WEBVTT - Bitcoin Policy Expert: These New Laws Change Bitcoin’s Future Forever | Dennis Porter

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Did the US government just guarantee to keep bitcoin legal? Well,

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the main things I hear from people that

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in bitcoin is that the government's just going

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to make it illegal. But things that just happen might

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>actually tell you the opposites, which is why I am

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>about to have on Dennis Porter. Dennis Porter is the

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>co founder and chairman of Satoshi Action Fund. It's a

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit educational organization dedicated to informing policy makers and regulators

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in DC and around the country about bitcoin, about bitcoin mining,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the benefits, how it can be used as a tool

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to support other public policy goals, and so much more.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know what's going on with politics

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and what bills just got passed and potentially President Biden

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>might try to veto overturn, then you want to hear

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. This is going to be an enlightening conversation

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>with someone who is in the trenches working with policy

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>makers lawmakers every day. Let's go ahead, just jump right

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>into the interview with Dennis Porter. All Right, Dennis Porter

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and co founder of the Satoshi Action Fund,

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>President and founder of Satoshi Action Education for Bitcoin advocacy.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Dennis is regularly testifying in support of bitcoin and digital

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>asset policy, developing.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Really key, innovative.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>First of its kind of policy across the United States,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>advancing bitcoin, bitcoin mining, and the right to own digital assets.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Dennis, thanks so much for joining me today.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Market's an honored to be back on the show with

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you and excited to chat about all things bitcoin and

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>digital assets.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Man, it's been a while and there has been a

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff going on, so I'm super excited to

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>catch up.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 2>But the first question, let's just dive right into this. Dennis.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the biggest things that I've heard

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for the last whatever it is now seven eight years

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about bitcoin is like almost like the

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>single biggest thing is like the government's gonna make it illegal.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the first question I want to ask is

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>did it just become legalized?

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's probably a very good way to categorize

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>what is taking place in Washington, DC. Even myself, I'm

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a little surprised by the amount of momentum that is

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>picked up here for what we should call rightfully called

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>digital asset policy in the United States. Although I care

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>predominantly about bitcoin, it is good to see digital asset

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>policy that will lift all boats. You know, rising tide

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>lifts all boats in a space. We're very fortunate to

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>see the progress we have now. That being said, right like,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 3>we still have a lot of a lot of room

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 3>to go, so to speak, with regards to passing this

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>legislation into law. I mean, there's some major hurdles that

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>we got to overcome. I'm sure we can get into it.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 3>But it's a very exciting time in the world of

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin and digital asset policy, and I'm looking forward to

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>seeing the United States create these necessary regulatory guidelines we

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>need in order to really benefit from this technology.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>You said a lot there that I'm ready to unpack into.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, do we need these regulations to

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>give us clear guidelines. We're going to come back to that.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>But let's stop. Let's just stop or start with.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Did bitcoin just become legalized? So to the point that

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you made, there's still a lot that has to be done.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So we had bills that just got passed by the House.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They still have to get through the Senate, I believe,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's probably a lot of the work show us

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to be done. There's another bill that has gotten overturned

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and now potentially the president could veto this. So I

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of dig into a little bit of

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the nuance. So I guess let's just start with at

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the top. In your opinion, you've been doing this now

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years. You're deep in the belly

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the beast. Let's just call it that. In the

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>politics world, it seems like this has become very bipartisan.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The sides are opposite of each other, although these latest

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bills seem to be I'm sorry, bipartisan. This latest bill

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like everyone's kind of together, but there's some stuff

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems more partisan where they're fighting. And so let's

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just frame it up from a top level. So, you know,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Bitcoin conference last year, almost a year ago

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, we saw presidential candidates, Vivid Gramaswami RFK, even

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Tulsi Gabbard not a candidate but kind of a front

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>running political figure, all coming out in support of bitcoin

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and digital assets.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Just maybe a week ago or so, Donald.

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump sort of came out in support of digital assets

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and crypt currencies and bitcoin, even accepting donations, and it

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe puts the opposition the Biden administration on

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the opposite side of this, So.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Let me frame this up.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell me if I'm wrong, But it seems like the

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration Elizabeth Warren, Gary Ginsler has been very, very

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>very against cryptocurrency, is very harsh on them. But the

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>tide seems to be turning. And now does Biden have

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to do you think he has to take the opposite

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>side of Trump because they're competing, or do you think

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden's going to be the Biden admin will be forced

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to sort of capitulate and just realize that they're going

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to lose voting base if they do that.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 4>That's an absolutely great question.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>As someone who's been fighting for a long time to

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 3>make sure that Democrats and progressives also see the value

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>of bitcoin and digital assets, I couldn't you know more,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>disagree that, like the Biden administration needs to take this

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>opposite stance, although that is just very stereotypically what we

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>do see in politics, So I wouldn't be surprised if

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 3>it does happen. But I'm really excited about this opportunity

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 3>for both sides of the aisle to be fighting for

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>the bitcoin vote. I see it very much like the

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 3>same way as like, you know, who's best on the economy. Right,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to be like like, oh, I'm pro bitcoin,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>your anti bitcoin. It is who's better on bitcoin? And

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we're moving towards that world. We're not quite there yet,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 3>So we could see the Biden administration take some missteps

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 3>on this issue. But predominantly I really see it as

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>as an Elizabeth Warren Gibby being given a mandate through

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the elections. This is actually like a well known DC

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>secret that during the election process, when Biden was trying

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to win that's what trying to win the office of

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the presidency, he cut a deal with Elizabeth Warren to

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>let her to like manage him in this banking and.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Digital asset stuff. And obviously it's been very, very bad

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 4>for the administration.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we could see a pivot. There's to

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people talking about that there could be

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a pivot. And the reason why is because at the

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, everybody's going to be pro bitcoin

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and it's only a matter of time, and so both

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Democrats and Republicans are fighting to be.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Number one on the issue.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to take a break just real

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>quick and say that you know, as we're talking about

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and digital assets, The question really comes down to, like,

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are you tired of the global elites robbing you blind

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>through all this money printing that's happening, And if so,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>then you need to be holding your wealth outside of that,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, you should be coming to the Bitcoin

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Conference in Nashville. The twenty twenty four conference is happening

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in July twenty fifth through twenty seventh. It's the largest bitcoin,

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the largest fintech conference in the world. I've been going

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>every single year. It's an amazing event, and Bitcoin twenty

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four really stands as a beacon of monetary freedom

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if you care about that. If you care about freedom,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>all freedom sits at the freedom to transact, and really

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the darkening macroeconomic backdrop that's happening needs the bitcoin more

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>than ever.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be top speakers there, companies, thought leaders

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>from across the industry. They're all going to be in

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Nashville looking ahead for the future.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to be there.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Lots of other people, my friends are going to be there,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and ticket prices keep going up, so the longer you wait,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the more you're going to pay. But I don't want

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that to happen to you. I'd love for you to

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>come hang out, meet me, hang out with me and

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all the other speakers there. And you can save ten

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>percent on your ticket by using code mark Moss at

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>check out. So get your tickets now. Like I said,

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the price is just keep going up. Use Mark Moss

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>at check out to save ten percent on your tickets

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and hit me up let me know if you're coming.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So I want to meet you. And also, while we're

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about bitcoin, we're talking about laws being changed to

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>basically guarantee your rights of self custody. The whole piece

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin that's so revolutionary is that we can custody

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our own digital asset, and so you should certainly do that.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But how I've been using this device, it's called a

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasure hardware wallet. I've been using it for about seven

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>eight years now. It's been my go to device. Basically,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little hardware device like this that hold your

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>private key and you plug it into your computer when

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to send a transaction. I like Treasure because

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's open source. Unlike some of the security flaws you've

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seen in other devices. I don't want to name them

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, but it's open source, so you know, that

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's safe, it's the easiest to use, which we'll have

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>used it forever. They have new devices that make it

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>much easier than ever before. There's no excuse for you

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.679
<v Speaker 1>not to secure your own bitcoin with the Treasure hardware

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wallet or something else like that. And more importantly, when

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're holding your Treasure hardware wallet or any hardware wallet

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, you need to back up your private keys. Now,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that you back up your

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>private keys and put them somewhere they don't get destroyed.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And they've come up with this new device where I

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>can put my private key on this metal device that

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>could withstand flat fire, flood or war, whatever it may be.

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So check out Treasure what they're doing. You can save

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ten percent on these things by using codemark moss. But

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>either way, make sure you secure.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Your own bitcoin.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I like how you frame that, how we should just

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>argue who's better on it, as opposed to trying to

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>take opposite sides of that. I just I you know,

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there's the never trumpers, and no matter what he wants,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to secure the border, they don't want to

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>secure them. It's like, unfortunately we're in this bipolar world.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Where we have to, but hopefully, hopefully you're right on that.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I find it odd that in the land of the free,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, any politician could run on a

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>platform to take away our freedom of choice.

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I just find it hard. How could somebody run on

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>that platform? And it amazes me.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So I want to dig deeper into that. Let's start

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on some of these specifics here. So a big news

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for you and the Satoshia Action Fund was what happened

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 1>in Oklahoma. So Oklahoma took the I believe. I want

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you to break this down for me, but it appears

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that Oklahoma basically sort of put the rights in two

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>man to make sure that the Oklahoma citizens, I guess

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at least have the right to have bitcoin, own it, custody,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that what happened.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is what happens.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 3>For those that might be new to the work that

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 3>we do at Satoshi Action, we are a bitcoin digital

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>asset advocacy organization. We work to pass pro bitcoin bills

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>into law. After we go through the education process with lawmakers,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>we help them understand the value of the technology, and

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>then we move and say, hey, now that you like

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin as much as we do, here's some ideas for

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 3>how you can attract this new technology to your jurisdiction.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Last year we passed our two bills into law in

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Montana and Arkansas called the Right to Mind Bill.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 4>And this year we.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Took decided to say, hey, we got a couple of

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 3>on the board. Bitcoin is about to go on and run.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>The sentiment is changing dramatically, and we should really take

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>advantage of that and try to expand the scope of

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>the policy. So now not only are we protecting bitcoin

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>mining with our legislation, we are also protecting the right

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>to self custody, the right to run a node, and

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the right to buy, sell, and trade.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And use digital assets broadly.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And so the first state in the country to actually

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 3>enact that bill into law is Oklahoma. It did it

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 3>just a little over a week ago, so very excited

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 3>about that news.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 4>But there are other states as well that are right behind.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 3>We have Louisiana passing it in the House and the

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Senate and we're just waiting for it to go to

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the governor's desk now, so very very exciting things happening.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>By the way, it's a.

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Little bit of breaking news too, because that hasn't been

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 3>that hasn't been widely reported, so excited to share that

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>with your audience here today. But yes, the right to

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 3>self custody and use bitcoin is now protected in Oklahoma,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and real quickly because people oftentimes they say, well, why

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>do why should we care about state law when you

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 3>have the federal law going on? Is in federal law

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of the ultimate sort of power in the USA,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>And to some extent.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>That is true.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>But the most important thing to keep in mind is

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>that when you have a lack of federal action, state

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>law reigns supreme. But let's say, even for instance, the

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>federal law decides to come in and say, well, we're

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>going to ban self custody, if the state of Oklahoma

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 3>protects self custody, then it's on the otus is on

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 3>the federal government to come in and enforce that policy.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 3>And just throughout history we have seen the federal government

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>is unwilling to enforce granular types of individual policies like

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 3>that where they'd have to come and knock on everybody's doors.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 3>The really clear line example of this is the cannabis industry.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 3>The cannabis industry is legalized in about seventy five percent

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of the country, we do not see the federal government

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>coming and knocking on doors and taking out every individual

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>user and cannabis industry business participant.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 4>They just aren't doing it. And so we're following that.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Same strategy, and so far it has worked for the

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>cannabis industry, and we believe that it will work.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>For us as well.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really good example, a good analogy.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So the way that I see this bill and I

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like it, and going back to I said, we'll come

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>back to do we need the government to give us

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>laws to give us clarity on this. And so you know,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm under the again, being an American, I'm under the

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>belief that we are free and we're free to do

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever we want unless there's laws that tell us we

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do those things. And so the Constitution is really

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a set of laws that prohibits the government from taking

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>away our freedoms, encroaching our freedoms. And so rather than saying, hey,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>please give us a law that tells us what we

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>can do with our digital assets as a slave mindset,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>instead we pass laws that prevent the government from encroaching.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And that seems sort of what this Oklahoma bill is.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like Hey, we're putting a law into place that

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>guarantees your right to keep these freedoms and doesn't allow

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the government to encroach it. Is that a way to

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of look at this.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean absolutely, the work that we do, I

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 3>oftentimes tell people, you know, if you like the Constitution,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 3>then you should like the bill that we passed in

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>a law in Oklahom. You should like the bills that

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we passed in a law in Montana, in Arkansas, and

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 3>you should love the bills that we're going to pass

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 3>in the law in Louisiana and others coming up here

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in the future. But at the end of the day,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 3>like let's go to the heart of that question, like

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>why do we need regulations? Ultimately in the United States,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>given the current dynamic that we're in, it is really

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 3>important to have clear rules of the road so that

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>people can know how to operate. I mean, think about it,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 3>like quite literally, like the road right when we're all

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>driving around. If there was no speed limits, you'd have

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>just this like very wide range of different driving habits,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and that would be make driving on the road much

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>more difficult. And although it does, you know, in some

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 3>ways slightly restrict our freedoms to create regulations. What the

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 3>most important part for people to keep in mind is

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 3>it creates a super highway for good behavior, a super

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>highway for people to know, Okay, this is what I

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 3>can do, and I know that I can do it,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not going to mess with me, and I

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>can go as fast as I possibly can, and I

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 3>can you know, move fast and break things, so to speak.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Similar to the tech and right when we create regulatory

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>guidelance for the tech industry, we've seen a super highway

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of good behavior. And obviously, of course we're trying to

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>limit that bad behavior, and we're trying to do it

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>in a way where we don't limit to the e

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 3>step that actually crushes innovation or crushes freedom. Obviously, on

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the edges you're going to see a little bit of that.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>But the most important part to keep in mind is

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>that it really does create this mega highway for people

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 3>to be able to go and pursue certain businesses that

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>they know for sure are going to last and be

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>here to stay for good in the United States.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Great, let's dig into a couple of specifics, because it's

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>been a busy week. There's a lot of stuff going

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on So the first thing I want to talk about.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>My opening question was did bitcoin just become legalized? Obviously

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in Oklahoma you've already kind of covered that piece, but

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a fit twenty one, right, And so this just

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>went through the House past. It hasn't gone through the

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Senate yet, but it seems like this big watershed moment,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>if you will, congressional validation for the crypto industry, digital

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>asset industry, if you will. And it seemed pretty by partisan.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It was like two seventy nine to one, thirty six

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans together. Some say the odds in the

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Senate remain low. Before I get into the details of that,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's the word on the street, is the

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>odds of getting through the Senate low?

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And if so, why, yeah?

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I mean you'd sort of need to keep your

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I think, perspectives and your expectations in check with regards

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to this.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Thing going through the Senate. I think your right to

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 4>do that.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>First of all, there's just there's no companion bill in

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the Senate. Typically, what you will see if you have

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a really really good effort going is you will see

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>a companion bill where there's a matching bill on the

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 3>opposite side and the other chamber. So if it's the House,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you have a companion bill in the Senate. If it's

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 3>going through the Senate, you have a companion bill in

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the House. There is no companion bill right now. And

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>also there's just really no constraints on when the Senate

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>has to act, So the Senate could just sit around

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and there's no there's no forcing mechanism to make them

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>actually take this bill and run it through their side.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 3>And also, one really key thing to keep in mind

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 3>here is that you have the Lumbas and Jillibrand effort

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 3>right on the Senate side, and they have been working diligently.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean Senator Lummas has been putting in a significant

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 3>portion of her time. She's the ultimate bitcoin champion in Washington, DC.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 3>And you know, typically when you've spent that much time

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>on a policy, you're not just going to be like, oh, yeah,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 3>let's go with the other guy's policy, like you're going

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>to want some piece of the action. You're going to

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>want to feel like your work was included. And that's

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Fit twenty one unfortunately, does not encompass all of the parts.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that Senator Lummas.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Would really want included in her bill. But but sticking

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to the sticking to the odds here, you know, it's

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>not a it's a non zero chance, right like it's

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 3>it's not zero, but it's not also probably fifty percent

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 3>or higher that it's going to get through. And then again,

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, you also have to be,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, considered that President Biden is in opposition to

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 3>this legislation. He did not announce that he was going

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 3>to veto it, but he did say that he would

0:16:58.880 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 3>be opposed to the legislation.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So some of the key points that I like, and

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>going back to did bitcoin get legalized? I mean, obviously

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Oklahoma, but in this specifically, I put

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>out a pretty long tweet thread on this the other

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>day because I, along with a lot of other people,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>seem to think that the probably the most likely attack

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>vector on bitcoin will be self custody, and of course

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what Oklahoma law entrines that right to do that.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>But in this bill specifically, there was a protection of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>self custody and so basically protecting the rights of individuals

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to use hardware, software, wallet, stora, digital assets, things like that,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and so that was sort of the like, Man, if

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this goes through, it's basically legalizing bitcoin. The one thing

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that it just seems insane if most people don't really

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the way the world works. But because we're in

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a debt based monetary system, everything in this world is debt,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and they've basically taken away our rights to own anything.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>So things that you think you own legally technically you don't.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So like the money in your bank, you don't own

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that money in the bank. It's owed to you. The

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>money's owed to you. That's why the bank tells what

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do. The stocks that you own, your Apple, Tesla, etc.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't own those. Those are owed to you by

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>your broker. We used to have stock certificates, there were

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>bear instruments. No longer it's owed to you now, and

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is sort of this last bear instrument that we have,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like they don't want us to own

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that either. They want us to have that ode to

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>us through some debt obligation. This would ensrine our rights

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But I guess maybe that's why there's

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>opposition to this. I don't know what are your thoughts

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>or what are you hearing.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a fantastic way to think about it,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 3>that we live in this society and in a world

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>where everything is given to a custodian for them to

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 3>hold on our behalf.

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 4>And I mean, we have very good custodial services here

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 4>in the United States. I won't complain.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you go to other parts of the world,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>there's just you know, there are parts of the world

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>where if you put your money into a bank account,

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 3>that money will get immediately taken out by the government.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>So we are very fortunate to have good custodians here.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>But at the end of the day, you're right, we

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>as Americans, we the people, should have the right to

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>hold our own assets and to be able to control

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>our own destinies. And that's why we put self custody

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 3>protections into the Oklahoma bill. That's why I love to

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 3>see that these self custody protections are also similar in

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>their effort to protect self custody in this fit twenty

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>one bill. And that's going to be big moving forward,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 3>because that is, as you said, a big, big, big

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>attack vector potentially on bitcoin, because if you can't hold bitcoin,

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 3>if you can't truly engage with the technology, then you

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 3>are sort of cut off from being able to benefit

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 3>from the greatest opportunities that bitcoin has to offer with

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 3>regards to enhancing our freedom and our economic mobility. So yes,

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 3>absolutely couldn't agree with you more that. I'm probably most

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 3>excited about this part. I mean, because ultimately, like the

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 3>whole digital asted ecosystem is super pumped, like, oh, we're

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>going to have these great guidelines for what can the

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 3>SEC do, what can the cf They're going to create

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>this really big ninety day deadline where the SEC has

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 3>to respond to say that it's a security or not,

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 3>and that if it's not, it goes to the CFTC

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 3>instead of just like making these people wait forever an

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 3>eternity and doing regulation through enforcement. So that's big. But

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 3>like I'm a bitcoinner, I don't really like everyone's pretty

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 3>clear that bitcoin is a commodity, it's going to go

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to the CFTC regardless of the lack of regulation on

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the issue currently. I just don't feel concerned about my

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin at this point. But things like self custody protections. Absolutely,

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a huge one, and and I'm glad that not

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>only did you highlight it on your Twitter, I was

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>a great breakdown that you gave gave there, but they

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 3>we're highlighting it here.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>As well now on the other side. So this is

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just stuff that the House is doing, but we don't

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.239
<v Speaker 1>know if the Senate's going to do it. There's no

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>companion bill to your point, and there's no deadline for

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the Senate to move. But the Senate is doing something

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. So in a resolution one oh nine,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the Senate's passed legislation to overturn a previous SEC accounting

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>rule SAB number one twenty one one, which basically prevents

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>regulated financial firm from custody in bitcoin. So it's still

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of this custody piece and that was put in

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>place that said, hey, they can't custody it, and that's

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like this big battleground. The Senate voted sort of bipartisan

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to overturn that, which seems pretty positive again in favor

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of custody, this time not self custody but by a

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>custodian a bank. This one seems to be a lot

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of people think that the President might want to veto this.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing on the street on that?

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he said it himself, right, He commented, that

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 3>he would veto the staff accounting bulletin on twenty one.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 4>For whatever reason.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think actually that was a very big mistake

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 3>on his part because you know, ultimately the digital asset

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem is looking for these wins. They have not had

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 3>any wins in DC, and all of a sudden you

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>see some movement finally for the digital acid ecosystem in Washington,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>d C. I mean, I have a lot of friends

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 3>that have been working there. I tell them, you're doing

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the Lord's work right, because it's just like nothing is

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 3>going through in Washington DC, And all of a sudden

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 3>we see this movement and it's a lot of excitement.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 3>It's there are much bigger things that we need to

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 3>do in Washington DC with regards to this issue. But

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 3>but the fact that there was something that moved forward

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>was so valuable to the people that work there. And

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you, man, I got friends that are just like,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>what's the point of life in Washington TC. We're not

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>doing anything? And they were looking at the down the

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 3>barrel of you know, November twenty twenty four thinking, I mean,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 3>we're about to go into election mode and not see

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 3>anything happen until the end of the year and then

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 3>new Congress has to come in. We got to restart

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 3>all these efforts. So for them to get this, this

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 3>this win, which from a regular perspective is small, but

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 3>from a from a momentum and from a from a

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>from an opportunity perspective, was huge for them to really

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 3>start to get wins on the board for all their efforts,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>and for like the Biden administration to come in like

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 3>snatch what is It's not a big, like huge, massive,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>like world changing victory, but it was a victory and.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 4>It was historical.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 3>So for them to try to say we're going to

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 3>come in and snatch this victory from you, even this

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 3>tiny little wind, we won't let you have really mobilized

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>those in the crypto space and the bitcoin space, and

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that's why you're seeing the Trump administration capitalize

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 3>really on this issue and say we're going to start

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>making sure that we take care of this industry. I

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know if he would have so strongly come out

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 3>in support of the space if it wasn't for that

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>move by the Biden administration, because it opened up a

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 3>door for the Trump administration to say, you know what,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>we're going to take a different path on this, and

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 3>now you do see quite a bit of aggressive pushes

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 3>for people to support Trump and the Trump administration because

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>of this. So I don't know for sure if he's

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>actually going to come out and vito it. I think

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 3>it would be a huge mistake on his part. I

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>think it would absolutely galvanize what is a very.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Non partisan or bipartisan.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Voter base that is, at the end of the day,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 3>like if you go after them, you're hurting not only

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 3>their wallet, but you're hurt you're actually going after a

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of their core values on like what we think

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 3>America should be about, innovation, access to your finances. With

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 3>regards to bitcoin, you know, it's like the ability to

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to custody your own asset and be able

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to save for the future. There's obviously a million other

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 3>great things about bitcoin benefits that has to offer everything

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 3>from banking the end bank to financial inclusion.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 4>It's like, if you're.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Against that, like, that's a pretty bad place to be

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 3>in because those voters are going to, like you know,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 3>they're going to go to the mat to make sure

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>that they can protect their issues. So I've always said

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 3>that bitcoin and digital asset voters are some of the

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 3>most well entrenched and motivated voters if you if you

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>motivate them, and it looks like the Bide administration is

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 3>ready to ready to motivate them against his own party.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, he could just sit on this too, right, I mean,

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>does he have to veto it right now?

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Or is there a deadline? Is there a clock counting down?

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>There is a deadline, There was like a there is

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>like a technically a ten day deadline once there's like

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 3>there's a few nuances around when that deadline starts. But yeah,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 3>there is there is a deadline when he have he

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 3>has to sign it or not sign it. If he

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't sign it, then it like becomes law automatically. There's

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 3>also weird rules around, like but if he isn't able

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to make it back in time and like the clock

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 3>runs out on the session, then it's considered a pocket veto.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 3>It's it's it's a little messy out there, but yeah,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>there is some regulations or rules around when he has

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>to respond.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>What I really what I really like is what you

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>said about the momentum. We see the tide shifting. The

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>tide is changing on this and so all of a sudden,

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it went from like this Elizabeth Warren led, Gary Gensler led,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, attack on crypto. I mean she literally ran

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>on like an anti crypto campaign and started started really

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>cracking down choke point two point zero, all these things.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And now all of a sudden, like we're seeing the

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite, Oklahoma taking the state, you know, other states

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>jumping in and trying those rights, and now these these

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rules and laws, and then obviously Trump taking the other

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>side of it, Kennedy RFK taking the other side of

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it as well, and it sort of forces Biden's hands like,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're either going to come out and you're

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>against Americans having freedom to choose, or you're gonna have

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to go along with it.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And so it's that momentum.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And even if it doesn't make it make it through

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in this you know, specific case, it's the momentum. It's

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the direction that we're going. And it seems to be

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>very bipartisan. It seems like a lot of the Democrats

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are jumping ship. They don't want to go down with

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the with the with the sinking ship of the Democrats

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to be restrictive on on these digital

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>asset rights.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is that is that kind of your take

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>on it?

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yes, absolutely.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that for a long time we have heard

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 3>that a number of Democrats in Congress are very supportive

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>of the broader digital asset ecosystem. Some like Center Loves,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 3>of course, are are extremely pro bitcoin, champions of bitcoin

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>on the on the Republican side. But it's great to

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>finally see that they were given a moment to show

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 3>how supportive they are of the space. And it's a

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a really big indicator of how many folks support

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the bitcoin and digital asset ecosystem from the left.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 4>And the right hand side of the aisle.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>And they they were given this opportunity to really just

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 3>pick a side, and when it mattered right, it wasn't like, oh,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe this isn't the right move. There was

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 3>so much broad support for this legislation that it forced

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these Democrats that I think were quietly

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 3>supportive to break ranks from the party line that they

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 3>had been holding for some time. And so, yes, that

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 3>momentum is building quite significantly. We are a very proud

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 3>contributor to that momentum. I mean, again, one of the

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 3>very big parts about what we are trying to accomplish

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 3>at the state level is to create that political momentum.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a twenty fifteen Bloomberg study which highlights that when

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 3>you see a flurry of state action on an issue,

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 3>you tend to see in a very short period of

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>time federal action take place. And we have created a

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 3>flurry of action at the state level. We have introduced

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 3>legislation in over twenty different states, everything from these policies

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 3>which enable folks to be protected for self custody, to

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>be able to study the big coin ETF to see

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 3>if the state pensions want to buy the bitcoin ETF,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to protecting nodes, to protecting bitcoin mining. And that's in

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 3>over twenty states. That's a large portion of the United States.

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a flurry of activity taking place, legislation even being

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 3>passed into law. When you see that type of flurry

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>of activity, you do see federal action happen more often

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 3>than not. We saw it with cannabis, We saw with

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 3>gay marriage, We saw it with women's suffrage, we saw

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 3>it with interracial marriage, and a number of other issues

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 3>where throughout history, when the states move, the Feds end

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>up following suit and acting alongside them. So very proud

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that we've been able to contribute to that momentum. And

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 3>we think that's a big reason why people should be

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>working at the state level, because the laboratory of democracy

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is a place where we can try out new ideas

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and show that they work and then force the FEDS

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>to act in good behavior.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, hopefully you're enjoying this conversation with Dennis and

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you understand that while we now are getting the protected

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>right to customer on coin and so you should certainly

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's what's revolutionary about bitcoin. But how do

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you do that? I like to use a hardware wallet

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>because I want to keep my private keys off the internet.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to use a wallet on your phone.

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I've done that before I lost a lot of money,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So you want to keep them off the internet.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>With a hardware wallet like this, it stores your private key.

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You plug it into your computer when you want to

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sign a transaction, and you unplug it and put it

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>back into your safe. I've used Treasure forever seven eight

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>years now. I've always used them because I think they're

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the easiest to use. Their newest device is even easier.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 1>It's got a digital display and they're open source, so

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know there's no back doors or rug poles waiting

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for you. I highly recommend Treasure. And then you want

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to back up your private key, and they came up

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with this new device where I can inscribe my private

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>key on this piece of metal so it can withstand fires,

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>flood or anything. Because you want to back up your

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>private key, check out Treasure. I've always been using them,

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm still using them today. You can save ten percent

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by using codemark Moss. Again, your right to custody your

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>own bitcoin is now being entrined into law. You should

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly do that and use a device like Treasure. Save

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ten percent by u the code mark Moss. And while

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about bitcoin, I also want to let you

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>know that the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville for twenty twenty

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>four is coming up. It's right around the corner. I'm

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. I hope that you'll be there

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. If you care about understanding bitcoin, digital assets, freedom,

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding the problems in the world with frivolous money printing,

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>then you need to be in the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's July twenty fifth through twenty seventh. It's the largest

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin fintech conference in the world, and it's really it's

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a beacon of monetary freedom. It's a glimmer of hope

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>amongst the darkening macroeconomic backdrop. Like I said, I'm gonna

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be there, lots of top speakers are going to be,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>their companies are going to be their thought leaders are

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. And ticket prices keep going up,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and so right now today is going to be the

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cheapest you can get it. And I can save you

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an extra ten percent if you use my code Mark

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Moss at checkout. But like I said, ticket prices just

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>keep going up. So don't wait, get your tickets, save

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ten percent with code Mark Moss and let me know.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Hit me up on social media if you're going to

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be there, because I want to meet you.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that. That's something I'm going to spend a

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>second on that. The laboratory or of democracy. I've never

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>heard it a termed that way.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But I like that.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's when states can compete. We can find through competition,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we can find out better product service prices. Is what

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I typically call competition, and it allows us to try

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>different things and see what works. And so to the

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>point that you're kind of making them at the end,

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I might disagree a little bit. I mean, obviously, per

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, the states are supposed to have the rights.

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>The federal law is not really supposed to have much

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>power over us on a day to day basis. Unfortunately,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the federal law has been creeping, creeping, creeping, creeping, creeping,

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and now is trying to sort of have control over

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But we are We see many examples

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>where you know, basically right down the middle, red and

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>blue states are just dividing. You know, twenty six states

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>sign on to you know, whatever, whether it's supporting Trump,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's actually The next point I want to talk

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about is the CBDs for example. So lots of states

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have come out and banned ESG investing, for example. And

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>now we have the CBDC going on. And so we

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just saw the US House passed a bill banning.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 2>A federal a federal or the Federal Reserve from issuing

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>as CBDC.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And again that seemed to be somewhat bipartisans Well, no,

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that actually seemed to be very partisan.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We had two hundred and thirteen Republicans, only three Democrats

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>voted for it. One hundred and ninety two Democrats voted

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>against it, so that was extremely red and blue on

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that one. Do you guys work on that, what's your

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>take on that?

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, we spent a lot of time on

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.479
<v Speaker 3>cbdc's you know. Generally speaking, I'm very interested in seeing

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 3>a competition take place over what would be some form

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 3>of dollar stable coin. I don't really prefer the idea

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of a central bank digital currency. I think that they

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 3>not only diminish quite dramatically at our privacy as individuals,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>but they also just give more power to the FED,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and they take that power away from Congress and from

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the people. And I would much rather see a world

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>where we have a US dollar back stable coins competing

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and work to be able to provide great products for

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the American people. And we do see that taking place,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately, I think that at the end of the day,

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.719
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a big win for the US.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, a lot of.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Us in some of us in the bitcoin space. I

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't say I'm included in this group, but some of

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 3>us in the bitcoin space, you know, want to see

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>the dollar system move away. I think that that's that's

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 3>not going to happen anytime soon. We're going to see

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a massive proliferation of stable coins across the world, especially

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 3>as stable coins become one of the number one buyers

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 3>of US treasuries. The United States likes that not only

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>are you getting dollars and in the hands of folks

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 3>across the world, you are also you know, those companies

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 3>that are buying that are offering these stable coins are turning.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Right around and buying US treasuries.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, tether is like the twentieth largest national holder

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>of US treasuries, right behind Germany. That's pretty incredible, especially

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 3>in a time when interest rates are rising. The fact

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that there is a marketplace coming in to buy these treasuries,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 3>it's actually suppressing those interest rates and keeping interest rates

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>lower for Americans.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's really a win win for Americans.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I think, well, those of us that don't like the

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Fiat system, obviously, you know, we want to see this

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 3>transition and we want to see the system get better.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I also think that the system does will get better.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we necessarily need to have a crash landing.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 3>I think we can soft land this plane and harmonize

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 3>these two worlds.

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 4>I think that bitcoin ultimately can.

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Become a really powerful tool to be able to show

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 3>what's going on in the economy. And at the end

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 3>of the day, I think it will help keep the

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 3>people or the industries or the institutions overseeing that fiat

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 3>system more responsible, right, because it's like a mirror that

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at and it like it reflux every bad

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>move that you make. So at the end of the day,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I think bitcoin instills more monetary responsibility in governments. I

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 3>think that stable coins will proliferate and that those stable

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 3>coin issuers will buy you as treasuries, and that that

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 3>will help stay the US economy and really the world.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 3>And then as more people this is my big pitch

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to bitcoiners too, It's like, as more people are on

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 3>stable coins, they're gonna buy bitcoin. You wonder how I

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 3>know that because the largest buyers of bitcoin are all

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the people who hold us scholars, like all the Americans.

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Have all the bitcoin.

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Why Because, at the end of the day, like the

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 3>dollar helps us to have a much more stable ability

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 3>to plan for the future and to be able to

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 3>pay for our groceries and pay for our rent. Yes,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 3>inflation has been raging recently. It's diminishing. But compare that

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 3>to like people in Zimbabwe, Compare that to people in Venezuela.

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Compare that to people across the world with local currencies

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 3>that just aren't operating at the way that they should be.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Moving to a dollar system for them will help them

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>transition in a better way towards bitcoin. I mean, I've

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 3>heard you hear all the time, people go into Africa,

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 3>people go into Latin America. You know, why don't we

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>see this large mass adoption of bitcoin because it's.

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 4>Not quite stable enough for people to like plan their

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 4>out and they're rent out. But I think the dollar is.

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 3>And then as people transition to a crypto stable coin dollar,

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 3>then from there they're also going to say, oh wow,

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 3>in their wallet where they're looking at all the exchange

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>rates of all the digital assets, a little at this

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin thing.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 4>You know what, I've actually been able to save a

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 4>little better recently.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take a little bit of my money and

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna put it in bitcoin.

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 4>People need to keep in mind. This is the last

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 4>point I like to make on this.

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really important that the ability to save

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 3>for the future and to actually save in a bank

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 3>account that you know that's not gonna get pillaged. Is

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 3>like a Western privilege. A lot of parts of Africa,

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of parts of Latin America or the world.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Do not have this privilege.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 3>They have unstable currencies, they can't save in, and even

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 3>if they do save in them, they put them in

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>a bank account, They're gonna get pillaged. If you want

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to save for a house, and a lot of these places,

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 3>you have to buy like save in bricks. You have

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 3>to buy the bricks individually because you know that your

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>local currency is not going to maintain its value in

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 3>order to pay for that house in the future.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So I know it's a little.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 3>I would say counterintuitive for some folks that want to

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 3>see bitcoin be successful.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, I do really

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 4>believe that as we.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Move towards the bitcoin world, we will see a pliferation

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 3>of stable coins that really unlocks the ability for people

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to buy even more bitcoin.

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, I totally agree.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>There's interim steps. So I try to remind people all

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the time this is a process.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not an event.

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So like we wake up one day and it happens,

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is there's a process that happens. I think most nations,

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>especially the rise of the bricks, I mean China, Russia

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. They're probably going to try and go back

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to gold somewhere. In the meantime, I think that might

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be an intermediary step as well. The people more decentralized

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>probably go to more of like a US dollar stable coin.

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 2>There's going to be.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Lots of things that are being tried and tested, and

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a process that it's going to take us to

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>get there. But going back to the CBDC ban for

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a second, they seem to be very partisan. It got

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>through the House, but this still has to get through

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the Senate as well. Am I right on that.

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 3>The CBDC band, Yes, that passed to the House, and

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 3>it's probably has even less of a chance to get

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to the Senate.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>In regards to the CBDC just a little bit. I'm

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>just curious if you've dug into this a lot. I

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>know you've probably worked on it quite a bit in

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>today's world. I just saw Jordan's Peters and I took

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>my daughter to go see him a week ago.

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Was amazing and they.

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Talked about how at the end of a society where

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we start to think that we're too smart, he references

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tower of Babel. We can no longer understand each

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.479
<v Speaker 1>other anymore. And he said, the story behind the Tower

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>of Babel is that they worshiped engineering. And when we

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get so full of conceit, we can no longer understand

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>each other. And so today says like what's a woman?

