WEBVTT - The Water Acidification Problem

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, somebody calls you,

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you answer quite slowly. I'm Jonvin Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I I was assuming that you were going to do

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an acid bath song. I had a lot of different

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the subject, and ultimately I decided to go

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>just one step further removed. Are we all of just

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>about the right age to have heard a whole lot

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about acid rain in school when we were kids. I

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think we are. Yeah, I definitely am. And that's what

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about water accidification today, and not

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just acid rain, but water acidification in general. What does

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that mean? What? First of all, what does the term mean? Second,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean to our planet? And third is

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there anything we can do about it? Uh? So? Yeah,

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was growing up, acid rain was like one

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of those buzzwords that I remember hearing frequently. Let me

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you what was like growing up in

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the early to mid eighties. So acid rain

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>big concern, probably second only to communism. It sounds like

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a joke, but I'm really Yeah, no, I

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I was there. I remember. Yeah, as a kid, it

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was weird getting this because I didn't know what communism

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was as a kid. I just knew it was supposedly awful,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>but you knew what acid was. It's that big vat

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that the bad guy hangs Batman over on

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a rope before Batman escapes. Pretty much, that's it's very

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>close to what my conception was of the idea of

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what acid was. Therefore what acid rain must be. And

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>this is this is despite the fact that all of

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>us kind of grew up. I mean, it's certainly like

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the seventies nineties were a golden age, a very weird,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>very earnest outreach to children about environmental issues. Outreach is

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a cute word, because because we kids had so much

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>power over the massive amounts of pollution being poured into

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>our environment. We we we mentioned fern Gully in the

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>last episode, Azing mentioned it recently, one of the in

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the last episodes at anyway. Yeah, yeah,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for Fern Gully, the last rainforest. There was also Captain Planet,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty amazing. Um. Of course, of course Dr

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Seuss Lorax and David the Gnome, and like the Final

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy series and the work that Miyazaki was doing over

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in Japan that wouldn't make it over here for another

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>few years, but was still part of the ovoir of

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, Like Nasca of the Valley of Wind. I

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like in this list you're kind of mixing together

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>some things that are like wonderful pieces of art with

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>environmental themes and then just pure propaganda. Well, to be fair,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it was all part of the spectrum that was coming

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out towards us kids. I gotta tell you, it did

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>convince me to shut down my coal gas firing plant

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and that I was using to really run my he

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>manuh toys. You know what it did convince me to

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>do was not to build coal plants in sim city.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It had an effect on that. Really well simulated environment

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was as well, go planet, Go planet. Indeed so so okay.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So all of these media were really good at convincing

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>us that the Earth was in terrible trouble, possibly even

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>our own sim sim Earth. But maybe they weren't as

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>good at explaining what any of these things actually were.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that either they were poorly uh written attempts

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to explain this like it was getting across the fact

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that this was These were important issues, but as a kid,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I was not absorbing the actual information of what the

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff meant. I was misinterpreting it. In my mind, acid rain,

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if it were to actually be a thing that happened

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in my neighborhood, it would that were I had to

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get caught out in it, I would melt away like

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the wicked Witch of the West, or like the Nazis

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of Raiders at the Lost Start. It

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would be another example and also raised lost art played

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a very important role in my childhood, so that definitely

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was one of the images going through my mind. Whenever

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard the phrase acid rain, I figured it literally

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>meant it must be raining. Acid. Um, well, you could argue, yeah,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but acid is a is a term that children don't

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>quite understand the right one. Adult start necessarily understand it

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>either broad term as well. Acidic things are many things. Yes,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they have a pH lower than seven point oh. Essentially

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that means that it's acidic. It doesn't necessarily mean that

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's acidic to the point where it could react

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with something like your skin. But as a child, that

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>subtlety was lost on me. As an adult, I understand

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit better. So here's the thing. Yeah,

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like this rain was going to melt the

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>flesh off of my bones and I was going to

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>be standing there as a skeleton for a second before

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>collapsing into a little pile. But we also shouldn't just

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sit here and mock the past for being concerned about it,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>because acid rain is something that's actually worth being concerned about. Absolutely,

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>And so we're gonna spend the first little bit about

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this in this podcast talking about acid rain, and then

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we will transition to talk about ocean acidification. The different

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is two are different, yes, although it's certainly related. Yeah,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the sense that you don't want either

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So, so the e p A defines acid

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>rain as quote a broad term referring to a mixture

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of wet and dry deposition, which means deposited material from

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere containing higher than normal amounts of nitric and

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sulfuric acids. So this would be acid rain that actually

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>contains nitric acid and sulfuric acid, not again at a

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>concentration or intensity strong enough to do physical harm to

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>your skin, but it could still harm you in the

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>long term. Uh, it's a little different from ocean and centification.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Ocean a centification really is the accumulation of hydrogen ions

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this absorption of carbon dioxide. We'll

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>get into that in a little bit. So acid rain

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>can actually come from natural sources, right, It's not just

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>man made. If there's a volcanic eruption, that can end

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>up injecting quite a bit of uh nitric acid and

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sulfuric acid into the atmosphere, which where it can then

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>be absorbed in precipitation and then rained down upon the

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>surrounding countryside, even miles or hundreds of miles away from

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>where the eruption happened. I was curious to see what's

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the worst acid rain we've ever had on Earth?

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>And I found an interesting article on smithsonian dot com

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from January talking about the acid rain that probably fell

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>during the Great Dying, also known as the Permian tri

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Triassic extinction event. This is also known as the next

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones novel. Yes, yes, this was the worst

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>stinction event in every Game of Thrones novel. Fair enough.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, I almost just said in human history,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>not in human history and the history of the Earth,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of life on Earth. Uh, nine out of every ten

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>species are actually more than nine out of every ten

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>species on Earth completely wiped out, which it was. It's

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so hard for us to even even fathom that today, right, Yeah,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that well, I mean, hopefully we'll never have

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually witness nine more than of all life forms

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>being wiped off the planet. But uh, you know, when

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we think of extinctions, mostly extinctions that we're aware of

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are tiny on a scale compared to this particular one. Yeah,

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing was horrible. Life on Earth could very well

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>have been completely snuffed out for all we know, and maybe,

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as far as we know we barely scraped by not

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we as in humans, but we as in our distant ancestors. Um,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So what caused it? Scientists are still debating this, but

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the usual suspects are called up. There's mass of volcanic eruptions,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>usually centered around these the Siberian traps, these Siberian eruptions

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that uh seemed to happen at a particularly bad time

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to affect the Earth's atmospheric composition. And then there's also

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hypothesized space impacts and maybe bacterial or microbial blooms that

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>changed the composition of the atmosphere. There are a lot

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of different hypotheses, but one uh anyway, that the article

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned talks about a few lines of research pointing

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to the theory that this volcanic eruption that's been hypothesized

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as one of the major causes of the extinction event

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>led to extreme, widespread acid rain. And so according to

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to several findings, the carbon dioxide emitted by the Siberian

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>volcanism would have lowered the pH of the rain to

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>about four, which is they compare that in the article

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to the acidity of tomato juice. I mean, it's not

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>acidic enough to burn your skin off, but that's really

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>acidic for rain, yes. Uh. And then at on top

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, the acidifying effects of sulfur dioxide from the

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>volcanic eruptions in the northern hemisphere they say may have

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>been uh seeing pulses of weather events with rain that's

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as acidic as lemon juice. Lemon juice is nice to

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>squirre it over your fish and chips, It is not

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>nice to square it over your land masses and oceans, right,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, I should point out, of course, the acid

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>rain that we heard about in the eighties and nineties,

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that was clearly acid rain that was caused by by

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>human activity. That was the sort of stuff we were

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>being warned about, like, stopped this stuff because it's killing

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>our planet, the bad guys on Captain planet. Yeah, yeah,

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that was the industrial revolution. Um, your coal burning factory, right, boy?

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Is my face red? Add of fact that the main

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>thing I remember being told as a kid about acid

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rain was that it would discolor our statues and natch

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>national monuments, which it would, so that is one thing

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it would do. So yeah, that just seems like a

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>weird thing to emphasize. Yeah, well, to be fair, it's

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that stayed with you. It's not necessarily

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that was stressed above all others. Yeah,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, the the the human made acid

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rain that comes from emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide,

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>both of which are biproducts of fossil fuel combustion. So

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as we depend upon fossil fuels, as we burn those

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, we release these sorts of gases into the

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere where they can end up becoming acid rain. There

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>can be some chemical UH processes that then converted into

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>nitric acid and sulfuric acid and mixed with the precipitation. UH.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Most of the sulfur dioxide emissions and about a quarter

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the nitrogen oxide emissions are the results of power

0:10:55.360 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>plants burning coal to produce electricity. So again, my little

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>coal firing plant was a really bad option. I should

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have gone solar. He man would have told me that

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>if I paid attention at the last thirty seconds of

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>every episode where the little educational p s a would

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>come into play, But I always turned it off at

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that point because I wasn't there to learn things. Darn it.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>What were the what were the power plant options in

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sim City before sim City two thousand? Was a just

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>coal and nuclear? Was that about it? I think giant

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>hamsters were also. I think it was just nuclear at

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>any rate. So when those emissions are released in the atmosphere,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the components react chemically with other stuff like water, oxygen,

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>other airborne chemicals that are already up there, and that

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>creates that mild sulfuric acid and nitric acid, and so

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you me I mentioned wet and dry deposition. Acid rain

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is wet deposition. It means that you're actually depositing this

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>acid through rain. Other types include fog and snow. Yeah,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>acid fog, which I'm pretty an the Surewood just that

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>should be the sequel to the John Carpenter movie, you know,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the exactly then everyone just tripping out as the fog

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is coming in and be that kind. So then uh,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sulfuric and nitric Nitric acid mixed with wet weather fall

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to the ground during rainstorms, and this acid rain can

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>damage plants and animals and change the acidity levels and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bodies of water like streams, lakes, and ponds. The actual

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>effects of acid rain depend on lots of different factors,

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so you can't give like a blanket statement that says

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>here's how it's going to affect this region. There are

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that will determine that, such as

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what is the acidity level, how bad, how concentrated is

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the acid in the rain itself? What is the buffering

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity of the soil to handle acidic water. Some soils

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>can absorb it and hold onto it uh more effectively

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>than others. Some it's going to run off right into

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever water bodies. Water are nearby, Um, things like marshes

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. You have a lot of very delicate types

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of animals and plants that can be very dramatically affected

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>by changes in acidity levels. Uh, it's you know, things

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we often think of frogs as an

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>early indicator species. That's one of the ones that we

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>would be looking at in areas around where acid rain

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>is happening, because they tend to be pretty sensitive to

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>those kind of changes. Uh. Then you also have to

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>take into account like there might be some species of

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>plants and animals in certain areas that are a little

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more hardy. They can they can handle bigger changes in

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>acidity levels without it dramatically affecting their health. In those cases,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you might not even be aware that acid rain is

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a factor because you're not seeing the the consequences, at

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>least not right away. So, uh, it's not a one

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>size fits all kind of thing by any stretch of

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the imagination. And as Joe is pointing out earlier, the

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>message he took home from all of this acid rain

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>talk when he was a kid, it can cause damage

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>demand made structures, including ones that are irreplaceable. No, Yeah,

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>like those statues, you know, like ancient statues or monuments,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing where you know, I think this

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>specific example I remember was something about the the what's

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it called Mount Rushmore? I was going to say, was

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it Mount Rushmore? Because I feel like that was a

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>big thing that was impressed upon me as a child.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It's still a big thing. These heads are enormous. I'm sorry,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>can you can you actually climb out their nose holes? That?

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't? Pretty sure you cannot. I can't. I have

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have never been to Mount Rushmore. It's

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>when it's still on my list. But uh, and I

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>guess I need to get there before the acid rain hits, because,

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>appoint to you guys, those heads are living on borrowed time.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>According to my memory of my childhood, it may very

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>well be that they're completely safe. I'm just considering it

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>infallible at this point. So also, the acid rain can

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>cause direct harm to our health. I mean, we're joking

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about this largely because it's a defense mechanism at some point.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've gotta you've got to be able to

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lighten up things. But it really can cause harm to us. Now,

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the acidity, as we said, isn't enough to harm you

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>directly through your skin, So you're not gonna be walking

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out there and rain starts to fall on you. You

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>see like little plumes of smoke where it's hitting your

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>skin and you can feel it bubbling. That's not happening. No, No,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>even drinking it isn't really going to do you any harm. Yeah,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it turns out you got acid in your stomach and

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty strong, um, way stronger than the acidity levels

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in the an acid rain. So I mean, if you

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>already drink Coca cola, that's fairly acidic, right, Yeah. I

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot of lemon juice, like you said before,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>very acidic, and we can ingest that without problems. I

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>mean most of us. Some of us get a sensitivity

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to it, and after a little while your mouth might

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>start to hurt, but that's that's kind of the extent

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. But breathing in those acids, when they're in

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere, that is a problem, and that can lead

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to long term health complications, everything from asthma to bronchitis

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to even heart disorders. So it's serious stuff. Obviously, the

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest solution to this problem is to find other methods

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of generating power and other and all the other fossil

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>fuel uses that we have. Getting off fossil fuels and

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>using something else. That's the big solution to acid rain.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It's you've got to look at what is causing the

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>acid rain. Can you affect what that is? Because otherwise

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all you're doing is treating symptoms, right, and that's that's

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a losing game in the long run. So, uh, well,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for treating some symptoms if it could you

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>help us not get asthma. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely, in the

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, in the acute sense, absolutely, But

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to to solve things for the longer term,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you've got to You've got to address the fossil fuel problem. Now.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The other issue that we're going to talk about today,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the different but I guess related issue in that it

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>also deals with pollution and acidity, is ocean acidification. Yeah,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>and by acidity in this sense, we're not saying that

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the oceans themselves are turning acidic, correct, but they are, well,

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you could say they're becoming more acidic even though they

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are not acidic, right, they they themselves aren't on the

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>acid end of the pH scale. No, the ocean is

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so basic. It's it's pretty basic. I mean, it's big,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's wet, covers most of the planet. How more much

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>more basic can you get? But now again to explain

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the PhD, so we say seven is neutral. Scale goes

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>from zero to fourteen. Anything above a seven is a base,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>below a seven is an acid, and the ocean is

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>what it's like seven points something yet's it's it's above seven.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It's in on the basics slightly slightly basic scale. It's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>between seven and eight, and it's closer to seven than eight.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But when we talk about ocean a centification, we talk

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about that number going down slightly. So it's still on

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the basic end of the spectrum, but it's lower than

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what it would naturally be otherwise. So according to woods Whole,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 1>ocean a graphic institution. I'll just call it woods Hole

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>because when I say ocean a graphic it sounds like

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm having some sort of episode. I'm having issues with

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>talking today. Don't know what the big deal is, Joe.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I just for some reason today that word is just

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>tripping me up. But at any rate, it's a multi uh.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>They say that studying ocean and centification involves a multi

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>disciplinary field of research, and it includes quote counter intuitive

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>end quote aspects such as carbonate chemistry carbonate as in

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>C A R B O in A T E carbonate

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's a little they say counterintuitive because once

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you start looking into this, it sounds like the opposite

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is happening what you would expect. And because of that,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it makes it particularly difficult to educate people and also

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to get across to the media the subtleties of what

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ocean and centification is all about. And uh, and I

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciate that. So we're gonna try our best to

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be as accurate as we possibly can, but keep in

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>mind this is complicated stuff. Yeah, it's one of those

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>things where like the issue is that Earth's oceans are

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are big, like really big kind of thing. Um, there's

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more ocean than truck. There's more ocean than truck. And uh,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and like trucks, oceans have a lot of moving parts.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Like like literally every molecule of water that makes up

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all of the oceans is probably moving right now. I

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to freak you guys out, don't think about

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it too hard. Uh, And every single one of those

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>molecules is interconnected and there's like a lot of fish

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. So you're connected. Now, you don't mean in

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a deepac choper a kind of sense. You mean in

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>like a fluid dynamics and if a dynamic sense more so, yes, right,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were to push against some of those molecules,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they would push against other molecules that would push against

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>other molecules, and so on and so forth, and a

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>butterfly with flap its wings, and then you would get

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>acid rain outside of my house. That's the way I

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>understand it. At any rate. I hate this fossil fuel

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>burning butterflies. They are the worst. They're so loud to

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you. Okay, but what what actually is

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ocean acidification? We sort of explained it, but it's it's

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the oceans pH becoming lower, not necessarily being an acid,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>but becoming more relatively acidic, right compared to what it

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was before exactly, And it's primarily caused by carbon dioxide

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>dissolving into seawater. So now now you may have actually heard,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I bet you've heard people who are trying to say, oh,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, global warming, climate change, it's no big deal

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because the oceans will absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not partially it's partially true, and that the oceans

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>will as long as the carbon dioxide concentrate, the atmosphere

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>goes up, and it goes up higher than what the

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>ratio between water and atmosphere typically is than the water

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>compensates by absorbing some of that CEO too. Now, it's

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not true that that means climate change is no big deal.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It also is not true that that that means that, hey,

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we're okay, because if the carbon dioxide goes into the ocean,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>who cares, right, because it turns out yeah, yeah. And

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so what's going on with this, with this equilibrium thing here,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>is that when there's less carbon dioxide in the surface

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean than there is in the lower atmosphere,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that the physical system that is that air and water

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is out of equilibrium. So so the water is going

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to absorb some of the carbon dioxide to

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>even things out. And it doesn't happen instantaneously. According to

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, it takes about

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a year for the system to reach equilibrium. Every time

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>has been happening more or less constantly as far as

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we can track it back, for decades and decades. On

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a molecular level, what's going on here is that the

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide in the water react form carbonic acid, which

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is a type of molecule that can lose protons, which

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>acidifies the water, decreasing the pH as. We've been talking

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about protons being hydrogen ions, right, because you get a hydrogen,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you lose the electron. You've got a proton that's a

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen ion. And that's that's essentially what we talked about.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Whenever you're talking about to sit, uh, you know, something

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>becoming more acidic, you're really talking about accumulation of hydrogen

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ions on a very simple chemical level. I almost said basic,

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but that would have been so misleading. Uh So, Yeah,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the ocean absorbs about a quarter of all the carbon

