WEBVTT - U.S Factory Index Rises, Tesla Worries

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affle Car Playing and

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Interesting on those isms expansionary territory here ism manufacturing coming

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>in at over fifty. So let's get to the man

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>behind the data. Tim Fioria's chair for the Institute of

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Supply Management's Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. Tim we knew we

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>were in the trough. Is this legit expansion here?

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, Alex, Good morning, Paul, Good morning Alex. So this

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 5>is the third month for covering demand and there's not

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 5>a lot to complain about in this report. I mean,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 5>we've got good demand to beat the seasonals expanded for

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 5>it's on average the last three months, it's an expansionary period.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 5>We had production go up, which is output pretty significantly.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 5>We were continuing to have layoffs, which I think is good,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 5>but that should probably end soon. Suppliers are starting to

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 5>stiffen up. So overall, this is a very good report.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Remember last time we spoke August September, we declared that

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 5>we thought we were in the manufacturing trough. In January

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 5>we indicated that we thought we're starting to climb out.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 5>We climbed out in January, a little bit of February,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 5>even more now in March. So we're well on our

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 5>path here to a good manufacturing recovery.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 6>And Tim you always tell us to kind of focus

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 6>on the new orders, and new orders showed some expansion

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 6>as well.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they sure did. They pop back above fifty. We

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 5>also had pretty significant new expert orders. There were a

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 5>flat expansion to the prior month, but they're expanding. Nonetheless,

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 5>backlog was stable, which is okay, it's in the mid forties.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>That's all right. That'll come back probably in the early summer.

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 5>And cuss Er inventories went way too low again, which

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 5>is very good. So we've got demand increasing, we've got

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 5>production increasing, we've got staffing being finalized.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 5>We still had a one to one hired a fire ratio,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 5>which means that we still have a lot of companies

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 5>letting people go. Seventy percent of our layoffs attrition freeze

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>activities were actually layoffs, so you know, people have been

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 5>getting a little bit more urgent on the tool to use,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 5>and like I said, on the input side, we had

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 5>inventory still contracting by getting very close to fifty. Across

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 5>all the industry sectors.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 7>They all did well.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 5>None of them did exceptionally well, but most of them

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 5>came in above fifty of the top six. If they

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 5>didn't come in above fifty, they were like forty nine. So,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, March is a big manufacturing month. We have

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 5>seasonal factors that hit us. We overcame the seasonal factors.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 5>We only had thirty percent of manufacturing GDP declining in

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 5>the month, down from forty percent to prior month. And

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 5>even more importantly, only one percent of manufacturing GDP contracted

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 5>below forty five.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, alex So Tim, so you were mentioning the layoffs,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>like legit layoffs. Do we expect that to end if

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we wind up seeing manufacturing truly recover? So, like you

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 3>mentioned recovery, and I'm wondering what that looks like, and

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 3>then what the reflection is on the job market.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 5>So you know, a couple of reasons I think companies

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 5>are cleaning up their staffing. You know, we did a

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 5>lot of urgent things over the last couple of years

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 5>to get headcount, probably hired some people that we don't

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 5>really want to keep, so some of that cleansing is

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 5>going on. But we are going to cross that conversion

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 5>line where you need the labor regardless of whether it's

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent productive or ninety five percent production. So

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to see that layout activity start

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 5>to diminish. In fact, I'm going to start to reverse

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 5>symmetric and start to look for hiring activities. So I

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 5>would guess that probably by June we'll see that slow down,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 5>especially for the second half of the year.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Tim thanks so much for joining us. As always, always

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>appreciate getting your insights here for this data. Tim Fury,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 6>chairman of the Manufacturing Business Survey at the Institute for

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.839
<v Speaker 6>Supply Management. Again, the ISM manufacturing headline number came into

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 6>fifty point three, signaling expansion above fifty. The consensus was

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 6>for forty eight point three, so a well above consensus

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 6>and last period a last month was forty seven point eight.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 6>So it's TIMO saying a good momentum there for the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 6>manufacturing site.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>The avenue is It's interesting. Is UPS as well as FedEx?

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 8>Two things to watch one.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>FedEx won a contract to be the cargo carrier for

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the USPS. FedEx, on the other hand, failed to come

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 3>up with a deal at a container deal for the

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>government as well, So a little bit of divergence between

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 3>the two.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 8>So who do we go to?

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Lee Clasgow, Bloomberg Intelligence senior transport logistics and shipping analyst

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>who was off last week during the biggest shipping logistic

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>nightmare that we've.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 6>Seen quite a long time.

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 8>That nicely, Yeah, Lee, did you get a vacation or

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:57.119
<v Speaker 8>not so much?

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 7>Not so much. I got woken up pretty early with

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 7>one US coast time, so it was a fun day

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 7>for me.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I can imagine that.

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 7>Hence the beard.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 8>Now, hence the beard.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 3>He just got a lot older over the last week

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>or so. So there's a lot to kind.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 8>Of get through.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to the positive UPS news about being that

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>cargo carrier for USPS.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you know, This is somewhat of a surprise.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 9>I think most people were expecting the FedEx would lose

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 9>maybe about half of that business, but they ended up

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 9>losing all of it. It's about one point seven to

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 9>one point nine billion dollars in revenue, makes up roughly

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 9>around four to five percent of their express business, maybe

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 9>two percent of their total business.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 7>So it's a.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 9>Big loss for FedEx. And you know, while FedEx is losing,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 9>Ups is gaining. What's great about this is maybe not

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 9>so much the revenue and.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 7>The yields that it provides.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 9>It's the stability of the freight that it's going to

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 9>be getting into its network. And when you have any

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 9>sort of freight network, you want equilibrium. You want you

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 9>want to be able to predict what you're going to

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 9>to need in terms of resources, and this provides a

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 9>good level set of predictability for them, and they can

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 9>build density onto these routes where the US Postal Service

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 9>will be leveraging.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 6>Why is the Postal Service making the switch, that's a

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 6>great question.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 9>They were negotiating with fed X. I guess the two

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 9>parties couldn't come to a conclusion in terms of an agreement,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 9>so therefore they just decided to part ways. You know,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 9>one would guess that this isn't maybe not the most

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 9>high margin business for whether it's UPS or fed X.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 9>But again, I think there is a benefit to having

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 9>this because it does create a lot of density in

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 9>their network.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 6>Let me ask a silly question. When I'm looking to

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 6>mail package, the United States Postal Service does not even

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 6>come into my mindset.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 8>Oh god, no, no, who still.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 6>Uses the US Postal Service versus FedEx? Or or you

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 6>know a UPS store that's right next to the Starbucks

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 6>in town. I can go, you know, get my cafe

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 6>mocha there. I'm not going to the post office. Who

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 6>uses a post office these days?

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean I do?

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 9>I guess I'm you do, but I do sometimes. But

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 9>but the reality is the Postal service. You know, obviously

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 9>you were not sending letters to Grandma anymore. But you

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 9>know what we are doing is we're ordering stuff online

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 9>and the US Postal Service provides a lot of the

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 9>final mile delivery.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 7>So you might be.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 9>Ordering from a department store or you know, a dot

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 9>com etailer, and you know they might be using UPS

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 9>and FedEx for the line haul, but they might be

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 9>leveraging the postal service for that final mile deliver because

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 9>the postal service at the end of the day has

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 9>to go to everyone's address, and it's it's a cheap

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 9>way to do it, you know. And as more and

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 9>more people are willing to maybe you don't need something,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 9>maybe you don't need that T shirt overnight, you can

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 9>wait a couple of days, you know, injecting that freight

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 9>into the postal service.

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 7>That makes sense.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 9>And Amazon's is a big user of that final mile

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 9>delivery as well.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 8>My daughter does send letters to her grandmother.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm just putting that out there on the flip side,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and I should point out they mentioned the margin part

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of it. So we talked to the UPS CEO last

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>week on television, and their whole pitch is that going

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 3>forward they want to focus on margin and pricing over volume.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 8>Does this fit into that strategy.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 7>Yes and no.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 9>So yes, because so what they're going to be focusing

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 9>on are verticals like small to mid sized shippers, and

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 9>those shippers come with very high margins relative to you know,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 9>large enterprise companies that are out there, so they're going

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 9>to be really focused on that type of that type

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 9>of business.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 7>But you know, what the what the.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 9>Volumes from the postal service brings is a level of

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 9>density that you can leverage because it's all about operational leverage, right.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 9>You know, no matter what you are in transportation, operational

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 9>leverage is pretty high. Because you add like one more

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 9>piece of freight, that piece of freight tends to have

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 9>higher margins than the first twenty pieces of freight. And

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 9>so what this will do is this will probably help

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 9>them provide a base level of cost coverage and you

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 9>know what a profitable cost coverage at that and then

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 9>all these additional volumes that they're getting from higher margin

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 9>might even carrier, might even carry higher.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 7>Incremental margins for UPS.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 9>So long term it could have a very positive impact

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 9>on margins. Near term, it might have somewhat of a mix,

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 9>a negative mixshift, if you will, but you know, we

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 9>think that it does make sense for them to take

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 9>this volume. And other verticals also that they talked about

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 9>during their analyst day were the healthcare vertical, which tends

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 9>to be highly profitable just because of the high touch

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 9>nature and the high service level of that freight that

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 9>goes through their network.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 6>So Lee looking at the air freight companies to the FedEx,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>the UPS, how is business? How are volumes these days

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 6>that they kind of peeled off from the pandemic or

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 6>how is volume?

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so, you know, we're coming off those highs that

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 9>we reached during the pandemic when everyone was sitting at

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 9>home and ordering toilet paper online or at least trying

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 9>to get some toilet paper online.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're back to a more normalized level. You know.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 9>But the reality is what the pandemic has done, is

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 9>it really increased that e commerce penetration. It kind of

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 9>kind of brought brought the penetration forward by three to

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 9>five years.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 7>Which is a net positive.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 9>But you know, we have to go back to this

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 9>quote unquote normalization process, which feels like a negative, but

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 9>it's really not because once we get this space, which

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 9>I think we're building right now, you know, we should

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 9>see positive growth from here on out.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, now since you're back, I can also ask you

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 3>about Baltimore. What is the news today?

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Like?

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Where are we I know that there's some salvage ships

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>that are coming in to try and get the stuff.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 8>Off the bottom of the port. Where are we here?

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 8>How's it going?

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 9>I'm not there, and I'm not My hands won't get

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 9>dirty because I just I don't have those kind of hands.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 9>But you know, it could take four to six weeks

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 9>to clean up the channel area to get the port reopened.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, obviously to rebuild the bridge, we're talking two

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 9>to four years, probably closer to four than two, and.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 7>So that's going to take time.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 9>The freight that is going to be impacted can be

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 9>moved to other ports, whether it's coal going to the

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 9>Port of Norfolk versus you.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 7>Know, going out of Baltimore.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 9>A lot of roll on roll off equipment, whether it's

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 9>ag or commercial equipment in addition to automotives could go

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 9>to Philly or New York, New Jersey ports. So there's

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 9>going to be you know, there's going to be other

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 9>ports that can pull the slack what you're going to see.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 9>Because we track weekly rail volumes, you're probably can see

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 9>some volatility and the rail volumes, especially for Norfolk, Southern

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 9>and CSX, the two eastern railroads, and that might make

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 9>earnings maybe a little lumpy or a little lighter than

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 9>what expectations were. But this is not like a huge

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 9>dislocation like we saw, whether it's during the pandemic, and

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 9>it's probably even less of.

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 7>Of a big deal if you will.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 9>Then what we saw in what we're seeing right now

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 9>in the Red Sea in terms of the impact, I

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 9>think we're gonna this is really like a from a

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 9>supply chain standpoint, It is really a short term negative

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 9>impact where we'll find the new normal. I guess you know,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 9>I do say that a lot in my job, what

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 9>the new normal is. But we will find a new

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 9>normal as freight finds other ports to go short term

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 9>until the Port of Baltimore opens up, which hopefully will

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 9>be in less than two months time.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Hey.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Lee, when you talk to your institutional investor clients and

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 6>you're talking about the transportation space broadly defined, where are

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 6>people most excited?

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 7>Is it the rails?

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 6>Is it the trucks? Is it the marine shippers?

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so that's a great question.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 9>I don't really think it's it's it's on a mode

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 9>basis right now.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 7>I think it's really by a company's story.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 9>You know, you have a Norfolk Southern where you have

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 9>a lot of activist investor activists activity going on there,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 9>so there's a lot of excitement about, you know, how

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 9>that company can improve its margins.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 9>In the West, you have a new Pacific on on

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 9>the rail side, where you have a new CEO that

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 9>comes in with a lot of precisions scheduling, railroading experience

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 9>and uh, you know, expectations are he's going to be

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 9>able to improve margins. And then on the growth side

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 9>of things in the rail industry, you have a Canadian

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Pacific uh Kansas City, which is uh, you know, the

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 9>byproduct of a merger that happened last year, and they

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 9>had some great growth opportunities because you know, they're the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 9>only railroad that touches Canada.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 7>The US and Mexico. And as you know, near.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 9>Shoring is a long term, slow, but long term secular

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 9>growth story that you know, we're looking at and they're

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 9>they're they're expected to benefit the most from from there.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 9>And then broadly speaking, I think people are just waiting

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 9>to see the truckload cycle rate cycle start to turn.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 7>We believe it's going to.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 9>Happen this quarter. We believe we're bouncing along the bottom.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 9>What happened in Baltimore could kind of give a boost

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 9>to certain kind of equipment types like flatbed equipment near

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 9>term here, which could be a great base to work

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 9>on positive pricing, which the truckload industry.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 8>Does really needs before we let you go.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean on that point, we had the ISM manufacturing

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>data coming in really strong, and you have been expansionary

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>territory for the first time since July of twenty twenty two.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>It has been bouncing along the bottom and troughing for

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>like five or six months. You're saying something similar for

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the transportation sector in some ways, does it reaccelerate, Like

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>what does the upturn look like?