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We can't understand each other anymore. And so definitions have

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten lost. And so going back.

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 2>To CBDC, like what is that?

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So, for example, eighty or about ninety percent of all

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>dollar transactions are done digitally right now. Anyway, I don't

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>really carry a lot of cash, I hate, it's all

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>wire transfers, debit cards, et cetera. And so we're already

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>using a digital dollar. And so could they just not

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>call it a CBDC? Could they just keep calling it

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a dollar? But since it's already digital dollars anyway, they

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of put the extra things in there. It

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>runs on a different set of rails. They don't really

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us that. I mean, they can ban the word, right,

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but like how intricate is the bill and like what

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly is it actually trying to block?

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would say, ultimately, the major problem, I

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 3>think that a lot of lawmakers have with cbdc's is

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 3>that they are going to diminish the amount of privacy

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that Americans have because it will create a payment system

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>where the FED has total like access to all the

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 3>data that's going on unmitigated right now. That's it's slightly different,

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.479
<v Speaker 3>although it's not necessarily too much better, in the sense

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that you know, there's a there's a bunch of different

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 3>companies that have your private information, and you know what

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 3>you're buying and what you're transacting on PayPal.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 4>MasterCard, visa.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's it's decentralized so to speak. I mean,

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 3>of course they probably have backdoor access to a lot

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 3>of this information, and there's the third party doctrine which

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 3>enables them to anybody.

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 4>That's if you give your the third party.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Doctor basically says, if I give my information over to

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 3>a third party, that the government can ask that third

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 3>party for it.

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 4>It's not necessarily an invasion of prising.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's it in like a very simplified form, and

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 3>that's what allows the government to invade our privacy, which

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 3>I think is I think I'm obviously opposed to third

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 3>party doctrine, but the FED, it's like washing all that away,

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 3>just and streamlining the capture of your information and your data.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 3>And I also the second point that I think that

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 3>lawmakers are most concerned about with CBDCs is that it

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 3>gives this granular control over money that we've never seen before,

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.439
<v Speaker 3>and that would be a problem when you get someone

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 3>into power that you don't agree with.

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 4>Like as an example, I mean, we've had.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Administrations before who have threatened to kick people out of

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 3>the financial system. So the CBDCs would just blow that

0:40:57.920 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 3>power up.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 2>And enable threaten What do you mean threatened?

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>My friend, doctor Joe Mercola had has been count shut down.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone that worked for him has a count shut down,

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and the people that work forms families got their count

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>shut down. This was just six months ago. This stuff

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>happens all the time. So it's really they're really trying

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to protect people's privacy and freedom to transact, and not

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically the word CBDC, I guess is what you're saying.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's the big that's the big message

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>here is protect people's right to transact, protect people's privacy,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and that cbdc's with dramatically tear down those those institutions.

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, last topic, real quick. I know, we gotta

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we got to wrap this up. But back to sort

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of the comment that you made, and I'm agreeing with that,

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the tide shifting, right, We're seeing momentum swinging,

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>which again is ridiculous. Of course, we should have freedom

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to transact as we see fit, but at least we're

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that politically starting to swing back that

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>way we talked about sort of Elizabeth Warren and Gary

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Ginsler have been seemingly very aggressive against our freedom to

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>transact with crypto and digital assets and bitcoin, et cetera,

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe some of that starting to.

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Shift as well.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the yesterday's news of the Ethereum ETF

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>getting approved, the spot ETF being approved, is that like

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Gary Ginsler realizing that he's lost the war and he's

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just got to throw the talent. I mean, is this

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like really a big signpost that like, hey Warren Ginsler,

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>get out of the way, like we're moving forward, or

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on that and what does that mean

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the greater context of things.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's a big capitulation and in some

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 3>ways could be seen as an SEC pivot. Could where

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.760
<v Speaker 3>that came from I think will will be really important

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 3>where that order came from, so to speak. I don't

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 3>know if that was a decision by Gary Gensler himself.

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that was something that was from

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 3>on high, the Biden administration or the Warren camp. But

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 3>ultimately that's a level of capitulation or pivoting on the issue.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Right we everyone was saying twenty five percent chance at

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 3>best of an etherey a METF getting through and not.

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Someone listen, I'm not living my day.

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Isn't getting ruined necessarily if an ETF to and get approved,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 3>But it does. Again, I think the important message here

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 3>is it highlights how much things are changing and how

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 3>much the momentum has shifted to the side of the

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 3>broader digital acid ecosystem. So yeah, it's interesting to see

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the way it's the way it's played out, don't I

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 3>can't tell you. You can't read minds. I don't think anybody

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 3>really knows yet. But ultimately it is a very positive

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 3>sign and in a momentum builder for the space to

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 3>see this, to see it get passed.

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right, well, we got a couple minutes left.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.879
<v Speaker 1>If you want to just stay like obviously Stoshi Action

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Fund is out there on the forefront. Do you want

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about anything like initiatives that you're working on,

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 1>like big things that are maybe in the works, things

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>that be paying attention to.

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>You know, you mentioned d banking just a moment ago,

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and that is an issue that we care deeply about

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 3>as ATOCI Action. We see folks in the bitcoin, bitcoin mining,

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 3>digital asset space being d banked at rates I mean,

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen in my lifetime, I've never even heard

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>of historically, and we want to make sure that we

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 3>put an end to the banking. And there are three

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 3>major components to the powers that be in the banking world.

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 3>That is the OCC. It's the federal regulator for banks.

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 3>It's the FDIC. Those are the guys that do the

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 3>insurance frear bank account. And then there's the FED. They

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 3>have the FED Master accounts. We did a lot of research.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 3>We put out a big paper on this. I encourage

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 3>people to go look it up on our websites atociaction

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 3>dot io under our policy section under debanking, and it

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 3>really highlights how the major point, the major choke point

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 3>for anyone is the FED Master account. Because the FED

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 3>has godlike power over who gets a fed Master account.

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to look any further than Caitlyn Long

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and Custodia to know that they were denied a fed

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Master account. In my opinion, I think it was pretty

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 3>obvious it was done in a discriminatory fashion. And so

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 3>we put forward this paper saying this is the problem.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Fed Master accounts for the problem. How do we solve

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 3>this problem? And I believe that we solve it by

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 3>having states have their own fed Master accounts. And we're

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 3>already all the pathways to showing that that can be

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 3>truly success.

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 4>The state of Texas.

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Already has its own fed Master account. North Dakota already

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 3>has a state bank with its own fed Master account.

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 3>So we don't even need to pass legislation to see

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>if this thing will work. We really just need to

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 3>take that, knowing that we have those fed Master accounts

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 3>and say, okay, let's position this industry underneath that fed

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Master account and see what the federal government is going

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to try to come after the states, Because at the

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, if they try to come after

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 3>state's powers to bank an industry and their own fed

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Master account, you are just like striking right at the

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 3>heart of constitutional powers that are given to the states

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 3>in the dual banking system. And if you do that,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you are going to see the fastest tracked a banking

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit get to the Supreme Court in a matter of time.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think with the current makeup that Supreme Court

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 3>would definitely side that dual banking still exist in America,

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 3>and if that happens, we essentially end debanking in the

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 3>United States overnight.

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Now you talk about the FED Master account and that's,

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like you said, reference Kaitlyn Long who's been on the

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>show a couple of times, and she's trying to get

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a bank through and they won't give her the ability

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>or they won't pass they want license that to go through.

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about the banking like Conductor Joe

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>mccola's case, for example, it was the commercial bank that

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>shuts a count down. So I mean, are you saying

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that came from the Fed? Like, hey,

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>commercial banks shut his count down, But it seems like

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the decision was made at the lower level because he

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to get other banks.

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Listen, the banks are businesses. Why would a bank not

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 3>want you to come do business with them? It's because

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 3>the federal regulators are applying undue pressure on banks to

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 3>debank those people that they don't politically agree with, that

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 3>they don't align with, or that they don't they think

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 3>is a competition to their banking system. Right, So the

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 3>way this works is the FDIC says, hey, I'm going

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to raise your rates.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 4>If you bank this industry, you know, you better watch out.

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 3>And then the banks themselves are like, well, we don't

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 3>want to deal with that, or the FED or someone

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 3>else in the regulatory space, like, we're going to audit

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you if you don't, if you don't get rid of

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 3>these crypto people, see they're safe, that they're unsafe, they're

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 3>not sound, So we're gonna have to audit you a

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit more and that's going to bring your costs up.

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 4>So it's very pervasive the way that it's taking place.

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 3>But at the end of the day, that will power

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 3>at the FED Master accounts is the one that you

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 3>hone in on because you can get away from the FDIIC. Right,

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 3>you can say I don't want insurance at my bank.

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to just do a fully reserve back one

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and five percent like Kitlin Long. You can also In

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the case of the OCC which is the federal regulator

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 3>for banks, you can say, well, I don't want to

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 3>be federally regulated.

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 4>I want to be regulated by my state. I'm going

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 4>to be a state charter bank.

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 3>So you can avoid those two regulators, but you cannot

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 3>avoid the FED Master account. It is impossible. You have

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 3>to have either ad.

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 4>Direct access to a FED Master account or you have to.

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Bank with an intermediary bank where or your bank that

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 3>you want to go to that say like offers crypto services,

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 3>has to go to an intermatory bank and say, hey,

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 3>you have a FED Master account, let me use your

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 3>settlement process with the FED in order to ensure that

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I can not only bank these people, but still you know,

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 3>get everything cleared out. But that is a situation where

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 3>those even those intermediary banks are saying, we don't want

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:55.919
<v Speaker 3>to touch anything. We don't want to touch other banks

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 3>that are crypt banking the crypto industry, because we're going

0:47:58.080 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to get pressure applied to us by that, you know,

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that federal banking mafia system that's been created over the

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 3>decades and over the last hundred years. Really, so that's

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 3>really where the problem is is that if you try

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 3>to bank this space, then you're going to run into

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 3>one of those problems. And even if you try to

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 3>eliminate the two, the FDIC and OCC, you simply cannot

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 3>eliminate that chow point the Federal Reserve.

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Good stuff, Dennis. I know we got to wrap this up.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You're on your way to a nice little vocation, so

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to hold you back from that, but

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I do want to just kind of shout out just

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a little challenge just to the audience.

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just seeing Jordan Peterson live last week with

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>my daughter. He was amazing as always, and at the

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>end he talked about how and really his message has

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 1>always been that we should all take personal responsibility for ourselves,

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's always been his message, like pull yourself up

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from a bootstraps, wipe your face off, like take responsibility

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for yourself. And he talked about the difference of tyranny

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and slavery and how they're sort of opposite sides and

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the slave doesn't want to take personal responsibility for themselves,

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>are just always being told what to do. And the

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>problem is that he says that specifically in regards to

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the way the world is working in politics.

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 2>And specific specificity, if.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't step up and take personal responsibility for ourselves,

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and we don't step up and take personal responsibility for

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 1>our our political system, our local politics, and maybe on

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a bigger level, if we don't step up and take

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for that, then the tyrants will So by abdicating

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>our responsibility, that leaves a vacuum. The tyrants will come

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and pick that up. And so his challenge is be

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>responsible not just for yourself, but for your community and

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>for your and for the political system as well, if

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>you care, and to be honest with you, Dennis, I

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>heard him say this. This is the second time I

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>heard him say this, and it's just like, oh, it's

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like man, it's like he's he's absolutely right. So I

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>applaud what you're doing. And I recommend everybody go check

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>out the Tushi Action Fund. If you can't, if you

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have the time, maybe you can at least support

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>them in some way. Anything else you want to say

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in closing, Dennis.

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 3>No, thank you again for having me on Mark, And yeah,

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll finish with a with a great Plato quote.

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:01.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, one of the.

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 3>end up being governed by your inferiors. So it's true.

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I know a lot of people don't want to engage

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 3>in the political system. They don't like it, it's gross. But

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:15.399
<v Speaker 3>if you just say, hey, I'm going to abdicate that responsibility,

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to get involved, somebody's going to get

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 3>involved and they're going to end up making rules that

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 3>you have to follow. So I always tell people, you know,

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.399
<v Speaker 3>if you want to make sure that America upholds its

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:26.439
<v Speaker 3>values and that we had the right direction, that there's

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 3>no better way to do that than to get involved

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 3>in the political process.

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Awesome, all right, Dennis. Always a pleasure. Thanks for joining

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 2>me today.

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:33.919
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Mark