WEBVTT - Would You Rather?-- Teammates Edition 0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.040 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.520 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:15.200 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, 0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.160 and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. 0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.760 Now here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. 0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:25.840 I am Paul Chargey in My co host this week 0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:31.680 is Bryan Johnson. What's up. Good to talk to you again. 0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.199 And this week's we're playing a game. You know a 0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:36.800 lot of times you're just grinding up a bunch of 0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.120 news and you know, all the latest stuff, and here's 0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.559 what's happening to the draft of free agency. This is 0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.959 our would you rather game. We've done this from time 0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.320 to time over the course of the Fantasy Football Weekly 0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.640 regular season show. I'm gonna give you the average draft 0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.520 position of two teammates, and I want you to choose 0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:01.840 one or the other. Factoring in the average draft position, 0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.759 you know, it's obvious which guy you'd rather have if 0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.480 one of the other. But if you've got to pay 0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.479 the price for one, who would you rather have? Let's 0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:14.319 do it. We've got nine teammates to evaluate. The game 0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.160 never gets old, by the way, but it stands the 0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.240 test of time, and there's some good ones. Indeed it does. 0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.000 We begin in Buffalo. Would you and the running backs? 0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.440 Would you rather have Devin Singletary right now going off 0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.680 with an average draft position of the fourth round, or 0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.520 rookie running back Zack Moss with an average draft position 0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.880 of the round. Devin Singletary was very good at the 0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.640 end of last year. Zack Moss a bit of an unknown. 0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.920 What do you think? Yeah, that's quite the disparity in rounds, 0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.480 that are right. So I went right to your favorite 0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.000 spot charts inside the five yard line for this one. 0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.280 And uh, Devin Singletary a very exciting running back, but 0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.120 kind of more of a scatback, certainly not a power back. 0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.560 And us by his three carries inside the ten yard 0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.160 line last year. I know he said inside the five, 0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.040 but this is inside the ten obviously twice as far 0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.839 out is it? Five? Only ten carries or I'm sorry, 0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.079 only three carries inside the ten. Frank Gore had eighteen, 0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.840 Josh Allen had eleven. Yeah, Josh Allen nearly quadrupled these 0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:22.040 carries inside the ten yard line. So right there, Zack Moss, 0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.720 rookie at Utah been heralded as a five tool running back, 0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.720 meaning he can run through you, run around you, just 0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.040 run right by you, avoid you entirely. If you wants 0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.200 pass protect, pass block, He's gonna absorb all of these 0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.240 red zone carries that Frank Gore once occupied. So for me, 0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.080 it's with the bullet Zack Moss easily in round fifteen. 0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.560 I'm with you, it's Zack Moss. And I like Devin Singletary. 0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.600 He was a good player and in PPR league still 0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.320 have value. But Zack Moss is almost free in round fifteen. 0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.040 And you hit on a lot of the key points 0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.200 and you you got all my inside the five stuff. 0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.760 I was. I was surprised to learn David single Tory seven. 0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.560 Singletary scored one touchdown from inside the five last year. 0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.959 He's got to score from distance. And you know we've 0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.640 seen over the years the players who have to score 0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.239 from distance. They put up some years they have a 0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.040 three touchdown year. I mean, they just have clunkers where 0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.760 it just doesn't work out that they score from distance. 0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:19.320 The easy touchdowns that just that make a player transcended 0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.800 are the ones that come from inside the five. And 0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.440 Devin Singletary isn't going to get those. And you mentioned, 0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:30.560 you know, Zack Moss is a big bodied guy built 0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.280 for goal line, and they drafted him specifically to be 0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:38.200 that tough yards inside guy. He welcomes contact, he breaks tackles, 0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.200 He's a finisher. Utah's all time leading rusher and all 0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:48.480 time rushing touchdown leader, Zack Moss. He is the correct answer. 0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.240 I believe, we both believe Zack Moss. Two votes for Zack. 0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:56.680 He's been playing at higher elevation. That's Buffalo is at 0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.960 sea level. By the way, Buffalo or at least Lake Love. 0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.600 How exciting is Buffalo looking on paper like this is 0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.640 the first time the early nineties. Yeah, man, they got 0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.000 a fun looking team. But yeah, people are gonna start 0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.200 to get more sharp to this where I think Zach 0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.680 Moss could surpass Devin Singletary and a DP come late August. 0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.719 Maybe no chance Za here to make an eleven rounds 0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.599 now he pops off, and we're praying that there's preseason 0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.159 games for once. We're praying for preseason games, right, but 0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.520 what if he pops off anyway, that's a chance not happen, 0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.560 all right? The next would you Rather Teammate? Edition? Would 0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.919 you rather have? A Marie Cooper in round three or 0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.840 seed Lamb rookie wide receiver in round nine. Obviously these 0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.480 are Dallas wide receivers of Marie Cooper round three or 0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:52.040 Seedee Lamb at round nine. Can I say Michael Gallup, No, 0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.919 I know not right now, A MARII Cooper, it's a value. 0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.800 He's valid for this. But it's the same old story 0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.320 with a Mari Cooper. It's it. It really hasn't changed 0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.920 since the trade to the Cowboys from the Raiders, where 0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.000 he's been this roller coaster ride of emotion last year. 0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.120 Four games over a hundred yards for Cooper, four under 0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.200 twenty five yards, that he is not reliable in a 0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.360 in in a scenario where you have to choose your 0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.880 starters and if it's not best ball I did I found. 0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.520 I came to the same analysis Dallas and in justice. 0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.240 Dallas games are just thrown out at the Raiders games 0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.920 because a lot of people like r fort of his games. 0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.560 That was a lot. He had forty eight scoreless yards 0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.360 or less in of his Dallas games for Marie Cooper. 0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.520 Those are games that kill you. And that's just too 0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.000 high of a clunker ratio for a Marie Cooper to 0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.920 pay in the third round. Yeah, and then you bring 0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.680 in Ceedee Lamb, who we were in agreement a couple 0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.840 of months ago, the top wide receiver in this year's draft, 0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.400 and Michael Gallops already there. You got it up and coming, 0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.320 Blake Darwin uh And of course Zeke Tony Pollard is 0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.479 an astounding football player pass catcher. So I'm just taking 0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.960 the cheaper guy here. I'm not going Cooper. There's no 0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.720 chance I'd rather take Ceedee Lamb all day. Ce Lamb 0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.080 was my number one rookie wide receiver going into the draft, 0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.560 as you mentioned, absolutely electric after the catch, twenty six 0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.680 broken tackles last year, number two in the n c 0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.880 A among all wide receivers, forced a miss tackle on 0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:22.480 over of his catches. It's insane. The best receiver in 0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.159 Dallas never dropped. Seed Lamb never dropped a pass of 0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.200 twenty plus yards in his three seasons at Oklahoma either. 0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.600 And he was the best yard after after catch guy 0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.239 in this draft. So elusive, so electric after the catch, 0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.719 Ceedee Lamb by a mile. I still cannot believe Dallas 0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080 got him. I cannot put we can either, Denver and Well, 0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.960 I was gonna say Oakland, Las Vegas passed for rugs 0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.080 and find players and they're probably gonna have good, nice careers. 0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.640 But I think Ceedee Lambs the best player in this draft. Definitely. 0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.040 All Right, Our third would you rather teammate ad a 0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.279 ship goes to Denver Melvin Gordon with his round three 0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.920 average draft position, or Philip Lindsay going off in round eight? 0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.400 Which would you rather have? This is probably one of 0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.960 the tougher ones we're gonna go through today. Um. For 0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.680 those who don't remember, Gordon held out with the charges 0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.320 last year for the first three four games I think four, um, 0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.760 But he ended up with the fifth most carries inside 0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.280 the five yard line with thirteen, and his fifteen yards 0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.440 inside the five was the third most on those thirteen carries. 0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.840 And uh, Gordon scored as many touchdowns inside the five 0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.480 as se Kwon Barkley, Nick Chubb and Levian Bell combined 0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.680 last season, missing the first quarter of the year. Now, now, 0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.000 Lindsay was no slouch inside the five either, eight carries 0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.360 for fourteen yards and five touchdowns. That is Exuberg averaging 0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:55.040 two yards for carry. We're gonna get some really horrible 0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.239 inside to five numbers a little later. Some other teams, 0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.480 But I mean Lindsay Lindsay and dreaming at the same 0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.840 number of carries inside the ten last year for Denver. 0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.600 Of course Freeman Roy Streaman that is is an afterthought now, 0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.280 but Lindsay had twice as many inside the five as Freeman. 0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.280 So really this work, who who's gonna get it is 0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.600 gonna be right down the middle. It seems I'm very 0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.160 much on the fence. So I'm just gonna shut up 0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.720 now and take the cheaper guy again and say, Philip Lindsay, 0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.880 We've both been on the cheaper guy in every one 0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.040 of these scenarios, and I'm taking Philip Lindsay here, but 0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.960 I'm gonna go for a little different direction than you did. 0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.560 Is Melvin Gordon even that good? Debatable? It is? Pro 0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.479 Football Focus ranked him eighty five in yards after contact 0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:41.560 eight five. I mean that's to take You're basically talking 0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.480 about not just second string running backs on thirty two teams. 0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.040 You're talking about the third string running the third best 0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:48.599 running backs and thirty two teams to get all the 0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.000 way to eighty fifth and yards after contact next to 0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.040 him at ranking eighty five, where guys like Frank Gore, 0:08:55.559 --> 0:09:01.320 when Dell Smallwood, David Montgomery, fullback Sea j Ham. These 0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.560 are the guys that have yards after contact equivalent to 0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.600 Melvin Gordon. He's been three point nine yards per carry 0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:14.200 or less in every season, but one three point nine 0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:19.320 or less last year. Three point eight. Austin Ekeler, running 0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.080 behind the same exact line as Melvin Gordon, has averaged 0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.200 five and a half yards per carry, five point two 0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.480 yards per carry, and four point two yards per carry 0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.400 over the last three seasons. I mean it's you know, 0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.080 Austin Neckla has got all the same disadvantages of the 0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.199 same offense, same offensive line, and he's popping off in 0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.319 an extra yard and a half yard yard and a 0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.320 half per carry. So I don't know that Melvin Gordon 0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.280 honestly is even that good anymore. And I'll never forgive him, 0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.439 even though it's not entirely his fault. Of course, Melvin Gordon, 0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.120 that is, for not scoring a touchdown, one single touchdown 0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.720 in his rookie year. This is statistical ottity. And then 0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.920 of course the next year was like a season, and 0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.120 you know everybody got him at a cheap price. We'll 0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.600 take a break when we come back. Three more would 0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:14.560 you rathers? Including some high profile players on the Cleveland Browns. 0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.640 Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charge and Brian 0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.440 Johnson with you high profile players on the Cleveland Browns. 0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.360 Who would you rather have? This is our teammates edition 0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.600 of would you Rather Go? To Cleveland? It could go 0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.880 a couple of directions. In Cleveland, We're going to the 0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.320 wide receivers. Odell Beckham has got an average draft position 0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.640 of round three. Jarvis Landry has an average draft position 0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.000 of the end of round five. Who would you rather take? 0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.400 Factoring in the average draft position? Brian Johnson, where were 0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.720 we a year ago? Just how excited about this Cleveland 0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.160 Browns offense team? In general? Everybody, everybody wanted a piece 0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.280 of the Browns and it turned out there was one 0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.280 for two really good player to get and that was 0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.680 Nick Chubb or maybe Cream Hunt later. Yeah, but uh yeah, 0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.320 Odell Beckham clearly a Bust of the Year candidate last season. 0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.600 I'd probably give it to someone like Juju Smith Schuster 0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:16.720 over Beckham. Beckham still David Dust from last year. Yeah, 0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.360 he had a good first half though, but uh, Juju 0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.280 throughout was just painful. But anyway back to Beckham and Landry, 0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.480 Uh yeah, Beckham, like you said, going mid round three 0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.560 right now, some leekus. He was going through it overall 0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.640 last year, so that's quite a discount on his side. 0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.080 But at this time last year I had Odell Beckham 0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.199 as my number one wide receiver. Over the course of 0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.840 the preseason, I had lowered him down to like number four. 0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.600 Still an epic with yeah, I'm he he scares me. Still, 0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.360 I think we've seen pique Odell Beckham. I know Eli 0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.880 Manning is not the ideal quarterback for a stud wide receiver, 0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.880 but back in those days, Beckham was the guy and 0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.680 that was it. And Beckham's not the guy here. And 0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.120 what scares me most about Beckham is last year sixty 0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.520 sorry I'm looking this up real quick, sixty three of 0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.320 his games he fell outside the top thirty wide receivers. 0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.440 Odell Beckham, Odell Beckham. Jarvis Landry, on the other hand, 0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.520 finished top five in PPR formats last year in the 0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.679 second half of the season after a slow start where 0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.920 they're probably just forest feeding Odell Beckham the ball soda. 0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.080 Long story short, it's uh Landry is a safer play. 0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.160 Beckham's a ceiling pick in the mid third, and there 0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.480 are guys like Kenny Golladay, and honestly, I would rather 0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.240 take Calvin Ridley two rounds ahead where he's going than 0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.960 over a guy like Odell Beckham. He just doesn't excite 0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.200 me like he used to. So I'm going discount again 0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.800 with Landry. I'm taking This is the first time we differ. 0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.280 I'm taking Odell Beckham. We know what Jarvis Landry is 0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.640 all about. If you want a wide receiver with four 0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:51.800 five touchdowns, Jarvis Landry is your man. That is your guy. 0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.479 You want eighty catches, one thousand yards and no touchdowns, 0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.120 that's your guy. He brings no upside to the table. 0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:05.280 Odell Beckham brings double digit touchdown upside sometimes something he's 0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.840 done three years he's had double digit touchdowns. And I 0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.360 really believe this is the year we thought we were 0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.640 going to get last year from the Browns offense. Kevin 0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.680 Stefanski is a proven good coach, not long track record, 0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.960 but he just got Kirk Cousins the best year of 0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.680 his career. He fed both two different wide receivers from Minnesota. 0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.320 Both Stephan Diggs and Adam Felan both got fed. Both 0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.000 of these guys can get fed here. I really do 0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.400 believe Beckham is going to rebound nicely. Here. You get 0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.760 him in round three when he was going off the 0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.120 board in round one and early round two last year. 0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.360 I can get him at double the number of picks 0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.000 his technical his average draft positions actually thirty to be 0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.040 more specific, he was going off the board at roughly 0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.720 fifteen or less last year. So I'm taking the discount 0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.280 that's built into Odell Beckham coming off a down but 0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.679 not terrible season. Um, by the way, he had a 0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.880 thousand year. Odell Beckham had a thousand yards last year. 0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.680 I mean it was not a total bust season for 0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.240 Odell Buckham as you positioned it. I don't believe I'm 0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.240 not gonna die on the Jarvis Landry Hill. I can. 0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.520 I can't contest it too much. Next we go to 0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.400 Green Bay and we're back to the running back position. 0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.360 Which of these teammates would you rather have Aaron Jones 0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.720 paying a second round price for him or A J. 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:24.560 Dillon the rookie running back in round fifteen? So Aaron 0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.640 Jones speaking of a roller coaster ride, he certainly was 0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.000 one last year. Party mom looking up some numbers here. 0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.400 So Jones finished basically as the second running back in 0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.640 PPR formats Uh certainly was boosted up by some monster games. 0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.720 The one versus Dallas comes to mind. Four touchdowns, I 0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.000 think four touchdowns like two fifty combo yards something like that. 0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.320 But when when he when he hits the floor, he 0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.160 hits it hard. And last year he had thirty overt 0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.240 of his games fell outside the top thirty at his position. 0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.360 And for comparison's sake, you have you got guys like 0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.120 Christian McCaffrey, Dalvin Cook. They're under ten falling outside of 0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.720 the top thirty. Yeah, I mean even like Derrick Henry 0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:12.080 seven percent, Austin Ekeler of your games outside the top 0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.040 thirty is a lot that when you're paying Yeah, And 0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.240 I don't know what what what A J. Dillon's gonna 0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:19.400 do in his rookie year. I don't know what any 0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:20.920 rookies are gonna do this year, to be honest with you, 0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.280 with no mini camps, we don't have to get into 0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.480 that now. But I'm still not drafting Aaron Jones at 0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.160 this price tag. You couldn't pay me to take Aaron 0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.840 Jones because he certainly could win you your league if 0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.240 everything falls place for him, But odds always gonna lose 0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.520 it for you because it's he's two up and down 0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.480 for me for going in the first second round too risky. 0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.640 Last year, Jones saw a two to one ratio of 0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.000 carries over Jamal Williams, and so really, a J. Dillon 0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.240 he's gonna get some carries this year. They drafted him 0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.200 in the second round and the front office took all 0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.200 kinds of heat for the pick. They're gonna want to 0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.600 validate that pick by getting A J. Dillon at least 0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.680 some run this year. So let me ask you this, Brian. 0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.280 Does A J. Dillon's carries come out of Aaron Jones 0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:09.240 or Jamal Williams or can we not know? I don't 0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.080 think you can really know, but if I had to 0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.920 pick one, it seems like you would be Aaron Jones 0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.840 car not Jamal Williams. And it's like they're just gonna 0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.160 relegate Williams to this third third down rule because Williams 0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.440 is never in. You know, he was an average ball carrier, right, 0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.760 He's more of a receiving back pass protector. So it 0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.720 seems like the touches when it comes to rushes will 0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.240 come from Aaron Jones and not Williams. So yeah, I'm 0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.040 I'm a J Dillon over Jones all day, if I 0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.680 gotta pick one. Jones and Williams are free agents next year, 0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.920 and so you know, there could be that could factor 0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.040 into this in some in some way. You know, we've 0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.160 we talked a lot about the possibility of them of 0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.320 teams going to Marco Murray on a on a running 0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.560 back and grinding them up. Usually they don't, but some, 0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.760 you know, some may. And if that's the case, Aaron 0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.720 Jones could get a ton of run if they decide 0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.920 to do that, and then position A J. Dillon as 0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:57.920 an air apparent for the next season, and they could 0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:02.240 rest effectively rest a J. Dillon this year now also important, 0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.320 and you've spent a lot of time focusing on yards 0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.880 in it carries inside the five, which is awfully important. 0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.120 But you can't talk about a J. Dillon not talking 0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.600 about his size. He's two hundred fifty pounds, he's six 0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.399 ft tall. That guy can dominate the line of scrimmage 0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.480 the catch though. Last year, Jones is super productive inside 0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.040 the five. He carried the ball seventeen times from inside 0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.760 the five he scored ten. That's a nice ratio. You're 0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.840 really you're looking for and somebody's spent a lot of 0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.639 time grinding up data from inside to five. You're looking 0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.800 for a fifty percent return on touchdowns and those carries. 0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.399 He turned seventeen carries into ten touchdowns. That's better than 0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.199 so Jones isn't bad there, But man, A J. Dillon's 0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.679 just built for that use. Um, I am with you, 0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.320 and I'm on A J. Dillon, But it's this one. 0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:50.760 To me. It was the toughest call on the board, 0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.119 and I went back and forth. At one point I 0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.760 had this as Aaron Jones, then I went to Dylon. 0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.280 But the only reason I went to Dylan's because he's 0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.200 so cheap. And round fifteen, I think Jamal Williams turns 0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.880 out to be a bit of a non factor this year, 0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.080 and I he's he's the third choice out of all 0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:09.400 of this. Let's go to our third would you rather teammate? 0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:14.160 Addition for this particular segment, We've got one segment more 0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.280 in the show. We go to the tight ends. There 0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.040 are many There are many tight ends tight end position 0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.760 battles to sort of talk about, would you rather have 0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:28.800 Rob Gronkowski in round six or O. J. Howard in 0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.359 round eighteen, making effectively free last pick of your draft 0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.880 in typical sized leagues. I thought we're gonna talk about 0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.800 my boys in Arizona and breakdown Dan Arnold and Max Williams. 0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:43.160 Maybe next week. Oh yeah, so yeah. Gronk making his return, 0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.160 reuniting with Tom Brady. Of course, um word has come 0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.639 out recently, Bruce Arians says Tampa Bay plants. He's a 0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.000 lot of twelve personnel. They're gonna both two wide receivers, 0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.600 suit tight ends, one running back. So let's not forget 0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.240 Cameron Bread by the way, either, because he's still on 0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.640 the team. And Cameron Brad was like a fifteen tight 0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:02.560 end last year, did better than O. J. Howard. But 0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.160 we're talking Howard and Gronk. Here. What it boils down 0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:11.000 to is where Gronk is going. There are you're banking 0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.000 on his ceiling. Basically, you're banking on fourteen fifteen games, 0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.160 and I just don't see him playing like a full season. 0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.680 I'd rather be taking guys like Cook, Austin Hooper, Mike 0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.960 Sicky in the in the in that mid range where 0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.080 Gronk is going, I would quote unquote play. It's safer 0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.560 with O. J. Howard, who was a massive disappointment last year, 0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.440 but he did have a stronger second half. Was the 0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.960 overall tight end first half of the season. The second 0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.439 half things started to look up. I do think he 0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.120 sees more work than break and I just don't see 0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.320 Gronk living up to his a DP where he's going. 0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.080 I think people are gonna be reaching for the past, 0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.080 so I gotta go as much as I don't really 0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:50.520 want Oja Howard, if I had to pick one, I'd 0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.800 take o J. Howard for Gronk. Tell me about some 0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:57.720 of the late round tight ends you do like this year? Yeah, 0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.520 this year. I'm not joking. I really do like Dan 0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.080 Arnold and that's super late. It is super late. Um, 0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.399 I could talk about this all day. I like, Uh, 0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.919 it depends on your league. He's creeping up and if 0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.480 you want to go super sleeper, I think um Trey 0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.479 Burton can rebound in Indie. Jack Doyle stayed healthy and 0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.679 what about Jack Doyle. Jack Doyle, well, I think he 0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.840 I wouldn't call him. He's probably going top fifteen. He's 0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.159 more of a you know, yeah, but it's the fifteen 0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:32.080 tight end of the board. He's going around right. Here's 0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.520 that's why I like Rob Gronkowski. Yes, I'm taking his upside. 0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.800 I'm taking the upside. But if I were to tell 0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.399 you right now and listeners right now, that Rob Gronkowski 0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.399 would finish this year with the most touchdowns, would you 0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.320 be surprised? Like from that's not possible. It's certainly feasible. 0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.760 It's certainly He's done it many times. Right, So he 0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.880 enters into the season with as healthy as he's been 0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:58.359 in years. He's knows his quarterback intimately, he's Rob Gonkrowski 0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.560 is only thirty one years old. Travis Kelsey is going 0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.439 to turn thirty one in this season. We don't think 0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.359 of Travis Kelsey is old, right, Gronkowski is not so 0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:13.000 old that he can't be still good. And yes, I agree, 0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.800 I agree that you're banking. You're banking a bit on 0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.800 the upside for Gronk. But if you believe that you 0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.480 can get a Jack Doyle in round twelve around thirteen 0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.119 and back that pick up with somebody that can still contribute, 0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.679 I like it. I'm taking Rob Gronkowski. I had a 0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.960 feeling you would say that I've been a Gronkowski apologist 0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.520 for years. Uh, sometimes to my own personal detriment. As 0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.639 it's turned out. Okay, we're gonna take one more break. 0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.240 When we come back, We've got our final three sets 0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.240 of Would You Rather Players? Teammates Edition. It's Fantasy Football Weekly. 0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.360 Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchie and Brian 0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.320 Johnson with you. It's a teammates edition of Would You Rather? 0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.480 Will give you two players on the same team, same 0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.479 position in who would you rather have? Between them? If 0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.320