WEBVTT - Oil and Troubled Water, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert.

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And after a little bit

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 3>of an interval, we are back with part two in

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 3>our series on pouring oil over troubled waters.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right to refresh. In the last episode, which I

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>guess was over a week ago, at this point, we

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>discussed several interesting mentions from ancient and medieval writings, in

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>particular about the interaction between oil and water. We went

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>over to some of the basics about this, and you

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>know the old idea that oil and water don't mix,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>and that oil in water or oil mixed around with

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>water can create kind of this novel appearance that captivates

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>our imagination. And we also discuss how it may have

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>been added to stormy seas to calm them down, and

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>it may have been used in some capacity by free

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>divers to somehow smooth or clear or illuminate the waters

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 2>they're diving in so as to better see what they're

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>looking for.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, that was an issue last time that I was

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 3>really confused by because it wasn't even clear to me

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>exactly what these ancient authors were claiming. They were saying

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that in some sense a diver might like swim underneath

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the water with some oil in their mouth, and then

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>when they needed to see better, they would like spit

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 3>the oil out into the water, or I think you said.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>In some other sources people just talked about like putting

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 3>oil over their eyes before they went diving, and I

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>couldn't understand from the original sources. We looked at, like,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>what even the alleged method of action was there? You

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>finally have some answers on this, right.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I don't know that i'd be able

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to bring one hundred percent clarity to the issue. I

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>think there's still gonna I think there may still be

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a certain amount of like historical telephone game going on

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>with some of these. But I did find a great

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>deal of clarity on this in a twenty two only

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>one book that I picked up titled Neither Letters nor

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Swimming The Rebirth of Swimming and Free Diving by John

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>m mcmanumon. So this is an interesting book where it's

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 2>a little harder to get your hands on this one,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's worth picking up if you're interested in the

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 2>history of diving and swimming in general. Oil comes up

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>multiple times in the book, sometimes just in general observances

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>of waters that were known to contain oil naturally in

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the ancient world. Ancient writers mentioned a spring at Carthage,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>There's the Laparous River in southern Turkey or what is

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>now southern Turkey, and there's also a lake in Ethiopia

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that were singled out, all noted for oil that could

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>either be extracted for use. In the case of Carthage,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I think they used it with livestock or just waters

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that had a quote unquote naturally lubricating effect on the swimmer. Mmm.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Sounds great now, this idea of lubricating yourself for a swim,

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>this was this. This was pretty interesting to me because

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I swim several days a week, but I never oil

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 2>myself up beforehand. And I don't see anybody else doing

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 2>it either.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I was gonna ask, is that even a

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 3>thing anybody does? I don't think so.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean you see cases, certainly, there are cases of

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>people lubricating their body with lotions and oils afterwards, or

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, something to that effect. But I mean it

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>may bee. I don't know if it's anything that has

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 2>ever explored, and say, competitive swimming. If it is, I'm

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>not aware of it off the top of my head.

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>But there are various mentions of oil lubricated swimmers in

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>ancient texts. The idea that before you entered the water

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>to swim, you'd want to rub your naked body down

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>with oil, okay, And the reasons for this is, you know,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to vary. So one account, during the Corinthian War

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in the three eighty nine BC, the Athenian forces use

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>swimming in against Spartan forces near this place in Egypt, Habatus.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Apparently the waters they were quite cold, so they rubbed

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>themselves down with olive oil beforehand, and they drink a

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 2>lot of alcohol before they got into the water. Now,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>McManamon points out that, okay, the oil might have provided

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>some insulation that actually helped protect them against the cold,

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>but the drinking would have been counterproductive.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Drinking doesn't actually make you warmer. It might make you

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>feel warmer temporarily, but right, yeah, it doesn't help.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>The general Hannibal is also said to have ordered his

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>soldiers to oil themselves down to protect against the cold.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 2>At the Battle of Trevia River, the first major battle

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>of the Second Punic War in two eighteen BCE. So

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in general, there seems to be this idea that like, okay,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>you could protect yourself against the cold by covering yourself

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 2>with oil, and then perhaps that would work in the

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 2>water as well.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, on the subject of ancient free diving divers, in

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>particular in the Persian Gulf and in the waters between

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>India and Sri Lanka, McManamon writes that there's a lot

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't know about their practices in the ancient world,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and then they were often working with kind of sketchy

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>ideas concerning the nature of oysters. So he mentioned this

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 2>idea that you see written in some of these old

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>texts about how oysters have leaders and you have to

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>take out the first oyster first. You have to find

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the leader, take it out first, and then the rest

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 2>will follow.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, decapitation strike against the oyster brigade.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's also talk about you need to watch your

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 2>fingers because the oysters may sever the fingers, and mcmamon

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>casts a lot of doubt on this. I mean, I

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>know that there are concerns with certain types of free diving,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, foraging for various shells and creatures. There

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>are particular creatures where you do have to potentially worry

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>about a you know, finger getting caught or snagged or whatever.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>But in this case McManamon seems to write that it

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>was not really But basically it all drives home just

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 2>how alien the environment was into which these people were venturing.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Just think about just how limited you were as you

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>gazed down into the water, as you dived into the

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>water and tried to find whatever you were looking for.

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So in this particular case they would have likely used grafts,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>which makes sense. And in the case of India and

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Sri Lanka in particular, there's apparently evidence that they made

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>condemned criminals do the work. And I think in general

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it was considered dangerous work and some writings reflect this.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Whatever the case, the clearer the diving conditions, the better

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>to see what you're doing as you go down there

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and to and try and venture into the oyster kingdom.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 2>So mcmamon writes, quote, if the sea was choppy, the

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 2>crew would spread oil on its surface to settle it down.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Modern fishermen use a similar method to improve surface visibility,

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 2>pouring shark oil at times mixed with sand to settle waters.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So this is the idea that we've discussed already. We're

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to discuss. The idea here, I believe

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>is that friction of the oil on the water surface

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>keeps the surface from ruffling or breaking, at least for

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a short period of time.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>The question of the mechanism of how oil colmbs the water,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>if it does, is something I'm going to get into

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in a paper that I'll discuss in a minute here.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but in general, it sounds like the idea that

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 2>is being expressed here is like if you can make

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the more you can make the surface of the water

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>like glass, supposedly through the application of some oil, the

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>better you can see down into where you're about to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>send your divers, who again are free diving without masks, etc.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So in this case it would be a question

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of being able to look down into the water from

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the surface and see through it better.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>That's my understanding, Yes, Okay. Now the author also discusses

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>a legendary free diver from Italian traditions by the name

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of Cola Pasha Cola the fish in Italian, a Mediterranean

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>hero whose exploits holding his breath were apparently comparable to Coculon,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to BeO Wolf, to King Oloffe and others. I often

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>don't think about this, but yeah, you have a lot

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>of heroes who can really hold their breath for a

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>long time, and you can take that into the modern area.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look at Indiana Jones right then he holds

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>his breath on that submarine or does he get in

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the submarine?

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, I know what you're talking about now. Yeah.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, in this particular case, this is an oral tradition

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that was written down by medieval chroniclers during the twelfth century.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>He said to have had various adventures and was said

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to spend so much time in the water that he

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>would die if he stayed on land for too long.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>So more fish than man in some ways. It's certainly

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a tall tale, to be sure, but writings about him

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 2>do contain some insight into the use of oil in

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>free diving. Quote. While diving, Cola followed the ancient and

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>releasing oil into the water column in order to see better.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Sicilian fishermen still use that technique, especially when they are

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>hunting octopi in the profound Abyss of the Straits of Messina.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Cola reported to the sovereign that he had seen mountains

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and valleys, woods and fields and trees with edible fruit.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 3>So like another kingdom, just like we have on land,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>but under the waves.

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, which is something we've discussed before in terms of

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 2>how previous generations thought about the world underwater. And I

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>like that there's also kind of a I mean, there's

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a hint of truth to this as well, like he's

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>reporting that, hey, underneath the water, there's actually a robust ecosystem. Now,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>whether it's actually woods and fields and trees with edible fruit,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>well obviously not, but there is in a sense this

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>rich other world down there that you can imagine a

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>free diver being able to attest to.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>So this passage is not just talking about putting oil

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>in the surface, but actually releasing oil down underneath the

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 3>water when you are down there, and again that helping

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>to see. But this passage doesn't say why that would

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 3>work if it did, right.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>And I wish again, I wish I could have one

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent clarity on this particular angle. I haven't found anything.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>It's worth noting that there are multiple factors that contribute

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to decreased visibility underwater and you have particles in the water,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>You have salinity gradients, temperature gradients, organic particles, just you

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 2>know issues of light and you know where the sun

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>is positioned in the sky and how much light you're

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>getting in a particular volume of water. Interestingly, I was

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 2>reading that you know sometimes there's a visible layer between

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>thermoclines that look like the smoothness of an oil schine.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>So I couldn't help but wonder if that might factor

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>into some of this, like things that may be encountered

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 2>underwater that have the feel or look of oil separation. Now,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 2>another interesting bit here on medieval pearl divers. Mcmanumon has

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>some interesting information on oil use from the Arabic world

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of the time, and I'm going to read a longer

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>quote here and warning that it is a little bit

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>graphic as it includes mention of alleged body modification for

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the purposes of free diving. Quote. Pearl divers attempted to

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>eliminate the pain in their ears and block their nostrils.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>They ruptured their own ear drum and knew they had

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>succeeded when blood flowed out. They soaked cotton in oil

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and inserted it into their ears. The technique had an

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>added benefit on the bottom. As the oil leaked out

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and floated up, it clarified the water column by allowing

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>greater light to penetrate. For the nostrils, pearl divers had

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 2>various options. They could plug the openings with small balls

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>carved from a tortoise shell and use a cloth soaked

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>in oil like the ones used in the ears. Alternatively,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 2>they could wear a clip over the outside of their nostrils,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 2>carved from ivory or horn or tortoise shell. The stated

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 2>purpose of blocking the nostrils was to keep water out,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>but it may also have aided in equalizing pressure in

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the sinuses. And years professional free divers still use a

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>nose clip, and he also mentions this at a later

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>point in the book as well, attributing the oil soaked

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>cotton swabs in one's ears as being protective but also

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of having this side effect of like, well, and

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 2>as the oil leaks out, you're only going to see

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>better down there.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>HM.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 2>So I think I think all of you, even though

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>again not one hundred percent clarity on all this, but

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I think some of these examples are telling. On one hand,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>they provide a little more insight into what some of

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>these accounts we're talking about concerning free divers bringing down

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 2>oil in their mouths or even in the around their eyes.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>We also see plenty of examples where humans would have

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>had a chance to witness oil interacting with water whilst swimming.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, this idea of Okay, if we had some

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of tradition of oiling your body up before you

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>go in, then perhaps you're bringing that information with you.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>If there is some practice about, you know, calming the

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>water at the surface of the water so as to

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>better seed down, then that can easily be translated into

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>this idea of like we'll bring oil down with you

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and make that clear as well. So, yeah, I think

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>there's still some mysteries remaining here, but I think I

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>can maybe sort of glimpse the shape of the thing

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a little better.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, even if the answer is still a bit elusive,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I think valued effort at digging there.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>We may have to come back to this particular book

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>in the future. He has a lot of great information

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 2>about like early ideas and developments in the creation of

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>like actual goggles and masks that would enable people to

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>eventually see under the water with the kind of clarity

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>they were clearly reaching for.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, we could do some invention coverage on old

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 3>school diving helmets, which are beautiful.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Now. I believe in the first episode we warned that

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 2>there would be been from that Ben Franklin would pop

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>up in this topic. So let's let's I see him.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>There is Okay, he's here. He does. He frequently pops

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>up on the show, especially in our invention episodes. Occasionally

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you didn't know that you were going to have Ben

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Franklin content, but then he appears.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So Benjamin Franklin often known as one of

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the so called founding fathers of the United States. Uh,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>he was an early American I don't even know what

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>what what are? What's the order that you put the

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>things he did when you say what he was, he

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 3>was an early American uh statesman, author, businessman, uh, scientist, inventor,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>he kind of did everything.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just kind of a general American polymath and weird guy,

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, an Enlightenment thinker that had a great deal

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of curiosity about the world and and entertained those curiosities.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Now specifically in the domain of science. Benjamin Franklin, I

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>think is best known for his experiments with electricity, and

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>this would include experiments with the storage and discharge of

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>electrical potential in what we now call a battery after

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Franklin's terminology, like the Franklin battery was made by putting

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>together a series of a pre existing invention called a

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Leiden jar, and he could He's like, oh wow, you

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>can really like stack these things up and really pack

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>a punch with the energy you're storing. One of these

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>battery experiments I know we've talked about on the show

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>before because of its weirdness, was the electrocution of a

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>turkey for a holiday dinner, which he then said was

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to be roasted upon an electric jack after it was electrocuted.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 3>But for some reason, Franklin believed that this would make

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the meat especially tender and succulent if he used electricity

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 3>from one of his batteries to kill the thing, but

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>he ended up badly shocking himself while attempting this. But

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>on the broader subject of electricity, Franklin's electrical research also

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>entailed work in support of the hypothesis that lightning was

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>in fact a form of electricity, was a type of

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>electrical discharge and Franklin was not the first person to

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>make this connection, but did important work investigating it. The

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>most famous anecdote here, of course, is the one the

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 3>kite and key experiment, which is in a way of

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 3>disputed historical status. Franklin apparently never described himself doing this

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>experiment in any of his letters, though I think he

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of described the experiment in some writing as a

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of hypothetical, like this is an experiment one could do,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>though after his death people did say that he himself

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>had carried it out. If he did do it, it

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>would have been probably in June of seventeen fifty two. However,

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Franklin was correct about lightning being a form of electrical discharge,

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 3>and this led to his advocacy of the use of

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 3>sharpened iron lightning rods to protect buildings during storms. And

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of a tangent, but one I got

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 3>interested in while reading about Franklin's lightning rod research for

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>this episode, I wanted to share a paragraph I came

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>across from an article from the Franklin Institute, which is

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 3>a museum of Benjamin Franklin's life and work in Philadelphia,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 3>where they write quote Franklin began to advocate lightning rods

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 3>that had sharp points. His English colleagues favored blunt tipped

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>lightning rods, reasoning that sharp ones attracted lightning and increased

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the risk of strikes. They thought blunt rods were less

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 3>likely to be struck. King George the Third had his

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 3>palace equipped with a blunt lightning rod. When it came

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 3>time to equip the colony's buildings with lightning rods, the

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 3>decision became a political statement. The favored pointed lightning rod

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 3>expressed support for Franklin's theories of protecting public buildings and

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the rejection of theories supported by the king. The English

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 3>thought this was just another way for the flourishing colonies

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to be disobedient to them. And I thought this was

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 3>funny because it's an eighteenth century example of a pure

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 3>scientific question, just like what's the ideal shape of a

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>lightning rod? Where really all we should care about is

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 3>what is the correct answer of this question? Being politicized? Now,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>which answer you favor has political connotations, and there is

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 3>political pressure to think a certain way about it.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, who is right? Is it the American way or

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the British way?

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 3>It seems in a way they were both wrong, but

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 3>it seems like the English had the better. The blunt

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 3>lightning rods were better overall, according to modern research. I

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 3>looked up there has been modern research on this, so

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I found a paper by Moore, Awlick and Risin in

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology in the year

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three, where they say, quote, an examination

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>of the relevant physics shows that very strong electric fields

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>are required above the tips of rods in order that

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 3>they function as strike but that the gradients of the

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 3>field strength over sharp tipped rods are so great that

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 3>at distances of a few millimeters, the local fields are

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 3>often too weak for the development of upward going streamers.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 3>In field tests, rods with rounded tips have been found

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>to be better strike receptors than were nearby sharp tipped rods.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Though it gets kind of complicated, so they say overall,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're trying to attract your lightning strikes to these rods,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the blunt ones are better. But as they explained in

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the paper, Franklin's idea was that the purpose of a

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>sharp tipped lightning rod was not to attract lightning, but

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 3>to prevent lightning by allowing thunderclouds to sort of silently

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and gently discharge electricity down to the rod without actually

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 3>allowing a violent lightning strike to occur at all. Of course,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>it was later recognized that a lightning rod could be

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 3>useful by providing just a conductive pathway to the ground,

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>rather than simply letting the lightning find its own way

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to the ground through the structure of the building, which

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 3>would be a lot more destructive. So the authors of

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>this paper say that lightning rods don't actually discharge thunderclouds gently.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Franklin was wrong in thinking that would happen, they say,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>quote it is now recognized that the sole function of

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 3>a lightning rod is to be the receptor or interceptor

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 3>of strikes for a lightning protection system that conducts lightning

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 3>discharges to the earth without damage to the structure on

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 3>which the system is mounted. So I would say Franklin

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>was correct about the nature of lightning being electrical. He

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>was correct that lightning rods were a good idea. He

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 3>was incorrect in part about how they worked. They don't

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>actually gently discharge lightning without a strike occurring, And he

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 3>was probably incorrect about the ideal design parameters because the

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 3>blunt rods, it seems are better. But also, if you'll remember,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 3>it seems like the English were also wrong because it

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 3>said that they thought the blunt rods were less likely

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 3>to be struck, and they're actually better because they're more

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 3>likely to be struck. So I thought that was interesting.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, we should come back to a different scientific question,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the one of today's episode. This was a different question

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 3>that captured Franklin's attention, and so I want to cite

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 3>a twenty thirteen historical science paper by Wang Stieglitz, Mardin,

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and tam in the Biophysical Journal, published in the year

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirteen called Benjamin Franklin, Philadelphia's favorite Son was a

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 3>membrane biophysicist. So here's the biographical context. In the year

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>seventeen fifty seven, the American House of Assembly in Philadelphia

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 3>sent Benjamin Franklin as an envoy to King George the

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Second of Great Britain, and Franklin was traveling on one

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of a fleet of ninety six ships that set out

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>to cross the Atlantic, departing from New York Harbor. Early

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 3>in their journey, the fleet hit some bad ways. There

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 3>were high winds and heavy waves, and the paper doesn't

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>mention this, but I will say I've read in other

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>sources that Franklin was very interested in storms and would

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 3>sometimes chase storms on horseback. So I kind of wonder

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 3>if he was out on deck observing the bad weather

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 3>with joyful curiosity while everybody else is vomiting. I don't know,

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 3>but whatever he was doing, he at some point made

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 3>an observation. He looked out at the rest of the fleet,

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 3>and he observed that a couple of the ships in

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 3>the fleet appeared to be sailing much more smoothly than

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the rest. Everybody else is pitching back and forth violently

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in the waves, and a couple looked like, for some

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>reason they weren't. They were just kind of cruising along smoothly.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 3>And Franklin mentioned this to the captain of his ship,

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 3>and the captain said to him, apparently thinking that he

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>was stupid for even asking this question, the captain said,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the cooks have, I suppose, been just emptying their greasy

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 3>water through the scuppers, which has greased the sides of

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>those ships a little, as if this was obvious, and

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>explained it totally, because, as we talked about in the

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 3>last episode, it had long been common knowledge among sailors

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that oil or grease would calm the waves.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, now Ben Franklin has been tipped off

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>and is on the case right.

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 3>Right, He's like, Oh, I need to get me some

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 3>of that rancid cooking grease. Figure out what's so special

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>about it. So the authors of the paper here they

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 3>go over some of the things we talked about in

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the previous episode that since ancient times, authors have mentioned

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>this here and there, this practice of pouring oil, sometimes

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 3>olive oil, on top of the sea to calm the

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>waters during storms. Remember that. Though we don't have Aristotle's

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>original writing on this subject, the Roman historian Plutarch attributed

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>a view to Aristotle that quote, the oil produces calm

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>by smoothing the water's surface so that wind can slip

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>over it without making an impression. So when the captain

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 3>told Franklin this, he's like, oh, yeah, they emptied. They're

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 3>nasty grease into the water after they're done cooking, and

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 3>then and it's greasing the side of the ship and

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the water around it, So that's making the waves calm.

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Franklin suspected that this explanation was wrong. He doubted that

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 3>greasing the outside of the ship would actually calm the

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>water around it. But the observation captured his curiosity, especially

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 3>since it reminded him of experiences playing with wax in

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 3>his father's soap factory when he was ten years old.

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>And he observed the same phenomenon several more times during

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 3>voyages across the ocean, so he decided at some point

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 3>that he should make experiments to better understand this. He

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>finally got around to it twelve years later in seventeen

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>sixty nine, during another visit to Great Britain. So Franklin

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 3>was staying in an area called Clapham Common in South London,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and together with a friend of his name, Christopher Baldwin,

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Franklin made his way to a local pond and started

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 3>just dumping oil in it. To quote from Franklin's own

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 3>description of his experiments at the lanth Being at Clapham

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 3>where there is on the common a large pond, which

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 3>I observe to be one day very rough with the wind,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I fetched out a cruet of oil, and just a note.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 3>A crue it is like a small flask or carafe

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 3>with a stopper on top, which you might use to

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>store olive oil or vinegar or lemon juice at a

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 3>dining table, a sort of you can think of it

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 3>as like, you know, you taco bell sauce packet, but

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>a rigid caraf.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's good that we know how much oil, because

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I think, as we discussed in the first episode, like

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>there's this one tail where it sounds like it's a

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 2>magic potion's worth of oil. Other cases it sounds like

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about, like, yeah, dumping out all the kitchens

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>excess oil. So there's always this question of like, how

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 2>much oil are we talking about here?

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 3>This is going to be a fairly small amount of oil.

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I've seen it described in the tablespoon range. Okay,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 3>but so Franklin says, I fetched out a cruet of

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>oil and dropped a little of it on the water.

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I saw it spread itself with surprising swiftness upon the surface,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 3>and there the oil, though not more than a teaspoonful.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh Okay, so he says, a teaspoonful here produced an

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 3>instant calm over a space several yards square, which spread

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 3>amazingly and extended itself gradually till it reached the lee side,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 3>making all that quarter of the pond, perhaps half an acre,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>as smooth as a looking glass. The oil layer was

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>so thin as to produce the prismatic colors for a

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>considerable space, and beyond them so much thinner as to

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 3>be invisible except in its effect of smoothing the waves

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>at a much greater distance. So this is a very

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>simple experiment, simply pouring oil out over the surface of

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>a pond in windy weather. But out of this very

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 3>simple experiment Franklin got several interesting observations. So one is

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 3>that a tiny container of oil spreads out over a

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>shockingly vast area on the surface of the water. And

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the second thing was it seemed true in the park

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>where the oil spread, the water no longer rippled in

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the wind, but became, in his words, as smooth as

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a looking glass, smooth as a mirror. But what if

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the effect was just something about this pond in particular?

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Franklin knew that you should repeat an experiment under different

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 3>circumstances to see if you get the same result or

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>a different one, So he wrote quote after this, I

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>contrived to take with me whenever I went into the

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 3>country a little oil in the upper hollow of my

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>bamboo cane with which I might repeat the experiment as

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 3>opportunities should offer, and I found it constantly to succeed.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm thinking of him a little bit like Gandalf,

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of wandering through the shires, stupefying the Hobbits by

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 3>pouring oil on water out of his staff.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 2>I guess so. But this makes me I ask all

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 2>sorts of questions about his cane. Did he always have

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a secret compartment in his cane for some sort of

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a flask or vial of some substance? And if so,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>what usually goes in there? Is this like you have

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of alcohol? Or is there is this

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 2>you put some poison in there? I mean, there's so

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 2>many questions about this bamboo cane.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what did he have in there when he was

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 3>not wandering the shire? Yeah?

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe he had it specially. I mean, it's like

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>all these options around the table with Benjamin Franklin. I

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 2>can also easily imagine, from what we've read of the man,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>him going into the cane shop and say, look, I

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 2>need to oil down some ponds in the as I

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 2>travel around, and I don't want to just carry it

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 2>on my person. I want to have it secreted away

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 2>within my bamboo cane. I would like to commission such

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a bamboo cane. And they're like, all right, yeah, we

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 2>can do that for you.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, So then he crosses commissioned secret grease cane off

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of his daily to do list. Well, anyway, so after

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 3>a while he'd observed this effect a lot of times,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and in trying to interpret the results, Franklin observed a

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 3>distinction between how oil behaves when you drop it onto

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>a solid surface versus onto the surface of water. He says,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 3>if you put a drop of oil on a table

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 3>made of marble, or a table made of wood, or

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>on a mirror glass that's lying horizontal, the drop just

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>remains in place as a drop. It pretty much keeps

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the same shape. It doesn't spread out. But on the

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 3>surface of water it spreads. There is a dramatically different behavior.

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not just a little different, like a single drop

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 3>of oil will spread over a vast area. I remember,

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 3>he said, the pond in England. It was about a

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 3>tea spoonful and that went to like a half acre.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So Franklin wrote, quote, if there be a mutual repulsion

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 3>between the particles of oil and no attraction between oil

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and water. Oil dropped on water will not be held

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 3>together by adhesion to the spot whereon it falls. It

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 3>will be at liberty to expand itself, and it will

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>spread on a surface that, besides being smooth to the

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 3>most perfect degree of polish, prevents, perhaps by repelling the oil,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 3>all immediate contact, keeping it at a minute distance from itself,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and the expansion will continue till the mutual repulsion between

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the particles of the oil is weakened and reduced to

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>nothing by their distance. And while, of course Franklin believed

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 3>there to be a natural repulsion between oil and water,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>he thought that there was no natural repulsion between water

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 3>and air, so the water and air could freely contact

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>one another, and that was why he thought it may

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>be stilled the waves. So we'll come back to a

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 3>slightly different explanation of how it stills the waves in

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>a minute. But first there's another interesting consequence of this experiment.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 3>The concept of a molecule had not yet taken root

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 3>during Franklin's life. Franklin wouldn't have known what a molecule was,

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 3>but the author's right that what Franklin had actually created

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 3>here on the surface of the water was a monomolecular

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>layer of oil quote, which eventually expanded into a two

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 3>dimensional gas of oil molecules at the air water interface.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>But what he had done is create a layer of

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 3>oil one molecule thick. That's what happens when you allow

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 3>oil to spread out without boundary on the surface of water.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 3>And so Franklin never made this next step, but later

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>scientists observed that you could use exactly this experiment to

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 3>calculate the height of a single molecule of oil because

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>you already know two things. You know the starting volume

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>of oil, and then when you drop it on water,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>you can wait for it to spread out completely into

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a monolayer and then measure the area of the oil.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 3>So if you know this starting volume and then the

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 3>area that it spreads out to, you can calculate the

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 3>thickness of the single molecule layer.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 3>If Franklin had thought to do this, and they say

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that he would have been able to mathematically, he apparently

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 3>just didn't. It didn't occur to him to do this.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 3>He could have come up with the first roughly accurate

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 3>estimate of the size of a molecule in history, and

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 3>he would have been one hundred years ahead of the

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>actual first people to do this. So one of the

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 3>later scientists who did make this kind of calculation was

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the British mathematician and physicist Lord Rayleigh, who lived eighteen

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 3>forty two to nineteen nineteen, and he realized that the

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 3>spreading of the molecules of oil across the surface of

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 3>water would illuminate the question of what he called molecular

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>magnitudes the size of an oil molecule. So he did

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>experiments of putting olive oil in a sponge bath to

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>calculate the size of a molecule of triolene, which is

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 3>a main component of olive oil, and he put it

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 3>after his measurements at sixteen point three angstroms and angstrm

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>is one ten billionth of a meter. And this calculation

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>was close, but was still a little bit off, and

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>it was improved by the contributions of a German self

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 3>taught chemist named Agnes Pockels who lived eighteen sixty two

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to nineteen thirty five. She had performed similar experiments on

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 3>her own before Lord Rayleigh, and she had done them

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>in her own kitchen at the counter. She was not

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>formally trained in science. She was an autodidact, and when

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 3>she saw his paper in eighteen ninety, she contacted him

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>with her own results, which had been hers had been

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 3>accomplished with the help of an instrument that she had

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 3>invented for measuring surface tension, which helped get a better

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 3>calculation of the thickness of the oil. And with her

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 3>method she measured the thickness of a single oil molecule,

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 3>or the sorry not just the oil, the triolene molecule,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the main component of the olive oil. She measured that

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to thirteen angstroms, and this in turn led Raley to

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>improve his own measurements. And then later the American physicist

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Irving Langmuir came along to do definitive work on oil

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 3>film chemistry, and when he did that, he did so

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 3>with the help of a surface tension measuring device which

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 3>was similar to the instrument that Agnes Pockles had already

0:33:54.520 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 3>invented in the nineteenth century. But anyway, why did the

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 3>oil actually calm the waves? What is going on when

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the waves stop rippling in water where there's an oil

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 3>monolayer on top. The authors of this paper suggest that

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 3>the best explanation is the one offered by Lord Rayleigh,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to read from Lord Raleigh. Here. He wrote,

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 3>let us consider small waves as propagated over the surface

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 3>of clean water. As the waves advance, the surface of

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the water has to submit to periodic extensions and contractions.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 3>At the crest of the wave, the surface is compressed,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 3>while the trough it is extended. As long as the

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>water is pure, there is no force to oppose that,

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 3>and the wave can be propagated without difficulty. But if

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 3>the surface be contaminated, the contamination strongly resists the alternating

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 3>stretching and contraction. It tends always on the contrary, to

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 3>spread itself uniformly, and the result is that the water

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 3>refuses to lend itself to the motion which is required

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 3>of it. The film of oil may be compared to

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 3>an inextensible membrane, membrane that can't stretch, floating on the

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 3>surface of the water and hampering its motion. And under

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 3>these conditions it is not possible for the waves to

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 3>be generated unless the forces are very much greater than usual. So,

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 3>if I'm understanding this correctly, it seems to me what

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 3>he's saying is that the oil, because of its hydrophobic

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 3>chemical reaction with the water, with its and with itself.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 3>It strongly prefers to stretch out into this single molecule

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 3>thick layer. And if this oil really wants to become

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and then stay a layer that's a single molecule thick,

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 3>that means it can't really stretch any thinner unless the

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 3>force of the waves is so strong that the oil

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 3>slick is actually ripped apart, and it repels being contracted

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to become any thicker. Since it resists becoming more than

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 3>a molecule thick, so it resists any wave motion at

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the surface. Though of course, at some point waves could

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 3>become so powerful that they would override the hydrophobic chemical

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 3>forces that caused this phenomenon. So it only works up

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 3>to a certain point.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 2>And yet you might ask, well, could we stop a

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 2>hurricane with it? This actually is something that I found

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 2>discussed in a paper from two thousand and five. This

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>is it's titled a Note concerning the light Hill Sandwich

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Model of Tropical Cyclones. The authors here are Baron Blatt, Chorin,

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 2>and Pros Taukashan. These three individuals would be Alexander Chorin,

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a Berkeley computational fluid mechanics expert Russian mathematician Grigory Baron

0:36:53.920 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Blatt and VM Takashin. So they seem to be individuals

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>who are very well established in their field here and

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 2>I looked at this paper and I tried to look

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 2>at the paper that it came before it, that they're

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of this is kind of an addendum too. It's

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 2>very technical paper, full of equations and whatnot. But in

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 2>this a note concerning the light Hill Sandwich model of

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 2>tropical cyclones, they suggest that that oil spread on the

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 2>surface of water could potentially prevent the formation of quote

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 2>turbulence dampening ocean spray droplets. The idea here being that

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 2>while there's a lot going on in a hurricane, quote,

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 2>flow acceleration in an ocean spray that carries large water

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>droplets unquote is part of the whole scenario, and if

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 2>one could, you know, theoretically curtail flow acceleration by droplets,

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 2>it might have an impact on the storm's overall strength.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read what the authors wrote here on

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the matter. Quote. In the present work, we demonstrated that

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the mechanism of turbulent suppression by water droplets in the

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 2>ocean spray can substantially accelerate the flow, so that the

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 2>speeds of wind characteristic of the strongest hurricanes can be reached.

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The complete mathematical model, taking into account both thermal effects

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and Coriola's force can now be constructed in the form

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that allows effective numerical calculations. Note that a model of

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 2>dust storms taking into account the thermal effects was proposed

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in reference seven. Furthermore, the effects of particles on the

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 2>dynamics of tornadoes can be studied by similar meats. Anyway,

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 2>they get to the conclusion here, they say, in conclusion,

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 2>we want to make a comment. Since antiquity seamen have

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>had barrels of oil on the decks of their vessels

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and thrown the oil on the sea surface in critical

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 2>moments of stormy weather, we think that the action of

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 2>oil was exactly the prevention of the formation of droplets.

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 2>The turbulence was restored after the oil was dropped, the

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 2>turbulent drag was increased, and the intensity of the squall

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>was reduced. Possibly, hurricanes can be similarly prevented or dampened

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>by having airplanes deliver fast, decaying harmless surfactants to the

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 2>right places on the sea surface.

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, a surfactant is a substance that reduces the

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 3>surface tension of water when you when you or of

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>any liquid, I guess when you add it to the water.

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>So soap is a surfactant, and it increases the wetting

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 3>properties of water. It causes water to less want to

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 3>cling to itself and more to spread out over whatever.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, I do want to stress that this proposal here

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 2>is very much based in mathematical modeling, and you have

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to sort of you have to take it with that

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 2>in consideration. On top of that, we have to to

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>mention that, Yeah, there have been various methods that have

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>been brought up over the years as possible means of

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 2>dampening hurricanes or preventing hurricanes, or stopping a hurricane and

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.720
<v Speaker 2>its growth. None of these I think has really proven

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 2>to be effective. We're not actually doing any of those

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>those things. I mean, we're there are things we know

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>that we could do in the world a large scale

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to prevent hurricanes from becoming worse in the years ahead,

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 2>and we're not necessarily doing all of those either. So,

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 2>but you know, nobody wants to to change their lives.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>They want they want the really quick means of stopping

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the hurricane some dynamic idea, something you can drop out

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of an airplane or so forth. But still I don't know.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 2>The modeling here is is is interesting and it's it's

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 2>neat to see this more modern, like very technical approach

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to trying to figure out the same thing that Benjamin

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Franklin was pondering over, and that the the the ancients, uh,

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 2>in many cases just took as fact you have you

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.439
<v Speaker 2>have turbulent seas well, throw a little oil in there

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 2>and that's going to calm things down.

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 3>It would be very very interesting if this worked, though, though.

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I just pulled up a New Scientist article that was

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 3>covering this paper that consulted somebody else in the field.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 3>They consulted Julian Hunt at the University College London, who

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 3>just said, quote, I am very doubtful about this approach.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And again even the authors themselves are pointing out

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that they're taking the various factors involved in the growth

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of a hurricane and reducing it to this one area.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 2>So this is not a solution that would seem to

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>take everything into account. But just concerning this one aspect

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 2>of storm strength building up.

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess this does raise different questions because if you

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>go back to in part one we talked about that

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 3>story from the Venerable Bead about I think the deal

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 3>was a bishop gave a priest, so like King Oswy

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 3>sent out a priest to bring his bride home from Kent,

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and then there was a bishop who gave a bottle

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of oil, almost as if it was a magical potion,

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to the priest and said, hey, you know, when you

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 3>get out on the sea, if there if there's a storm,

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 3>you pour this oil on the water and it'll calm

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 3>the storm. And so that raises two different interpretations. One

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 3>could be like, oh, is he just talking about the

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 3>thing that is in a way. I mean, I don't

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 3>know how well it would really work on a large

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 3>scale around a boat, but there is at least experimental

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.720
<v Speaker 3>evidence that you pour oil on waters and somewhat will

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 3>calm waves. Is that all that this story is talking about?

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Or should we take it in the broader sense of

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 3>it will actually stop the storm, like it will affect

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the weather coming from above and the winds.

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean in so many of these accounts, you're

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.919
<v Speaker 2>dealing with retellings of the thing. And even though even

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 2>though bed was was maybe not too many degrees away

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 2>from the actual account. Yeah, it's easy to imagine how

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the story could could be exaggerated, you know, the calming

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 2>of the waters to the overall you know, calming of

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the storm in the same way that perhaps an effect

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>that makes the surface of the water more like glass

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 2>so that you can see down into it. Could I'm

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and I'm guessing here potentially be you know, further exaggerated

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 2>into making the entire water column illuminated and diveable in

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 2>a way that you can easily find what you're looking

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>for in the depths. But this is all what I

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 2>think makes the topic so fascinating because it, you know,

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be this realm where this some it

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>seems on one hand that this could not be. This

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>seems like, surely this is just fable. But on the

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 2>other hand, we do see, you know, some of the

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>science at play here. We can see like why it

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 2>works at least to some degree. So it's it's it

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of has a has a foot in both worlds.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yes, I think this has been a delightful ramble

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 3>around the countryside with a bit of oil in our

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>bamboo cane.

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, all right, Well, We're gonna go ahead and close

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 2>out this episode and this exploration, but we'll be back

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 2>with more episodes in the future. Here core episodes of

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind come out on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 2>We have our listener mail episodes on Mondays, short form

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Monster Factor Artifact episode on Wednesdays, and on Fridays. We

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 2>set aside most serious concerns to just talk about a

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>weird film on Weird House Cinema. Let's see what else

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 2>do we need to mention. If you are a listener

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 2>in the UK and you're still getting these episodes, I

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much longer that's gonna be the case.

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 2>So as we've been trying to stress, go out there

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and find the Stuff to Blow your Mind UK feed

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 2>on Apple Podcasts or on Spotify and subscribe there. That

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 2>way you can make sure that you're going to keep

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 2>getting these episodes.

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 3>It's the same thing. You get the same episodes as

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 3>published in the other feed. It's just called Stuff to

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Blow your Mind UK. But that's all you gotta do.

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Just go sign up for that one. Much thanks to

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 3>our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If you would like

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 3>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 3>episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 3>or just to say hello. You can email us at

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 3>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.