WEBVTT - How We're Getting The Vaccine To Our Patients: Heal's Dua

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Dr do A Dr Rene

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>do A is founder and chief medical officer of a

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>company called Hell h e a L. It provides on

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>demand telemedicine as well as some in home dr house calls,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>and Dr do A joins US Now. Dr do A,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>how will your company and companies like a deal with

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the distribution of the vaccine? Do you have orders in?

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect to be contacted? How does it all

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>work so so far? Thanks first of all for having

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>me on this show. Uh, first of all, it's it's

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of been an interesting roll out. You know, about

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a week ago, I was concerned that the logistics and

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the routing of getting this vaccine around we're going to

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be there very difficult. It seems that piece by piece

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these items are falling into place. I was asked to

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>fill out some paperwork on the CDCs website to apply

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for not just my medical teams, but also our patients

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that we serve um to to to try to acquire

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>enough vaccine for those those members of the team in

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>each and every one of our markets. I'm waiting to

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>hear back, but I've been consistently following up as well

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what's going on. I've also been seeing that

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the hospitals on which I'm on staff are trying as

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>well to have a rollout process, and there have been

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>glitches with accessibility to you know, sign up forms and

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>email addresses and so that that's also been a very

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting perspective as well. It's, of course, as expected, rushed,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but certainly hopefully will happen this month. So DR do

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems like what we're hearing in terms

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of the rollout is healthcare workers, folks in our retirement

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>homes and so on, to get getting to those critical

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>populations initially and then out to the broader populations over time.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>What is your best guess as to when the average

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>American out there will have access uh to this vaccine.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So the goal is to have a hundred million people

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated in the first part of so I think that

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end of summer, the average person will be vaccinated. Now,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind this vaccine is for those folks sixteen

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and up, so we still have work to do for children.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it fine to let children be are among the

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>last to get this vaccine or should they be earlier?

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think with children we see a very interesting infectivity.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So you've of course read in the news and seen

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the news that children have died because of COVID.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They've certainly been infected, they're certainly carrying and transmitting. But

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've also seen is the population suffering

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the most are those that are elderly and immuno compromised.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course my colleagues on front lines are being exposed,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>um in their efforts to keep people safe. So I

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>would say those are definitely the right priorities. So Dr Derot,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this country at least, uh, there is

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a sizeable percentage of the population that just doesn't feel

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with the old concept of receiving vaccines for you know,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the measles amongst and other things. Um, how do we

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as a society, you know, get those people to accept

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine and take this vaccine. It's such a challenging question.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>We we deal with it in the routine vaccines such

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as MMR as you described. And so this concept of

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>herd immunity, where enough people are vaccinated so that as

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a population we are all protected, is the most critical

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>piece to our survivability. The amount of lives we have

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>lost with COVID is tragic, is an understatement, right, So

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we all have to do our part, and even while

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we are being vaccinated piece by piece, you know, population

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>type by population type, until we are all vaccinated effectively,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we won't have herd immunity, which means we do need

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to wear masks, we do need to uh physically separate,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and these measures will go on and on until we

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are safe literally from each other. At this point, Dr Dooan,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would you feel comfortable if you had vaccine going out

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>in company or would you still be worried that you

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>might be able to pass it on? So I I

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>plan if if I am able to get the vaccine,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I plan to take the vaccine. I plan to vaccinate

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>all of our medical teams and immunocompromised and elderly patients,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and I will hope that as doing in doing so,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we are doing our part to protect our communities, and

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly our plan forward. Sorry, should be a little

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more clear. What I meant was, would you be worried

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that you could still be passing on the virus? Well, well,

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so there are two vaccines that are required. The first

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>dose is reportedly effective, but you want a second dose.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I would continue to physically separate and wear

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a mask. Not so much because I am worried about

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>me transmitting though of course every vaccine takes time, as

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to ramp up and build the immunity, but

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>additionally because others around me are not yet vaccinated, and

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if I am carrying during that period of of immunity building,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to infect them. Dr Rene Do, thank

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you so much. We really appreciate your thoughts and your expertise.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Rene Do a founder and chief medical officer of

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hell joining us on the phone from Los Angeles, giving

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>us the latest on these vaccines which are just beginning

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to roll out across the US. We're waiting for modarren

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>and later this week to receive it's FDA approval UH

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and that can join the Visor vaccine in the marketplace.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>As we build this vaccination population well, we got some

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>weaker than expected retail sales this morning, suggesting once again

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is a lot of stress in the economy,

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the consumer of the question is what can

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the folks in Congress do? What can the Federal Reserve?

