WEBVTT - US Services Index Shrinks, Jobs Report, Apple Earnings

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apocarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 2>The S and P is still up one percent, but

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>if you take a look at an inter date chart,

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it is a nice straight line down after we got

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>that ism services number, Paul, when you have prices paid

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>higher in next slipping below fifty and that employment number

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>coming in at forty five point nine for the service sector,

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>which does echo what we saw in terms of hospitality

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>jobs and sort of the meager edition that we saw

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>in today's jobs report.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so. I mean, I think the labor market,

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>we had a lot of guests on Bloomberg survants, a

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of economists, and I think the consensus kind of

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is still a solid labor market, but just cooling. And

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that's probably all. Maybe the Federal Reserve might need to

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>pull maybe rate cut.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 4>We'll be a little bit forward in a year.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And if we dot together all the things we learned

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>from say bookings and Expedia, et cetera. The kind of

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>service economy is starting to slow. So let's get more

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>with that. Anthony Javis, he joins us. He is the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>ISM chair Services head. He is the chair of the

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>ISM Services Business Committee. Let me get that title right,

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So talk to me about how you understand these numbers. So,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>services and next slipping below forty nine point four, how

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>would you describe that?

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, what we're seeing here is a pullback in the

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 5>leading indexes that comprise this composite index Business activity fifty

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 5>point nine. That's down six point five percentage points. Still growing,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 5>but as you said, it's cooling, it's definitely pulled back.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 5>Some new orders still growing fifty two point two, but

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 5>down two point two percentage points. And the employment market

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 5>continues to be just as this index indicates forty five

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 5>point nine, down two point six percentage points, attributed to

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 5>a combination of things that we've seen in the past ongoing.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Either they can't find applicable workers for open positions, or

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 5>they're controlling that labor expense. And the last one, supplier

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 5>deliveries continues to be faster due to waning demand as

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 5>well as improved capacity.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 3>So Anthony, can you kind of give us some context here,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>because context matters, and give us a little sense here

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 3>of the trend here in some of this services data.

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 6>That's a great point.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 5>This is one month we've contracted here first time since

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 5>December of twenty twenty two. Well, we thought it might

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 5>take a little bit longer to balance back. It came

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 5>right back the following month. Not trying to be the

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>consummate optimist here, but again one trend, we're just under

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 5>the baseline. Based on responded comments, they indicate that they

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 5>see the next part of the year that it will

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 5>be some improvements there. So we'll just have to wait

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 5>and see how it trends out over next couple of months.

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Where are the worry spots within all the respondents? Where

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 2>are the weak links?

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's inflation is a big one. You know, Pricing

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 5>is definitely impacting their various industries and their companies that

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>make up this sector, as well as the challenges and employment.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 5>You know, construction still seems to be an area where

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 5>they can't backfill positions, and you know, geopolitical issues as

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 5>well also is on the forefront of our respondent's minds

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 7>All right, great stuff, Anthony, Thank you so much.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Avis. I love that you hop on with those.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>We know you have a busy day. He's the chair

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Ism Services Index.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>You know there's a luck going on out there in

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the marketplace. Here and again, it's economic data, it's earnings data.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta Trez joins his managing partner and director of Economic

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Policy for Veda Partners. I believe from Zoom, I mean

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>from Louisiana via Zoom. Hey, Henrietta, what do you make

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 3>of this job's report? I mean, to what extent is

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>this labor market cooling? In your mind?

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, first of all, I have to just say, the

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 8>Stones played last night the jazz Fest down in New Orleans.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 9>So y'all just all that down.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 8>Oh fantastic, It'll be going all weekend, so can't wait.

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 8>But no, the jobs number continues to be really I

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 8>think just a goldilocks moment the market participants are focused

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 8>on FED interest rate cuts, and this reignited opportunities and

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 8>sort of optimism for a FED rate cut in September,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 8>which is a market difference from just earlier this week,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 8>and expectations for the last couple of weeks. I've been

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 8>pushing it out till November or even next year, or

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 8>even say that there could be a FED hike. So

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 8>I think this job's number, while slightly lower than it

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 8>has been in the last couple of months, I.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 9>Mean, continues this ridiculous trend.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 8>Of some four percent unemployment, which is full employment in

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 8>the United States and really just paints the picture of

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 8>a very robust, strong economy that is the longest running

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 8>since the nineteen sixties.

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's sort of a perfect number, to

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 9>be honest.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 7>How fast, though, can the job market cool?

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Someone pointed out on m Live, which is the great

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of blog that we do here at Bloomberg, that

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>health and private education excluding public school teachers, accounted for

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>over half of the entire gain and payroll, so if

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>you back that out, it was actually a lot weaker.

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm wondering how fast we can cool here.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think that the ridiculous strength in job

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 8>growth for the last couple of months. It's just been

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 8>blowing out expectations. It's almost like where were those jobs

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 8>even coming from. It's hard to sort of wrap your

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 8>head around those numbers so consistently for what is it,

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 8>twenty four.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 9>Months or something.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 8>I think that this job's number reflects more of a reality.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 8>I saw the same post, you know, some similar comments

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 8>about the weather over the winter period, maybe just bringing

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 8>this back down to earth, and I think it reflects,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 8>you know, a very strong economy that really doesn't have

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 8>much room to continue growing jobs the way that it

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 8>has been.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 3>All Right, So I guess when we combine this jobs

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>print today, Henriette, with what we heard from FED Chairman

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 3>J Powell earlier in the week, does this kind of

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 3>alter the way you think about how the FED may

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>proceed for the remainder of the year in terms of

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 3>perhaps cutting rates.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, I don't subscribe to the theory that the

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 8>FED is politically motivated.

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 6>I know a lot of.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 8>Investors are in that headspace, but you know, I've worked

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 8>with Federal Reserve folks for many years, going back to

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 8>when I was in the Senate and here and work

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 8>with many of the former FED chairs, former FED employees now,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 8>and I think the understanding that they are not a

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 8>political animal is something that Jay Powell tries to relay

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 8>over and over and over again, as you did on Wednesday.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 9>But you know, investors don't necessarily all want to hear that.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 8>I think that if the FED feels it to contain

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 8>inflation and keep its dual mandate going, they will cut

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 8>as needed. I mean, one of the things that I'd

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 8>point out is that we have elections in the United

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 8>States all the time. Granted they're only every four years

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 8>of presidential election cycle, but we've got generals, We've got

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 8>different elections across individual states, constitutional referendums.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, this happens all the time.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 8>So to assume that the FED is somehow not going

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 8>to cut from you know, July to November because the election,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 8>that's a big swath of time that they're just going

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 8>to let the economy run.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 9>Unregulated, you know, that's not really how they operate.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 8>And so I would just encourage folks to say, if

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 8>they do need to cut, they will, and I think

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 8>they'll do that x any political considerations. One more thing

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 8>I'd add is that there's this view that if they

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 8>don't cut in March or April or even June, then

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 8>they can't come in and cut in September. I've read

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 8>that repeatedly from investors and the idea of being it'll

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 8>look to partisan, too politically oriented, and I disagree with that.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 8>But it's interesting to see the market move since Wednesday

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 8>and today's jobs report. Now there all of a sudden

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 8>pricing in cuts again in September, so it seems to

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 8>vacillate quite a bit. And I just point that out.

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 8>So it's an interesting dynamic from investor perspective.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean even before this is already happening, they

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>had that article last Friday right about potentially the Trump

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>campaign talking about eroding that independence regardless, So there's that.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 7>Before I let you go.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>The way labor market slows, When could we be in

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>a higher unemployment environment in this election cycle.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think to your earlier point, it could

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 9>happen pretty quickly.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's only a three point nine now, it

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't take much to take up to four four point one.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 8>And I think the revisions are something to watch certainly

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 8>as well. And as we get into the summer months,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 8>you talked about school teachers. I think that there's opportunity

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 8>for change and they can imagine us being higher than

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 8>four percent come election day without question.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, Henriette, thank you so much for joining us.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta trees A Managing partner and director of Economic polse

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 3>at Veda Partners.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Afocarplay and Android Auto

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Alex Steele alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 2>where we bring you all the economic and financial news

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>that you need to know.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 7>With our great.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence analysts, they cover two thousand companies and one

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. We also venture outside of that

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 2>and talk to some really great investors who have their

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>pulse on the market. I can really understand how to

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>position your portfolio for the next couple decades.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 10>Really.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Carol Pepper is one of them, founder and CEO of

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Pepper International. She joins us now from New York City. Carol,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.239
<v Speaker 2>the market seems to be taking the report is goldilocks.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Im services number might have put a little bit of

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>dent in that, but either way, does this give you

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>confidence to the market.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Yes, I mean I think we are in a very

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 11>nice sweet spot. I'm not necessarily want to buy the market.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 11>We look at sectors and see where the growth is

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 11>going to be. So, as you know, I'm a big

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 11>tech bull for the long term. I think you buy

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 11>tech on fear days and the United States really leads

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 11>in technology and innovation and artificial intelligence, and those sectors

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 11>of the magnificent six if you will, out of seven

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 11>are really powering the market forward and we'll continue to

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 11>do so. I think it looks likely that you know,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 11>the FED will ease at some point this year, and

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 11>that's very good for growth stocks. So I'm in a

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 11>happy place with the report.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 3>What did you make of that Apple print we saw

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>last night after the clothes What are your takeaways?

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, I just think again it's you know, everybody wants

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 11>to keep counting tech out because they missed the rally.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 11>And what I tell everybody is you can't time when

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 11>all the good news will come in. So things are

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 11>looking up for Apple. You just have to get in

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 11>there hold your knows. If you're a value investor and

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 11>you think everything's overpriced, because it's not. If you have

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 11>a long term time horizon, as you know, I manage

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 11>money for family offices, generally people with over one hundred

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 11>million dollars, and we make long term bets. And the

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 11>long term bet to make right now are the Magnificent six.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 11>I leave out Tesla because I think they have a

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 11>lot of problems, but if you look at all the

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 11>other stocks these are this is a good basket. Or

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 11>if you can't buy all the stocks individually, you can

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 11>look at QQQ, get a broad based of American technology

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 11>exposure and global technology exposure, and set it and forget it,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, and you will see continuing upside surprises. Sometimes

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 11>we'll miss the quarter. Look at what Microsoft just did.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 11>They're reinvesting to buy more AI. So the earnings might

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 11>be down for a quarter, but that is only going

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 11>to translate into double the earnings two quarters later. So

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 11>you can't just go, you know, month to month and

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 11>say it uperates down. You have to make some long

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 11>term bets if you want to make money over the

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 11>long term.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm hearing you right, you're saying buy on

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 2>fear Big ten because it's a good value value plus tech.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 11>Yes, it is the real value. The real value today

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 11>is not the value stocks. The real value today or

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 11>the big tech stocks because they have the balance sheet,

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 11>they have the cash, and they're leading the entire country.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 11>Because their technologies will impact every single other industry in

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 11>this country. AI is going to touch everything. So if

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 11>you really want to make long term money, if you

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 11>want to fund your retirement or your kids education, put

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 11>money in tech and leave it there. Don't try to

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 11>trade it daily. It's very hard to guess which quarter

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 11>the yearnings are going to pop up when people are

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 11>going to be more or less fearful. But when they

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 11>are fearful like there were a few days ago, that's

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 11>when you jump in and buy.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So, Carol, what do you think about healthcare here? And

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 3>recently I asked us, I'm looking at Amgen here. Here's

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>a company with the one hundred and sixty billion dollar

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 3>market cap company up twelve percent, and it seems like

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 3>in the healthcare space, if you could talk about a

