WEBVTT - Selects: How Gossip Works

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>M Hey everybody, it's Saturday, and I've got to tell

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you I heard something about Jerry the other day that

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I should say, but if you

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>promise not to tell anyone, I will tell you right now.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>She is pretty great. That's called bad gossip. No one

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear gossip like that. The only good gossip

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is maybe to say that Jerry is not great for

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a list of reasons. But I'm not going to do

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that because Jerry is great. But you could listen to

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode from December, a Christmas episode. It's all about

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>gossip and it's called How Gossip Works. Welcome to Stuff

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you should know, a production of I Heart Radio. Hey,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark and there's

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Charles w Chuck Bryant and uh, it's just two of

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>us again. Man, not getting any easier. This is just

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>let's getting old, it is, man. We need Jerry back.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are you, Jerry? Where did you go? I selfish?

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Jerry wants to be at home with her baby. Yeah,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we all went to shopping at Kmart and she wandered

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>off and we haven't seen her since. We all want

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to be at home with Jerry's baby. Sure, that's a

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>cute baby, but we can't be you know the old

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 1>joke that Jerry could be replaced with a those dipping

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>birds just to hit record. We were just kidding. It's

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's happening. It is true, maybe not the post production stuff,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>but definitely the recording thing. Clearly takes a finger to say, Okay,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys are rolling. Yeah, we cannot stop griping about

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this time. I know it's just weird. You know, when

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a threesome becomes to twosome, things get awkward. Yeah, I try,

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a diade, or when it twosome becomes a

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>threesome that gets super awkward. Or I mean really, anytime

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you're moving people in and out of some sort of dynamics,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it can be weird. Transition could be rough, I think

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is the that's what you put on the T shirt. Ultimately,

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>al right, the transition is rough anytime you're moving people

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in and out of a dynamic. Ready, yes, didn't know

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you say that already. Yeah we're recording, Chuck, I have

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something for you. Right. I am not much of a

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>gossip at all. I just don't do it. But do

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know who does Jerry a lot, and she's really vicious.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I know she's not here right now, but just between

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the two of us, I don't gossip. Jerry does, and

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you should really watch out for her. I heard that

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>she gossips. I'm not saying that, but I just heard that.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I got you, well, I've seen her do it. She's

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>gossip to me because she finds me very important and

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>likes to confide to me. But it's just so vicious.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So we just gossiped. We did. That was play acting.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The ironic thing was that I was gossiping about how

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't gossip. That that came through. Huh, everybody gossips, Yeah,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess so. I mean, apparently people gossip way more

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>than they realize. But I think you're I think gossip

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is a normal thing. It has such a bad connotation

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>though that people say, like, I don't gossip, I'm not

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a gossip but liars. Technically, not necessarily even liars. I

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>think it also as far as like linguists and psychologists

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are concerned, it comes from a misunderstanding of what gossip,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes gossip. That's right, Like, at its basic, barest,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>bare bottomed element, gossip is simply too, or it can

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>be more but a couple of people speaking about a

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>third person's business while the third person isn't there. There's

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>another person who's being talked about who isn't there. It

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean you're talking about how they're just just

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what allows you parents. They are sure spending baby shoe

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>money on gambling rather than gambling in order to get

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>more shoes. That's bad parenting right there. There's all sorts

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff you can say, but you could also say, actually,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy is a great dude. He spends all of

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>his money on nothing but baby shoes. That's gossip. It

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is gossip, and it's not necessarily harmful. It's in this

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>case you're you're helping someone else's social status in the

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>other people's eyes. That's still gossip. Yeah, I think, um,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what's this tracy of stuff you missed in history class?

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Wrote this one? That is true? She's always thorough and

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>uh she included in here something I thought was pretty

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pertinent gossip v rumor Yeah. Uh, And there are differences

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in Um, well, I say there's differences, but if you

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ask professionals who study this, and there are weirdos who

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do that Um, they will say sometimes now it's the

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Or a rumor is just a type of gossip. Uh,

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>here's some other distinguishing factors. Gossip is based in fact,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>rumors are based in hypotheses. Um, I don't know about

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that one. That makes sense to me because it kind

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of ties in with the last one. Yeah, gossip is

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a tool for maintaining social order, which we're gonna talk

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>about at length. Rumor is a tool for explaining things

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that people do not understand. I'm not sure I get

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that one. Like there's garbage raining from the sky, it's

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the government, that's a rumor, okay. Whereas if you're like

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Charles is up on the roof again dumping his garbage

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>out on the street's technically so yeah, or that's just

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>laying it out there, you know. Yeah true. Uh. And

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>then finally, gossip or late something people believe has happened,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but rumor expresses something people hope or fear will happen.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>So I have my own hypothesis of the distinction between

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rumor and gossip. It's here, Uh, rumor is uncurated gossip rumors.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Any dude walking down the street, you can be like,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there's garbage falling from this guy and it's the government.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>There's no bond that's formed. There's no requirement of a bond,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whereas gossip requires some sort of connection, or you're forming

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a connection from the gossip. You know what I'm saying.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Rumbor is just for anybody. Gossip is between confidence to

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an extent. Yeah, and Tracy points that out too, And

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that is why supposedly celebrity gossip isn't qualified, doesn't qualify

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as gossip because it's a third party that doesn't know

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the others in general, unless it's you know, Jennifer Ranison,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's talking smack about Angelina. No, she would never do that.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, No, she loves courting cocks. They're still friends.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Huh sure. Why doesn't she ever have around cougar Town?

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Then I think she was on cougar Town? Well I

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>stayed corrected, although I have no idea because I've never

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>seen cougar down. Did you hear about what happened when

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>she was on cougar Town? I heard she washed her

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>hair and heavy and water. That's Shannon Doherty? Yeah, that's right.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that a rumor? Gossip? I don't know, because we

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know Shannon dherty. Uh. And then there are some

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>other stipulations that researchers point out for gossip that I

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>also take issue with. Some of these. Um, the conversation

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>takes place in private usually the case, yeah, if not

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like actual private depends on what private means. You you,

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got the shoulders turn. There's like a creation of

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a private situation. Yeah, I got you. Uh. People are

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>saying it as if it were fact, even though it's

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not confirmed. That's definitely true. Yeah, but that's not necessarily

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the case. That's I take issue with that one. It's

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you were saying, like I heard, but

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't checked it out to take it with a

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt. But get this yeah man uh people, Yeah,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we already talked about that knowing each other. And then

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the body language and tone, uh suggests a moral judgment.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one, you know, like when people use

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this tone. But again, that's malicious gossip. Typically there's such

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a thing, So this is it should be said. Tracy

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really say it in this Um. I think she

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was drinking while she was writing this one. That's what

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I heard. Um, she didn't lay out that there's really

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>two types of gossip. One is malicious gossip. That's the

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>type of gossip people think about when they hear the

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>word gossip. But the other type, the far more are

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently far more prevalent type, is um regular gossip. Yeah,

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some weird, unsubstantiated stat here that only that five

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was malicious, Yeah among most gossip. Yeah, how in the

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>world did they pull that out of their key start?

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's that's a great question. So they are linguists, historians, uh, anthropologists, psychologists,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people who started studying gossip for a very long time.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is aware of gossip, but they're like, it's just noise.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not to be studied, it's to be ignored. And

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, there's this really great article

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in The Atlantic that talked about gossip and how it

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>was viewed um and specifically, there was this thing in

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth and seventeenth century England they didn't like it, called

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the scolds bridle. And if you want to see what

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a scolds bridle is, you should check that out online,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>because there are actual such things. But they're basically iron

0:08:55.720 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>masks with like points sticking into the The woman who

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>was accused of gossip's mouth usually a woman and she

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>would just have to wear that and be publicly humiliated.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them had like a leash leading from them.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the gossip or the scold is what

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they used to call, could be paraded around town, right, Yeah,

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and also get the feeling that a lot of women

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>were probably made to wear those who just talked too much. Yeah,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I would I have the same the same impression because

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the time period of So that's how people typically

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>viewed gossip. It was something to be stamped out. It

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was something that was um very undesirable, and academia treated

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it the same way. Then World War two came around

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think the government saw that there was some

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>real harm that could be done with gossip, with rumors,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to start to understand that. So that

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of led to the basis of academia investigating what

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>gossip was, what rumors are, and then um, over time

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>organizations got in on the act because there came this

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>idea you that if the rumor mill or the gossip

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>mill in your office was really going over time, you

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>needed to stamp that out. True. They've found the opposite

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually true. Yeah, they found it can do a

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>lot in a workplace to keep people in line, Uh,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>either by scaring them in line or what it What

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a lot of gossip does in that

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment, is it establishes like the norms and

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the culture is expected out of the bosses. That's like

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one low level that's like low level background gossip if

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's peaking and really working over time. You, from what

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand, you're not supposed to attack the gossips. What

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to do is be more transparent at the top,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and then people don't have reason to gossip. So it's

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not It doesn't mean that you have a lot of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gossips at your place. That's a normal human situation. As

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, it means that your managers and the people

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who are running the show aren't being open enough for

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the the hoi polois tastes, right, see what I mean? Yeah,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>good point, And that was a big thing that came

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out of study it. But to answer your question, I'm

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about to finish, they study it by eavesdropping on like

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are talking in cafeterious. That's how about the

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>only way you can Yeah, because it's so spontaneous and

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's largely unconscious. Yeah, unless it's you know, just some

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>dumb pole where you're asking people about gossip and self

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>reporting poles like that. I don't put a lot of

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>stock in you know, Well, actually they're funny to look at.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>There's one that found that about we spend about three

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>quarters of our time gossiping apparently. Yeah, and that's in

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the broadest sense of the definition, right, not necessarily malicious. Yeah,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>because about five percent of that supposed lyst malicious. But

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people self report gossiping about they they spend about thirty

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of their time. So rather than people are like, oh,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>only gossip, yea, and all that comes from eavesdropping on

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>people and then asking them afterwards whether they gossip. Tracy

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>points out rightfully so that most world religions have always

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>said gossip is a bad thing. Uh, include in the

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian Bible. Uh in Leviticus, Thou'll shalt not go up

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and down as a talebearer among thy people. Oh that

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>was good. By the way, I wanna echo the kudos

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that have wrong throughout social media, applauding your scary spider

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>growing redneck man. In the Halloween episode, it was cleardis

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a slack jold yokel sort of and my friend Big John, well,

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it was good. It was a mashup. I appreciate that

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it was Big John in New York. No, he's in

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he's in Atlanta. Okay. Um. I actually thought your your

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>vomit take was the funniest part of the whole thing,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the gag, thank you, thank you. Uh. Jewish tour always

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>also says so in Buddhism. We've talked about Buddhism before

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the eight full Path to Enlightenment. No place for gossip there,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>my friend, No way, not if you want to become

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>one with the universe, no gossiping. And like like I

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>said earlier too, it's not just the religious hypes that

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are against it. People. And remember the business world kind

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of started looking in on this, and they're like, don't

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gossip if you want to be a good person, don't

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>gossip and spreading unless you're spreading a gossip rumor that

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we want you to spread. Right, that's the official company line. Uh.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this dude, Robin Dunbar, who wrote a

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>book called Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. And

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked into this guy. He he really goes for it.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He says that gossip is the whole reason that we

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>have language, and it evolved from primates grooming each other

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and that took so much time to groom one another

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't efficient. That language was created in order

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>to not have to groom one another, and so you

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>would vocal groom, that's what he called it. So this

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a big deal. Let's let's take a break

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>for a second because we're pretty deep into this, and

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about Dunbar and his mad ideas after this.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dunbar, Dunbar can't put them off any longer,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Robin Dunbar. Yeah, that's a pretty out there theory. I

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think like Dunbar is saying, we developed language so we

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>could gossip in in essence. Yeah, the tide of grooming

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is where he loses me a bit, and vocal grooming,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just he says basically it was a more efficient

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>way to uh service your allies rather than grooming one another. Right,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think what he's saying is that when you

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>win a primate grooms another primate, it's an act of

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>um kindness. It's saying like I'm doing something nice for you.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It gives the other primate who's being groomed, an opportunity

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to reciprocate, INSUREM and even stronger bond. Right, scratch my back.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But it takes a little while to do all this

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff because you're actually going through the act of grooming,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you just gossip about somebody, Um, you can

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of that same stuff, but just by talking. Yeah,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't get what it has to do with

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>picking knits out of fur. It's it's I think what

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he's saying is it's it developed out of that. It

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>serves a lot of the same purposes. Plus also it's

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that gossip began around the time or I

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>guess during grooming sessions. Think about it, If you're just

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting there picking knits out of somebody, are you just

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit there silently not chat start chatting? How how

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>easy is it going to be to lead to tuck

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tuck and what he did after he ate that for minute? Apple, Sure,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like the barbershop or the beauty shop, right kind of. Um,

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some different roles though that it does play

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in social interactions where I guess the grooming thing comes

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.359
<v Speaker 1>into play. Um, entertaining one another, like you said, influence

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on one another. That's a big one. Um. Exchanging information,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that's important, uh. And one of the biggest ones is

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>learning from mistakes that UH linguists point out is a

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really big part of gossip, or a part of positive gossip,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and that there's oftentimes a moral lesson attached to it. Yeah,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like you don't want this to happen to you, right, No, exactly,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of um in that respect. It gets

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>across somebody who's perhaps a little more established in a group,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe an older person, like ingratiate yourself, right, But but

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's also saying, like I'm a part of this group.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You're a little newer than I am. Let me tell

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you the story about what this guy did when he

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>transgressed against the group and bad things befell him. Like

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you said, don't let this happen to you. Don't transgress

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the group's boundaries, right, And that's important if you get

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're like a new hire, they say, a lot

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of gossip flies, uh. Like I remember the movie Be Big,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Remember when Tom Hanks gets hired. Like the very first

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens is John Lovitts comes over and starts

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about all the gossip of everyone in the office.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that part. Oh yeah, he talks about

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>like this lady is easy and this guy's a jerk,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's just pretty common. I think when you get

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a new job, there's always someone in there that's like

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And what they're doing, though, is they're not just it's

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not purely they're trying to help themselves. It's socialization. It's

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in dr nature. Oh that's not what I thought you

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>were gonna say. No, Like, I think they're trying to

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be like, well here's a new ally I can get right, Yeah,

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so let me let me you know. I mean, it's

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's they're also it's reciprocal, I guess to a certain degree. Yeah,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>both people are getting something out of it. But I mean,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you make a good point. The person who is doing

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the gossiping, especially in that situation, is setting themselves up

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>as a like a wise older sage or advisor, like

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I know this place. You come to me if you

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>want some information. Well you'll find though over the years,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you should. The first person who comes up

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and starts gossiping to you about how the office works

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is usually also the most disliked. Yeah, you know, that's

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>why they cast John Lovett. He's great for that. That

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>or the dude with forehead the size of a dinner

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>plate who was in all the eighties movies as that character?

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Was he the jerkin big I don't know, is the

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>dad from Home Alone? No? No, no, this is um

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the coked up sidekick from the eighties with the huge forehead.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He was in About You. He was the sidekicking mad

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>about you. Oh that guy? Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, same

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>same function. Yeah, he's uh. He's in that show now,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>ah with Joey Tribbiani. It's called Joey, Melissa and Joey. No,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he's on the episodes. Yeah, yeah, he's on episodes too, Okay, great.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Does he play himself now? He plays a jerk? Um

0:18:55.760 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>uh TV executive perfect, exactly. I love that guy that.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He's such a good actor. No, that's what I'm saying.

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But he always plays that part. He's definitely he's got

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that part down. You're right, he's not a romantic lead. Um.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times. The feeling of superiority is another

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>big part of gossip, like I would never do this um.

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And Tracy also points out the old schaden freuda, which

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite words. It's a good word

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of my least favorite things. That's you must

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>be very ambivalent about that word. What do you mean? Well,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if you love it but you also hate what it means, well,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>let's got to tear you up inside. Well. I just

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like someone delighting in someone else's misfortune unless it's

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a bad person. Yeah, Like if the Jimmy John's guy

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like shot his toe off on a big game hunt.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he's a big game hunter. I would probably

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think that was kind of you know, just as I

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's acceptable shot in freuda, Okay, especially if it

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was just a relatively minor injury. You know, you go

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>shod in. Yeah, you say shaden shod and frauda. That's

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how I say it, So, Chuck, kind of what a

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>couple of Like we've were kind of dancing back and

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>forth across this line, like going to the office, setting

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>up the first day and having somebody come over and

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you how the things work. Yes, there might be

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of malicious gossip in there, but for

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the most part, that's not bad gossip. That's neutral gossip, right,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But putting someone else down or talking about how how

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>much superior you are by not you would never do

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what they did. That's definitely the malicious variety. And there's

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>an idea that if gossip evolved like um, Robin yeah, like,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>like Robin Leach says in his post Rich and Famous

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Career he became an anthropologist, you know, Um, Robin Leach

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>says that if if language evolved as a means of gossiping,

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the guy takes it further by saying, Um, the reason gossip,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the reason we needed that in the first place

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was because we grew out of these little hunter gatherer

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bands of like fifteen people, and as our societies grew

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>larger and larger, we weren't as able to be able

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep tabs personally on others in this group that's

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>getting bigger and bigger, So you don't know who to trust.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I'm going to leave my crops to

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody while I go on a walk about or something,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I need to make sure that all my crops are

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be there when I get back, you know,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really know this guy. Gossiping serves that function.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like a stand in for being able to

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>keep tabs on everybody else in the society, because when

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you gossip with somebody, you're sharing a trust, a bond

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to use that information against you

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that you shared with them. And um, so there's a

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a definite element of trust to it. And when

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when people gossip in a larger society, they're they're trusting

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that the person is either vouching for the person or

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>they're being warned against trusting that third party. Right, So

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it works in that same way that it's like a

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a means of um keeping tabs on everybody at

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time. On the other hand, or at the

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>same time, it's also um a means of social control

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you know people are gossiping about everybody else,

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then surely they're gonna gossip about you too, which means

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you better just be an upstanding, upright person. Yeah, there

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was this uh, this what's his first name, Fineberg, let's

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>just say Dr Fineberg, Dr Fineberg at Toronto in Toronto,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>University of Toronto. He's done some studies and he did

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>find in fact that uh, basically they did these studies

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>where they were um, were you were allowed to exclude

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>non co operators in like a group work setting, and

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they found that you you set them out for one game,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like you've not been playing nicely, so you go sit

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>over there in the corner, and when they came back,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>they were more likely to behave in other rounds. And uh,

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if they knew that their behavior was gossiped about people,

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of like what you're talking about, the staring, Like

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>if you knew someone was watching you, you would return

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the grocery cart. If you know, if you know someone's

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gossiping about you, you're gonna tow that line and get

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>your act together exactly. It's again, it's a means of

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>social control. You know. Who were really really really good

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at gossiping. Uh, the Puritans in colonial America, they were huge,

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Like their whole society operated on gossip and the encouragement

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of gossip. As a matter of fact, I think women

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>were called gossips um and not necessarily negatively. It's just

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like there was a really good means of social control.

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Not only was God watching you, your neighbors were too,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and they would go tell the preacher who would put

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a scolds bridle on you and maybe them too for

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>telling and toss you in the lake. Yeah, and if

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you if you drowned, you weren't a witch. All right,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>well let's take another break and we'll talk a little

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more about some studies and some other theories about

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the origin of gossip. Uh so, Fineberg, we talked about

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Dr Freinberg. Okay, I hope he or she is a doctor, um,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but if not, we just gave him an honorary honorary

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>doctorate from stuff. You should know you people are going

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to request those now, which is great, but we can

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>sell them. Uh So. One thing that he found is

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that gossip can also relieve you, um, physiologically, Like if

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that you're allowed to gossip, you won't get

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as upset about unfair things then if you had to

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>hold it all in or it's like a way of

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>setting injustice, right yeah, like it's street justice without like

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a Saudo shotgun as Charles Bronze I would dispense it right.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, good point. Man. Have you gone back and

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>seen Death Wish recently? That is a rough movie. Yeah,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, same with Death Wish too. What did you

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>think it was? I mean, I remember seeing movies when

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid and just being like, you know,

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>as a growing up You're like, this was nothing. That

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was something. Those movies were very violent and very disturbing.

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You see, Joles Brunson did not ask questions. No, he

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just shot everybody. He did. Man, that was crazy. Why

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>why did you go back and rewatch Death Wish? I

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta watch something good? Point it was on. That's why

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I got you. I was like, I haven't seen Death

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Wishing forever. When's the last time you saw it? It's

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>been a while. It's disturbing, especially as an adult. You

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know what movie I love? What Chardles Brunson movie I love?

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Is a mechanic? Well, that one's good too. Um, what's

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it called ten past Midnight? Is that right? I think

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that's on Netflix. Maybe there was. There was some creepy

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>serial killer, like psycho sexual killer that he was. He

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was he's always hunting some money. He was the Liam

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Neeson of his day. That was like supposedly a very

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>very underrated horror thriller, horror slasher thriller. I'm with you

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way. I haven't seen it's good though, it's good.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll check it out. Very creepy and and I learned,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>well it's not for kids because I learned some things

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in that movie. Oh yeah, yeah, it's one of those

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I can specifically remember. It's like, oh, well, that's how

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I know what this is. Charles Bronson will teach you

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all about life, whether you want to learn it or not.

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was ten past midnight. Um, all right,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that sidetrack. Where were we? Uh we were

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about the origins of gossip. Oh yeah, there's some

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you read the other article I sent? Um? I

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think it was from the Guardian, I can't remember where.

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the theories is that I was a BBC

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that hunting and gathering and foraging was a big reason

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>gossiping came about because you had to know, you had

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about each other, like you know tuk tuk.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not very good at the hunting, but

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he's quite the gatherer. So it helps them organize in

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the most efficient way to get things done, because how

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is she going to know unless you tell somebody what's

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>going on. So that makes sense, No, it is. And again,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>if this person, if the if the band is large

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>enough for the civilization is large enough that the person

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>can't keep an eye on tuk tuk all the time,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how that person will gain understanding of tuk tuk's

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>abilities for tuck tuck keeping tabs on poor tuktok uh.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the other cool thing I thought was the

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>uh when we finally learned to harness fire. Uh. This

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is during the day, we were out, you know,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to stay alive and doing our thing, finding building shelters,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>hunting for food, finding water, and at night when we

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>finally got fire, well before fire, you would just go

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to sleep and rest because it was dark and it's

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>weird to sit around the dark. But once they had fire,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>people literally from the very beginning started sitting around and

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about their day and kind of gossiping about what happened.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's amazing. It's hard to blame anybody if you

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think about it, like, when's the last time you had

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a legitimately interesting conversation about fantastical stuff? They're there are

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>few and far between. For the most part. People are

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about their day. They're talking about people they work with,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about some dude that cut them off in traffic.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about their immediate experience. So of course you're

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna gossip. It's this if if the definition of gossip

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is talking about people who aren't there every year, right,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone gossips you're going to It's a completely natural thing.

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm totally unsurprised by the idea that it started

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>out at the first campfire, of course, and it still

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>happens today. Apparently, there are researchers who studied um bushmen

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Kalahari Desert in Botswana and they say that

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the language and the stories and the things they say

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>during the day are completely different than the things they

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>say at night around the campfire. And they say, there's

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really no reason to think this hasn't always been the case.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>That's neat um. So you said that still goes on

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to day, And we were talking about modern studies of gossiping, right, Um.

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the there was like a series of studies.

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they were all from the U

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of Toronto or not, but they seemed to be somewhat

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>related where it was um. Outside observers could watch people

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 1>playing games and they noticed cheaters. So they had this

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>information about cheaters that the people playing the games didn't

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have about the cheaters. And when they were given the

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the chance to let the players know about a cheater,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to send him. I think like a gossip note is

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what they called it. UM. They they would most people

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would take them up on the offer and would send

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a note of warning to the person that they were

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>playing somebody who was cheating UM, and they, like you said,

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they went from being really upset and up in arms

0:29:55.800 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to that release valve being undone and every it was

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>fine with the world again because that person had been

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>alerted to cheating through gossiping. So there is such thing

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>as altruistic gossiping as well. Yeah, with altruism. Tracy had

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>another example of let's say there's like a coral group

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and the self appointed leader is really kind of lazy,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and if someone um, then other people are kind of

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>making up the slack doing the duties that UM he

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or she should be doing. So when new comes in

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the group and they say, hey, listen this this girl,

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Jane is the head of the coral group. But you

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>should know don't count on Jane to bring the sheet

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>music for you because she never does it. So that's

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of altruistic in the you're helping someone learn the

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>rules of your new group, but you're also kind of

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>talking smack and making yourself superior to Jane, right. And

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>then so Tracy adde of this one another thing that

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>some people would say that the person who's doing that

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is really, like you said, just talking smack and isn't

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>really working towards a solution to the actual problem, which

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is Jane being slack at her job. Right. And I wonder,

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like that's a really good descriptive of what gossip is.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Like gossip would be talk that's not directed toward any

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of solution. It's just talking. You know, like if

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you take that same conversation to somebody who can fire

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Jane or make her do her job, you would no

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one would consider that gossip because it's directed toward a goal,

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>towards the solution. So I guess, and that's probably one

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that people don't like about gossip. It's it's really

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, it's just blowing off steam.

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not really serving any direct purpose. They all seem

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be indirect, like socializing people. I did, now I

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>need an honorary doctor from somewhere. You've got one. Um.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, chuck um. One of the other things,

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>especially from malicious bond Um malicious Um gossip, is that

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>UM when somebody. It's a very dangerous game, right, when

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gossiping with somebody, especially you with somebody that you're

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not super tight with, um, you you run the risk

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of scaring that person. Because if there's one thing that

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>people do when they hear gossip, it's they take themselves

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and put themselves in that situation. And one of the

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>things that you will immediately think when you're being gossip too,

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is well, this person gossips, so they could very easily

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be gossiping about me. How much should I trust this person?

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's especially pertinent when it's not already like a

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>tight pair, and when the gossip is malicious, you know.

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Good point. Yeah, well it's not mine. I'm just relating facts.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>You ever see you ever watched that Gossip Girl show? No,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's a Twitter handle gossip girl. I'd noticed in

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>my research, and it's like real right, No, it's like

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>real gossip. Really Yeah, I've never seen it either, But

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not real gossip because it's all celebrity gossip, right.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a kid's not a kid show show

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for younger people than me. It's for middle aged man.

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Although I do like Blake Lively, so well that was

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one other thing too, like when I don't we haven't

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>come out and said this. Um, there's a definite perception

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that gossip is much more prevalent among women. Sure that's

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not true. No, No, research shows that men and women

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>basically across the board equally gossip. It's old white men. Yeah,

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's old white old white men under attack in America.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You got anything else? Uh? No, sir, being trolley? You

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>know that? Yeah? Uh. If you want to know more

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about gossip, you can type that word in the search

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>bar at how stuff works dot com and it will

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>bring up this article complete with totally superfluous illustrations that

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>will baffle the mind. Um, did you see him? Yeah,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just weird. I kept looking like did I miss

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a story or something that relates to that. It became

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a game find the meaning? Uh? And I think I

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>said search bar, and I think I said how stuff works.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 1>But either way, it's time for listening. Now I'm gonna

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>call this Disney Disney band. Hello, Chuck, Josh and Jerry

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and Neil. He really wouldn't Neil the chair, No, Frank

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was the chair. I think he means nol probably, So

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just hilarious. I've been listening for a few months now,

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>binging episodes like uh, well, I can't see what she says. Um.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I just listened to your part one of Fairy Tales

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last time on my way to work. The

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm writing is about the original Little Mermaid story.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>When I was growing up, my parents were hardcore Southern Baptist.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>During my childhood, the Southern Baptist Convention did not like

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that Disney was friendly towards homosexuals and supported evolution, so

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>they called on all the churches to boycott Disney. So

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>my parents, a good Southern Baptist that they were, took

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>everything Disney out of our house and we weren't allowed

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to have any Disney clothes or watch the Disney Channel,

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course no Disney movies. So when the Disney

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>version of The Little Mermaid came out in nine I

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>was in first grade, all my friends watched it, loved it.

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>My mom was at a loss. Luckily, Golden Films released

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>their own version of The Little Mermaid and my mom

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 1>bought it. I watched this many times as a child,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>honestly thinking this is the only vision. Didn't learn until

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a few years later when I saw the original at

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>her friend's house. Um, boy, I bet she felt like

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>watching The Little Mermaid. It's in color. Uh. This version

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw followed the original story by Hans Christian Anderson,

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>complete with a terrifying sea witch and the suicide at

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the end, which was a great movie for a first grader,

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the sea which started my nightmares. That's about the time

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that I started smoking cigarette. So thanks for all the

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>great side tracking as well as the amazing content you provide.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And that is from Lindsay. Well, thanks a lot, Lindsay

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. I'm glad you finally got to see The

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Little Mermaid. I like that she thanked us for side tracking.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Some people do. Sure, it's pretty infrequent people are like

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to you on point, and when they do, I'm like, buddy,

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you have a long archive to go through. If that

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.479
<v Speaker 1>bothers you, We've got There's a lot of good sidetracks today.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was ten past midnight, by the way. Nice um.

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with this, you

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>can tweet to us at s Y s K Podcasts.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You can join us on Facebook dot com slash stuff

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you should know. You can send us an email to

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and Chuck

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>as always join us at at home on the web

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuck Chuck, Stuff you Should Know Chuck dot Com. Stuff

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio. For

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.