WEBVTT - Trump Tariffs Take Effect; Vicious Treasury Sell-Off

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Karen Moscow. Here

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>are the stories we're following today.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Karen, we begin with the new salvo in President Donald

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump's global trade war. So called reciprocal tariffs are now

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 3>in effect for roughly sixty countries, bringing duties around the

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>world to levels that haven't been seen in a century.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 4>They've ripped us off left and right.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 3>But now it's our turn to do the rippin'.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 5>That's okay. We're gonna make our.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Country even stronger, stronger than it ever was.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 3>Speaking at a Republican fundraising event, President Trump said tariffs

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 3>are already bringing in two billion dollars a day, and

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>he said they're leading to negotiations. The President says he

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>had a great call yesterday with South Korea's acting president.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>He also spoke with this week to Japan's Prime minister,

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>who urged the president to reconsider.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And Asian nations are bearing the brunt of the new tariffs.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Cambodia is now under a forty nine percent tariff rate,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Vietnams is forty six percent, but China is taking the

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>hardest hit with duties on top of existing tariffs running

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>as high as one hundred four percent. President Trump says

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that'll force Beijing to the table.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 7>They don't want tariffs on themselves.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 6>And it's very simple.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 8>We're making deals and people are paying tariffs.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Countries are paying tariffs right now.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 9>China's paying a one hundred and four percent tariff.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 7>Think of it, one hundred and four percent.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>And President Trump said he won't stop there. He says

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>he'll announced tariffs on pharmaceuticals very soon. He's also threatened

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>other sectorial tariffs on lumber and semiconductors.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>So far, Karen, China has not immediately responded to the

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>new tariffs. That's a departure from the last two episodes

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>when Beijing hit back within minutes. For more, Let's go

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to Hong Kong check in with Bloomberg's Joe Lisis So, Jill,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>what is the latest.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 10>Morning, Nathan and Karen. Yes, so far, we have not

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 10>really seen any kind of drastic measures out of China.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 10>It's really been radio silence. All we've really seen from

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 10>Beijing is they've released a short white paper on trade

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 10>with the United States. But this does stand in pretty

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 10>start contrast to just earlier this year when there were

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 10>earlier levies that Donald Trump implemented on China, we saw

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 10>immediate responses in the form of additional retaliations that came

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 10>with some tariffs on American goods that were sent to China.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 10>That also came with some other punitive measures, such as

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 10>investigations into various American companies that do some operations in China.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 10>That doesn't mean, though, that China isn't going to respond. Remember,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 10>we did see over the weekend when that initial ten

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 10>percent tariff went into effect that China came out with

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 10>its own duties on the United States. That's, of course

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 10>what led to this massive escalation leading to that total

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 10>number of one hundred and four percent that Trump is

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 10>implemented in tariffs on China. So it could be that

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 10>China is kind of biting its time. Maybe it'll come

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 10>back with something else. We've also heard there's been some

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 10>reporting that some within Chinese officials are meeting to talk

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 10>about some economic measures that they could take to sort

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 10>of bolster the economy. Right now, obviously, all of that

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 10>coming against the backdrop of tariffs. We'll have to see

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 10>what continues to come just over the coming hours. If

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 10>not days and weeks in Hong Kong, Jilldy says Bloomberg Radio.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jill, thank you. Now it's head to Europe

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>where stocks are selling off on the Trump tariffs, and

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>bloombergs U and Pots joins us in London with the

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>latest Good morning you.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 11>In Karen Nathan. After yesterday's bumpy session in Europe, which

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 11>saw stocks gain before a late selloff, the direction of

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 11>travel so far this morning is very clear and it

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 11>is down only sixteen of six hundred shares on the

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 11>benchmark stocks ex hundred in the green today within next

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 11>currently down two point seven percent. All twenty industry groups low,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 11>with healthcare stocks the worst performers, off more than four

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 11>and a half percent. Energy and real estate also under

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 11>performing this morning. Looking across the region, the Swiss market

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 11>at the bottom of the table, it's going down more

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 11>than four percent. Live in London, I'm um Pots, Bloomberg

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 11>radea you.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>And thank you hearing the US futures are mixed down,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>futures lower, Nasdaq futures higher. That puts SMP futures right

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>in the middle. That that follows yet another turbulent session

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street for four straight sessions we've seen moves

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>at least four percent from peak to trough. The S

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred is down almost nineteen percent from

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>its February record, posting the worst four day run since

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>March twenty twenty.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nathan, we are seeing major movements in the bond

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 2>market once again this morning, and we bring in Bloomberg

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 2>John Tucker for the very latest, John and Karen.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 7>Treasuries, which are supposed to be the safest and most

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 7>liquid assets, they're selling off and when the prices go down,

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 7>the yields go up. A Calvin yo Muddy, manager at

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 7>hedge fund blue Edge at Binzer, says this is a

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 7>fire sale of treasuries. He adds, it's like ice sculpting

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 7>in a forest.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 8>Fire.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 7>Grace Peters a JP Morgan Chase sees it this way.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>You know what the market is digesting this week is

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 4>that tariffs are not going away. In Volatility is likely

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 4>here to stay.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 7>US government bonds may be losing their safe haven status

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 7>if it concerns the trade war will trigger stagflation. Hedge

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 7>funds may be unwinding a popular leverage trade, and investors

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 7>maybe just be dumping whatever they can to get cash

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 7>That could signal liquidity concerns, and that's never a good

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 7>sign for markets. Some investors also speculate that global reserve

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 7>managers like China could be re evaluating their positions in

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 7>US government debt. In the US right now, the ten

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 7>year is now ten thirty seconds in price. That is

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 7>pushing the yield up four basis points the four thirty

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 7>three you know, New yorkom John Tucker, Bloomberg Radio.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, John, thank you for hearing a warning this

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 3>morning from former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. He says the

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 3>US is now likely headed toward a recession thanks to

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the tariff increases.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 6>We'll see an extra two million people be unemployed. We'll

0:05:55.440 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 6>see losses in household income that are five thousand dollars

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 6>of family or more. We're very likely, in the context

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 6>of a recession, to see markets reach levels significantly below

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 6>their current levels.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers also tells Bloomberg's Wall Street

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Week and economic downturn would have various other negative effects,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 3>including a wider budget deficit. You can get the full

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 3>conversation with Bloomberg's David Weston on the Bloomberg Talks podcast,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>or watch it on the Bloomberg Podcasts page on YouTube.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Meywell Nathan. Many strategists say Trump's tariff policy should not

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>come as a surprise. Limy Countrilla, as Managing director for

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Public Policy at PIMCO, this.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 12>Is a worldview that President Trump has had for forty years.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 12>This is what we keep telling our clients, and he

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 12>ran on this. He believes he has a mandate to

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 12>fulfill this. He believes that there's a lot of unfinished

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 12>business from the first administration. And I think that the

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 12>market obviously wants to maybe see through this or hope

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 12>that there is some this will result in a different outcome.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 12>But our view is tariff rates are going to be

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.239
<v Speaker 12>going up and that will have a headwind on growth

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 12>and likely have implications for inflation.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Jim Coos Lebby Cantrell says one of the president's primary

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>goals is balancing the goods trade deficit, and that he

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>plans to use tariffs until that metric is better balanced.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Karen, this morning, we have a warning as well from

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Ray daly O for investors who may be too fixated

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>on tariffs. Let's get the details on that. From Bloomberg's

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 3>li So Mateo.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 9>In a post on X. The billionaire founder of Bridgewater Associates,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 9>said investors are not paying attention to underlying conditions the

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 9>breakdown in major monetary, political, and geopolitical orders, and that

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 9>failing to do so may blindside them to the biggest

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 9>disruptions that are still to come. Dalli explained how Trump's

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 9>tariff policies are driven by too much existing debt and

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 9>the rate at which new borrowing is added. He said

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 9>the US is hooked on using debt to finance successive spending,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 9>while creditor countries like China sell goods to detornations like

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 9>the US, and that will lead to a correction of

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 9>these imbalances and a change in the monetary order. Balio

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 9>also notes that gaps and education, opportunity and values are

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 9>contributing to a breakdown of the democratic system and the

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 9>rise of autocratic leaders, while the US is shifting from

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 9>a multilateral to a unilateral approach in the geopolitical arena.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Lisa Matteo, Bloomberg Radio, all.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Lisa, thank you about Bloomberg News has learned the

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 2>White House's top economic team argued over plans to impose

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>even bigger tariffs. Trade advisor Peter Navarro was among the

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>more hawkish officials who pushed for a flat twenty five

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>percent levy on all countries. The revelation comes as Elon

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Musk called Navarro dumber than a sack of bricks. That's

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a quote and truly a moron. On social media, Navarro

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 2>said the Tesla CEO was a quote car assembler who

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>used parts from other countries. White House spokesperson Caroline Levitt

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>downplay the spat.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 13>Look, these are obviously two individuals who have very different

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 13>views on trade and on tariff's. Boys will be boys,

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 13>and we will let their public sparring continue. And you

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 13>guys should all be very grateful that we have the

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 13>most transparent administration in history. And I think it also

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 13>speaks to the President's willingness to hear from all sides

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 13>that he has people at the highest levels of this government,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 13>in this White House who have very diverse opinions on

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 13>very diverse issues.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Whitehouse spokes version Caroline love it and must defend a

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Tesla as the most vertically integrated auto manufacturer in America.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>It's time now for a look at some of the

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>other stories making news in New York and around the world.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 2>And for that, we're joined by Bloombergy's Michael Baher Machael

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 2>good morning.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 8>Good morning, Karen. It's another disturbing milestone in the Texas

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 8>measles outbreak. Texas has now confirmed more than five hundred

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 8>measles cases in a little more than two months. The

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 8>outbreak is responsible for two deaths and more than fifty hospitalizations. Meanwhile,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 8>Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Now

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 8>says he is encouraging people to get vaccinated against measles.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 14>I'm not going to take people's vaccines away from What

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 14>I'm going to do is make sure that we have

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 14>good science so that people can make an informed choice.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 8>Kennedy spoke on CDs Mornings. A roof collapse at the

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 8>iconic jet Set nightclub and the Dominican Republic has killed

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 8>at least ninety eight people and others may be trapped.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 8>Emergency Center director Juan Manuel Mendez says Cruz would search

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 8>tirelessly for people at the site of the collapse in

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 8>Santo Domingo. Among the missing is marengue singer Ruby Perez,

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 8>who was among those performing when the roof collapsed. Those

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 8>who died include a saxophonist on stage, local politicians, and

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 8>two former Major League Baseball players, Octavio d'hotel and Tony Blanco.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 8>The acting chief of the IRS plans to quit after

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 8>a deal to share tax data of undocumented immigrants with

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 8>Homeland Security authorities. Acting Commissioner Melanie Krauss is also said

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 8>to have disagreed with the agency's direction. A federal judge

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 8>in New York will hear argument it's on the Trump

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 8>administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport undocumented migrants.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 8>Lee Goerlernt is the American Civil Liberties Union attorney leading

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 8>the challenge against that use of the Act. He says

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 8>he believes President Trump has exceeded his authority.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 5>We are hoping that the judge will issue a temporary

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 5>restraining order to keep things in place while the case

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 5>can proceed further, and then we can provide the court

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 5>with more briefing and more facts.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 8>On Monday, the Supreme Court lifted a DC judges order

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 8>that prevented the White House from deporting Venezuelan migrants who

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 8>the government alleges our gang members. Global News twenty four

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 8>hours a day and whenever you want it with Bloomberg News. Now,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 8>I'm Michael Barn. This is Bloomberg Karen.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Michael Barr, thank you. Time now for the

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Sports update. Here's John stash Hour, John, good morning.

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 14>Good morning. Here the next of the Celtics with a

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 14>hint of what could very well happen when the NBA

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 14>Playoffs get to the second round. Height game with the guard,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 14>Nick's had a one point lead and the ball.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.479
<v Speaker 15>Brunsingle try to orchestrate. With the one point lead, Brunsvill

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 15>tried cutting hard Brunson, who sins play hearts and he's

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 15>right on the Celtics. It's Tatum on top, Tatum chip

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 15>stepping three.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 2>For the time.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 14>GNT Josh Hart miss the game when he shot out

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 14>the end of regulation and Boston won and overtime one

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 14>nineteen one seventeen. The one time Nick Chris TOMPs Porzingis

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 14>at seven foot three, put on a long distance shooting

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 14>display eight three pointers, a couple of them from the logo.

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 14>He scored thirty four points. Jason Tatum scored thirty two.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 14>Karl Anthony Towns led the Knicks with thirty four Next

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 14>beat New Orleans won nineteen one fourteen. The Denver Nuggets

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 14>only three games ago in the regular season, fired Michael Malone,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 14>their coach the past decade. He coached them to the

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 14>NBA Championship only two years ago. Devils lost to the

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 14>Ruins seven to two. The Islanders a wild seven six

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 14>overtime Watson Nashville and talk about while the Vancouver Canucks

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 14>trailed in Dallas five to two with one minute left,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 14>scored three times in the final minute and one in

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 14>ot make it six wins in a row for the Mets.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 14>They're five to zero on this first home stand. They

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 14>beat the Marlins ten to five. Francisco Lindora lead off

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 14>home run four RBIs for Pete Alonzo. Those Yankee Torpedo

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 14>bats very quiet in Detroit against Tigers Ace Trek Scubel.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 14>Yanks had just six singles, got shut out five nothing

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 14>their third strate Laws all three without a home run

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 14>being hit. The Nationals again surprise the Dodgers eight to two.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 14>James Wood Duomer's five RBIs. Red Sox lost at Toronto

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.119
<v Speaker 14>six to one. John Stasheward Bloomberg Sports, Darin Nathan.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Coast to Coast on Bloomberg Radio nationwide on Sirius XM,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and around the world on Bloomberg dot Com and the

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. This is Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 15>Good morning.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Nathan Hager, and as promised President Donald Trump, so

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>called reciprocal tariffs are now in effect, driving duty rates

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>for countries around the world to one hundred year highs.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>And even after four straight sessions of market turmoil on

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street, the President says tariffs are already a win.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 4>We'll making a fortune with tariffs.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 7>Two billion dollars a day.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 8>Do you believe it?

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I was sold two billion.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 15>Dollars a day.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>And that was the President speaking at a Republican fundraiser

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 3>in Washington last night, hours before these new tariffs kicked in.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>This morning, we were joined by Bloomberg News Global Trade

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>editor Brendan Murray. Brendan, can we start there? Where did

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>two billion dollars a day number come from? How much money?

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>If ed, he is the US taking in from the

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 3>duties that have already been in effect.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 7>Good morning.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 16>Well, that's the number he's saying is coming into the

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 16>US treasury, collected by the Customs Agency. For He started

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 16>with ten percent on China, then he went to twenty percent,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 16>and now we're looking at one hundred and four percent

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 16>it is starting today, So that's the amount of money

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 16>he thinks it's generating. He's going to need a lot

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 16>of money to pay for the tax cuts that he

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 16>trying to push through Congress to extend as well. So

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 16>there's both the effort to rewrite US trading relationships, trade

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 16>deals with countries like China, economies like the European Union,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 16>and as well as to generary revenue for the Treasury

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 16>to help reduce the national debt.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Closing sympathis we should talk, Brennan about the scope of

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>these tariffs. You mentioned the one hundred and four percent

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>duty on China. That alone is eyebrow raising. But we're

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 3>at levels that literally haven't been seen since even before

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the Smooth Holly tariffs in the nineteen thirties.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, exactly. So the average US tariff rate has gone

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 16>from something in the mid single digits five seven percent

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 16>to over twenty percent now with the tariffs that were

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 16>enacted today. The European Union was hit with twenty percent,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 16>the UK ten percent. Countries like in Southeast Asia, like

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 16>Cambodia and Vietnam are looking at rates in the mid

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 16>forty percent too, So those were countries that companies had

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 16>shifted to to get outside of their move their supply

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 16>chains outside of China. So pretty much there's no place

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 16>to hide from these enormous tariff rates that the President

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 16>imposed today.

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>And as the President mentioned last night, he's already been

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>having discussions with the leaders of South Korea, Japan. We

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>saw Israeli Prime Minister natanyahuo in Washington this week. So far,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 3>though China hasn't immediately retaliated, does that come as a surprise.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 16>It's a little bit of a surprise. Though China likes

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 16>to wait until rate before the US stock market opens.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 16>It has done that in the past to maximize the impact,

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 16>the economic impact, the financial impact on the US. So

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 16>China has been quiet for the past several hours. The

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 16>government hasn't said anything publicly, but that can't last, and

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 16>they have said that they will they will fight to

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 16>the end on this in this trade war and not

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 16>cave to pressures. So it's only a matter of time.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 16>There's only so much imports that China can hit imports

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 16>of American products, so they're going to be looking at

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 16>other other things like export controls, cutting off American access

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 16>to raw materials, things needed to make high tech gear.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 16>And they've also got big, big US tech companies there

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.239
<v Speaker 16>a big US automakers including Elon, Musk Tesla. So if

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 16>you're an American company in China right now, you know

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 16>you're potentially a target for the government's retaliation.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate this. Brendan again, thanks so again for being

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 3>with us this morning. That is Brendan Murray, Global Trade

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 3>editor for Bloomberg News.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Karen Nathan, We're just watching the markets this morning as

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>treasuries extend their decline. Stocks in Europe or lower, and

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>futures this morning are mixed s and P futures they're

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>up to tens of a percent of eleven points down.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Futures are a little change now. Future is up six

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 2>tens of percent, or one hundred and six points. The

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>decks in Germany is down two point two percent, so's

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the CAAC in Paris fort C one hundred down two

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>point one percent. Then EK two twenty five in Japan

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it was down about four percent. The ten year treasury

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 2>down twelve thirty seconds, seeal four point three four percent,

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 2>yield on the two year three point seven eight percent,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the thirty year yield four point seven nine percent. NIMEX

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>scrude oil is down three percent, down a dollars seventy

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>seven at fifty seven dollars eighty five cents of barrel

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>comecs Gold up two and a half percent. It's seventy

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>three dollars ten cents at thirty sixty three and ounce.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>The Blueberg Dollars Spot index it's lower. It's down half percent,

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 2>with the euro one point one zero three zero against

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>the dollar, the n one forty five point three eight

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 2>and Bitcoin up a quarter percent.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Okay, Karen, thank you for more on the market impact.

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 3>We are joined now by Sema Shah, chief Global Strategist

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>at Principal Asset Management. Seema, it's great to have you

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 3>with us this morning. Where do you see risk assets

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>in particular going now that these new tariffs are in

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>effect around the world.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 4>Good morning. Well, look, with the new tariffs, particularly the

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 4>escalation of China's tariffs, we are looking in a slightly

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think, a very concerning global economic picture

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 4>and also for the US from our perspective, unless there

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 4>is I guess a release of those tariffs, or you

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 4>have some kind of positive news with regards to tax

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 4>cuts or deregulation, it is quite likely that the US

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 4>would slide into recession. There is still I think a

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>lot to be seen over the last next couple of

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 4>months from the administration per Certainly that is the direction

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 4>that things would move without any kind of action to

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 4>reverse some of the things have been playing out over

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of weeks. So from that perspective, I

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>think it seems likely that you're going to have risk

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 4>of sentiment lingering for a little while longer. At least,

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>we need to see a rerating of valuations to a

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>point where investors are want to get interested, and to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 4>have that, you're need to see another downward revision of

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the earnings forecasts to slightly more realistic level, one which

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 4>is more reflective of a weaken economic picture.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that what we're seeing in the treasury market right now,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>with the sell off across the curve this morning, a

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 3>repricing four recession.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 4>I think the seller for in the treasure curve is

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 4>actually quite confusing. It's quite opaque. There's a number of

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>different possibilities that could be playing out over here. It

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 4>could be down to inflation concerns, it could be concerns

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 4>around tax revenue, with a weaker economic outlook then starting

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 4>to create additional fears around the budget deficit. And of

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 4>course there's the key risk out there which investors are

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 4>increasingly talking about, which is a loss and interest of

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 4>the US as a safe haven. As I said, it's

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 4>very unclear exactly which one of those is really the

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 4>key driver. Per certainly it does make the economic outlook

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>that much more concerning if you have interest rates which

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 4>are spiking at a time when they should ideal be falling.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 3>If the US is losing its status as a safe haven,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 3>where is a safe haven at this point?

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's been interesting today when you look across across

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 4>the global market, then you can see that there are

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 4>some traditional safe havens still playing out to the Japanese yen,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 4>German burns, So there are still places in the world,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and that gives us an indication where if investors were

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 4>really to start losing interests, and I have to I

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 4>think it is still quite premature and there's a lot

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 4>to be discussed and read into to understand exactly what

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 4>is going on. But the alternative to a US dollar

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 4>it's not entirely obvious at the moment. There is potential

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe over the next couple of years for the euro

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 4>to show growing prominence. If Europe can show closer integration,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 4>you see additional fiscal spending for shure to spend, but

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 4>that is still a big question mark, so I think

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the jury is still out. But of course the developments

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 4>in the last I think twenty four hours are an

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>additional concerent on top of what was already worrying markets

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 4>point and I want.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>To imagine there are some questions as well as what

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>as to what could tariffs could mean for the European

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 3>economy at a time when they've been looking to increase

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>defense spending. What's the outlook for Europe now?

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think after the Wednesday announcement Liberation Day announcement,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 4>we did lower our forecast for Europe even further. For

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Germany we now see recession as quite likely, so that

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 4>was a shift down from point three percent growth in

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five. And for Europe we've lowered our forecast

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 4>from er point eight percent this year down to point

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 4>three percent, so they're still skirting recession. But of course

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 4>these are really based on what are the sensitivities to

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 4>terrass So there's going to be any substitution, and of

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 4>course a question around retaliation still there, so there is

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 4>a risk that this is even deeper concern than we're

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 4>already seeing.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 4>The good news is is that the fifth or stimulus

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>from Germany, it will start to positively impact the economy,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>but not until twenty twenty six, and at that point

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>we would start to see a stronger picture. So right

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 4>now now twenty twenty five is looking particularly tough, but

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 4>brighter times ahead from twenty six when the fiscal stem

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 4>starts to bleed through to the real economy.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>To bring things back to the US, there had been

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 3>a question before these new tariffs kicked in about whether

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the Fed could step in at some point if we're

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 3>heading into a stagflationary environment, where is the Fed?

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 3>What kind of response could they pose here with these

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>new tariffs?

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Right well, so from a traditional standpoint, when you're just

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 4>thinking about interest rate cuts, we are expecting the Federal

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Reserve to be able to put more emphasis on the

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 4>employment side of their mandate. So even if you were

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 4>and we are expecting inflation to increase, our forecast is

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 4>for core PCE to hit around four percent by year end.

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 4>But even with that and assuming that inflation and expectations

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>remain fairly and could. We do think the Federal Reserve

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 4>will start to cut rates within the next meeting of

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the second in June, and cut maybe by three to

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 4>four times. The only scenario that we see hikes at

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 4>this point is if actually the economy were to return

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 4>to significant strength. So we do think even in stagflation,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the Fed emphasizes the employment side of their mandate. The

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 4>bigger question I think at the moment, which is really

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 4>being discussed in circles, is if you were to see

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 4>a continued sell off of US treasuries, is there a

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 4>role for the Federal Reserve to come in with some

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of emergency action. We're still far from that, but

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it is something that we need to keep

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 4>watching that. If there is a concern around the financial

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 4>plumbing of the system, is there something that we can

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 4>expect from the Fed?

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 6>On that count?

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Got about thirty seconds left, Seima. Are we in a

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>game of chicken between the market and the president? If so,

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>who blinks first?

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that's exactly what we're in. Trump has focused

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of bond deals, That's what he's been saying.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 4>So if he's watching this picture, He will be likely

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 4>quite concerned about what is folding in front of him,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 4>and if this continues, then potentially we could see a

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 4>step back from the administration with regards to the policy

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 4>that they've already introduced.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloombergy Daybrea, your morning podcast on the stories

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Look for us on your podcast feed by six am

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live each morning starting at five

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>am Wall Street Time on Bloomberg eleven three to zero

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 2>in New York, Bloomberg in ninety nine to one in Washington,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg ninety two nine in Boston, and nationwide on serious

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 2>XM Channel one twenty one.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Plus listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>now with Apple CarPlay and Android auto interfaces.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget to subscribe to Bloomberg News Now. It's

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 2>the latest news whenever you want it in five minutes

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>or less. Search Bloomberg News Now and your favorite podcast

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 2>platform to stay informed all day long. I'm Karen Moscow and.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Nathan Hager. Join us again tomorrow morning for all

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the news you need to start your day right here

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Day Ray