WEBVTT - Tail as Old as Time: Part 1

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. So, Robert,

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got a question for you. Okay, shoot, I know

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you've heard the old would you rather be able to

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fly or be able to turn invisible question? What's your

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>answer to that? But it's always been invisible? Yeah, that's

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the creep's answer. Well, it's the creepy it's you know,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it's the observer's answer. It's this, it's the student of

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>human behavior's answer. Because if I'm flying around looking at stuff,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be scaring wildlife. You know, people are

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be staring up at me, and tripped traffic accidents

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>are gonna occur. But if I've invisible, and if I'm

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>invisible and I play it safe and I you know,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and ethnically, then you know, I get to observe the

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>world as it goes about its business. You know. Another

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>advantage there is that flight can easily be achieved with technology,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's no way to become invisible technologically, So that's

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the really more magical power. But what I was gonna

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>ask you is would you rather have wings or a

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>prehensile tail. This is interesting because I was I was

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>actually blogging about this a little bit yesterday. I was

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>looking into because there's a particular plastic surgeon, Joseph Rosen,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who's a real real trends that are real, real, just

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing intellect in the world of plastic surgery, does a

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of actual real life work with facial reconstruction and

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>wounded warriors. But he's also a trans humanist, so he's

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's written a lot about the not only can we

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>do all these things, we should do them. We will

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where we add tails and wings. Well,

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I was coming at this from a somewhat magical perspective

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think humans would necessarily be able to

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fly even if they had wings, because we're just too dense, right,

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you would, They're like, our beings are much more dense

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>than birds. Yes, now, there are theoretical ways to transform

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the human arm into a bird's wing, and it's would

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>be a lengthy surgical process, and then they still wouldn't

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to support you and fly. You would have

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to have additional uh tissue, perhaps clone tissue or vat

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>grown tissue that would be used to to graft on

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and create the size of wings necessary to fly. And

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>then of course you still wouldn't have any arms. You

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>would just have like the large bat wings. So I mean,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, I would probably go with the tail

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because it would it would change my life less dramatically.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Now would it be more horrifying to not have hands

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>at all and just have wings like a bird, or

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be like a bat and basically have gigantic hands

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can't really use as hands but you can

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>still see some finger bones in there. Um, well, they're both.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>They're both fine choices. But wait a minute. This episode

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't about wings. It's about tails. That's right. We're talking

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>about tails specifically in this episode, about animal tails, and

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>then there's gonna be a second episode when we talk

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about the absence of tails for the most part in

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>human beings. Okay, so did you come down one way

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or another? Wings or tails? Definitely tails. You'd rather have

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a prehensile tail than wings, yes, I mean especially it

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>was a nice functional tale that, you know, the prehensile

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>tale that I could utilize in my daily environment. It

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't just be about you know, keeping flies away from me.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought a prehensile tail would be most useful

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to a musician. Yeah, you know, playing a musical instrument,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when you really wish you had more hands. Yeah,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a one man band, you could you could

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>really use that extra appendage, right that that's for your

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>double bass drum pedal. Yeah, so before we got one

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>man death metal band? Not but what would it be?

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Speed metal, thrash metal? Who uses the double bass pedal?

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It's two technical question for me. But you know, when

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to tales, and you know we're already

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about semi fictional accounts. But but I say a

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>few examples that come to my mind that make me

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>also I want to want to go into the prints

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>off to the prehensile tail direction versus the wing direction. Um.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think of Minos from Dante's Inferno, who has this

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>enormous serpentine tail, and when you have a new arrival

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in Hell, he wraps this tail around you and he

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>is able to determine which level of the Inferno you're

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>bound for based on how many coils wrap around your body.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I can't remember. Does this also go into sorting

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the virtuous Pagans or is this only once you're definitely

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the hell part. I think this is more about

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like definite hell as opposed to the the the limobile

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>page Pagans and limbo on the outside. Yeah, this is

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>your inhale. Help now we need to get you where

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you go. And Minos is in charge of sorting it. Well,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a smart tale. Another one that comes to mind

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is u Calabos from Clash of the Titans, the old

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Clash of the Titans Harry Hamlin duking it out version.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I assume you've seen this classic film, you know, I

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have to admit I actually have not said this is

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this is some ray he Housing claimation. Yeah, fabulous, fabulous claimation.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I love that stuff. And I've never seen this movie.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I've seen the scene where the where the

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Titan comes to life is a huge statue of that

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from Clash of the Titan. Well, there's the kracking. This

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>one has the Kraken, it has Medusa Pegasus, that little

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mechanical owl. Of course, Calibus, who's this um, this character

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who's twisted by the gods into this sort of caliban

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>esque creature with horns and a demonic face. And then

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a long swinging tale. That's great. We'll have to watch it.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I love the Harry Housing sin Bad movies. Great creatures,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>those are wonderful. Yeah, there's one that has um what's

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>his name? That went imp be doctor who or the

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the doctor and Doctor who? Rather um the class. Oh

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, yeah, Tom Baker, Tom Baker? Yeah, which

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>one is it? I don't know. I saw it a

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like a drive in event once and it was It's

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>fabulous because you get to see him as a dark sorcerer.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's great. Um. One other fictional tale creature that

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention because it's it's played a role

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in my life a lot recently is the Chippendale mup

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from Dr Seus's Sleep Book. I don't know what you're

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Oh, well, this is This is a fabulous

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Dr Seuss book in that it just takes the soon

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully to be a sleep child through this dreamland. Um

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>or so I guess this awaking dreamland and all these

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>creatures are going to sleep. And the the overall argument is, hey,

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>look at all these things that are going to sleep.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You should join this crew in slumber. And the Chippendale

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>um up is this character who quote, his tail is

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>so long, he won't feel any pain till the nip

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>makes the trip and gets round to his brain. So

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens is this, Um, this creature bites it's exceedingly

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>long tail right before it goes to sleep, so that

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the pain will travel all the way through the tail

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and travel eight hours all the way around and back

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>up the spinal column hit his brain, and then he'll

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>feel the pain and wake up. And I recently crunch

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the numbers on this, and if I'm correct, for this

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to work, based on the speed at which pain travels

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>through a nervous system, uh, the tail would need to

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be about a thousand and eight kilometers or six six

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>miles long. So that's enough. That's so if the thing

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we're laying out straight in the Western United States, it

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.119
<v Speaker 1>could lay with its nose in Seattle, Washington into tail

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in Sacramento, California. Wow. Yeah, I have absolutely nothing to

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>add to that horrifying children's story. Yeah. Um, beyond that,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only other fictional tail that that instantly

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind is, of course the xenomorph tail uh

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>from Alien and Aliens creature that every every part of

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the creature is a is a weapon, and of course

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>its tail is a rather cinematic weapon as well. Yeah,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a barbed spear. If you look at

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it, it it looks like it was designed to get stuck

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.559
<v Speaker 1>in you. And one thing I have to notice about

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that tail. It never seems like you see the tail coming.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's always suddenly poking out of your torso and you're

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>looking down at it. And why did this happen? Yeah,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it had whips it around and then right through you.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But those are fictional tales. We should, uh, we we

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>should start by just talking about the very basics here,

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the basics of tales. Yeah, for example, what is a tail?

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the essence of a tail? It's uh, it's

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a harder question than then you then you, you know,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because when you first think of it, especially from a

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>vertebrate standpoint, you think, well, that's just the other end

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of of the vertebrae, right, that's the the tail end

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the verb. It's almost indifficult to think about tails

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>outside of our language of tales. Yeah. And an interesting

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>fact is that even animals that don't have tails as

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>an adult often show a tale at some stage of

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>their development. So a frog might not have a tail,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but the tadpole that became that frog had a tail.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You might not have a tail, but when you were

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in the womb as an embryo, you had a tail.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And then it it simply goes away, usually

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>before we're born. Usually we'll get to that, I guess

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode. Yeah, it gets reabsorbed by the body, right, Yeah,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So tales are a huge deal with vertebrates. We just

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>happen to belong to rather exclusive club of creatures that

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>do not have tales. Uh. And likewise, you look at

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the invertebrate world and tons of fascinating tales there as well,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>that exist without the necessity of underlying vertebrate. Now, if

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you're an invertebrate and you have whatever we would call

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a tale, is that technically a tale or not? Yeah,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a It's a more difficult question than than you think,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know when you start, especially when you look at

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the specific examples that we're going to roll through.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, you know, particularly with a scorpion, like trying

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to forget where this tail came from and how it

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>uh eventually evolved into this rather curious form. Now, when

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in discussing tales, you basically have two types. There's kind

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of and you can sort of think of this as

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>non functional or barely functional tales versus functional and highly

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>functional tales. So the first thing I've got to ask

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>about before we get into these vertebrate tales is what

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is going on with the scorpion? Because I love I

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>love aragnids, and I love scorpions. When I was a

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>little kid, my dad one time took a trip to

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and when he came back, he had one of

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those one of those tourists you know, gifts that that

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is a scorpion inside a piece of glass. Oh yeah,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And he he gave this to me, and I used

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to just stare at it, thinking like, this is the

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>coolest thing on planet Earth. Where where does this tail

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>come from? Why is it so cool? Well, it's a

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because of course what you what you have

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>here when you're looking at a scorpion, you have a segmented,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.599
<v Speaker 1>curved tail that's tipped in a venomous stinger which he

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>uses for self defense, but also against prey that's large

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or feisty, like if they're if they're coming up against

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>something small, they'll often just use their claws and not

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>even employ the stinger um. And about twenty five different

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>species of scorpion possessed of venoms capable of killing a human,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and the rest have venoms that are not that potent.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But of course, you know, allergies and whatnot can play

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>into reactions. Uh. Now, the interesting thing about scorpions is

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that their body is a very old design. It's changed

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>little over the past four hundred million years, and they

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>probably evolved from the long extinct sea scorpions. Oh, the euryptorids. Yeah,

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the eureptroids. Those are the huge ones, right, Like you

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>see the fossils of those, and it's just astounding. The

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest people and uh, the sea scorpions. They also featured

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a segmented tale that ended in at least a spike. Now,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult, perhaps even impossible, to know if these were

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>venomous or non venomous. It's likely that they used to

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>use them for propulsion or balance steering swimming, and that

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it just eventually evolved into a venomous weapon over time.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the interesting stories about evolution because

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you see this primeval tale emerging in many older forms

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of life. Where they've got some kind of appendage coming

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>out the back of their body. But there are so

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>many different evolutionary routes this tail could go down in

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>in later development. Uh, And I guess that's what we're

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be exploring in in this episode of the podcast.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Today is like eighteen roads diverged in a yellow wood,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and depending on which one you picked, you might have

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a tail that communicates your emotions, or a tail that

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 1>stabs your prey and injects venom, or a tail that

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>helps you climb trees, or who knows what I mean.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>There are tons of things you can do with a

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>part of your body that you don't necessarily have to

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>use for walking or propulsion, though some animals do continue

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to use it for that. Yeah, so I definitely challenge

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone to keep our trans human question in mind as

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>we move forward. If you were to to have the

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>chance to gain a tail, might some of these examples

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>sweeten the deal for you. I think everybody is just

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going to go with the xenomorph tail and yeah, but

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't see the xenomorpha doing a lot

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of practical things outside of murder with that tale, right,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it must not be that fulfilling to be a xenomore. Well,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, fulfillment is a very human classification, right, I'm

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just projecting. I guess well, I think we should first

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about prehensible tales in the animal kingdom. If you're

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with what they are, I guess you might

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a little bit lost so far. But a

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>prehensible tale is a tale that to some degree can

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be used for manipulation and grasping. They're usually divided into

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fully prehensible or semi prehensible tales, depending on what the

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>animal can do with and you you might think it

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>would be really great to have a prehensible tail as

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a human because it'd be like having another hand. You know,

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you could just do whatever we were talking about it earlier.

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>You could play more musical instruments or something like that.

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to ask the question of do

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you really need one? Because when you look at all

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the animals that have prehensile or semi prehensile tails, I

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>see a common feature. And this might not be the case,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but at least in my observation, they all tend to

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>live in environments that are kind of like a jungle gym,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>where there are branches or sea grass or coral reefs.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at pictures of animals using their

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>prehensile tails, sometimes they're used for free object manipulation, you know,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>scooping up a bunch of something. But the majority of

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what I see is animals using the prehensile tail is

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>an aid in climbing, or an anchor against some force,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>such as hanging from a tree limb, so anchoring against gravity.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Or how a sea horse uses its tail as a

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>grasping oregan the latch onto things like coral and anchor

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>itself against the tide so it can just sit there

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and wait and and do its thing with its head.

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess the seahorse doesn't really have hands to work with. Yeah,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the discussion of a jungle gym like environment, it reminds

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>me of Dan Simon's Hyperion Cantos, his sci fi series.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a kind of a subspecies of humans or a

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>branch of humanity known as the Alsters, and they live

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in uh in in in low gravity or zero gravity environments,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and so they're their soldiers particularly will often be seen

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with robotic tales added to their suits to to aid

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in this very kind of environment. Because you're in a

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>wait list, like you know, shiphole environment. You are essentially

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>living in this kind of jungle gym. So we would

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>be advantageous in that environment to have a tale. Uh,

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>even if it's just a robotic one, a robotic tale,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think I've seen people have already created

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>robotic tales. Have you read about these? No, I was looking.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I've looked at a few different studies that have involved

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the biomimicry of say, the sea horse tail. Oh yeah,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't. I didn't notice in any studies where

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone's actually fixing this thing under the their posterior. Oh,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not so much studies. There's something I know we've talked

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about in for we're thinking that was it wasn't so

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>much functional as it was decorative, but it was a

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>tail that would respond to your emotions. Okay, all right,

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so the tail of the communicator. You could, Yeah, you

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>could wag your tail like a dog, which we will

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>get to in a bit. But of course, I I

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>said at the beginning, what you can do with the

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>tail if you don't have to use your tail for movement.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, plenty of animals do still have to use

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>their tails for movement. They're they're a crucial part of

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>their locomotion method. We birds, for example, Yeah, I mean snakes,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fish birds in particular, you have a highly specialized tailed,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the feathered tail. The flighted bird contributes to lift as

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>well as stabilization drag reduction, so it's a very fine

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tune part of their anatomy. Yeah, and of course there

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>are fish. Animals that live in the water often use

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tails for propulsion, generating a paddling motion that pushes against

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the water in a way that cancels outside to side

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>motion but generates net thrust in the forward direct And

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact, if you've never seen it, you should look

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>up simulations of fish swimming motions and fluent in fluid

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>dynamics simulators. There. I found a couple of videos of

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this on YouTube, and it's really interesting seeing the waves

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that are generated by the side to side motion of

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a fish's body and tail. As the waves sort of

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>starts at the head and then gets bigger and bigger

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as it goes back towards the tail, and it generates

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this upside down y shape of of directional motion. Oh yeah,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like a full body movement as opposed to just

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mechanical fish with the tail that goes

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>back and forth from their your bathtub, right, that'd be

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>more like a I don't know, a side to side propeller.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's kind of like sculling in a in

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a boat, right, if you just wag the rudder back

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and forth. Another interesting fact, if you've never noticed, is

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that fish tend to sweep side to side and there swimming,

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>and marine mammals like dolphins and whales sweep up and down. Uh.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There may be a septions to this, I'm not aware

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of them if there are, but it's an interesting artifact

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the divergent and then subsequently re convergent evolutionary pathways

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of fish and marine mammals, so that like the whale tail,

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the horizontal whale tail versus the vertical shark tail. Yeah.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Or I guess the more apt of comparison would be

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>dolphins and sharks, as that is the distinction one is

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>often trying to make at the beach in the water. Yeah.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it took me so long in

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my life to notice this, but I just never noticed

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that difference until I think I was at an aquarium

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one time and I was looking at the belugas that

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're swimming through the aquarium, and I was like, what's

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that thing's tail? Oh, it's just not like

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fish tails, it goes the other way. Yeah. Of course

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.239
<v Speaker 1>we already mentioned that communication is a big deal with

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>tales and a number of species, and of course what

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>what manner of communication is more important than than that

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in courtship? Exactly right, And here we're going to

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>get to one of the most interesting things I've come

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>across in in our research about tales, which is the

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>courtship tail feathers of the p cock. Actually, another pop quiz.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you know the generic non gendered term for peacocks

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and p hens? No? I don't. It is p foul

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>foul Okay, that's that's that seems brother neutral. Yeah, I

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just thought that was a great word. Fo Yeah, nobody

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>ever says, let's go look at the p foul though

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the peacocks. It's true. Well, it's an unfortunate fact that

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares about seeing the p hens because they do

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not have these gigantic, interesting tails. Uh. I'm sure phns

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are wonderful. No, no offense to them, but that they

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>don't put on a display like this, and that's what

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about here. Another interesting fact, did you

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>know that what we call the peacocks tail is usually

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not actually it's tail really yeah, most of the time

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing you see when you think of a peacock,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about is it's covert feathers, which your

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>feathers that cover the tail feathers. It's also referred to

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as a peacock's train. And as you've surely seen before,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when a when a peacock props up and spreads out

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>its covert feathers, they formed this gigantic, shimmering, iridescent display

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of plumage full of spots that look like eyes, and

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to use a cool word, those eye

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>spots are called ocelli. I had always read that the

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>peacocks train was known to be used for mate selection purposes,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>though in reading up on this for today's episode, I

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>found out that there have been some really interesting questions

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and doubts recently thrown into the mix here. But this

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting story about the complexities of evolutionary

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>biology and and questioning what we thought we knew. So

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>there's this mate selection theory of the peacocks train. The

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas of the most prominent one, this is the one

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>we've all heard growing up. Yeah, and and Charles Darwin

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>thought about this. Charles Darwin. If you're Charles Darwin and

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at a peacock's train, this huge, huge, shimmering,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>eyespot covered extravagance, you think, what on earth is this for?

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You're you're coming up with this theory of natural selection,

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>where organisms that are the most adapted to survive and

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>reproduce in their environment are the ones that survive. How

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>do you encourage a trait that's so wasteful and pointless.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it doesn't it takes energy or resources to

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>develop a train like this. It doesn't seem to provide

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>any sort of mechanical survival advantage, So it doesn't help

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the peacock fly higher, or you know, kick with its

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>spurs harder or something. In fact, it would actually seem

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that feathers like this make the peacocks more vulnerable to predators.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So what's the deal. Why would you have something like

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this in an animal? So I've actually read several hypotheses

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>over the years to explain the the extravagance of the

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>peacock's train display and the I guess we should start

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>with the sexual selection effect. This is what's sometimes called

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>runaway sex sual selection. And the point is that at

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some point, way way back in the p fowl's ancestral lineage,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the p hens, the female p foul preferred slightly longer,

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>more elaborate trains for some reason related to fitness. Maybe

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it made the males stronger, more powerful in flight. And

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this choosiness kept being magnified more and more over the generations,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>until the peacocks were no longer displaying fitness, but they

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>were just being bred by the females to have longer

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and more elaborate trains. In the same way we would

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>breed a dog to encourage a certain trait to to

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>intensify over generations, we just end up with a ridiculous

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>breed of dog that has no clear function anymore other

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>than to look funny. Yeah, And that's what the p

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hens are doing to the pea cocks. Over the generations.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They develop a preference for a certain type of trait

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in males, and the males that have that trade get

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>more mating opportunities, and this gets magnified over the generations,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and if there's not enough of a selection pressure to

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>counteract the sexual selection, like if there's not a strong

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>enough force saying okay, males with these big train displays

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>really are going to get killed all the time, then

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>they'll just keep getting bigger and bigger. Another evolutionary explanation

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that I've read about is that the large extravagant displays

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>function as a sort of calculated, conspicuous handicap to show

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>off the fitness of the mail. And it's kind of like,

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in human terms, a guy showing off how much money

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>he has to waste by wearing lots of pointless expensive jewelry,

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>or like a swordsman demonstrating his superiority by dueling with

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one hand tied behind his back. The point is like

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I am so fit, I am such a good mate

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that I can have this enormous handicap, this pointless waste

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of resources, and still be the best that made that

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. It's like I have the time and

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>energy to put into this ridiculous, uh cumbersome uh addition

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to my body. Another hypothesis that's been developed over the

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>years is that the ability to produce large, elaborate trains

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is an advertisement that the peacock is relatively free of

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>parasites which would impair his ability to produce and maintain

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a large, beautiful train like this. But I want to

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about some specific studies because, like I said, the

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>research now seems to have gone back and forth about

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the role that the peacock's tail plays in the mating rituals.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So in the early nineteen nineties, the behavioral ecologist Marian

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Petrie of Newcastle University carried out some really often cited

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>research and this is one of the big studies in

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this field. One paper and Animal Behavior in nine was

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>called p Hen's prefer Peacocks with elaborate trains. So what

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>do what do peacocks do when they want to mate? Well,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they aggregate into something called a leck. I believe I'm

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>pronouncing that right. It's l e K and that so

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the males gathered together and in this case, uh Petrie

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and her her team observed one leck that was consisting

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of ten males, and they found that there was a

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>big difference in how much the different males in the

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>leck got opportunities for mating. So the top male, according

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to them, copulated twelve times, while the least successful males

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the leck got no sex whatsoever, and Petrie's team

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>concluded that quote over fifty percent of the variants in

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>mating success could be attributed to train morphology. There was

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a significant positive correlation between the number of eye spots

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a male had in his train and the number of

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>females he made it with. So they found that the

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>females didn't mate with the first male they met, but

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they would visit several different males and in ten out

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of a in cases in their study that ended with

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>successful copulation. In their terms, I'm trying to imagine what

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful copulation is, the male that the female chose was

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the one with the greatest number of eye spots. So

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this seems pretty straightforward. More eye spots on your train

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>means you get more mating opportunities. Okay, that's pretty straightforward.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like more the more jewelry, the more

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the fancier the clothes, the more the more money that

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the that the individual has to spend on drinks and

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>nights out translates to the the economics of the development

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of these eye feathers. Yeah. Yeah, So this seemed to

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>be accepted for a while. Until now. That paper was

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>called p Hen's prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. In two

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, in the same journal Animal Behavior, there was

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a paper called p Hen's do not prefer peacocks with

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>more elaborate trains. This was carried out by a team

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>led by Mariko Takahashi, and they were trying to replicate

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the original results in a feral population of Indian pe

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>foul in Japan. Over the course of seven years of observation,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and Takahashi and her co authors claimed to have found

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>no evidence at all that the phn's expressed any preference

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>for peacocks with more elaborate trains. That's what they said.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>This means the females did not show any noticeable preference

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for males with longer trains, more symmetrical trains, or more

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>eye spots. And those are the three things that are

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>often cited as as being the you know, the things

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you want your train to have. So what does that?

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Where does that leave us? Well?

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>According to them, they concluded that the peacock train display

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is it might be a necessary part of successful mating.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So a male that can't show a train display is

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to get to mate. But they came up

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with three concluding points. They said, the train is not

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the universal target of female choice. Uh, the trains don't

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>vary a whole lot across male populations. And then they

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>also said, quote, based on current physiological knowledge, it does

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not appear to reliably reflect the male conditions. So they

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the train is all that much of

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>an indicator of fitness. And what they ended up concluding

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just an obsolete signal that maybe it

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>used to correlate to female preference, but it just doesn't anymore.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.479
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tempting to take that and try to apply

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it to the human world and and various mating practices

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, romance practices that are really kind of

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming pointless than our modern age. But it's it's part

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of traditions, so you kind of have to do it.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't really do it, but every you

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>don't I mean you don't really have to do it,

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but everyone feels a little weird if you don't write. Yeah,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>how many common I don't know, dating or courtship practices

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are still somehow based on the idea that in a relationship,

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a man will be the person who's earning the money

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for the couple, when in you know, many or most

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>cases in the Western world, that's not the case anymore. Yeah,

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Or there's so many different little you know, superstitions and

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>traditions and the wedding ceremony itself. My my wife shoots

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weddings, so I get to hear I

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>always hear, you know, how did they do a first

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>look or did they do the whole you know, the

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>straight up deal where no, the bride in the room

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>do not see each other till the ceremony, Like that's

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>something that really had there's no bearing on anything whatsoever.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes time to put the wedding together,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>there's often you know, enough tradition, uh, you know, bouncing

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>around in your head that you say, I know, we're

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna stick to the old I don't see

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you and you don't see me until the moment of

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of our of our our actual ceremony, our weddings. The

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>human version of investing tons of resources in an elaborate

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>train display. Yeah, I think there's a strong case for that.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So that was what they concluded. But there's still more

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the story because yet another animal behavior study was

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>published in two thousand eleven that seemed to strike a

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>note somewhere in between the two that came before, and

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>said p ns prefer peacocks displaying more eye spots, but rarely.

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I can see this study perhaps not getting as much

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>play and the media. Yeah there, I did read a

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>good Nature News article about it, but the main takeaway

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>was and I want to read a quote here to

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>get it exactly right. They said, p foul mate choice

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is clearly more complex than previously thought. Females may reject

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a few mails with substantially reduced I spot number while

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>using some other queue to choose among males with typical trains.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you have way fewer eyespots the normal,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were obviously I spot deficient, you will not

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>get sex as a peacock. But there's no real difference

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>between an average number of eye spots and a much

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>greater than average number of eye spots. The main takeaway

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I got from this is that p foul mate choice

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more complicated than we originally thought. And

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>actually the main author of the original study from nine,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Petrie, said as as quoted in a two thousand

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven article in Nature News quote, at the end of

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the day, we will never know what p hens are

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at and how they select their mates. You can't

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ask them. Now at this point in our discussion of

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>peacocks and p hen's um, you know, I have to say,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be a way to spice it up

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I feel like some some listeners out

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there might be saying, all right, I'm I'm ready to

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>extract from the whole peacock discussion. But wait, right, what

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>if we throw cyborgs in there? Right? Because you can

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>answer Marjorie Petriots question in a way you can ask them.

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't ask them, but you can take

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a look at what p hens are looking at by

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>making a cyborg p hen with eye tracking devices. In

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of Experimental Biology in April, there was a

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>paper called Through Their Eyes Selective Attention in p hen's

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>during Courtship, and the researchers behind the study wanted to

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>see if they could find out exactly what phn's were

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at when they were presented with a male doing

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>his courtship display. So they rigged up what looks like

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a cyborg PHN. She's got eye tracking hardware on, and

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>she looks like something out of those you know, those

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Terminator rip off movies that started coming out in the

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>late eighties where everybody was a cyborg or had had

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of like cyborg upgrades for a while. Though

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there were so many of them, they were all shot

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on the same pseudo industrial setting back lot where everybody

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just seemed to wander around factories and alleyways all the time. Anyway,

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what did the PHN look at? Curiously? In the video

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw of this, she spent almost all her time

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>looking across the bottom of the Peacock's train display, and

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the scientist in the video suggests that that means she's

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>evaluating the width and symmetry of the train. So I

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, we're kind of back to the beginning. Yeah, Anyway,

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was very interesting that something that we

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>originally thought was a pretty settled matter of evolutionary adaptation

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>turns out as very complicated and we don't fully understand it.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And just one more hypothesis I came across. I don't

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know where to fit this into everything else, but this

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was that the Peacock's train display makes infrasound as it vibrates,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and this infrasound might play some sort of role in mating. Wow,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so it could be even more nuanced than originally suspected. Yeah.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to talk just briefly about the hippo tale. Um,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because this is a tale that is easy to miss,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is easy to you to forget to draw. When you're

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>drawing hippo's for a child, as I often do, I'm

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>picturing a hippo tail. It's not very big. No, it

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make a courtship display. No, it doesn't seem to

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>communicate a whole lot. Maybe it communicates a little. So

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the point. It's just a little dangly tiny thing. Yeah,

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like barely covers the hippo anus really. Um, Well, here's

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the here's the thing. If you see, if you see

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a hippo in a while, if you see a hippo

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at the zoo, uh. The what the tail does is

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>that as the hippo releases its bowels, uh, the tail

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>flips back and forth in order to fling poop like

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of fecal sprinkler system. And it's suspected that

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this is how male hippos wou mates and territory, So

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it could be a form of communication, a fecal communication system. Uh.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Though there's another theory out there then. This theory is

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's a means of flinging parasites away from the

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hippo's body, such as the place of dell Odeo's Dieger

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Skio Delhi leech a special leech that feeds exclusively on

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the rectal tissue of a hippopotamus. So what's it like

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to be that leech. It's a very specific lifestyle. I mean,

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there's so many different types of leech leeches out there

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>with the very specific hosts in some cases, uh, and

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>some actually eat worms as opposed to the on blood.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But this leech knows what it wants it and it's

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hippo rectum. So it's possible that the hippo tail is

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as much about just flinging those away from its body

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and certainly in other large herbivores, we see

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the use of the tail as a means of keeping

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.959
<v Speaker 1>flies away from the rectum as well, and ultimately about

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, keeping parasites away from that delicate area of

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the anatomy that is otherwise difficult to reach. Now. I

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to monkeys for a second, because

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when I talked about monkeys and their prehensile tails, obviously

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not all monkeys have preensile tails, but the New World

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>monkeys that have them, I talked about them using them

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in climbing. And there are multiple ways actually that a

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tail could come into climbing behaviors. It wouldn't necessarily just

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be for gripping branches or for bracing against

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>trunks and limbs, right, yeah. It can be used as

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a as a balance, as a counterweight. Ah there you yeah,

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly you can imagine this, but I just

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine yourself balancing on a beam and the various things

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you use your arm for, you know, spreading your arms

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out and all that. If you had a tail, that

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>would just be another part of your body that you

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>could utilize in such a fashion. Even something like your

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>modern house cat will utilize it's its tail for balance. Yeah.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>But another animal that uses it not only uses its

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>tail for balance, but also for propulsion and uses it

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>for pulp for propulsion on land is of course the kangaroo.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have that large tail, uh, sticking out

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>behind a huge muscular tail, and according to a two

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen study published in the journal Biology Letters, the kangaroo

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>utilizes its tail as a true fifth leg. The researchers

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>found that the tail of a walking kangaroo works as

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>hard as the leg of a comparably sized human moving

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same speed. Wait, so the tail makes contact

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with the ground. Yes, it does, and I'll get to it.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>To to that part in a second. For the most part, though,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as it hops, the tail lashes up and down, helping

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the creature stabilize while also serving as a motor to

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>lift and help accelerate the kangaroo's body. So it's almost

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a ficio's tail, except it's uh, it's

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just it's moving in the air, and it's about, you know,

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>thrusting the body as opposed to actually making contact with anything. However, However,

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to your point, though, the that that fifth lag, that

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>giant tail can support the kangaroo's full body, and you'll

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll often see this occur when when male kangaroos are

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>kicking at each other, they'll kick up, you know, they

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do that kangaroo kick and uh, and in doing so,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they actually come up on the tail. Now, of course,

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the rest of the time, the creatures

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>are not doing high speed hops and they're not kicking

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>each other. They're just you know, gently browsing um for

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff to eat. And in those those situations, the tail

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of, uh, you know, faces into the background

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit. But it's a really really remarkable

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>tale when you when you look at at at its

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>high speed hopping behavior and its ability to just rear

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>up on that tail and kick with its feet. When

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I remember I thought kangaroos were

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the coolest animals, and I think that simply

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do with the obvious athleticism you see in

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in a kangaroo bounding, and I never really thought about

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the role it's tail played. Yeah, it's easy because they have,

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty remarkable physiologies. Otherwise that nothing really looks

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like a kangaroo um. But yeah, when they're that challenge

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone to next time you're watching a kangaroo run, either

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at at a zoo or or just looking up you

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>know videos on YouTube, observe the tail. I mean, what

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the kangaroo is doing. It's a full body movement obviously,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and the tail plays an enormous role in that movement,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not making contact with the ground. Um.

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit the kangaroo is a creature I

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of took for granted because because you would see

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>cartoons where they get in boxing matches, you'd see footage

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of them running. But then you go to the zoo

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and you see captive kangaroos and they're just all, you know,

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>lying on the ground and kind of splayed, and they

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of look like old men, like naked, furry old

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>men laying around. I can think of it as a

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kanger danger. You know, you just want to look around,

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>look away, and tell the children not to make eye

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>contact with the creepy kangaroo. Yeah, there is something kind

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of sad about seeing bounding animals in captivity, and yeah,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>well it's it's almost the equivalent, though not quite the same,

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of hunting animals in captivity. I'm sure you've seen those

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>YouTube videos where a tiger will see a child at

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the zoo and come up and through the glass and

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>try to eat the baby. Yeah. Yeah, it's far more,

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>far more depressing with the with a large carnivores for sure,

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly any animal that depends on you know

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a large territory in which to range about. Now I'm

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna also and throw the fox in here. There's not

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot to this one, but with the fox, you

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>do see them using their big bushy tails as a

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>warming wrap. So there's another use right there. Of course,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tail can play a role in some kind of

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>energy conservation. Another way it could play a role in

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>energy conservation is storage of fat, like you might see

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 1>this in an alligator that stores fat at the base

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of its tail. I was trying to find information about this,

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and when I googled alligator tail, almost all of the

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>results were about meat. I thought that was interesting. For example,

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a grocery item on Amazon called alligator tail meat five

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>pounds and have very good reviews. Uh. But apparently alligators

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't the only ones who will put some fat in

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>their tail store it for later. Yeah. For instance, sheep

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>also keep a fat reserve in their tail. And really,

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 1>if there's if there's room for fat in an animal's tail,

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially serving that purpose. And that's one of the

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>things when you start looking at tails um with various creatures,

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there's often like a very predominant talking point purpose for

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the tail. But then there are various other uses as well,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:07.959
<v Speaker 1>like you could be a prehensile tail, but if there

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is room for any fat storage in there, well, then

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's also achieving that go as well. Another way

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that a tail can be fat without necessarily being fatty

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>or having fat cells in it is tail volume. Yeah.

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in the question of what creature in

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the world has the biggest tail, But then I realized

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that's actually not very interesting because and I can't find

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>any documentation to confirm this. I have to assume that

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's probably just the blue whale, since the blue whale

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has the biggest of everything it has. That would I

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>think that would be a very sick that But if

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know otherwise, please email us that blow the mind

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com and let us know.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But I did think of the question of what land

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>mammal has the largest tail in relation to its body,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So the largest tail to body ratio, and if you

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>count the volume of fluff rather than mass, the trophy

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to go to the tufted ground squirrel of Borneo

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or Rathroscurus macrotis. I found a great feature in Science

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>from June about this bizarre animal and what they said,

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is that it First of all, it's about twice the

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>size of most tree squirrels, and they say it reputedly

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>has a taste for blood. But like for real or

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>just in like folklore. I think it's folklore. But we'll

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a second. So the size of it,

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about like thirty five cis long. It has the

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>bushiest tail to body size ratio of any mammal, with

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the tail being thirty percent greater by volume than the

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the squirrel's body. Wow, that's a big tail.

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Is a big tail, So why is the tail so bushy?

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the scientists referenced in that in that science

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>article hypothesized that this giant puff ball of a tail

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>could confuse or distract predators like leopards, or it could

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>simply prevent the predator from getting a good grip on

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the squirrel if I'm just trying to catch it. Also, apparently,

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>like I said, squirrel has this messed up reputation. In

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>local legend, hunters claim that it attacks much larger animal

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like deer, it slashes them to death and then tears

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their guts out. Well, I certainly want to believe that story.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the blood crazed killer squirrels. He reminds me of

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a certain rabbit from Monty Pyth. Right, Yeah, it's the

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>only squirrel you know of that might harvest your organs.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like the scientists are skeptical that this

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>is true. All Right, we're gonna go and cut the

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tail off here, Okay, But next time, in in part

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>two of our two parter about tales, we're going to

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about using tales in communication. We're going to talk

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about the strange world of autotomy. Am I pronouncing that right? Autotomy? Tommy?

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and the scorpion will come back up again

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as promised. Um. And then of course humans human, why

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>don't we have tales? Where's our tail? We will discuss

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime. If you want to check out more

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>content from Stuff to Blow your Mind, hadn't over to

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's the mothership.

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>That's where we'll find all the podcast episodes, all the

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>blog posts, various videos. This one links out to our

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts that we we keep all our eyes on.

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to follow up on any of

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the rabbit trails we went down about tales today, or

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>if you just have an interesting tale fact you'd like

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to share with us. You can email us at blow

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the Mind at how stuff works dot com. For more

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. Is it how

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com