WEBVTT - NFL Week 6 Best Bets (Ep. 116)

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast. I'm

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>your host, Dan Harris. Find me on Twitter at Dan

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Harris eighty. It's time to talk about our week six

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>best bets for the NFL season. Here's me to do

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that is Benny Richardi from FTN. Find him on Twitter

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>at Benny R eleven. Benny, thanks for joining me. How

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing?

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing good man. It's an interesting week coming up here.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Some some good games to bet on, some other ones

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that I don't really know what I want to.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Do with, so I'm just kind of avoiding them.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>But again, the good thing is the book's got to

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>make a line for all of them. We just got

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to find one or two that we like.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this week is harder. I just I

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have a good enough sense for a lot of

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>these games. Like I look at a lot of these

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>games usually, you know, you we were just talking about

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>how we do opening lines, right, you do you know

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a big video I do podcast, and how like I

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>generally feel like there's usually I don't know, four or five,

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe six games I have kind of a strong reaction

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. This week, I didn't.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>This week.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I was very much like ah, these are these are

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of sharp. You feel the same way.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a lot of there's a lot of those

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 2>games that have the hook on the on the other side,

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Like if it was three, I'd be like, oh, I'm

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>definitely taking this, But like that hooks a big deal, man,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>when you got the three and a half's there or

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>even some of them are at four, like the you know,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>like one of them I think we're gonna talk.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 3>About in a little bit here with with Dallas.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Like those those are key numbers, and those numbers like

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 2>they change a lot there, you know. I mean I

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>I think that numbers are in that area are even

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>more important than people are making a big deal. Oh

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Carolina was favored to start the week and now they're

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the other minus one to plus one.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>That to me, that's the melting move.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Nothing move.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like it doesn't matter to me when that happens.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you go from from three to three

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half or three to four and a half

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>like that one and a half one point right there,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>much bigger deal to me.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>And we got a lot of those this week.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>So absolutely, I'm hoping I'm not on the wrong side

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of a bunch of hooks on something that's basically what I'm.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Saying on here. We'll find out soon enough, as you

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>guys know, with this one, we talk about each of

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>our three best bets for the weekend, can be spread,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can be total, can be moneylined if we want, and

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to quickly run through the remaining games

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>before we get into a couple of housekeeping things again.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>This podcast, as you guys surely know by now, is

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet MGM, and I want to

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you about their latest offer. You can bet ten

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>dollars and you win two hundred dollars in free bets

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>if the team you bet on in an NFL game

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown. Okay, bet ten dollars either side wherever

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to go. The team you bet on scores

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, two hundred dollars in free bets. That is

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington,

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>d C, Arizona, and Wyoming. And the code is Juice

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred. Again we have the Daily Juice podcast hosted

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>by Matt Parolt. That's where that code comes from. Juice

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred over at bet MGM's second seque. Barkley is

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to play this weekend, but we sell the

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sign Saquon Barkley jersey that we are giving away. You

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>guys know how to enter by now I'll get it.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Was the review for the show Apple Podcasts or cast

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>box and then go to Betting Pros dot com slash

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>review if you are subscribed to our YouTube channel YouTube

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Betting Pros counts as three times the entries.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Benny, Before we get into it, I'm gonna

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>run through how we did last week. Our guest Scott

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Bagman went one, one and one. He hit on the

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Pats and Texans over thirty nine and a half. He

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>missed on the Vikings laying nine and a half to

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, and then he pushed on the Packers, laying

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>three to the Bengals, which I'm sure his heart was

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in his throat throughout that day. I had another positive day,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>third week in a row. Here I hit on the Eagles,

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>getting three and a half from the Panthers, and the

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Falcons over forty five and a half.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But the train on the Broncos under finally ended, and

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I missed on the under thirty nine and a half

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Broncos and the Steelers. But it's been a

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of good weeks here, seven and two over the

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>last three, Benny, So if this goes downhill, I will

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be blaming you. But it's fine. We're gonna be using

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines. I'll check the lines of betting pros come

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but obviously it's all over the place with the various books,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I will point it out. Benny, you are the guest.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You get to get us started. What's your favorite bet

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>here of the weekend?

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So my favorite bet of the week is actually the

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati Bengals on the road against Detroit in one of

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>those games where the hook is on the other side

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>from what I was talking about here. So I'm actually

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 2>willing to lay the three and a half here with Cincinnati.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati has a top nine rated offense a top seven

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 2>rated defense. You know, when I originally looked at this line,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I said, oh, this must be the line in case

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow doesn't play because they had to take him

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to the hospital after the last game, some kind of

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>throat contrusion or something that happens. He did finish the game.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>He's been practicing all week. I just thought that the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 2>three and a half was just way, way too low

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of a number here.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, you look at this Detroit team.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Most people in their power rankings have Detroit and like

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the bottom four, the bottom five of the league. Now,

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>there are four or five teams that are just absolutely

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>horrible football teams that depending on which power ranking you use,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>on which site you're looking at, but it's the same

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>five teams that are basically down there, with Detroit being

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>one of them. Cincinnati right now is you know, you

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>look at PFF, you look at some of the other

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>rating systems out there, this is a top ten overall team.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Good on both sides of the football here.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that their defense is really good

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>at is stopping to run. The only thing that Detroit

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>can basically do right now is kind of run the

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>football a little bit there with you know, the two

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>good running backs that they have in Swift and Williams.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's really the way that they want to play.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>And if Cincinnati's going to stop them, then they're not

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to do that. So they're going

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>to have to go to the air when you look

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>at Detroit having to go to the air. It is

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Jared Goff throwing the ball to pretty much wide receivers

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>like three, four and five on their list right now,

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 2>because when you look down at the list, it's going

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to be like Khalif Raymond, probably like Amen ros Saint Brown.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, those are the guys that are going to

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 2>be in there. Tyrell Williams has been out with a

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>concussion for a couple of weeks. They lost a Quintes

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Siphas last week. Even TJ. Hockinson, who is probably the

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.799
<v Speaker 2>one guy you could really count on on that team,

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 2>mispracticed yesterday. His status is up in the air for

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>this weekend. You know, I'm looking at this here, and

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 2>then you look at the other side of the ball too.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Detroit has one of the worst pass coverage defense, is

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the worst pass coverage grades in the entire league.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And then you have a healthy T Higgins. Now you

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>have arguably the rookie of the year out there, you know,

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>catching touchdowns every week, and that Tyler Boyd as well.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's like even cj Uzaman, who had a big

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>week two weeks ago. There are just so many weapons

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>here for Joe Burrow to play with against the defense

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that has absolutely no chance to stop the pass. So Cincinnati,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I know they're on the road. I know they're laying

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the hook. I know it's three and a half. I

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>think the reason it's three and a half is because

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the books know if they left us at minus three,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>this game would get absolutely hammered by everybody, So they

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>added the hook there to try to scare a few

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 2>people away. But I'm a little smarter than the book,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not gonna be scared by it. I'm gonna

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>lay the three and a half.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Within I'm looking at the various lines that are available,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and there is a three, oddly enough, sitting one three

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting out there at points. Bet it's just up it's

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>minus one thirty here if you're gonna lay the three.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, three and a half is there. I think

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I don't have a strong feeling

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, just because when I look at it, it

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>does feel like even with the hook, with it being

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>over three, the books want you to take the Bengals,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and the books expect you to take the Bengals. Like

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the public, the number of tickets that are

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to come in. It's got to be heavily on

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, right, Even after that loss, nobody wants to

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>back the lines at this point and with a small spread, right,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So it feels like my only worry with it is

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I feel like the books kind of

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>want you. Do you ever factor that in? By the way,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do you ever look at a line and say, this

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>almost feels like they're baiting me, they want me to

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>do this, or do you just throw that out the window?

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I do, but I look at it the other way.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>As you know, if you see a line out there

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that's minus two and a half, to me, that's almost

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the books baiting me to take the minus two and

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a half, being like, oh, I'm going to get the

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>three on it. When they bump it up to three

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and a half, I kind of look at it the

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 2>other way. It's like they bumped this up to three

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and a half to try to keep me from taking

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 2>this line because they knew that if it was two

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 2>and a half or three, people would be more likely

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to take it, and then they would get something that is,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, completely one sided, which is obviously not what

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the books want to do, right.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>People because Detroit had a couple of those games where

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>they lost by like, you know, less than a field goal. There,

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I think people are giving Detroit a little too much

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>credit for being a good team. Like Detroit is not

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a good team. They're not good on offense, they're not

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>good on defense, they're not really all that great on

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>special teams. Not that that is a major factor in

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>my numbers, but when I look at it, I just

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>think that.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 3>They're being a little bit overvalued right now. And that's

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>what you really want to do.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>You want to find the teams that books are overvaluing,

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>and you want to bet against them, and you want

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>to find the teams that they're undervaluing and kind of

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>bet on them.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I still think since he's being undervalued, and I think

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Detroit's being overvalued.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>So when you put those two things together here, I

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 2>love this bet on the Bengals.

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, I mean your point is correct. Obviously they're

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. That's sort of something that is saying, oh,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you might not you know, in a vacuum, you would say, oh,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to take the Bengals. It's over a

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Like look at this. I think for me, though,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with the very very Joe Q Public out there betting,

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like looks at sort of be like

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the Lions suck their own five. I know they almost

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>won that game, but they should have lost. They think

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are young and exciting. If it's anything remotely

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hanging around a field goal, I feel like Joe Q

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Public is going to want to take it. It's interesting.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't that is the side that I would go

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and if I had to go on another side, but

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stick in this game. Okay, this isn't

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>technically my second bet whatever, but I'm sticking in this

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>game for another one of my bats. Actually, it's gonna

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be the under the forty seven and a half, and

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is based on the points that

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you made, Benny, which is the Lion's offense is abysmal

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>right now, like really really terrible. And don't forget the

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive line for them, at one point was a strength

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of this team and it is decimated, especially with ragnow out.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge loss for them, right And you mentioned Hockinson. Yeah,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my guess is he's gonna play because he's been playing

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>through this new thing a lot. But without the offensive

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>line there to block or anything like that. It doesn't

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do it. You mentioned Cefest Brocus collar bone, he's going

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to be out. They don't have the pass catchers. They

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>do have the running backs. We're pretty strong, but you

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it. That's kind of Cincinnati's strength here on defense

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>seventh in defensive DVOA against the run. So it's really

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to see the Lions. I mean, you

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>got the coach, you know, Dan Campbell, talking about how

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jared gobb is struggling with like too many

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>plays and stuff like that, like he he knows realistically,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to put a point. So for me,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all about whether or not Cincinnati completely explodes offensively

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And they could. I mean, obviously they

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have the three wide receivers back, Joe Mixon appears healthy

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>though I know he was limited early in the league.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But obviously they should win this game for sure. But

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>for me, the reason, part of the reason why I

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>like the under both teams are really slow. I mean, Benny, like,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the Lions are the sixth slowest neutral pass play pace

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of play in neutral situations, the Bengals are the second slowest.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Like neither one of these teams, other than the fact

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be like a seventy yard pass

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>play to Jamar Chase and we just have to fake

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that in Neither one of these teams wants to hurry up,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let's go, let's go, let's run this. They

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>want to milk the clock, they want to play it slow.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So I do see the Bengals winning this game. I

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>do think they win it by more than a field goal.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm on your side there if I have to

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>go away. But I still I just don't see it

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>being like this high, you know, powered game or anything

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think it's going to be a relatively

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>low scoring game. So at forty seven and a half,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>it's the only total on my list right now, it's

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the only I like, but it's my favorite total of

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the week. What do you think about that?

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean when you look at Detroit, they

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>went seventeen seventeen, fourteen, seventeen in their last four games here.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So basically what you're betting on right now is that

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the Cincinnati Bengals aren't gonna score thirty five points.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think Cincinnati's gonna win this game too. But

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 3>thirty five is asking a lot for them.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>If Detroit's defense could play well enough to keep since

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the other five touchdowns, I think you got it.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you got a winner there.

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think the only thing that, like, the one

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that the Lions kind of do it from a

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive standpoint is they do get pressure, Like they're able

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to get pressure on the quarterback. And Burrow's taking some shots.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You're right, he's gonna be fine with that throat contusion

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but he's taken some shots the last couple

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So I think with them getting pressure that

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna at least throw them out of their rhythm

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and probably affect them offensively. So it's something let's go

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for both of us winning this one, the Bengals winning

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, a nice tidy twenty to thirteen game. We'll

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>both go home winners. Go to your second bet. What

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do you got?

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the second one I'm looking at here. I'm

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 2>actually gonna bet we're gonna go to a total in

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>this one. I'm betting the over in the Kansas City

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Washington game. And I know it's a big number. Is

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it fifty five?

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 3>Right now? I mean, what are you looking at.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me take the consensus. It was fifty five and

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a half last time I saw it. I'll pull it

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>up here, hold on, it is ooh, fifty there's it's

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some books are at fifty five and a half, but

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the consensus, the majority books fifty four and a half.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So even better for you, right you're going out.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 3>There, I'll take it.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here, here's the numbers so that you can

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 2>you can see why I'm on this side. So far

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 2>this year, Kansas City averaging thirty one points per game,

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>giving up thirty two points per game, Washington averaging twenty

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>four points per game, giving up thirty points per game.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>So we're looking in.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>That fifty five sixty five rage right there. If we

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>just kind of, you know, go with those raw numbers

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 2>and add them together and then you know, the thing

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think people understand is like everybody looks

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>at Washington and they think of last year with the

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Washington Redskins, top.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Five defense, like you know, all that stuff. The offense

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>is really bad.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 2>But so far this year that's not really the way

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>it's been. Other than the first game, which again was

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Fitzpatrick, not you know, Taylor Heineke, who's in there now.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Heinike's actually been putting up points with this team, So

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, if this team is gonna score. And then

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the other thing is the defense hasn't been as good

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>This year.

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Again, I'm not saying they're like a bottom ten defense

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.599
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that, but they're a middle of the

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 2>road defense. And you know what, the Kansas City Chiefs

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>are gonna pick apart a middle of the road defense,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a top five defense like they've played last week with

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the Buffalo Bills. Yeah, and even Buffalo top defense in

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the league, one of the top five defenses depending on

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>whatever ratings you're looking at. They still hung up twenty

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>points on Buffalo last week. They're gonna hang up thirty

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>here this week on Washington. And then the thing is,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Washington can hang it up on them because

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 2>right now, Kansas City is literally the worst defense in

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the league. So the only way that Kansas City could

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>win games is getting into shootouts and basically Washington at

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>this point, I'm not saying this offense is elite.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying it's great. There are pieces missing.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Logan Thomas being out is obviously a big deal to

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 2>this defense. Antonio Gibson's been a little banged up, not

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>completely himself, and you can run on Kansas City, so

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be something that you want to hope that

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be in there, or at least whoever

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is in there at running back, whether it's j D

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Mciszick or somebody else further down the you know, the

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>depth chart is going to be able to get some

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>yardage here.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 3>I just think there's gonna be points on both sides

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>of this game.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And I have no problem playing overs with Kansas City

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>because this is the exact kind of team that I

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>want to play overs with. Their defense can't stop anybody,

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>so anybody can put up points on them, and their

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>offense literally doesn't need more than three plays to go

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>eighty yards down the field and put up a touchdown.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>So I am hoping that this gets into one of

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 2>those close, back and forth kind of games where Kansas

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>City goes down I don't know, fourteen three or something,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>storms back to make it seventeen to fourteen. Washington scores,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>then Kansas City scores, then Washington scores because Kansas City

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>can't stop them, and then the next thing you know,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>we're up there in the sixties. And I mean just

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the scores for Kansas City's games this year.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Sixty two was the total in the first game, seventy

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>one in the second. The bad game they had was

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>fifty four in the third game, and then it was

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>sixty two and fifty eight in the last game. So

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not like this is, you know, fifty

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>five very high number, but the way Kansas.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>City's playing, they're almost playing like a college football team.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>So if you're gonna get those kind of points in

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 2>their games, I'm still gonna be on the over here.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of the public is on the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>under So wait a little bit. If you can get

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>it at fifty four and a half, I like that.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>If it drops even lower than that, that just means

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you got a bit bigger.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you one hundred percent. Like I realized,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's like, oh, the Chiefs defense is so abysmal

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that I can't even really put into words. And Washington's

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>their offense. It's not explosive or anything like that. But

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>at you know, as much as Antonio Gibson apparently has

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the stress fractor in his shin, he looked fine last

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>week he scored two touchdowns. Terry McLaurin, I realize now

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that he's pretty much the last guy standing because even

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel again came back for ten minutes and then

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is out. That's fine, doesn't matter. They cannot stop wide

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers no matter what you do. Heineke's played better than expected.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Jad McKissick is probably gonna have a decent

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>game in here. So I agree with you, and the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have to win, and the only way the Chiefs

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can win their two and three is to outscore you.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So it is going to be monstrous amount of points. Yeah,

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it said fifty four and a half to me. I'm

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire. I have only access to DraftKings. It's

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half at DraftKings, which is great.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I totally love it. Again, and you mentioned it Washington's

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>defense man, like, where are we where all of the like?

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I expected them to be a complete strength coming into

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, complete strength and their defense right now that

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you can pick on. So I don't know where this

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>happened now. The one thing is Tyreek Kel has misspracticed.

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He misspracticed again today, so I want to make sure

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he plays. Of course, by assuming he does. Even if

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, they'll i mean, pal Hartman will probably just

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>step right in.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Right Iron Pringle get a touchdown there.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the things about Washington's defense this year,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they do still have a good pass rush. They have

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 2>good I shouldn't even say they have a good pass

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>they have good pass rushers, right, but the secondary is

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>so bad that I mean, like, listen, these guys still

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 2>need about three seconds to get to the quarterback. If

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>they can't even guard, if they can't even stop anybody

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>or cover anybody for three seconds, it's not going to

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>make a difference.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>And that's really what the you know, what the numbers

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 3>have shown.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Right now is that their secondary is just so bad

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that they can't even stop anybody here.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 3>So they're not even giving that line a chance. With

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>all those pass rushers they have to kind of get home.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 2>You hope that your a good defensive line can help

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 2>out your corners, but the corner's got to do a

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit of work too.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 3>If it's like you know, teams.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Are just throwing all over you, I mean, really, there's

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>nothing you can do about it. And again that's the

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>big difference between not Washington defense this year and last year.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Last year you weren't lighting them up through the air

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and those guys were getting home. This year, it feels

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like there's always receivers open, so quarterbacks don't have to

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 2>hold on to it too long. They can get rid

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of it. If you're not getting home, they're gonna get

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>picked apart. And that's what's been happening.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep, I'm in agreeing with you. I like the over here.

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't care that basically taking a Chiefs over sounds so

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like Chalky or whatever. I'll take it out they get

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they can't stop anybody. I think it's going to be

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 1>a shootout again in a game that they absolutely have

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to win, and they win by putting up points. So

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you there. I'm really interested, Benny, to

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>hear your opinion on my next pick, okay, because you

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>may hate it. I like it obviously because I'm picking it,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but you may hit it, so let me get through it.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Then after that, I want to hear this is the

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Browns laying three to the Cardinals. No, this was two

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half when it opens, so it's at three. That'snnoing,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a three and a half out there as

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking right now at Fox Bet, but at three

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take it. Kind of a combination here

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of me buying the Browns and selling the Cardinals. The

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Browns are just a really, really impressive football team. Their

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>run game is awesome. As we know, Baker Mayfield had

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that one terrible game against the Vikings, but overall he's

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well. Defense is very good, maybe not quote elite,

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but they are very very good. They're not that far

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>away from being five to zero, including that game against

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. They lost against the Chargers in that heartbreaking fashion.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And conversely, I'm just selling the Cardinals a little bit.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were outplayed by the forty nine ers

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>last week in like many notable categories. They could have

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lost that one. They should have lost that game to

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings that were behind against the Jaguars. I know

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a little fluky, but still they are due

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a letdown game, and this game in particular, feel

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like it favors the Browns. Starting on Saturday in Cleveland,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be horribly windy for like three straight days.

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be twenty to twenty five mile an

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hour wins. What does that favor the run game, which

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is all Cleveland wants to do, so I think that's

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be something good. The Cardinals have allowed five point

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry on the year. Cardinals have a

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of injury concerns. They lost Max William obviously the

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Now they have a million pass catchers, but

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>still that's something. Chandler Jones is likely out. He is

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID nineteen list. And they lost their center

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Rodney Hudson with the rib injuries. So they've got some

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>injuries that they're dealing with. Everything here screams the regression

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to the mean for the Cardinals to me. The Browns

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back from that tough loss again two and a

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>half earlier in the week. I liked it. I didn't

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>bet it. I should have. It's still at three right now.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I see one three and a half out there, so

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lock it in before it gets there. I

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>will take the Browns at home Lang three. Benny, your

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts please.

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you didn't even mention the fact that

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray's a little banged up as well.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>That's true?

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely right, Yes, it's a throwing shoulder, which is

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously gonna be a big deal for them. And I

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 2>mean he's been amazing this year, you know, no knock

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>on him whatsoever. He's been absolutely great for them so

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 2>far this season. But he wasn't that great last game.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 2>And that's what you started seeing it there. You know,

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>this team had been putting up a lot more points

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>than they did in that last game.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 3>And again, decent defense.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna say great defense, but a decent defense

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>they played last week and all that. So you would

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>expect a little bit less than you know, the stellar

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 2>performances you put.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Up against some of the weaker teams in the league.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I mean there are there are quite a

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>few red flags here for the five and oh Arizona Cardinals,

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.719
<v Speaker 2>which again I don't think many people thought the Cardinals,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 2>including the Cardinals, who haven't done that in like thirty years,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>started off a season five and oh, I think I

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>don't even know if they did it in like the

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Order days when they were in there, you know,

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>at least in our lifetime when they were in their

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of heyday right here.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 3>But you know, yeah, I don't mind it at all.

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know that Cleveland is gonna basically play

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 2>hard nos football. They're gonna play good defense, They're gonna

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>run the football down your throat as often as they can,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and when they throw, it's gonna be play action off

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 2>of those you know, off of those runs. So windy

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>day doesn't affect them anywhere near as much as it

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>effects a team like Arizona that would need to kind

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>of spread it out. So you got the weather on

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>your side, you got the injuries on your side, you

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 2>got Arizona having to travel to Cleveland for this game.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>You got Cleveland being a little upset at, you know,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>losing that game last week forty seven to forty two

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>in a game that they played very well against arguably

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 2>an even better defense than they're going to be facing here,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and they still hung up forty two points. So yep,

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this Cleveland team is another one kind of

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>like the Bengals, where the offense is pretty good, the

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 2>defense is very good, and people were still under rating them.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Probably a better team than most people think when you

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 2>look at the Cleveland Browns here.

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 3>So I don't hate it.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I like it extremely well coached. I really like what

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski's then obviously coach of the year last year, and yes,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>totally spaced for whatever reason, even though I had factored

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it in the Murray injury, which again he's gonna play fine,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that that did you know, impact

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>him last week against the fourty niners. He's a slight guy.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>We saw him injured obviously last year. That really affects

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>his performance. So all the factors taken together, that might

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>be why the spread has moved up to three. I

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like it, but I am locking it in now before

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it moves. God passed again, Fox Bes already at three

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half. All right, last pick, Benny, what do

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you got? Yeah?

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>So I was hoping to get a little bit of

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 2>a better number on this game. I'm not gonna lie

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>to you, but I do think this is another situation

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>where it's one team that the books are still overvaluing

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>because of name brand recognition with the New England Patriots,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 2>and one team that the books are undervaluing with the

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Cowboys. The Dallas Cowboys being the only team that

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is five and zero against the spread so far this year. Now,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I will say this based on the way my numbers

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>look and based on what I've seen the last couple

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of weeks from the books, I do think the books

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>did actually make an adjustment to Dallas this week, So

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I was expecting to get Dallas closer to like one

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and a half two points. Right now I think it's

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>three and a half some places. I've even seen it

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>as four, you know, so it is kind of creeping

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>up there. But that doesn't really matter to me, to

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>be honest with you. The Patriots defense is not the

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Patriots defense that was the one two or three years

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>ago that every but he was scared of. That was

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>like the super defense. And people keep pointing to oh,

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>look they shut down the Jets.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I am a Jets fan. That is not hard to do. Yeah,

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 3>it is not hard to do.

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Like, if your best argument you could make to me it's, oh,

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>well look what they did to the Jets, I'm gonna

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>be like, yeah, so, like you know, my kids pop

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 2>order team can shut down the Jets.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm not worried about that whatsoever.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, this defense, if you look at them right now,

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots are like middle of the pack, honestly, even

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>in the lower half of the league, and a lot

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 2>of categories that you look at overall and you look

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>at Dallas's offense right now. You know, I know Pro

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Football Focus has them right that's the number one overall offense.

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I know over at FTN, I think we have them

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 3>as number two or number three.

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 2>Every single projection system that you look at right now

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 2>has this Dallas offense.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>As being near elite.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>And then just look at what they've done in the

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>last couple of games, forty one points, thirty six points,

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>forty four points in the last three games. They're putting

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 2>up thirty four points on the season. Now, do I

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>think they get anywhere near thirty four against the Patriots? No,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots are gonna have a good game plan. The

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Patriots defense, I'm not saying they suck. I'm just saying

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 2>they're not the.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Elite level defense that people used to look at them.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Ass They traded away Steven Gilmour, who is a major

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 2>piece of that team, and people don't realize when you

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 2>have a guy who could be a one on one

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 2>island shutdown corner, it allows your defense, especially a smart

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>guy like Belichick, to do a lot of other things

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 2>because you could just stick him out there and say,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 2>all right, your job this game is to take away

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Amari Cooper, and you know that that's going to happen,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and then you're playing ten on ten with everybody else

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out how to stop teams. When you

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 2>lose that guy, that's a big deal. Now you have

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 2>to make up for that fact because now you can't

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 2>just say we're taking away that side of the field

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know, playing ten on ten on the other side.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Now they actually have to go out there and you know,

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>be an eleven man unit that actually goes and shuts

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 2>teams down, and so far this year they haven't been

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 2>able to do it. And then the other reason why

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I like it, I think Dallas's defense is a little

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 2>better than people give them credit for, and I think

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots offense is even worse. Patriots right now basically

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>only averaging nineteen points on that side of the ball.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>So if Dallas can get to like twenty four, they

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>this number. I don't think they get to the thirty

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>four they've been averaging, but I think think it gets

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. And if you can score twenty points against

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, you're gonna win because this team just can't score.

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going against you, but I'm not jumping

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>on the train. I don't know what it is, Benny,

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>So this is like not this is not great now.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw it out there. It's not great now

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for me. I don't know what it is, and it

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>might just be my history. Of course, we're both Jets fans.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I live in New England, of understanding this spot for

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick. Now, obviously you want to talk about the defense.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Davis Mills just totally lit you up right,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's not an offense that you're necessarily crad of.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has been home for three games, right, three straight games.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you're coming on the road. That's a spot generally historically,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't you know, bode well for teams, at least as

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>against the spread. For sure. Mac Jones is not a

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback or anything like that. He's been okay. He

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>really struggles with pressure. That's the one thing Dallas doesn't

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really get. They don't get a tone of pressure on

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. So I think I think their offense, the

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Patriots can have some success here in this game. The

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>big question is whether or not their defense can shut

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>down what is basically an elite offense with Dallas and

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that they can. I don't think they

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>could sew him down. I mean, even you admit you

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't expect this to be the you know, thirty eight

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>points or anything from the cap rights, like, you don't

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>expect this to be crazy at all. I just don't

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have it. Again, I kind of felt like this different obviously,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and there were weather against the Bucks, but it strikes

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit against the Bucks where I was like,

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how you're gonna put up any points.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how your defense is going to possibly

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>hold them in check. There was no way. I felt

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>good about the Patriots in that game, and they came

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>out and they played extremely, extremely well. It strikes me

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as it's going to be one of those games and

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a close game. But again, this

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is not great analysis bending because I don't I just

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have it like here. It's just something that makes

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>me uncomfortable.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 2>I've actually had this same discussion already once today with

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 2>my producer when we were talking about it on the

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>show earlier yeap, and basically what I said to him

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is the Tampa Bay game literally required an act of God.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>The weather was horrible in that game. It required an

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>act of God to slow them down. But on the

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 2>other side of it, you were right. They still only

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>scored seventeen points. This is a seventeen to twenty four

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>point a game offense. That's the best you're going to

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>get out of this new England team.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 3>There's no explosive wide receivers. You know.

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Again, they lost Damien Harris, not that he was I

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think that that's a big deal. I think Rimandre

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Stevenson can give you basically approximate what you got out

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of out of Damian Harris. I think the bigger deal

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 2>was them losing James White a couple weeks ago because

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Bolden being in there now and taking that role.

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 3>And I like Bolden.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a solid guy that could be on

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the roster, but he's not the same upside that James

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 2>White was, so that only hurts their offense even more

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>right there. Like I said, my biggest problem here is

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Patriots can put up more than

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty and I don't think the Patriots defense, which is

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 2>not as elite as they used to be, can keep

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 2>this elite because Dallas's offense is elite can keep this

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 2>elite Dallas offense under twenty. So I'm hoping I get

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 2>a twenty four, seventeen, even twenty four to twenty.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 3>If you can get it out the three and a half, right,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>it would work for me too.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a three and a half everywhere pretty much again,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>except for me. It's at three at DraftKings. Maybe a

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. It's the little Patriots love there, I guess.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think really the issue for me with

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys is not their offense whatsoever. It is I

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>don't have as much faith in their defense. I mean,

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Treyvon Diggs is great. Of course, they don't get a

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>ton of pressure. They've been built so much on this

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>insane turnover rate that they have. But again, this is

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not the offense that can exploit that with the Cowboys,

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>right because they're just not explosive. So I feel you.

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I really don't hate it. It's something though I can't

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>do it personally because again, I'm just scared. I'm a

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>scared man, and I don't mind that. I don't bet

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>games i'm afraid of, but I will bet a disgusting

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>game right now that we alluded to earlier it's a

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>line that has crossed zero, but doesn't really matter to me.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>It's whatever side you want to be on, is the

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>side you're on. I'm going to take the Vikings laying

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a point in a half right now to the Panthers. Again,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it. I think it opened at the Panthers

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>laying a point or maybe laying a point to half

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point. It's not cross but again, you and

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I talked about it. That is a far less significant

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>move than going from two and a half to three

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half or three to three and a half,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. I have a bit of an irrational

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>love for the Vikings and they have done nothing to

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>justify it whatsoever. I've only actually taken them on the

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>show once, it was against the Cardinals, and they did cover,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>even though they wound up losing that game. This is

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>much more, though, of a fade of the Panthers. Things

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>look a lot different for the Panthers right now when

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not facing the Jets or the Texans. And Benny,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you are a Jets fan. I am a Jets fan.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>As we just said, we have watched mister Sam Darnold,

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I'm glad Sam Darnold is out of

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the Adam Gase threshold right now and able to have

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>some modicum of success. But one thing that I don't

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>really think was a product of Adam Gase was how

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold looked under pressure. I think that he is

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not a great quarterback under pressure. We have seen it

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in his career. We have seen it now with the Panthers,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and we certainly saw it last week against the Eagles.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They pressured him forty three percent of the time. And

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the stats from Sunday against the Eagles when he got

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>rid of the ball under two and a half seconds,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he was eleven for eleven for seventy nine yards and

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. When he had it held on to the

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>ball for longer than two and a half seconds five

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen with two interceptions. So Donald generally holds the

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ball too long. That's kind of what he does two

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>point eight seconds on average. And again, the games that

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he has won is against the Jets, against the Saints

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we don't really know what the Saints

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are yet, and against the text and now the Vikings

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>do have holes on their defense, but they get pressure

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>second in the NFL in pressure rate, Zimmer is a

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>good defensive coach. They might have CMC back here. I

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>guess they're supposed to. But again, yesterday Matt rules that

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he was fifty to fifty. Who knows that will help Darnald,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But still I think we are basically starting to, you know,

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>look like what he's going to look like against a

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>legitimate defense. The Vikings have a good offense, they just

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.719
<v Speaker 1>don't score a ton or anything like that. And Cousins

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina gets a lot of pressure too, but Cousins

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is much better under pressure. So I think this is

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a close game. But I think the Vikings figure this

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>one out. I think the Panthers are having the balloon

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>burst a little bit with them, So I'm going to

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>take the Vikings laying a point a half to the Panthers.

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I like to do every week

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>is look at teams that are underperforming and or overperforming

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>what they should be. And the Vikings are one of

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 2>those teams that you look at their you know, you

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>look at their grades by position, you look at the

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 2>guys on that offense, you look at even the defense,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>which is supposed to be much improved from last year,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>although it hasn't really looked much improved yet this year.

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 2>But that was the consensus coming into the season that

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 2>they were going to be much better here. So they

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 2>have played just nowhere near up to expectations this far. Now, again,

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're somebody who believes in variants, maybe they just

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 2>had a couple of those down games, played a couple

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>better opponents the first couple of weeks, a couple of

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the teams they played, our teams that are showing up

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 2>better than a lot of people thought they would. So

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to start out two and three not the worst thing

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 2>in the world. And then you look in the other

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 2>side with Carolina, and you mentioned it. You know, Carolina

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>is three and on the season, but who have they

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>really beat? You know, that Saints game made everybody excited

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in the second week because the Saints went.

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Out in Week one and beat Green Bay.

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 2>But if Green Bay and New Orleans played again tomorrow,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody in the world would think that

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans should be favored in that game. Right now,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>they just happened to run into a buzzsaw. Aaron Rodgers

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>had to touch the football in like four months. He

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>was still playing jeopardy and figuring out the answers and

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff. So, I mean, I think people overrated

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the Saints, which made them overrate Carolina for beating up

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Saints. You know, I mean, I agree with

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>everything that you're saying here. Listen, the market moved for

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a reason, right The market opened that way. The money

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 2>came in heavy, and that's why it moved from Carolina

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>being favored to Carolina being the underdog.

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, whether or not it moved enough, it doesn't

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 3>really matter. When you're talking.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 2>About one point yere one and a half points there,

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>anything under a field goal.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 3>You still just picked the team that you like. On

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 3>either side there.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I would have liked you have taken Minnesota if you

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 2>really liked them on Sunday Monday when it was still

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>like plus one ten or you know, something like that.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 3>But even now, I have no problem laying a one

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half on that side.

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I just think even though they haven't showed it yet,

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I just think they're the better football team overall.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and their defense to right, coming into the year,

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>people were kind of excited about them that they had

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new faces, but the secondary hasn't played

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as kind of we expected. Them to play necessarily.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think they are a better team than

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what they have showed right now, and their record could

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be better. Obviously, they just you know, they almost won

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals. They probably should have won that game.

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is something where I think they're a little

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a better team. And again it's largely a

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>fade at the Panthers at this point. Who again we

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned it, their strength of the you know,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>opponents who they have beaten is not impressive. All right,

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's recap very quickly. You were taking the Chiefs

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Washington football team. I'm going to give you

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half. That's like this line over

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half, the Bengals laying three and

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Lions, and the Cowboys laying three

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half to the Pats. I am taking the

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Browns laying three to the Cardinals, the Bengals and the

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Lions under forty seven and a half, and the Vikings

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>now laying one and a half to the Panthers. You're

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ready to run through very quickly all the remaining spreads.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it.

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. London game, really exciting one here, the

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins laying three to the Jaguars.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>What do you think I'm gonna go?

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>My number is actually a little below three, but it's

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>still Miami being favored. I think it's like two and

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 2>a half or so, So I'll take the Miami side

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 2>of that game.

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I just don't want to be on the Jacksonville side.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the correct answer, which is probably like Jacksonville like there,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some value on Jacksonville, but you just can't

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do it right, there's under no sus right, you just

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. I completely agree with you. Chargers are

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Ravens. I think this was the Ravens saying

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>three when I looked early in the week. But right

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>now it's down to two and a half. There is

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>still three out there at FanDuel at points bet, but

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the consensus line Ravens laying two and a half to

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers in Baltimore.

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my number was actually Baltimore minus four, So if

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I could get it at the two and a half now,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I would definitely be on the Baltimore side of it. Again,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 2>to me, that one and a half points right there

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>is worth a lot more more than the one or

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>two points that we saw the move in the other game,

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>so I thought it should be Baltimore minus four.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be a great game.

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I wouldn't be shocked if the Chargers wound up

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 2>winning this, But Baltimore seems to be able. They win ugly,

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 2>but they win, right and at the end of the day,

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>you are what your record says you are. And you

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>know they got a good record because they come through

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and they win those close games.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 3>So I think Baltimore wins a close one at two

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 3>and a half. I would be on the Baltimore side.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I think they cover.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I liked the Chargers getting the three. I don't

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like them under the field goal.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little concerned because I don't know what we're

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna see here from the Ravens off that game, right,

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that is an emotionally draining game. That's you know, they're

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on a short week, so I just I'm a little

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned with what we're gonna see. I'm just I'm gonna

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>stay away. I'm just gonna watch it completely. But if

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it was three, I kind of like the Chargers because

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm really god, I love I love the coaching staff,

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I love the way the team is playing, so I

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do love them. The Colts are laying ten to the

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Texans right here at home?

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you think too many? For me? I thought

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 3>it should be eight.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>So again, I'm not games like this, like I don't

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>want to. I'm not actually betting the Houston signe. Like

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 2>I said at the beginning show, we don't have to

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>bet every game. But if we're playing in a pool

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 2>here and you got to pick a side, I think

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 2>ten is too many points.

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the Colts are gonna win. I just think

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it's too many points.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I'm not betting it. I agree with you,

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but ten points, really, I mean, given the fact like

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>how exhausted they are, how much their spirit was broken

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, how decimated their secondary is, the Texans are

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a little better than people have kind of given them

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>credit for, like throughout the season, ten is too many.

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I'm with you, Like if I'm

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in a pool and I have to bet it, I'm

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going with the Colts. I mean, I do not have to.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Bet Colt survivor pick by all means, if you got survivor,

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I got no problem with it. But I don't want

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 3>to lay ten with them. Yeah.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>How about the Packers visiting the Bears. The Packers are

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>laying five right now. There's four and a half five,

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>five and a half actually out there at Fox Bet,

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but five is the consensus. What do you think?

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 3>How are the Chicago Bears three and two? I have

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 3>no idea how the sea was three and two.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 2>The offense is horrible, the deep is not as good

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 2>as they have no idea how they've.

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Got the three and two. I thought this numbers should

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 3>have been bigger.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 2>I think this is gonna be like if you're in

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 2>one of those you know, like circa millions or something

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 3>I think this is gonna be the.

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Most picked game of the week. I think everybody's on

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 2>the green Bay side. I know we are as well.

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 2>That was one of our circle picks. So I'm going

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 2>with green Bay in this one.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 3>No problem with that.

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>How about the Rams visiting the Giants. They're laying consensus

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is nine and a half. It bounces back and forth

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>between nine a half and ten. We obviously have, you know,

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand question marks right now about the Giants. We

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if Daniel Jones is going to be

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>up for this game, So I don't know if you

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 1>can even touch it right now, but what do you think?

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, for the fact that there's all those

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>question marks and I actually thought it should be double digits. Anyway,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I would be on the Rams side of this, but

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 2>again it's it's not a game i'm betting on. Again,

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 2>laying ten points is a lot of points. People don't

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 2>realize that's a lot of points. But I do think

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the Rams could cover because the Giants right now, assuming

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that even half of these guys are out.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna be playing with like a skeleton squad. Kadarius

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I hear Kadarius Tony might be playing.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Quarterback this week, which since I heard that, I was like,

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>all right, I'll lay the ten in that game.

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and they might be better. Who knows I have.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I can only get it at ten here drafting, so

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't get it, but I would take it at

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half because again, the Rams are off

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the mini by they shouldn't look to make a statement here,

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants are just in disarray at this point,

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>regardless of who plays. You mentioned the total in this one.

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>How about the side the Chiefs are visiting Washington and

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they're laying six and a half.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I the Chiefs are like one in four against the

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 2>spread this year, and it's because the defense is so

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>bad that you know, you always feel like the other

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>team is going to score. At the end of the game,

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you feel like the Chiefs are going to score too,

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and it really comes down to who has it last.

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you're forcing me to take a side here,

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll take Kansas City, but I'm not betting it. I

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 2>don't feel comfortable with it.

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>What worries me a little about this game, Benny, is

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is a please tease this game down to

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>half a point, which makes me a little worried about

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to see here in this game, right

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that this like this has got to be one of

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the legs and everybody's two teams teas there this week.

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be in mind too. I don't care if

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the trap doesn't matter to be, it's got to be,

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>which makes me just a little concerned about it. So

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a stay away from me again. You mentioned the

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs just they I mean, they haven't been winning obviously,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but they never cover if forced to take a side,

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree like it should be the Chiefs in this

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>game under a touchdown, but man, this is day. I

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just that number makes me very, very nervous because it

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're like, we know what's gonna happen and

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we're okay with it.

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, last year they were this way and so far

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to start this year it's been the same way as

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>they win a lot, well not this year, but last

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 2>year they won a lot, but they.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Didn't cover a lot. This year they're not winning or covering,

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 3>which always makes me nervous.

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>But at the same point in time, like if you're

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 2>asking me, that's the side I want to take, you know,

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>if I had to, But man, it just it hasn't

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>worked out well. The variants has to swing at some point, right, Like, Yeah,

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it's too good for it not to be.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You and I take the over. We'll tease it down,

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll be fine. Raiders are visiting the Broncos. Broncos here

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are length three and a half. I have no idea

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the Gruden stuff, Like, I don't know

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what the impact is of it on this team, So

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think?

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I try to go by that. I try not

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 3>to use narratives here.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they come out with their hair on fire and

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 2>you want to prove to everybody that they're gonna be

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 2>better without John Gruden or something. But just based right

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>on the numbers, Denver's the side I want to be on.

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I would have liked it at minus three, but I

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 2>would even lay the three and a half there because

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the side I feel more confident.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Again, this is one of them that I'm just I

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 1>felt like a lot of the lines are tight right

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>now and it's not one that I want to go after.

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>If I do pick a side, it would be Denver.

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Who I will I will generally if there's a tiebreaker,

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm unsure, if I have to bet it, I

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>will always lean the Broncos at home, particularly early in

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the season. But still it's a good line. It's the

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 1>right line and something that I'm staying away from. Forced

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to choose, I would take the Broncos. This is one

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>where I wish it was a little lower because it

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 1>might have been one of my picks. But the consensus

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Ligne right now is the Steelers are laying five and

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Russell Wilson less Seahawks on Sunday, night,

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Well in Pittsburgh five and a half, what do you think?

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the problem with this game this week is

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to figure out how many points Russell Wilson

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>is worth to the Seahawks side. My number came out

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 2>to just shy of seven. I think it was like

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 2>six and three quarters or something like that. So I

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 2>think that this game should actually be Pittsburgh closer to

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>six and a half. So minus five, I'd still be

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>willing to take it there because you got to also

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 2>factor in that all these other weapons are going to

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>be decreased without oh Wilson. Oh, so you know, it

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 2>hurts DK, it hurts Tyler, it hurts everybody on that

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 2>entire team right now. And again another former Jet quarterback,

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Gino Smith going out there.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So you and I love it, Yeah, I mean we've

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 1>seen him enough. That's the thing that he played very

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>very well in relief last week, like surprisingly well. I

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was very impressed. But it is a much much different

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>story when you pop in in relief in a game

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way that you're down and it's a negative

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>game script anyway, but when nobody has prepared for you whatsoever,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you pop off a couple of good throws

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. That's a much different story than when

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you give a team a week to say, Okay, you

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know Smith as the starting quarterback, let's plan our defensive

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>game plan around this. I agree with you. This is

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the spot you hate back in the Steelers in right,

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you hate back in the Steelers when they are home favorites.

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to back them in their road underdogs, and

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin can get them all coached up. But still I

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with you, Like there's no way. And again,

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they look better last weekend. Like I was surprised with

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>how cohesive their offense looked, especially the run game. And

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, their offensive line looked better. Whether it looked

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like more of a change in the scheme than it

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was suddenly them improving and everything like that, but the

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>offense did look better. The defense is still solid. With

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Gino going, I think it really hurts Tyler Lockett for sure.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I will take the Steelers, even

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>though it's five and a half. It's a little nerve wracking,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but I will take them. Last game here Monday Night football,

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are visiting the Titans. Titans are getting five

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. What about this one.

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I have Buffalo as the number one team

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 2>right now in my power rankings.

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 3>This opened lower than this.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 2>This opened that like three and a half, four and

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a half on a lot of sites somewhere in that range.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So my number was five and a half, which is

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 2>what it has come up to right now. So again,

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>if I didn't have to bet, I wouldn't be on it.

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 2>But I will stick with the Buffalo side. Like I said,

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 2>number one team in my power rankings right now. The

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 2>defense is just elite and the offense is good enough

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 2>to put up The offense is good enough to put up.

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of points.

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>You got an elite defense and an offense I could

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 2>put up a lot of points. You're gonna win a

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 2>hell of a lot of football games.

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I'm taking. I'm not betting on

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it again. I've told you only though what I bet.

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think I take the Titans. First of all,

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I expect Julio Jones to play in this one. I

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>think this is the game he comes back and you

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>returned to practice yesterday. I don't know about today yet,

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but obviously it wasn't placed on my r. This is

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Game three. They're at home. It's a big spot. I

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>could see a little bit of a letdown here for

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bills after coming off that giant win. But it's

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a tough game and it's five and a half. It's

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>like a dead number. What do you want to do

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with it? But I think I'll just take the points

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>here with the Titans. It forced too if I were

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in a pool, which I'm not. Benny, I really enjoyed

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. I'm glad you came on the show.

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Remind everybody you do fantastic work. Remind everybody where they

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 1>can check it out.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, you could always follow me over on Twitter

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 2>at Benny R eleven. You can catch me there or

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 2>anything going on at the FTN network. My fingerprints are

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 2>on it, either in front of or behind the scenes

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 2>one or the other day.

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll keep crashing it over there in the meantime,

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>enjoy your football this week, and everybody, we'll be back

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as always on Monday talking about our early reaction to

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Week seven NFL lines. I will talk to you then,