WEBVTT - A G20 Country Will Adopt Bitcoin by Yr-End: CoinShares' Demirors

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, folks, looking

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at bitcoin once again. It is up five percent today

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>called as to the green Side, putting it just over

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty one thousand dollars per coin. Let's get a sense

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on with bitcoin at All Things Crypto.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We're fortunate to welcome our next guest, melt Him Demire's

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer for coin Shares Group. They have about

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in assets under management. Matt, what do

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you think is driving your Actually I can't wait to

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get her on the line because I have so many questions.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the products that coin share offers is an

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>e t P and exchange traded product, and of course

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there haven't been any e t f s yet for

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>buying bitcoin, and I think, you know, it's just why

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>why why is they just haven't been allowed by regulators,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Winkle Vye. We're trying to get one

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out there, and there are a number of, um, really

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>reputable people working to get to get an e t

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>F out there. Um. One of the main problems, Paul,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is that when you go and buy something like bitcoin

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that you don't understand in the first place, and you

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out where to put it in the wallet,

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>then inevitably, as I did, you lose your password and

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>then it's just lost forever. It's terrifying. So I'd rather

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to buy an e t F or um

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they sell an e t P and I wonder what

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's apparently it's physically backed e t P. Alright,

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.279
<v Speaker 1>we have Mel tem back whether Mel Mel temp Demere's

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer for coin Chairs Group about some Thanks

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I'd love to just get

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts initially here on what's driving bitcoin at Hey, guys,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>great to be here, Thanks for having me. Um. Look,

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what's driving bitcoin is with driving I think all aspects

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in the macro market more broadly, a lot of drive

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>powder on the sidelines, over five trillion of cash, higher

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>record savings UM, and we're seeing asset prices going up

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Bitcoin is not immune to that. So

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the macro environment is definitely driving some of

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the inflows into bitcoin, but more than anything else, over

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the last six months, we have seen the sentiment and

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>demand for bitcoin shift dramatically. We have corporate treasurers and

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the renown spot managers, Bridgewater, black Rock, all of the

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>world's largest asset managers now talking about and allocating to bitcoin.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So overall, really, the way I think about it is

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sentiment more a brilliant, more ulish than ever. Sentiment translates

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>into demand. There is more demand than ever. Bitcoin has

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a limited supply um. Only eighteen and a half million

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in circulation today applies CAPTI twenty one million. Happens when

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you have something rare that there's a lot of demands for.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>As demand goes up, price goes up. And then the

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>last thing I'll just mention from the market structure perspective,

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing record inflows week after week into structured products.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Last week alone three million. First two months of this year,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>especially the first month and a half when we have

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to into February, over two billions of inflows compared to

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>seven billion for the entirety of last year. So yeah,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about one of those. So

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at your exchange traded product. You've got

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>physically backed e t P that offers exposure bitcoin. So

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? Does that mean you hold bitcoin

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>basically in cold storage? For me if I buy the

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>e t P exactly and more than that, we are

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's first asset manager to actually give you a

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>certified aspectation from Armanino LP, one of the world's large

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>audit firms, every thirty minutes our blockchain wallet and confirmed

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that that bitcoin is there. You can check that on

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>our website as well. So we are the first ones

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to provide a blockchain based at a station where you

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can actually see we hold the bitcoin, you say, which

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. Alright, So meltem it was a big

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>news when Elon Muska and Tesla they put a billion

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>five of bitcoin on their balance sheet. When will we

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>see a G twenty economy brace bitcoin? You know what,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, by the end of this year it will

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>happen that you can you can print that that's bit

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>to a print. I've predicted by the end of this

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>year it will happen. Look at the end of the day. Um,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of jurisdictions right now

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that are competing for talent and for business. You look

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>at the exodus of financial services firms from New York.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>New York is not a friendly state for finance or

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>for cryptocurrency for that matter. So businesses are going to

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>go to jurisdictions where they are welcomed. And certainly as

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at the economic turmoil, UM, that's the resulting

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>from this, this pandemic. The crypto industry is the growing industry,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>contributes billions of dollars in tax revenue, UM, creates a

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of jobs. So I would not be surprised if

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>one country, one twenty economy really tries to make itself

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>appealing to crypto entrepreneurs who are dealing with an increasingly

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>challenging regulatory environment. Got a target for us? Where do

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you think bitcoin is going into? Uh? You know, I

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>say name or price, but no date or name and

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>date and no price. Look, here's what else say. I

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>have a hat that's been made for me that says

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin Henry K and I expect all you wearing that

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>hat for the end of this year. Wow, very good.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest risk to bitcoin, meltem It's had such

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a great room. What's the biggest risk thirty seconds the

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest risk, honestly, I think um cyclicality. Right so we're

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in an a bullish, a bulliant market cycle right now.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>There is a cyclical trend and bitcoin in a secular

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and beast. The clickal trends, I think can be challenging

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to confidence. It's particularly investor confidence. So I think the

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>thing we're really looking for is the futures curve and

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>its trade or suniments. That's really gonna drive Tyson. Hey,

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>malt Tom, thanks so much for joining us. As always,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we love to get your thoughts on all things crypto.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Meltemp demers, chief strategy officer for coin Share Group. US

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>retail sales they surged in Januate by the most in

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>seven months, beating all estimates. So really just some strong

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers showing that the consumer, at least in January was

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>quite active. Let's break down those numbers see what's behind them.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Craig Johnson. He's the president

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of Customer Growth Partners, joining us on the phone from Connecticut. Craig,

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You look at

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the numbers today much better than expected. What do you

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think are the real drivers behind the consumer here? Well,

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess as a number of drivers, we weren't surprised. Frankly.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>We we just issued our annual forecast for reach all

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>um ten days or so ago, and we called for

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>growth of eight point one percent year of a year.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's exceptional growth, the strongest this century. Um. But

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the drivers behind you that you've

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>got to start with personal income. Personal income has been rising. Uh.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Job growth has been decent, not great, but over the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>last you know, six or six months plus has been strong. Um.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh. Last but other factor is is that the

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of personal savings that people have, households have on

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet is exceptional. A year ago was about

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one point two trillion. Now it's double to two point

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>four trillion. That's an an incremental one point two trillion

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars in dry powder available for spending. Uh. So these

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>are some of the factors. Are other things are going anyway?

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that people feeling better about vaccinations and so forth,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and those are the factor key factors. I think it

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bears repeating your forecast, bears repeating you expect an eight

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>point one percent growth annually in retail sales. And this

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is not including cars, gas, restaurants. Um that is huge

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and as you said, the biggest this century. Where do

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you think consumers are going to spend that money? What

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna buy? The Well, it's broad based across categories,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but the strongest growing categories. First of all, anything associated

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with a home, home of approvement, home furnishings, uh, etcetera. Uh,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the online side of it is going to grow about

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty year of a year, again, very strong growth, and

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this January it was two year of a year. Uh,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's a major category. Um. Uh. Personal care

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>healthy and personal care is growing category. That's gonna rise.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And Uh. The other factor that comes into into it

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is is a small category but very strong, and that's

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>sporting goods. This has been a stellar year for sporting goods.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Anything associated with the outdoors, outdoor living has been strong. Creig.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>How much of that of your eight point one percent

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>annual forecast is predicated upon additional fiscal stimulus? Um? Uh

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really only modestly. We're assuming that there's gonna be First

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, there's existing uh incremental unemployment benefits, etcetera already

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in the system, and we're anticipating some increase, but only

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a modest increase. And we're in assuming it has to

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>be the full you know, with one point nine you know,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. Uh, it's just even a fraction of that

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is included in our forecast. Uh. Most of the growth

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing comes from the basics, in other words,

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>job growth and then income growth that goes along with

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>job growth. UH. And that's the key factor along with

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this this again the UH buoyant, buoyant factor of having

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>one point two trillion dollars extra dry powder available to spin.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Those are the those are the real key drivers. Are

0:09:58.160 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you worried about rates at all? I mean, if people

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to spend money, um, and that's gonna boost prices,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you'd assume if demand goes up and not, as you know,

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more than supply does, does the FED then eventually have

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to go to neutral and even thinking about shifting into drive. Um,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we're anticipating we're already beginning to see some uh increases

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in pricing, obviously in in the in the energy sector

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that started to take up a very strongly over recent

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>days and weeks UH, and home related things. Otherwise, price

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of lumbers going up. So we are going to see

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>some inflation coming into the mix. We don't anticipate it

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be sufficient enough to be you know,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>like the olden days of you know, the early nine anything,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing near that, But we do it just is going

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to take up a little bit. But we're not you know,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the predicting freed UH decisions is above above my pay grade.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But we do anticipate some inflation creeping into into the mix. Correct.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest risk to your retail sales forecast this year.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>The biggest risk is if job growth jobs off again,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>job growth and personal income growth. That's that's that's the

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>predetermined factor of retail sales and really evolved consumers spending

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>UH and UH. The job growth has been a little

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>flattish over the last month. It too strong for the

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>last six or eight months, but but but a little

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>bit flattish the last month or two. And if that

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>somehow takes a real downturn rather than steadily improving, that

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the biggest factor. And so that's that's something

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we're keeping our eyes on on it. But there's nothing

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Uh that that that says job growth

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is suddenly gonna start to drive dry up. You know,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it'll continue and there won't be the kind of

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>shocks that will uh that will trigger any kind of

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>major job losses, and that would be the biggest risk.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Craig Johnson, thank you so much for joining us. We

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your thoughts and sharing retail sales forecast with us

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on the back of a very strong retail sales number

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for or January. Craig Johnson, He's the president of Customer

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Growth of Partners Based. He's up in a New Canaan, Connecticut.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Again some very strong retail sales number suggesting that the

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer is in pretty good shape despite the pandemic. Well,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Texas and many other parts of the Midwest are experiencing

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented blackouts do in very large parts of just some

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>brutal winter weather that has been just pounding that region

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the country for days. Here, let's get the latest

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on what is going on on what the future might hold.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We do that with Liam Denning. He's the energy, mining

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and commodities calumnists for Bloomberg Opinion. Liam, thanks so much

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. I know We're just a few

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>days into this real crisis in Texas and other states.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>What do we know as to what happened? It just

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like it was a you know what some people

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are calling a perfect storm. Yeah, I mean these events

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>have happened in the past in not to this magnitude,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but all that all the way back to which is

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the first time, Um, we we saw blackouts in that

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>market or controlled blackouts to deal with a spike in demand. Um,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that the complex answer will take a few

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>months to come out, but the simple answer is that

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a spike in demand due to cold weather

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and also a lot of plants went offline again because

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of cold weather. The system in the power system in

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Texas is geared mainly to dealing with big increases in

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>demand during the summer for air conditioning. Um, it's not

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>really built or for dealing with a surgeon demand in

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>in in winter. And that's the problem here. So my

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>my first thought was, Um, the grid is garbage? Is

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that right? Or do they have a really great grid

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>into access? Uh, it's not so much a question that

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the grid is garbage. You know what we've seen is

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is really a bunch of a bunch of plants go offline,

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's due to several factors. So you know, we

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>saw over the weekend, UH and in the last couple

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of days, you know, people blaming wind turbines because they

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stopped turning because of a build up advice. That's true

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, but actually the wind turbines are a

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty small part of it. We all. We also saw

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the much bigger part was with gas plants shutting down,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and that was due to a range of factors. Um

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>partly because gas was being diverted to heating people's homes,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so they're simply was have fuel available, but also plants

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just not being built for this weather. So you see

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>valves freeze up, gauges freeze up, even a nuclear plants

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>shut down rain. Yeah, I saw a report of of

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of one nuclear reactor shutting down temporarily. I wasn't entirely

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>sure what happened there, um, but but you know, these

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thermal plants rely on water for cooling, so there may

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be an issue there if if stuff is freezing up.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's not so much that the grid is bad,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's that the the the infrastructure isn't built to

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>um to take on this kind of event. I mean,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to think about it this way, it's

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of an insurance problem, right. You have these events

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that happen from time to time, and it costs money

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to build things in a way that they can deal

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>with it. And the fact is that the Texan market,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's deregulated. The focus is much more on

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping prices low. And so when a plant operator is

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>making that decision, well, do I invest X to deal

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with an event that might have and once every ten

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years, or do I keep my cost down

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time they're gonna say, I'll keep my

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>cost down. So Liam, you know, some arguments are being

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>raised that climate change has to be addressed here as

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it relates to Texas and others power grids. I eat

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change producing I guess greater swings in whether it's

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe hotter summers colder winters, and that has to be

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>incorporated into the design and maintenance of these systems. Is

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that getting any traction in places like Texas? Um, I'm

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sure it will gain traction among some. I'm not sure

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's gaining much traction in the Governor's office as yet. UM.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's un ignorable. I mean, look, Texas never

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>likes to um to be compared to California, but in

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this respect they're united. You know, California faces growing problems

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>with wildfires due to climate change, and we've seen the

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>havocates reeked on the grid there. Texas is going to

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>face extreme temperature variations as well. And it's not just

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the power system that isn't built for it. You know,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of big houses in Texas that take

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heating and cooling. They aren't well and insulated.

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's an urban planning issue here as well,

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's it's tempting to go on TV

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, it's all the wind turbine spault, but um,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, ideology is a good way of getting people's

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>blood boiling, but it won't actually keep them warm, you

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. I'd say I'm a huge fan

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>of Texas. Visit Dallas as often as I can, and

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I just love how big everything is, from the houses

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to the truck's. The only thing not big is the

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gas bill when I when I fill up my gigantic

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>F three fifty duly there. Well, I want to ask

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you throw you a bit of a curve ballium since

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we got you, and I'm looking through all your opinion columns.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I just just recently watched this Bill Gates documentary on Netflix.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, well, I hope we've all seen it. It's

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>really good. What do you think about nuclear? I mean,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 1>seems like everyone just passes it over right away, but

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the world's smartest man's figured out a way to make

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it safe. Well, here's the issue with nuclear. So there

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>is a safety issue, and there's a public perception issue,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the bigger problem with nuclear is really

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a capital markets issue. Right If you if you think

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, if you're going to build a nuclear plant,

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cost you, you know, five nine billion

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars to build this thing. It's probably going to take

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you the best part of a decade to build it.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>For that kind of investment to pencil out, you've got

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to be really certain about what's going to be happening

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>with power prices and demand over the next forty or

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. And what we've seen in the past several

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>decades is in deregulated electricity markets, nuclear has become less

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>popular because it costs a lot of money and you

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have to take a big upfront risk on you know, expose,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>expose risk, exposure to two prices and demand. And that's

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of these plants you know, don't get built,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly because they also tend to run over budget, take

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>longer to build. That's why we tend to see more

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>nuclear panths being built in in regulated markets, you know,

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like like China and that sort of thing. So, you know,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>nuclear is fine and it has real advantages in terms

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with addressing issues of climate change. The one

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>issue it cannot deal with or has struggled to deal with,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is it costs a lot of money and it represents

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risk. Liam Denning, thank you so much.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your thoughts as always on this crazy, crazy

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>story in Texas and other parts of Midwest. Hopefully they

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>get some release soon. Liam Denning, Energy Mining and Commodities

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Calms for Bloomberg Opinion. You can read liam work and

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that of our Bloomberg Opinion columnists. They do great, great

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>work Bloomberg dot Com, Slash Opinion or O P. I

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>N Go on the Turn. Why I recommend you take

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a look at that work again. Liam Denning on the

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>energy business, and what is going on down in Texas

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>with those rolling blackouts that news reports suggest will go

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on at least for another couple of days. Well to me,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess one of the more interesting developments in the

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>US economy over the last decade or so is the

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>growth of the gig economy. Think Uber and Lift and

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the in the real key to the economic model for

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a gig company like Uber and Lift is that they're

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>drivers in this case are deemed contractors and not employees,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and that has a lot of implications. Let's dig down

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>deep on that issue. We can do that with josh Idolson,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>labor reporter for Bloomberg News. So, Josh, you know in

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>California or I know you're based California voted. The voters

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>actually voted to classify Uber Lift drivers as contractors. What

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>are the implications of that. The implications of that vote

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>substantively and politically have been huge. There was a two

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollar ballot measure campaign by gig companies in California

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>which secured passage of Prop. Twenty two. This measure making

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>workers under California law contractors and not employees if they're

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>doing app based driving, whether it's for delivery or passengers.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That means people are excluded from a whole range of

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>protections that California employment law provides employees, though they are

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>provided an alternate suite of more circumscribed benefits. Why why,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>why why would I mean? I think of California as

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a super progressive state, and um, whenever I, well, I

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>take uber's a lot, or I did before the lockdown.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I take an uber, I think this poor guy

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is working like sixteen hours a day just to pay

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>off his lease. Um, why would such progressive people vote

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to m make this guy's life so much harder? Well,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the polling suggests that some of the people

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>who voted for Prop two thought that it would ensure

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>benefits for workers that they might otherwise not have. Certainly,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the messaging from the companies, both in advertising

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and in messages they put in their own apps, suggested

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that workers would not have these jobs at all if

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the ballot measures didn't pass. This is something that has

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>been part of the debate for a long time, is

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies saying their business model and therefore their workers likelihoods,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>depend on treating workers as contractors. Meanwhile, you have some

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>workers and advocates and lawmakers who say this is just

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a new modern version of an argument that companies have

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>always made that they need an accept shin station and

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have to pay people the same minimum amount for each

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>hour of their work that others do, and the fact

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that it happens during an app doesn't change the potential

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of that debate. So how does the proposed fifteen

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage does it? That does that impact you know

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>California or just gig economy workers in general. Well, minimum

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>wage is a great example. The federal minimum wage, like

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the federal labor rights in the National Labor Relations Act,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>applies to employees, not to contractors. So under federal law,

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like under state law, if you're considered a contractor, you

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are excluded from many of the protections that the New

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Deal in trines for workers. Now, what makes this particularly

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>complicated is someone can be an employee under one law

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and not under another. So while the companies have one

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Crop twenty two in California, that doesn't in and of

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>itself protect them from being found under federal law, to

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the employers that are under on the hook for what

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they haven't done under federal law, Josh, so many, uh

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>so many Americans work now in the gig economy, not

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just in California but across the country, and I'm just

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you have any insight as to how they

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are being supported by the stimulus measures that we you know,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that we got under President Trump, that we're expecting under

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>President Biden. Are there are there any um exceptions made

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to try and help these gig workers who are hard

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to kind of value. Well, one of the things that

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was passed last year was the p u A, a

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>separate unemployment system for people that were not considered employees,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and there was disagreement amongst some advocates about whether gig

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>workers should be except or accepting that program or pushing

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to get full unemployment benefits as employees, as some agencies,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>such as in New York have concluded some of these

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>gig workers are entitled to because they found they actually

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are employees and not contracted. Josh talked to us about contractors,

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of companies use contract employees to

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, on different demand, seasonality thing things

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>like that. What's the impact of gig workers on those folks.

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So what gets talked about as the gig economy now

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in some ways is a face of something that has

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>existed for many, many decades in the United States, as

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I talked about in Business Week, even in the early

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>years of the National a Relations Act in the nineteen

0:25:55.240 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>fourt you had William Randolph, First Publishing Company going to

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court arguing that it's news these were not employees.

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And while they lost at court, the company then ultimately

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was indicated in that Congress passed the law specifically excluding

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>independent contractors. So you've had these controversies about so called

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>misclassification of workers of contractors in industries from construction to

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>education to mixed martial arts the Big economy, and fact

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is a modern face of that modern face of that. Hey, Josh,

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Josh Idols, Bloomberg Labor Reporter,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>joining se Careet. Josh's stories featured in the new issue

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine, on newsstands and at Bloomberg

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. But clearly that is a key key issue

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for the gig economy employees for contractors. This thanks for

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews of Apple podcast, Asks or whatever podcast

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer I'm Matt Miller, I'm on Twitter at

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. And I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio