WEBVTT - #485 Packers Unscripted: Wrapping up the week

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined by my trusted colleague West

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hod Kuwitz. We're coming to you here from our studios

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at lambau Field West. It's Friday, our final show of

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the week, and that means we talk about keys to

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>victory for the Green Bay Packers. They will play the

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins on Sunday at lambou Field a noon Central

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>time kickoff. I think you and I are both headed

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction with where we're starting this conversation,

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So go, it's gonna be spoiler alert, shocker, Hold onto

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>your seats. The run game will decide the victor in

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, Okay, but it does go both ways, right

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan, You know when you heard Mike Petton discuss

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it on Thursday evening, Matt la Floor touched on it.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>He wants to run the football. That's the way it

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>tried and true from the very beginning. That's his philosophy

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's the reason why he was ultimately picked as

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the interim head coach here. He had the experience and

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this is honestly what is allowed Washington to have the

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>most success they've had all season as of late, and

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they have two really good backs. Now we got to

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>see exactly what's going on with Adrian Peterson and this

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>toe injury. Yeah, he popped up on the injury report. Yeah,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>he didn't practice on Thursday, was a full participant presumably

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. So we got to see where that's at.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But Darius Guice to get him back, and that was

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions I asked Callahan on Wednesday how

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>important that was for this offense because this is a

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>guy from the very beginning, as I said, going back

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to last year, before the knee injury, before some of

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that he's had to overcome, he was considered

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the top prospects in that draft class and

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy that Washington was really excited about to build

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>their backfield around. There was a reason why for a

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>number of years people weren't really sure what Adrian Peterson's

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>role was going to be because Geiss was presumably the

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>bell cow, the number one back. Well, now they found

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and fell into a spot where they were using both

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>from last week, and I felt like that gave them

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>their truest identity. So what does that mean for the Packers.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That means you have to stop them, whether it's guys,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Peterson, or a combination of both. That is

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where this all begins for the Packers defensive front, Kenny Clark,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Dean Lowry, like Martinez, all of those guys working together

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in tandem. Because on paper, yeah, it's been an up

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and down season for the Packers against the run. They

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>have to make a statement this game because last week,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike I felt like, for the most part, they did

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>just that against a really dangerous sake Kuon Barkley. Yeah,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Packers did all right against Barkley. I mean,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>did they completely shut him down. No, But the way

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that the conditions in that game, the way the Giants

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly wanted to get that running game going, the fact

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that Barkley had only four point four yards per carry,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any of those backbreaking type of runs. That

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty solid performance against a really good running back.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>My question for you with regard to this one now, when,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>as Matt Lafleur I believe he said it earlier this week,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins are going to come off the bus, wanted

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball. There they are. They are going

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to pound the Packers with the run in

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this game on Sunday with guys and Peterson schematically, how

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>much of the true three four base defense do you

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see and by that I mean three down lineman,

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>two outside linebackers, you know, a full five man defensive front.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think Mike Petton goes to that

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>schematically here against this one too, punch of Washington. It

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on the first quarter goes because they do actually

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have a modification a variant of that base where they

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can use is Abraham Campbell almost at Isaiah Ibrahem Campbell

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>as that other linebacker too. We saw it two weeks

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ago against San Francisco. That's how they started the game

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>against a run heavy team, Campbell as the linebacker, but

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>yet still a five man front, so they I think

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's gonna be okay, not only how

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you're defending the run, but how are you matching up

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with Terry McLaurin. How are you being able to you know,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>eliminate some of the threats that are there. I mean,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a real possible city, Mike, depending on how this

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>injury port shakes out for Washington, they could start three

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>rookie receivers in this football game, that's a real possibility.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They're down their top two tight ends due to concussions.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Those perimeter weapons need to be held in check, and

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is going to be the tried and

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>true test of how they can defend this team because

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in a traditional sense, this appears like a base three

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>four from the first quarter to the fourth. But if

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin is being able to hit some explosive, if the

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>safeties aren't able to you know, contain that, well, then

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when you have to start shifting to your sub packages.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So I really think that first fifteen minutes and how

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you stack up against it. I thought one of the

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>real understated parts of that game against the Giants was, Yeah,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they weren't able to run in the first quarter, they

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>did hold Barclay back and that's what allowed them to

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>win some of those three and ounce early on. You

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to do that against Washington because,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned in a final thoughts video, we shot

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>moments ago and one of our other mediums we just

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>got our stocking caps taken off inside they are able

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball. That is the number one best friend,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins right now, it's gonna be what he's gonna need. Yeah,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been talking about it all week long

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Packers defensively, you've got to put this game

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the rookie quarterback's hands. You've got to make sure

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have that best friend that he can rely upon.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Now with Haskins, I'll give him credit. He's he's had

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>four starts. He's essentially played five games because one of

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the games that he didn't start, he played a good

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>chunk of it. So in essence, five games, he's taking

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>care of the football. Okay, certainly compared to Daniel Jones

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and and even Kyle Allen to a certain extent, he

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>only has, I believe it's a half dozen interceptions, only

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>one lost fumble, So he hasn't been this turnover machine

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as a rookie quarterback. But in those five games, essentially

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>five games he's played, he's been sacked twenty two times,

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>three drop backs. So defense, defensively, that's the Packers would

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>love to be able to get after of the rookie

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and make things difficult for him. But to get

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to that point, you can't let Peterson and guys get going.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You have to shift the responsibility to the quarterback for

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Washington be able to move the ball, while Washington's goal

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the other way. They're gonna be

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to limit the responsibility on the rookie quarterback for

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the offensive success. Former Packers defensive line coach Mike Turkovac,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and it says something to me. I remember it was

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand thirteen or twelve, like maybe my first

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>year even on the beat, and it was, you know,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we make so much out of man versus zone coverage

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>and all these things that we just kind of, you know,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we always rattle them off, and it's just part of

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the lexicon when it comes to football. One of the

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things very few people talk about is in the defensive front,

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>whether or not your defensive lineman can jet rush, and

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>what the risk and reward is of jet rushing with

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>your defensive lineman, because if you send a guy like

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Clark who has that capability, that can potentially expose

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you other places. That's why it's so critical to stop

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the run here because if you can that allow is

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Petton and Jerry Montgomery that allows them to open

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>up the playbook a little bit, because if you look

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>at the games where Haskins has succeeded, it's because he

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gets the time to scan the field. As a rookie quarterback,

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he needs that extra millisecond to be able to process

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>everything that's going on. If you get pressure coming from

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the outside and you collapse the pocket up front, that's

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>when the internal clock starts to speed up, and that's

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>when guys start to make mistakes. That is what I

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think is critical because as much as people are gonna

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just say, well, it's Preston Smith versus old team and

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Zadarius Smith has twenty quarterback hits and those are the

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>two one, two primary options. No, I mean, as some

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things you and I have discussed this week,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and you've articulated yourself, it's a lot on Dean Lowry

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Kenny Clark and that defensive line this week, how

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they defend, how they hold their gaps, but also how

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they're able to push that front. Because it's been a

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really difficult year for Washington, but they still have some

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>guys there. They've made some investments to make sure that

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they can actually get the protection they need for Haskins.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That is the number one chess piece, and I'm really

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>intrigued to watch once the game gets started on Sunday. Yeah. Well,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball, the Packers would

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly like to get their running game going as well.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur talked about it. The Packers did not run

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball as well as they had hoped last week

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants. La Fleur said he actually put the

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>offense in some bad situations as far as personnel packages

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and still trying to run. The Giants did have a

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough front against the run. You give them credit there.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot. There's there's a lot of talk

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>outside the building west about getting Aaron Jones more involved

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in all this kind of stuff as far as the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>running game specifically goes. I honestly don't care whether it's

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones or Jamal Williams, whichever guy is producing, but

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the Packers need to get that running game going because

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>so much, so much of the rhythm and so much

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the production that we've seen from this offense in

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen has come from the play action when the

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>running game is working. So I don't really plays last

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>week even when the running game wasn't working. I mean

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>early on. They had some nice runs in the first

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>half and then the play action passes came off of it,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and then in the second half it got to be

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a struggle there to run

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the football. So whatever it takes to run it, whichever

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>back it is, and maybe because of the weather, Jamal

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Williams more of the bruiser, the power guy in the

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>cold weather. Whatever it takes, the Packers have got to

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>find a way to uh to run the football. You

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get that going here in December for the

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>stretch runs. So I have to add this Mike spotted

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>caveat to this because at the time we take this,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>we haven't gone to practice on Friday. Jamal Williams was

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>listed as a as a limited participant in Thursday's practice.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Now was that being mindful of his workload with the

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>knee injury or did something happen that we don't know

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? So I want to be careful with that

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in case this doesn't age well. But be that as

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>it may. He was in the locker room yesterday. You

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>would hope and presume everything's okay. But the original points

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>stands is firm and true. It is Aaron Jones and

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams in tandem. How you use those two guys

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and how they're able to be effective. What I'm looking

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for in this game particularly is they're going up against

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the ranked run defense that has been really up and

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>down from the Moss here. Now they do have Ryan

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Carrigan back, they have some of those guys that are there,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they're stalwarts up front, so that certainly would change things.

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's just so it's so incredible how much different

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this offense looks when Aaron Jones is going off, when

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he is making the big place and the one thing

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we still haven't really seen yet in week fourteen is

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that's sixty yard breakthrough run. I mean, he has that

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>capability on every play and at this point he still

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as carries only twenty eight yards. That could

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>happen this Sunday, It could happen next week against Chicago.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Whenever Aaron Jones goes off, everything else follows suits. So

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think you don't want to It's it's so

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>easy just to say, well, why doesn't he just carry

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball twenty times? Well, you you can't just keep

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>running against a wall and going three and out, and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that's your offense, and that's what you're hanging

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>your hat, and you have to be more multiple and

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>diverse than that. But at the same time, what he

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>did well in the Giants game is what you want

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to see them try to continue to do, which is

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>those six and seven yard carries that stretch and and

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>get you in those favorable second downs and favorable third downs.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Because Aaron Jones and Jimal Williams are both talented enough

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to occasionally break a big run, but

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not being in second and eight and second and

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>nine that really is what puts you in a hole. Offensively, Yeah,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and certainly getting into those manageable third downs is where

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur, it's where Aaron Rodgers, that's where they want

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. And I'll be writing about this in my

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>one Last Look column for Saturday. As far as okay,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Packers have four regular season games here too to

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>make their last strides of improvement in all three phases.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we know. On defense, it's about limiting the

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>big plays on special teams. It's about finding a return game.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>On offense, it's about getting more efficient on third down.

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Both Aaron Rodgers and Matt Lafleur brought that up when

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I asked the specific question, what is that, what is

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the focus for improvement over the final four regular season games?

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's third out and you look at this game West,

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Redskins are thirtieth in the league and third

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>down defense. Now, last week against Carolina, after they fell

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>behind fourteen to nothing, they stopped ten consecutive third downs.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a stretch there it was actually eleven third

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>downs where Carolina's only conversion was via a penalty. Now

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they got Carolina in a ton of third and longs.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You look through the play by play in that game,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it was third and sixteen, there was third and twenty three,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there was third and eighteen. I mean, Carolina was in

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>these ridiculous situations and Washington's defense got on a roll.

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They kept stopping them on those third downs. But still,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a defense that is thirtieth in the league

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on the season in third down conversion percentage. And that's

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something the Packers have to take advantage of and start

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to crank that up, start to turn that back the

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>other way. Att, Yeah, and I do have a lot

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of respect for what has happened with Washington. How Callahan

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>has pulled this thing back together because this very easily

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>could have been a two and fourteen one and fifteen

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>type team the way the direction season went. Now that

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>being said, your record isn't always what you say you are.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The two wins that they have are over arguably the

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>two most struggling, inconsistent teams right now in the league

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit and Carolina. They're in the conversation at least

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a team that are going backwards right now. Certainly so

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, you take it with a grain of salt.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But when that team steps on the field on Sunday,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to care about who they've beaten or

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what their record is. They care about the fact that

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they've won two games in a row. They're going to

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have some wind in their sales, and they want to

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>suddenly pull themselves back into this NFC East race. That

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it really looks like eight wins could win this thing,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe seven. So that nothing you can't you can't say

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>anything's out the door, You can't say anythings out the window.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It goes back to the exactly what I was saying

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in this very seat at almost the exact moment a

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>week ago. Giants struggling. The Giants had the record they had.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The Green Bay Packers have nine wins for a reason,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>they need to go out in lambeau Field on Sunday

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>at home in front of their home crowd. Improve it. Yeah,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time to take care of business certainly. Well, you

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the NFC East race. We saw a Thursday night game.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The Dallas Cowboys went into Soldier Field and quite frankly,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>West they stunk it up and the Bears took advantage.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>The Bears got Mitchell Troubinsky running with the ball again,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>both scrambling out of the pocket, read option runs, all

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things. Suddenly, the running Mitch Trubisky that I

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>thought was a big part of the Bears going twelve

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and four last year, he's back that that's what they're doing,

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it got them a big win over the Dallas

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys thirty one to twenty four. And the game was

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not that close, quite frankly, not not not even close

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to being that close. And the Chicago Bears are seven

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and six. They're still hanging in this thing in the

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>NFC to try to make a push for the playoffs.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The Dallas Cowboys still lead being the NFC East at

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the moment, but at six and seven, with Philadelphia trying

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to right the ship, and quite frankly, the Washington Redskins

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>looking now at an opportunity that hey, we're three and nine,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but if we run the table at seven and nine,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it might actually be enough to win the division. Washington

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is not completely out of this yet. So the one

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things I really hated about the narrative this game,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and I watched basically all of it. The first thing,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas's side, They're gonna put a lot of this

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on Mayher, the kicker, Brett Mayhor. They're gonna put a

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of it on Jason Garrett. That is as bad

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>as I've seen a team defend the read option in

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the last five years. I mean, it was there was

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>no commitment to the ball carry at all. It was

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>selling out for the running back. It was just making

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the wrong decisions at the wrong times, and they picked

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>him apart. The Bears were able to do at will

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted to do. They had the explosive chunk

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>places and they just had the momentum. I mean, defensively,

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they made the plays when they need to, They got

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the pressure when they needed to yeah, other than Troubinsky

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>throwing that interception at the goal line like on the

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>first possession. Other than that, it was like Dallas couldn't

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>stop him all the all night long. So and from

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bears perspective, the one thing that has been kind

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of maddening for me, and I think you can only

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>really have this perspective if you're on the outside looking in,

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>because I think people in Chicago are really quick to

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>jump on Trubisky, whether it's media or fans. I've tried

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to be right down the middle with this guy from

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning. I didn't buy into the hype at

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the bending of the year that this guy is going

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to be an m v P candidate and all that.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>But I also never really got to the point where

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it was like, no, you gotta move on, you gotta

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>find a new quarterback, which is what the narrative kind

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of was. Mitchell Trubisky is a really talented guy, and

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>when you call the game to accentuate his strengths, like Mattnege,

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, did on on Thursday Night, you see

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what he can do to a defense. Now Dallas is

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>struggling on defense. They are not the defense I thought

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they were when they played the Packers earlier this season,

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but you have to play the team that's in front

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of you. So whether it was you know, Montgomery being

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>able to you know, get some yards and actually build

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>some momentum out of the backfield, just what Trubisky was

0:16:58.240 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>able to do with the ball in his hands and

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>spreading it around. They made the plays they need to make,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and when they got the turnovers and takeaways, they executed

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on them. Yeah, well elsewhere here in Week fourteen, we

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>won't spend too much time talking about the Lions traveling

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to Minnesota because quite frankly, I'll be shocked if Detroit

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in the situation there and and with Minnesota coming off

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of a difficult loss, but but certainly a performance that

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>was nothing to hang their head about in a tough

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>road environment in Seattle. I think Minnesota wins that the

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers are going to need to win to stay a

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>game ahead of the Vikings. But two big games in

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFC that we definitely need to talk about. What's

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a pair of ten and two teams. The San Francisco

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. We'll be traveling to New Orleans to take

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints, and then in Sunday Night football. The

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks, coming off of that big home Monday night

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>win over Minnesota, they will go to Los Angeles to

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>play a Rams team that seems to have found a

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of new life. The Rams are at seven

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and five, and they were trying to stay in this

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>NFC playoff mix as well. Yeah, they're trying to stay

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the orbit of this whole thing. And the thing

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that differs from where the Rams are where the Bears are.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The Bears have a really they have a grind coming

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>up here, including Green Bay. Yeah, they are sitting at

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. The Bears get the extra rest now, the

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mini buy with the Thursday night game, but then they

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>have Green Bay Kansas City in Minnesota to finish the season,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears are looking at needing to run that

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>table to get to ten and six and then let

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chips fall and see if they're in the mix. Yeah,

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>whereas you look at the Rams right now, they have

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas coming up. They do have to face San Francisco

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>at San Francisco and then they actually close the season

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>at home against Arizona. So there's still very much in

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the thick of this thing. If they can get on

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a run. You'd imagine they're gonna have to beat Seattle

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>or and or San Francisco probably and uh to really

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>make a run at this thing, but they're still in

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it as well. A great matchup. It'll be interesting to

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>see exactly how Seattle responds. Uh. Just an incredible game

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were a part of too. To be able

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to pull that out and everything that went into it. Uh,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you saw, I thought the resiliency from Russell Wilson bounced

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>back from smart early adversity and now he's gonna be

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>taken on a RAMS defense that's look pretty good as

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of late. The main event, and we've been pointing towards

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>this for months has been San Francisco versus New Orleans

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because these are the two teams I think since the

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>very beginning of the season, once they started to realize

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>when San Francisco got on this undefeated run, they're legitimate

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>their contenders and they can win the way that they

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>play and New Orleans is just a different type of bird.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the way that they come together and we're

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>able to get through Drew Brees injury and get Breeze

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>back on the field and he hasn't been perfect, but

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>he's played well and just keep the cylinders running the

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>whole time. That's a huge testament to Sean Payton. And

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested to see how this week plays out

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>because every single game in some shape or form has

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>implications for Green Bay. Who wins, how they win, and

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know where everything falls after that. If you're a

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Packer fan, you're cheering for the Rams. Is that right?

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Or how do you see that? Yeah? I think as

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as a Packer fan, I think you're child that you

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>w note you're hoping that. I think because because the

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>potential for a first round by is still there. I

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think you're cheering for the Rams to beat the Seahawks.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And and and I'll have this by the way, in

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>my Path to the Playoffs, it is returning two Packers

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Path the Playoffs will be posted later in

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the day on Friday, so check that out over the weekend.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think you want the Rams to beat

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, and I think you want the forty Niners

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Saints, because when you look at it

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from the from the big picture, if the Packers are

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going for a potential first round by one of those

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>top two seeds the Seahawks and the forty Niners. Only

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one of them can get one of those spots because

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same division. Whoever doesn't win that division

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a wild card. So the Saints,

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who have already clinched the NFC South, there a division champ.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They are fighting for one of those top two seeds.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's really the team. If you just say, okay, between

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners and the Seahawks, whoever wins the West

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to get one of the buys. Then if

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you're the Packers, you're like, okay, Well, if the Packers

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>can overtake the Saints, then you would get the second one.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think you want New Orleans to lose. But

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>regardless one of those teams, the Saints of the forty

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers, barring and overtime tie, will be ten and three.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And if the Packers beat Washington, the Packers are ten

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and three, and then you're looking at a little bit

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>different picture here the last three weeks. I'm glad you

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>do path to the playoffs. I don't think my i

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Q level or my a c T scores high enough

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to well you can you can read it and get

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>all caught up, and then we can talk about Sunday.

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about it Sunday morning when we reconvene

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the press box. But before we go here west,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>there is one other thing we'll go a little bit

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>over time because a couple of weeks ago and it's

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a subject we just haven't gotten to yet with everything

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>else going on. Leroy Butler, former Packers safety, for the

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>third year in a row, has reached the semifinalist stage

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in his bid to gain induction into the Pro Football

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio. Now, the previous two

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>years he has not gotten from the semifinalists to the

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>finalist stage. Semifinalist stage is the top twenty five candidates

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for induction. Then when it goes to the finalist stage,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I forget and I was a ten or fifteen. So

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>then it'll be whittled from twenty five down to fifteen

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>before the Hall of Fame Selection Committee meets on Super

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Bowl weekend and then they whittle it down from fifteen

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to a maximum of five modern day inductees from this group. UM,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you have some thoughts here on Mr Butler

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and his candidacy. I know you and I are very

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>much on the same page with this, but I'll give

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you the floor for the moment. Well, the journalistic oath here,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit, like there is an internal bias

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with me. I've known Leroy Butler since two thousand thirteen.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I did a radio show with him for four years,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>So there is a personal investment here. I want to

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>disclose that. So it isn't just that I'm just spouting

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>off on all this. But that being said, when I

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was at the Green Bay Press Gazette, I remember the conversation.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>It started to get you get fired up a little bit,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>especially as kind of the the relation and um, you know,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of the field towards safety started to turn, started

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit more respects what I'm trying

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to say. And there was a time that I kind

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of in my mind was able to understand maybe why

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Leroy Butler had been overlooked. He got hurt, his career

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was over after two thousand one. Maybe he just didn't

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>play quite long enough. Yeah, the career did end sooner

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>than expected. And then about two years ago I said,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's absolute garbage. I don't know what I was thinking

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>with that, because then you start to see some of

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Ten years in the league is a long

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>time now. Was Leroy Butler starting safety from day one? No,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he was a cornerback. Took two years from to go

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and play safety. Once he did, he became an All Pro.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe the only four time All Pro safety that

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't in the Hall of Fame if I remember that correctly. Yes,

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>all any, any and all safeties who have been first

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.479
<v Speaker 1>team All Pro four or more times, every single one

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of them is in Canton except for Butler. And I

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this a couple of days ago. And you can

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>go back and write any number of stories I've written

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on le Roy over the last time. I should I

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>should clarify who are eligible because Troy Polamalu is you know, um,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he's another one of those guys on the list, but

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he just hasn't gotten far along yet. He'll be in there.

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is the thing I struggle with with this

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing with Leroy is that. And I tweeted a

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of nights ago. If you watched Packers, and I

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>know you did, and you tell me that that team

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>had to count them one too. Reggie White bred five

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to Pro Football Hall of Famers on that team, and

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason they won the Super Bowl. That's the

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reason they turned around this whole narrative with the Green

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers and they went to back to back. Everything

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>relied on them. You are a fool le Roy Butler

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in the way that Friz Shermer used him. I keep

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>saying this over and over again, and it's getting kind

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of old. But he was hybrid before hybrid was cool.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>He did not play strong safety like strong safeties played

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>strong safeties at that time. He played something more. It's

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason he had as many sacks as he did.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I am not asking the Pro Football Hall of Fame

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>voters to put him in the Hall of Fame this year.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not asking that because I have a lot of

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>good friends on that panel that I respect mightily. I

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>am asking you to get him in the final fifteen

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>because the fact that Larroy Butler in two thousand nineteen

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>has not had Pete Doherty or Cliff Crystal standing up

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>there presenting his case to that panel is embarrassing. It

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is embarrassing. All due respect to Steve Atwater, all due

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>respect to John Lynch, I hope they both get in

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame at some point. The fact that

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Larroy Butler has not been up there and is considered

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a tear below those two guys is unjust. Yeah, I

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, and we were discussing this before we

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>turn the cameras on. I have nothing against John Lynch

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or Steve Atwater, but when a couple of weeks ago,

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when Butler was announced as a semifinalist for the third

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>year in a row, I answered a question and insider

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in box with regards to Okay, what are his chances.

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen John Lynch and Steve Atwater both make the

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>finalist stage over the last couple of years, Butler has

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten knocked out at the semifinalist stage. I look at

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I look at Atwater specifically if you're going to make

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a side by side comparison, and the thing that I

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think is really unfortunate because Butler's a four time first

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Team All Pro. At Water's got a couple of All

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Pro nods, has a bunch more Pro Bowls, Yeah, he

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has I think eight Pro Bowls. Butler doesn't have that

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>many Pro Bowls. You look at the statistics, interceptions and sacks,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Butler's got him beat um So from a statistical standpoint,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a really strong case for Butler, and I have

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing against Atwater, but what I think is unfortunate here

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>is it feels like the reason at Water, who played

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>a long time for the Denver Broncos, has been a

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.959
<v Speaker 1>finalist and Leroy Butler has not is because of the

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>result of super Bowl thirty two. Because of that result,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Steve Atwater is a two time Super Bowl champion and

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Leroy Butler has one super Bowl ring. And I personally

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think that if that Super Bowl thirty two result had

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>been reversed, that where we'd be right now is Butler

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>would be the finalist and at Water would be the

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>guy on the outside looking in. And I don't think

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That that's the part to me that is

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>unjust because, as I said, nothing against Lynch or at Water,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Lynch I think is a little bit different case.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But looking at looking at Atwater and Butler, why why

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>does the number of Super Bowl rings matter? It was

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 1>one game. It was one game in San Diego in

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>January that it feels like it's that's what's blocking Leroy

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Butler from getting further in this process. And I think

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. And I have to present this too, at

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>least on the record, there is one coach from that

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>game that talked about needing to take away the other

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>team's safety. That coach was not Mike Holmgren. That was

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Shannon talking about trying to take away Leroy Butler.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He is the guy that we need to have a

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hat on. He's the guy we need to be able

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate. The reason there's a lot of all I'm

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>asking for is that if you look at the Pro

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Football Hall of Fame process, and it is not an

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>easy process. I can continually admit that. But the way

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing has gone in recent years is they create

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they've created this line. Okay, at Waters

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a two time finals, he moves up a little bit.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're a unanimous first bout Hall of Famer, you

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>know it. Lynch has been in the conversation, move up

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I just don't want to be in

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a position where Atwater and Lynch get in his modern

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>day nominees and they push Leroy Butler off so that

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when he's sixty years old or whatever, he can go in.

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He has to go the Roy Butler is at peace

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.239
<v Speaker 1>with the fact he's going to be in the Pro

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Football Hall of Fame. He's the calmest cookie in the

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>room as it. Yeah, he absolutely believes it's going to happen,

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't. He doesn't sweat it, which I give

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>him credit for that because because yeah, you and I

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who are sweating it right now. But

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for little old Green Bay, Wisconsin, if you've lived here,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if you've been a part of this thing, you understand

0:28:58.320 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what it was like for twenty nine years to be

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in just complete irrelevancy. But Wright Butler was a big

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>part of this resurgence. People. Brett Favre was fun, He

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was the trend setter. He he did everything as the

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>face of this franchise to make the Packers cool again.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Reggie White believed he came in and changed the culture

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that defense. Roy Butler is on that Mount rushmore though,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at least as it relates to the Packers and the

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>success they had in the nineties. Yeah, I certainly agree

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>with you, and we have run over time. But we're

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very much the rap on this edition. In this week

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of Packers un Scripted, be sure to follow all of

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>our coverage of the team and of Sunday's game from

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>lambeau Field against Washington on Packers dot com. Subscribed to us,

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like us on iTunes and other podcast services, and check

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>out the Packers YouTube channel for all of your great

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>video content for West I'm Mike. Thanks for tuning in.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time.