
<v Speaker 1>I want to put the Vikings maybe in the playoffs

1:02:03.970 --> 1:02:07.870
<v Speaker 1>in some way. I don't feel good about any of

1:02:07.910 --> 1:02:09.610
<v Speaker 1>this in this division.

1:02:09.770 --> 1:02:11.650
<v Speaker 2>No matter what we pick, we're going to be wrong

1:02:11.670 --> 1:02:13.190
<v Speaker 2>because it's that wild of a division.

1:02:13.210 --> 1:02:14.550
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:02:15.010 --> 1:02:15.510
<v Speaker 3>It's freedom.

1:02:15.590 --> 1:02:16.350
<v Speaker 1>You don't know. That's true.

1:02:16.370 --> 1:02:17.390
<v Speaker 3>Let go a little bit, you know?

1:02:17.410 --> 1:02:17.670
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:02:17.790 --> 1:02:20.650
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Lions, Vikings, Bears, Packers.

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Out of all the division previews, that's going to be

1:02:26.100 --> 1:02:27.020
<v Speaker 4>the graphic we put out.

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not.

1:02:28.200 --> 1:02:29.380
<v Speaker 3>Please don't.

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.570
<v Speaker 2>Please don't because the Packers fans we know are extremely online.

1:02:33.260 --> 1:02:35.490
<v Speaker 1>I like the Packers. I always pick the Packers to

1:02:35.530 --> 1:02:37.750
<v Speaker 1>do well. I can't even abide by that. I'm flipping

1:02:37.790 --> 1:02:39.850
<v Speaker 1>and I'm flipping the Packers at least putting the bears

1:02:39.870 --> 1:02:40.670
<v Speaker 1>in last either way.

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>The Bears last?

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:43.780
<v Speaker 1>Well, someone's got to be last if I put the

1:02:43.820 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Vikings second. Oh, I don't think the Bears are going

1:02:46.020 --> 1:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to be last. I've gotten very chocked with these predictions.

1:02:48.440 --> 1:02:49.580
<v Speaker 1>Ben Johnson's going to come for you.

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:53.380
<v Speaker 2>Think of the Ben Johnson stare and then see if

1:02:53.420 --> 1:02:54.220
<v Speaker 2>you want to reconsider.

1:02:54.300 --> 1:02:57.660
<v Speaker 1>Well, I am really hoping I'm wrong, at least statistically,

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:01.590
<v Speaker 1>because I went early with a Caleb Williams, Colston Loveland

1:03:01.630 --> 1:03:03.950
<v Speaker 1>stack on my fantasy team. So I will be watching

1:03:03.990 --> 1:03:04.570
<v Speaker 1>those Bears.

1:03:05.010 --> 1:03:08.010
<v Speaker 2>See, this is what we call the Rosenthal hedge, where

1:03:08.090 --> 1:03:10.430
<v Speaker 2>he picks someone and someone's going to get mad, except

1:03:10.470 --> 1:03:12.730
<v Speaker 2>they can't really get mad because you guys were first

1:03:12.810 --> 1:03:14.010
<v Speaker 2>on my fantasy team.

1:03:15.210 --> 1:03:16.970
<v Speaker 1>I will try to make that the last time I

1:03:17.010 --> 1:03:19.830
<v Speaker 1>talk about my fantasy team. It's come up three times today.

1:03:20.310 --> 1:03:22.590
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to hear about your fantasy team. And yet

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:26.100
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be doing our fantasy preview later on

1:03:26.420 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this week. Hit that music. Good show, Jordan.

1:03:29.140 --> 1:03:30.620
<v Speaker 3>It's good to be back in the studio.

1:03:32.020 --> 1:03:34.820
<v Speaker 1>Also in the studio. is where you will be conducting

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:39.060
<v Speaker 1>a big-time interview. Quickly, tell them about it.

1:03:39.280 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got Adam Barry, assistant GM of the Philadelphia Eagles,

1:03:42.720 --> 1:03:43.700
<v Speaker 2>coming up on Power Play.

1:03:43.720 --> 1:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That is next. And then, yes, we're going to do

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:49.660
<v Speaker 1>another fantasy football preview later in the week. See you then.