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 9>So the ISM index is probably a great precursor to

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 9>less than truckload demand. So think companies like XPO, Old Dominion,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 9>even FedEx Freight is the largest LTL carrier out there.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 9>Tonnage has been in decline h broadly speaking, and what

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 9>the ISM usually is, it kind of leads demand.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 7>By by three to six months.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 9>So the fact that it inflected into expansion territory is

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 9>a positive.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 7>Sign for the LTL space. You know, That's how we

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 7>look when we're looking at the is m all right?

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Lee great Stuff has always appreciated, uh bringing it as

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 6>he always does. Leek Clasicow, senior Transportation Logistics and shipping

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 6>analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence coming to us from our Princeton

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 6>studio via that technology, the kids call zoom. So that

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 6>worked out worst. Yeah, just looking at the logistics, it

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 6>seems like we're back to normalized logistics, getting up, you know,

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 6>our product from point A to point B. Kind of

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>back to where we were. I guess, I guess. My

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 6>My question is what happens to justin time inventory? Is

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 6>that still thing? Or do people learn their lesson like

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 6>that just in time that's a little too dice meat, right.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 8>But it's not like a huge build up of inventory, right.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like you have enough but not too much and

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of finding that sweet spot as I feel like

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>retailers have been trying to find for a bit can

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>be quite tricky, you know, but it will be interesting.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I know that we're writing off what happened in Baltimore

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 3>in terms of logistics.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 8>I know, I know we're doing that.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 3>There's space, there's capacity at different ports, railroads have capacity,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. We have to wonder, though, if it doesn't

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>take any shorter than four to six weeks, do we

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 3>have to rethink the disinflationary trend that we're seeing, Like

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 3>not inflation, not something crazy, but just.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 8>You know, stops the stops the decline.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>broyd Outo with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 3>But we're looking to sell off all across the bond

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 3>market here, particularly in the long end, and it seems

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>like the good data is going to be bad then

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 3>for the market.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 8>Are we seeing actually a re ex of the economy.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 8>I think that's going to be my question of the.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Day, Pall, I like that.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 8>Let's do it.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Carol Pepper is founder and CEO at Pepper International and

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 3>she joins us. Now, Carol, are we seeing a reacceleration.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 10>I think we're seeing a steady, continuing good performance. Reacceleration

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 10>would imply that it's going to get a lot hotter

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 10>too quickly and it will not allow the FED to cut.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 10>I don't believe that's the case. I think we're just

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 10>going to continue to see a good, strong, muscular market

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 10>that's doing well. I don't see it as a reacceleration.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 10>I see it as fairly a steady state, almost a

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 10>goldilocks market, not too hot, not too cold.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 6>So if that back. With that background, Carol, what do

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 6>you think are Feeder Reserve is going to do in

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 6>the upcoming meetings.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm definitely in the camp that says they're going to

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 10>cut in June because they have no reason to keep the.

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 4>Rates so high.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's just there's not a lot of justification

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 10>if we don't have rampant inflation and the rates being

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 10>so high do threaten the real estate markets, which in

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 10>turn threaten the banks. So you know, a lot of

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 10>people have been holding on by their fingernails, and a

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 10>lot of banks don't want to take back all that

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 10>real estate, so they really need to start cutting.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So if we just do so things are just

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>humming along and doing all right. As you were just saying,

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>is that enough for equities to keep going up?

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, remember, we're going to have the stimulus coming, a

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 10>real stimulus, which is the cut of interest rates.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 4>That will help real estate.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 10>That will help banks, That will help consumers because the

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 10>credit card rates will go down.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>But if we don't get that, Carol, if we don't

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>get the cuts, or if that gets pushed off even

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>by a month, et cetera, can stocks will go up?

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes? I think so.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 10>Because again we're at the beginning of another level of

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 10>secular change. I was around trading the Internet when it

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 10>first launched, and everybody said it was too expensive, don't

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 10>buy it.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 4>And look where we are today. You know, will there be.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 10>Blips, yes, but the AI revolution really is going to

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 10>be another huge leg up in productivity. And that's why

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 10>you see the NASDAC running as strongly as it is,

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 10>because people, a lot of people you know, still around

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 10>to remember how it worked out last time. So AI

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 10>is a secular change. The money that's been poured in

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 10>by the Inflation Reduction Act is a secular change. These

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 10>are real things that are causing real things to happen

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 10>in the real world, and those are additional boosts even

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 10>if we don't.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Get the rate cuts. So there are very positive headwinds.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 10>And certainly if you compare what's going on here to

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 10>the threat of Russia looming over Europe, the threat of

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 10>China looming over Asia, you know, where do you go

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 10>in the world, Middle East or here.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Really that's why you see a lot of people moving.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 10>To you know, Ua, and people bringing their money to

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 10>the United States, lots of international clients.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 4>As you know, I work with family offices.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 10>I manage money for people with over one hundred million

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 10>who are who have single family offices, and they're all

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 10>looking at the US as a safe haven. And that's

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 10>going to continue because on a relative basis, the US

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 10>looks fantastic if you think about going to other regions

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 10>of the world.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 6>So do I stick with my large cap growth stocks, Carol,

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 6>that have been working for me? Or do I try

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 6>try to go out there and find some value?

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 10>No, no, forget value in my opinion, I mean you

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 10>can honestly value has I've been hearing about the renaissance

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 10>of value for forty years.

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it just never happens. It's like waiting for goodo.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the the United States is a leader in

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 10>technology globally. And if you stick with the large cap

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 10>growth stocks, particularly ones with lots and lots of cash

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 10>on their.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Balance sheet, which you can easily see if you look

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 4>on you know, any any online.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 10>System you're a trader on Bloomberg channel wherever you can

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 10>see how much cash they have on their balance sheet.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 4>That means they can weather any storm.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 10>So you know, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, these big names are

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 10>going to continue powering upward.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 3>So okay, to that point if I didn't own though,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 3>say the mag four Fab four. Is it too late

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 3>to do that or do I need to sort of

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 3>play the themes that you're talking about that are real

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 3>structural shifts in different ways.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>No way, you have to play the big guys.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 10>This is the leader's market and there are lots of

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 10>fear days coming.

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Don't think we're done with fear days.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 10>Fear days of the days when something spooks the market.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 10>Let's say Paul says something that makes the traders fret that.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh he really isn't going to cut. Oh my god,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen?

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 10>And everything will drop like a stone, and you smart

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 10>trader are waiting on the sidelines, and you'll get into

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 10>those big names. There will be fear days, there will

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 10>be fear events. That's just the way things roll these days.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 10>So on those days you can get in if you

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 10>want to get a better entry point. But frankly, you know,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 10>I remember when Amazon first came out and everybody said

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 10>it was too expensive. Event it's you know or Microsoft.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 10>These are up two hundred three hundred thousand percent. I mean,

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 10>there's no waiting for the exact right day. Isn't the answer.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 10>The answer is get into those stocks, particularly for your

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 10>retirement accounts or your kids college stick the stick them somewhere,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 10>don't look at them every day, and.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Just know that you've made a great, solid investment for

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 4>years to come.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 6>Em XC What is EMXC and why should we buy it?

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 10>Okay, EMXC is the Emerging Markets Mexico Fund. So I've

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 10>been spending a lot of time lately in Mexico. Mexico

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 10>is the destination for a lot of the near shoring activity,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 10>meaning people are moving their operations out of China's sphere,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 10>not only China, but anywhere China for example, like Hong Kong,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 10>anywhere where China has undue influence, They're moving those operations

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 10>to Mexico. Mexico is on fire. If you go to Monterey,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 10>the building is unbelievable. If you go to Tijuana, the

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 10>building is incredible. Why because all these both European and

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 10>US corporations are moving operations there.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 4>So that country is doing extremely well. Of course, they have,

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 4>like a lot of countries.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 10>Right now, they're a little nervous about the presidential election

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 10>coming up, but once we get past that, that country

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 10>is going to continue to do extremely well. So that's

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 10>a way the small percentage of your money to play

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 10>a trend that's going to only get bigger over time.

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 8>Do that also go to Canada, Carol? Or is that

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 8>purely in Mexico?

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 10>Because the wages are too high in Canada, so that's

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 10>why they go to Mexico. So it's sort of you

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 10>get emerging market wages and labor in a market that

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 10>where you can literally, like Canada, drive into the US.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 10>But unfortunately Canada doesn't have enough labor to take all

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 10>of our near shoring, and they're they're more like US,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 10>they have high wage structure, So that's why people go

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 10>to Mexico.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Do people Are people going to increasingly go to India

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 6>if China is less investible here? A lot of folks

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 6>have been suggesting that's the next trend in emerging markets.

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, for example, two important things happen in February

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 10>MSCI the index for the Rest of the World. If

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 10>you will increase the waiting for India and decrease the

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 10>waiting for China, India.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Up two points, China down a point.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 10>JP Morgan this coming month is going to be adding

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 10>India bonds for the first time into their International Bond Index.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 4>So India is.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 10>Muscling in and China is falling behind because they're just

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 10>not playing ball with the rest of the world.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 4>So, yes, India is a great trend right now. It's

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 4>easier to buy India through some emerging market ETFs that

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 4>are equity focused.

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 10>There's really not a lot of great debt options yet,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 10>but I think those will come because what tends to happen,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 10>the street gets excited when when a country is included

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 10>an index is now it's worthwhile to go and build

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 10>products around that country. So that's why there's Ida, which

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 10>is a great ETF that you can look at, and

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 10>there's gli In. Both of these you know, gli In

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 10>was up fifty three percent last year. It's smaller, but

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 10>Ida is nine billion dollars already and.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>It was up over thirty percent last year.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, here Before we let you go, though, I

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 3>just want to get one day, like, what's the biggest question?

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Like we covered a lot of ground, what's the biggest

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 3>question you're getting right now from your clients?

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's really will this good time last? And I

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 10>say yes, I say this year it's an election year,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 10>the good time will last. Don't be too frightened and

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 10>jump out because you're scared, and don't try to time

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 10>the market. Look for long term trends that will work

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 10>for you in the right proportion for your portfolio, and

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 10>stick with them. Don't go crazy unless you have a

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 10>day trading account. That's a whole other story. But if

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 10>you're investing, bind the right trends and ride them over

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 10>the long term.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 8>Carol, thanks a lot.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 3>We really appreciated Carol Pepper, a founder and CEO over

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 3>at Pepper International. So interesting because it just flies in

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the face of like my philosophy, which is gold and

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 3>soup canes kind of under the bed, but speaking of

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 3>gold at a record high, but that you know, like,

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 3>don't get scared, we'll have down days and sort of

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 3>buy the dip in the large guys.

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 8>I always wonder what the first member.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Advantage is for the AI trade, Like do you want

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 3>to buy the first guys or do you want to

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 3>buy the fourth derivative fourth guys?

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't know. I mean a lot of Apple investors

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 6>are suggesting, you know, Apple may arguably has missed the

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 6>early move, but they often missed the early move. They

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 6>wait for people and so don't worry that Apple will

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 6>be there. There'll be an AI play there, maybe as

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 6>soon as their June Developer meeting. But the chip makers

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 6>have been the ones that are just the clear winners.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Obviously in Vidio, but just a chip sector broadly defined

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 6>has been I guess, the initial winners for the AI

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 6>and then the questions get brought that out to software

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 6>like a Microsoft and yeah, so on and so forth.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And then also I liked your question about value because

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the theme of the second quarter is rotation, rotation,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 3>broadening out of the rally, broadening out of the rally

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the rally. And then she's like, no, not gonna happen. Yeah,

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I just go by the big guys, which is quite interesting.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 6>It's a very aggressive call. I would say, it's even

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 6>a little out of consensus call, sticking with and kind

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 6>of you know, literally in her notes she's saying, go

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 6>out and buy Nvidia today, basically in her notes. So

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 6>we'll have to see. So Carol Pepper's some bold call,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 6>staying aggressive.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>If you will, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Catch us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 2>car Play and rout Auto with the Bloomberg business. You

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>New York station. Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 6>T s l A Tesla as mister musklakes to pronounce

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 6>it stops down twenty seven percent year to date. There's

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 6>a million cross currents there, So let me just bring

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 6>in someone who kind of think can clear it up

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 6>for us, Alex Steve Man. He's global autos analyst for

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Intelligence. A Steve stocks down twenty seven percent. You know,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm sorry, stucks on thirty percent year to date. What's

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 6>the rub on Tesla right now? What's the big bear

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 6>case for Tesla?

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 11>Hey, Paul, thanks for having me on the big bearcas

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 11>is really you know, how are they going to do

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 11>this year? You know, EV sales and the US markets

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 11>slowing down, China sales have slowed down as well as

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, even with steep price cuts in both regions,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 11>and then you know they have the cyber truck ramping up,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 11>and you know it's not the most easiest product to build,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 11>so that you're facing some challenges there. So earnings, you know,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 11>I think earning is going to growth is going to

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 11>slow down this year. Free cash flow growth is going

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 11>to slow down this year, So that's the main overhang

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 11>on that stock right now.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, also we're waiting for first quarter deliveries.

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm totally unclear as to when we get that number,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>but it does look like Wall Street analysts are getting

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>more negative and more negative and what they'll actually be

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 3>able to deliver.

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 6>What are you modeling?

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so their number is supposed to come out tomorrow.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 11>But if you look at yeah, if you look at

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 11>the Chinese auto sales like Neo X Punk BYD they

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 11>all have reported they have really strong March sales number,

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 11>but that's on the back of really steep price cuts

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 11>over the past few weeks. So if you look at

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 11>those number, you kind of infer that probably, you know,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 11>Tesla is going to report you know, probably low single

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 11>digit growth, may flat to slightly up year on year

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 11>in the first quarter. That's that's pretty much in line

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 11>with consensus because consensus estimates have come down over the

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 11>past few months already.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 6>So you know, Steve, what do you what's your view

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 6>of you know, overall demand for electric vehicles. It seems

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of folks feel like, boy that it's kind

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 6>of peaked. The early adopters, they're done. The tree huggers

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 6>like Matt Miller, they're done. What's the ultimate demand for EV's?

