Speaker 1: Over the course of the many recent months, I have
Speaker 1: made the point that one of the objectives of the
Speaker 1: modern American left is to transform America away from its
Speaker 1: intentions and its designs as founded. And in many ways
Speaker 1: this was one of the agenda objectives of the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: Look to do it in a stealth way. And Obama
Speaker 1: couldn't come out and say beyond that his policies were transformative. Uh,
Speaker 1: he couldn't define what that meant. There would have been
Speaker 1: a revolt and he wouldn't have been elected had he
Speaker 1: been honest about what transforming America meant. So what he
Speaker 1: claimed it, man was taking on issues like climate change
Speaker 1: and health care for everybody and all this transform America.
Speaker 1: But what they really want to do is transform America
Speaker 1: away from our unique founding, converted to a socialist democracy.
Speaker 1: Some of the radicals even want to go further and
Speaker 1: have this country become totally communist. Fact. Look at there's
Speaker 1: a poll out here today, this in a Daily Caller.
Speaker 1: The poll is BuzzFeed News of millennials identify as democratic
Speaker 1: socialist according to a study that has been taken. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, you'd like to not believe this, but the
Speaker 1: facts on the ground. It's just what you see, even
Speaker 1: though it maybe anecdotal evidence indicates that a lot of
Speaker 1: them have fallen for this. Millennial men were far more
Speaker 1: likely to identify as some kind of socialist then women,
Speaker 1: a total of forty percent responding affirmatively to the question, Now,
Speaker 1: how in the hell can that be? Because there's one
Speaker 1: thing that something just doesn't drive a socialism. You know
Speaker 1: what it is? Self reliance. Self reliance, taking yourself seriously,
Speaker 1: standing up for yourself, believing in yourself, relying on yourself,
Speaker 1: being a man, just does not jibe with socialism. Socialism
Speaker 1: does not work well with self reliant people. Socialism and
Speaker 1: communism attempt to erase self reliant people. Self reliant people,
Speaker 1: people do not need, do not depend on anybody but
Speaker 1: themselves their immediate circle, are huge threats to socialists and
Speaker 1: commusal How in the hell has this happened? How is
Speaker 1: that forty percent of millennial men have become socialist more
Speaker 1: than women? It ought to be the exact opposite. Well, hello,
Speaker 1: modern era of feminism, which has had as one of
Speaker 1: its targets the de masculinization of men, and they've been
Speaker 1: very open and honest about that. They've even conjured up
Speaker 1: terms for it, toxic masculinity, dangerous masculinity. They are doing
Speaker 1: their best to erase male natural male characteristics from as
Speaker 1: many young guys as they can. And since guys want
Speaker 1: to pole around with women, whatever women want is what
Speaker 1: men end up doing. On balance, I mean you have
Speaker 1: individual exceptions. Of course, you've got Clint Eastwoods or you've
Speaker 1: got James CON's that tell everybody to go to hell
Speaker 1: when they're told how to live and how to act.
Speaker 1: But on balance, men do what women want them to do.
Speaker 1: If a big book is famous and hot and women
Speaker 1: dig it, men are gonna go say they're reading it
Speaker 1: or try to become conversant in it. Just the nature
Speaker 1: of things. And so they're being highly highly successful and
Speaker 1: targeting America and its founding. Not just targeting capitalism, it's
Speaker 1: targeting the concepts of individual liberty and freedom, and targeting
Speaker 1: the concept that government is the institution that needs to
Speaker 1: be limited most in a representative republic. The de emphasis
Speaker 1: of government, the getting government out of people's lives, just
Speaker 1: the exact opposite with communists and socialists. So I have
Speaker 1: an evidence piece here. I'm not just flapping my guns.
Speaker 1: There's a New Yorker's story by Michael Lista, a Guy,
Speaker 1: published yesterday. The Tears of Brett Kavanaugh is its title.
Speaker 1: It is a horrible piece, and it does exactly that
Speaker 1: which I have been warning people. It goes all the
Speaker 1: way back to the founding of America, the trash white men.
Speaker 1: Oh that reminds me. Hang on here, you need to
Speaker 1: grab an audio sound bite here, it's six and seven
Speaker 1: pull quote. Kevanaugh has no avenue of appeal though, except
Speaker 1: his own hurt feelings. He's in touch with them as
Speaker 1: he was taught to be, and so he's seemingly weaponized
Speaker 1: cry the way a little boy does when he's in trouble.
Speaker 1: Another pool quote. But Kavanaugh's performance last Thursday was something
Speaker 1: entirely different, distinctly contemporary. It combined the post war attitude
Speaker 1: that men should be in touch with their feelings to
Speaker 1: the point that they may cry, with the intrinsic American
Speaker 1: ideal of white male privilege. Because Kevanaugh is accused of
Speaker 1: sexual assault and maybe denied the career elevation he has
Speaker 1: long plotted. He blubbered like a newborn. He has plotted
Speaker 1: his career. You see, he hasn't had a series of
Speaker 1: goals and achieved them. Oh, no, the guy is a
Speaker 1: dangerous schemer. He has plotted to get on the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court where he can rule against minorities and women and
Speaker 1: Latinos and Hispanics and gazed in lesbians and transgenders. Don't
Speaker 1: you know? This has been the lifelong plotting strategy of
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh. And when there was the least bit resistance
Speaker 1: placed in his way, he reduced the tears started crying.
Speaker 1: And then this bulk quote Kavanaugh's tears made a kind
Speaker 1: of sense from a single phrase by Thomas Jefferson that
Speaker 1: public life is about life, liberty, in the pursuit of happiness.
Speaker 1: The fulfillment of the white American man's atomized desires assumed
Speaker 1: the force of a fiat and became the ultimate purpose
Speaker 1: of this country's society. If a white man didn't get
Speaker 1: what he wanted, it was nothing short of a constitutional crisis.
Speaker 1: This is what this clown saw in the Kavanaugh hearings.
Speaker 1: But you'll note the references here. A single phrase by
Speaker 1: Thomas Jefferson, public life is about life, liberty, pursuit of happiness,
Speaker 1: The fulfillment of the white American man's desires assumed the
Speaker 1: force of a fiat, meaning an automatic and became the
Speaker 1: ultimate purpose of this country's society. If a white man
Speaker 1: didn't get what he wanted, it was nothing short of
Speaker 1: a constitutional crisis. Bingo. These people proved me right each
Speaker 1: and every time I'd go analyzing them. So the trouble
Speaker 1: with America is that it was established by white men,
Speaker 1: four white men, and the pursuit of happiness and life
Speaker 1: and liberty was only intended for white men. And if
Speaker 1: any white men was instructed in the pursuit, then there
Speaker 1: was something wrong with America. Do not minimize this. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you this belief is animating the last two generations,
Speaker 1: informing the last two generations of kids going to high
Speaker 1: school and college. This is the kind of drivel that
Speaker 1: they are being taught that America is corrupt from its
Speaker 1: founding days, that it was founded for an exclusive group
Speaker 1: of people, white men, nobody else need apply. And when
Speaker 1: they don't get their way. In other words, when minorities
Speaker 1: start taking over, latinos, lesbians, gaze, transgenders, you name it.
Speaker 1: When those people start taking over, that's justice. When white
Speaker 1: men have their lunch handed to them and have to
Speaker 1: listen to what their pursuit of happiness has meant for
Speaker 1: everybody else. Misery, death, destruction, discrimination. This is what this
Speaker 1: sick bunch of people believe. Go to the audio soundbites
Speaker 1: more documentation. Last night's CNN Tonight with Don Lemon talk
Speaker 1: king about the protests against the capital nomination and your
Speaker 1: beloved host me, there's a not at all subtle undercurrent
Speaker 1: to all of this. This is not just an attack
Speaker 1: on conservatives. It's an attack on white men Russia. Limbaugh,
Speaker 1: come on down. These women are angry, something has happened
Speaker 1: to them in their lives, and their rage and anger
Speaker 1: they take it out now on the country or on
Speaker 1: all men or men in the powerful majority, which are
Speaker 1: white Christian men and so forth. He said it. So
Speaker 1: don't get mad at me and say, well, Don Lemit,
Speaker 1: everything's about race. Rather than searching for the truth, the
Speaker 1: president and his party, they're appealing to their base, people
Speaker 1: who feel feel victimized, who fear the world is passing
Speaker 1: them by, feel fear people who see all of this
Speaker 1: as a zero sum game. If women or people of
Speaker 1: color or LGBT people advance, it must be at someone
Speaker 1: else the expense. No, no, no, Don, that's what you
Speaker 1: people are doing. I'm merely chronicling what's happening out there.
Speaker 1: It is undeniable. I just shared with you one of
Speaker 1: the countless examples. I could cite this guy Michael Lista
Speaker 1: in The New Yorker suggesting that Kavanaughs crying because he's
Speaker 1: a white man, targeted, singled out for advancement in America
Speaker 1: by other white men, and when it's not going his way,
Speaker 1: breaks down and cries. This piece justifies the attack on
Speaker 1: white men. It says it it's about time the whole
Speaker 1: country and the assault on the whole country is validated
Speaker 1: because it's actually an assault on a white male majority,
Speaker 1: which has caused tyranny and sadness and misery and death
Speaker 1: and destruction for everybody else. All I said was women
Speaker 1: are angry, Me too, movement. Women are angry, something's happened
Speaker 1: to them. Their rage and anger they take out now
Speaker 1: on the country, the majority of which white Christian men.
Speaker 1: That's the target. You can't deny that white Christian men
Speaker 1: are just white men period, are the target of modern feminism,
Speaker 1: of modern American liberalism, and the American left. Somehow Don
Speaker 1: Lemon converts this into a racial issue. It isn't race.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the structure of America as founded in
Speaker 1: what's to become of it, and the justification the left
Speaker 1: seas for getting rid of it and transforming it. He
Speaker 1: wants everything to be about race. There was no racial
Speaker 1: component in my comment at all. I'm simply identifying the
Speaker 1: targets today of the American left. Let me take a
Speaker 1: brief time out. See how easy it is for me
Speaker 1: to make my case here. They help me. They make
Speaker 1: my case for me. All I have to do is
Speaker 1: read to you what they say, or play audio of
Speaker 1: what they say.