WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 4 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Now Down Now Thursday morning, September

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Tend Up Eating the Book podcast BEGA Pod full Week

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>four in the National Football League. It's Gill Alexander. As

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, thank you for joining. As always, the staples

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the show are with us today from Circus Sports,

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the vice president of operations, and also Derek Stephen's conciliary.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know by that title, it's Mike Palm.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mike. How you doing, Man? Well, we're finally

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>getting over this cold. It's breaking up now, so so

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that's good. And I'm very, very very honored to be

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on the panel with today's esteemed rotating guests. Esteamed Rotating Guests.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to him, but of course on my left

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's Todd wishing of everybody from Showtime's docuseries Action and

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of course a numbers game, weekly appearances on Visa and Todd.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you in circle right now? Ten and five?

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I am ten and five and Circus So the end

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is near? What does that me that you're about to

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>say you're about to suck royally? Yes? Probably excellent. You've

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>also been very good on this megapod. The both of

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you have been very good I have sucked. I've been

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one in two every week and they've lost the teaser.

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So something's wrong with me. I gotta get off this night. Uh.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The Rotating guests that Mike Palm is referring to the

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>esteem Rotating Guests first time on the podcast. He's obviously

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>been on the show on Visa on the Numbers Game

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for years now. We can actually say years plural. He

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>hosts the Lombardi Line on Visa in the Vegas Stats

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and Information Network series x M channel two oh four

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Saturday and Sunday mornings leading into football. He writes for

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>The Athletic. He of course, has his own podcast, which

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>ranks way higher than this one, I might add in

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes rankings, called the GM Shuffle. He does it

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with add Nan verk And and he's got a book.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's called Gridiron Genius Ladies and Gentlemen. He's worked with

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Walsh, Bill Parcels, Bill Belichick, Al Davis, you name it.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Michael Lombardi. What's happening, Michael? Not much here? Week four?

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>This is always a good time of the year. I

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you having me on. It's good on starting to act,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think you gave me the ultimate compliment when

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I said something about Pinnacle the other day. You actually

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>were I'm pressure you with my betting Esteine there. Yes,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that was my big takeaway from that all interview. I

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, wow, it has been Actually, you know what,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>there were two There were two points Todd actually said,

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>because Todd came on the next day after you were on,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's and Todd, if I might talk about our

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>conversation about Michael, there were two points that we had

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in our conversation I think stood above the rest. One

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing the Kansas City Chiefs, like run the

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>clock down, shorten the game, right like that was a

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>big thing that the Ravens didn't do. And what was

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the other one, Todd that we seized upon. Oh the

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>coaches thing. How you could almost do better just betting

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>coaches in the National Football League. Forget every other little detail.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Just do a power ranking of coaches and bet coaches

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and you might be better off than actually putting your

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>own brain into things. I think that's true, I really do.

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a coach last night. He's driving

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>home from work, and we were talking about how these

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>teams they don't understand that pass rush really determines how

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to play the quarterback. So you know, for example, De

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Troit it's gonna play Kansas City, and they'll copy what

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Belichick did against Kansas City. They'll take their two defensive

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>ends and they'll push the pocket back and they'll try

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to squeeze the two tackles, especially cam Elion is not

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very good, try to squeeze him in and make the

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pocket a little uncomfortable for Mahomes and end up going

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to jam Mahomes and the receivers to kind

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of disrupt the timing. And so the front can really

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>help the quarterback, and coverage help defend the quarterback as

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>opposed to coverages. But most coaches they don't see that

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's an imbalanced pass rush. You'll see three guys on

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>one side of the center and one guy over there

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback scrambles for twenty odds, and the analysis

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>as well, you know they scrambles for twenty ars first down.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that that should never happen. So those little details

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that coaches don't see, the good ones do, that's what

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're betting against. Should it ever happen on fourth and

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>five on the last drive of the game, that the

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks should be allowed to run down the Red Sea

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as the Israelites did going away from Egypt, no one

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near him to score the game winning touchdowns. Should

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that ever happen? Ah? Well, that you know, that's really uh,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what we call coaching mal practice. I mean, you know.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And so it's one thing to play too deep men

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>under where you lose sight of the quarterback. But if

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you better have somebody in the defensive

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>front who's making that pocket very tight and keeping it

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in there. And no, it should never happen like that. Look,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are you know, I marvel at

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the pr of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. You know, Jason

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Lights drafted two kickers. He can't I think you can't

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>get a kicker situation solved. And he's got a new

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>five year contract extension. Bruce Arians has come in as

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this quarterback guru, and then he's let's change, let's he

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>lets Byron left, which call all the plays, Like we

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hired you, Bruce, we didn't hire Byron, you know, like

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like you're the reason you're the highest paid coach on

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this that you should be calling the plays. You should

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>be running the offense. So the Bucks to me, I

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I was actually having the same conversation with

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>his head coach and we were talking about how bad

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks were and and he was like, look, they

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>only give a shit about Manchester United anyway. All those

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all those Buccaneers receivers were very well covered, Todd. I

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>just want to point that out, very well covered, except

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they forgot about the quarterback. By the way, I'm glad

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>you cursed right there, Michael, because you are allowed to

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>curse here. My last experience with Michael Lombardi cursing on

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts is when you used to do the the old

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one with your buddy Tate Frasier. Young jim Nance by

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, everybody um and Jimmy, Yeah, Little Jimmy, I

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>call it. Actually, we did a podcast today with Little

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Atman and I hosted a Little Jimmy on. We

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.559
<v Speaker 1>had a segment where we talked about the great Baker

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield and we talked about the clip that I think

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is the essence of of who the Washington Redskins are.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It was in the Washington Post the other day and

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm, you need to look at this because If

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you ever see any of your employees down at Circa

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or at at your hotel's behaving like this, you know

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>your culture is rotten. It's Dwayne Haskins sitting on the

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bench looking completely in the opposite direction as Kevin O'Connell

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>instructs case Keenum on what to do. Yeah, my beloved

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington Reskins, so bad, so bad. Might be Colt McCoy

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this weekend we shall see, could be Dwayne Haskins, might

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>be called McCoy Case Keenum in a walking boot. By

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, what's Tate doing now? I think Kate's as

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>as one of the great Mike. You might know this guy,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mike Tony, Mike Mike. You know Mike tomp

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you know Mike Tony? Michael Tony. Michael Tony used

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to hang around when I was in Vegas. He would

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hang around the basketball program. He would come in Tim

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Gergeritz who's now at the Pistons, Mark Arkantine is at

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Nuggets, and I and I was. I had an

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>office next door of them. So Tony was helping out

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the football and the basketball program, helping us get comp

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tickets and all that stuff. And he under the greatest

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>line of all. He said he was in between successes,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's where Tate Fraser is right in

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>between successes, in between successes. I like that. Um. Just