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 3>GLP into your portfolio, it's kind of like saying you

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>got a eye exposure in technology kind of works.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 11>Healthcare, Well, I really think that healthcare right now is

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 11>being driven by the whole weight loss craze, because that

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 11>is a huge trend that's going to keep going up,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 11>and I do predict that eventually it might take another year.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 11>We're either going to get pills or we're going to

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 11>get the price of the shots coming way down, and

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 11>that will just bring a flood of new patients into

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 11>the market. So that is a trend that you definitely

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 11>want to jump on. I think for the next four

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 11>or five years. At some point the governments will put

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 11>their foot down and start to mandate lower prices for

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 11>these drugs. But for now, it's definitely a trend that

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 11>will make money for you over the medium term for sure,

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 11>because what most of America is overweight and this is

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 11>a way to help them get their weight under control.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Paul, sitting at this current moment, Carol, before let go,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>what else do you like right now?

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 7>What else do you want to buy on fear?

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think the main thing is just you know,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 11>those are my favorite picks. I also think you should

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 11>buy estate, frankly, because real estate is going to come

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 11>back again. You have to be a little bit patient,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 11>but if you're willing to sit through the summer, you

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 11>can get some beaten up real estate and development stocks

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 11>and home building stocks. Real estate will come roaring back

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 11>the second that the rates come down. The rates aren't

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 11>going to come down. Do we know if it's two

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 11>months or six months. We don't know, but we do

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 11>know we're going to get there. So those of you

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 11>who loved a bargain, look into the real estate sector

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 11>right now. Look at home builders and people like that.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 11>That's really a place where you're going to be able

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 11>to get in there early and patch yourself in the

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 11>back when the rest of the world catches on your

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 11>trend that you got in early.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Carol, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Pepper, she's a founder and CEO of Pepper International,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 3>joining us from New York City via zoom Here.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to that labor data, because that is

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>certainly the big play here for the markets here. We

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 3>want to always like to chat with Tom Gimble. Tom

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 3>is the founder and CEO LASAL Networks. Tom, talk to

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>us about this number here, A little bit a slowdown

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>in hiring, but still a pretty healthy number. What's your perspective.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 4>I tell you, I'm not sure that it's not actually

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 4>a better number than people think. If you look at

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 4>how small the government hiring was, all right, break it

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 4>down for you. So we've been averaging. Government's been averaging

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>about fifty five thousand jobs a month. This month it

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 4>was eight thousand. So when you look at the percentage

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 4>of non government jobs added, this was one of the

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 4>better months.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 7>Interesting because it I heard that.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So then why is the Why is the rhetoric like, ooh,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>if you back that out, the overall number wasn't that great?

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh, because economists are depressing people. I think that. I

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 4>think that that in reality, you know, the as we

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 4>talk about every week, adding jobs is better than losing jobs.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 4>So the economy is good. I think where we have

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 4>a problem that everybody knows about is inflation. And for

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 4>some reason we've got cost of things going up, stock

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 4>market going up, but it's being driven by by a

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 4>few of you know, the Magnificent seven and all that

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 4>good stuff. And then we're sitting here looking at at

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 4>at people working, and the labor market is healthy. Now

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing is a lot of the jobs are

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 4>in healthcare, and they're in hospitality, and they're in construction,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and so those are a lot of hourly jobs. They're

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 4>not the highest earning jobs. And we're seeing a little

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:52.479
<v Speaker 4>bit of white collar stalling in the hiring side.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So, Tom, it's early May. It means kids are gonna

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>start graduating from college.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 4>What's that job market look like. It's there. It's there,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 4>It's just not as healthy as it was. And what

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 4>I mean by that is it's the jobs aren't going

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 4>to be if you want, you know, a lot of kids,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 4>oh I want to work remote, I want to work

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 4>from here, that you're gonna have to go into an office.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I think for a lot of the jobs. Number one,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Number two, the salaries aren't going to be as high

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 4>starting salaries as they have been historically for recent college graduates.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 4>And number three, you're not going to see as high

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 4>a volume of hiring at companies, so you might not

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 4>get the company that you want or the job you

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 4>think you want, but there are jobs available.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you what sectors do you still feel like are

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong? I anecdotally was speaking to a friend of

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>mine who's pretty high up in the tech sector on

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the data side, and she is just like, I can't.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>It's really hard to get a job, and there's been

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 2>so many rounds of layoffs over the last year and

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 2>a half or so that there's a plethora of people

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 2>trying to get in on the same jobs. At this point,

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>where are the jobs where they're not talk us through

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 2>all the dynamics.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think the real challenge is where were

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 4>I think things are going to move over the course

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 4>of the next couple of years. Is less industry and

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 4>more skill set. Meaning technology might not be hiring, meaning

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 4>big tech companies, but people who do sales may be

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 4>getting hiring, and people who do development or product maybe

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 4>getting hired, but they're not hiring in marketing or HR.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's more of what your skill set

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 4>is versus the overall industries. Right, so, healthcare may be stalling.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 4>We don't there the nurse shortages at what it was

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 4>three years ago. However, they're hiring a ton of doctors

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and they're hiring a ton of of medical records people.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 4>As they move to AI, they still need to get

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 4>the work done. So it's really in the roles versus

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the industries. But if I could wave a wand and

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 4>give myself a skill set, it would be in security.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 4>In technology security. You guys see the hacks that Microsoft

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 4>had a couple months ago, and there's a new one

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 4>every week or every month coming out. And if somebody

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 4>is really talented in the cyber security space, that ain't

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 4>going anywhere.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Tom, I wonder from your perspective how the influx

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 3>of immigrants, legal and illegal into this country and a

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 3>surge it's been, how does that impact A lot of

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 3>folks are saying that's been a net positive for the

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>labor market in the economy. What do you see from

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 3>your perspective.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't necessarily see that yet, So I think on

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the legal side, the problem with the layman, as you

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 4>guys know, is people think that coming in is purely

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 4>south of the border for immigration, and legal immigration is

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 4>people who want to get married or they're just going

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 4>to move here. We educate. There's different laws for non

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 4>citizens to come into the country to be educated at

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of our best schools and then you have

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 4>to leave at after that. And so the legal immigration

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 4>of educating people and then not allowing them to work here,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 4>especially in technology fields and engineering the stems. Right, we

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 4>have this population, we educate and then we send away.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 4>It's almost a non with this country was built on methodology.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 4>And then number two on the illegal side. I think

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 4>the negative on the workforce isn't that we don't need

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 4>people at an entry level and blue collar skill set.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a matter of how it's affecting society and what

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 4>businesses want to do and people being scared and where

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>things are at, and it overloading the system on some

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 4>social issues and that has ripple effect into corporate America.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 4>That's my concern. And then the last thing, you know,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 4>you know it's the third rail, right, But I think

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I was doing an interview the other day about how,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, we're seeing an influx from our clients at

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 4>state schools doing finance and consulting recruiting because they don't

0:20:57.800 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 4>want to just touch the ivs with a ten foot poll.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's really interesting. What what what's the why there?

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 4>No, I think there's you have so you have a

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 4>smaller student population base at the IVY leagues. So companies

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 4>don't want to spend their time trying to to look

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 4>at social media and figure out who's in the protesting,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 4>who's not, who might have been abusive to other students,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 4>who wasn't right. It's easier to say, you know what,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to discriminate against people within the ivys.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 4>We're just not going to recruit from the ivys.

