WEBVTT - The Future of the Bicycle

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, hey man,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>John's was never my scene. I don't like Star Wars.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren, and I'm Joe McCormick and Jonathan.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought today we'd definitely or almost definitely be hearing

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>about how you want to ride your bicycle. But yeah,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>if you followed that lyric long enough, you would have

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>heard about how I went to ride my bicycle on

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's actually from Bicycle Race by Queen. What

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a Way? Yeah, Jones will was never my scene and

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>adult like Star Okay, then I just don't know my

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>stuff at all, and I can't sing like Freddy Mercury song.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I know why I tried. I don't even know what

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>song book. You guys are talking about what Queen arena

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>rock band Queen, I know the band, im my gosh,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So day we're gonna be talking about the future of

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>operatic rock music, and you know, I wish, but we're

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>actually going to talk about something that a listener has requests.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>A couple of listeners have requested, Yeah, I don't say

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish like this isn't a cool topic. I think

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this is okay. This is from our listener Richard, who

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>wrote to us and said, I really enjoy your podcast.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you consider doing a podcast on the bicycle as

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a future form of transportation? I think it would be fascinating.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, how about the electrical assist bicycles becoming more

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>popular with aging population. Well, the cities of the future

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>look more like Amsterdam in Holland with well developed bicycle infrastructure,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>for more like Los Angeles or Atlanta, Georgia, extremes in

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction where the car remains king. Well, thank

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you for that question, Richard. We decided we'd take you

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>up and talk about the future of the bicycle. And

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we can speak to that last point from personal experience,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>because the three of us live in Atlanta, Georgia. Yes,

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's true this city could definitely be more bike friendly. Yeah. Yeah,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some parts of it are getting better. About that the

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of small towns within Atlanta, But lots of places

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I okay, Well, I find driving terrifying around Atlanta, but

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I find the very idea of being on a bicycle

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the same places just completely out of the question.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it seems really scary. There are actually a

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of issues at stake here, and it's one of

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>those things that I hear is actually an issue throughout

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the world, not just in Atlanta. It's one of the

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>things we noticed. But uh, there's the issue of the

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>driving culture in Atlanta, which is definitely king uh if

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's got a lot of sprawl, it's kind of like

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>l A in that sense, and that everything is spread

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>out and it's not easy to get to various areas

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of Atlanta without having a car. Um, the public transportation

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>system is not is not a world class. It's not

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>all bust. It's not what you would kind of like

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. You can get to some places pretty well

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on Marta, but it's sort of in a plus shape.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So anything right along that plus shape is good and

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>then you can you know, on the train, you can

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>take a bus to get somewhere else. But yeah, they're

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely much better public transportation systems around. And also another

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>element um is just the the bicycle culture and how

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>uh not all bicyclists are say, you know, adhering to

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the road. But I mean, so one

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the issues we want to really talk about, though,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is what can we do on the other side, right,

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not just bicyclists need to make sure that they obey

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules, because part of the problem is that the

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>deck is stacked against them here. Yeah, the rules are

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not set up for for them to work. Well, yeah,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's they are trying to fit within an infrastructure that

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was designed for a completely different mode of transportation. So

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to really look at what are ways that

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we could change things. What what's the future of the

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>mode of transportation in places like the United States? How

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>could it be more like other places in the world

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>where we see bicycles being used by growing populations of

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>commuters and uh, and you know what's the How can

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we set ourselves up for success? Is really what we're

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at here. Yeah, so let's look back first to

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the olden bicycles, all right and figure out where these

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>came from. I was actually curious because I didn't know

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>when the bicycle was invented. I was looking it up

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's actually a cool article on Live Science about

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this called who invented the bicycle? And according to them,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a German inventor named Carl Drace or Carl

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>von Dre d r A I s. I guess there'd

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a French pronunciation dre. Well, if it's Vaughn,

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>then it would be Germanic would be dra unless he

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>pronounced it weird. Yeah, so uh, I'll get on the phone.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You keep going, okay, yeah, you go find out. But anyway,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the the idea here is that he probably made the

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>first two wheeled bicycle in eighteen seventeen, and his own

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>term for it was the Louth machine, which is German

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for running machine, which is great. It's a machine that runs,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>except it doesn't run. It uses wheels, and it was

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a modification of an earlier four wheeled human powered vehicle,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think actually predates the bicycle. I think the

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>reason it was called a running machine was not because

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the machine itself ran, but because in order to operate it,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you had to push yourself along the ground with your

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>feet no pedals, right right. It was a little bit

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like a two wheeled flintstones car, yeah, or like a

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like a really big skateboard. It's just you'd straddle this

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>thing and use your feet to push yourself along, or

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like have you seen those balance bikes that kids have today?

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>If you got on the belt line in Atlanta, you'll

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of kids who are out with their

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>parents and they've got their bicycles. And it's a little

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tiny bicycle without pedals on it, and it's short enough

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that the kid's leg can reach the ground while they're

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the seat. It's essentially a modern version of

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here. Yeah, they were also called

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>hobby horses. They were made from wood. The wheels were

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>solid wheel, so it was not the softest ride you

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>can imagine. I read that one. I bet they were

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so comfortable. I read that they used a leather saddle

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>nailed to a wooden frame. Nothing luxury. But my favorite

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>example from that article did they come with a monocle holder?

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they did. My favorite example from the the

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>article there was a there was a list of illustrations

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>dated from the late nineteenth century. Was the auto bicycle

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>auto as an O T T O. And it looked

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like a Victorian woman who had wheels attached to her.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just just like two big wheels and to either

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>side and two smaller wheels in front. So it was

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>just ah for your wheeled Victorian lady the auto bicycle. Um,

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're if you're like whale bone undergarments are

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>strong enough, and I you know, the wheel and axle

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was quickly followed by the bone corsets. So, um, yeah,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it was. It was one of those those

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>illustrations that just I know what it was. It was

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the obviously the platform that she would be sitting on

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or standing against or whatever was obscured by her large

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Victorian dress, but it just made it look like a

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wheeled Victorian lady. Um. So I wondered, what's the difference

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>between a bicycle and a velocity? I will tell you

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that difference. So by the teen sixties, that's when we

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>see the entry of the velocipede. And this was the

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 1>first type of bicycle or or two wheeled human powered

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>vehicle to actually have pedals and a fixed gear system. Uh.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>There's controversy about who was the first person to actually

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>suggest this. A German inventor named Carl Kech claimed he

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was the first to modify a hobby horse by pedals,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>but a French inventor, Pierre la Lament, said that he

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was well, he patented it He was the first one

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to a secure patent in eighteen sixty six, and a

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people immediately got in on it. In fact,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that patent offered any protection whatsoever,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because from what I could tell, everybody immediately started trying

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to make these things. Um. Now, these had steel wheels

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh no suspension, so very bumpy ride if you're

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on one of these things. They were often referred to

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as bone shakers because they were not terribly gentle. Now,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the main difference between that and the modern bicycle two things.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>One is that we don't have solid steel wheels anymore,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or we have the rubber wheels that allow us usually aluminum,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine, Yeah, usually you don't want. You don't

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>want something that's going to make the bike super heavy. Um.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And also we don't have we tend to have some

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of tension absorbing system so that it's not as

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>as rough on us. But to smooth out the ride

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>when we have these velocities come out on the scene,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they would do, the manufacturers would

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>do was make larger and larger front wheels. That's where

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that image comes from. Yeah. Yeah, well also you you

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have to work as hard. Um, it's just one

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>rotation of the pedal in order to push the bicycle

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot further. That's true. Yeah, because you're you're pushing

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>your your rotation of the petals is at the center

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of the wheel, and of course the circumference of the

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>wheels much larger. So one little rotation of the petals

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is one big rotation along the wheels outside. So you

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>do go a lot further for a for a simple

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>crank of the petals. Uh. But it also smoothed out

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the ride significantly. Those were the two big reasons. Apparently

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>young men took to racing them in the streets of Europe.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Um became something of a menace, and really wasn't that practical.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They were the common term for these were the penny

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>fig things. Uh and uh they got so ridiculously big

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and setting that high up is not really conducive to safety. Yeah, no,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's I can't even imagine what it was like getting

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on one of these things. I mean, once you're in motion,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that that some tripical force really helps, that gyroscopic effect

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>really helps you stay upright. But coming to a stop

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>or or getting started, I can't imagine how challenging that

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.719
<v Speaker 1>was without falling over. I mean, this is coming from

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy who hasn't ridden a bicycle since he was

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a kid, and I remember it took me a while

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the hang of that particular part of the

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>riding a bike myself. That's when John Kempt Stanley came along.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the one who created the tension absorbing front wheel

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that allowed actual bicycles the way we consider them today

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to begin to be manufactured. Now, this was still very

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>much in the early days, but a lot of people

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>credit him as the father of the modern bicycle for

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that invention that made it actually possible to have normal

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sized wheels and not a bone shaking experience, and that

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>still wasn't quite gentle at this point. Probably not, I'm

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>sure that that kind of thing, and then probably also

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of like variable gear bikes and things like

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that is what made bicycles as popular as they have

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been in you know, the past century, as we've known

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>them today. Sure, I mean that in the freewheel invention,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that's the invention that allows you to coast where you know,

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you pedal and pedal and pedal, then you just stop

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>peddling and your wheels can keep ongoing. That's different from

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed gear, which we'll talk about a little bit later.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of interesting, but it's really kind of I'd

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>say that was a big advance as well. It was

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that allowed people to use these

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in recreational ways here in the United States, and in fact,

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I would think that here in the US, recreation was

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the largest use of bicycles, not as a vehicle for

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>commuting for most communities. It's not true everywhere. Some cities

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>are very bicycle friendly. Portland, I think it's the law

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that you have to own a bicycle and then talk

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about it at length. That might be based upon my

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>viewing of Portlandia all weekend long. However, how if we

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>were to look at it's popularity worldwide, that's pretty complicated stuff, because,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, there are not a lot of

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>authorities that collect and curate statistics of bicycles. We're gonna

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>come back to this a couple of times in this podcast,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>but there are some inescapable facts. One of those is

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>that bicycles are an incredibly popular means of getting around

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in various parts of the world, like in China, where

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>four thirty million people own bicycles, So you know, it's

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>larger than the entire population of the United States. Four

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty million bicycle owners in China. It's like if everybody

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States owned one point three bicycles. Yeah,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And according to the two thousand ten

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Earth Policy Institute, they had a report that said that

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bicycles are the quote biggest means of individual mobility for

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of Chinese end quote. Not to suggest

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>us that it's the primary method of transportation or mobility

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for all of China, but for hundreds of millions, it

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is the primary one. Uh. Now, going back to that

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>fixed gear, this is the kind of bike that this

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is the first type of bike I had as a kid,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a fixed gear bike, which is the kind where actually

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't technically fixed gear because it didn't have a

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>break stop to it, but you use the you know,

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as you move the pedals, the wheels move, and as

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the wheels move, the pedals moved, so you can't coast.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't just you know, stop pedaling and keep moving. Um.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But it does mean that when you apply pressure to

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the pedals, then it stops the wheels from turning, and

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's how you can break. And in a true fixed

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gear bike or fix ee, you could even pedal backwards

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and have the bike move backwards, although that is not

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>recommended by people by people who want to live, it's

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently very difficult to learn um or at least tricky. Okay,

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but here we are today, and there are very obvious

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>advantages to bicycles. I mean, there's some disadvantages to I mean,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we all know that you can't travel as far as

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly in a bicycle as you can in a car.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh Well, I mean maybe in some condition conditions, depending

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on traffic or something like that, you could, but if

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about moving at high speed, that's sort of

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a setback. You probably can't haul as much cargo or

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as many people and things like that. But on the

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>other hand, there are tons of advantages to bicycles. Uh.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>There are a much greener option than cars. I mean

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much goes without saying. There are zero emission

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in in the everyday use. For furthermore, they're they're very

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>much smaller and more lightweight, so right, you can fit

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more of them on a road, you know, Like they're

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>lower traffic density, So you can get the same number

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of people through a thoroughfare on bicycles much faster than

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you could in cars, just because they're not surrounded by

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge bulk of metal that takes up space. Same

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thing for a storage and parking they take up less

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>space there too. These are all important considerations. They also

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>promote healthfulness, right, that's true fitness activity, Like if you're

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you're traveling back and forth place as well, are you

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be basically passively sitting the whole time or

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be moving getting your heart rate up?

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I lift weights while I'm driving. Now, is that why

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you've had so many accidents? Are you talking workout accidents?

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you talking like car accidents? I'm talking about all

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>those times we heard about when she threw a dumbbell

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>out the window of her car at another driver and

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>road race accidents, um, but accident anyway. So there are

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously lots of advantages to a bicycle based transportation infrastructure.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It just makes for a much nicer place to live

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, and it makes for you know,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a healthier body, greener environment. It's also one one other

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>thing to point out before we move on one. Other

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>consideration is that it's less expensive toning and maintaining a car.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly once you factor in gasoline and insurance

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. Yeah, yeah, I mean huge advantage there.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not even close. And if your bike breaks down,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit cheaper than right. But if you

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>look at most American cities today, they're not really geared

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>towards bikes. Are they geared? That was like a pun

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh I didn't even do that on purpose. I almost

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>pointed out too, I'm so probably Lauren, you got it

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>before I did. They don't really cater to the cyclist

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the way that they cater to motor vehicles. Some

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>places in the world, like the Netherlands, or like probably

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>places in Asia too, are designed to cater particularly two cyclists.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They've got infrastructure designed that protects cyclists and encourages people

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to ride bicycles. Other places not so much, like the

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>places Richard pointed out, maybe Los Angeles or Atlanta, even

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're getting better than they used to be, they're

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the Netherlands. So I was wondering how it

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>got like this, and I found an interesting story that

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was in a November article for Wired, written by the

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>writer Adam Man, and he made an interesting point about

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>how roads in the United States are engineered and how

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this affects the kind of traffic they cater to. So

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Man claims that in America, a bunch of social and

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>economic trends after World War Two, like and he gives

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the examples of suburban planning, interstate highway development, and movement

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the middle class out of cities, caused cities to

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>change the way they designed roads, specifically changing them to

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be more focused on accommodating cars and trucks. And now

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, most states use a standard for

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>evaluating roads that's called level of service, which essentially means

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>how many cars can I cram through this intersection in

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a given period of time. Now that's good if you're

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a driver, I guess, because it means you and less

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>time clogged up in traffic trying to get where you're going.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>But obviously, relying mostly or entirely on a metric like

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this is going to come at the expense of other considerations,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like how the road serves foot traffic or cyclists or

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>public transportation. And Man points out that optimizing roads to

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>make auto travel easier creates a situation known in economics

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>as induced demand. So as we constantly work on making

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>roads easier and easier to drive, it simply encourages more

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>people to drive cars because it's easy to do so,

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and that creates a positive feedback loop that requires us

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to optimize roads for even more cars because more people

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>are driving them. Yeah, here in Atlanta, you know, we'll

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably be referring to our city quite a bit

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>in this because we've seen this in the city. You know,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen uh, big projects where you're you're looking at

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>budgets for transportation and a lot of it gets earmarked

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for things like widening roads or highways. Highways and particular

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta highway system is ridiculous, but uh, you know

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's what you really need, these twelve lanes and

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>uh and also the things that each driver needs about

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>four lanes to themselves, right, you know, because because you know,

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it's important that you be at least five lanes over

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>from your exit when you realize you need to get

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all the way across and then you've got to cut

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>across all those other lanes. So uh, yeah, that's ridiculous

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously there are plenty of studies that show that

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you add more capacity to roads, that capacity gets filled.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't it doesn't alleviate traffic. It just means that

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you have more cars in that same space demands. Yeah,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>so it's you know, we we've seen this many times

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>here in our city. Um, and the important thing to

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>remember is that there are alternatives. Right. We've actually seen

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>other cities kind of incorporate new strategies that have had

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>measurable and quantifiable results, and not just improvements for for cyclists, right, No, No,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>these improved months for cyclists. I would argue our improvements

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. So I want to look at one No, really,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at one particular example. And I

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>say this as somebody who's not a cyclist. I mean

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I could be interested in becoming a cyclist, but I don't.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not personally staked in this right now, me neither.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually I don't even own a bike. I own a

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>bike helmet. I'm not sure. Well I don't bike, but

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>no helmet. So yes, we have one person who can

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>legally ride a bicycle in our city. Well, I own

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a unicycle. So you you, Maverick, But you were about

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, I'm just kidding. I don't own a unicycle,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but I do have some facts about what's been going

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on in New York City. So a big thing that

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be crucial in the development

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of bike friendly cities in the future is the addition

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of protected bike lanes. So you've been out driving before,

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>while not you, John, but you've probably been out riding

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>once or twice, and even in road A lot of

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.239
<v Speaker 1>roads around here don't have bike lanes at all, right,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them that do have bike lanes essentially

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have what what I would look at and say, that's

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>just insulting because it's just like a you know, foot

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>wide stripe that's sort of painted along the edge of

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the road in the rightmost lane that's kind of partially

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in the gutter sometimes and and may or may not involve,

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting your elbows lopped off by someone going

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>even the normal speed for that roadway A lot of

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>times to riding over storm drains like like it doesn't

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>even clear the storm drains sometimes A lot of times

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, it doesn't look any different than if there

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>were just a cyclist riding as far as he or

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>she could to the right in the right lane, so

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that I don't really see another lane. That line is

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a force field that protects the bicyclist from any cars

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that could end up swerving into that traffic. Right, that's no,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but there could be such a force field, not so

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>much a force field, but maybe say in physical matter.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand seven, the City of New York

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>started adding protected bike lanes on some roads. And contrasted

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to the type of lanes we were just talking about,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>these are lanes for bikes that are set apart from

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>motor traffic by barriers or parking spaces, like parallel parking

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>spaces between the bike lane and the driving lanes, painted buffers,

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>street lamps, planners, and trees, and other non driving zones

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>like it might be just a raised curb, almost like

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a median, but just a very thin one that separates

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the bike lane from the car lane, right. And so

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they started in two thousand and seven. Now they've got

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty miles of these things in the city,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and in September, the New York City Department of Transportation

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>released to presentation showing some of the results, and one

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>important finding is that these protected lanes definitely did cut

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>down on legions with injuries, and encouraged more people to

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bike on the road. So that's two improvements right there.

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Just to give a couple of examples, on a stretch

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of ninth Avenue in New York between sixte Street and

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty third Street, they eliminated one traffic lane and added

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a protected bike lane offset by a parking lane and

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a buffer area with some trees in it, which you know,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of nice anyway. Tree In this stretch of road,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Crashes with injuries were reduced by fort and bike traffic

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>volume increased by sixty simultaneously. That's awesome. That is incredible

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know you're talking about you know, you have

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more bodies involved here and yet fewer actual incidents.

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>That Yeah, that's that's a really great story. Yeah. Just

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>one more example on Columbus Avenue, and this was between

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>street and street. They didn't eliminate any traffic lanes. They

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just narrowed the ones that already exist. Did They added

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a protected bike lane again, it was offset by a

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>parking lane and some some planners with trees in them.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Crashes and injuries fell by and bicycle volume increased by

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and they had stats like this in the presentation for

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different stretches of road. I just wanted

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to give a couple examples. Now, hang on, Joe, if

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were to go and say, remove a lane

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like in that first example, you gave, sure bike traffic increases,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, a few people managed to get there successfully

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>without being hit because of that. But doesn't that end

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>up really impacting the car traffic. I mean, if I'm

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>a motorist, aren't I gonna be totally cheesed off. You

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>might be cheesed off, but you wouldn't have justification for it, because,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, it actually had a positive impact

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>on the flow of auto traffic. Uh So, in many

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of these roads, the travel time was unchanged, and it

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like in a lot of cases the protected bike

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>lanes actually read deuced travel time on that section of road.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see any speculation as to why exactly this was.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't imagine at least some of those people would

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have been in vehicles that would have increased the traffic,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and instead we're in bikes, which removed them from those lanes,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and therefore that that would that would at least partially

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>offset it. Yeah, that brings up the volume thing we

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before. If you can get some of

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the people traveling this this route from cars, two bicycles

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>more can go on the same stretcher road without congestion.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the numbers were For example, on eighth Avenue

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York, travel times were reduced by an average

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of four by adding the protected bike lane, which is crazy.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like making your city more bike

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>friendly in this aspect is a total win win. Well,

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>what about what about a situation where I mean, okay,

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>so so you've got all of this extra space between

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the road and the the retail shops they're lining the street.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>How do how do businesses feel about this? Awesome? Actually,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and this is the next win. So actually it's a

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>win win win. So the New York City protected bike

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>lanes helped confirm something that actually already been observed in

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the past. This wasn't new to this research, but bike

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>lanes boost business. Stores and restaurants that are along roads

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that have bike lanes and bike traffic receive more customers

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and make more money. Just one example, again, we're looking

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at ninth Avenue here, so this is West twenty three

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>West thirty first Street in New York between before they

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>added the bike lanes and then the two year mark

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>after they added them, the area of shops on this

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>street section saw a forty seven percent increase in combined sales.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And Okay, so that might just mean, well, maybe the

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>city is having a strong year economically. So they compared

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it to two other sites that were similar but without

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the protected bike lanes, and those sites only saw a

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>forty three percent and twenty three percent improvement in the

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>same time period. So there's a lot of evidence to

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>indicate that encouraging bike traffic. I think the same is true.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Foot traffic in front of retail areas is good for

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the local economy. More people our patrons of your businesses

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>when they're passing in front of it on bicycle and

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on foot. So this is actually key in my opinion,

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you can get business owners pressuring local politicians

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to make these kinds of changes on the promise of

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>attracting wealth and indirectly increasing revenue, you have a much

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>better chance of actually seeing cities change. Yeah, that's one

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you have to make I mean,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just true with politics you have to make

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a good business case for for what you want, you know,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the change you want to see enacted. And sometimes that

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>might be in some in some areas, like in Portland,

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that might be the environmental impact where you can make

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of argument, and that's going to to work

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in that community. Other places like Atlanta, you you know,

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you might have to find a few other things to

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>convince people to put in a bike lane for once.

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's such a good case that. I mean,

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>based on everything I've read, I couldn't find what the

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>drawback was except I mean, I guess you have initial

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>construction costs and the inconvenience on the road while you're

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>while you're making these changes, and so yeah, there is

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that drawback. But as far as I can tell, once

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you've actually made these changes, it's a win win win.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>It's good for everybody, and everybody seems to like it.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>This is also just a way to make your streets nicer.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you imagine what it actually looks like on

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the street when there's a sidewalk and then a bike

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lane and then a buffer area between the bike lane

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and the traffic, there is much more of a sort

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of peaceful sidewalk atmosphere, you're not right up against cars

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that are knocking you over with wind as they pass

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>three ft beside you at fort or you're also you're

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not encountering bicyclists who are riding on the sidewalk because

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the road is way too freaking scary. Right. So, these

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>protected bike lanes, I think really are the future of

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>American city infrastructure. If we want to encourage people to

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ride bikes, we need these protected bike lanes, not just

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because they make it safer and do all this other stuff,

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but because they encourage more people to ride bikes by

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>making biking less stressful. Right, So, let's talk about some

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the improvements that we could see in this because

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>even in the one the examples you were siting in

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>New York, Uh, those bike lanes, while a huge improvement

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>over the sort of things that we see in other cities,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>there still are some proposals to make them even more

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>safe in the future, right right, Well, because having protected

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bike lanes doesn't solve all the problems, it definitely makes

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>biking safer and less stressful while you're sort of moving

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>along the link of a surface street. But what happens

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>when you get to an intersection right, especially if you

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have to make say a left turn something if you're

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a if you're a cyclist, I think a lot of

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the fear is coming from a right turn because a

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>car turning right might not see you right and it's

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to cut right. But if you are making a

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>left turn as a cyclist, you're cutting across the two lane,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the lane of traffic that's immediately to your left, plus

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>any oncoming traffic that's coming the other way. Yeah, So

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's either way. You have to worry about

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>motorists turning right. If you're turning left, you have to

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about everybody on the road. It's it's it's you know,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>intersections are tough, right, And so this is where the

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of the protected intersection comes up. I I was

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>reading about this earlier and I thought that this was

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>just great and really beautiful. So it's inspired by the

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>design of intersections. Again in the Netherlands, a very bike

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>friendly country. A Portland based urban planner named Nick Falbo

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>came up with this design called the protected intersect, and

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and it could be used in American cities. And there's

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>really nothing all that fancy or high tech about it.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of some smart design. That's pretty much

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all it is. What are the what are the integral

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>elements here? Okay, So imagine your standard traffic intersection where

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there are rectangular streets coming up to it. They each end,

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, four corners, and then there's an intersection box

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. That's where the crosswalks are. Yeah, and

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the crosswalks are right at the edges of the box.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of the old way. This has several different things.

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>First of all, what you're going to have to imagine

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are these things that he calls corner refuge islands. So

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine the box again. So at every corner of the box,

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine there is centered on that corner, another smaller box

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that includes this island he's talking about in the corner

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the box that extends into the big intersection box

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>following me at all, it's it's sort of like a

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>little bubble if you can imagine like like kind of

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like a little bubble coming off of the sidewalk area

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further out into the intersection. That's kind

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of what it looks like. Yeah, that's a good way

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. Even at each corner. Wherever you'd be turning,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a bubble of sidewalk and protected area that extends

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>into the intersection right, so that the bike lane, the

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>protected bike lane that you are in. So when you're

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're writing and it's immediately to your left, that's

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>separating you from the cars. It actually extends into the

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>intersection just a touch, so that when you make your

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>right turn, uh yeah, but you can go straight there's

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>an opening, but if you make a right turn, you're

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>never exposed to vehicle traffic. Yeah, So any car making

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a right turn there or coming the other way, it's

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have to turn around the outside of this

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>island curb area that's between you and it constantly. So

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one protection. The next one is is the forward

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>stop bar for cyclists. This is simply the idea that

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the place where cyclists to stop at the intersection and

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>wait on the traffic light is much further ahead than

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>where the cars have to stop like a yeah, And

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so this ensures that cars see where cyclists are right

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not and they're not in the blind spot, they're

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.239
<v Speaker 1>not immediately off to the right where you know, they

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>may not notice because they're looking the motorists is looking ahead,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>not directly to the right, that sort of thing. Right,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The next thing is set back bike in pedestrian crossing.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So this just means that instead of the crosswalks being

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>right at the edges of the intersection, they're set a

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit back from the intersection. And this has several advantages.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>One of them is just that let's say you are

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>going through a crosswalk and somebody is turning right into

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the crosswalk while you're going, Well, they're not going to

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be just turning into you blindly, because the crosswalk is

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>set back far enough that they will be facing you directly.

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>By the time they get to it's right, they will

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have already completed the turn and be moving straight again,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>so they have to consciously make the decision to run

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you down. Right. Yes, the next would be and this

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is the last one, bicycle friendly signal phasing. And this

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is just how you control the stop lights there, having

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>separate lights for bicycle traffic and for auto traffic, and

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and also controlling the phases of them separately. This is

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how some intersections have a a walk

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>phase for pedestrians, that is that allows people to start

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>crossing before the traffic for cars changes, so it'll hold

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone like a four way stop, it will hold everyone

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>has stop while the pedestrians are able to cross. I've

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>seen that in a couple of different intersections. Most of

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>them are not that way, but if you are, yeah,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you get a chance, I really recommend looking

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>this up. I think it looks really cool. You can

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>check it out at Protected Intersection dot com. I think

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a smart idea that the creator did admit. There's

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>basically one major drawback to it, UM, and that's that

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>because of this bubble formation, that's a terriff protected area

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for both pedestrians and cyclists to hang out in. UM,

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're you're modifying the way that cars are going to

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have to turn in the intersection is going to be

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a much sharper turn, and so you know, like a

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like a two seater isn't going to have that much trouble,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but a large truck might, which might mean, UM that

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to either change the way that trucks are

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>built or or change the way that cities allow trucks

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to drive around in them. Right, you'd either change the

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>truck's route where it's going, or you might change I

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know how good truck drivers are at what they do,

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>but just what sizes of trucks are are built and

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>us so, I mean you could see this easily becoming

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Let's say that you you are moving from

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one part of the city to another and you rent

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a trailer to to haul your stuff. I mean that

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.479
<v Speaker 1>would alone would make it very differ Like what about

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a school bus. Those things can't turn for anything, right,

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So then I guess, yeah, there's a question. It's well,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>does the inconveniencing of large trailer trucks, uh, you know,

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>does that offset the benefit provided by this kind of system.

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it seems like a really good

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>idea to me. Yeah. I'm not a civil engineers, as

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>someone again as someone expert, as someone who's a pedestrian

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and and soon to be cyclists, uh, you know, these

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of things really appeal to me. I mean, anything

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that increases the safety of folks in general, and at

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time is promoting a healthier lifestyle and more

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>green method of getting around, reducing traffic. I mean, all

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of these are are definitely incentives to look into stuff

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like this. On top of everything we've said, I think

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's one more piece of news we came across that

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it look actually looks good for bikes in cities. Yeah,

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this would be going back to that level of service

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>you're referring to earlier. Right, that was the idea that

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>roads are measured in performance by how many cars they

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>can get through them in a given period of time.

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And generally speaking, civil engineers don't didn't like to see

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that number go down for any reason, right, They didn't

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>want to see it become less efficient. And in some states,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like in California, this ended up becoming a matter of policy,

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>where as a rule, the city of Los Angeles, for example,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't consider any kind of proposal to any sort of

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>transportation project if it meant negatively impacting the level of

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 1>service of the intersections nearby. And that would mean that

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps there'd be some projects that in the long run

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>would be incredibly beneficial, but in the short run might

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have a negative impact on a particular intersection for you know,

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>however long it's going to take for the project to complete,

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and those projects would not even be considered, despite the

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>fact that there might be a real benefit in the

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>long run. But recently, the state of California decided that

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>level of service would no longer be the guideline for

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>makeing these kind of decisions. That, yeah, that there they

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can make changes now that in the short term might

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>make life a little more complicated for folks who have

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to navigate through that intersection, but in the long term

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>could stand to benefit people in immeasurable ways. Right, you

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can have a longer view of the improvement of your

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>traffic infrastructure right now. First of all, one of the

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting things and this is one of those. It almost

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems really informal to me, like there are a

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of informal news reports about how millennials are giving

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>up the car. They're not interested in owning cars, They're

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not interested in having that automobile. That's not how they

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>define independence, by Gali, The way they define independence is

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they can access the world's knowledge using

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a device in the palm of their hand. Whereas I think, well,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's also because of crippling student debt and the

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>inability to afford a car and maintain a car. But yeah,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's tight genes. It gives them idea exactly. There are

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of factors that go into whether or not

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>people of the in the millennial's age range, which is

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>late teens to mid twenties. UM, why why there seems

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a larger population of them who are not

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>getting cars, not owning cars, buying cars. What are the

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>actual numbers on that. I don't have numbers for you, Joe,

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I do. Oh that's good. Uh so. So basically, according

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to research that was done by the p I r

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>G Educational Fund and the Frontier Group, which it should

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be said, are like pro green kind of entities. That

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>being said, though, UM, they found that Americans in general

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>drove less from two thousand one to two thousand nine UM.

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the population increased by ten percent and driving simultaneously

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>decreased by one percent. And that's the first decrease that

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in recent decades, like basically going back to

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties. However, people ages sixteen to thirty during

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that decade drove the least uh twenty of percent less

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>than that same age group did in the nineteen nineties. UM.

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And as of eleven, they found that only six of

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Americans ages sixteen to twenty four even had driver's license UM,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the lower percent lowest percentage in the past

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. Now, you can also look at that decade

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and see another trend, which is at fuel prices were

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>increasing fairly steadily. So it's one of those things where again,

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>uh the the factors that determined why people were doing this,

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>why this this particular generation was doing this, are varied.

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Some may very well be making it as a lifestyle choice.

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They want to live close to where they work, close

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to where they play, and all of that means that

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a need for a car. That could

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. But some of them may be

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it because they are environmentally conscious and they want

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to be very eco friendly. Some may be doing it

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>simply because it's the financially viable means for them to

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>get to where they need to go. Um Boiling this

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>down to a simple answer is I think a mistake,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 1>because life is never that simple, especially when it gets

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to something about why humans do something in a particular way.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's always complicated. But there are a lot of uh

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>these a lot of these factors are all coming to

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>play at the same time, and we are seeing this

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of shift at least right now now. Granted as

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this, gas prices are are significantly lower than

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they had been for quite some time. So it could

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be that we see a reversal in this trend. It

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that has nothing to do with the generation at all,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and that this ends up just being a little blip

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in the long term uh history of the United States

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans in their cars, because we do have a very

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>car centric um culture in many parts of the United States.

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, it's just something to keep in mind. And

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the one other thing to keep in mind is that

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about millennials and this adoption of bikes,

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is that we're largely talking about the United States. That's

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as not. Trends are different, probably quite different. Yeah,

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And in China and India, a lot more younger people

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are interested in buying cars, and there are a lot

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>more people in those countries than there are in the

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>United States. So globally, the story is not that young

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>people are are issuing automobiles and and we're not going

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to see cars except for long distance travel in the

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>near future, or it's all going to be cars sharing

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and no one's going to own a car. That's not

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to be true across the world. Okay, Well,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so We've talked about how the cities of the future

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>might change to become more bike friendly and why that

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of seems at least to be hopeful likely to happen,

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and possible trends in how people are feeling about cars

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and bicycles. But what about the bicycles themselves? Right? Could

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the bicycle as a machine actually change in the future

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or is that pretty much gonna stay exactly how it's

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>always been. It's it's a pretty simple machine, right, I mean,

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty effective the way that it is. What what

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>could we do to improve it? Well? Uh, rockets? Yeah, yeah,

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's good. I like where you're going. Okay, that's good,

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that's good. What what if what if we double the

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>number of wheels on a bicycle, put it in a frame,

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cover that frame and metal sheeting, put a motor in it,

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and run it on fossil fuel, right, so you don't

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have to pedal, you don't get wet when it rains. Yeah,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna catch on. It was certainly has

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I you know, we can just look at the window

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and see. Uh. Now, there are actually lots of different

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ways that bicycles could evolve, and many of them are

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the mind of the millennial. I mean,

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the idea of having this connected device. It's just

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that now it's also a device you ride on, not

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the stuff that you're carrying on your person.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 1>But some of the more simple improvements are ones we've

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last couple of decades, such as electric bicycles,

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.399
<v Speaker 1>which is not a new idea. Is that different than

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.760
<v Speaker 1>an electric motorcycle. Yes, an electric motorcycle does not require

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 1>any sort of pedaling at all. In fact, there's usually

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>no sent no actual pedals, whereasn electric bicycle can at

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>least be switched to manual pedaling if you want it.

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are two different ones. But we're seeing not

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just electric bicycles, but electric assist bicycles. By these are

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>bikes that have an electric motor that help kick in

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and give you a little extra boost so that you

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have to exert yourself quite as hard on difficult terrain,

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, or a really tall hill, which I think

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would make people who live in San Francisco extremely happy. Um, Now,

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like I said, they're not new. There are patents that

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>actually date from the late nineteenth century, so that's the

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>same century that we saw the bicycle itself be invented

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>by That was at the beginning, but towards the end

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we started seeing patents being filed for battery operated bicycles. However,

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that being said, as far as I could tell, there

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like a lot of production for electric bicycles early on.

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of patents, but that doesn't necessarily

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>mean people made the stuff that they came up with, right. Um. However,

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look in the mid twentieth century, you start

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of those designs actually work their way into production. Um.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But then it was even just a tiny niche of

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the overall bicycle market, right It wasn't like it was

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the common element. I mean, I never had a bike

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>that had any kind of electronic assist to it. I

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>had just regular old, you know, human powered bicycles. But

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see the market grow rapidly today, particularly

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in regions such as Europe and Asia, but we're also

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing it start to grow in the United States. We're

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of interesting innovation in that spot. So

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the pedal assist versions. You have a motor that kicks

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in once you hit a certain threshold and it ends

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>up taking over of the work so that you know

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you're still doing In most cases, you're still doing some

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>work as you're peddling, but the motor is taking over

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>any uh any excess so that you don't have to

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pedal extra hard in order to get over that hill

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Some other ones that like a true electronic

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>bicycle where the motor can provide full propulsion, might have

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>throttle control, so it would essentially be like you know,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a pedal or more likely something that's in the handlebars

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to control the throttle and write it

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>more like it was an electronic motorcycle, and then you

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>can switch to manual by easing off the throttle and

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to pedal. Uh. And there are a lot of

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:45.280
<v Speaker 1>really cool products that allow you to turn existing regular

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>old bicycles into e bikes, although not all of them

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are are actually available on the market, but they're you know,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>coming out soon, like the the fly Clie smart wheel

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and the Copenhagen Wheel. Have you heard about these? Both

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of these are super cool. Copenhagen wheel was developed I

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think by M I. T. And uh fly Client was developed.

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to say it was Eastern European company that

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>made that, but both of these are similar concepts. They

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are replacement wheel for the rear rear wheel of your bicycle.

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So you would, you know, dismantle your bike, take the

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>rear bike wheel off, put this wheel in its place.

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get a little greasy, Yeah, you gotta get

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a little greasy, and then you replace the drive system,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>which I'm imagining would for most of these bikes is

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be a chain driven bike. There are other

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>types of drive trains for bicycles, but chain is one

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of the most popular in common. Uh. And there's the

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>fly wheel. It stuff as motorized. It's inside the hub

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the bicycle wheel, so it looks like a regular

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>wheel on the circumference. There's spokes that lead in, but

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>then the hub is much larger, like dinner plate sized

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a little round circle the very center

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and that flywheel is what kicks in and gives you

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the pedal assist. Uh And uh, you know, it's depending

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 1>upon which version you have, you have different options. Like

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the fly cli has a Bluetooth connection that connects to

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>your smartphone. That and that you can set what your

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>top speed limit is going to be. Because these things

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>can let you go pretty fast, like in excess of

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty miles per hour on a bicycle. Um, but you

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can set that that speed in your app and say,

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't let me do that. That would be dumb

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of me. I don't and I don't trust me, so

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you make sure I don't do that. But there are

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other ones, like I know, the Copenhagen wheel in particular,

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to allow you to set a specific threshold

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for physical exertion and say this is how hard I

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.439
<v Speaker 1>want to pedal, and anytime you encounter terrain that would

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>require you to pedal harder than that, it automatically kicks

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 1>in so that you are constantly peddling at the same

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>physical exertion from beginning of ride to the end, no

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>matter what kind of stuff you encounter. So even if

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you hit a really steep hill, you're okay. I love

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that idea because Atlanta does have quite a few hills,

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and I have a feeling I'm going to need all

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the help I can get. Um. But these are just,

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of concepts of stuff that allow you

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to convert your existing bike into that. And I don't

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think the Copenhagens available yet. But the fly Cli had

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a Kickstarter and I think for five fifty bucks you

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>could get one of those wheels. So it's almost it's like,

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>depending on what kind of bike you get, it's about

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the price of a bike. So you're just you're doubling

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the price of your of your bicycle at that point. Um.

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.479
<v Speaker 1>And of course that's just like a middle run, uh,

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan style bike. They can get pretty expensive if you're

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>very serious about this stuff. Then there's the bike of

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the future the future. Yeah, it's called the Denny. So

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>that sounds of futuristic. Well there were there was no

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I did read about this one, and it does sound cool. Yeah.

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This this was part of a design competition. There was

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a design competition. It began way back in like twenty eleven,

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, and there were a bunch of different groups

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that were all interested in designing what would be the

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bicycle of the city of the future, Like what what

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would be the elements that you would want to include.

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And some of the bikes were I mean, all of

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>them are really cool ideas. All the ones that made

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it to the finals and then were voted upon, uh,

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're all nifty And some of them had things like

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>GPS sensors so that if someone took your bike, you

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 1>could totally find out where your bike was. Uh. Some

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of them had uh you know, very lightweight materials that

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were printed in by a three D printer, so like

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of neat stuff. But the Denny was kind of

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an e bike on steroids. So it had a motorized

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>front wheel, not the rear wheel like the Copenhagen or

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the fly Client, but same sort of concept. Pedal assists

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that could kick in and help you out. Uh. Had

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a had an automatic shifter to control the gears that

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was puterized, so you never had to worry about shifting gears.

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted full manual control, it would shift gears

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>automatically to give you the best experience for whatever, you know,

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:11.919
<v Speaker 1>situation you happen to be in. Uh. It cuts down

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on splash back if you're running riding your bike and

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you're hitting puddles or it's raining. Um. Instead of having

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a fender, which is why most bikes that are designed

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of travel that's the way they handle it,

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it actually had a little, uh little thing that stuck

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>out behind the rear wheel with bristles to break up

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the water droplets. As they get kicked up. So yeah,

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, you don't have this big fender covering your

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.760
<v Speaker 1>back wheel, just this these little bristles that it's almost

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like a little broom that breaks up the water. And

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently it's really effective. Smart. Yeah. Uh, I'm really curious

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to see how many times I show up to the

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>office with like a a streak of road grit down

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:54.240
<v Speaker 1>my spine from riding the bike and and and weather

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that was not so great. Um, I'm hoping it's not frequently.

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It also had handlebars that could come apart, detached from

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the bicycle and act as a bike lock, So not

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>only are you locking your bike, but you've removed the handlebars.

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So it makes makes anyone stealing the bike less likely

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to do so because it's now they can't steer it. Um.

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was kind of interesting. So it was the

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:23.879
<v Speaker 1>one that actually won this design competition. There was some

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>coverage on it in in mid two thousand and fourteen,

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, I haven't seen it's supposed to go into

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>production because the winner of the competition was supposed to

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>get like a a production of these. Don't know how

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>many are going to be made, and I don't know

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how expensive it's gonna be. I have a feeling it

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>will probably be outside of my price range for a bicycle.

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It would be hard for me to justify that expense

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to my wife, like, you have a bike, Uh, it

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>works well, but it's not like you're getting a car.

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Well, if I did get a car, she'd say, now,

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this was a colossal waste of money. Don't have a license.

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 1>What were you thinking? You know, speaking of not driving cars,

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I had one more thought about how the future of

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bike friendly cities could look even better than it does

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so far, and that's autonomous vehicles. Yeah. I think self

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:23.959
<v Speaker 1>driving cars as they enter the market, On one hand,

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>they will be a very tempting technology to take advantage of.

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So well, I mean, yeah, of course I want to

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ride in a self driving car. I can do whatever

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I want while I'm riding. I don't have to worry

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about all that my nails or right. But it's also,

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about many times on here, I think

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we're all three pretty convinced that self driving cars are

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be massively, massively safer than human drivers. The

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Google cars alone have been on the

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:55.319
<v Speaker 1>roads for more than a year and only have been

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 1>involved in two accidents, both of which were driver fault,

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>not human fault. Yeah. Yeah, that tells me that this

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>is this is a good pathway, and I think they're

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>only getting better. Yeah, I think. And also, I mean

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>almost all accidents are caused by humans human fault. Sure,

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 1>they're there are things that could have been avoided if

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people had been better drivers. Sure, and the cars that

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are driving themselves are better drivers than you are. This

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is yet one more factory that I think is going

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to increase the safety of cyclists on the road and

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just generally decrease the stress I imagine. Yeah, cars can

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>be way more aware of what's going on around them

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>than a driver can. I mean, just human limitation. Right,

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even saying that there are people out there

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>who are terrible drivers. The best driver in the world

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot have three D and sixty degree awareness of his

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or her surroundings like an autonomous car with the right

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sensors could. Sure. Sure, And I mean, you know, as

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people get more used to see eeing bikes on the road,

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that that drivers are going to be more

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cautious about it, um more used to it and incorporating

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these infrastructure changes would would definitely help and

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting bikes out to a place where a

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 1>car can see them before they make a turn or

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Um. And and giving the bikes a

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>safe lane in which to ride, which is not you know,

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at the at the car's elbow, um, because cars have

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>elbows now it is the future. Well um. And also

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on that same on that same pathway, uh, making the

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:36.399
<v Speaker 1>roads safer for bicyclists and and allowing for these kind

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of things and keeping them outside of the lanes for cars. Uh,

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ends up being less stressful for the motorists in general

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're no longer trying to you know, they're no

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>longer complaining about that guy who's weaving through the traffic

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lanes because they're on a bicycle so they're going right

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>between two line lanes of cars or there, or it's

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>someone who is running through a a stop sign or

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a red because now we've got an infrastructure where, because

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the support being there, bicyclists don't there's there's not any

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 1>incentive for them to break rules, right right. But but hypothetically,

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, as as good as this could be, yeah,

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that automated cars could could do a much

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>better job of it just by virtue of what they are. Yeah,

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel really good about the future of bicycles. Actually,

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what I thought before I started researching

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for this episode, but the more I've read, the more

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, Yeah, I think the future for bikes

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in cities is very strong. Yeah. Yeah, So thank you

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for writing to us, Richard. This is a

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really fun topic to dive into. And if any of

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you out there have a similarly fun topic that you

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>would love us to tackle something that's future oriented, and

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you should get in touch with us too and let

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think and we'll be, you know,

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot more of these kind of episodes in

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. So to get in touch with us, you

0:56:57.200 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can rise an email that addresses f Winking at how

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com, or you can always drop us

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a line on Facebook, Twitter, or Google Plus. At Twitter

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and Google Plus, we are f w Thinking. Just search

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>fw Thinking and Facebook will pop right up. Leave us

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a message and we will taunto you again release soon.

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic in the future of technology,

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>visit forward Thinking dot com. H brought to you by Toyota.

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places