WEBVTT - Tech News: Google I/O Highlights

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I love all things tech. And this is the tech

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday May one, and we're gonna concentrate a

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>lot on Google for much of this episode. So, last year,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Google canceled its annual io event for developers because of

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. This year, the company held a virtual event

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in which presenters appeared on camera in front of a

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>small audience of Googlers at the Google Plex in Mountain View, California.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to go over some of the announcements

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from that event. And first up is Android twelve. There

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of updates to Android's operating system that

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we're announced and it is now public beta, but it

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>will launch for real zs this fall. Some of the

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>changes are to use your interface and they're largely cosmetic.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, the color palette of the operating system is

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>more customizable in Android twelve, and you can set the

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>OS so that it will choose a color palette sourced

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>from whatever image you choose as your background wallpaper. So

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>on my phone. I've got a picture of my doggie

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Tibolt as my wallpaper, and presumably if I run Android

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>twelve on my phone, then my notifications and stuff will

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have a color scheme that reflects the colors in that photo,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of neat. There are tons of other

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>updates besides the cosmetic, however. One is that there's a

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>new privacy dashboard and Android twelve, which lets you see

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>which apps are accessing your phone's various features and how

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>frequently they do so, so you can check to see

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which apps are checking on the your location, you know,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>really frequently, or making use of your camera or your

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>microphone or whatever. And you can also use the dashboard

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to revoke access to those features should you wish. So

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look and say, oh, this app is pinging

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>my location, you know, twenty times a day, you can

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>revoke access from that dashboard. It's Google's way to give

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>users more insight into how their phones are harvesting data

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with these various apps. And don't get me wrong, Google

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>does this as much or more than anyone else, but

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think this is a really nice feature. Other

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>updates to the OS include a feature in which the

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>clock on the screen saver screen will change size depending

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>upon how many notifications you have, so as you clear

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out notifications, the clock gets bigger. That's a pretty handy

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>way to see if you've got messages waiting on you

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on your phone. One of the cool technologies Google showed

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>off at the event was projects star Line, which is

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of three D video conferencing technology. In the

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>version we saw at the event, there were examples of

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>two people each sitting down in front of a large screen,

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and there wasn't really any indication as to how far

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>apart these people were in real space. I mean, maybe

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they were across the country from each other, or maybe

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they were in different parts of the same building, but

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>either way, the setup included depth sensing cameras that could

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>capture light fields and then send that data over to

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the other screen while doing the same thing for the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>other side. So the effect was that the image you

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>saw on screen appeared to have real depth to it,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>almost as if the person you're talking to on screen

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually sitting right in front of you in person.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Which is pretty nifty stuff all by itself. But what

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I found particularly fascinating is that Google developed a compression

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that can handle this kind of application in the

0:03:55.280 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>first place. High definition camera with depth sensing capabilities is

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going to generate a lot of data and transmitting that

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>data in real time so that you can have a

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>video chat with no perceptible lag time. That's a big challenge.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Google says it developed a way to compress the data

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>stream down to a factor of one hundred, so one

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred times smaller than the uncompressed size. The demonstration was cool.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>It was also prerecorded, I should add, but there's no

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>word on whether Google is going to roll this out

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on any sort of meaningful scale, or if this will

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>remain more as a demonstration of really neat technologies that

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>might find their way into other applications in the future.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Something that is rolling out is another collaborative work tool

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>called smart Canvas. Google's demo showed team members working on

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a project together in real time on a Google platform

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that incorporates stuff like Google Docs and Google Sheets. Also

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>allowed users to have a video chat going at the

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>same time, so that people can talk with one another

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>while collaborating in real time, and the tool incorporates some

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of Google's AI features as well to to help communicate

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>clearly and avoid pitfalls. So the example they had in

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>their video was using the word chairman in part of

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a presentation and the AI suggest changing it to chair

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>person to avoid using a gender specific noun. So that

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was one example they gave. Google isn't a stranger to

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>creating collaborative tools. I still remember the old Google Wave product,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>which was interesting but somewhat confusing way back in the day,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and that would allow multiple people to work in the

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>same virtual workspace simultaneously. At the time, it was kind

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of hard to imagine use cases for Google Wave beyond

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how I was using it, which was to build out

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a rundown for live shows. But smart Canvas has a

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>more straightforward approach to collaboration that I think is pretty

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to understand. I wasn't super impressed with the interface

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>when I saw it, but um, it was, you know,