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 11>Do you think I'm actually optimistic about ev I think

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 11>ev that ship have sailed, and I think we're just

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 11>seeing a cyclical downturn. Part of it is because the

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 11>product that's available to the masses is still not there yet.

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 11>A lot of the EV's that are on sale today

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 11>are over fifty thousand dollars. A lot of people cannot

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 11>afford fifty thousand dollars cars, especially in a high interest

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 11>rate environment. So I think a lot of the automakers,

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 11>including Tesla, G and the rest, are introducing more affordable

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 11>evis in twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six. I

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 11>think that's going to expand the market of a little

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 11>bit more and hopefully my hope is that you know,

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 11>sales will come back at that.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 8>Time well to that point.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 3>And this ties into Tesla delivery sales because Elon Musk

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>has talked about the facts that getting from their sexy

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 3>models now to the affordable models later, there will be

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>a sales slump as they kind of fix production and

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 3>they ramp it up et cetera. How long do you

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 3>think that gap slump, et cetera is going to last?

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 11>For Well, Tesla's going to introduce to the compact vehicle

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 11>that's supposed to be supposedly under thirty thousand dollars. They're

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 11>going to start production in the second half of next year,

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 11>and we probably don't see any contribution to profitability and

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 11>cash flow until twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 11>So it's not that too far. It's not that far

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 11>are from now. And you know, GM is doing the

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 11>same thing. They're reintroducing the cheaper version or less lower

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 11>cost version of the Bolt in twenty twenty five as well.

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 11>So I think it's it's it's it's not that far away.

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 11>Twenty twenty four. Like I've always said, it's gonna be

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 11>an adjustment year for for a lot of automakers. They

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 11>gotta they gotta reevaluate the cost structure, reevaluate the portfolio,

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 11>and uh, you know again, this is why I think

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 11>it's a cyclical downturn. In twenty twenty five twenty twenty six,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 11>you're gonna have cheaper cars, lower costs, and hopefully better

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 11>earnings for the EV market. EV automakers.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 6>So, Steve, do we know whether the industry I'm even

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 6>gonna call out TESLA or GM. Can the industry replicate

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 6>the profitability it has on its internal combustion engine vehicles,

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 6>which I understand now the unit economics are very good.

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Can you replicate that? Or in the EV space.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 11>It's very possible because battery lithium prices have come down

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 11>quite a bit, destabilizing at a lower level. The whole

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 11>auto industry is re evaluating their manufacturing, how they build cars.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 11>So vertical integration has become a very important kind of

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 11>strategy for automakers to cut costs across the supply chain.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 11>That will take time. And then thirdly, the IRA, the

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 11>Inflation Reduction Act is supposedly on shore a lot of

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 11>the battery manufacturing. Again, that is supposed to cut costs

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 11>for automakers. And that's why I think in twenty twenty five,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty six they're able to roll out more affordable

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 11>evs at a lower price and hopefully, you know, if

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 11>volume does get there, it's going to be a lower

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 11>cost per unit.

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 6>A Steve thirty seconds, why is GM at a fifty

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 6>two week high today?

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, they've done a great job in managing the investors

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 11>by buying stock, you know, a very spending a lot

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 11>of money to buystock and an accelerated rate, and you

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 11>know investors love that on that return of cash to.

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 6>That nice all right, you can't, you know, beat him,

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.239
<v Speaker 6>join them. That's a good thing. Steve Man covers all

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 6>the auto stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. We've got a great

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 6>global team following the global auto of business. Steve just

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 6>relocated from Hong Kong back to the US to Princeton,

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 6>New Jersey, so he knows that global auto space, including

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese market, which is such a key market for

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 6>the global auto manufacturers, particularly Tesla, who's got a big

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 6>commitment there.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station just

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty again.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 6>Heck of a first quarter four equity markets up ten

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 6>percent for the S and P five hundred looking at

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 6>that October low, up over just over twenty five percent,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 6>so a big, big move just in the last five

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 6>to six months, I've gone too far? Do we still

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 6>have more room to grow? Let's check out with Christina Hooper.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 6>She's a chief Global market strategist for Invesco. Christina, again,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people, I think are kind of looking

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 6>back at this first quarter we had and looking back

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 6>up to October and say, boy, that was a nice move.

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 6>Now what do we do? What are you telling them?

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's important to keep our focus on

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the longer term. Yes, it seems likely that stocks will

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>take something of a breather after such a strong quarter

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and such a strong rally since October. But the reality

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we are still waiting for the start of

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>rake cuts, which could very well be a positive catalyst

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for stocks. We also have a very significant cash sitting

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines that could easily start to move into

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>equities as well as fixed income as rates start to

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>go down. So what we're saying is don't overreact to

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the environment, but be well diversified, because we could very

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>well see a rotation. For example, one more unnoticed development

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>last week was the Russell two thousand, surpassing the high

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hit in early March, and I think it's a reminder

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that there are opportunities outside of large cap US stocks

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if we go across the pond, if we look internationally,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as if we look into the smaller capped space.

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, the key is to be well diversified across

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the major asset classes and within them.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 8>So Christina does that?

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Is that a value call or is that just own

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 3>lots of different things because we don't know what form

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the economy will really take in what the FED will do.

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that it's a call on expectations of

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what is going to happen later this year and next year.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So what I think we're going to see is a

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>rather brief and mild slowed down for the global economy

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>followed by a reacceleration. And typically asset classes discount these

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>events before they happen, which is why I think we're

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see improvement in small caps, why we're seeing

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a broadening of the stock market.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 6>Does a broadening of the stock market include China? There's

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of folks out there that say China, for

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 6>a variety of reasons, is uninvestable. What do you think?

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue that sentiment has gotten far too

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>negative on Chinese equities, and it really creates a situation

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in which we could see some very positive Chinese equity

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>market performance with a little positive surprise. And an example

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of that is the some data we saw, the pm

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I data better than expected and of course no surprise

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that we saw positive reaction because China is just Chinese

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>equities have been over sold. There are opportunities there.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 8>Hmm, that's an interesting call. How do you head?

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you go internal stocks like small caps

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 3>that might get a boost from any government stimulus, or

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>is it you still want to own US companies with

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 3>exposure just maybe we have to be selective on what

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of exposure a lah apple.

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's a case for both, but certainly

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese equities, you know, getting in there, especially areas like

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>China Tech. I think there's there's significant potential there. I

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>think what we're hearing from Chinese policy makers is a

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>willingness to be you know, an interest in being very

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>business friendly, and I think there's upside potential there.

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 6>How About on the fixed income side here, just broadly speaking,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 6>do I want to just stick with my two year

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 6>treasury at four point seven percent or all I want

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 6>to go out and take some credit risk here.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think in this environment with an expectation of

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty soft slow down, what I would argue is

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that it is a time to take credit risk and

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>also move out in terms of duration locking in rates

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>because we know what is likely to happen in the

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 1>future in terms of rate cuts.

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So is that a price appreciation play or is it

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 3>an absolute yield play?

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a little of both.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Interesting and is the U So how do I then

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 3>think about the economy and relation to the FED cuts?

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just today, right, we get that nice and

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>hot im manufacturing data at the top of the ten

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 3>o'clock hour, and we see a pretty sturdy sell off,

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 3>particularly in the back end, like higher for longer there

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 3>for growth will be impacted later, et cetera.

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 8>How do you view that?

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So, I think there was a real overreaction on the

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the market to today's data, and understandably so.

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of jitters out there. We are

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly getting conflicting messages in terms of FED speak. But

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the reality is I don't think anything in that print

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>today changes my view that we will see a rake

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>cut before the end of the second quarter. Yes, hotter

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>than expected, but we didn't see anything dramatic, and in fact,

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>employment remains tepid. That's sub index. The price sub index

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>went up, but it's largely a result of commodities. So

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand why we saw, why we're seeing the reaction

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we are, but I don't believe that's going to change

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's mind. I mean, we've seen very very significant

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>progress on disinflation, and core PC on Friday underscores that.

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 6>So Christina, you know, I'm just guessing thinking about an

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 6>environment where interest rates are coming down, what does that

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 6>mean for real estate?

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that takes some of the pressure off real estate,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're likely seeing a bottom for the real estate market,

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly for you know, for refinancings that are to come.

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>That will certainly certainly be a positive. And we also know,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of course that there is a pretty strong correlation between

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>real estate prices and interest rates. So I think this

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is this is a very positive development. The sooner the

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>better in terms of ray cuts starting for real estate.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 3>You sound like a very engaged goldilockser. I'm just going

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to coin that term goldilockser. What are you then most

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 3>worried about? Because if we go with the way you're

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about, this could be very good for many different assets,

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 8>What do you worry about?

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So I worry about the FED weighing too heavily the

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>ghost of Paul Voker. I work about the FED having

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>egg on its face from being late to react to

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation, and as a result of being more more

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hawkish in rate cuts this year, or deciding to forego them,

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or having a reduced number. I think that could be

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>really problematic, first of all, because markets are expecting some

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>level of rate cuts this year, but also because what

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we know is that there are long and variable legs

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>between when monetary policy is implemented and when it shows

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up in the economy. So we could still very well

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>see damage from what the Fed has done thus far.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So to compound that by keeping rates at high levels

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>for longer would be a mistake in my opinion.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 6>All right, Christina, thank you so much.

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 7>We appreciate it.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 6>Christina Hooper, Chief Global market Strategist for Investco.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on bloomberg dot com,

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal