WEBVTT - 8am-9am ET: Garten & Shepherdson

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveibans. We think we're heading into an

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties type environment where it's a Warren Buffett

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>slash Peter Lynch type world where you buy good companies

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and you stick with them. We live in a world

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which is more more witless in tangibles are such an

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>important part of the economy. I think it's pretty clear

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you only looked at the economic data and

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not at the market, the FED would be raging. Radis

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to hen March Bloomberg Surveillance your link to the world

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, and investment on Bloomberg Radio. Good morning everyone,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee and Tom Keene worldwide Bloomberg Surveillance. Who welcome

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>all of you on Bloomberg Radio. Plus. I'm Bloomberg's thrilled

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that you listen on iTunes. Are podcasts that are out there.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg twelve Boston, Bloomberg eleven three on New York, down

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to Washington FM and Good Morning, Good early morning on

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast and across Sirious and next M channel

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one nineteen in Bloomberg nine sixty the Bay Area. In

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this uh half hour, in this hour, I think I

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>can say it is the beach read of the year

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for thinking people. Jeff Garden to join us from his

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yale University and we'll talk about what we don't know

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about globalization and what we need to know as well.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Watch You by Cone Resnec Accounting Tax Advisory

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.639
<v Speaker 1>just sees opportunities in commercial real estate. Your businesses market

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>focused guidance from the industry leading experts at Cone Resnick.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Find out how a Cone dot Com Michael you okay

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>over there, Peyton Manning retiring, You're gonna survive. We're We're glad,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He gets out while getting good. Dean Garden Michaels sedated

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>after rooting for the Bloomberg the Denver Broncos called the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Broncos as well. Um From Silk to Silicon Jeffrey

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Garten The Story of Globalization through ten Extraordinary Life. I

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>want to get to the book, but first I have

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this political process and the discourse you

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>teach with Steve roachump at l Roach gives out seas,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you give out a's we know how the dance goes,

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and and when you talk about Wall Street in Washington.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I go back to him sitting with a son of

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>arguably the most decorated military officer of America in the

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>last century. Your father, who fought in three wars World

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>War Two, he was at pork Uh pork Chop Hill

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in Korea, he was in Vietnam as well, your head

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>must be forget about the politics. Your head must be

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>spinning at the discourse that your father served in three wars.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>To get us to this point, well, you know, my

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>father died a couple of months ago, and he died

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in in his sleep, which I was grateful for, and

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm glad he died when he did. I think

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>if he will were watching the primaries now, Um, he

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>burst a coronary because you know, he and and and

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and his comrades, they fought for in America that is

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot different than the one that is being discussed.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They fought for a country that was a leader on

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the global stage. They fought for a country in which

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>UM immigrants came in and had upward mobility. I mean,

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but you know I'm the

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>third generation. My father was second generation, my wife's parents

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>were second generation. Our grandparents all came from somewhere else,

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and UM that's what that's what this country stood for.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And those wars were fought to defend a way of

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>life that was an open that was an open society

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that basically said to the rest of the world, UM,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we can take you and we can do some great things.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the discourse that that exists. Now we

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta get to your book, but I gotta follow up

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and ask how did that change change? How did we

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>get to a country where people are so afraid of

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. I think we dropped. I

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think we became very complacent. That is for if you

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the end of the Second War, World War

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and when my father came back from the Pacific, UM,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there was no country in the world that can challenge us.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We basically created and Tom alluded to this, before you

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>know a world. We created the rules. It was an

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>open global economy. It was open to our companies, which

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were the most powerful in the world. UM. We had

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the best education system, we had the best technology, and

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so we could flourish in that global economy for a

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>long time. But somewhere around the nineties, UM, a lot

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of other countries began to catch up, and we were

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>asleep at the switch. And I think now what we're

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>realizing is that we have a lot of work to

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>do internally in order to continue to flourish, in order

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>for most of our people to continue to flourish in

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>this global economy. And that's what we have to do

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than close is down. We were just speaking with

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Admiral James dadis from the Tough School, and he said,

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important things for new president coming

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>off is to have good advice, good people around him.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What advice would you give the next president to whomever

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he or she is. What's the most important thing they

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>need to do to change that? Well, I think if

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I had to put my finger on the single biggest thing,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the workforce. If we have if everybody is employed

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in decent jobs, I think many of the issues that

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're concerned about, we'll go away. Okay, we're getting to

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>your book now. In terms of the workforce, globalization has

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>affected the workforce in profound ways, and it's not as

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>easy as saying we just want to, you know, get

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody into good jobs. That just doesn't happen. No, that's right,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And but the thing is, the jobs of the future

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are not the jobs of the nineteen seventies of the

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, and we need an internal system that is

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to prepare more and more people

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for these new jobs, whatever they are. I don't think

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we can know exactly what they'll be, but we need

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an education system that is far more effective. We need

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the most modern kind of infrastructure so the economy is

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>more um um competitive, and that itself will also generate

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of jobs um And I think we need a

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of social safety net that allows people to be

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>unemployed for a while while they're training for something else

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and not fall all the way down the rabbit hole

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're just joining us. Jeffrey Garten serving with Nixon, Ford,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Carter Clinton, and also serving in who have in Connecticut

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for decades. The book is from Silk to Silicon, a

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>story of globalization through ten extraordinary lives. Everyone yearns for

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>technological progress. It will provide investment that will put American

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>jobs for work. We did that with the underwater cable.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>My most enjoyable chapter of your book is linking the

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>old World to the New World. Cyrus Field did that

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a zillion years ago, and we know it created a

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of jobs. You got Indigo grow of Intel later on.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe he created a lot of jobs. Why can't

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we reduc that in your eleventh, twelve or thirteen person

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you would write about in five years? Well, I think

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we can. But let me just drop back and say,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what I tried to do in the book was to

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about globalization in a way that people could better

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>understand and relate to. So rather than talk about big trends,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I talked about people who did something really They did

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>something really spectacular, and they changed their world. And they

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not they not only changed the world they lived in,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but the impact was so great they continue to change

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>our So let me let me comment on the two

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>people use and I think you're absolutely right that major

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>breakthroughs can create all kinds of jobs that are future oriented.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So one of these chapters is about cyrus Field, who

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>UM lived in the mid eighteen hundreds, and he's the

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>guy who built the Transatlantic cable. UM to tell you

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>how monumental that was. UM on the day before that

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>cable was absolutely it was was constructed and was concluded

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>when when it it linked Europe and the US. On

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the day before, news traveled across the Atlantic no faster

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>than it had for four thousand years that it was

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it is. It was a question of the wind on

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one minute. When that cable was actually joined, we had

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>real time communication between the US and Europe, and within

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>two or three years after that, the entire world was wired.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Think of think of the discontinuity. In fact, the Transatlantic

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>cable was a far bigger advance and civilization than the Internet,

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>because when the Internet came along, we already could look

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>at our TVs and see uh, you know, we could

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>see Vietnam real time. So um, the incremental advance of

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was far less than going from zero to

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>real time. Les Robert Gordon's point in his in his

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>book that the big advances have been done and now

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's incremental change. Well let's let's let's come back to that.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But I just, um, I want to I want to

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>reinforce Tom's point, which is that Transatlantic cable was the

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>forerunner of the radio, of the telephone, of the and

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, and so it was a huge job changer.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it basically put the United States into a

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>totally different era of global communications. And you think about

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the jobs that were created with all the new cables

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that were you know, being liked and all the equipment

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that wait with it, but not only that, all the

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>business that took place that couldn't place before. Well, we

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have to come back. Jeffrey Garden with US of Yale

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>University has a wonderful new book, From Soak to Silicon.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike wants to follow up. I know where the important

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thought is, Well, we will do that. From Soak to Silicon,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>The Story of Globalizations or ten Extraordinary Lives Futures of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>negative seven down futures, negative assuring to the market. You

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>see that the Monday after Job today. Coming up Jeffrey Garden,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk to him about Andrew Grove. We'll talk

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to him about some of the other names of Michael

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>McKee I know, and some thoughts as well. Also Jeffrey

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Garden on the potato bosel for TATA, talk about that

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. First, I check in with Michael Barr. We

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get the latest World of National headlines. Blank, Tom,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Vice President Joe Biden told American

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>troops and the United Arab Emirates the US will wipe

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>out Islamic state militants in Iraq and Syria. Biden is

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Middle East trip. Biden also told the troops

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the US has carried out eighteen hundred air strikes against

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ISIS since October. The verbal battle between Hillary Clinton and

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders took a more pointed turn at last night's

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Democratic presidential debate in Flint, Michigan. Clinton accused Sanders of

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>turning his back on the auto industry. Sanders said Clinton's

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>friends on Wall Street destroyed this economy. Republican presidential candidate

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump says Nancy Reagan, the wife of a truly

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>great president, was an amazing woman. She will be missed.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Reagan died yesterday in Los Angeles at age ninety four.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Global News twenty four hours a day, powered by our

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hundred journalists and more than a hundred fifty

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>news bureaus from around the world. Michael Blarn, Mike Tom

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and macn thanks so much. Yields elevated off the jobs

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>report on Friday, the tenure year of one point nine

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>zero percent with Jeoffrey Garden from Silk to Silver com

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance. The news update brought to you by Flushing

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank open a complete business checking account with fifteen thousand

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more and get a free sixteen gig WiFi tablet.

