WEBVTT - Mnuchin Eyes TikTok

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car Play and Android Auto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Steve Menushan is apparently targeting a purchase of TikTok from

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>his Chinese parent company. This comes a day after House

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>lawmakers passed a bipartisan bill that would ban the widely

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>popular social media app in the US. Quite interesting, particularly

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>after he led that buyout of a NYCB.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>I know, and I think it's even more interesting about

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 3>it is because there was that whole issue with NYCB earlier.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>It cause a lot of concern about regional banking, a

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of concern about TikTok and the minds of teenagers

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>all across the country and politicians.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>So let's go to Dan Ives. He joins US managing

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>director and senior equity analyst ever at Web Securities. He

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>always has opinions about these things. Hey, Dan, I guess

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it's twofold. What do you think about manution leading a

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>group of investors to buy TikTok let's just start there.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna join the long list, right, I mean, others

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 4>haven't talked. If you a strategic financial you're gonna have

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 4>a long list of buyers from Big TAC as well

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 4>as outside looking to get TikTok because it's a unique

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>golden asset that no one ever thought would become available.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 4>We still believe only a twenty five percent chance this

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 4>ban actually happened.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>So what's gonna be the big sticking point for that

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of a bet? Is it the algorithm?

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 4>It's all about the source code is not gonna lead

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 4>by dance in China. Are not gonna allow the source

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 4>code and the algorithm to go to a US company,

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 4>And that's buying an F one car without the engine.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 4>That's the fundamental issue here is that because of the

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 4>source code, it makes us extremely complex. The value is

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 4>vastly different without the source code.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, then here's my question in terms of what the

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 2>government will allow. It's like, well, the government like a

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 2>minus led investor takeover. Will the government like a Netflix

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>or a Netflix I'm in, a meta or another social

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>media company buying TikTok, like if you divest, like they

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 2>have to be okay, with who's going to buy it?

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 5>What do you think the devil's in.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 4>The details, right, I mean the problem is, Look, this

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 4>is all a third rail issue. It's great theater in

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 4>DC in front of the microphones. The reality is the

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 4>selling and ban of TikTok. First, besides First Amendment, what

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>could happen to other social media. There's a huge ripple effect,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the negative retaliatory from China as well as ultimately, how

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 4>could you sell this without the source code? And that

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>and Bye Dance in Beijing are not going to allow

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 4>source code to be sold.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 5>And that's the issue.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Shoot for Senate, I mean, the Shumer you even let

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>this get on the floor, that's going to be the problem.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>It's very good for grand standing, but the reality of

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 4>it is very complex.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and you add to that that Congress really

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>just has not done well in the past of turning

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>denunciations of these perceived tech abuses into law. I mean,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 3>you think about things about protecting children online, anti trust authority,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>data privacy. This is not something that has come into

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 3>really forceful law. So I mean there's a chance this

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>might just all fall apart anyway.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 5>That's why it goes. But like all the work.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 4>We've done twenty five percent chans a ban actually happens

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 4>because to Alex to your point, Okay, so now a

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>ban happens the twenty five percent chance, how do you

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 4>sell it? So you're forcing them to they don't have

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 4>to sell without source code.

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 5>Then who's going to buy it? And then it comes

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 5>down to this.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Now let's say it gets sold to Microsoft, to Oracle,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 4>then is there anti trust issues from a government perspective?

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>The problem is you can't put Genie back in the bottle.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>This is going to have huge complications because TikTok as

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 4>well as the precedent and even the Spider Web in

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 4>terms of how it gets sold.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>How much do you think TikTok's worth? Like, let's just

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 2>game it out.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 4>One hundred billion with the source code, without the source code,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty to forty billion.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that is a big, big, big, big difference. So

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 2>what do you watching next for it? Then? Like, what's

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 2>the next trigger point for you?

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 4>I think now the soap opera, we'll see that in

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the two or two area. So it does it actually

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>get to the Senate for what negotiations go behind the scenes?

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 5>You have one hundred and fifty.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Million users, So you know you're in election year too,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 4>So it goes back to that third rail issue. Voting

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 4>down TikTok as a ban not good for the eighteen

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 4>twenty four year old vote.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 5>So that's we got to see how this all puts out.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Obviously Trump on one side, by none the other in

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 4>terms of TikTok ban book, Manutian has the first shot

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 4>across the bout in terms of you know, looking for

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, potential to line up as buyers. Others are

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 4>clearly behind the scenes doing the same thing. But it's

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 4>all a game of high stakes poker right now playing out.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So on the assumption that somehow this algorithm and the

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>source code does become part of the sale, who do

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you think is the best strategic fit for this as

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>a buyer.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, there's a better chance of me playing in March

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Madness next week than this being sold with source code.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 5>And that's what you never know.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Man, they could never.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Again and again three pointer decent but but look, but

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>the point is, you never know in terms of now

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 4>what Beijing and byte Dance are thinking to now even

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 4>to just trajector you this out, what's do they do

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 4>it without source code and there's buyers.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Then the question is.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Where does it is a big tact Is it a

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 4>consortium like Ammunition other financial buyers? And this is gonna

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 4>be just despite whoever regulatory it'll get, It'll go through

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 4>the court system. And I think that's how this is

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 4>all going to play out, is there's a huge ripple

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>effect unintended consequences when you go down this path.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>Before I let you go, I got to ask Tesla.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>We talked about it earlier in the hour after that

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 2>downgrade yesterday over at Wells Fargo, saying that it's a

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>growth company with no growth, Uh correct, accurate, not accurate?

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Look for now, I mean clearly going through massive headwinds

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>in China, but we've never called Tesla for the last

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 4>decade in terms of the next thirty days sixty days.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 4>On the other side, growth is still going to be

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 4>massive ev leadership AI. That's what we continue to be

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 4>bullish here. But no doubt it is a white knuckle

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 4>period that we're going through in you know, especially in

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 4>China for Tesla, and that's why bears are all coming

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 4>out of hibernation.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so what do you think is next for them

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>in the next two quarters or so in terms of

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>analysts coming out with dimmer views on it.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, clearly numbers are getting caught.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>A lot that's getting probably, But it comes down to,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 4>like they got away out the goalpost. Are the price

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 4>cuts done? We just came back from Asia. I think

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 4>ninety five percent price cuts are done. If they put

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>a line to stand, their street starts to look through

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>second half of the year into next year, and I

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 4>think then we sort of bought them out. It's also

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 4>about Musk the twenty five percent ownership I think at

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 4>the shareholder me and they formally go to Texas from Delaware.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 4>That continues to also be an overhang over the stock.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of that gets resolved. We've been

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>here before. I don't view this as really the end

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Tessa growth story.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just sort of like delayed kind of thing.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Hate real quick twenty seconds in video headed into their

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>GTCAI conference, what do you think.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>The godfather of Ai Jensen I think continues to is

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 4>going to show behind the curtains just what's coming and

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 4>because they're going to continue to lead the revolution. And

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>this is not a nineteen ninety nine moment, it's a

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety five and get out the popcorn parties you started.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>That's how you love Dana Ives. He gives you those

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>wonderful soundbites. Dan Ives of Rodwood Bush. We appreciate your time. Today.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 6>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act.

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>So one stock to watch is US Steel. It's down

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>another one point three percent today. President Biden says that

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 2>US Steel should stay in American owned and operate a company.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>This is nip On Steel over in Japan is trying

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to buy the company. JP Morgan now saying that it

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is possible that Cleveland Cliffs could rebid for US Steel.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's a lot. It's a lot happening. At the

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, is we need the steal. We

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>want to produce it. Prices are not that great, therefore

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the consolidation therefore a backstop. Who better to talk to

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence A senior analyst. He covers basic materials for

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>US right here at Bloomberg Richard, How did this whole thing?

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to say fall apart, because it hasn't

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>fallen apart, but like what happened?

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 7>Really?

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 8>Politics?

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's so weird.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 8>If you look at US steel is located in Pennsylvania.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 8>Biden won Pennsylvania by a little over eight thousand votes

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 8>last election twenty twenty. Steel Union members in Pennsylvania are

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 8>about seven hundred and fifty thou Union members in Pennsylvania, and.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 2>They don't necessarily want this deal to go through.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 8>And the union does not want the deal go through.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 8>And you also had Trump come out saying that he would.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 9>Block the deal.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's three or four you know, I'm not

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 8>a election expert, but there's three or four critical states

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 8>that probably will flip the election. In Pennsylvania's probably.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 9>One of them.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So I guess I'm sort of wondering, knowing that that

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>is the politics of the situation, what was the motivation

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>to bring the deal in the first place.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 8>The motivation is if you look at the US steel

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 8>market is actually with the Infrastructure Act and Inflation Reduction Act,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 8>is actually probably one of the more higher growth steel

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 8>markets across the world. And Nippon Steel has said that

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 8>they want to get to one hundred million tons of

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 8>steel production a year. This was kind of helped them

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 8>along that goal.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 2>Without them though, could they not do it? And is

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 2>it because it's just expensive to get it done or

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is it because the prices are low so their margins

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>are not great?

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 8>Not quite falling?

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh that if the Japanese company Nippon Steel went away,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and they you need all this product here in the

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>US to help satisfy all the infrastructure acting the chips

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>act without a buyer, why can't you still just do

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>it on their own?

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Is no?

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 8>US still can't do it on their own?

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Can Okay?

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 8>And they have outlined a plan to get there, to

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 8>improve their assets and build up. You know, they're building

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 8>another plant in Arkansas, Big River Steel too, which they

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 8>built you know, but back in August, Cliffs kind of

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 8>put them in play. Cliffs came in with an offer

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 8>for thirty five dollars a share, kind of put US steel,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, said that they had to evaluate strategic alternatives,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 8>spent a few months doing this, and then came up

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 8>with where Nippon was the highest bidder.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 3>So, I guess if you've got these competing bids for it.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what's the expectation for how long this can

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>go on?

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's it's currently under reviewed by SYPHIUS, which is

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 8>the Committee for Foreign Investment in the US. Syphius deals with

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 8>national security, so as people said, their deliberations are shrouded

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 8>in secrecy. So you know, initially, when when we looked

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 8>at the deal and we saw the union opposition, we said,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 8>what they should do is US steal and NIPHN should

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 8>slow walk the deal locked approval get passed the November

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 8>fifth election, and then maybe, you know, politicians attentions turn elsewhere.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible that US steal says all right later

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 2>and like the and they're just going to go on

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>their own way.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't think suareholders would appreciate that appen.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 2>So now they're like, okay, we want to get right right.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 8>I mean the steal, you know, the stock was traded

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 8>like in the mid twenties, and you got a deal

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 8>for fifty five dollars a share.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You want to take that, you want to get something.

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess my question is, let's pretend that the the

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>nip On deal falls through. Let's say Cleveland Clips comes

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>back in and rebids, right, and the company's like, all right,

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess we're up for sale. Is the US government

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>going to like that deal? Because that's gonna that's gonna

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>be antitrust concern right.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 8>That's so it's just from national securities to anti trust concerns.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 8>And also the other thing one of the areas of

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 8>anti trust would would come on our scrutiny. US still

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 8>and clean Cliffs are two of the biggest players to

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 8>the auto industry, so you have, you know, the auto companies,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 8>you know, not happy with the deal there.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So to go back though to the politics of it,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 3>just thinking through some of the opposition to the npon bid,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 3>because a lot of that had to do with the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 3>objection from the steel workers. So if you think of

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>it of an American bidder coming in, do you think

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 3>that's an easier that's an easier thing for steel workers

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>to accept?

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's you know, Cleveland Cliffs is has a very

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 8>good relationship with the steel workers union, so that's why

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 8>the union has been favoring Cleveland Cliffs. In fact, in

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 8>the in the union agreements, there's a thing called right

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 8>to bid where if a be under a with the

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 8>US steel has a contract with the steel union gets

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 8>acquired by somebody, the union has a right to bid.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 8>So in this whole escapade, the US steel Workers Union

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 8>assign their right to bid to cliffs, so favoring cliffs

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 8>and things along those lines.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Can I just ask, like, what's the fear of a

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 10>foreign company owning US steel? I mean, they're gonna nip

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 10>on steel is going to pack it up and move

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 10>it to.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Japan because Japan is supposed to be like a friendly

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 2>country like well, and it's.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 10>Not like they're going to like raise prices to the

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 10>point where they're going to shoot themselves in the foot

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 10>to like have sales decline. I mean what it's now

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 10>part of this is jingoistic, is that agreed?

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 8>And also Japan is the biggest number the number one

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 8>a foreign direct investor in the United States. US has

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 8>over five trillion dollars a foreign direct investment. Japan accounts

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 8>for fifteen percent of it. It's the biggest foreign direct

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 8>investor in the United States. So on that it doesn't

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 8>really make sense either.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Hence just pointing out the whole union politicking of it. Okay,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>so what do you think actually happens? Best guess?

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 8>Best guess I think you got a lots smart people

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 8>and at both companies.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 8>I, like I said earlier, I would slow walk the.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Deal and get something.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 8>Passed the elections and see what happens. You're probably going

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 8>to have to pay the union a little bit more

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 8>to get them on board. But Nippon still just could

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 8>deal two to three days ago with the unions in Japan,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 8>so obviously they realized the worker landscape of wages are

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 8>going up.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh you know what, I wonder if the financing picture

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>will be a little bit easier if they cancel walk

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the deal and get it past the election, because looking

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>at the FED dot plot, we could have had a

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>couple of industry cuts by then, so maybe it'll be

0:15:58.840 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>a bit cheaper.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>They have everything all right align you know, companies have

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, signed up to provide them the fifteen billion

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 8>dollars that don't need to buy all.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, So banks have broadening out for a second, what

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>is steel demand like right now globally and in the US,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and how prices because if you want to find one

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>ticker for steel prices, good luck, it is such a

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>regional market. Yeah, give me the landscape.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 8>No steel prices are you know, what we had was

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of an interesting year. Usually you have steel prices

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 8>at the beginning of the year increase because of seasonality.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 8>Obviously constructions construction is the biggest market summer, it's easier

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 8>to do construction.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 11>Everybody's buying steel.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 8>What happened is that auto workers strike last year. Everybody

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 8>held off buying steel because they thought steel prices would

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 8>really go down because the auto workers strike was rumored

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 8>to be prolonged. And really what happened is the auto

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 8>workers strike didn't have as much effect as people thought.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 8>Everybody rushed back to the market and really pulled in

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 8>pricing at the end of last year, so you had

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 8>kind of that peak of pricing rather than coming in

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 8>the first quarter. Actually prices peak back at the end

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 8>of January. They've it looks like now they're probably've hit

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 8>a bottom. Both New Core and Cliffs that come out

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 8>with announcements that you know, eight hundred and twenty five

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 8>dollars a ton we want and eight forty respectively, So

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 8>that's kind of stopped the free falling prices. You have

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot uncertainty. What I would characterize across the world

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 8>is hand the mouth buying. You're just buying what you need.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 8>You're not taking any speculative risk or anything like that

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 8>to build up inventoris.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Richard, thanks a lot. We super appreciate it. Richard Burg,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior analyst on US Steel.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo car Playing and

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>broun Otto with the bloom Bird Business app. Listen on

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to the retail sales here. That disappointed

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and this just goes to my point. I tell everyone

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm on a budget and no one believes me, and

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 2>yet these sales prove that it's true. Just putting that

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 2>out there. Jill Blanchard is president of Enterprise Client Solutions

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>over at Advantage At Solutions and she joins US. So

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Control Group flat for February back out autos,

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>back out gas just up by three tenths. You also

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>had January revised lower. What's the state of the economy

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 2>When you look at consumption, you look at retail.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 12>So hello, thanks for having me back. I was listening

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 12>before Happy Friday Eve. It still continues to be a

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 12>struggle for consumers out there when we look at things

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 12>like in consumer package, because the prices are still up

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 12>six point eight percent.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 11>Versus last year.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 12>The good news is that in the recent Advantage Outlook survey,

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 12>manufacturers fifty percent said that they don't have plans to

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 12>increase prices, but we do have a that plan to

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 12>increase prices on non core items, so think of things

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 12>like a.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 11>Smaller size package or a low fat version.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 12>Where we really get concerned is with the value priced brands,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 12>and so those are the lower price brands that typically

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 12>compete with like a private brand. Those those brands have

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 12>increased their prices one point five points higher than a

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 12>mainstream price or a premium price, and so essentially is

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 12>the rising of the floor further squeezing consumers.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting, you've got the cheaper stuff is getting

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 3>more expensive, and then you've got continued triflation. It sounds like,

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 3>so you know, how much more of this can consumers take?

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Because you know, at the same time you've got an

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 3>incredibly strong job market, so something's got to give.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 9>I would have thought at some point.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 12>We do see a lot of give actually out there

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 12>in the form of a few things.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 11>One is trade down right or pare down.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 12>And so we see consumers you know, pairing down whether

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 12>they're buying a you know, a used luxury car instead

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 12>of a new luxury car, or they're trying to make

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 12>meals at home instead of going out, and so we

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 12>see a lot of shifting in that spending to lower

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 12>price things. We see consumers buying more private brand boys.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 12>They're having a really good day. In fact, to seventy

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 12>five percent of retailers say that they're number one growth

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 12>strategy is private brand. We see consumers buying things on promotions,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 12>so we're definitely seeing a big shift in behavior. Promotions

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 12>are a top strategy for manufacturers and for retailers, but

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 12>they've got to be really careful not to sacrifice tomorrow

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 12>by giving away today. And consumers are becoming more disloyal

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 12>to brands because they're waiting for brands to be on

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 12>sale or switching to a brand to be on sale.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 12>I mean, consumers new loyalty is disloyalty.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 2>That is such an interesting point because you've basically described

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>my entire shopping habit for discretionary So I wanted to

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>go to the point of sort of the macro and

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>then the retail. So let's just pretend we get three

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>or four rate cuts this year, right, does a consumer

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden go out and spend a lot?

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Is their pent up demand in this area that you.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 12>See, No, I don't see. I don't see the consumers

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 12>going out and spending more. Consumers are going to continue

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 12>to well, actually they might tick up a little bit

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 12>on the out of home spending. So think of things

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 12>like the big ticket items like a car or vacation,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 12>a home remodel. That might tick up a little bit,

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 12>but those are such big priced items that consumers really

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 12>have been pairing that down or foregoing that in lieu

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 12>of in home activities, in lieu of affordable indulgences. So

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 12>think of things like getting your nails done at home

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 12>instead of a spot.

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 11>So I could see a little bit, but not a lot.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 3>So I guess what's next for retail because it doesn't

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 3>sound like a particularly you know, enthusiastic outlook there for

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the consumer.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean both both manufacturers and retailers are really

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 12>struggling to find a path to win for both of

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 12>them as well as consumers.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 11>As I said upfront, it's a super challenging environment.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 12>Retailers have to find the right way to promote, and

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 12>when they all have the same strategy, it's hard to win.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 12>And pretty much when you talk to any company out there,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 12>they've got a plan to win in an environment that's

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 12>largely going to be stable flat to down. So they

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 12>truly have to find a differentiated way to meet that

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 12>consumer where they need to be met to win, whether

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 12>that's a differentiated way with products, which is also pretty interesting.

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 12>If you look at retailers, over forty percent plan to

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 12>carry less products, but higher performing retailers carrying more product,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 12>which really speaks to consumers valuing choice and differentiation. So

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 12>lots of different strategies, it's really going to be challenging

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 12>to find the right one to win.

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would find it to be so hard, like

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 2>so much that you have to anticipate and then stock

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 2>up and then if not, you're looking at eighty eighty

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 2>five ninety percent discounts, which I love, but can't be

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>good for an investor. Who would you say has a

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 2>good strategy, Like, what's a good formula to emulate.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 4>You?

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 11>Right now? We see consumers.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 12>I talked about consumers pairing down. I think discount retailers

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 12>are having a really good day and it's making it

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 12>pretty challenging for mainstream retailers. So mainstream retailers need to

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 12>look at why consumers are going there.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 11>Is it?

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 12>Is it purely priced? Is it the ability to one

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 12>stop shop? Is it the ability to you know, the

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 12>the environment of the retailers, So retailers need to look

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 12>at or is it their online strategy? So lots of

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 12>different things to look at, But who's winning are largely

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 12>discount retailers.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, could you give us a sense of the

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 3>bigger picture here for consumers because you know, I've certainly

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>read a lot about consumers moving away from stuff and

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 3>towards experiences. But everything is so expensive right now, so

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, for you're mentioning that it's the discounters that

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 3>are winning, but that's a very you know, sort of

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 3>centraded area in retail.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 9>I would have thought, So, you know.

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Is the thought there that retail is just perhaps too big.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 12>That retail too big? Now I think it's more that

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 12>retail is really varied. So I would say, in response

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 12>to your question about what does this mean for consumers,

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 12>consumers behavior today is so drastically different than it used

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 12>to be in twenty nineteen in terms of.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 11>You know, what we buy, how we buy, and when

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 11>we buy.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 12>Think of online, think of discount, think of of you know, of.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 11>Being in the.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 12>Home versus outside the home. So the future for consumers

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.479
<v Speaker 12>is that continued shift, you know, towards more value based living.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 12>I'd say one thing that we talk about often is

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 12>the is the baking aisle. And twenty nineteen in the

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 12>grocery store that ale gather dust, and now it is

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 12>the hot spot. Over twenty twenty and twenty twenty one,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 12>we actually created a lot of bakers, and today it's

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 12>really one of the fastest growing aisles in the store.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I did the baking thing before and then during the

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 2>you were ahead of the curve. I was ahead of

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the curve, says no one ever.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 10>But what is it the bake? What is it? You

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 10>bake like a chocolate I happen to love chocolate cake,

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 10>so I actually.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Have a fantastic chocolate cake recipe that is super east.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 10>I don't want the recipe.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give it to you. I'll bake it

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>at some point. But I actually do like baking, like

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>bread and clastants and things like that. But anyway, that

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>was hard to do U during the pandemic before we

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>let you go. So I gotta say, I go out

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to eat, you know, two adults and a kid, and

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like three hundred dollars. It's bananas. And I'm not

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>talking like a super fancy restaurant, like I'm talking like

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the neighborhood place. At what point do you think that

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>that's going to top out? And then we're gonna see

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 2>people sort of readjust and then all of a sudden

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the stay at home stuff comes back.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I'm right right now, out of home food prices

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 12>are are higher in terms of their increases than in

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 12>home and so it really is making it challenging for

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 12>families to do more things outside the home. That has

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 12>already contributed to increased in home consumption, which will continue

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 12>to grow if we if we continue to see the

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 12>outside the home food prices elevate.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting because I feel like restaurants are just

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 3>getting so squeezed. They've got the staffing issues, they've got

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the food costs, and so consumers just want to break.

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 3>But you know, cooking at home is has its own

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 3>challenges and you know, you're mentioning the point about food

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 3>at home and people are so pressed for time. It's

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of like one of those things, how do you

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 3>trade that down?

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 12>I sometimes feel like the world that we're living in

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 12>today is so circular, right, So the cost have increased everywhere,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 12>and it continues to go to be passed around. Right,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 12>So restaurants are paying more for their for their products,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 12>for transportation and distribution of the products, for their labor,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 12>and they're having to pass as much as they can

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 12>onto consumers who in turn can't really afford that and

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 12>are cutting back, and so it continues to have a

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 12>circular effect on the overall economy.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, great stuff, Jill, really appreciate it. Thank you so much.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Jill Blanchard, President of Enterprise Client Solutions for Advantage Solutions

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 2>time other weeker retail sales.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Blackstone President John Gray was in Rome tough gig attending

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 2>the Bank of America Global Investor Summit conference, and here

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 2>was the headline, Time to buy real estate as prices

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 2>are at bottom, he says, quote the perception so negative,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and yet the value decline has occurred. So when you

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>get into this bottoming period, that's when you want to move.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's get another perspective here. Lisa Nie is managing partner

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 2>and head of real Estate over at Eisner Amper. She

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>joins us here in the studio, is that true? I mean,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>who's going to disagree with John Gray, like clearly talking

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>your book for Blackstone too, but price is bottom, time

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to buy?

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, first of all, thank you for having me. So

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 13>his perspective is correct. And so what happened when Signature

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 13>Bank went out and brought its portfolio out to market.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 13>The prices were at a really good rate for people

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 13>to come in and take the opportunities and go purchase

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 13>all those great assets that were in that portfolio. And

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 13>so he was one of the companies that went out

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 13>and was looking at those portfolios. So there's plenty of

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 13>opportunities for that careful investor to go out and there

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 13>is capital to go out there, whether you're saying it's

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 13>a distressed asset or a really good investment. The market

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 13>is set to go out and have an influx of

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 13>capital within commercial real estate, whichever sector it is. So

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 13>never going to disagree with him. He certainly is accurate

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 13>on that one. And again it's for that investor who's

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 13>making sure that they're really doing their due diligence and

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 13>their background, making sure that the interest rates and the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 13>cash flows make sense. That's always first and foremost.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I for one, definitely would not want to

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 9>disagree with him.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>But one question I would have is the whole reason

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 3>why we're in this commercial real estate crisis is because

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 3>of the shift to working from home, and so is

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 3>that crisis over? I mean, it still seems to me

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>that you know, personal anecdote only, but the subway isn't

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 3>nearly as full as it used to be, even though

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 3>it's picked up a little bit. I mean, if people

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 3>are still working from home, there's still quite a lot

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>of risk there for somebody trying to get in at

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>these low prices.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so real estate is cyclical, So every asset class

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 13>goes through its highs and lows. It was retail, now

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 13>it's we're at the lows of office, we're going to

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 13>see some inflections and some differentiation within a multifamily as well.

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 13>And when we look at what work from home concept did.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 13>I'm looking around here today and I'm seeing a great

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 13>amount of activity where people are collaboration. And if you

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 13>look back, I think two or three years ago, all

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 13>the big tech companies that everyone gets to work from home,

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 13>and they've changed their statements. They're coming and saying we

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 13>want you back two to three days. And when you

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 13>look at an office lease, you're leasing office space for

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 13>five days, but.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 9>You're getting it for seven.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 13>And so it's just changing how you're looking at office

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 13>and looking at some of the buildings that are out

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 13>there in the marketplace, those older buildings that need some

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 13>adaptive reuse. We're going to need that regardless of where

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 13>we were in this cycle.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you think there's people out here now, you

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>just wait till the snacks come up around two. It's

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>like a people wait online for that stuff. So to

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 2>that point, just in terms of the capital being out there,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 2>do you notice the bid ask like, have we resolved

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>for that gap yet or is that still to come.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 11>So that it hasn't been resolved.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 13>And what's happening is because of the banks and their

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 13>underwriting and regulations, they're unable to go in and provide

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 13>a capital at at a rate that's worthy of the

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 13>what's being underwritten. So who's coming in the rescue capital,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 13>which is people who are opportunistic, So you're going to

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 13>come in as a preferred equity or a mess lender,

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 13>or you know, at a higher rate.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And so those interest rates, if you're that.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 13>Really discerned investor, is going to be very good for you,

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 13>but it's not going to be great for the owners

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 13>and they're not going to get their cash flow back.

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 13>So the rates right now for the rescue is really

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 13>really high, So we're not at that time. Well, we've

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 13>seen some preferred equity coming in between eighteen and twenty percent.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 13>That's very Remember those are for some distress deals that

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 13>might need that rescuing and they just don't want to

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 13>get back the properties.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 9>What's it going to take to broaden this out? But

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 9>YEWND non rescue deals.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 11>What's it going to take?

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 13>So it's we have to wait to see, as you

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 13>mentioned before, what the Feds are going to be doing

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 13>later in the year where interest rates are going to

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 13>be who's going to be providing that capital? Is it

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 13>going to be the banks getting back into the market.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 13>So once if the banks go back in and they're

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 13>at a better point where we can pencil out.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 9>Some deals, it could take.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 13>It could just be a wait and see approach. Also,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 13>there's not a lot of trading going on, so people

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 13>really don't have the true understanding what valuations are right now.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 13>So time's going to tell, and we really don't know

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 13>where we're going to end up in the long term

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 13>because consumer behavior is still so different than any one

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 13>has anticipated in the past.

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>So let's broaden out then and talk about say reshoring, onshoring,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>near shoring, all that stuff and logistics we were supposed

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to see like a ton of data centers, build, a

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 2>ton of logistics, and then a ton of factories built.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Are we still seeing all of those three things happen?

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 13>So I love the fact that you brought up the

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 13>concept near shoring, which is now Canada and Mexico really

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 13>is coming in because so it's going to really change

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.239
<v Speaker 13>the landscape of where those industry and those warehouses were

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 13>being built before they were built on the East and

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 13>West coast. Now you're going to see them having to

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 13>be built northern and southern because that's where the cheaper

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 13>containers are going to be able to be brought in.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 13>Because so Mexico, which was our largest importer export of

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 13>this year, and Canada coming in. So it's going to

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 13>change where those industrial cities have been historically in the US,

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 13>and it's going to change the landscape. So once you

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 13>change the north and the south with the industries, you're

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 13>also for an industrial center. Multi family is going to change.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 13>Commercial office center's going to change there. So to really

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 13>look at where we are in the and those cycles

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 13>could be really interesting when you're looking at the concept

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 13>of near shoring versus right shoring.

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 9>It's interesting.

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Can we shift gears a little bit to talk to

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 3>us about a subject very near to my heart, which

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 3>is residential realize, Oh, yes.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>We always go there.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 9>We always go there.

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 10>We just take out an ad, you know, looking.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 2>She's looking to buy. It's not the best process.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 9>I might have a house, help me out, don't's get

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 9>a house?

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Some long house applies coming online? Okay, cheap though, there

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you go.

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 9>So what's the outlook? What am I looking for here?

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 9>So I think you have it?

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 13>Spot on is so the people who have the homes

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 13>would be looking to go. We have no place to

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 13>go to to sell, and so for us to replace

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 13>our homes is there's no place for us to go

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 13>at a low cost of capital. And so that's why

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 13>that housing market is so difficult and why pricing is

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 13>still so high for residential for single family homes. And

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 13>if you look and you look at Biden's bill that

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 13>he's proposing out there, when he's talking about housing, they

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 13>are very well aware that we have we are do

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 13>not have enough supply for the demand of single family homes.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 13>And so you are not alone with your frustrations. But

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 13>for people who could be potential buyers, we're sitting and

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 13>waiting because we.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't know where our next home is going to be.

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 13>And that's not helping your story at all.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 2>So I'm yeah, she pain, she feels your.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 10>Pain on it and a three twenty five, I think

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 10>we're staying put.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Really, yeah, we can't replace it.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 10>That's that's really what My mortgage is higher. My toll

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 10>bills are higher than my mortgage.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 2>But that's a reflection how you feel about your toll bills.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.439
<v Speaker 10>No, it's it's true though, no, I know it's true,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 10>but I.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Also feel like you like to complain about toll.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 10>Bills, which is like a complain about everything.

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 2>That's also fair. All Right, Lisa, thanks a lot, really

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 2>great stuff. Definitely come back. Love that conversation. Lisa Nee,

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>managing partner and head of real estate over at Eisner Amper.

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>week days at ten am Eastern on Apple car.

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 6>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go now to Tesla. So that stock is down

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 2>by another three percent. Let me just let me just

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 2>see if I can pull up how bad it's been

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 2>for Tesla, because I gotta say it has not been

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 2>very good. The news from yesterday, of course, as well

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 2>as Fargo con Langen says it'll be zero growth in

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 2>sales volume for the ev maker this year. So can

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>you be a company that's growth company if you have

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 2>no growth in sales? And that stock has just really

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 2>had a tough run of it, down eighteen percent just

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 2>so far this month. Steve Mann is Global Auto's industrial's

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>research analyst. He's standing by for Steve. What do you

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 2>think growth company with no growth?

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm I tend to be more optimistic about the company.

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 7>I really like the stuff they're doing behind the scenes

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 7>with AI with full self driving, the optimist robot. I

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 7>think the company is pretty much set up vertically integrated

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 7>to actually succeed, So I'm not as negative. But there

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 7>is a valley right that the company's going through right now.

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.959
<v Speaker 7>The problem is, you know, where is the bottom.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 10>Of that valley?

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 7>Because prices for their cars just keeps coming down. You know.

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the issues that Elon Musk has faced with

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Tesla is what he gets out of cutting prices. And

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I wondered if you could talk a little bit about

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 3>what you think he's going to be able to earn

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 3>if he thinks that he's going to be able to

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 3>institute more if he thinks he's gonna be able to

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 3>get more sales with lowering prices.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so.

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the you know, pricing is pretty elastic. I

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 7>think he will get some sales. The question is is

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 7>how far and how much price cutting can he do

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 7>from now on? Well, their gross margins are still in

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 7>the mid teens. They still have room. I think relative

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 7>to the legacy automakers, their margins are still relatively healthy.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 7>The issue is China. China's hype competitive market. Their main

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 7>rival is BID. They're continue to cut prices, and if

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 7>they do cut prices in China, they really have to

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 7>do the same elsewhere in the world to eliminate the

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 7>arbitrage that can actually occur if there's a price difference

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 7>across the world.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>So here's my question. I hear that it's not as

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 2>desperate as maybe Wells Fargo is saying, but we're still

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 2>looking at an estimated price startings multiple at fifty four times,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 2>So is it worth that much based on everything we've

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 2>just talked about, do we need to rewrate that in

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a more significant way?

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 6>We do.

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 7>I think we're in a cycle where we're going to

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 7>see some rerating. But long term, what I'm really excited

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 7>about is the company is actually very vertically integrated. They're

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 7>actually behaving like an Apple where they're trying to create

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 7>an ecosystem. We haven't seen it yet, but it's an

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 7>interesting thing. There's doing a lot of interesting things with manufacturing,

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 7>with their FSD and how it creates value for the

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 7>long term owners of the vehicle over time, and that's

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, I don't think the market wants to look

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 7>at that right now given the slowdown in EV sales.

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 7>But again, like I said earlier, we're in that valley

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 7>and there is I think light at the end of

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 7>the tunnel. But you know, where are we at? Are

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 7>we at the bottom of the valley? That's the main question.

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 7>I don't think we're there yet.

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I want to pick up on your point, you know

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 3>that we don't think we're that we're there yet because

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there might be more to come from analysts,

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 3>potentially more people souring on Tessa.

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 9>But do you agree on that or what's your expectation

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 9>for the coming core I do.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 7>I do. If you look at consensus earning, the range

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 7>is very wide. I think there's still still very bollish

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 7>people out there, bullish analysts out there that's going to

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 7>have to bring down earnings to more a little bit

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 7>more realistic to the current growth rate that we're seeing,

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 7>especially in the US market.

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 2>When do you think we then get to the valley?

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And what is the vale?

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 7>I think the I think one thing that we have

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 7>to keep track of, and that's what we're doing as well,

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 7>is a slowdown in price cuts. You know, we may

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 7>be starting to see that at the moment because price cutting,

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 7>the additional sales from price cutting is actually shrinking. That

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 7>gap is shrinking, So I do see it. We're closer

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 7>to that than maybe six months ago. So hopefully, you know,

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 7>by midyear, second half the year, we can see some

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 7>relief in price cutting.

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Talk a little bit about Tesla's margins, because we've got

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 3>some analysis. It says that Tesla aims to slash production

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 3>costs by about fifty percent, but maybe that's going to

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 3>be wind up being more about like thirty three percent.

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 9>What do you think about that?

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think their target.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 7>I think their target of fifty percent is a stretch target,

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 7>especially as you know, as they ramp up the model too.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 7>This is the fifty percent that they're referring to, and

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 7>cost cutting is really on their next generation of vehicles,

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:07.800
<v Speaker 7>the model too, and you know, they've done a huge,

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 7>significant revolutionary change to how they built vehicles. You know,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 7>you haven't seen that since Toyota introduced the lean manufacturing

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 7>in nineteen fifties. So the cutting price cutting of fifty

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 7>percent likely unrealistic. Unrealistic, especially as they ramp up production

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty five, twenty twenty six. You know, maybe

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 7>beyond twenty twenty six, we may get to fifty percent,

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 7>but that's a little bit far out there to really forecast.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 2>So, Steve, I was interested in what you said about

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Apple in terms of sort of being all things to

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 2>all people in one area. Right, So does that mean

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and I know that Apple is a harbor company, but

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 2>they really want to be a services company, Like they

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 2>want that to take up a lot of their space

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 2>in terms of earnings and their revenue. Right makes sense?

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Tesla's going to do the same thing?

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Like they're going to get you know, your solar panel

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to get services from that. And I

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 2>appreciate the tests is a little bit different than your

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 2>battery storage and then your car, Like is that the

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 2>company's going to be in twenty years?

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 7>I you know, if you look at all the things

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 7>that they do, right, the solar panel you just mentioned,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 7>the Starlink satellite system, you know those all can be

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 7>connected where you know, I can imagine where Tesla not

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 7>only you know, you have the uber or lift model

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 7>that you know, robotaxi model, but you know, these cars

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 7>are actually carrying heavy, high capacity batteries that you know,

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 7>it can be moved around, redistribute power around, and you

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 7>have the star Link system really connected to these vehicles

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 7>to really manage that in a more efficient way. So,

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 7>you know, we haven't really talked about energy. We only

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 7>you know, I think the market really are focused on

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 7>the current EV sales and how are they going to

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 7>roll out the self full self driving, but the you know,

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 7>long term, the next step could be you know, managing

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 7>power with these mobile batteries that are in these cars.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk a little bit more about demand for

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>electric vehicles? And part of the thing I'm wondering about

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 3>is if you see that Tesla is going to need

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a very particular policy environment in order to see sales

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 3>continuing to pick up, and you know, in particular we've

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>got the election coming up, a potential change of administration.

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything to think about there for what that

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 3>would mean for Tesla?

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 7>Actually, I think Tesla have a unique benefit where they're

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 7>actually a very global company already, Like they have a

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 7>third of sales in the US, third in Asia, mostly China,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 7>and then third in Europe, so they're very diversified regionally,

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 7>So I don't think they really need any specific policy

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 7>push from the US, you know, with their model to

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 7>their next gen vehicle coming out in twenty twenty twenty

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 7>five and twenty twenty six, that will really resonate to

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the emerging markets around world. So US

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 7>is an important market, but I think their aim is

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 7>really go even more global.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Hybrids. Is hybrid is going to be a consistent thorn

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in tesla side or we think we overcome that.

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 7>I think the world's gonna see a mix of powertrain

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 7>to really get to kind of net zero emissions. So

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 7>I think in the US, I think, you know, plug

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 7>in hybrids will play a bigger role, potentially bigger role.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 7>But I think the rest of the world we're going

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 7>to see, you know, significant growth in Southeast Asia, Southeast Asia,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 7>continued growth in China, Europe. You're kind of between the

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 7>US and Asia. I think there's still a big enough space,

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 7>a big enough market the pie. I think the pie

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 7>for battery electric vehicles will continue to grow and absorb

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 7>some of the newer competition that we're seeing from test

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 7>that Tesla is facing.

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>See, we're gonna leave it there. Steve Mann, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Automotive Analysts joining us. Really good stuff. Okay, so I

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>know you're in the market to buy home, but what

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 2>would it take you to buy a Tesla or an

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 2>ev Hibar.

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I think the charging situation is just too horrible, Like

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 3>there's just not enough around anywhere in New York City.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 9>Well, no, I take that back.

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of man Henan, but you get to

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the out of Burrows and it gets a lot more tricky.

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot coming up in Brooklyn, like you

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 2>can see dedicated charging spots. But I'm also in Parkslope,

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 2>so that would make a lot more sense. But I

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 2>wonder too, is that we put so much emphasis on

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the evs and we missed the hybrid there. And I

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 2>feel like we're all playing a little bit of catchup

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 2>because you can make an argument that while John Tucker

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 2>waits for his hydrogen car, that you know a hybrid

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 2>makes good sense.

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I'm not disagreeing with you, right, just don't have

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 10>any money, so I'm spending so much on my bathroom.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, Well you've got to pick your poison.

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't you.

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 2>That's true. One big purchase in the house, you do

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 2>in the.

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.240
<v Speaker 10>Bath environmentally friendly bathroom.

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's gonna be a This could be really tough

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:01.720
<v Speaker 9>to get that fixed.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true. No floating toilets, no floating sings. I'm

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 2>really glad we work that out.

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal