WEBVTT - Will Prediction Markets Come to ETFs?

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Wokan A trillions.

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Weber and I'm Eric Belchunas.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Eric, I know you're really excited about this episode, and

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I had a prediction that was related to that. We're

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about prediction markets, which had become I

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>think one of the most fascinating areas in all of

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of we'll call it finance, even though I think

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's slightly adjacent to that, but people have gotten really

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>into prediction markets, and that meant that the ETF industry

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>has also taken note, and there's been some filings that

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in discussing on today's episode. What caught

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your attention?

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, about maybe a month ago somewhere, and there I

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>was sitting I remember exactly where I was. I was

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 2>at my kids au basketball game. We're just about to

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>keep score. I wasn't the coach. I was the scorekeeper

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>for this one. But anyway, I saw the filing. I

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>think James might have texted it to me and he said,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>look at this. And it was Friday. A lot of

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the best filings come in at Friday on Friday at

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>like four pm. Anyway, I'm looking at it, and it's

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>prediction market ETFs. There was a filing from round Hill

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and then Bitwise followed and then there was a third

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>issue or so there's three issuers who filed for prediction

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>market ETFs. A that's interesting, and be the ones they

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>chose were Democratic president wins twenty twenty eight election, Republican

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>president wins twenty twenty eight election, and then there's some

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Democrat Republican Senate ones in there, so it was political.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Now that's just a tip of the iceberg of what

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>prediction markets could do. But as instantly as an ETF analysts,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh my god, they're going after this. I

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 2>just didn't anticipate it. There was nothing in my brain

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that was expecting prediction market ETFs. And I'm pretty aware,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm total nerd in this space. So it

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>was interesting to be caught by surprise. And then you know,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>we looked in how will these work? And again that's

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>why it's fun to be an ETF analyst. It's never

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a dull moment. I mean, every time, every time it

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>gets a little like calm out there, something else throws

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 2>you into this new world. And this could be really

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>interesting because if these go through, there's you know, the

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>sky's the limit. You know, we could see a whole

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>gigantic category created for basically easy ways to click a

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>button and bet on prediction markets for a variety of things.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>So I thought it was worth discussing, you know, while

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>they're in registration, just so people could sort of, you know,

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>get these teed up and look out for them if

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>they launch.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So if being the big operative, we're there and to

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>discuss all of this with us. Matt Hogan, who's the

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer of bit Wise Asset Management. Usually he

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>comes on to talk about crypto, so I'm excited about

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>talking with him about something off today, this time on

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>trillions prediction markets. Matt, Welcome back to trillions.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I didn't know that you wanted to do

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>things other than crypto. I thought you had gone full crypto,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and once you go full crypto, you can't do anything else.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But I guess there's room for a little bit more.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hold on, did you go full crypto? Because whenever

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>we had him on and he said he was fifty

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 2>five percent crypto, he.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Was full crypto. But yeah, okay, I think you're full now, Matt, Yeah,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>what's that breakdown? Now?

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Come on, guys, I dragged ETFs into crypto along with

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of my friends, so I merged the two worlds. Yeah,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>full crypto, full financial innovation. Look, prediction markets are a

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 3>close analog to crypto. They sort of got their early

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>traction in the crypto market with Auger and then polymarket,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 3>and now we see more regulated traditional onshore venues like Kalshi.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 3>So these were close cousins. I think if you've been

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>involved in crypto for the last five years, you've been

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>paying very close attention to prediction markets, So to me,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>it's a natural extension.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I'm really curious about how this is actually

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>going to work, Like, how do you imagine calci or

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>polling market style bet being packaged into an ETF. What

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>are the mechanics of that?

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Sure, I mean first I should say that I

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>can't speak about the filings beyond what's in the actual filing,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of course, because they're alive filing and registration. I'm going

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>to speak generally about the process as opposed to specifically

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>about the prediction shares filing. But look, you know, if

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>you think about the ETF industry writ large you guys

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>have been covering. It takes interesting financial applications and packages

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 3>them into an easy wrapper that people can access. We've

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>seen that from stocks, to bonds, to hedge fund like strategies,

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. This is a natural extension of that. So

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 3>if you think of the underlying exposure, what's going on

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 3>in prediction markets. There are prediction markets on a wide

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>variety of things, from the silly to the geopolitical to

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the political. Have something like a Democrat or a Republican

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>wins the election in twenty twenty eight, people in the

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 3>underlying prediction markets can bet on that outcome. Let's say

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>it's trading fifty five forty five Democratic. They could bet

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>on the Democrat winning fifty five percent. If he wins,

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>it goes to a dollar. If he loses, it goes

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 3>to zero. The ETFs, per the filings, can use swaps

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 3>or direct exposure to gain exposure to that kind of outcome.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 3>So it's actually it's relatively simple, which is that this

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 3>exists in a regulated market, and the ETFs are capturing

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 3>that or proposing to capture that, because of course they

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>aren't launched. They may not launch theirself to be approved,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 3>proposing to capture that in an ETF rapper.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Matt, Basically, if you're looking at let's say

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to CTF launched, and you were at the fifty five

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to forty five the Republican one, I forget what you said,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 2>but let's say that was the fifty five to one,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you would buy the ETF and it would match the

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 2>percent currently on polymarket or whichever interface you were using.

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So effectively, all this is doing is just making it

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>a little more convenient for people who do like to

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>use ETFs versus getting your own poly market account, which

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>again isn't that dissimilar from crypto, where you're literally just

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 2>having this thing put into your environment where.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You like it.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>That's all that's happening. There's no other variable here. You

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 2>basically will click by at fifty five and that number

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 2>will move based on how poly Market moves up to

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the election.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that is what you see in the filings.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 3>That is how it's defined. Of course, the exact exposure,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 3>as I mentioned, could be either swaps based or direct

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>contract based. The proposals contemplate both, but the general idea

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 3>is exactly that. I think the analog to crypto and

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin is very similar. When the bitcoin ETF's launched, there's

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 3>this hue and cry you heard it about why do

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>we need a bitcoin ef You can buy it on coinbase,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>you can buy it through self custody. It turned out

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that people like the protections and ease of the ETF format.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 3>This is exactly that. It's absolutely true that individuals can

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>open a Calshie account or a poly market account and

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>trade tailor swift song views if they want to, but

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>not everyone wants to open those accounts, capitalize them. They

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>don't fit into their plans, et cetera. So if these

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>were allowed and permitted, it would allow it to happen

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>in a traditional ETF repper.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So how have regulators responded to your interest so far?

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're engaged in the process with regulators. I'll just

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>say that there is there is interest. But you know,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 3>one thing I've said before when we filed originally for

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>crypto ETFs is that bitwise doesn't exist to pay lawyers

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>and file projects that we don't believe will launch. So

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>if we didn't think there was a pathway to launch,

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>we wouldn't have taken this filing. All that said, I

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>said that when we first filed our bitcoin et which

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I think was twenty nineteen, So you should take because

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 3>words with a long term view and not a guarantee

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of any short term activity.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a prediction on when your filing will actually

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get through?

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yet?

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we get.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Prediction markets on when the prediction ETFs will launch?

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I've actually pretty shocked that there isn't. Well, as far

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>as I know, there's not one. But maybe after people

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>listen to.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Should I should get it going?

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>You should get it going.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean after seeing what went down with the bitcoin

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>ETFs and the crypto ETFs and how well they've done.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>And again, the ETFs have proved over and over you

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>could stuff almost anything in there. These issuers know what

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>they're doing. I don't see them taking that long to launch.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>There could be something I'm not seeing here, but it's

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>seems like you would just be able to use those

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>other examples as things that worked fine in a similar fashion,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's all ETFs have ever done. They've just made

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>something you can probably do on your own easier.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's right. If you think back of

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the history of ETFs, they've almost always worked extraordinarily well

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 3>accept in situations where the underlying was really complex, like

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>inverse vix, or where they were underlying liquidity issues like

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 3>putting private shares into an ETF have. Those have enabled challenges.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>But if you have a liquid underlying that's accessible and

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>that could be clearly explained to people, that has an

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>extremely strong track record in ETF land over the last

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty years.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm a regulator, what's going to make me nervous? Like?

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>What did you have to anticipate as you were thinking

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>about this, about what the anxieties are going to be?

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, certainly, I think they're probably two that come immediately

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 3>to mind, and these would apply to any sort of

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 3>filing that you're doing. One is the underlying liquidity. Right,

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the underlying liquidity on some of these contracts can range

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 3>from very good to very poor, and so you have

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>to think about how liquid the underlying is. That's certainly

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 3>something that went into our calculus when evaluating this space.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And then the second is that prediction markets are a

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>vast canvas and we've seen reactions for and against different

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>parts of the prediction market sector. Right, there's this big

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 3>debate our prediction markets investing or gambling, and I think

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it's like not a great debate, because if you take

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a prediction market on a sports game, like the outcome

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of the NCAAA final, that looks a lot like traditional

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 3>sports betting. If you take a prediction market on FED

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 3>fund futures and the outlook for interest rates, that looks

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>like a lot like traditional investment categories. And so I

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 3>think the other thing that we think a lot about

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 3>is what is appropriate in a setting and then what

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is maybe less appropriate. And I think that's that's something

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>that I think you'll see et officialers think carefully about

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>as they look to pursue this.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 2>You guys have these look I agree, and I actually

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>before on the train ride up, these political ones Joel

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 2>are the most popular. So my guess is there's a

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of liquidity for giant political races, and that's why

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>you started here.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm actually sports is by far the more popular

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>place where the money goes. It's like something like Matt,

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably know better, something like ninety percent is all

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in sports. It's basically become a proxy for sports books,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which is why states have been filing lawsuits against prediction markets.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious, like you, I mean, starting in a

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>place like politics and elections purposely avoids that discussion, and

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious why go politics to start?

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, look bit wise exist to help people gaining interesting

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 3>exposure to important areas of the market. I think politics

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is obviously extremely important for the outlook of the market.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, living in crypto, the outcome of elections has

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge impact on my business, and there is no

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 3>way to explicitly hedge that impact or lean into that impact.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>So if you think about it from an investment lens,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the presidential election will impact huge numbers of investments. Whether

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Michigan beats Yukon or not will not impact a huge

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>number of investments. So I think it's as simple sort

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>of real politic as that.

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But isn't the sports thing inevitable, Like we're going to

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have Super Bowl bets and ETFs at some point if

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we go down this path.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't know. I'm not sure that that's true,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 3>you know, as you mentioned, and there's a lot of

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 3>state based litigation about that. I think that introduces some

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 3>regulatory risk and maybe some existential risk into the development

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of products focused on that, while those is still adjudicated.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure that you have to assume we

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 3>go to infinity, if we go to one, I would

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 3>even say that oddly about prediction markets. I think there's

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>a possibility in the future that prediction markets narrow in

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>from their current enormous scope and refine what is appropriate,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>at least on the regulated onshore markets. I don't think, yeah,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that is fully scoped at this point,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 3>and people are sort of feeling out the edges.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It does seem like the ETF industry will definitely play

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>with this a little bit. I expect that if these launch,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>we will see a little silly season, but generally speaking,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>when it comes like I'm I'm thinking of like will

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Aliens come back? Will Jesus come back? Will the Eagles

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 2>win the Super Bowl? I want a two x version

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:47.239
<v Speaker 2>of that. I could see this happening, But those ideas

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>are very similar to crypto. The further you get from

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>further away you get from these big liquid areas, they're

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>not going to be huge successes in the ETF either.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think sticking to politics it is probably makes

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 2>sense for me point of view too, which is there's

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>probably a lot of people who are interested in that,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and you know, there's always been this thing like oh, hey,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I think Trump's gonna win, let me go along the market.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Or some people were like he's going to crash the market,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's actually two way bet there, like people don't

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>even know. This cleans that up a little because then

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to actually do like three D math, like, well,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>if the Republicans win, the rates will do this, and

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>people will think this and this will go up and down.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>This is just straight up this will pay off if

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>they win, which it cuts through having to do that

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 2>three D math, which people have to do with the

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>political stuff a lot. I think.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that's enormously true, and I would actually extend

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>that beyond things. If you look at something like interest

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>rates and you look at the Fed fund futures market,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>that involves a high degree of math to figure out

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>what they're expressing, Whereas what people want to decide is

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>will interest rates go up or down at the next meeting.

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I would even say that that extends to some degree

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>to like options and and equity price outcomes. You know,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 3>what people want to allocate to is will bitcoin cross

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand dollars. They don't want to talk about

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 3>various Greeks on how that's expressed in the options market,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 3>at least not everyone wants to. So you know, again,

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>if you think of one pathway that ETFs have followed

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 3>has been taking institutional exposures and making them accessible and

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>easy to understand for everyone. I think prediction markets are

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.239
<v Speaker 3>in that vein when it comes to politics, economic indicators,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>market indicators, and I think that's really good for investors

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and actually really good for the world as well.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Just to stick with the regulatory theme for a second,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I find interesting about prediction

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>markets is that we've talked about the states and how

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're suing the companies and trying to change what you

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be able to bet on. The

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>CFTC has really been the most vocal on a federal

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>level proponent of the markets. So I'm curious. We've seen

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens between SEC and CFTC on occasion. Do you

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have any inklings of how that dynamic plays out yet?

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think it's it's you know what celig has said.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>The chair of the CFTC is pretty clear that he've

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 3>used these as swap contracts that ought to be regulated

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>by the CFTC, which means a lot of things which

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>are worth noting. It means things like market surveillance, it

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 3>means things like rules against insider trading, et cetera, et cetera.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that is obviously the dominant paradigm. ETFs have

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>interacted with commodity swaps and options for years, right, So

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.239
<v Speaker 3>ETFs hold things that are primarily regulated by the CFTC.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 3>That's been going on at least since the gold ETFs, right,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>certainly you know before that. So this is just an

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>extension of that. Now, of course, the SEC has its

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>own review process for these contracts, but the underlying I

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.359
<v Speaker 3>think there's a I think there is a broad consensus

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that those are you know, swap that belong under a

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 3>CFTC guidance.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And just to stick with the mechanics of how this

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>might work. So there's this, let's call it a binary

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that on a presidential outcome. What does that look like

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>after it resolves? From an ETF perspective, Is there any

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>version or comparison that we've ever seen in the marketplace

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of basically a you know, ETF resolving itself in sunsetting

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like that seems like a new chapter.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Actually, so there are two versions. There's one that

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 3>you're referring to, which I would say there is a

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>great example, which are the bullet shaars. The bulletshairs were

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 3>bond ETFs that targeted specific years, so like I'll only

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>hold treasuries that mature in twenty twenty nine, and then

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 3>at the end of twenty twenty nine you would get

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 3>your one hundred dollars par back. You've collected interest along

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>the way, and then the it liquidates and off you go.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And the reason that was a successful franchise is because

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 3>people have specific needs at specific years. They want to

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 3>get their money back, and traditional bond ETFs don't do that,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and then people would often move from the twenty twenty

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 3>nine to the twenty thirty or the twenty thirty one,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, using them like a bond ladder. So I

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 3>think that is the best example of sunsetting ETFs that

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 3>we have, and it was enormously successful. Obviously, it introduces

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>some capital and tax considerations that are worth thinking about,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>but we do have a clear example of that. The

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 3>other thing you see in the filings, again not talking

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 3>about ours, but just the filings broadly, is a concept

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 3>of rolling these into future where you would use stock

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 3>reverse splits to sort of recalibrate it to the next election.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it remains to be seen. You know, what

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is the best approach, what investors want, how those will

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 3>work from a mechanical perspective, But if you dig into

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the filings you'll see both ideas.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, Matt, because you're referring to filings other than

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just your own. Is there anything else you saw in

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the filings that made you go, Oh, that's that's different

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and that tickles my brain in a way that I

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hadn't expected.

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think that is the That is

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 3>the primary thing that I've seen. From a difference perspective,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of the details have to have

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>yet to come out and yet to materialize. I think

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>if you're thinking around where are the interesting structural questions,

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>that's the primary one, and then how you gain exposure

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 3>is the secondary one. But that's more sort of nuts

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 3>and bolts. And if you think about product development perspective,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 3>it's the question we talked about earlier, is are there

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 3>more where else could get this go? Where is appropriate?

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 3>What is helpful for investors versus harmful for investors? What

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 3>is easy to understand versus not easy to understand, and

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I think those are the two avenues of exploration you'll

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>see at least first as we go down. As Eric mentioned,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the ETF innovation machine throws everything against the wall.

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So I won't foreclose what other people will do in

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the future. I have no idea if we'll see leveraged

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>prediction markets or something like. Who knows.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And I'm telling you right now, these things go through.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, Matt Tuttle, just the name one. He's on

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>a loan. We're going to see some funky stuff and

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm here for it. I don't mind that. I've always

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>looked at the exotic and even silly part of ETFs

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>are just you can't have perfect innovation where everything's serious

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and perfect and always works. It's just the way capitalism works.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And one of these goofy ones may take off, and

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. This is a free market. That said, like earlier,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the goofy er and crazier you get the less of

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the market. There will be the same thing's happening with

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 2>the crypto. As you get further away from bitcoin, the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>assets are going to go down and down, and the

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 2>interest will go down. It's not like the ETF will

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden drum up new dynamics that the

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>underlying market doesn't have. So I do think though there's

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>there are some ones that could appeal to direct retail

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that are just silly, goofy and you know a little

0:20:57.920 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>on the de gen side, and then they might leverage them.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there are two x dock ETFs out

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>there right now that have such incredible volatility that you know,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 2>there's plenty of ways to gamble. So it's not that

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 2>big of a deal. But the it'll be seem like

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 2>a big deal for a while. It always, it always does.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>I've just been doing this so long. You know, at

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>some point nothing shocking, you know, like.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>This is when he like becomes the old man on

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the rocking chair.

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, I feel pretty young at heart because there

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>are some other analysts I won't name them who kind

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>of crap on a lot of the new stuff. We

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>had a theme that we started writing about last year

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>called no industry for old analysts.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 3>That's it. I think that's right. But that's been going

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 3>on in ETF land forever. I mean, people didn't think

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 3>we should do bonds in ETFs. To me, the dividing

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 3>line is is it easy to understand or is it

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>hard to understand? The exotic ETFs that I dislike are

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 3>the ones that are difficult for people to understand, like

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 3>highly leverage, daily resetting ETFs that are subject to path dependency.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>One of the great things about prediction markets is that

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>they are easy to understand. Right, the Democrat will win

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 3>or the Republican will win. And if you can design

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>an ETF that expresses that, well, then I think the

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 3>probability that people who allocate to it know what they're

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 3>doing is very high, right, And that's the job of

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the ETF issuers to increase that fidelity between what people

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>expect and what they get. And so that's what I

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 3>think people will try to do with these.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So, Matt, what comes next? What do you what's the

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>next step that you're waiting for?

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, what do you want to what do you want

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to see in a prediction market ETF? Joel, do you

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>tell me? Man?

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm allowed to comment on that specifically,

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but I mean more of.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's got to do something, It has to do

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>something with Beyonce.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh No, I think the thing that I find interesting.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll Beyonce Win the Grammy like that that's the stuff

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>he wants to bet on.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But I already can do that, right, And I think

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>what is interesting about this conversation. You know, it's like

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what you can do on Kyle she or Polly Market

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>currently versus the stuff that you can potentially tie into

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>your brokerage account, right, And clearly Matt's thinking the same way.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So so Matt, you know, I think I could almost

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you could just look at what's currently available and start

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to go, Okay, well if you really think about how

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>investing could fit in this wrapper or like, there's a

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that are currently there that would suddenly

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like be available in your Schwab account y or robin

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Hood account or whatever else. So so I meant the

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>question more as you know, you're engaged in the SEC

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>could have a long time ahead of you. What's mechanically

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for you? What's the horizon look like here? What's the

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>how much dancing do you have to do?

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? That makes that now I understand. I was going

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 3>to say, I'm not going to tell you what I'm

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>filing for because I'm sure Will ryand and others are listening.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 3>So what happens from here. So typically in an ETF filing,

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>there's you know, there's a series of comments and questions.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 3>The SEC will look at your initial filing and come

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>back to you with a list of questions and you'll

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 3>answer those, and you'll go back and forth over things

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>like disclosures and the underlying functioning. As an outsider, the

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 3>clue on whether you're getting close or not is how

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>detailed the filings are. Filings start very abstract, and once

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 3>they fill in all those details, that is the signal

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 3>that you're typically approaching launch, although nothing's guaranteed until it launches,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 3>so that will be the process behind the scenes. What

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a company like bitwise will work on in these situations

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 3>is ensuring that the liquidity is there, ensuring that the

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>trading partnerships are there, ensuring that swap counterparties are lined up,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>ensuring that you know the initial audit and things of

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the filing is done, and then on something like this,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.719
<v Speaker 3>ensuring that you know how you're going to communicate about it,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 3>that you can do so in an appropriate manner. A

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a pretty big task. So there's the SEC dance.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>There is the sort of execution of the product if

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 3>it launches, dance, and then there's the messaging dance, all

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 3>of which has to happen well in advance of any

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 3>potential launch because it has to go through regulatory compliance approvals.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 3>So that's the process taking place a bit wise, and

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>it's a yeah, it's a lot of work.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Ben Johnson, our mutual friend from morning Star. When these

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 2>came out, he wrote this, He goes casino. Gamble has

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 2>just filed for its first ever gamble shares ETFs. Gamble

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 2>shares when baby swift ETF, gamble shares what will bitcoin

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>do in the next five minutes ETF, and gamble shares

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 2>who wins the next powerball ETF. So he's having a

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>little fun for that with that. That's where I think

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people's minds initially went, We'll see I

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>hear you, though. I think being able to bet on

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 2>politics without having to overly think it makes a lot

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>of sense. I want to just ask one of the

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>questions for you about polymarket. It's somewhat related. It's adjacent

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>to this. Polymarket runs on the blockchain, correct, Can you

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 2>go into that a little bit? I found that people

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know that, and even I don't know it completely.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>But how does that work?

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Yeah, Polygon is a crypto based prediction market. It's

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 3>not the first, but it is by far the largest.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>So the underlying contracts are resolved using oracles as opposed

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>to external data feeds run by an individual. So, in

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>other words, while a traditional market may look to Bloomberg

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>data directly to resolve a contract, polymarket will engage with

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a data oracle that will aggregate sources to resolve it,

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of independent of internal oversight, and then the underlying

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 3>contracts are maintained and stored on a tradition from a blockchain.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 3>The beauty of it is it's not that different. Actually,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 3>it speaks a lot to where crypto is going. If

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>you think about it from a user perspective, polymarket calshi.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Your user experience is actually remarkably similar. Right, you invest,

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you get the outcome, it's a dollar or it's zero,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and you don't care what's happening behind the scenes. Right,

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 3>do you really care how exactly they're resolving these contracts

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 3>or how exactly they're storing You don't. The real difference

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>is in the community they access in sort of the

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>global versus country based regime. And I think you're going

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 3>to see that. It's sort of a roadmap to where

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 3>I think things like tokenization will look like in the future,

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>where you won't even really notice how it works.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, Joel's been asking me about his

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin investment. You know, he's again saving up for his

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 2>cyber truck and he wants to know when's it going

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to hit one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Again check the Polly market man.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love I love that Eric can just read

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>my mind and articulate all the things that are ticking

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>around my brain.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Everything I just said is kind of the opposite of

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 2>how of Joel.

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't. Yeah, I do, but nottt just done. On crypto.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it has been a bumpy last few months,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just to change gears out of prediction

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>markets and and talk about where crypto and and and

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin seemed to be going, Like where do you feel

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we are in the life cycle of uh, you know,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>post ETF launch, huge initial enthusiasm now a lot of

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>retail investors bought in at a moment that you know

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're well below.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's absolutely right. Specific to bitcoin, I think we're

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 3>in a classic crypto winner. It's a four year cycle.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it will recover towards the end of the

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>year as we get past tax season, particularly if we

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 3>get passage of the Clarity Act, and particularly if the

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin community takes action on the rising concerns about quantum computing.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I do think that that is a weight holding the

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>market back from what would otherwise be a recovery into

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the spring of the four year cycle. So I think

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 3>will it rally towards the end of the year is

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 3>dependent on whether the Clarity Act passes and whether the

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin development community takes robust action on quantum concerns. If

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 3>both of those happen, I think it will be a

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>great end of the year. If neither of those happen,

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it will be challenging. So that's a contingent

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 3>answer on the rest of crypto. Look, I think stable

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 3>coins and tokenization are effectively a runaway train, and I

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 3>think that's going to drag up the rest of crypto again,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 3>particularly if we get the Clarity Act passed through Congress.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I do think that that is an important fork in

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 3>the road, because if it doesn't pass, I think you'll

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>see Wall Street pull back a little bit from tokenization efforts.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 3>On concerns on what would happen in a new administration.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 3>If it does pass. I think they'll lean in, and

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 3>so that is supportive for Ethereum, Solana and DeFi apps

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 3>in particular, but generally speaking, we're just in a traditional winter.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 3>We've had these before. Bitwise is seen three of these now.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 3>We started in twenty seventeen, and you know, even with

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the pullback, bitcoins up, you know quite a bit since

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 3>since bitwise started, So I think it'll be okay.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you maybe want to make a prediction

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Clarity Act.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Actually, the funny thing is the prediction markets on the

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Clarity Act. I think put the odds it's something like sixty.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm slightly more barrassed than that. So if I were,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 3>if I were taking the bet on that, I would

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 3>take the under unfortunately, but wouldn't it be nice if

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I could hedge that in a familiar ETF wrapper.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>It is really crazy how you can do. You can

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>get on some of these things pretty easily. The ETF

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>just is that much easier. It's just it's amazing to me.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not that hard to do prediction markets or crypto

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 2>on your own. I just want to put that out there.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's it's that's again why I got

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>into the industry. It is unbelievable.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It is, it is remarkable, and it expands the set

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of people who use it dramatically. We saw that in

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin ETFs. Now you have every macro hedge fund trading bitcoin. Look,

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>I think prediction markets are one of the most important

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 3>new financial ideas that I've seen, maybe since crypto uh

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and and I think I think if we can impacte

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 3>them in an e t F, you'll see extensive use

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>of them in various portfolio settings.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll leave it there, Matt, thanks so much for joining

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>us on Trillions.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Matt, thanks for having me.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Spot five, or wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. Hit us up on social

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Joel Weber Show, He's at Eric Faulcinus. Trillions

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Magnus Henrikson