WEBVTT - Anil Dash Talks About Tech Industry Ethics

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg Radio.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have a special guest.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>His name is a Neil Dash. He is a leading technician, entrepreneur,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>founder uh in the world of micro publishing and blogging.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I know his work from back when six Apart was

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an early pioneer in the world of blogging. They put

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out type Pad, which was really the first robust, whizzywig

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>what you see is what you get sort of blogging platform.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Before that, you had companies like Yahoo Geo Cities. My

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>first blog was on Geo Cities and I say this

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 1>it's It's really not a joke. It's true. I say

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it as a joke, but it's true. I would take

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>fift twenty minutes to write something and then two hours

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to code in an HTM out in order for it

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to work. On Geo Cities. It was you were literally

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>coding everything. Every every indent, every bold, every underlying, every

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>paragraph had an htmail code arout it. So to reduce

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that process of of micro publishing to something that was

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like it very much was like working on a document

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on Microsoft Word. If you wanted to format it, you

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>just clicked the button that said, here's your underline, here's

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>your talles, here's your footnote, here's your and it was.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>It was absolutely game changing. It went from a tent

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to one ratio of of coding to writing to hundreds

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to one in the opposite direction. You would take a

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>half hour to write something and maybe thirty seconds to

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>format it. It was easy as pie. My first blog

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was big Picture dot type head dot com. It's still

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>up there, by the way. Not only did they create

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the software for this, but they also created the hosting

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.559
<v Speaker 1>for it. And I find six apart was a game

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>changer for the world of publishing. I found this to

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be an absolutely fascinating conversation. If you're into blogging, technology, entrepreneurship,

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, et cetera, you're gonna find this conversation fascinating. So,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my conversation with a Neil Dash,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>My special guest today is a Neil Dash. He was

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an advisor to the Obama White House's Office of Digital Strategy.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>He is a technical advisor to Vox Media advises the

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>company medium on its publishing. He is also on the

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>National Advisory Council of Donors Choose. His day job is

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>CEO of fog Create Software, which has created such products

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>as stack overflow and trell Oh were they involved in

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Marker Bass or is that something separate? Was a startup

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was doing right before this? Before that, he writes a

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>monthly opinion column on the impact of technology on society

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 1>for Wired magazine. I know him as employee number one

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at six Apart, behind the seminal blogging software type Pad.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He also serves on the board of the Data and

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Society Research Institute. Neil Dash Welcome to Bloomberg. Thanks so

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>much for having me here. So I mentioned type head,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I really have to jump right into that. I know

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who you are because I actually was a beta tester

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>for type pad, and that's where I rolled out. Thank

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you for being one. That's where I rolled out the

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>big picture blogged tell us about your role with the

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>company six Sure. So I started blogging back and there

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>were a couple dozen bloggers on the internet, and I thought,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what were you using? Two blog? I was manually doing it.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I was the people who use Windows who remember an

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>app called notepad, and I was manually writing HTML, the

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>language of webpages, in Notepad and saving it onto a

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>web server by myself, which is the cutting edge or

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>technology back into the last So I was using Yahoo

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>geo Cities, which you're telling me is more advanced. I

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was just cutting and pasting content and then having to

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>wrap the HTML code around, right. So that was the

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>state of the art. And then in late ninety nine

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the first blogging tools came along and

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>then and so I started using those like Blogger and

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>which Google later bought and other things like that, and

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 1>uh and Friends shortly thereafter built this tool called movable

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>type and it was the first sort of serious blogging platform.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Almost immediately people used it to build Gawker, huffing and post.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>What was behind movable type, Uh, they were then husband

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and wife couple Ben trot A, Mina trot Um and um,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and really we're sort of visionaries about the idea that

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we should take this medium seriously. It was going to

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>be something big. It wasn't just h you know, people

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sharing their feelings in a journal online like this was

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be where media was head. And this is

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>this is pre Facebook, pre Twitter. Oh yeah, this is

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>way earlier. Yeah before friends stir you even remember that one,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.799
<v Speaker 1>so way way back there, and consumer internet was dead

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>deader than dead in two thousand one. I mean you

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>couldn't you know. We we did it a round that

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>was six grand that we raised, and people were like, wow,

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that's all the money in the world. You know, I

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>was here. I mean, it's it's it's like the catering

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>budget for a launch party for one of these startups today.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh. And so we did that and what was

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting was people almost immediately recognized this is important, this

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is something new in media. There's something really powerful enabling here.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And we thought it's still not easy enough. It was

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>still you had to have a lot of technical knowledge.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And that was where Type came from. You know, I

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think the predecessor to today. You see the word presses

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and mediums and tumblers of the world, and all of

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>them I think would say, you know, Type had as

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a direct antecedent to that. And it was the first,

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can recall, is the first whizzy

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wig sort of blogging software. What you see is what

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you get. It was like operating within a word perfect

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>or a word doc. Since it was since it was

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years ago, I could say word perfect exactly like

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows what that for The old timers. But I think,

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the other thing really interesting was we were

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with today you know, a lot of things that

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we take for granted and consumer web. So just the

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that we had a consumer pay model those five

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month, ten bucks a month. I mean, now

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody's paying for Spotify and Netflix and it's nothing, right,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Nobody was really thinking in terms of recurring revenue stream

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in a monthly Yeah, hits a credit card. Yeah. The

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>idea that that we were even gonna ask people to

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do that was radical. I mean, this stuff sounds like

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous because we all do it now, but you know,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it was this sixteen years ago. Fifteen years ago, people

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>were really really taken aback by that. The other thing

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that I think in retrospect was a bigger deal, huge deal,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and we sort of just took it for granted, was

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we were probably the first consumer product to use Amazon

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Web services on the back end, so were we had

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>some features that would let you list books you were

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reading and music you were listening to, and they would

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to Amazon and link up you know, buy my

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>book or or or you know by this back then CD.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And the interesting thing about that is some of us

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>still buy CDs just as every one's in a great while,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say so for collecting purposes, that's right. And

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it was an interesting thing was that, um,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we had this this app talking to web services from Amazon. Um,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, years and years before I think that became commonplace.

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the third thing that that type Pad did,

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think nobody really remembers. Um So the you know,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone launch, you didn't have an app store. You know,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs is like, you gotta use against it originally

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and then and then a year later, so they said, okay,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna introduce the app store. At that initial rollout

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>on stage with Jobs, we had our head of product

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for type Pad showing type Pad taking photos on your phone,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>uploading them to the web from your iPhone, you know,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in real time. This was, you know, the sort of

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the years long before Instagram took off. The very first

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>initial launch of the app store, type Pad was one

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of the first apps they ever future and type head

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is still around, still support, still doing this. They they

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>changed ownership a bunch of times. I don't I literally

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have even followed because I've been so busy with other stuff.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>For the the last several years. But they I mean, I

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>know the old big picture, which I did not take

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>down when I moved toward press in in oh eight.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I picked September oh eight is perfect time in the

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of the financial crisis. It was like six months

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in advance, and then the world blew up. I kept

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>both that and I had a fun Essays and a

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Fluvia for just random of fluvia. Um and they're still

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up and running. I still at one point in time

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it was fifty percent of the traffic to wear Press

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it gradually, you know, as as people move

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>their bookmarks and RSS feeders which no longer. Yeah, there's

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I mean, there's a lot of technology that's

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of come, come and gone, and I think some

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of these things will come back around again. But it's

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>been an interesting thing to watch. Um, a lot of

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>these ideas we thought were really radical around Oh, you

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>might take a picture on your camera on your phone

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and then share with people instantly, and you might store

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that on Amazon web services, and you might use a

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>service that's got a consumer subscription model as the way

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of accessing it. All those things, Um, you know, we

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily what we were first on some of them,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but we weren't, you know, the only ones doing them.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I think to have been certainly popularized that I think

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to bet that that was the way the Internet was headed,

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>where some of the things that we're just as important

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as the idea that blogs were going to be media

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that matter. Here's the quote of yours that I like,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>any form of electronic communication will first be dismissed as

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>trivial and worseless until it produces a profound result, after

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>which it will be described as obvious and boring. Yeah,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been my experience for sure. You've been blogging since?

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Was this the plan all along? To keep keep? You know?

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It was really one of those I was underemployed, not

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>real happy with my place in life, and thought, I'm

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a creative outlet to put stuff out there.

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And I can't sing, and I can't, you know, I can't,

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I can't do a radio show, so let me do this,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it was an interesting thing to to sort

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of just have this outlet. And then realized this media

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>mattered enough and that I had been early, you know,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was late, starting at nine. That's funny

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>because when I started on type head. It was oh

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>three the song I even remember July, and it was

0:09:55.600 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially a handful of college uh economics p fessors, nobody

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>really writing about markets, nobody really writing about investing, and

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you end up my experience was similar to yours, and

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not thrilled with what I'm doing. I'm kinda,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking for a creative outlet. But it was

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>clear that the mainstream media they take some young kid

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>out of school and throw them. Uh. Nobody wants to

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>cover the FED. Nobody wants to do economics back then,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and they were frequently, if not wrong, then lacking context.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>They were they weren't deep enough in it right. And

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the thing. Is that then the

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>people writing the blogs, with the people who are like,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm obsessing over this whether there's an audience or not,

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that nobody cares, you know. My view was, who

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>cares if there's an audience? There was a whole run

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of expert amateurs. Is that is that a real thing?

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I know exactly what you mean.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that summer too was a particularly interesting time,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>summer a GOO three, because we had folks coming up

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing covering aspects of economics that people weren't covering. Um,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>we brought some of the verse first. Well, really, I

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>think all the first vcs that started blog and came

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out on type paths. We had Fred Wilson on, we

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>had yeah, David Hornick from August Capital, a bunch of

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>these folks, Joe Eto, who's now heading up the media,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all these folks were Reid Hoffman, um,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like has a podcast exactly, the CEO of

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of Lincoln and uh and so all these people were

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I knew them as investors, and I was

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not at all fluent in m VC. You know, I

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>knew tech, but at that time you could actually build

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>an entire career writing software and never crossed paths with VC. Really, yeah,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know it was it was pretty common. And because

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of big companies on the pop

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>shops that were building software and apps and they would

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of grow organically out of that. And um, and

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't in the valley in particular, you know,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you could easily. I was in New York. You could

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just never cross paths. And so to read these blogs

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was like opening up this whole new world, and they

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>were now I understand, like you know, to some degree,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was content marketing. They were marketing their their firms by

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>being better storytellers. I think that's what it's involved, right,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what it's evolved to, the same thing

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with the freemium model. Here was a whole bunch of

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>free content owned by the way. If you want to

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>work with us, you can. But that's not I don't

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think that was anyone's intent. It truly wasn't my intention.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I do. I'm gonna blog in obscurity for

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve years and then have a radio show. Well, it's

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so interesting because I had that where. You know, one

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the people I connected with back then, UM was

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Joel Spolsky who was writing a blog called Joel on Software,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and he was really the first person to write about

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of coding culture, technical culture, and it was one

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things that those of us were coding for

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a living, which is what I did back then. I

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>knew these things, but had never seen them addressed as

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like you are you are you know people at the

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>place in society, and he was taking programmers very seriously. Um.

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason he was blogging. Then he was

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>explaining the ideas behind the new company he had just created,

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>which was Fall Creek Software. And so seventeen years later,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, for well sixteen years from that point that

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I took over as CEO of that company. Uh, it

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>felt like I knew everything about how this company ran

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and what its values were, and what his purpose was

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>in the world, because I had from day one followed

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>along with the storytelling. And you think he was not

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>content marketing, He was not. He didn't start writing this stuff.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>He was literally like trying to solve a problem like

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with real estate in Manhattan? How

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you keep programmers happy in a

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>world where you know, back then, hard as it is

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to believe, programmers were treated sort of like dirt. They

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>were like this guy in the back, We're going to

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>get him a computer and lock him in the dark

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and exactly right, and throw caffeine at him. And uh

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and now you know, you think, well, I mean, there's

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>probably no more spoiled workers in the world in terms

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of like the free massages and the trades of candy.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned that Google lifted the idea of all

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the free food. Yeah, this and this is one of

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>those things where like things become urban legend, and so

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to separate fact from fiction. But what I've

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>heard so one thing that is, you know, definitely true

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is fault Creek was one of the first companies to

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>do the like let's really spoil our coders and our

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>technical workers. And it was everything from great free lunches

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to UM. One of the things I still spend a

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of time working on completely end to end healthcare.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody on our team pays anything for healthcare UM. In fact,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we have people who have been at the company a

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>long time or they came right out of school. They

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what in network out of network means because

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they never had to deal with it the network. And

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that's great, Like that's what we want

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>people to feel. And then one of those things was

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>really great free catered lunches. In retrospect, I think some

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of this was the company was always like downtown Manhattan,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and especially back then, you know, just post nine eleven,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't There wasn't like good restaurants there, you know.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You know it also, especially if you're working late, like

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>five pm, it would just shut down that neighborhood would

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>just be dead a so how do you get food

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>down to So they had caterers, right, and they had

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>caterers come in many employees. So now the company were

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about forty it's it's still pretty small. It's it's kind

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of going up and down in size because um over

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the years, like they co created stack Overflow and they

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>created Trello, and as those products grow, they get pretty

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>big and then they would spin them out. You know,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Trello spun out a couple of years ago and sold

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to it last back in January for let let me

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>reel you back into the blog is sphere and talk

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about one of my favorite subjects, which is um uh

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>public a blog post of yours called Don't Read the

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Comments Now. I wrote Bailout Nation on the blog. I

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>would put up a few hundred words and I would

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>get feedback and have you seen this story and look

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at this link and the readers the community was astonishing.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And then tragedy of the comments that just gets overrun

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with the spammers and trolls, and it became so time

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>consuming to stay on top of comments that finally I

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>had to just grip my teeth and rip the band

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>aid off in close conscience, and I was not happy

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>about doing it, but it just became this giant time suck.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>What is the problem? And by the way, that's true

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on my columns at the Washington Post and Bloomberg as well.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, if you want to say something, go someplace.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's a link to Twitter, Here's a link to Facebook,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>where hopefully you aren't doing this anonymously, and you could

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>be called out because eventually I could subpoena Twitter and

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>find out who you are if you say something. Although

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has been done a good job of protecting people's nanimity,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they've done at protecting on a non amenmity yet but

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but not abuse at all. Right, they're just in fact.

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, my argument as to why Twitter stock prices

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>has been in the crap all this time is they

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have not created an encouraging communally totally agree. So there's

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple things I would sort of break out here.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. The first is, um, I get to watch

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>people creating the first comment systems on the internet. You know,

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a time when you couldn't actually comment on

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a web page and so um. The interestingly, the challenge

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>then was what are people can type in this box

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. Are they can even understand that you can

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>leave a comment and will show up on the page,

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing you can do. So they were

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hyper optimized for at any cost. We just want to

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>put we don't want to put any barriers to somebody

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>typing in this box and leave and comment. Um. Of

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>course that pretty quickly became well, we made it really

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>really easy, and now there's no barriers and there's no

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>standard and what you know, I wish we had understood

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the time. And I will say this, this is something

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I personally didn't get for a long time. Was you

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>make a real community by introducing a set of rules

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that everybody understands. This is true in the physical world.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>We get it very intuitively. If you go to a

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>park and it's got the you know, you can't be

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>throwing your ball around here because you're gonna hit these

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>little kids that are over here, or there's a dog running.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You gotta keep your dog inside the fence. Whatever the

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rules are. It makes the place work for everybody, and

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be honors. It doesn't have to

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>be a burden. We needn't do any of that in

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>creating these online systems, and in fact, a lot of

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the people, and this is something it wasn't as much me,

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but people that I saw that were creating other tools

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that made the systems for commenting and feedback online were

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>total zealots about the fact there shouldn't be any rules.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>It should be wild West all the time. And you

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>know wild West is basically well, if you have wild

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>West and there's no cops, guess who runs the shell

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the outlaws. And in fact, when when I was I

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>went through a two step process. The first step was saying,

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna do moderated comments and and in

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>order to I'm gonna set up some rules which I'm

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to share, so you're not gonna know, you

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to gain the system just for just

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just to get past step one. And then step two

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is no ad hominem attacks, no no false no fake

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>news like it. It's amazing that one simple sentence of

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>nonsense can undercut this conversation deep deeply researched, intelligently debated

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>um and I want back and forth. I wanted debate,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but what I didn't want was just people derailing things

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with nonsense. So we've had Trump talk about fake news.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Fake news, some of which is confirmation bias and tribalism,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and some of which is just people purposefully trying to Yeah. Yeah,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's there's a couple of guides online which I've

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>posted on the blog as a see. It's it's the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>guide to disrupting Social Forums. They're they're actually out there

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're out of the CIA Black Book to how

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to go disrupt society. Right, it's misinformation as a tactic.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And so there's there's an interesting thing here where we

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we've had this escalation. So first we had, um, you

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, the Internet always had ordinary trolls, right, just

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>people saying like I don't because I can hide behind

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>my anonymity or relative nanimity, I can be transgressive in

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 1>this way where I'm just being the person who's like,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, ruining things for people, but but in a

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>way that I think they think it's entertaining. Um, And

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of like it's annoying, but it's not a

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>big deal, and if you can ban them, that's fine.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The evolution of that into organized communities that are trying

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to undermine other communities or undermine individual people who are

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to communicate by misinformation, by personal attacks, by threats,

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>by all that sort of these tactics. I think people

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't understand that these have gotten very organized and very instructure.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>As you said, there are guides to how to do it,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and so they say, well, why don't you just ignore

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it if you don't you know, get y yeah, yeah, total.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whether whether it's you know, the game or

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Gate or or or the men's rights activists, like, there

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of communities that we're doing this online.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And and the interesting thing about this is one they

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>learned from each other. They've been evolving this over ten

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years. Uh, they are very organized, but they

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>organized in places that people aren't watching. So they're happening

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on you know, some screw chan. I mean, there's the

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that people know, but there's also just private channels.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can text each other like anybody else.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Like they're they're not you know, they're very technically literate.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens is people who are not sophisticating

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>these things think, well, okay, look, if this person is

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>being a jerk to online, why don't you just not

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>go on Twitter? Or why don't you just not you know,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about a delete or comment and kind of thing.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, the difference is when you have

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>people organizing trying to undermine a specific community, Um, just

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>ignoring it doesn't make it go away. And the the

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the social costs of for example, saying just get off

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of social media or don't go on Twitter, don't go whenever,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, that's you know, if I work in media,

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I work in publisher and work in tech. It's a

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>business tool. I need that. I need to have a

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>presence there. Translate the digital version of that into meat space.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like saying don't go to the town square,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>don't don't go to the school, don't go to the theater,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a ridiculous exactly right. Then you take like,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, YouTube comments. I think they're getting a little better,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but notoriously terrible. And if you said I'm gonna go

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to Google's lobby in Mountain View and I'm going to

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>start shouting epithets at people, They're not gonna be like,

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have a seat, have some of our free lash. They're

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, no, you gotta stop doing that. We're

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna kick you out my My explanation of it was,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>if you have a cocktail party, a you get to

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>invite who comes and be someone starts flipping over tables,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you get to throw them out. It's not like well,

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that makes me incensed about this is that

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>they scream First Amendment. And my response is always, nothing

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is stopping you from going and starting your own blog

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and laboriously building it other than the fact that you're

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>lazy untalented. Other than yeah, I mean the other thing

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to feel free. They don't want to do that. They're

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not trying to create some coy're trying to destroy something exactly.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that there's a really there's a

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>tough lunge where um, you know, you can express yourself

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>however you want. You're not entitled to destroy my platform

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and my community and my back and forth. Yea, and

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and and and It's an interesting thing because there's also we,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think especially technical people, have this desire to say,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I want one set of rules that applies to everybody,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and I want this one set of you know, this

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>behavior is always bad if you do this, if if

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>then exactly exactly exactly. Binary logic like the stuff that

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't always work, and and it ignores the realities

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of societies, which which is that people have different positions, roles, power,

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>all these things shape of dynamics. And the example I

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>else give is the sort of like the classic, you know,

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst things that people do to threaten

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>people who are on the margins, who are vulnerable or

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>ideas that are unpopular. You know, they're gonna, we're gonna

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>expose you. We're gonna, we're gonna you know what they

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>called docking, and we're going to publish your home address.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, have had this happen to me? You know,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the gamer gets published my home address. Don't you have

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>your phone number on your do? I thought that was insane,

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. So there's an interesting thing where part of

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it is about reclaim aiming like I'm going to control

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and what's out there. Um, some of it

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is I do I want to show people of good intent.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I am accessible, I'm not trying to hide sometimes, I'm

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be you know, wall myself off from

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>because I do think most people are good and do

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>want to engage with ideas and want to be thoughtful.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's something that's just signaling like I'm open

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. Then there's this other part, which is so

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a behavior where like if somebody is like legitimately

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable and they are keeping themselves anonymous or pseudonymous in

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>order to to keep themselves safe, and you out them,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a real danger. On the other hand, if you say,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the person who did this transgressive thing, this dangerous thing,

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>who posted this threat, I'm gonna identify them, that is

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>actually protecting people. Right. So the exact same activity I'm

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna identify this person who's trying to hide can be

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>both very good or very bad. It can be very

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>much a positive that helps society, or can be very

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>negative because you're making somebody vulnerable. And so the logic

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of what I think a lot of programmers tend towards,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like if you do this rule, you're bad. If you

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>follow this, if you break this rule, you're bad. It

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ignores power, ignores the dynamics of society, and that's why

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we keep bumping into what seemed like really obvious screw

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ups in tech where we're like, how come we can't

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>make a civil place. It's like, you're not going to

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to regulate human behavior with a single binary

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>set of rules. Let's talk a little bit about diversity

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and inclusion. This is all over the You were way

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of the curve on this. We have the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Uber being forced out. We have a number

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of vcs having to step down either from the boards

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that they serve on or from their own companies. Uh.

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the broke culture in Silicon Valley is

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>coming to an end. UH, tell us a little bit

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about your perspective on diversity and inclusion in the world

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of technology. So there's definitely a moment of reckoning going

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on right now. And for me, ten years ago, I

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was just I had been in Silicon Value a couple

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of years. Um, even though I've been in tech twenty years,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I've spent a couple of years. Because you're really uh

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Yeah, yeah, so you when did you?

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Were you here when we were they were doing six

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>apart and the company was growing. And I went out

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to uh San Francisco in two thousand four and I

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was there until two thousand seven. And really one of

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the drivers for me of sort of being done with

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>being in Silicon Valley and being in San Francisco was

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it felt so homogeneous and and yeah, it just you know, well,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I've been spoiled. I've been in New York.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I had worked in media publishing, where you are there's

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>so many and you know, and I had people that,

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were friends that were outside of tech

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were in other just ones that they could

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>be in fashion, they can be media, they can be

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in in finance, whatever it was. And you just get

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a different view of the world. And it was astonishing

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. It's like, with all the problems that you know,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>say the entertainment industry had, there was still much more

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>inclusive and much more diverse. And so to go into

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>conference rooms, boardrooms, meeting rooms in Silicon Valley and look

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>around and be like, essentially, this is just a bunch

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of white and Asian guys and that doesn't count as diversity,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well, and it's interesting because it's it's it's

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly complicated being Asian American, where we're overrepresented and you know,

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like we over index were two percent of the population.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>And yet you look at just Indian American you know,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>people in tech, the CEO of Google, CEO of Microsoft,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Adobe, these are all Indian guys, it's like,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we're doing fine. And yet you know, like I said,

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>being in media, publishing, entertainment, I was like, I know

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that there are black and Latino folks in California. You

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can't tell me they're not there. And yet you go

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to these offices and it wasn't just technical staff, it

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>was the legal staff, the marketing staff that you know, everything,

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>every one of these roles. The representation was way out

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of whack to a point where you couldn't ignore it anymore.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The number that was in in one of your columns,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>California's Hispanic population is uh the average percentage of employees

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and tech companies head quartered there is less than five percent.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Google is three And if you look at the industry

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>average for women, it's only a third of employees and

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>women when more than half of the population of women, right,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and so so there's just this proportionality where you like,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point you can say, Okay, it's not

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly match, of course not, but if you try, if

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you take you said, well, we we looked at the

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>population and we could only find three percent of our

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>staff that could meet our requirements. I don't buy I

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't buy it. Just the math doesn't add up.

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Now that the pushback to that is, hey, you know

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned India, huge technical training, engineering, mathematics science, UH,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Indian Institute of Technology, go down the list, just tremendous. UH.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And my other favorite stat is half of the C

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>suite and Silicon Valley are immigrants. So there's clearly some

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>recognition of meritocracy, at least in fear that's the ideal.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I could not be more pro immigrant.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>My parents are immigrants. They're here because you know, you know,

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they were willing to do the work and get educated

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and and and you know, I'm incredibly proud to be

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in that you know, of that descent and in that tradition.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>That being said, you look at the costs for paying

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for an H one B, for paying for the lawyers

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring somebody over here, for paying for all these

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>things to bring those workers over here is a huge

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>investment for these companies, huge And for the same amount

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of money, you could train workers here and they're not

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and you could train people from the underrepresented communities. So

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the thinking that's a sure thing and training them

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is a risk? You know, well, I think there's a

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of factors. I think one of them is, you know,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>h one B workers can never organize or really complain

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you you know, essentially, if you get too

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>up at you lose your job, you get deported, and

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>then you're not sending money back to your family, to

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>your village or whatever else. So the amount of leverage

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they have over these workers is incredible. UM. I have

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to think that's a factor, you know, you look at

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the case of like there was UM this

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>collusion orchestrated by Steve Jobs and and and Eric Google

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple for you of the biggest techn companies, everybody exceptally

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially except for Facebook, UM colluded against their own workers

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>right to depress their wages by saying we're not going

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to poach each other's workers and UM, which is still

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>astonishing to me. And if there was almost no ramification,

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an amazing thing. Is the workers Like there

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of obligatory lawsuit. I think it was

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for eight billion dollars or something. They settled it for

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a tiny pittance that which and you know the people

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at Apple who went through this. I talked to people

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that work there and they were like, yeah, I still

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just really love and Revere, Steve, and I'm like, the

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>guy took money out of your kids college funds and

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you're like, it seems like a nice guy. Like what

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>would you have to do for you to be like,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna, you know, fall along with this. You'd

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have to remove the headphone jack from that is a

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bridge too far, right, That's the line. And what you realize,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what you realize is, you know, when there's that reverence

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to they're like, who am I to complaint? I am

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>getting a good salary, I am being paid well. And

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what they don't see is common cause with those H

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one B workers or common cause with the you know

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the contractors, I say contractors and quotes who are providing

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the meals, driving the shuttles to the office and giving

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>them a free massages. All those things are presented as

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>perks or you get free lunch, you get these things

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like therese are people are workers and they never get

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>equity in these companies. And so we realize that there's

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this sort of you know, this class system built in

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that um and I'm just a big believer in like,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you got to treat your people well and they certainly

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>have the money to do it, and they didn't need

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to nickel and dime their workers they did. That's kind

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of odds because there was no reason they have more

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>cash than all these companies and more cash I have

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to point out that the only reason Facebook did not

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>participate in it is a they were too young for

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that deal was originally made, and be they were busy

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>rating Google for some of their favorite engineers. So as

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.239
<v Speaker 1>well as Apple. Let's talk a little bit about what

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fog Creek is doing before we have you repair Twitter.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what tell us about glitch and some of

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the other products. Creek Creek is a very storied company,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has been around seventeen years. Brilliant co founders Joe Spoilsky,

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Prior and what they always wanted to build one

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a great place for like people who want to make

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting technology to come work. And it's been

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a very influential company that has spun out. They co

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>created stack overflow, which is a community that pretty much

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>every code in the world uses to answer the questions

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>about programming. Did that eventually become like a white labeled

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>version where if you want to set up your own

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>internal Q and a UM you you can do that. Yeah,

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for sure a sacriflow has has an enterprise product for that.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm just on the board of Stacks, so I

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>get to see a lot of what they're doing. And

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and the bigger thing to me is you have this

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>community where tens of millions of coders around the world

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>come and answer each other's questions in this really collaborative way.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Um and and interestingly, it's a very you know, reassuring, nurturing,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>supportive environment. People really get answers right away, problems or

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>no and you know, like I think historically the one

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest challenges was they weren't probably friendly enough

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to newbies because they were like, you have to phrase

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>your question the right way and it has to be

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, exactly right. I think that's starting to ease

0:31:57.640 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, is the sort of you know,

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the community evolves in being more welcoming. But the key

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is there's never been wide scale harassment. There's never

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>really wide scale abuse. And that's what the site that

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably in the top forty websites in the world

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of traffic. So it's possible to make a

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>large site that works well. So so Stack was co

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:15.959
<v Speaker 1>created with the Jeff Atwood and his team, and that's

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>spun out. It's an independent company. H They made a

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 1>project management tool, Trelloh, which lots of people use. It's

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really popular, and that spun out and last thing about that.

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's this track record of making these wildly successful products.

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I they approached me about taking over

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the CEO last year and I said, well, you know

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what's what's coming down the pipe. And I saw what

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>became Glitch that we launched earlier this year, and I

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was just blown away. I think it's one of the

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>most revolutionary products I've seen in my life, like in

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>my whole co text. And so what glitches is very simply,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a programming environment where you can go

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and write code. Um and there's a couple of things

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that does that nobody has done before. The first is

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as you type, it's automatically taking the code you're writing,

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the that you're creating and publishing it live to the web.

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That sounds trivial, but that's you know, you take entire

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>businesses like Amazon's web services hosting business or Hiroku, which

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is sort of beloved by coders, and the whole process

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of getting an app live onto the web is really hard.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>It's become very complicated. To do it completely automatically in

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the background is a radical change. So is this an app?

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>When when we talk about apps, I think about the

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>app store in the Android stores right now web app

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is things that you go to in your browsers.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to make a little, you know,

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a simple app for your business, you're gonna make an

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>expensing app for your your team to use, or you

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>make it to do list app or something like that.

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It can be as complicated as you want. But the

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>problem is that process of like even if you know

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>how to write the code and you've built that whole

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>thing yourself, just getting it onto the web was a

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of work and it was just a pain. So

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we took all that away and that was step one.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Step two was your entire coding environment. Everything just lives

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in the browser. And that's easier for the same reason

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that like you'd like to use Gmail instead of having

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a mail app on your on your computers, like it's

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just there, whatever computer log into all my stuff is there.

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Those alone were a big leap forward. The biggest things

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that happened the two things that sort of came out

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>earliest year was the first is we made almost an

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>app store, a catalog of all the different apps people

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have built, and you can remix any of them. So

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I say, somebody already made it to do list app

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and you say, well that's nice, but I want to

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be blue instead of green. You go in there, you

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>edit it. That's instantly, years you can remix it, do

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to with it. So it's really the

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>power the promise of open source that we've had for

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>many years. And then the thing that blew my mind

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>when I saw the team had built it was you

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can edit this code in real time with other people.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So like Google Docs. I was about to say, that

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of Google Docs, but for application exactly

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>applications that's exactly it. So nobody has made that kind

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of powerful real programming environment that that is multiplayer. What's

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the business model on this? You're selling it to enterprise.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a couple parts to it. Um. The first

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>thing we're doing is um incidental to the fact that

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you can code at the same time as other people,

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>which is an incredible learning tool, teaching tool because you

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>can help people. So right now, all of the big

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>companies have what they call their APIs Application Programming Interface,

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is the way that you build services on

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>top of Stripe for payments, or Twilio for messages, or

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>um Twitter for sending messages obviously and um but it's

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>really hard for them to get developers to try out

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>their tools. So if you say, we have a new

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>developer platform and we want people to use it. For example,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has skills for the Alexa, you want to make

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>new commands that work there. Where Slack has bots in

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>their messaging app. They're desperate to be just added a

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of slack bots and the birthdays and it's

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>just really interesting. Now you see that and you're like, wow,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish it would talk to this other system we're using,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I can never do that, that's too hard. The

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>process with glitch now is we've got a sample slack

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bot for you. You go and your remix it. You

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>change the part that just works for your system to

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be exactly what you wanted to be, and it's instantly

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>up and running. So we take the time to develop

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a slack bot or Alexa skill from uh days or

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hours in two minutes, and that is something that's a

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>normal value. All these companies of shots platforms, so they

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>want to use it um and be able to pay

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to do a couple of different things. The key one

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is supporting developers creating these things. So right now, if

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I want to build on you know, Alexa's

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>skill set from Amazon, so it's Amazon buying this or

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter buying this, not necessarily an enterprise company to

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>create their own unique Everybody's desperate to make things easier

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>for developers because developers are so in demand and it's

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so rare to get them and pay attention to your platform.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I look at it. There's a search tool called

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Algolia that I just love. It was one of those

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>searchers really hard to do well, Like, I'm not Google,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to figure this thing out. I had

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>always been interested in trying it, and I thought I

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have if I could tie that search feature into my app,

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would be really useful. And I was like, but you know,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm running a company. I'm busy. I don't have time

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to learn all this stuff. Even if I got a

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of coding skills. Now I can go remix

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an example out from Algolia that already has search working.

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Just plug in the parts that I want to into

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>my own app and be up and running instantly. That

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was something where I was like, it took it from

0:36:58.440 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be cool to try this out. I have

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this intent of learning this programming skill into I can

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>deploy it instantly. And the biggest thing I see is

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the coders who we show it too, like their eyes

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>light up, like it looks like Christmas morning for them,

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, that is a really good sign that

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we were on something something big with glitch. So that

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 1>sounds really fascinating. You you mentioned Twitter earlier. Let's let's

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about what you would do to fix Twitter. I've

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>been amazed that they while there have been a series

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of updates and they continue to improve the interface and

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the general behaviors, the broader concept behind the community,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they just can't seem to wrap their their heads around.

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a hard thing. And I do have a lot

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of empathy for the team. I do think they're trying,

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, it was so long for

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>them to turn the ship around to really addressing a

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the issues that that's the question. Believe in it.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Why why did it take so long? For them to

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>notice that they had a giant harassment problem. You know,

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a there's a lot of reasons for that.

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I am one of the key issues is um who

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>feels the pain? Right? So we talked about the inclusion

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in diversity issue and tech and you know, Twitter is

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like most of the tech companies, it doesn't have a

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people from you know, black and Latino communities,

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have as many women. And guess who gets targeted

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>by the majority of harassment online. See, I haven't let

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>me stop you there, because as a white dude in

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>New York City, perhaps I'm not experiencing the same thing. However,

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm kind of thick skinned. I'm more annoyed by

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the failed logical deduction people calling me ugly. But what

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I I'm amazed at is and I'm I'm I'm seeing

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all this harassment mostly on a partisan basis, name calling

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and stupidity, just craziness, which I think discourages knew you. Oh,

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go ye absolutely, And so it's

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a little moderate in Facebook because people have to use

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>theoretically are using their real names or otherwise I have

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to go through hope process of creating a fake name.

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know people certainly do that, but but there's

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>some barriers, right, it's harder to do. So what would

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you do to fix fixed Twitter? Yeah, there are a

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. I actually wrote a piece back in

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>January one Jack Dorsey asked, I guess the whole internet, like,

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>how would you how would you fix Twitter? And there

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>were a couple of things I wrote in there, and um,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the more cogent ones. One of them which was, um,

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>show people you know how to update the service and

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>update the apps. Just the ability to iterate and introduce

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>new things would introduce a lot of trust into the platform.

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Because they hadn't shipped any features, they hadn't updated anything,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>so you can make whatever proclamations you want to about

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we're fixing abuse, for fixing harrassment, we're adding better features

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>or filtering or whatever, and people don't believe it because like, well,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing hasn't changed at all in a long time,

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. And in fact, they were killing off things

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like vine that was really great and creative and interesting

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and didn't have harassment problem. And and you know, she said, okay,

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>well these these things that make you feel good, and

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>those are getting killed and the things that are making

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>me feel terrible. You're you're you know, doubling down on

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So what I think they've gotten better at that they've

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of started shipping more too, is to sort of

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>be really clear about a harassment policy. So instead of

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these nebulous, vague rules like we have to see like

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this person who's very obviously transgressing, being abusive and horrible

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to people, Um, we got to see their account gets suspended.

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>That that happened not too long ago. I forgot his

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>name is a fairly milos Yanna Pulosolis, right, notorious troll

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and harasser. And he finally again you have to go

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>so far, so repeatedly before your account. Is not not

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just that that he transgressed so frequently, so often that

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>he was openly explicit about the fact he was trying

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to harass people, right, you know, and like these are

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the things where it's like this is a um, but

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he stands out as as someone who's

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>banned and there isn't. First of all, there's a boatload

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of bots just insane anounza. I assume half might it

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>or followers or software al goes and then on top

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, it seems that there are some people that

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are just you know, calls to violence and just all

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of like how do they tolerate this? I think

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things it's easy to lose track of

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of Silicon Valley is how extreme they are about

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>some of some parts of libertarianism around these views. Right,

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're very like everything is free speech, everything is

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>fair you know, fair game to put no one saying

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you you can't do this. But we're a private company,

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this is our product, and you could go do this

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>house free. You're free to be obnoxious and offense of

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want, just not in our private community. Well,

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing, I think there's a couple of parts

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they sort of ignore, one of which is, you know,

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the argument there's often the argument that technically it's too

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to limit these things. They say, well listen, and

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I say listen, you know, go ahead and upload a

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce MP MP three. Quickly they can detect that. So

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>like the tech is there, Right, it's not harder to

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>detect you know, a sound signature and a song than

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it is text. Right, this is a racial epic. A

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>key phrases. Here's I mean especially in the machine learning

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is making leaps and bounds in advancements like that can

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be something where you can get better at a I

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>should really be all over And I think that is

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to seep into Twitter a little bit. They're getting

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better at hiding and flagging things. Um.

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to say, but that's part of this.

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>They need to communicate clearly about it. The The other

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>part is, um, you know, we always talk about the

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>free speech for the people who are harassing and abusing,

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but what they do is they chase off vulnerable voices,

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and what about the free speech and the people who

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are exactly And I see this where like you know,

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I have extremely thick skin. I am a loudmouth all

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the time, so like I'm I'm pretty hard to shut up.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>There are times when you get to the worst of them,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mob of people coming after you and

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, targeting you, your friends, your family, your coworkers,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and you just say enough, I'm gonna put this away.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And like, if I can go through that with all

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as fortunate and privilege as I am, with as much

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of a network as I have to be able to

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>be like, sometimes it's too much. People who aren't as

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lucky as I am and don't have that support network

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>behind them can easily be hounded out off of this network.

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's like their speech matters too. And I care

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about the people who are targeted, you know,

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fairly for harassment. I care a lot more about their

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>free speech than the people who are saying horrible things

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to them. We have been speaking to a Neil Dash

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of fog Creek Software. If you enjoy this conversation, be

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sure and stick around for the podcast extras, where we

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>keep the tape running and continue to discuss all things technology.

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check out my daily column on Bloomberg

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>View dot com. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at rid Holts. I'm

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Barry rid Holts. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:43:53.480 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast, and Neil, thank you

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for doing this and appreciate you being for so so

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>generous with your time. Happy to be here. We we

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking during the during the break about the blocking

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>problem on on Twitter, and you mentioned the service Twitter

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>has its own service for importing and exporting lists of blocks,

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not very well integrated. There is a site

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>called block together that actually a bunch of activists made

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that gives you the tools to share a block list

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>with your friends and or to subscribe to theirs and

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and it's really handy because then you don't have

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to individually block a whole community of people that are

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to troll a harass. So if you're looking to

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so I break the world into three categories of people

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll keep this relatively PG. But there are

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the folks who are just simply misinformed. And I've learned

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>if you give somebody a fact that challenges their misunderstanding,

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't doesn't help them. So what I always do

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with that group of people is you should find data

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>source for the bls and if you could, if you

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can prove to me that what you're you're saying is correct,

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll write a column on it and either all because

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>if they follow me, I could d M them and

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>then subsequently delete the d M so they can't harangue

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>me on direct message, and I'll give them a not

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so much a homework assignment. But if you really believe

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this steaming pile and nonsense you've shared. I'm not asking

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you to create a persuasive argument, just sending your data source. Right.

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So so that's a that's the sort of gentle nudge.

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The next level of people who are just kind of

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>ideologically broken. And what I mean by that is no

0:45:55.760 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 1>concept of of beyond not having any data, any data

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that contradicts their beliefs, their ideology, just pure cognitive dissonance, right,

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and and for them but not but not venal, but

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>not vicious, just philosophically askew on top of not being

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>evidence based. And so now you know, I really because

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I start, I'll look at something and I'll go down

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the rabbit hole and it's like, oh, okay, I know

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, old roads lead to bright Bard

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and Drudge in a bunch of And there's some versions

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of that on the left as well. Some of the

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>early um, I'm trying to remember the sites Salon could

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be a little over the top. And then there's another

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one on the left. And I mean, I think they

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can be wrong or exaggerated, but they very seldom inspire

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a mob to go target people, that's for sure. But

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who works in finance. I can't afford to

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have a stream of dead, bad memes and misinformation and myths.

0:46:57.960 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to cut so those people get

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>me did But the aggressive like I'm wrong and I'm

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be aggressive about it, um and obnoxious about it

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and offensive about it. I'm sorry those folks have to

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be blocked. I didn't know block together even existed. My

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>only concern is how do I not So I've noticed

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>some crazy Trumpers lately. Right at one point in time,

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it was other crazies. But I don't mean people who

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are pro Trump or anti Trump. I have friends in

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. Anthony Scamucci is a buddy of mine.

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>We've had very civil debates about Trump. Someone in my

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>office as a Trump supporter. She and I have had

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>very rational adult discussions that online just do something tribal

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and partisan that people lose their mind. So, and I'll

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>give you a perfect example. This weekend, I discovered that

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Jenna Jamison, the former adult film star, is kind of

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like a wild just listen there. There is some extreme

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>behavior in her history. So but I never expected that

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to tip into wild ideological and it was just kind

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of random that I found she's amplified white supremacists. I mean,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>there's Yeah, it's a sort of surprising, you know, I think, Um, so,

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you block the people that

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to block, yet at the same time not

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>block so so I can't say it on the radio,

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but there was a science thing about something happening in

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the guests, giants in outer space, about a

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>subsequent probe. I won't even go there, and she just retweeted,

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at least buy me dinner first. And I just found

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>that hilarious that I was looking for something science and

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>phil plate uh does does a bad astronomy exactly? And

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>from that led to this, led to that, So I

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to The beauty of the web is the

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>random serendipity. Yeah, absolutely, So how do you block people

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on a list like um blocked together and not lose

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that random? You know what I want? They're going to

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be some false positives, but that already happens, an email

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that already happens, and everything, right, I mean, but you

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can at least check your seat. But yeah, but it's

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing like if you really I mean, you

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>know somebody exactly, you can just go and and bet

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it like if you're like I really want to see

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this tweet, but I have this person blocked, you just

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>do unblock them. There's nothing to that. I think what

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is key is like being able to use the service

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>where like it's not it's not some huge barrier, right

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>if you block somebody, they can still see your tweets

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>if they want, they just don't. Yeah, absolutely, So it's

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.879
<v Speaker 1>not like this is some impermeable barrier. All it's doing

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is making it harder for a mob of harassers to

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>target you. And that's really useful. Like for me, it's

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like like if I'm like whatever, out with my kid

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're doing fun stuff on the weekend,

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and it happens to be the moment when like a

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>mob of white supremacist is a decided they want to

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>come after me for something I wrote. And the thing

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 1>is like, they'll go back through your history. It could

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be something I wrote years ago. Um, and I'm getting

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>notifications on my phone while I'm out with my kid

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, yeah, exactly. I like, I don't want

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to be distracted by this. If I can just go

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and find somebody who's already got a good block list,

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and just share it and be like, Okay, good, I've

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been able to sort of cut this off. That's it's

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer. Like why can you search for a

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>blocklist by a specific it's block list with this person

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll share it's just a person. Yeah, so

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you go by like an individual Twitter user who you

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>trust and use, you know what I mean? The opposite,

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to block Jimmy Dean and then who else

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is blocked? I don't think so, And part like they've

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>been very thoughtful about it where they don't they don't

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>encourage sort of willy nilly blocking, Like it's really about

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of sharing with the community and doing and and

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and people having human judgment involved in it. And so

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really good. And you can um and

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you can also go and search for like people that

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you UM follow who do have lists, and so like

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>those things are very handy. I think Twitter is gonna

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>involve their tools too. But the key is that, like, um,

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:02.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a really valid use to blocking people

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that we learned from Again, like I almost think digital

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>communities need to learn from physical communities, right, And there's

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a reason why we sort of say, like you can't

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:12.479
<v Speaker 1>come into this coffee shop if you're going to shout

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at people, and you can't you come into this lobby

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna be acting this way, and a crowd theater,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and so being able to have analogous tools for sort

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of just limiting really really anti social behavior. I think

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really useful, and I'm glad that, like the tools

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 1>are starting to evolve. I think it's a shame they're

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>happening by like activists self funding themselves, building as opposed

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to the platforms building in. So are we just going

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to end up with ideologically opposed left blocks and right

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>blocks or is it really is the unifying factor anti

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>social behavior? I think it's a social behavior. There are

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>people that do that, of course, that are like ignore

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody who disagrees with them politically, but they were already

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>doing that, Like they don't need software to do that

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're the kind of person they can't deal with

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dissenting ideas. The block was not the issue. The interesting

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>thing that's happening rhetorically now where I'm like, I don't

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>want to interact with for example, like white supremacists online,

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>go figure right and they'll come back to me. And

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, you can't handle political dissentsion sake. I

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 1>love the expression snowflake, yeah, because it's all massive projection

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:20.279
<v Speaker 1>because to the slightest challenge and and and and I'm

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just like, you know what, Like I like, I'm tough

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>as nails. I have no question about that. Like I

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>know what I've been through, and I know you know

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.399
<v Speaker 1>what I'm able to do. I'm just like, why would

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to deal with you? This is like, this

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is an elective thing. It's about me having good judgment

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and discernment where I'm like, you're you're a person who

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>acts obnoxious online all day? Why would I put like,

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that's that's not the idea. I'm working to engagement.

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Like if you think that the only way that your

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ideas can be representing in culture is by you acting

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like a monster all day lighting it on fire, and

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 1>yours probably aren't that good, you know. And it's like,

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I'm not intellectually curious. I know, I am.

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested in having my options challenge and learning

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>things like I am very much like I love that

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.439
<v Speaker 1>idea of like I had to change my mind because

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about the way I thought about this thing,

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I love that feeling. Uh, it doesn't come from

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>somebody saying, like why streaming epithets exactly, Like why the

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that, like my family is multiracial is wrong? Like

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that is never going to be the thing that I'm like, Wow,

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the light. You know, we used to have

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>laws against that sort of stuff that's in the good

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>old days. It's uh, it's it's amazing. You know, when

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I get the requests through a colleague, Hey, you block

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so and so so. Now the processes, I'll go look

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at their not only their tweet stream, but their tweets

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and replies because I want to see how they're interacting.

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And I say to people, listen, life is

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>too short. You're not a good person. There's eight billion people,

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>most of whom are half decent and well intentioned. Some

0:53:50.719 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>may be misguided. But I don't need venal jerks and

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody needs no Life is too short, and I got

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>too much left to learn to spend my fighting with

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the strangers really wants to fight more than they want

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to learn. Right, That's right. You know. One of the

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>beauties of of going to law school is mood court.

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And the best part about mood court is you have

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to switch hats and argue either side

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of any litigation. Literally mid case, you could be all

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I've always taken that as a as

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a sign of intellectual openness. Having the ability to see

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all sides of an issue, of a problem, what have

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you prevent you from, uh turning your your opponents into

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a sub human It keeps the discussion rational because Hey,

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:44.319
<v Speaker 1>things that are really really at least in court, things

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that are really one sided, those cases settle. But where

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a legitimate debate, let's have the debate. And unfortunately

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>too many people uh just can't imagine the other side

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the discussion. And that's amazing. Yeah, and I'm very

0:54:57.640 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, my my mother's families all lawyers, and I'm

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know Rais Well, you know, it's interesting

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they were both um somewhere criminal defense lawyers and and

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>then um, my great grandfather was involved in the Indian

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>independence movement. He marked with FANDI and was sort of

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:19.440
<v Speaker 1>very involved in civil rights and social justice about you

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting is they had a printing press at

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the house, and so there is a tradition of like

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you use your own you know platform exact idea? Right, Yeah,

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:32.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know a century ago, that was cutting edge

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>technology to be able to have in a rural, very

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>very poor part of India. And so yeah, I think

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there is this idea of how do you debate ideas

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 1>using cutting edge platforms to get your ideas out there

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and advancing the cause of social justice. And I think

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>those are things that you know, you don't think about

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>consciously as a kid, but they sort of seep in

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 1>into your mind. And and so there was always a

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>healthy debate about how to how to do these things.

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, like especially you look at this

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>is still true today. Civil rights movements always have these

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 1>big schisms within them of like how how radical do

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to be? And what's the right way to

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.240
<v Speaker 1>approach this? And you know, do we change the system

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from the inside or do we you know, try to

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:12.880
<v Speaker 1>tear it down from the outside. And those kinds of debates.

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think those are fascinating and timeless debates. And I'm

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>always happy to engage in those. The people who are

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like I want to personally, you know, hurt you or

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or or I want to attack you, and and and

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way to vance my ideas. I'm like,

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's never it's never going to be the thing that

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that persuades me or that makes me see the light.

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And it certainly doesn't indicate much confidence in that person's

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>argument anyway. You know, I've gone back and looked at

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>some old blog posts that I could see are out

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of frustration where I don't want to say I just

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>called other people idiots, but I would look at their

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:51.280
<v Speaker 1>position and first try and take it apart, and somewhere

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the middle was a little bit of name calling

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>would be in and then you catch yourself and move

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>away from it. How have you you, more than any

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.279
<v Speaker 1>person and I know, have been at the vanguard of

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the arc of the blogosphere change over time.

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>What what have you noticed? Um? How has this evolved?

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you plan on continuing blogging for forever? What? What

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on? Yeah, you know, I've learned a lot.

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, it is that I definitely see you

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when I look back at eighteen years of writing now,

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:30.439
<v Speaker 1>UM that it is always this sort of ink blot

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>test about where I met in my head. You go

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>back and read it and I can see exactly how

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I was feeling at the moment, even if I don't

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>remember writing it. Shocking, wo, I was having a bad

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>day that you know, or or wow, I was really

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in a good mood. And and and you can really

0:57:44.440 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>read that into you know, the work. I think that

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's been really instructive, because like, I don't keep a

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like a mood journal, and so I could be writing

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about like whatever a new update to Windows came out

0:57:54.800 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when I used to blog about tech a lot, and

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I could still tell you exactly how I felt, you

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I read. I think that really instructive. I

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think my attitude about dealing with you know, people being

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>aggressive or hostile online has has changed a lot over

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the years. I think initially, um, you know, I think

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your first reaction is like, well, you know, screw you too, buddy,

0:58:14.920 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can sort of go at them. I think

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I spent a long time trying to be like I'm

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna, you know, love you to death and that'll

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>get you to change. And and I had some successes

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with that. I mean, I have actually seen conversations where

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I change somebody's mind her they changed my mind, or

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at least you get them to back down from the

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of over I think people's initial emails, like it

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>would be great if email had like a sixty minute delay,

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't respond instantly. So every now and then

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 1>someone sends an email and if you give them a

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>big friendly hug and say like you're really upset or

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>or hey, I hope you're not missing the key point here,

0:58:56.360 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>here's my data source. What are you using to reach

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this conclusion? As often as not or not, especially in

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the professional community, So my universe's finance. When someone gets

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not even though back down it's like I've gotten Hey,

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your responding. Civilly, I was online like you say, oh,

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>these people are really professional and smart. He was just

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>perturbed at something. Yeah, it's yeah. It could be whatever

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they didn't eat lunch that day, or

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they have something else going on. What what about the

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>change in media? How has the bloggersphere impacted that? In

0:59:28.960 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, it is It's interesting. I was such an

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>idealist about blogging and social media when he came out.

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, we're gonna give platforms that are going

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to give voice to people that don't have any other

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>places to share the words, and that was true. That

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 1>did happen the professional amateurs exactly who are no longer

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:50.360
<v Speaker 1>amateurs now they're professional experts, expert professionals, right, And I'm

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:52.720
<v Speaker 1>exhibit A. Yeah, and you know I've been very lucky

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from that too. And I think that was true.

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And and we kept saying, you know, the whatever, the

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media makes all these mistakes, and now the social

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>media will help correct it. And then we ignored or

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't anticipate the exact opposite, which was the times when

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media was exactly right, and people would use social

1:00:10.840 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>media to spread disinformation. Yeah, and the idea that like, um,

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the people who didn't have access to get their voice

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>out there, some of them would would not use that

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>power responsibly. We I was such an optimist and idealist

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of like, wow, if we just give everybody a printing press,

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>all they're going to print is good, thoughtful, true things,

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know that's not the case. And it

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was a a long, slow, painful lesson that I I know,

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I personally took too long to learn. What's the old

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>quota a law is halfway around the world where the

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>truth is still tying on its boots. Yeah, yeah, and

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that was very naive on my part. And

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the amazing thing about it is I felt like I

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>was slow to get that lesson and slow to to

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>really build it into my work and the and the

1:00:55.160 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>tools and the platforms I was creating. And yet I

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think it still took even longer for the people that

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>made the facebooks and twitters of the world to get

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that lesson. And not only do they have to recognize that,

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to then recognize that it's an existential threat

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to their platform and then create the tech to response

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to it. Well, and I was lucky and that we

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>had built a product when we built blogging tools that

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>people paid for. You paid for right, you know, And so, um,

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to have a voice in a platform,

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you were going to directly support it and you were

1:01:27.960 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>head an investment in it. And so we weren't based

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on attention, We were not based on the ad model,

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and um, so you didn't have to be outrageous, you

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to jump up that scream, you don't have

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to have clickbait headlines. Well, and you won't believe what

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>slide three, right, But even if you're going to do that,

1:01:44.800 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you were incentivized to build your audience on your terms,

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but not just views at any cost, you know, Patriots

1:01:50.760 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in any cost and everybody else basically went with the

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>ad model, and I, you know, I was really adamantly

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>against it, and I do think inc you know, you

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>see the sort of return as subscription models right at

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Times New York Times and like everybody, we want

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you to subscribe and pay for great journalism all these things.

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>This is this reaction to seeing the distorting effect that

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that the major ad models have on on web media

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and the facebooks and twitters and and you know instagrams

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world built models that were totally advertising dependent

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and so get hyper exaggerated into attention getting models. And

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something that the publishers didn't understand how

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>much that would skew their business. And it's interesting because

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in print, you know, there's one of there was more

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ad dollars to go around two they were indirect models, right,

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that you had a ton of classified

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>ads might encourage you to have a real estate section,

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't make your news headlines more extreme about

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>politics and about whether and about whatever. Same thing with

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the automobile, so you can go through each of the

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>major sections of the Sunday New York Times, and they

1:02:56.040 --> 1:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>were advertising and so you have the theater section, the

1:02:59.520 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>arts and Arts and Entertainment section, real estate, automobiles. I

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they still have an automobiles. They might,

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they might have killed off. But even to that example,

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like the existence of an automobile section was as a

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sop to advertisers obviously, but it didn't skew the hard

1:03:13.640 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>news reporting, and so that was okay because you're like, okay, whatever,

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta pay the bills. Of course you have comics.

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't have comics because like, like, this is an

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>important news for people, Like this makes people read and

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that gets the circulation up, and that that um, let's

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just do the hard news work. And the problem is

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that line goes away in web media. There isn't some like, well,

1:03:32.760 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna come and read the car ads and that's

1:03:34.760 --> 1:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>going to support you're reading the hard news. The hard

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>news has to sell on its own, and so it

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>gets more and more distorted and more and more exaggerated

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in order to get to that attention because you're in

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this more and more extreme environment. Now that that's a

1:03:45.560 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>buzz Feed or maybe a vox or something like that,

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But that shouldn't be The Washington Post, in the New

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>York Times, the Wall Street Journals, all of them. There's

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>no difference between those. Like, yeah, I mean you look

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at like the best reported stories on buzz feed are

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not different than the best reported story race on the

1:04:01.080 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Times of the Post, like when you do good journalism,

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like there are but not necessarily the most read stories. No,

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's true. And there are more you know, cat pictures

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>or lists that are subsidizing that journalism on the buzz

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.959
<v Speaker 1>feeds than there are on you know, the other sides.

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But like that's just a that's just a question of

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>how you subsidize, you know, in the case of the

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Post of the Times or whatever, they're subsidizing through print

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions that are going to go away as that audience

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ages out. I finally, I finally dropped everything but the

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition in New York Times because I would carry

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>through the office carrying home and it would go go

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>into the recycled. Then yeah, and the Wall Street Journal

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to the office, and this way I don't have

1:04:43.720 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to take it home. It goes right into the recycled, right,

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the Journal has there, and I think the

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Times is the same. If you do a digital subscription,

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the print edition is free. Yeah what what? Well? And

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this is all about the metrics and the numbers, right,

1:04:57.600 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so the advertising exactly. So they want to tell the advertiser,

1:04:59.880 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we this many print subscribers, even though all those people

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are just you know, when does that stop? When does

1:05:04.880 --> 1:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that go next? Ten years? Ten years? No more newspapers? Yeah,

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, for any practical purposes, there will

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>be the same thing with New York or New York

1:05:12.840 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or the digital subscription and the digital plus um print

1:05:17.880 --> 1:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are the same price. So your initial reaction is, oh,

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>well this is more for the same price. I'll take that.

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you have a stack of unread magazines. It's pointless.

1:05:25.720 --> 1:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Well it's like, yeah, unless you're going to the beach

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>or something, you're not you're not looking at that print edition.

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I see this all the time with people that

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like I watched, that have print subscriptions that are saying, Okay,

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>well I found this article, but I'm gonna read it online. Now.

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that when you thumb through a paper,

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find things that you're not going to discovery digital. Yeah,

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's other than the ink on your hands and and

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're carrying around. There's there's no question

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the discovery experience on print media is good, is an

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting and unique thing, and you find stuff you wouldn't

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>find otherwise on digital. But that's also just a design challenge,

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not impossible to solve these problems in the

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>digital realm, they just haven't invested in doing so. So

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I've noticed in the arc of

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>um of media has been how in the beginning, and

1:06:11.480 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to call that the mid two thousands, they

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>felt very comfortable lifting anything from print, anything from the

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>blogosphere without attribution, just relentlessly, and and I started the

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>read it here first, here's the blog post from Monday,

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and oh look, this is what the whole Street General

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>had on Thursday. I would do screenshots side by side. Yeah,

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely had that with with stuff I read about tech. Right,

1:06:37.040 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And then then you send it to the editor and

1:06:38.760 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>saying I want you to know that I'm going to

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>keep doing this until you're free to call me. I

1:06:43.160 --> 1:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>have a professional title where I'm quoted in the media

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Don't don't rip this off, and if

1:06:49.200 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you do this more blatantly, I'm going to stick the

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>lawyers on UKUS. At a certain point, you cross the

1:06:54.000 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>line from inspired by two copyright infringement and there was

1:06:59.600 --> 1:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a head. My favorite was a thing I did on

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>terrestrial radio. I'm a big music buff and I just

1:07:06.480 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hated what Clear Channel was doing to music. And I

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't right oh three or row four. It was way early.

1:07:13.880 --> 1:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I think it was Barons had this front

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>pick cover story losing the signal, and to their credit,

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't actually steal language, but the structure, and it

1:07:24.200 --> 1:07:26.919
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait a second, this looks really really didn't

1:07:26.920 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>even notice it until a friend said, hey, Barons ripped

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you off? What do you mean? Look at that? It's

1:07:33.200 --> 1:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>um And there are a couple of other people I

1:07:35.000 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>won't mention their names who feel like they can take

1:07:39.640 --> 1:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that and it's so first that was the first phase.

1:07:43.880 --> 1:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>The second phase was one the Wall Street Journal in

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Times and other mainstream media started rolling out

1:07:50.760 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>blogs of their own. Does this have any staying power? What?

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you see the role of a fast, not

1:07:57.200 --> 1:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>really very lightly edited, get it out quick gale. How

1:08:00.360 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>do you see the role of that in mainstream media.

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on the vertical and you know

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what what space you're covering, and um, how much reporting

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and and you know the original network sort of fuels it.

1:08:12.800 --> 1:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>There are there are great blogs done by mainstream media

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>outlets that are usually written by somebody that has a

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 1>great voice, that knows the space really well, has their network,

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:25.599
<v Speaker 1>and um can turn that into you know, a story

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>really quickly. And I look at like it, Actually it

1:08:28.320 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a blog, but I look at like David Carr

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what he had done at the Times. Um, boy, I

1:08:33.200 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>missed that guy. And you know he was very blog

1:08:37.400 --> 1:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>like in the way even he wrote his print columns

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>very fast, turn things around new exactly who to call

1:08:42.840 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>connected the dots really really well. I think that model

1:08:46.280 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>can work, UM, but very few of the major outlets

1:08:51.080 --> 1:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have a business model for that. You can't hide the

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>blog behind a paywall, because that that ruins its point

1:08:56.400 --> 1:08:58.759
<v Speaker 1>of linking to stuff. I've had that argument with the Wolster,

1:08:59.160 --> 1:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this discussion with editors of the Wall Street Journal. Hey,

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>why don't you put your blog out ahead of the payaball?

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be a registered subscriber to comment,

1:09:07.720 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and this way not only that you have actual people

1:09:10.960 --> 1:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>who are identifiable and make sense, right, you're inherently raising

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the quality of discussion. Yeah yeah, and you know so

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the business tensions always arise, and you see

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:22.599
<v Speaker 1>that with even sites that create great blogs, they sort

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:24.519
<v Speaker 1>of fade out after a while because the company is like,

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really behind this, I don't believe in this,

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>um and and I draw that contrast to like organizations

1:09:30.720 --> 1:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that started by blogging, right, so, you know, Gizmoto formerly Gawker,

1:09:34.120 --> 1:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like they're sort of still all in and they still

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do good work. I mean, I think it's you know,

1:09:38.120 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's always been uneven, but like the good stuff has

1:09:39.960 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>always been good. You know, BuzzFeed still feels like a blog, um,

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, I don't like you can define

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>blog however you want, but like that that that aesthetic,

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that voice is still there. Can we say the blogosphere

1:09:51.840 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is a meritocracy? Or is that overstating Yeah? I think

1:09:55.920 --> 1:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that's overstating it because you still have the same dynamics

1:09:58.600 --> 1:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you have in a lot of media. Would one of

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>which is just simple, like you know, old boys network,

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like people promote who they know and these kinds of things.

1:10:05.160 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easier to get in. UM. I think

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you can blog your way to being the voice on

1:10:10.840 --> 1:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain topic. Like if you have a certain niche

1:10:13.479 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 1>or a certain subject that you are just obsessive about

1:10:16.640 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 1>and you go all in on and you just keep

1:10:18.560 --> 1:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>bloging about it, you can own that topic or that idea. UM,

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's still true. I think if you're in a

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>popular subject of you know, you know, the sort of

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>like like for me, like a generic tech blog about

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the tech industry, it's really really hard

1:10:33.439 --> 1:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to break out. And that is going to be about

1:10:35.640 --> 1:10:37.519
<v Speaker 1>do you have the relationships? Do you have somebody who's

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna scratch your back by giving you traffic? Let's jump

1:10:40.560 --> 1:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>right into our favorite questions. Tell me something. The most

1:10:43.600 --> 1:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>important thing people don't know about your background. UM, A

1:10:48.000 --> 1:10:49.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't know that I am from a

1:10:49.560 --> 1:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>tiny little town in rural Pennsylvania and that we were

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the only uh certainly only Asian families uh

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and that and that really UM informed out of my

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>view of like having a very different, probably the opposite

1:11:03.439 --> 1:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>perspective of living in a big city like Manhattan. Understandable,

1:11:07.160 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>who are some of your early mentors. Um, I've been

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>very lucky to have a lot of good ones. I

1:11:11.720 --> 1:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had a business partner named Fred Burke, who was my

1:11:15.240 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>partner in my first company I started the day after

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I graduated high school, and he taught me a ton

1:11:18.960 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about sales and marketing and that was really really instructive.

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Who most influenced your approach to technology and entrepreneurship? Um,

1:11:28.600 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of the biggest influences is Dan Brocklin, who

1:11:31.600 --> 1:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is the inventor of the spreadsheet and later later it

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sold it to Lettus and was working with Mr k

1:11:39.280 --> 1:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Port and that team that made one too three. But

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan is one of the more thoughtful, brilliant, creative voices,

1:11:46.120 --> 1:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, really undersung as one of the heroes of

1:11:48.040 --> 1:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry and um super generous with his thoughts

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and ideas. This is the question that listeners ask all

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>about constantly. This is the most asked question from listeners.

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>What are some of your favorite books? Favorite books? UM,

1:12:03.160 --> 1:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The Powerbroker, Robert Carross, Bio Robert most classic and and

1:12:06.880 --> 1:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and also really teaches systems thinking. Um, so that's one

1:12:10.360 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of those that really really jumps out. Um. Uh. David

1:12:16.600 --> 1:12:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Ritz did a biography of Aretha Franklin. Really and it

1:12:22.720 --> 1:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is it is it's almost a history of America in

1:12:25.760 --> 1:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the form of a biographyavor Wretha Franklin. It is such

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant, brilliant David Ritz, Yeah, the biography of Aretha Franklin. Yeah, yeah,

1:12:34.280 --> 1:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>see I would have named that respect if Yeah. He

1:12:37.000 --> 1:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I forget what, I forget what the actual titles and

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they there's a bunch of books about are name of respect,

1:12:41.160 --> 1:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't go with that name. But it is, um,

1:12:44.560 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it is actually one of the best business books that

1:12:46.360 --> 1:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've read in a long time. Really, Yeah, that's quite fascinating.

1:12:49.280 --> 1:12:54.519
<v Speaker 1>And give me one more. Oh, um fiction nonfiction technom. Yeah,

1:12:54.640 --> 1:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's there's so many, it's really it's it's give us

1:12:58.200 --> 1:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ten more. There was actually, um, I'm gonna forget the

1:13:01.280 --> 1:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>name of it, there was a book about the creation

1:13:02.640 --> 1:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Highline Park here in New York City, um,

1:13:06.160 --> 1:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and how it started as a really a community movement

1:13:08.360 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and it became this sort of you know, one of

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the top landmarks in the city. Now touris to visit.

1:13:13.439 --> 1:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are actually consulting around the world, people are

1:13:16.120 --> 1:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to do similar and they did such a good

1:13:18.040 --> 1:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>job of telling story and of even being self critical

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about the mistakes they made. UM, and for example that

1:13:24.080 --> 1:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the park is not really inclusive enough of the community

1:13:25.960 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's part of UM. I thought it was just

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>very thoughtful and nuanced and also showed how you can

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>build things that are improbably ambitious and make them happen. Anyway,

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>now now they're talking about trying to create an underground

1:13:36.920 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>park from it. I don't know if that will really

1:13:39.960 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>work to the same degree. But listen, no one thought

1:13:43.080 --> 1:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Highline would work. It's been a home run. UM.

1:13:46.400 --> 1:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Since you've joined tech, tell us about what you think

1:13:49.160 --> 1:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>are the most significant changes. UM. You know what I

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>would say these past couple of weeks has been one

1:13:55.920 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the most significant milestones, which is this this wreckling

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of you know, vcs being pushed out of their own

1:14:02.840 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>funds on ethical grounds Susan Fowler blog post, which was

1:14:07.360 --> 1:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>really powerful, which is amazing because that post was around

1:14:09.760 --> 1:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>for months before it seems to have gained any traction. Yeah. Yeah,

1:14:12.760 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and and also there were voices before her, right, And

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the fact that just a steady

1:14:17.200 --> 1:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>drumbeat of activism worked and that you have things like

1:14:20.479 --> 1:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the CEO of Uber stepping down. I think

1:14:22.400 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>these are hopefully a moment of reckoning for so many

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of us that have been talking about the need for

1:14:26.800 --> 1:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>tech to be more ethical, more humane, more inclusive, to

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to really point at that having had some impact.

1:14:33.280 --> 1:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And these are not victories, because these are horrible situations

1:14:37.160 --> 1:14:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that people went through, but it's just the first time

1:14:39.680 --> 1:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't completely lose after somebody had to endure

1:14:43.400 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of indignities at work. I suspect Travis, who

1:14:47.520 --> 1:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>owns fifty one plus percent of the voting stuff, is

1:14:50.760 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>going to eventually find his way back when he's being

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, re educated and and the kindler, gentler Travis

1:14:58.040 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>will show up. But you never know. Um. So that's

1:15:01.600 --> 1:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the changes that have taken place. What do you

1:15:03.760 --> 1:15:06.839
<v Speaker 1>think the next major changes are? And it's only technology,

1:15:06.880 --> 1:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not a big field that I do think there

1:15:12.040 --> 1:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is um a return to first principles about people being

1:15:14.880 --> 1:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>able to create on their own, which is that, you know,

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the promise of the web was that we were all

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have a voice and we have a place,

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and that we would be able to publish and create things.

1:15:23.400 --> 1:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And there is such a centralization happening around Facebook, Google,

1:15:27.720 --> 1:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, go to those two exactly and about that

1:15:33.000 --> 1:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>much of the tech platform development. So what developers are

1:15:36.800 --> 1:15:39.439
<v Speaker 1>doing outside in the world is I'm doing this for iOS,

1:15:39.520 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for for Apple, I'm doing this for Android for Google,

1:15:42.320 --> 1:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and being able to go back and say, well, the

1:15:43.800 --> 1:15:46.439
<v Speaker 1>web itself is still the bigger platforms. So the biggest

1:15:46.439 --> 1:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>platform has ever existed. How do you create for that

1:15:49.040 --> 1:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and support that and express yourself there? And I mean,

1:15:51.520 --> 1:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a dog in this fight with

1:15:53.360 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>glitch where I'm very lucky because developers love it and

1:15:55.880 --> 1:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they're catching on and and really saying like this is

1:15:58.200 --> 1:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that gives us hope. But I

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:02.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's a broader movement, which is um what brought

1:16:02.520 --> 1:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us to the web in the first place,

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we could create something in the world

1:16:05.600 --> 1:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>could find it and respond to it and make it

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a successful So this is a standard question I asked people,

1:16:11.080 --> 1:16:15.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's especially poignant for you. Tell us about a fail.

1:16:16.000 --> 1:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about a time you failed and what you

1:16:18.439 --> 1:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>learned from the experience. And if people want to know

1:16:21.200 --> 1:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>why that is a point in question, just google anal

1:16:25.439 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>dash and quote fail and you'll understand why. Um, I

1:16:30.360 --> 1:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>do think one of the biggest failures was in being

1:16:34.800 --> 1:16:36.559
<v Speaker 1>part of the community that created the first social media

1:16:36.600 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and social networking tools. We were so desperate for and

1:16:41.880 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>hungry for people to use them and optimize for growth

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of making these environments humane and thoughtful

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for people, and and so there's been a tremendous social

1:16:54.400 --> 1:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>costs where Yeah, everybody got connected, and it's great, it's

1:16:56.760 --> 1:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>amazing to be able to send messages and media and

1:16:59.200 --> 1:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>photos to people instantly anywhere in the world, but it

1:17:03.360 --> 1:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>should have also been something that empowered the people, most

1:17:05.840 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the margins, most vulnerable, to be able to advocate

1:17:09.200 --> 1:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. And and instead, in many ways, we re

1:17:12.600 --> 1:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>victimized them. And um that is something that I hope

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to spend the rest of my career working to fix.

1:17:19.640 --> 1:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>To be fair to you guys, that's like third level

1:17:23.520 --> 1:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking at the time, it's hey, is anybody going to

1:17:25.880 --> 1:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>use these tools? Not the is gonna become widespread, widespread adoption,

1:17:30.200 --> 1:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It'll be enormously successful, so successful that trolls are going

1:17:34.800 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem in the common sense that that

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was just ends. Yeah, you know, you know, someday there's

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a million people on social media, and she

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>was you know, she was founder of our company, and

1:17:45.640 --> 1:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>she's like, you idiot, there's gonna be a hundred million people.

1:17:48.600 --> 1:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, then it turns out there's a billion, and so,

1:17:51.280 --> 1:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you would never it would have been absurd

1:17:55.439 --> 1:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>if we had said, let's plan for what happens when

1:17:57.400 --> 1:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>a billion people show up on these social networks, because

1:17:59.479 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>people like you're of your mind. There aren't a billion

1:18:01.000 --> 1:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>people with computers, right, but there are a billion people

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with smartphones. It was just so there was no like

1:18:09.080 --> 1:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>science fiction that that's exactly right. Um, what do you

1:18:12.080 --> 1:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>do to keep mentally? You're physically fit outside of the office,

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you do to relax? I love music. I

1:18:17.920 --> 1:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>know you're a music fan. I I still am. I'm

1:18:21.680 --> 1:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of notorious for being a big Prince fan even

1:18:24.000 --> 1:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>before he passed away. But I love sort of cataloging

1:18:27.479 --> 1:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>his work and so he's showing the cultural impact and

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's it's a fun hobby because you cross

1:18:32.840 --> 1:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>paths with like an improbable cross section of life. Like

1:18:35.400 --> 1:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>there are people in politics and media, all these different

1:18:38.320 --> 1:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>disciplines that are like, oh, you know whatever, they like

1:18:40.520 --> 1:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the music. It's fun, but also this like, oh, he

1:18:42.439 --> 1:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>was a pioneer in tech and did all these sort

1:18:44.640 --> 1:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of interesting cultural things. And then of course just at

1:18:46.479 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a human level for me, like, um, one of the

1:18:48.960 --> 1:18:50.599
<v Speaker 1>best ways to clear my head is I have got

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a six year old son and will go out and

1:18:52.600 --> 1:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, just sort of do something fun. Go to

1:18:54.760 --> 1:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a museum, uh, you know, walk around the neighborhood, take

1:18:57.280 --> 1:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the dog for a walk, and I am now for

1:19:00.600 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>not reset by spending it just a little bit of

1:19:03.400 --> 1:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>time listening to him in his view of the world.

1:19:05.760 --> 1:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of fun. If UM, if a millennial

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>came to you, or someone at the beginning of their

1:19:11.240 --> 1:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>career came to you and said, hey, I'm interested in

1:19:14.400 --> 1:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>going into tech or social community, what sort of advice

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>might you give them? Um? One of the key things is, uh,

1:19:22.520 --> 1:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>find this topic about which you are irrationally passionate, like

1:19:27.200 --> 1:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so that it can be as narrow as niche as

1:19:29.439 --> 1:19:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you want. But if you can be the person who

1:19:31.680 --> 1:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is the one person in the world who is most

1:19:34.160 --> 1:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in love with that idea and knows the most about it,

1:19:36.360 --> 1:19:39.719
<v Speaker 1>obsesses over it, and really just owns it, Um, there's

1:19:39.760 --> 1:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>something there for you like you you can you can

1:19:42.160 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>really build a whole career around that because you can't

1:19:45.280 --> 1:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>win on Like everybody is chasing this one trend and

1:19:47.439 --> 1:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be part of it. I think that's

1:19:49.160 --> 1:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really key. I think the other part um, because the

1:19:52.800 --> 1:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>tide is starting to turn, particularly in tech, find the

1:19:55.600 --> 1:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are most of the margins, least connected, least central,

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:04.719
<v Speaker 1>at least privileged in tech and lift them up because

1:20:04.760 --> 1:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>people one day will remember it. They'll never forget you

1:20:07.120 --> 1:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>did it too. I think that is who is a

1:20:08.760 --> 1:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sentant broadly is the people on on the outside are saying, Okay,

1:20:12.040 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to be part of this success, that I

1:20:13.960 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>want to benefit from it. And three it's just the

1:20:16.160 --> 1:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do. It feels good. And our final question,

1:20:19.600 --> 1:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you know about technology and social

1:20:22.560 --> 1:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>networks today that you wish you knew seventeen or twenty

1:20:26.439 --> 1:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Um? I wish I had known that technology

1:20:31.479 --> 1:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>follows the same rules of human society that the physical

1:20:34.000 --> 1:20:36.519
<v Speaker 1>world does. In the same way that we architect our

1:20:36.560 --> 1:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>buildings and design our communities in our neighborhoods to be safe, comfortable, welcoming,

1:20:42.080 --> 1:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>warm places for us to live. We need to put

1:20:44.960 --> 1:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thought into designing our digital spaces so that

1:20:47.680 --> 1:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people are welcoming and kind to each other and treat

1:20:50.880 --> 1:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>each other well and feel neighborly towards one another. And

1:20:53.800 --> 1:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>if we can just repeat a lot of the lessons

1:20:56.520 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that the last ten thousand years of civilization have taught us, uh,

1:21:00.120 --> 1:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we can make being online and in our apps a

1:21:02.240 --> 1:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more thoughtful and rewarding experience. We have been speaking

1:21:07.360 --> 1:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with Anald Dash he is the CEO of fog Creek Software.

1:21:12.040 --> 1:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and look up an inch or down an

1:21:13.760 --> 1:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>inch on Apple iTunes and you could see any of

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the other hundred and fifty or so such conversations. We

1:21:20.680 --> 1:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>love your feedback, comments and suggestions right to me at

1:21:25.720 --> 1:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I would be

1:21:29.560 --> 1:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I did not thank my audio engineer Charlie Valmer,

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:37.599
<v Speaker 1>my head of research Michael bat Nick, and my booker

1:21:37.640 --> 1:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>slash producer Taylor Riggs. I'm Barry Ritolts. You're listening to

1:21:42.400 --> 1:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.