WEBVTT - Economic Heavyweights On the Banking Crisis

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Life from the Bloomberg Interacting Burgers Studios. This is Bloomberg

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>day Break for Friday, March twenty fourth. Coming up today,

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen says the government stands ready to protect the

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>banking system. The chorus grows louder for the Fed to

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>cut rates this year. China rolls out the welcome that

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for Tin Cook and other top corporate executives and TikTok testimony.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>False flash on Capitol Hill. What made hundreds of students

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sick at a high school on Long Island? Plus? North

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Korea says it has an underwater drone with a nuclear warhead.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Block. More ahead, I'm John Stash, Aaron's wards.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>The Knicks and Nets lost, the Rangers won. Four teams

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>advanced to the Elite A to the NCAA tournament. That's

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>always straight ahead on Bloomberg day Break, The Business News

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>you need to sturn your day, and just one fifteen

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>minute podcast each pointing on Apples, Spotify, The Bloomberg Business

0:00:54.680 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Appen everywhere you get your podcasts. Good morning, I'm Nathan

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Hagar and I'm Karon Moscow. Here are the stories we're

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>following today, Karen. We began with the latest on the

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>turmoil in the banking industry, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>regulators are prepared to take more steps if needed, to

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>protect the banking system. Yellen spoke before a House Appropriation subcommittee.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>The strong actions we've taken ensure that Americans deposits are safe.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Certainly we would be prepared to take additional actions if warranted.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Yellen's comments came a day after she said

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>officials had not considered temporarily expanding insurance to all US deposits. Well.

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>The con former economic policymakers are criticizing the fed's bank

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>stress tests in twenty twenty two for failing to pro

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>potential vulnerabilities in the banking system. Be got up with

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>former FED Governor Dan Tarullo, but I think in the

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>most immediate sense this is clearly a supervisory failure. Other

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>factors may be uncovered as the own investigation proceeds, and

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan Trullo, oversaw financial regulation and supervision at the FED,

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>may be cooments in a special Bloomberg round table, along

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and Bloomberg News Head

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of Economics Stephanie Flanders, hear more of that conversation a

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>little later in the program. Well Karen, one top banking executive,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>says the worst of the crisis may be behind us.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We spoke exclusively this morning with Standard Chartered CEO Bill

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Winters in Hong Kong. I hope we're through the worst,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's still some questions around business models

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world, or have there been weaknesses that have

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>been exposed in the business models of any of the

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that have had trouble that need to be addressed

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point, But it certainly seems that the acute

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>phase of the crisis has done. Standard Chartered CEO Bill

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Winter says he'd be open to looking into credit suite

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>as assets if they were made available. Well, Nathan, there

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>may be more trouble for a credit suite and ubs,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's related to the war in Ukraine. The banks

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are among several facing a Justice Department investigation into Russian

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>only guard finding help avoiding sanctions. Amy Morris says more

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>from our Bloomberg in ninety nine one newsroom in Washington,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sources tell Bloomberg News the Swiss banks were included in

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a wave of subpoenas that were sent out by the

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>US government before the crisis that resulted in UBS's takeover

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of Credit Suees. DJ is focusing on identifying which bank

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>employees dealt with sanctioned clients and how those clients were

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>vetted over the past several years. US Deputy Attorney General

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Monaco says the Justice Department is beefing up its

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>National Security Division, saying, quote, corporate crime and national security

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are overlapping to a degree never seen before. Credit Suis

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and UBS declined to comment in Washington. I'm Amy Morris,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Day Break. All right, Amy, thank you. Now, let's

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>turn to the economy. The chorus is growing on the

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed not to raise rates this year, but to cut them.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the latest live from Bloomberg's John Tucker, John

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and A Double Line Capital's Jeff Gundlock is adding his voice.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>He took to Twitter saying the Fed's going to be

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cutting interest rates substantially, and they should be doing it soon. Well,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>he sees the same data as everybody else, an adverted

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>yield curve that Gunlack calls a red alert recession signal.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He's at odds with the Fed. Share Jpale, who said

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>this week that officials don't anticipate cutting rates, the market

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is pricing for easing before the end of the year.

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Live in New York, I'm John Tucker, Bloomberg day Break.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, John, Thanks World. China is hoping to show

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the world it's back in business. It's hosting a high

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>profile corporate summit this weekend, and some top American executives

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>will be there. We get the latest live with Bloomberg

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Rappaboord's Steve, Good Morning, Good Morning, Karen and Nathan.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Organizers of the China Development Forum say hundreds of foreign

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.679
<v Speaker 1>representatives from various industries registered to attend the three day event.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Corporate a listers like Apple CEO Tim Cook and Fiser

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>boss Albert Borla plan to show up, but many American

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>companies are sitting this one out. Sources tell us that's

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because they want to avoid scrutiny from a newly formed

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>House committee investigating China's Communist Party. The conference will be

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>held fully in person this year for the first time

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>since twenty nineteen, before the pandemic upended business for Beijing.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Live in New York. I'm Steve Rappaport, Bloomberg Daybreak. Thanks

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Steve While, the CEO of TikTok, had a long day

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill, but it might not have gotten him

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>any closer to assuring House lawmakers that the wildly popular

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>app is safe for national security. Show Chow was asked

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly whether the Chinese Communist Party can access Americans data.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I have seen no evidence that the Chinese government has

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>access to that data. They have never asked us. We

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have no provided in a way I've asked it. I

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>find that actually preposterous. I looked in. I have seen

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of this happening. Man. We got reaction to

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>show choose testimony from Senate Intelligence Chairman Mark Warner, and

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel for the CEO because he doesn't

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have an answer end of the day. TikTok is owned

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>by Bye Dance. Bye Dance is a Chinese company. Chinese

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>law as of twenty seventeen says every Chinese company the

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>first obligation is not shareholders or customers. Their first obligation

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>is they got to turn over any information or any

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of belity to manipulate content to the Commonest Party

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of China. Democratic Senator Mark Warner spoke on Bloomberg Sound

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>On with Joe Math. You can catch the show weekdays

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or listen on demand

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Right now, SMP futures are

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>lower by two point Stown futures are down sixty one,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and Nastack futures are higher by eighteen points. The ten

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>year treasury is up twenty three thirty seconds now for

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>a yield of three point three to four percent. The

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>yield on the two year is at three point seven

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Straight ahead your latest local headlines and a

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>check of sports. This is Bloomberg. It is forty nine

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>degrees in New York. We got a chance for some

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>showers tonight. We'll head up to the year fifty. So

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much where we are now. Let's take a look

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at some of the other stories making news in New

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>York and around the world. Good morning, Michael Barr, Good morning, Nathan.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Students became ill at a Long Island high school. About

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty students classes at Babylon High School

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Absences were down to one hundred ten yesterday.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>About seven hundred students go to the school. The Suffolk

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>County Health Commissioner believes the likely cause is no ravirus.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a push in some New England states to help

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the police know how to deal with the drivers who

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have autism. Connecticut launched a Blue Envelope program for artistic

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>drivers three years ago. Now Rhode Island is considering the

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>same type of marker. Joanne Quinn has a twenty seven

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>year old son with autism. She says those police sirens

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and lights will likely be a trigger and maybe even

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>take off if he says, hey, let's get out of

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the car, and he'll get out of the car and

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>then he'll start talking at him, and with the lights

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and noise going, Pat's going to turn and walk away.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't be here. I need to go somewhere else.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a century overload. How's that going to go

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>over with a police officer? Meanwhile, opponents fear this kind

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of designation could lead to a breach of confidentiality. The

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon says a US contractor was killed and five US

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>service members and another US contractor were wounded when a

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>suspected Iranian drone struck a facility on a coalition base

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in northeast Syria. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin says US Central

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Command Forces retaliated with precision airstrikes. North Korea says it

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has tested an underwater attack drone in its latest warning

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to South Korea and the US to stop their current

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>military drones. According to state media, the weapon, fitted with

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear warhead would destroy enemies with a large radioactive wave.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Analysts are skeptical. Secretary of State Antony Blincoln says funding

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>for Ukraine should last for much of the year. Bloomberg

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>said Baxter as the story. Blincoln before the House Appropriation

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Subcommittee says the billions already being approved as being closely watched,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and the embassy in Ukraine, he says forty five people

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they're overseeing. This is a series of hearings focused on

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the budget request for an eleven percent increase. Some lawmakers

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have worried money is being lost to corruption and that

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>other nations are not doing enough. B Lincoln telling the

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>committee the US does have real burden, but notes the

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>other nations are doing other jobs, like taking in refugees

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. I'm at Baxter Bloomberg. Day Break Global

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>news twenty four hours a day, powered by more than

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts in over one hundred

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and twenty countries. I'm Michael Barr. This is Bloomberg Nathan.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Michael, time for the Bloomberg Sports Update, brought to

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>you by Tri State Auty. Good morning, John stash hour

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>yead morning, Nathan. Not a good trip to Florida for

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the next they lost in Miami, followed a night later

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>by a lost in Orlando. Knicks were without Jalen Brunson.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>They fell behind by nineteen. They did rally, but the

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Magic hit four late three pointers and one one eleven

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one oh six oh chance for the Nets to get

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to within a game of the Knicks for fifth of

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the East. At Barkley's Nets Buckley, they had a victory

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>until three turnovers of the final minute. Cleveland, on a

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>three pointer with less than a second ago, pulled out

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the win one sixteen one fourteen, sweeping the home and home.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Rangers and Hurricanes played at home at home, each winning

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Rangers in Allie won two to one

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on an out of Bucks Bowl NCUBAA tournament in overtime

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Garden, Kansas State pulled out a ninety eight

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety three win over Michigan State. The Wildcats Marquis Snowel

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>had nineteen assists. That's the most in any tournament game ever.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a New York City native. This is probably my

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>career high an assists. You know. Ever, I had a

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of games of fourteen, a couple of games of

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen back in high school. But you know this one

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>was special. In front of my hometown, in front of

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the city, you know that loves me. I

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>came here playing some worries. You know how blessed and

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>grateful I am. Tomorrow at MSG Kansas State versus Florida Atlantic,

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a surprising East Regional final the owl small school from

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Boca Raton, Florida, but they've got a thirty four and

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>three record. They upset Tennessee sixty two fifty five a route,

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>then a thriller West Regional in Vegas, Yukon a third

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>straight blowout victory for the Huskies eighty eight sixty five

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>over Arkansas and Gonzaga, then top UCLA seventy six seventy

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>three on a late three point shot. Four more games tonight,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>including Princeton seated fifteenth, taking on freighting that game in Louisville.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>John Dashaw Bloomberg Sports Live from coast to coast from

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>New York to San Francisco, Boston to Washington, DC, nationwide

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on Sirius xamp, the Bloomberg Business App, and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak. Good morning. I'm Nathan Hagar. Markets

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>are searching for calm on this Friday as we close

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>out the most tumultuous two week stretch for the US

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and global financial systems in recent memory. A weekend of

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>US regional bank runs was followed by a weekend that

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the collapse of Credit Suie capped off by yet

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>another Federal Reserve rate hike this week. It's all left

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>many asking what went wrong, where did it go from here?

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And should the FED shift its priorities from inflation to

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>financial stability. Not to mention, many are left wondering if

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fed can achieve that soft landing amid all this turmoil,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>When we explored the bank failures and financial stress tests

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the top voices in economic on a

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>special episode of Bloomberg's Wall Street week Our, David Weston

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>hosted that roundtable with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, former

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>FED Governor Dan to Rulo, and head of Economics at

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Stephanie Flanders, let's bring you part of that discussion.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you, Dan. You were a

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>colleague for several years of j. Powell. During the time

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you were on the FED, you had responsibility for banks supervision.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>We've been told the banks were so strong we didn't

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about it what happened here. We didn't

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think we still had banking problems. I trust that the

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>largest banks truly are in the much better capital and

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>liquidity position that Jay Powell referred to yesterday during the

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>press conference. But I think there are some things that

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we do know. We know first that there was a

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>significant supervisory failure somewhere along the way. Was that failure

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the San Francisco Fed's inability to identify problems of

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>growth and maturity mismatches? Is in the like early on?

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Was it a supervisory failure because of the light touch

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>approach to supervision that the Federal Reserve Board had put

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in place over the last four or five years, Or

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was it a supervisory failure because the supervisors generally had

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>not adjusted their method of assessing liquidity to take account

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of very high uninsured deposit concentrations. Coexisting with the capacity

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of big depositors to run at warp speed rather than

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the way they used to run. I also would not

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>rule out a contributing factor being the twenty eighteen legislation

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen FED regulation, both of which deregulated banks

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of under seven hundred or the regulation banks of under

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred billion dollars in assets the legislation banks of

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred and fifty. But I think in the

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>most immediate sense this is clearly a supervisory failure. Other

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>factors may be uncovered as the FED Zone investigation proceeds.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So Larry, let's put you back at the Treasury or

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for them, or at the White House. If you were

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at this situation, what questions would you be asking

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you understood the possible ramifications of what

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen so far in a broader financial context. Before

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I answered, Before I answer that hypothetical, let me put

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a question to my friend Dan, who I'll just say

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think did an enormous amount to strengthen our financial

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>system during his time at the FED. Dan, I've heard

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it said, and I don't know that. Even in twenty

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, the FED stress tests that were applied to

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the largest banks did not include an analysis of the

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>stress from a major interstrate hike. If that's true, that

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>seems kind of bizarre from the point of view of

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the world of early twenty twenty two, when it certainly

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>many people, certainly me on David's show, were emphasizing that

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.119
<v Speaker 1>there was likely to need to be very substantial increases

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates. Can you say something and if the

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>stress tests weren't considering increases in interest rates, then perhaps

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the exempting of Silicon Valley Bank from the stress tests

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was not central to understanding the problem. Can you say

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>something about interest rate hikes and FED stress tests? Sure? So,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>First off, I think Larry, I agree with the statement

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you made towards the end of your question, which is actually,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if Silicon Valley had been in last year's stress test

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>FOREL rather than its stress rehearsal, I don't think it

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>would have made much difference, for precisely the reason you

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>say that they weren't stressing the things that were the

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>SVB vulnerabilities with respect to stress testing. Generally, over again,

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last five or six years, the stress test

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>has become eminently predictable. The scenario that's used is now

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a single scenario, which is essentially a variant on the

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>very first one we put in some years ago. That

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is a severe, quite severe recession, but it follows the

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>basic pattern of the scenario that was developed when we

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>began doing the annual stress test. The scenario, of course

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>includes a reduction in interest rates because of the hypothesis

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of a recession and the Fed's reaction. When I was

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at the FED, we were using also an alternative scenario.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It's called the adverse rather than severe, adverse scenario, and

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>we use that scenario to test things other than the

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>prototype of the severe recession, And indeed we used it

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at least one year, and I think a couple of years,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to test what would happen with unusual changes and interest

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>rates which were not then anticipated. So to some degree,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the answer to your question is like supervision. Generally, the

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>stress test has become less rigorous over time, and I

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think more importantly, it's become too predictable. And the whole

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>purpose of a stress test is that you're trying to

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>stress against the unanticipated, not the anticipated. At the risk

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of preps being too tough on your former colleagues at

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the fair, you talk about predictable versus unpredictable. I would

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>argue that at a very minimum, the stress tests ought

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to consider what is the major risk of their moment

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>When you were at the fed DAN in that period,

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it was reasonable to think that the major

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>risk was a tilt towards recession and deflation. But I

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>don't see how anybody last spring could have thought that

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the major risk was anything other than a spike in

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. So a process that didn't consider as a

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>risk seems to me to be a profoundly problematic process.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>It seems almost like the supervisors were mailing it in.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there a defense? I would say, first, this is

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not by way of defense, or certainly not an apologia,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but just a bit of explanation. It's quite likely that

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the scenario development was taking place in the latter part

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty one if it was going to be

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty two stress test, And of course this

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is the period in which the FOMC was still figuring

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>out that the inflation problem was not transitory. But I

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to use that as a kind of exculpation

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the supervisors. Second thing to say is it's not

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the supervisors meeting the staff who are making the policy

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>decisions as to what kind of stress tests to have,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>whether they have multiple scenarios, that's a decision of the

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Board of Governors, and so it rests with them. But

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the gravenment of your remarks, which is

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not to have tried to think about something other than

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the same scenario is a failure of supervision in and

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of itself. Stephane, you've worked at the Treasure United States.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You also have covered financial markets and other business issues

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>over in Europe for a good long time. One thing

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing from both Larry and and is rates were

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>going up and there weren't just going up here, They're

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going up over in Europe as well. Was what we're

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing around now in the banking system. Maybe not the

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>specifics of Silicon Value Bank, but was something like that

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>almost inevitable. After we've pumped so much money in the system,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we start taking it out, there's going to be stress,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>real stress, and there's going to be some failure. Yeah,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And I wish I was I was closer to you guys,

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>because I knew I was going to struggle to get

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a word in with you too. But I think in

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, I think it is important when we're thinking

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>about what the implications are. You know, you have to

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>distinguish what is an outlier about not to Silicon Valley Bank,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>but others that have got into trouble in this episode.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>What is fundamentally a regulatory stupidity, you know, a very

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>traditional problem the interest rate risk that was just hiding

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>in plain sight, and what is a genuinely new issue

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>which was not being fully taken into account by anyone

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at the risks. And I think when you look

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>at something like Silicon Valley Bank, you know clearly it

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>was an outlier in the speed with which deposits have

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>been built up, in its massive exposure to uninsured deposits

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and reliance on that for funding. I hope it was

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an outlier in not having a chief risk officer for

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nine months, which was an extraordinary state of affairs. But

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what was very traditional about this, and as the discussion

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>with Larry and Dan is suggesting, was that you know,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>right here was a massive interest rate risk that was

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was in the stress test was

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>something that central banks should have been thinking very hard about.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think it was sort of striking that. We

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of the debate around this, what are

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the hidden risk You know, all the conversations that you

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>will have had, David, when you ask regulators what's keeping

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you up at night, they would always talk about private equity.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>They'd talk about non bank shadow banking. Has been the

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>thing that people were you know, was this worry for

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>all these years, and in fact it was the most

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>obvious problem sitting on bank balance sheets as a direct

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>result of monetary policy actions by central banks that has

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>actually caused this issue. I would just say, though one

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons maybe they weren't looking at that so closely,

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>or that'd be interested to know what Dan and Larry

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>think about this. You know, there is an element of

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this which is new, and we see in the speed

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with which deposits left these institutions, and that's the non

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>stickiness of those deposits. And I think, you know, one

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things that regulators were thinking when they looked

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>considered interest rate risk potentially was that there was a

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of self hedging mechanism in a bank of the

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that deposits would be slow to move if they

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't being paid the higher interest rates. That is no

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>longer the case, and I think that probably does have

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>longer term implications for regulation and potentially longer term implications

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for how much we ensure deposits. We had a decision

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed this week to raise another twenty five

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 1>basis points. Some people had been urging that actually they

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>just hold given the difficults with banking. At the same time,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>he Jap admitted that there's more uncertainty about the extent

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of which what's already happened with financial conditions may have

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially imposed or the rate hike already. Did they get

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it right? Dan, from your point of view, did j

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Pal get it right? Market expectations helped him. They had

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of converged around twenty five basis points, and so

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>then it became a communication issue. He said, quite explicitly,

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's too soon to tell how monetary policy should respond

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to the anticipated credit tightening. But I actually think their

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>actions yesterday were a fairly significant response. I mean, everybody,

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks ago, people are anticipating a fifty

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>basis point increase. We got twenty five. Three or four

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. We thought we might see the step suggest

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a ceiling of five to seventy five or six percent interest,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and now we're back to exactly where they were in

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>December at last December when they did the last SEP,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course they changed the language on the forward

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>guidance type language. Instead of ongoing increases, we're back to

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>may have some firm And of course some people were

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>reading that as the end or close to the end

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of the tightening cycle. So I actually thought that they

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were conveying more of an assessment of the impact than

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Chair Palace suggested in his remarks yesterday. I think what

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they did was broadly appropriate. It was a time for temporizing,

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of uncertainty and a lot of

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>cards are going to be turned over in the next

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>several months. And the question then was just temporizing mean

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stopping all rat increases. And I think if they had

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>done that, it would have sent actually a signal that

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they were very highly alarmed and would have been a

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>mistake whether to continue precisely on the path that they

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>were on before these banking concerns arose. I think that

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>would have seemed almost oblivious to what was a potentially

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>gathering storm. And so I think, as Dan suggests that

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>a middle ground path was right, and it was particularly

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>right if the policy is going to be signaling in

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a clear way that even if your bank fails, you're

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a depositor as well. But yes, I

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>think what they did was broadly appropriate, particularly if we

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>can be sending reasonably strong signals of confidence in the system.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Today, your morning brief on the

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>stories making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed at six am

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Can also listen live each morning starting

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at five am Wall Street time on Bloomberg eleven three

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>zero in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one in Washington,

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one oh six one in Boston, and Bloomberg nine

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to sixty in San Francisco. Our flagship New York station

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is also available on your Amazon Alexa devices. Just say

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty bloss listen coast to coast

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Business app, Serius XM Channel one nineteen,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Karen Moscow join us again tomorrow morning for

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>all the news you need to start your day right

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Daybreak