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Dude kind of ease the pain. Danielle di Martino Booth

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO and Director of Intelligence at Quill Intelligence, also a

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>former advisor at the Dallas Federal Reserve, any Bloomberg opinion contributor.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Also she's the author of a book entitled fed Up,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an insiders take on why the Federal Reserve is bad

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>for America? What do you expect, Danielle, thank you so

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. What do you expect this Federal

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Reserve which is bad for America? As per your book?

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect to hear from the Fed chairman

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of this afternoon? Well, it'll be interesting to see what

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>he has to say. I think he's finally going to

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 1>get the stimulus that he wants. I I I suspect

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not near the price tag that he was

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>hoping for. Uh. You know that the Fed wants to

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>commit to capping longer maturity treasury yield, and it wants

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to buy longer maturity treasuries to hold those prices down,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but those those yields won't seem to come up enough

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for them to to launch yield curve control um. So

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's I I Red Jersey did some fantastic work. I

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hope everybody thought on what some of the possibilities would

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>be in terms of just the numb the amount of

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bonds that that the FED can buy if they were to,

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if they were to buy the entire Tips market, which

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>would be crazy, it would destroy the structure of the

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>kIPS market. There's nearly seven hundred billion more that they

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>could buy there. You know that that would continue to

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pump up the inflation narrative. Or they could go from

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know the seven to twenty area on the yield

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>curve in terms of treasury maturities, and that there's another

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred billions they can buy there. But again, I

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think what the Fed wants more than anything else, And

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll be looking to Janet yell and to see if

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't push this is is the supply of longer

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>maturity treasuries itself to increase because those buckets are relatively small.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>What happens if we get stimulus, but it's nine billion

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>or below, so less than the you know, the trillions

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats wanted, but also you know, not enough for

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>states to to get some of the pie. Well, and

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you hit the nail on the head.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>They're vunny because you've seen all of these job cut

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>announcement announcements come out of whether it's Washington, d C.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Or San Francisco or New York around their transportation authorities. Uh.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's just going to make a bad problem worse

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, because so many of the

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lower income workers who can't work from home are going

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to have the means by which they transport themselves to work,

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>uh cut that much more. So. You know, the Republicans

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have been very articulate in saying this is not a

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package. We anticipate that the economy is going to

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>accelerate because of the vaccine being distributed throughout throughout the country.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is not stimulus, this is just pure relief. Well,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is also a foot race between now

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and then and the damage that's going to be inflicted

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on the economy because of this spike in hospitalizations and fatality.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The question becomes one of is their stimulus necessary the

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>minute Joe Biden takes office. Yeah, that's kind of where

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go, Danielle. What do you think it's

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>got to be presumably on the top of us to

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do to do list for those first one days. What

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>do we know about Joe Biden his administration kind of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking about in terms of fiscal stimulus. Well,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think that they would be huge advocates for

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>getting as much aid to states and locality as possible.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if I'm an a Biden administration, it's

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do any planning, just as if just as

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult for most of us to plan out whether

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>or not inflation or is coming or not because of

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>these two senatorial runoff elections in Georgia. And that's how

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>critical they've become. They will be the determinant of the

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>size of the next stimulus package and it's composition and

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>how aggressive it can be. Yeah, it's a it's it's

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a difficult winter, Danniel. What do you

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think is priced into this market given that we've only

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>gone up or sideways, we've barely gone down since mart Well,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is is certainly pricing in a

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario in terms of the the economy being

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fully reopened by the time spring rolls around. That is

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>where I feel these markets are priced. For a friend

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of mine, PHILLIPA Done, did some fabulous work looking at

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Schiller Cape price to earnings, the longer term price

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to earnings ratio on the SMP back and right now

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>stocks are trading in the percentile historically. So you know,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that that that the stock market

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>right now is priced such that we are a fully

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>open economy in the headed into Q two. Um Daniel,

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of Janet Yellen as a Secretary Treasury. Well,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been openly critical of Janet Yellen because

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in in higher testimonies, in statement she has she has

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>spoken to the fact that she didn't really understand the

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>makeup the structure of the financial system and did not

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see the crisis coming as we were headed into the

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>last crisis. Uh. You know, she's a labor economist by training,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have my I have my my doubts as

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to whether when the repo overnight repo crisis cropped up

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year when that was what

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. I don't know how well equipped

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>she is because of her background and I should say

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>lack of background in the financial markets in being able

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to tackle something like that, especially because you have another

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>pure academic running the New York Fed, John Williams. So

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody who was savvier to the structure of

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the markets, the plumbing of the financial system which we've

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered is so critical to the execution of quantitative

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>easing or quantitative tightening and the ability for the normalized

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy. I would have preferred to have seen somebody

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>who was much more familiar with the makeup of the markets.

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But of course my opinion doesn't count because most of

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>most of the political world knows that she will be

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>able to cross that aisle. Well, there's also Chris Waller,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>who has not gotten through sanergy yet. So this particular

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>meeting goes ahead without two governors as a vacancy to

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Waller, and uh, well see if that gets

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>resolved as well next year. Um, Danielle, I presume you

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>know a FED without all of its governors is not

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a fully functioning FED either. Well, you do want to

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have all of the voices around that table. I would say, Vannie, though,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that the leadership structure, those at the very top of

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED right now are extremely familiar with one another,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so I wouldn't I'm not too I'm not too particularly

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. One thing I would watch out for

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>with today's meeting, in particular, is that we forget the

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>last time that FED had Quie running, that they put

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate targets out there, and they had to continuously

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>move the goal post down further and further because they

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>realized the markets could not be weaned off of que.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>In fact, at the time, J Powell himself said that

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Quie had become habits forming to to the market. I

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if they tried to put another target

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, like the unemployment rate today that we that

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see some dissenting voices there on that committee.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Danielle's thank you for that. Always some sobering advice there

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from daniel D. Martino, Booth CEO and Director of Intelligence

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at Quill Intelligence, coming to us from Dallas, Texas. Well,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the consumer whole year, really, but

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning we got retail sales data that we're a

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit less positive than we were anticipating so advanced

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>month of a month, they were down one point one percent.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Economists were looking for them to be just down point

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>three percent. The control group was down a half a percent.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Economist were looking for that to be positive. Let's bring

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in somebody who handles consumers money their cash, and through

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>his bank allows them to keep that cash on deposit

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if they wish. Brendan Coughland is head of consumer banking

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at Citizens Bank, and he's coming to us from Providence,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island today. So, Brendan, what have you seen with

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the amount of savings in your bank right now and

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's increasing or decreasing. Yeah, we've seen very healthy

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>savings by the consumer. Uh. We're certainly not out of

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the woods yet with the economy, and Q one is

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly going to be a bit rough until the economy

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fully reopens. But the consumer has been very resilient through

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>all this. In fact, much better than expected. Savings are

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>really piling up through stimulus and with the economy shutting

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>down in general, spending as you as you teased, and

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the open has been a little off. Having said that,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is a real recovery on both credit

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>card spending and debit cards spending. So debit cards spending

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually up about fifteen percent right now year or

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a year on a dollar basis, and flatish on units.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So customers aren't going to the grocery store two times

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a week, they're consolidating that into one one trip, and

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they're spending a little bit more. And credit cards have

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>actually come all the way back up to slightly positive

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>year over year, So we're seeing consumer confidence come back

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in their behaviors around spending, which is

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly a good sign. Brendon, what are you seeing in

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of credit quality out there right now? Yeah, I

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>have been, isn't lea surprised non credit quality And as

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I said a second ago, we're certainly not out of

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the woods yet, but we um we do have very

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>positive indicators on a relative basis on credit. So at

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>its worst, we had eight percent of our portfolio in forbearance,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>which means uh, the customers taking a break from making

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>their payments. That has geared down to about one point

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>five percent, so the vast majority of customers have left

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>forbearance status. At the same time, our delinquency rates have

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>actually gone down, not up, and so as these customers

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have migrated back into repayment, the vast, vast majority are

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>landing on their feet, which is a very very good fine.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So the remainder of customers are going to transition off

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>through December and into January. So we'll have to help

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>them make sure the remainder land on their feet. And certainly, uh,

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the stimulus talks out there could really help

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure that's the case. What kind of loans are

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>being asked for brendon Our companies that are looking for

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, fresh or extend the lines of credits, still

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>doing that, or you know, have they decided to just

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>close their business and mortgages. Yeah, so um um. On

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the commercial side of the bank and with our small businesses,

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly we saw a lot of them draw down at

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the height of the anxiety in April and May a

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has gone back away. Liquidity is very

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>strong with our businesses, both in the mid corporate and

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>small business space. Um so that's kind of coming back

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to normal. We on the consumer side, we've seen actually

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant loan demand this year, and it's really led

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>by two spots. Of course, mortgage is booming. We're having

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a stellar year in UH in mortgages. The market could

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>hit four trillion this year in mortgage originations, which is

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly high, probably the largest year on record for mortgage

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>originations just given the speed of rate drop that happened.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And citizens is doing quite well UM in in the

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>mortgage space taking market share. We're we we will potentially

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get close to fifth billion in mortgage originations UH this year,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so very very strong year. The other product that has

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>stimulated a ton of demand is student loan refinancing. As

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>rates drop, a lot more customers have been placed in

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the money, if you will, so there the rates offered

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>today are much better than what they have today, and

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>they're refinancing and restructuring their debt for payment savings, and

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, refinancing your student loan debt or your mortgage

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways a form of stimulus for the

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>customer to put extra money in their pockets every month

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and be able to help stimulate more spending and some

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the savings that we've seen customers accelerate. Brendon talk

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to us about digital banking. I for one, has really

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>ramped up my digital banking game during this pandemic. I'm

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>suspecting other people have as well. Do you expect that

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a big trend going forward? Yeah, I do.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Digital banking has been a trend that's been increasing for

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some time now, and this UH, the COVID period has

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>has massively accelerated UM digital banking activities. So our digital

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>metrics are up over and a relatively short period of time,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>our brick and mortar banking is down about the same

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>amount UH and and so what we're seeing is that

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>customers are engaging with the digital UM mobile app to

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do their transactional banking much more frequently. They still want

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk to humans when they have a big life event,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>when they want to talk about retirement or their mortgage.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's very very important our brick and mortar strategy

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and our human interactions will be foundational to our our

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy and the industry going forward. But digital banking is

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>accelerating at quite a clip, which which poses a lot

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of questions for retail banks. What should be the size

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of your brick and mortar network? UM, You know, do

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to upscale your colleagues to have them step

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>up to more advice based banking versus transactional banking is

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all that moves to a self serve model. Wow, Brandon,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for journeyings. We appreciate it. Brendan Coughlin,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>head of consumer banking for Citizens Bank. It is based

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in Providence Road Island, giving us a sense of that growth,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Vonny in The shift to from bricks and mortars to

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>digital is just a fascinating and it seems like it's

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be long term for sure, and it's going

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting to see what happens to all those

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hs BC branches that are closing down. Will other banks

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>make a bid? But you know, will there be any need?

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>If there's going to be such a shift from big

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and mortar to digital, what's what will become of that?

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Realist exactly? I know, Just again speaking for myself, I've

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>stepped up and done a lot more digital banking more

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>than I did pre pandemic. Well, big in the US

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>technology companies think Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook, they've been facing

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>much higher levels of regulatory scrutiny. Here in the US.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>We have the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at those big tech names. Now that European Union

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it wants new powers to curb tech companies dominance. To

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>get some more color on this, we welcome Alex web

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>European technology and media columns for Bloomberg Opinion. He joins

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from London. Alex, thanks so much

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. That the European Union has long

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>had a history of tightly monitoring US technology companies. What

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>are they looking to do now for some of these

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>big tech giants. So there are two proposals to regulation

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>which are called spectively, the Digital Markets Act and the

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Innitial Services Act. And one will classify big companies essentially

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that there are ones you can think of um as

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gatekeepers and will there then subject them to particular rules

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>which will make it harder to do some acquisitions and

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>protect smaller companies that operate on their platforms. And the

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>punishments that they can be imposed are fines of up

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to ten percent of revenue and your revenue and in

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario, forced divestments of businesses, which but

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was a very extreme scenario. Letters, So it's

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming added from all sides. If you like,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean it will be successful. How can the companies

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>block some of this from happening? Well, so Firstly, it's

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be passed. It's gonna be passed by the European

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Parliament and the Council. That's likely to take about a year,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and then it will take another six months to come

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to effect. There is going to be a huge lobbying

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>effort on the part of these companies. Um, it is

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not a question of really blocking of the European Parliament

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>or the European Commission. It's a question of actually just

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that you're buy by the rules and then the

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>europe then there will be no impetus to actually force

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a breakup. You know, the way that these rules work

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is that if you give a regulator the power to

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>break a company up in an ideal world, they don't

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>need to because the threat of the breakup is enough

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to change company's behavior. And that is you know, we

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen time and again instances of the big tech

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>companies pursuing seemingly anti competitive behavior. They're now being pursued

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for that in the US as well as in Europe

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and Australia and elsewhere. And this is just giving the

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>European Commission more power and more tools to punish the

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>companies when they overset the mark because clearly the deterr

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and hasn't been adequate until now. So, Alex, I'm old

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to remember the European Union really coming down on

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft about twenty five years ago, and I think investors

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>learn from that that, you know, the European Union, it's

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not that big a deal. It's a fine here, it's

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a fine there. It's not that big a deal. Why

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>would this be any different. It just seems like the

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>European Union is doesn't have much power beyond just leveling

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>some fines. Well, I think that's exactly the problem, that

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that previously they have concentrated UM on remedies, which are

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>as you say, finds, rather than behavioral remedies, which seek

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to change the way the company's clus in the name behave,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and the US has leaning historically a lot more on

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>behavioral remedies of trying to change the way that those um,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those those companies go about their business. UM. Now, if

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>behavior remedies in extreme don't work, then you lean on

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>structural remedies where you can force companies to divest their

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses and um that is something where the European Commission

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>has has been wary about taking actions in the past

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that this gives them, in extreme cases, the power to

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>do it in the future. So the fine could now

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be up to ten percent of revenue. Is that enough

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of a deterrent for the likes of Amazon, Facebook, Apple,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean other finds They've been quite happy to pay

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and carry on with their business. But would a ten

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of revenue fine really dentist their balance street? So

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we're just in of itself. Know, these companies average free

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>cash revenue each year. If um, they you know, break rules,

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>then they could place a one off fine center revenue

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or um, you know, daily finds of revenue. And if

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>they continue to to break the rules, that's when the

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Commission has said that they will consider forcing divestments of business.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's when it starts to get you know, there's

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of the really start to get really serious essentially,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that inevitably these companies will want

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to avoid. Alex you know, is there a sense across

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Europe broadly defined, why there hasn't been more technology companies

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of created across Europe? I mean, yes, we

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of big big ones like SAP and

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>so on and ericson, but just generally speaking, why the

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>technology companies. Development across Europe has been not nearly anywhere

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as it's been, say the United States, even in just

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. I mean it's a very simple reason. Really,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>there are any number of big factors. You know, the

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley of course has standard and you know, concentration,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>eventual capital all usk the same. But also the US

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>has one single addressable market that speaks the same language.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can launch in the US and you

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 1>are immediately in front of three million people. Um In Europe,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are a bunch of different app stores

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for Apple, there are a bunch of different languages that

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>are spoken. There are you know, as much as it's

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>theory a single market and practice it can be a

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more complicated than that gives American companies a

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>huge advantage. And the companies that have proved successful are

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the ones from Europe that have scaled immediately into the US.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Think about Spotify, Swedish company now the biggest music streaming

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>company in the world. So that I think is the

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>singular answer that is part of the US for the

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>europe to compete. I'm sure the teams of lawyers at

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all these big companies are looking at all of the

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>different options, including actually divesting parts of their business. Alex,

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do you know about any of these discussions or any

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of the parts of any of the businesses that might

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>be up for discussion. Well, it's it's unlikely that these

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>companies going to voluntarily divest businesses. There was a report

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal earlier this year that there had been

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>discussions at Google informally about perhaps selling part of their

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>advertising businesses, business that places ads on third party websites

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, would maybe addressed some of the concerns

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about an acquisition that Google did more than a decade ago,

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.479
<v Speaker 1>which beefed up that business and in hindsight looks as

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>though it probably shouldn't have been passed. Um doesn't look

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as they Facebook is they're going to sell voluntarily? What's

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that for Instagram? Absolutely not, But there maybe are things

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>around the edges which as a sign of good will

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>or to take defang some of the plan incended to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>defang some of the attacks room from regulators, that might

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be feasible, but nothing significant. So just real quickly, is

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there an expectation that this will pass? Alex, Yes, absolutely,

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>there's huge political will behind this In Europe. Opposition perhaps

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>some Ireland, unsurprisingly given that a lot of these companies

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have their European HQs there. But broadly speaking, um, this

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that you know there might be changes, and

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>there will be changed with the course the next year,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>but the trust of it looks like it will get

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>through European Parliament and of course, as we know, the

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>European Union and I TRUST chief Margareta Vestiga is well

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>versed in all of this language and well well able

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to take on these companies. Alex, thank you for all

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was giving in touch with us on what's going on

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>with these major major Silicon Valley companies. Alex Web is

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>European technology and media columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. But of

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>course a lot of that has to do with the

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>big American companies as well. As he said, they're all

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>based in Europe to they've headquarters in Ireland and some

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of them in other parts of Europe as well. Thanks

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn,

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio