WEBVTT - PIMCO’s Richard Clarida Talks AI, US Economy

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Between everything going on

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with AI, the big IPO with SpaceX, raising rates over

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>at the ECB, and a lot of concerns about geopolitics.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Who better to kick the show off with than Richard Clara,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Managing director and Global Economic Advisor at PIMCO and former

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>vice chair over at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors,

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Rich Grick, to have you.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Here, Glad to be with you again, Romaine.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I do want to take a moment to talk about

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the report that you and Dan Ivison and others put

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday, your annual Secular Outlook, And there are a

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of themes in there, but obviously one big thing

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't ignore was AI. And you kind of

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>described it as a potential disinflationary force because of increased protivity,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe wage compression, but also presenting a certain degree of

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>financing risk as well. Kind of square that circle for us.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, Romain, AI's gone from really being a

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>wildcard what if to a major driver of economy and

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>markets the next five years.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Right now we're seeing it in.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>This Campex boom we talked about, not just in the US,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 3>but really a global capex cycle, including defense and potentially

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>energy security, but also at the marginal A lot of

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>this AI is being financed in the credit markets and

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 3>in the bond markets.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, PIMCO has been active in that.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>And certain select deals, and so, you know, like it

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>or dislike it, investors are going to need to factor

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 3>in AI and all of their calculations going forward.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>One thing I thought was interesting there, and you talk

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>about the capex boom obviously not just an AI, but

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you also mentioned defense in a few other areas. But

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've been doing this a long time. There

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was a criticism for years, decades really that there wasn't

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>enough capex spending coming, not of course for America, that

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>they were taking their cash and just having them for

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>buybacks and things like that. And now we're finally getting

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>it and everyone's ringing their hands over it. So I

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know there's got to be a balance. But when you

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think about the potential for an increase in productivity, something

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's been relatively absent, at least in any kind of

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>headline numbers for years and decades, are you kind of

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>excited that maybe we'll finally hear Oh.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly, I want to be very clear.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>We think AI is a transformative technology. In fact, if anything,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>we think the productivity benefits in Boom from AI could

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>happen sooner than.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of folks believe. But we're also humble.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>We don't have a crystal ball, and we think there's

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a wide range of outcomes. But let me be clear,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>we think this is how capitalism and financial markets are

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>supposed to work. Attractive investment opportunities receive funding, and as

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 3>I said, we've participated in some of those deals as well,

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>and I think I expect we'll continue.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's interesting, you know how this is all being financed,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 4>because you're seeing a lot of this coming through in

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 4>the private markets, but it's making a big splash in

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 4>the public markets as well. You think about the hyperscalers

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>and some of their plans for borrowing for this year,

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 4>and I wonder, you know how you're viewing that over

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>at PIMCO. You know, you think about the world where

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 4>credit spreads are so so tight and the fact that

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>we have this influx of supply it hasn't yet really

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 4>made a dent on those spreads.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are a couple of things going on.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>First, A lot of the companies that are issuing and

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>borrowing are very, very prosperous and profitable companies, and so

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that's a big difference from some of the previous capex

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 3>cycles where we've seen where a lot of borrowing is

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>companies that don't have a lot of revenue or cash flow.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 2>So that's one big difference. But but Katie, you bring

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>up an excellent point.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>We do think we're in a world where investors are

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>going to need to do their homework or hire firms

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>to manage their money that does their homework, because you

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 3>need to look at the details on the deal.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 2>You need to look at the way the deals.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Are structured, and the details will matter. You know, we

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>believe that if you're going to provide liquidity in public markets,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>you should be paid for providing liquidity in public markets,

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 3>and so we look at each deal on its own

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>merits and talk to.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Us a little bit about you know, how this is

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>wrapping into the view that you put out yesterday about

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the credit loss cycle. You sort of think about the

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 4>heavy spending that we're seeing on AI. Obviously there's going

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 4>to be certain companies that come in a big way

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 4>and you know, really try to spend there that maybe

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 4>don't have the fundamentals to all back on on the

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 4>way the Magnificent seven does, and I was hoping that

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>you could sort of thread that needle for us.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are a couple things that we highlight in

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the essay that I'd like to bring forward. The first

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>is that a lot of the incremental growth in lending

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>in the last dozen or fifteen years has been in

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>a particular segment of the private credit markets, in particular

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>direct lending to middle market companies.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>That's probably the area of the credit market.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 3>That we would highlight as the one in which the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>credit loss cycle has begun already to turn right now,

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you see it not so much in actual losses as

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>you do for creative financing, payment and kind and other arrangements.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 3>But as I said, this is going to be with

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>us for the next five or ten years.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Opportunities will be there.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>But it's also important for investors to do their homework.

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Is this when we start to talk about not only

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the increase in CAPEX spend across industries, this.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Is a global story.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see better share of this spend

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>from say Europe for example, Asia, maybe even some of

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the emerging market nations exactly.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>So when we highlight this in the report, we're talking

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>not just about the AI piece, which is really relevant

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 3>in the US and also frankly some Asia countries that

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to be big providers of the chips and

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 3>silicon into AI Capex, But in Europe there's a real

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>push as we all know too, for really now they

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>really need it to increase defense spending, in particular in Germany,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 3>so Capex there maybe more have more of a defense

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>and then also in Europe a big push on continuing

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 3>on the green transition.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I am curious, and I know you're not picking stocks

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, but there's a lot of people

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>focus on this spacexipo, not only for the company itself,

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but the idea that it could be a catalyst for

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a much broader investment in not just AI, but the

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>space economy. A lot of new areas of the world

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and really beyond the world that haven't been invested in.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Have you started to kind of factor that into your

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>economic forecast about maybe the potential increase and broadening out

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity around these new technologies.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh sure, And again we want to be wary

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 3>of thinking we have false precisions. So I think we're

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>more confident in the direction of travel than necessarily in

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>the pace and.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>The path to the destination.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>But absolutely, and again I'll defer to your equity experts

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 3>here about how to think about the IPOs this week.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 3>But they're certainly eye popping numbers.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you can't ignore them, right, I mean,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not only this, and then maybe we get another trillion

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar IPO in a few weeks or months.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, turning it back to the area I know better, macroeconomics. Obviously,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>buoyant equity markets and financing availability for companies also increases

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 3>wealth value.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>There's a wealth.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Affecting consumption and the economy, and that's an important tailwind

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>for the economy.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, well, you know, to brought them back, I mean

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 4>to get to the conversation we were having, O Katie,

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>To interrupt you just for one second. We are getting

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>some breaking news actually right now on SpaceX. The registration

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>filing has finally been declared defective as of today, June eleventh,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and as Bloomberg reporting has been, the document says the

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>price will be at one hundred and thirty five dollars

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a share. Obviously, there was a lot of discussion about

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this was an attritional range that you

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>typically see on these roadshows where everyone has to sort

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it out. It was basically, this is what it's going

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to be. Just tell me how much you want and

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be thankful if you get any piece of it.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Maybe less surprise here than a traditional IPO, given that

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it seems like this price was very much set at

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and thirty five dollars and as you said,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of take it or leave it for investors, Rich.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I do just want to give you one a final statement.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Then we have to go, and I apologize. I mean

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX unfortunately impigio to welcome back, but I do just

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>want to in all seriouses, let's get your general view

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on this idea of the cost of capital, particularly in

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>light of not only this IPO, the borrowing that we've

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>seen in the debt markets by a lot of these companies,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that at least in Europe, you're in

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a rate hiking cycle. Who knows what happens with the

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>FED next week. Yeah, there are a lot of people

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>betting we could be on an upcycle here as well.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, look, the energy shock in the Middle East

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 3>is pushed the ECB and perhaps some other countries to

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>hiking rates.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>We don't think that's not our baseline for the FED.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>We think the warshead will be wait and see for

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a while. But importantly, the borrowing that you're talking about

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>in credit markets is potentially going to be putting some

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 3>upper pressure on credit spreads that are at very tight

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>levels and also probably lead to some important changes in

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>some of the private markets as well.