Speaker 1: Introducing The Fountain Road Files, a new horror fiction podcast
Speaker 1: from Unexplained creator Richard McClean smith. In March twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: twenty seven year old cafe worker Ben Williams began recording
Speaker 1: an audio diary of the coronavirus pandemic. Two months later,
Speaker 1: he was found dead in the South London flat where
Speaker 1: he was spending lockdown alone, or so he thought. Search
Speaker 1: the Fountain Road Files wherever you get your podcasts, and
Speaker 1: for more information go to the Fountain Road Files dot com.
Speaker 1: Welcome to Unexplained Extra with me Richard McClain smith, where
Speaker 1: for the weeks in between episodes, we look at stories
Speaker 1: and ideas that, for one reason or other, didn't make
Speaker 1: it into the previous show. In the last episode you
Speaker 1: in there, we got a little eerie in Indiana with
Speaker 1: the story of LaToya Ammons and her beleagued young family.
Speaker 1: Back in twenty twelve, LaToya became convinced that she and
Speaker 1: her children were being tormented by demonic entities at their
Speaker 1: home in Gary, Indiana. After an assessment by the Department
Speaker 1: of Child Services, it was decided that it wasn't demons
Speaker 1: at all that were plaguing the family. But Latoya's overactive imagination.
Speaker 1: As a result, the young mother of three was separated
Speaker 1: from her children until she could essentially demonstrate that she
Speaker 1: no longer considered demons to be real, or rather that
Speaker 1: demons may be real, but they couldn't have any tangible
Speaker 1: effect on her reality, because to accept demons and evil
Speaker 1: entities weren't real would effectively mean LaToya having to accept
Speaker 1: her faith and the God she believed in was not
Speaker 1: real either, because all these things are in many ways
Speaker 1: contingent on each other's existence. This, of course, was not
Speaker 1: how her case was written up, but in practical terms,
Speaker 1: this is what the assessment amounted to. Yet this is
Speaker 1: something that would most likely never be asked or expected
Speaker 1: of her by the State department of virtually any nation,
Speaker 1: no matter how secular its society. And here is a
Speaker 1: strange conflict that often pervades this kind of story that
Speaker 1: even in the most secular societies, where medical institutions will
Speaker 1: have no problem in referring to a belief in demonic
Speaker 1: entities or the thought that you might be possessed, or
Speaker 1: that your hearing voices as being reflective of a delusion, rarely,
Speaker 1: if ever, will an individual's belief in a god or
Speaker 1: higher power in the traditional sense be undermined in the
Speaker 1: same way. Which isn't to say that I think people
Speaker 1: should therefore be encouraged to believe in demonic entities, but
Speaker 1: rather just to draw attention to how thin the line
Speaker 1: is between those potential fictions we are more willing to
Speaker 1: indulge and those which we are not. Stories about things
Speaker 1: that may or may not be true. Aren't, of course
Speaker 1: restricted to the supernatural. So much of our world and
Speaker 1: how we comprehend it is based on fictions that can
Speaker 1: become so ingrained we can often take for granted just
Speaker 1: how mutable and arbitrary they really are, such as the
Speaker 1: rules of our favorite sport or the borders of a country,
Speaker 1: for example. Such seemingly solid and fixed things have always
Speaker 1: changed and shifted over time and will continue to do so,
Speaker 1: which doesn't mean fictions are bad things necessarily, or that
Speaker 1: we must always be looking to deconstruct them. Though there
Speaker 1: are undoubtedly fictions that don't serve as well, many are
Speaker 1: useful to us. One stark way in which we can
Speaker 1: see this in operation is validation therapy, a controversial technique
Speaker 1: first developed by US academic Naomi Fell in the nineteen sixties.
Speaker 1: The therapy encourage relatives and careers of people suffering from
Speaker 1: cognitive impairments such as Alzheimer's disease to engage with the
Speaker 1: suffer's experience rather than deny it or try to coax
Speaker 1: them out of it, no matter how unreal we might
Speaker 1: consider it to be. If an individual with Alzheimer's wants
Speaker 1: to tell you about the lavish wedding they went to
Speaker 1: that morning, for example, rather than try to remind them
Speaker 1: that they haven't left the house or day, you might
Speaker 1: instead ask them to tell you more about the dress
Speaker 1: they wore or how good the food was. Though many
Speaker 1: have questioned the merits of this technique, others have found
Speaker 1: it invaluable in reducing the stress of the condition for
Speaker 1: both sufferers and those closest to them, all of which
Speaker 1: put me in mind of the time Vanity Fair magazine
Speaker 1: sent William Friedkin to Rome to spend some time with
Speaker 1: the Vatican's chief exorcist, Father Gabriel Amorth, and posed the question,
Speaker 1: might exorcism, too have a useful function even if there
Speaker 1: are no such thing as demons? On December twenty sixth,
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy three, Warner Brothers released the film The Exorcist,
Speaker 1: widely regarded as a cinematic masterpiece and one of the
Speaker 1: most iconic films of all time. Viewers might not think
Speaker 1: it today, but it's hard to underestimate the impact of
Speaker 1: the film when it first screamed. Many cinemas reported audience
Speaker 1: members fainting, crying, and vomiting in the aisles, with ambulances
Speaker 1: and paramedics regularly dispatched to attend to the hapless viewers.
Speaker 1: It was even effectively banned on video in the UK
Speaker 1: until nineteen ninety nine, after Warner Brothers decided against submitting
Speaker 1: the film for classification due to the likelihood that it
Speaker 1: wouldn't have been accepted anyway. Incredibly, such a band was
Speaker 1: not anticipated because of any misrepresentation of possession or exorcism,
Speaker 1: but rather because Friedkin's rendering of the process was considered
Speaker 1: so realistic there were fears that it would lead to
Speaker 1: an outbreak of mass hysteria. It may be surprising, therefore,
Speaker 1: to learn that Freakin had never actually witnessed an exorcism
Speaker 1: before making the film. All that changed, however, when in
Speaker 1: May twenty sixteen, he was invited to attend the Exorcism
Speaker 1: of a young woman given the name Rosa, conducted by
Speaker 1: exorcist Father Gabriel Amorth. Friedkin's account of the event, later
Speaker 1: published in Vanity Fair, is every inch as terrifying and
Speaker 1: dramatic as that depicted in his film. Rosa, a woman
Speaker 1: in her late thirties, had been visiting Father Amorth for
Speaker 1: nine months and was having her ninth exorcism when Friedkin
Speaker 1: joined to watch. Over the next hour or so, as
Speaker 1: Amorth conducted the ritual, Rosa appeared to fall in and
Speaker 1: out of consciousness, sometimes into trances, and would scream and
Speaker 1: thrash her body wildly. In the moments between Father Amorth
Speaker 1: compelled the apparent legion of demons that possessed her to
Speaker 1: leave her body, she would scream no in reply, or
Speaker 1: implore the priest in a deep and unfamiliar voice to
Speaker 1: leave her alone. At other times, the voice would proclaim
Speaker 1: violently that it was satan. Throughout the session, Friedkin claimed
Speaker 1: that while the room was cold, everyone inside was sweating,
Speaker 1: with the exception of Rosa. Finally, with the exorcism over,
Speaker 1: Rosa appeared to return to her normal self, but claimed
Speaker 1: to have no recollection of what had taken place. Friedkin
Speaker 1: an avowed agnostic, was unnerved by what he had seen
Speaker 1: and showed the footage to a number of leading psychiatrists,
Speaker 1: including doctor Roberto Lewis Fernandez, President Elect of the World
Speaker 1: Association of Cultural Psychiatry, and doctor Jeffrey Lieberman, director of
Speaker 1: New York State Psychiatric Institute. Lewis Fernandez had worked to
Speaker 1: add the word possession to the description of dissociative identity
Speaker 1: disorder found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Speaker 1: the industry standard classification manual. Although neither would claim Rosa's
Speaker 1: condition to be the result of supernatural forces. Liebermann did, however,
Speaker 1: note that treating her symptoms as demonic possession may not
Speaker 1: be the worst thing, implying that if she believed in
Speaker 1: it so strongly, practicing an exorcism on her might be
Speaker 1: sufficient to convince her that she'd been cured. In this sense,
Speaker 1: the question of the existence of Satan and demons could
Speaker 1: be considered irrelevant in relation to the well being of
Speaker 1: the patient. If the patient has come to believe in
Speaker 1: a world where Satan is real, an exorcist operating with
Speaker 1: sincerity in that world, too, may bring a comfort to
Speaker 1: the inflicted individual. Much in the way that validation therapy
Speaker 1: might help the sufferer of Altzheimon's. It is an example,
Speaker 1: perhaps of where what somebody feels may be more important
Speaker 1: what is rational or logical, where something feeling true can
Speaker 1: be more powerful than the truth itself. Unexplained, the book
Speaker 1: and audiobook, featuring ten stories that have never before been
Speaker 1: covered on the show, is now available to buy worldwide.
Speaker 1: You can purchase through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Waterstones,
Speaker 1: among other bookstores. All elements of Unexplained, including the show's music,
Speaker 1: are produced by me Richard McClain smith. Please subscribe and
Speaker 1: rate the show wherever you listen to podcasts, and feel
Speaker 1: free to get in touch with any thoughts or ideas
Speaker 1: regarding the stories you've heard on the show. Perhaps you
Speaker 1: have an explanation of your own you'd like to share.
Speaker 1: You can reach us online at Unexplained podcast dot com,
Speaker 1: or Twitter at Unexplained Pod and Facebook at Facebook dot
Speaker 1: com forward Slash Unexplained Podcast