WEBVTT - The Amazon Threat Forces Grocers To Go High-Tech

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. You know, when Amazon bought Whole

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Foods for I think fourteen or fifteen billion dollars, I

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself at the time, why would they want

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to get into the grocery business. It's a low margin,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>highly intensely competitive business. Why would they want to, you know,

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of get away from their cool tech and home

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>delivery and all that kind of stuff. But they're there.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>They are sticking with it, and I think they're actually

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>increasing their investments and that's forcing the industry, the supermarket industry,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to respond with their own technology. Matthew Boyle, us retail

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News, joins us live here in the

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and Director Broker studio to help us break it down. So, Matthew,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what the supermarket industry is

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>doing to try to fend off or compete with Amazon. Uh, well,

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they need to do something. I mean, they're in a

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>war of attrition right now and they're losing. And I'm

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about traditional supermarkets. You know, um places like Kroger,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>which just earlier this year had to throw out their

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>long term guidance because they couldn't get a story remodel. Right,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about traditional supermarkets that are getting squeezed,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and not just by Amazon, by companies like all the

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this German import which is very deep discount what they

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>call hard discounters, where it's a lot of store brands

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and a very spartan store experience. But people don't mind

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've give them what they want at a price

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's affordable. They don't need a lot of

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the bells and whistles. So the grocers are kind of

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>getting it from all sides. The traditional grocery stores. They

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>need to think differently, and so they're looking to technology,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>some of which Amazon is has already adopted or is

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>adopting as ways to not just you know, make shoppers

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>go wow, look at all these funky bells and whistles,

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but just to sort of get the basics right and

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>solve some operational problems that will hopefully lift those margins

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned that are always a razor thing. You

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>also suggested that perhaps they could hide under a desk

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in the fetal position, but that might not be the

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>best business Other industries have industries have done that, and uh,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a business model that has been adapted,

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily successfully. One statistic in your story that I

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.119
<v Speaker 1>thought was really compelling was that food retailers globally lose

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about three billion dollars a year due to items being

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out of stock. Is this the type of technological challenge

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that could just be fixed by having the right program

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that understands what you have. I mean, I don't want

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>to say fixed, but it will certainly help. I mean,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what is easier? You know you've got these days you

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to hire people to literally walk down the aisles.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It could take hours and take them away from other tasks,

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say, like filling an online order and getting that

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out to a shopper and doing something more value added.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>These robots that we talk about in the story that

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>just sort of meander up and down the aisles checking

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for out of stocks, for missing items in the company.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to a Giant Eagle, which is, you know,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a great Pittsburgh, Midwestern based retailer. Uh. They saw a

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent reduction in out of stocks in the

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one store where they've had this robot the longest I

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta say in this, in this technological revolution that we're in,

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the problems that people are discovering, and the solutions stock

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the shelves. Yeah, I mean literally it's you know, how

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>much how much money and how much time can it

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be just put into the idea of better Yeah, exactly. So,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Canney, I'm thinking about, you know, walking down the

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 1>aisle of a supermarket and seeing that worker with the

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of the price gun. Do you know kind of

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are those days can you do that one more time?

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That sound? Did you? Are those days still with us?

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Things like which I didn't even write about, But those

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>robots we mentioned, if you add electronic shelf labels or

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>electronic shelf tags to replace the sticker gun, um, that

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can that will benefit even more so the use of

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>those shelf stocking robots when you just have electronic shelf X.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of them, but again it's slow adoption.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>A big problem here is that the grocers are very

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>risk averse. They want to do, you know, what their

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>dad did, their grandfather did. This is the way we've

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>always run this store. Um, you know, this is what's

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>worked in the past. But they again, they're starting to

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit more adventurous here. It's more than that, though.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of these companies operate on pretty

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>small margins, right. Uh, this is not a get rich

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>quick kind of business, and you have to make investment

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in order to succeed against the Walmarts of the world

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>or the Amazons of the world. So can you sort

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of give us a sense of how they're doing it,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>how they're investing, if they're able to invest given the

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>overhang of their little Exactly, you're rightly, this is not

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>get rich quick, this is not die. This is don't

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.119
<v Speaker 1>go away, don't become the next year's So they're making

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>investments that exactly you know, they have to make. But

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a the same time, look at Walmart, they're they're also

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>paying all of their workers more. You know, they've had

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to increase just their starting minimum wage and in many

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>cities New York included. You know, if you're talking about

0:04:59.920 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen dollar minim waves. So they are making investments

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in their people, but these investments in technology, which are

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>increasing what they will not make them though if they

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>don't get a clear return on investment. That's why a

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of what we're seeing just now is just pilots,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of stores here, twenty stores there, figure out

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what's working tweak it. So we're not going to see

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>wide scale universal adoption of a lot of these technologies

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for probably years, and there have been technologies over the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>past five years that we thought we're going to change

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way we shopped, and they haven't because it was

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of g whiz stuff that didn't really provide

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>an r O. I. So Amazon again, they I call

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it dipping their toe with this Whole Foods acquisition, dipping

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>their toe into the supermarket business. Is there any sense

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna maybe do more than dip their toe. Yeah,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a foot in there now. It's

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more than a toe, given you know, it's started with

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods, of course, but just in recent weeks we've

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of news from them. They are going

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to open a traditional, more traditional, lower priced than Whole

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>foods Uh grocery chain. Starting in l A. They have

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>slashed or eliminated the additional fee that they charge for

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their prime customers to do Amazon Fresh, which is their

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>online service, essentially saying, if you're a Prime customer, now

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the food delivery is free, just as the streaming video

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is free. So and they're also planning to take their

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Go technology, the cashier list stores we all have

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>heard about, and bring that to bigger stores rather than

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the tiny ones. What's that smell? It's the smell of

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>burning cash. I mean, I'm listening to you speak. Where

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is the make money part? Well? For Amazon, you know

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they're making money off the cloud and advertising. Yeah, so

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that's why again we're seeing very selected small pilots. But

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with the things like the shelf scanning robots don't look

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at it of out of stocks, that's such jargon e term.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Think of it as lost sales. If the honey bear

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>isn't there on the shelf, you're not getting that sale

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of honey If it is there, If the robot tells

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you it's not there, get you know, get somebody to

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 1>get it in the back. You have now gained a sale.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>That is a sale that is profits certainly, so that

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is what will help these I certainly, rather than all

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>these fancy terms like AI and VR and stuff like that.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If the money bear ain't there, the honey bear ain't there.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Here's the revelation for you. I actually enjoy food shopping.

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But I have to tell you this. If there was

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>an app to say, hey, where is the honey bear? Oh,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all three road to you know, ten steps that

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually looking. Most good retailers will do that. If

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you have their shopping app and you walk in and

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them will allow you to upload your

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>shopping list. There will be a map overlaid. It'll know

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>where your location is, and I will say, the honey

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>bear is here. Um. You know that's what really screws

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>people up. When a store gets remodeled, people are suddenly saying,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>where's the honey bear? I will say. One thing I

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think would be really cool being app showing the expiration

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>dates of different things. So that's a totally different topic.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the sell by used by that's we'll have

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue that. We'll have to have a full show

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on the sell by and used by dates. Matthew Boyle,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. That was

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a great story. Matt Boyle, as the US retail reporter

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, joining us here in our interactive broker studios.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting revolution under way in the groceries, not where

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry can keep up. Boy US shopper spent a

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 1>record at nine point two billion dollars on Cyber Monday.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>That's sevent more than last year. It added to a

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>robust Black Friday. So it seems like the consumer is

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in good shape as we head into the thick of

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the holiday sales. To get more color, we welcome Christian Magoon.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian is a chief executive officers Amplify e t S

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with over seven hundred fifty million dollars and under management

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>based in Colorado Springs. Christian, thanks so much for joining us.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like the consumer is out there spending

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for the holidays. Yeah, Paul, has been definitely a very

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>good start to the season. Um, We've likely to see

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>record holiday shopping. Um. You know, some forecasts believe that

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this year will grow about four percent overall and holiday

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>shopping and actually go from about a nine hundred and

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy billion dollar season last year to a trillion dollars

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>season this year, so very exciting. I think, you know,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty year unemployment, steady wage growth are really helping the

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>consumer be confident. Here. Of course, the big area of

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>growth has been online retail. UM. Well, total sales maybe

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>up about four percent. Online retail is trending up maybe

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to sixteen percent. So that's going to be the

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot for investors and we think for those looking

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for to kind of ride this retail trend, both you know,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for growth, but also for kind of the trend of

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going online versus in store. Christian, I'm looking right now

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at the holdings of I Buy, which is the e

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>t F that you run, uh with about two billion

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars of assets over under management. I'm just looking. Hell,

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>let's one is that is that a retail stock that's

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your top holding according to this That's right, So it's

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a newly added member of the e t F. And

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>really the criteria, Lisa, is that a company has to

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have seventy or more of their revenue coming from online sales.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And Peloton fits that that criteria. Um, you know, most

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>people think of Amazon as being you know, kind of

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the primary online retailer, but you know, Amazon is just

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>one of many. We've actually had more performance in alpha

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>generated in the last year from companies like Carbona, Shopify,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>v I P Shop, all those companies up between a

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty and a hundred this year. UM. You know,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I buy is unique from an online retail ETF because

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it is not market cap weighted. It's equal weighted UM

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and we do have that revenue test, so we think

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting access to a lot of unique names

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that maybe don't necessarily know. I think Peloton is one

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that people know right now, but the carbon is of

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, v I P Shop, Okado, those name tims

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a nice impact and have been an alpha

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>driver for the fund, which is a five star rated

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>morning Star fund in the number one performer in the

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer cyclical category over the last three years. I will

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just say, Paul, it's interesting to see what retail online

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>retail consists of. It consists of food and getting cars

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to take to places, right, I mean, it's it's grub Hub,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>it's getting lift uber and then and then when you

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>feel really guilty about not moving around, you go bike

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and covered. Hey, Christian, so I know there's one less

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>shopping week here for this holiday period relatutil last year.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>What kind of risk is that for some of these

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>retailers and some of the ETFs that track them. Yeah,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it definitely is a risk. I mean, we're six days

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>less because the holiday shopping season started later, with Thanksgiving

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>being six days later than last year. So you know,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>one risk is bad weather, frankly, because we have a

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>compressed time period, and we've actually now seen that a

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit on Black Friday and Cyber Monday. Thank you

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>guys experienced it yesterday a little bit. And the interesting

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>stat we're seeing from Adobe Analytics, which tracks the hundred

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>largest online retailers, is that uh, states that had bad

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>weather two inches or more of snow solid uptick and

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>online retail sales by between uh you know, seven and

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>nine per cent. So we're seeing that, um, you know,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar kind of face this headline risk of

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>bad weather where people stay in, but it actually turns

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>into a tail wind for online retailers. Um. Also, you know,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this this trade issue is definitely something that could impact

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>some consumer confidence. In the last four months, we've seen

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it trending downward, still in a very healthy range, but

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's something to watch, particularly as we've heard President Trump

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>back away from maybe the urgency of doing a trade

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>deal here by the end of the year. Christian, you

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about the good performance of I Buy over the

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>past three years, and certainly the shares of stocks that

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you have, the shares of companies that you have in

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio have done very well, the likes of Expedia

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>or let's see lift Uber Netflix, That however, is getting

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>called into question now because of how high the valuations

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are and this question of yes, this is the new model,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps there has been too much capital put into

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>these particular companies. How do you respond to the valuation questions. Well,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a challenge because when you look at maybe

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the counterparts of brick and mortar, they have very low valuations,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>but of course there's the risk they're going out of business.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at the valuations of these growth companies,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, their PEG ratios are we think are still attractive.

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now there's still about eleven percent market

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>share of online retail as opposed to all retail sales

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in the US, uh in China, for example, that's over

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>market share. We think many of these companies are going

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to double or triple their market share or their sales

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>over the next three to five years as online retail

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>starts to continues to emerge. Right now, going back to

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>online retail has gone about an average compounded annual growth rate.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at these companies, we actually think

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that over the next three to five years, if they

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>double or triple their their sales, that these these valuations

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>will actually look potentially like values. Um. We just think

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this trend is going to continue. More and more consumers

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to trust going online, whether that's through mobile

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>payments or the convenience, the competitive pricing, or the or

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the increased selection. So we think this is a global

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>trend that investors can capitalize. And you know, since the

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fund has been out, it's returned about over the last

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>three and a half years versus the SMP at about

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>fift so it's definitely been a place for Elphin. We

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to continue. Christian mgoon, thank you so

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Christian mcgoon, chief executive officer

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of Amplify E t F. It's all about trade today.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what's thinking at stocks. At least if you trust

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the price action in responds to certain headlines President Trump

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>coming out and saying, who knows, Maybe we'll make a deal,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe we won't, maybe we don't need to make a

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>deal before election, and I'll push it back after that.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing the nastack down one point two percent. Also,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>now we're hearing about taxes on porcelain and French wine,

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and she's joining us on to discuss all things trade.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Murray, who covers the entire area for US here

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News, Brendan, can you just paint a scene

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>here on what was driving the escalation that seems to

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be coming to a ford in some ways? Today the

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>President and his advisors say that we're inching closer and

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>closer to a deal with China, uh, making it sound

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like something was imminent and they were going to meet

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>meet this uh sort of a deadline of December fift

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>before the U s raises more tariffs on Chinese imports.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And yet the President today kind of stepped back and said, Uh,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't really have a deadline that I'd

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be fine if this drags out fully all the way

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>through the election of next year. So I think the

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>stock market reaction is definitely Uh. They were that is

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that investors have been thrown for a loop here, Uh,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking that they were close to a deal,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but now this is something that could drag on and

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on for months and months. Uh you know, whether this

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is just a negotiating strategy on Trump's part, the idea

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>being that you know, the closer you get to deal,

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the more you the more you act like you don't

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>need it, you don't want it. Um is a whole

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>another question that uh you know that that is still

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>remains to be answered. But I just want to take

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a step away here. This has been just a tariff

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>news cycle here over the last several days. It's not

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just China. Uh we had yesterday steel tariff discussions on

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Argentina and Brazil. Today it's French wine and cheese. You know, Historically,

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>how effective have tariff's been and has the US been

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a big wielder of tariffs historically? Not in the recent past.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the Trump administration changed all that. But tariffs are

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are fairly blunt instrument, used mainly as uh leverage in negotiation.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>You threaten them before you actually impose them. So the

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>big difference that we've seen in the Trump administration is

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that they impose them and then they say, Okay, let's negotiate, uh,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to, if you want us

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to remove them. So uh they have traditionally in the

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the recent in the recent past, the

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>past few decades, you know, uh, countries have have been

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>moving more and more to lower tariffs. Uh. You know,

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump has come in and uh you know, is using

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>them to extract concessions from from trading partners. The interesting

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about the French uh move that you that you

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned is that this could sort of bring the trade

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>war into Europe as a whole. The the European Union,

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, uh will will have a reaction to

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to that on France's behalf. And you know there's a

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario that uh you know that you can see where

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>things kind of spiral out of control in this sort

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of tip for tat uh way that the U. S.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>China trade war has evolved, that you know, we could

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>wind up with two fairly large showdowns on you know,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>two huge continents for a huge economic trading partners of

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the US. Brendan, do you think that the headline is

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe are kind of ratcheting up the

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>tensions on both sides of the Atlantic, or do you

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think that the headline is it could have been so

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>much worse and President Trump could have been going after

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the auto sector for example, uh in Europe. And this

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is sort of more a negotiating tactic all around as

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>he tries to seem powerful heading into a couple of

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>tough weeks. Absolutely, the car terirafs that you mentioned, that

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>deadline for the Trump administration to act upon came and

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>went without any action. A lot of people, uh economists

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and auto industry experts have said that, you know, something

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>like that would surely uh you know send you know,

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>some economies like Germany into recessions. Uh you know, so, Uh,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a measure that there is a measured approach

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it easton that way from the Trump administration. Uh. And

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you know in in in reality, the two point four

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars UH tariffs on two point four billion dollars

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in French products is it's not a huge amount when

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you consider, uh, you know, the tens of billion dollars

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that the that the country's trade between themselves. Brendan, you

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>briefly describe what the digital service taxes and why it's

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to the US government. So this is

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a three percent tax on the gross revenue of of

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>large tech companies. Companies that make over bring in more

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>than seven fifty million dollars in revenue a year. This

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>hits companies like Google and Facebook and Amazon, and France

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>has has enacted that's enacted it this year. They're trying

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to drive a sort of international move toward towards such attacks.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and the U. S has has has come

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>out against it, saying, if we're gonna tax, if American

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>company is going to be taxed, the U. S. Government

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to do that, is going to do that,

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>not the French government. So uh, you know, in some ways,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Trump administration is acting, uh, you know,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to to defend companies that it normally doesn't defend. Uh

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, and and in in this case

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in particular, you know, they could have gone to the

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>w t O UH to dispute this, uh this tax.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Instead they're taking the you know, the the Trump strategy

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of going one on one uh you know, so w

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>t O case could drag on for years and years.

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh, this is this is the Trump administration strategy

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is to is to uh is to fight their own fights.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Murray, thanks again so much for joining us here

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and bring us up to date on all things trade.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Brendan covers the trade issue globally for Bloomberg News. Joinning

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>us from London and there is a lot for Brendan

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and his trade team to be working on now. We

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have trade discussions, tariff discussions, it seems like in every

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>corner of the world, and it's obviously has major impacts

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on financial markets. Rates continue to be exceptionally low. The

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>question is, how about is it time to start looking

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>at and what should we expect To answer that question,

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody better than our good friend, Ira Jersey, chief

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks so much

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. So as we think about is it

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>still a lower rate for longer type of outlook from

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, Well, I think in the in the front

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>end and policy rates I think will continue to remain

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the in this area. I don't think

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed is likely to do anything, if at

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>all next year. Um Potentially they could, they could ease

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>policy a little bit if things get really bad on

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the economic front, but I think they'll wait until after

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the election to kind of reassess how things are unless

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you see things like you know, negative payroll prints

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>for example, um on on. On the on the longer

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>term side, it's looking at like a tenure rate. I

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty clear that when you get these headlines

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>about trade, you wind up, uh, you know, rates winded

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>rawling like today ten years down eight basis points and

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>yield um but you know that goes away and you

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>wind up with probably a pretty substantial sell off and

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you wind up with um tenure yields up closer to

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a quarter instead of where they are now.

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So so I think a lot of this is very

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>predicated on uh, kind of the balance of uncertainties remaining

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>remaining negative. But if you get rid of some of

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>those uncertainties and you know, the market can kind of

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>take off. Troy Gisky of Skybridge Capital is on Bloomberg

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio earlier. We were noting that, yes, the market was

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>down ahead of the open, but not down by as

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>much as you would expect if President Trump, say in

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the summer, had been saying, you know what all tariffs

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are ago, who knows if we're even going to get

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a deal this year or next year for that matter,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be a buffer, and he was saying

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that comes in the form of the FED increasing its

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet about three bill million dollars since the end

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of August. How big of a support is that to valuations,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly in bonds. Yeah, well, well it helps a little bit.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you remember, they're buying mostly um, they're buying

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>mostly shortened UH debts, so they're buying mainly TE bills,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which you know don't have really a lot of market risks,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>so um. So yes, it's helpful a little bit, but

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not as meaningful as if they were going out

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and buying a whole lot of you know, five, ten,

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and thirty year bonds. But but that said, it actually

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>dampens volatility, which is a proven risk encourager, right, I

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mean basically, the lower the the the volatility, the more

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>people will be inclined to buy stocks and by jump

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bonds and going to risk. Well, I think I think

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a little bit more of a risk on

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because by buying by by buying TE bills, they're effectively

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>increasing the UM. They're increasing bank reserves, which which does

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>encourage some risk taking. UM. But but that's not what's

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>helping keep ten year yields low? Right, So, so there's

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a difference between you know, how this might be helping

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>risk assets versus how it might be UM supporting or

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not supporting things like ten year treasuries and and and

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the like. UM. So I think the the thing that

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>economic fundamentals, I think matter much more to the long

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.239
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve. And what you see is when

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you see uncertainty and you see heightened uncertainty, you're gonna

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>wind up with UM regardless of what happens to say

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the equity market. The equity market might go up a

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit under the idea that's going to ease, that

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going to be low, and that might

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>be supportive evaluations in some risk assets. But on the

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>other side that the reason why that's happening is because

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the expectation for low inflation, for for low

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and and stable grow low but yet stable growth that

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will keep bond yields very low. So UM because when

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at things like really yields, so the that's

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the yield on on tips and and the yield that

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>investors are demanding above inflation, you're only looking at that

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>being ten basis points over the next ten years. So

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>people don't think that there's going to be a lot

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of volatility or particularly fast growth where you would expect

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there to be a lot more risk in things like

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>uh inflation and inflation expectations that you demand a higher

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>premium for that, and you don't see that. So as

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>long as that remains very low, which I think is

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>what the trade tensions do, um, you're gonna wind up

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing low bond deals. But again, like that can go

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>away in a heartbeat, and you can wind up with

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a fifty basis point sell off in a hurry if

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that uncertainty goes away. Presidential election year and your experience,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>has there been increased volatility or the hows the bond

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>market typically done in presidential election years. Yeah, so so

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>during presidential elections, the only time that you saw a

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>major move after an election was really after Donald Trump's

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>election in two thousands sixteen. You go back, um, you

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to the prior thirty years, so the prior

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>six elections, and you really did not have significant market

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>reaction one way or the other. It tended to be

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever the trend was going into that based on economic

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals is what continued to drive the bond market. But Steen,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that that was a significant change, and you

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>know this this year, maybe you could see something similar

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>if you've got to had a candidate win that you

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>know was going to either, uh, you know, change policy

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>quite significantly, and you know we'd have to see who

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that was before you can make a guess us to

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which direction the bond market would move. Our Jersey. Thank

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Our Jersey covers

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>all things interest rates for us as chief US interest

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening to the

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bram Woods. I'm on Twitter at Lisa bramwods one. Before

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.