WEBVTT - A Tussle Or Two

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot Com. Here's

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome to America's longest

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>running fantasy football show. It's called Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Charchy and from fanball dot Com my

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>co host today Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Hey boys,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello friends, Mellow greetings, Paul and mellow greetings. Well, isn't

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that nice? Is it? Are you drinking mellow yellow? Is that? No?

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a is a yellow container, but it is

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not mellow. It is not mellow at all. Red Bull

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yellow Edition free advertising. Kidding. Yeah, we've got a lot,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>especially when we've got so much to get to over

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that true, what are we doing? We will break down

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>every single matchup fantasy style with letter grades on every

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>player who matters. We will give you our rationale for

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>all of those grades, so you get to decide if

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you agree with our our decisions or not. We'll we'll

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>answer three tough questions. We'll give you nine players upon

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>whom you can take a chance, and we will jump

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>into our time machine and give you the player that

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna be looking for next week on the waiver wire.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But you'll already have them because it's this week and

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you heard the segment we like to call premature speculation.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I expect that peacock for my Jacob Hollister prespect a

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. It's gonna go down the prepe

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Hall of fames. Even had Arizona yet week, I know,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't that isn't that isn't a little carried away on

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the button bar is playing in Arizona. Happy trombone that

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you can be happy about a lot of things, not

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just Mitch Trabiski and his three touchdown game. We'll pull

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>up a happy trombone ski later in the show. All Right,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to that. We've got plenty of matchups

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to get to all of them, and beginning with buff Well,

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not two is not Thursday Nights Buffalo at Miami, Brian,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, for Buffalo, this has been a the end

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of a series of polled, strongly positive matchups. So this

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is the last one, and in honesty, the Bills have

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not maximized this opportunity against most of these bad opponents.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think happens in this game in Miami?

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I think they probably win. Let's analyze this from a

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective. Okay, just kidding, Devin Singletary start with him.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I gonna give him a B. Over the last two weeks,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Singletary is total thirty four touches to Frank or Is seventeen.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins are conceving thirty two touches per game to

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs. So if this trend continues, Singletary should touch

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball around let's say twenty three times. My estimation

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be plenty, which means Franco would handle the

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>ball around nine times nine times. Thanks for the manual.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Good job. By the way, these teams are played already

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this season. This is the second meeting of the year.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Singletary and Gore combined for eighteen carries, eighty one yards

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and zero rushing touchdowns. In the first meeting, Francore at

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the only reception but single Arry is the bell count

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>now would appear, so he gets the B. So does

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>John Brown. In the passing game, at least four catches

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yards and seven straight games. So Smokey has

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a safe floor. We're not used to seeing. He's usually

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>been very boomer Bucks. Is he smokey or is he

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>smoke It was smoky Brown Brown, I believe. So that's

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Smokey the bear. I think he Isn't he just thought

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it was smokey. Well, we'll have to fact check that

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's different. Yeah, well yeah, we'll get back to you

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on now. I'm calling him very important. But this is

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a high ceiling scenario for smoke or smoke, whichever one

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. We'll figure about. Brown had five for eighty

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>three and a touchdown in the first meeting, and that

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was when Xavian Howard was healthy, their best cornerback. He's

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on I R now, So I'm like in the ceiling

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for Brown here, I didn't actually give him an a

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>screw it from John Brown. See for gold Beasley. Beasley

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>also scored in the first meet, but only at three

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>catches for sixteen yards, but Miami allowed at least eighty

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown slot receivers ju Juice with Schuster

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and James and Crowder in the recent games since the

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>first meeting. So Beasley is worth the dark throw and PPR.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo tight ends are not though they're all on the

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>bench for me, and Josh Allen is not on the bench.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him an a uh, just a modest

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>two O two and two touchdowns passing four thirty two.

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>That's good passing for thirty two rushing. We're used to

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing the Yeah I want, I want the eleven scrambles

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for nine six yards from Josh Allen and we're back

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>getting it all year. Yeah, we'll hope we will see

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it in this game because last year he had ninety

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>five yards rushing and two touchdowns, then a hundred thirty

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>five yards rushing in the other game, so that's ceiling

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>still exists. Miami has actually opposed limiting, uh limited opposing

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback production over the last three but they faced Mason

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph Sam Donald and Brian Hoyer during that stretch. So,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Allen, here over to the Miami side before

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we have breaking news. Before you get over to the

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami side. It's Smokey. I did it. I don't know

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what made me think it was smoke, But by the way,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some people do call him smoke And it turns out

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a restaurant in Kampas City called the John Brown

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>smoke House, all right, and according to yelp, it's delicious. No,

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they're they have anything to do

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>with each other. Wait, no, no, no, it's in Long Island. Sorry,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's in Long Island, I guess. But if they call

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>themselves Kansas City style of barbecue, anybody, if any listener can,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>has ever been to the John Brown Smokehouse? Let us know,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people in Casey like us, which Miami cornerback is going

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>to the John Brown Smokehouse this week? Hey? Uh? Not

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Xavian Howard or basically Finn past pick Finn Patrick. All Right,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to get to how bad Caitlin Blage sucks. Okay,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna give him a cee in this matchup.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>O god, wow. Fifty five carries on the season for Blage,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a hundred and thirteen yards on those

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>five carries. Unbelievably bad. He called his forty five combo

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>yards on twenty two touches against the Colts last week

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a quote okay, quote unquote okay day for career, But

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. In the first meeting Miami Backs total

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety four yards in a touchdown on twenty three carries.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But when I say Miami Backs, I really mean Mark

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Walton and Kenyan Drake. Blage had three carries for seven yards.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>He is the one who scored the touchdown. The Bills

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>have allowed four running back rushing touchdowns over the last

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>four games. Nick Chubb and Adrian Peters and both topped

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the hundred yards against Buffalo in the last two weeks,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and neither had more than twenty Gary's to do so.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give Ballage the sea based on volume. But

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.239
<v Speaker 1>again he blows. Uh. Davantae Parker, he's on the bench,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>had five for fifty five and one in the first meeting. Uh,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what that was? What I'm sorry? Yes, he had

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>five fifty five and one in the first meeting, and

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>in his first game without Preston Williams last week he

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>saw ten targets. But Preston Williams was shadowed by Tredevius

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>White in the first meeting. Vante park was gonna shadowed

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 1>by So he's on the bench, Alan hearns. I'm gonna

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>make up my mind on the fly here played the

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week. He won't be shadowed by Tredevius White

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>White lockdown Beckham last week and that's when Jarvis Landry

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>went off and Richard Higgins even scored. So Alan earns

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Man that's a throu throw on fanball dot com. That's

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>basically not a take Colm receiver but a dart throwing

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Fanball Mike Kasecki can give him a c not one

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of posing tight end as top fifty yards against Buffalo

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and then includes Cosecki wcause he had four for forty

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one in the first meeting and sadly that's decent tight

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>end production these days to get about eight PPR points.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's a round tight end fifteen this week, and

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting your boys to bear on the bench chart.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>He did have eight two and one passing and thirteen

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and a rushing touchdown in the first meeting,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not banking on that rushing touchdown. The Bills

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have allowed one er zero touchdown passes until Baker through

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for two last week. But uh, I know Patrick as

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>good as Baker, and who knows they're both not very good,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so you'll be nice. O Denver takes on the Minnesota

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Vikings in Minnesota. For Denver, it's Uh, it's a game

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>where Brandon Allen, former a f quarterback, gets his second

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL start ever and it's on the it's to get

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>against Mike Zimmer, So I you know this. It puts

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a damper on everything here. This feels like a sizeable mismatch.

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I could see him finding his way to like a

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown maybe in garbage time, maybe gets a second in

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>garbage time, something like that. But other than that, I

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think you want to start Brandon Allen and that

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>brings down quite a bit the other players in the

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Courtland Sutton remains a B level grade though,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>because Vikings cornerback Xavier Xavier Rhodes Xavier Rhodes as he

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>likes to be called now, who's it's just been a

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>bad year. He's catch The catch rate on him is

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty six percent. That's crazy. His path to passer rating

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>against him a hundred one. Courtland Sutton is uh, just

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>super safe as well, averaging seventy four yards over his

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>last six games, four touchdowns over those six games. Most

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of those are Joe Flacco, and again, I don't trust

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Allen to get a lot done here, but that

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>might be enough to get Courtland Sutton up to a

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>B grade, but he's the only receiver you want to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>start in this game. Noah fan gets a wobbly see

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>mostly just because of the bye week and injuries to

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Kittle and Hooper. Uh So, normally I'd give him a bench,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna give him a CEE for Noah fanse.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>He has seen seventeen targets the last three games, a

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>notable uptick for the rookie tight end in usage. Vikings

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed the third most tight end receptions, although none have

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>scored Philip Lindsay by you guys know, I love love

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay. The Vikings do not have their primary run

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff for Lindval Joseph for this game, but even so

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough matchup. Viking shutdown Ezekiel Elliott without Lindvald

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Joseph last week, Vikings right nine and rushing yards allowed.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>They've given up one rushing touchdown since week two. I've

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>got to see grade on Philip Lindsay. Royce Freeman is

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. He has top forty yards once in

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>his last five games. He's been held to under three

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>point five yards per carry for a month straight. He

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't catch passes either. He's dead to us for that matter,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when is Denver and Vic Fangio, who I love, gonna

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just let Philip Lindsay, be a workhorse and see what happens.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what happens if you give him the ball

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five times, He's not gonna snap in half. Yeah,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>he broke his wrist at the in Week sixteen last year.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean he's fragile. I put the unnecessary hits

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on him, though in the lost season at time you

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>could say that, I suppose let's go to the Viking side.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The storyline here is really that Vic Fangio has migrated

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>his Chicago defense westward. They are awesome. In fact, statistically

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>since Week four, the Broncos are the better defense than

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. Let's talk about it. Dalvin Cook, I've got

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I've just got to be great. On Dalvin Cook, only

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>two backs have averaged four yards per carry against Denver.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos have given up just one rushing score running

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>backs in their last six games, only one receiving score

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>two backs all year long. Cook his averaging five catches

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and six eight yards through the air in his last

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>three games, and the screen pass has become devastating, and

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that part about the the the game for

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook has now become a very valuable receiver. But

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Fanjo's defense is good enough to keep him

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>at a B level for this game. Kirk Cousins gets

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, and it's a wobbly see it at

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at that The past five teams to face the Broncos

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of average just two hundred seventeen passing yards and zero

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>point four touchdowns. That's it. Yeah, Kirk's got to do

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot better than that if you're gonna even

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>consider starting him here. He's further challenged by the absence

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of Adam Feeling in this game. Stefan Diggs will draw

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>shadow shadow coverage from elite cornerback Chris Harris, who's giving

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>up just thirty nine yards per game in his coverage.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I've got Diggs with a bench grade.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Last two games without Adam Feeling, Diggs just four catches

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>for fifty four yards. That is it. I mentioned Chris

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Harris giving up just thirty nine yards per game in

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>his coverage, so it's a It's a brutal matchup for

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Diggs as well. Cal Rudolph is on fire with four

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the last four weeks, but the Broncos are

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>tough against tight ends. Denver's only surrendered one score to

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the position. They held Travis Kelsey and Darren Waller to

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>under five receptions each, so I've got a bench grade

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on him as well. Uh So, overall, it feels like

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a defensive tussle. I don't particularly like any of the

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>players involved. Tussle tussle. Uh. Let's go to the say

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to found themselves in a bit of a tussle last week.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh nobody thought that the Falcons would shut out Drew

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Brees and they take on Tampa Bay. It's not no

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>chance that Drew Brees goes zero and zero against the

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Falcons and the Tampa Bay buccaneer. Yeah. I don't think

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so either, but it is worth noting in his last

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>five trips to Tampa Breeze has only had one game

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with multiple scores and only one game of over three

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards in his last five visits to Tampa Bay.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But I'm giving him an a grade. We all know

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa defense is non existent, allowing multiple scores to

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the past seven quarterbacks they've faced, including four touchdowns the

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater in Week five. Mike Thomas easy a had

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven two and two in the first meeting. Ted ginn

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>even gets a C grade in this one scored in

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting. I tried that last week and he

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>gave me zero zero. Yeah, I think we're all skunked

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>last week in that Atlanta game. Uh, Tampa stops No. One.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Five different wide receivers have topped seventy yards in the

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, and they're so bad that they just

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>cut former first rounder Vernon Hargraves the third. Yeah, he's gone.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook is getting a B grade. Eight different tight

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>ends have either top to fifty yards or scored against

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks this year. That's one per game on the scores. Uh.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Cook was targeted ten times last week against Atlanta. That

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was the first game that Cook played with Drew Brees

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>since Week two. So that's that's a pretty good target

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>share right there. Uh. Like Michael Thomas, I like him

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot this week. Uh. And then Alvin Kamara and

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Latavius Murray. I'm giving Kamara a B and Lotavius a

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid bench grade. Um behind most of the week.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Last week to Atlanta Kamara ran forty five pass routes

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and was on the field for the Snaps had ten

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>targets in that game. Murray is basically only in play

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if this game gets out of hand in the Saints favor,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you believe they're about to dominate, I guess

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you could fire him up. But even if he gets

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the game, the Bucks have allowed the fewest rushing

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in the league this season. They're really

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>good UM, and New Orleans is three and two in

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>their last five trips to Tampa. They've only one by

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>more than a touchdown once in that span, so this

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>game is not going to be a blowout. And if

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if history serves right, on the other side, Ronald Jones

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Peyton Barber, they're both on the bench. They're back

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to splitting the rushing touches almost evenly. In fact, that

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>each had eleven rushing touches last week, but Jones did

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>add eight catches for seventy seven yards through the air. UM,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you're gonna start one of them, it's probably

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones. But the last back to score against the

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Saints was Peyton Barber back in Week five. It's been

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a while weeks. UM, so they're both on the bench.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston, I'm giving him a B grade. Winston his

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>top to three hundred yards and six of his last

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>seven starts. He's been great for fantasy really, as the

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one outlier here was the game against the Saints, who

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>held him to two hundred four yards and two scores.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Although Marshawn Lattimore is expected to miss this game hamstring

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in that really helps Winston's chances. And as Lattimore is

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down Mike Evans in the past few weeks, that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>really helps Mike Evans. Because speaking of Evans, remember when

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he had zero catches in the Week five meeting going

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>up against Latimore. Well, Latimore shadowed him the entire game.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Since he's gone, it's open season for Evans. He gets

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the A grade since he topped eight yards or scored

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in six of his last seven games. Oh, that seventh

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>one was against Lattimore. UM, Godwin is getting a B grade.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he'll be facing slot corner P J. Williams,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>who's allowed eight point five yards per attempt this year.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Godwin hasn't scored in four straight weeks, but he has

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>average ten targets per game during that span, and he's

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>also managed a hundred and twenty five yards and two scores.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>In the first meeting. There's some talk that they'll move P. J.

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams outside to take on Evans and that Gardner, Yeah,

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Johncey Gardner bill up the fourth would end up who

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>has been absolutely a disaster to in coverage this year

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in a short spurt. So it's it's all looking good

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for Godwin. O. J. Howard is getting a C grade

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Braids on the bench. Braid has seen fewer than

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen snaps and two consecutive games, and Howard was on

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the field for of the snaps last week, and he

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>scored against the terrible Cards tight end defense. The Saints

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't yielding a lot to the position, but with Howard

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on the field the snaps and a lot of people

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>having issues at tight end, he's probably good enough to

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>start in some scenarios. It wasn't Chauncey Gardner, the the

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>name of the Peter Seller's character in some seventies movie

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>where everybody thought that he was like a chart was

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>born in the eighties, brilliant artists out that he was

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really just super stupid. I think I swear Chauncey Gardner

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 1>was that guy. I just think that's Johncey Gardner Billips.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I like that part of it. We'll go, We'll go

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>with that. Yeah, it's something like that. It wasn't okay,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Brianne is younger than all of us, and Brianne is confirmed.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Chauncey Gardners that was the name of some of this.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure behind the glass Brianne just dabbed there too. Yeah,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>hard dab because we don't soft dab on the show,

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing but the firmest of dabs. She's got dabn fever.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what that means, but I like

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>sound everything. Charge available at famba dot com. By going

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to fambale dot com slash charge that is me, you

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>get instant access to my free weekly rankings, my free

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one thousand dollar weekly contest, which this week is a

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>super flex contest. Get Jamis Winston in your lineups. I'll

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you that much. You get instant access. Oh, I

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned my free rankings are podcast. It's all kinds of

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Famball account slash charge coming up next, It's

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a segment we call take a Chance on Me Nine

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>players who you would not or normally you would not

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>normally start. Many of whom are available on the waiver

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>wire will tell you who they are when we come

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Take a chance on It's

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it's three. Duface is here to try to help you

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>find duface is. I am do FI number one Paul

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Charchy and you can find me a Twitter at Paul

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Charchy and I'm with Matt Harrison and that is at

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>explosive output and Brian Johnson at b T x J.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in your lineup, so many of

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>whom are available on the waiver wire. Take a chance

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on me. We begin at the quarterback position. Brian, who

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you got? I'm getting grimy today and we're starting with

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>since he's Ryan Finley at the Raiders. Uh, Finley likely

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not really good, but he's okay. He had one and

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns against Baltimore last week. I'm giving my

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>hat touchdown. I'm the twenty two rushing yards he had.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>That's about two points, so U this is a much

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>better matchup for Finley though Oakland is top eight an

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>opponent passing play percentage at home, and since he has

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the highest passing play percentage on the road, passing the

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>ball seventy three percent of the time on the road.

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Oakland secondary has been in shambles all season. Now, Starting

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>corner Trayvon Mullen very questionable. Starting free safety LaMarcus Joyner

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is doubtful to play. And this game has the high

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>third highest over under of the weekend, and there's gonna

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>be precious garbage time. And I'm not done pimping the

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Bengals yet, all right, So that's just just the beginning

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of your Bengal pimping. The madness is just popping the

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Bengal pim That's what I think. Let's let's sounded like

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, I hear what I want to hear. I

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>guess uh, let's go to your quarterback. What is it

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>with you? I don't I would not recommend trying to

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pop a Bengals pimple, either a player or the animal. No,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>both correct. Certainly not Myles Garrett. I've got a guy

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>who's probably on most rosters, but he's probably sitting on

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench in most leagues, and that's Kyler Murray. Uh.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You might see Murray going up against that big red

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>number one defense this week and be poised to put

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>him on your bench, but not so fast. Murray has

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdown passes and three of his last five games

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>offers a nice rushing floor of about thirty five yards

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>per game, which is what he's averaging over the last

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. That's similar to about a touchdown pass in

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>most league formats. Plus, he played that these Niners two

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. He's stuck with them. They only lost by three.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The key came up with two forty one yards and

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>two scores with thirty four yards on the ground. The

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Niners have been good against the quarterbacks they faced, which

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>includes such stalwarts as Andy Dalton, Mason, Rudolph Baker, may Field,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared goff case Keenum, and Kyle Allen. Yeah, I'm including

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Jared goff in there. These are bad quarterbacks. Is Kyler

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Murray not in that group? No, Because he's Kyler Murray,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he's good. Um. The Niners have lost two key defensive

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>pieces in the last two weeks to injury. His pass

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>rusher Ronald Blair and linebacker Kwan Alexander both hit I

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>R So like Kyler Murray sneaky spot here? That would

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be sneaky. You know who's a good quarterback? Nope, Kyle

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Allen is a good quarterback. He is. He is. He's

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>coming off his best game as a problem watching that game,

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going you know what this kid can play. I just

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>had him in the list of bad quarterback. He's he's

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback. He the kid, he really ken. He's

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>got it whatever it is that a quarterback has to have,

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that intangible thing. Kyle Allen's got some of it. I

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. He's a little talent moxy he's got. He's

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>got boxy chutzpaw. Do you know what he's got. Kyle

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Allen's got chutzpaw. He's also facing the Falcons, which helps

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You don't have to be that good now.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I know they just shout out Drew Braids, but let's

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>take a longer view of the Falcons. Prior to that,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>six straight games with multiple touchdowns are gonna give up

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns. Here included in that group of multiple touchdown

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>games alleged great quarterback Kyler Murray, Jared Goff, Jacoby Brissette,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and Marcus Mariota. Since benched, Kyle Allen might take a chance,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean quarterback. Let's go to the running back position.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian back to the Bengals in Geo Bernard at the

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>same Raiders h Geo was working his way into essentially

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at a time share when it comes to snaps with

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon, but he left lat last week's game against

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore with an injury not listed on the injury report

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, so Geo will be back in action against

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, who over their last six games, have conceded

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>six receptions per game to opposing running backs, who have

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>also totaled five receiving touchdowns during that same span. So

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Geo Bernard another Bengal who's gonna mop up in garbage time?

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, I got Raheem must Ert. Matt Brito looks

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>like he's missing this game with an ankle injury. Brita

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>did lead the San Francisco running backs and touches last

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>week uh most are Ted had seven during that game. Actually,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>he should fill into breed a spot, as the Niners

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>have done before an injury occurs in their backfield. They

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of slide the next guy in and he

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>takes over the touches. Well. Since Tevin Coleman returned, Brita's

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>averaging thirteen and a half touches per game. So I

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>put mostart on something close to maybe fifteen touches in

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this game. Could be um Now he's also you know, he,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he may be shaping up as a game time decision,

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you could pivot to Jeff Wilson because it

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is next It is next man up. Zonas allowed five

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the position in the last four games. Have

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you given up twenty seven receptions to the position in

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the last three I can't believe you just most are

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>debated on air. I can't believe you squeezed all the

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pus out of the Bengals, or so we think. Yeah,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I can't remember the last time I had

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a chance on me running back inside my

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>top ten at the position, but I do. This week,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Brian Hill starting running back Atlanta Falcons, going up against Carolina,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>probably the worst running back defense in the league. Now

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to know Devon Freeman's out, you know Smith's

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and I are. Brian Hill got twenty carries in relief

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>last week twenty. They have no problem giving him the

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot, and Carolina over the past four games

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has given up twelve running back touchdowns. That's a full

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>season for many teams. In the NFL, Panthers have done that.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>In the last month. The last six runners to face

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolina have averaged at least four point seven yards per

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>carry on the ground. Accepting Peyton Barber, you think they'd

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>been good like having to go up against Christian McCaffrey

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and practice every day. It doesn't work that way. Doesn't know,

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Brian Hill might take a chance of me running back,

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. Let's go to the receiver position. Who you got?

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Is this the first time in the history of the

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>show that we're going full on stack. I think it's

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna take ans on me because the first time somebody

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>has been so lazy that they did not hold all

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>three guys out of the same team. Listen, you daily players,

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>go over to fan ball dot com. I got your

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>basement value garbage time stack here, and it's finishing off

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>with Audentate of the Bengals. Of course, at the Raiders,

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>no way A J. Green's playing this week, so Tate

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>remains in the starting lineup. And since week three, when

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Tate became a starter, he's thirteenth among all wide receivers

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and targets and top twenty five yards. And the Raiders

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>secondary is absolute trash. Outside the two injuries I mentioned earlier,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you know they've lost players to i R. They traded

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>their best quarterback, Garon Connelly, so Audent Tate completes the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Bengal stack for me. Heaven helped me Matt take a

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>chance of receiver. I've got Randall Cobb. Cob has been

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>targeted eight times and caught six balls in each of

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. Last week, he led the Cowboys

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with a hundred and six yards in a score. This week,

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he faces a terrible Detroit defense that has been roasted

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>by slot receivers as of recent uh. They gave of

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up touchdowns and each of the last two weeks to

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriel and Hunter Renfrow. And they gave up eight

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>catches for eighty five yards to Golden Tate the week

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>before and two touchdowns to the combo of Adam Theelan

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and B. C. Johnson the week before that. Randall Cobb,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got Curtis Samuel. Normally I don't go with somebody

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>who's so well rosters, but Curtis Samuel's got the Falcons

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>already told you all. Like Kyle Allen, he actually leads

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers in red zone targets from Kyle Allen. He's

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>had eight of them so far. He turned eight turned

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>half of those into touchdowns. He faces a Falcon secondary

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that over the last three games has allowed one hundred

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards per game to receivers and has allowed one

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard receiving performances in back to back games. Curtis

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Samuel absolutely startable for fantasy owners. Let's say we can

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sneak in one more matchup, Brian. We've we've already mined

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>in many ways this this Atlantic Carolina matchup with some

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the players I've already talked about here because all

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>three of mine came out of the same game. Uh,

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>two on the two on the Carolina side, one on

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Land side. I've already told people about Brian Hill.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell people about the Falcons passing attack against Carolina where

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot trickier. Well yeah, well it's very tricky

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Ryan doesn't play with this ankle injury. But

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna assume he's playing. We'll go forward with he'll play.

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give Ryan a b has top three

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and or throwing multiple touchdowns and seven straight games

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Panthers. The Panthers haven't allowed more than two

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns to a single quarterback all year, and they

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>just blanked Aaron Rodgers without their best corner James Bradberry

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>last week. So I'm a little worried about Ryan re

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>interested the ankle. It's a bad matchup. No, Austin Hooper, Well, yeah,

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>so Matt Ryan, I'll give him a very very soft

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be here. Uh, Julio Jones, I'll give him an a

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost leaning be here. Julio has had some monster

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>games against the Panthers in the past, but he hasn't

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>topped the hundred yards against them since November, only total

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>nine catches for nine two yards, and the two games

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>against them last year, he did score a touchdown in

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the later game. James brad But what about this part?

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>If Hooper's out and Hooper has been siphoning off all

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns and here Julio hasn't scored and I don't

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>know forever, but it's certainly Yeah. The absence of Hooper

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and DeVante Freeman too, by the way, opens up thirty

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>percent of Atlanta's target share, so certainly bodes well for

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Julio Ridley too, and yeah, definitely Ridley um Dante Jackson

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>questionable with the hip injury. Bradbury might come back. He's

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the better corner, but if Jackson doesn't play, that bodes

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>well for both. So I'm giving Julio the A and

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Ridley a b. Uh. He scored in both

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 1>meetings with Carolina last season. The Panthers are allowing more

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>than two yards per game to wide receivers over the

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks. Mentioned Austin Hooper is out for about

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a month, which really sucks. I'm not going by way

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of Luke Stocker though, but he's the guy up but

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>deep tight end leagues, I guess go grab Stocker. Really

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he did. Let's not let and Brian Hill. Your take

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me running back chart On the Carolina side,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll take a chance on Christian McCaffrey and

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this one. Uh. Surprisingly only one touchdown in four games

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>against Atlanta and became in their first meeting. But last

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>year he had combo yard totals of one seventy eight

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and one thirty nine and those came on twelve and

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>four team catch performances. Che So yeah, you're playing McCaffrey.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You're definitely playing DJ more too. He and Kyle Allen

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are really starting to click. Double digit targets and back

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to back games, and Atlanta has allowed a one hundred

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>yard receiver and back to back games. So big day

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for my boy d J. Moore, and this one could

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be a big day for Curtis Samuel as well. Charges

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me wide receiver. Maybe even a

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>big day for Greg Olsen. Shockingly, just one touchdown in

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>his last seven games against Atlanta, but that's kind of

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ancient history because he didn't play last year, so I'm

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not too concerned about that. And tight end is such

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a waste land that Olsen is certainly viable coming off

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a big game in Green Bay last week. Atlanta has

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>given up four tight end touchdowns over the last five games,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and an opposing loan tight end has seen ten targets

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and two of the Falcons last three, so tight ends

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are involved. And then Kyle Allen, who is take a chance,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean quarterbacks, arches, take chance on the quarterback Bengals.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You game stacked, okay, Cam, No, you know, at least

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I took two of my three guys, were only two

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of my three were so the same, They're all from

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the same game. I would go fanball and uh superplex

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen and Ryan Finley and then throw in all

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Why can't I play daily fantasy auctions? You

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>can do that. You both you love auction in the preseason.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't you love auctioning for this weekend's games? The

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>family auctions fast paced, frantic, incredibly fun as you've been

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on four players simultaneously against your opponents, and you might

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>even win a little bit of money while you're having

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>all that fun Fanball auctions. Coming up next on Fantasy

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, we will break down more matchups, including Jacksonville

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>at Indianapolis. The return of Nick Foles will tell you

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what to expect when we return to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Fulcome back Fantasy Football Weekly on Well church In my

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>co host of Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison for Fambile

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. You can hear us over the are in

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>many stations around the country, and this show is also

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a podcast available every Friday on every major podcasting platform,

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>including the number one destination for podcasts, Hi Heart Radio.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville takes on Indianapolis, Nick Foles back under center. It's

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been every quarter since quarter one of the priests of

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, since we've seen Nick Foles. Over the

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>past five weeks, the Colt rank number one in passing

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns allowed and number six and passing yards allowed. Nick

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Foles comes in rusty having missed ten weeks. So we'll

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>roll all that together and we're gonna bench Nick Foles,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And that means that I'm not about any of his receivers.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The only one I'll bother to talk about here is

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>DJ Chark, who gets a cautious C grade. He's looked

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lost in the last four games, scoring just once and

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>topping fifty three yards just one time. Remember how good

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>things were rolling for d J. Chark for a long

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>That was with Minshew though, and and Foals was always

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about in the preseason. I remember the preseason shows

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>how we were saying Folds really likes to target the

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>slot in d. D. Westbrook is set for a huge year.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in d. D. Westbrook is a long

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>term pick up. The rest of their schedules great. By

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, after this week, the cold secondary has been great,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>yielding just one score to opposing receivers in their last

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>four games, tied for the fewest over that last month,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and they've been doing so impressively without the probably their

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>best corner, Pierre to see Her, who will likely miss

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this game as well. Apparently they don't need him. Um.

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Remember by the way in that quarter of play that

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>falls had touchdown too dj hr uh. The only other,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the only the Jaguar you likely care about is Leo

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>four Nette, and he gets a B grade. India is

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not allowed one hundred yard rusher all season, and they're

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>allowing the seventh fewest rushing yards per game over the

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks. For Net has only played two games

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts in his career and was held under

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>three yards per carrying both outings, but did manage to

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>score in both, which is sort of the flip of

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this year where's getting a lot of yards but not

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of touchdowns. I think one way another he

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>cobbles his way to a B worthy grade. Let's flip

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>over to the cold side where we get Jacobe Percet back,

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Um, But like Brian Hoyer last Sunday,

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be without t Y Hilton and Paris Campbell's

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two best wide receivers. Did you guys happen to have

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunate, um, unfortunate I guess happenstance to run into

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the picture of Paris Campbell's hand. Oh god, it's gruesome.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I really really encourage you to not look at the

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>picture of of of Paris Campbell's hand. I'm looking right now.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He told me not to do something. I'm gonna do it.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh it is not it's not pretty. The Jaguars are

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>allowing barely one touchdown per game to wide receivers, and

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>much of those, or what passing touchdowns overall, much of

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those are going to tight ends. That's your glimmer of

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>hope with present really is his tight ends. Ebron and Doyle, Uh,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they give up a they face the Jaguars defense. That's

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of five tight end scores in the last

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>five games. So I've got C grades on both Ebron

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and Doyle. Most weeks Ebron only gets a couple of targets,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but maybe turns that into a touchdown. Last week, that's flipped.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>That script flipped, but that was a Hoyer game, and

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>God only knows. I still think together they represent the

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>best chance for a touchdown. But you're at a kind

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of a coin flip between the two of them, for

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which one may do better. They we do care a

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Zach Pascal, although I think you got

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>picked up in a bunch of leagues a couple of

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. They got dropped in all those leagues last week.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars have only allowed two wide receivers scores since the opener.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, only two wide receivers have scored against

0:34:55.200 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars since the opener, like four weeks ago. Ahead. Uh,

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that was like Patrick Mahomes they faced in the opener,

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, right, that's a pretty good excuse. Marlon

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Mack has received at least eighteen carries in five straight games,

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and that volume will come in handy against Jacksonville. They

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>have allowed at least ninety yards all three times at

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 1>back has received at least eighteen carries. So if he's

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be if he's got at least eighteen carries in

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>five straight you hope he gets to the ninety yards.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Mac has never scored. He has never top fifty yards

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in four career games against the Jaguars, though, But let

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>me mention this backup Jordan Wilkins may not play with

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>an ankle injury that could force even more use to

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack And if he's out and you really want

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to do you really need a dart throw in a

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bye week now, you Hines, I think becomes quasi serviceable

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if Jordan Wilkins is in fact out for this game.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next matchup, which is Dallas taking

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on Detroit. Matt Dallas Cowboys were unable to get Ezekiel

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Elliott going last week against the Vikings. I don't think

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have any trouble this week against Detroit. I mean,

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>is Zeke like, do you feel like Zeke's having a

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>good year? It seems bad, But that was the first

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>game of the year last Sunday. Of the nine games

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he's played in which he did not top a hundred

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards or score in the game, he just hasn't.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just been like quietly consistent. It's y in a

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown or a hundred and ten yards and no score.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It just it hasn't all come together for Zeke. Um.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You said Carolina's run defense was the worst in the league.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I see you a Carolina and raise you at Detroit,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>um they have allowed a hundred and twenty rushing yards

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>per game to the position over the last five weeks. Plus,

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs are averaging a rushing touchdown per game easy

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for Zeke uh decks and easy a as well, Deck's

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off and three against the Vikings. Plus the Lions

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have given up fifteen touchdown passes in their last five games,

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>including and are you ready for this charge? Get your

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>get your mouth's ready three last week too happy Trombone Ski.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he's back, He's back. Amari Cooper, he gets an

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>easy a. Michael Gallup as a B and Randall Cobb

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me wide receiver. The

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys wide receiver group is leading the NFL in yards

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>per game at two or twenty three per game. Uh

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooper mrs practice or two every week with a nagging injury,

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but he plays every time. Gallup has sixteen targets over

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>his last two has reached paydirt in each contest. Darius

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Slay is still injured and he's been burned for eight

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>point nine yards per target this season. You know, I

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>think we have a sleigh ride button on there too.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>The sleigh ride is very jolly right now. It's just

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>like that. Um. The Lions are bottom half in the

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>league in receptions, yards, and touchdowns allowed to the wide

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver position. Jason Witten even gets a C in this grade.

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really trust Whitton overall, as he hasn't scored

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>since Week two. He could get off the schneide here, though,

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>as the Lions have allowed a tight end touchdown in

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>four straight games. I'm still worried that Blake Jarwin vultures

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that sucker in this one. Though. On the other side,

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Jeff Driskell a Sea grade. I probably should

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have used him as might take a chance on the

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as a bonus one. Um Stafford has been ruled

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>out again with a back injury. It's possible he may

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>miss the rest of the season. Um Stafford's a sneaky

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop. By the way, After this week, the Lions

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>get Washington, who's surprisingly good against the past Chicago Minnesota.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>They get Tampa in week fifteen, and then Denver in

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Week sixteen, so there's only one good matchup the rest

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>of the way for Detroit. Well that Tampa matchup. UH

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>driskll through forty six times last week in Chicago. That's

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>more attempts than Stafford had all season. He did run

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for a team high thirty seven yards last week too.

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>He's their best runner. Um, considering the disaster, there's a

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lion's backfield right now. He might do that again. He

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>has four five combine speed, so that's not terrible out

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>of Jeff Driskell. Alright, but maybe he'll run his way

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to fantasy roll. He might. Uh. Ty Johnson looks like

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna miss this week with a concussion, meaning Paul

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Perkins and j. D. Mckissic will split reps. Kissing at

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen touches last week, including six receptions, only managed forty

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>five yards. Uh. He's been burning me on take a

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>chance on me, So you've got to be done with

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with mckissic and Perkins. They're both on your bench.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Golladay gets a C grade, Danny m and Dola and

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones are on the bench. Uh. Driskoll's targets were

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty even last week, nine at Golladay, eight at Am

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and Dola six at Jones. But the Cowboys have been

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>legit against wide receivers this year though. Their top seven

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in receptions, yards and touchdowns allowed to the position, and

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they've held every receiver they faced in the last three

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>games under fifty yards. That includes al Shan, Golden Tate,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and Steph digs Uh. T J. Hockinson, though he's might

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>B grade in this game. Hockinson is my favorite cheap

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end plan fan ball this week and only four

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. The Vikings tight ends combined for nine catches,

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>forty eight yards and two scores and a two point

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>conversion last week. Dallas has allowed the third most receptions,

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth most yards, and fourth most touchdowns to the tight

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>end position this season. I like t J. Hockenson in

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this one. He's kind of gone off on those easy

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup games so far this season. All Right, Houston takes

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>on Baltimore. Brian Um, there's a tough matchup for you know,

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you're used to starting a lot of Houston players,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you just automatically put them in your lineup. It's a

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup against a Baltimore defense that seems to be

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>improving almost on a weekly basis. What do you think

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about some of the star players, including Watson and Hopkins

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this week? Why couldn't the NFL figure out how to

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>get this game on Sunday Night? Football. By the way,

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chicago is the third biggest city and the

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Rams of the second biggest city. Let's see how many

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of them actually watch the game. Anyway, over to this game,

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>as you said, tough guys to sit on the Houston side,

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>starting with the Andre Hopkins gonna give him an a

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>even though now that Jimmy Smith is back in the

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fold for Baltimore, that secondary is very scary. Over their

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>last five games, only one wide out has topped ninety

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and it was my boy, Audent Tate who did it.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Got Hopkins as certainly has a chance to top ninety

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>yards in any matchup. You're not benching him, no way.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I am benching Will Fuller if he makes his return

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>from a hamstring injury. It's looking sort of likely and

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see a full game from Fuller before you

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>trust putting him in a lot and you're lining up

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is a very bad matchup and I'm not.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not starting Kenny Stills if Fuller where to sit.

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm also benching Darren Fells even though he's tied for

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the tight end touchdown lead and has more combined touchdowns,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Kelsey and Zach Ertz. How about that, But

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>no tight end has more touchdowns in the last six

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>games than Darren Fells. It's insane, But this is a

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.800
<v Speaker 1>bad matchup for Fells as well. Baltimore hasn't allowed a

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end to top thirty four yards over the past

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, while also only surrendering one score to the

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>position over that span. There are better options at tight

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>end this week than Fells. To Shaun Watson, gonna give

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>him a b. Only Patty Mahomes has thrown for more

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>than one touchdown and this defense practically gets better every week.

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Watson can run, of course, but Kyler Murray

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and Russell Wilson only total thirty one yards on the

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ground against the Ravens. So just to be for Watson

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and to see for Carlos Hide, there has been just

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>four running backs we've reached double digit carries against Baltimore

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and just two running backs who topped sixty five yards

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. So not a great matchup for Hyde.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Over to Lamar Jackson, this is a great matchup Jackson matchup.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>They're saying Jackson could score more fantasy points. He's on

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 1>pace to score more fantasy points and Patrick Mahomes had

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last year not throw for more touchdowns. Of course, facts rushing,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's absolutely insane um Don rookie quarterbacks and that's

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>basically Gardner Minshew and Kyle Allen are averaging seventeen yards

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and two point eight passing touchdowns against the Texans this

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>year and Houston has not been tested on the ground

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>by a quarterback yet either. Gardner Minshew might be the

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>best rushing quarterback they faced, and he had six carries

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for fifty six yards. So yeah, I mean that's part

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of the beauty of Lamar Jackson, my number one ranked

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback this week is even if he doesn't run, he

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can pass you to a big game. And even if

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't pass, he can run you to a big game.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And he might do both. Just an absolute beast. Hollywood

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown Marky's Brown returned to practice on Friday, so it's

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>looking like he'll play a great matchup for him. Of course,

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Houston secondary is awful. They are allowing one point nine

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>PPR points her target this season. That's crazy. You don't

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>even have to complete a pass to be a target.

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh for that reason, we have well, we have to

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>mention Myles Boykin I was gonna give him Brown's b

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if Brown sits, But Brown looks like he's gonna play.

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna bench Boykin just because Baltimore doesn't pass

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton. But here's the angle on Willie Snead. Really,

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>if Bradley Roby sits like did last week, that would

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>put Cornell Armstrong back to man the slot. Cornell Armstrong

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has played a hundred and sixteen snaps in his short

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two year career. He's given up twelve of fourteen completions

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and seventy four yards and two touchdowns.

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong Armstrong. So Bradley Roby is out. Willie Snead on fanball,

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>get to it, uh real quickly? Mark Andrews a b

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for him. Tough matchup for him for him. The Texans

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>surrender just two scores to tight ends all season. Austin

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Hooper is the only tight end to top four catches

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans so far this year, and then Mark

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Ingram gets a b. Uh. Actually, I'm gonna give him

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a hard seat. Texans are tough against the run. Over

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the last five games, only Josh Jacobs has top fifty

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, and no running back has scored Houston is

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>also allowing the fifth least yards per carry over the

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.760
<v Speaker 1>last three games at three point six. All right, well done,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>well done. Coming up next, let's answer three tough questions

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>you can play along try to go with perfect three

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and oh on Fantasy Football Weekly. It's Fantasy Football Weekly

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Archie and Famil dot com. My co host

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson, Matt Harrison, Boys, it is time four three

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>tough questions. Tough question Number one, Should David Wunson owners

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop him? Now, there's a reminder for people have

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not heard this before. Sabotage drop is it's a drop,

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's a drop of a big name player that

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people are going to Your opponents will pick up and

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>then try to find value in but there's no value

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to be had and they're just wasting roster spots and

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially wasting starting spots. And and to maximize the value

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on the sabotage drop, you drop him right before the

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>fab run happens, and you drop it before so people

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.320
<v Speaker 1>either have to use a lot of their fab budget

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or they have to use their top waiver priority correct

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it like on Friday, It's two easy. You don't

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have to give anything up to go get him. You're

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not doing it. Do you want to do it? Like

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunday or Monday is the time that you drop David

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Johnson if if you were to decide to do that, Tuesday,

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday at noon is when you drop him. That's exactly

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what you think, Tuesday at noon. Yeah, I think that

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you should sabotage drop him. Yeah alright, well go ahead

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and explain your rationale. Um, he's got to buy next week,

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's reason to believe he's not gonna get any

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>points next week. Um. Then he has matchups against the Rams.

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a bad matchup. Pittsburgh, that's a bad matchup. And

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then in week fifteen and sixteen, just kind of middle

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pack matchups against Cleveland and then at Seattle,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>especially with Kenyan Drake kind of being anointed as now

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the starter there. And I don't know if you saw

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this going around on Twitter, the video of David Johnson

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just walking into defenders and and looking like he has

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing left in the tank. You mean David the refrigerator Johnson.

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>He's taking over William Perry's name. Wow. Uh Yeah, I

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's time to sabotage drop David Johnson, get rid

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of him, Brian, Yeah, I don't have much to add. Yeah,

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if you watched him play last week, he was the

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>epitome of plotting for David Johnson. And on Friday he

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was running with the twos when Kenyan Drake was running

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with the ones. They said he looked good in practice

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. That's because he's running with the twos. I

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 1>could look at running instit twus and practice and Matt

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>alluded to the schedule. According to Fantasy Pros, it's the

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>third hardest remaining schedule for a running back behind a

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>very good offensive line. So yeah, drop him now, well

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 1>not now at the right time. Yeah, drop him Tuesday.

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday in apparently I think Monday works fine. Um, he

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.760
<v Speaker 1>might not have value. He's probably still locked on Monday

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because the games aren't done for the week. Yeah, well

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's probably well. But in many leagues you can

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>still drop a guy. It depends on your system. I guess, um,

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>when Chase Edmond comes to, Chase Edmonds comes back, David

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Johnson might be third in the pecking orde. I mean,

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>there's no guarantee. He's just second in the packing order.

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I agree with everything you guys said in fact, but

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to get a bonus question. What about Dynasty

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and Empire League ers? Are you dropping David Johnson outright? No,

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>he's got enough value still that you just you just

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. You could trade him for something, can you? Though? Yeah,

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the all time low water mark for trading.

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I would probably go to anybody in the league and

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be like, I'll take a draft pick for David Johnson.

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Give me, give me a first or second next to

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hear any draft pick for David Johnson. Let's roll. Remember

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the last time he was good sixteen. He's had one

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>good season one. These are there's a lot of people

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>this this is so. This reminds me of the Josh

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon thing, as people reliving with Josh Gordon. I think

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there's serious question about whether David Johnson, however, has any

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>value whatsoever for the remainder of his cares. I definitely

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want him on my roster. I don't either. I

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 1>don't even want him on yours. Tough question number two

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in many leaks, the trade deadline is this weekend. Should

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>say Kwon Barkley owners trade him now while they can? Brian, Well,

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you should never sell a player at his lowest points.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if there's a point lower than

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>coming off a thirteen carry for one yard performance last

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>week k Barkley had against the Jets. So you're not

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get fair return for Barkley. And he's not

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a bye this week, which is no good. At Chicago

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>next week that's not very good. He there Green Bay

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is a good matchup, but then at Philly is bad.

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, we'll say the Red Sea parts

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs weeks fifteen and sixteen Miami and at Washington.

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if you get a package of three

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>or you'd have to be a monster package. But you're

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get it. That's what she said. But sorry

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>or myself laughter, I didn't play on doing that. I'm sorry. No,

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trading, all right. Brian alluded to the schedule,

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's that's the thing. In the

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>last four weeks, three of the four matchups are really good.

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really not that afraid of him going up

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>against Philly. He's going to be the the top target

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and I think Philly can give up

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some some points to pass catching backs like Sa Kwan.

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You really need to get it insane haul to get

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>anything for Sa Kwan right now. So no, I'm not

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>trading him. No, you're both wrong. And most leagues Barkley

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>owners are in bad shape between the ankle injury that

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>knocked him out and then the middle n performances since

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>coming back. Most Barkley owners aren't trouble right now. They

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>need to win now. They cannot afford the zero points

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this week and the at Chicago next week. What's more.

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>What's more, that playoff schedule that seems so easy is

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>suddenly turning to be really tricky. Philadelphia has been good

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>against the run all year long, Miami is suddenly turning

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>into a competent run defense, and Washington is actually like

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a top five run defense quietly. So it's not it

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>feels easy because these are floundering teams. But that's not

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>an easy schedule you need to get out of. Sae

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley. Now, his name value carries a lot of cash.

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 1>A you're going to get a Derrick Henry or a

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four net from some owner who's heading to the

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and thinks and he sees Philly, Miami, Washington in

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and he's like, say, Kwon Barkley is gonna

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>lead me to the promised Land. He may not be.

0:50:55.560 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You make that trade now, tough. Question number three, are

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you holding a roster spot for Matt Brida? Matt, you

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>know this one caused a little bit of damage to

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>my amygdala. I hate it when my amygdala gets damaged because, um,

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a visible bulge is known when that happens, is just

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>happy to see me. It might be both. Uh Themigdala

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>helps me respond to emotions, memories and fear, and uh,

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very fearful for Matt. Matt Brita's remainder of the season.

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>He has dinged up right now after this week and

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's been I think ruled out this week. Um, he

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>gets a good matchup against Green Bay next week, but

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:39.879
<v Speaker 1>who knows if he's healthy for next week's game two.

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Then after that it's awful at Baltimore, at New Orleans

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams in week sixteen are all bad matchups.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's kind of the middle of the road run defense.

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>They're really bad against the past, but mid all the

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>road against the run. So with Brita splitting touches, no,

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that you can hold onto him. I'm

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.919
<v Speaker 1>actually holding him in two leagues, but those are Empire leagues.

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Draft here, all right. I won't add much to what

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Matt said other than the Atlanta matchup, which is good.

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's a revenge game for Tevin Coleman. That game,

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>all right, But I just want to throw one. Matt

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Breed us that he's the he's been uh clocks is

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the fastest ball carrier on the single play this season

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>by next Gen stats at twenty two point three miles

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>per hour, faster than Corduill, Patterson, Brandon Wilson, Christian McCaffrey,

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, and me Cole Hardman. He's so good, but no,

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I gotta you gotta drop him in redraft at this point.

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the only thing I was gonna add. He's a

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>really good player. Hey, Matt Breed is really talented. It's

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>just always constantly hurt and and that match and all that,

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Staley out for several weeks with the mutilated finger.

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>For Joe Staley, did you see a picture of his

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>fingers Paris Campbell's hand. Don't do what I'm telling you.

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a disaster all for you and three and

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>oh and if you did, congratulations, the panel of experts

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>did very well this week. Congratulations to you guys. You

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>know it's not going to go very well. Jets at

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins. Let's talk about it. You know, I just

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>alluded to the fact that Washington was a tricky good

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>run defense. Listen to this, as levy On Bell gets

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Washington has allowed three point nine yards

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>per carry over their last three games, but they've also

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>seen the most attempts, so they've actually given up the

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>second most yards over that time. But it takes a

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of attempts to get there. The hope here is

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that levy On Bell will get the attempts. But he's

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>eclipse three and a half yards per carry just twice

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 1>all year. He put up one point nine yards per

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>carry last week on a bad knee. I don't like

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>him much here at all. It just the C grade

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bell, between the the shockingly surprisingly difficult matchup and

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the the odd ball usage and his general in effectiveness.

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the passing game, where I've got

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:56.760
<v Speaker 1>C grades on a couple of guys, beginning with Sam Donald,

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and I would love to endorse Sam Donald in eight

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>seemingly easy matchup against Washington. But how can I when

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he has failed fantasy owners the past two weeks against

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>similarly easy secondaries the Dolphins and the Giants, just one

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>score in both of those games. And actually, you'll notice

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I said the words seemingly the Redskins secondary has actually

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>played much better of late. Over the past month of games,

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed just two hundred three yards and half a

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. Suggest the C grade on Sam Donald,

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Robbie Anderson. He faces a Washington secondary

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of one excellent cornerback, Quentin Dunbar, and one lousy one

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman. Historically, Robbie Anderson runs on Quinton Dunbar side

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>more often, but it'll be on Norman's side enough to

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>give him a C grade here, Uh, Anderson is fast,

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman is among the slowest starting cornerbacks in the league,

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he's got a chance to add a deep

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 1>catcher two. Here, we'll try Robbie Anderson as a C grade.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Washington side, where I've got two

0:54:56.800 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 1>guys with the starting grade, beginning with Adrian Peterson. In

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the four games under Bill Callahan, Peterson averaging nineties six

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in five yards per carry. This is

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the best stretch of running since the middle of the

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen season for Adrian Peterson. New York has allowed

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the fourth fewest rushing yards to running backs, though they've

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:18.439
<v Speaker 1>been quietly great all year long. The Jets have held

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all running backs to three yards per carry on the season.

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So just the C grade for Adrian Peterson. What about

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Darius Guys. You made ask who will be active for

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this game, and he will see the field. I think

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets used sparingly in this game, and the Redskins

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will slowly use him more and more over the course

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season, so that by the end of the

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>year they know if Darius Guys is a guy they

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>want to go with next year, or if that's a

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>spot they have to fill. But I don't think it

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>starts here in his first game back. Well, and actually

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:49.760
<v Speaker 1>his first ever NFL game was it would be outside

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of the game one where he got hurt. He he

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 1>got some run this year. Yeah, it will one. Yeah.

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, Terry mclauren, Terry McLaren, Darius it is

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 1>over come the many. I think he will potentially overcome

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the many shortcomings of his rookie quarterback Dwayne Haskins, but

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he faces a jet secondary that over the last three

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks has allowed ten receiver touchdowns over three weeks, which

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is great, and that was coming from Gardner Minshew and

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick and Daniel Jones are not great passers. Uh

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 1>make Lauren overwhelmingly plays from the left side of the field,

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>where he faces cornerback Arthur Mullett. You made that name

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.879
<v Speaker 1>up an undrafted journeyman who has two career starts. So

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we will try Terry McLaurin with a C grade. He's

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>been very quiet for a month, but I think this

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>might be the opportunity. UM, I'm sorry, I was looking

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>at mutilated hands. Did you grade Jamison Crowder? I did not,

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Jamison. I have whole paragraph on him. Jamison

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Crowder is now notched at least eighty yards and a

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>score in two straight games. He runs from this lot

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the time where he faces Redskins slot

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Fabian Moreau, who's allowed in eighty eight percent catch

0:56:57.840 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 1>rate but no scores. So I do think we're looking

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at a PPR style game from Crowder. Which is what

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you usually get in the seven eight catch eighty yard range.

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>He gets a c gre just not a sheer spite.

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He's going to get in the end zone though, because

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:15.399
<v Speaker 1>he's mad at washingting revenge. You know much, you got

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>paid by the Jets of some obscene amounts, so he's there.

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Really shouldn't be a lot of revenge, even if you

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>want it. What would revenge sound sound like? The psychos?

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the only thing I have in the soundbar that

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. It's it's the revenge duck. No revenge duck.

0:57:37.200 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I love it. The revenge duck. Well, let's see if

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we can turn that into something some reoccurring bit on

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this show, because because we're stupid, it's every week. You

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>can play the Crushed Church Championship for free at famball

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:52.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. When you assemble a better salary cap team

0:57:52.520 --> 0:57:54.520
<v Speaker 1>than mine, you get a shot at this week's prize

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pool of one thousand dollars. But more importantly, beating me

0:57:57.160 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is the only way to get an entry into our

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>week seventeen Championship, where you will battle me for the

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one ten dollar prize pool. Famball dot com slash chart

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com slash chart. When we come back. More

0:58:09.440 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>matchups to get to, including Arizona taking on San Francisco.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>What to expect from Jimmy Garoppolo with or without Emmanuel Sanders.

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly returns were diving back into matchups. But first,

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>did you know you can play super flex salary cap

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at fambile dot com if you love starting two quarterbacks

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or four tight ends and nobody loves starting. Uh, this

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is quite the year for that to start one and

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>having be four thousand. Go to fanball dot com play

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our salary cap super Flex d f s at family

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Okay, let's jump back into matchups. Arizona takes

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on San Francisco. Matt, we already talked about a lot

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of players we like at various levels. Here Christian Kirk

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>coming off a three touchdown game. You liked Kyler Murray

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and you used him as you take a chance, I

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>mean quarterback. What do you think about Christian Kirk coming

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>off the big performance? I gave him a B grade,

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>mostly because the Cardinals sneakily have moved Christian Kirk. He's

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:28.080
<v Speaker 1>no longer a slot receiver. They've been pushing him to

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter more and more, where you can really gouge

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this Niners defense. Dk Metcalf had six catches for seventy

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:37.720
<v Speaker 1>last week. Andy Isabella had the a d R touchdown

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>catch the week before, uh and John Ross had one

0:59:40.520 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a score from the perimeter to earlier in

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the season. Kirk was finally healthy last week. It showed

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:47.680
<v Speaker 1>up in a big way with the three scores on

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:51.640
<v Speaker 1>ten targets. I'm only given Larry Fitzgerald to see because

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>his average depth of target is only five point three yards.

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Compare that with Christian Kirk, who's at fourteen and a half.

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's almost ten yards more. Uh So FitzGeralds is not

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>getting deep enough to make a big difference. He only

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>managed four catches for thirty eight in the meeting two

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago against the Niners. Um The running back situation

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is gross. Chase Edmonds is probably not going to play

1:00:15.720 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with the hamstring injury. Cliff Kingsbury indicated that Kenyan Drake

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>will remain the lead back this week, although that meant

1:00:22.920 --> 1:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a snap count in favor of Kenyan Drake, so David

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Johnson still eating into these touches here. I don't know,

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:32.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe that doesn't continue. Maybe they just pulled a plug

1:00:33.000 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on the whole David Johnson experiment. I gotta pull the

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>plug on the whole running game this week. They're all

1:00:38.200 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. It's not enough for me to want

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to start either of these guys against the Niners defense

1:00:42.360 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's done a great job against the run this year.

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Their top ten in attempts, touchdowns, receptions, and receiving yards

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running backs. They've only allowed eighty seven rushing

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to the position. That's just not enough

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to split. On the other side, you mentioned Jimmy g

1:00:57.400 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the last segment. He gets an a

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>gre He's just a weak remove from three seventeen and

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>four scores against the Cardinals, four of the last five

1:01:05.680 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to face Arizona have topped three. Three of those four

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have thrown for three or more touchdowns. Unfortunately, we have

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some receiver issues. George Kittle is trending toward out again,

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which means Ross Dwelly his backup is kind of worth

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a c start. Because it's Arizona. That's the only reason

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a it's a week try in

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a sixteen team league where you need to start

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a tight end dwell. He had seven targets last week

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle, and he gets Arizona this week. Uh. They've

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>already allowed ten touchdowns to the position this season, putting

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>him in my four tight end lineup on fan ball

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>where it is. Emmanuel Sanders is also trending towards not playing.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>He didn't practice again today. Um, he hasn't practiced it

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>all this week with a rib injury. Uh. He did

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>participate in the walk through, though, he's a true game

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>time decision. He gets a C grade if he plays.

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Deebo Samuel a B grade and a stat

1:02:01.600 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from Kate. I'm gonna butcher her last name Majusic h

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>f f ball Blast on Twitter. That's that's her Twitter handle,

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>f ball Blast. She's a good follow. You should follow her.

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson in Uh, he's allowing fourteen point nine yards

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>per reception. That's a career high seventy one yards per game.

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a career high, seventy nine point to catch rate

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>career high, and a passer rating of one point four

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>when targeted. Deebo led the team with eleven targets last week.

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>He's also had five red zone targets in the last

1:02:35.200 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Nobody's scared of Arizona, even Pat Pete anymore.

