Speaker 1: And the key plank of ensuring the future will be
Speaker 1: made in America.
Speaker 2: Megan India, for India, n for the world.
Speaker 3: Hello' Stephonomics here the podcast that brings you the global economy.
Speaker 3: Joe Biden has put made in America and the revival
Speaker 3: of American industry right at the center of his economic policies.
Speaker 3: He wants to bring more jobs home as a good
Speaker 3: in itself foreign policy for the middle class, they call it,
Speaker 3: but also to reduce what he sees as a dangerous
Speaker 3: reliance on China. But it is hard to do, especially
Speaker 3: when it comes to core consumer goods like clothes and toys,
Speaker 3: where China has built itself a completely dominant position. Have
Speaker 3: I mentioned recently that China makes nearly all of the
Speaker 3: world's socks, while India's Prime Minister Narindra Modi thinks India
Speaker 3: can give the world a Plan B, probably more easily
Speaker 3: than the US. Well, hear how that's going in a minute.
Speaker 3: We'll also hear an economists perspective on all this from
Speaker 3: the Milk Institute's William Lee. But first, our luxury retail
Speaker 3: reporter Jeannette Newman went to la in search of a shirt.
Speaker 4: I'm walking through the Fashion district in downtown LA It's
Speaker 4: one hundred block area that's at the heart of apparel
Speaker 4: production in the US, but I can't really tell that
Speaker 4: from walking around.
Speaker 2: Right now.
Speaker 4: I'm on Santi Alle, an outdoor shopping market that's packed
Speaker 4: with stalls and people seeking bargains. To my right, I
Speaker 4: see some knockoff Adidas sweatshirts and joggers, And to my left,
Speaker 4: I see some T shirts that are selling for three
Speaker 4: ninety nine. I've been looking at the tags, and most
Speaker 4: of the clothes are made in China or elsewhere in Asia.
Speaker 4: But down at the end of this alleyway, I see
Speaker 4: one sign, one single sign that says made in the USA.
Speaker 4: I'm going to go talk to the owner to find
Speaker 4: out a little bit more. Hello, Hi, can I speak
Speaker 4: with you, ah claro in Espanol. No, But effect Maria
Speaker 4: tells me. The leather belt she's selling our USA made.
Speaker 5: La Maria Pa Saina.
Speaker 4: But most stuff at the market is from China. She
Speaker 4: says that's because labor costs are lower there. I'm not
Speaker 4: surprised that a lot of these cheaper goods are made
Speaker 4: in China and Asia, as Maria told us, But I
Speaker 4: would have expected to see just a few more products
Speaker 4: around here that are made in LA. After all, we're
Speaker 4: just a few blocks from ten story brick buildings that
Speaker 4: are full of floor after floor of people cutting and
Speaker 4: sewing apparel. And right around the corner from where I
Speaker 4: am is a street where you can find roll after
Speaker 4: roll of fabrics and also buttons and zippers, anything you
Speaker 4: could possibly need to make clothing. And the county where
Speaker 4: I am, LA County, is home to more than a
Speaker 4: quarter of all apparel manufacturing.
Speaker 3: In the US.
Speaker 4: That's the largest ship in the country. To learn more
Speaker 4: about why it's so hard to find made in America
Speaker 4: products at the epicenter of American apparel production, I set
Speaker 4: off to talk to some designers and factory owners in
Speaker 4: the area.
Speaker 6: LA is all about image and being able to create,
Speaker 6: you know, the style and the looks that influenced the world.
Speaker 6: That all happens right here in downtown.
Speaker 4: That's Courtney Campbell. He's thirty six years old and runs
Speaker 4: a small clothing brand called Almighty Los Angeles. It's one
Speaker 4: of the few boutiques I've come across in the fashion district,
Speaker 4: which surprised me. Feels like going to Little Italy in
Speaker 4: New York and struggling to find a slice of pizza.
Speaker 4: A lot of retail stores in LA closed during the pandemic.
Speaker 4: The bounce back has been slow, like in other city center's,
Speaker 4: but the decline in LA was underway before COVID nineteen.
Speaker 4: The number of apparel factories and shops in the city
Speaker 4: has been falling for years, succumbing to rising labor costs
Speaker 4: at home and increase competition abroad. When Courtney started designing
Speaker 4: clothes in twenty seventeen, he was able to source most
Speaker 4: of what he needed in downtown LA.
Speaker 6: When I started, I would just walk blocks and go
Speaker 6: into a building and hit each floor and just knock
Speaker 6: on doors and say, you know, what do you guys
Speaker 6: do here? Or can you do this for me?
Speaker 4: But it's become harder for Courtney to find everything he
Speaker 4: needs here. He recently bought some checkered fabric from a
Speaker 4: nearby store and then hired a small factory to cut
Speaker 4: and sew some shirts, but he couldn't find anyone to
Speaker 4: make matching baseball caps.
Speaker 6: It's very hard to find manufacturing in America for your hats,
Speaker 6: and if you do find it here, most of the
Speaker 6: times they're going to send it over to China, get
Speaker 6: it made, and then and then just sell you the product.
Speaker 4: So he cut out the middleman and source the hats
Speaker 4: directly from China.
Speaker 6: China gives you that opportunity to still be able to
Speaker 6: maintain what your consumers are used to at the cost
Speaker 6: that they can afford.
Speaker 4: As Courtney expands his business, he keeps encountering hurdles to
Speaker 4: manufacture apparel in la.
Speaker 6: If you're going to do one hundred pieces and America,
Speaker 6: it's fine. If you're gonna do a thousand, then it
Speaker 6: doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 4: I've spoken to a lot of apparel executives and entrepreneurs
Speaker 4: who would like to rely less on Chinese suppliers. In
Speaker 4: the past several years, the list of reasons to exit
Speaker 4: China has only gotten longer. First there were the tariffs.
Speaker 4: Then COVID nineteen snarled supply chains and shut down factories.
Speaker 4: More recently, pandemic restrictions were abruptly lifted, and US authorities
Speaker 4: have restricted the use of cotton from a Chinese region
Speaker 4: because of human rights abuse is there. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions
Speaker 4: have forced many to contemplate what would happen if China
Speaker 4: were to invade Taiwan. Despite the laundry list of hurdles,
Speaker 4: many clothing companies say they're sticking with China. It's unrealistic,
Speaker 4: they say, to think they can quickly extricate China from
Speaker 4: their supply chains. Why. For one, Chinese companies dominate the
Speaker 4: global production of yarn, cotton, polyester fabrics, and the cotton
Speaker 4: spandex used to make your work from Home loungewaar. Some
Speaker 4: executives told me that even if they've managed to stop
Speaker 4: producing in China, they remain reliant on the country for
Speaker 4: raw materials. Also, Chinese factories have machinery that's top notch
Speaker 4: and a workforce that's highly skilled. That means they're unbeatable
Speaker 4: at making hats, for example, or sowing a certain type
Speaker 4: of stitch that doesn't chafe. And even if factories elsewhere
Speaker 4: can do those things, they often can't produce them at
Speaker 4: the same volume, price, or quality. Some firms have been
Speaker 4: moving out of China, of course, to countries such as
Speaker 4: Vietnam or Cambodia, but sometimes those factories are owned by
Speaker 4: Chinese companies that are also trying to diversify outside the country.
Speaker 4: All of this is possible because China has been investing
Speaker 4: billions of dollars for decades to become the world's manufacturing powerhouse.
Speaker 4: That's turned cities like Guangzhou into supply chain marbles. Here's Linfeng,
Speaker 4: who owns clothing factories in and around guangzhout.
Speaker 5: Great reach.
Speaker 1: If we need materials for production, will immediately contact our suppliers,
Speaker 1: send photos to them, and they'll deliver to us within
Speaker 1: just a few hours. Or sometimes we'll go to the
Speaker 1: wholesale markets to purchase. That's also less than a forty
Speaker 1: minute drive away, so it'll just take up to half
Speaker 1: a day to finish the purchase. I don't think anywhere
Speaker 1: else can be that efficient in sourcing.
Speaker 4: Lynn says. Many employees live nearby in areas populated mainly
Speaker 4: by migrant workers. Their salaries are low, which keeps the
Speaker 4: lid on costs. In this dense network of workers, suppliers,
Speaker 4: and infrastructure, orders are turned around quickly and at a
Speaker 4: competitive price. It's taken decades to build this ecosystem. US
Speaker 4: apparel executives say it will be hard for any country
Speaker 4: to compete effectively at scale against China and its factories
Speaker 4: anytime soon, but that doesn't mean US factories have given up.
Speaker 4: They're pulling out all the stops to convince American brands
Speaker 4: to produce here. That's the sound of what it takes
Speaker 4: to compete against China. It's an automated knitting machine that
Speaker 4: looks like it's printing out a sweater. I met on
Speaker 4: Dari Fashion, a knitwar factory about twenty minutes from downtown la.
Speaker 7: It's being tough the past five years.
Speaker 4: That's way Wang, the CEO.
Speaker 7: We have to find efficiency winning the factory to continue.
Speaker 7: I mean to basically to be profitable.
Speaker 4: His parents moved here from Taiwan in nineteen ninety one
Speaker 4: to start the factory. After the two thousand and eight crisis,
Speaker 4: Wade left his tech job to help his parents run
Speaker 4: on Darry. He started producing for Ralph Lauren and other
Speaker 4: high end clients that can afford a manufacture in the US,
Speaker 4: and he put his tech background to work by automating
Speaker 4: the factory as much as possible. Oh, it's right, it's
Speaker 4: writing the RL right, Ralph Lauren.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Okay.
Speaker 4: We watch one machine embroider Ralph Lauren's initials on a polo.
Speaker 4: In another room, the automatic knitting machine spits out three
Speaker 4: separate pieces of a sweater that an employee will then
Speaker 4: sew together. The machines cost between eighty to one hundred
Speaker 4: and fifty thousand dollars each, so.
Speaker 7: Each machine is like a Mercedes. That's why we detail
Speaker 7: people like there's like ninety Mercedes in a park here
Speaker 7: in the in this factory.
Speaker 4: But not every brand can afford to produce nitwear on
Speaker 4: these machines, so even Wi has to outsource the production
Speaker 4: of some apparel to China. Listening to the sounds of
Speaker 4: his factory, Way says he can tell the apparel industry
Speaker 4: has a tough year ahead.
Speaker 7: So usually we should be picking up for the fall
Speaker 7: and holiday a sweater season production, but this year has
Speaker 7: been slow, so we're not. I mean it's not as
Speaker 7: loud here in the in the lining.
Speaker 4: Room, production is down by about one third at Andari
Speaker 4: and Way here's the same thing from factories in China
Speaker 4: and Sri Lanka. Despite all the hurdles, Way thinks he's
Speaker 4: discovered away to keep more brands producing at home.
Speaker 7: This is what waff Lauren calls a cree your own
Speaker 7: poil shirt. Basically, consumer can't go to the website and
Speaker 7: pick a base style and customize it who they like
Speaker 7: you way things.
Speaker 4: Clothing made on demand for a single shopper is the
Speaker 4: future of US apparel production. This version of that future, though,
Speaker 4: does look a little hodgepodge.
Speaker 7: The sleeves are different color, the rice lead or left
Speaker 7: sleeve is different.
Speaker 4: Right has the left sleeve is black and the right
Speaker 4: sleeve is white. And then the cuff is green and
Speaker 4: the body of the polo is blue with a red
Speaker 4: a red collar. So this person had very particular taste
Speaker 4: right about what they about what they wanted.
Speaker 7: And then you can also put the leather on the sleeve.
Speaker 4: I can't imagine anyone I know wearing the shirt, but
Speaker 4: that's kind of the point. It's one of a kind,
Speaker 4: and that allows way to charge clients more for brands.
Speaker 4: It reduces the amount of extra merchandise they have on hand. Also,
Speaker 4: the likelihood of returns is lower. Los Angeles factories haven't
Speaker 4: been able to go head to head against China on
Speaker 4: price or volume, but perhaps if they go customized cuff
Speaker 4: by customized collar, they'll have a shot at survival. That
Speaker 4: future looks a lot more colorful. From Bloomberg News, I'm
Speaker 4: Jeanette Newman.
Speaker 3: Well, we're going to hear the Indian side of that
Speaker 3: story in just a minute. But first you might remember
Speaker 3: my conversation on the sidelines of that big Milken investment
Speaker 3: conference in la with their chief economist William Lee. Well,
Speaker 3: as it happens, we also spoke about whether not making
Speaker 3: in China was a viable strategy for global business or
Speaker 3: a wise investment decision for all those big money investors
Speaker 3: gathered there in La. Okay, I want to talk to
Speaker 3: you about decoupling US China because it's an an endless
Speaker 3: source of conversation on this podcast, but it's also you know,
Speaker 3: it comes up again and again, and we have had
Speaker 3: you know, reporters coming at this story in different ways.
Speaker 3: And one thing they've noticed in the US is really
Speaker 3: hard for people to source outside China. That China plus
Speaker 3: strategy is proving much easier said than done. Yes, and
Speaker 3: yet it does seem like the US is wanting us
Speaker 3: to reduce our vulnerability or a dependence on China. So
Speaker 3: what are you seeing? I mean, how realistic is it
Speaker 3: to think that one can have this diversification of supply chain.
Speaker 8: I think that every investor in the West looked at
Speaker 8: China at least at some point they say my god,
Speaker 8: look at that population, Look at that size of the market.
Speaker 8: If I just sell one of my stuff right, one
Speaker 8: bottle of coke, right, just one to everyone there, I'll
Speaker 8: make a fortune. And so that huge size of the
Speaker 8: market was what attracted a lot of investors there. And
Speaker 8: then they discovered, my god, if I produce stuff in China,
Speaker 8: it's going to be really low cost. Can export it
Speaker 8: to the rest of the world.
Speaker 3: Vultus just like that. They worked out much better than
Speaker 3: the first. The first one is hard to sell to
Speaker 3: Chinese consumers.
Speaker 8: Because there's a high savings rate because when people earn
Speaker 8: money in China to save it rather than spending it.
Speaker 8: But also official policy is one where they really want
Speaker 8: domestic consumers to buy from domestic companies. Now, as an
Speaker 8: export engine, China has been very successful, but with COVID
Speaker 8: and the shutdowns, people recognize that it's very dangerous to
Speaker 8: have your supply chain concentrated in China. So the China
Speaker 8: plus model, let's see, the companies are moving out of
Speaker 8: China to Vietnam and other areas where they could take
Speaker 8: advantage of a lot of cheap labor, but also you know,
Speaker 8: avoid a lot of the political flag of having imported
Speaker 8: from China, so that model is there. But as you said,
Speaker 8: it's very hard for semiconductor company to or Apple to say, Gee,
Speaker 8: I want to take some of my stuff and make
Speaker 8: it over in India, because China really has a huge
Speaker 8: ecosystem set up to service all the facet of manufacturing,
Speaker 8: and when you try to take one or two elements out,
Speaker 8: you really can't succeed by just manufacturing someplace else. You
Speaker 8: really need the entire to replicate the entire ecosystem. So
Speaker 8: for China, a lot of the industries have proven to
Speaker 8: be a lot stickier. The question I think most of
Speaker 8: my colleagues here at Milkin are asking, which is should
Speaker 8: I allocate an extra dollar to China now or should
Speaker 8: I be going to Vietnam and other places. Well, China's
Speaker 8: gone on a charm offensive to say to everyone we're
Speaker 8: open for business, be welcomed foreign capital. But if you
Speaker 8: look back at the speeches of Hijin Pin, his warning
Speaker 8: was we want to have domestic champions. You're welcome to
Speaker 8: come here and produce, but you have to help us
Speaker 8: build up our national champions. And unless you do that,
Speaker 8: you're really not welcome. And I think that's the message
Speaker 8: that most investors are starting to get now, and that's
Speaker 8: the hesitancy even without the US China conflicts, the fact
Speaker 8: that China's owned domestic policies are ones where you come
Speaker 8: to China to help us become better manufacturers, period.
Speaker 3: But that's what I was amazed. So that one of
Speaker 3: the one of the panels I did, as you know,
Speaker 3: at the at the Milk And conference, was with Asset Allocate.
Speaker 3: You know, these big investors, people from big asset management companies,
Speaker 3: and of course we had James Fraser, the head of
Speaker 3: City Bank, and it didn't really sense any lack of
Speaker 3: enthusiasm for China. It was extraordinary. I mean, people under
Speaker 3: people recognized the geopolitical headwinds quote unquote and everything that's
Speaker 3: happened in the last few years, but they were still
Speaker 3: I would say, pretty gung ho for China.
Speaker 8: Stephanie and Stephanie stuff. If you were in doing business
Speaker 8: in China to the extent that our audio are the
Speaker 8: people on stage were doing, and you actually said, gee,
Speaker 8: you know that domestic policies are getting less friendly toward me,
Speaker 8: you really think, and you're.
Speaker 3: Going to be welcome. That's interesting. So you think they
Speaker 3: weren't being because they also were talking about it. I
Speaker 3: was struck by one of the claims was from one
Speaker 3: of the big hedge fund managers was, you know, the
Speaker 3: more China gets separated from the rest of the world,
Speaker 3: but more it did couples, the more attractive it is
Speaker 3: to me because it's going to move in different directions
Speaker 3: from the rest of the world. And when the world's
Speaker 3: going down, maybe China's going up. It's that diversification benefit.
Speaker 3: You know. Again, that struck me as quite a little
Speaker 3: bit complacent. I mean, you know what happens if the
Speaker 3: US government just says no, sorry, you can't have any
Speaker 3: of those assets.
Speaker 8: And then they'll use their subsidiar of Luxemburg to do
Speaker 8: the investment. Right, so I think that they can avoid
Speaker 8: the US sanctions. And I think that that answer is
Speaker 8: actually very practical because they're thinking, if China really indeed
Speaker 8: the couples, that huge China market is still there and
Speaker 8: they want to chuck of it. So it means that
Speaker 8: I have to invest in the Chinese domestic champion to
Speaker 8: service that market. I'll at least get a share of
Speaker 8: that huge domestic market, and the Chinese domestic champion might
Speaker 8: start exporting to the rest of Asia other emergent markets
Speaker 8: Africa and Middle East. China is making inroads into places
Speaker 8: where a lot of these investors want to be. So
Speaker 8: just as investing in US multinationals used to be one
Speaker 8: way to get international exposure, if the world becomes a
Speaker 8: bifurcated bipolar world where China dominates and the US dominates
Speaker 8: other parts, it's pretty smart to invest in Chinese multinationals.
Speaker 3: It's fascinating though, because previously we would have had this
Speaker 3: model of globalization, a global capital market, and then the
Speaker 3: money is flowing to the most efficient place or the
Speaker 3: highest return place. You know, we have a segmented world
Speaker 3: that regionalized. There's more tensions, but somehow that makes us
Speaker 3: we're still making the argument that that means you should
Speaker 3: be investing in India or in China around than in
Speaker 3: the US.
Speaker 8: When I use to teach trade at Columbia and we
Speaker 8: talk about comparative vantage, we say, oh, gee, you know,
Speaker 8: this country should make wine, if this country should make machines,
Speaker 8: and they should trade with one another and just gains
Speaker 8: from trade. Comparative advantage is not static. It changes over time.
Speaker 8: And so one of the things that I think we
Speaker 8: have to recognize is that globalization, where China produces all
Speaker 8: manufacturing goods and it's the huge supply source to the
Speaker 8: rest of the world, may not be the most efficient model.
Speaker 8: You invested in China because there's low cost of labor input.
Speaker 8: But technology makes expensive labor actually more productive. So if
Speaker 8: you have the right technology in other places where labor
Speaker 8: is more expensive, call it the United States, the more
Speaker 8: productive worker could actually be more worthwhile to invest in.
Speaker 3: We have tended to say, and actually Bloomberg economics, we've
Speaker 3: made lots of you know, we make some assumptions in
Speaker 3: order to have estimates of what the cost of decoupling
Speaker 3: might be, and we have tended to think it will
Speaker 3: mean higher prices at the margin and lower productivity at
Speaker 3: the margin, even if you're using more productive workers. But
Speaker 3: you think that's going to potentially be turned on its head.
Speaker 8: The gap may not be as big as you think.
Speaker 8: When you have ESG you're missing a couple of essays
Speaker 8: there safety, souldness, security, and so when you tag take
Speaker 8: the aweing costs of manufacturing in certain parts of the
Speaker 8: world and concentrate a certain part of the world, those
Speaker 8: costs don't the economic costs don't incorporate all of the
Speaker 8: costs that you really have to worry about.
Speaker 3: Fascinating, Well, William Lee, thank you very much.
Speaker 8: Well, it's been a pleasure to talk to you, and
Speaker 8: I really feel privileged to be in your presence.
Speaker 3: Now, If made in America isn't practical for everything or everybody,
Speaker 3: could making in India be an alternative? A Prime minister there,
Speaker 3: Narindra Modi, certainly hope. So he's been pushing He's made
Speaker 3: in India strategy for nearly a decade. It's fair to
Speaker 3: say the world's now paying a lot more attention. Even
Speaker 3: the multinationals that Bill Lee was mentioning there who are
Speaker 3: sticking it out in China now do feel the need
Speaker 3: for a Plan B supplier. They call it China plus one.
Speaker 3: And with China's population now poised to shrink, India also
Speaker 3: stands out as the only country around with a population
Speaker 3: big enough and young enough to make up for all
Speaker 3: those workers about to retire in China and around the world.
Speaker 3: So it all looks very promising on paper, but in practice,
Speaker 3: Indian producers are struggling to supplant Chinese imports. Even in
Speaker 3: the domestic Indian market let alone to compete internationally. Bloomberg's
Speaker 3: Rushi Battia and Rishti Beneval in New Delhi have been
Speaker 3: digging deeper. Here's their report and it's Rushi's voice you'll
Speaker 3: hear doing the narration.
Speaker 5: We're in a Hamley store on the outskirts of New Delhi.
Speaker 5: It's a multinational toy retailer and this is one of
Speaker 5: the biggest toy stores in the country. And yet Olo
Speaker 5: Swen is finally given difficult to pick up something for
Speaker 5: his children. What's the five year old's name?
Speaker 6: Amen?
Speaker 5: And the one year old adi Adi. Swain used to
Speaker 5: come here a lot to shop for Hot Wheels, a
Speaker 5: brand of toy cars that's loved by his boys. It's
Speaker 5: a bit expensive, but of good quality. Most importantly, it
Speaker 5: can survive the endless energy of his kits. Now he says,
Speaker 5: the store doesn't offer many choices anymore. The lack of
Speaker 5: choice in toy cars might have revealed a bigger problem
Speaker 5: that Prime ministerndery in Remove faces.
Speaker 2: Making India, for Inja and for the world.
Speaker 5: He has been pushing to reduce India's reliance on Chinese
Speaker 5: imports for years. With the world's biggest youth population. India
Speaker 5: is naturally a key market for Chinese toy makers, so
Speaker 5: when Mody decided to crack a whip on trade with China,
Speaker 5: toys came on top of the list. Every metaboli cities
Speaker 5: there are shortage of toys. What I feel like, Swain.
Speaker 5: Many other customers are leaving the toy stores a bit disappointed.
Speaker 5: After Hamley's we went to a more than a century
Speaker 5: old toy shop in Delhi called Rum Tunder and Sons.
Speaker 5: There were just a couple of customers in the store
Speaker 5: when we visited. While it had a few toys imported
Speaker 5: from China, Vietnam and other Asian countries, most of the
Speaker 5: products had it made in India. Attack and World Gathering
Speaker 5: dust Sunjay came here looking for fine quality metallic helicopters.
Speaker 5: Any particular reason why you want to buy the toys
Speaker 5: which were manufactured in China.
Speaker 1: It's a good quality, good cost, good quality.
Speaker 5: Do you think the Indian manufacturers are not able to
Speaker 5: provide that or a scalability and the shoe licensing.
Speaker 2: No, India.
Speaker 1: Cannot make that quality. If India goes for the manufixing,
Speaker 1: it will be costly for them.
Speaker 5: The quality of the China product is far better than
Speaker 5: Indian products. It's the same tale from the US and
Speaker 5: Mexico to India and Vietnam. Most local producers will tell
Speaker 5: us no, we really can't do what China is doing,
Speaker 5: and even if we can, it won't be at the
Speaker 5: same scale or price. But the government tried to push
Speaker 5: the envelope to curb imports from China. Prime Minister Moi
Speaker 5: first tried to use the nationalist rhetoric calling for boycott's.
Speaker 3: Meridie call to localize industries.
Speaker 5: India's Apex Traders Association has also announced to launch our
Speaker 5: massive campaign to boycott Chinese products China. Next came the
Speaker 5: trade barriers. Duties on Chinese toys have been raised from
Speaker 5: twenty percent to a whopping seventy percent in the last
Speaker 5: three years, and India even offered fiscal incentives on local
Speaker 5: production in certain sectors, But all that effort didn't move
Speaker 5: the needle much further. China's imports to India stood at
Speaker 5: over one hundred billion dollars in twenty twenty two, nearly
Speaker 5: double of what it gets from UAE and the US combined.
Speaker 5: China was the biggest exporter for India in twenty fourteen
Speaker 5: when Mody came to power and it remains its biggest
Speaker 5: suppliers nine years later. That said, for some local producers,
Speaker 5: it certainly feels like a beginning of a boon after
Speaker 5: Corona Prime. Mister mister Modi has a great focus on toys.
Speaker 5: That's N. K. Gupta, the founder and owner of a
Speaker 5: local soft toy factory called Funzu. Since the policy change,
Speaker 5: sales at Funzu have more than doubled. But the rapid
Speaker 5: growth wouldn't have been possible with other raw materials like
Speaker 5: metallic pins, integrated circuits and LEDs, which Gupta gets from China.
Speaker 5: We have just introduced electronic choice. What I said now, Challenger, Look,
Speaker 5: that tells me that he needs to import more components
Speaker 5: from China now than before as he rams up assembly
Speaker 5: in the country. The conund room seems to be unsolvable,
Speaker 5: at least for the moment. What choice we have?
Speaker 9: We have the choice either to cut down my finished
Speaker 9: goods imports are cut down by ramty or immediate imports.
Speaker 5: Ajasa Hai is a director general of the Exporters Lobby
Speaker 5: Group in India. He believes India needs to pickets battles.
Speaker 9: We have taken a choice that initially we will focus
Speaker 9: in more on the finished goods. So as of now
Speaker 9: we are providing PLI support to those segments where finished
Speaker 9: goods are being imported, but over a period of time,
Speaker 9: once we are able to achieve that with the condition
Speaker 9: of the local content and with more competitiveness happening, I'm
Speaker 9: pretty sure the large companies will look into producing the part.
Speaker 5: India's plans to focus on some sectors has read benefits
Speaker 5: with companies like Apple moving to the country, but the
Speaker 5: jury is still out if India can break China's dominance
Speaker 5: and become the factory to the world, which means for
Speaker 5: Swain the search for his kid's favorite toy car could
Speaker 5: be a tad bit longer. From New Delhi, Ruchi Patia
Speaker 5: and Rishti Beniwal for Bloomberg News.
Speaker 3: That's it from this not Made in China episode of Stephanomics.
Speaker 3: Next week we'll be hearing from Morocco. We'll also be
Speaker 3: hearing what the man who led President Obama's trade policies
Speaker 3: thinks about the very different approach that President Biden is taking,
Speaker 3: So don't miss any of that. In the meantime, you
Speaker 3: can get a lot more economic insight news from the
Speaker 3: Bloomberg Terminal website or app. This episode was produced by
Speaker 3: mangnus Henrickson, Yangyang and Sammasadi, with special thanks to Aette Newman,
Speaker 3: Danielle Way, Bill Lee, Rishti Beneval and Rushi Batya. The
Speaker 3: executive producer of Stephanomics is Molly Smith and the head
Speaker 3: of Bloomberg Podcast is Sage Bowman.