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Visit flushing Bag dot com for details. Remember f D

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I C Equal Housing, London Global business news twenty four

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hours a day. It's Bloomberg dot Com, the Radio plus

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Mobile Act and on your radio, this is a Bloomberg

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Flash and I'm Karen Moscow a US stock index

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>futures are lower. Let's go to the first Word breaking

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>news desk for today's morning call. And here's Bill Maloney.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Bill, Good morning Karen. That's right US. You

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>just remain under pressure today. Down futures lower by forty

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>two points, SP futures drop seven and NAZAC futures declined

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>by seventeen U S ten Uel at one point nine

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>per cent. Main up of markets are also trading lower.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Energy names, telcom and financials need to drop in deal

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>news b A s F said to be a valuing

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>rival takeover bid for DuPont Another news value to hold

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>call on March fifteenth on preliminary Q four and Dinan's

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and sell X plunges fifty percent pre market after study

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>eating this endpoint. Finally, some of your key wallsheet upgrades

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and downgrades Archer Daniels cut your neutral over at Bank

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of America. Stratus has cut the underweight to JP Morgan,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Michael's cut the eagle weight at Morgan Stanley add no

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more Micron cut to reduce and anger sol Rand raised

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy Finally Win Resorts raised to buy versus neutral

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>over at ubs live on the first Breaking news desk

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>on Boumloney Karen thanks to Baible to hear live breaking

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>news over your Bloomberg type squawk and go on your terminal.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That's squ a w k go. That's a Bloomberg business flash.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom and Mike Karen, thanks so much, Bloomberg Surveillance Brunch

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you by indesco. Have you considered all of your investment alternatives?

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Non traditional asset classes and strategies may help you achieve

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your goals? Find out more in investco dot COM's slash alternatives.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And Michael McKee and I were an esteem because Michael,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>did you notice that Yale Hockey once again does it?

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They host Dartmouth in the E C A C S

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>seven all ivy picks. They're just the powerhouse. Well we are.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations to them and no doubt all reading Jeff Carton's

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>new book. Yeah there, Well, you know it's funny. It's

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be seventy one degrees or so in the middle

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of this week. So Tom is already in beach mode

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's declared from Silk to Silicon. His beach reading

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>book of the Year, The Story of Globalization Through Ten

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary Lives, written by Jeffrey Garden. He is the Dean

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>emeritus of the Yale School of Management. We were talking

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about how, uh, one person, through their efforts, can make

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a major impact on history. You've got ten extraordinarily lives

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in there, but these are lives that have been lived.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Whom do you see out there as someone who who

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>could be the next the next chapter is there is

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there a person or a subject matter that you would

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tout as perhaps the next big thing? Well, um, you know,

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>before I answer that, I just want to I just

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>want to re emphasize the criteria I used, because by

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>any account, there are lots of really extraordinary people who

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are doing extraordinary things. The ten that I picked had

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a big idea, but they also were the ones who

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>executed the idea, So that really limits the That limits

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the pool. I mean, there's been many big thinkers, but

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a thinker and a doer on an extraordinary scale.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That that puts you in a much more rarefied environment.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And the second kind of criteria I had is that

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>what these guys did kicked off an entirely new age.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So for example, I write about my first character, Genghis Khan,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he really kicked off an age of global empire. Or

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I write about um Cyrus Field, and he kicked off

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>an age of global communication, you know. And I write

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>about John Rockefeller, who kicked off an age of industrialization. UM.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>If I use those categories is very very hard for

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>me to I think for anyone to identify someone now,

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>um you know, the the usual suspects. Let's say Jeff

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Bezos you know, or or maybe um you know Steve

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Jobs or maybe um uh Elon Musk. I don't know

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're kicking off new ages. Now. The person who

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kicked off the new age in my book, the one

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I picked that relates to all of them, was Andrew Grove.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Because Andrew Grove, as the head of Intel, UM didn't

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>create the microprocessor, but he figured out how to make

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>it to commercial to global commercial scale. And it's the

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>microprocessor that's at the center of every Internet digitalization gadget

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about. It could be phones, it could

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be three D printers, it could be all kinds of sensors,

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but without the microprocessor, none of it would be possible.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's that was my thinking. So who who?

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I can identify a person, but I could identify maybe

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a a an arena that I think someone is going

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to come along. Let's say, and um be the person

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>who may eradicate certain diseases that would have an enormous

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>global impact in terms of populations. I think someone might

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>come along and have a technological breakthrough when it comes

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to climate change. You know, someone anyone who can figure

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>out how to capture the coal emissions or forever that

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>would be. But I don't know who those people are. UM,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got to rip up the script here. I put

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>out a slight article of fabulous article by Dana Goldstein. This,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>uh we can on Andrew Hacker in his hugely controversial

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>book basically saying the liberal arts curriculum doesn't need math.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I went suitably ballistic, as I believe you would as well.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Would you explain to our audience why people that aren't

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be engineers like the people in your book,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like Grove or or Um the others, why we need

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>math at every level of our education, Well, I just

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think we. First of all, I agree with you, and

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we have entered in era where the kind

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of reasoning that math induces is absolutely critical to understanding

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>various relationships. That, let me put another way, We're living

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in an era where you need deep knowledge, but you

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>also need to be able to relate it to other things.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And math is the ultimate sort of relational kind of discipline.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we need math. I thought what

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you were going to say is do we need poetry?

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think we need that. We need that as well.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We need that's the house I grew up. So I

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>think we need people who because because we can't anticipate,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but the world is going to be and I really

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>believe that because I think the change is moving so fast.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>We need people who have technical capabilities but also the

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>ability to reason critically, to ask the right questions. We

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>could go for hours. Jeffrey Garden with a Samarith Yale

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>University of the School of Management. The book is From

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Silk to Silicon, and it is the early advances we

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>have seventy degrees temperature uh this week in New York.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>It is the beach read of the ear. It is

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a fabulous ten chapters. I didn't even have time to

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>mention Sean Money, which is a wonderful chapter. Jeff Garten

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>with us from Silk to Silicon. This is Bloomberg's surveillance

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up there, with all due respect highlight. Brought to

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you by land Rover. If it's in your nature to

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>cast off the every day and seek adventure, the Discovery

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Sport was built to help your search. Visit Landrover tri

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>State dot com for special offers during the only Adventure

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Sales event. Land Rover above and byl broadcasting live to

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>New York, Cloomberg Eleventh, Rio to Washington, d C, Bloomber

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to Boston, Bloomberg Dwell Honors, to San Francisco, Bloomberg to

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the Country, Suis Exam Channel one ninety and around the

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>globe the Bloomberg Radio Plus happened Bloomberg dot Com. This

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Surveillance. Good morning as a thorny on Wall

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Street at Michael McKee along with Tom Keene and our

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>economic indicators are brought to you by Commonwealth Financial network.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>When it's time to change the conversation, talk with a

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>broker dealer, r I A that's ready to listen college

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>six six or six two three six three eight, or

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>visit Commonwealth dot com to learn more. A slow week

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead jobs week, the first week about always very big

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>for indicators. Uh, this week not so much today. The

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>other thing we really have are the FEDS Labor Market

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Conditions Index, a lot of labor market numbers, especially out

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of the jobs report mushed together is supposed to come

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in at one from zero point. For surprise, it didn't rise.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>And then consumer credit later this afternoon, we'll see if

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we get any kind of indication of whether Americans still feel,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, happy enough to borrow. Mushed came out of

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>econometrics after World War Two. Yeah, I took a mushed

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>class the Jolts. You make a big deal about the

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Jolts server. Yes, it's delayed data, but it does tell

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>us a lot about um, the state of the labor market,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>how many jobs available, et cetera. The of course, everybody's

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>still reacting to Friday's jobs report better than forecast in

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of headline numbers. But the big quest was why

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>did we see ours work and particularly compensation go down.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Wages fell after a big jump the month before. H

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Ian Shepherdson from Pantheon Macroeconomics had a unique explanation. We

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get that from him, he joins us now,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and you were the first out of the gate to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>note that even before the report you were expecting a

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>disappointing wage number. What have you found. Well, this is

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a technicality, like it's a calendar quirk UM. So the

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>peril survey is the week of the twelfth UM, and

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when the fifteen falls on the following Monday or Tuesday,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are paid semi monthly, some of them get

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>missed out of the WEDGE numbers. And this isn't supposed

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen UM. Employers are supposed to recognize when those

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>people are being paid outside the survey period and count

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>them anyway when they report their WEDGE data into the

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Labor Statistics. But some of them clearly don't.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a very very consistent pattern going back

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>over the past decade when when with the data first

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>started to appear in their current form, showing that nine

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>times out of ten when the fifteen is a Monday,

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>or Tuesday, the wage numbers come in way below their

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>previous trend, and then they tend to rebound a month

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or two later, so we don't lose anything permanently, but

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we do suffer what appears to be these sort of

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>substantially volatile monthly swings in numbers, which really ought to

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be quite smooth, but they're not. And it turns out

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that a huge amount of that variation is because of

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>this calendar quirk. December was one of those months, and

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we came in with a zero and expectedly big rebound

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in January. Then February another one of these crazy months,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and we get a minus zero point one. So it's

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty consistent and absent any other substantive explanation for the

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>February weakness. That's what I'm going for. Well, you'd be

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for, then a big rebound. What is the underlying

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>state of wage growth once you've move all this stuff out, Well,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's accelerating, certainly accelerating. The trend is stripping out. The

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>calendar quirks is probably now at about two point five

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>two point six year of the year this time last year,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it was two the year before, it was two point

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>zero the year before it was two point zero. So

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this has been quite a marked acceleration after our a

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>long time of very little action going on. Because if

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>funny thing is if you look at the wage numbers

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in real terms rather than in nominal terms, you'll find

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that they've been accelerating for quite a while, and they've

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>been picking up in line with the tightening of the

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>labor market that you can see in a whole bunch

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of surveys n SID and others um and that tightening

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is continuing, it has continues for some time, and it's

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>signaling that real wage growth has to pick up further.

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>What makes us difficult or interesting is that given that

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation has now bottomed out, and I think everybody agrees

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with that, now that we've we've we've had the downward

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure on inflation starting to move a little bit to

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the upside um. The only way you can get real

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>wage growth accelerating is phenomenal wages to pick up faster.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is where things get interesting, because I think

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the year when we hit the sort of

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>rates of wage growth at the FEDS pass begins to dislike,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what that is. But Stan Fisher said

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>about a month ago that he'd be comfortable to see

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wage growth at about three. Well, we're not there yet,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think by the end of the summer we

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>will be, and by the end of the year will

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be more like three and a half. And that's when

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>things get very tricky. I agree with that nicely explained

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>on these dynamics and whether you're an optim mr a

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>pessimist in the economy, the backdraft of wages animal spirit

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in nominal is sustained real GDP growth? Are you suggesting

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ian that real GDP could be two point eight or

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Dare I say three is a run rate? Three is

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be difficult for the full year because we've

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>got a horrible base effect at the end of last

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>year because the Q four so weak. But that but

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the courtly run rate, I think three

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is is plausible, probably off for the first quarter, but

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for the second, third, fourth, three is is kind of

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>my base case. And if we get that, then of

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>course that means of the firth that the plan in

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate is more or less inevitable. You know,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a big pick up in the labor force

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in the last few months, but it's not sustainable at

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this rate. So I think unemployment drops further, puts greater

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>pressure on on real wage growth. And again because inflation

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't going down anymore, that means that to get that

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>real wage growth, you've got to get the nominal and

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the fad. You know, looking back over the last thirty years,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty consistent pattern of behavior on their part

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that when wedge growth accelerates substantially, they tend to panic.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And this happens quite quickly, you know, in the very

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>last cycle. Yeah, you know that we went from two

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>percent wage two and a half where we are now

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to four percent in just over a year. And during

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that year the FED went the FED went from being

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>quite relaxed about everything to being in you know, we've

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>really got to slow this down mode and rate throws

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>very substantially. We've got to continue this discussion because the

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>heart of the matter is if you assume of FED

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>do nothing in March, where are they the next FED

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>meeting after that? In terms of getting back to the

0:26:54.400 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>framework that Ian Shepherdson sture way behind, it's even worse

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>than that because they gotta wait till June. Really, if

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody thinks they would move in the April seven meeting

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's no press conference, so that you know they

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>got waited several more months. I don't know. I find

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it fascinating what you just heard their folks was very important. Again,

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Ian Shepherdson looked for that across the Bloomberg terminal. Will

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>continue with Dr Shepherdson here, but I also want to

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>point out all of our interviews Jeff Gardener and Shepherdson

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and the rest out on iTunes and podcasts here. Uh

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in a bit negative eight on the SMP The Deal

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Future is a negative forty two. What check in with

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Barr now get the latest world in national headlines.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike tom thank you very much. The two Democratic candidates

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>squared off in the debate in Flint, Michigan last night.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 1>State has a hundred forty seven delegates up for grabs

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for tomorrow's presidential primary. Senator Bernie Sanders, continuing his argument

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to invest in municipal projects and the wealthiest country in

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the his theree of the world. We have got to

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, our water systems. I've got a

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>build for a trillion dollars. Greg's thirty million jobs rebuilding

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Flint Michigan Clinton during the presidential debate on cnntegrad with

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Sanders that Michigan's governor should resign after lead contaminated water

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in Flint's drinking water. People should be held accountable wherever

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that leads, if it leads to resignation or recall if

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in political office, if it leads to civil penalties,

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if it leads to criminal responsibility. Nancy Reagan will be

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>buried next to her husband at the Reagan Presidential Library.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The former First Lady died yesterday at age ninety four.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Spokeswoman for Jimmy Carter says the former president does not

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>need further treatment for cancer. Global News twenty four hours

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a day, powered by our two hundred journalists and more

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred fifty news bureaus from around the world.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bark Night, Tom, thank you, Michael. Time now for

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Boomberg NBC Sports Update, with thanks Mike. Rangers and

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Islanders longtime rivals, but now when they play, it is

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>truly a battle of New York City teams, and this

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>year it's been all Islanders. They've won all three meetings.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>At the Guarden, they led three nothing. Five minutes in

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they led four to three third period, when the Rangers

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>tied it with a minute and a a half to go,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Cal Clutterbuck scored off the face off isles one six

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to four, two goals for Johnny Boyjack. Islanders go six

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and one on their road trip in Newark all Penguins,

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they beat the slumping Devils six to one, Golden State

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Warriors an amazing fifty five and six. But when they

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have lost, it's always been on the road, mostly by

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>wide margins and mostly the bad teams routed by the

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lowly Lakers one twelve to ninety five of Steph Curry

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and Clay Thompson together shot one for eighteen on three pointers.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>There could be several local teams in the upcoming n

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>C Double, a tournament assured of one coming out of

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Metro Atlantic as Monmouth but play Iona in tonight's

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>final and Albany at the Colonial in Baltimore. Hofstro will

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>play in North Carolina Wilmington for the right to go

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to the n C Double. As encouraging news for the Yankees,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Masahiro Tanaka to scoreless innings of this first outing since

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>elbow surgery last year. Not many of the all time

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>greats and their careers with a championship victory, Peyton Manning did.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He had already hinted this could be his last rodeo,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as he says, and it was. He retires with five

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>m v ps, two Super Bowl wins, almost all the

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>career passing records. He'll meet the media in Denver today

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>way at the Bloomberg NBC Sports Update. I'm John stash All. John,

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, appreciate that. On a Monday, as we

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>moved forward through the week, we always do it looking

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at equities, bonds, currencies, commodit. He's quite on a Monday always,

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems after a job report. We did see adjustment

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>yields higher off the jobs report, but the curve really

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't steep in all that much. It did a little

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred one basis points right now, one point zero

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one percentage points between the ten year and the two year.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit steeper over the last number of

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>days of tenure one point nine zero percent to two

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>year point eight nine percent. Even three month T bill

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lofty at zero point to seven SMB futures of negative,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>eight down futures negative. And the yen is that global

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>barometer churning one fifty four. This is Bloomberg Surveillance earnings

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for US corporations up one and a half percent if

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you leave out energy, is that enough to keep wages growing?

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Will continue our conversation with Panton macroeconomics Ian Shepherdson here

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on surveillance, Global business news twenty four hours a day

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, the radio plus mobil and on

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your radio. This is a Bloomberg Business flash and I'm

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>far in Moscow. This updates brought to you by Sector

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Spider A t F. So I buy a single stock

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>when you can invest in the entire sector. Visits sector

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>sp d r S dot com or call six Sector

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>e t F. European shares are falling with copper and zinc,

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>while the dollar in German bonds climb as investors assess

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the impact of China's growth plans and the potential for

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>European Central Bank stimulus measures. This week, we checked the

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>markets every fifteen minutes throughout the trading day on Bloomberg.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>US dock index futures are lower, SNP EVENI futures down

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>nine points, now eveny futures down fifties six, and nasdak

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>emny futures down twenty two. Tax in Germany's down one

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>point one percent, CAC in Paris and FT one hundred

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>both down more than one percent as well. Ten Your

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Treasury down eight thirty seconds, the yield one point nine

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>zero percent yield on the two year point eight eight percent.

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Nimex Screwed Oil up six tenths percent or twenty one

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>cents to thirty six thirteen a barrel. Comex Gold is

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>down three tenths percent or three dollars forty cents to

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve sixty seven forty announced the euro a dollar oh

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>nine six one, the yen one thirteen point five zero,

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and selled X Therapeutics of Nita, Massachusetts is now down

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty one percent in early trading after saying it will

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stop a five no stage study of an experimental brain

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>cancer vaccine. That's a Bloomberg Business flash. Tom and Michael

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Churn thanks Future Negative nine A bit of a deterioration

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the tape on this Monday. It is on Wall Street.

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The following is from Bloomberg View, opinions and commentary from

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg columnists. I'm Paula Dwyer, a columnist with Bloomberg View.

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The Republican establishment with Mitt Romney and the lead is

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting back against Donald Trump. Yet no matter how many

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>party elders pile on, Trump keeps winning and poles show

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>fortent of Republican voters support him. Let's face it, the

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Republican elite has lost control of the agenda. To win

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it back, author and social scientist Charles Murray says the

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>GOP should rethink bedrock policies, including a relentless focus on

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts, endless attempts to repeal Obamacare, and opposition to

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>improvements in the social safety net. Such ideas are heresy

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>among the Republican elite, yet they'd be good for Trump's supporters,

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly white, non college educated, and lower income voters. They

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen wages go up since the nineteen seventies, the

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>factories that once employed them have shipped out. Seen through

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>his base, Trump's anti immigrant and anti free trade views

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>makes some sense, yet the GOP has done little to

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>help them. Trump exposes the ineffectiveness of Republican policy, but

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he does so by manipulating and encouraging racial and ethnic animosities.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>To the condemnation of Mitt Romney and many other Party elders,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope they're not too late. I'm Paula Dwire, a

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>columnist with Bloomberg View. For more commentary and opinion, please

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>go to Bloomberg View dot com. This has been Bloomberg

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>View and bloom Review commentaries. Com Here to hourly weekdays

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Michael always going to talk to Ian Shepherdson. Yes,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's terrific to have him on with us. And Uh,

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you were talking in as of course the chief economists

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at Pantheon. You were talking before the break about the

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>outlook for the picking up as the year goes on

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and for earnings rebounding. But we're not seeing the same

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>thing in corporate earnings. I'm wondering how whether the growth

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pick up actually translates to earnings and whether companies can

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:21.439
<v Speaker 1>continue to give raises if we don't see earnings rise. Yeah,

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it kind of depends where you are, really. I mean,

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a manufacturing exporter and you're selling things to

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Asia and you're competing with exports and other countries, it's

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be very difficult for you because the dollars

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem. It's very strong. Um, you're suffering weak demand

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in some of your key markets. Obviously China's one of them,

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but others as well, and for you things are going

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a real struggle. So unfortunately, for those sort

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of businesses, the pickup and wage growth, which they can't

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really avoid because they're all competed for the same pool

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of labor, that's just a margin hit. But if you

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are a domestic facing business, as a service sector business

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular with mostly domestic customers not worried about the

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 1>strength of the dollar, then fore you it's much more

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>manageable because the given wage growth, of course, just means

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>your customers have got more money to spend. Now. It

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you're going to be able to recruit recoup

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>every dollar of extra wage growth, because you may lose

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of market share somebody else might come into

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>your space. But in aggregate it should be okay. And

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so for those businesses, which remember are the overwhelming bulk

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of US corporations in that domestic consumer facing space, the

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wage pressure is not the end of the world. But

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's a minority of companies externally focused dollar sensitive

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and for those it's going to be extremely difficult. It

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>already is extremely difficult. This is not a news story.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>It's just likely to intensify over the course of the year.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But I got to say, it doesn't mean that the

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>whole manufacturing sector, which of course has most of the

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>exporters in it, is going to perform as badly as

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it did last year. Because one of the big drags

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>last year was the massive collapse in capital spending in

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the oil business. And that's pretty much over now. You know,

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it's fallen so far that it cannot fall again as

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>far as it did last year. We we we've probably

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>taken capex in oil from a peak of about two

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>billion annualized down to about fifty so it cannot fall

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as far again. And that was a really big hit

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on manufacturer, So less pain from that source. But they're

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>going to have to deal with that wage problem. Yeah.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to catch you by surprise. You're I,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're so good at this. When I look at

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>full and part time employment, Joe Malinsky rights it up

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at advisor perspectives, and the bottom line is part time

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>employment is better. There's less of it and more full time,

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but part time employment is is thirty five percent higher

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>than it was at the bottom. We were at thirteen

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>point five percent a million years ago. We get up

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>into the twenties and we come back to eighteen point

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 1>two percent. So we've moved from thirteen point five percent

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen point two percent of America. Which way is it?

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it part time America? Are we actually moving in

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the right direction? Well, we we are moving in the

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>right direction. But there's still an enormous legacy from from

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the crash period which distorted so many of these labor

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>market numbers, and not all of them, many of them

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet reverted to where they were before the Great

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Crash um. This is a you know, there still an

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of people in these part time jobs who

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>want full time jobs. But at the very same time,

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>surveys of businesses are telling us that they're saying they

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>can't find the people they want to hire. And this

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is one of these apparent contradictions that we can't really

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>resolve with the data that we've got. I mean, why

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 1>would it be if you've got millions of people who

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>want to work full time, they're currently employed. It's not

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like they, you know, dead, be two, I'm going to

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>get a job. They've got a job. They want to

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>work full time, And at the same time, employers are

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>saying we can't find the people we want to hire.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know whether nobody knows whether this is

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 1>a geographic problem that the people are in the wrong place,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's a skills problem. I think that's more likely,

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's a sector problem that you know, we've

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of people maybe working part time insectors

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>where the growth isn't very strong, and where growth is

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>stronger they don't have the right skills. We don't know,

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>but certainly there's there's several million people who would love

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a full time job and several hundred thousand

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>companies who want more full time employees. You would think

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it would work out, but it isn't. So someth there's

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a mismatch somewhere. All The one thing that is clear

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is that even with all that, the FED is pretty

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>much there with the employment part of their mandate. What

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:14.439
<v Speaker 1>do you see happening with inflation going forward? Well, here's

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Janet Yellen said back in December that temporary factors,

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the strong dollar and dropping oil prices are holding down

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the core PC deflator, which is a FEDS target measure

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of inflation, holding it down between a quarter and half

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a percent the target too, and the current rate the

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>latest state that we have is one point seven, So

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you add back in those temporary factors, and core inflation

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 1>on the fed's own target measure is already at two

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to two and a quarter. The FEDS forecasts don't show

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 1>them reaching that two percent target until the fourth quarter

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of two and a half years from now, and yet

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the very same data that the FED targets are showing

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>already using Yellen's own calculations, that the underlying rate is

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>already there. This really worries me because I think a

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>FED that wasn't so rabbit in the head it's when

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>confronted with slow down in China, would have been hiking

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>rates much more quickly. And the longer that they delay it,

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and the more they find excuses looking at international developments

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and worries about overseas economies, none of which are very

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>much bearing on the US domestic labor market, the more

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the danger rises that eventually inflation bites them and they

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have to catch up very quickly with very disruptive and

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 1>destabilizing right tags. But funny thing is, of course that yeah,

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps referring to this danger, saying, well, if

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we leave it too long, then we'll have to go

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>more quickly and that could be very damaging. But the

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>action that they're taking seems to me to be raising

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the very risk that they're setting out in those sort

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of statements, and I really don't get it. I think

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they're hugely overplaying the danger post by China slowdown, and

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>overplaying the danger players by the manufacturing slowdown, which is real.

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>No question, manufacturing is very weak, but it's a teeny

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of the economy and the rest of it's doing

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>much better. And the danger is that that tightening in

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it is going to catch them underwares.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, looking at the data, by their own terms,

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they're already at the sort of rate swearing thestry policies

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>should be much nearer in New Trall and he isn't. Okay,

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>So quickly, here's summarized for us. Do you agree with

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>more I heard from Michael McKey, you know, my suggesting

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that with an opinion, But March, no decision, next meeting,

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>no decision because there's no press conference. Unfortunately. You know,

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it does look to me like if if they don't

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>go in March, and it seems extremely unlikely that they're

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>going to move now. Um, then June is the most likely.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 1>And the danger is that by the time we get

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that things have moved on significantly. Uh, you know, they're

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>already at their mandate in terms of the employment picture,

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're very close on the inflation front.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that if they do wait till June,

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>then they'll be going very rapidly after that, and they'll

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be a significant adjustment in the markets in

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of thinking about what the FED is going to

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do, and it will all be triggered by

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the wage numbers, because ultimately it always is the added

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of free song, if you like, is that the

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>actual inflation, which was supposed to be something we didn't

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have to think about for another two years, could also

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>be forcing them to move at the same time. And

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the history tells you that when you've got accelerating inflash

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and wages at the same time, things get very messy,

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Ian Shepherdson is always brilliant, Thank you so much.

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>With panther Young Mike, I'm gonna put out on Twitter

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>on the part time full time question, Jill miss Lynskey.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>It's important when economic data and reports are constructed by

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a physics and astronomy major from the University of Chicago.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that qualifications or what Jill mss Lyndskey.

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll put it. I'll get it out on social just

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>super work. Rob Low tweeting out Peyton Manning's retirement timed perfectly.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He could step in as a candidate in a broker

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican convention. We want IK or whatever the phrase was

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from fifty two Tim Keenan, Michael McKee and Peyton Manning.

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Good morning,