WEBVTT - The Growing Crypto Ecosystem

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and then Donna h a cross asset reporter with Bloomberg.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>This week on the show, well, they were calling it

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the crypto Winner. The value of big coins like Bitcoin

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and Ether were cut in half and a little more

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>than two months, and many of the smaller coins fared

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>even worse. But there have been some green shoots since

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>late January and crypto values have perked back up again.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What does it all mean for the huge ecosystem of

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>products that have grown up around crypto. We'll talk to

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of a company that provides exchange traded crypto

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>products about what he's expecting in the coming year. But first,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fill Donna all this talk about crypto winner. Has been

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about groundhogs? Or do you say will break Groundhog Day?

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't everybody? Don't? We all sort of watch and see

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>what happens because we want the winter to end. We do.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's very sort of ominous news in New Jersey.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Did you know there are local groundhog in New Jersey?

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Melville Millville mel actually dropped dead right before he was

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>supposed to see his shadow or not. I find that

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I find that ominous. Yeah, it is pretty ominent. I

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know what. I don't know what that means. But

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we need a groundhog for crypto winners, maybe

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like an n f T. Like if bitcoins down, you

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have a groundhog n f T that comes out and

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>sees the shadow or not? What how would you How

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>would you get it to pop its head out of

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the ground. It has to be I think it has

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to be triggered by like a forty percent drop and

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>pick coin and then it comes out, and it could

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be a coin toss too. I was reading apparently punks

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a tawny phil the most famous groundhog only has a

0:01:55.360 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>track record that compares his to his benchmark of a inflip,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's trailing his benchmark terribly. So I don't you know,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a good n f T crypto groundhog can

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>beat him. I don't know. I'm throwing it out there

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's any developers out there listening. It's a weird idea.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a free, free idea for me that I'm sure

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>no one's no one's probably gonna take up. But I

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do what I can possibly our guests might have some

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this. I don't know if I'm sold on it,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but I want to welcome Honey Raschwand he's the co

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of twenty one Shares and a Moon,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and Honey, I want to thank you for joining us.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Of course, thanks for having it. I want to get

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>into your sort of outlook for for crypto in general.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's a lot of listeners might not be very

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>familiar with twenty one shares. It's funny because in the

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>US we sort of fixate on, you know, the SEC

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>being very slow in approving uh bitcoin or other crypto

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ETFs around the world, though it's flourishing. I mean, twenty

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>shares has a bunch trading in European markets, So up

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about some of your biggest

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>products where they're trading, how how much assets are involved,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. If you can't tell by my voice, Um,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I did grow up in America as well, and so

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>did my co founder, and so the fact that we

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>actually built the company in Switzerland was very much on purpose.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>What we were just looking to do at the beginning

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was put crypto in a safe, accessible, known package. Or rapper.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of people, buying e t S is easier.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>For some people, buying e t S is necessary. And

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't find any of these products out there. There

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>were numerous reasons why not, but we sort of scoured

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the globe. We we We spoke to twenty seven different jurisdictions,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>different regulators around the world before settling on Switzerland and

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then using Switzerland as a base too from which to expand.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The first product we we launched was actually a bit

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of a complicated product. I think people assume we did

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin ETP first. No, we we first listed the

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>uh what was the world's first and only index one

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it was an index of the top five

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>cryptos represented the market, was just a single share and

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time that anything globally had been

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>listed on a stock exchange that was physically back. Now

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean some people listed things and said they

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>were physically back, but there's no guarantee. It's not in

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the product structure itself. These are physically back commodity e

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>tps and we put crypto it. At the moment, I

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think we have maybe two and a half billion or

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>so spread across about total products. We're going to double

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe triple the product suite this year, and we cover

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>everything from a single assets like the most popular ones

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin ethereum, to some less popular ones or more let's say,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more esoteric, younger ones like Polka Dot or chain link

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>or Solana or binance coins. We also have a bunch

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of index is if you want to buy thematic baskets

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing. Uh. And we also have

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the only bitcoin short in an ETP format, and so

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a single bitcoin short at the moment. It's

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, Austria, Germany, Holland, France, Sweden. I think we

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>announced that we're bringing Australia it's first bitcoin and ethereum ETPs.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>They're classified as at S there actually uh. And we're

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>going to do the same with brand new region in

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. And so that's sort of

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>where we're at by both assets as well as number

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of products. Certainly, we are the world's largest issue of

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto ETPs and we were the ones that first brought

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it to market a couple of years ago. Amazing, yeah,

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>just a few years. I mean the company's two thousand

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen. You were started, so that's a lot to

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>get done in a few years. We're three years old. Yeah,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're three years old. In a couple of

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 1>months now. I think this this is my third startup.

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It is the quickest of product market fit. Now. It

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't instantaneous. I remember launching in November with at the

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>time five million in seated capital, which we slaved away

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to raise, having never been in e t F before,

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and just the price action of crypto. This was a

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>basket of the top five. We launched the first day

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>with five million. On Thursday day two, second day of trading,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>three point five three point seven millions, and so that

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>was the the drop in just one day. I mean, actually,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it took us a really quite some time to get

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to an acceptable, respectible level and then from there. I

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>don't remember going from twenty to twenty million to two

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>billions again. I remember being in the range of thirty million,

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, we're now talking about

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two to three billion. A lot of people have have

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>used it, but I think it just it speaks to

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the product market fit here. A lot of people were

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at this. Why a few folks on the crypto

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>side were scoffing at the people that would buy crypto

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>using an e T S or wasn't as exciting adventure

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to pursue. Everyone thought it was impossible to do, or

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe if it's not listed in America, it doesn't matter.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Various other viewpoints there that we happen to disagree with

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>took a contrarian opinion, and here we are, so, honey,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>can you actually talk about the regulation in Europe and

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how that regulation actually allows for your products to exist

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>over there, whereas over here in the US we have

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin futures product and everybody is still sort of

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that holy grail bitcoin spot e T F.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So when we okay, when we say Europe as it

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>applies to us specifically, there are two Europe. There's Switzerland

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the European Union, and the regulations are

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit different. Switzerland has a very very rich history

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of costuming and trading commodities like think about swizz gold,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>baults and that kind of thing, and so it was

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>actually be one of the easier conversations with regulators that

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that we had was here in Switzerland, because very very

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly they got it. We said, we want to wrapper

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for physically backed, instored in our vaults gold. We wanted

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to have these characteristics. We don't want the ability or

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>power as an issuer to take the money out. We

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be guaranteed, and we wanted to trade in

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this way. We wanted for retail and institutional and they said, great,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>here is a package. And then towards the very end,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember say yes, but it's digital, that's the only thing.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>And so instead of physical bars, we're gonna, you know,

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>put laminated pieces of paper or platinum plates or whatever

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>within custody vaulting and do it that way. And so

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the Swiss really understood that they got it. There was

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>also a tremendous amount of political agreement, and not like

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in America where it's a little bit more

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>partisan than I would want it to be, but in

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, which is quite part is in itself. Everyone

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>agrees that this the crypto nation and they should have

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a stake in the future here, and it's a very

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>important thing for them. And so we get we get

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>that treatment, and then we help the country build this

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>entire program of having been the first to do it,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and and so very good relationship there. Europe is a

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>bit different in that there is a passporting scheme and

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so once you get approved in one European country for

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>X license, oftentimes you can passport it across the rest

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of the European Union, all the other twenty seven countries,

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and so that was basically how we've done it, which

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is why in some areas of Europe where the regulator

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>may not be the most bullish crypto, we still may

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have listings just based on precedent passporting and doing all

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of those various things. But we have a very good

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the German regulator. Germany is the largest on

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>me in Europe and that's something that we feel very

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>very good about. On the US and regulations can't comment

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>too much with any specifics. We do have a filing

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think it's public news that we've filed with

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood and ARC as well as twenty one shares.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess here's what I could talk about. We filed

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to files. One was futures and one was physical, and

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we have pulled the futures file. We were tracking and

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to see what people were looking for, how people

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would react to it, and in the end it wasn't

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the product quality that we wanted from the beginning. We

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>could have listed private trusts with premiums to uh net

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>asset value. We could have done things that have greater

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>counterparty with We could have done things that would have

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>made us more money. And we've shied away from bad

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>product built in bad product quality because we don't think

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you can as easily replace any of these things over

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>time and its compounds and all of a sudden you

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have a crappy company, right, And so we really didn't

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. We thought, maybe there's enough liquidity,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this, maybe that. But I think that the data

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>across the board shows that sends the futures et f launch.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't track the price of bitcoin, which one would

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>argue is the most important thing, and then it has

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>myriad other issues as well, given that it's built on futures.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Physical is the way to go. Physical is how we've

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>done it so far in probably a dozen countries, and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we will continue making our case. And I can honestly

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>say that everyone we're speaking to is listening with open

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ears and is willing to have a conversation, which is

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>all that you can really expect and hope for here.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And we will along with the rest of the community

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>try and work very hard to bring America an easier

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>way of accessing with the cryptos. Well, honey, I gotta say,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>if you have to live through a crypto winner in

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a regular winner, Switzerland seems like a

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>good place to do it. I hope, I hope you

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>ski a little bit, uh while you're there. I'll tell

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you this. Recently, the blizzards in New York are far

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>secure whatever interesting. Alright, so we are getting we are

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>getting the shirt in. But I wanted to sort of

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>gauge your mood and and what you sense as the

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>mood of the industry after this this nasty sell off

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in in crypto that we've seen since November. Um, you know,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously the space was just flourishing. I I know, you

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had really ambitious hiring plans. You're gonna hire more than

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people or something like that this year. And

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's that's the story you hear all over the place,

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>people really ramping up and and and really interesting projects

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of venture capital coming in, and and

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on and on. Does this price action change the temperature

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at all? Does it change the mood in the industry?

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Make you sort of second guess any plans or anything

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. Uh, you know, how are you thinking about it? Look,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a very very interesting question because

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>by all means, Crypto is not the only one that

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>it faces these kinds of things. Like I think, I

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>remember when I when I did my first startup, I

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>dropped out, I moved to California. It was the Sequoia

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Capital's rest in piece good Times power point presentation, because

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that's how the market was. And like I remember my

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>first round that I ever raised was on a today

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively small cap. I think it was three or four million.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It was three million the first time, four million the

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>second time around. And it's it's it's a very very

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>very different world. Of course, it changes the scene. People

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are more careful. I forget who said this. It was.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a seat station investor. I think it might

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have been Michael Deering. And it's it's the most perfect way.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think during downturns, we all know a Kleenex box,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and based on whether we have just opened it or

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if there's only four kleenex is left and it's nighttime,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>our use of the Kleenex is going to radically change.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing here now, and so I think

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, companies that were more casually doing

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars sponsorships for conferences of mostly crypto insiders

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are probably rethinking. Some of these companies that were not

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on solid footing. Well, you know, now now we see

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>who's swimming without any swim trunks. Now a lot of

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sunlight is the best disinfectant here, and so I think

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it makes everybody more careful, which is probably why the

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>data shows that downturns are better times to build companies.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Not everything is going well, you have to make sacrifices.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to think about this or that, which is

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a new paradigm ship for our industry. But you are

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>honest with yourself. You're intellectually honest with yourself. You've seen

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this coming. If you're careful, you've seen this coming. If

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you're in crypto, that's for sure, because you know we

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we do these normally and will continue to do them

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for for quite some time, and you care for it.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So we still have all of these hiring plans. We

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have forty or fifty open positions. Were a hundred and

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five people now up from twenty. I think or

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so about a year ago. But we've been, you know,

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent squirrel during the bull market and really stored

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>up to make sure that we not only are safe

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>now but can can be opportunistic in case something comes up.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>We were widely profitable, we remained pretty profitable. But I

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>think the extra attention to detail is something that I

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly missed during the bull markets where everyone's a genius

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and I wish the prices were higher, I always do,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but I know they'll be higher a year from now,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and I would much rather be in this position than

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. It's also all cyclical, and relatively speaking,

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>every metric you've said so like bitcoin or ethereum dropping

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by half as compared to what date, because I think,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a year out, we're all up, we're all

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>beating the SMP. Well, I haven't sold any crypto for years,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so how how am I? And I think we have

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to really consider all of these things, especially in an

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>area like crypto where a lot of us are very

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>very trained holders and it's part of the culture. Something

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting that I actually noticed is a bunch of research

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>reports that I've been getting in my inbox have been

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that there actually have been slight inflows into

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of crypto products over the last couple of weeks,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and and even if there are outflows, they're really miniscule.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at the bitcoin features E t f S,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the ones offered in the US, and they've seen no

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>outflows at all. And I'm just wondering why you think

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that might be, given that there is so much attention

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at the recent draw down. I think it depends on

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the person, because every every person sort of in crypto

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for a slightly different reason. Those that are investing in

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto because of political risk, what has changed. Nothing. Those

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that have invested in crypto because they're worried about increased inflation.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>What has changed. Part of the equation has changed, which

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is why the prices have moved. But largely that thesis,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're a long term holder, still applies. Those that

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have invested in crypto as a VC case, like a

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of I think tokens can be looked at as

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>VC project. Of course they're going to hold that. That's

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole point, and so I think that's how we

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have to think about it. Really, A few of our

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>competitors have customer profiles that are far different from us,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're inflows, outflows. Activities as a result, even in

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the good time, are just different from us. We don't

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really attract too many traders. We attract long term holders.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Our AUM tends to be among the stickiest in the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>space as a result of what is predominantly family offices,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>private banks and fund managers that hold the ball of

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the au M of the product, and the healthy dose

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of retail that give it act. But you know, I'm

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not surprised by the data. Our data shows the same.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's a little too soon, but I think

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we've come close to maybe inflows in the last thirty days,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which is very good. Actually, you know, a couple of

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>days of outflows, but overall for the month, net inflows

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and the outflows weren't nearly serious. You're in an industry

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that talks a lot about in ten years we will

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>be x and as a result, you get a lot

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of people in the industry that invest with that time horizon.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are trying to get rich quick,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but they tend to be uh, sort of flushed out

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in these market movements. Honey, I want to rewind a

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit to something you said that I've been thinking

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, and that's sort of the partisanship. Uh no,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to politics and crypto now here. You're

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's you know, flown around to how many

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions twenty First of all, I wish I had your

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>frequent flyer miles. They must be you can probably get

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a trip to the moon at this point. But but

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, you know, tell me if I'm wrong in

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of simplifying it to the to the idea that

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the conservative side, the right side of

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the political aisle is very much sort of pro crypto,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hands off regulation and the and the left side is

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>more cautious at once tighter regulations, more restrictions. Is that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>too simplified of a way to think of it, or

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>from your experiences, is that sort of what's going on.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not a bad summary. I haven't thought

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>about it under those models. I think it's I think

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly interesting. I I I've always looked at this

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>as even earlier than that, in that none of the

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>commentary that I'm hearing on the bearer's side, left or

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>right makes sense. So it there there's an element there

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of you know how, at the very beginning of crypto,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we were getting a ton of this is only used

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for drugs, and at some point we were getting this

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is only going to be used by criminals and terrorists,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and that narrative has largely died due to data, to

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the anecdotal evidence, due to monitoring on exchanges, the professionalizing, etcetera.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the same thing here as well.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the comments that I'm hearing are about

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this is going to exacerbate income inequality as an example, right,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and so very that's very clearly something that is a

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>commentary from the left. That's that's unhelpful. And I'll mention

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one on the right as well, just to be fair.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's unhelpful mostly because it's not true. Right. My

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Failure loves crypto in part because of

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>female and women empowerment in the developing world, suddenly having

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>access or being able to have access to finances, which

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>has proven to be better for families overall. Anyone anywhere

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in America elsewhere can suddenly plug into a financial system

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that is global in nature. There's there's a ton that

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the left with love about crypto. It's just not properly explained.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>On the right, I think I've heard some things about

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>how this is quite negative for the United States, it

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>should be squashed. Maybe China or Russia are behind this

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to destroy the dollar or to control it

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It's very clear based on Russian and Chinese

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>actions that they are similarly confused, right, And I think

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a bit early. But to me, bitcoin

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is is pretty American. It's what's one of the most

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>American things I would say has ever been invented build

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>on sovereignty as a concept, let alone sovereignty in the

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>digital age, which is which is both American individual liberties

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and freedom combined with American ingenuity and innovation. Right, this,

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing, this entire asset class is super American, which

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is why a lot of people that happened to the

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans are in the industry and a lot of American

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars are in the industry. But it would be a

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>shame if America missed out on this, and I think

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>America can really benefit from this in myriad ways. One

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is the bitcoin mining and we've been seeing what states

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like Texas are doing to incentivize Chinese mistakes ultimately of

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>destroying the their own mining industry. But we should see

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Right now, American exchanges don't seem to

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>be as competitive as global exchanges based on revenues, based

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on market share, based on kind of products, and and

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and I would I would argue that we have been

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>falling behind on a couple of things. We've been doing

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>well on say mining and a few other topics, but overall,

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that it is the best place to

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>do DeFi best place to be crypto And you know,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>boy should it be? And we make that case privately

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>UM as a company, h and we will continue to

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do so. I forgot already what were you used to

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>describe some of the I think it was esoteric products,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So you had mentioned Salona, Polygon, a bunch of other

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>e t p s. So I'm wondering which of your

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>products you're seeing the most investor interest and why that

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>might be. We look at two metrics. One is just

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, what are our biggest products, and those tend

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the usual suspect Bitcoin, Ethereum, the basket, etcetera.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>We also get a lot of attention with bringing accessibility

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask that are even in the West generally inaccessible.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they launched it yet, but I

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. And I think for the longest time

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>polka dot has been wanted by coin base and just

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not there. I think they they in the end listed it,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but there was a time period where we were the

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>only way to access polka dot in the West. Certainly

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that is the case for Binance, which is a very

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>good product for US finances by far the world's largest exchange,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and mostly people in the West really don't know too

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>much about it, like as on a retail level, and

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we are one of the few, maybe only way in

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a regulated fashion to purchase this asset in the West,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you get a lot of attention. The other

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>metric that we look at besides just overall, what are

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>our biggest product, and really it's just the usual suspect

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is time that it takes to get to a hundred

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a one because that actually shows there

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are some products that that list and then soar to

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred millions, are products that take another two years

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and still haven't hit a hundred uh and on those

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>basically all the layer, all the layer ones and layer

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>two's that we've launched everything that you could see as

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>either an Ethereum competitor or compliment, depending on how you

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>look at has been soaring, and it's been soaring in

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the summer, and it's been soaring since we've listed it.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it's Lana Avalanche Polygone, very very popular launches

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos right now because you know, Mikey brought this up

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bear market even though I think the podcast is the

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>price goes out for something, right what goes up? Yes,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you didn't even know the name right now, but it's okay.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think I think even if if you

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>were to look at the bear market right now, Cosmos

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is and we happen to have I think the only

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos product in the world, So all in all, we'll

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>still see strong influence to that point, you know, honey.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Before every podcast, the Albanna gathers up a list of

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>about three d and forty seven questions for for the guests,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and uh, unfortunately we never get to all of them,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but she has got a good one on on her

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>list that I'm gonna steal because we are running out

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of time, and it's about basically the notion of institutional

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>investors and decentralized finance. Um, do you see an interest

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>from institutions to get into defy? If that, what will

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it sort of take to get them involved. I feel

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like institutions are just finally worming up to sort of

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the big cryptos Um. Are they ready to sort of

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>go into the rabbit hole of defy? And if I

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>can tack one more question on that, you know, the

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>barrier tentry is so low that there's so many projects,

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>so many coins going out there is that a hazard

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to the space when you have so much supply of

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>new stuff coming in, does that sort of water down

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>dilute you know, the potential worth of of of all

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the projects. Yeah? Absolutely, So let me answer your your

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>second question first, because that's an easy question. There's about

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>two million apps maybe more on the Apple App Store.

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>There's I think three to four million on the Google

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Play Store. We're not that concerned about good mobile apps

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>taking off. There's going to be a ton of noise.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It is our opinion that there's going to be more tokens,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not less. Because we're starting to see this, you see it,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>especially with the n f T s. It's very possible

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that instead of subscriptions, we get n f t s,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>or we get tokens that represent something like that is

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>very possible that for a bunch of aspects of our lives,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>we will you know, add on top of it some

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>crypto element, which is quite interesting. And so if anything,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see more tokens, not less. There will

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>still only be the top top ones. Maybe it's ten,

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's twenty, maybe it's five. Uh, and so it

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>still makes sense to invest in the in the big ones,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the ethereums and their compliments and competitors, the bitcoins, etcetera.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I would assume if if we really think

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this will go to a hundred trillion dollars, it's it's

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not inconceivable for a bunch of random tokens to get

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>tens or hundreds of billions in market cap. And you're

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing it right now like it's super early. We have

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>defy assets with tens of billions in market cap. Once

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it goes a step or two more in adoption, those

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>same asthlets would be hundreds of billions or or maybe

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>low trillions if you really extrapolated up, and we would

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see that something quite similar. Institutions have an incredibly long

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>term perspective, which is very helpful. Here. Institutions have a

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>ton of money, which is very helpful. Here. Institutions move

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, and they have an incredible amount of needs,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and so that's not helpful. Institutions are not here. Uh,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they're on the way, but sure everyone is on the

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>way to something. I think they still need a lot,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're talking about big pension funds and insurance

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>companies and the like. The good thing is that they're

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at falling bond yields, issues with interest rates absolutely

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>low yield, sometimes negative, like in Switzerland it's negative seventy

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>five basis points what the bank charges you on your balance,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're seeing all of that and they need to

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>do something about it. So they are actually some of

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the best conversations we have. But they are the conversations

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we have that we know will take another two, three, four,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe five years to materialize into anything. And that's fine,

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you continue to invest in that, but I think it

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a while before this really tips the scale.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Which makes this such a unique asset because I'm pretty

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sure that most asset classes are first embraced by the institutionals.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Honey frequent listeners of Price Goes Up know that Mike

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to ask multiple multipart questions. So I have a

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>two part question for you as well. One one is

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>parts that's amateur. It's amateur, but it's it's big for me.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I usually like to keep it just one question. One

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is it is Mike you might learn from that? Uh.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>One is we mentioned that you are the co founder

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of A Moon and I wanted to ask you to

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about a Moon a little bit because the reason

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that you and I originally started talking is and the

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>reason I wanted to have you on the podcast is

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that you were telling me about index tokens, and so

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us what our index tokens? Describe why

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys started working on this for our listeners. And

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>really it was the very first time I had heard

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>about them when when I when you told me about them,

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So all of those details would be great. Absolutely. I

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's all about the end consumer when you think

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. If our mission is to make crypto marks

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a sessible and what we see ourselves doing is just

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>building bridges into the crypto world, if you want to

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>take that analogy to the limit, then there are different

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>vehicles for different people on that bridge. And that's sort

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of how we see tokens overall, just conceptually, is that

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for some people the product that makes the most sense

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is an e t F my mother for example, a

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fund manager for example. But for some people, and this

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>could be either a mix of maybe someone is more

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>technically savvy and technical and crypto forward. But and this

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is where it's really important to us and how we've

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>initially thought about it. Maybe they're in a geography where

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future, a we will not be listed

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>locally on our local stock exchange and be they will

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not have access to the markets that we are on.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Most people around the world don't have access to the

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>American stock exchange system, and that by itself is the

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest one, let alone the German Stock Exchange or the

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>French stock exchange. And so we want to have a

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>product whether you are in Guatemala or in Germany, and

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue having that. And there are indexes

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that I can give to you in an ETP format.

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to make a themed allocation into

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>say the metaverse or defy or or anything else, and

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you want this for some reason as a Salona token

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or an Ethereum token, we should have that product should

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have our name on it as well. That's the basic

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>summary of why we do tokens and how we think

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about it is greater accessibility. You do get into some

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>very interesting things though, with respect to like what kind

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of products you can build in tokens, because it turns

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out that when you start doing this, you'll then see

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things I can do with tokens

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that are impossible to do with the t f s,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of the other way around, but mostly

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tokens are better in a lot of technological ways. You

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 1>could build products that incentivized long term holding by air

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>draw up in the feedback at first certain period of time,

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>help and various things that you know you could not

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>do independently. And so there's all of those aspects to it,

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which is how we broadly organize it. Think about it.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Tiden up your straight jackets. It's time for the craziest

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>things we saw in markets this week. Well, the way

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I organized and think about things is in crazy things.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's an awful seguet, but I'm trying here.

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But let's get you. Have you start us off, what's

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the craziest thing you saw in markets this week? Well,

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as you know, my recent favorite topic to talk about,

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which you and I have discussed, is football. So my

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>weirdest thing actually is a story about football. The Bloomberg

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>headline said, Lucky Better wins dollars with a twenty dollar

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>wager on NFL weekend games. So it was somebody who

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>bet the Bengals would beat Kansas City twenty four and

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Rams would beat San Francisco T to seventeen.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a twenty by getting the scores and the

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>winners correct. Wow, that's it's pretty amazing. Nine thousand dollars

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for a bet. Yeah, but they they're killing themselves for

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not putting another twenty in the right. Well you wonder

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that person had a thousand twenty bets on

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>all various permutations, but I hope. So I like this

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>story because I'm so bad at guessing the outcomes, Like

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely guessed the opposite for both for all for

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>basically all of them all season. So this this is

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>really striking to me. So no Draft Kings app for you.

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Do not down that, don't download, that would be dangerous.

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty good. One bill down. I'll give you.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you credit for that, and I will accept

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>sports gambling as a crazy market thing. You know, why not?

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Ino? How about you? How do you you've

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>seen anything crazy in the past week or so. I've

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>done zero preparation for this, so I'll just say content

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>thing that irks me. Coin Base is a bell weather

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for crypto. Coin based is an incredibly undervalued company. No

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>one really understands coin based on the public markets. You

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>could see this gulf between public and private in how

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ftx has pund raised this week versus the very public

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>price coin base. At some point, ft x is a

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>wonderful exchange. It's very quickly growing. It is small compared

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to coin base, and if at some point the private

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>markets are valuing it higher than things coin based publicly,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that should say something. People are overreacting in general. Overall,

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we see it with crypto prices. We also see it

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with crypto public equities. And this is a clear case

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of like, read that coin based quarterly reports, see how

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>much money they're holding, how much money they're making, what

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they're actually doing, and you know, tell me somehow that

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's worth thirty six billion dollars or whatever. Though the

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>number that's it's pretty uscinating. I wonder if there's you know,

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you something about sort of the amount

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of private capital looking for a home and and uh,

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know something about that side of the market that

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is out of balance. Maybe? I think it mostly is

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just a reflection of how short term cited the public

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 1>market is. And I think you you deal with venture

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>investors who are comfortable holding for five to ten years position,

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's not the case in the public markets. Crypto

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to go whatever the price of bitcoin is

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, which I am proud to say I do

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not know. Crypto will go below this price. Crypto will

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>go above this price, but in a certain time period

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years, crypto will materially be above wherever

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>we're at now in terms of adoption, in terms of price,

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of usibility, in terms of a lot of

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 1>other things. And I just think that bet is harder

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to make in public markets overall than in private markets. Right,

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense. All right, I'll give

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you my crazy thing. Um, I'm fascinated with domain names

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>in web three domain names m because I'm old enough

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to remember back in the original dot com boom, all

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the domain names squatting that went on, people thought, if

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you bought the right domain name, and in many cases

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they're right, it ended up being worth a fortune. So

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a similar thing going on with crypto domains

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>um and the idea if you're not familiar, I think that,

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and honey, correct me if I'm wrong about any of this.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the main appeal of having your own

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto domain is, you know, you can put your wallet

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at that address, and then it's a lot easier to say,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, send me some crypto to this Mike dot

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>ether or whatever. Then here's my you know, super long

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>uh wallet address. What is it like forty forty numbers

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and letters or however many it is. But so I

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the Salona name service yeah, bonfida yeah,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit different than the Ethereum one. And

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that they they will allow you to buy a corporate name. Yeah,

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you can buy Like I was, I'm

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at their leaderboard. Number four is Starbucks dot s

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>o L. I guess went for about interestingly, which seems

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>low right interestingly, right right interestingly. A corporate name is

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not the top of their leaderboard. So I want the

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>two of you to hear me out here and try

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to guess what is at the top of it. Bill, Donna,

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>if you had read my little contribution to the Crypto

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>newsletter this week, you would know this. But I think

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that might if I'm with any luck. That's the one

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thing you haven't read, uh this week. I read it

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 1>three times. Give us a hit. The top priced domain

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>name for Salona is an emoji. It's not even a word,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an emoji. So so guess the emoji and

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>guests guess the prices a tiebreaker, you go first of all, Donna, Well,

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel silly because I read your column three times,

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but I was sweeting it for grammatical errors. Would you

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to make a lot? Nothing gets full dot and

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>we're excited than finding it a type something I've written? Yes, yeah,

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So am I allowed to say poop emoji just for fun?

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's that allowed on the podcast. I'm going to go

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with that, and I'll go with ten thousand. I guess,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just double the Starbucks alright, hotty Starbucks.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So boomji was actually one of mine. Because ship coins

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are a thing. I'm amazed. It's not Oh wait, wait,

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>never mind, I'm giving them giving away that. I'm giving

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it away, the secret diamond hands. I gotta give it

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the honey. It's it's just the diamond and and sixty

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thou dollars. What a guess. Wow, he's off bite neither one.

0:39:56.120 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>If you is allowed to ever sell me do why

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people will be contacting your people about there should be

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a hand in there, diamond tomoji the hand. Well, apparently

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the single character ones are the most valuable, So yeah,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.919
<v Speaker 1>diamond hands would probably be up there too, I would mention.

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, that makes sense. I don't think I

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>won that. I said, diamond hands, Yeah, close enough, close enough,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>better better than the disgusting one vildonna. Just at least

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't curse, honey, curse. It was my number one choice,

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>number one choice. It's a vertical in our space. It's

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>an important to us at class at this point. But

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>all right, well we'll see, we'll say maybe that one

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you may or may not have that ticker reserve. I

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think we just broke some news filled out. I think

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>we just broke some news. Yeah, I think we did well.

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding. But but if I'm not kidding. I will

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>do this right now. Fantastics all right, We'll have to

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>check back on the leaderboard for the Salata domains. I

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling maybe someone will. We'll hear this podcast

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and bit up that that discussing emoji that but you

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>should you should buy it as a gift. You should

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>be doing that. I'll see. I'll talk to our compliance people,

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>see if I can get that get that whatever she wants.

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll air drop the poop emo g T. I don't

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>know that that sounds disgusting, but honey, really fascinating conversation.

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Can't thank you enough for your time. Hopefully we can

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do it again some day. Thank you so much because

0:41:50.280 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a black Thank you, honey. What goes up? We'll be

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 1>back next week. Until then, you can find us on

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal website and app or wherever you get

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. We'd love it if you took the time

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts so

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>more listeners can find us. And you can find us

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Follow me at bring Anonymous. Bildonta Hirich is

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bildonta hi Rich. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts, and thank you to Charlie Pell to Bloomberg Radio.

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Laura Carlson. Ahead of

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg podcast is Francesco Levie. Thanks for listening, See you

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>next time.