WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off May 14th, 2024 (EP. 811)

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to Fantasy Grows MLB. This is Leading

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Off Live, brought to you by Bet three six five

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Bet five bucks. You get one hundred and fifty and

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bonus Petsuendia do what but only when you use the

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>promo code leading Off. It's me Joey p that's the Welsh,

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's you the Peanuts and the Cracker Jacks. Who

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>makes this show? Go Welsh. We've got a lot to

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get to today. We've got some injuries. We've got the

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>guy back to back home runs after not having any

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>home runs. I think someone named Torko Sin's getting red hot.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go, and of course the good, the bad, the ugly,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of wagering, a little bit of home

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>run calls and Welsh. I kind of want to start

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with the home run calls.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>No, yeah, sure, surprise, surprise. Hey, look that Joey called

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>multiple homer. I don't even know what to do anymore. Like,

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just just into the wind. You know what, we

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>might be getting back to a wheel. We might need

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>to get back to a wheel to get me started

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>here in the near future. We'll see if we get

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>how many how many likes do we usually get on

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>these videos. If we double the likes, we'll bring back

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the wheel. And I'm gonna start just four likes.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh I don't know. I don't know how many likes

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we get. Like like the videos, like the videos. Subscribe

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros MLB because remember, if you do, we're

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>still giving this away. I think we're gonna end this

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. I've been talking to the gang. I think

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's time for something new here. We still got the

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>trophy Smack Fantasy Baseball Championship Belt available. Subscribe to the channel.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Comment on any video. I guess we should say like

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it and don't forget to ring the bell of notification,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know if you are the big winner. But

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>well let's start there, because sure, Adlie Rutchman hit not one,

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>but two homers, so it was a beautiful night there.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>H Burrios, Like you know, he has the numbers against

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Burrios for his career. We were talking about Burrios being

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys where you know winter was coming,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's been certainly coming for him lately. But I

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of just want to throw the home run board

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>up here already. So I'm back up there, baby. Top five.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. Let's go. Passy still got seventeen, but I

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>went from the right side of the board to the

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>left side of the board. And I can't wait to

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>win that sign flat Junior bat because when I do,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna break into a million pieces and light it

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on fire and then I'm gonna come c promo in

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the history of professional.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh you know what you should do? Then I know

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I got the best idea. Break it into a million pieces,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>get the address of everybody else on the home run board,

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and send them little pieces. Yeah, send every single one

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of them a piece. That's what I would do.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like a V. Somebody got a G

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or someone got like an RN.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And O in one sign every single piece and be like,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>here you go, you filthy animal. So yeah, I don't know.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I I'm trying with the home run calls. You know,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>yesterday I had Oneil Cruz and he got a double

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and I bet him to get two total bases. You know,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I like to bet my home run calls on two

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>total bases. But I just say, I can't get there, Joe,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You've been red red hot. I'm just gonna have to

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>sit at the bottom, just looking up at everybody, please.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Far away from the board though, I mean, you were

0:02:58.120 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>scratching double dish its.

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 2>So I think I'm at nine right now, so I

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 2>think I have to have a big day, and I

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>haven't had a big day in a while. So that's

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>why the wheel might be coming back very soon.

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am. I am the heel of this program.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the ultimate heel move for sure. Choltoy Minaga

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>is talking about the great performances. Eight strikeouts for him,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>five shutout innings, no decision unfortunately against the Braves, but

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>still another really good dominant I mean, let's just say

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it dominant. That's what it is. He's been dominant that

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>where gets thrown around way too much in sports. He's

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>been dominant in fantasy baseball this year and in real

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>life baseball. So yeah, another great performance.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>And I wanted to mention eighteen swing and whiffs in

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that start, which is unreal. He continues, it's so crazy.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I need to like really get into like the heat

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>map of the zone and everything, because he was a

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety six percent fastball or splitter. He just continues to

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>do that thing, which is insanely crazy. He just deadens

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 2>that splitter out, so it ends up. You know, you

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>can probably manipulate it so it has the maybe sinker

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>or maybe has the change up type of feel. That

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>thing just absolutely comes out. Thirty three inches of vertical

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>break was max in this start. But it is fastball,

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it is splitter. He had ten whiffs on the fastball,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>six on the splitter, a thirty six percent whiff rate,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent CSW. I just can't help but always

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>look at it and go, oh, okay, this is gonna

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>keep continuing like this. But you know, you take one

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of the better stuff, plus like fastballs out there, guys

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>can't hit it, guys can't pick it up. And then

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you have a secondary pitch that you know you can

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>probably move around the zone and that has the feel

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of a fastball coming out. This is guys cannot get

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 2>on top of this. I do think there's gonna be

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>a point soon that that is gonna start happening.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But we are getting to like six pitch to one

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ers like that just doesn't happen, you know, is not

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>This is not the dead ball era, This is not

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>the late sixties. It doesn't happen. By the way, Fred Dinger,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>who takes care of our stuff over there early home

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>run stuff side says Welsh, you have ten, so you

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have double digits.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>You're right, You're right, there's great, all right, all.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, so don't worry about it. George Kirby held the

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Royals three hits, six strikeouts, seven uh Andres Munos struck

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>out three guys and bitch one of the third scoreless.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So a good game there for my Seattle Mariners. Brady Singer,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>who was in Welsh's trade video last.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Week, I want to say, yeah, trade away.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope you listen. Four runs, five innings, a

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>loss for him against that same Mariner team, Mitch Keller,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>another good start for him. So Mitch Keller throws a

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>complete game now, six more shoutout, innings, seven ks. So

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at Mitch Keller, I'm looking at Jared Jones.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking because they signed Mitch Keller for extension. I

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>remember in the off season here, so Keller Jones schemes.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates of the future. Welsh are looking pretty good

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Where are they standing? Where are they in the standings?

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'll tell you where they stand? Okay, you talk,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll stand.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Because yeah, this team yesterday, one thing we probably shouldn't

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>have opened up with I don't know if you saw it.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Brian Reynolds was five for five. I tuned in, She

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>oh it is okay, Oh yeah, probably the three up,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>three down.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I work so hard every morning. I get up.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>The roosters crow. I get up and I do the

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>show sheet and look at it. He didn't even look

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>at it.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>By the way I'm sitting.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates are nineteen and twenty three. They are two

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>games out of the Wildcard, five and a half out

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Central.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of my point right there, is like

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>this is that that Royals feel. Everyone's like, hey, the

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Royals is going to make the playoffs and stuff like that.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>The Pirates are in that They've got an all star closer.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 2>They've got now a three man rotation that is not

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the tippy top. It's not going to compete necessarily with

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the Mariners, but it's not not going to compete better

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>than what the Diamondbacks are putting out in their front three.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You've got Brian Reynolds to lead the way. The team

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>went five for five last night. When I tuned in,

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I was looking for a cruise to hit that homer

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 2>at the very end. Brian Reynolds dead center Homer for

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 2>his fifth hit of the day. Oneal Cruz. Whatever people

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 2>get on about him, he's hitting around two sixty. He's

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 2>doing his thing. You have pieces, you have pieces to

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>be competitive. I know this team probably doesn't make anything impactful,

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go and make some impactful move or whatever, but

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>it would be the type of recipe where go and

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>trade a little bit of your minor league, go get

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 2>one good at least one good veteran. I would love

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to see this team go get some vet pitcher to

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>put into that rotation, and then one more hitter. I

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>just don't know if they will be competitive, but they

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 2>are in my mind, like you know, at the tippy

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>top of the like more exciting young team.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>A good veteran bat would be a way to go. Okay,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask Top. I say showtime Imanaga every single time?

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Why is he keep saying there's an a at the end? Boys?

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>What are we saying wrong? Tyler? Every time we talk

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about Imanaga, somebody and I think it's Tyler as there

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was that. You're not saying it right. It's not show Teaga.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We say it right every time?

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not?

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't listenery Joe's come out early in

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the show today.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not one to question the pronunciation unless I'm you're

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the last guy, because I you know what the worst

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>part is, I tell people this all the time. I like,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I will have it completely right. I saw that Michael,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>get out of here, Michael, and and then I will

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I will, like in my head, start to question it,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and then I'm done. As soon as I start to question,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>even if it's right, I am over it and it's done.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Showing as I see everybody talking about him in the chat,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>blow and save for him. Look, I'm not worried. He's

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in a rough patch. It's gonna be fine. Closers go

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>through this, Pictures go through this, Players go through this.

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Edward real quick. The reason people are up is because

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 2>read Garrett up on Diaz. Because of read Garrett is

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's been doing some big stuff. So I

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 2>think that's why people get all up in arms about

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Edwin Diaz Blown to Save? Could it be time? Like

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that's where people are going?

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you high? Maybe much money they have invested in crazy? No?

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree. I'm just telling you what the people

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>are thinking. I'm a spokesman for the people, a man

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of the people. The Welsh has always been.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Whoever thinks that I'm telling you is high, Okay, it's

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not even it's Look, I live in the New York,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey tri state area here. It's not even a

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>blip on the radar here about that. So you could

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>put those fantasy wet dreams aside because it ain't never

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. Okay, would take an injury for him to

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>lose this job, and barring that, nothing else.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>The the the chat with their they're they're poking with

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 2>the stuff.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm Managa. You're a Naga. He's a Naga too. Wouldn't

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>you want to be an Aga two? I mean, come on,

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's chotteau. I mean, I don't understand what's going on.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman not showed to Monaga with three four with

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the double and two homers. You should have pick Bregman

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last night. That would have been fun. You troll him there,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a good time. Let's get to more fun,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just for fun. Spencer Torkleson, I love how Angelo took

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this personally too at the chat when I said Torkleson

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is getting hot doesn't make him hot, and he did

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>quotes on me Welsh, but come on, we're having fun.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Guy's been terrible. Give him a break. He's got two

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>homers in two games. Let's get excited for Spencer Torkles Okay, please?

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Can we?

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? You know what the really tough thing about. I mean,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously you have the former track record which you could

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>work off of, but in May he's hitting two point fifty,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>he's got those first two home runs, the strikeouts haven't

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 2>really kind of fallen down, and there's just not quite

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>enough of any data to work with. The thing I

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>hated about the Torkalsen thing in general was his hard

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>hit rate was so low. His barrel rate was so low.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>There's kind of a like it can't maintain at this level.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the one positive that I've tried to approach with him.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>But you know, he had kind of a higher babbit number.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>His k percentage in general's kind of lower, and his

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>rolling expected well, but chart is starting to move up

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, so that's good. But we don't have

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>enough of the data to be like, oh, hey did

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the barrel percentage? Are the hard hit numbers starting to

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>make that turn? We don't quite have that. Could Torcosen

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>turn it back around, Yeah, sure, but he isn't gonna

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 2>be worth it.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Holms after the break last year. You know, I brought

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that up yesterday and I'm bringing it back up again

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>today because it's not impossible that he gets the thirty

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>again like he was. He had one last April. I

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're two too last April. So it's not like

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have an awful start to the season. His

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>batting average was lower last year than it was this April.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's just he's another one of these guys. You

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just circle him on your draft board, and if you

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have the draft or you do draft him, you just

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>realize April's gonna suck, like the year's weeks of the

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>season is gonna be bad.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I will tell you. Like he has been

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>chasing in a bad way. His chase contact percentage is

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>almost ten points lower, fifty four percent last year forty

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>five percent this year, but his zone contact percentage is

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the same. So all he's got to start doing making

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>a few better decisions. If he starts barreling, then the

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 2>hard hit numbers are gonna come up. Yeah. Well, I'm

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 2>just saying his chase numbers are not bad, so that

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that's like the positive. His actual chase numbers are the

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>same as always, but he's not making as much contact

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 2>when he's chasing, but he's making the contact in the zone.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So stop, you know, getting outside the zone. Start making

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more contact and maybe we'll get that

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 2>original version. So I don't know if though, what's available

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>out on the wire is worth Like if Tourkosen were

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, somebody had cut him and you could go

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and pick him up. My advocating to go and pick

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 2>him up over what player, That's the thing like I

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>think I was at.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Not to drop him unless you're in shallow leagues. That's

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what I was advocating, And you can check that out

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>out Fancy bros dot com. As a hold right up

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about that, Walkee Penguin brings up a good question here too.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Have we ever heard Welsh pronounce my last name?

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I said all the time piece of Pia.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there you go. I mean I feel like, yeah,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there you go. See Kelly wanted to throw the goatlet down.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Kelly, I know how you I know you see me

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>as this big, bumbling, stupid idiot as everybody else does.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't pronounce anything, but like as I stumble right there,

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>like I can get it. I can have I have

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>some things. It is the constant internal chatter that ruins,

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and that is what creates welshisms. There is a constant

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 2>chatter that is second guessing the things that come out

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of my mouth in pronunciation, and that is what causes

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 2>me to say insanely stupid things. But I can say

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>piez a pia.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>There you go. How about Gabriel Moreno, can you say

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that solo Homer for him three walks.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't cut wife wire release, no longer need Gabriel.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Marcin See I'm buying I still. I mean, he's always

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>been a good contact guy. Maybe again it's low start,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Let's get to the rookie lookie here, because

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this is really what I want to talk about. Another

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>prospect comes up, another prospect failure. It feels like so

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>far mansarto for two with a walk, he's in a

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>buck fifty eight three for nineteen, he's gonna walk a

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>double eight. K's how we're feeling about the man child

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>here over the first week.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, clearly not good to the point there's just

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>not enough great data to tell us any story. I mean,

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the data we have is not good. The hard hit

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>rate is trash, the expected batting average is trash, and

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>he's struck out. So the things you have to go

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>back on is like what he's done in the minors.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>He has a really good hitting profile. It's interesting. I

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>wish we had this stuff for the minor leagues because

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're going to talk about it today.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But Baseball Savant just released their bat tracking data, which

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>is really fascinating because it gets it. I don't I

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know the full applications yet as I've been playing

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>around with it, but you know it's dealing with bat

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>speed versus bat length. And then you know they've got

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple of terms us it Yeah, will blast and

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and all this type of stuff there is, there's a

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a blast stat and.

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So it talks about the length of it talks about

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just trying to motion.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the motion of the ocean.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But you said, no, you said things. You said it

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about the length.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Yep, the length of the swing and the speed of

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the swing. Uh huh. And then there are I know

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you're going. There's just a couple other terms in there.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>They use called a blast It's like a blast rate

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and they turn for it and squared up.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe, they call blast were caught.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about data. Listen, how fast you swing it is,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 2>how much you passed it? Joe. I don't know what

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to tell you.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We were already supposed to talk about this today.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>The only thing I was getting at is if we

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>had all of this data in the minor leagues, the

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>thing that works well for a guy like Torkosen is

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Torkalsen doesn't have a big long swing and he shortens out.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And one thing we learned from some of this data

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>is the shorter swing with a faster approach that's gonna

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>have better results for the most part. That's tell people

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 2>my whole life anywhere. Everyone, Oh Welsh can't pronounced this.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe can't even get through this. Yes, but I think

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Vantario will be find long term, but for

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>this season, I don't know. I think how he's performing,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be really hard for them to stick around

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>with or with Manzaro. But he's probably still got three

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 2>weeks until Kwan comes back, all.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, that's the whole thing. When Kwank comes back,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that might make things a little touch. Jason Vargas, I

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>just traded uh Ober and McGill for a ros A Reina.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Did I do a good uh? Jason? I think he

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>did a great uh. To be honest with you, like

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Ober is a good picture and and McGill has been

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>really solid in the rehab starts. But still a Rosareina

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is an all star. Rosarina is a guy, you know,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick? Yes, oh yeah, took a lot

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>out of me. What's the X plug numbers on the

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>did did the ex plug come out in some of

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>those new uh after?

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I wish we could. I wish we really could get

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>X plug on there.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like if that's I mean, what are we doing

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't change the dame of this show? From

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>leading off the blastery, there's Wonky Penguin for the wind.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They have better blast rates on sletters, but I'm not sure.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, bless this place. This is our happy place.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lopez, I'm gonna do this to run Homer

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for him. I want to talk about auto Lopez for

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a second.

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's talk about Auto.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know He's twenty five year old kid

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the slash right now three thirteen, three seventy one, six

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty six. He's got three homers in this steal in

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty five played appearances. He is rostered in like ten

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues? Should he be rostered in more? Is

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this a guy that actually might have something to contribute here?

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Which I know for the Marlins we're talking about contributions,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of few and far between. But is

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Otto Lopez one of these guys that is slowly kind

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of sneaking up on the radar? Maybe?

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so on the A's Abraham Toro is a guy

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 2>that I've never really been super into. He's always been

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a super utail player, and he's just

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 2>getting time. He's getting, you know, the ability to get

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>in there, have some at bats and have a little

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 2>bit of success because there's no one out. We always

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>see this from these teams that get rid of good players,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and obviously, you know, the Marlins getting rid of a

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>rise kind of starts that process. I think they're going

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to release a few other players. This could be one

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of those speculative ones in the near future. He had

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a little I mean the the data so far from

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>this year and what he's done at a major league level,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it's actually pretty good. Really high hard hit and barrel percentage,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>low k rates. There might be something. I think it's

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>probably more speculative than anything else. But yeah, keep on

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>keep on a wire as playing time keeps, you know,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 2>being given to him. And yeah, I could be interested,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think he's gonna He's a watch.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This guy, watchless guy like or if you're in a

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team league, maybe maybe a speculation guy. You know,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>throw a bucker two see what happens. Also, speaking of speculation, Welch,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I called you Welch for a second.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I thank you, Thank you, Jo Welsh.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh. Yeah, that was so fun. I cannot wait now

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for these extra stats. Now now I wanted every show.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you have to bring all the blast rates and

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>everything else. But you were not the little league field yesterday?

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But you were you? Where were you yesterday? Because I

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>saw some of the footage. Can we talk about some

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of the players on a presentation?

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Where the hell were you? Well, we're just say something worry.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>After that last thing. I don't know if I've got

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>anything left. That's a lot out of me.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I was over at the Purious Sports

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Complex for some rookie ball Arizona Complex League, and this

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>was really cool. You can check it out on my timeline.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>When we're talking about prospects, you non tend to be

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>like big prospects that are out here outside of far

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 2>like far away guys. He's a rookie level guys. But

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the biggest name that's probably out here and there'son a

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>complex league is Felman Selston with the Seattle Mariners. In dynasty.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>He has floated around being a top one hundred prospect.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I can firmly tell you this guy is a top

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred prospect. And I was able to capture his

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 2>first major league homer and it was pretty awesome. Got

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to see a couple of bats. He actually hit two

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 2>in that one. This go on my timeline yesterday.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Adams. If what if you called him for a home

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>runs too, I don't know, can.

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 2>I start calling complex guys be amazing? But it was

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>this and it was just incredible about this high fastball

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 2>that he had just comes up on slams at dead center.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>It's around four thirty. You can check out the video.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And someone said something really interesting that there was like

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>this reminder of like Raphael Devers in his swing and

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Felman I just would repoint out to

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 2>people like he wasn't seen in this necessarily top one

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred range, like guys like Ethan Solace had moved past

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>him Leo de Vries of the Padres. If you're in

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>deep dynasties, Felon Selson is a really really interesting talent.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Body's gotten bigger switch hitter, mashing homers, steals bases. I

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna be probably unanimously a top fifty to

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 2>even top like thirty five fantasy prospect by the end

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of this year. So just letting everybody know, and you

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>can go and check out the homer on my timeline.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where I was, Joe. If you're keeping tabs on.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Me, there you go. I like to keep tabs on you.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Vapors, I think kind of nails

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it here with this comment. No more prospects, big misses

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>all season so far. I think that's how everybody feels

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jackson holiday fatigue. I mean, Paul Skens was fun,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, a little underwhelming based on expectations.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Just find Jared Jones has been great.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Jared Jones has been great. You know, I don't know

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if we want it. But in terms of prospects that

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have gotten called up this year, we were excited about

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>kirs Dad that hasn't come to fruition. Holliday was off

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the charts, that did not materialize. Man Zardo hasn't materialized.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Paul's hard baseball is hard, but it's also I feel

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like in some ways this has been a weird year

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because we've been spoiled in the last few seasons where

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these rookies have come in and basically

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>been as advertised. You know.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>But I said earlier, dude, I was like, we have

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>absolutely we have the expectations of last year of I mean,

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone kind of forgets how bad Gunner was at the

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>start of the year, and then he bounced back and

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>was incredible in the back half. Horvin Carroll was an

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 2>absolute unicorn in that world. And that's also why, like,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>that's why you don't hear me go like, yeah, cut

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 2>this guy, cut that guy, cut all the guys. Like

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I've tried to be careful about it. I think it

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 2>is worth speculation on the game's top talent that's coming up,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>but there's no guarantee. So when you guys ask those questions,

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to mitigate the risk as much as possible,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 2>as much as you possibly can. And unfortunately, this year,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 2>more than ever, we're definitely seeing a success rate that

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 2>is going down the two.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean it looks Ellie. Last year was fun, like

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I know, there were some bumps in the road, but

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there was some some high points. So he'd hang your

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hat on see yes, said his moments there McLain, who

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Razors and Michael we're talking about the chat. Uh, clearly

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some really good stuff. Junior Cameranaro is gonna save it everybody.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Junior Cavanaro maybe James.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Wood, maybe James would. Yeah. All those other ones they stumped.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But the new ones they're.

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Coming if you ask. But this is not different. If

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you go back and listen to the shows in February,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I said the same thing. The guy that you asked me,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a cheerios. I was like, for me, it's cavan Aro.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>It was Camanaro in February, it's camin Aro. In the

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth of May, up and down, three up and three down.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Brian Reynolds five for five two doubles a Dinger. Oh

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what a good day. Jose Ramirez two for three, two walks,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two steals. Very good night for him and William Contreras

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>three for five with a run score there for the

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>brew crew three down. Yamamoto wasn't good. I'm sorry everybody.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the L on that. I'll take the W

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Rutchmen Dingers, I'll take the L on the

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yamamoto four runs and five and two thirds. I mean,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>come on against the Giants, what do we do it here?

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That lineup stinks right now? The oscarnandez Oz for five

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>three k's there you go, a little uh hat trick

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for him and Matthew Libertor, which you should, by the way,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>see a doctor before you start taking. Libertor was charged

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>with four runs.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you struggling with your blast rate? Get yourself a

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Libertory.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It may cause your blast rate to increase. They also

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>cause death or similar feelings of depression injuries. Austin Riley

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>speaking of depression injuries, Austin Riley, MRI showed nothing more

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just an inflammation. Everything's okay. Hora Polanco came out of

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the game against the Royals with tightness of his hamsterring.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not good. Speaking of not good, also a hamsterring

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>issue for Rhye Hoskins. So that's a problem there. He's

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna have an MRI today. Sounds like an AI to me,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>my friend, what do you think?

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I don't love that. I really really hate that.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 2>But guess what if it is? Tyler Black is here

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to save everybody back again? Another guy back in black.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>There you go, back in black. And also officially jungu

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Lei put on the IL. It's a tough open for

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.959
<v Speaker 1>him to his major league career. I feel like injuries,

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the performance issues, last rate not being what it should.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Be means liberatory.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He needs a little bit extra there. You know what

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I need?

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Welsh?

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Fine, I need Tuesday's best bets the day with Joey

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>p and the Welsh. Make sure you're placing your wagers

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over at bet three sixty five using that promo code

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of leading off. When you do bet five bucks, get

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty COMPONUS bets when you do twenty

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>one or over. In Kentucky gambling problem called one hundred

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gambler or one hundred bets off. In Iowa, terms and

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. We love a good terms and conditions here

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on the program. Some good and bad yesterday a bit

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of a spottiness there. The Dodgers did win, Yamamoto was

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>not good. So gonna get back on track today with

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Louis Cardinals. I want them minus one and

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a half on the run line at plus money Welsh

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty five. Sunny Gray's last start wasn't good,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but everything before that was great. Gray got bumped because

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of the weather that one day. I think it threw

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>him off, gave up a couple homers. I ain't worried

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because the Angels lineup is not good and Reed Debtmers

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is worse. He's got an ERA over ten in his

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>last year start eat. So I think the Cardinals can

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>win this game by two runs. I think they can,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>so give me plus money there. Cleveland and Texas going

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 1>over on this one. Jack Lder's on the mound, so

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go the over this bad boy just for that.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>That's enough for me to take the over in this

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>game at minus one fifteen and then logan Gilbert Tonight

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>over five and a half strikeouts minus one thirty four.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So the juice is a little steep but if you

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>want to put the same game parlay of that together

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Seattle Mariners on the run line, actually on

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the money line, I think that would probably be a

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>good way to boost it up a little bit. Yesterday,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>really good outing there we talked about at the top

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of the show from the Mariner's pitching staff. So hopefully

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this continues to roll for them against Kansas City again

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>another same game, partly again right now at the money line,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners and Gilbert. With that five and a half

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts over, you can get up to plus one fifty six.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's your exact number there on that. So my

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 1>favorite bet of the day though is the Cardinals and

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunny Gray. So I'm going all in on that one. Welsh,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you going all in on today on Tuesday's

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>best bets of the day.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I am actually joining you in that Cleveland run.

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>There a lot of first five stuff for me today.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>As I do, I'm going to take Cleveland first five

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>team total runs at two and a half over that

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>is plus one ten because as you said, Jack Lder,

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>he's on the man. As much as I love me

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>some Jack Lighter, he's given up four and seven earned

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 2>runs respectively over his last two starts, and he didn't

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 2>get past the fourth in either one of those, so

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I get plus money for three runs scored through the

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>first five for Cleveland. Yes, so that's one of my favorites.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with the Arizona Diamondbacks and Cincinnati Reds

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 2>first five under total runs, which is at four and

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a half. Slay Chacone has actually been pretty dang good.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Green when the walks don't get too crazy, has

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>been solid, so you know, I do worry that one

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>of these pitchers let's us get out of hand, but

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>overall four and a half, I get minus one fifteen.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I like that one. Then I'm also going to take Baltimore.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>This is an early one. I think it's popping up here,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 2>first five to be up by a run, so it's

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 2>essentially their run line through the first five innings. Baltimore

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>first five minus one ten. Those are my three best

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>bets and I'm feeling good hopefully cross fingers because it

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 2>was a perfect three and oh yesterday on the show.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 2>And my extra bet that I added make it four

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and o, which you could have seen on the Betting

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>pros app or you can go see on the Betting

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Pros app. If you want to cross check me, go

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 2>check it out bettingpros dot com slash Welsh or bettingpros

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash Joe.

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And download the Betting Pros app. Start betting smarter, not harder,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>see all the best lines at the best houses. That's

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>what you gotta do again. It is the greatest tool

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen. I've turned a few of my friends

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>onto it who just started recently getting into some of

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the betting stuff with baseball and some of the things,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, this is the greatest thing ever. Makes

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>everything so easy, And I said, yeah, that's the point.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're trying to do here to make things

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>easier for you. Prop bet Chi Chi comes out every

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>morning too. If you look at the projections based on

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the lines, you can go whatever you want, choose your

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>own adventure, or you can just have some fun and

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>make some picks with us over at bettingpros dot com

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>slash leading Off where you can join our group. But

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that'll do it for us. Here on the Best Bets

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of the Day with Joey p and the Welsh. All right, Welsh,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the home run calls because that's where

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we're left. So when last I left you, I called

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Ali Rochman. He hit two yesterday, so I expect two

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>from the guy that I'm picking today. And that man's

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>name is Jose Ramirez. That's right, Jose Ramirez. Today I'm

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for he's walking's seeing the ball, well, hitting the ball?

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Give me Jose Ramirez, Welsh, who are you taking today?

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Before we have to go back to the wheel.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I actually I almost want to change. I'm not going to,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but uh race.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be the worst. If you change, is going

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a bad thing.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I know. And Ra because Razor just brought up a

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 2>good point. He said Josh Naylor. And boy, I'm feeling

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 2>a Josh Naylor one.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I almost took Naylor. You should do it just to

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>troll me now.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but here's the problem in my face. When I

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 2>need to get back right, there's only one man that

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>can get me back right, and that is Gunner Henderson.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>No Gunners, I am taking Gunner Henderson today. Get me

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>back right. I think he has done this three times

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>now for me on bad runs. Gunner's going to restart,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>get me back to today, maybe get me back on

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the board. Otherwise we might be bringing a wheel back

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 2>this week. Maybe all right, I love the wheel.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The wheel was great and the wheel was good to

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>us right away, right the second wheel gave you a

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>high run.

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it was the first wheel that gave us

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the first or second? Yeah, for sure? Oh, I don't remember.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it was my true Maybe it hurts people,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe maybe has even more drama in it. Very

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>possible if you like drama and home run calls, and

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of course if you like extra baseball with us tomorrow,

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>well join our discord fancypros dot com, slash Chat and

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welsh and I tomorrow after the show will be on

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Discord live taking your questions. We finally figured out

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>why the audio doesn't work for me on discord anymore.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We figured it out. Now it works. There's one more

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the home run board, just for great prosperity,

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because my god.

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Think why Joe wants to make sure everybody can see it.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, should I get two more today, I'll be in

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>second place hopefully if Passey gets shut out. That's That's

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm thinking. That's what I'm thinking about. But again,

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the channel, drop your comments, but you got ten.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you have so much less than me.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>We've been on the board one. I don't think one day.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh you were on the board once. It was a nice.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Day the first day.

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So we enjoy all of you. Thanks for hanging out

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with us, for all the baseball and all the stupid

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>forget tomorrow, extra baseball, extra stupid over on discord cleaning up.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Will be there and make sure you subscribe wherever you

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast so you can also check out the site.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Go with me and the Worm, I'll be.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Even more of a reason to check I'll be on

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>with I think it'll be portions of just me and worm.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I think speak and they just but I don't know.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>You have to listen to the whole show. I'll be

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 2>there some portion of it right there.

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It is the cycle and checking out every single Thursday,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>dropping for you. That'll do it for us, But the

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>story of the game goes on for Welsh. I'm Joey P.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time. Gives watch your glass rates. Peace,