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Arizona has allowed a league high seventeen red zone receiving

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this year. That's where Debo comes into play. I

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna score for sure this week. So I

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like Deebo quite a bit. What's the great on Deebo?

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Samuel b a bibo on Deebo? Uh. Tevin Coleman gets

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a B grade Raheem Mostert was might take a chance

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the runner. Coleman abby gets all the goal line

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>work and is very involved in the passing game, as

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, to take a chance of the cards to

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have been gouged by pass catching backs as of late,

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>allowing nine receptions per game uh and about two hundred

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>yards and a score just the last three weeks. And

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>those weren't backs that are known for their pass catching prowess.

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That was Latavious Murray and Ronald Jones. So Tevin Coleman's

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>got a good shot to put up a huge day

1:03:22.200 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in PBR. Yeah, I'm closer to an A on Tevin.

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You're probably right with frieda out. I could be convinced. Alright,

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>New England takes on Philadelphia. That's our next matchup here,

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm in correct about that being your next No, it's yeah, No,

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it is Cincinnati and Oakland is our next matchup. You

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>already told us everybody to set up since what about

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is likely only starter you haven't mentioned from Cincinnati already,

1:03:46.280 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and to take a chance of the segment. Tyler Boyd

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>has something to say about that, but I'll start with

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon. Uh, We're finally working on a Bill cow

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>role last week, but that was because Gio Bernard left

1:03:55.280 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the game with an injury. Geo not on the injury

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>report this week, and that was because they were killing clock.

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes deficit, they didn't, they were just trying to leave

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the I think it was the Cardinals that did that

1:04:08.560 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>last year against Seattle. They're losing by and they just

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>kept Yeah. Anyway, the Raiders have been tough against opposing

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but Chargers backs did rack up a hundred

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty one combo yards and two touchdowns last Thursday night

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>against Oakland, So I'll give Joe mix In the CEE.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Oakland has surrendered the seventh most running back receptions, and

1:04:29.280 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that is why Joe Bernard was gonna take a chance.

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean running back Tyler Boyd. Everyone should take a

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>chance on him this week he gets an a opposing slot.

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Receivers are averaging ten plus targets, seven plus catches, and

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight yards per game and have totaled six touchdowns

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in Oakland's nine games. You're gonna start five Bengals in

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a lineup you're gonna goans won't allow it. For whatever

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they should, certainly allow me give them my money away.

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If I'm gonna start all Bengals, but I am starting

1:04:57.040 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at in tape. Might take a chance to my wide receiver.

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not starting to Tyler Eiffort. Even though we scored

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, he only ran twelve pass routes. He's like decomposing.

1:05:07.240 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for Tyler Efford. Well he does. That

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>means I hit on Ryan Linley. It might take a

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>chance on the quarterback. I just paired him with the

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong players. But like Linley and this one, it's all

1:05:20.920 --> 1:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about chasing points and garbage time. Here over the Raiders side,

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it's Josh Jacobs and guess who else is in the

1:05:26.520 --> 1:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>room with him. It's the Fantasy Fonzie A for Josh Jacobs.

1:05:31.200 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Over the last four games, enemy backs have totaled six

1:05:33.920 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns while averaging a hundred and forty five combo yards

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals, who are conceding thirty touches per game

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to the position on the season. UH A for Jacobs.

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>H A for Darren Waller since he sort of appears

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tough against tight ends on paper, but it's not hard

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be tough on tight ends from Arizona, Jacksonville, or

1:05:52.240 --> 1:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh when the only tight end is Nick Finnett who

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>just got off a plane via trade from Seattle. Let's

1:05:56.920 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>take a look at what the Ravens tight ends have

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>done to the Bengals. That's a fair op, right, Dads.

1:06:01.120 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Waller nine and then twelve for one, fifty one and

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>two against the Bengals last week. Waller is gonna smash

1:06:08.120 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's been a quiet couple of weeks for Waller,

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but he'll bounce back. Tyroll Williams is gonna give him

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a b here because because he's touchdown dependent and since

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>he's only yielding the third fewest pass attempts for a

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>game per game, because everybody runs on them with such success. Ye,

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and so just a be for Williams. I will give

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hum to Renfrew with c and I was going to

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>use this might take a chance to me receiver, but

1:06:26.360 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it's almost too easy. Per Sports Info Solutions, Cincinnati has

1:06:30.280 --> 1:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>given up a hundred nineteen point five passer rating on

1:06:33.520 --> 1:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>slot targets. And finally Derek Carr because of the volume concern,

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just gonna give him a B here um like he

1:06:41.760 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>has a very safe floor in this matchup though, and

1:06:43.360 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have a very clean pocket. Cincinnati is dead

1:06:46.120 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>last in sacks and quarterback hits Dre Kirkpatrick going on

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, So that's it's another reason for some optimism

1:06:55.720 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with the with the Oakland passing attack, New England takes

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on Philadelphia. Guys, this is this one is a little

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>bit thorny. We'll work our way through it. Here. For

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, a B grade because the Eagle secondary rolled

1:07:07.160 --> 1:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>into the bye week having held Josh Allen and Mitch

1:07:10.360 --> 1:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Drabinsky to just one hundred sixty nine and on the

1:07:13.520 --> 1:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>return of Ronald Darby and Avante Mattock definitely helped that secondary. Meanwhile,

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously Tom Brady is a lot better than

1:07:20.120 --> 1:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen and Mitch Drobisky, but over the previous month

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of games for Tom Brady it wasn't that great. He

1:07:28.720 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was averaging half a touchdown per game one touchdown, excuse me,

1:07:32.160 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown per game over the previous month of games,

1:07:34.880 --> 1:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>almost as many interceptions as touchdowns, by the way, which

1:07:37.640 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady never does. So just the B grade on

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady here. Julian Edelman also with a B. Over

1:07:42.480 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the last four games, Edelman has commanded over eleven targets

1:07:45.400 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>per game. He has scored twice well thinks per game

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>over that last month. The Legal secondary has given up

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>five wide receiver scores in their last four games, but

1:07:53.560 --> 1:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they haven't surrendered a touchdown from the slot since Week two,

1:07:57.320 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's why Edelman is a B and not an A.

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The only other startable Patriot I've got is Mohamed Sanu,

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>fresh office first Patriots touchdown, a game in which he

1:08:05.720 --> 1:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>notched the most targets and receptions in eighty one games,

1:08:10.480 --> 1:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so obviously getting a lot more action as a Patriot

1:08:12.920 --> 1:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>than he ever got as a Falcon. But this matchup

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit trickier. You know. I mentioned Brady

1:08:17.320 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with either has tossed zero or one touchdown in three

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of his last four games. Philadelphia has only allowed two

1:08:22.439 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in the last two games. Um, he'll get

1:08:25.400 --> 1:08:29.479
<v Speaker 1>a matchup largely against Ronald Darby Derby a gambling corner.

1:08:29.760 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how that works out. For Mohamed Sanu. You

1:08:31.800 --> 1:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>could start him in a pinch. Philip door Set on

1:08:34.120 --> 1:08:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I'll be interested to see what Nikkil Harry does.

1:08:36.560 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about him a little bit more next

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>segment as well. Um, but this will be his first

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for playing time in this game. We're not gonna

1:08:42.880 --> 1:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>start either him or Philip door Set here, Sony Walkman

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. They'll be running against a Philly defense

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>that allows three point one yards per carry at home,

1:08:52.760 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>good for second fewest he's averaging. Michelle averaging just three

1:08:56.600 --> 1:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>point four yards per carry. He's failed to top four

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry every game but two, and also Rex

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Burke had finally healthy. He could really carve into Sony

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Walkman's role. And as as another side, Michelle doesn't catch

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>any passes, he doesn't have any speed, he doesn't have

1:09:16.240 --> 1:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>any footwork, he doesn't have any elusiveness, and he has

1:09:18.360 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>no power other than that he's a great running back.

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the eagle side starting grades on Jordan's Howard.

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Get this forty two carries in his last two games.

1:09:30.800 --> 1:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the most Doug Peterson has ever given us a

1:09:34.439 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>single runner in back to back games. To get to

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>forty two carries, that's impressive. On the season. And by

1:09:41.479 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the way Sprawls just went on, I R I didn't

1:09:44.479 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>want to interrupt in the ji. I mean, but why

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't under why even sign him? There? Under using

1:09:52.160 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders as it is, right whatever, j He's just

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>got to be just for a warm body. That's I

1:09:57.600 --> 1:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know why else you'd bring him in On the season.

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>New England still technically the stingiest team against fantasy running backs,

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>but more they're given more. Lately, over the last two games,

1:10:08.920 --> 1:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed one hundred fifteen or more rushing yards. The

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>last three backs to face the Patriots have all averaged

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>four and a half yards per carry. I think Jordan

1:10:17.920 --> 1:10:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Howard gets something done and the best way to beat

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots is on the ground. Let's go to the

1:10:22.080 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>passing game where Carson Wentz is on the bench. Your

1:10:24.840 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>confidence in Wentz has got to be shaken. Over the

1:10:27.240 --> 1:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>last three games. He's averaging just two hundred yards and

1:10:29.840 --> 1:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown to Sean Jackson. Dead all Shan Jeffrey so

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>slow and injured, and he drops passes and here comes

1:10:38.880 --> 1:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in elite secondary New England. The average passing game against

1:10:42.160 --> 1:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots just one hundred seventies six yards per game.

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>No quarterbacks topped one yards since Ben Roethlisberger in the opener.

1:10:49.439 --> 1:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a disaster start here for Carson Wentz, who buck

1:10:52.479 --> 1:10:54.479
<v Speaker 1>has to buck a lot of trends. As I already

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 1>tipped my hand. I don't like all Shan Jeffrey here,

1:10:56.800 --> 1:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>super slow, no separation, dropping balls, and he gives a

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>goes up against a secondary that's allowed one wide receiver

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>score all year. So he's on the bench. Miles Sanders

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>also on the bench. It's worth noting he's only seen

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>three targets in each of the last four games. We

1:11:12.120 --> 1:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think of him sort of like the past catching back,

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's not even getting that much work there. Sanders

1:11:17.160 --> 1:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>has given us a thirty yard or more play in

1:11:19.640 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>four of his last six games, and that's probably what

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you need here. But that the Patriots don't give up

1:11:23.320 --> 1:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>long games, so it's really it's a bad matchup for

1:11:25.720 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>him too. He is also on the bench. The only

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>other Eagle worth mentioning is zach Ertz. Here he finally

1:11:30.280 --> 1:11:32.639
<v Speaker 1>broke out last week with season highs and targets, receptions,

1:11:32.680 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and yards. On paper, the Patriots of smother deposing tight ends,

1:11:36.040 --> 1:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>holding them to thirty two yards per game, but the

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>competition is largely been bad and zach Ertz will be

1:11:40.439 --> 1:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the best tight end they faced all year, and they

1:11:42.200 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have given up a tight end touchdown and back to

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>back games. So zach ERT's with a B grade. If

1:11:47.040 --> 1:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you're in a real pitch, you could consider Dallas Goddard,

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't go that low. I think you can

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:55.519
<v Speaker 1>probably find more help from other players. Our final topics

1:11:55.560 --> 1:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>are ahead. When we provide you with three guys we

1:11:57.600 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>believe will be hot waiver wire pick up next week,

1:12:02.400 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but you're going to pick them up this week. We'll

1:12:05.200 --> 1:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>jump into the time machine for premature speculation happening next.

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It is Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of Fantasy Football

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Premature Speculation, our favorite segment out of all of them,

1:12:46.479 --> 1:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>as we try to identify players you want to pick

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>up this week that everybody else will be trying to

1:12:51.000 --> 1:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>pick up next week, but blammo and or they're already

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on your roster. Feels so good, Brian, who's your premature

1:13:04.280 --> 1:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>speculation player this week? I'm gonna go with a bit

1:13:07.280 --> 1:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of a dynasty empire angle here and say you go

1:13:12.200 --> 1:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>grab Justin Jackson, the long forgotten running back of the

1:13:16.439 --> 1:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Chargers who look great in the preseason, and the Chargers

1:13:19.760 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot. I think he has the ability

1:13:22.680 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a starter, maybe even a bell cow. And

1:13:25.160 --> 1:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget Melvin Gordon, last year of his contract,

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not guaranteed to resign with l A Austin Ekeler free agent.

1:13:33.280 --> 1:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Say he doesn't come back all of a sudden, you're

1:13:35.720 --> 1:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting on Justin Jackson, who is out there display the

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>deepest dynasty last just available, and you might have a

1:13:41.360 --> 1:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>starting running back on your hands come August. Obviously, have

1:13:43.880 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to go through the NFL Draft and all that and

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Gordon and but if you're if you're wallowing away in

1:13:48.000 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the dynasty league and you got extra spot, go grab

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson. I think it's a great I think it's

1:13:52.840 --> 1:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. Let's see, I'm I'm sold absolutely all right, Matt,

1:13:56.600 --> 1:13:59.519
<v Speaker 1>I have got a J. Brown who's top sixty yards

1:13:59.640 --> 1:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or score in three of his last four games, which

1:14:01.880 --> 1:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is basically since Ryan Tannehill took over um. And then

1:14:05.160 --> 1:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got this really awesome schedule in the fantasy playoffs,

1:14:08.400 --> 1:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>which includes Oakland, who's a bottom five wide receiver fantasy defense,

1:14:13.400 --> 1:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Houston in Week fifteen, who's a bottom five wide receiver

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy defense, okay, and then New Orleans in Week sixteen,

1:14:20.240 --> 1:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>which isn't awful. It's not great, but if he doesn't

1:14:22.680 --> 1:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>get march On Lattimore in that game, if they have

1:14:24.760 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a matchups work that way, it's not a bad matchup either.

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So a J. Brown is worth a pickup. Drew Bennett

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>could maybe even come back. They had the late season

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>blow up. That might be nice. Man. I'll never forget

1:14:36.880 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that year. That must have been like two two thousand three. No,

1:14:40.120 --> 1:14:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that long. It was more like ten eleven

1:14:42.520 --> 1:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with Billy Bullick. Yeah, I'll look it up, like, yeah,

1:14:46.200 --> 1:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>please do look that up. I'm gonna I'm gonna go

1:14:47.920 --> 1:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three for the big Drew Bennett, Miss Lyndale White. Yeah, yeah,

1:14:54.400 --> 1:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he also had a really good end of

1:14:56.240 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>season run with him and run Dane. Some true story

1:15:01.040 --> 1:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about two years ago. Guy comes up to me with

1:15:03.760 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a Ron Dane football card with a five dollar bill

1:15:08.160 --> 1:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tucked it tucked into it. It's in a little holder,

1:15:10.680 --> 1:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and he says, I listened to Fantasy Football Weekly. You

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:16.719
<v Speaker 1>guys put me onto Ron Dane from my fantasy playoffs

1:15:16.760 --> 1:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote him to the championship. So here's a tip.

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>He gave me the five bucks in the card. I've

1:15:22.720 --> 1:15:26.559
<v Speaker 1>still got it. My premature speculation player is nikkil Harry,

1:15:26.640 --> 1:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as I just alluded to earlier. Remember first round taken

1:15:30.240 --> 1:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first round for a team that desperately needs

1:15:33.160 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver help after jettisoning Josh Gordon. He's got the

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:40.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for a media playing time. He's got Tom Brady

1:15:40.800 --> 1:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing him the ball. He only needs to really overcome

1:15:44.760 --> 1:15:48.599
<v Speaker 1>very little to make an impact, like Philip Dorset, who

1:15:48.640 --> 1:15:51.599
<v Speaker 1>they always seem to want to bench. So it doesn't

1:15:51.720 --> 1:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe it turns out he's an impact outside receiver.

1:15:54.360 --> 1:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>They need an impact outside receiver. Maybe they're gonna try

1:15:56.680 --> 1:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and to kill Harry. Usually I'm lukewarm on rookies getting

1:16:01.080 --> 1:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>their first starts, but the situation, the stars may aligned

1:16:05.320 --> 1:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to get something out of nikkil Harry the rest of

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, Okay, you were you were right charge two

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand four. Time has flun so the epic three games

1:16:16.120 --> 1:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>stretch for Drew Bennett. For Drew Bennett Week thirteen, don't

1:16:21.120 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>go into opponents, doesn't matter. He had three for one

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>four and three touchdowns, all right, the following week twelve

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:31.639
<v Speaker 1>for two thirty three yards, three touchdowns, the following week

1:16:31.880 --> 1:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen for one sixty and two touchdowns, and so then well,

1:16:35.920 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and then he disappeared. So now put yourself in my shoes. Right,

1:16:39.200 --> 1:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've got now, I've got the next spring, next summer,

1:16:42.080 --> 1:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got a magazine to put out with all my

1:16:43.920 --> 1:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>player ratings. What do you do about Drew Drew Bennett

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:50.599
<v Speaker 1>coming off of that playoff run? Where do you rank him?

1:16:50.880 --> 1:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell people what Drew Bennett did in the next day

1:16:52.960 --> 1:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the month of the next season, if you would, Brian,

1:16:55.240 --> 1:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do I even have to. It's not gonna be good.

1:16:57.320 --> 1:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna be good because you know, we're like, oh,

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:02.599
<v Speaker 1>and Drew Bennett looks so good, and that's what you remember.

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, well, he started with three for seventy nine,

1:17:05.040 --> 1:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>so you're like, Okay, he'll get going. It's not awful,

1:17:10.400 --> 1:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but he only had one touchdown in his first ten games.

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Half yards but yeah, never the same epic bus. Yeah, yeah,

1:17:20.920 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you get tricked. That's part of what fan a That's

1:17:22.840 --> 1:17:24.599
<v Speaker 1>what fantasy football does too. A lot of the time.

1:17:24.720 --> 1:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>They just trick you out. Right, let's go to the site.

1:17:26.720 --> 1:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>The Sunday night game in Chicago taking on the Rams.

1:17:29.439 --> 1:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Brian they got three touchdown passes out of three touchdown

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a great game, but it was by his standards,

1:17:41.720 --> 1:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a better game than we've had in the past. What

1:17:43.760 --> 1:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the passing game for the Bears

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams? Well, I was listening to say, despite

1:17:49.080 --> 1:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the three touchdowns, you're benching this game, So I'm gonna

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>go into it too much. Really, the only past catcher

1:17:56.120 --> 1:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning is Allen Robinson, but the Rams have Jalen

1:17:59.720 --> 1:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams and Mitch true Bisky is the quarterback of the Bears,

1:18:03.000 --> 1:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give a rob a c based on

1:18:05.760 --> 1:18:08.519
<v Speaker 1>name alone. They both played for the Jaguars together a

1:18:08.520 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whole while ago, their buds Ramsey in the league. Then yeah, okay,

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>yea there bud anyway, David Montgomery is uh buds with

1:18:19.880 --> 1:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>his ankle after rolling it in practice on Wednesday, and

1:18:22.800 --> 1:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't work at all. But he's gonna be a

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>game time decision going into this one, and it's it's

1:18:26.800 --> 1:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not a good matchup. And he went the bed against

1:18:29.000 --> 1:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the Lions last week smashed spot. The Rams have allowed

1:18:32.560 --> 1:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>just one rushing touchdown to a running back over their

1:18:34.760 --> 1:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>last five games. Only two running backs up top the

1:18:37.439 --> 1:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards against them all year, the Rams. That is.

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>It was Christian McCaffrey in Week one and then Chris

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Carson had a hundred eighteen rushing yards in Week five,

1:18:45.080 --> 1:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but it took him twenty seven carries to get there.

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He almost can't bank on starting David Montgomery between the

1:18:51.400 --> 1:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>game time decision in the matchup, I think he's a

1:18:53.280 --> 1:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bench and no, you're not gonna go grab Ryan Hellnall

1:18:57.400 --> 1:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>his backup. So I said the only pass catcher worth

1:19:01.320 --> 1:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioning was a rob. If Montgomery sits, hear me out alright,

1:19:05.120 --> 1:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Cordurell Patterson sneaky, sneaky play. He's probably better running back

1:19:10.920 --> 1:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>than Ryan All. He could be the running back for

1:19:12.800 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the Bears could be starting running back. I have a

1:19:16.600 --> 1:19:18.559
<v Speaker 1>quote up on my wall at home. It says, don't

1:19:18.600 --> 1:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>get cute at running back Brian Johnson, he's a wide receiver.

1:19:26.080 --> 1:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I would get cute with the wide receiver playing running back.

1:19:28.000 --> 1:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see what happens with Montgomery. He'll probably play.

1:19:30.240 --> 1:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But awful matchup. I'm gonna say bench Montgomery out right,

1:19:32.640 --> 1:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>even if he plays. Uh. I almost want to say

1:19:35.479 --> 1:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>bench Todd Gurley out right going to the other side.

1:19:38.560 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Get this. Gurley has yet two top twenty opportunities in

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a game that's carries plus targets. He hasn't even It's disgusting.

1:19:48.600 --> 1:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>The last two weeks ten touches and twelve touches. That's

1:19:52.320 --> 1:19:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it for Todd Gurley. And they never passed to him anymore.

1:19:55.240 --> 1:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>He was any leaf pass catching back. How's the stat?

1:19:59.080 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The Bear l a the Rams running backs I can

1:20:02.240 --> 1:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>barely read this, it's so bad have totaled five catches

1:20:05.240 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>over their last four games. Twenty running back catches on

1:20:09.000 --> 1:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole. See Sean McVeigh lose his touch like did

1:20:12.000 --> 1:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he get shattered by Bill Belichick in that Super Bowl?

1:20:14.840 --> 1:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it all over for the Wonder Kint I think

1:20:17.240 --> 1:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that the Rams offensive line is awful,

1:20:21.920 --> 1:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>awful and by the way they just put their center on,

1:20:23.840 --> 1:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>eye on and the right the right tackle is going

1:20:25.479 --> 1:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to miss this game, Ross Haven or whatever. Yeah, I will,

1:20:31.400 --> 1:20:34.599
<v Speaker 1>I will give Gurley. See still, Chicago has been kind

1:20:34.640 --> 1:20:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of bad against the runs since losing a Chem Hicks.

1:20:36.560 --> 1:20:38.479
<v Speaker 1>They have even up seven rushing touchdowns in the last

1:20:38.520 --> 1:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>five games. But temporary expectations with Girly, you know you

1:20:41.960 --> 1:20:44.519
<v Speaker 1>need to do that already. Ronald Jones has like the

1:20:44.600 --> 1:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>same numbers as Todd Gurley this year. You can do

1:20:47.760 --> 1:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like the player player and player compared. It is very depressing.

1:20:53.439 --> 1:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh what else was depressing? It was Cooper Cups goose

1:20:57.000 --> 1:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>egg last week, probably the most brutal goose egg of

1:20:59.200 --> 1:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy foot all season so far. Mike Evans saying,

1:21:02.840 --> 1:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what at least marsh On Latimer, it was sort of

1:21:06.560 --> 1:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>an excuse for that. Like Jared Goff, Cup does way

1:21:09.479 --> 1:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>better at home, where he averages an extra thirty yards

1:21:11.840 --> 1:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>per game on his career. Not a great spot on paper,

1:21:14.479 --> 1:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>though the Bears have only allowed one wide receiver to

1:21:16.840 --> 1:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>score since Week three. In the last three weeks, seventy

1:21:19.760 --> 1:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>seven yards is the high watermark from opposing white out,

1:21:22.240 --> 1:21:24.519
<v Speaker 1>so just the sea for cup. I will give Robert

1:21:24.560 --> 1:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Woods to see. Uh got eleven targets last week with

1:21:27.920 --> 1:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks on the sideline. Cooks definitely not playing this

1:21:30.360 --> 1:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>week or probably for the rest of the season, but

1:21:32.360 --> 1:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>again not a great matchup in Woods only has three

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets on the season. That is inexplicable. That

1:21:37.479 --> 1:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>explains his zero receiving touchdowns. Yep. Gerald Everett has caught

1:21:42.439 --> 1:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some touchdowns, but they've really been on the road. He's

1:21:44.760 --> 1:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the reverse goff split guy. He's better on the road

1:21:47.200 --> 1:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>than at home. Has average eleven targets over his past

1:21:50.040 --> 1:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>three road games, but only five targets over his last

1:21:52.840 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>three at home. He's been held scoreless and under twenty

1:21:56.479 --> 1:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one yards in five games, whether it's home or on

1:21:59.720 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the road. Most of them have been at home, but

1:22:01.960 --> 1:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in his other four games he's gone off. He's either

1:22:04.000 --> 1:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>scored called eight passes or top the hundred yards, but

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:08.759
<v Speaker 1>he's so boom or bust. This is a bus scenario.

1:22:09.120 --> 1:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Outside of Zach Hurts his big day against the Bears,

1:22:11.479 --> 1:22:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Chicago hasn't allowed any other tight end to top four

1:22:14.680 --> 1:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>catches or fifty yards. So Everett he gets a seat

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>just because tight end is such a waste land. But uh,

1:22:20.880 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be a good day for him. And

1:22:22.360 --> 1:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>then Jared Goff, I know he's at home, but I

1:22:25.640 --> 1:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>got him on the bench. I'm aware of the splits.

1:22:28.320 --> 1:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But Chicago is allowing just one passing touchdown per game

1:22:31.720 --> 1:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on average, and only one quarterback as it has hit

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>three d passing yards. That was case keenum and garbage time.

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, charge the Rams without their starting

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>center and right tackle. It's not all Golf's fault, but

1:22:42.760 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 1>it's like drop her bile and redraft down. There might

1:22:47.600 --> 1:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be true, that might be true. All right, let's go

1:22:49.800 --> 1:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to our Monday night game taking place in mexicollicoll and

1:22:59.479 --> 1:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are correspondent one one? No, it's mateo, mateo one, Yeah,

1:23:03.880 --> 1:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>blond matteo. Um, hey I need some here we go yeah,

1:23:08.439 --> 1:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>now now I'm feeling it. This is the way to

1:23:10.680 --> 1:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do it. The Kansas City f As at the Los

1:23:14.360 --> 1:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Cargodores in Mexico. Um, we'll start with some Briado McCoy.

1:23:20.960 --> 1:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Shady McCoy, who was a healthy scratch last week.

1:23:24.280 --> 1:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>He's still on your bench. Damian Williams, he gets the bay.

1:23:28.080 --> 1:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Not to wait, that's not p plus is it? No?

1:23:31.320 --> 1:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Not to gra Okay, thank you? Yeah you get an

1:23:34.280 --> 1:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a bay or say yeah obviously. Williams had twenty four

1:23:39.200 --> 1:23:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nine touches last week, including five receptions. Those

1:23:42.680 --> 1:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>five receptions are important as the Chargers have allowed an

1:23:45.400 --> 1:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>average of eight capturas and sixty receiving yards in their

1:23:49.720 --> 1:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>last five games to the running back positions. When you

1:23:52.680 --> 1:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>add in three receiving scores to opposing backs in that time,

1:23:56.439 --> 1:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a scoring fiesta for Damian Williams. Patricio

1:24:02.080 --> 1:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Macasa he gets an cute yes, Patrisa never mind no

1:24:12.479 --> 1:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes Tobilo. Tobio ankle injury looked like a non factor

1:24:17.479 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>last week as he threw four quatro cientos quarenta passing

1:24:22.240 --> 1:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>yards that's four forty six in Tennessee. The Cargadores have

1:24:26.400 --> 1:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>been good against the past, but Vuelo superior quarterbacks such

1:24:30.439 --> 1:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as Deshaun Watson and Ryan Tannehill have each top three

1:24:34.080 --> 1:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>yards and thrown for multiple scores this year. Travis Kelsey

1:24:37.520 --> 1:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>gets the bay. Nota Kelsey is not Mattiol against the

1:24:43.560 --> 1:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Chargers since they moved to l A. He has not

1:24:45.680 --> 1:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown against the Chargers since they've become the

1:24:48.280 --> 1:24:51.759
<v Speaker 1>l A Chargers, in fact, outside of Kansas City because

1:24:51.800 --> 1:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>two his last two lines against the Chargers are one

1:24:54.760 --> 1:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>catch for six yards and one catch for Juno yard.

1:24:59.080 --> 1:25:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Yuck uh. The Chargers haven't allowed a tight end touchdown

1:25:02.560 --> 1:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in seven games. Derwin James isn' due back for another

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, but he was the guy who really

1:25:06.960 --> 1:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>shut down Kelsey last year, so that's why Kelsey still

1:25:10.120 --> 1:25:17.799
<v Speaker 1>gets the bay. Tyreek Colina Hill he gets the nota

1:25:18.840 --> 1:25:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Mikole Duro hard Man. Yeah, and Sammy Watkins are on

1:25:24.600 --> 1:25:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the bunco Uh. Tough to knock a guy with nineteen

1:25:27.800 --> 1:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>targets last week. Like like Tyreek Hill. The only minus

1:25:31.400 --> 1:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>here is the matchup. No wide receiver has topped seventy

1:25:33.960 --> 1:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored against the Chargers in the last three games.

1:25:36.720 --> 1:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They've only allowed one wide receiver to top a hundred

1:25:39.120 --> 1:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>yards on the year, and there's just not enough to

1:25:41.080 --> 1:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>go around outside of Hill, so the other guys are

1:25:42.800 --> 1:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I'm a bombko. Isn't that bank or

1:25:45.000 --> 1:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>is that Banko? That's Banko Philippe Rios. On the other side,

1:25:53.080 --> 1:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>he gets the same not Rivers hasn't topped dose touchdown

1:25:57.560 --> 1:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>passes since Week one. He's only three yard mark twice

1:26:01.479 --> 1:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in his last six games. The bright side is that

1:26:03.960 --> 1:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have allowed multiple scores to each of the

1:26:06.080 --> 1:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>past three quarterbacks they've faced. His favorite receiver is Kaza

1:26:10.600 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Door Henry. He gets a note. Uh. He's totaled at

1:26:15.080 --> 1:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>least forty seven yards or score in every game he's

1:26:17.439 --> 1:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>played this season, and the Chiefs are bottom ten in

1:26:20.200 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>receptions and yards allowed to the tight end position. Hunter

1:26:23.320 --> 1:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Henry a great uh. Miguel Williams, he's on the bench.

1:26:27.240 --> 1:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I mostly just wanted him to call call him Miguel.

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't scored yet this season, hasn't topped six targets

1:26:33.000 --> 1:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or four receptions any of the last four weeks. But

1:26:35.240 --> 1:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen he gets the bay note and what should

1:26:37.880 --> 1:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be a shootout. Allen as upside ten or more targets

1:26:40.400 --> 1:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and three of his last four. Hasn't scored since Week three.

1:26:43.360 --> 1:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't scored in seven weeks. Keenan Allen. However, the Chiefs

1:26:47.280 --> 1:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are only allowing ten catches and one fourteen on average

1:26:51.000 --> 1:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position over the last five games. That's

1:26:53.080 --> 1:26:57.479
<v Speaker 1>all got to go to Keyan Allen here. Uh, Melvin Gordon,

1:26:57.560 --> 1:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets an ah note here. Um. Gordon has re

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>established himself as the conquistador of the Chargers backfield with

1:27:05.640 --> 1:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>over twenty carries and back to back weeks that resulted

1:27:08.960 --> 1:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in Ciento Centa Echo eight total yards and three touchdowns

1:27:14.320 --> 1:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in those two weeks. Speaking of Ciento Centa Echo eight yards,

1:27:19.760 --> 1:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly how many Derrick Henry ran for last week

1:27:22.160 --> 1:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Chiefs. Every top back to face the Chiefs

1:27:25.120 --> 1:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last three weeks has topped two hundred and

1:27:27.240 --> 1:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ten total yards, which brings in to play Austin Ekeler.

1:27:30.320 --> 1:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the final guy in this matchup. He gets a

1:27:32.400 --> 1:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>say nota. He's still averaging twelve touches per game over

1:27:35.800 --> 1:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks since Gordon really took over. And

1:27:38.200 --> 1:27:40.559
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting we're only a couple of weeks removed

1:27:40.600 --> 1:27:43.519
<v Speaker 1>from Aaron Jones going for seven catches, a hundred and

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine yards and two touchdowns through the air. So

1:27:46.280 --> 1:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why Austin Ekeler is still in play. I think

1:27:48.880 --> 1:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he is in play very possibly Mexico City Field doesn't

1:27:55.280 --> 1:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>end up destroying anybody. Well, they didn't turn him around

1:27:57.840 --> 1:28:00.599
<v Speaker 1>and put him back in l A. All right, it's

1:28:00.600 --> 1:28:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a good sign. Um, we've only got a few moments

1:28:02.840 --> 1:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>left in the show. Let me get you with a

1:28:04.120 --> 1:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of quick ones. Brian Johnson, Can I drop Juju?

1:28:07.720 --> 1:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith Schuster outright? He's in the concussion protocol? His status

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for next week Week twelve unknown? Yeah, sabotage drop Juju.

1:28:16.040 --> 1:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a headache you don't want to deal with if

1:28:17.800 --> 1:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the playoffs with Juju and roster. But ye,

1:28:20.920 --> 1:28:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I would drop it down the stretch. Would you rather

1:28:22.600 --> 1:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have Juju or Alexander Madison? I'd rather have the handcuffed.

1:28:27.439 --> 1:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather exactly or Madison. And that even if, even

1:28:30.400 --> 1:28:33.519
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have Dalvin Cook, just in case something happens,

1:28:33.800 --> 1:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he's your Sander. Madison's the top tennis you're taking. Tony

1:28:36.320 --> 1:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Pollock could be the same way. Maybe it's another opportunity

1:28:39.360 --> 1:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. Al Right, guys, a nice job. Thank you

1:28:41.680 --> 1:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for all your help with we get people ready for

1:28:43.280 --> 1:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>week number eleven, And if you love this show, go

1:28:45.439 --> 1:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to fanball dot com. Slash chart for my free player rankings,

1:28:48.280 --> 1:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>my free one thousand dollar weekly contest, our, Frantic auctions,

1:28:51.479 --> 1:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and podcasts and more, and many thanks everybody who takes

1:28:54.360 --> 1:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the time to rank and review the show on your

1:28:57.080 --> 1:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasting platform of choice. Really appreciate all of your feedback, good, bad,

1:29:01.240 --> 1:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise, and we look forward to bringing you a

1:29:03.960 --> 1:29:07.439
<v Speaker 1>fresh Fantasy Football Weekly next week. Bye bye. Fantasy Football

1:29:07.520 --> 1:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of I heart Radio. For more

1:29:10.200 --> 1:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:29:13.040 --> 1:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.