Speaker 1: You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shield Time.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Hey team, Welcome to
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hot Tuesday, December thirteenth edition. We are going
Speaker 1: to talk about ftx's collapse and SBF's arrest. Sam Bankman freed,
Speaker 1: it has been taken into custody, and the billionaire Frodo
Speaker 1: Baggins is now facing perhaps decades in prison. Going to
Speaker 1: be quite a situation as this trial plays out, so
Speaker 1: we will certainly be discussing that. We'll also talk about
Speaker 1: the latest goings on with the Biden administration firing official
Speaker 1: Sam Brenton for stealing not once but twice from people
Speaker 1: from ladies who had luggage at airports. And we also
Speaker 1: have a pole out that shows De Santists versus Trump,
Speaker 1: and we'll talk about what those results look like. That's
Speaker 1: all coming up here in just a second. On the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show, let's talk about the Tunalata Towers Foundation
Speaker 1: for a moment. Tunalta Towers is doing good with its
Speaker 1: due good village in Lando Lakes Florida. Tunalta Towers is
Speaker 1: doing even more for their program recipients, and it's all
Speaker 1: thanks to extraordinary donations of many acres of land and
Speaker 1: your kindness and generosity. This is the first community of
Speaker 1: its kind, one hundred and ten homes for the Foundations
Speaker 1: program recipients. Families have fallen first responders, GoldStar families, families
Speaker 1: of catastrophically injured first responders, and service members, all in
Speaker 1: one community as neighbors, their children playing together and growing
Speaker 1: up together. Loving families being there for one another through
Speaker 1: good times and bad help. America's greatest heroes and their
Speaker 1: families heal to other, make to do good Village, the
Speaker 1: first of many communities like it. With every mortgage free home,
Speaker 1: the Foundation makes good on its promise to do good
Speaker 1: and never forget the sacrifices our nation's greatest heroes have
Speaker 1: made for our country and our communities. Donate eleven dollars
Speaker 1: a month the Tunnel of the Towers at T twot
Speaker 1: dot org. That's t the number two t dot org.
Speaker 1: Sam Bankman freed my friends has been arrested. You know,
Speaker 1: yesterday I tweeted out in jest that mister Bankman freed
Speaker 1: wasn't able to attend the hearings today in DC because
Speaker 1: he was googling non extradition countries, apparently not googling them
Speaker 1: fast enough. He got arrested in the Bahamas, and now
Speaker 1: he is facing the music, so to speak, for a
Speaker 1: multi billion dollar fraud. This is a big deal, obviously,
Speaker 1: and there's a lot of out this that the Democrat
Speaker 1: machine I think doesn't want to talk about, doesn't want
Speaker 1: to be coming out here on any of this. And
Speaker 1: first of all, you have to understand that he was
Speaker 1: somebody who bought off the elite establishment. He didn't think
Speaker 1: he was even going to get arrested. Here he is
Speaker 1: on a podcast, This is a cut twenty nine, a
Speaker 1: podcast just yesterday. This guy is part of a huge
Speaker 1: financial meltdown, and here he is saying, well, I don't
Speaker 1: think I'm actually gonna get like arrested. Listen, are you
Speaker 1: worried you might be detained if you stepped foot into
Speaker 1: the US. I don't believe I would be, but I
Speaker 1: haven't done a deep dive into that. At some point,
Speaker 1: something I have to think harder about. I don't believe
Speaker 1: I would be, but I think it's distinctly possible that
Speaker 1: there is some people who maybe are upset about losing
Speaker 1: billions of dollars. Yeah, yep, he's looking at a whole
Speaker 1: lot of colonies, including charges of money laundering. The amount
Speaker 1: of damages here is massive, which could also just create
Speaker 1: a This guy could go to prison for the rest
Speaker 1: of his life. I mean, you look at what they
Speaker 1: did with Bernie Madoff, and this seems to be a
Speaker 1: pretty straightforward fraud case. Talk to Andie McCarthy about this
Speaker 1: earlier today. He said he was gonna do one thing,
Speaker 1: and he did another and people lost a lot of
Speaker 1: money because of it. If you say that you're going
Speaker 1: to take in money to buy a crypto and you're
Speaker 1: gonna hold that crypto on your exchange for people, You're
Speaker 1: going to hold that asset for them. But then you
Speaker 1: actually take the money they give you and you invest
Speaker 1: in other things, including real estate for yourself, your family,
Speaker 1: your friends, and you lose all that money. Yeah, they're
Speaker 1: gonna come after you. How did it get so bad?
Speaker 1: How did this get so out of control to the
Speaker 1: tune of billions, perhaps even tens of billions of losses
Speaker 1: in in total when this is all calculated. Well, because
Speaker 1: he understood something very important along here that the apparatus,
Speaker 1: the apparatus of the Democrat Party and the elites in
Speaker 1: this country can be bought off with money, which he
Speaker 1: certainly did forty million dollars that we know about to
Speaker 1: Democrat candidates, and sure he gave money to Republican candidates too,
Speaker 1: not as much money, but he was trying to buy
Speaker 1: off everybody. But even more importantly, I think than the
Speaker 1: political donations at some level, the money that he gave
Speaker 1: and we don't even know the full extent of it
Speaker 1: yet Elon Muskatt he believed it could be a billion dollars,
Speaker 1: but the money that he gave out to different interests
Speaker 1: in order to create a bank of goodwill, if you will,
Speaker 1: to essentially create a situation where Sam Bankman Freed knew
Speaker 1: that the media wouldn't come after him because he was
Speaker 1: trying to solve climate change, and he gave money to
Speaker 1: media entities that are supposedly engaged in journalism. This is
Speaker 1: also important because these people are frauds. They are frauds.
Speaker 1: They have no interest in actually protecting the everyday investors.
Speaker 1: They don't want to speak truth to power. They want
Speaker 1: to get invited the libs of the journal world. They
Speaker 1: want to get invited to the conferences where the fancy
Speaker 1: people show up in private jets. They want to be
Speaker 1: featured speakers at you know, the New York Times Ideas
Speaker 1: Summit or whatever, the big Deal deal Book Summit, the
Speaker 1: stuff that Bankman Free did recently. They want to be
Speaker 1: at the if not the cool kids table, is certainly
Speaker 1: the rich and famous kids table, which is usually the
Speaker 1: cool kids table. I guess as an adult, they're not
Speaker 1: looking to protect you. They don't care about you. Makes
Speaker 1: no difference to them. It's all about these people in
Speaker 1: their positions maintaining those positions. And Sam Bankman Freed they
Speaker 1: thought of as one of them, a guy who cared
Speaker 1: a lot about climate change, a guy who was doing
Speaker 1: everything in his power to save the world from the
Speaker 1: boogeymen created by the left to control people and to
Speaker 1: allow them to engage in tremendous hypocrisy. And climate change
Speaker 1: the best example. But there are so many things, and
Speaker 1: there was even some effective altruism is what they called it,
Speaker 1: as opposed to ineffective altruism. But you know, just writing
Speaker 1: checks to the right interests to change things and to
Speaker 1: fix society. It was really crazy when you think about it,
Speaker 1: the whole situation. But this is this is going to
Speaker 1: be one that as we find out more, you'll see
Speaker 1: there was a recklessness, the regulators, all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: This guy was connected with the Democrat elite and celebrity
Speaker 1: elite as well, Tom Brady, a whole bunch of other
Speaker 1: big celebrities out there. But more importantly, he had the
Speaker 1: apparatus of propaganda in his pocket because he was writing
Speaker 1: the checks so they could do good journalism. Sure, that's
Speaker 1: what it was. Just bribing them, just bribing them. It's
Speaker 1: really what it was. And now he faces decades in prison,
Speaker 1: and he deserves it. By the way, there are people
Speaker 1: who will have lost a lot of money because of
Speaker 1: the fraud that was perpetrated here, and there must be
Speaker 1: consequences for this. There must be. I want to talk
Speaker 1: to you about the preborn Pregnancy Clinics. They began their
Speaker 1: mission over sixteen years ago to love and help women
Speaker 1: with unplanned pregnancies by offering free ultrasounds. You see what
Speaker 1: an expectant mother here's her baby's heartbeat and sees the
Speaker 1: image of her baby on ultrasound. It's so often an
Speaker 1: immediate connection. The majority of the time she will choose life.
Speaker 1: By positioning their clinics in states where over fifty percent
Speaker 1: of abortions occur. Preborn has rescued hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: babies lives out of the country's largest provider of free ultrasounds.
Speaker 1: Their response is entirely dependent on you, the pro life community.
Speaker 1: Your help is needed now more than ever. One ultrasound
Speaker 1: is just twenty eight dollars, and one hundred and forty
Speaker 1: dollars can help rescue five babies lives. To donate, dial
Speaker 1: pound two fifty and say the key word baby. That's
Speaker 1: pound two five zero and say the word baby. That
Speaker 1: will connect you with someone at Preborn who can tell
Speaker 1: you more and can receive your donation. This is our website,
Speaker 1: preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn dot com slash
Speaker 1: buc k. Let's help us organization save as many as
Speaker 1: forty thousand lives. Preborn dot com slash b u c K. Now,
Speaker 1: the Biden administration, as you know, has been a an
Speaker 1: administration of first's. They had the first non binary deputy
Speaker 1: assistant secretary in Sam Brinton, and now they have the
Speaker 1: first fired non binary deputy Assistant secretary for nuclear waste
Speaker 1: disposal with Sam Brinton. This individual was for a second
Speaker 1: time accused of felony theft stealing women's luggage from an
Speaker 1: airport going up with the carousel. And this is a
Speaker 1: person with a top secret security clearance, a person who
Speaker 1: is supposed to be involved in important discussions about nuclear
Speaker 1: nuclear energy, probably has access to highly sensitive information about
Speaker 1: our nuclear programs and protocols. And he stole. He's stealing,
Speaker 1: stealing ladies clothing basically from these from these luggage carousels.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I haven't seen the footage. Did
Speaker 1: he look in them first? Oh? Can we not say he?
Speaker 1: We're supposed to say they. No, I won't say they
Speaker 1: because it's an individual, it's one person. They is plural.
Speaker 1: Don't don't get me started on the fact that the
Speaker 1: gender binary is real. They singularity versus plurality or singular
Speaker 1: versus plural. There we go. That's not something that can
Speaker 1: change just based upon someone's whim. It's not something that's
Speaker 1: supposed to shift. And you see that there's now I
Speaker 1: think it was the came Bridge Dictionary or Oxford English Dictionary.
Speaker 1: Doesn't even matter. Now I'll check and see they've changed.
Speaker 1: Officially the definition of man and woman to include transgender individuals.
Speaker 1: So this is like, this is exactly what. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: Cambridge Dictionary has changed this definition of man and woman
Speaker 1: because everything is going to be forced to bow to
Speaker 1: the trans agenda here in reality, because it can't withstand
Speaker 1: the most basic scrutiny of rational discourse. Men have penises,
Speaker 1: women have vaginas, and they have different parts even beyond that,
Speaker 1: and all their chromosomes are different in every cell in
Speaker 1: their body. This is just the most basic reality. Why
Speaker 1: does the left want to keep this fight going well?
Speaker 1: Because at some level they understand if they can get
Speaker 1: you to affirm something that is so clearly untrue, they
Speaker 1: can get you to say anything. If you're willing to
Speaker 1: say that a man can get pregnant, what are you
Speaker 1: not willing to say? Where will people who have been
Speaker 1: forced to debase their own powers of reason and logic
Speaker 1: and deduction. Where will they decide that they've had enough
Speaker 1: and they won't actually go forward and say things that
Speaker 1: they know to be untrue just because it is humiliating
Speaker 1: to them Intellectually. It is a humiliation to say things
Speaker 1: that are so obviously false, but you bend the knee.
Speaker 1: This is the ultimate kind of power when you can
Speaker 1: invert reality and look at totalitarian states, look at cults
Speaker 1: and even deeply fundamentalist or extremist versions of faith traditions
Speaker 1: around the world. They want total control of your mind
Speaker 1: and they want you to say things that now, at
Speaker 1: least in a faith tradition context, you're saying things that
Speaker 1: you are accepting, you are taking it on faith. They're
Speaker 1: not saying it's faith based. The Left isn't saying, oh, well,
Speaker 1: I've believe that this is a miracle that a man
Speaker 1: becomes a woman. They're saying, no, a man becomes a
Speaker 1: woman ending a pregnant, because that's that's science. They say
Speaker 1: it's science. And this is just the most obvious kind
Speaker 1: of lie. So they've now finally fired Sam Brenton after
Speaker 1: the second luggage carousel theft. And clearly this person is
Speaker 1: a cleptomaniac. And when someone is a cleptomaniac at that
Speaker 1: level of access in the government, deputy assistant secretary, top
Speaker 1: secret clearance. Yet to wonder was this not known beforehand?
Speaker 1: Nothing came up in the background check. I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you this right now. Do you think that anyone doing
Speaker 1: a background investigation of a non binary individual for a
Speaker 1: security clearance or for a high level government position like this.
Speaker 1: Do you think the government bureaucrat doing that background investigation
Speaker 1: is free to really present an honest report on the
Speaker 1: mental stability and trustworthiness of the non binary candidate here
Speaker 1: who teaches kink workshops where people dress up as dogs.
Speaker 1: Because there's that video that's out there too, I'm just wondering,
Speaker 1: what do you think. I'm pretty sure they don't. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure if you want to keep your job working
Speaker 1: for the federal government doing background investigations or even as
Speaker 1: a contractor for the federal government, and if you don't
Speaker 1: want to be sued and called a bigot, you're just
Speaker 1: gonna go along with whatever the high level non binary
Speaker 1: government official, whatever storyline you have to to get their
Speaker 1: clearance through. This is wrong, my friends, This is wrong.
Speaker 1: But the transagenda is the lefts This is the left
Speaker 1: van guard right now. It's very important to them, and
Speaker 1: it has become something that be prepared for the way
Speaker 1: that they're going to argue on this. They're going to
Speaker 1: keep pushing and pushing, and when we push back and
Speaker 1: say enough is enough, they will say why are you
Speaker 1: so focused on this? Why are you so bigoted? This
Speaker 1: isn't a big deal gaslighting. This is why the word
Speaker 1: gaslighting has become so commonplace in our uc because it
Speaker 1: really does describe a form of politics now that the
Speaker 1: Democrats excel in, and that is that they push these
Speaker 1: issues and they make it an issue for all of us.
Speaker 1: And then when we say, hold on a second, I
Speaker 1: don't agree, they go, why are you making this an issue?
Speaker 1: What's the problem. Why are you focused on this? It's
Speaker 1: meant to unsettle you. It's all rooted in dishonesty because
Speaker 1: obviously they've made it an issue. But you see what's
Speaker 1: going on, You see how they do what they do.
Speaker 1: And now this poll that I mentioned, so this is
Speaker 1: the New York Post. GOP backing for former President Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's third consecutive White House bid has fallen apart in
Speaker 1: the last several months, most Republican voters saying they would
Speaker 1: prefer another candidate. In twenty twenty four. This is a
Speaker 1: USA Today's Suffolk University poll. Thirty one percent of Republican
Speaker 1: and Republican leading independents want Trump, seventy six years old,
Speaker 1: to run again in two years sixty one percent say
Speaker 1: they would rather have another GOP standard bearer. This is
Speaker 1: about what I would have guessed then are right now.
Speaker 1: And look, there are a couple of ways that this
Speaker 1: can play out. You could have a Trump as a
Speaker 1: candidate and also the people around him, the organization around
Speaker 1: him that sees this as a bit of a kick
Speaker 1: in the kick in the pants to get going here
Speaker 1: and to focus in and to do more with greater precision,
Speaker 1: with more focus than has been the case in recent months.
Speaker 1: You could see this as just the momentum of a
Speaker 1: possible discantists or who knows, maybe some other Republican contender
Speaker 1: for the GOP nomination that will become increasingly inevitable over time.
Speaker 1: It's not clear to be. I put out a poll
Speaker 1: earlier today, obviously a non scientific Twitter poll, because there's
Speaker 1: this possibility as well that I think they're going to
Speaker 1: indict Donald Trump. I'm not sure, but I think it's
Speaker 1: better than fifty fifty at this point. They're going to
Speaker 1: bring some charge against him, and that will change a lot.
Speaker 1: I think of the perception here I put out this poll.
Speaker 1: If the Biden apparatus and it's Trump, the political result
Speaker 1: will be derailing his nomination or rallying around him, ralling
Speaker 1: the GOP around him. Only thirty six percent thought it
Speaker 1: would derail his nomination. Sixty four percent think it will
Speaker 1: rally the GOP around him. And now what's really interesting
Speaker 1: is if that is true. And remember we're just trying
Speaker 1: to measure perception here in a snapshot, so who knows.
Speaker 1: But if that is true, then does that affect whether
Speaker 1: the bide administration, it's apparatus, Merrick Garland, the DOJ, we'll
Speaker 1: actually bring charges Because if they bring charges and that
Speaker 1: rallies everyone around Trump, well then maybe they don't want
Speaker 1: to rally everyone around Trump or do they want to
Speaker 1: rally everyone around Trump because I think they can beat him,
Speaker 1: So then they will bring charges because they want that
Speaker 1: rallying effect. Starting to get into four dhs here kind
Speaker 1: of territory right to borrow phrase, starting to get into
Speaker 1: a realm where it's not really clear how this will
Speaker 1: play out. And I think nobody, nobody can see the future,
Speaker 1: and on this one man it is there's a lot
Speaker 1: of different things that can happen here. So it's so
Speaker 1: early in the twenty twenty four primary season, really hasn't
Speaker 1: even started. Yet officially, although Trump is inofficially, I expect
Speaker 1: these polls to have big swings, and I don't even
Speaker 1: know in what directions. In the months ahead, it's certainly
Speaker 1: going to be an interesting time in politics. Thanks for
Speaker 1: hanging out with me today. Team has always appreciate you
Speaker 1: doing some buck Sexton showtime and we will be back
Speaker 1: tomorrow with our shields high.