WEBVTT - Tech Stock Headwinds and Apple's Shipment Drop

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley, NB. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Hide and Ed Ludlow. I'm Caroline Hide and Bloomberg's World

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in New York, and I'm Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Tech stocks facing headwinds

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as we head into earning season. We'll discuss why the

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>sector is twenty percent rally may be disconnected from reality.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Plus a plunge in PC shipment's Apple seeing a forty

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>percent drop in shipments. Is the industry grapples with unsold inventory.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll bring you the details next, and mention capital firm

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Eclipse raises one point you billion for two new funds,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>both dedicated to backing startups trying to modernize physical industries.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Will have an exclusive conversation with Fanning Partner or Susan.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But first, let's check in on these publicly traded markets

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, and interesting that we've had a little

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a flip reverse. I think we just want

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the broader markets. Head I seem

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to be jumping the gun and being trying to tell

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>everyone your micro moves. It is a lot about chips.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing a focus on the sales that are

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>happening at the moment in terms of PCs. What that

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>means also for the flood of infantry and chips. But

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>let's just move it on to what's happening in terms

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the broader markets. If we can the nastac off

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>by nine tenths of a percent, This is more about

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the jobs print on Friday, more about the economic fundamentals,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>more about the Federal Reserve maybe giving us another twenty

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>five basis points hike in May. Two year yield up

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>two basis points, so boring cost, justus rising to that

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for all important four percent level. Bloomberg dollar indexts on

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the higher side as we start to price in a

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>more hawkish fed. Moving on, because what does it mean

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for the world of crypto? While Bitcoin, even amid this

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar strength ed, we're still seeing Bitcoin managing to pull

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>up actually more than a percentage point. We're above that

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight thousand level. We all I, of course, what's

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>happening in the world of eth ethereum. We're expecting that

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>upgrade come Wednesday. A lot of volatility likely to come.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>What about the micro though. Yeah, when it comes to

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>single movers, the markets in the tech sector are trading

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened Friday because it was a holiday here in

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the US. Also, you know kind of thin volumes. Samsung,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest maker of memory chips, basically said they're

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going to cut production to meaningful levels get rid of

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the supply glut. You see names like Micron and Western

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Digital trading markedly higher, even though broadly tech is down.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>TSMC also posting numbers second consecutive quarterly sales miss, and

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that is weighing on the US ADRs of TSMC down

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent. The other data point we've woken up to

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this Monday morning is the IDC PC tracking data. A

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>long story, shortcarrow. We will get into it later in

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the show. With IDC a big drop year on year

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in PC shipment's Apple certainly the worst, more than forty

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>percent drop in its shipments. The stop reacting two percent.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Dell also sort of drop, but it's a little bit higher,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more sangwim when it comes to that name.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>The reason we care is that is not a good

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>leading indicator or four bow for what's to come in

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this earning season. Around the quarter for those hardware makers

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>carry Yeah, and it is all about now bracing ourselves

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for the earning season. What we anticipate, whether or not

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we can see any real fundamental reason for it, is

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>basically a ball market that we've gone back into in

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAC and it seems as though when you go

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to the m Live pulse, this is a great way

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of getting the Bloomberg user that people who are managing

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>money trading these stocks deciding really whether they're optimistic or not,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately it feels like they're not particularly they think

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>only fourteen percent in fact, think that the earnings are

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be strong enough to really vindicate some of

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the rally we've seen it. The other part that we're

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at with this is the rotation into tech came

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of the banks. Right, you think about

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened with SVB, So the question we ask ourselves

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward is, well, that's a little bit artificial because

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>what hurt the banks is also worrying for the tech sector.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Forty one percent of respondents saying what we saw with

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>SVB could spill over in some of the bigger names.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean going into earnings? What does that

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>mean for the tech sector, Well, we are s our audience.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is what they've had to say in recent weeks.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Carry the decline in the yields is actually driving tech stocks.

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you take a look at the Quintessential Central Fangman,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they peaked at twenty eight percent of the SMP. They

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>trotted around eighteen and they've really inched up recently. And

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that's being because you know that discounting mechanism, which is

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>represented by the yield, has resulted in those long tail

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>cash flows being worth more. These tech companies, if we're

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>talking to some of the bigger ones, I think they're

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive and the standpoint of the health of their balance sheets.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You can see that when the banking crisis erupted that

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>even some of the bigger fan companies actually outperformed in

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a relative basis because essentially their balance sheets are stellar.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>The cost cutting once that started happen, the bottom and tech,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, was done, and that's why I believe

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there is still another ten to fifteen prison upside tech.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the seven biggest tech stocks in

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, I think they make up almost more than

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the SMP. Five hundred in terms of

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>market cap, and that's only going to grow as people

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>find that that's the only place to hide. But once

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>earnings start to slow down, you should see that. You

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>should see this segment start to start there. You should

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>see their share prices start to fall a breadth of

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints their head. But actually, what hasn't there been in

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>breadthin is the market rally in the first quarter. It

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>was all down to some of these big tech names.

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's important for the broader market, right, And

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the run up and then as that

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred the first three months of this year, the

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>rotation into tech, it's completely odds with earnings expectations. The

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>data shows that we think it's going to be a

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>pretty rubbish season, particularly for megacap tech. So how do

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you tally those two things? And also how expensive? Therefore

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tech has become twenty four times on the NASA one

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>hundred in terms of forward earnings. That's more than we've

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last Hey, let's get straight to it

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with all. The woman has a few ancess for us,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Gina Mouston Adams. We're so prettied to say she's coming

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to us. Of course, you know, our Broombag intelligence Gina,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a lot of adam more basically, how

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>we've set ourselves up for the earning season. People bracing

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for the numbers to come down and actually what there

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and six. Yeah, it should be a

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty rough earning season, not just for tech but really

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for the SMP five hundred at large. And indeed it's

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>expected to be a pretty rough first half altogether. Analysts

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are now forecasting greater than seven percent decline in the

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>first half. Remember at the beginning of the year, they

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>were expecting only a two percent decline, So in the

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>matter of just a few weeks, analyst expectations have been

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>plumbing techs a big part of that. Both the tech

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and communication sector, which of course houses stuck like Alphabet

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and meta stocks that we generally think of as tech.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Both of those segments of the SMP five hundred are

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>anticipated to produce double digit declines and earnings for the

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 1>first quarter on the heels of a really rough fourth quarter.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So not much good news anticipated to come with the

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>first quarter earning season. It's the only thing that from

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental perspective, may be enabling some better performance from

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>these stocks on the communication side is the valuations are

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>very very low. This is a group that has been

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>trading off for the better part of a year and

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a half, so at least on that side of the

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>space where the Googles and that rather alphabet and Meta

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Netflix disneys of the world are trading at relative discounts.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So that has emerged. And then also we have seen

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of cost cutting. So the consensus is

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>anticipating that within the first half of this year these

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>companies will prove enough cost cutting, rationalization of expenses and

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the like that they can produce a margin turnaround by

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty three. Gina, we talked about

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the rotation into tech they kind of gained and then

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as that one hundred, this sort of starkist example of

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that you have megacat tech in that indatex. You also

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have very high multiple software names, some of them preprofit

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. Why is there such a why are they

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so odd? The sort of outlook for a poor earning

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>season and the performance of that index, Well, I think

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a combination of things going on. The first is,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>even though outlook the alok for earnings is relatively negative,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we did price in a very negative outlook for earnings

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by the end of twenty twenty two. Really, as of

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the early part of October twenty twenty two, the market

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was pricing for a significant decline in earnings to come.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We did see the relative momentum and analyst revisions reach

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a low at the point as well, So even though

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>revisions are still going lower, they're not going lower as

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>fast as they were in the fall of last year,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so that has created some degree of stability. I think

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>another thing to consider is at the start of this year,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these stocks were incredibly discounted. Again, these are

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the communications segments of tech, not the traditional tech, but

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the communication stucks were trading at very extreme discounts relative

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to their long term history, which would imply they were

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively prepared for very negative earnings news. And then many

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of these companies came out and announced cost cutting measures

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that allowed for the consensus to start to think about

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a potential margin finally forming for this segment of the index.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>And then the whilest I would say really did support

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the rotation was about interest rates. We've seen a pretty

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>big rally and interest rates, which naturally results in improvement

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in some of the longer duration, higher growth segments of

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the index in terms of valuation expansion. So it's not

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>been about earnings really, it's more about a lot of

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>other factors that have helped some near term recovery in

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this group. Caroline, you mentioned earlier the valuation question. You

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>know later in the show we're going to pass over

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the IDC data with IDC. I'm looking forward to that.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>How much is that a crystal ball for the trouble

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>macro environment we're in right now for technology? Yeah, Gina,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to that point, you used to always come on around

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings in the clothes when I was lucky enough to

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be in those hours as well, and thinking about when

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you get about earnings from For me, the canary in

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the coal mine was nearly always snap and it was

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about advertising. But now all were starting to think more

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about well, inventory, about consumer, about demand, about the chip sector. Yep.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a really important distinction between

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>This is why I keep talking about the communication stocks

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>versus the tech stocks. Communication stocks are a different group

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>intentionally because fundamentally they trade on a slightly different cycle.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Communication stocks led this down draft. Remember that's where you

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>saw a tremendous amount of margin weakness. That's where Snap

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely a good leading indicator. Now we're moving into

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different portion of the cycle, which you would

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>expect would probably hammer away at some of the tech

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>strengths and tech specific strengths, which is really more about

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not only software and services, but those hardware names, the

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>communications equipment names, the semiconductor's names. The areas of the

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>index that are really traditional tech they're subject to an

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>inventory cycle, are the areas where, unfortunately valuations are still

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit overpriced. Earning's weakness is emerging, has emerged

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last year, certainly with an inventory crisis that

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>has emerged but is likely reaching more critical levels. And frankly,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the investor base is really captivated by the

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of a cycle, and in particular with Apple and

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft really being able to shrug off risks fast quickly

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and recover quickly. Yeah, and that's a notion that we're

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>going to really question over the course of the next

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>earning season is how much of this is a short

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>term weakness versus a long term weakness. How rapidly can

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies to recover strength into twenty twenty four that

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is likely to frame. I think the outlook for these

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ducks and how many times can they mention artificial intelligence

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to get people on sited Gina Marston Adams, I mean,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much opening meg Intelligence. IDC out with

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>its latest report showing PC demand is plunging, with Apple,

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, seeing a more than forty percent decline in

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>shipments year year in the first quarter, joining us an

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>now I DC Group Vice President for Consumer Device Trackers

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Reith, and Ryan, you know, Apple is the kind

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of headline here that across the industry we're back below

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>early twenty nineteen levels for shipments. What is the principal

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>cause really demandsload? Good to talk to you guys, by

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's nice like going on again put on. Honestly,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really a demand story at this point. You know,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the way we're looking at the

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>entire market is we're basically at a correctional standpoint, and

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the correction is not just going to be this Q

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>one that we just put out a report this morning. Realistically,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the correction is going to be probably most of this

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>year or the industry sees some growth around PCs. But

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, that's kind of where we're at at this stage,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not a supply issue. It's not anything there. It's

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>really a demand issue. And Ryan, the reasoning behind the

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>demand issue. Is it that well, some of these computers

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't been upgraded of late, with silantipitating Apple to do

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the second half of the year, everyone already

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>over indexed on purchasing them. Or is it actually when

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I worried about our finances, we don't want to make

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>big purchases. It's probably more of the ladder. I think

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, you know, you've got sorry about that. I

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just pumped the table here. Um, you've got the you know,

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got the ongoing you know, inflation concerns that are

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>rising costs of goods already, you know, the global recession

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fear has not gone away. It's been tempered a little

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>bit in some regions. So I think it's probably more

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of the ladder that both consumers, companies and education institutions

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are sort of holding onto their purse strings a little

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>bit tighter than they would And it makes sense. And

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the industry, from supply chain

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to the OEMs, they foresaw this coming.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the question was really what's the magnitude going

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to be, And nobody wanted to, you know, over sort

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of correct on the downside because they didn't want to

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>miss an opportunity like many did throughout the pandemic. So

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at that point now where you're gonna

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we already heard a little bit from Samsung

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>around memory, but we've got some really important tech earnings

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the next couple of weeks. Would you

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>guys know very well? I think we're going to start

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear a little bit more, probably hear a little

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more. You know, the storm's not over, more so

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>than the positives. But you know, I just want to

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of just preface by sort of saying that we

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>still believe that, you know, we get into next year,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be at at or a little

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>above pre pandemic level. So there is some positive in

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all this, but we're going to hear some negativity not

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>only from what we put out today but realistically probably

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>through the next couple of course. And ed, I mean,

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we already heard the warnings. The CFO of Apple himself,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Luca was saying we're going to see double digit declines

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in the map part of the business. But it's not

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just Apple being affected. Yeah, And we were saying earlier, Ryan,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much is your data set a crystal

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ball ahead of earning season? But I wonder if we

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can actually get even more granularity. Right, it's not Apple.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You look at Dell greater than thirty percent, decline HP

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>greater than twenty four percent. Is there any geographic or

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>demographical breakdown you can see real pullback from the consumer. Yeah, well,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's happening across the board. I would say the pullback

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing now, the shift is probably more angled

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>towards the developed markets in the last six months, and

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that is because more of the developing

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>markets around the world had already sort of corrected for

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer pullback, you know, hit a little bit harder on

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the wallet and so forth, and businesses sort of followed

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in sort of in that same segue, meaning, you know,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>businesses in these emerging markets sort of said, hey, look,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>if we needed a PC, maybe we could do another

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>six months without buying that PC. Or if people were

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>going to refresh every five years, maybe we can get

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>them to six years now. And that sort of prolongs

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost. So again, I know, developed market versus emerging

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>market doesn't really sort of break down the geographies. But

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think when you look at things, you know,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>our expectation is that, you know, the the North American

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>market has still been doing good in comparison to the

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>global market. You know, we've seen pockets of again I

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>use the word strength very lightly because it's really not

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>strength but a little bit better sort of opportunity in

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the European markets. China seeing a little bit

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of recovery. Going to take a little bit more time there,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>especially on the consumer side. So it's really spread out,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably hitting the pullbacks and the developing markets

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more just because of the cost. Ran

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>reath great breakdown, thank you of IDC Group, and he

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>led us there. He started talking about China and the

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>demand from that country. Let's stick with Apple and in fact,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's relationships with China, and you know that it's one

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>US business that's facing some of the steepest challenges. So

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we say to selective decoupling as it's been called from China.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a key lawmaker has been saying after a series

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of meetings with executives and experts in Hollywood and Silicon

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Valley over the last week or so. Let's go for

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>more on this from the most Economics Tom Orlick and Tom,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Mike mcgallagher in particular, discussing this selective decoupling.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>What does he mean exactly? So we've got Mike Gallagher,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the chair of a new House committee on US China

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>relations heading over to California, meeting with Tim Cook of Apple,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Bob Iger of Disney, and talking about this

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>concept of selective decoupling. Now, the idea here is that

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some aspects of the US China relationship which

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are strategically important. Most here in Washington, DC, for example,

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want China to get the edge in artificial intelligence,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why there's now a ban in selling China

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the leading edge semiconductors which are required to do leading

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>edge AI work. Other parts of the relationship, though, snapping

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>together iPhones, watching Disney movies, cooperating on climate change, there's

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a desire to keep those relationships on an even keel.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 1>The big question, of course, is well, in practical terms,

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for a company like Apple, for a company like Disney,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>what does that selective decoupling look like, and is it

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact possible to have intense colastetition, intense rivalry over here,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>but normal relationships over there. Tomorlick of Bloomberg Economics, who,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, Caroline spent many years in China at the

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>heart of that economy, so knows both sides. All right.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, We're going to talk Tesla, which is building

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a large new battery factory in China in Shanghai, further

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>cementing China's place at the top of the global energy

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>storage supply chain. More with that next, sickem of the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>world of mask. Twitter has changed its description tag for

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>MPR to government funded Media from state affiliated media following

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 1>criticism last week. You probably saw this one. The company

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>rewrote the label on Saturday, following pushback from MPR, which

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't used the platform itself since April fourth. MPR CEO

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>had called the state affiliated media label quote unacceptable. This

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg time now for Talking Tech. Open AI sending

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>its eyes in Japan. The co found Racio some altman

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who's here. He says, the organization is looking at opening

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>an office there and expanding Japanese language services. After meeting

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with the country's prime Minister, let's move to Uber now

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's Middle East unit is selling a fifty percent

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>stake worth four hundred million in its Kareem super app

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Emirates Telecom. Now, that's an Aberdabi based firm trying

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to reinvent itself as a global tech investor. And Tesla

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>will build a large new battery factory in Shanghai the

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>ev Makawar manufacturer those megapacks, those large scale energy storage

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>units in the new facility, adding to its factory for

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>evs in the area, and ed you're going to talk

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>about that more. Yeah, I've got DNA Hole who covers

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all things Tesla for us here in San Francisco with

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>me on set. You and I always talk about when

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to report out these things. It's not a surprise.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has always said long term, we need more

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>giga factories all over the world. But this one's quite

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it's in China. Yeah, I mean, Tesla is

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>really doubling down on its investment in China at a

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>time when the like tensions between Washington and Beijing are

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of at an all time high. And this is

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not super surprising. At Investor Day, last month, Tesla talked

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about the energy transition. They've always made it very clear

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that they are more than a car company. You know,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for years energy storage took a backseat to the cars,

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but now we're seeing Tesla talk a lot more about

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the energy storage products. A lot of news from tests

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are over holiday weekend, which often happens. They cut prices

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>again in the United States. Where and how and why?

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So they changed the prices on their website late Thursday

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>night Friday as a market holiday, cut the X and

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>asked quite a bit, you know, shipped off some prices

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the three and the why. Musk has said that

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to chase volume over margins, and I don't

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>know if investors are super thrilled with that, but I

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mean he's made it very clear that in the short term,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the way to go. We saw prices rise

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit because of the chip shortage. Now

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they're coming back down and he's determined to maintain that

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>pole position and he's going to cut prices to move

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>on them. All right, Bloom bogs Downahole, who leads our

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>coverage of all things Elon Musk, All Things Tesla. Welcome

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>back to mow Med Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>York and I'm med lod Low in Sam Francisco. We've

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>got some thin trading, to be honest, amid the holiday weekend,

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>but most major equity indicias lower a lot of trading

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>driven around FED bets and has that one hundred off

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>by a percentage point. Also, the US listed shares of

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>China Tech down more than one and a half percent,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of underperforming the market where there's outperformances in the chips.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Look at the Philadelphia semi conductor index up eight tens

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>or one percent. When you look at the individual movers, Caroline,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you kind of understand why. It's the memory chip makers

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>really pushing higher significant single digit gains that dragging up

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that index, all after Samsung said on Friday that it

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to cut production and memory chips to a

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>meaningful level take some of that supply glut out of

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the market. Where there is weakness is TSMC, which, as

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>you know over the weekend said that it essentially has

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>had its second consecutive coursely sales miss against expectations. But

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how quickly things are changing this sector from supply glut

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to no demand. What is going on. Yeah, and ultimately

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the self prescriptions that are going on at Samsung cutting

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>its production and TSMC actually cutting its capital expenditures. That's

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. With Joanne Phoene, Partner Portfolio manager and Advisors

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management, who really we looked to you for the

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>expertise in the chip sector right now, joe Anne, because

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>should we expected all of this? Yeah, Caroline's good to see,

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the challenges of the chip industry you're facing

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>look like they are coming to an end, which is

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the good news. The cuts at Samsung for a manufacturing

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>capacity is always part of a big bass boom cycle

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the memory chip world. We're seeing that play out.

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Apple and TSMC news, you know, it has

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some people wondering just how far down the PC sales

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to ago and how long that part of

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the world is going to take to recover. And this

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>becomes circular in a way, and are we kicked off

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the conversation of today really discussing some of the Apple issues,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're seeing a slowdown in PCs that

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just is highlighting the electronics demand that diminishes and ultimately

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that hits chips. I think John, this is where It's

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand what's going on, right, Is this a

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>demand issue for the end market memory chips go into

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>PC's are the consumer electronics? Is this chip customers going

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>through inventory and that there is a supply gout? What

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for you is the single biggest factor right now that's

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>hurting the chipmakers. You know, if for those exposed to

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumer PCs and smartphones, it's certainly a demand decline

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>right after the surgeon purchases during the works of the pandemic, right,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing them digest that and wait till they need

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade their PCs and their smartphones. So I think

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>demand is largely driving what's going on bulth with Apple

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on TSMC and have already gone on at the other

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>PC manufacturers. The latest data from IDC just can firms

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that Apple's higher priced PCs are now seeing that same

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of drop off. And don't forget we also saw

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>news recently that Apple was cutting its demand for chips

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>out of TMSMC, particularly the newest chip, the M two,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, was also a signal of what

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this was likely to be for them for the first quarter.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You've taken us there. It's the next generation technology The

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>first thing that Caroline thinks of Joan when she wakes

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up is artificial intelligence, and when she goes to sleep,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence is all any of us think about the moment.

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>But in the chip sector, that's what's driving sales right now.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You look at Vinvidia as the kind of prime beneficiary

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. Is that an area that excites you as

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>an investor, Yeah, ed, you've just bridged to the exciting

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>area of the chip world, which is high performance computing,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the generative AI. And don't forget there's also a broader

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>demand for chips out there in industrial applications and medical

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>care applications. So while we do see right the PC

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and smartphone space in a demand and driven decline and

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all the inventory problems that came along with that, we

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to see a secular that is, multi year growth

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in the other areas of a more advanced chips demand,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like for Invidia chips, like for servers. We know data

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>centers are continuing to expand we have all this traffic

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>running across the Internet, and now all of this demand

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>for really high intensity computation driving the demand, for example,

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for Invidia chips. So one has to look more broadly

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>at the chip space and not just focus in on

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the PCs, which we know they're encyclical decline, but there

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of opportunities for our companies to continue to

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>grow through those other areas. I'm saying it's a family affair,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and my husband did all of the Easter egg hunt

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>clues this weekend VACHACPT and nearly blew my mind. But

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>so to us, John, I mean about aside from the

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>excitement of ultificial intelligence, there was some hope, some silver

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>linings coming from for example IDC saying some of this

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>pullback means maybe TSMC and the like start to get

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>where they manufact show in order as we start to

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>see a bifurcated world of China US as the US,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>but also that things are going to pick back up

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. Yeah. I think that's fair and

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we've been looking at as a

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>potential positive driver for these markets. In addition to eventual

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>stabilization and ultimately cuts in interest rates, which will help

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>these higher growth stocks to recover as they have been

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>right since late last year. The next thing to come,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we do believe is going to be a recovery in

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>earnings outlooks for the second half of this year and

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, and you know, you saw that

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Micron report and it was terrible, but yet they said, hey,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the end of this inventory clearing cycle.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Things are going to get better. And so I think

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately the tech investor is recognizing that cyclical declines

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>are temporary. We're probably at the worst it's going to get.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably see companies come out with almost terrible earnings here

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for the first quarter and cautious guidance, but they're probably

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>going to point beyond that and say, yeah, this is

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical decline. We still have these structural drivers. Let's

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>everybody look forward to that, because these companies still have

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of earnings power, and earnings got ahead of

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>them once we get through the circlebal decline, and and

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>these are companies that have to think for the very

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>long term, particularly when I think about R and D.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Well like the point you be made about where they manufacture. Sorry, Joam,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's just you know, one thing we haven't talked

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about recently is the Chips Act. You know, you have

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Intel trying to reinvent itself on the foundry side, but

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>also TSMC. Looking at Arizona as an investor, is there

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to put your money among those names that

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are due to get public money support? Right is what's

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>happening in the Chips Act, the rethink on production and

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. You know, I think that's going to be

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a relatively minor driver of the stocks. It certainly gives

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Intel a lifeline to get it past this technology, you know,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>stumbling walk they've gone over. Gives them time potentially to

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>get into the foundry business. We're not so excited about

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that name in particular, but the other ones, though. What

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you can start from these subsidies is ultimately decline in

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the depreciation that they'll have to take against these new factories,

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and that should help sustain their margins. That's a good thing,

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't drive our investment thesis. Overall. We still

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>want to look to see whether they have a leading

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>edge in the chips they're producing or designing, and whether

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they're serving the right markets, the ones that are really growing.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't use that as a real driver of

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>an investments at this point, but it should help sustain

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some margins. And one company, of course, we were shining

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a line in the companies that do well on the day,

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Microns, because Samsung's going to pull back in terms

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of its supply Joan. But I remember speaking to the

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Micron, who a year or so ago was saying,

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>boom bus cycles that're over, weren't it for the long term.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see IoT, we're going to see autos,

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to have this perpetual need for chips

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem to ever work out. That wasn't the

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>great hope, and we heard it from many companies, from

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Texas Instruments to Micron to others. I think, though, we

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 1>have to take a little bit of a step back

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>recognize two things. One, it is the case that the

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>demand in the use of chips is far more diverse

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>now than it was the case in the nineteen nineties

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and the first decade of the two thousands is what

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>happened to disrupt that whole thesis that chip demand was

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more diversified and therefore there'd be less of these cycles,

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>which in the past had really been driven by the PC.

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And when the new chip came out, what happened was

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we hit a pandemic and the pandemic coordinated the purchases

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>by lots of companies and lots of people of new

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>PCs and new smartphones, and now we're seeing the backside

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of that where they're now pausing since they just bought

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of new stuff and they're waiting. We didn't

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>expect to see that kind of a shot to the

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>PC and smartphone cycle that really probably only came about

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic. I think once we get beyond this,

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that more diversified and market dynamic will come

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>back into place and we'll see much smoother cycles going forward.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Or the chip industry as a whole. Joan Poeni partner

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and portfolio manager had Advises Capital Management. Someone Caroline on

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the research and investing side has covered that sector for

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and it's interesting to get the kind

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of real time views on that newsreaction from an investor's perspective.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Now coming up, betting on real world industries to redefine

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the next decade of tech. We're gonna be joined by

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a CLIPS founding partner, Leo Susan for more in that

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>next character. Yeah, let's just check in what's happening in

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the world of crypto, there was this key story if

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you're following the FTX fallout, well, the debtors, they've just

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>been releasing their first report since the collapse, and it

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't paint a pretty picture. Unsurprisingly now, the report says

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that the company lacked fundamental financial and account and controls,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>stifled descent within the company, and that top members even

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>joked internally about their tendency to all lose track of

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars in assets. Former CEO Sam Bankwinfried faces

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>trial in October after pleading not guilty to forward and

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>campaign financial law charges. Let's just check in though, on

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the broader crypto's scene right now, because bitcoin the strength

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>still there. We're at twenty eight twenty eight and a

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>half thousand now, and even if getting a little bit

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of a bid despite strength in the US dollar today,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we're all thinking about Wednesday. We're all thinking about the Shanghai,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing nature of a move from proof of work

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to proof of steak with Ethereum, and some of the

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>unstaking of some of those eighteen million ether that have

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been locked up for a few years. From New York,

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco, there's a Bloomberg have private markets become

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a victim of their own success. That's what new research

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Intelligence would suggest. As a surgeon fundraising more

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>than doubled in recent years during the error of low rates.

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>This environment curvated created some perverse incentives for valuations, right

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as cash rich firms chase deals. B i AN Lists,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in a note published today, say they now expect institutional

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>investment in private equity and venture capital to cool off

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as restructuring marked down, slowing dry powder for deals and

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rates force basically a reevaluation of that risk

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>reward equation. Now, there are some firms out there that

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are still raising money, powering through with new fund. Silicon

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Valley firm ECLIPS just raise one point two billion dollars

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for two new funds, both dedicated to backing startups Caroline

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to modernize physical industries. Fund five will

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on early companies, while Early Growth Fund two or

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>back more mature companies. Delighted to say that the Clips

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>founding partnerle Or Susan joins us, Now, this is interesting.

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You want to back startups that make stuff, actual physical stuff.

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Why why is that so appealing to you? Because, first

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of all, thanks for having me focus, and you know,

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's matter and the end of the day,

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll live in the physical world. Seventy five trillion out

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 1>of thee hundred trillion dollars, it's industries the belt physical

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and those industries did not add the same digital ons

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>formation that we are sol familiar in the world of

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Internet and etc. We want to digitize in those industries

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's matter and because I think the

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>impact from financial point of view is going to be tremendous. Leo,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a name at your firm familiar to me, Charlie Mwonghi,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who was an executive at Riving, and that got me

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about your strategy. A lot of the areas you're

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at require scale and they're very capital intensive. Does

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that make them more risky as a VC investment? You know,

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually kind of was the perception. The reality is

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to technology reached a point right now that you actually

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>don't need the same amount of capital you needed before

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>because you just goes talked about semi conductor. I can

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>use semi conductor of the shelf. I can use contract

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing of the shelf. I can use the same open

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>source and cloud infrastructure that our friends in the area

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of Internet is being developed, and I can apply that

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the physical world, meaning the cost of capital and

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the needful capital went down dramatically and the upside is

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a seventy five trillion. So what we're seeing is a

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>new area of our opportunities for new founders to come

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and change the industries that matter. You know, Caroline, what's

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating. We're talking on a daily basis about artificial intelligence, software,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Web three again software. Now, there must be a chunk

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of investors out there that are interested in getting into

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>physical assets, physical companies building real stuff, even though at

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment, for a lot of institution investors, you were

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just saying it's a time to rethink your allocation to

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>private markets. And therefore, how hard or indeed easy was

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it to raise money? What the LPs look like? Yeah,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we raised money from a nonprofit institution in the United

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>States that will be our endowment foundation and pensions hospital system.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I probably needs to say right now, Oh, it was

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really easy. We did it in two months. We will

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>oversubscribed all of the things that probat of this is

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>will say that's true, but that's actually another point. The

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>point is. We are seeing some of the most amazing

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>founders right now in the market. Wants to be ellen mosques,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 1>They wants to go cars, they wants to build rockets.

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>They understand that the impact of technology can be much

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more superior in the physical world than what we've been

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>trained in Silicon Valley. It's all about SaaS, It's all

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about recount revenue. That's just not true anymore. Where are

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these founders that you're seeing. This is not a Silicon

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Valley things. You need agriculture in China, and you need

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>logistics in Austin, Texas. You needs manufacturing in Berlin, and

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you need industrial systems in Abu Dhabi. This is a

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>global efforts to take the industries the powering our life

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and digitizing them. And I'm telling you that some of

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the smallest people right now are not doing any more

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>only crypto or SaaS or enterprise software. They are taking

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the long roads to go and build companies that will matter,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that will move the economy into a digital phase. Lee

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or you reference China, so you do plan to take

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>some of your funds raised from US based investors to

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>deploy into startups that are based in China. We are

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent focus on Today in the United States,

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we are all based in Carlo, alto thirty of US,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are focusing on investing in the domestic area.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that we're spending most of our

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>time on onshore manufacturing, semiconduct, those batteries, defense systems that

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are very domestic oriented. And this is currently where is

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>our focus on. But that's not mean that there is

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>no opportunities in China real quickly. Or there is one

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>company that's looking for some money and that company is

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Orbits. First of all, are you interested in investing

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in Virgin Orbit? And second of all, how do you

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do due diligence on the physical space? How hard is that?

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So we all operate those that operating those industries from below,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Revian Apples, some Sara, flex Ge and many others, and

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of I think would bring us the edge

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to not only diligence in those companies

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>when they have two guys in a presentation, maybe a dog,

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>but also to help them building when they're scaling into

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>commercialization and then hopefully into the public market. One day

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Virgin I will likely pass ah exclipts founding partner, Leo,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You've been so fruitful in all the rest of your answers.

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>We thank you for politely deciding not to answer, Leo.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Susan Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Alexandria Ococia Cortez are

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>demanding answers over Silicon Valley banks close relationships with some

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of its customers now in let us since Sunday I'm

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>reviewed by Bloomberg. The Democrats are asking fourteen of the

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>largest depositors with SVB about the nature of their connections

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with the bank, including where the board members actives investors

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.959
<v Speaker 1>when they received special benefits such as lines of credit

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>from SVB. Well, Hannah Miller wrote that story. We're very

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>pleased to welcome her to the show and anyone responding

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to these letters so far, Yeah, so far, I've only

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>heard back from Robox, so we haven't seen many responses

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>come through yet. But it'll be interesting to see whether

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>these companies choose to answer these letters, and if they don't,

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what Warren and AOC will say. You know, Hannah, I

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 1>will never forget that weekend, the Saturday and Sunday following

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Banks collapse. You and I were working together right,

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and we very quickly learned that actually many, in many

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>cases depositors did use other services for the bank. What

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the kind of CrOx of what Warren is

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to find out here. Yes, so Silicon Valley Bank

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>was just this cherished institution among venture capitalists and tech

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>startup founders, and they had a wide, wide range of services.

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could go to them for your own

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>personal finance as well as those for your company. So

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the contagion here that was felt when SBB collapse was

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>really widespread and at Warren and AOC want answers as

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to whether these personal relationships that SVB had with founders

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and vcs actually contributed to its collapse. It's interesting that

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to a lot of the big now public

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>companies for these sorts of answers. Is the real end

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>person they're trying to label here the VC community. I

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think they are targeting the VC community. I mean, both

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Warren and AOC have been extremely outspoken and critical about

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened with SVB. There are concerns here that you know,

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>SVB was so willing to provide short term funding, you

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 1>know that it may have contributed to instability at the bank,

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>so they want to closer look. They want to see

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>how you know, SVB coddled its clients. I think that

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was the word that Warren used. So it's very interesting

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to see how this will play out. All right, Bloombogs

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Miller, thank you very much for your reporting. Now

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about it and it's going viral. The

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Mario movie. It just topped the box office and

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest opening weekend for a film so far

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 1>this year. Super Mario is released on Wednesday to take

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the spring break in East the holidays, and

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>over the five day period it took in two hundred

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and five million dollars domestically according to comScore, and with

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a global hall of three hundred and seventy eight million,

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest opening of any movie so far in

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three is out in Japan. Yet that was delayed,

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.879
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't it. That's the big question. Delay because it's

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a tough crowd to please, and still they rake in

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>all of that money globally, quite astounding. Have you watched it?

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't, but I will, Okay, I might wait until

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's more for a family affair, but great amount of

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>focus on that. I didn't even get to ask you though,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>ed whether you've picked up your fire Festival two tickets.

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I wish we had got this in. I haven't picked

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>up my fire Festival too tickets, But that is certainly

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>something that's taught us. Bound Twitter right now, don't worry,

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll go and do a little video for social media.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Come follow us at Bloomberg Technology. Meanwhile. That does it

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of the show Bloomberg Technology. Yeah, it

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was packed, big focus on markets and chips. You can

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>recap on the podcast Apple, Spotify, iHeart Bloomberg, wherever you

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. From New York, from SF, this is

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg