WEBVTT - The Top Tech Stories of 2020 - April through July

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech, and we are covering

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest text stories of twenty twenty, some

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, not all of them. In our last episode,

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we looked at the first three months, which means if

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>we were to keep that pace, we would need four

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>episodes to get through the year, assuming each quarter has

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about the same amount of news. However, if you listen

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to the late last episode, you also know that I

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>stuck with stories that played out through twenty twenty, so

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe that will help us out. I guess we'll see.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I know that that's going to be at least three episodes. Spoiler,

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't finish it out today, but let's jump back

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>into April twenty. In a tip of cool Year, I

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>would start off talking about April by mentioning the various

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>pranks and jokes that brands pulled or tried to pull.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Something that exasperates many of my peers who cover technology,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of like a good silly joke as

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>long as it's not you know, mean spirited or just

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>an outright lie posing as the truth in an effort

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to actually trick people. But the pandemic and the Black

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter movement really changed things in the United States.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Many states or cities had issued lockdown restrictions, and a

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of brands chose to give April first twenty a pass. Personally,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I would have preferred twice as many jokes and no pandemic.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But the balls in your court, grouchy tech journalists, those

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>jokes don't seem so bad now, do they. In our

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>previous episode, I talked about how Zoom had a huge

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>year due to more people moving their work and personal

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>connections online. In April, we would see some concerns about

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>zooms security. The company's privacy protections were brought into question,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and we started seeing a trend of zoom bombing, in

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>which people who were not invited to a Zoom session

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We're showing up, often because someone had shared the link

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for that meeting in a way that wasn't secure, and

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it would prompt Zoom to institute more accessible password protection

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>options uh into an encryption and other methods to make

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that the people who are joining a session were

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are meant to, not just people who

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>happen to have a link to the online session. Now,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>granted these are all options. You don't have to have

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>password protection on your Zoom meeting, so it's still are

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there still are possibilities for people to to barge in

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on a meeting they aren't really welcome to, but there

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are now more options to allow you to have more

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>control over that. We also began to see various coronavirus

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tracking apps in development. The apps had a couple of

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>real big jol leunges. So the idea is that these

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>apps can track where you go, and if you should

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>happen to be near someone else who happens to have

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the app and who has indicated that they have been

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>exposed to COVID, then you would get a notification saying, hey,

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you came into contact with someone who has already indicated

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that they may have been exposed. If used properly, you

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can help mitigate the spread of the disease. But there's

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>also a genuine concern for privacy and a general fear

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that such an app would violate the privacy of the

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>people using it, or that the companies that are making

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the apps could then later on use that information in

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ways that we don't necessarily approve of. And if this

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>were just a disease and people were just treating it

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>as a disease, maybe all of these concerns are things

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that we could overlook. But we have to remember that

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>there are other factors at play here. One of those

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is that some people hold up pretty racist and xenophobic

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>opinion about the origins of the disease. There were so

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>many stories of people with Chinese heritage being harassed because

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of that perception, and people can be pretty awful if

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they choose to be, so there are a lot of

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>things to balance out when it comes to tracking coronavirus.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, the apps tend to be voluntary,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which means each person has to choose to download and

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>install it, and some people are just unwilling to do that.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fact that you would need to

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>update the app to reflect a diagnosis. It's an imperfect solution,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and in places like Europe, there were a lot of

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>long discussions about how to balance out these various concerns.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>As it stands, there are lots of different apps, most

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of them focus on relatively small regions, but much of

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the world is not covered by them. I mean I

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>live in Georgia, which is the home for the Center

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for Disease Control, and we don't have an app for

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>our state as of yet. We also started seeing cases

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of people damaging five G towers in April of twenty twenty.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned in my episode about five gen myths,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>some people somehow corroborated these towers with the creation or

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>spread of coronavirus, as if somehow, then, for some reason,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the telecommunications companies were broadcasting a virus which is just impossible.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a virus that can affect humans. I guess

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you could broadcast a computer virus. That's a different kettle

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of fish. The pandemic also delayed one of the more

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>anticipated criminal trials in recent tech history. Elizabeth Holmes, founder

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of medical startup Theoris, was to have her trial begin

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty but the pandemic became a factor and the

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>court would order the trial to be delayed until the

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>spring of For those who don't know who Elizabeth Holmes

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is or what her company, Theopness did, here's a super

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>brief rundown Holmes, who idolized Silicon Valley leaders like Steve

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs created a company that had the goal of developing

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a medical device. The device, which was projected to be

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>about the size of your typical desktop printer, would be

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>able to take a very small blood sample, the tiniest

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>little droplet, and run hundreds of different analytical tests on

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that sample. Within a short time, perhaps an hour or two.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The device would produce a report about that sample, giving

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the user information about their health, diagnosing any diseases or conditions,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and in theory, empowering the user. And The idea was

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to democratize medicine in a way that would give users

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>more information about their own health and a better way

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to interact with their primary care physician and the general

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>medical establishment. Some doctors worried that this would cause people

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to misinterpret results, but it turns out they didn't really

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have much to fear because the device never worked properly,

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at least not to the extent that the company wanted

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it to. It turned out the actual process was way

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more are complicated than Holmes had first imagined, and her

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>team of engineers were tackling problem after problem in order

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to try and make it work. In the meantime, The

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>allegations against Holmes state that she and her fellow executives

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>purposefully misled investors, including using equipment from established blood testing

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>companies to run blood tests while claiming that a themised

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>device was actually doing all the work. The house of

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>cards came crashing down, but not before investors had poured

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>more than seven hundred million dollars into it. Holmes is

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>now charged with numerous counts of fraud, and we'll have

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to wait to see how that all turns out. One

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the big early stories tied in with the coronavirus

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was how ill prepared hospitals were to meet the challenge

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of early serious cases. We saw some people try to

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>help in novel ways, such as using three D printers

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to create airflow splitters for ventilators. So ventilators take over

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the process of breathing for patients, and they are expensive

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pieces of machinery and there's a limited number of them.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So the thought was that by using splitters, you could

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>divert air from one ventilator to multiple patients, like two patients,

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and that way you wouldn't have to have just one

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>ventilator per patient, and thus you could stretch the limited

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>resources you have further. And I think it was a

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fairly clever move. But I also have very strong feelings

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about how the United States government completely failed to meet

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the challenge of COVID on a national scale. But i'll

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>spare you that rant. I'm sure you're all familiar and

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>tired of hearing those kind of things already. But on

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a related note, in April, Elon Musk said he had

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>sent ventilators to hospitals in California to help alleviate the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>resource scarcity. Musk had sent valuable equipment, but they weren't

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>technically ventilators. There were machines that aid in breathing assistance,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but there are stepped down from ventilators themselves, which, as

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, handle breathing entirely for a patient. This I

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think was largely a case of bad communication, by which

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean Musk really did help these hospitals, just not

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the way that was initially reported. So I don't

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>want to throw shade on Musk for this, as he

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.119
<v Speaker 1>was doing something that actually was incredible and the hospitals

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>did have need of that equipment. But that being said,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Musk also used his position and platform to argue against

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff like stay at home orders. He was defiant of them.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He said that Tesla would continue to operate even in

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the face of stay at home orders, and he helps

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>spread misinformation about the coronavirus. So while he did help

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>some hospitals by sending them equipment, he also lent credence

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to false narratives about COVID And I think the scales

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly way on the You done did bad on this one,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and I almost forgot. On April six, twenty Quimby, the

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>short form high production video streaming service, officially launched. Led

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>by dream war its founder Jeffrey Katzenberg and former HP

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO Meg Whitman. The service could not have come out

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>at a worse time. It was geared towards mobile users,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that people like to consume media on

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>their phones well they're waiting for stuff like when they're

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on a bus or on a subway, or when they're

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in line for something. But of course, the service launched

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just as a pandemic was forcing most of us to

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>stay at home. Even without the pandemic, a new video

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>service was going to have a really tough fight to

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be competitive, But the use case for Quimby was pretty

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>much wiped out before it could even get started. It

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>launched a lot of exclusive programming and gave a lot

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of creative folks and outlet, but it couldn't tough it

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out and it would shut down late in so R

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I p Quimby if you want to learn more. I

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>did do a couple of episodes about Quimby earlier this year.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I did one a few months after it had launched,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and then I did another one after the announcement that

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Quimby was going to shut down in December. There are

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a few other stories that happened in April, but they

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly involved how the heck do we do what we

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>do when there's a pandemic going on? And I think

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we've heard, you know enough of those to kind of

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>know that these stories are largely the same as companies

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>big and small. We're grappling with the challenges of a

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>world being thrown into chaos thanks to a virus. Two

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>other stories I think I should mention, though, are that

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo revealed in April that hackers compromised one sixty thousand

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>accounts on the Nintendo network, and they stole funds from

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>account holders in the process by using any stored funds

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that were in the those accounts to do stuff like

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>by Fortnite's virtual currency, which, as we learned in a

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>previous episode, would not be subjected to federal taxes. The

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hackers exploited the older Nintendo Network I D system, which

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was used for the older three DS and we U consoles.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>The company offered to fund money to those affected and

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>urged users to change their passwords. Later on, Nintendo would

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>reveal the hat compromised more accounts than they first realized,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly twice as many in fact. The other little story

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that from April was that Apple introduced the iPhone SE,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the budget model entry into the iPhone line, and it

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>looked a lot like the older iPhone eight which came

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>out back in And while it is a budget model,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean it's actually cheap. The baseline iPhone SE

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>marketed for three dollars. Still, compared to top of the

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>line phones in the iPhone line, that's definitely on the

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>less expensive side. Now we're up to May, Airbnb announced

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it would lay off a quarter of its employees. The

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>travel industry in general was hit super hard by the pandemic,

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from hotels to airlines, to ride share companies and more.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>We'd see a lot of other companies follow suit, either

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>laying off employees or ending contract worker agreements, all in

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>an effort to scale back and tighten the belt to

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>outlast the pandemic. So here are a few companies that

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>laid off people. In Cisco laid off around thirty five

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred employees, Comcast laid off another thirty dred A. T

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and T was right behind with thirty four hundred. Salesforce

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>laid off a thousand people. Microsoft laid off nine hundred

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty employees, PayPal laid off a hundred employees, and all

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of those companies managed to remain profitable during COVID. So

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty tough pill to swallow. Right, that these

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>companies were making these big cuts in an effort to

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>remain profitable during a pandemic benefits the shareholders, but not

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the employees. Meanwhile, those workers are left to struggle and

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>find new employment in an environment that's really, really hard.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is difficult to to overstate how hard

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it is to get a new gig in the midst

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a pandemic. And I'm sure some of you out

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>there either may have dealt with this personally or know

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who is dealing with it. And you know, this

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is tough. And then there are the companies that made

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>big cuts but we're still unprofitable during COVID. The Walt

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company is a big one. Now I'm a big

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Disney fan, but the company has got a pretty ugly

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>tarnish on it, having laid off more than thirty thousand

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>employees during the pandemic. And you could argue that a

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of that might be necessary from a business standpoint

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>because some places, some points of employment within Disney, like Disneyland,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, those remain closed with no firm reopening dates.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to justify, Hey, let's keep all the

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>people from Disneyland on payroll indefinitely and we have no

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>idea when we'll be able to reopen. You can see

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>from a business standpoint how that's a tough call. But

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you could also argue that Disney has been printing money

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for the last few years, with franchises like Star Wars

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and Marvel bringing in billions of dollars from the box

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>office alone, and that's before you even touch stuff like merchandizing.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>The company has been losing money, however, and shareholders typically

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are not super crazy about that, So this is a

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult road to travel here. It's I don't want

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to to dismiss this as saying Disney bad. I am

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not a fan of them laying off so many people

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>during a pandemic, But at the same time, you have

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge the realities of what business is. So it's

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>not like there's an easy decision to make here, but

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>man talking about having the magic stripped away, or rather

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>having to reckon with the realization that magic is all

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in perception, and when the veil has fallen, it's a

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot harder to you know, recapture that feeling of Oh,

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a magical company. Uh, it's a company, and it's

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a company that that is very much focused on its

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>forward facing pr with the public, and that took a

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty big hit in Boeing, Chevron and Exxon Mobile also

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>laid off thousands of employees and also remained unprofitable during

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Uber laid off a lot of its staff.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Unemployment claims in the United States have hovered around one

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>million each month, with some of the most recent being

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>between a hundred thousand and nine hundred thousand claims. UH

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the average in a year that is not going through

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic in the United States would be two thousand

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>claims or so. Now we should keep that in mind

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that as bad as all this is, at least it's

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not the levels that we saw unemployment hit in March

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>when the claims spiked up to six point nine million. Meanwhile,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>companies like door Ash and insta Carts saw their valuation

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>skyrocket as demands for home delivery services increased. We saw

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this stuff too, with services specializing in

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>deliveries growing quickly and hiring on a lot of people.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>So there were some industries that were actually in a

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>hiring mode, not a laying off mode. Twitter would announce

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in May that it would flag tweets containing coronavirus misinformation

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>on its service, even if those tweets should come from

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>really important people such as President Trump, and this would

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>kick off essentially a big old mess in the United

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>States as Twitter would become more aggressive and flagging tweets

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that contained misinformation, including those coming from Trump, and the

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>categories of misinformation would extend beyond the pandemic as well.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>This would infuriate the President, who stepped up his opposition

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to Section two thirty A bit of American legislation that

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>gives online platforms protection against what their users post, as

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>well as gives them the authority to moderate posts without

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>fear of litigation. I did a full episode about section

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to thirty not too long ago. If you want to

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>learn more about that and what the whole argument is

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>both for and against it, I recommend you check that out.

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for us to take a quick break.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.239
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we will get through spring and

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>start pushing into the summer of But first let's take

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. May was when A T and T

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>agreed to stop using five G evolution in its marketing efforts.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you listen to my episode about five G

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Myths versus Reality, you know that A T and T

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>had rebranded its LTE service, a four G service, as

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>five G E, with the icon and users phones changing

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to reflect this. Now, a lot of other carriers criticized

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>A T and T for doing this. They claim that

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this was a deliberate misdirection with the intent to make

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>people think that they suddenly had a five G phone,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>when in fact they didn't. They were using a four

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>G phone on a four G network that was being

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>labeled as five G. A T and T faced some

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctions when they were using this in their marketing, and

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so ultimately the company stopped using the terminology in its

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>various advertising campaigns, but the five G E icon on

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the phones stuck around. Also in May, Doug Lavero, who

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>had served as the head of human Spaceflight Operations at

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>NASA for six months, resigned abruptly, and in his resignation note,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he alluded to making a mistake, but there was no

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>real elaboration on what that mistake was. Speculation and rumor

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>soon took hold. I mean, if there's ever a gap

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in knowledge, people will fill it with whatever they can.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So could it be that he made some sort of

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>controversial decision regarding the use of commercial space company like

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX might have something to do with the Artemis program,

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which has the incredibly aggressive goal of getting people back

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Moon by four At first, there wasn't much

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>information on the matter, but later on in August, the

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal reported that a federal criminal probe into

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Lavero's activities was commencing That was looking to see if

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Laverro had given any information illegally to Boeing during the

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>bidding process to design and build a new human lunar

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lander for the Artemis project. If he had, that would

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be in violation of the Procurement Integrity Act. As NASA

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't to show any favoritism to any particular bidding entity.

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not supposed to give information that might give one

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>bitter uh of an advantage over others. And the announcement

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of his resignation in May was particularly of concern because

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it happened just two weeks before NASA was to rely

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>upon SpaceX launch vehicles and spacecraft to take astronauts to

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station. So this was just two weeks

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>before the first manned launch of a spacecraft on US

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>soil since the conclusion of the Space Shuttle program. Bad timing.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Besides the pandemic and the election, another thing we need

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to remember about in the United States is the Black

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter movement and how they would play a big

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>part in how tech and society intersect. As organizers relied

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on social platforms to bring people together to demonstrate in

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the real world, so too did those who opposed the movement,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So you had rights activists clashing with white supremacists online

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and off. Some platforms like Facebook tried to take a

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>hands off Switzerland like approach. Others like Twitter, tried to

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>flag content that contained misinformation or those that glorified violence,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>including tweets from Trump, and it became the subject of

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>increasingly heated debates about what text role is in these

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>matters and whether or not these social platforms were making

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>things better or worse. Let's move into June. Early that month,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a group of Facebook employees staged a virtual walk off

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in protest of Zuckerberg's lack of response to Trump's messaging

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, largely regarding the Black Lives Matter movement. They

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>were arguing that he was turning a blind eye to

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>posts that clearly violated Facebook's own terms of service. Internally,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook managers were told not to retaliate or require employees

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to use paid time off to cover for the walkout,

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and so the company was facing criticism both from external

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sources and from within the company itself. Not that this

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>would change things very much over at Facebook for most

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of twenty and you might think I have a bias

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>against Facebook, And you know what, I guess I kind

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of do, as I've said in previous podcasts, if you

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>give the truth and lies and equal ground to stand

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>upon lines are gonna win. It's just way easier to

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>tell people what they want to hear rather than to

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>make them listen to the truth. At the protests themselves,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw tech also play a role. People used drones

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to get footage of protests, including one case at least

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>one in which US Customs and Border Patrol flew a

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>drone over Minneapolis. And I'm not talking about some little

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>quad captor. The drone in this case appeared to be

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a Predator B drone a k A and m Q

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>nine Reaper, which is designed to be a so called

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hunter killer drone, as in, this was a drone designed

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be armed and used to track down a target

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and fire upon it. Now, the agency said it was

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>operating the drone purely as a means to keep police

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>informed of potential problems like outbreaks of violence or looting.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But the Customs and Border Patrol jurisdiction ends once you

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred miles out from US borders. I mean

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's Customs and Borders Patrol. Minneapolis is three hundred miles

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>away from the Canadian border, so that creates a pretty

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thorny basis for operations. How can the the U S

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Customs and Border Patrol justify flying a drone over Minneapolis

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>when it has no jurisdiction over that area. This is

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a troubling matter. The use of drones raised multiple privacy

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>concerns and fueled allegations that the government was actively attempting

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt citizens as they exercise their constitutionally guaranteed First

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights to public assembly and free speech. One Twitter follower,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I have suggested that I talk about how the federal

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>government used drones and other aircraft to jam cell phone

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>service over areas that had protesters. Now, as far as

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I know, that never actually happened. Jamming cell phone service

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is technically possible, but legally it's very tricky to do,

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and it brings along a lot of collateral damage because

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone in an area would find their service disrupted, whether

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they were part of a protest or not. You can

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>easily imagine how that could lead to disaster. I mean,

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you could have a medical emergency, or there could be

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a fire not even connected to the protests, and you

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have any way of of contacting first responders to

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>get aid. But there were reports of various agencies, federal

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and local, using things like helicopters, drones, and planes to

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>conduct surveillance on protesters, which definitely was happening. The cell

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>phone jamming probably not, but surveillance definitely happened, including some

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>allegations that the government was making use of devices called

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>sting rays. Now, a sting ray poses as a legit

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>cell phone service tower as far as phones are concerned,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. But it's real purpose is to

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>pick up data from phones that are in the area.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like having someone posted at a

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>cell phone tower and making note of all the phones

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that connect to that tower and to what those phones

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are there then connecting to, like if they're making a

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>call somewhere or uploading data to a service. In October

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of twenty a group of US representatives called for an

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>investigation into the surveillance techniques that were being used by

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>federal agencies during the Black Lives Matter protests and demonstrations,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>questioning whether the government violated the constitutional rights of US citizens.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>As I record this that has not concluded, but it

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>points to how serious this issue was. The protests would

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>affect the tech sector in other ways as well. Sony

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>chose to postpone its PlayStation five event. Largely due to

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the protests, Various online personalities such as YouTubers and twitch

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>streamers would use their platforms to help raise money for

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the activist movement. IBM canceled and entire your program that

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was using machine learning and artificial intelligence to build facial

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>recognition systems, recognizing that these technologies had a disproportionately negative

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>impact on people of color. Amazon announced it would stop

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>providing facial recognition software to police for the terms of

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a year, with the company representatives saying that their their

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>hope was that the US government would quote implement appropriate

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>rules end quote regarding facial recognition technologies. During that year

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>long ban, Microsoft also announced it would not sell facial

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology to police departments in the United States. So

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he started to see the corporations make a shift as

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the public sentiment grew around the Black Lives Matter movement.

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>On a totally different note, Microsoft announced in June that

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it was going to shut down its streaming video game

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>platform uh known as Mixer. So it's kind of like Twitch.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a platform for people to stream their video game

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>playing sessions to an audience, and they chose instead to

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>partner with Facebook Gaming and some very high profile streamers

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had been enticed to leave Twitch for lucrative contracts with Microsoft.

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Among them guys like Ninja and Shroud, two of the

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>most popular video game streamers in the world. Microsoft spent

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on these exclusive agreements with these

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>top streamers, hoping that they would bring their legions of

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>fans along with them to Mixer, but that really just

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen. Twitch was pulling in fifteen million visits per

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>day with one million monthly active users. Mixer, on the

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>other hand, was managing ten million monthly active users, literally

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one tenth of what Twitch was pulling. Microsoft had introduced

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of innovative features that users and critics were praising,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but it just couldn't make much ground against the juggernauts

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of Twitch and YouTube gaming. The low return on investment

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>meant that Microsoft decided to pull the plug and folks

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>like Ninja and Shroud were free to go wherever they pleased,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Mixer technology would transition over to Facebook gaming,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>which I have honestly never checked out. I have no

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>idea how big Facebook gaming is, uh, which is odd.

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those things that I've heard about, but

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I have never experienced. I am more of a twitch

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube gaming kind of guy. Also tying into this

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was that in June we saw another surge of the

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>me too movement, this time focused in video games and streaming.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Many women's streamers came forward with accusations against influential people

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the streaming community, most of them men, saying that

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they had been manipulated by these people, they had been groomed,

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they had been coerced, and it's all really ugly, ugly stuff.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And this was also when we started hearing more about

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing sexual harassment issues at the major video game developed Ubisoft,

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which would go through a tumultuous series of personnel changes

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as a result. And I recently did several episodes about Ubisoft,

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to know more, you can check

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>those out. But some of the people who were ultimately

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>let go had been with the company for more than

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a decade and included very high ranking executives. Meanwhile, over

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook, the company was now dealing with more than

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just criticism. Advertisers were starting to leave the platform. They

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>were concerned that Facebook's opposition to dealing with harassment and

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and hate groups would end up reflecting poorly on

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the companies that were using Facebook to advertise their Verizon

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>would announce it would withdraw ads from Facebook in late June,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and that must have been a serious wake up call

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for the company because most of the companies that were

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this, where they were backing away and boycotting Facebook,

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>were in the small to medium range, which honestly doesn't

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>represent very much of Facebook's revenue. It's of a few

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>very very large companies that represent the bulk of revenue.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So a company like Verizon definitely got a lot more attention,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and this became known as the hashtag stop Hate for

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Profit movement. More than one thousand advertisers would join this campaign,

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but many of those also said that their boycott was

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>temporary and that the pandemic had made it too risky

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to remain off Facebook for very long, like it was

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary evil essentially, and the company managed to actually grow

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>its revenue despite this boycott. As The New York Times

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would point out in November, the movement did more to

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>hurt the platform's reputation than its actual bottom line. That's

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not to say that a future, more widespread effort wouldn't

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have a greater impact, but this was more like a

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>warning signal sent to Facebook than anything else. Facebook did

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>agree to ban negative ads about immigrants or those who

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>seek asylum, as well as on ads that include hate

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>speech or discrimination. Zuckerberg said Facebook would also begin to

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>label quote unquote newsworthy posts that violate the site's policies,

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that if a post is newsworthy, then

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it can still be on Facebook, even if otherwise the

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>content of that post would violate Facebook's terms of service,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but now at least Facebook would flag those ya. Meanwhile,

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube would ban David Dukes and Richard Spencer and a

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>few other prominent white supremacist channels from its platform after

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>being pressured to do so, and a year after the

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>company had said it was going to ban accounts that

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>posted videos supporting white supremacists. So there was a big

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>question about why it took so long for these particular

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>high profile cases by the company's own policies. This action

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 1>was long overdue, and it followed what other platforms like

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Reddit had been doing in the wake of the Black

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter movement. These bands would sometimes include accounts or

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>subbreddits that purported to support President Trump, turning this into

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a political controversy, though the reason for the

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>removal wasn't because of a political affiliation, had to do

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with the actual content within these accounts and subreddits. So,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, the subreddit community the Donald was home to

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of posts that included hate speech and promoted

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories that blamed minorities for various societal problems, so

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it got the acts. Toward late June, we learned that

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Uber was in talks of acquiring the delivery service Postmates.

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Uber already has its own food delivery service with Uber Eats,

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the talks progressed throughout ending in November, when the

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>companies agreed to an all stock transaction that would see

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Postmates moved to Uber for the princely sum of two

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>point six five billion dollars worth of stock. Uber had

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>previously attempted to scoop up grub Hub, but the company

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was beaten to the punch by a different company out

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of Europe called Just Takeaway for seven billion dollars. Holy cats.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>One bit of more lighthearted news that I can add

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to June was published on my birthday, that would be

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>June twenty six. That's when I learned that NASA has

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a design competition, or rather had a design competition, and

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the first prize of this competition was twenty thousand dollars,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>second prize was ten thousand dollars, and third prize five

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. And what you are meant to design was

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a toilet yep. NASA was looking for designs for a

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>toilet that can work in micro gravity as well as

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the reduced gravity on the Moon. The Moon's gravity is

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about one sixth that of Earth's and presumably this would

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be on the lunar Lander module of the future, so

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they had very strict size and weight limitations for this

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>particular piece of technology. And because NASA intends to send

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>women to the Moon, it means the toilet has to

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be to work for both men and women. And a bonus,

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>said NASA, and I swear I am not making this up,

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the toilet should be able to deal with

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>an astronaut who needs to vomit without the astronaut having

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to place their head and said toilet. That was the

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that NASA was looking for. And if you have

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a great idea for the design, well, I hate to

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>be the bearer of crappy news. But the deadline was August,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I just flushed all those hopes and

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dreams down the moon toilet. When we come back, we'll

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>head into July and see if I can compress the

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year's news into one third of

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>an episode. Spoiler alert. I couldn't, so we will have

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a part three. But before we get into all of that,

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>let's take another break. I haven't really talked about it

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so far in these episodes, but one of the stories

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that played out over the core of twenty was the

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>fate of TikTok and how the US government was continuing

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>to exert pressure on the company for its links to

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese parent company like Huawei. The implication was that

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the company was potentially vulnerable to Chinese government interference, and

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>since so many Americans were using the app, it could

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pose as a national security concern. Or if you look

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at it another way, you could say this was a

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>high profile company that the US government could target in

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and thus be a point of pain that US could

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>inflict on China. Now, the truth behind the motivations to

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>pressure TikTok is probably somewhere between those two pillars of philosophy.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Cybersecurity experts, however, have pointed out that it is unlikely

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that China would be able to access data about US

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok users because that data would be stored on servers

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that are here in the United States and thus outside

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the grasp of China directly, and that the TikTok CEO

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is an American CEO, so there might be a desire

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to access all that stuff, but not necessarily an actual

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to do that anyway. In July, we saw some

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>curious reactions to TikTok in corporate America. Wells Fargo sent

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a directive to employees to delete TikTok from any corporate

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>owned devices, citing security concerns. Now, I don't think this

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is actually that unusual. Companies must frequently deal with the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>possibility of data breaches or security vulnerabilities, and many of

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>them are created not because of a hole in the

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>technical security that a company has put in place, but

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>rather the human element, the behavior of employees. I felt

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that Wells Fargo was actually pretty much in the right

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with this one, as the directive really only covered corporate

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>owned devices, so to me, it's the same as if

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>my company were to tell me, hey, you can't install

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the games on your work computer because that computer doesn't

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>belong to you, it belongs to the company. So to me,

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that works the same way with this Wells Fargo example.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok's response, however, was to say that it was open

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk with Wells Fargo about how TikTok's secures user privacy,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe if Wells Fargo had told employees that they

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't use TikTok on their own personal phones, I would

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>feel that that was a totally different conversation and would

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>be unjustifiable. But as it stands, I don't really see

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a big deal here, because even if you remove the

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Chinese element, let's say, all right, let's let's say let's

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>say that it is impossible for China to get hold

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>of that information, which is probably true. It's still a

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>problem to have an app from a different company installed

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>onto a corporate owned device because it could represent a

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>potential security leak. And we already give a lot of

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>our information over to company. He's both private and publicly traded,

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's already an issue. It's it's almost like the

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>problem is present. It's just that the the ultimate uh

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>entity that we should be afraid of is misidentified, if

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Now, Interestingly, Amazon had also sent a

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>similar directive to its employees to delete TikTok from corporate

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>owned devices, but within a couple of hours of that,

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon sent a follow up email saying that the first

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>message was sent in error, so Amazon retracted that directive. Now,

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>we did see one big security breach in July. On

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>July to be precise, that was buzzworthy. Hackers gained access

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to multiple high profile accounts on Twitter belonging to people

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Gates, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Elon Musk, and others.

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The accounts blasted out messages promising something too good to

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>be true, and we all know what that means. But

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the message has said that people should

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>send bitcoin, the digital cryptocurrency, to a particular digital wallet,

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.479
<v Speaker 1>and in return they would receive double what they sent.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you're thinking, well, that just don't make no sense,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're way ahead of the game, because this is

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>just a scam that praise on the impulsive and the greedy.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If I walked up to you and said, hey, if

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you give me a five dollar bill, I'll give you

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks. You would probably be suspicious of that, and

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you should be, because I'm a shifty character. But for

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some reason, scammers use this technique with Bitcoin and compromising

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>such high profile accounts to do this seems to give

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the scam a bit more legitimacy. I mean, if it's

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>coming from Barack Obama, it's got to be legit, right,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that was the real difference here. So how

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the heck did this hack even happen? Well, once again

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw that the way into the system wasn't to

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>brute force passwords or anything like that. Rather, the scammers

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>targeted Twitter employees, trying to trick them into going to

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a dummy website to enter their credentials and solve some

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>imaginary problem that was in the initial message. And it's

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the sort of approach that requires a very wide net,

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but you only have to catch a few fishies for

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it to pay off. And it paid off. The scammers

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to get enough Twitter administrators to give them

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of access, and they began to use Twitter's

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>methods to access various accounts, which actually raises questions about

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Twitter could ever do this to your account,

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>could Twitter send out messages under your account without your permission,

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's a topic for another discussion. I guess Twitter

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>eventually got it all locked down, but it was a

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>sobering experience, particularly in a year where there was so

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>much misinformation running rampant regarding everything from the pandemic to

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>social movements to the upcoming US elections. Towards the end

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of July, the U S Congress called upon executives from Google, Apple, Amazon,

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook to appear for hearings about whether these companies

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are engaging in anti competitive practices and monopolizing various tech sectors,

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>primarily digital advertising. And it was the first antitrust hearing

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the tech sector in the United States since Microsoft

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>had to do this back in nine now. The outcome

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of that Microsoft case was initially a threat of breaking

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft up into separate companies, but ultimately Microsoft was able

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to come to an agreement with the government that kept

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>it whole, so it didn't have to split up. These

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>discussions with Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook continue up to

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast, but for one company in particular,

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and that is Facebook, things escalated dramatically. In December, a

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>collection of states and the US federal government sued Facebook

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in a pair of antitrust lawsuits, and the Federal Trade Commission,

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>or f TC started taking steps toward demanding that Facebook

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>divest itself of some of the properties it has acquired

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>over the years, like Instagram and WhatsApp. So Facebook has

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a history of acquiring companies that fill in gaps in

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what Facebook can offer, particularly from other types of social

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>networks that serve a slightly different purpose from Facebook's main site.

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes it's just easier to buy up your competition

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>than trying to outperform them on their own turf. But

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>now various governments and agencies are arguing that Facebook has

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively established an exclusive lock on certain online services, particularly

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 1>with regard to monetization, and that further, the company has

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>actively tried to discourage competition from other companies, and that's

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a big no no. It's still way too early to

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>say how this is all going to turn out, and

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it's quite possible that litigation could last several years. Now.

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Complicating matters is the fact that the US government changes

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>over all action cycles, and new leaders might not share

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the same concerns or beliefs about Facebook as the ones

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who are currently pursuing this litigation, and there are those

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who argue that should the antitrust lawsuits conclude with Facebook

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>having to divest itself of Instagram and WhatsApp, that the

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>underlying problem itself still won't be solved. So, in other words,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 1>this process is going about things the wrong way. But

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a very complicated issue with a lot of vested

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>parties involved in Honestly, I don't know what the right

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 1>answer is here, or even if there is a right answer,

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because tech is simple, but business is hard, you know.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>By the end of July, Google's parent company, Alphabet, posted

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the first decline in revenue in the company's history. Now,

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean the company lost money. Rather, it means

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the company made less money than it had the year before,

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so it didn't grow. It indicated that the company wasn't

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>growing at the same rate as it had been. Alphabet

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>brought in a revenue of thirty eight point three billion

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the second quarter of so I'm not talking

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about annual revenue. That's the revenue that the company generated

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in just three months, just shy of forty billion dollars.

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And this represented a two percent decline in revenues from

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the previous year. However, it was still more than what

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:27.240
<v Speaker 1>analysts had predicted for Alphabet given the circumstances of stuff

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.959
<v Speaker 1>like the pandemic and social unrest, so it was still

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>good news for Alphabet. And when you start talking in

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>terms like that, you begin to get a feeling of

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the scope of those antitrust issues that the US government

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and places like the European Union have really been looking into.

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to say we've had a two percent

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>decline in revenues, which you know isn't great, particularly in

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a world that values year over year growth over just

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>about everything else. But when you break that down as

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we only brought in thirty eight point three billion dollars

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for these last three months, it kind of breaks your brain,

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or rather it breaks my brain. I mean, your brain

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>might be just fine. I don't. I don't mean to

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>project my own limitations on you. But we have now

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>reached the end of July, and if I'm looking at

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>this calendar correctly, we still have a few months to go.

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like I'm going to need to do

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one more episode to cover everything else. And I don't

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 1>want to jump into August only to have to cut

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>off everything after a couple of stories for the next part.

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna pick up in August for part three

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of our retrospective on the year. And I guess I

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>could go on about how this is all really irrational

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>because of our way of tracking time. It's all human

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>construct so it doesn't really matter what I cover when.

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's not really interesting or techie, so well, I'll

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just spare you. In our next episode, we'll wrap up

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the big stories of and you can look forward to

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a quick overview of the struggle between Epic Games and Apple,

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as the continuing proliferation of streaming services and

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>how they are making huge waves in the entertainment industry

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>at large, and more in our next episode. If you

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, shoot them

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>my way. It can be a technology, it could be

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a company, could be a personality in tech, could just

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be a trend in tech. Any of those things are

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>fair games. Send me your suggestions over on Twitter. The

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>handle is tech Stuff hs W and I'll talk to

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Y. Tech Stuff is an I

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows,