WEBVTT - Investors Fail To Ask Apple Most Fundamental Question

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Apple shares surging today up about

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, the biggest game at one point since April

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>two tho fourteen. The shares now currently at the highest

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>levels since November. The question is, did they deliver something

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 1>so fabulous yesterday after the bell that this is a

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile rally? And here too, uh, perhaps cast little skepticism

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in sua ovida Bloomberg opinion columnists nobody covering all things

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>tech and perhaps deservedly, let's hear what's going on here?

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's your take on this rally? Why our investors

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so excited? Well, the short explanation is the Apple's results

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>are less bad than people and maybe Apple it's thought

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. So that's good news. Um, but look,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still not great conditions for Apple. So look iPhone

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>sales declined. I think it was seven revenue from iPhones

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>decline in the March quarter. The company forecast implies that

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth might be more or less flat from a

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>year ago, so not great. And you've seen from what

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the company has done that it's doing things like discounting

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>iPhones in China, offering aggressive prices on trade ins of

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>older phones throughout many of their markets, so you know,

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there are effectively subsidizing UM iPhones to compensate for what

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>has been declining unit sales of those devices. So I

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>guess the question one of the questions I heard from investors,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of on the call last night, was

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a sense of this iPhone business. How

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>much of it is a temporary weakness and I phone

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>sales or is this just a fundamental change in their

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>phone business? You know, I actually think this is a

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>significant failure of Wall Street two force Apple to answer

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the to me what to me is the most fundamental

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>question about Apple's business. Smartphone sales globally are declining, and

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they have been declining for eighteen months to two years,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on or maybe longer, depending on whose numbers you

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>look at. And if your Apple and you make the

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of your revenue from selling iPhones. That change in

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the market is an existential problem, and the company has

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>never really had to address that question. Look, the market

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is declining. The market for your most important product is declining.

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's temporary? If not, what are you

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>doing about it? And the company really hasn't tackled that

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>question head on, And again I think that's a failure

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>by investors. Although you could say, in fairness, Apple has

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>been emphasizing their services and Internet products side of the business,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and that was one of the actual positives and surprisingly

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>positive aspects of their earnings report was that they showed

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger than expected gains in those areas, So uh to

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>some degree, couldn't you say that that's what they're trying

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, is to offset some of the concerns about

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the slowing smartphone UH cycle by emphasizing these other areas. Yeah,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a fair point that and that's

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly what Apple bowls have been focused on, is this

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>growing pile of revenue and high profit revenue generally from

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>things like you know, um Apple's commission on App Store

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>downloads or Apple Music subscriptions or they're coming Apple Television

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Service or Apple Care warranties. So that is good news,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but look, that cannot fully fill the whole left by

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>declining iPhone sales. So once that I had in my

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>column was in the first half of Apple's fiscal year,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>iPhone revenue declined by sixteen billion dollars, and the gains

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of everything else, every other business at Apple was eight

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars, right, so you can see

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that there is still a mismatch between the declining main

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>business and the growth of their other businesses. And look,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I also feel like eventually you sort of run out.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like the coyote that I'm sorry, the yeah,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're running out over the canyon and eventually kind

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of lost track of my cartoon metaphor. But anyway, you know,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're running, your legs are running, and eventually

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you run out over the canyon and you fall. That

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>at some point, if Apple doesn't grow the number of

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone users, it is losing opportunities to sell you know,

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>apps and Apple Music subscriptions and Apple TV subscriptions to

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that pool of people who own Apple devices, and so

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>far to their credit, They've managed to keep growing that

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue even as the pool of new iPhone buyers levels off.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But I can't imagine that last forever, particularly if Apple

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make a more concerted effort to sell those services

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to people who don't own their devices. It's billions of

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>people at Apple's ignoring. So is there what do you

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think they need to do to maybe recharge the growth

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of this company? Is is it something as big and

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>existential and changing as a big acquisition, or is this

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just trying to build up their services business. I don't know,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think part of it is what kind of

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>company does Apple want to be in the future. If

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it wants to be, let's say, a load a load

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of no growth company that generates revenue growth from squeezing

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>its existing customers for more money. And my colleague Sarah

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Hallzac and I compared this basically to like Starbucks and McDonald's. Right,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that restaurant traffic has been declining, but restaurants like McDonald's

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>has been making up for it by price increases. So

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if Apple wants to do that, if this is an

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>r poo play, you generate more revenue from a stagnant

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>base of users. Fine, but that's not the apple that

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people have come to expect, and that's not the That's

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. They've been to such a great growth story

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and new product after new product, and you know where's

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the next new product? Sure of a day. Thank you

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Shares of Technology, Calumness for

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion. You can attach to any number of superlatives

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to Shopify, the Canadian e commerce retailer. If you take

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a look at its shares, they have more than doubled

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>since Christmas Eve. They're the best performance performing shares on

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the S and P TSX Composite Index after a pot stock.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Joining us here to talk about the company is Harley Finkelstein,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>chief operating officer of Shopify, Joining us here in our

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberger Active Brokers Studios and Harley. Before we get into

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>all the superlatives, can you just give us a sense

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of what Shopify exactly is. Yeah, it's a great question.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're best known for is is helping

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>small businesses build beautiful online stores. We've been doing that

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>now for over fifteen years, and people know us best

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for that. But I think actually today which shop play

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is truly as we are a retail operating system. And

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is you can come to

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Shopify because you want to build a great online store,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you want to sell offline in a brick

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and mortar store and use our point of sell product,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you want to cross sell on Amazon or

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>eBay or something like Instagram or Facebook. But the idea

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is that it all feeds back into one centralized back office,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and that Shopify. It's the first thing you open in

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the morning, lasting you close. That's where you have your inventory,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>your customer information, your marketing data, that where you process

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>shipping and payments, and that really is is your business um.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we're doing that now for about eight twenty

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand merchants who have sold more than a hundred billion

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars on Shopify. UM. But I would say retail operating

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>system is probably a better, uh definition of what we

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are today. So obviously you're benefiting from this tremendous secular

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>move from bricks and mortars to e commerce, and people

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>think of that and they think of Amazon obviously. So

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>aside from that great secular wind, that's that's at the

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>back of your sales, What really are the growth drivers

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for your company. Here a couple of things. First of all,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we make it really really easy to start a brand

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>new business. So most of the most of the merchants

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that are on shop if these are first time entrepreneurs

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that are just getting started. In fact, every minute or

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>so a new business gets their first sale on Shopify,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which is really exciting. Remember the first time that I

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>had my first sale, I was an early Shopify merchant

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>before I joined the company about it was called Smoother.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a T shirt company. I had to support

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>myself in law school and didn't have any money. My

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>parents couldn't pay for school, so I built a Shopify

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>store back in two thousand six, ended up selling T

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>shirts and paying my law school tuition. Um. And getting

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that first sale was it changed everything. It meant that

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I had freedom and I had autonomy and all of

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, now I can pursue my life's work and

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens now almost every minute on Shopify. UM. So

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say that making it really easy for people

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to start me and so not only we're growing our

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of the pie, but we're going the pie itself

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from a total usable market perspective, and the ones that

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>are successful on Shopify stay with us for a very

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>long time, and in that journey we try to find

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>them all the things they need to run their business.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So we created Shopify Payments to give them economies a

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>scale on payment rates. We gave them shop by shipping rates,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning they can get better rates to give you bigger companies.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We now give capital. We've given out about over five

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of capital to these small businesses. So the

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>idea is to find all the pain points that an

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur may have and make it easier for them. And actually,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>if you aggregate all of our stores all in one,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pretend that we are a retailer, we would be the

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>third largest US eclom retailer. So we are able now

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to go to the shipping companies and the payment companies

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and negotiate rates as if we were the third largest

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of US online retailer. But then give all these economies

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a scale to someone just starting at their mom's kitchen table.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting And just to sort of give some more context,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>after your ported earnings yesterday, uh, your second quarter revenue

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>forecast did beat estimate, so that was one five above estimates,

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like things are going well. One question

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that I have though, is we talk about Amazon and

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>its dominance and its effort to create its own products.

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>We talk about Walmart, We talk about, you know, sort

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of how the big behemoths are getting bigger. How do

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>small businesses compete with those? How do people find these

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>sites given how much big, big, big store competition there is. Yeah,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great question. So one of the things

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we also have as part of our retail operating system

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is a marketing UH marketing section, a place where a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>small business can go and easily able to buy ads

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and things like Google or Facebook. And on Monday we

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>announce a partnership with Snapchat, so now they can easily

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>buy ads directly on Snapchat to Traditionally, if a small

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>business want to go ahead and buy ads on Facebook

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or Google or Snapchet, they would have to go to

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>three different sites navigate the complexities of those ad platforms.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And now we simplify it for them and we can

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>go to those companies to ensure they're getting the best

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>rates possible. I think most people assume that, um So,

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>right now e commerce globally is about one point nine

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. That's gonna go to about four trillion dollars

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years. I think a lot of

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>people automatically jump to Amazon, owning a majority of that.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Amazon ultimately will be the place where you go.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You go to buy the stuff that you need as

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a consumer, your toilet paper, your shampoo, your your paper towel.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think for most consumers today, they actually like

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>buying stuff from the people that make it. So you

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>look at some of our favorite stores like Bombas Socks

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or Tommy john Underwear, or All Birds Shoes, or Kylie

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Cosmetics or Fashion Nova. These are all small businesses that

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are really large on Shopify, and they're able to sell

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>direct to the end consumer in a way that they

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.599
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to do before. I see on my

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>handy Bloomber terminal here that Shopify gets about seventy percent

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>revenue in the US. So talk to us about kind

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>of how you view some of the opportunities outside of

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the US and maybe North America broadly. Yeah, So it's

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a great point you make. Um So, traditionally we've

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really focused on North America, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>About a year ago, almost to the day, we decided

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was time for us to expand to an

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>international market. We knew we had merchants elsewhere that wanted

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to use our products, but we didn't feel we had

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the right product fit yet, and so we began the

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>journey to find product market fit internationally. And so we've

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>now translated the Shopify dashboard into more than seven languages.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We now have partners on the ground and in most

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of those countries as priority countries that can help you

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>build an online store. And also we have the right

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>payment gateways. So for example, in a place like Germany,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>credit card penetration is not as used as like debit

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>cards are. So we had to begin the journey to

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>find product market fit internationally. But I would say that,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>um the future, in the future, international will be a

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>huge part of our story. We're just getting started with

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that right now. Do you still sell T shirts? Uh,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you can go to my T shirt shop. It's uh,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's smoofered out my shopify dot com. It's still up there,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but but unfortunately I've disabled to check it because I

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have time to shift the products out anymore myself.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But um, but actually it's it's it's really great. In fact,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Toby or our CEO and founder. He started Shopify because

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants sell snowboards on the internet in two thousand

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>four and didn't like the software that was available throughout

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>his own piece of software, and that software to sell

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>those snowboards has become Shopify. That's a great story. That

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is a great story. Harley Finalstein, thank you so much

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Harley as the chief operating officer of Shopify.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>There based in Ottawa, Ontario, kind of, but he joins

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Brokers studio. President Trump

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and a group of leading Democrats announced a promise of

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar infrastructure plan. To get a sense of

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what this means, we welcome Michael Jay's. Michael is the

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>chief US Public Policy AMANUS WILL strategist at Morgan Stanley. Michael,

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. So what is your

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>take on this plan that was announced after the Democrats

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>met with President Trump? Yeah, and thanks for having me

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on UM. I would say that until someone can identify

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what two trillion dollar tax i can fund this, that

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>you should be deeply skeptical that something like this can happen.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And in our view, we don't think you're going to

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>see an infrastructure package before one because of it. I mean,

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there's just a couple of numbers to put it in perspective,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of different taxes that have been

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>floated out there is potentially pay for us. Right, So

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if you increase the gas tax, that would get you

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>about four hundred billion dollars. If you're rolled back the

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate tax rate by five points, that gets you about

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred billion dollars. If you took the two top

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two tax brackets up by a percentage each that gets

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you a d and twenty billion. Those are all extremely

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>politically sensitive, and if you at all of them, you'd

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>still have a trillion dollars left to go. So I

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>think fair to say, can color us pretty skeptical about

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this going forward? So, Michael, there is a question though,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the private intervention here, the private involvement in some

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of infrastructure plan. To Lane show, the Transportation Secretary

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>saying telling Bloomberg Television at the Melican Institute Global Conference

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles that there are private pension funds as

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>well as damnment funds that would love to play to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to invest in public infrastructure. Do you see

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that materializing something on that front. Yeah. Yeah, it's a

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting idea. And obviously we we've dealt with this

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for uh ten twenty years now, the sort of the

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>talk of their being a tremendous amount of interest from

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>private capital and investing and owning and operating public infrastructure assets.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, from my perspective, as I mean

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's poll analysts, I can tell you that I don't

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>feel confident that the supply of those assets is there.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is that you know,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>state local government's own about eighty eight percent of all

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure assets in the US, but they're sort of highly

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>incentivized to keep them right, so it's a revenue producing asset. Generally,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>state lowe garments don't give them up unless they are

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhat desperate for money. And uh, the cost of financing, uh,

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the construction of new assets is frankly just a lot

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>cheaper through the tax exem bond market than giving up

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the cost of capital seven to eight percent returns for

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. So um, while you know P three's

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are generally the rule rather than the exception in other countries,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>largely because of the federalist system, we've set up here

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the availability of tax exam financing. They're more the

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.359
<v Speaker 1>exceptions in the rule, and I would expect that to continue.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a bad idea to do what

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you can to incentivize private capital come in, but I

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't expect that to be the thing that catalyzes the

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>major infrastructure investment that the US needs to get back

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up to speed. So, Michael, if there's two trillion dollar

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>number that was thrown out by the Democrats and President

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump is not, you know, necessarily that realistic, what do

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you think can actually get done from the federal level. Yeah, Well, unfortunately,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think on this issue where grid locked until the next

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>election because um, frankly, what you need is one party

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in control of both the White House and Congress and

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for them to make this their top priority. And it's

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>probably because if you if you know, you go through

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the list of tax revenues that we just talked about,

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there's probably not a politically friendly way to completely fund this,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you need one party or the other to

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of frame this as um a deficit financed investment, UM,

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but in sort of politically friendly terms, right, as an

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>economic investment or or something some other way that's consistent

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with their ideology. Uh So in the meantime between now

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and then, UM, I think unfortunately you're gridlocked. And even

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>if you do the exercise of thinking about, well, what

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're wrong again, what if they actually could do

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a funded infrastructure plan, maybe slim it down to a

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars over ten years. Um. You know, for investors,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that necessarily sends clear signals on

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>what to do. Right. If it's funded, it's not a

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>technically a fiscal stimulus, so over the next six to

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, it doesn't necessarily translate into a GDP boost. Uh.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are companies that should benefit from this,

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>but if you're rolling back the corporate tax rate, that

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>cuts against them, right, or if you're increasing the gas

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>tax that hurts autos and freight transportation. So just a

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of mixed signals on what investors can take away

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>from this. I'm curious from your perspective, what's the most

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>pressing infrastructure project that the federal government uh could finance

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or push along that that localities cannot. Well, you know,

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's one project in particular. I mean,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they're Obviously there are several critical infrastructure projects UH in

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>major urban hubs around the country. I think this is

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a situation where there just needs to be more federal

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>money brought to bear in the aggregate and that sort

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of priority number one as opposed to being specific and surgical.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why I ask is because we've been

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about the record volume of cash flooded into the

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>municipal bond market, and we've talked about how, yes, these

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>are slow moving freight trains when you talk about local governments,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But why couldn't they take that private money and pump

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it into projects that they need. Well, they can, but

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the question of whether or not municipalities are

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to access the taxics a market to undertake new

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>money financing. Right, So it's not that the money isn't there,

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a question of whether or not the willingness is there.

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And the constraint that state and local governments faces kind

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>of a It's a combined political and fiscal constraint. And

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is that there's generally reticence

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to um increased taxes to help finance borrowing UM and

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>budgets are already constrained from a combination of factors high

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>operating leverage for one UM as well as pension overhanging

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different areas. So you have a system

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>where state and local governments spend about the money on

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in this country, UM, but for a combination of

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>political and fiscal reasons, are constrained. So they have been increasing,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular over the last two years, they have been

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>increasing their infrastructure spend, but just not to the degree

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that gets you the sort of catch up the potential

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that we need to to be at. And that's where

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the the federal government's role, UM hypothetically then should be

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to really come in induce that entire process with more money. So, Michael,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a resident of New Jersey. I take the train

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>every day back and forth under the Hudson River tunnels,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and I fully expect them to cave in on me

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>one day. Let's talk about the Gateway project. What is

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the status of that? Because that is going to be

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a state and federal partnership to get that done. What's

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the status of that? Yeah, also a resident of New Jersey. Uh, So,

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand where you're coming from. UM. I think this

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is a situation where the need for that projects largely

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>already been improved. Um, it's been somewhat delayed over the

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>last couple of budget rounds uh and what appears to

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a personal disagreement between the President and

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer. Uh. So, I think there's a situation where

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the money, because it's already been approved, will eventually make

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it to its target, but it's being delayed for largely

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons of politics, which is not particularly comforting understand. But um,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this appears to be a situation where the money has

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>already approved for it. Yeah. Um, we're speaking with Michael

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Z's chief US public policy I mean strategist at Morgan Stanley.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to just let you know that William Barr,

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General, is currently giving his opening statement in front

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate, discussing, of course, the Robert Mueller report

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that he did release UH with with redactions and did summarize.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>There is obviously a concern on the part of Robert Muller,

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is expressed by I letter released earlier today that it

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>was not fully represented in the summary. We will bring

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you all of that when we get it. Michael. We

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>want to continue the conversation here because as much as

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a two trillion dollar infrastructure spending plan is not

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>realistic or feasible politically, there is a question of the

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>municipal markets right now, and given how much money has

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>gone in and I'm wondering from your perspective, especially where

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>we are in the economic cycle, and given the tax cuts,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering from your perspective, which areas do you see

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as the strongest and the weakest right now from an

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>investing standpoint. Yeah, Well, for us that we think the

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity still lies more in the enterprise segments of the

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>municipal market as opposed to the state and local government

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>segments of the municipal market. Right. So that's uh, the

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>public enterprises like airports and toll roads and not for

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>profit hospitals and higher education institutions. UM. And that not

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because there's more yield to be captured in those areas,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but more because we remain concerned the the overhang of

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>liabilities UH that continue to pressure state and local governments. Uh,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and that the next time we have a recession, we

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think will exert a fair amount of pressure on budgets. Right.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So that is deferred capital needs that is underfunded, retiree liabilities,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the types of things that in good economic times, uh

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, strong and growing tax revenues and

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can kind of deal with the cost of

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>those things as they come. But when tax revenues are

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>declining in a recession, that financial leverage becomes operating leverage,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>which creates a budget deficit and forces some really tough choices.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't think the market is properly a uh priced

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in that segment for that. But the key there is,

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the market to weaken on that

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>future dynamic, it requires you to place a high probability

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>on there being a recession, and that's just not in

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>our base case right now. And obviously I think investors

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really have that in their base case right now.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.239
<v Speaker 1>So the market um in our view, even though it's

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty rich, can keep coming, keep humming along. Michael Jesus,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for spending the time with us.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Z's chief US public policy and municipal strategist for

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley joining us in New York. Switching gears, Let's

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go back to the financial markets. You know, we think

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about the melt up in the financial markets so far

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in one sector that has certainly participated has been the

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>US high old market. We welcome Ken Monahana Mundy, pioneer

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>co director of hi Yield Ken, thanks so much for

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Brooker studio. What

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing in the high old market so far

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this year? It's been a great rebound off of that

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>December low Thank you for having me again. And a

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>melt up is the correct phrase for this, because we've

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly had a dramatic rally. Spreads have tightened in dramatically

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>since um they're there their wives of December when we

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>were trading in about five and fifty basis points over

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're now down to about three seventy five. And

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that means that high yields made almost nine percent year

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to day. It's been a big year. Like equities. Yeah,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's made almost nine percent of this year. That

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is the best return for the first four months of

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>a year since two thousand and nine, when the market

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was rebounding from the worst financial crisis since the Great Recession.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, what do you think the full year

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine total return is going to be for US

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hild bonds. Well, I think that if you look at

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the prognosticators out there right now, they're talking about a

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>double digit return for the year, and that makes sense.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>If you kind of layer in four percent plus current

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>yield for high yield UH for the remaining eight months

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the year, it can get up to a double return.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Double digits could be, it could be what are you

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Forties? Hard? It's really hard to get to

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve to thirteen is is certainly within the range. That's

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly, and that's assuming we can straight line it.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And obviously markets don't generally move in a straight line UM.

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But so I'm not saying that there's not going to

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be any disruption between now and the end of the year,

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly achievable. So given that great performance, almost

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>nine percent off of the low, where are you seeing

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>value today in the HOW market? Well, you know, it's

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's harder to find value. So if we look

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at double B s, which is a significant portion of

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the market, UH spreads are only about sixteen basis points

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or so wider than they were at their October troughs,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>which is when early October we hit the post recession

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>trough UH and we're a little wider, but not dramatically so.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Triple c's, on the other hand, are significantly wider and

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of your reporters has written recently written, Um

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that there are opportunities perhaps in the triple D spay

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a triple C space where one of those who's looking

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for value there. That doesn't mean that we're we're buying them, uh,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, without any um selectivity at all, Um, you're

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>having to kind of really go and look for that

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>proverbial needle in the haystack. And the market's very bifurcated

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>between triple ceas we wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and those that look more attractive, and those are harder

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to find. Yesterday we were speaking with Bearing CEO Tom Fink,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and he said that he is seeing the pendulum switch

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit up more towards leveraged loans over hiled bonds,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>given how much highled that is rallied and the loans

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of lagged behind. Do you agree, Well, you've

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly seen a pick up and returns to her for

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>loans as well, because they had gotten beaten up. Having

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>said that, there is a much higher percentage of the marketplace.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That's leverage loans that are training above par right now. Uh.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And with leverage loans, you don't have a whole lot

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>further to go than par because that's what they're gonna

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>pay you back, and there's no prepayment penalty. UM, So

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. And uh, leverage loans particularly look particularly cheap.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>UH in the fourth quarter of last year when they

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>got beaten up, is did HI yield bonds. And I

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know that there are a lot of structured products or

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>cello managers that were quite excitedly picking up loans at

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that point, and and and and banking them for new

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>transactions that have been priced this year, which ought to

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>do quite well. But I think leverage loans, your upside

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is limited, and that's the problem. So we're we're ten

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>years into this economic cycle. How is when you take

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a look at your portfolio or some of the issues

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at, how was a credit quality given

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>where we are in the cycle right now. Well, you know,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting if you if you look at it, um,

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not seeing the types of things at least yet

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that you would typically see that are aggressive behaviors. So

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk about zero coupon bonds paying kind bonds, a

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>large number of dividend transactions where companies are borrowing money

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just to repay the private equity sponsor. Now there are

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some of those in the offing. It's clearly because we're

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>hearing some rumors of some of them right now. And uh,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that may indicate that, you know, we're kind of closer

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to the ninth ending and than we are the sixth

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or seventh. This recovery has certainly gone on for a

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>long period of time, where one in the hundred and

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth or eighteenth month at this point, um since the

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the recession in online um. But as we know,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>recessions don't, excuse me, recoveries don't die of old age.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So you said that there are some deals on tap

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>dividend payment payment deals right there are, yeah, and I've announced.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But the deals that they're out there also pick toggle deals.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen any pick toggles yet. That would be

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one to see come back. I'm not saying

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that won't, but you know, that kind of is the

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of aggressive transaction structure you tend to see at

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the end of the cycle where people are trying to

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out how do I make a little bit extra

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>return in my portfolio. Yeah, just before whatever. Everything's glowed

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not suggesting that either, but don't worry. Uh well,

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we've tried on to to push with that. Ken Monahan,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. As always, we love your insights.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Ken Monahan, I'm aun new Pioneer, co director of High Yield.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woids. I'm on

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa A. Bramwod's one before the podcast. You

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio m