WEBVTT - 2017 U.S. Open Recap

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a brid egg,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the dreaded Friday Egg, Friday Frida Egg, Bride

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the course.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg Podcast. It's your host, Andy Johnson, and I'm

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>joined by DJ Paiehowski of Scratch and Brendan Poorath of

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>sp Nation. Welcome on, guys, Amen, good to be here. Yeah,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>running it back again, running a back So I don't want.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>To uh think Tron, you know he needs to worry

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>about his roster spot here, but happy to fill in again.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, Tron's got a you know, he's got bigger engagements.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>He's got you know, he's got big things going on.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>So we big timer he is. But you know that

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that's his uh, that's part of his his pro trage holding.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So we were many fresh mm hmmm. I think this

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is good though. This is like when when Bob Ryan

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>sits in on a pt I that's good.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I love it, just a little a little some new

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>new takes new perspective, you know, a little less spicy,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 2>a little more nuanced.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna make even spicier.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, might become spicy at me. But you know, so

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>so Brooks Cavka, you're twenty seventeen US Open champ. What

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 2>do you guys think?

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Man, I don't know, it's one of those things. I

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think that like, there's nobody that's surprised that it happened.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's a player that's played great at you know,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>big manly golf courses, which this certainly was, and you know,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>he's been in the moment, he's been close in majors.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's kind of the progression that you expect

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>from these guys where they show a bunch of talent,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they you know, get close a couple of times, and

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>then they finally break through and like, yeah, I mean,

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it kind of turned into a bit of a snooze

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>fest unfortunately. I think, you know, Brooks Brooks hitting some

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of the shots he did down the stretch made it

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch. Not necessarily you know, interesting from a

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>competitive standpoint, but it was fun to just see just

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the shots he pulled off, some of the

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>putts he made. But yeah, I don't know. I mean,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it ith to borrow phrase. I think it

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>just it is what it is. Yeah, I mean, I.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>See, you know the barrow line. Many people are saying

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>that they had this. It's like a lawn shot call.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>But like you know, it's not a lawn shot for

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>anyone who knows anything about this. It's as expected. It's

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>it's it's no more shocking than I would say if

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Ricky won today, or you know, Thomas won to day

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>or maybe even you know, if Speed's won, Like, yeah,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Speed has more name recognition, but we kind of you know,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Kopka only has one PGA Tour win, which you know,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe you know, kind of the golf nerds. He's got

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 3>too much of a cult following, you know, that's not

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>commensurate with one, you know, waste management Phoenix Open win.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I think everybody saw this as a possibility,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 3>and it's not really a launch shot win.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It was it.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, the day lacked a little kind of little

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 3>sizzle there, you know, but him streaking down the back

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>and maybe that's an old old man media complaint Andy

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 3>that it lacked sizzle, But you know, him streaking on

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the back nine was cool. That was that was fun

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to watch, just like JT the prior day on the

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>back nine was fun to watch.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's what what I would ask you.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Andy's kind of like, you know, you talked about how

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>this set up for every player, but what did you

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>think of like that? I thought fifteen was like a

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 3>great example of that. You know, it's hardest all on

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the course Brooks is. Everyone just says power, power, power,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>like he's a masher, and then he played you know,

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 3>it makes a birdy. I'm fifteen, you know, just three

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty six. That was kind of all strategy and touch.

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, do you think that like a

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>firms that's going to affirm like the lazy take that

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>this was just a bomber's course.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I've already heard it. You know, we expected a bomber

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>to win. But like Brooks won because he played the best,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, like what he didn't hit any bad shots,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was it was fair away and then

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>green and then you know he rolled in some putts

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and you know, you look down, you know fifteen or

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, that was you know, those

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.799
<v Speaker 2>were just incredible shots he hit over and over again

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to make birdies there and basically put it put the

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>whole term into sleep. I mean, fourteen, you know, easy

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>birdie for him there, and then fifteen that web shot

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>was just so good. I mean, I don't I don't think.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think one of the things I don't think

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Fox did was to give enough of a narrative of

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>how difficult fifteen was playing, because I mean, yeah, it was.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It was a full shot harder than the day before,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 2>and a half a shot harder than the first two rounds,

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 2>and it was already a tough hole, so you know,

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>for him to hit that iron, it's a really hard

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>driving hole with that iron because it's really narrow. And

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 2>then he hits a wedge right up there to this

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>small back shelf. I mean, then he goes and birdie's

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>an X hole, which is a tough hull. Part three

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I think. I mean, he was the best player this week.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>He hit what is it of his greens eighty eight

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 2>percent of his greens miss ten greens for the week.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's a I mean, I think it was

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>cool though you saw Harmon was there playing a completely

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>different style of game. I mean, I know he's not

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 2>like he's not short as everybody wants him to say,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>but he's not long. You know, if that many people

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>expected him there, You saw Bill hass Is another one.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>He's in the top five. Completely different style player. You know,

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Reid thirteenth, Oh so close to his first top

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 2>ten in a major.

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Thought his Ryder Cup pants are going to carry him

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>to that top ten first ever.

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think the crazy thing, I think

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>people overlooked Kopka's major record coming into you know, he's

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>got a top ten at the at the British he

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 2>had a top five at the US Open, and two

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 2>top fives at PGA is coming into this week, Like,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's that's far better than JT's major record.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>It's probably about the same level as Ricky's. And you

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 2>know he he was flying under the radar for no

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>reason because he was playing great golf offspring.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good way to put it. I think.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was looking earlier today and we're kind

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of texting back and forth with both of you guys

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and looking at that cluster of guys that was you know,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there was whatever five six guys that were kind of

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>within a shot or two, and you know, you know,

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a major Sunday and one of those guys is

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>at least is going to get just vaporized. And I

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it's kind of hard to it's kind of hard to.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of hard to pick out who that

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>person was going to be. And you know, I was

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking, like looking at Brooks, I'm like, eh, maybe,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's just yeah, he's he's been there

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a few times, like more times than people realize

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Sundays of these things. Here's Royder Cup is

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>another example too, And.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So Kepka was the only player that shot four straight

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>under par rounds.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's hard to beat.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>He played the best, and he was the most consistent.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>He was never in trouble all week. You know.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you kind of kept waiting for him to lose

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it or to kind of hit some wayward balls or something,

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he just yeah, he was just never

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. Like you know, he had maybe had a

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of part like a couple of lengthy par putts

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like that was when he's making bogie. He's not he's

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 1>not out there making doubles and the kind of stuff

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that knocks out of contention. I mean, he just was

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of impossible to catch.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>He bludgeoned it.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, do you think that?

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that was kind of why he won't

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Did he hit the right angle? Do you think he

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>just he wanted because he hit whatever three hundred and

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine yards on eighteen and that kind of stuff.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>So it was interesting. I heard one of his, uh,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of his post round interviews, and he

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>talked about how like he just was hitting driver and

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>hitting it far and he hadn't hit anything more than

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a seven iron. You know, it didn't play long, and

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it was a you know, there was a

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of different ways to play the course, you know,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I've written a lot about it. But his way,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 2>what like, he went out there, took advantage of the

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>wide fairways and hit the driver spectacularly well you know

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 2>where he did not miss, you know, and that's what

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>DJ what Rory and what Jason Day did was they

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't hit the ball well. You know, they missed a lot.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't miss, then you're hitting drivers well

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>and you're hitting eight iron, nine iron wedge seven iron

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and all these other guys are hitting six iron, five iron,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>four irons into greens, like your birdie puts are gonna

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>be shorter and you've got a lot less chance of

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>missing greens and a lot less chance of making bogey.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought watching him this week and just kind of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>his like his you know, just the fact that he

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>never did miss and he was just zoning for seventy

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two straight holes. It felt a lot like watching Jason

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Day a couple of years go. It just feels like

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a super similar style. And it's almost like these two

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>guys that when they're on they're just like fully optimized

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>machines that just like can't miss, you know what I mean.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you got that. And I kind

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of felt the same way as I feel when I'm

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>watching Jason Day, which is like, man, I know this

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>is like so impressive and awesome, but for some reason,

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like not that into it. Yeah, I felt,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>You definitely felt that way more even than the power

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 3>was like the putting the back to back on fifteen

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and sixteen, where like just that trademark day like pouring

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 3>them in from whatever, like fifteen feet to like put

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the gas down and you know, grind it, you know,

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 3>just grind everyone else to dass. I thought like fifteen

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>was like ten feet coming back down.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was six That was a hard putt.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Sixteen was a pretty big you know vendor, you know,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 3>and that was whatever fifteen seventeen feet I can't remember,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>but you know that's like trademark day. Just smash and

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 3>then you know, be just like a machine on the greend.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, you know that was that was day

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>pre blade collar.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Wow color.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Brooks is defiant and it kind of applaud him

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 3>in that regard. Defiantly anti blade. And you saw like

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>those little bubble boys, you know, the whatever Tron.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Called them, like the there.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 3>Were so many different takes like Slushy Machine, Gender reveal.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, Rory and Jason Day kind of ejected early,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>but you know, Nike Nike boy, Brooks defiantly anti blade

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and he's there with the trophy. Makes you think.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Something I saw think Jonathan Wall tweet yesterday that I

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>thought was so interesting is Brooks no equipment deal they

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize that he made himself a lot of

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>money today.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Yeah, it is curious. I wonder what the trade

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>off is with like, you know, if he like what

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the incentives are if you win a major on those

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>equipment deals, like those things stack up. But I mean,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what is Do you know what's in

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>his bag?

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Like I know he has one Nike club.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>If Leeward is playing that Nike driver all week, it's awesome.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I saw someone tweet like they're gonna have to start

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 3>making these clubs again if he wins. I remember I

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>said it, but I think I saw Taylor may Woods.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure. I don't want to. I don't want

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to give it. Uh any kind of unpaid for brand

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 3>advertising here.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, speculation, it's a big no. No, I'm the

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 2>fried Egg POD's Uh, I'm not.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>In the pocket of a big Carls bad.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>So Brooks twenty seven, top five, two, top five and PGA, Like,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's gonna win one of those. It seems like, yeah,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>top ten at an open, which should fit his game

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 2>really well if he gets the right side of the

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>draw and US opens should be I mean, like, is

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>is this the guy? I mean, like, how much I

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>honestly thinking about when I'm putting it when I was

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>just writing about this ah a little bit. Is is

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>like this guy could be one of the guys that

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>wins three four majors.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Well I think, you know, I don't know if it

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>was lessened by like the lack of presence, you know,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 3>chasing him just because like JT and Ricky kind of faded.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 3>But like his round to day was outrageous. It was

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>a sixty seven, and I don't know, like why if

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 3>it just kind of like why people were not like

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 3>freaking out the way they were maybe with he Decies

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>was arounded the day sixty six, and then after that

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 3>it was Brooks and he was already using the second

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to last group and he's got a sixty seven. I'm

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 3>not sure like we're giving that number like the proper credit,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>just because maybe like no one was kind of pushing him,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, it was just him.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but Harmon was right there and then he vaporized.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It right exactly exactly.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that's why too, because there was just like

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 3>no one kind of keeping pay us, and all of

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>a sudden it got boring. I wasn't I don't know,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>it was odd. I don't think we're giving that sixty

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 3>seven enough credit.

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think sometimes when you uh, you know,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>when you when you win by one and you come

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and you burdy the last hole or something, it just

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like a much better round than when you just

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>shoot a flaw as sixty seven, you know what I mean,

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like winning by four almost hurts, like I don't know

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if this makes any sense, but I mean it almost hurts,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like how we look at the round because it just

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel close, and it just feels like he was

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>completely in control the whole time rather than actually like

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>responding to punches or something like that, which I think

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what you're talking about, right, I think it.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's so interesting too, because, like you know,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it was one of the most packed leaderboards and bunch

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>leader boards. It had big names, It had you know,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>it had Ricky and JT. Fleetwood is you know, becoming

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>a you know star in Europe. And this guy, yeah,

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this guy just blew them all out.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>To see it is funny, man, Like I forget who

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about. This might have been earlier in

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>our pre tournament podcast, but just look at the last

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what sixteen twenty majors something like that like the guys

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>who are winning these things. You know, there have been

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pack leader boards and it hasn't been

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the no name guys that emerge out of those packs

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like almost ever. I mean, we're we're joking about it,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, the biggest quote unquote no name

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>guy was Danny Willett, who was like number fifteen in

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the world or something when he won, right, and it's like, man,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>these guys are just to win one of these tournaments, man,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be just an absolute horse.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>That's what like the whole like, oh, you got a

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>lawn shot, like I had Brooks like that. That's like

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>bugs me, like and maybe that's just the nature of

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of the whatever. This like the post Tiger era,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>where like anyone who wasn't Tiger was you know, I

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>had him. I got that was like a good call

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>because I didn't pick Tiger. But like all these guys,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, we said, like the last seven first time

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>winners saved for Willett. But Willett was like a stud

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>at the time. You know, he's not right now, but

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>he was a stud when he won the Masters. Like

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>they're all completely you know, realistic, no Fluke, like totally

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 3>reasonable champions and nothing, nothing is shocking about this, And

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe that's kind of just like how we're

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 3>adjusting to this like post Tiger era, where you know,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 3>if it's a guy that maybe like Skip Balis has

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>never heard of, it's all of a sudden like some stunner,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, Cinderella storm.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't had any of those.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I have. Skip was right a tall player one, that's true.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>All the short players kind of faded at the end.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Is he six feet?

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, I think Brooks? Is he that

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>short or that's not short? But he seems bigger than that.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>He does seem bigger than that. He's he's he's built

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>like a brick ship house.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know he actually wanted to play baseball.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>If you guys heard, oh.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I heard athletics running his family.

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But I know.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 2>So so, you know, I think we've talked enough about Brooks.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 3>What about girlfriend Gate? You have any thoughts on that?

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that fit your you know, I think that's Andy's

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>audience is really into golf architectural Yeah, I think your

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>audience is really big into like the off the course

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle choices of.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>These guys, it's amazing how many people like there's some

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 3>serious like bloodhounds out there rummaging through the Instagram archives

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>within second ridiculous.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 2>It's uh, it's whatever. You know, it's cool and neat

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>and fun, but curious who you got are thinking in

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>terms of like who's who was your most pleasant surprise

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>this week? Like what player?

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for me it was in granted, you know,

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>today's round went a long water. I think it was

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>hit Ecky. That was awesome to watch some of the

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>shots he was hitting, and like, you know, I think

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we were saying earlier, you know, he's he's just done

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in by his putting so often, and it was just

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>cool to see him you know, wholesome putts when they

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really mattered and and not fade away and not make

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, miss short chances and all that kind of stuff.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was. I'm so pumped for him to

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>win one of these things, which which obviously doesn't seem

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's very far off.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean obviously, like yeah, when he walked out

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the eighteenth grade and I was just kind of like flabbergasts, like, God,

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 3>this guy is such a killer, Like I love watching

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 3>this guy sixty six just kind of wasn't really on

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 3>TV until like the back nine fires of sixty six

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 3>like a day after it or two days after. You know,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>he could have shot maybe sixty three. You know, he

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>burned some edges on Friday.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he opened with seventy four in the

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>first round, that's right, and then shut twell under he's

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>just the tournament. So I don't know. I mean, I

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm going to Harmon was obviously so fun.

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's kind of he's not going to give

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>you like a ton of like fist pumps, which is cool,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 3>but he's just he's cool to watch, I think. And

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, he had really no major kind of results.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, he hadn't done a ton at the US,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>but he's cool.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I love.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I tweeted about it, you know, the X man when

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>he finished and looks like he just missed like a

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 3>master's exemption.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>But he was cool to follow.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Like I got into him kind of randomly last year

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 3>at the web Web Finals event, and uh, you know,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 3>because he had he had already got his card. It

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>was just I don't know, and some web guys tipped

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 3>me off saying he was on a run, so I

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>followed him.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, he he got his card through finals right right, right,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>right right.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 3>Right, So he was he was cool to watch this

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 3>week and his first, you know, ever US Open. He's

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 3>in double digit under par, which they said would win

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>what all the two US Open.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>He was, he's cool to watch.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he what I was impressed with. He shoots that

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 2>sixty six. He shoots seventy three, which wasn't bad backing

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>that up, you know, and that was right, you know,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 2>and and then he comes back he I mean, he

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>played great. Most guys, you know, most of the younger

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>guys kind of faded on the weekend, you know, like

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Cameron Champ faded. You know who else was up there?

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>They had, you know, basically guys that just you don't

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>expect their usually fade away. And he was there till

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the end. You know, I was impressed as much as

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I want to say Trey Mullnax my boy, but Tommy

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Fleetwood because I was going to say too. You know,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>he hit some like really bad shots and had moments

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>where it could have gone really off the rails quickly,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>but it never seemed to like he never seemed to

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>let go of the rope if that makes sense. You know,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>like you know, when he had that that kind of

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>disaster on eighteen yesterday, but then hit that like unbelievable

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>chip back up to save Bogee after you know, playing

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>ping pong, and then today, you know, on four he

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>puts the ball off the green and you're like, oh boy,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 2>this just could get out of hand. And then he

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, managed to get up and down there save Bogie.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, he was you never felt like

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>he was gonna win, but you never felt like he

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>was out of it. You know, he had a chance.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's got a fun game and good personality, good story.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm in on the on seeing him a lot more.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about, uh, what do you think

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about Pat Reid fading today?

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think much, and I didn't think much beforehand,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 3>all right. I just thought, you know, I thought Tron's tweet,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>believe it or not, was instructive.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is discrimination against his ball flight.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he had he had to kind of he

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 3>was trying to make a pretty desperate charge to get

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>up into that cluster that was you know at twelve

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and eventually thirteen under. I think he just probably I

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know, playing playing to win.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He just just going for and couldn't couldn't make the birdies.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting that the days he played well were

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and Saturday, which were the soft days, you know,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, there is probably something too. I mean,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's Andy's Andy's take, which I love, but there's something

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>to you know, just the hard draw into those greens.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's a tough one.

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, as somebody that used to hit a hard draw.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, when he hit a hard draw, you eat

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>hot dogs, and when you eat a fit and when

0:22:58.640 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>he hit a fade, you eat fully.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you like Hogan. You like Hogan.

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Here. Here's the thing with Reed like to be very

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 2>frank like. So Reed went thirteen greens on Thursday, thirteen

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>greens on Friday, shot one of the most I can't

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>believe people haven't talked more about this. He shot sixty five,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 2>hitting twelve greens. He made eight birdies and only hit

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>twelve greens yesterday and today he hit eight greens. Like

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 2>simply put like that doesn't win you a US Open.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, you look at Kopka. Kopka hit seventeen greens today.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>He hit fifteen greens yesterday. He hit fourteen greens the

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>day before and sixteen greens on Thursday. So you know,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Kepka's worst day was better than Reid's best day. T degree,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's you can't win the US Opens without

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 2>hitting the ball good.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I made look sixty eight seventy five, sixty five,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 3>seventy four.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That's rollercoaster. Yeah, Captain America.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 2>It's he's I mean, he's great when when conditions are

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>soft and you know there's there's only so many pins

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>you can get at and it's tough to play in

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 2>the wind when your ball moves one way. You know,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>it's it's just it's hard. What do you guys think

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>about JT and Ricky?

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know. I just saw Will Gray tweeting,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, but that, like Thomas said, he struggled to

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 3>not like read all about his sixty three on his

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>phone yesterday. I don't know, it was just he said, Uh,

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it's interesting. I don't know that it

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 3>was necessarily like unexpected after the high of yesterday, it

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 3>seemed like that would have been hard to back up.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know, I was kind of more

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 3>disappointed with Ricky really just not really again, like it's

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>hard to say with Kepcaz shooting at sixty seven, like

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>you can't fault these guys for not keeping pace with that.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>But I just kind of expected Ricky to not seemed

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>like he played like a little.

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Conservatively down the stretch.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't know. I don't not trying to

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>go brand All Poulter here, but uh, it just kind

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 3>of wanted a little bit more and expected a little

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>bit more of Fouler.

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think on the JT front. I mean, I guess

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not super super familiar with his wins. I mean

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess enough that you know that, like they've all

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of been these like really massive margins of victory.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've really seen him go out and

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like grind one out quite yet, you know what I

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>mean Where I think, I think when it starts to

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>go sideways, I think that's why. I think. That's why

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I just like, I'm like the biggest speef in the

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>world is like that guy just fights and fights and

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>fights and fights, and he'll miss a shot and then

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know he's back making birdie on the next hole.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like when things start to go sideways

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with JT. I mean he gets you know, it's well

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>documented that he starts throwing clubs, he starts finding things

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to blame that kind of stuff, And I mean everybody

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of externalizes things differently, I'm sure, but that's just

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of the feeling you get when you're watching him

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is like, man, it just doesn't look like a guy

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to like dig deep and you know, fight

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>back and get back into it.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I will say I was surprised he was. I wasn't

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 3>surprised that, you know, he didn't win or it was

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 3>pushing at the end. I was surprised he was basically

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 3>completely ejected from the broadcast by the fifth pole, like

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>we just he was dumped by the fifth pole. I

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 3>was a little surprised by that.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think it's incredibly hard to back

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>up really really great rounds. Nothing ever seems to go right,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>you know it. It's just something that's very hard, and

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 2>it's I think it was a bad break that he

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 2>got into that last group. I think if he was

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 2>not in the last group, it would have been a

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>lot better.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so Fowler made the turn and I

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>texted somebody's like, you know, it kind of felt like

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Fowler had weathered some you know storm, and it was like, oh,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 2>like here's where he's I think he ripped one on time.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like, oh, you know, like this is

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 2>where he could turn it on and put together a nine.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like that's kind of where we've gotten

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 2>with Ricky, is that he gets to this back nine

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 2>in a major and you're and you're waiting to see

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>what he did at the Players, happened in a US

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Open or a Masters, or because like the Masters this year,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 2>he was still in and and it just doesn't happen.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>He did that yesterday.

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean after he bogied the thirteenth and he's kind

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of like, you know, after sitting on top of leerboard

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 3>for thirty six holes, or you know, at near the top,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 3>he bogees thirteen and he's like, uh, followers, like you know,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>falling out again. Then he birdies three in a row

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 3>fourteen through sixteen, and yeah, the course is harder today,

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 3>but I still, like you said, I think we're just

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of expecting some you know, one more punch there

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>on the back nine.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really do it today.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I think. I think though, you know, you get close

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>in golf and you have these moments of like where

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't where it doesn't go your way, and the

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>key is just keep putting putting yourself in that situation.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, it's becoming where he's he's becoming

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>more and more prevalent again. It's more of a matter

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>of when, not if.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think, yeah, I would be surprised

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 3>that he's not there again in whatever three or four

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 3>weeks at Birkdale.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Birkdale, one guy you definitely got to look

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at for that. Uh. West Wood a little one fifty

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>one on the weekend.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, west the Island is uh, you know, you

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>see like you know, something like a you know, a

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>beach town post hurricane. That's kind of the state of

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Westwood Island right now.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It kind of feels like one of those one of

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 1>those towns in like the Northwest that used to be

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like a really big, like forestry place and then kind

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of all these logging companies left and now they're just

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like really desolate and kind of like full of crystal

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>meth and kind of delusional people. That's what west That's

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what West. The island kind of feels like to.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Me right now, you know you're your.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Man, the crackpots that are still still inhabiting it, or

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just you know, just no sense of reality whatsoever.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I just want you to know, your big man, big

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>leash is down two to one to West this year.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Sure, or that's true.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 2>We got two more, We got two more West West?

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 2>You know he uh.

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say Tour championship as well, but West would

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely will not be there.

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 2>So this is the I would say, this is probably

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the last year for Westy. Do you think, well he's

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 2>gonna fall out of the top fifty.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What was he saying about the golf course?

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. I need to. I need to

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 2>he needs to answer my tweet, dear sir, because because

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 2>there could be a I could be packing up, I

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>could be shuddering up and out off Lesty Island, if

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, if he answers that the wrong way?

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>What did he say? What did he say? I didn't

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>actually see it.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that it was he was asking about the

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 2>course and relation to par you know, basically, I mean

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Westwood likes when scores around par like he's not gonna

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>wine when it's he's not going to shoot sixteen under. Yeah,

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>but he can shoot even part you can get two

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 2>under four under six hunderd. Yeah. It's a you know,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>he's a fairways greens machine and this week it didn't

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>work out. It's a you know, he's but he's a

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that could go out on a on a really

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>really windy day at Birkdale and shoot like at sixty

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 2>eight when everybody else shoots seventy five.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what did you uh so, what did you think

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 3>of how it played today? You wish it had been

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 3>like that? You know, you said the fifteenth you'd like

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 3>when the fifteen is a full stroke harder and then

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, generally the course overall it was a lot

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>like is that that's how they wanted to play basically.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean it still wasn't firm, you know, like yeah,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>firm like when guys can hit shots and there's no

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's no penalty for being out of position

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>as much, you know, when the greens are soft, and

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean you see it week to week. It's it's

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 2>one of the sad things about the PGA Tour is

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>like how rarely it plays firm and fast, you know,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it's it's the best defense because then all of a sudden,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 2>when you miss the fairway, you know, it becomes that

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>much harder to hit the green. It makes it, you know,

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>from the fairway even you have to be so dialed in.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean it firm and fast is the way to go.

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 2>And that course was never firm and fast. And you know,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>if that place is firm and fast and it's windy,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a disaster, you know it, it might have gone

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the complete opposite way, where people are like this is

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>out of control hard.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>That's my problem with all the people yesterday saying it

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 3>was too easy, they're like the same people who you

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 3>know today probably said it was boring because you know,

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 3>it was harder and more even par scores, and then

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 3>they'd say it was tricked up and unfair if you know,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the leader was a two over or something.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>There's just kind of people are never happy. I think

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for me, it either has to be I mean, not

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just for me. I'm sure this is pretty obvious, but

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that where it's super exciting like yesterday, where

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>people are making birdies and eagles and all kinds of

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>things that obviously those are incredible to watch and I

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think the days when it is brutally difficult and guys

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are just getting ejected constantly is when it's good to

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>watch it. Today just like felt really stuck in the middle,

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>which I think was a lot of you know, had

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with the course being damper than

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to and them having to kind of you know,

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of front pins to kind of try

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to protect a lot of the holes and stuff. I

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think it just kind of, I don't know, it's kind

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of set up to be set up to be a

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>good day, like in relation to par or whatever, you know,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to to not have another big scoring day, but it

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was also set up to just kind of, you know,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it was set up to kind of be what it was.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of a little flat and not all

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that crazy interesting.

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 3>So you think we're going back. That was the big thing,

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Like Chambers is, you know, never coming here again.

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And there was you know, a.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Speculation that might get one of those whatever like four

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 3>balls or something. Then they didn't get that.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Seems like people think we're gonna get this again. Everyone else.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I hope it does. I mean, I think it was.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I just I wrote an article about this yesterday, but

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 2>like this was the first US Open where being long

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, with the exception of guys like

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Jim Perrick, but like being extremely great off the tee

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a prerequisite. And I think that's so good for

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 2>golf because like you got to see Brian Harmon, Like

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 2>if this is at Oakmont, Brian Harmon is probably fortieth Brooks.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>It would have still won, you know, but you wouldn't

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 2>have had I don't think Xanderschaffle would be up there.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Bill Has certainly wouldn't have been on the leader board.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Shay Revey, I mean stricker future. Yeah. It allowed different

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 2>styles of play and what makes other players great be showcase,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, And I think that that's the cool thing.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Reed hitting twelve greens and shooting sixty five. Yeah,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>his short game was out of control and that wouldn't

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.959
<v Speaker 2>happen if there was you know, eight inch rough around

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the greens.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But like three times yesterday.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the short that short grass, like the short grass

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>around the greens. Really great pictures of the ball, like

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 2>feast on that and guys like Westwood are putting and

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 2>having them roll back down to their feet.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Right, can we just can I kind of bring that

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 3>up for a s. I love how the US opened

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that those chipping areas, the US Open makes these terms

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 3>of art and closely Moaned became a a now like

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 3>hit it to the Closely Moon, like's just like facts

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and these guys just throwing these terms out. It's ridiculous

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 3>the calmarrain and I love it, like only at the

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 3>US opens these like these terms just become you know,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>ubiquitous closely Moans.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you guys think coming back?

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope So I loved it. I mean I thought

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it was awesome. I think anytime you know I'm biased,

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, but anytime you go to the Midwest, I

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think you get awesome crowds of like good golf fans

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and people who are like pretty hungry for these kinds

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of tournaments and support them well and all that kind

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And so I mean, yeah, I was all in.

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they got a little unlucky with

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some poorly timed rain, but other than that, I mean,

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think you can. I don't think you

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>can say anything bad about it. I mean good, good winner, good,

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, good setup, everything was, everything was good.

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 3>I thought, Yeah, I'm totally fine with it going back.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just you get this hostility to new

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 3>venues because there is so much competition and there are

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 3>so many classic courses, even just in the Midwest that

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 3>you want majors going to that are kind of off

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the RODA.

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's is that.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Like you need property to accommodate these and maybe the

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 3>course layout is sometimes secondary to the operations being able

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 3>to set up across the property.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's where it seems like the USJA is kind

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of like is kind of doing a cool thing. I mean,

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if you remember at one of these like

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>really classic courses, you're not into this trend, but you

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>know this this kind of model that they're building now

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>where they're they're kind of building these golf courses specifically

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to host US opens is you know, it's just interesting,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, and like that's kind of what they did

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with Chambers Bay. It feels like, and you know, I

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think it backfired. I still low key think that a

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>US opens is going to go back to Chambers Bay.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Not for a long time, but I think it will

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just because I don't know, I feel like they've got

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>so much skin in the game when they when they

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>develop these venues that way, and I don't know, I'm

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool with it. It's basically them kind of

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>building their building their stadiums around the country. Basically, Yeah,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I uh yeah, I think.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and like, let's let's keep in mind that

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Hills was was up against cog Hill Number four,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>which got a got a restoration, just got just got

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the character just wiped right off its face. And like, frankly,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't even say it's one of the fifty best

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 2>courses in Chicago anymore. So Wow, it's just it's sad

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 2>what happened to that course. So as much as I

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>would have loved like the twenty minute drive from my

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 2>apartment there, it it wouldn't have been as good as

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Hills.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>So there any upcoming Chicago majors. No, No, nothing on

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the raidar.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we've got a We don't have like

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 2>we've got Madonna, which is you know, the PGA thing,

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you know it. I just don't think it really like

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 2>does and get the juices flowing?

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Olympia Fields. The problem is it's south of the city,

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 2>so you don't have like the fan base like you

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 2>where you draw fans for golf tournaments, isn't it from

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the north and the west, So you need it, you know,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to be in one of those two areas. Butler is

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the course that would be the ideal US Open course.

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that place could host it tomorrow. But they

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>are all men, and if if I forgot my shoes,

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 2>my fiance would have to drop them off at the gate.

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 3>So don't think. I don't think that's gonna fly.

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Diana Murphy's going there anytime soon. So

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 2>until they dropped that, I don't think we'll get we'll

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 2>get anything big for a while. I just don't think,

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, frankly, I don't think we have a rate

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 2>of we have great golf courses. We don't have great

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 2>We don't have Shinnacock, we don't have Marion. We we

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 2>just don't have one of those pedigree We don't have Oakmont.

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, Shinnakock should be awesome, though I heard they're

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 2>they're really I heard of their widening faaraways and the

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>trend is real and they've been expanding greens, so we

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 2>should see a lot of what we saw at Aaron

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Hills at Shinnakok, awesome.

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that speaks to the question, is the USGA woke?

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I think that's more Shinnacock's woke, you know, Yeah, yeah,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like the pretty they gotta have

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of carp launch over what happens at a lot

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of these.

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Venues, right Well, they're getting it back to the original design. Yeah, so,

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think it's just the overall trend of

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>classic courses is getting green sizes back, getting fairways back

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 2>to original wits and and it's it's a way out

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 2>or golf. We saw it this week. Just when fairways

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 2>are wide, it lets all types of players play. It's

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>not just who can hit their driver best.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's do a quick overrated, underrated. Let's do it,

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 2>John Rob.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, that's a good one. Brendon, I'll let.

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 3>You go first. I will say underrated. I think the

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 3>backlash is just too too hot this week. So now

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 3>he's gone too he was he was, he was, he

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 3>was catching a little too much trendy hype, and now

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 3>he's back to being underrated because people think he's you know,

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>too hot.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, I think he Yeah, I think he

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>was so underrated that he became overrated, which makes him underrated, right, Yeah.

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I agree, what about it? I mean, I'm in on

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 3>throwing bunker.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Rings, punching signs, love it, love it. I'm I'm I'm

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 2>still in on him. I like we talked about with

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 2>j T. It's it's tough when things start going the

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 2>wrong way. But uh, underrated backlash was high. See who

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 2>kim Oh?

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Underrated?

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Underrated? Just a killer. I watched him last night. I'm

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 3>such a fan. He did a flash, he did he

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 3>did a press conference with no translator. You know, he's

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I love it, I love it. He's just he's just

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a killer. Well, all these other guys are antsy. He's

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 3>just like deadpan, ready to go out and carve it up.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know it said finally, I was watching live

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>from last night and finally, you know, Brandle was like,

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, we might need to look at last year's

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 2>statistics instead of this year's and realize that this guy

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 2>made it to the you know, tour chances. It's like, right,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 2>like when you see a series of withdrawals from tournaments

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and miss cuts, like their serious. Probably something going wrong.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Yeah, I think he's a he's he would

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be a good. I know you guys both love the

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>player A player B. Take the names away comparison, and

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>if you said, you know, you have this twenty one

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>year old kid who has won a players, won another

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>tour events, made it to the Tour Championship, all this stuff.

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean like if he was, you know, named Michael

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Smith instead of Seewoo Kim, I think he would probably

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more popular. Frankly, I mean it's it's

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that like, I don't know what

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>else he can do to like show people how good

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he is here.

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Here's a good question, good follow up on this, Like

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 2>who's got a more impressive career? Him or John Robb?

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, you Wiu. I think I think

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>John Ram is a He's like he has the benefit

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of just us knowing more about him because he went

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to college here and because he played some other tour

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>events before getting his card and all that kind of stuff.

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>He just had a little bit of like built in cachet.

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>But again, kind of the player A player B Like

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right now they see.

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Kim right, he's younger too.

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really I don't know that.

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, John twenty one, Yeah, John Ram's twenty two. Or

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. So yeah, you got it's kind of crazy.

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 2>It's uh you know, so uh I had another one?

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 2>What do I have?

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh? How about Fox?

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Fox?

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Overrated and underrated?

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Ooh underrated, underrated. I think there's just still that stigma

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 3>attached in Chambers. But like you know, people have watched

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the last two years. No, they've improved that. What do

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:04.720
<v Speaker 3>you think, Andy?

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I love how many golf shots they show. I I

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think that is laboring, you know, really yeah, how

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 2>good was that?

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>How good was having Gil hands out there?

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 2>It's good? But here's the thing is like they they

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't let Gil Hants like really go in. You know.

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>That's something that bothered me is they have they have

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>this world class architect up there, and they put who

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>do they put next to him? Some of the time

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 2>they had Darren Clark next to him.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Clark.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like, let this guy like go in like what

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Gil hans for thirty seconds, like he can do stuff,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>but like give him like a real thing and let

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 2>him like he knows what you know, and have somebody

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 2>help him and say like hey these are this is

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.479
<v Speaker 2>this type of player, like explain why they're playing well here,

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, explain why this is doing, like why this

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>is happening, explain like and that is what you know,

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Like you had this guy here and he said some

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 2>insightful things, but he never they never took something to

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 2>the next level where I was like, whoa, like you know,

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 2>like this is like you know, And I think that's

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the thing they're missing out on is that they I

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's they don't have anybody there that

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 2>can like that can coach Gil up to that to

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 2>get to that point and maybe that like there is

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the issue where you could you know, say like let's

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about that, you know, like and he'd once you

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 2>lead him into the right direction, he probably would come

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>up with pure goals. But I feel like he never

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 2>got led into the right spot.

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I think even just having him have a seat at

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the table, so to speak, is like a good step

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction because I think a lot of

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the former players are really good. Johnny comes to mind

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure, as guys who can put you in the

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>moment and like describe what's going on. But a lot

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of them, I mean have a tendency to you know,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Darren Clark was was okay. I don't know that I

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>really heard anything from him that was like went beyond

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of cliche and like, you know, kind of taking

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>up space. But so I think having just having a

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really really really smart non player at the table, I

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's good just for balance.

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess by like one kind of I don't know,

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I hate playing like medium budsmen all the time because

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 3>this stuff's hard. But I guess like what you're saying is,

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I would think there's like too many people at the

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 3>table sometimes, and Grant, when you're on the air for

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 3>more than nine hours, like you can't have I just

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 3>want more of their best people. And I know that's

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 3>hard when you have like a nine plus hour broadcast,

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 3>but like, I don't know, it just seemed like there

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 3>were too many people, like they'd throw it to Holly Saunders,

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 3>who like does like a fifteen second introduction of like

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 3>a Shane O'donahue video essay on like the fields of Wisconsin.

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, just just felt like there's too many people

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 3>do it and not getting enough exposure. You know, you

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 3>want more of the best people.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 2>See. That's that's kind of my point, is like I

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 2>don't think they gave Gil enough time to really to

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:19.399
<v Speaker 2>get let him get what he could have given out,

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Like there is so much he could have This golf

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 2>course was like an architecture in Nirvana for a modern

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 2>architect because like it was you know it it had

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 2>so many little like intricacies and so many little things.

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 2>And in like just talking about like what happened with

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 2>the leader board was you never see this at a

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 2>US Open, and like they'd never let Gil talk about, Hey,

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 2>why did Ricky? Like what did this course do? That

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>made the top three guys? Rory, Jason Day and Dustin

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Johnson missed the cut? That wouldn't have happened at Oakmont?

0:48:56.520 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, why did this happen here? You know? And

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 2>in trying to kick it over and give him something

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.879
<v Speaker 2>where he could say like this is why, right?

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 3>But did you think overrated? Underrated?

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I think underrated. I think a lot

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of I don't disagree with anything that you're saying. I mean,

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's room for improvement, but there's always room

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for improvement.

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I think underrated too.

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that a lot of the stuff

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that they kind of quote unquote messed up is stuff

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really TICKI tech that I don't really care about

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's messing up the name of the girlfriend.

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, I don't care about that, like whatever,

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just do a good job like showing the golf, and

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of they're outside the course stuff,

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I keep bringing it up, but I'm dead serious.

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the Ken Brown brownie point stuff about how the

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>holes are playing was so awesome. I was like made

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the room stop talking when those came up,

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.720
<v Speaker 1>because like you learn so much about like these holes.

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And I tweeted something about it, but like my favorite

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>part about that was just it's such a good indicator

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of like how quote unquote easy it is to like

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>make impactful segments on these broadcasts. And like what they

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did with those things was they went out there with

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>one camera. They took one take. There were no cuts.

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just Ken Brown riffing. And it probably took six

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>minutes to shoot that thing. I mean, he knew what

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he was going to talk about when he got out there.

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But like it's not like it requires a huge graphics

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>package and a huge like you know, a camera crew

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting for three days to get all the b roll

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for these features. Like no, just like take somebody who

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really is passionate and knows exactly what they're talking about

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and has a good personality and can carry a segment

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and just turn them loose and let them go do that.

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what you don't see on the

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>week to week telecasts, at least not nearly often enough.

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the other thing was they didn't

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of the big the big features and

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the big kind of like essays and packages and stuff.

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And I thought a lot of those were you know,

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of times those segments have a

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>tendency to answer questions that like nobody's asking or like

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>care about. And these segments were all, like I thought

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 1>they were all did a great job of like explaining

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>something that you either we're curious about or should be

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>curious about. And like they did a really really good

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:27.879
<v Speaker 1>job with that. And our boy, our boy Bacon did

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 1>well as well. That's always fun to do, always fun

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 1>to see.

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Fun to cool to see him ye up on the

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 3>big screen. Uh yeah, I would just say, you know,

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I know those segments like they have to do some

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 3>tape segments because to break up the live stuff. Sometimes

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 3>they're sold and advertisers thing like that, like yeah, that's

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:47.320
<v Speaker 3>exactly what you should do. And maybe because like it

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 3>appeals to us because we're already in the boat, like

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 3>we're golf nerds. We're watching this. We don't need, like,

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, the emotional essay on whatever else. But like

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 3>him just with a whiteboard and like a basketball or

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 3>with the balls, like showing us the open the grain

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 3>was had me locked in. I was completely locked in.

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 3>And the other times, like when we do those tape

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 3>bits for whatever, a normal PGA tour broadcast, I'm like,

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, wandering off and looking at something on my computer.

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I just don't care. But I was locked in.

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I think it's good. I think

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's only only gonna get better. Yeah, actually I think it.

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It kind of a lot of the stuff, I mean,

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody points out, like the pro tracer stuff, but like

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things that I think, you know,

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the CBS and NBC producers are probably watching that broadcast

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>very very carefully and looking at a lot of these

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>ways that you know, they're incorporating things that that you

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't see in a week to week basis. So hopefully

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of keeps pushing the pushing the ball forward.

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Or pushing the stick higher or lower, whatever the metaphor.

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Is, Hey, last one.

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Par It's the most the most overrated thing there is.

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't matter, like you're, yeah, you're gonna get

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 3>contensus here matter, it's over right, Car's over.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 2>It's so dumb. It really has it. It doesn't matter

0:53:09.880 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 2>at all, Like to me to a certain extent, Johnny's right.

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Johnny's always right. How how much would you

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have paid to have Johnny in azing your seat today?

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Watching JT?

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think what got buried yesterday was him, you know,

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 3>calling at the Milwaukee Open and calling it like an

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 3>easy setup. But those were like the headliners. But what

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 3>got buried was like the other quotes, like the specialness

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 3>of my round is not altered by this. I did

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 3>this in the final round the US Open at Oakmont.

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 3>The specialness he said, the specialness of my round is

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:50.920
<v Speaker 3>completely not impacted.

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>This does not hold up to it, So how could

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you disagree?

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 2>I texted ZB last night and I was like, what,

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 2>uh what is it? Andy? His caddy who caddied for Johnny?

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:06.439
<v Speaker 2>What what does Andy think about this? And he texts

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 2>it back. He goes, Oh, Andy says Johnny's was five

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 2>shots better at least. Oh man, that's great, five shots

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 2>better at least.

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 3>So good.

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That guy, he's great.

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 3>He would have been on there today, like DJ said,

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 3>just roasting.

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. Jas's like I told you the specialness of

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my rout. He can't. You know, it's just different dynamic.

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 2>It's one thing to do it on a Saturday, it's

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 2>another to do it on Sunday.

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Hey, can I throw it at Andy real quick?

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's overrated or underrated? Is it wise

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or crooked? With the misdirection of another Illinois grad actually

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>wearing Badger red in Wisconsin?

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 2>You know I heard that is his daughter place on

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Wisconsin golf team. All right, so all right, some

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 2>some pod listeners inform me.

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's like you're flip flip flopping.

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, it's still very dishonest.

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just good marketing. I think he's just

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>playing to play into the crowd. It's like it's like

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy with like a Lakers sticker on his bumper

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and a Yankee sticker on his bumper. Let's see at

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the John Der Classic what he wears. I've been to

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have a little blue and orange out there.

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:47.359
<v Speaker 2>You can't have it both ways, you can.

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a nuanced position. You're all about nuanced. You know,

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>everything's not black and white. Just broadening his base.

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I think he knows he lives in Madison. He knows

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:04.279
<v Speaker 2>who utters his bread. You know, he knows, he knows that.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, when he hits the Senior Tour, there's gonna

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 2>be some it's gonna be some more local sponsorships. You know.

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. He's got his Champions Tour event

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>next week. They playing it, they play it in uh

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you rich in Champagne, or they play it.

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:24.799
<v Speaker 3>In Madison, MS. Just the Daughter is a good cover

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense.

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Alone. I'm thinking everyone pilot on strigger.

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:30.359
<v Speaker 3>All the time.

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 2>When when.

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Just let the guy be.

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you when when, Uh, how about he's

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 2>surge to beat Jordani Brugie. He almost lost Low, Wisconsin.

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It's true, he won Low Alna predicted.

0:56:52.520 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know if he is an a Lini anymore.

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, all right, yeah, we'll ended on that depressing note.

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, good week, Thanks for all the thanks

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>for the takes. Andy, good stuff, Andy, brilliant stuff. This

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>week on the course. I really really appreciate that.

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I do what I can not. All

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 2>heroes wear capes right.

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Shining light, shining light in the darkness. Ignorant takes well,

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know I didn't.

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.919
<v Speaker 2>I did actually break my rule and talk about how

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 2>far somebody hits it.

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true. So it was a note.

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but then I'm a champ. Yeah. Then I misled

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 2>poor Wrath and I played collar Sean Foley for text.

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true. Yeah, he's a nuanced character.

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey, overrated errated Sean Foley.

0:57:56.040 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I feel like he used to be overrated and

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>now it's cooled so that he might be underrated.

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Now totally the rob thing. He got so rated that

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 3>he became underrated I think.

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I'm gonna go overrated just because Brandle

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and him teamed up to do like some segment together.

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Saw that and it made me cringe it what how

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 2>how did Brandle do that?

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it's pretty weak principle.

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 2>He gave in.

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was shocked when I saw that. It's a

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 3>forthcoming show or something it sounds like. But they they

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 3>used some footage this week. I was I was shocked

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 3>when I saw that.

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That's good to see guys bury the hatchet. Yeah, there

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can be peace in this world.

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, there can. But do you think that was

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 2>because of crookedness?

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's for the next podcast.

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll leave it up in there. We'll let we'll

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 2>let the listeners.

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 1>That's good. But this podcast provides more questions than answers,

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what you want. Yeah, any great art.

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, you guys have a have a great night

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 2>and actually a really exciting week next week at the

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Travelers pump Field.

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, one, two, three.

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You know it might there might be rumors that the

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Travelers is the new US Open.

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:36.919
<v Speaker 1>That's what a lot of people are saying. Yeah, Phil,

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 1>many people are saying that.

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, phil Phyi'll believe that right is either travelable par

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 2>four fifteen.

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You know they were there first. Yeah, that's the one question,

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know we're wrapping up. That's the one question.

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Would Brooks have won? Is there an asterisk on this

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 1>US Open without Phil? Or first major without Phil? Or

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Tiger since nineteen eighty four? You know, again, I don't

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have the answer. I think we're just you know, providing

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more questions and answers let the listeners aside, I.

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Got a great story from the media more.

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Like the more like the listener. I guess an hour

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and five minutes into the podcast, we.

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Said we were going to do this like in thirty minutes.

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 2>So this is a phenomenal story from the media center.

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>This week, I went to say hello to Jay Rigdon,

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>who I'd never met before, and great guy. And right

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>next to him is this guy I forgot his name,

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and he just pipes into our conversation and he goes,

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I talked to Bones today for about fifteen

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.919
<v Speaker 2>to twenty minutes. He says, Phil is going to try

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and come.

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And Sally wasn't even there this week.

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>So I turned I and I, you know, this guy's

1:00:55.200 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>never met me. I turned, I looked at him and

1:00:57.880 --> 1:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I go, you know, you know what, I'm tired of

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about a guy that has zero chance to win

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>this tournament. I turned it back to Jay.

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I kept talking, Wow, savage, Andy, Andy is better than

1:01:15.480 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 3>anyone I know, completely just icing down someone looking for

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a conversation. It's on at the players first hand that

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>he just completely puts a wall up and shoots it

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>down right away. Amazing, amazing, pre eminent talent.

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You must be real. Yeah, you must be really fun

1:01:33.040 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in elevators.

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:38.400
<v Speaker 2>You know. I don't want people to get a wrong impression.

1:01:38.480 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I am very friendly, but you know, I had not.

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want to talk about Phil. I'd already seen

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>eight thousand stories written about the same thing with no updates,

1:01:49.360 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>stories every day about the same exact thing, and I

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>really didn't want to hear about it. Man, So we'll

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:00.439
<v Speaker 2>we'll now land on that note.

1:02:01.120 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Alright, alright, alright guys, thanks, have a good one, yeah,