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to finish, the last time I was listening to their podcast, UM,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I was playing catch with my de facto daughter, a

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>little Gracie, who was eleven years old at the time,

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>when we were playing catch in the room, and I

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>was listening to uh Lombardi on the the old podcast,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and then Lombardi starts cursing like a sailor and I

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>had to sprint across the room and shut off the podcast.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You are very animated. No, that's quite all right. I

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>was probably bad. It's was probably something man at something.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Gild, is it possible that on the

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>wonder Lick test, there's not a question saying if the

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>head boats talking to the quarterback, do you a pay

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>attention or be look in the other direction? Seriously, it's

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not even Dwayne's fault though, right, yes, Gild, you had

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Haskins is ready to play in the NFL. I don't.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him playing. I don't know what is

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the playbook. He's even with it. They could start

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>him this week. Yeah, I'm not sure that you know.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Mike, Here's what I said tweeting. I was

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>having a tweet storm the other night on Monday Night football,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>after my favorite who I will never mention his name,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>after my favorite general manager, who's Fio and one with

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins, And I just tweeted this very clearly. I said,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, you people calling for Askins of the dumbest

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>human beings of all time because the starters aren't ready

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to play, how do you think the backups could be

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ready to play? I got so many tweets like that, like, oh,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you think we should put it Haskins against the Bears? Now?

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? You'll ruin the kid. Let's get

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>into a gentleman, Let's get into our best bets of

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the week, Mike, real quick circle million update. How many

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people at thirteen and two? Three at the top. Yeah,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we have three at thirteen and two, and then we

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have ten at twelve two and one and ten at

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve and three. So there are twenty three people either

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at the leader within one game of the leading. Heading

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>into the final week of September, Todd wishnev is in

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this ship not for the not for the quarterly, but

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for the for the whole kitten caboodle. He's in this. Yeah,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if you, if you over the course of

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the season, hit hit, hit at the rate he's hitting,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right there in the conversation. Because remember we're talking

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about Westgate having almost double the amount of people. So

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to take that kind of

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a percentage to win this thing. Just because of the

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sample size, right, you won't know. The randomness is that

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>much more muted. Exactly. The nice thing about Circle again again,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if you go oh, in twenty the first four weeks,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you go five and oh week five, it's

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>all good because then you have a three week sprint

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to get a hundred forty seven thousand in

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the quarterly. So just a great contest over there at Circle. Mike,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we start with you, Mike Palm. Actually, you know what,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go to our guest, Michael Lombardi. Michael, you

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>said you might have a pick or two. What do

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you like best on this late You know, I like

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the Denver broncos I think that Denver is a you know,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>they if you if I were to tell you you

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that that Denver would not have a fumble, created, would

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not have a sack, and would not have an interception.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>After three games, I would say, well, there's another planet

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm living on. And if I would also tell you

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that Jill Flacco's numbers, his numbers are similar to what

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>his numbers were in two thousand and fourteen. Now they're

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not great, don't get me wrong, and they're not great,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's averaging seven yards per attempt down the field,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>which is highest since two thousand and fourteen. He's had

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>five passes over twenty five yards this year. Now, he's

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not playing great, but what he's been able to do

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is their defense is only playing about twenty eight minutes,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so they're playing less defense, which is one of the

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>things that I love the most is teams that play

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>less defense. Beans you can play good defense. And I

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think the listen line has moved. It's it's open to three.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's I think the Sharps are playing Denver a little

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>bit three and a half. We knowe Denver's twenty two

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and going into the first game of the year against

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bears that they kind of got ripped off and lost,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they should be twenty three and oh in the month

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of September. I Denver to bounce back this week. I

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>think they'll create some turnovers for Gardner, McKay Minshew and uh.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And I just hope that they give the ball to

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for Neet because if there's ever a more overrated player

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, it's for that. We were talking about

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>him for fantasy purposes today with Todd Wright on the

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>show on a numbers games just awful. I'm just gonna

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>step in, Mike and take my turn on the button

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because I have Denver two as uh my first best bet.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Denver is favored by three. It is extra juice, but

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it is three across the board. And I agree with

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>everything you're saying, Michael. For the third strade game, Von Miller,

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Chubb, Denver defense, no sack, no turnover forced. If

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a game where Vic Fangio can get his

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>defense to do something, it's against the quarterback who has

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>only had two career starts in Gardner Minshew. Yes, I know,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>he has a seventy four percent completion percentage, the highest

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in any players first three career games since the merger

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>minimum seventy attempts. But if there was ever a game

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that this defense should show up and you're only giving three.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I too, am taking the Roncos is my first bet.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>The only caveat I will say here, Michael is let's

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>see how long it takes for us to text each

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>other and say, oh my god, we're betting on the

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco face. That's the only thing. It's the only

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm worried about. I'll send that. I'll send that

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>text before the game. I promise you. Flacco sacked six times,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way last week in Denver's loss. Mike Palm

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>your first best bet, sir, well, At the risk of

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>offending Michael Lombardi, I'm gonna go to a game that

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the wrong team is favored here and I'm

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Vikings plus two uh at Soldier Field.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>If not for the fact that Kirk Cousins hasn't won

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a big game since he threw the Hail Mary against

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson's Badgers, and he's Lansing, I would bet all

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of Todd wishnavs, Visa and paycheck on the Vikings on

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this game. I how that is bold. I think Minnesota

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits from having this game earlier in the year. Where

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be a frigid soldier field. It

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>should be very nice, almost perfect football weather with a

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>three kick in Chicago. I think that Minnesota is so

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>far the best team in the NFC. They actually dominated

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay for three quarters of that game in lambeau Field.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm very impressed with their ability to run the football

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>right at you, and yet they still have all the

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>talent at wide receiver and tight end. It's a formidable defense. Uh.

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit of a coaching edge

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of of just from the fact that Naggi

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is so limited in what he can do with Trabinsky. Now,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought Trabinsky looked a little better trying to run

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this hurry up offense. But then again, I remind myself

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the Washington Redskins defense, and you know, a good

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas six A team could go up and down the

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>field against them as well. So I'm gonna take Minnesota

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and take a couple of points on the road here

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears. You know what, I actually think the

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Redskins defense is actually pretty good. I just don't think

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>if you give them ten yards to defend right and

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they're on the field all game along, I don't know

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that we get a real accurate spate of them. The

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>other thing that Minnesota has done great, They've kept Kirk

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Cousins off the field. So Cousins fifteen of twenty one

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>last week a hundred seventy four yards for the second

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>time in two Minnesota wins. They did not even attempt

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a fourth quarter pass so against Atlanta and then last

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>week again who they played last week? Again? Real quick,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember Minnesota the Raiders both of those games,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not a single for fourth quarter past and remember that

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>went against Atlanta. Eleven dropbacks for the whole game, ten

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pass attempts from Cousins. So I guess whatever works. Dalvin

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Cook sixteen for one ten last week after missing nineteen

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of his first thirty four games. Michael LAMBARTI, did you

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>want to respond to Mike Palm taking the vikings there

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at all? I love it. I think that when you

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>look at when you look at this game, I mean,

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what you've got is you know we talked

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about coaching. You know, Mike Zimmers, Uh, Mike Zimmer understands

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>how to play the great Mitchell Robinsky. Mitchell's average five

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>yards for past attempt in the games that he's had

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to play. Last year they went to get Last year

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they won both games only because they could run the ball.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year they ran for three seven yards in those

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>two games. You know, m v P. Mitch has thrown

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five passes over ten yards this year, Gil and

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>m v P. Mitchell has completed six of them. So

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>anytime you're getting the points and Mitchell's your opponent, I say, go,

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you this question. Is there anybody

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in your guess, in your posts uh NFL employed life,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say, in your broadcasting life, that you have had

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in your craws more than Mitchell Drobiski? Does anybody you've

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>hated more? You know? And I don't hate him. I

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just hate people's ignorance. I hate people thinking that that

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're that you're you're using this as an agenda.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an agenda, you know. I off readily

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>admit if I would have been the general manager of

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, I would have stayed at three and I

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would have picked the Shawn Watson and I would have

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>probably had to listen to people tell me I should

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have picked the homes and they were right, you know,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But to pick a quarterback that did play one year

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at North Carolina, didn't get didn't get scholarship to play

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at Ohio State, and then trying to convince me

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's coming around, he's playing better. When he goes

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>against the correndous secondary, throws the ball, Damn they're out

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of bounds on the deep throw that the kid makes

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an incredible catch and keeps his feet in bounds. Anytime

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>he throws the ball, you're working extra hard to catch it.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Accuracy is something you can't improve in quarterbacks. And so

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>when the game's on the line, look, let's let's be

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>honest here. This game is gonna be a third down game.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Zimmer is one of the best third down coaches

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in football. This is where he wins. You've got to

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>try to stay away from third down and stay out

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of that for me and stay out of those situations.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at Mitchell, you know Mitchell's not

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a good third down The game goes too fast for him.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not I'm not you know, I hate I

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>don't hate the guy, but I do know that if

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if Mike Zimmer stops the run in this game and

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>puts it on Mitchell and Mitchell has to expend throw

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>over ten yards. I think that I think Mike Mike

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Palm is correct. I think that that it's favors, its

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>favors Minnesota take the points and watch Mitchell. Yeah. And

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to and to insinuate that you hate

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>him personally, but just the the game and all the

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>things that you said. I'll say this here. I'll say

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it on the podcast because I I don't say it

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on Visa and when we do our segments because it's

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a third rail. But I guess maybe

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it's because I was also watching the great ESPN one

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty year uh College Football Special America's game and they

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>did one on integration. Um. So this is kind of

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>close to home because my ex father in law was

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a great high school quarterback African American in Fullerton, California.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>He later became a great safety for the Over the

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Hill Gang Washington Redskins. But when he was recruited as

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback, his name is Brig brig Owens. His name,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>his first name is Brig. He was recruited by b

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>y U and they thought sight unseen. They just saw

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>his stats that he was short for Brigham and so

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they recruit him at b y U and then when

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they saw him on campus, they were like, uh no,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this can't work. This is back in the sixties. I'm

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wondering the Robiskie thing where they traded up guy played

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>one year at North Carolina, didn't draft to Shaun Watson,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't draft Patrick Mahomes. We're are still seeing a lot

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of this in football. And I guess what I'm saying

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is if a black quarterback played one season at North Carolina,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>would they have traded up to draft him? Like, I

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>really wonder if we still have a little of that

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>still lurking in the NFL. Yeah, I mean I don't.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we fall in love with I think Ryan

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Pace fell in love with potential, and you know, and

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that anytime you fall in love with potential,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way you take a quarterback in the

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>same conference the guys won the Player of the Conference

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>two years in a row called the a CEC. You

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>take the guy who played at North Carolina one year.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if I went upstairs and said to Millie, my wife, Look,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a guy from the a c C.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>But he's not the best quarterback in the conference. He

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't start three years and he didn't win the national championship.

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Her CPA instincts would say to me, you're an idiot.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Go back back to your office. Yeah, And and can

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I just say, like for people who are like, oh, Gail,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't say that, I'll give me that. Sam Donald,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen, Josh Allen all drafted ahead of Lamar Jackson. Right,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson looks pretty good to me, Gil I I

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote that. I wrote that for the for my article

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>for the Athletic tomorrow. And if you go to and

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't look, I don't buy a lot of like,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against analytics, so I like objective things like

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the Madden ratings. I do. I think you know they're

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>completely objective. Whether you agree with it or not. There's

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>no bias in it. So it's based strictly on numbers.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>For Whisky was the worst quarterback in the Madden ratings.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you go to q BR and whether you

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>like to BR or not, and you revisit that draft,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Baker Mayfield draft, I mean, Lamar Jackson has

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>an eighty quarterback rating. They can make sure us a

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>forty think about that. Something to think about. I have

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>two questions. First, of the last three episodes, we did

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday night game first, and we just skip that

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for no reason. To goodness, I'm an idiot. Yes, we

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>should have said, let's let's get your first best bet

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll go right to the Thursday game. I'm sorry,

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make I'm gonna make my best bet the

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Thursday game to save you, Mr Doctor Gill, and I

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go with phil Ladelphia Eagles plus

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the full. But now, do I like the Philadelphia Eagles? No?

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I think they can run the ball? No? I

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like what's happening with them this year. No, I don't

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>like any of it. So you say, why do you

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>take the Philadelphia Eagles. Here's why. The Philadelphia Eagles are

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>oh and three against the spread. The Green Bay Packers

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are three and oh against the spread. In my short

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>life of gambling on football, if you take teams that

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>are oh and three against the spread versus teams that

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>are three and o against the spread, you tend to

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>do well. Can I make a case for how the

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles, down by ten in the last two minutes

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>will get a backdoor touchdown to lose by three. I

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>can can I also see the Philadelphia Eagles mustering everything

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they have for this game in order to stay in

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the race at one and two right now, Yes, I

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>can do. I think the Green Bay Packers are amazing. Well.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they played great on defense against Robinsky, But

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>we've just heard what Mike Lombardi said about Dr Biski.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I think they really should have lost the game against

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings and that wasn't that great. And this

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>past week they got to play Fannie Pack Fangio at home.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So what have they really accomplished in this in this

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>season so far? Nothing amazing? Four points at the Lauder

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in an NFL game. The Philadelphia Eagles are still a

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>pro team. I like Peterson, give me the Philadelphia Eagles

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night. I think you should do all of

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>your betting capsules by answering your own questions. Call in response.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I think this, No, I do not. I'm in the

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>question and answer mode because I'm watching a lot of

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>congressional hearings today. Take care to care to give your

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>politics on that todd at all? Do you want now?

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pass. I'm gonna pass. I've already stepped on race.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You might as well stop step on politics. You'll have

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>no listeners by the time I'm done, Gill, I know

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't. Philadelphia at Green Bay is the Thursday night game.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I should have started there. I am not right for

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>having forgotten that, but Todd saves me here. Uh sick.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm, do you have any thoughts on tonight's game?

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>If I played the game, I think I would lean

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Packers first half just because of the way these two

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>teams have played so far. The Packers have been much better,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, in first half of games, and the Eagles

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have been awful in first half of the game. I

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>mean they were. They got down seventeen to nothing to

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Redskins for God's sakes. Uh down at the halfway, right, yeah? Yeah,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>down at the half. Well, the Packers have played well

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in first half, and and you know, look how they

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>came out against Minnesota in the first quarters. So I

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>would lean to Lane three in the first half with

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the Packers here. Forty five of the packers fifty eight

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>points this year, fifty eight have been scored in the

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>first half. Michael Lombardi, Does that tell you something about

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur and coaching staff right off the bat at

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>half times. Yeah, it does, you know, And I think

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I leaned towards I think both calls are

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the right for me, the right calls. I think when

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Eagles, they've only scored twenty three

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>first half points all year. We know that the Packers

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are first to have point team at last week seven drops.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>You know the really the Eagles gave that game away

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and the concern you have the Eagles their number one

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sacker on their team is Zundejo in the free safety.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't work if you're Jim Schwartz. Your defensive line

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 1>has to control the game. Their defensive lines beat up.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that on a short week. Carson

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is only five and eight in his last third

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>team games, he's when you pressure them. But I just

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling they're gonna come out and this is

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the first time I really think that the Packers are

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna get challenged with the quarterback who can move, can

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>make plays, and I think that they can handle it.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>They'll run the ball out of the spread. When you

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the Green Bay defense when they have to

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>play against shotgun formation. That the teams have carried the

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ball twenty three times for a hundred seven yards, it's

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>almost five yards to carry. I think that's why the

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Eagles will do it. And I think the Eagles are well.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles could win out right, and I

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do think they'll cover. Yeah, Eagles are nothing for me tonight.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I could tease them. I could play him on the

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>money line. I'm all about the Eagles tonight catching the four. Mike, Paul,

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you needs a tissue, man? You okay? Back there? Well, no,

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm alright, so wonderful Gil before we go to the

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>second pick, can I ask Mike Lombardi a quick questions? Okay,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lombardi, here's my question. I love I've been listening

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to you since you were way way back on Bill

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Simmons and then with GM Street and blah blah blah.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I love when you are just so candid about how

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel about these teams. Do you get a lot

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of blowback from NFL people because you're like, Mike, why

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are you throwing my guy this guy under the bus

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and this guy under the bus and this guy under

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the bus. Do you get blowback No, I don't get

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>any blowback. I mean, I talked to a lot of

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>people in the league and a lot of people like

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to the podcast, my podcast, the GM Shuffle. I

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty much that they know I'm I'm That's

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just the way I've always been, and I've always been honest.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't really fudget. I'm not going to be political

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, you're playing great today, you know, by

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, Baker Mayfield, you know, it's okay. You've got

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty one passes knocked down at the you know, and

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes only has three. That's not a problem. You know.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do that. I think I thought that

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>was the most refreshing thing about Rex Ryan coming out

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about Baker Maysher. He finally made a stand about something,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like you have opinions, like you gotta

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>give your opinions. So I don't really get much blowback.

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm not probably popular in Los Angeles and

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. I mean McVey I talked to McVeigh, but

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on their front office probably doesn't talk to me because

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they just gave one of the most ridiculous

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>contracts to a guy in the last in the last

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>eleven games, that's throwing eleven touchdown passes and eleven interceptions

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and the averages under seven yards per passion attempt. You know,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to give a hundred eighty million dollars to

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that guy? Feel free? That's a great question, Todd. I've

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to ask Michael that maybe I have in

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the past, but I certainly think that's a great question.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>And I do like that that Jared Golf take, and

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you and I got into this little Michael the other

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>day because I agree with that. I really felt like,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is like again would make NFL heads explode

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and fans has this club, But I really felt like

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Jared Golf might have been the first guy, the first

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who was drafted high, who they would have had

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>on a rookie contract, tried to win as much as

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>possible with him, and then said to themselves, he is

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what he is, but we're not going to give him

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>all this money, and they would have essentially started from scratch.

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>We've never seen that in the NFL, and obviously it's

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not happening here because they threw a hundred and thirty

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>four million at him, a hundred and ten guaranteed. Good lord,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome. Good for him. All right, let's do the

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.719
<v Speaker 1>second best bets. Michael Lombardi, do you have a second

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>guest best bet or did you want to just uh

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>staying after the Denver pick? Well, you know, I uh,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean the games that I like, the ones that

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked about on my podcast is uh. You know.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I talked about green Day and Philadelphia. I like them.

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked about Denver and Jacksonville. I really like Seattle

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and laying the points against Arizona. I don't Arizona didn't struggle.

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>They struggled back against Carolina. Carolina only allowed a hundred

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven yards passing. I think Seattle. I think Groan

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is having an MVP season now. They've turned the

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ball over too much and it's always about the ball

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to ball the ball when you're dealing with pet Carroll.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But I just think that to me, these are two

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>teams that are just different, and one team's coming off

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a loss, and the level of importance is far greater

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for Seattle. They can't get behind. They've got to get

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>more out of clowning. I think Iron Zoom will play

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this week. Clowning has had one sack and one harry

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>all season. They need to get much more out of

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>him to be able to be effective. But I think

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game without Patrick Peterson, that secondary is really bad.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you see Wilson in average and

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>eight point six yards per tenth a hundred nineteen quarterback rating,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdown passes, one interception, you know, and so they

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>got to find a way to get the pressure on

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the passer. And I think that Russell Wilson will do that.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And as long as this line stays four or under,

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at five now. It opened at four,

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it moved, it moved to five. I liked it really

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at four. I think at five I still would take

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>it in five and a halfs to but five is

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the can sense is still Seattle was like my fifth

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or sixth highest picks. So they can't make my top

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>three here. I don't hate it, that's for sure. Okay,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to a total here. I'm gonna take

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and the Bills under forty two and a half.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're dealing with two of the top five

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>defenses in the NFL. With when I think the Patriots

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are the best defense, but the Bills have been very

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>good early in the year as well. You're gonna have

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a big game here, a divisional matchup, and I think

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this game will be played pretty close to the vest

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in Orchard Park. We've seen this game traditionally be low

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>scoring when it is an Orchard Park. I make this

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>number myself about thirty nine and a half, so I

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thought there would be some value here, uh in the

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>under at forty two and a half. All right, what

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>were you last week on the show? By the way,

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you three oh two and one. We lose the total

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with the pick six by the Jets. We were just

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>dead wrong on the Eagles, Gale Um. We pushed the

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>push the Broncos total, and then we hit the teaser.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I guess the teaser. My teasers was Chiefs

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and Vikings one. Yeah. We were just dead wrong on

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles last week, although they dropped seven passes, as

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Lombardi said, so you know it could have gone the

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>other way. But yeah, that that that I don't chuck

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that up as a bad beat or a coin flip.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>In the end, that's just a loss. And I had

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles and a teaser too, so I got screwed there.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd picked two second pick right before. I just want

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask party because it is a Patriot UM insider.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen and I'm not asking this because

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I had the Jets team total under end last week?

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen the Patriots gave up a special

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>teams and uh pick six in the same game in

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the history of Bill Belichick. No, I think that's a rarity. Uh,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we gave up Let's see. Yeah, we did it against

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Todd in two thousand and fifteen at the end

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the at the end of the at the end

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the half, we got a block punt for a

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown against the Eagles. And then to start the second

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>half week, it's fourteen before we built fourteen fourteen nothing

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to lead. Eagles came back, blocked the kick at the

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the half to to make it fourteen fourteen,

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and we started the second half, took it all the

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>way down the field and Malcolm Jenkens picked it off

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and returned to four touchdown. They went up feen. They

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>beat us that day. So it's happened before, but it's uncommon.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that what Mike said about this Patriot

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>defense is is dead on. I think his his total

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is right. I think this will be two defenses that

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>will really dominate the game. I think the Patriots will

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>struggle to move the football against the Bills front, especially

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>considering that Marshall Newhouse is the left tackle and they're

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do everything in their power to help

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>him against Jerry Hughes. So I think the unders the play.

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>How about if your Jared's did him right now? Your

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>third pass, you throw the pick six, you get benched

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it for Brady. He actually Beljick puts Brady back in

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the game. And now you signed Cody Kessler off the

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>scrap here. Well, I think I can explain that. So

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>here's Belotix methodology, and this is what makes him so good.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>He Brady's forty two years old, he can't practice, and

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to give him a day off. Well, it's

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to give him a day off when you only

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have two quarterbacks, right, So there's no quarterback he could

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>put on the practice squad that he felt like he

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>could actually have to put in a game if something

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>happened to Brady. So he brings Kessler in. So really

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Kessler is like he's on his practice squad, but he's

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>not because he has to carry him on the fifty

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 1>three man roster. He'll educate him, get him caught up

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to teaching the offense, probably cut him in a week

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or two, let him sit out there, and then when

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he needs to bring him back and the guy has

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>already had work, or just hang onto him, depending on

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what his roster manipulation needs to be. But also it

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>gives him a chance on Wednesday to give Brady a

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>complete day off and not where stid him out. This

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>guy is not going to take any reps away from Stidham.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna jump stid him. He's just gonna be

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there to help with an arm and somebody to learn

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the offense. And this is classic Belicheck, thinking about twelve

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>games down the road, ten games down the road, not tomorrow.

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why we have you on the show, Michael, roster manipulation.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly, that's right, what's going on. I have no

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>doubt you want me to give my second pick now

0:31:55.120 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>because we got Plice waiting, right. So my second pick

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is the under forty seven and a half in the

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Houston game. And here's why. The Carolina Panthers had

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>their backup quarterback who just might be better than Cam

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Newton uh and run rough shot all over Arizona. I

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that same backup quarterback, while he may be

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>better than Cam, is going to run rough shot all

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>over the Houston defense. In Houston, Houston's defense put really

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really threw a zero against Minshew until the last intil

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the last drive. Um. They even went into San Diego

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and held Rivers down. I think they're a very good defense.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If they can get ahead, they're gonna run the ball

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>like crazy. Because Mr Bill O'Brien, first and ten run

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>up the middle, second and eight run up the middle,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>third and six try to get the first down. He

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>loves to run the clock. He loves to run the ball.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He loves to be uncreative. He is Mr uncreative at

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick is Mr creative, Mr Bill O'Brien and Mr

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Uncreative uncreate of leads to the clock being drained. The

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>clock just tick tick tick tick tick tick tick. And

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm going under the forty seven and a

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>half because I think it's gonna be a typical Houston

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ball game where it's gonna be like twenty three to

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one or one to eighteen or some crazy number

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>because they run the clock. You just like using the

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>word rough shot. How many how many times in life?

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, have you used the word rough shot?

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Not in the context of run rough shot in the

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. It's interesting. But I also you've battened

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>down the hatches this week on your other show, which

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is another one of my favorites, because old Jimmy g

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>better battened down the hatches or it's gonna be a

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>long season than the niner Lands. That's right. It's usually

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>hurricane talk, bad dada hatches, like actually protecting yourself from hurricane,

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but Todd managed to use it there. Um. My second

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>pick is the Kansas City Omaha Chiefs. I'm going with

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. They're given six on the road at what's

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>called six and a half to be fair, that's consensus

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Detroit. And this is nothing more

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>than me saying it's the Chiefs by less than a touchdown.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't care where they are. They're at Detroit and

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Patricia, this gets back to that coaching thing I

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about where I'm just gonna do my power rankings

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on coaches. I like Andy Reid a whole bunch better

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>than I like Matt Patricia. And as long as you

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>give me the Chiefs lesson a touchdown. Look at last week,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson needed circus plays like just throwing the ball

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>up in the air. Miraculously Ravens receivers came down with

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it for Kansas City backers to lose that bet. That

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was the magic of Lamar Jackson, who can get away

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from anything. I'll take the same exact number on Kansas

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>City on the road this time, mind you, I get it.

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take the exact number on the road against Detroit,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 1>who I fear not at all. And I know people

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>are high on Detroit. They are undefeated, they are two

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>oh and one. But you know what proved me wrong.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Kansas City Chiefs offense every day of

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the week when it's less in a touchdown minus six

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Here Chiefs my second pick. By the way, Gil,

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I love it because guess what. Detroit had two games

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that were given to them, and the other game was

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that debacle in Arizona, total debacle. I had them first weekend.

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>We both did just horrific. I think you know, I

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>think the team speed of the Chiefs, I think the

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are always gonna be primed for a backdoor cover.

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I learned. I listened to you today

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about uh being right on picks and coming out.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, these guys like Mike, these guys are thirteen

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and two. It's truly there is a degree of luck

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think you could have handicapped that getting

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>better than thinking the Chiefs were gonna beat the Ravens

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>by more than five and a half, and yet you

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>still lost because you're up thirty to thirteen, your kid

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>misses an extra point right and then and then you

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have this huge lead, and then when the clock becomes

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>your opponent, they don't care about the spread. So in

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>this sports handicapping world, you've got to almost look at

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the you have to look at the clock as a

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>dimension that you're dealing with as well. And so you know,

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think the Chiefs will beat the Lions. I

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>think the Lions, like Todd said, are are much fortunate team.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>They've avoid losing before they've won. But I've always I'm

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>scared to death that these backdoor covers are gonna catch

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you on this because the Chiefs are not that great

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>on defense, and they'll they'll deal with the clock as

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the opponent. It is a great point to

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>make always susceptible to the back door. I guess with

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, I'm gonna need to be beaten over the

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>head twice before I stopped doing it with the Chiefs.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But Lamar Jackson was one thing. But if Detroit can

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>do it again, tip of the cap for me. But

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a valid point. Todd was was harping on

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the back door covers at nauseum. May I use that

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>nauseum for you to I had Todsum do it because

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's so so much of the NFL comes down to

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the back door cover's. I hate to say it, but

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to handicap it. And and you know on

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your show on Wednesdays, I go on there and I

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about who got the back door touchdowns and who didn't.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't keep track of it, folks, you're

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna to get well, you know, I think the point

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that we made on that show, and kudos to you

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for making it when we were kids, right, whether it

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was the Redskins or the Giants or the Niners of

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, whatever dynasty, whatever many dynasty we had going

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on in those days, those teams would blow out opponents

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>every single game, right, and they would not those It

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>would be nothing for those teams to win games by

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>thirty points week in and week out. Today. We just

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't see that in today's NFL, and we and you

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>wonder there has to be a reason for that, like

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>all the dynamics that are in play, and so much

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of that is perhaps the talent is more evenly spread

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>across the board, but a lot of it has to

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>do with the officiating, right, the fact that that everybody

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>has such an offensive advantage now, the way that flags

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are drawn, and so it's probably easier for worst teams

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep games close. I mean, Michael, I don't know

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>what your theories are on that, but there's there are

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so many dynamics that make games not as consistently blow

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>up natured in this era. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's especially with the Chiefs. I know. One

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thing about Andy Reid is you never really have to

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>worry about him going conservative on you, like if he's

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>actually if he's behind, you're in a better position to

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>handle the over the cover. Then when if he's ahead,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>because he's you know, he's gonna keep trying to score.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've always said Andy Reid's like the fat

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>guy at the buffet lin He's just gonna keep scoring

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and scoring and scoring. He don't care, you know, and

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't He never works three dimension like he did

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Patriot game at home. But I do think

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that the speed of this game is too much for Detroit,

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and especially the slaves hurt, and then they're gonna and Melvin.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going after Melvine like you can't. I mean, he

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>will be Harold Melvin and the blue notes. By the

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>time this game for Chards, Melville will be done and

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>there will be no Py Teddy Pendergrass to save him either.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Excellent R and B referencing from Michael Lombardi. I love

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that Teddy Pendergrass. Of course he went onto solo fame

0:38:54.200 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was tragically paralyzing the what a great great

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>voice Teddy Pendergrass at back in the day. Okay, so

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>final picks and Michael, so, Michael's kind of given three.

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia was one of yours, Denver was the other. And

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you like Seattle May, I asked Michael Lombardi a question

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>before I get my third picks, since Todd's already asked

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>two yes, please of course, Michael. I I believe that

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if he stays healthy, that Patrick Mahomes may go down as,

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if not the greatest, one of the greatest quarterbacks in

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the history of the NFL from the skill set that

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he's shown so far. Your thoughts on that, you know, Mike,

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I watched him every week and I'm marveled at him.

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's truly remarkable. He has incredible sense instincts

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket, he feels the pressure, never takes his

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 1>eyes off the field, he throws it down the field.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The fact he's played three games and only three of

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>his football's have been touched by the opponent, just three,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>As I've mentioned, Baker Mayfield's had twenty one touched by

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the opponent, right, So you can't get your ends on

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He can escape, He's elusive, and then he

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>forces you to defend every single blade of grass vertically

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and horizontally. So the way the game is today and

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the way the way his talent sets up for the

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>game today, I could not I could not the three

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>with that statement. I mean he's remarkable. And let me

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 1>say this, I love DeShawn Watson, and I think Deshaun

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Watson has flat out remarkable. I mean, the first three

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season, Deshaun Watson is great, but my

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Homes just does it at such a little higher level.

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Poor Deshaun Watson until last week, twelve consecutive games getting

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sacked four times. I believe it was just ridiculous. You know, Gil,

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he I think he I think he does that.

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit like, uh, it's just his style

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of play. I mean, he's not a true rhythm thrower.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hold the ball a little longer than you want.

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.919
<v Speaker 1>But some of the escapes that he's gotten out of

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are just flat out remarkable. And then he breaks place

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>down with his unique ability. Eight games in a row

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with four sacks. Pardon me, eight games, not twelve. Still

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>one question before Mike gives his pick. You said, Patrick

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes has only had three balls touched by an opponent

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>three passes. Where are you getting those numbers from? That's amazing. Well,

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you know stack pass has them. If you go to

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>stack pass Think or whatever that site, or if you

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the clubs most of the times you can

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the clubs, uh, the the releases. They keep

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>track of passes defended by the opponent and passes defended

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>by your team. And I've always looked at that because

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that tells you who's making plays on the football. You

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 1>can't you can't get an incomplete pass if you don't

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>break it up. I mean mostly you know you've got

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to hope for a drop and so the team. And

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it also is an indication of team speed of your defense.

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you have don't have a lot of passes defended,

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't have pretty good team speed. The other alia

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to evaluate team speed and is in fumbles

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>forced fumbles, because the speed at it's Einstein's theory, a velocity,

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, power and specs, you know whatever that is.

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a math major, but you know, and so

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can see it. And I always look at

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>whose fource bumbles. It truly goes back to your team.

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Speedy defensive lineman that run after the football. They tackled

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the running back from behind with speed, that ball comes out.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Love it stat task P A. S. S Got. My

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>final best bet is the Sunday night game. And I'm

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the two and a half points with the

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>home dog, New Orleans Saints against the Dallas Cowboys. A

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of facts. I preach, preach, Mike, I'm with you.

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that Superdome is a tough place

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to play for an opponent Number one, number two. I

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's a huge coaching mismatch in this game between

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Peyton and coach Clapper. Number three. I think the more

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 1>time Teddy Bridgewater gets behind center in these games and

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with this offense, the more comfortable he's going to become

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>um and he will continue to to improve as he

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is he fills in for Breeze for the next five

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or six weeks. I think Kamar gives him so many

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>options both catching the ball and running the ball out

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield. I think this Dallas offense will have

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>trouble with the noise and the dome. And I really

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>think that New Orleans is a side that's gonna win

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this game. Not just covered the two and a half

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night. I think the wrong team is favorite.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you heard my rand on guessing

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>lines on Monday, um I was shocked that this spread

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was what it was Dallas has beaten nobody, right, the Redskins,

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, and the Miami Dolphins. Um, and it's it's

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still the Superdome, it's still prime time. And yeah,

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the points, thank you very much. And yes,

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the coaching is the other thing. Again, getting back to

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the coaching rankings. Sean Payton against the Clapper copyright Michael Lombardi.

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that every day, Michael. I would add this

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to Look, I'm a big believer in you're coming back

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to the lead at some point. So Prescott's been unbelievable, right,

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know he's played the Miami secondary. We

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>know what they are, the Giants secondary, really bad, Redskins secondary,

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really bad, pretty bad secondary. So he's got a nine

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>point eight yard per attempts so so far, his career

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is seven five. He's got nine point six touchdown percentage.

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>His career is four point eight. He's got a seventy

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>five point five percentage of completion, his career sixty six.

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.959
<v Speaker 1>His quarterback rating is this year, it's career ninety seven

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>point nine. At some point, it's coming back to the

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>met at some point. Now I'm not saying you can improve,

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna come back to the mean and eventually,

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's games like this that gets it back to

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the met and I think that that's really going to

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be the issue you pick, man. So so your final

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing them all down. Your final pick is New

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Orleans plus two and a half kill. Yes, I have

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>been screaming about it all week. Okay, So so my

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>final pick is going to be the over now now

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>tread carefully, folks. The over forty nine in the Washington

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Giant game. I believe this game has already

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>moved up, so it's probably not a great idea to

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be taking a bad number. But you know me, I

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>do things that are bad ideas all the time. Um,

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>over forty nine in this game. And here's why the

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants defense is or riffing. I watched that

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill's game. They made Josh Allen look like the second

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>coming of Joe Montana. He was literally just throwing it

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>down the wide open people. The Giants didn't stop Tampa

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Bay last year, I mean last week, and in fact,

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they even let him get into field goal range on

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the last drive. So the Giants, we know, cannot play defense.

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Redskins we know cannot play defense. And with

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that being said, Danny Dimes is the quarterback in New

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>York who actually showed a little spunk last week in

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. Now he gets to play in front of

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the home crowd. I think he's gonna be able to

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>score on Washington. I think case Keenum is gonna be

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>able to even though I don't like case Keenum. I

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>think he can score against the putrid, abhorrent New York

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Giants secondary I'd say over forty nine thesaurus listening to

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, it might be Colt McCoy. Keep in mind,

0:45:57.800 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Case Keenum is in a walking boots, so could be

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Cool McCoy better, even better. I like Colt McCoy even

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>better than thank you. I love Colt McCoy, I really do.

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Cole McCoy. But cold McCoy has never

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>done anything wrong in a redskin uniform. Let me just

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>point that out. He's limited, but he's never done anything

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>truly wrong in redskin uniform. I think the Redskins might

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>win this game. But the over is the play for Todd.

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine is the number Todd? Is that what you're saying?

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I see forty nine and forty nine and a half. Okay,

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So over for Todd, we'll give you the forty nine

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>consensus on that one, all right. Yeah, and and Gil,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great call and open a six

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And now it's up to forty. I

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if this thing gets to fifty. Okay.

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Support for today's show comes from Bookmaker dot eu and

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>industry leader for close to thirty years. Pro players consider

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>them a must for three major reasons. One their first

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of post odds, too, they take the highest limits in three.

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Most importantly, they pride themselves on never having kicked out

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 1>a winning player. That is everything in this day and age.

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bookmakers a highvolume sports book best suited for the sophisticated

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:01.919
<v Speaker 1>player who understand sports betting. They also cared to large

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>recreational players as well, and their motto is where the

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>lines originate, because it cs are the sports book at

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>which you've been betting follows their lines anyway. So right now,

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash GILL that's Bookmaker

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>dot U slash g I l L, you can claim

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars.

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That's bookmaker dot eu slash GIL. Bookmaker dot U slash

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>g I l L to join and claim your welcome

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bonus of up to three hundred dollars right now. Remember

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the three characteristics. First to post odds, take the highest limits,

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and never kick out a winning player bookmaker dot eu

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>slash GIL. Final two questions, gentlemen of the show. We

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>close out each and every show with these, have been

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>doing it for years on the megapod. The first is

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of all the big favorites on the board, what about

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the teasers? Gil? The teasers? I don't even know the

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:54.720
<v Speaker 1>format of my whole new show. Do I teasers? First?

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>You're right, Todd, Todd, maybe you should take this chair? Uh? Teasers?

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>What is your teaser the week? Let's start there. We'll

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 1>give Michael Lombardi a little time to think about it,

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think I prepped them on teaser of

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the week, Mike Palm, what would be your teaser of

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the week? On My Guys in the Desert on Monday, Brent,

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, return very crest ball and after having watched

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>his Raiders just get dismantled in Minnesota, Brent and I

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>told them that I've I've come up with a formulaic

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>teaser for your show. I'm going to do the same

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>thing every week until I'm wrong. I'm always going to

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tease the Chiefs down, and I'll tease the team that's

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 1>playing the Raiders down. So let's take the Yeah, let's

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>take the Chiefs minus a half in Detroit. And you've

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>already talked about this game, Gail. Detroit has been extremely

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>fortunate that their two oh and one having been gifted

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all of those victories and ties and uh, and then

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the Colts will tease them down to one against the Raiders.

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see what's to like about this team. Um, Michael,

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You've spoken at length about the philosophy and what are

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they and what they're trying to do in the mumbo

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>jumbo that that orderzation is. And now they go to

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis traveling on this ridiculous schedule where they don't get

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Oakland until November. So I like

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Colts here big, but I'll use them in the

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>teaser minus one and I just add I'll just step

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in here to mine was pick any two of the Chiefs,

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the Colts and the Ravens. As a tease because I

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>love the Ravens against the Browns as well, so they

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 1>might be one of my circuit picks for all I know.

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But any combination of those three teams Ravens, Chiefs, and Colts,

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I like that, Todd. I'm gonna go similar but a

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>little different. I'm gonna go with Indie as well, because

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I like everything Mike Palm said, and I agree the

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are fraudulent, Craik. They start superior coach than Mr Gruden.

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Indie, and then I'm gonna use

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriot minus one and just win the

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>game at Buffalo if Bill Belichick could somehow figure out

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a way not to give up a special team and

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a defense, again refusing to call them Patriots the Patriots

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>for Todd at Buffalo the other the other end of

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>his teaser, would you have any thoughts on the teaser, Michael,

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would take the Rams and and get

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that number down that mine is two. I think the

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Rams will win, I don't think they'll cover. And then

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I really, you know, I really would like the Minnesota

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and getting nine and a half. If I could

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>get that, that would be like walking in the park.

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>If I could get those two, those two would be

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>my teaser. We'll we'll give you the rams down to three,

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and we'll give you the vikings up to eight and

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a half. About that. So I only get six points

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on a teaser, Okay, great, then I'll take that. That's fy.

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You've given me almost a touchdown without an extra point

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with Mitch Robiski on. I'll take that every day there

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there are teasers, of course that are six and a

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:47.399
<v Speaker 1>half or seven, but for our purposes on this show,

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>we can find at six. Okay, Todd, Now it's two

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>question time? Is the final two questions? Now I believe

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got it right. Jesus, what is wrong with me?

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing brain sales by the way. All right, So

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the first of the final two questions, which are the

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>big favorites? Do you believe is the most likely to

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>lose outright? Not saying you're predicting it, but of this group,

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what is the team that you think is the most

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 1>ripe for an outright upset? And I will take it

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as six point favorites and higher for the purposes of

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>today's show. So the candidates are Baltimore, Ravens six and

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a half let's call it seven point favorites at home

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.280
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland, Kansas City six and a half point favorites

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on the road against Detroit. As we mentioned New England

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites on the road at Buffalo, the l

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>A Chargers fifty and a half point favorites on the

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>road against the Miami Dolphins. Colts we mentioned seven point

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against Oakland, and finally the l A

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Rams nine point favorites at home against Tampa Bay. Michael Lombardi,

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>which of those big favorites do you believe is the

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose? Outrightmore Baltimore? Interesting? Is that because

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see Cleveland stepping it up? Or is that

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>more of a damning of Baltimore? I think a little

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of Baltimore Secondary. You know, they got torched a

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit by uh By, not a little bit the

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>torch tremendously by Arizona. They got torched by Kansas City.

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't have Jimmy Smith. I think I think, you know,

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they could get beat this game. The bacteria

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 1>filled Mike poem. What do you got? This is a

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 1>tough one because uh I'm I'm between New England and

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we did well last we did. We all

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>said Tampa Bay. I'm gonna go with Michael. I think you, oh,

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>b Jake can hit him, hit that secondary couple of times.

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that the Browns have a talented defense. So yeah,

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with Baltimore. I almost this, for the record,

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I almost went with almost. I think you're right. I

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>think that New England games will be hard game. But

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. I'm sorry, No, that's all right. New England

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and honorable Mention Todd, same thing for you. I'm gonna

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>go with Baltimore too. I mean the Cleveland Baltimore game

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>as well. And the reason is last year end of

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the season, Cleveland played Baltimore really, really tough. If you remember,

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:55.959
<v Speaker 1>it was a third down in ten where um Mr

0:52:56.120 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Baker Mayfield through the ball behind his sever Otherwise

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they would have been in first Uh, they would have

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>been in field goal range to hide the game, I believe,

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or even win it. I can't remember. I think they

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>were down too at the time, but they played them

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>real tough last year. The other thing is Baltimore played

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Arizona at home last week before the Kansas City game,

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and it was only seventeen. They never really put their

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>foot on the throat of Arizona and just killed them

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like I thought they were going to. They let Kyler

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Murray run around and stay in that game, which means

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to me, maybe Baltimore is not as great as we think. Now.

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think they're gonna lose this game, but

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Cleveland's got some talent, and maybe they get lucky.

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say New England as mine, and just really

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>as a default because I just like it more than

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the others. As the answer to that question. In other words,

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see Kansas City losing. I like Baltimore, so

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gravitating that way. The Chargers can't lose as

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen and a half point favorite, can they can they? Uh?

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And then the Colts I don't see losing or the Rams.

0:53:57.440 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So for me, the default answer would be New England

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road Division game at Buffalo. For me, Baltimore Cleveland,

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll still take John. I love analytics hardball over Freddy Kitchens.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Like Freddie Kitchens to me, is that is your story

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is great there, Todd, but I just like this is

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a different staff and I just don't know about Freddie

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Kitchens at all. That thing he did at the end

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of that game where he the end of the Jets

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 1>game still rings in my head. Oh, I don't like

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:25.800
<v Speaker 1>him either. Yeah, I don't like him either. I'm just saying,

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if we have to pick somebody, that's right, you have

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to pick someone alright. Final question, then, gentlemen, if we

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>lived in a bizarro world and you were betting aside

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on all fifteen of these games, because we do have

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>two buys, the Jets and the Niners, uh, let's say

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of all fifteen, you could get one free pass,

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you had to been on fourteen of the fifteen. What

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is the game on the spread that you would want

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>no part of whatsoever? Michael Lombardi, That's always a hard one. I,

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>on my instincts, tell me the Tennessee Atlanta because I

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>don't like either team, and when I don't like either team,

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I stay away from I like that answer. I think

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that's my answer to Tennessee Atlanta. I have no feel

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for that game whatsoever. Palm. I think it's this game

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in South Florida between the team that never plays to win,

0:55:13.320 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. They always played, not to lose against the

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>team that's playing to lose, the Dolphins. I can't. I don't.

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't tease this either way. I couldn't. I have

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>no I have no feel because Anthony Lynde, I just

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can't deal with him ever in my life again. I

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>mean what he does in the second half of these

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>games is Look, if you watch the first half of

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that game between the Texas and the Chargers, how would

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you think they were going to lose that game? If

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you watch the first three quarters of the game in Detroit,

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>how would you think they're gonna lose that game? It's

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just remarkable. I even like the Monday night game Pittsburgh

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati better than I like Chargers Miamis. I think I

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>would agree there, Todd, which would you want to? I

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have to go with Tennessee and Atlanta too, because I

0:55:56.680 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>look at Atlanta is such a jackal and high ridiculous team.

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:03.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you figure out when Matt Ryan's gonna throw

0:56:03.960 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculous interception? How do you figure out whether it's

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Mike Rabel with a great game plan going

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into Dallas and winning on the road last year, or

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.800
<v Speaker 1>playing a game way above their head and beating somebody,

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>or on the other hand, just laying an egg like

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they did against Jacksonville. They're so hard to figure out.

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So to me, they're both crazy teams. I'm out, all right,

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. I'm out, and he's out for the show

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. Thank you to everybody really appreciated, not only Todd,

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>wished him and Mike Palm of course the staples of

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the show. Thank you gentlemen for taking the time, but

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardi a mensh. Thank you for doing this man,

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it is my pleasure, my pleasure. I enjoyed

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the company. Thank you. I learned a lot to the

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you, and hopefully we can get you

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 1>back here at some point later in the season. Nikkil Alexander,

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>sorry for not knowing the format of my own show.

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank god Todd was here. Good luck with all your

0:56:51.960 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bets this weekend of the Nashville Footballers. On both back

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that battle, but both