Speaker 1: COVID mandate madness. Oh yeah, there's lots to talk about
Speaker 1: that we have. I know you're gonna find the shocking
Speaker 1: booster shots coming. The FDA is going to approve booster shots.
Speaker 1: We've got Congressman chip Roy and much more coming up tonight.
Speaker 1: And I'm right, you know what I think about sometimes,
Speaker 1: how wild it is, the level of I don't know
Speaker 1: if we even want to call it corruption, how high
Speaker 1: it's all gone, and how we've just built in a
Speaker 1: certain level of let's just call it corruption into everything.
Speaker 1: Now what am I talking about specifically right now? We're
Speaker 1: gonna bring in chip Roy here in just a second
Speaker 1: to talk about it. But boosters, the coronavirus vaccine boosters.
Speaker 1: You see, the FDA is almost undoubtedly going to approve
Speaker 1: booster shots for everybody over at the age of eighteen tomorrow,
Speaker 1: maybe even today. Let me ask you something, because I
Speaker 1: don't want to just gloss right over this. Why is
Speaker 1: it a guarantee the FDA is going to approve this.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't there be some suspense and yet everybody and their
Speaker 1: brother knows they're going to approve this. Why has every
Speaker 1: single part of our system become simply a rubber stamp
Speaker 1: for more lockdowns, more mandates, more boosters, more everything. I mean,
Speaker 1: we have doctor Fauci. Of course, remember this is fifteen
Speaker 1: days to slow the spreads, Fauci. And then it's well,
Speaker 1: maybe Eastern time Fauci, and then well, hopefully by Christmas Fauci,
Speaker 1: and then well, okay, once everyone gets vaccinated Fauci. I
Speaker 1: know you're gonna find this shocking. The goalposts are moving again,
Speaker 1: he telled Axios. Quote. In my opinion, boosters are ultimately
Speaker 1: going to become part of the standard regimen and not
Speaker 1: just a bonus. Yes, that's right, everybody out there fully vaccinated.
Speaker 1: I apologize you were about to join me, and about
Speaker 1: five other is in the no longer vaccinated line. That
Speaker 1: is simply the way it goes. And look, let's be
Speaker 1: honest about what this has all been about. Hasn't been
Speaker 1: about coronavirus. It stop being about coronavirus about five minutes
Speaker 1: after coronavirus got here. This has all been about, well,
Speaker 1: what most things in politics are about money and power. Listen,
Speaker 1: listen to doctor Fauci when he talks about your freedom
Speaker 1: as if it's some annoying little net in his agenda.
Speaker 1: But I didn't quite understand what the purpose of that was,
Speaker 1: except to put this misplaced perception about people's individual right
Speaker 1: to make a decision that supersedes the societal safety. You
Speaker 1: hear how he said individual right? These people man? Oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, I shouldn't I should mention Fizer, BioNTech
Speaker 1: or bioin tech. I never knew how to said. And
Speaker 1: Maderna are now making a combined profit of sixty five
Speaker 1: thousand dollars every single minute. How about that. I'm sure
Speaker 1: they're definitely interested in stopping all this right joining me now, Congressmanship,
Speaker 1: Roy running for reelection, I might add in one of
Speaker 1: the very few good ones in congress Congressmanship, Roy of
Speaker 1: the Great State of Texas, Congressman. I can't help but
Speaker 1: feel like they don't actually want to fix coronavirus. I
Speaker 1: feel like this might be about something else. You know,
Speaker 1: Jesse has never been about making sure that we protect
Speaker 1: Americans and have actual medicines, having the ability for American
Speaker 1: people to go to doctors and make decisions about what's
Speaker 1: in their best interest. It's always, as you said, been
Speaker 1: about power. It's been about frankly, corruption, been about float dollars.
Speaker 1: What you just said, I mean, this is one of
Speaker 1: the reasons why I've said I won't take any money
Speaker 1: from FISER. I won't, haven't, I don't take any money
Speaker 1: from big tech. At the end of the day, we've
Speaker 1: got to stop this. And you've played that clip that.
Speaker 1: I think it's probably the most important thing about what
Speaker 1: BAUGI said, as you said, dismissing like a na our
Speaker 1: individual liberty, our freedom, our healthcare freedom, our ability to
Speaker 1: make decisions for ourselves or our family. You've got the
Speaker 1: government with the power of government, Joe Biden, all of
Speaker 1: these lunatics, of CDC, of the nih FDA, all of
Speaker 1: them has coming in and literally limiting our ability to
Speaker 1: get care, for example, monoclonal antibodies and tech while mandating
Speaker 1: you get a needle stuck in your arm on a
Speaker 1: still to be figured out effectiveness rate on a vaccine
Speaker 1: and that seems to be declining an effectiveness, while saying
Speaker 1: you've got to get a third booster. Now they're even
Speaker 1: talking about the fourth booster all, by the way, when
Speaker 1: we know that natural immunity works, and they literally refuse
Speaker 1: to do any work on natural immunity. I'm introducing legislation
Speaker 1: this week to make them put out information and have
Speaker 1: transparency on that community. But we have to get all
Speaker 1: of our answers on that community from Israel, from the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom, studies, and from private studies in America, but
Speaker 1: not from these jackasses who are actually more interested in
Speaker 1: empowering themselves and doing fashionable interviews like Fauchie than actually
Speaker 1: protecting America Chip. Why do they want to make America poorer?
Speaker 1: I mean, look, let's be honest. Joe Biden isn't sitting
Speaker 1: on the board of Fiser. Doctor Fauci isn't, although we
Speaker 1: probably will be when all this is done. But doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci isn't. There are so many people pushing things that
Speaker 1: are making us poor, making us more miserable. They're two
Speaker 1: randical things they don't have the authority to do. Why
Speaker 1: what's the motivation? Well, I think there are two pieces
Speaker 1: to this. One are those that are actually seeking power
Speaker 1: and using the power of government purposefully because they have
Speaker 1: an agenda, an agenda that they want to advance, awoke agenda,
Speaker 1: a climate agenda. We are going to determine healthcare for all,
Speaker 1: agenda all because they believe either that they've got all
Speaker 1: the infinite wisdom to make good choice. They're benevolent, you see.
Speaker 1: Or they just want to power. They just like the empowerment.
Speaker 1: And they're so beholden to a secular, woke, you know culture,
Speaker 1: bowling down at the altar of that as opposed to
Speaker 1: Our Lord Almighty into freedom and those principles that are
Speaker 1: founder spot for they're fighting for power. The rest of
Speaker 1: them are sheep. They just go along. They just go, oh, well,
Speaker 1: this isn't really taking away your liberty. This is actually
Speaker 1: just taking care of everybody. This is making sure everybody's okay.
Speaker 1: But that's just total crap, right, the same ideology, and
Speaker 1: this is an ideology, it's a religion for these people.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing that has them targeting South Lake
Speaker 1: Schools right now with the Department of Justice, the same
Speaker 1: thing with a whistleblower showing that the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: is targeting parent in order just because they're raising issues
Speaker 1: with CRT at school board. That is the exact same thing.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing driving my house colleagues on the
Speaker 1: floor going after Paul Gosar right now when they're leftist
Speaker 1: nuts have said all sorts of crazy things over the years.
Speaker 1: This isn't about righteousness This is about power. It always
Speaker 1: has been, it always will be, and it's about time
Speaker 1: Republicans start acting like it instead of the thirteen losers
Speaker 1: you're folded like you know wet noodles two weeks ago,
Speaker 1: are indeed losers, And I love to hear you say it. Well,
Speaker 1: we do have some good news, I think, Chip, I think,
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you know more about this stuff than
Speaker 1: I do. We have the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Speaker 1: saying this vaccine mandate is completely unconstitutional and there's no
Speaker 1: authority for this whatsoever. So now OSHA has to back
Speaker 1: off because this isn't I don't even want to say laws.
Speaker 1: It wouldn't have been a law anyway. The president can't
Speaker 1: just pass laws willy nilly. But as this thing gonna died, Chip,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to forgive me if I don't have
Speaker 1: the most amount of faith in the supreme court in
Speaker 1: the world. Yeah. Well, first of all, you should never
Speaker 1: put your faith in court to determine what your God
Speaker 1: given right. Let's start with that, Okay. I believe in
Speaker 1: the rule of law, and we go quite and we
Speaker 1: argue where we can do defend all right, but we
Speaker 1: defend are right, we the people, and what just happened
Speaker 1: is good. Okay, let's let's take wins when we get them.
Speaker 1: The fifth Circuit. I've got lawyers friends of mine like
Speaker 1: Robert Hennicky at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, Texas Attorney
Speaker 1: General's Office, Louisiana, you know ag Landry, all those guys.
Speaker 1: They're all fighting hard. And now you see in the
Speaker 1: sixth circuit that was the consolidation in the sixth circuit.
Speaker 1: So now we're seeing a win with ocean backing away
Speaker 1: for now. But here's the thing. The one group that
Speaker 1: has the power to fix this right now are forty
Speaker 1: one Republicans in the United States Senate. If forty one
Speaker 1: Republicans in the United States Senate use either the National
Speaker 1: Defense Authorization Act, which we've talked about its garbage gold draft,
Speaker 1: their daughters in touch and we can talk about that
Speaker 1: more or more importantly, the Continuing Resolution right our funding
Speaker 1: for government expires on December third. That's why there's some
Speaker 1: senators they're calling on using that as a moment to
Speaker 1: say no Republican should vote the funded government that is
Speaker 1: carrying out unconstitutional, unlawable, or wrongheaded mandates of vaccine one
Speaker 1: final point. Stopping OSHA's not a not that is unconstitutional
Speaker 1: and it's crap. But we have to stop the Department
Speaker 1: of Defense. We have to stop border patrol. We've got
Speaker 1: to stop the FEDS and of going after contractors, by
Speaker 1: the way, stopping going after our men and women in
Speaker 1: uniform who might say, you know what, I'm twenty two
Speaker 1: years old. I don't want to get a job that
Speaker 1: might cause me to have heart inflammation when I've already
Speaker 1: had a nat full immunity. And that guy is going
Speaker 1: to be facing dishonorable discharge or hell, even just honorable discharge.
Speaker 1: My colleagues hiding behind, Oh, let's fix it so they
Speaker 1: can be honorably discharged. Who gives a damn. They're having
Speaker 1: to lose their job, They're having to lose their dream
Speaker 1: of serving in the United States military because these woke
Speaker 1: are undermining their ability to serve. We should not fund
Speaker 1: a government that does that. No, we should not. And
Speaker 1: I'm really afraid to ask this question. We only do
Speaker 1: need forty one Republicans in the Senate, chip are we
Speaker 1: going to get him? Not unless the people demanded. Now
Speaker 1: I've seen this before. We're heading into Thanksgiving. We don't
Speaker 1: have a lot of time. Thankfully, yesterday my Freedom Caucus
Speaker 1: colleagues and I we came together. We put out an
Speaker 1: official position of the entire Freedom Caucus that we will
Speaker 1: not support any funding of government that includes vaccine mandates
Speaker 1: of any kind. Vaccine mandate. We're now pushing to the Senate.
Speaker 1: They've got a letter. I think they've got maybe fifteen
Speaker 1: senators or on that letter. We need to demand that
Speaker 1: every Republican senator sign on to this and say we're
Speaker 1: not going to fund the government that's going to mandate
Speaker 1: the American people have to be subjected to vaccine, whether
Speaker 1: they're private sector contractors, DoD order patrol. No American should
Speaker 1: have to get a COVID nineteen vaccine by force of government.
Speaker 1: An all right, Congressman. Speaking of senators, as you know,
Speaker 1: one of the good ones is one from the great
Speaker 1: state of Texas here at Ted Cruz. I did enjoy
Speaker 1: this little exchange he had with majorcas Man alive. Were
Speaker 1: we in trouble now? You told him, other Senator, you
Speaker 1: don't know how many gataways there been. I will have
Speaker 1: to circle back a senator with that information. So that
Speaker 1: wasn't a fact that you thought was relevant to this hearing. Oh,
Speaker 1: it is absolutely irrelevant. I understand why the question is posed.
Speaker 1: It's a fact of great, but you're not prepared to
Speaker 1: answer great. Our DHS secretary doesn't have any idea what's
Speaker 1: going on at the southern border. Do I have that right? Congressman, Well,
Speaker 1: you do have that part right. But he's lying. Of
Speaker 1: course he knows how many gataways there are. I know
Speaker 1: how many gataways there are because I talked the sources
Speaker 1: at the border, and that numbers between brandred thousand and
Speaker 1: four hundred thousand. On top of what he admitted in
Speaker 1: cross examination and the hearing of something like four to
Speaker 1: six hundred thousand people who have come across been apprehended
Speaker 1: and then have been released into the country under asylum
Speaker 1: laws at which he was all preaching about yesterday. Look,
Speaker 1: he should be impeached. We know full well he is
Speaker 1: willfully choosing not to enforce the laws of the United States.
Speaker 1: He is hiding behind asylum laws which were never meant
Speaker 1: to allow a wave of people to come here for
Speaker 1: economic benefits instead of seeking something when they're being religiously
Speaker 1: or otherwise persecuted, which is a fraction of these people.
Speaker 1: They're doing it on purpose. They know what they're doing
Speaker 1: that is failing to faithfully execute the laws of the
Speaker 1: United States. I wrote a thirteen page memo to my
Speaker 1: Texas colleague saying that we should impeach this guy and
Speaker 1: that frankly, that will lay the foundation for going after
Speaker 1: Biden because of what they're doing. But we need I
Speaker 1: need more folks in the House to not get hung
Speaker 1: up on their interpretation of high crimes and misdemeanors that
Speaker 1: there needs to be some specific law. No, the founders
Speaker 1: clearly intended runs to be able to go after executive
Speaker 1: branch officials from reaching our oath and their duty to
Speaker 1: faithfully execute the laws. So we should impeached this guy.
Speaker 1: A man, you are running for reelection, right, we really
Speaker 1: do need you to stick around there for a while. Congressman.
Speaker 1: I am Jesse Banks. Yeah, I'm running for reelection. A
Speaker 1: great district. My district proved a little bit after the
Speaker 1: districting process, secual, Texas health country, reputable, great constituents. But yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm running again. I'm foolish enough. I want to come
Speaker 1: beat my head against the ball, but it's because I
Speaker 1: love my country. I did not wear the uniform like
Speaker 1: you did. This is the little bit that I can
Speaker 1: do to give back, to try to fight for freedom,
Speaker 1: to fight for our men and women in uniform, but
Speaker 1: more importantly, to fight for our kid, to save this republic.
Speaker 1: For them, freedom matter, right other than you know, believe
Speaker 1: in the Lord Almighty and typing my family, freedom matter.
Speaker 1: And I'm not gonna love these democrats. They don't get
Speaker 1: to have her. We're taking our country back and they
Speaker 1: don't get to have it. We did, man, Congressman chip Roy.
Speaker 1: I support you. I hope everyone else does as well.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir, I appreciate you very much. Thanks Jesse Goblass.
Speaker 1: It's a good man right there. We need a lot
Speaker 1: more like him. He's got some good ideas. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you all right. All that may have made you uncomfortable,
Speaker 1: but I'm right. We got my buddy Cam Edwards joining
Speaker 1: us next. There's been a lot of gun talk and
Speaker 1: self defense talk. Cam knows more about that stuff than
Speaker 1: anybody I so we're going to talk to him about it.
Speaker 1: But first, what if I told you you could avoid
Speaker 1: the gigantic insurance providers, probably ones who hate your guts,
Speaker 1: and go with one that's a faith based group called
Speaker 1: one Share Health and when you picked up that group,
Speaker 1: you would have unbelievable coverage options dental vision, you would
Speaker 1: have twenty four to seven telemedicine. You would have Oh
Speaker 1: did I mention? If you go to my dot one
Speaker 1: sharehealth dot com slash Kelly and use the promo code
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly, one share health donates five percent of your
Speaker 1: monthly contribution to our veterans struggling with PTSD. Did I
Speaker 1: not tell you this is a great group my dot
Speaker 1: one sharehealth dot kelly promo code Jesse Kelly. Go find
Speaker 1: out the great insurance that is out there for you
Speaker 1: and your family. We'll be back. When the defendant provokes
Speaker 1: the incident, he loses right to self defense. You cannot
Speaker 1: claim self defense against a danger you create. That's critical
Speaker 1: right here. If you're the one who's threatening others, you
Speaker 1: lose the right to claim self defense. Joining me now
Speaker 1: from Bearing Arms dot Com. My friend Kim Edwards cam
Speaker 1: It's been bizarre. I'm certainly not a lawyer by any
Speaker 1: stretch of the imagination, but I do know my eyes
Speaker 1: and ears tell me the prosecution in this case isn't
Speaker 1: He's an idiot? How did that? How did that happen? You? Know,
Speaker 1: it's a really good question, and I don't know if
Speaker 1: he's an idiot or if he is just willing to
Speaker 1: use any argument possible in order to try to obtain
Speaker 1: a conviction, even if he has to misrepresent what the
Speaker 1: law of self defense actually is. You know. And it's
Speaker 1: good to be here, Jesse, because not only did Thomas
Speaker 1: Binger say, listen, I mean, if you provoke an attack,
Speaker 1: you lose your right of self defense, which actually is
Speaker 1: not even the case under Wisconsin law. If you provoke
Speaker 1: an attack, you have to retreat before you can use
Speaker 1: reasonable force to defend yourself. But there's no evidence other
Speaker 1: than these you know, blurry, grainy photos that Rittenhouse actually
Speaker 1: provoked anyone that night. In fact, there with plenty of
Speaker 1: testimony over the course of this trial that Rittenhouse try
Speaker 1: to de escalate tense situations at time. But you know,
Speaker 1: we saw the prosecute should argue that if you bring
Speaker 1: a gun to a fistfight, that you can't act in
Speaker 1: self defense. That everybody just needs to take a beating sometimes.
Speaker 1: I mean, this was an absurd take on our right
Speaker 1: of self defense. And thank goodness, Thomas Binger isn't writing
Speaker 1: the laws. It's just a shame that he's out there
Speaker 1: trying to enforce the laws that are on the books,
Speaker 1: because at least stuff like cam help me understand how
Speaker 1: the sieving gets to try. I mean, I know I'm
Speaker 1: not a lawyer, but we have It's not only that
Speaker 1: all these things took place, They're all on video tape.
Speaker 1: You can go on Twitter right now and look at
Speaker 1: the evidence. It's that crazy. You can look at all
Speaker 1: this it's on video. He's defending himself and yet as
Speaker 1: we speak right now, the jury is deliberating about sending
Speaker 1: this kid to the prison for the rest of his life.
Speaker 1: How did it get this far? Well, I think that
Speaker 1: Kyle renounces Attorney Mark Richards summed it up in his
Speaker 1: closing argument. I mean, he basically said, look, this was
Speaker 1: a politically motivated decision to charge Kyle Rittenhouse, and it
Speaker 1: was done about two days after the shootings took place,
Speaker 1: long before the investigations had ever been concluded, long before
Speaker 1: witnesses had been interviewed, well before the prosecution or even
Speaker 1: police had the opportunity to view some of these videos,
Speaker 1: including the the drone footage that you know is at
Speaker 1: the heart of the prosecution's case that the decision was
Speaker 1: made to charge Kyle Rittenhouse with first degree murder before
Speaker 1: any of that information had been obtained, before the investigation
Speaker 1: had ever been concluded. So he asked how we got here.
Speaker 1: I think we got here with, as Mark Richards said,
Speaker 1: a rush to judgment on the part of prosecutors who
Speaker 1: wanted to send a message that, you know, what things
Speaker 1: were going to be common Kenosha. We weren't going to
Speaker 1: put up with this type of violence. And it didn't
Speaker 1: matter if it was self defense or not. What mattered
Speaker 1: was sending the message that, you know, Kenosha was not
Speaker 1: a place where this type of behavior was going to
Speaker 1: be acceptable. The question then became again, what was this behavior?
Speaker 1: Was it murder or was it self defense? And I
Speaker 1: love all the lawyering I've seen from the communists out
Speaker 1: there in recent days, Cam, I particularly love this one.
Speaker 1: This is in August twenty twenty a fact check from PolitiFact,
Speaker 1: which I just love the name of that. It's just wonderful,
Speaker 1: it said. A Facebook post says, at seventeen years old,
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse was perfectly legal to be able to possess that
Speaker 1: rifle without parental supervision. That's false, Cam, Was it egal
Speaker 1: for Kyle Rittenhouse to have an AR fifteen. Well as
Speaker 1: that little editor's note you just scrolled by notes, not
Speaker 1: according to the judge in this case. You know, the
Speaker 1: judge took a look at this Wisconsin lawn question and look,
Speaker 1: admittedly the laws really confusing, but it was just as
Speaker 1: confusing for PolitiFact a year ago, right, and yet they
Speaker 1: supposedly came to the determination there. No, of course he
Speaker 1: wasn't allowed to carry that gun. Well, actually, according to
Speaker 1: Bruce Roeder, based on the Wisconsin lawn question, if the
Speaker 1: gun was not a short barreled rifle, then yeah, Kyle
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse was legally allowed as a seventeen year old to
Speaker 1: possess that firearm, which is why the gun possession charge
Speaker 1: was dropped. Now, you don't have to like the law.
Speaker 1: You could say the law was you know, poorly worded
Speaker 1: and the legislator has actually meant something else. But look
Speaker 1: that's the way the law is written. And so Kyle
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse is not facing a legal gun possession charge. The
Speaker 1: charge of violating curfew was dropped. He had a right
Speaker 1: to be in Kenosha that night. He had a right
Speaker 1: to have a rifle with him at night. Those those
Speaker 1: points are not in dispute from a legal standpoint anymore. Cam.
Speaker 1: But he crossed state lines, haven't you heard. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: not with a rifle, right, because the rifle was in
Speaker 1: the possession of Dominic Black the entire time. So Kyle
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse drove what seventeen miles from Antioch, Illinois to Kenosha, Wisconsin. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't know about you, Jesse. You know a lot
Speaker 1: of folks have at least that long of a commute
Speaker 1: to work every day, and they don't consider themselves to
Speaker 1: be outsiders when they're driving from where they lived to
Speaker 1: where they go to work. Kyle Rittenhouse did work in Kenosha,
Speaker 1: he had friends in Kenosha. His father lived in Kenosha.
Speaker 1: But that was one of the other, you know, sort
Speaker 1: of prosecutorial arguments that the Binger trying to make is
Speaker 1: that this guy didn't belong here that night, Right, he
Speaker 1: was a stranger as it turns out. You know, Anthony
Speaker 1: Huber I think, actually lived further away from Kenosha than
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse did, but prosecution never called him an outsider.
Speaker 1: It it's you know, it was a lame argument. I
Speaker 1: I didn't like it. I don't know how well it
Speaker 1: went over among the jurors. But you know, the bottom
Speaker 1: line is Kyle Riddenhouse had a right to be there,
Speaker 1: He had a right to have that gun. Those issues
Speaker 1: aren't in dispute. The question is whether or not he
Speaker 1: was acting in self defense. That's what this case is
Speaker 1: all about. Cam explained this to me. Please, why on
Speaker 1: a macro level, why is there so much anger at
Speaker 1: somebody who stopped the insanity at least temporarily from last summer,
Speaker 1: and virtually no anger from the mainstream media at the
Speaker 1: animals who were torching American cities. It's so bizarre who
Speaker 1: they've chosen to defend and who they've chosen to demonize.
Speaker 1: It really is. And even you know, this week we've
Speaker 1: seen I counted a half dozen stories. There might be
Speaker 1: more of a mather I kind of a half dozen columns,
Speaker 1: generally along the lines of Kyle Riddenhouse is no hero.
Speaker 1: He might have acted in self defense, but he's no hero. Okay, look,
Speaker 1: if you want to believe that, that's your opinion, fine,
Speaker 1: But you're right, Jesse, why are we talking about, Well,
Speaker 1: Kyle Ritenhouse may have backed in the self defense, but
Speaker 1: he shouldn't have been there. Why is nobody's saying Kenosha
Speaker 1: shouldn't have been burning that. You know, Kyle Rittenhouse wouldn't
Speaker 1: have been there if you didn't have people who were
Speaker 1: trying to kick off a revolution, to to ignite this
Speaker 1: revolution fire by burning Kenosha to the ground. That's why
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse were there. That's why Ryan Baltz was there.
Speaker 1: That's why you had dozens, if not hundreds of individuals
Speaker 1: who were Kenosha residents or who lived nearby, who came
Speaker 1: to that city to stand guard over businesses, to watch over,
Speaker 1: you know, the livelihoods for people who were getting ready
Speaker 1: to lose everything if the mob decided that their business
Speaker 1: shouldn't be allowed to exist. And you're right, we're not
Speaker 1: talking about that. The media isn't interested in having that conversation.
Speaker 1: Apparently the leftist guide to riot response is stay home,
Speaker 1: don't just set foot off your property, particularly if the
Speaker 1: mob is telling you not to, don't have a firearm,
Speaker 1: allow yourself to be beaten if you're attacked, and and
Speaker 1: that's how you're supposed to respond, Well, I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't think that's how Americans respond to situations like that,
Speaker 1: and so we certainly haven't seen that in the past.
Speaker 1: I don't think we're going to see that in the future.
Speaker 1: We care about our businesses, we care about our communities,
Speaker 1: and yeah, I think that you've You've got millions of
Speaker 1: Americans who are prepared to defend their neighborhoods, their communities,
Speaker 1: their cities rather than see them towards and burn to
Speaker 1: the ground. Cam what's the right to carry? Question? Gun
Speaker 1: control activists don't want you to ask. That question would
Speaker 1: be why do some people get to carry while others don't?
Speaker 1: This is, you know, I question that's really at the
Speaker 1: heart of the right to carry case that's before the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court right now. I wrote about this at Burying
Speaker 1: Arms because you've got gun control activists who, you know,
Speaker 1: just want to say, look, it's more dangerous if more
Speaker 1: people can carry guns. Well, who gets to decide who
Speaker 1: the chosen few are? Why in New York City can
Speaker 1: the rich and the powerful carry a firearm but the
Speaker 1: average citizen can? Why do you have to demonstrate some
Speaker 1: sort of special need or special circumstance to exercise your
Speaker 1: constitutional right? And why would you ever expect that Americans
Speaker 1: would simply accept that. Let's not how we treat our rights.
Speaker 1: The question that gun corolackvics don't want you to ask
Speaker 1: is basically to explain their own position on what the
Speaker 1: right to bear arms it actually means, because it becomes
Speaker 1: readily apparent, they don't consider to write at all. Of course,
Speaker 1: well they should be allowed to hurt you, but not
Speaker 1: vice versa. Cam Edwards Bearing Arms dot Com. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much, brother, Thanks chasing good seeing man. All right,
Speaker 1: we have new whistleblower information and wow, the FBI, the DOJ,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General. Yikes. We're gonna get to all that
Speaker 1: in a minute. But let's talk for a second about
Speaker 1: one of my favorite subjects in the world. Gear. I'm
Speaker 1: a gear freak. I love it, always have, always will.
Speaker 1: I love good gear. That's why I've been telling you
Speaker 1: for so long about Northwest Retention Systems made in the USA,
Speaker 1: custom made holsters, not just the best design, custom made holsters.
Speaker 1: But understand this, it's more than just this kind of
Speaker 1: holster or that kind of holster. Make sure when you
Speaker 1: go to NW Retention dot Com you check out the scout.
Speaker 1: It's actually their best selling item. It's a chest holster.
Speaker 1: It's awesome. Check out their belt. I'm wearing one right now.
Speaker 1: It's incredible. Make sure you check out the sling. My
Speaker 1: favorite part of the sling is it's a two point
Speaker 1: sling and there's not a bunch of garbage on it
Speaker 1: that makes things confusing buckles and such like that. Go
Speaker 1: to NW retention dot com. It's the best gear I've
Speaker 1: ever found. I've ever used in my entire life, and
Speaker 1: I've used a lot of gear. NW retention dot Com
Speaker 1: used to promo code Jesse when you get there that
Speaker 1: gets you ten percent off and free shipping at everything
Speaker 1: over one hundred bucks. NW retention dot Com. We'll be back.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be a Debbie downer, but I
Speaker 1: do think it's really really important we continue to have
Speaker 1: the conversation on this show about the most dangerous development
Speaker 1: going on in the United States of America right now.
Speaker 1: What is that development? Well, that's paused for a moment.
Speaker 1: Think about a historical monster, somebody you hate, someone everyone hates.
Speaker 1: Of course, one of the first names is going to
Speaker 1: be hit or Stalin or now that these are these
Speaker 1: are the names that are probably going to be on
Speaker 1: the forefront of your mind. You know, I'm in the
Speaker 1: terrible Maybe if you're if you're a bit of a throwback. Okay,
Speaker 1: you hate them? Why do you? Why do you hate
Speaker 1: these guys? Well, Jesse, they killed all these people? They did?
Speaker 1: Did Hitler actually kill all those innocent shoes? Did Stalin
Speaker 1: go murder all those Soviet citizens? Mao? Was he a
Speaker 1: busy little boy just the fingers getting cramps out there
Speaker 1: shooting all those Chinese people. I've in the terrible even
Speaker 1: see out there personally slaughtering his own people. No, they weren't.
Speaker 1: You see, in the end, these evil people need someone
Speaker 1: to pull the trigger, swing the sword, run the death camps.
Speaker 1: What I'm getting at is this, you, as an American,
Speaker 1: me as an American, do not fully appreciate the absolute
Speaker 1: terror that comes with having a state run police that
Speaker 1: is completely corrupt and operating at the behest of the regime.
Speaker 1: They are, in the end, the ones who pull the
Speaker 1: trigger and run the camps. It's the state run police
Speaker 1: you need to be very very very worried about. And
Speaker 1: I am officially at the stage of being very very
Speaker 1: very worried. You See, you remember when parents were getting
Speaker 1: upset at school boards and they're going down. They're yelling
Speaker 1: because they don't want their kids learning about critical race
Speaker 1: theory in school. They don't want their kids learning gender queer, perverse,
Speaker 1: disgusting stuff in school. They just want their kids to
Speaker 1: get a decent education. And the Biden administration, well, they
Speaker 1: decided they didn't like that it was making their teachers
Speaker 1: unions look bad. So the Biden administration directs the Attorney General,
Speaker 1: the top law enforcement officer in the United States of America,
Speaker 1: to attack these parents. The Attorney General then six the
Speaker 1: FBI on concerned parents. Remember, the FBI recently is admitted
Speaker 1: they're not even looking into Antifa or Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: but they are not only going after concerned parents. We
Speaker 1: now have a whistleblower. There's a report that shows on
Speaker 1: October twentieth, the heads of the FBI instructed the counter
Speaker 1: Terrorism divisions to flag all assessments and investigations into potential
Speaker 1: criminal threats, harassment and intimidation of educators with a threat tag. Yes,
Speaker 1: that's right, the FBI counter Terrorists Unit was talking about
Speaker 1: concerned parents. Are you worried yet? You should be? And
Speaker 1: here's the Attorney General of the United States of America
Speaker 1: lying under oath before Congress. Does that seem like an
Speaker 1: act of domestic terrorism that you or your justice Department
Speaker 1: ought to be investigating. Absolutely not. And I want to
Speaker 1: be clear, the Justice Department supports and defends the First
Speaker 1: Amendment right of parents to complain as vociferously as they
Speaker 1: wish about the education of their children about the curriculum
Speaker 1: taught in the schools. That is not what the memorandum
Speaker 1: is about at all, Nor does it use the words
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism or Patriot Act Act. Like you, I can't
Speaker 1: imagine any circumstance in which the Patriot Act would be
Speaker 1: used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children.
Speaker 1: Nor can I imagine a circumstance where they would be
Speaker 1: labeled as domestic terrorism. Oh, except that's exactly what he did.
Speaker 1: He then promptly briefed the counter terrorism heads of the FBI,
Speaker 1: who then acted on these parents. Are you worried yet?
Speaker 1: You better be, because if the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Speaker 1: is now officially the enforcement arm of the regime, we
Speaker 1: are in very, very, very deep trouble. Oh and do
Speaker 1: keep in mind he's directly tied to critical race theory.
Speaker 1: His son in law runs a company that pushes it.
Speaker 1: I'm not making that up. And it's funny, you know.
Speaker 1: I mentioned ANTIFA in Black Lives Matter, and we're told
Speaker 1: all the time that these parents are potentially domestic terrorists
Speaker 1: and white supremacists. Sir, there's all these white supremacists. You
Speaker 1: don't know any but they're they're all hiding right around
Speaker 1: the corner over there. They're they're a big concern ru
Speaker 1: anything could happen. But they're not even looking into people
Speaker 1: who say things like this. I wonder why I've got
Speaker 1: to go where you case you missed that in the beginning,
Speaker 1: I've got a thousand soldiers ready to go. FBI didn't
Speaker 1: even looking into them, didn't even get a phone call. Oh,
Speaker 1: but if you're upset about critical theory, be careful, they
Speaker 1: might come knocking on your door. This had better make
Speaker 1: you very, very uncomfortable. And I'm look, we're gonna get
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan on to talk about this soon, but I'm
Speaker 1: glad he's all over it. This scenario where on September
Speaker 1: twenty ninth, a left wing political organization rights the President
Speaker 1: of the United States saying we want you to get
Speaker 1: the FBI involved in spying on parents, setting up a
Speaker 1: dedicated line of threat communication a snitch line on parents.
Speaker 1: Five days later, a memo goes out, he comes and testifies,
Speaker 1: looks like he said something that wasn't true to this committee.
Speaker 1: And the very next day, think about this, I've never
Speaker 1: seen this at all my time in Washington. The very
Speaker 1: next day, the organization that started this whole thing in progress,
Speaker 1: they apologize for the initial letter that started at all.
Speaker 1: They withdraw the letter. And you guys won't join us
Speaker 1: in wanting to We need the Attorney General back sitting
Speaker 1: right at that chair, answering our questions. You know what
Speaker 1: this reminds me of. This reminds him something we all
Speaker 1: went through ten years ago. This reminds me of when
Speaker 1: the IRS targeted people and then it wasn't called a
Speaker 1: threat tag. Then it wasn't called the terrorist tag. No,
Speaker 1: then it was called the blow list. Be on the
Speaker 1: lookout list if you said the wrong thing in this country,
Speaker 1: the IRS, lowis learned. The RS puts you on a list,
Speaker 1: much like what we see the FBI doing now. Thanks
Speaker 1: to this brave whistleblower who came forward, Thanks indeed and
Speaker 1: anyone else that the FBI wants to come forward. Now
Speaker 1: is the time. Now, it's the time. Believe me when
Speaker 1: I tell you it gets worse from here if this
Speaker 1: organization is not exposed for what it has sadly become,
Speaker 1: because it is scary. The FBI has the power. Remember
Speaker 1: every person watching me right now, the FBI has the
Speaker 1: power to destroy your life like that if they want to.
Speaker 1: It's a big deal. All right, Now, we got a
Speaker 1: lot more show. We got to mek A Hamilton come up,
Speaker 1: but talk about something good. Flipping houses. I know you
Speaker 1: watch the shows, don't well? I know you do. My
Speaker 1: wife does all the time. Every time I walk by,
Speaker 1: she's watching some TV show about flipping houses. And they
Speaker 1: bought this house and they're gonna they're gonna rip out
Speaker 1: this wall, and they're gonna improve this bathroom and then
Speaker 1: they're gonna turn around and sell it and make a
Speaker 1: pile of money. And it looks like so much fun. Right.
Speaker 1: It is fun. People make a fortune doing it. Why
Speaker 1: aren't you. You don't have to be an expert, you
Speaker 1: don't have to know anything about it. Go to flipping
Speaker 1: maadeasy dot com. Sign up with the promo code Jesse Today.
Speaker 1: What you're gonna find there is a one stop shop
Speaker 1: for everything you need. They'll teach you at endless articles
Speaker 1: and information from experts about what to do, what not
Speaker 1: to do. You need vendors in your area, plumbers, electricians, drywall,
Speaker 1: whatever the case may be. It's on flipping meadeasy dot com.
Speaker 1: You want to know what the opportunities are, What are
Speaker 1: the flipping opportunities in your area? Flipping medeasy dot com.
Speaker 1: Go to Flipping made easy dot com and sign up.
Speaker 1: Even if it's just a little side hustle. You're gonna
Speaker 1: be surprised how much fun you have and maybe make
Speaker 1: some money flipping made easy dot com promo code Jesse,
Speaker 1: We'll be back. Joining me now is Tamika Hamilton. She
Speaker 1: is one of the good Republicans running for Congress in California,
Speaker 1: and she is also a fourteen year veteran of the
Speaker 1: Air Force. Tamika first and foremost California. I know it's
Speaker 1: easy to bag on California. I've spent a lot of
Speaker 1: time there. I don't know that I'm ready to give
Speaker 1: the communists paradise just yet. Huh no. And I just
Speaker 1: have to correct you really quick. I've been in for
Speaker 1: nineteen years. I've been fourteen. I was fourteen years active duty. Yeah, oh, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: so it's nineteen years all right, apparently I sure changed
Speaker 1: you there. Anyway, here's a little intro of Jensaki. I
Speaker 1: didn't know. I don't know if you know this to me,
Speaker 1: but the economy is doing fine, so I would just
Speaker 1: note this is not you know, sometimes it's I'm not
Speaker 1: saying you're doing this, but sometimes people compare this to
Speaker 1: the Recovery Act of two thousand and nine. It is
Speaker 1: not that. We are not in the middle of an
Speaker 1: economic a historic economic crisis right now. This is an opportunity.
Speaker 1: Everything's fine to make. I don't know what you're worried about. No,
Speaker 1: you know, Jesse, every single day I am talking to
Speaker 1: people on both sides of the aisle, and that is
Speaker 1: not what is happening, especially here in California. I did
Speaker 1: a tweet the other day about the child tax credit.
Speaker 1: For example, I get six hundred dollars from that child
Speaker 1: tax credit. It is not going to building anything back better.
Speaker 1: It's literally going to the gas tank, it's going to
Speaker 1: the high food cost and that is literally everything that
Speaker 1: That's something that's happening to all Americans across the nation,
Speaker 1: especially the middle class. And you know, obviously they are
Speaker 1: trying to sell us alf fantasy and it's not happening.
Speaker 1: Why do you think they're trying to sell it? I
Speaker 1: find this part odd because surely they have to know
Speaker 1: to me because that they may not be experiencing this
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC. But normal people can't afford gas. Their
Speaker 1: eggs have gone up twelve percent. Normal people are getting hit.
Speaker 1: How are they trying to sell that everything's fine? Thing?
Speaker 1: It's such a bizarre political tactic to take. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: they're trying to keep up a lie that they've manufactured.
Speaker 1: You know, Joe Biden has end up to be a leader,
Speaker 1: and we need people that are going to tell the truth.
Speaker 1: And this is why I tell Republicans every step of
Speaker 1: the way, we need to be behind them with the
Speaker 1: numbers and the facts. And right now Americans are making
Speaker 1: life decisions on what they're going to Rob and Peter
Speaker 1: to pay Paul to survive in America. Right now, this
Speaker 1: is everyday average American citizens. And the Joe Biden administration
Speaker 1: is going to go on a tour from what I've
Speaker 1: read the other day, to sell this message that the
Speaker 1: infrastructure package and all these things are making sense and
Speaker 1: it's going to work. But you and I both know
Speaker 1: us a lie because that's all they know how to
Speaker 1: do is lie. And so what I keep telling Republicans
Speaker 1: is that at every turn we need to be fighting
Speaker 1: them with the facts. And the facts are that we
Speaker 1: have nine was it, I think, like seven dollars gas
Speaker 1: in southern California. I have five dollar gas here in
Speaker 1: a little town in Dixon. It's not right. And so yeah, exactly,
Speaker 1: So this is the message that we need to be pushing,
Speaker 1: is that average Americans cannot afford to survive in this
Speaker 1: Joe Biden administration. It's funny you brought up gas because
Speaker 1: Joe Biden today. I mean, I'm not surprised. There is
Speaker 1: no ineptitude or two radical thing they could do that
Speaker 1: would surprised me at this point in time. He gets elected,
Speaker 1: promptly shuts down the Keystone Pipeline, stops any drilling on
Speaker 1: federal lands, gas prices stunningly start to increase, and today
Speaker 1: he directs the Federal Trade Commission to I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't know how you can take this any other way.
Speaker 1: Dig into the oil people to see if their price
Speaker 1: scal jing, or if there's corruption to make this is
Speaker 1: not only too radical, this is insane. Everyone knows why
Speaker 1: gas prices are high, right, We're not. We are informed,
Speaker 1: and I think that what happened in the past almost
Speaker 1: four years, the American people are not going to be fooled.
Speaker 1: And that's why we're seeing a big shift, especially if
Speaker 1: we saw that in Virginia, and if we continue on
Speaker 1: this trend, we are going to be able to not
Speaker 1: only win twenty twenty two, but we're going to be
Speaker 1: able to hold it in the years to come because
Speaker 1: they have had their chance and they have not. They
Speaker 1: have not risen to the occasion. And it's they lied
Speaker 1: and told us that all these things were going to
Speaker 1: change when they got in office. And what has in
Speaker 1: the past ten months, almost eleven months, They've done nothing
Speaker 1: but destroy America. They're trying to break America, and sadly,
Speaker 1: it's going to hurt it. It's hurting average, middle class,
Speaker 1: everyday Americans. And that needs to be messages drove home
Speaker 1: every single day. When Republicans gate on shows like yours,
Speaker 1: why don't they do it? Because I agree, I think
Speaker 1: the message does need to be about p people and
Speaker 1: speaking right to people and the struggles they go through,
Speaker 1: and to be honest as much as I can, as
Speaker 1: much as I hate them. Democrats are better at that
Speaker 1: message than Republicans. Why because they don't want to roll
Speaker 1: up their sleeves. I in my district, I received forty
Speaker 1: six percent of the vote in twenty twenty, and I
Speaker 1: was I did not get any party support, and not
Speaker 1: a negative way. It's just that this seat was not
Speaker 1: a competitive seat for the past ten years. John GAMINDI
Speaker 1: has been in office an elected official for a close
Speaker 1: to fifty years. And and when I came onto the scene,
Speaker 1: I matched the district. You know, I'm in the military,
Speaker 1: my husband's a cop. You know. We raise our family here,
Speaker 1: traditional family values, talking about the basic things. And when
Speaker 1: I knocked on these doors and I talk to these
Speaker 1: people and I put one hundred thousand miles in my car,
Speaker 1: people kept saying, we've never seen a Republican and this
Speaker 1: district is twenty seven percent registered Republicans. How do you
Speaker 1: get forty six percent because you left no stone unturned again,
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand miles in my car. And Republicans have
Speaker 1: to get out of get out of their comfort zone,
Speaker 1: stop being afraid to talk to, stop being afraid to
Speaker 1: be called names, and do the work you And then
Speaker 1: they say that we have solutions. Republicans say, oh, we
Speaker 1: have the solutions, we have the solutions, but yet they're
Speaker 1: but the solutions don't follow present And how are we
Speaker 1: going to get people to come to our side if
Speaker 1: they don't see us. And so that's the message that
Speaker 1: I drive home every single day. Republicans have the solutions,
Speaker 1: but they don't have the presents. And so this is
Speaker 1: why my candidacy like mine is so important because we've
Speaker 1: shown that we can do it even here in California,
Speaker 1: and we're if we're gonna win in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: This seat is on the target list, and we've raised
Speaker 1: more money in the past two quarters than we've done
Speaker 1: that we did last you know, last cycle or last year.
Speaker 1: And so I just keep telling people that Republicans have
Speaker 1: to do have to get in the game, just like
Speaker 1: the Democrats do. They're able to the Democrats just make
Speaker 1: people feel like home. And so if we can't talk
Speaker 1: about traditional family values, if we're not doing the same thing,
Speaker 1: how are we making people feel like this is a
Speaker 1: place for them to be if we're not getting out
Speaker 1: there and talk from making Hamilton. Best of luck to you, ma'am,
Speaker 1: wishing you the very best. Thank you appreciate you about that?
Speaker 1: All right? You know you can get a little something
Speaker 1: extra from the first, right, I'm talking exclusive content, exclusive
Speaker 1: content from me Buck, Dana Bill, I thought the whole lineup.
Speaker 1: You get all kinds of special goodies. But you have
Speaker 1: to do something first. But it's simple. Go to the
Speaker 1: first TV dot com slash support. Look, I understand you
Speaker 1: enjoy it. I understand you enjoy the first. I can't
Speaker 1: tell you how blessed I am to work here because
Speaker 1: they let me say whatever I want. You can't find
Speaker 1: another network like that. They let me say whatever I want.
Speaker 1: All of us we could say whatever. How awesome is that.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of company you should support anyway, let
Speaker 1: alone get some good goodies for it. So go to
Speaker 1: the first TV dot com slash support and sign up today.
Speaker 1: We'll be back. All right, it's time to lighten the mood.
Speaker 1: You know what, you know what? I don't miss dating?
Speaker 1: How big of a pain was dating? But I'll tell
Speaker 1: you there's one guy who appears to have figured it out.
Speaker 1: This dude, this is his first date, does this in
Speaker 1: front of his first date. And look, as they said,
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure the man has pretty much locked up
Speaker 1: his chances at a second date. Oh my god, thank
Speaker 1: a four piece high opinion cheddar bike handing up for
Speaker 1: you actually make it eight. Hey? Can I get a
Speaker 1: Hershey Sunday pie on the side if you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. That'll be y'all. Hey, call me crazy, but
Speaker 1: give me some ranch on the side. I like it
Speaker 1: with my cheddar bikes. I don't know why it makes
Speaker 1: me laugh. I respect it deep old gentlemen, all right,
Speaker 1: that's suitable