Speaker 1: Part three of our exclusive sit down with James Comer
Speaker 1: about the financial crimes that have been committed by the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family. And this part, Part three is really
Speaker 1: interesting because we get into where the money was coming
Speaker 1: from and the questions that the president may be forced
Speaker 1: to answer. Finally, here is that Part three, and don't
Speaker 1: forget if you miss part one or part two. Makes
Speaker 1: you go back and listen to that and share this
Speaker 1: on social media wherever you are.
Speaker 2: So let me ask you something. When Usupoene and Hunter,
Speaker 2: he came back and said he was willing to testify,
Speaker 2: but only only in an open hearing, not in a
Speaker 2: closed door deposition. Tell us from your perspective, what the
Speaker 2: advantages are of doing a closed door deposition first before
Speaker 2: open public testimony.
Speaker 3: We have tens of thousands of pages of documents, bank statements, emails,
Speaker 3: sworn testimony. We have hundreds and hundreds of questions. You know,
Speaker 3: probably close to a thousand questions. In a deposition, you
Speaker 3: have one hour. The Republicans have an hour, than the
Speaker 3: Democrats have an hour. Then you come back and have
Speaker 3: another hour. The Democrats have another hour. So you know,
Speaker 3: easily you can get an eight hour deposition in in
Speaker 3: a day, whereas we would have four hours, the staff
Speaker 3: would generally be the ones that would which I have.
Speaker 3: You know, my lead deposer was the lead deposer at
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice in the in the Trump administration
Speaker 3: under Bill bark So we've got the you know, really
Speaker 3: good people that are really good at this, and Judiciary
Speaker 3: does too.
Speaker 4: Jim has good people there. They were both going to
Speaker 4: be in there.
Speaker 3: We were going to ask them specific questions, hundreds of questions.
Speaker 3: If you have a committee hearing where you have twenty
Speaker 3: five Republicans and twenty one Democrats going back and forth, yelling.
Speaker 3: The Democrats at the last year and they filed three
Speaker 3: motions to adjourn during the committee here in trying to
Speaker 3: disrupt it.
Speaker 4: You get five minutes each back and forth.
Speaker 3: We might get forty forty five questions in So it's
Speaker 3: a difference of forty or forty five have questions in
Speaker 3: a complete chaotic pop scene versus a sit down, substantive
Speaker 3: deposition where we could easily ask eight hundred questions.
Speaker 4: This is too important.
Speaker 3: This is an investigation of public corruption at the highest levels.
Speaker 3: This has been a substantive, credible investigation that we've accumulated
Speaker 3: mountains of evidence through bank records and emails. We have
Speaker 3: lots of questions. You just can't get that into a
Speaker 3: public hearing. But I want to have a public hearing
Speaker 3: with Hunter Biden, and we will have a hearing with
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden after he gets deposed.
Speaker 2: For what it's worth, James, and this is something that
Speaker 2: I've talked about on Verdict recently. Look, you're in the
Speaker 2: middle of the fight. You're working your tail off with
Speaker 2: a lot of complicated stuff. I understand everything you said there,
Speaker 2: and I agree there's a lot of force to the
Speaker 2: argument you're putting forward to the extent I can share
Speaker 2: some unsolicited advice, which I did in our last podcast,
Speaker 2: and you know I'm a lawyer and a senator, so
Speaker 2: I'm in the business to give it unsolicited advice. But
Speaker 2: I would encourage y'all to go ahead and have him
Speaker 2: in a public hearing anyway. And I understand why it
Speaker 2: would be better to depose him, but from their perspective,
Speaker 2: they can litigate and fight this contempt for the rest
Speaker 2: of the year and run out the clock, and that's
Speaker 2: what they want to do. And I know you know
Speaker 2: this very directly, but just I want to remind our listeners.
Speaker 2: This is ultimately about Joe Biden, not about Hunter Biden.
Speaker 2: And although the questions won't be as detailed, there won't
Speaker 2: be as much time in a public hearing getting Hunter publicly.
Speaker 2: He claims he will do it, and I would also
Speaker 2: encourage and I don't know the House rules the mechanics
Speaker 2: for doing this, but to the extent you can, I
Speaker 2: would encourage you if you do a public hearing with
Speaker 2: Hunter instead of doing five minute rounds, do ten minute
Speaker 2: Roundsate in the Senate and the Judiciary Committee, we often
Speaker 2: do seven minute rounds or ten minute rounds. For a
Speaker 2: Supreme Court nominee, we do thirty minute rounds. The difference
Speaker 2: is as examiner, of what you can get in a
Speaker 2: ten minute round versus a five minute round is night
Speaker 2: and day, and so so I would just I think
Speaker 2: the value if we could get Hunter to testify in January,
Speaker 2: and if your team could work with your down DIAS
Speaker 2: members to have all, right, here are all the questions
Speaker 2: we need to get. Can you take this module? You
Speaker 2: take this module? So you know, sometimes you and I
Speaker 2: both know their hearings where you have members, they all
Speaker 2: do their own thing, and they're all running around like
Speaker 2: crazy for something like this, to the extent the down
Speaker 2: Dias Republicans each can take a particular issue and say,
Speaker 2: all right, I'm going to take my five or even
Speaker 2: better ten minutes and ask the questions. Would it be
Speaker 2: as good as a deposition? No, but I think the
Speaker 2: value of doing that publicly if Hunter would answer those questions,
Speaker 2: the legal jeopardy for Joe would be massive from that,
Speaker 2: and I think that outweighs the strategic benefit of waiting
Speaker 2: for the closed door deposition. So consider that I don't
Speaker 2: need an answer from you now, but that you know, look,
Speaker 2: I've litigated a lot of cases, and that would be
Speaker 2: my pretty emphatic advice is that don't let the perfect
Speaker 2: be the enemy of the good, because getting Hunter on
Speaker 2: the record in public on all the questions that we've
Speaker 2: been talking about, that is enormously valuable. And I don't
Speaker 2: want to see the clock run out, particularly if look,
Speaker 2: you and I are both hoping there's a good election
Speaker 2: in November, but it could be a bad election. And
Speaker 2: if in November the speaker is a Keem Jeffries, your
Speaker 2: committee's going away and they're in the deposition, they're into
Speaker 2: public hearing, and it's all over, so we can hope
Speaker 2: we have a good election. But I think it's it's
Speaker 2: wise to assume that your clock may be at most
Speaker 2: eleven months.
Speaker 4: Agree or lest Yeah, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you are sick and tired
Speaker 1: of feeling like you've gotten a little bit older, maybe
Speaker 1: you feel like weakness and complacency have set in, You're
Speaker 1: not alone. Testosterum levels have literally fallen off a cliff historically,
Speaker 1: and they're now at an all time low.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: Thankfully, the patriots at Chalk are here to help real
Speaker 1: men just like you, take back your right to proudly
Speaker 1: maximize your masculinity by boosting testosteron levels up to twenty
Speaker 1: percent over ninety days. Yes, twenty percent over ninety days.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: I've been taking the Male Vitality Stack and it's manufactured
Speaker 1: right here in the US of A. Chalk's natural herbal
Speaker 1: supplements are clinically proven to have game changing effects on
Speaker 1: your energy, your focus, and your mood. So if you're
Speaker 1: ready to fight back and not give in to the
Speaker 1: weakness that everybody seems to be obsessed with, then check
Speaker 1: out Chalk choq dot com. Boost you testosterrom mobs up
Speaker 1: to twenty percent over ninety days. Go online to choq
Speaker 1: dot com. That's choq dot com, check out the mail
Speaker 1: Vitality stack and use the promo code Ben for thirty
Speaker 1: five percent off. That's right, you'll say thirty five percent
Speaker 1: off right now for life at chalk choq dot com
Speaker 1: promo code Ben. Let me ask you this question too,
Speaker 1: is we kind of put a rap on this? I
Speaker 1: want to play Hunter Biden. Yeah, and I want to
Speaker 1: play what he said because I don't know, if you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of people thought the White House is probably
Speaker 1: give me advice. I think there seems to be a
Speaker 1: little bit of a riff now between the White House.
Speaker 1: We're seeing some weeks coming out. They didn't like what
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden did at this press conference, and that means
Speaker 1: he's kind of a rogue actor in this scenario. Right now,
Speaker 1: I want to get your reaction to just as demeanor
Speaker 1: and what he said.
Speaker 6: Take a look.
Speaker 5: Let me state as clearly as I can, my father
Speaker 5: was not financially involved in my business, not as a
Speaker 5: practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Barisma, not
Speaker 5: in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in
Speaker 5: my investments at home, nor abroad, and certainly not as
Speaker 5: an artist. During my battle with addiction, my parents were
Speaker 5: there for me. They literally saved my life. They helped
Speaker 5: me in ways that I will never be able to repay,
Speaker 5: and of course they would never expect me to. And
Speaker 5: in the depths of my addiction, I was extremely irresponsible
Speaker 5: with my finances, but to suggest that as grounds for
Speaker 5: an impeacement inquiry is beyond the absurd.
Speaker 6: It's shameless.
Speaker 5: There is no evidence to support the allegations that my
Speaker 5: father was financially involved in my business because it did
Speaker 5: not happen. James Comer, Jim Jordan, Jason Smith, and their
Speaker 5: colleagues have distorted the facts by cherry picking lines from
Speaker 5: a bank statement, manipulating texts I sent, editing the testimony
Speaker 5: of my friends and former business partners, and misstating personal
Speaker 5: information that was stolen from me.
Speaker 1: He accuses you of manipulating text messages without any evidence
Speaker 1: and says that you guys are cherry picking lines.
Speaker 6: I gotta get your response to that.
Speaker 3: I've never seen such a display of arrogance and entitlement
Speaker 3: in my life, but I'm not surprised because look, he's
Speaker 3: gotten away with this for years.
Speaker 4: Because he's a Biden. The rules don't apply to the Bidens.
Speaker 4: But I don't know how you manipulate a text.
Speaker 3: Was his father beside him when he was extorting that
Speaker 3: Chinese national or not?
Speaker 4: That's a simple question. The media should have asked the
Speaker 4: in and there.
Speaker 1: And they stopped the GPS, right, they stopped the GPS.
Speaker 6: You and I have talked about this here. We could
Speaker 6: have answered that.
Speaker 2: Question, okay, And it's important. Look, this is there's a
Speaker 2: reason people hate lawyers. I listened to that as a lawyer.
Speaker 2: When they say manipulating a text, what they mean is
Speaker 2: one of the copies that was released of the WhatsApp
Speaker 2: text from one of the House members, they put a
Speaker 2: Chinese flag next to the Chinese person speaking to identify them,
Speaker 2: So like, aha, you manipulated it, because in the real
Speaker 2: one there's not a Chinese flag, so it's true. For
Speaker 2: purposes of display, they added a Chinese flag to demonstrate
Speaker 2: that that was a Chinese person. When they say manipulated,
Speaker 2: what they don't mean. What Hunter has never said, what
Speaker 2: his lawyers have never said, is that one word of
Speaker 2: that text is inaccurate. What they have never said is
Speaker 2: I did not send that and we talked about on Verdict.
Speaker 2: One possible defense he could have is Nope, that text
Speaker 2: is fake. I never sent it. Now that's a defense
Speaker 2: you can make, but then you've got to prove it.
Speaker 2: The fact that they haven't said that much like like
Speaker 2: Sherlock Holmes and the dog that didn't bark, The fact
Speaker 2: that they didn't say that tells you that they are
Speaker 2: implicitly admitting it is accurate. We also know that DOJ
Speaker 2: prevented any search of GPS data would be very easy
Speaker 2: to determine where was Hunter's cell phone at the moment
Speaker 2: that text was being sent, Where was Joe's cell phone?
Speaker 2: Were they in the same room where they sitting next
Speaker 2: to each other. The Biden Department of Justice does not
Speaker 2: want anyone to know the answer to that, and so
Speaker 2: they blocked that. But by the way, that text is
Speaker 2: direct evidence. So and next time you hear a Democrat
Speaker 2: or their shills in the media saying there's no direct
Speaker 2: evidence of Joe Biden's involvement, understand that WhatsApp text is
Speaker 2: direct evidence. It's not circumstantial. It is written testimony from
Speaker 2: Hunter about Joe's involvement in the shakedown. And I got
Speaker 2: to say by the way Ben I noticed something, So James.
Speaker 2: In our last podcast, we held the New York Times
Speaker 2: to task because they took Hunter Biden's quote at the
Speaker 2: press conference that my father was not financially involved with
Speaker 2: my business and they misquoted it to say my father
Speaker 2: was not involved in my business. They deleted the word
Speaker 2: financially and that was I believe, a very deliberate deletion.
Speaker 4: Absolutely.
Speaker 2: Well, what's interesting, I just discovered something again. Let me
Speaker 2: ask the team put up the very last shot from
Speaker 2: the Hunter Biden video that we were watching, if we
Speaker 2: can put it on the screen now. If you notice
Speaker 2: CN end did the same damn thing. Yeah, look at
Speaker 2: the chiron in the bottom. Hunter Biden, my father was
Speaker 2: not involved in any of my businesses. What he said
Speaker 2: was my father was not financially involved in any of
Speaker 2: my businesses. CNN and New York Times both deleted the
Speaker 2: same word. By the way, they know how to quote
Speaker 2: what he said. Often a chiron will be Hunter Biden
Speaker 2: quote quote my father was not financially involved in any
Speaker 2: of my businesses. But understand, CNN is on team Biden,
Speaker 2: they're on team Hunter, they're on team Joe. And it
Speaker 2: reminds me of the famous CNN chirron of the reporter
Speaker 2: saying fiery but peaceful protest as a building is on
Speaker 2: fire with a Black Lives Matter an ANTIFA protest going on,
Speaker 2: CNN is happily editing out Hunter's comments to benefit the
Speaker 2: White House.
Speaker 1: For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile has been America's
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. They stand behind their values
Speaker 1: and they stand behind exceptional service. They're an example of
Speaker 1: putting the cause a head of profit, and that is
Speaker 1: why I am proud to partner with him. Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: is extending their Black Friday deal with the Every Friday
Speaker 1: Matters deal, and you can get a free smartphone when
Speaker 1: you switch today. Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving
Speaker 1: you access to all three major networks, which means you
Speaker 1: get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding
Speaker 1: the radical left. Now, when you switch to Patriot Mobile,
Speaker 1: you're supporting free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life,
Speaker 1: are veterans and first responders, and more than just that.
Speaker 1: They are actually a one hundred percent US based company
Speaker 1: with customer service teams that make switching easy so you
Speaker 1: can keep your same number you have right now you
Speaker 1: can keep your existing phone or for a limited time
Speaker 1: get a free smartphone from Patriot Mobile. Go to Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson or call them nine seven
Speaker 1: to two Patriot. Use the promo code Friday seven to six.
Speaker 1: That's Friday seven six. Again, get a free smartphone with
Speaker 1: promo code Friday seven to six. That's the limited time offer.
Speaker 1: Join me make the switch today at Patriot Mobile dot
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson
Speaker 1: or nine to seven to two Patriot. Let me ask
Speaker 1: you one other question about this that I think is
Speaker 1: also very important, and that is to remind people financially. Now,
Speaker 1: how many countries was the Biden crime family getting money from.
Speaker 6: We haven't even mentioned in the last hour. Romania. That's
Speaker 6: a country that has to be brought up.
Speaker 1: But you guys are finding more money in more places
Speaker 1: with more people, and even Hunter Biden there in what
Speaker 1: he said, he said with my foreign business dealings plural,
Speaker 1: he was admitting, Yeah, I'm getting money from everywhere in
Speaker 1: the world.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we know I got money from China, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Uzbekistan.
Speaker 3: We know that he was paid through China for stuff
Speaker 3: he did in the Congo. We know that Jim Biden
Speaker 3: operated primarily in the Middle East, so pretty much every
Speaker 3: bad country in the world is where the Bidens would
Speaker 3: target their influence peddling schemes.
Speaker 1: Do you expect to get anything new about James Biden's money.
Speaker 1: I mean, we obviously know a lot about Hunters, but
Speaker 1: are you guys finding more and more of James, Because
Speaker 1: before Hunter Biden was of age, James was the bat,
Speaker 1: was the bag man, and then it kind of turned into, oh, hey,
Speaker 1: we've got a kid here that we can get to
Speaker 1: be the bag man, and we have an excuse for
Speaker 1: his actions that he's a drug addict, which is exactly
Speaker 1: what Hunter Biden said in that video. I was in
Speaker 1: the depths of addiction. You should feel sorry for me.
Speaker 1: I had just seen the money from anybody. James Biden
Speaker 1: seems to be smarter and have done this for decades,
Speaker 1: while Hunter's kind of the pupil under him.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have a lot of questions for for James Biden. Again,
Speaker 3: the reason no one knows much about him is he
Speaker 3: didn't leave a laptop lying around, but having looked at
Speaker 3: his bank records from his LLC and from his personal
Speaker 3: bank records. I have a lot of questions for James Biden.
Speaker 2: He's then appear that that James, Joe's brother, was as
Speaker 2: involved in this family business as Hunter was, or would
Speaker 2: you say they're they're equally complicit.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't say he's as involved.
Speaker 3: But a lot of transactions in and out of James
Speaker 3: Biden's LLC were with the Biden shell companies, and then
Speaker 3: obviously the two hundred and forty thousand dollars that came
Speaker 3: from Hunter's shell companies went through James Biden's personal account
Speaker 3: and had him write the money to Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: I think at the end of the day, when.
Speaker 3: Joe Biden was saying, oh, there's not a shred of evidence,
Speaker 3: not shred of evidence, they thought that we would try
Speaker 3: to get their taxes. And I never wanted their taxes.
Speaker 3: I wanted their bank records. I've looked at enough tax returns.
Speaker 3: As the director of a bank, you want to look
Speaker 3: at the bank statements. Bank statements don't lie, and you
Speaker 3: would have never seen that money to Joe.
Speaker 4: You would never.
Speaker 3: See any of these these millions of dollars they're labeling
Speaker 3: as loans.
Speaker 4: If you had just subpoena the tax records. You had
Speaker 4: to get the bank.
Speaker 2: And to be clear, the two hundred thousand dollars payment
Speaker 2: that went from from Jim to Joe that they claim
Speaker 2: was a loan repayment, there is zero evidence, or to
Speaker 2: use Joe's phrase, not a scentilla of evidence, that that
Speaker 2: was actually a loan that had ever gone from Joe
Speaker 2: to Jim in the first place. In other words, there
Speaker 2: has to be a loan in order for a loan
Speaker 2: to be repaid. Is there any evidence at all that
Speaker 2: that loan existed.
Speaker 3: No, it's not hard to prove alone. If you paid
Speaker 3: me back one hundred thousand dollars, then I should have
Speaker 3: a check to you for one hundred thousand dollars at
Speaker 3: some point before you paid me back one hundred thous dollars.
Speaker 3: That's pretty simple, and I think every American, even the
Speaker 3: financially illiterate ones, understand that.
Speaker 2: All Right, two more questions I want to get to,
Speaker 2: what do you make of the fact that the countries
Speaker 2: that are doing business with Hunter and Jim Biden are
Speaker 2: all countries that are shady, that have corrupt oligarchs that
Speaker 2: are to various degrees enemies of America that they don't
Speaker 2: They don't do business with any of our close allies.
Speaker 2: You don't see them doing business with England. You don't
Speaker 2: see them doing business with France or Germany. You don't
Speaker 2: see them doing business with Japan. You don't see them
Speaker 2: doing business with Canada. I mean, there are lots of
Speaker 2: countries where people can do business with them, where it's
Speaker 2: not necessarily shady. You go out of your way to
Speaker 2: find places like Russia and China. That says something. What
Speaker 2: do you make of that?
Speaker 3: I think that was their business model. We know they
Speaker 3: sold the Biden brand, but where did you sell the
Speaker 3: Biden brand? You sold the Biden brand in shady countries.
Speaker 3: You revolved the business model around people who were in trouble. Barisma,
Speaker 3: the Romanian foreign national, the Russian oligarch.
Speaker 4: China was always.
Speaker 3: In trouble because no one wants them in the United States.
Speaker 3: We don't want China buying farmland. We don't want China
Speaker 3: buying our energy companies. But they use the Bidens to
Speaker 3: try to get their foot in the door everywhere they operated.
Speaker 3: We're in countries where we have problems with bad people
Speaker 3: from bad countries.
Speaker 2: All right, Last question something Hunter mentions at the end
Speaker 2: of that press conference that's kind of gratuitously tossed on there.
Speaker 2: He says, Dad wasn't involved in Bearisma and my legal
Speaker 2: practice such as it was, and my businesses, and then
Speaker 2: he says or with me as an artist, and it
Speaker 2: kind of pops out of nowhere there. What do you
Speaker 2: make of that and what is your take on quote
Speaker 2: Hunter as an artist?
Speaker 3: Well, Hunter was never an artist until Joe became president.
Speaker 3: And it looks like their business model changed. From twenty
Speaker 3: fourteen to twenty eighteen. They were taking wires directly through
Speaker 3: those show companies. Then the ir ashrals in on them.
Speaker 3: Then they start trying to say this money they were
Speaker 3: taken in from influence pending, we're loans. Then once Joe
Speaker 3: become president, they stopped all of that and Hunter started
Speaker 3: selling art. So I believe the influence pedling may still
Speaker 3: be going on. It's going on through the art sales.
Speaker 3: We need to know who's purchasing this artwork.
Speaker 4: That's why do we know that.
Speaker 6: Do we know who's purchasing the artwork and how much
Speaker 6: they're paying.
Speaker 3: We think we know of two people and they're part
Speaker 3: of the people we're trying to bring in to ask
Speaker 3: questions or to the post. So that's something every American
Speaker 3: should want to know.
Speaker 4: Who's behind this artwork.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you about Blackout Coffee. Bidenomics is a
Speaker 1: complete until disaster. But I don't let that or any
Speaker 1: of these other issues ruin my day. You want to
Speaker 1: know why, because I start my day with a hot
Speaker 1: America first cup of Blackout coffee. Now, if you like
Speaker 1: a premium cup of coffee to start your day. And
Speaker 1: I got to get up every day and get on
Speaker 1: the radio at seven in the morning. I have to
Speaker 1: be ready to give the news. And that is why
Speaker 1: I have to have a good cup of coffee, not average,
Speaker 1: but a really good cup of coffee. Blackout Coffee is
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of America zero percent woke company. You
Speaker 1: know there's a bunch of woke coffee companies out there.
Speaker 1: The biggest ones are the wokest ones out there. Well,
Speaker 1: Blackout as one hundred percent committed to conservative values from
Speaker 1: sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping.
Speaker 1: They embody true American values and accept no compromise on
Speaker 1: taste or quality. I'm drinking it every day. I can
Speaker 1: tell you this is true. You need to try Blackout Coffee.
Speaker 1: And if you've got someone on your Christmas list as
Speaker 1: a coffee drinker that loves premium coffee, go to Blackoutcoffee
Speaker 1: dot com slash verdict. That's Blackout Coffee dot com slash verdict.
Speaker 1: You'll use the promo code Verdict and you're gonna get
Speaker 1: twenty percent off your first order, plus you can see
Speaker 1: all their incredible gift ideas for the holidays. It's Blackout
Speaker 1: Coffee dot com slash vertict.
Speaker 6: Be awake, not woke.
Speaker 1: Blackoutcoffee dot com slash vertict. So even with the investigation
Speaker 1: going on, and this is just to make it clear
Speaker 1: the American people where we are now, there's no reason
Speaker 1: to believe that the Biden said okay, they're onto us,
Speaker 1: let's shut it down. They just said, okay, they're on
Speaker 1: to us, let's change the way that we're operating our business.
Speaker 1: We found out, for example, that the first American hostage
Speaker 1: that was released from Hamas was had a family member
Speaker 1: who had bought artwork from Hunter Biden is another example
Speaker 1: of still now this is going on in real time.
Speaker 2: So do we have evidence, do we know how many
Speaker 2: paintings Hunter has sold to whom and for how much?
Speaker 2: Those are basic questions. Since Joe became president, do we
Speaker 2: know whether he sold one painting, fifty paintings, or one
Speaker 2: hundred paintings.
Speaker 3: We know he sold several. They bragged about it. The
Speaker 3: art director, George Burgess, he's one.
Speaker 4: Of the people we expected to pose. Hopefully in January,
Speaker 4: we'll ask those questions.
Speaker 1: And has any of Hunter Biden's art ever hung in
Speaker 1: any government buildings or the White House? That would, in theory,
Speaker 1: raise the price of that artwork, the value of that artwork,
Speaker 1: because we know that artwork where it hangs can increase
Speaker 1: us to value significantly.
Speaker 3: I don't know that that'll be a great question. We
Speaker 3: can ask George purchase.
Speaker 2: But the point you made that there's no evidence Hunter
Speaker 2: was an artist until daddy became president is rather amazing.
Speaker 2: Every artist I've ever known, they've been an artist their
Speaker 2: whole life. They've been painting. Usually people have been painting
Speaker 2: since they were kids. If you want to be a
Speaker 2: commercial artist, most people don't start off saying I'm gonna
Speaker 2: paint something and sell it for half million dollars. Is
Speaker 2: the Biden family blocking your committee getting the information on
Speaker 2: how many paintings have been sold to whom and for
Speaker 2: how much?
Speaker 3: Well, somebody's blocking it again, that's the question.
Speaker 4: We're going to ask the art gallery owner.
Speaker 3: And we're going to ask Kevin Morris, who's the Hollywood
Speaker 3: attorney and we believe he has a lot of inside
Speaker 3: knowledge over this artwork and who's purchasing the artwork.
Speaker 2: This would be the Hollywood attorney that paid off Hunter's
Speaker 2: back taxes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the media reports that he's paid hundred two and
Speaker 3: a half million dollars, but it's five million dollars. It's
Speaker 3: five million dollars from this Hollywood attorney he never met
Speaker 3: until Joe was the nominee to be president.
Speaker 2: He never met the guy.
Speaker 3: Never met the guy we had the picture when the
Speaker 3: first time they met.
Speaker 4: It was at a political fundraiser.
Speaker 3: So this guy didn't grow up with, wasn't friends with
Speaker 3: like Devon arger Boba, Linzcury, these.
Speaker 4: Guys, and he met this guy.
Speaker 3: Now this guy has loaned him five million dollars.
Speaker 6: At least don't have to put that on your taxes.
Speaker 6: I guess that's the purpose.
Speaker 2: I tell you this. This is James, thank you. This
Speaker 2: has been very helpful and I want us to close.
Speaker 2: We've heard mountains and mountains of evidence of corruption, mountains
Speaker 2: of evidence of corruption of Hunter Biden, mountains of evidence
Speaker 2: of corruption of Jim Biden, mountains of evidence of corruption
Speaker 2: of Joe Biden. I want us to close with Kareeine
Speaker 2: John Pierre claiming there is no evidence. So just give
Speaker 2: a listen to what the White House House is saying,
Speaker 2: and then we're going to look at the newspaper headlines
Speaker 2: that have followed.
Speaker 7: What we're seeing from House Republican is wasted time and
Speaker 7: it is certainly, you know, baseless political stunt. That's what
Speaker 7: we're seeing. And they're leaving. House Republicans are leaving this
Speaker 7: week to go, you know, enjoy a nice holiday, right
Speaker 7: as most Americans should. But what happened to the funding
Speaker 7: to Ukraine? Just asked me about Ukraine. They haven't been
Speaker 7: able to get that done. They haven't been able to
Speaker 7: fix help let's fix what's going on at the border.
Speaker 7: They haven't been able to get that done. They haven't
Speaker 7: been able to start a conversation on how we're going
Speaker 7: to avert a shutdown in January. They haven't been able
Speaker 7: to do that. And so look, you know, there's been
Speaker 7: zero evidence, zero evidence. You can ask me about engagement
Speaker 7: and what the president has done with his family and conversation,
Speaker 7: but there's no evidence. There's wait, wait, but there's no evidence.
Speaker 7: There is no evidence that the president has done wrongdoing.
Speaker 7: There's none, absolutely none, none, And that is just a fact.
Speaker 7: You've heard it from Republicans themselves. So they're wasting their
Speaker 7: time instead of doing the work on behalf of the
Speaker 7: American people, they go after the president's family. But that's a.
Speaker 4: Waste of time.
Speaker 2: Every time she says no evidence, no evidence, no evidence,
Speaker 2: it's a lie. But here take a look at how
Speaker 2: Reuter's reported the House vote on impeachment Biden impeachment inquiry
Speaker 2: authorized by House Republicans COMMA despite lack of evidence. Mind you,
Speaker 2: this is news. Next headline, New York Times. House approves
Speaker 2: Biden impeachment inquiry as GOP hunts foreign offense. Republicans are
Speaker 2: pushing forward with a former investigation even though their year
Speaker 2: long scrutiny of the president and his family has turned
Speaker 2: up no evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors. That is
Speaker 2: complete bs by the way. Washington Post next headline, Washington
Speaker 2: Post still lacking evidence. House GOP votes to formalize biden
Speaker 2: impeachment inquiry. Lawmakers have said the step will put them
Speaker 2: on a stronger legal footing for any court challenges related
Speaker 2: to their investigations. Understand Reuters, The New York Times, The
Speaker 2: Washington Post, and Karine Jean Pierre on behalf of the
Speaker 2: president are lying, and James, thank you for joining us,
Speaker 2: because you have laid out an enormous amount of evidence
Speaker 2: that apparently you don't exist. The House doesn't exist, the
Speaker 2: investigation doesn't exist, the bank records don't exist, the WhatsApp
Speaker 2: doesn't exist, Barisma doesn't exist. Twenty four million dollars doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: Two hundred and forty thousand dollars to Joe Biden doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: None of that exists because we're told there's no evidence.
Speaker 2: These are lying shills, but the truth will out. Thank
Speaker 2: you for all you're doing, and James, have a merry Christmas.
Speaker 6: Congressman again, thank you so much for joining us. Senator.
Speaker 1: This is such an important conversation, obviously, and I will
Speaker 1: say to everyone that's listening or if you're watching, if
Speaker 1: you miss part one or part two of this three
Speaker 1: part series, would you, James Comer, make sure you go
Speaker 1: back and listen, but also make sure that you help
Speaker 1: us get the word out. Whether you're on Facebook or
Speaker 1: on YouTube or on x you can grab the video
Speaker 1: and watch. You can share the video there and also
Speaker 1: share the podcast links to part one, Part two, part three.
Speaker 1: Because without you the Verdict listeners, this show doesn't happen.
Speaker 1: And when you share it on social media you bring
Speaker 1: so many others into the conversation and allow them to
Speaker 1: hear the facts of what the mainstream media is not covering.
Speaker 1: I'll say it again, thank you to James Comer and
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan for all their hard work and we hope
Speaker 1: you enjoyed everything that we talked about the Senator and
Speaker 1: I will see you back here in a couple of days.