WEBVTT - Tech News: Questions For Facebook, No More Answers from Yahoo

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and I love all

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>things tech, and it is time for the tech news

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for Thursday, April eighth, twenty twenty one. Yes, that pause

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is me looking at the calendar because every day is

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the same to me, but the news keeps changing, so

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's something right. And you know, there are

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>spy films that start off with a villain sabotaging some

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of high security, high value target, like a nuclear

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>power plant, for example, but it turns out that the

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing can be done by a gooey ocean critter.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about salps, which are a type of invertebrate.

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>They're called tunicates. They look kind of like jellyfish, but

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they are a different species. They use water jet propulsion

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to get around, so they siphon in water

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and siphon it back out again and squirt ahead. Anyway,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of them have gummed up the water

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 1>intake valves for two nuclear reactors in South Korea, which

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is not you know great. The nuclear plants use water

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to cool the reactors as part of the heat exchanges

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>that are at the heart of power generation, so those

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>reactors are currently offline. Salt numbers usually swell in early summer,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>so we're actually seeing an early surge here. Now whether

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that has anything to do with climate change is an

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>unresolved question. It would be premature for us to draw

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>conclusions without a lot more data and looking at trends

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>over time. This could just be an abnormality but not

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an indication of big changes. It's kind of like how

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>if you had an unusually cool day in late May

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta, you wouldn't say that's counter evidence to

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change, that global warming is not a thing or whatever,

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>although no one really wants to use the term global

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>warming anymore. That's kind of reductive, But anyway, you wouldn't

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>say that because weather and climate are not interchangeable. The

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>story of the salps, I think is a little amusing

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because the thought that this little sack like critter could

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>shut down a nuclear power plant sounds, you know, kind

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of bizarre and funny, but it's obviously serious business, both

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the impact on power generation and changes

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in wildlife. Routines. One story I did not report on

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week was about how hackers have been scraping

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>information pertaining to more than half a billion Facebook accounts,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>including Mark Zuckerberg's. As it turns out, someone collected the

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>data back in twenty nine teen, and it includes stuff

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like names, occupations, location, marital status, or relationship status in

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>some cases, phone numbers. Facebook says that the hackers likely

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>used a contact import tool to scrap data from various profiles,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>which means no one actually penetrated Facebook's systems and then

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>rooted around for information that way. Instead, they just pulled

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it off Facebook directly. So prior to twenty nineteen, it

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was possible to do kind of a reverse search of Facebook.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You could plug in a phone number and put that

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>into a contact importer, and it would then search Facebook

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to see if there was a profile on Facebook that

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>matched that phone number, which would then give you not

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just the personal information of the account, but it would

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.839
<v Speaker 1>confirm the link between the phone number and that person. Right.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you automated this and you just went through,

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a robo dial list of phone numbers, you

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>could collect a huge amount of data. Now Facebook changed that,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but the damage had already been done, the data was

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>already collected, and it's not much of a relief to

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>hear that the company has, you know, already done something

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about it when the information is already out in the wild.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those shutting the barn door things after

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the horse has already kind of bolted. You can check

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>to see if you were affected by going to have

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I Been zucked? That's zu ckeed dot com, and you

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>can search against the database of all the stuff that

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>was collected, so you can put in your phone number,

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>your email address, or whatever. I tried my information. I

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>was not in that twenty nineteen hack. But that was

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>just pure luck. It wasn't that I did anything, you know,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to prevent it from happening. I was just lucky that

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't in part of that grab. Another bad Facebook

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>story coming your way. The Insider has an article titled

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook did not higher black employees because they were not

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a culture fit. Report says the article is well worth reading.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the headline kind of gives away the idea

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of what was going on, but we'll dive in. So

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received reports from a few

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>black applicants who were seeking jobs with Facebook, and they

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>all reportedly had the qualifications necessary to do the posted jobs.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>But they were all turned away, apparently after being told

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they would not fit in with the corporate culture of Facebook.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to view this as anything other than

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>grossly racist. A Washington Post article quoted an operating manager

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>over at Facebook who said he was told that the

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>people he recruited into the company needed to be a

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>culture fit, but quote, Unfortunately, not many people I knew

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>could pass that challenge because the culture here does not

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>reflect the culture of black people end quote. Organizations like

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Society for Human Resource Management have pushed back against

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that have culture fit requirements in their job postings.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>They've argued that this effectively creates an excuse to hire

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly white applicants and turn away people of color while

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>attempting to maintain a sort of plausible deniability that there's

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>any kind of racial discrimination going on. Facebook representatives have

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>said that their company has policies and placement to detect

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and eliminate discrimination. But this culture fit thing strikes me

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>as a way of kind of getting around that, maybe

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not a conscious way. It might not even have been

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>consciously malevolent or malicious, but it has the effect of

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>being discriminatory, and that's a problem. On Tuesday, the messaging

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>app Signal rolled out a new beta in the UK

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>with a feature that, well, let's say it's caused a

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a fuss. Signal is an encrypted messaging service.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It offers end to end encryption between people using it.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>That's one that a lot of users have flocked to

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to switch to a messaging app that didn't

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>commoditize relationships. When Facebook's WhatsApp started, when it was revealed

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that the app was going to be collecting data about usage,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not even personal data, but enough data about usage

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that would ultimately go to Facebook proper and other Facebook properties,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people said, you know what, peace out,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go use something else, and a lot

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of people went to Signal, and signal sales pitch is

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that it lets you communicate privately and securely with your contacts.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And there aren't really any bells and whistles thrown in,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>except now there appears to be one a cryptocurrency called

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mobile coin. Critics say that Signal is commercially exploiting its

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>user base, introducing a company controlled digital cryptocurrency, pumping up

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the value of that digital currency, then pushing it all

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>off onto users, and then pocketing profit from it. Stephen

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>deal That's d I. E Hl wrote a great blog

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>post that critiques this move, and it laments the fact

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that Signal seems to have taken a drastic turn from

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>its philosophical anchor point. It's called ET two Signal. I

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really recommend you read it. His perspective, which I find

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty compelling, is that there's this growing trend in tech

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in general to rely on these digital tokens, whether they

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are cryptocurrencies or NFTs. That trend sees a small group

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of people trade digital goods a few times, thus driving

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>up the perceived value of those digital goods. Then they

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>can cash out, you know, they can build up some wealth,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>cash out, and then they have that wealth in some

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>other form. And meanwhile, those digital assets are in a

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>danger of having a total collapse in value, similar to

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen with Bitcoin in the past. Bitcoin's

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>writing high, but there have been times where we've seen

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the value of bitcoin dip really low from pretty big high.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's no guarantee that it's going to maintain that.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>While some might survive the ups and downs and stick around,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and by some I mean cryptocurrencies and fts. There's never

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee that they will stick around. And the more

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we see companies employ these kinds of strategies, the more

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>likely we're going to see governments take a closer look

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>at the whole thing and potentially try to pass legislation

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to address it, particularly if people are at risk of

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>losing significant amounts of money due to these types of strategies.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And as we all know, it is not easy to

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>address the consequences of technologies once they are out in

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the wild. It is way too easy to pass laws

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that have their own unintended consequences. The laws might be

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>coming from a good place, but they can often not

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hit the actual problem and cause other problems as a results,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so not necessarily a great move. Oh and just to

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>link the Facebook privacy story with the signal story, is

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>another story that a lot of people are having fun

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with right now, and that is that by using that

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>screat data, some folks found out that Mark Zuckerberg, whom

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, his data was among that that was

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>found in that more than half a billion accounts list.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It turns out he's been using the Signal messaging app,

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because Facebook is the owner of WhatsApp

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a Signal competitor. But if you run the

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>company that owns a messaging app, why would you be

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>using a different messaging app than the one you actually

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>own as part of your company. Why would you use

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a different one for your personal communication? Well, Signal has

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>d end encryption, and unlike WhatsApp, it's not coming through

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>user data, or at least it's not supposed to in

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>an effort to sell ads to users. So perhaps Zuckerberg

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>prefers his messaging services to be a little less intrusive,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but wanting a different set of rules for everybody else,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm just spitballing here. Amplify Media gave

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts a thorough look recently and found out some

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I didn't find all that surprising. Apple podcasts

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>recently hit a milestone of having more than two million

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>different podcast titles on it, but amplify discovered that twenty

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>six percent of all those podcasts have only published a

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>single episode. Thirty seven percent had only published two or fewer. So,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you know, we went from twenty six

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seven percent having had published two or less,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and then forty four percent had only published three or fewer.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So once you hit the ten or more episodes, like

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>how many podcasts on Apple Podcasts have published more than

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ten episodes, Well you're looking at just thirty six percent

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of all the podcasts up on Apple Podcasts, which tells

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>us that there are a ton of shows that have

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not hit ten episodes on there. This didn't shock me

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because podcasting takes a lot of work and energy. I

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>can name at least three shows I personally started recording

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and stopped before I hit episode number four, And what

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this tells me is that there are a lot of

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are trying to podcast, but many of them

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>get discouraged for whatever reason and they give up on it.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, some of those shows might not have been abandoned.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of them could have easily just been one offs

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or very limited series. For example, Till Death Do Us Blart,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a show in which the hosts get together to watch

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul Blart Mall Cop two every year, had to run

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>for four years straight before having more than three episodes,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and it currently has eight. If you also include the

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>trailer from twenty fifteen and a bonus episode from twenty twenty. Meanwhile,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is currently close again on fourteen hundred episodes,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's if you're not counting classics. If you do

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>count the classic episodes that we publish on Fridays, because

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at that point you're talking about one thousand,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred twenty nine episodes. This will be one five

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty one because I'm pretty sure the Wednesday episode

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't published as I record this, and I think out

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of all of those, I'm only not in one of them.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean every single one except one of them. I

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>need to lie down for a moment. A recent court

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>filing in a criminal case illustrates how sometimes smart city

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>implementations can be dangerously stupid. And let me be clear here,

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's dumb to update city infrastructure. I'm

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>saying it's dumb to do it poorly. In this case,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the incident in question happened back in twenty nineteen. A

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>man named Wyatt Tranacheck attempted to sabotage the water cleaning

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>system of Ellsworth County in Kansas. Travnicheck had been working

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with the county, which had installed software in the county's

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>water cleaning system and it let employees log into that

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>cleaning system remotely, and the purpose was to let employees

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>monitor systems without having to be on the physical premises.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But the software also allows employees to make changes to

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that system, like shutting down various subsystems. So Travin to check,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>after having left his job, logged into the system months later.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>His access had never been revoked or limited in any way,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so he logged in and he started to shut stuff down,

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>allegedly with the intent to cause harm. He was found out, arrested,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and if he's found guilty, he could serve up to

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty years in prison for this. Fortunately no one was

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>actually harmed in this case, but it really illustrates the

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>need for proper security measures and critical systems that includes

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>everything from the power grid where we know foreign agents

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have infiltrated various systems, to our water systems, to communication

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>systems and beyond. Good security is hard. It requires work,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It requires maintenance, It requires updating passwords and changing logins.

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It includes revoking access when someone no longer merits having access.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially all the stuff that we should be doing

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in our private lives with our own systems. But a

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of us don't do that because it's work, it's tedious,

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and there are only so many hours in a day.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But if we insist on making these various systems accessible remotely,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to take those measures into account or else

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we will suffer very serious consequences. This could have been

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse in the tell us something we didn't

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>already know category. The Broadband Technical Advisory Group reports that

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>broadband usage surged between thirty and forty percent in most

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the United States during the pandemic, with some areas

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>getting up to sixty percent. Of a surge. Seems like

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>when a lot of folks are stuck at home, they

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>turned to the Internet when it comes to things like

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>getting work done, or finding entertainment, or researching ways to

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated and so on. And also, while downstream data

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was way up, so was upstream activity. Again, no big surprise.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of you have been on your

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>share of video meetings over the course of the last year.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And I mean working from home for me means that

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm regularly uploading large audio files to my producer Tari,

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and that adds up pretty quickly. While the infrastructure in

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>most cities handled the increased load without too much of

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>an issue, rural areas were a different story. Some of

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>those were relying on older networking devices that weren't able

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with the demand as easily as the

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff we have in metropolitan areas. And what this tells

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>me is that stuff like data caps sound like they're

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>more about getting cash out of customers and less about

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>guaranteeing a good Internet experience. If the US had a

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>surge and we didn't see home service slow to a

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>crawl across the country, seems pretty disingenuous to say that

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>data caps are necessity. Amazon's Twitch service has a new

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>policy in place that could see twitch streamers get banned

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>indefinitely for things that they do offline. That is, you

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>might have a perfectly acceptable streaming record, but you might

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>do something really bad out there in the real world,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and if Amazon finds out about it, you might find

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that your stream has been shut down. Now I don't

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>object to this, by the way, but it is interesting

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to me. Twitch streamers can achieve a great deal of fame.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>They can attract a large and young audience, and if

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a streamer has been found to have engaged in some

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>seriously bad behaviors, like being involved in acts of deadly

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>violence or terrorist activities, or committing sexual assault. Twitch has

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>rules now laid out to ban that user from streaming.

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>According to Twitch, it will work with a law firm

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>when cases arise to determine if any claims that were

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>made against that streamer have validity to them, and that

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>all has to happen before or Twitch does anything else.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Only on confirmation that the streamer was actually involved in

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>these activities will Twitch then act on the account. According

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to Twitch, a person who has been found to have

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>engaged in these offline activities poses as a potential threat

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Twitch community in general, and that is unacceptable.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Other platforms like Facebook and YouTube also sometimes take offline

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>behavior into consideration when dealing with accounts, but it's more

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>common to see most platforms focus solely on the behavior

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and activities that happen on the platform itself and not elsewhere. Finally,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the second McElroy family reference in this episode, let

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>us all bow our heads in a moment of silence

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for yaho Answers, the platform which allows people to ask

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>questions ranging from the mundane to the unintelligible with answers

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that frequently match or exceed the questions. Is going to

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>go away? On May fourth? Wiped clear off the internet

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars Day. I mean, really, guys, that's low anyway.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yaho Answers has been a part of the web since

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, and it's been a part of

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast My Brother, My Brother and Me. There's the

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>reference to our mackel Royce that had originally launched back

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty ten. And sure there were really dumb questions

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and even more dumb answers on yaho Answers, and sure

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>most of those questions you could probably find answered elsewhere.

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And sure some people use Yahoo Answers not to ask

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>or answer questions, but to create a kind of rich

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>metafiction of weirdness. But without yah who Answers, we never

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>would have had the question how is Babby formed? And

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>countless people too scared to ask a question that they

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to know the answer to and then potentially

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>look foolish, would be able to go to yah Who

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Answers and ask it there, and sometimes they might even

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>get a useful response. Now there are other sites that

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do sort of what yah Who Answers was doing, though

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>usually not with the same level of surreal datastic activities.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>As for Mbimbam, that's my brother, my brother and me.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>To y'all who have never listened to that show, I

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>suspect the show is going to be just fine. Yah

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Who Answers served a specific role on that show, well

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>two of them really. One was to help buff up

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>listener questions because, of course, in the early days, the

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>show was still building its audience and so it only

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had so many questions per episode. Yah Who Answers helped

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>fill that out. But the other was to sign off

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>every episode with an unanswered and arguably unanswerable question from

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Yah Who Answers. There may now need to be a

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>new way to close out shows, but I believe in

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the mackelroys. As for yall Who Answers, I'm sad to

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>see it go. It was bizarre and weird, sometimes disturbing,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but it also felt like a pretty accurate representation of

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the psyche on the Internet. So shine on you, Crazy Diamond,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for today's episode. That's all the news

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that I care to report for Thursday, April eight, twenty

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. If you have suggestions, for things I should

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>tackle in episodes of tech Stuff let me know. The

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>best way to get in touch is on Twitter. The

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text stuff HSW and I'll

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.