WEBVTT - Fixing Traditional Finance

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make informed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>this started, blow and welcome to another episode of the

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Market Disruptors podcast. Today I am joined by Mona Elisa

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and she is the CEO and founder of Melanport, which

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is working in the decentralized finance space. She has a

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really unique background working in traditional finance and raising money

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>through hedge funds and dealing with the bureaucracy and the

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>high expensive costs it takes to do that. She saw

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>those massive problems and figured out there's got to be

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a better way, and she has since worked on decentralized technology,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>using the blockchain to build new applications to cut down

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on that red tape, cut down on time, and save money.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You got a really unique perspective. It was a great conversation.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's goad just jump right into it. Hey, everyone, welcome

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to another episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast. Today. I'm

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with Mona Elisa. She has the CEO and

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>founder of Melanport. Um there in the decentralized finance space

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a really exciting area. I'm excited to sit down and

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and talk with her this morning. Somna, welcome, thank you. UM,

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>great to be here, all right. So, UM, yeah, I

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>know you're in the decentralized finance space. You kind of

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>have an interesting background. UM, that's led you here. Why

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>don't you just fill everybody in and kind of what

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been doing, um, and that brought you to the

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>space and what you're doing currently. Yeah, sure, so UM,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I started my career in London working

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for Goldman Sachs and equity trading, which was kind of

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid role between market making and prop trading at

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the time. And eight years later A decided to go

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and work for one of our clients based in Geneva,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>who was a large hedge fund and I ran a

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>long short equity book for him. So I basically sat

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of the trading desk, which was

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the investing role, investing other people's money and

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>m and four years later I got um made an offer.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a part of my life I

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about very much. But four years later I

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>got made an offer by a small family office who

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see me twenty million dollars to launch my

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>own long short equity fund, and I, you know, as

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>most young aspirational traders, I jumped on the opportunity, and

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this is a this is an opportunity to

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>make a name for myself and my own track record

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and do what I love doing. So I took the

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>offer and moved to Zurich and I tried to launch

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>my own long short equity fund, and my my dream

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly became my nightmare because it was a horrible year.

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>UM Launching a fund with anything less than two hundred

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>million dollars is very, very difficult in this day and age.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>UM there's an incredible amount of administration, operation compliance that

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done, and I was very naive thinking

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that I could do that with twenty million. I actually

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>raised thirty million in total UM. But basically within a

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>year I realized that most of my time was being

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>spent in an operational and administrative role when I should

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have been focused on investing and preserving capital of my investors.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately I decided to wind it down. UM, I

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to take a year off. But essentially during

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that year I discovered blockchain and discovered etherium, starting with

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin obviously, UM. And then and then I thought, why

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>don't we do this all again? UM? I mean when

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I say do this all again, I mean, why don't

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we just reinvent the financial infrastructure so that we can

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>lower these barriers to entry and automate all of these

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>processes and and make it make finance much more easily

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>available to people who want to um, who who are

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talented and and aspiring, and who want to be able

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to do things without the large headwinds. Yeah, that's that's awesome. UM.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing to think that thirty million is not enough

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>to start a fund, especially when you're saying that you're

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>really being gobbled up or swallowed up by the fees

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and admin costs. Yeah, it's insane. I mean it's Anyone

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>who's raised that kind of money before for the first

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>time without a track record knows how difficult it is. Yeah.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>What what year was that? That was in two thousand

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen? Okay, okay, so even when you had a

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>good market behind you, Yeah, so it wasn't about the market.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It was really about the not about the performance of

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the market. It was about the market overall, or the

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>regulations and admin costs that are involved with ut Yeah,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it was just you know, I mean, if you want

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a little, you know, peek into what my my kind

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of average day look like. It was dealing with UM. Okay,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So starting with the end of a trading day, you know,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to fill in four different types of spreadsheets.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Each of them had forty different columns reporting um, forty

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>different bits of information on each trade that I had done.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>One spreadsheet for equities, one spreadsheet for FX or currency trades,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>one spreadsheet for bonds, once one spreadsheet UM for cash management,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and report that into the fund administrator, who's then receiving

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the counterparties, you know, reporting on the other side, who

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>checks them. Sends a bunch of emails the next day

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>saying this trade doesn't match, that trade doesn't match this

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Your fourth decimal place doesn't match his fourth decimal place.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Some one of you is wrong. We've got to settle

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this before we can settle the trade. That's one part

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. Then there was like you know p n

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>L spreadsheets where you know, at the end of the day,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I have my piano calculation of fund administrator has their

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>calculation almost never matched. They were always slightly off. Have

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>software for that? Oh yeah, you have software, but I

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you have software that costs a hundred thousand dollars

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a year to run. Again, that's back down to the

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the barriers. How much do you want

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay to run and operate your fund? You know,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>when you when you're thirty million dollar fund and you're

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>charging what one per cent and feest you've got a manager.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got a manager. Operating costs become you know,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>quite crucial where you spend them, right right? Yeah, So

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>even those p and and monitoring tools are not perfect.

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, they require they still require a lot of

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>manual input. Right. Um, So those are the costly layers there,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>um that you saw. Now, so so you saw a

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>theorym and then you figured there's some way that that

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that compliance piece, that those layers could be compressed down

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>using the blockchain. Yeah, well, I mean what what what

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ethereum really gave us was well what let's let's take

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a step back. What Bitcoin gave us was a way

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>too was an accounting system. Right, an accounting system which

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was UM a way to transfer money from A to

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>B with no counterparty, no sorry, no into between two counterparties,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with no intermediary in the middle, in a completely transferse way.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you had Etherium, which took that same accounting methodology

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and secure secure accounting methodology and embedded an entire coding

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>language on top of that, giving you something that looks

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they used to call it a computer.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you know when you can code, when you

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can code UM rules and conditions onto how transactions can

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be spent, and when you know what you can and

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>can't do. This becomes a very powerful tool in finance

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because it basically solves all This is essentially what the

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>operational layers are there for, right, to make sure that

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fund managers don't UM run off with your money in

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>basil your money, steal your money and run away to

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>spend is in a way that wasn't that they weren't

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>permission to UM as per the kind of advertisement or

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or fun perspective perspective of that product. UM. And we

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>see that. You know, it's happened time and time and

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>again in history, whether it's rogue traders at ubs or

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a model for whether it's whatever. You know,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the system constantly fails people. People people managed to get

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>away with things, spending investors money or savers money in

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a way that they were not permission to do. Yet

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we keep adding these layers of compliance and layers of

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>operations to check and double check and triple check. But

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the traditional financial system is that it's

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so untrained, it's so it lacks transparency. There are so

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>many layers of technology. There are so many there's such

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a lack of technology actually, and you know, tracing a

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>trade is just like it's a very difficult process. So

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's easier to get away with things because there

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't you know, there wasn't a good trace trace ability,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's so many part is in the middle, you

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>never know where something is. Um So blockchain etherium gives

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you this transparency, accountability and a way to kind of

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>embed rules sets within smart contracts and enforce them. The

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>blockchain can enforce them, so all of a sudden you

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can do away with these operations, compliance teams, um you know,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>accounting teams, etcetera, etcetera, because you have an immediate almost

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>immediate settlement time. You have a completely transparent settlement system.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You know when a trade fails and why it fails.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You can see where everything is at any time. You

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can see in you know, we will get to Mala

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in a second, I'm guessing, but you can see, you

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>can you can predefine rules by which people can do

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>things or can't do things um. And there's absolutely no

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>way those rules can be broken because they're embedded in

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a smart contract. So when you talk about the settlement

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>times in the traditional stocks, I mean there's so many

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>different people in the middle, right, So from the from

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>the company issuing it all way down to the individual

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe retail investor or trader who owns that stock or

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks they own that stock. There could be what five

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>six different people in between, and then when someone trades

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that stock or buys your shells at stock, then it

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>has to get settled all the way through the line.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're talking about? Yeah? Absolutely, you know

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you need exactly you need to transfer ownership um And

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, you know, ownership in the traditional

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>world of finances is literally a bit of paper, a

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>legal document that tells you yes, so and so owns this,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to transfer, you know, the ownership of this

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>asset to the new person. And this is it's it's

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a lengthy process, so it takes time, it takes verification,

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it takes people, it takes it takes a lot of

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>manpower as it stands today, and manpower costs money. So

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it adds costs layers of costs. So some of that

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>also has to do with like the custody, right, So

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>then um, just like with what what the blockchain has

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>enabled us to do is to take custody of the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>asset um not i and all these intermediaries to keep

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>keep their ledgers up to date or sort of speak

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely yeah. Yeah, But actually this is very interesting point

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that you bring up because so um, over the years,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's become a regulatory requirement that every hedge funder asset

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>manager has a fund administrator and a legal custodian. And

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason that that those rules have been enforced by

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>law are that it's it's a way of ensuring that

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the fund manager can't just run away with the assets

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and spend them on porsches and private jets and whatever,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but they actually have to spend the funds they you know,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>investors are trusting them with in the within the within

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of rule sets that have been defined to

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the investor. UM. When you talk about the world of blockchain,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this rule actually just becomes a nuisance, right because investors

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>always are the the the owner of their own funds,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because they're always holding custody or at least the world

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>defy decentralized finance is such that investors should always have

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>custody of their own assets if they want it. Um.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And so this rule about having a custodian and a

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fund administrator suddenly becomes quite interesting to to reassess because, um,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>everything is so transparent and everything is pre defined in code.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So why would you need, you know, why would you

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>need to replicate this role when it's arguably more efficient

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and potentially in future more secure than having uh kind

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of manual intermediary in the middle. Right. So to set

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the stage, then, so the big problem that you ran

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>into and that everybody is facing is massive administrative cost

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the way that custody is happening and settlement

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>has to happen through multiple people, and so the compliance

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with that UM is just just too

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>burdensome and just to to cost too costly. Absolutely, and

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, compliance requirements are only going in one

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>direction because every years, there's every two or three years

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as another scandal, there's another you know, financial meltdown, and

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>then regulators deal with it by slapping on more and

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more rules and more and more restrictions. And in order

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to to meet those reporting requirements and

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet those regulations and rules, you know, funds essentially

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>just get slapped with more and more costs. So it's

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>it's a yeah, it's a difficult environment for funds. And

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what you end up seeing is instead of the biggest,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>instead of the best fund managers doing best, doing well,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what you end up seeing is it's the big ones

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>getting bigger and the small ones getting smaller because the cost,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the cost to do the administration. Exactly, you

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>need the scale to be able to suck up the administration.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a great I wish I could remember the source,

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but there was a great article um a couple of

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I think it's said something like of the

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>world's assets invested in hedge funds are invested in five

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>largest hedge funds. Yeah, one about that. We see that

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>all throughout different areas in the world. For example, in

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>e commerce, right, so you have am on that's continued

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to grow bigger and bigger and bigger, and then regulations

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have been constantly put into place for small businesses to

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>keep up with, like local tax jurisdictions for example. UM,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's too burdensome for those small entrepreneurs,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those small sites to keep up with those regulations. And

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so Amazon of course has the scale and they can

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. So UM and we can see that just

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>play out over and over and over, and it's it's

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of what you're saying, is it's kind

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of like, on one hand, Um, the regulations continue to

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>build up and continue to make it harder and harder

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and harder. But at the same time, we're on a

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>system that's been around for eighty years or I don't know,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty seventy years and it hasn't really changed. Is that

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of what what you see? Absolutely? And and the

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is, you know, eighty years ago we didn't have

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>very exciting technology. Today we do, and UM and probably

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know we've had exciting technology for the last couple

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of decades as well. But the financial system, so UM,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's so fragile right now because we've

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just slapped layers and layers and layers of um of

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>old technology on top of our new technology on top

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of old technology for so many years that the technology

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>stack that they're dealing with such a mess in banks

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and financial institutions. So to to try and you know,

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>make any proper use cases or to use blockchain or

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>new technology to its food potential, it's almost impossible if

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a large incumbent. And I think the people that

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>are doing the really exciting stuff now are the people

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that can really start from fresh, take all the technology

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that's available to us today, and reinvent things from scratch.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You I want to ask you, um how hard that's

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be because of the incumbents that are there

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on the regulations. But before we get to that, UM,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>let's jump back to UM. Let's just jump back now

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to melon. So you've seen these problems, You've you've had

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this in real life, the burdensome costs

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and compliance and labor and so forth, and so UM

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>using this new technology of bitcoin, etherory and blockchain, UM,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you think you found a better way? Absolutely? I mean,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we are. It's still very early days in terms of

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>where the whole space is UM, but I think you know.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>In February nineteen this year, we went we went to

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>main net with version of one of Melon, and Melon

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>enables you to As of today, you can set up

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a crypto fund within a few minutes. You can define UM.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You can pre define things like who is allowed to

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>invest UM, where to your asset universe, which trade, which

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>exchanges are you allowed to trade with? Which, what's your

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>maximum number of positions, what's your maximum position size? All

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things that you can define in a

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>fund perspective which is enforced by financial intermediaries. We can

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>start to define those by smart contract code in a

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>customizable way. I can customize my fund with its rules

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and its parameters. I can select my fees, my my

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>management and my performance fees, and I can deploy this

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>fund to the blockchain. It takes the form off its

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>token and people can invest. The smart contract takes care

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the accounting, the share creation, the fund administration, the risk,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk management, everything operational about the fund except the

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>except the investing, which is done by the manager is

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>taken care of, which just frees up the manager to

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>focus purely on investing. Now, UM, that's huge when you

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think that. You know, my fund took six months to launch. UM,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they can take up to twelve months to launch. And

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the costs involved before you even launch are north of

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars in most cases, and the running costs

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>of a fund are at least that per year. So

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've reduced that to process to a few

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>minutes and um less than a hundred bucks. And you can, yeah,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and you can, and you can start to see. You know,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the user experience is not as easy as UM. You

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>know we'd like it to be, but that's largely because

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of other developments that need to happen. There is the

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>user experience on setting up a traditional fund. It's true,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's true. But you know, blockchain is not perfect. And

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to sit here and say as of

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>today it's perfect. But UM, if we keep if we

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>keep improving, or if we keep developing things in the

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>way at the speed that have they have developed in

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the last three years in the blockchain world, I think

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>that three years from now we'll be looking at a

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>system which is massively, massively better experience than the traditional

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>experience of fun management. Now when you say a fund um, uh,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a couple different things. I mean. Originally I

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>was thinking MELON was like helping someone set up like

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>an index fund, which means I would say, you know,

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for simplicity sake, I have ten different assets in there

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>at at different ratios, and um, someone could buy into

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that index fund. UM. But I think now you're talking

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>about setting up a fund where I could raise however

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>much money and then go invest that kind of whatever.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>My thesis is, Yeah, I mean, and I use the

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>word I default to the word fun because it seems

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a word that most people can relate to.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But actually you can use melon to set up any

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of investment vehicle. It can be an e t F,

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It can be a hedge fund, it can be a

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>VC fund, it can be whatever you want. It can

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>be a dow UM. There's actually no limitations on because

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>each each investment vehicle is customizable. But you know, what

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we give is and what we hope is that one day,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, five years from now, maybe any kind of

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>investment vehicle is doable on melon um all the rule sets,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all the risk management rule sets. You can imagine are

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>available because obviously there's a limit finite amount right now

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact that we're a small team UM

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're only two three years into the project. So

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>um but you know, it's all open source, it's all

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>code that's there for anyone to see, anyone can participate,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>anyone can um submit proposals or code, and it's you know,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's easily integratable. So there's absolutely no reason why it

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be used as the future financial infrastructure for all

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>asset management. And so how how would someone use that now?

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, for example, we talked about um ash that's

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>building on top of that, and they're doing some sort

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of like gamified UM fund fund investing type platform. So

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if I was a builder, I would want to build

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>on Melon and I could come build my fund. I mean,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're saying like the options are endless, or

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like I would set up like my own marks index

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>fund or um or I could say, hey, this is

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just give me just raise a million dollars and I'm

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go invest it. However, I see fit, I

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>mean any option that I want. So Melan just kind

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of takes care of the compliance piece of that. So

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>You can think of Melon as the infrastructure, right, the

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure which gives you the tool kit to build whatever

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to build. In the asset management space, you

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can you can set up a vehicle. This vehicle can

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be invested in. You can limit the number of investors,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you can keep it unlimited, you can you can select.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It gives you all the tools that you need to

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to customize whatever you want to do. Now, we haven't

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>got all the bits there, but we have a full

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>feature set and we've delivered everything, all the features we promise,

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're now looking towards the future to what else.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are the next features that people want

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to see? Ashes building a use kick that we never

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>actually imagined on Alan and I just came along UM

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a year and a half ago,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and they said, oh, we love what you guys are doing.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We uh, we're really good with UX and you I

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and UM. We want to build a fun use case

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>on Melon and we want to kind of do something

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like a Battle of the fund managers on Melon where

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>people can just challenge one another to short or long

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>term you know manager competitions and UM and you know

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's sort of sort of prize pool which

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gets allocated to the winner, and it's all very competitive

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's a very playful there's a very playful element

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to it. UM. I have actually envisioned the use case

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of Melon initially to be much more serious because I

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>come from the traditional world of finance. But I'm very

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>open to anything that anyone wants to build on Melon

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately, it's all the same infrastructure and it's all

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the same you know, it's all the same tools. And

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the more people that are building on Melon, the better,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's when we're going to get the best features,

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the best functionality, the best minds on it, the best

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the more the more developers that work

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on it, the more secure it is. UM. So, so

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we're very open to working with any teams that want

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to build on Melon to build anything asset management related. Now.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>UM basically, what you're trying to do is make it

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>much easier to build a fund in the financial space,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about like compressing those layers, the costly layers,

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>taking out some of that admin. A lot of that

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is there because of laws regulation. UM there's a lot

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of people that make money from that as well, So

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like quite a lot of people are going

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to be disrupted through this process. So, UM, are are

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the regulators going to allow this to happen or what's that?

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>What's that battle going to look like? Yeah? You know

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this is I mean, this is the this

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is a great question. UM. Who knows? Um? You know

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you you see there was a report. I'm just trying

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to put it up now so i can give you

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the title. It's just shocking. But you know, the center

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of fund administration in the world is Luxembourg, as you

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>probably know, and there was a report UM published by

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Deloitte this week or maybe it was last week. The

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>title is quite striking. It's called um blockchain technology has

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the potential to wipe Luxembourg off the map something along

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>those lines. And you know that's because Luxembourg, basically, I

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think most of it's g d p IS is made

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>from servicing the fund market, the funds asset managers. So UM,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know people are signed it. We've we've been

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>saying this for three years. I was amazed at this

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>report came out now, but you know this is this

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>has been our belief all along. Our regulator is going

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to accept it. You know, it depends, um that some

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are more open to others. Um. If you're Luxembourg, probably not, frankly,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>but if you're you know, if you're a jurisdiction that

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that embraces new technology doesn't have a lot going for

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you in the asset management space to start with, or

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the finance industry, Hey, you may want to make

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a name for yourself by being open minded and embracing

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this kind of technology. Um. But in general we're seeing

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>mixed you know, mixed um, mixed reactions on that. And

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, the law is the law at the moment

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for most of the kind of financial centers where you

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>do need these financial intermediaries and so well, you know,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll either see creative technological solutions that come come up

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that sort of build the technology in a way where um,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, where where the law you know, there's no

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of strict definition on how the law can be interpreted,

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or you'll see the technology being built in a way

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>that you know, can fit into the existing law. I

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>hope it's the innovative way we see because there's absolutely

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>no point in in in there's no upside in this

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>technology if you have to fit it into the regulatory box. Frankly, UM,

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you think regulators should be open to people experimenting and

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to seeing what can happen. And I think ultimately it's

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>better for UM, it's better for you know, sandbox environments

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>are very good, but it's better to it's better to

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the potential. The potential of what this technology can do

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for the fund administer, just for for the fund industry

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is huge, yea. And I think it's largely you know,

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the focus seems to be people seem to be getting

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>stuck on K y C A m L A lot.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think, yes, maybe you could argue that, uh,

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on which angle you're looking at, it

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>could be a disadvantage from a regular from a regulator's perspective.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>But the flip side, I mean the advantages that get ignored,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, risk management, control, transparency, reporting possibilities, UM, you know,

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the investors can keep custody of their assets,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that UM, you're somehow protected from a

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>market downturn in the way that you weren't during Lehman

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for example. So UM, I think that there's a large

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>educational role that needs to be played there. I think

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that sandboxes are good, you know, you know, in increasing

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>usage in a sort of controlled environment to prove your

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>use case and then going you know, kind of mega

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>big with it. It's always a good way to do things. UM.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know who knows? Yeah? Now, currently are you

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>only doing it on digital assets like the digital assets are?

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you? Is it being done on actual securities right now? Oh? No, no,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>we're We're not. We're definitely not able to interact with

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>securities UM in the traditional sense. Um. There's because none

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of them have been none of them have been tokenized. No, No,

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely something that might become possible in future. Um. We're

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>only able to include e r C twenty tokens UM

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Melon protocol UM. And yes, if there are

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>e r C twenty tokens that are securities, users can

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>make them part of their asset universe. UM. But that's

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's really a user. It's kind of part of the

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>customization process, right. The users select which assets they want

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to trade. If they're UH, if they're able to trade

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>securities within their fund, then then they can. If they're

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not able, and they should stick to other types of tokens. Right.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We are starting to see some people um, like, uh,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they called wrapping them or you know, creating an arc

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>token that represents an actual security. So maybe something like that.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>We actually have wrapped BTC already available in the Monon protocol,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>which is cool. Okay, I'm curious. Um, I'm curious. Coming

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from Switzerland, which is known for having one of the hardest,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most sound moneys, Um, what you think about bitcoin overall?

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And then and then how like ethery um compares to that?

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you are you a hard sound money

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>person or do more like the expandable fiat kind of money.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not originally from Switzerland, but I definitely love this country,

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and I, um, you know, I if I had to

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>put my money in any fiat I would I would

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>probably pick the swizz frank frankly. Yeah. But as far

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as um crypto goes, I think, um, you know, I do,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I do see I do see Bitcoin and etherorum in

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different way. Bitcoin is for me a you know,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a digital um, a digital money. You can you can

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>buy things for you know, you can exchange it, you

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can you can you can use it as a store

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of value. And it's for me, it's um, it's it's

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I see it as a compass with Frank, but maybe

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>even more secure and in fact, definitely more secure UM

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and an etherory m. I see it in a slightly

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>different way, you know, I see a theorym as um

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a platform that will grow with with its

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>use cases. I don't really see it so much as

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a as a currency, although it can be used as

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a currency, right, So not direct competition. They're serving different

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>purposes and different needs in the market. Yeah, you know,

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the pure noess of bitcoin, the fact that it can

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>only be used to hold or exchange, you know, exchange

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for good to deser versus um makes it characteristically more

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like a currency for me, a digital currency, right. And

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>then as far as building on Ethereum versus other protocol platforms,

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>um have you guys, did you guys do due diligence

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on other platforms? Is it something where like at some

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>point you could move it to another platform or are

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you sold on Ethereum's position in the marketplace? And and

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you think Ethereum is kind of the front running winner

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Yeah, well funny you say that. But

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>back when we started in two thousand and of two

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen, I mean, there weren't that many other platforms today, Yes, UM,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and we started my ethereum UM. We continue to keep

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>an eye on other blockchains that are emerging in the space.

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I still don't think there's anything that offers to you

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what ethereum can offer. UM. Having said that, UM, there's

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be a lot of blockchain new block

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>newer block chains that are going to main net soon

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ish and UM, and you know, we plan to research

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>them and and we've definitely researched. We've definitely you know,

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>started looking at things like the Polka Dot network and

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>into as we think about scalability and interoperability. UM. But

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, ethereum two points around the corner two and

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we're excited about that. And it's just a matter of

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 1>keeping in touch with what's happening in this space and

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>making sure that UM, you know, we're we're up to

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>date and we're ready to to make a necessary amendments. However,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as of today, most of the decentralized finance, in fact,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the decentralized finance applications are on ethereum, and

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so moving away from ethereum would be silly at this stage. Yeah, UM,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for the decentralized finance space. It's an area that that

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think is just fascinating. I mean, I love

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the decentralizing everything. Um. Do you see that as kind

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of being like the main use case right now or

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the primary use case, um of what of what we're

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>doing with this technology? Yeah? I do, I really. I

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm biased obviously because of my background, but I

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that, um, you know, the industry,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the only industry that hadn't been disrupted by technology, in

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, was was financial services um um. And finally

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's happening. You know. I think etherium gives us the

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>possibility to to to finally get rid of a lot

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the fat in the financial industry and do it

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in a different and better way. UM. So I'm really

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>excited about that. Yeah. Now let's just jump into the

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next thing. Now. What I what I find is really

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting is how talking about how I just mentioned how

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I love everything becoming decentralized, Um, you would actually built

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>melon and now have launched it in a more decentralized

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>manner where you've kind of I think, created like a

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>doubt decentralized organization and kind of giving it back to

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the community. Can you talk about that a little bit. Yeah,

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so we yeah, so we always promised that at the

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the two years, when we completed our roadmap,

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we would um, you know, we would sort of let

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Melon out into the wild, so to say. So, we

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the main net UM and we I wanted to

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>make a point of giving up any control over the

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>protocol UM, so we we handed it over to decentralized

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM government system, which we call the Melon Council,

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>which is composed of a group of technical users and

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>UM user representatives and it's running currently on arragon os

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>UM software. So so we did that UM and yeah,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's completely you know, we we have a seat on

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the council. UM. We're definitely consulted when the decisions have

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to be made, but we have no more than one

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>vote on the council. So and and over time I

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>would expect that to you know, of as the council grows,

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>i'd expect you know, our our influence and influence just

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>continues to diminished. But what does that look like? So,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've given it up to the to the community. Uh,

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you're still taking a seat on there. So now it's

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like up to the community to vote on the direction

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that it goes and new features and stuff, but who

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>actually will manage it and run it or or or

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>develop on it. So UM, so there's a few, there's

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different parts, so the council. So let

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>me take a step back, UM in order to use

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Malon protocol, so we have we have a token.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh we there is a MELON token that exists which

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>basically is a usage token and is basically consumed as

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>a kind of asset management gas whenever anyone is interacting

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with certain functions in the system. When the ecosystem UM,

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the tokens are are basically burnt once they've been spent.

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side of that, there's an annual amount

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of tokens which are created by the network and these

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>go towards future maintainers and developers of the network, and

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>they are allocated, uh allocated or burned by the TAO

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as per the needs of the network. So essentially UM,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the token holders and the users are somehow aligned by

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the token o mix. So users are incentivized to help

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>grow the network because as usage goes up on the network.

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>In theory UM, this should be linked to the token

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>value and the future maintainers and developers are also incentivized

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because as they develop cool new features and maintain the

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>software effectively. Also, users go up on the network and

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they're earning in this kind of token UM. And and

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>then the one kind of stakeholder in the ecosystem that

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is not represented anywhere is the user right because the

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>user UM just wants to use a secure protocol. They

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really care are about the token. And so when

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we designed our governance, we said, like, you know, how

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>can we design a governance system that represents the stakeholder

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that is underrepresented in our ecosystem? And so we said, okay,

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>if we were users, we would want to know that

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>people looking after this UM software are technically competent or

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>user representative. And so that's exactly how we designed the

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Melon Council in the dow around it UM. So basically,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone who joins the Melon Council has to prove that

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they're somehow technically competent in order to make decisions around

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>upgrades or UM any kind of protocol related decisions. And

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side of that, UM, if you're a

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>user of the network and you can prove that you're

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a user of the network and you're you're you're sort

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of elected by the other users. You can join the

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Melon Council to represent the users, so you can say

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to the you can say to the technical council, you're

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 1>spending too much time on security. Actually, we really wanted

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this cool new feature. You know, go ahead, guys, build

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this for us UM and this is this is I'm

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>representing the users and this is what we want. So

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of um, it's kind of a good balance

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>between the token economics and the governance. We've basically represented

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and looked after we hope all users and stakeholders in

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem interesting. And so you have the new tokens

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>being created that can fund it um, you have the

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>token holders the users, which are are voting in the

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>governance of that, and then you have the funding that

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that can pay for the ongoing development. Just to be clear,

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the token holders do not vote with the token. The

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>token holders basically just benefit as used it of the

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>network goes out the users. UM, the users consume Melon

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as they use the network, and the yeah, and the

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and the the us the exactly. Yeah. So the reason

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>we didn't go for the token holder voting, which is

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on chain government, and it's because it's too easy. In

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>our opinion, for our use case, it was too easily gamable.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you had token holders vote voting on sensitive

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>things like protocol upgrades, it's very easy to influence or

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the vote. UM when you when you're not necessarily

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>technically qualified to make a vote on an upgrade, right,

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>or even worse, we've seen and a lot of protocols

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>which have token hole token voting rights, we've seen apathy

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in voters. So uh, you know, something like less than

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of people will typically turn up to vote

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with their tokens. And this um, this is also a

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>negative for the protocol because you know, then the swing

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>vote or the ability to influence a vote in a

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>malicious ways is too easy. So we've we decided to Actually,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if we had on chain governance, this would have made

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the users very vulnerable. You know, you could have had

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a competing network come along and try to maliciously upgrade

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>code to something that was insecure, or you could have

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>had um, you know, you could have you could have

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>had a number of malicious attacks. UM. So what we

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to do here is give the give the users

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the network. Um, We're sorry. Give the token holder

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is something to Tom to look after them, and that

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is the more users on the network, the more the

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>token holder benefits because the the buying burn model links

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the value of the token to the usage of the network. UM.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 1>And what we gave the users is this governance which

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is designed in a technically competent way so that people

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>making the decisions around the future of the protocol have

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to be technically competent to do so, or at least

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>user rep provably user representative. Yeah. Yeah, we're really interesting.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>It's such a it's it's so fascinated to see these

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>different types of governance that are that are coming out

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of this use of blockchain techn apology, you know, theoryum

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. So um. You know, it's all very new

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and experimental. The whole idea of decentralized governance. I mean

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe Switzerland is the closest example to it, you know,

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 1>given they have a very decentralized government government system here. Um.

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's in terms of doing it tech on technology

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>with tokens and on chain versus off chain. It's still

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>very early days and I think time will tell, you know.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the stuff being done now

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>is still very experimental. Yeah, yeah, great, Well, UM, I

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get into more stuff, but we are running

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>long on time, so I think we'll have to go

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead and wrap it up here. But I'm definitely gonna

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>be keeping an eye on Melon for others that are interested, UM,

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what are some things that they should be looking for

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>where they should be watching. UM. We're very active on

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>our Twitter channel, so Melon Protocol we are. We try

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to write UM regular blogs on Melon Protocol medium page. UM.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to chat to us directly, you

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can join our get your channel. There's one for users

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and one for developers UM, and we're always happy to

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>take questions on either of those subjects anytime. All right, Mona,

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been been fascinating. I love to hear how this

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>old old style of finances being disrupted and I'm excited

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to see it happened. And I appreciate you taking the

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>time to explain to everybody. Pleasure to be here. Thanks

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>about Mark, Take care. Hey. If you like this episode

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Market Disruptors podcast, please help us take this

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the podcast charts. Just please do

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>me a favor and rate review. And subscribe. Taking fifteen

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>seconds to just leave a quick review goes a long

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way and helping us reach more people and disrupt more markets.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate you listening and I'll see you next

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>time on the Market Distructors podcast