WEBVTT - Week 10 Recap: Part 2

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hull.

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.079
<v Speaker 2>That for me, I'm a man, I'm for it.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 3>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 3>be happy. You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Edith Steak is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And then and tie Dan Rubinstein back in the home

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>studio after a long weekend away and beautiful and arbor Michigan,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>my friend watching your Oregon Ducks take it to the

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan Wolverines. We had a weird setup in the hotel

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>room to pull off something of a recap episode on

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night. But alas, as you can see from the

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>background for those of you watching the video back where

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it all started, my friend, how goes it?

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>It's it's very good time. Life is very good. Not

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>my first time, probably won't be my last time hauling

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>production lights into a hotel room and getting a few

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>looks in the lobby're like, what's about to go down

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>in a room two three one tonight? As I'm looking around, like.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Everything's cool, guys, this is just college football and we're

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not talking ring lights. We're talking the big light with

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the umbrella, like full on production. I said, we use

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for what we do. Yeah, and a few kind of

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>stray glances, like what's what's going on up in that room? Yeah?

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Like like, are we going to be interviewing somebody on

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>camera saying you ever done something like this before?

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 3>No, huh, I mean you're a natural. That's that's the

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>vibe that I picked up on from people's eyeballs looking

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>at me hauling a light stand and a giant light

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 3>dome in the Hilton Garden, Detroit, Marriott. Yeah, that's the

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 3>life we lead.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the show, one and all. Thank you

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for your patients this past weekend as we did our

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>best to put a show out there. This show now

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a continuation of what we did

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. So yeah, because we were at the Oregon

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan game, we did not have a chance to do

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>our normal bit of football consumption. This gave us an

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to go back and rewatch games, formulate some thoughts.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We did not talk a whole lot about what transpired

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nightcap because we recorded the show earlier. This

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to give us a chance to go

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>through some of those games and also take a stroll

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>back down memory lane talk through what happened at other

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>points throughout the day in Week ten.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I have a lot of thoughts, a lot of opinions.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>We have rankings, reverbs. It's a jam pack show. Yes,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>it is a jam pack show. Hit follow, hit subscribe.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to miss any of our episodes moving forward,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 1>because as we will discuss on today's show, as I'm

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure I am going to discuss at nauseum on

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday preview show, there is a lot that's going

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to go down in November. Oh my god, Yes, a

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>lot is going to go down in November with respect

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to conference standings. So if you are ever so inclined, folks,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for the next forty five minutes, sixty minutes, what whatever

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>time you choose to spend with us to distract yourself

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from the healthscape of American politics which is going on today.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>As we released this episode, thank you for joining us

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the Rebowler hood.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Dan thrilled your hair.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So look. Week ten featured seven teams of the AP

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Top twenty five going down. Yes, we had Penn State,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we had Texas A and M. We had Iowa State, Clemson,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State, Pitt and Illinois. Of those teams, Texas A

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and M Clemson and pitt All lost at night while

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we were recording. I would also add Iowa State lost

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>while we were in the car, Kansas State lost while

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we were in the car. Illinois happened a little bit

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the day. That was one that we had

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>telegraphed as part of my locks yep on our previous

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>preview episode. But definitely an active week with respect to rankings,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>which leads me to where we are right now with

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Baller top twelve. Got a new one that is

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>out there, number twelve, Boise State crack in the top twelve,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>number eleven, SMU welcome to the dance, my friends, number ten,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>notere Dame now firmly in our top twelve. They hadn't

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>been there before. Peeking back in Tennessee at nine, BYU

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at eight. Penn State drops all the way down to

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>number seven, but still very much in the thick of

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>things here. Indiana all the way up to number six.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein, wooh, finally getting a little bit of love

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Hoosiers. Top five is Texas at five, Miami

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at four, Georgia at three, Ohio State at two, Oregon,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Your Oregon Ducks a comfortable first place in this poll.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Also add before I get your comments, Alabama is thirteen, Ole,

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Missus fourteen, Army fifteen, Texas A, and m sixteen in

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>LSU at seventeen. Any reactions, any thoughts to that top twelve?

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Uh? Yeah, I mean the conversation around number three is fascinating,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 3>though it's hard for me to put Texas there, obviously

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>losing to Georgia the way that they did, hard for

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 3>me to put Miami there in terms of strength of

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 3>performance that you know, there's no good answer for number

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 3>three in this moment. Georgia won an absolute clunker given

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 3>Carson Beck's interception issues against Florida, and it's difficult to

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>say Indiana, even with an undefeated record in a power

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 3>conference like a slam dunket number three, given who they've played.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Now you can say they've performed like a number three

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>team should with a weirdly weak schedule. And I understand

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>why they scheduled down in the non conference, because Indiana

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>has been long a program scheduling to get to a ballgame,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>and so they weren't even thinking about like style, points

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>and record and any of that kind of stuff, because

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 3>why would you given the history of Indiana football. So

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of defensible that they're sort of not in

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>that number three conversation. And I don't think, what are

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>they in the eight.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>People yet there's somewhere in that vicinity. Yes, six, seven, eight, Yeah,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they've now cracked the top ten, which good for them.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>They should be there given the way they've played. Definitely,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and to your point, this schedule definitely predates Kurt Signetti

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and all this renewed optimism around the program. Like you said,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get too a bowl game that was

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of seen as the stepping stone, but never in

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>their wildest dreams did we did they did we expect

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that they'd be in the thick of this thing come

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>mid November.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>In terms of if we are once again just looking

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 3>at this poll, is it a poll that combines who

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>we think are the twelve best teams or the twelve

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>best resumes or everything you know that goes into a ranking,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 3>like I happen to think Ole Miss is probably one

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of the best dozen teams in the country right now.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Even with the injuries. Trey Harris didn't play against Arkansas,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, a little bit thin at running back at

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the moment. Set in records. The defense I think might

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>be leading the nation in sacks. They're playing at their best,

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>as complete a football game as most, if not all,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>of the sport, and so that's an O mission And

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I get it because of the loss to Kentucky. Totally

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>defensible why you would leave them out. But if we're

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>just having that conversation about who are the twelve best

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>teams in the country, I think you're doing a little

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>bit of an injustice leaving will miss out.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We opened up this poll to all of our Patreon members,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so those who are certified in Premium for Ballers, also

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>those who join on the free tier, just to get

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>more opinions because things are starting to heat up now,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think again with respect to how these teams sack up.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see the first round of playoff rankings

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday evening for those who care to pay attention.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>We a little distraction. Yeah yeah, nice distraction.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how it compares to this for ball Oer

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Top twelve poll. Again, this is voted on by our

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>community and everybody kind of has their own measure for it.

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We have some folks that want to put Vandy in

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the top twelve. We have others that take it. You know,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think from your standpoint of well, I don't care

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>what the records are. I'm just looking at this in

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of who I think the best teams are, right,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to take something of a hybrid approach, though

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>not including Vandy, I would add, and I find it

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting that we've now got some new teams that are

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that are peeking their way into this thing. It took

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a while for people to get comfortable again with putting

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame in their top twelve. That' SMU finally getting

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>something of a boost after playing really good football, progressively

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>better football after that loss earlier in the year, to BYU,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>even BYU. I feel like our voters have struggled with

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>where do we put BYU. If you take the poll

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>points the way I calculate them, you can use that

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where the decision points are. Right now,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Oregon is a clear number one, Yes, Ohio State and

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Georgia damn near tied for that second spot. All right, So,

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>even though Georgia did have a bit of a clunker

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>this past weekend against Florida, it stands to reason that

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at least our for baller hood still feels pretty confident

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia. Miami a very comfortable fourth in front of Texas.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas are very comfortable fifth in front of Indiana. Once

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you get to six, this is when things start to

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>get interesting. There's still a nice gap between Indiana and

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Penn State, but after you get to seven, seven, eight, nine,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>like the whole way down, it's very very tight. How

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the committee kind of susses all this out would be

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see. I don't know what to expect there.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't take the first round of polling that seriously,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of course, but it will be interesting just to get

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a check as for how the Committe

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>feels about what it's seen so far.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not so sure I understand why Penn State is

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 3>where they are on this list. You play in a

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 3>big game, a top ten matchup at home and score

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 3>how many offensive touchdowns tie once exactly zero, exactly zero.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Now we don't know what b y you would do

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>at home against Ohio State. We don't know what Indiana

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 3>would do. We don't know what Tennessee would do, we

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know what Notre Dame would do. But we know

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 3>what Penn State would do, and that is not all

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>that much, and so I'm with them in like that

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 3>ten to eleven range instead and having to prove themselves

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>to be a top ten team given that the results

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>this year to that point, as we talked about on

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the preview show, little to no throttle on offense all

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>year long, that they are just in general, you know,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>distancing themselves from clearly lesser teams. That's that's not the

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Penn state of twenty twenty four, and it feels like

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 3>they're in that spot, whether it's the A People Coaches

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Poll or even more important for Ballerpol that they're getting

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a benefit of the doubt for an unclear reason right now.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think this week will help us sort things

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit further agreat. We've got Georgia on

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the road at ol Miss, We've got Alabama on the

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>road at LSU, We've got BYU on the road at

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Utah and the Holy War. Even games like Colorado Texas

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Tech have a lot of intrigue associated with them. There

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are suddenly real conference implications for some of these games

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>that we couldn't have dreamt up weeks ago. So we'll

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>get into that and much much more either on today's

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>episode or as we get into the preview, but as

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>we have advertised this show as sort of our opportunity

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to take a look back at what we missed. Let's

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>talk week ten again. Dan, Let's what did you have

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of going back and watching where did your

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>where did your attention go? First? When you look at

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the sheet, realize what we still had to cover, and

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>decided to fire up the nefarious YouTube streams and watch

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a game. I think Texas Tech won their game in

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>such a losing effort that I cannot believe Iowa State

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>lost that game. I cannot believe Baron Morton threw two

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>picks in the opening part of the middle eight within

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>like a minute and a half of time, want first opportunity.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State went three and out in like twenty seconds.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And then they score a touchdown right before halftime, get

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball back after halftime, and lose their first fumble

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think of season.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what I saw. Their tight end got

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>it punched out from behind as they were driving. It

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>starts raining like crazy near the end of the game,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and somehow Texas Tech. Texas Tech puts together like a

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>twelve play buck forty two long drive down the field

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 3>in the rain, surviving a third and fifteen, a fourth

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and seven, and are able to punch it in with

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, twenty seconds left something like that, and

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 3>somehow hold on to win that game. I don't it was.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 3>It was a cocktail. It was a losing cocktail that

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 3>somehow came together for Texas Tech. I could not believe

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>watching that game back, and they had the performances right.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 3>Josh Kelly was very good and was an absolute dude,

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 3>especially early on in that game. TODJ. Brooks continues to

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>be a dude. Baron Morton did make plays. I just

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 3>can't believe the stolen possessions and the freak fumble loss

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>all added up to losing this game for Iowa State

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 3>in the rain, Right, it was going to be so

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 3>difficult for Texas Tech to move the ball down the

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>field against the quality Iowa State defense. And credit to

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Texas tack of course, of course, credit to Texas Tech.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Win your clunkers, of course, of course, of course, win

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 3>is a win. I can't believe Iowa State.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Lost this game and Texas Tech now finds itself in

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a position of real consequence. That's not to say that

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a great chance of winning the Big Twelve.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they have much chance at all of

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>winning the Big Twelve, if I'm being honest with you,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But they definitely have a chance to impact the way

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that that conference shakes out, not the least of which

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is this game this weekend against Colorado.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I cannot believe it.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I was curious what happened in that one. I put

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the call out on our discord, and people were just like,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State kept stalling out. They kept stalling out, they

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>had some mistakes. It was totally unfounding that they would

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lose that game, because it felt like they were good

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>enough to win. But we know the way that sometimes

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these games go, especially in the Big Twelve.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>It was twenty two to seventeen Iowa State with two

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>minutes left with I think a long field right seventy

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 3>one yard drive, so yeah, a not insignificant amount of

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>yardage to cover in the rain. I can't believe. I

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>just I watched that game and I knew what had happened.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>It had happened twenty four hours early, and I was like,

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I must have seen the results wrong here. This is

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>an impossible game for Iowa State to lose. Yes, the

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 3>offense was not on track at all and they couldn't

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 3>generate bigger plays consistently ied the touchdom pass of Jaden

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Higgins the lone touchdown pass.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Its great, But man, I first went to the South

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolina win over Texas A and M.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you and I were watching this one a little

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>bit in the car as we were stuck in Michigan

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>stadium traffic.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina ended up winning forty four to twenty. A

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>game was at home and Williams Brice over Texas A

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and M. A and M was fine high right and

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>was the only unbeaten team in the SEC. That obviously

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is no longer the case. I was really struck. First off,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina came out like a ball on fire, Yes,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a ball on fire away, jumped on A and M,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>had a long drive, scored a touchdown like right away,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>right away. South Carolina was in this one to win it.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of this game, though, for them to

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>amass two hundred and eighty six yards and three touchdowns

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, that I think speaks volumes about how

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they were able to control the line of scrimmage, and

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that is not something that we saw coming at least

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I expected at Carolina would give them a game.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect that they would bully a really good

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>A and M front Lenora's sellers over one hundred yards

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>rushing Rocket Sanders one for four rushing two touchdowns. You

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>combine that, by the way, with what Lenora's sellers also

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>did through the air, which was close to two fifty

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had two touchdowns. Didn't make the killer interception, right, didn't

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>make that killer mistake. This is a really really interesting

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>spot now for Texas A and M, which in effect

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>still controls its own destiny in the SEC. If they

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>went out, they owned the tiebreaker over LSU, who's got

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a big game this week, and they beat LSU earlier

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this season, and I believe they would make it in

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>over Tennessee due to their own win over Arkansas earlier

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the year. Go to like the second tiebreaker or

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>something of that nature. So and I'm still in a

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good spot. But like we have seen elsewhere in

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, losing a game in this capacity, it gives

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you more questions than answers about their viability longer term. Right, Truly,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>nobody in this conference is bulletproof and that is such

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a departure from where I feel like we have been

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade. There's always been a bulletproof team

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC, somebody that you can count on getting

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to the playoff feeling good that they're going to win

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a game and get into the championship. I don't know

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>if that's the cases here, I really don't. We have

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>gone from a point in time where the SEC was,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in some respects one of the least interesting conferences, because

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>all too often it felt like a foregone conclusion, to

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're at now, where there is a true log jam.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>We have a log jam dan of five one loss

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>teams with Georgia and A and M and Tennessee and

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Texas and LSU, and there are all sorts of different

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>combinations that are possible as a result of this loss.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So I was blown away by how well South Carolina

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>controlled that point of attack. I'm even more impressed that

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they were able to win this one going away in

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the way that they did. I at one point, you recall,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thought about trying to throw some money on the live

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>line on A and M. I was like, there's no

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>way this is going to continue on this path. A

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and M is gonna find their way to call back

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>into this thing, right They didn't. They didn't. It was

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a professional win by South Carolina.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it felt going in as somebody who had happened

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>to have a very good week picking games. I'm a

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 3>big data guy, Ty, you're a little data guy. It

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>felt like a scheduled loss for A and M. I

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 3>told you I'm a low information pick low information. I'm

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 3>a high information Yeah. Non better. It felt like South

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Carolina or excuse me, Texts A and M received specific

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 3>directions don't go swimming in. There are definitely alligators lagoon

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 3>and texts A and M said, I don't know. I

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 3>think the title's misleading. And then guess what the lagoon

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 3>was full of. In Williams Brice, they both of their

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 3>lines got beat up. They play surprisingly undisciplined football on defense,

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>like they're using the crowd energy to try and motivate themselves.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it was Shamar Turner is playing like not

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>an inch out of control, but a couple feet out

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 3>of control, and that the A and M defense, for

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 3>as strong as they've gotten over the course of these games,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina got under their skin. Whether it was on

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 3>the ground, whether it was when they got pressure that

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Leonoris Sellers was lofting it into the end zone. I

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 3>think was Josh Simon who had the big game for

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina through the air and honestly beside it was

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 3>one long run from was it Daniels who spelled Levon

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 3>Moss for texts? A and M couldn't run the ball

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>at all against the South Carolina front. Marcel Reid looked overwhelmed,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 3>not fully his fault, for sure. The offensive line themselves

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 3>were overwhelmed in this one.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But this was.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Texas A and M entering the lagoon and making those

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 3>mistakes early on that they you just can't come back from.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 3>If South Carolina's offense with even short little dump offs,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the tackling was awful for Texas A and M uncharacteristically so,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and so it was just maybe it was the letdown

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 3>moment after the nice win over LSU. Nice is probably

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>under selling it. Really impressive win over LSU, the way

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that they came back, but it was just a tough spot.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm not down on A and M. I

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>think that was just an impossible task, a near impossible

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 3>task to ask of them going into again. Definitely Alligator

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Lagoon and so really really interesting conversation we had about

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina and what their ceiling might be when fully

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 3>healthy Lenora Sells is in there and they're playing at home.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 3>They are really fun. I wish there were more to

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 3>their offensive line in terms of consistency. I wish there

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>were more in terms of the back end of that

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>defense in terms of consistency. But there's a lot there.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 3>There's a really solid foundation. If they can keep recruiting

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like this and finding those guys up front. I don't know, man,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 3>They're awfully fun.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They are fun. And look, this has been by any measure,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and incredibly successful season so far. Yeah, because I recall,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as is ever the case with South Carolina, at the

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>start of the year, you look at the schedule and

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, there's no chance, right, there's no chance. I

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think I even said if they make it to a

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>bowl game, there's just like no chance of them making

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a bowl game. They're five and three right now, they

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are five and three. They close out the year with Vandy, Mazoo, Wafford,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and Clemson.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 3>That's just a fun TV show, right, That's a fun

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>stretch of the South Carolina TV season.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Three of those games are obviously tougher than the Wafford matchup.

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna beat Wafford, They're gonna get the six wins,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to go to a bowl. Yeah, what is

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling? We know Vandy's beatable, Vandy's plucky.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 3>They can win all those games for sure. Where's the

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Clemson game?

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Clemson games at Clemson.

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Tough but not flying across the country All.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Metal Bowl closed out the year. Clemson's beatable. Missoo, we

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>know Missoo's beatable. Yeah, a nine and three South Carolina

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if everything goes according to the plan, oh Man.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Nine and three, maybe get that tenth in a bowl

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 3>game and get just an unbelievable amount of offseason juice

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>in Columbia could be a candidate.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Shane Beemer would have to fight off Oklahoma with a

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stick if that happened, Just go to Oklahoma. Tennessee also

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>struggled a little bit. If we're talking all things SEC

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>struggled with Kentucky. Of all teams, Kentucky led ten to

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and half. Then Tennessee came storming back in the

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>second half. They outscored Kentucky twenty one to eight. Kentucky

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was down five starters to injury. Then they lost Brock

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Vandergriff to a hard hit. They also lost Barrion Brown

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>during the game, so it should not be understated how

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>banged up Kentucky is.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>But and yet, well, I was gonna say, and yet

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Kentucky was in this one late.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>They were in this one late. They had momentum. Tennessee

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>could not stop missing field goals. They missed three field goals,

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 1>including one early in the third quarter. They get the

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>ball back, Rock vander Griff loses a fumble on the

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>ensuing drive, sets up Tennessee for go ahead score. Suddenly,

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the game's fourteen to ten. From that point forward, they

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>had all the momentum Tennessee did. Yeah, so it continues

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what I think is a frustrating season for Kentucky. They're

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>four straight week now where they failed to score points

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>on a drive inside their opponent's five yard line. Feels

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like Penn State, frankly feels a little

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>bit like USC feels like there's a lot there. Yeah,

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky has yet to score more than twenty points in

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>an SEC game this season, so the offense is not

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>really taken. Kentucky's got a lot to sort out on

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the tennis seaside, though they close out with Georgia, with

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.959
<v Speaker 1>U tepping with Vandy and big games coming up.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 3>Definitely.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Nico finally threw from more than two hundred yards against

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an SEC opponent, but.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Was not really like super decisive. Kentucky did a good

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>job taking away the deep ball. He had a nice Nego,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>had a nice rapport with was A Kitzelman the tight end. Sure,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 3>he had a sensational game. Dylan Sanzman was one who

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty much drove the train for Tennessee. I would say

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 3>a continued apprehension from Nico at times that improvised well

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 3>because he wasn't necessarily on time going through his progressions

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and hitting somebody in stride and then the pass rush

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>would collapse the pocket, but he would, you know, scramble

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 3>to pick up a third and three first down or something.

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 3>But there is not that it doesn't seem that there's

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that comfort and confidence to just like hit a guy

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 3>up the seam in rhythm right now. Credit Kentucky, of course,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know there's he's just he's taking a

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>tick too long still and then rolling out and then

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 3>hoping to find somebody during a scramble drill a little

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>bit too often.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe Tennessee, Yeah, can make the SEC title game

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>if they win out and if Bama beats tells you

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this weekend.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 3>If Bama beats LSU, Tennessee winning out means wins over

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Georgia and Vandy anybody else on Tennessee schedule. I forget

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 3>you went through it just recently.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So if that happens, let me pull it up

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>here quick. They would obviously have the win over George,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>WHI would be a really nice win, and that would

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>knock Georgia from out in front of them right in

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>these standings here other teams that they have beaten. They

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>beat Alabama, that was a big one. They beat Oklahoma,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a common opponent with some of their.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and George and Vandy are both on the road.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Vady both in the road. They lost their one

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>SEC game to Arkansas on the road. And that's sort

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of why we start looking at this and wondering, right,

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>who has to lose to whom in order to give

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>them an opportunity. But this is what you want if

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a Tennessee fan, you want you want to win

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way, and then you want, of course,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for Alabama to knock off LSU.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you want if you're a Tennessee person, you want

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the defensive effort to continue, and you want just a

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>little more in terms of pop. I think I have it.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Poll got on that offense, just a little more in

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>terms of big plays, a little more in terms of

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.959
<v Speaker 3>opening things up on the outside, a little more of

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 3>that confidence just in terms of what they have left

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>on their schedule, what they might have moving forward. But

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>all things considered, to just have the one loss pretty

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>nice place to be.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The one issue that we did not discuss at all

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on the episode was the ACC title race. Right we

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about Miami. We talked about the Miami duke game

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because that was close until it wasn't late. Miami ended

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>up winning that one, put up over fifty points, ended

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>up winning that one going away cover the point spread.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Louisville knocked off Clemson thirty three to twenty one on

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night and Pitt knocked off or excuse me, SMU

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>knocked off Pitt by a forty eight to two twenty

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>five score. Yes, where things stand right now is both

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami and SMU undefeated in conference both five and zero.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Clemson and Pitt need to win out and get some

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>help if they want to have any opportunity to get

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>into that ACC title game. I think the way things

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are shaking out right now, it is unclear to me

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's going to be the ACC or

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the Big twelve getting two teams in. I had for

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a long time been in the camp that I think

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the ACC is going to get the two teams in.

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Big twelve is only going to get one.

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I think Notre Dame's going to get in. We're obviously

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have our G five team, and then the

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>rest are going to be split up among the Big

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ten and the SEC. Yes, starting to question how that's

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>going to shake out now. I think I need to

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>see more data. We know that the Big twelve is

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>going to come down to the wire. I think it

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>depends a lot on how some of these teams look

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>from this point forward. But let's start with the Clemson game. Yeah,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as we were recording, we were looking at the score

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on my laptop thinking, what the hell's going on here? Yeah,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>what is going on here? Because Louisville had a seventeen

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to seven lead at half. They were up twenty six

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to seven after the third quarter. Clemson did try to

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mount a late rally, but it was too little, too late.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>If you look up and down this one, Dan Louisville

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>blocked two field goals, one in the first half, one

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the second. Their defense a defense, by the way,

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that to I think a fair it's not unfair to

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>say that Louisville's defense to an extent has underperformed. They

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't end this game, No.

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 3>They did not.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>In this game. They had plenty of opportunities to showcase

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>how good they are. They had a really big fourth

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>down stop late in the third quarter. Clemson went for it,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think from their own thirty three yard line something

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. They did not get it. They stopped film

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>off up up the middle. This was a nice showing

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for Louisville. I don't know if it poortends anything for

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of Louisville's season, where they go in the

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bowl season, what it looks like moving forward. But there

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>were individual moments in this game, not just on defense,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>but Tyler Schuck sort of flying through the air doing

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>his summer assaulting Superman into the end zone to emphatically

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>score and give Louisville a little bit more of a lead.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>This was a loss for Clemson that really caught me

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>off guard. I've watched a lot of Louisville this season.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I genuinely did not see this one coming.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>It was the high leverage moments and the line play,

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 3>especially the defense, But honestly, I thought the offensive game

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>was called a little bit weird. Certainly when you look

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>at the two point conversion versus extra point decisions that

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Dabo was making late where he pointed to not going

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 3>down eleven because the card said to kick two extra

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>points and hope for at least one on sidekick.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm just not terribly bright.

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And they attempted two of them. They attempted two of them,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Louisville recovered both.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just don't think the percentages are terribly in

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's favor for that type of plan. But I don't know.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>It just seemed questionable to me. But everything was questionable

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 3>about Clemson. Their defensive performance was not good. They got

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 3>pushed around a ton, especially up front. Defensive line was

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 3>on skates. Neither of these quarterbacks were particularly great and

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>consistent downfield through the air, Louisville just made better decisions

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and executed in big moments in a way that Clemson

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 3>simply couldn't. And so I guess the best possible thing

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 3>now for the ACC would be I mean, because it's

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 3>what SMU and Miami aren't kind of a collision course, yep.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>So in regard to your saying you know who's going

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 3>to get two teams in the ACC are Big twelve,

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess the worst thing would be for BYU to

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 3>run the table and give somebody a second or third

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 3>loss in the conference championship game. So you have one

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 3>BYU team standing apart and then an easily dismissable second

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 3>or third team whatever within the Big twelve, whereas we

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 3>could just have a conference undefeated SMU with a loss

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 3>to BYU. So that's an interesting conversation to have down

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>the line when there's a head to head with SMU

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 3>and BYU, if they're being pitted against each other in

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of playoff selection, and a Miami team that has

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>been good but inconsistent and undefeated. Right, So Pitt certainly

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 3>did not look to be of playoff caliber or of

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 3>conference championship caliber given their performance against that SEMU, which

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 3>we can get to and we talked about the Miami

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>game already that they had you know, long dry spell,

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 3>but did what very good teams do and pull it

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>out and improve over the course of the game. I

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I want to see Clemson again

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 3>in this ACC championship game.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think you're gonna. I mean, Clemson would

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>need to run the table, would need some help to

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have any shot of getting into that title game. Their

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ability to do so is limited because they close out

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with Roague games against Virginia Tech and Pitt the Citadel

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and then a non conference game while the Citadel's non conference,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but a Citadel another non conference game the pull Metal Ball.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>As we mentioned earlier against South Carolina, there are just

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough teams above them in the standings on this schedule,

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to need help from the outside. They've

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>got a big one against Pitt that will be meaningful

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for both of those teams I think, to decide in

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>effect the third place finisher in the ACC regular season.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But as things stand right now, with any kind of luck,

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>right if Miami, if SMU find their way through this

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>thing without hitting a snag, they're going to be unbeaten,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to be playing for the a SEC

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>title game now. Between by Miami and SMU, Miami definitely

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>has more in their path that I think could trip

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>them up. I think it looks pretty clear for SME.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the reasons why I like them

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to win the conference, or to at least be in

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>contention to win the conference at the start of the year.

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The schedule sets up real nice. I think it's harder

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>from Miami this point forward. People who listened to this

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>show know I'm on record saying that one of these

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>games is going to jump up and bite it me.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It could be this week, could be this week. We'll

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about that on Thursday. The other one, though, if

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about SMU, so, it was Louisville thirty three

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Clemson twenty one. SMU beat Pitt forty eight to twenty five.

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They led thirty one to three at half. They outscored

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Pit twenty four to zip in the second quarter. Pitt

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was down thirty four to three before they scored their

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>first touchdown in this game. Damn So. This was a

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>dominant effort from SMU. Of Pitt's four hundred and fifty

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>three yards They had three hundred of them after half,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>when they were already down four scores. This was a

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>game where pitt was uncharacteristically bad at tackling, at least

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the early part of this game. They had some

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>early tackling miss apps that led to big plays for SMU.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That is what I think sprung them and gave them

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that momentum. Also, speaking of professional wins, Kevin Jennings bounce

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>back effort. Yeah, absolutely, bounce back effort on horrible outing

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a week ago looked really solid, really solid, big game

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for Brishard Smith, my guy, you know, I love.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Them, dude, Roderick Daniels all over the place.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>SMU rose to the moment in this game, and it

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was not a matchup that got a ton of national

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>attention for whatever reason.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>MM.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But here we are now going into week eleven, looking

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at the standing, it's clear as day it's there for U. Say,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it was there for the winner of this game to

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>just have this march into the ACC title game. Being

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so SMU one looking at schedules, they've got the clearest

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>path through. They really truly do. It's incredible.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe. September sixth BYU SMU was a game

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that we now look back on as having major majum

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 3>major playoff implications, right, And it wasn't a blowout, No,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 3>it was. It was a crazy close game.

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It leads us down a very very uncomfortable path frankly,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>where somebody in one of those post ranking interviews on

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the Tuesday Night rankings reveal shows is going to say

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at some point, quote SMU gets the benefit of a

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>close loss to BYU. B Why I cannot express this enough.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I did. I thought by you might win four games

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, four games.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I did not see this coming. So we're going to

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation. That game is extraordinarily meaningful. I wanted

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to write SMU off after they lost that game because

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>they looked horrible. But we now have the benefit of hindsight, and.

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about two teams who are brand new to

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Power conference football now having a result in which there

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 3>are major implications in SMU playing forever in the American

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 3>and BYU most recently as an independent. But certainly you

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 3>look back at some of those West Coast conferences they

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>were in wild that that is a big success story

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 3>of realignment in terms of programs who have invested and

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 3>have been patient and have hired well, especially in terms

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 3>of where SMU is with you know, going coach over

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 3>coach over coach for so long that RHT Lashly and

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 3>making a move from Preston Stone to Kevin Jennings has

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 3>paid off in a big way. It's it's crazy impressive

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 3>that these two teams are in this spot. And I look,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean Crowe, I was making fun of you for

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 3>your SMU talk you season.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>We have our story.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 3>It's on me.

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>We all have stories. There were ones that I was

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>way off on too, so it's yeah, I don't hold

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it against you. I love you like your brother. You

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>know that.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much time.

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>A couple other games here that we did not get

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to discuss in any great level of detail. You and

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I watched the edd of this Washington USC game, and

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to peel back the curtain a little bit, Yeah, what.

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Did I tell you?

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You foretold what was going to happen in this game.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean the universe foretold it, The Universe four told it. Yeah,

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but you were watching this game. They were about five

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>minutes left, and you pretty much said it to a

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>t USC's gonna have the ball late. They're going to

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to score, They're gonna have an opportunity

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to win, and they're gonna find some way to blow it.

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Sort of happened to him again, didn't it.

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course it did. This is USC on the road.

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 3>This is USC with Miller Moss making some absolutely sensational throws.

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>This is USC leaning on the run game super effectively

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch. It is a Washington team who was

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 3>able to play good enough defense. I think it was

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Carson Brunner who came up with the big, big pick

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 3>when it seemed I think USC was up twenty one

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to twenty at the time and driving, and Washington was

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 3>able to completely silence that drive and take away any

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of momentum, and then the goal line stand. I

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>think it was run, run, pass, run on fourth and

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 3>goal from the one for a loss, and then more

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 3>Lincoln Riley saying, you can just see how close we are.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Anybody who's watching knows how close we are. Losing late

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 3>always is not close. It becomes a certainty at a

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 3>certain point if you're in a position to win a

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 3>game on the road late always and are always losing.

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think I saw some stat that Eric Gentry

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 3>is still leading the team in sacks and he hasn't

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 3>played in five weeks. That they just don't get to

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback. That I don't think.

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Again, this is me paraphrasing. I don't believe a defensive

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>lineman has a sack for USC this season. I think

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 3>they've all come from linebackers or dbs. It's either this

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 3>season or in Big Ten play or something. So as

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 3>far as the defense has come in terms of tackling,

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 3>in terms of getting off the field, this defensive line

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 3>is very limited in terms of tangible pressure and results

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 3>and improvement. It's wild that this USC team just does

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 3>not get home.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Ever. Where do they go from here?

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Don't know?

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Man, Like, what is what is the grand plan? If

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you're Lincoln Riley and you have to give a power

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>point at the end of the year to your boss

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and outline what the philosophy is the what the strategy

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is for getting this team to the next level. Right,

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen them try to do it on the

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>back of incredible individual efforts I e. Kleb Williams, and

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly they have had talented skill position players at USC.

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>The last couple of years, that's not anything new for SC. Right,

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like the defense is improved this season.

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.959
<v Speaker 1>They're better, if nothing more, at tackling, but it still

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.399
<v Speaker 1>feels like they are a few ticks short of where

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to be. Is it a Miller Moss thing?

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it a play calling thing? Is it a Lincoln

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Riley thing? Is it too complicated to pin on just

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing? What should the strategy be? Where is it

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>falling short?

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean just finishing games? I mean that's generally the difference.

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 3>That USC was in a position to be a disappointing

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Maryland team, a disappointing Michigan team, decent Minnesota team, but

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 3>the game was in their grasp, and now a four

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 3>and four Washington team. It's away from home, but it's

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 3>high leverage moments. It's having a plan. It seems like

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 3>it might be whatever it is that they are or

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 3>aren't practicing in practice and just being ready to be

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>on the same page for these big moments. I don't know.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes those excellent teams you watch them and you're like,

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 3>this is second nature. Right, They've practiced this so much

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that they can't screw it up. And USC it was

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 3>receivers getting open. It was pass protection. It was Miller

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Moss not being able to pull the trigger, laid on

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 3>that fourth and I think it's fourth and four. Yeah,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 3>deep in Washington tear. They're just, for whatever reason, they're

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 3>not ready to succeed late.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Ever, I'm curious to get your read on who impressed

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you this weekend. Not so much from any of the

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>games that we have discussed here over the last half hours.

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So maybe going back to some of the games we

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>talked about on Saturday. I have three in particular that

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to call out. The first is Arizona State. Yes,

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>shout out Jonathan Pope, who sent us a tweet asking

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:33.919
<v Speaker 1>when are you guys going to talk about Arizona State.

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not lost to me now that we now have

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>dueling big twelve popes Jonathan and Peter Oh.

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 3>I was hoping this was going to be like your

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 3>psych like psich, We're still not going to talk about

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 3>ASU and set up a nice little teas there continue.

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel compelled to talk about ASU because I was

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so high on Oklahoma State. Yeah, so this conversation is

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>half what the hell is going on with Oklahoma State

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and half how about Arizona State? Arizona State is Tame

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Bowl eligible. They were a bull elder six and two.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>They held the ball for damn near forty minutes. They

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>held Oklahoma State to two hundred and seventy yards, including

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just twenty five from Ali Gordon. This was a really

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nice cam scattabo.

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Come on, man, scataboo. Yeah, what are we.

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Talking about here? I got scat on the old doodle

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>alerts on the list. I had to put him on

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the list. A great effort on the ground and through

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the air. He is powering this team. I like Sam Levitt,

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I like Kenny Dillingham. Seems like could

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>be a fun dude to have a drink with, you know,

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I is he old enough? Probably not.

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:43.919
<v Speaker 3>I think I saw he was the first coach born

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 3>in the nineties to take a team to Bowl eligibility.

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Ever, ASU closes out with UCF on the road at

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>k State home against BYU and on the road at Arizona.

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's what's interesting about that slate M no idea what

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to expect from UCF at this point. Now it's a

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 1>winnable game. It's at home, on the road at K State.

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>K State's be difficult. I would still see difficult. I

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>get able.

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that was a tough spot against Houston, but yes,

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 3>by not not impossible, BYU.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Not impossible, tough, but not impossible. Arizona. They're going to

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>beat Arizona. Arizona's a mess right now. Yeah, what's interesting

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about that slate? Though, even if they're not going ten

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to two, maybe the most consequential November in the Big

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Twelve because they've got both k State and BYU remaining. Yeah,

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if they were able to pull an upset in one

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of those two affairs, that would have real significance elsewhere

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the conference. Ash's not going to win the conference,

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>but as you, with a shot at both of those

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>teams is interesting and makes the Big Twelve all the

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>more fascinating just from a TV show standpoint. So, I'm

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>impressed in the manner in which they won this game

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>forty two to twenty one. This was a bludgeting good

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for them.

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 3>This is let's be clear, though their schedule leaves a

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 3>lot to be desired in terms of how we evaluate

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 3>their quality. Agreed same with Indiana saying with a number

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 3>of these teams, I guess he was not different in

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 3>this regard. But also if they're a quality team. They'll

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 3>draft off of the opportunity truck. And they have a

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 3>collapsing Utah. You have a collapse in Kansas, a collapsing

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma State can't lose to them, and quality teams don't.

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 3>As you didn't.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>They didn't win this game twenty three to twenty one

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at the gun. No, they won this game going away,

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and would I would hold that same argument up for Indiana,

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because there is such thing as a killer instinct. Again,

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a team is not necessarily only as good as it's scheduled.

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the old Boise State argument, as I've made years

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and years and years now. Right, the schedule does not

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean you are a weaker team. It is just

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:56.240
<v Speaker 1>another data point.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 3>And Boise would schedule to be fair to Bois, they

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 3>would schedule Georgia, they would schedule again, they would schedule

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 3>I think Virginia Tech was one of those teams. Maybe

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm conflating it, but Boise would go out there and try.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>This is another instance, though, of a team that's just

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the bullligibility at this point.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they were decimated after the Herm Edwards thing

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 3>in terms of their roster just going out and getting

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 3>as many guys as they could and it's coming together.

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're ahead of schedule. That's all you can say.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Good on them.

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed with Houston knocking off Kansas State. They showed

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>real resolve late, getting too late scores in order to

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>knock off the Wildcats. That was nice for Willie Fritz.

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm also really impressed by Iowa. I mean I was.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Brendan Sullivan was my answer to your question.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Why why Brandon Sulivan? Why do he impress you?

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Because he looks like a real cornerback and you don't

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of those in the Big ten all

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:45.720
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>He was like a real quarterb Forty two to ten

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for Iowa.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 3>Forty two to ten. Multiple running backs went off. Their

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 3>offense looked continue to continually modern, you know, just spreading

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the ball around more and more, making decisions at quarterback

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 3>faster and faster. Brendon Sullivan used his legs efficiently. The

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 3>defense was opportunistic against a real bummer of a Wisconsin offense.

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 3>If we're going to be clear, like it's very difficult

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to see this Wisconsin offense going anywhere significant as currently

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>constituted and as currently run. It's just it's such a

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 3>disappointment and disjointed Wisconsin offense. It's difficult to squint and

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 3>see what they're going for the next year or two.

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And so Iowa did what again, any quality too very

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 3>good team should do against a Wisconsin team like this,

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.240
<v Speaker 3>went straight at them. They were varied, they finished drives,

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 3>and they left no doubt.

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Any other teams, any other games that you want to

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>discuss here, We've got doodal words, We've got your reverbs

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>from week ten that we still need to get to.

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I can give you a brief outline of what's to

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>come in week eleven. Kind of a weird week, but

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a fun week, I think in front of us here

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>as we get into Saturday. But anything else, Dan, any

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>other points that you need to bring up, I.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Don't think so. It makes me look forward to week

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 3>what's next week? Week eleven? Yeah, even more. I still

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 3>want to go back and watch a couple more games

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that I that I missed out on before the preview

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 3>show this week. But no, I think I think that's

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 3>just about it. I mean I sort of underlined ole

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 3>miss performance against Arkansas as being of top ten twelve

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 3>quality nationally and who knows the way it shakes out

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.959
<v Speaker 3>with the end of the SEC schedule. Weird things have happened.

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Even though you've claimed ole Miss has done though.

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're done so with respect to the SEC, they're

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not winning the SEC. They get a win over Georgia,

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they're back in the playoff conversation.

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they have to be.

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>They have to be. They have to be back in

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that playoff conversation. But they got to be Georgia. That's

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you can't lose again and still be

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in this thing. They'd have three loss at this point,

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and I am very skeptical that this is the year.

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we say this is the year every

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>year for ole Miss, and so as I look at

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that matchup, not to give the game away too much,

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>there are real issues I have with their ability to

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>go toe to toe with Georgia.

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they have a path rush and Carson Beck

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:30.280
<v Speaker 3>gets very sloppy and unhappy and skittish with the pass rush.

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Did against Florida. He did against Florida.

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's Georgia's second straight game away from home.

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm skeptical, and we'll find out at three

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty Eastern on Saturday. I am skeptical, but to that point,

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:46.959
<v Speaker 3>they're not done. So not done.

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So so they're not done. So let's do dudes. Let's

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>do dudes. I've got Jacob Rodriguez from Texas Tech Dan

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen tackles, nine solo, two pass breakups, two sacks, two

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tackles for lost, big day or Jacob Yeah? Isaac Brown?

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you go ahead? No?

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 3>Keep going?

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Brown from Louisville had a big game on the ground.

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Noys from Colorado State kicked a sixty yard field goal.

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a thing. Now is a thing. Dylan Rizzik

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>had a great game for UCF. Is the backup to

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the backup better than the starter. Who's to say, Rockets

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Sanders or South Carolina campskataboo. There he is there he

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is twenty three for one to fifty three on the

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ground and a touchdown, four for one twenty one and

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.240
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns through the air. Jordan Watkins from Ole Miss.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Somehow we miss this stat line record center eight catches,

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty four yards and five touchdowns. Mike

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>out Wide and of course Mari and Hampton, who we

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>did mention on the abbreviated Saturday recap that we did

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>went off against Florida State, anybody else, anybody else that

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I missed.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 3>Bryceon Washington for Baylor ran for I think right around

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 3>two hundred yards anytime you can had a last second win.

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:04.479
<v Speaker 3>I think the kicker was hoisted after Baylor was able

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to get that win over TOCU. But Bryson Washington was

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 3>a major major reason. Treyshawn Holden stepped up for Oregon

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 3>against Michigan. Though the game we were watching, Tes Johnson

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 3>leaves the game I think on the first drive and

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Trey Shawn Holden downfield against again beleaguered Michigan secondary. But

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 3>he stepped up really nicely in this game against Michigan,

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, come back coming back nicely from the

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty dumb awful incident against Ohio State, so they're gonna

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 3>need him, and he stepped up as always.

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We put the call out on social media later in

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the day every college football Saturday to get your dude suggestions,

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>your dude nominations. There were many other awesome individual performances,

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but these are just a few of our favorites.

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 5>Dan.

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we also got a bunch of calls from the

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>verballer hood at eight five to five verbal three. We

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>did not have a chance to play those because we

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>did not have the ideal audio setup on Saturday night,

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>But our guys, Shay dutifully went back through.

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Did you say dutifully?

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Dutifully?

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was obviously that's a word. But I thought

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you were gonna go with dude duty full Ley. I know,

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I know, I was hoping that was intentional.

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Week ten reverbs have listen.

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 5>Damn Hi, I hate college football. Hey boys, This is

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 5>Adam from Minnesota.

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Brian from Virginia. Hey guys, it's Ween calling

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 2>from our local community, Craft Fair, and I just have

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 2>one question for you. Did Vanderbilt just win the Iron Bowl?

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 4>I just watched elite loser he Freeze use one of

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 4>our final two timeouts while there was two minutes one

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 4>second on the clock in the fourth quarter. Let me

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 4>say that again, while we were losing, we use a

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 4>time out to save one second.

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I graduated from Purdue, I married into an Auburn family,

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 2>and my.

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Team's just lost to Nerds?

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it basketball season?

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Watching Ryan Day and James Franklin out Day and out

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 5>Franklin themselves should only be done under the heavy influence

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 5>of drugs from Atlanta, Georgia calling but nine Windiana. Look

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 5>we got boys, coach to Olyncian.

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 3>This is Jeff from me Flanston.

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm currently walking back to my car from the stadium early.

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 5>The only joy I can find in my pain is

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 5>the fact that Michigan is also losing. Go Green.

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>We may have lost the game, but let's not worry

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>about those details.

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 3>It's all about the friends you make along the way.

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Great to see you guys in sunny Annaba. Theme of

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 2>your defending national champions at least for a little while longer.

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 4>If winning is a skill, Brent probably could really use

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 4>some practice.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 5>And the words of the great Pete Webber, who do

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 5>you think you are?

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I am youcon baby?

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Going bowling?

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's go commencing big twelve kind of Ball's they shunning

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:51.479
<v Speaker 2>racom tack? Hey, dan Ty, is it time for kids

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to talk to their parents about Nebraska football?

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 5>How they may never see them playing a bowl again?

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Skym rolled the boat. This team could be eight and

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 5>one if they didn't show against UNC and if they

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 5>didn't get jobbed against Michigan. But you know what would

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 5>it could have should have rose before nos go gos Hey.

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Jack from Louisville.

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 5>I have a boss who's a big Clemson fan, and

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 5>we killed them tonight because our defense set up.

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 4>Isaac Ground is a beast and my boss is a

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 4>deeply bad person.

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Jobsablog, dan Ty, It's Halloween and guess who just got murdered.

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Ulane with forty two minutes of possession. Visceraates Charlotte Rowaves

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>very good. Thank you, Shay, Thank you for baller hood,

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for those wonderful messages. We did meet Jimmy and Ann Arbor,

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who oh yeah, give us a call out there did

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not talk at all like that in person, I would add, now.

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And maybe there are two Jimmies.

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe.

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The one that we met had a very normal sounding voice.

0:52:57.280 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:52:57.920 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 3>By the way, a couple like weird results elsewhere. Rice

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 3>beat Navy like cleanly fired their coach and beat Navy

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 3>by a couple touchdowns.

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was one of my terrible bets of the weekend.

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I also had South Alabama covering the six when I

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>looked at the when I looked at the scoreboard before

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we hit record on Saturday, they were up big. And

0:53:20.360 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>then I woke up the next morning and looked to

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>see why didn't they cash my bet? And I realized

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>they lost? Right, that wasn't good. That was a bit

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of a weird result, or at least a weird finish.

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Slow ish start for Ashton genty but got going and

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 3>led the way for Boise. That was Friday night, slow

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 3>but eventual win for Army over air Force, which good

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to file away. You're gonna have those games. There's a

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of emotion obviously tied up in Army Air Force.

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Good good on them. How about Colorado State? Do you

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:50.919
<v Speaker 3>have a sense for what Colorado State is doing this year?

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Not a great sense.

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you're mister tiebreaker, You're mister standing. All of these

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 3>things are true. Colorado State hasn't lost a game in

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the Mountain West. Look at the standings. It's not a

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 3>slam dunk that it's gonna be UNLV Boise State, Colorado State,

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I believe, will technically play five non conference games because

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Oregon State technically is not a Mountain West team.

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Colorado State has beaten precisely nobody in terms of how

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 3>good these teams are. But I think that's they're either

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 3>four or five and oh within the Mountain West.

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're four and oh. Right now, yeah, they

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>are four and oh.

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Their schedule gets a little bit more difficult a little bit.

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean they have left.

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>They've got Wyoming, who's two and seven.

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Wyomy is not good.

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>They're on the road at Fresno, who is the best

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 1>remaining school, right.

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the team that's more difficult. But Fresno just lost

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 3>two They hung with Hawaii.

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Right and Utah State, which Utah State does have statistically speaking,

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst defense in college football right now.

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Colorado State, they've lost to Oregon State. They got

0:54:56.080 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 3>destroyed by Texas. I don't know if they've lost anything that. Yeah,

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 3>they've lost a third game as well, Colorado, Oh, Colorado,

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 3>of course. But in the Mountain West, they've snuck by

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 3>with single digit wins against Air Force San Jose State

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and then beat Nevada by seventeen, beat New Mexico by eleven,

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:18.359
<v Speaker 3>beat UTEP non conference by ten. Like they're just they're

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:21.919
<v Speaker 3>not crazy impressive, but they're they're painting the corners tie.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 3>The Rams are in an interesting weird position to play

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 3>in a postseason game right now.

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Boise, for what it's worth, has Nevada road

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>games against San Jose State and Wyoming. Then they close

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 1>out the year non conference against Oregon State. So things

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are setting up really well for boise to make a

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>run at the Mountain West, for Boise State to finish

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the season one lost, just that one loss being the

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>close one against Oregon right now projected to be at

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>least a fourteen point victor in each of their remaining games,

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So things definitely set on a nice course. Let's say

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to put Boise State in that G five playoff spot.

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And look there, this team is not going to make

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the playoff because they did lose to Boise State. Wazoo

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 3>is probably going to finish the year eleven and one, Yeah,

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and probably not be in a place of consequence because

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:22.399
<v Speaker 3>they just dumb bad luck. It's pretty great what we're

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:24.319
<v Speaker 3>seeing around this spar right now. Here's what we're looking

0:56:24.360 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 3>at for Week eleven. I mentioned it's kind of a

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 3>weird week.

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are four big games that I pulled out.

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The four that jumped to mind are Georgia at Old Miss,

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Alabama at LSU. Those I think are obvious I mentioned

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier BYU at Utah obviously the Holy War. There's a

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lot riding on that for BYU. Also, Colorado at Texas

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Tech suddenly has a lot more meaning attached to it

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because Colorado's there, Colorad's got one loss in the Big Twelve,

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and if things break accordingly, they could find themselves playing

0:56:55.360 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for the conference. Those are I think the most significant

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with respect to standings immediate future. But there are a

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other interesting games. Florida at Texas interesting.

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Ah, not anymore ish because of Djail Lagway.

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, at least interesting hypothetically two big brands. Miami

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>minus eleven at Georgia Tech. Is this one of those

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 1>games where Miami trips up West Virginia at Cincinnati since

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>he a four point home favorite. We've got Clemson at

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech. We've got Michigan at Indiana. Indiana favored by

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:30.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen points against Michigan.

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 3>You saw that.

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I Alwa stayed at Kansas. This was not a

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>game that I really pulled out thinking it was going

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to be all that competitive given the way Kansas started

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the season. But Kansas is slowly kind of like a nuisance. Yeah,

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I Alwa stayed on the road. Who knows. South Carolina

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at Vandy suddenly a very interesting matchup one that I

0:57:55.800 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think has real consequence for the aforementioned SEC tie break?

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 3>What about what about Mississippi State Tennessee in a letdown

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 3>look ahead spot Mississippi State Tennessee.

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, also got Florida State Notre Dame Washington at Penn State.

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the proper wideout game. I guess eight o'clock

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on Peacock, Maryland at your Oregon Ducks. You see f

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at Arizona State. Let's keep the train rolling here with

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Arizona State.

0:58:24.600 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Baby, can't wait.

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of really interesting matchups this week. Hope to

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have you there with us on Thursday when we preview

0:58:34.040 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the games. Make sure you hit follow or subscribe.

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Also check out, of course for ballers dot com. That's

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>where you can go to get in on the action,

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>not just to vote in the Verballer Top twelve poll

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>every week, but take part in our play the Run

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Board game where we pick. Last week, I think

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we picked sixteen games against the spread. This week we

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want to have sixteen games. We're going to introduce some

0:58:55.000 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>player props as well, but if you are looking to

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>play for fabulous prizes, we introduce a new one every week,

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>so go to verbowlers dot com or play rund theboard

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com for a little bit more information on that.

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I agree, by the way, just to file away, ty,

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 3>because we do this generally on the Tuesday show with

0:59:13.480 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the in week games. Yeah, the return of Tuesday Wednesday Action. Yes, Yes,

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we have Iowa traveling to La to play Ucla Friday

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 3>night eight pm, well APM Central, nine pm Eastern, and

0:59:29.920 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 3>my math tells me six pm local. And I'm going

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 3>to tell you something. If you're thinking that, even if

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 3>UCLA is having kind of a resurgencies and wins over

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Nebraska and Rutgers, if you think anybody is getting to

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Pasadena on a Friday night at six pm, you are

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 3>out of your mind. It's going to be a very

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 3>strange looking Rose Bowl for Iowa, Ucla, Rice, Memphis all

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden has a little bit of juice. I

0:59:55.160 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know. Memphis lost to Utsa, Calwake Forests to four

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and four. Maybe that gets a little bit weird. App

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 3>State Coastal four and four, and even like the Mac

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Games right now, everybody's like kind of evenly matched up.

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 3>It should be a nice, hopefully week of distraction for everybody.

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll take it with college football. Yeah, let's take it.

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there. Dan, Thank you one, thank you

1:00:18.040 --> 1:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>all for your patience. You know it took us a

1:00:20.440 --> 1:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more elbow grease to get all of these

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>recaps out there to talk through what transpired in week ten.

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Next episode, we start looking forward into week eleven. These

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>last couple weeks are gonna be nuts, so buckle up,

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>get ready for what amounts to a great close of

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the season. We'll be back on Thursday. We're not just

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>going to preview games. We'll react to the playoff rankings.

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll do the whole thing. For that guy over there,

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for my self, Tie Hiled Bred,

1:00:47.760 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks again for downloading, listening, supporting. We'll talk to Elsey.

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Stay solid, peace,