WEBVTT - Meta to Become the Biggest Nuclear Buyer Among Hyperscalers

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Meta agrees to a series of electricity deals to power

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 3>data centers, making it the biggest fire of nuclear power

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 3>among the hyperscalers plus Minimax, one of China's largest generative

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 3>AI startups.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Goes public in Hong Kong.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 3>For that means with China's AI ecosystem and Snowflake plans

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>to buy Observe, an AI powered observability platform. We're going

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 3>to discuss the move with Snowflake's c EO. Let's get

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 3>right to it and what's happening in the markets. Later

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in the program, we're going to go big on Intel. Lipbutan,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Intel CEO has spent the last twenty four hours in Washington,

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>d C. In the White House with the President and

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 3>with Howard Lutnik, the Commerce Secretary. Glowing remarks from President

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump about Litbutan's leadership of Intel, but also the progress

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>that the US government's made in taking a steak in

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the chip maker.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>More to come.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the big one investing in a multi gigawatt

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>deal with some big names in nuclear energy. Opkloat up

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>fourteen percent on that deal. Of course backed by some

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>outman district corps. Up thirteen percent, Meta up eight ten

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to one percent. We said at the top of the program.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>This puts them among the biggest energy buyers, among the hyperscalers,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 3>and we remind ourselves Meta is not technically a hyperscaler.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>That's get the blue most Riley Griffin details here really

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 3>important size of the deal, how many gigawatts, but also

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the structure.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Please.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So three different agreements and they actually are different

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 4>in form and functions. So this is about supporting up

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 4>to six point six gigawatts in nuclear energy, but it

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 4>is both about ensuring that existing nuclear power plants continue

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 4>to thrive and investing in future nuclear power. Meta's head

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>of global energy told me last night that they heard

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 4>that there's real concern about the amount of energy that's

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 4>out there. As you know ed, there's an insatiable demand

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 4>for energy, and this cements their low carbon play.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll find this fascinating because while Meta is not a

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>hyperscale or a hyperscale of being a cloud computing company

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that basically leases capacity, Meta is doing this on its

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>own behalf right. It has been aggressive in in securing

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 3>the supply of energy it needs for its own data centers,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 3>which principally I use for training and inference of its

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>own activity in AI. What else has it done and

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>where does this bring them to date?

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I want to note that you made a really

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 4>important important point there. Prometheus and Hyperion. These are two

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>of their biggest AI plays. Prometheus actually is in Ohio

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 4>and these agreements are in Ohio and Pennsylvania. So some

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 4>of this energy presumably is going to go to the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Prometheus data center cluster, which is one of their biggest plays.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 4>But we're also seeing Meta turn with Hyperion to natural gas.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>At least three natural gas plants are being fired up

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 4>just for that single facility, So it's not like nuclear

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 4>is the only strategy that Meta is employing here.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get to the sort of available energy

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>sources around the world in a little bit. There is

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>an interesting point you co reported this with Will Wade,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 3>who's just been really on top of the nuclear side

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of the story. There does seem to be some anxiety

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>from the technology companies that the existing NUCLEME infrastructure that

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 3>does exist in America, limited as it may be, is

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>also at risk at being shut down. Is this kind

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>of future proofing a little bit.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, that is what I'm hearing from metas head of

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Global Energy. They started back a December two years ago

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 4>and they were looking into what nuclear needed to keep going,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 4>and they heard we need investment now into plants that

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>could potentially shutter. So this is a future proofing, as

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 4>you say.

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Riley Griffin leading our coverage of Meta with a

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 3>must read, Thank you very much. Access to power has

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>been top of mind in AI. We spoke about that

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 3>with Nvidia CEO Jensenmong earlier this week.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 5>In order for our new industry to emerge, you need energy,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and so I think it's safe to say that we

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 5>wish we had more energy in the United States. Your

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 5>wis should have more energy. I think the world all

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 5>wish we have more energy, and so we have to

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 5>invest in all sorts of different forms of energy.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Paul Meeks for more.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>He's managing director and head of Technology research of Freedom

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>Capital Markets. And when I was reading your research last night, Paul,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 3>A little bit relieved coming up this morning when I

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>saw the Meta headline, because you're very focused on the

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>real terms footprint of data centers. That's what we're talking

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>about here. You heard Riley's reporting on the specifics of

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 3>what Meta has done to secure future capacity. How much

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of a bottleneck is that to your mind right now?

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>For this sector?

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>It is absolutely critical of all the bottomnecks. It is

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 6>the most important. I like what Meta is doing here,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 6>but folks need to realize that if you ramp up

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 6>nuclear capacity, we're not going to really see power generation

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 6>until twenty thirty earliest, maybe even not until twenty thirty two.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 6>So what do we do for the next four to

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 6>six years? So the immediate draw is probably that gas.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 6>But when I look at all of these companies and

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 6>we cover the AI hyperscalers and the neo clouds and

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 6>everybody adjacent to them, we are looking for their availability

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 6>for power, their capacity to find power, because it's not

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 6>a demand issue, it is a supply issue focused on

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 6>this particular metric.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, pool.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I played you just just some of the interview that

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 3>we conducted with Jensen Wong earlier this week, and when

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I was sitting in front of him, you don't really

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>get any sense of anxiety from him, right Think about

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the mechanics of how this transaction works and video brings

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>GPUs actually that's probably not fair. Increasingly they bring more

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 3>of the content of the server, but there is an

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 3>acknowledgment that something needs to change, principally in America. He

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 3>did go on to talk about the differences between Europe,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Asia and the United States and where we're sourcing energy.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Do you get a sense from your research that the

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 3>companies you cover acknowledge the severity of that deficit right now?

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 6>So when they are public facing, particularly somebody like Jensen Wong,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 6>who is essentially the spokesperson for the entire industry, they

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 6>have to exude optimism. However, behind the scenes, particularly when

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm talking to companies about my financial models, which of

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 6>course the revenues and then the follow on cash flow

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 6>and earnings come from.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 7>Do you have the power?

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 6>Yes, they are anxious, and I think they're actually very anxious.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 3>There will be people watching Bloomberg Tech that work at

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Meta or in the AI industry. There will be Meta

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>investors watching this program, and some of these people may

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>never have heard of an outclow.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Have you had to.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Change the remit and breadth of your coverage if you

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>say I cover AI data center to include future sources

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of electricity supply, Yeah.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 6>It's really interesting, ed that years ago, you know, nobody

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 6>in my line of work covering tech sector like I

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 6>have for decades, would be interested in any utility company.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 6>It's the antithesis of tech. They are boring, regulated, slow

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>growth businesses. However, now they've come to the four and

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 6>of course these are not just your regular utilities, you know,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 6>they're your new era utilities. But yes, if you are

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 6>a good analyst, you have to cover the entire supply chain,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 6>the entire ecosystem. And because demand is so robust, we're

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 6>focusing on supply absolutely critical. And it's not just the power.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>There are physical constraints here, like simply pouring the cement

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 6>to build the next data center, which can't be a bottleneck,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 6>even though it sounds, you know, so old school in

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 6>a new school business. But yes, these are some factors

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 6>that are very, very interesting that people didn't even conceive

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 6>of a couple of years ago.

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Pol is there an adequate federal level framework regulation to

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 3>support the energy requirements of the AI industry in this country?

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, there is not. And here is my problem.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.479
<v Speaker 6>We are still suffering from a lack of solid regulation

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 6>for the Internet because even today in the US the

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Internet is operating under nineteen ninety six legislation when Bill

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Clinton was president, and so I'm hoping that we're not

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 6>too restrictive.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 6>We need to embrace our entrepreneurial companies and give them

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 6>room to roll, but we need to have some guards

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 6>else on everything AI because what happened last time is

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 6>we end up abdicating the legislation to the EU because

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 6>we didn't have the will to do it ourselves. So

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 6>we missed that opportunity in the Internet. Here is the

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 6>next wave. We need to embrace it and at least

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 6>come up with some guardrails that are going to guide

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 6>all this because there are some important decisions on the

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 6>federal level to be made.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 3>In your research pro it's very interesting to see you

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>approach data center from the perspective of yes, you know,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>energy supply, but also real estate. The reats right, and

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>what you want to ask you is away from the GPUs,

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 3>where are the frailties in that industry? Is it literally

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the folks building the tin can around the outside of

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 3>the data center, the labor, the concrete.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we've seen some hit in short term revenues because

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 6>a couple of the number or a few of the

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 6>players have subcontractors. Now this is not them, this is

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 6>their subcontractors.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 7>That are delayed.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 6>What we call building a powered shell. So it's more

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 6>than a quandset hut that you might find the army in.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 6>These powered shells are a little bit more sophisticated. But

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 6>one company I cover had a one hundred and fifty

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 6>million dollars revenue deferral from twenty five to twenty six

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 6>because at one of their forty one data centers someone

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 6>couldn't pour concrete because it was raining. And so yes,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 6>all these things come into play, and it's interesting that

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 6>they may not necessarily be technical bottlenecks, but old school

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 6>physical including construction bottlenecks. In addition to the power.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 2>I just go back from Vegas.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 3>With all the attention on artificial intelligence in the digital world,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 3>we have an industry that's getting hit by a rainstorm.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Pool meeks, buckets, unbelievable. It's great to have you on

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. A lot more to come and coming out

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 3>an exclusive interview with the co founder and COO of

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Minimax after the company just went public in Hong Kong,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and that's the debut trade.

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Minimax, one of China's largest generative AI startups, backed by

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Ali Barber and Abadavi Sovereign Well Fund, is now public.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Shares surge in Hong Kong after an IPO that raised

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 3>six hundred and nineteen million dollars, closing up one hundred

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and nine percent in its Friday debut trading. Bloomberg Stephen

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Engel spoke exclusively with co founder and COO Yee Yun

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>about growth and expansion plans as Minimax faces hot AI

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>competition both locally and globally.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 8>We really focus out that capital efficiency caused the efficiency,

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 8>so we had always spent a round five hundred media

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 8>USC in the in total, probably only one or two

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 8>percent of the biggen suspending, So we did all the organization,

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 8>mad creativity innovations on.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 9>The h How do you compete though, if you're going

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 9>to go global, how do you compete with an open

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 9>AI or others that are throwing lots of capital at

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 9>their business?

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Is it viable and what is the.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 9>Technology gap looking like in the next few years.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 8>Actually, I don't think it's a competition. It's more about

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 8>all the top talents across all the world. They bring

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 8>the technology break through to the society, to the end users.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 8>So you will see each models have pros and accounts,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 8>so we focus more resources on building the models, building

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 8>the best product experience to a more and more uses

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 8>from all the world.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 4>To use it.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 9>We're hearing as well, the Chinese government might approve in

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 9>Vidia's H two hundred for China in this quarter. Perhaps

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 9>is that something you need to look at importing more

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 9>advanced accelerators for your training.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And the like.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 8>I think in every industry with a really high growth

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 8>when the new technology comes here, so you will see

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 8>every startups, all the companies. This please resources comestring probably

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 8>chief constring computing constring is only one of the challenges.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 8>So in the past you will see our model performers

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 8>and our product performers, so our resources is stable. We

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 8>can get access to all of them, so we focus

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 8>more on our R and D and foundation model. So

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 8>we just use whatever chiefs who make sense for us

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 8>at that specific stage.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 9>Is your goal to stay indigenously with your chips locally

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 9>made chips or would you buy nvidio chips as well?

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't matter what kinds of chiefs it is. It's

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 8>more about which chiefs can give us best ROI, which

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 8>can help us to achieve our mission to make the

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 8>best technology too accessible to all of the users across

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>the world.

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 9>So when does the emphasis turn from efficiency to profitability

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 9>and also getting that steady revenue growth that will then

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 9>justify a higher stock price valuation.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 8>So we put loss of R and D resources and

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 8>innovations on the efficiency part. You will see our API

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 8>we have the enterprise business and you will see the

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 8>gross profit margin of our API is more than sixty

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 8>five percent, which is probably already one of the highest globally.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 8>So we focus more on make the best technology and

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 8>the best the user experience that people would love to

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 8>pay for the best performers models for their use cases.

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 9>You've also come out of a price war essentially a

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 9>race to the bottom some have called, because of you're

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 9>trying to keep costs down and you want to survive

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 9>as well. There was a battle of survival and you

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 9>have been one of the survivors. But at the same time,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 9>the startups are not the only ones. The big players

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 9>Ali Baba, by Dads, tens and others. How do you

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 9>compete with them at a low cost basis?

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 8>Actually it's not. I don't think that's a press word.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 8>It's more about the performers the competition, So you need

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 8>to make your model best. And the people I mean

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 8>and the user are interpress customers. They don't choose your

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 8>model because of its cheap or expensive. It's more about

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 8>its performers. So that's the key. As you said, I

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 8>think it's not about the competition between like all these

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 8>big chenz, but it's more about some of them. They

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 8>are like our cloud providers and some of their products

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 8>you see our models, So it's more about the collaborations.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 8>All this company brings the foundation models to all the world.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Many Max co founder and COO Yaun speaking exclusively with

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Steven Engel. Public listings in Hong Kong are hot

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>right now. Chinese industrial robot maker in Events is now

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>also considering a second listing in Hong Kong, according to sources.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's get out to Bloomberg Executive Tech editor Peter Elstrom.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>To discuss this.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>But also like this growing trend of more of China's

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of post chat gbtai firms going public. The team

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 3>that you lead out in Asia busy right now. In

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Events's case, what are the details in our reporting that

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 3>we need to know about.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, there are a lot of these IPOs that we're seeing,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 10>and we're seeing a much more forward move into the

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 10>public markets for a bunch of these companies and events

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 10>has already gone public in the mainland and Shenjen now

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 10>it's looking at an IPO in Hong Kong.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 11>Two.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 10>That's partly a reflection of how hot demand is from

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 10>investors for these kinds of companies. When you're talking about

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 10>Minimax in particular, they went public, as you mentioned, their

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 10>shares more than doubled in the debut. The founder of

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 10>the company is very fascinating. These are some people called

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 10>them the AI tigers, some people the AI dragons. But

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.359
<v Speaker 10>these are startups that really have very very different strategies

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 10>for how they're approaching the market. Compared with some of

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 10>the US competitors, Like in open Ai, they tend to

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 10>be much lower cost models. They tend to be much

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 10>more aggressive about implementing the technology with their customers, with

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 10>corporate customers, and giving them very low cost, very low,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 10>very efficient models that they can use and they can

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 10>actually deploy more quickly than some of the US counterparts.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 3>PETE in the world of technology or in financial market's

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>like a term like an AI tiger or AI dragon.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's kind of commonplace. We bandy it around.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 3>But for those watching Bloomberg Tech that are saying, what

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>are you talking about? How do we define the AI tiger?

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>What are we talking about here?

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, we're talking about a whole series of companies coming

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 10>out of China. In Stevens interview with the Minimax COO,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 10>they talked about the competition there. We've of course heard

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 10>a lot about Deep Seek and how good their model is,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 10>how technically good it is, but also how low cost

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 10>it is. Behind Deep Seek, you have a whole bunch

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 10>of other companies like Minimax, like Jipou, which just went

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 10>public on Thursday. So yeah, the IPO of Geepoo on Thursday,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 10>mini Max on Friday investors showed a lot of demand

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 10>for those shares. And what these companies have been able

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 10>to show is that with a very low cost model,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 10>they're out there in the market competing. It's not clear

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 10>that they're going to be able to compete directly with

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 10>Open AI or Anthropic, but they have very innovative models.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, first of all, the US models are not

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 10>going to be let into the China market. But these

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 10>companies are also going out very aggressively and competing in

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 10>some other parts of the world. We've written about how

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 10>much traction Deep Seek is getting in Africa in particular,

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 10>because their companies are sensitive to costs. They're sensitive to

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 10>how much power, how much computer resources they need to

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 10>be able to deploy these models. So they are having

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 10>some successes. We're going to see a lot of competitive

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 10>clashes in the months ahead.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's executive editive for Tech, Peter Alstrom. Great to catch

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 2>up with you, Thank you so much. Now coming up

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 2>on the.

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Program, Love Musks Grock image generation tool faces backlash after

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 3>reports that's generated thousands of undressed women and children.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Go more on that data. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk's AI startup Xai is burning cash quickly. The

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 3>company spent almost eight billion dollars in the first nine

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 3>months of the year. That's according to internal docs that

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's viewed. Though revenue has nearly doubled quarter over quarter

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred and seven million dollars, Xai's losses have

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 3>been mounting on costs to build data centers, recruit talent

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>developed software and to build AI that is self sufficient,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and according to Bloomberg's reporting, the plan is to use

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that AI to eventually power Tesla's humanoid.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Robots in the Optimus program.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Right Sticking with XAI, the company has limited access to

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Grock's image generation tool for most users, following widespread criticism

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 3>that the feature was producing thousands of explicit images of

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 3>women and children. Bloomberg reporter Cecilia Deannastasio broke, the story

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>has been tracking the developments, Cecilia, that we just summarized

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the issue, right think, let's start with the methodology, how

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 3>we went about looking at the data, how we got

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the data, and we'll go from that.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Bloomberg worked as a researcher

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who scraped thousands of images produced by groc and published

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to the platform X between the period January fifth and

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>January sixth. The researcher analyzes images to determine what percent

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of them were sexualized and neudifying, and found that every

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>hour during that twenty four hour period, X was publishing

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>about six thousand, seven hundred images identified as such, and

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>just for a comparison, websites that are dedafied dedicated to

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>publishing deep faked images AI generated images of women who

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are sexualized neudified. Those top five websites out there published

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>together eighty images per hour. So GROC is one of

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest deep fake producers on the Internet today.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Where are these images showing up?

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, to the uninitiated people may not know the

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 3>sort of interconnects between XAI the AI company, and x

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>the social media platform, for example, but they are now

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of one entity as they combine last year.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, that connection is exactly why x has become one

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest deep fake websites on the internet. Anybody

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can well not anybody now, now you have to pay

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this, But over the last couple of days,

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody could just at rock on the X platform and say,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>put this woman in a bikini under an image that

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a woman had post on the internet. And a lot

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of women women primarily are the victims of this, took

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>to complaining to GROC directly and arguing with GROC in

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>their comments.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 7>GROC would apologize for posting.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>These images, but then continue posting them and not take

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>down Many of the images that the women felt were violating.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Succeed That did X or XAI respond to our reporting,

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 3>engage with us on it.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>X has not responded to our numerous requests for comment

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days. Elon Musk himself, in

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a reply to a post on X said anybody using

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>groc to make illegal con tent will suffer the same

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>consequences as if they upload a legal content, and Musk

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there was referring to allegations we believe of child sexual

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>abuse material that's been posted to X using the croc app.

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Bloomberg's the CID Danna Slasio important reporting.

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Read the story on the Bloomberg terminal on bloombuw dot com.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up from the program, we're going to speak

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 3>with Snowflake CEO Shrida Ramaswami. Is the company enters into

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>an agreement to buy AI powered platform observe. We'll get

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 3>his observations on that piece of M and A that's

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 3>coming up next. You're halfway through the program, and this

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I've been

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 3>using the power of my Bloomberg terminal. It's been a

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 3>long week with cs and Las Vegas. The power of

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 3>my brain is dwindling. But it tells me that Apple

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>is down for an eighth straight session, which matches the

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>run of declines that Apple saw in May of twenty

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty five.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Now using more of the power of the Bloomberg terminal.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>If Apple was full for a ninth day, we think

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 3>that would be the longest run of decline since the

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 3>early nineties. And obviously we are only nine days into

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six. But so far year to date, this

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>is a stock that's down five and a half percent.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>You saw the letter from Tim Cook to shareholders talking

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 3>up the company's progress of late and last year, but

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>right now that stock heading down and will continue to

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>track it. We had some M and A in the

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 3>last twenty four hours, but it's actually in the AI

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 3>and software space. Snowflake has agreed to buy Observe, an

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>observability platform and AI powered observability platform. Observability something that's

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>come up a lot recently, particularly in the context of AGENTICAI.

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 3>When I've been around the table, particularly on the engineering side.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Why this piece of M and A? Why now that's

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 3>sorts of Snowflake CEO Treda Ramaswami. Those are the reasonable questions,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>right SHREDA I do want to get to defining observability

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and why it's important.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>But it's an interesting deal. Why do you do it?

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 12>Hey?

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 7>Great to see you.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 12>Snowflake's acquisition of Observe is a game changer for our customers.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 12>As you pointed out, observability is basically looking at applications, websites,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 12>AIA agents to make sure that they are functioning properly.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 7>It's a diverse and messy problem. It's a big data problem.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 12>And because observer is built right on top of Snowflake,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 12>they are able to use our very efficient storage as

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 12>well as computer platform to help customers find problems ten

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 12>times faster, often at three to four x less cost.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 12>Take a company like Top Golf, it's a customer of

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 12>a Observe. I go to Top Golf all the time

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 12>with my team, not much of a golfer, so I'm

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 12>playing an angry Bird's game or something like that. Top

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 12>Golf used to struggle when these games went down because

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 12>they collected everything in a central place but could not

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 12>identify that a particular booth had problems. They're able to

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 12>do that with Observe in a matter of a few seconds,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 12>send out a tech team to go fix that problem

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 12>and have happy customers.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 7>That's the power of this acquisition.

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 12>Increasingly, capabilities like observability are going to be a core

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 12>part of a platform like Snowflake. And we have great

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 12>customers folks like Barclays, Capital One, Commonwealth Bank of America,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 12>and we're super excited to bring this to over ten

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 12>thousand plus customers on Snowflake SHREDA.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's get it out the way if we can. The

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 3>report saw that it's about a billion dollar deal. What

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 3>was the structure of the deal and the financials on it?

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Please?

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 12>We can comment on the structure of the deal it is,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, some of it will come out in the

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 12>some of it will come out in the filing.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 3>Signal that there might be some more pieces of M

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and A, particularly on that layer that you sit on

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 3>right you know, as you know very well you were

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 3>there on Monday at the video event Jensen talks about

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the five layer cake and one of the layers you occupy.

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 3>But as observability evidence is, there might be pieces of

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 3>competency missing. How are you going to use M and

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 3>A to plug those gaps.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 12>We've been pretty open that we want to be an

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 12>end to end data platform for our customers from the moment.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 12>Data is barn when you interact with an application, for

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 12>example two, bringing it in for analysis, analyzing it, and

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 12>then acting on it increasingly with AI agents. We've been

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 12>systematically going through this process of both acquiring customers and

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 12>building up.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 7>Functionality from within.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 12>Things like observability or data clean rooms are adjacent functionality

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 12>that sit on top of a data layer. You will

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 12>continue to be super act about both spinning up new

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 12>projects internally and acquiring companies. I think the environment is

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 12>right for that, and honestly, our customers want that because

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 12>they're spending entirely too much time just stitching things together,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 12>and we make it seamless and easy to use for that.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 2>How competitive is that m and a environment right now?

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Because when I look at Observe and what it's offered, you,

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, the analysts looked at that deal and said

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 3>completely logical that Snowflake would do it. But one would

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>imagine that there would be others in the market for

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a name like Observe as well.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 12>There are many things that we're going for this particular deal.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 12>As I said earlier, Observer is built on top of Snowflake,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 12>which means that we didn't have to deal with a

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 12>long integration cycle. The products are super tight. We've been

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 12>collaborating closely with the team as partners for a very

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 12>long time. I've actually gone and visited the Observed team

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 12>multiple times in their location in San Mateo. We felt

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 12>like this was a natural extension of who we were

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 12>as a platform, and we think that Observed, by using

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 12>both their technical capabilities and now also being part of Snowflake,

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 12>can offer an incredibly cost competitive solution. Cost has been

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 12>a big factor in the world of observability, especially with

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 12>things like AI agents, which are complicated pieces of software

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 12>that generate enormous amounts of essentially telemetry information.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 7>We think this is a good combination that's.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Worth some academic debate, you know, should I'm not a

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 3>computer scientist or an engineer, right, so so take that

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 3>into account. But the thing that we argue about with

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 3>a truly autonomous AI agent is that it's exactly that

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 3>it is supposed to act. With autonomy and observability raises

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the question of if a human is required at some

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 3>point in the process to check.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>In, what's your point?

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, well, it becomes a matter of how many

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 12>people you need in order to accomplish a problem. So

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 12>I live and breathe agent Kai. I mean, I really

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 12>mean that I use these products every single day. And

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 12>the leverage that you get is the game changer. Used

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 12>to be that a support ticket would come and a

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 12>person had to go read the text of what that

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 12>case was, copy and paste that text into multiple tools,

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 12>figure out what is going on, and then perhaps send

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 12>a Slack message over to somebody in order to answer

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 12>a problem.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 7>A lot of this, as you know, is low value work.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 12>Copying information from one screen or one app to another

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 12>is just tedious, it's no fun. I think the power

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 12>here with Agentic systems is going to be all that

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 12>boring stuff is going to be automated, so that when

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 12>a problem comes in, you go reach out to the

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 12>ten tools that you need to collect information from, you

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 12>analyze it, and then you show that somebody to that

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 12>person who decides what action to take.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 7>But furthermore, if they have to go write.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 12>Some custom gode to solve a new problem, they'll do

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 12>it two three times and turn that into a skill

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 12>that can be used by everybody else. I think it

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 12>leverages people enormously. I can tell you again from personal

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 12>experience that I can get stuff done in a matter

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 12>of a couple of hours on top of Snowflake building

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 12>things that would honestly have taken me two to three

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 12>weeks just last year to get done.

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the game changer that's here treat us. Snowflake rose

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>forty two percent last year. What are the goals that

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 3>you're holding you and the team to for twenty twenty

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>six and the things that you want to achieve this

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>year in AI?

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 12>As you know ed, it's important to focus on the

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 12>things that you can control. What we're super excited for

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty six is making agent ki.

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 7>Come alive for all our customers.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 12>Snowflake Intelligence is our agentic data product and it's been

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 12>a game changer again for me to do things like

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 12>do research on customers before I meet with them. This

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 12>is the fastest product in terms of customer adoption and

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 12>revenue in Snowflake's history. We want to make sure that

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 12>we drive adoption of these products, and in turn, what

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 12>this does is it enhances and makes the power of

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 12>data more and more visible to future customers. I expect

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 12>this AI to be a strong pull that makes data

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 12>modernization much much more relevant part every customer and future

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 12>customer of Snowflake.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 3>It is really that in and yang that I'm super

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>excited about. We started the week together in Las Vegas

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Nvidia keynote. We end the week together talking

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>about the roadback from part four the Snowflake. Snowfake CEO

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Shreeta Ramaswami. Great to have you back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, we're going to take a look at

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the state of media mergers as one of brows sticks

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 3>with its buyout by Netflix and it's trying to shake

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 3>off that paramount takeover.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>We have the details. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Lairs of Netflix have tumbled nearly twenty eight percent since October,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 3>but the streaming giant stock still appears to be too

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 3>expensive to many investors. Here of more is Bloomberg Stock Reporter,

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>All Things Terminal, authoring Squawk Police Morantz.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a really important write up.

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Right there is so much hype and a lot of

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 3>headlines around what's happening with Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And you do what you needed it.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>You go back to basics, look at the fundamentals, look

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 3>at the stock to must read on the Bloomberg Tamila

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 3>dot com. But just I guess give us the top

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>line of the reporting.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 13>The top line is that this stock has really plunged

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 13>since investors started questioning whether this deal was a good

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 13>idea or not.

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 7>You have questions about cost, You have integration risk as.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 13>Netflix doesn't have much experienced swallowing large deals, and you

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 13>also have a big regulatory fight that's looming. So there's

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 13>not a lot of extreme enthusiasm about the stock right now.

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 7>In fact, it's down.

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 13>You can see it's down about two percent today on

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 13>an update for the S.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 7>And P five hundred.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 3>The people you speak to it in the piece, you know,

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 3>one of the anecdotes is like Netflix is not screaming

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 3>by right now. Right But you also, I guess, look

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 3>at multiples, current multiples and historic multiples and compare them.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>What would that tell us?

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 7>So there are various different kinds of multiples.

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 13>But if you look at a basic price to earnings ratio,

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 13>the stock is not expensive historically, but Nora is it

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 13>very cheap.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 7>It's training a.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 13>Bit below its historic norm, but not enough to really

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 13>grab people.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's police morans is awesome and it's been great to

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 3>have you back on bloombog take this Friday.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. I want to get deep. You're welcome.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's get deeper into that deal.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Part the future of streaming the Warner Brothers Discovery Saga

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and then the two bids Matthew Dolgan, morning Star Senior

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>around equity and this covering communication services.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Felice did a good job right going over the stock.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 3>But there's a piece of the deal that I asked

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the team to find someone to dig in with us on,

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 3>which is do we value the cable networks part of

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Discovery at zero?

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Which paramount?

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 3>When it reaffirmed it's thirty dollars a share bid came

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 3>out with your take on that.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 14>No, we don't think it should be valued at zero. However, well,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 14>first of all, there is a risk that it could be.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 14>We don't think that that's right. But this is going

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 14>to be a very heavily debt laiden company and that

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 14>leads to more risk, and so it's possible that zero

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 14>it would be in the future. We don't think that's

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 14>the most likely thing, but there is question of whether

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 14>it's worth two dollars a share or three dollars a

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 14>share or more and that matters because that is what's

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 14>making up the difference between what Netflix offered for the

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 14>portion of Warner Brothers Discovery that it wants versus what

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 14>Paramount offered for the your company. And so there are

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 14>a few different moving parts as you compare the deals,

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 14>which are not apples to apples. But it doesn't have

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 14>to be zero. If it's one dollar, like Paramount has

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 14>said previously, and this week with versants trading, that adds

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 14>another potential new data point, but it can be definitely

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 14>less than what the thirty is combined.

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just going to recap for the Bloomberg Tech audience.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's where we stand. Netflix has offered twenty dollars twenty

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 3>seven dollars a share for the streaming and the studios

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and would plan to spin out the legacy cable networks.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 3>And as we've said for five days in a row

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech, Paramounts Guidance want the whole enchilada, all

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 3>of it, but at thirty dollars a share, saying that

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>they assume a zero dollar value for that cable network.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 3>You're covering the space, and you're covering these names, and

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 3>you're covering the deal. It's actually a very reasonable question

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>of what happens next. Because Warner Brothers board sent a

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 3>letter reject the Paramount offer and explained why. The next

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 3>day Paramounts guidence reaffirm that offer. We just continue in

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 3>that cycle.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, we continue in that cycle for a little bit.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 14>Yes, January twenty first is a critical date that we

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 14>should circle on our calendars. That's when the tender offer

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 14>for the Warner Brothers Discovery shares by Paramount is currently

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 14>set to expire. So we'll see what happens at that point.

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 14>It doesn't appear that right now Paramount is likely to

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 14>get a sufficient number of shares by that date, but

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 14>they can extend it, extend the date, and they can

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 14>also well at any time. But that's when we would

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 14>expect potentially they would look at increasing their offer to

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 14>beyond thirty dollars a share. And so, yes, we do

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 14>kind of wait and see the next development. I don't

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 14>really expect anything until close to the twenty first as

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 14>far as new information. But at this point we'll see

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 14>where Paramount is on the shares that are being tendered,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 14>and then the ball is kind of it's kind of

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 14>in its court as far as whether it wants to

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 14>do something else in the interim before later this spring

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.479
<v Speaker 14>or summer, when Warner Brothers Discovery shareholders are likely to vote,

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 14>and that Netflix deal that the Warner board has recommended.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 3>We spend a lot of time this week talking about

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the Warner Brothers Discovery rationale for rejecting Paramoun's guide on

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 3>so we included debt. It included a discussion either negative

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 3>or positive about Larry Allison being the bank stop on

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the deal, and it talks about the restrictive covenants on

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers not being able to make major investments what

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 3>in this interim period. But the question actually I have

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 3>is who would get the most out of those assets HBO, Max,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 3>the catalog and then the studios, Like which company would

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 3>be better at getting them out into the real world

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to your mind?

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, we think Paramount is the company that I guess

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 14>needs them more and probably would benefit from them more.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 14>As far as getting them out into the world, that well,

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 14>arguably would be more Netflix a side with the business

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 14>they already have in place in the streaming service and

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 14>subscribers they already have in place. But if you're looking

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 14>from a business and an operating point of view, we

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 14>think Netflix has far less to gain as it does

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 14>that than Paramount would, which really needs the scale and

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 14>has I think a better combined type of offering, whereas

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 14>Netflix incrementally is sure it adds quite a bit to

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 14>it as far as incrementally on how much more revenue

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 14>that bring in, whether they're cannibalizing some of the profits

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 14>that Warner takes in with some of its licensing. The

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 14>reasons why we think that from a business standpoint, Netflix

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 14>doesn't benefit quite as much as Paramount would. That's of

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 14>course a maybe different question than what the consuming public

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 14>and how they benefit from the content and the availability

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 14>and the pricing for that.

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>It's out there.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 3>You heard Felice's reporting on the stock why very quickly

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 3>we just have thirty seconds? Has that sentiment with Netflix

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 3>soured since the deal first kind of got announced.

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 14>As far as the deal goes, I think there's been

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 14>some fear that Netflix would even pay more. There's also

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 14>some fear they've overpaid with what they've agreed to already,

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 14>so that may not be worth it. I also think

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 14>it's maybe just brought to light some things that we

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 14>had been thinking about for some time, even apart from

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 14>what's going on with Warner, which is the growth is

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 14>set to slow at Netflix, and therefore the multiples that

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 14>it had historically aren't necessarily justified today. And so if

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 14>it is at lower motiles now, which it certainly is

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 14>where compared where it's been historically, that's probably justified. Being

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 14>the growth outlook now versus in the past.

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 2>We got to leave it there.

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 3>But that brings us a nicey full circle to what

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>police was talking about at the start of the block.

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Dog in the morning, so thank you very much.

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Intel CEO was at the White House

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 3>to deliver a progress report on its activities. The US

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 3>government is its big shareholder that it's being accounting to.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Bit more on that next, as the Bloomberg Tech for

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Talking Tech first up, Vodafone Idea is considering raising debt

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 3>financing to accelerate growth.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 3>This comes after Delhi decided to cap annual payouts for

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 3>past spectrum fees, forerring a lifeline to the country's third

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 3>place carrier that's out in India. Plus compensation for Apple

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 3>CEO Tim Cook held steady at a cool seventy four

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 3>million dollars last year. Just three million of that comes

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 3>from salary, though the rest is in the form of

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 3>stock awards. You may remember a few years ago Cook

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 3>was criticized for pay packages close to one hundred million

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 3>dollars apiece, prompting him to request a compensation reduction, and

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 3>TSMC provided an upbeat sales forecast. The company reported a

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 3>roughly twenty percent rise in the December quarter revenues based

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 3>on calculations off monthly figures. The company reports full quarterly

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 3>earnings next week. All this coming after chip makers projected

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 3>optimism for AI demand at cs this week. Now, sticking

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 3>with Chips, shares of Intel up today in a big way.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Of the company's CEO delivered a progress report on its

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 3>company's U line of processors. At the White House, Libutan

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 3>met with President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik. After

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 3>the meeting, Trump praised Intel and said the government was

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 3>proud to be a shareholder.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>For more.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's get out to Bloomberg's Ian King, who of course

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>leads our coverage of Chips. Actually, where I wanted to

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 3>start in is the President in his post talked about

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the result of the government's investment in Intel, yielding I

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 3>think said tens of billions of dollars for the American people.

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 3>It's important probably to do the math on what the

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 3>actual return would be at this stage.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Please.

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, no, I mean, as taxpayers, we own currently about

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 11>eleven billion dollars worth of Intel stock, and that's a

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 11>nice return, roughly twice what we owned when we made

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 11>the investment as a nation last year, and not in

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 11>the tens of billions. For that to happen, obviously Intel's

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 11>share price would have to go up a lot more,

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 11>and or some ex extra kind of arrangements that exists

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 11>would have to be bigger.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 3>All the same that there has been some stock performance

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 3>here since lit Bhutan kind of had this improvement in

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 3>relationship with the president. What do we know about yesterday's

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 3>meeting and kind of where Intel's focus right now in

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 3>what it's trying to tell the US government.

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, you know, the fact that he's in

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 11>the White House is important because that is basically drawing

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 11>attention to the fact that this investment that we saw

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 11>last year from the US government from in Nvidia, from

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 11>SoftBank has really stabilized Intel's kind of balance sheet, and

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 11>so it's in a much stronger position than it was.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 11>But where we are and where we really need to

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 11>be is to have much better operations and much better

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 11>performance from the company, and that is going to take

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 11>new products. You and I were at CES this week

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 11>and we saw Intel come out and say, hey, here

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 11>are our new chips. These are the ones we promised.

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 11>These are the ones that they are going to deliver. Obviously,

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 11>three or four days into that launch, we don't know

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 11>how well they're going to do yet, but at least

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 11>in terms of the specs, way better than the position

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 11>that Intel has been in.

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 3>And again a large portion of the government's ownership of

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Intel is contingent on performance of those goals. Bloomberg Z

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 3>and King, Happy Friday to you and thank you very much.

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech in

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 3>what's been a monster week. Frankly, just back from Las

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Vegas and see yes and the headlines keep coming, particularly

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 3>in the world of AI. Great place to recap the show,

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the week, the interviews and the reporting is on the podcast.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 3>You know where to find it online, Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and all the Bloomberg platforms.

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Happy Friday. This is Bloomberg