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 7>That's real, Tom.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 3>So what's kind of your view here as it relates

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 3>going forward in terms of how do you think this

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 3>labor economy is going to evolve for the remainder of

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to continue to be be fine.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>I think what we have is, you know this intersection,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 4>this then diagram if you will, of where it meets

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of the overall stock market, a change in Washington d

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 4>C with the election, potential change with the Washington d

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>C with the election coming up, and then and then

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 4>just where we're at with inflation and things like that,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 4>and and interest rates and so we got today is

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 4>to me, it doesn't seem like the Fed's going to

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 4>lower rates. And if that happens, I think the status

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 4>quo continues. And I think it's going to be just

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 4>this emotionally purgatory world we're going to live in for

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the for the next six or eight months.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 7>Okay, but let's let's game that out. So that's the

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 7>FED not cutting rates.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 2>If the FED does cut rates, or do the companies

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and industries you talk to, how would that influence their hiring?

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Most it really depends, right, twenty five basis points, you know,

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 4>not that much. What it what it does is what

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 4>it'll do is if it has the desired effect that

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people in corporate America think, which is

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 4>send the economy back into a hyper drive state, then

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 4>they continue to The theory would be they'd continue to

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 4>lower interest rates, and then when money got cheap enough,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 4>you could hire people in the in the classes of

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifty one hundred. But I don't think twenty five

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 4>basis points in the next or two sessions from now

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 4>is going to all of a sudden turn three hundred

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 4>or four hundred thousand jobs a month. I don't see that. Hey, Tom,

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 4>is there.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Any regionality out there into the hiring market. I'm just guessing,

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, Texas, Florida going crazy? But is there any

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 3>regionality out there.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 4>No, I think you're right. On the Red States. We

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 4>continue to see Nashville, we continue to see at Birmingham

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and Alabama and cities like that, and the Triangle in

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 4>North Carolina just being a hot sector. But now I

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 4>think other than that, it's I do think you're starting

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 4>to see a little bit of it move in from

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 4>the coasts, and I just think that's more of social

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 4>issues than anything else. So it's where companies will go.

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at I read an article. Don't quote

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 4>me on it, but that Goldman Sachs has more employees

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 4>in Salt Lake City than they do in New York.

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think that tells you that second and third

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 4>tier cities are deaf. A place where corporate America is going.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 9>And we're going to Nashville.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 4>We are going there.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I'm super excited. I booked my hotel and I

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 7>booked the airfare. Okay, so this is big for me.

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Water slide to die for water? Yeah, Oh it's a

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 4>water park.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 9>Oh no, we go we go to this.

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 7>Okay, there we go. Bloomberg Intelligence on the road from

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 7>a water park.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Tom Gimble, founder and CEO over at lasal Network, thank

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you so much. We really appreciate all of that for you,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>But that's so interesting. It's like, you know, when you

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 2>stay on the West coast or the East coast, you

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>forget that there's a lot of building happening, particularly in

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Red states, particularly from some of the infrastructure bills that

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>we've seen. Any respective of that, there's still a lot

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of build out as well, so that's actually quite interesting.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Royd

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play. Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 2>We bring you all the news and economics and finance,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and we bring it to you through our lens of

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. They cover two thousand companies and one

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries worldwide. They've been doing it for

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 2>decades and they are really good at what they do.

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>So on that point, we want to go to anurrog Rana,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior technology analyst to give us the breakdown

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 2>for Apple earning. So we're looking at the best rally

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>in almost eighteen months from Apple stock is up by

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 2>six percent. I should point out that the S ANDP

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>is really starting to roll over. We're now up only

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 2>eight tens of one percent, so we'll see how long

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the rally and Apple lasts. But an a wrong, What

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>was the biggest standout that justifies the rally for you?

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 10>When the results came out, you know, I remembered the

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 10>code from late Charlie Manger that the secret of happiness

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 10>and successful marriages low expectations. So I think this is

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 10>exactly what happened with Apple that you know, people going

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 10>in were like so pessimistic that any bit of good

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 10>news was just hailed with you know, the stock react

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 10>that you're seeing right now.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So An Rag, I guess before the print you're talking

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>about what you really want to hear regarding China and

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 3>their business in China was stabilization?

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 4>Stabilization? Did you hear that?

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 10>In fact, he said they were doing very good in China,

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 10>which is contrary to every data that out there. In fact,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 10>a couple of analysts this as asked him that, like,

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, how do you reconcile with all this data

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 10>on shipments being down versus your comments in China. He's like,

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm not responsible for them, but we are doing okay

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 10>in China. So it's it's a big dichotomy right now

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 10>in the market as to you know, who to believe,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 10>whether the third party data providers are that are that

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 10>are talking about a massive decline in iPhones versus Apple

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 10>that's saying, you know, China is okay.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Did you like them spending one hundred ten billion dollars

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>on a buyback. I'm guessing you didn't because Paul was

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 2>into it.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 8>No.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 10>Actually, to be very frank they spend over about one

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 10>hundred billion right now, so the one hundred and ten

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 10>is a minor upgrade. You know that the real new

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 10>would have been if they said they're going to do

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 10>about one hundred and fifty. Frankly, so I think, I know,

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 10>the headline number looks really big, but they do already

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 10>spend currently close two hundred billion dollars buying back you know,

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 10>their share. So I mean, I like it, there's no

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 10>problem about it. But but I think that's not really

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 10>what got the stock going. The fact that they said

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 10>that they're going to grow in you know, those single

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 10>digits after forever about you know, close to two hundred

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 10>basis points, you know, impact on FX.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 6>That's I think the biggest news at this point.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Ana Rock, I guess their developer conference coming up

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in June is going to be big for Apple from

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 3>an AI perspective. What will you be looking for at

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 3>that conference?

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean, my personal preference would be if they

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 6>do a tie up with Google and use Google's model

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 6>to run.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 10>Some of those stuff, because you know that there is

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 10>a big unknown out there as to what's going to

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 10>happen between their relationship with Google when it comes to

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 10>the default search engine and Google you know, supposedly pays

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 10>them twenty billion dollars for it. I think that's under

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 10>a lot of regulatory scrutiny. If Apple were to refine

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 10>and do another deal with Google where they can you know,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 10>mix both those things, it will really help their AI

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 10>costs because I don't think organically they can do something

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 10>this quickly. There are news by Margament that they're going

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 10>to either tie up with Google or Open AI.

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, my preference would be if they tie up

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 6>with Google over there.

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So what is that risk for Apple from Google?

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 10>It is there, but to be honest, it's a it's

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 10>a it's a it's a one or a zero, which

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 10>means there's no way to predict which way the judge

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 10>is going to go. But I also feel that if

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 10>they if this does come down to that, you know,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>some kind of illegal issue, the two parties are willing

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 10>to pay each other or you know, there is a

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 10>transaction there, so they'll find another way to make it

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 10>look less like that, you know, a payment for default

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 10>search engines, maybe per click, or there's some there could

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 10>be some economics there, but it is a headline issue

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 10>you at least in the near term for Apple.

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I have to say anag you do not seem that

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>thrilled or that you've you know, you don't see that

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>thrilled after Apple's quarter.

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, no, that's that's not true. I mean

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm very happy with this.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 7>I'm actually skeptical. How about that?

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 6>No I I no, no, not at all. I'm relieved

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 6>of what happened from last night.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 10>I just need to get to some of these one

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 10>or two different things that are pending, because I see,

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 10>at the end of the day, Apple.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Is one of the most phenomenal companies right now.

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 10>There is nobody with an ecosystem that's stronger in the

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 10>retail world or in the consumer world.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 6>But the question is how do they get back to

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 6>the growth rate and can they get.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 10>Rid of some of the regulatory handles Right now, their

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 10>fees is under a lot of pressure, both in EU

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 10>and perhaps.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Even in the US. So there are a few things.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's not a clear cut story as a

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft or an Amazon or an Nvidia at this point.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 6>There are certain things that need to be cleaned up.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, no, I'm I'm always a big fan of Apple.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Nothing about it.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Very good Anna, rog rn I thank you

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>very much. We appreciate that. As always on a Rogronic

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Technology Analyst or Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Else you get your podcasts.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.