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dioxide we released into the atmosphere. Well, in some senses,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>like if it didn't do that, then the rate of

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>climate change we are observing would go even faster. However,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the tradeoff is we have this increase in uh, the

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>acidification of the oceans, and as it turns out, that

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>is pretty bad. So one thing we can say is

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that while climate change and ocean a centification are not

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, they both have they both share one

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>common cause. Keeping in mind there are a lot of

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>different causes that are at play, but carbon diox Yeah. Both,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but carbon dioxide is like a big player in both,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the emissions of carbon dioxide have an impact

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>on climate change as well as ocean a cidification. Now,

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing we should probably point out is even though

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we are tracking a trend where the oceans are becoming

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more acidic, it will probably never dip below the neutral

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>pH and become an acid. No, it will not do

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that because other other chemical components that are in the

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>ocean will end up neutralizing acids. It will never get

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to the point where it goes below seven on the

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pH scale. It's never going to actually become an acid.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>The acidification is really talking about the trend of that

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>pH getting lower. But essentially every research that I read,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>every single paper I read, said it is for all

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>intents and purposes, impossible for the oceans to become acidic,

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>right to to actually turn onto the ascid level of

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that pH scale. Come on, it's impossible. With that kind

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of attitude, I mean, yeah, I mean maybe if we're

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>really determined and we really mess things up, we can

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. But I really don't think we want

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to find out. No, no, And and those small changes,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>though are are are perhaps surprisingly impactful, and we'll get

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>into that a little bit later on. But but yeah,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So so there we were talking about some of the

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the other factors that go into this carbon transfer,

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this carbon dioxide transfer, right, And as it turns out,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not even as simple as more carbon dioxide

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>goes into the atmosphere therefore more common doxide gets or

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>by the oceans, and it's never as simple as that.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>We often will try and talk in those terms to

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of boil down a concept so it's easily digestible.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is part of the reason why woods Hole

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>was saying, guys, this is complicated. Don't oversimplify the issue,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because then you're really misleading the public. So the concentration

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere drives acidification overall. So

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, as those carbon dioxide levels increase in the atmosphere,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the acidification process increases, But other factors mitigate how much

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide the ocean can actually absorb. So one of

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>those factors is the ocean water temperature. Uh, if ocean

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>water warms, however, it might warm, let's say through climate change.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one, right. Then the warming effect actually

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>reduces the speed at which the ocean will absorb carbon dioxide,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the rate of acidification will decrease. But it

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't stop, It just slows down a little. Well, that's great.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's say let's continue global warming while decreasing carbon emissions,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and eventually it'll I'll just work itself. You know, I

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't work up a whole bunch of notes on why

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>climate change is bad. I didn't anticipate needing them. But yeah, no,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously you don't. You don't want the planet

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to warm up because of all the implications of climate

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>change where you know, and of course we're when we

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>say global warming, we're oversimplifying. Really when when you're talking

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>climate change, some regions are going to experience overall cooling

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. The point is that's we don't want that,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want ocean a cerentification, right um. And

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>also if you think that that, hey, wait, wait, wait,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what about the ice caps, right, Like what about icebergs

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and and and glaciers and sheets of ice if those

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>belt those are fresh water, right, if those melt and

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>then doesn't that dilute the ocean? Won't that dilute the

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>acid or the acidification and thus slow down or maybe

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe even reverse acidification. And the answer to that is nope,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>or at least not in the long term. That does

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>seem kind of intuitive, but yeah, why why not? Because

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>once the water does start to dilute that concentration of

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide in the oceans, you still have the imbalance

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the atmosphere, which means all you've really done is

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is increased the ocean's capacity for absorbing C O two

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in that particular region, and that's what it'll do. So

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, it's kind of like, um, oh,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>what would be a good analogy I'm trying to think of,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Like if you had like a paper towel and you

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>soaked up a little water and you had just a

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>little little corner of your paper towel and it was

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>still dry. So you're thinking, all right, well, uh, if

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I pour a little bit more are on there, it's

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>going to absorb everything that's just that's as much as

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it can go. Everything's cool. But then you pick up

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the paper towel and you wring it out and you

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>put it back down. Now it has the capacity to

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>soak up even more water. It's that's sort of what's

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>happening with the ocean. It gets diluted. It's like ringing

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>out that paper towel. Uh, really, you've just you've just

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>except instead of getting rid of the carbon dioxide, you

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>really just diluted it. Now you have the capacity to

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>take on even more. And once that happens, once you've

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>reached that level of equilibrium between the atmosphere and the

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ocean again, you're right back to where you started from,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>with the added benefit of not having those pesky giant

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sheets of ice anymore. So that's a bad thing because

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the polar bears will have no place to live well,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.239
<v Speaker 1>polar bears that that Speaking of fauna, one of the

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>things that we should be thinking about is what effect

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>does ocean acidification have, Because one of the most obvious

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>things to be concerned about is, well, if the oceans

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>chemical nature is changing slightly, how does this affect the

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 1>creatures that dwell in the ocean? And and as it

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>turns out, just like the other elements that we've talked about,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it is incredibly complicated. It is not

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so simple as to say all species, you know, ocean

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>dwelling species are equally affected through the process of acidification. Right. Well,

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, um, I've read that you might be

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>able to look at ocean acidification and say, well, it

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like this might have a beneficial effect to photosynthesizing

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>animals that live in the oceans. Though that's not necessarily

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>so good for the rest of the planet, right right, right,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>because since it's an ecosystem, not a eco, there's no

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>eye and ecosystem. Um, No, there is, but there isn't

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>emy not in order. No, you make a good point. Yeah, yeah,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's overall if if the play ants,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the photosynthesizing stuff that lives in the ocean, um has

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance to overgrow, that it's going to set off

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the balance of a lot of other things that are

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>either competing for the resources or or in other in

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>some other way need to hang out at a certain level. Yeah, exactly.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it would lead to this, this

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thing in particular, but one comparison point I have is

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea of algal blooms in the ocean leading to

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>oceanic dead zones, or if you have, you basically you

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>create regions of the ocean that are too friendly to

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>explosive algae populations, and then they make that water uninhabitable. Yeah. Yeah,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some species that, like you were saying, Lauren, are

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>competing for the exact same resources, and if the chemistry

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean ends up favoring one over the other,

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the danger is to the other, right, that the other

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>could suffer, perhaps even die out, and in some cases

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that could be absolutely catastrophic. The the one of the

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>example is that that goes right into what you're both

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Is coral the actual organisms of coral, Yeah,

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or any actually, I think it's any mineral forming or

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>cast calcium based mineral forming organisms organisms in the ocean, right,

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>all the all the ones that have calcium based shells,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>those are also affected by ocean of cientification. Have you

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>did you, guys see the pictures of like the the

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sea snails. Yeah, I think you're referring to the tarot taropods, right,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember specifically seeing a sequence of pictures of this snail,

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and it showed what the what happens to the shell

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>over the course of time in one of these environments. Yes, Uh,

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so they simulate this this water environment with the decreased

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pH that is that was matched up to what it

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>was predicted to be within a hundred years in the oceans.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>If trends continue and the shell does not do well, no,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you start to see it like it becomes translucent and

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>then transparent and look at this as this gonna make

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>me really upset. It made me really upset. I got

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>very upset when I saw it because I wasn't expecting

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that when I was doing my research. Well, I mean

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it was just very to see just to see like

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the actual uh sequence that that this represents and thinking,

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, well now this is no longer uh this

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of just vague idea that I have in my head.

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm seeing actual results of what happens. Uh. That

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly impactful. And you said, especially if you are

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those people who really likes marine biology or

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you have an interest in things like the ocean. I mean,

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I I I love going to the ocean. I love snorkeling,

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I love exploring and to think of those environments being

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>put in danger. I mean, obviously I have a greater

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciation for what that means to on a larger scale

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem wide and and planet wide ultimately, but also on

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just a personal scale of my own experience of interacting

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in these environments. It's a pretty powerful thing. But I

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>guess we should look at beyond the specifics of which

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>organisms would be affected in what ways, because really that's

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that we don't entirely know, you right,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we we we were just species by species speculating here

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>based on what seems like will probably happen. Um, we

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>could look at a kind of general approach to what's

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to species overall, Like what are their

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>strategies for coping with this? Yeah, there are three general responses,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>right there is acclamation, adaptation, and extinction. I think we

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know extinction ex is not a great strategy. It kind

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of kind of stinks if that's the one you choose. Well,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it's not. It's not usually the first choice.

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think acclamation essentially an adaptation are are are

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>similar but not exactly the same. But both of them require, uh,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the the organisms to be able to to survive and

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially thrive in the changing environment. So animals that have

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>long lifespans are the least able to adapt to new conditions,

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense right. The longer the lifespan, uh, then

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got these very long generational periods between generations. That

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>means that you have fewer opportunities for new generations to

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>uh to to succeed in a changing environment. So if

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you get fewer mutants to work with, pretty yeah, pretty much. Yeah.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>If the environment is changing faster than the mutations can occur,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then it's a losing battle for that particular species in

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the In general, uh So, the ones that that tend

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to have shorter lifespans tend to be better able to

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>adapt to conditions. That's not a rule across the board.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Some organisms can get left behind even if they have

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>short lifespans. Coral was that example I gave earlier. They

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>coral has pretty short lifespan. But if you have another

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 1>species there that is competing for the exact same sort

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that your species is competing for, and they're

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>better at adapting to that environment than your species is,

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you still can come out behind, and you can still

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.479
<v Speaker 1>lose out and still face extinction uh in the long run.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the case that people are talking

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>about with coral um like that, you know it won't

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to outcompete those types of algae. And more

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more than that, ecosystems are incredibly complex, right, and we

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot anticipate what will happen to an ecosystem. Even if

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you were to remove just one type of species from

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that ecosystem, it's very difficult to predict how that would

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>play out across the entire ecosystem. Yeah. In in in general,

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>biologists have identified a bunch of keystone species that are

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the most important to keeping the whole thing running. But

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but but every every cog is important. Yeah. Uh. For

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing, every time you lose a species, you have

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a decrease in biodiversity. We've talked about biodiversity in previous

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>episodes of forward thinking in general. When you see biodiversity decrease,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a bad thing. Uh. Species like coral again

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>very important to to uh, to certain ecosystems. Right, you

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have the coral reefs. If those were to no longer

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be a thing, if they were the organisms were not

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>there to build coral reefs, and those were to break

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>down over time, those entire ecosystems would completely transform, and

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we would likely see many species suffer as a result.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Some might benefit because they might be praying on all

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that no longer have a home. But that

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't last very long. That lasts for essentially a generation

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or two, and then after that you've got the problem

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of Hey, that plentiful food source that we were so

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>happy about just a couple of generations go is gone.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Now what happens? So it becomes this crazy dumb into effect.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I said, something that even is potentially

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fairly localized can become a global issue due to this

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>complex interlocking nature of ecosystems. Um and that means we

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>could see massive shortages in lots of different ocean resources.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh so it could. It could have an actual financial

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>impact as well as a food source impact to us

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>as humans. We could see a decrease in fisheries and

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lots of other important elements to our economy and to

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>where we get our food. I mean, I'm not eating

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>shrimp anymore, but that doesn't mean I don't think anyone

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>else should be able to get it. They should be

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>able to get it. Um and it would also have

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a big impact on the carbon cycle. So coral creates

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>calcified minerals and they kind of lock carbon away. When

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when coral ends up breaking off and crumbling and landing

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>onto the ocean floor, it's a sin really locked in

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon into the actual material there. And and so if

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>coral is gone, then that one that that way of

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>locking away carbon is also gone. So now you have

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one fewer way to lock up carbon, and potentially that

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>could create you know, it could exacerbate a problem. Right,

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you get even more carbon being released into the environment.

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what started this issue in the first place. That's

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. So how bad are we talking about? Well,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>according to the research I was reading, it looks like

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the pH of the ocean surface has decreased by zero

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>point one pH unit since pre industrial times, which doesn't

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sound like a whole lot. So what's the big deal, right, Well,

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, isn't the pH scale logarithmic, Well, there's that,

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a part of it. Is also that the point

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one pH unit indicates that hydrogen ion levels those protons

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about, have increased by twenty six percent,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and projections predict that the pH will continue to drop

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between point three and point four pH units by

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the century, which would mean a one

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>one increase in hydrogen ion concentration. That that is a

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dramatic enough change where the the the safety of many

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>different species is called into question. We honestly do not

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>know how many of those species would be able to

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>adapt to such a dramatic change in ocean chemistry, or

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>which ones would not be able to adapt, in which

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ones are the most at risk for us to lose UM.

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's again complicated. Yeah, and unfortunately the ocean is

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to study than the atmosphere. The data

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've been collecting so far has not added up

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to to a smooth trend like decade over decade. That's

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>indirect correlation with climate change, and researchers aren't entirely sure

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>what's driving this variability. So without knowing what's really going on, UM,

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to to either help alleviate the problem or

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>or to even to even figure out where it's going

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to go. And then, adding to this complicated nature of

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the issue, you know, marine ecosystems are are part of

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>what affects how the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide, so as

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a cidification changes these ecosystems, the problem could get better

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or worse. Uh, No, one knows. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Again,

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those things where first of all,

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the ocean and centification research is a relatively young science,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>really very detailed work has been going on for about

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a decade. Yeah. And in fact, the reason why we

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>know information about like, how can we say since the

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>pre industrialized era, After all, you just said the research

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>is only be going on a decade. We can say

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that because of ice, we can look at ice and

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we can see what the water acidification was in uh

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>sheets of ice that were around in the pre industrial era,

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and then compare it to what we see today. Yeah.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and those efforts um, I mean there are

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely organizations that are working to study the issue and

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and figure out how to best apply any potential forthcoming solutions,

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to in a second. Uh. For for example,

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>helps conduct hydrographic cruises science cruises. There's no tick drinks

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>involved probably on these cruises. No. They they send ships

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>out that are equipped to take measurements about how different

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>parts of the oceans vary and how different marine environments

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>in them contribute to to this carbon cycle. Uh. They

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>also employ a fleet of volunteer observation ships and all,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so another fleet of moored buoys that that can monitor

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide levels and temperatures and salinity and all that

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So so, so we're working towards it.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But but some of those solutions are Are there solutions

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to this problem? Well, I mean, one, one big one

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>would be to cut carbon dioxide emissions as much as

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can, because again, if if the carbon dioxide

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>levels in the atmosphere are lower than you start to

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you decrease that pressure where carbon dioxide ends up being

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>absorbed into the surface of the ocean. Well, let's just say,

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of argument, that we live in some

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>strange alternate universe where people don't want to do that.

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Are there other options that could potentially be available to us.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>There's some band aids where we could we could alleviate

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the symptoms, but again it would be like treating the

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>symptoms but not the disease, so you would still have

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the overall problem. Geoengineering. Uh, people have talked about potentially

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>using geoengineering tactics in order to lock up carbon to

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to take carbon dioxide either out of emissions and lock

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it up in some way, or to actually find ways

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of pulling it from the atmosphere itself and locking it up. Uh,

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that's important. It would definitely help the acute problem. But

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>as long as we're continuing to produce carbon dioxide, it's

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.439
<v Speaker 1>not a long term solution. It's really again, it's it's

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>too reactionary. It's kind of like when we talk about

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>health care and we talk about treating an acute disease

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and not doing preventitive care where you don't get sick

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. It's very similar to that. Um.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>There's also there have been some people said, well, what

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if we were to add some sort of carbon neutralizer

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or even hydrogen neutralizer into the oceans, like essentially, uh,

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the equivalent of ant acids, just dump

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>bunch of that in the ocean to soak that stuff up. Well,

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem there is that you have to add

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an equivalent amount of the neutralizer as the carbon dioxide

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that's actually going into the ocean in the first place.

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's like a that's that's not a little bit. No,

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's that's literally m thousands, hundreds of thousands

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of tons of material and one that could have a

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really serious effect on ocean ecosystems too. But to to

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>generate those neutralizers, to get that stuff would involve mining,

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it would involved manufacturing processes, so it would involve a

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff that guess what, am, it's a lot

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of carbon. So you're making the problem worse while trying

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to treat the symptom. Uh. Not a great solution either, um,

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but here's here's hoping that at least the awareness of

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the problem, the fact that we have this this growing

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>discipline of science that's really looking into it, and we

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have multiple avenues where people are paying more attention to

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions uh, and and trying to find ways of

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>reducing that, both in developed nations and industrializing nations just

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly difficult because remember the United States, the United Kingdom,

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other developed nations, we went through that

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>industrial era and we weren't worried about carbon emissions, and

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's and now we're very much concerned about it. But

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>all the other countries that are undergoing that same sort

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of process. Now if you think about it from their perspective,

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, you're placing an unfair burden on us

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because you didn't play by those rules and you enjoy

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of industrialization. Our country is trying to get there,

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but you're putting the brakes on us. So we've got

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of complicated issues social, political, economic, environmental all

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>coming to play in the same space. The hope is

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're able to science our way out of it,

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>both um an energy uh standpoint, how do we deal

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>with the stuff that's already out there, and how do

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we do it in a way that's that's environmentally, economically, politically,

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>culturally responsible. I don't have the answer to that. It's

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a big question. Uh. And I'm just a dude who

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sits to the computer and does my TYPEE type TYPEE

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and research stuff. It's I'm I'm glad that we see

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so much attention going toward it, and I am encouraged

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>by the work of various scientists to try and create

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to carbon admitting methods of energy generation or electricity

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>generations relations and not energy generation, but to generate electricity. UM.

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's a fascinating subject one that I thought was

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>important for us to really take a look at I

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>personally support the work of scientists who want to create

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>energy out of nothing. Do you yeah, I can point

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you in the direction of several blogs are so for

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>those of you who are interested in real science, or

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you have questions about how something is going to be

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the future. You've got or you've got comments on this.

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you're someone who works in this field and you

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have your own insight into it. We would love to

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Please email us. Our address is fw

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or drop us

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a line on Facebook or Twitter. At Twitter we are

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>f W Thinking. If you put f W Thinking in

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the little search bar on Facebook, our profile should pop

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>right up. You can leave us a message there and

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 1>we will talk to you again really soon. For more

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on this topic in the future of technology, visit forward

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking dot com. Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go Places,