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of stripped down. It wasn't like flashy or anything,

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>so maybe simpler is better. I don't know. I'm also

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>notoriously bad about using collaborative tools, so maybe I'm not

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the right one to comment on it. In addition, Google

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>showed off an AI app called lamb DA that was odd.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So this AI uses things like voice recognition, and natural

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>language processing to interpret language. Then it generates responses and

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>makes it very conversational, and moreover, it can generate responses

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as if it were something else, as opposed to you know,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the Google Assistant, which is just this kind of ephemeral

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>AI assistant. In the demos that Google showed off, they

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>had Lambda answering questions as if Lambda were a paper

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>airplane or the dwarf planet Pluto. And this makes me

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you had Lamb a pose as a chicken,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>would it finally explain why it crossed the road, Because

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have been asking about that. It

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>really was interesting to think of an app that could

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>presumably put itself in the role of different things and

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>then answer questions about it, including bits in which the

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>AI would make the equivalent of small talk only as

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if the AI were you know, the dwarf planet Pluto

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it was neat and it really shows how

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>far we've come with natural language processing and the ability

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to create AI programs that can seemingly converse fairly well.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Though Google does say that this is far from perfect,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still a pretty early build. It feels like another

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>big step forward from the demo we saw a couple

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of years ago in which a Google assistant program made

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>reservations on the behalf of a user, and it seemed

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be an actual assistant, like it called up a

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>restaurant to make reservations, and it was impossible to tell

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was an automated program. It sounded like it

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was a person, which is pretty nifty. Google also had

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>some announcements about where os that's w E A R.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just known as where, and didn't really talk

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>about the Pixel Watch. In fact, Google also didn't talk

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about pixel phones. Really. There was a distinct lack of

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about hardware at all. They didn't mention anything about

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the rumored Google design chips that are codenamed Whitechapel. You know,

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like Apple, Google is apparently moving toward developing its own

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>processors rather than relying on stuff that's made by other companies.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>None of that was brought up in the IO event,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>at least not as of the recording of this episode.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Other stuff Google showed off included phone apps that are

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>better at working with different skin tones for stuff like

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>white balance that has traditionally been one of the big

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>problems with Google photo apps. They simply didn't work as

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>well for people of color, which is one of the

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>many ways tech can turn out to have a bias

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>against certain groups. And Google demonstrated a cool technology that

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>could create an animation from two different photos of the

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>same scene. So let's say you take a picture of

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>someone who's standing in a particular pose and they're standing

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in front of like a landmark of some sort, and

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>then they make a different pose and you take a

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>second photo. With this new feature, Google could create interpretative

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>frames between those two photos and create a short animation

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>moving from one pose to the other. It's kind of

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>creepy in a way because Google is literally creating new

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>images based off the input of the two reference frames

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and then joining them together. So it's creepy and cool

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, kinda like most of my friends.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And Google showed off updates two maps which will now

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>include more relevant information as you move through areas. For example,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the new maps will show you restaurants that happened to

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be open as you pass through town, so you're not

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>getting a notification about, you know, Billy Bob's Best b

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>b Q when Billy Bob's happens to be closed. That

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do you much good, and maps will alert you

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>when areas are getting busy and help you plan routes better.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's best to stay at the office for another

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes and that will end up saving you forty

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>five minutes of sitting in traffic, for example. And there

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are some cool a R features in Google Maps that

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they showed off, like virtual signs that can pop up

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in your view that tell you where certain landmarks are

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in relation to where you are. Oh and they will

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>also help drivers pick the most eco friendly routes, routes

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that will have fewer stops and starts to them, or

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fewer locations where you know you might have to break

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly or drive up a steep hill, which is kind

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of a neat feature. So it may not be the

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fastest route to your destination, but it would be at least,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.359
<v Speaker 1>in theory, a route that would generate fewer carbon emissions

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 1>because of the nature of the drive, which sounds kind

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of chill to me. Oh and if you have a

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>BM double you you might be able to unlock and

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>start your car using your phone as a digital key.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Android twelve will support digital key operations over u w

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>B and NFC protocols. But so far, BMW is the

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>only automaker confirmed to offer compatible car models with this technology.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>It is another example of how smart devices are replacing

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>various other things we typically use, from payments to car keys.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But in non Google news, the cryptocurrency world has seen

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic drop in value over the last two weeks.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Since May twelve, the overall market, which includes cryptocurrencies like

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin and ethereum, as well as doge coin, the joke

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that really got out of hand, and numerous others, the

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>market has dropped in value to the tune around eight

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars as I record this. Many cryptocurrencies are

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>experiencing a brief climate value as I record this episode,

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So it could be that we just saw ma of

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>drop and now the market is recovering. Or it could

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>be that what I'm seeing is just a blip and

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a bear market in which valuation

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>will continue to drop further. No one is really sure,

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and the big part of that is that the value

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of many of these currencies largely depends on whether people

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are buying into them or selling them off. Buying cryptocurrencies

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 1>decreases the supply, at least for most cryptocurrencies, which in turn,

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, drives up the value of the remaining cryptocurrencies

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that are in circulation. Selling off cryptocurrencies to convert them

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:41.359
<v Speaker 1>into cash, that increases the supply and thus the value decreases.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a bit more complicated than that, but those

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>are the basics. So does this mean you should rush

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>in and buy up cryptocurrencies while they are still relatively

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>low or at least, you know, lower than they were

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. I have no idea. We might see

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the market plunge again. Heck, this could be the big

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>getting of a relatively long bear market where values dropped

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>week after week before they recover. Or we might already

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be in another upswing. It's really hard to tell, and

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>chances are anyone who is giving you hard and firm

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>advice has a vested interest in the outcome. So if

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>someone you know is stressing that, hey, now is the

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>time to buy, a good follow up question for that

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>person is how much money do you have wrapped up

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in cryptocurrency? Because it could be that the person telling

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you to buy is desperate to see those values go

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up so that they can recapture some of the wealth

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they had been accumulating prior to the market downturn. Just

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>be careful, is all I'm saying. I mentioned in the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Google Stories about how Google's photo app is getting tweaks

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to address negative biases and the app has with regard

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to people of color. Twitter is doing something similar. Twitter

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>had been using a tool to auto crop photos, using

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I to identify the subject of a photograph and then

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to crop the image so that it would better fit

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>within Twitter feeds, particularly on mobile devices. But in use

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it was shown to work best with pictures of white people,

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and it would crop those images fairly effectively, but it

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>worked much less well for people who weren't white. Not great,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So now Twitter is abandoning the auto crop feature. The

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>company tested the algorithm for gender and race biases and

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>concluded that in fact, the algorithm does have problems. Now

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's mobile app will show full images in the Twitter

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>feed and will only crop photos if the pictures are

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just too tall or too wide to fit on screen,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and then only doing that in a pretty standard way

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to trying to auto identify the subject of

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the photo. Once again we see how bias can work

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>its way into code, even unintentionally, and I think Twitter

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>made the right move here. Perhaps in the future the

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>company will have an improved auto cropping tool that won't

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>show the same tendencies towards bias, But in the meantime,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's better to have nothing than to have a tool

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that works really well for one demographic and not so

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>well for all the others. Finally, byte Dance, the parent

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>company that owns TikTok, has announced a change in leadership

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that I find interesting and fairly refreshing. Co founder jeng

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Yi Ming says he will step down as CEO to

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>take on some other role in the company. So in

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a message to employees, he explained that he felt his

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>strengths were in areas outside of managing people, including ideation

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and data analysis and that kind of thing. He also

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>said he's not a very social person and that he

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>felt that byte Dance needed a leader who would be

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>able to take the company to new places. So, in

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, he was saying, I might have been the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>right person to get things moving to where they are,

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not the right person to evolve the company

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>from here. Co founder Liang Rubo will take over as

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ce oh, and I've seen this sort of thing happen

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with a few companies here in the States. There are

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>some entrepreneurs who absolutely love the experience of launching a

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>new company and then having it grow to a certain point,

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but beyond that they tend to lose interest. Their strengths

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>lie in those early phases of getting a company off

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground and establishing a presence. But once these companies

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>reach a certain scale, the entrepreneurs find it less interesting

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or outside of their wheelhouse of skills, and so they

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>look for ways to move into other roles. And I

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's a healthy thing. Not everyone is made to

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>grow into these leadership positions while the company itself is

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>also scaling up, and a transparent transition of leadership tends

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a sign of a healthy company as opposed

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to some of the revolving door situations we've seen with

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>companies in the past. Analysts don't expect this change in

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>leadership to have massive consequences for daily operations of either

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Byte Dance or TikTok. And that's it. That's the tech

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, May one. I hope all of you

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are well. If you have any suggestions for topics I

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>should cover in tech stuff, reach out to me on Twitter.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff hs W

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.