WEBVTT - Microsoft, First Republic, the Debt Ceiling, and Watches

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk tech. The tech geeks are out

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in force today. MSFT put up some numbers. Let's bring

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in anaag Ran and man Deep Singh, our tech analyst

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. And we can't get rid of these guys.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They keep sticking around. So on, rog, let's start with

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you Microsoft. I mean, this is a two trillion dollar

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>market cap company and stocks up seven percent today. Talk

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to us first about the earnings and then second about activision.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, Paul, you've known that I've liked this

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>company for many years. But frankly, going into the quota,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I was a little worded that they were going to

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>not only miss, but actually guide downwards. And the exact

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>opposite happened. Almost every major product category performed better compared

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>to last quarter, and you know, increasing revenue run rates,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>So I have no words. I mean, they just blow

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>it out of the park.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, all right, activision. Activision is big, I mean sucks big.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Not hurting Microsoft, though, I should point out that, you know,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft was up like eight percent in the pre market trade.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Then the headline came across from the UK that the

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.279
<v Speaker 2>regulator there is going to bigfoot this sixty nine billion

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>dollar purchase and Microsoft is still up seven percent.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's fair, but they are up on you know

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 3>numbers and not lets you know, not that it had

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>nothing to do with the you know, the acquisition in

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 3>our vue. But this is going to be a big

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>problem in terms of how this thing gets settled. Now,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a lot of court fighting and

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>legal issues. And I mean this just shows that regulators

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>around the world don't want big tech companies to buy anything.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is so basically buybacks, more buybacks.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw Jenary on Bloomberg Television. I get to see

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what she said. What is Jenry, who was our was

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>our anti trust expert in Bloomberg Intelligence, What is she

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>saying about it?

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>She thinks it's just going to be an ongoing legal

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>battle to try to get this resolved. I mean, that's

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>it's just going to take a lot more time to

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>figure out. Microsoft not going to back down anytime, honoring.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Why does Microsoft need call of duty? You know, why

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 2>do they need activision which makes call of duty? Now

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that they have AI powered bing?

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you've told me this many times that you know

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 3>the cloud gaming is not ready here right now, and

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>you know maybe it will be ready three to five

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>years from now, and the whichever company has more content

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to be dominant, is going to be one

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 3>of the dominating force there. And gaming has been a

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>big part of Microsoft since southiat Okoba.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Mendeed, Meta platform slash Facebook in this studio stock is

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>up seventy seven year to date. I thought these guys

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>had a problem with costs going crazy on something like

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>called the metaverse, which I don't know what that is.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Advertisers pulling back because there's a recession. How did they

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>turn the narrative around here for meta.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is still driven by cost cuts. Nothing has

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 5>changed in terms of the top line expectations. I think

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 5>what Alphabet did yesterday was to la fears that, you know,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 5>digital advertising was going down the cliff. I don't think

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 5>that's happening anymore. And look, there will be at pricing headminds.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>Search is the most resilient, which is what the alphabet

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 5>number showed. I do expect some at pricing headminds in

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the results tonight, But when you are cutting ten billion

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 5>dollars in costs, I think it's always a good story

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 5>to sell, given we know these models are so good

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 5>in terms of you know, throwing out free cash flow.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 5>So that's what's driving the stock right now.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Does Google have a weakness here? I know they dominate

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in search with something like ninety percent of the global

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>search market right and Microsoft they're being had like six

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>or seven percent. But now they've got this AI powered bing.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I used it this morning to ask what kind of

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure upgrades are needed on the US electricity grid if

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>people start adopting a higher share of evs rather than

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>ic E cars. You asked chat, I asked bing in

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>one in one sent in one you know search query,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 2>I said, what kind of infrastructure upgrade does the US

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>electric grid need if we start buying more and more evs?

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And the and the and the.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>And the AI chat bot came back with an incredibly

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>elegant UH and direct answer, citing three different sources saying, look,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna need one and a half to two trillion

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars of infrastructure upgrades by twenty thirty just to maintain

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the electric grid where it is today. That's incredibly smart.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Google couldn't do anything near that.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, they will be, and that's the risk when you

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 5>have a ninety percent share in search. It's like anything

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 5>that comes on the horizon is always an imminent threat.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 5>So in this case, clearly.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>But there's never been anything on the horizon before.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Well no, I would disagree because a lot of people

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 5>and companies have tried PageRank. They've tried to copy Google's algorithm,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 5>but they've never been as good in search as Google.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's why that mode has been penetrable, because no

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 5>one has been as good in search. So clearly, this

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 5>is something new on the horizon. It has a lot

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 5>of promise. We think it's going to raise Google's cost

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 5>of revenue because the cost of infrastructure goes up. But

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 5>will it be as good and as simple to use

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 5>as Google Search. The answer so far is no, and

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't heard their revenue, which is why search are

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 5>performed last night.

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But Matt had a I can't believe Matt put that

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>query in.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 5>That's pretty yes, And that's where the search market could

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 5>grow because now you could search in terms of you know,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 5>long questions, which you weren't able to do before, and

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 5>you don't have to browse through the links that they showing.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>You said, this is a better way to consume Internet

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 5>content because you can search in paragraphs like long queries.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And I just like liquor store near me. That was

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>man so Ana Rod talk to us about just tech

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>spending overall. I mean, you know, really over the last

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen twenty years, it's just it seems like it's never slowed.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You guys think you're smart, but reality is you're just

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you're just behind this great tech wave. I mean, anybody

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>could do that. But now we actually have some headwinds

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>to tech spending. Where are we seeing some of those headwinds?

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>How pronounced are they How long do you think they'll

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll persist?

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>See, before last night, I thought it would last by

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year. But to be very honest,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>after Microsoft, you know, we could already be at that

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 3>pivot at this point, and you know it will take

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 3>a few more couple of months more for us to

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>figure it out. I have no doubt that once all

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 3>of this thing you know, settles in next year or

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>whenever that you know twelve month period is over, we're

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 3>going to see a bounce back and a major bounce

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.239
<v Speaker 3>back in growth rates. Because the shift or digital sift

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to AI shift, all of these things is still in

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>such early innings that there is no reason for companies

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>not to spend on technology products.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Mandy.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean in your in the companies you cover, where

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you seeing some of the biggest growth in tech spending.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there the next cloud out there? What's the next

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>big thing?

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 5>I think the next big thing is clearly large language

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 5>models and generative AI. That's what these generative AI, generative

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 5>generative AI, That's what Matt's query is about, you know,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>in terms of looking at content that's out there on

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 5>the web and giving a smart long form results where

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 5>you don't have to go through different types of links.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 5>And you can apply that concept with images, with different

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 5>types of content, so it's not just text based searches.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 5>You can apply that framework to a lot of different

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 5>types and I think every company right now is tinkering

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 5>with it. Clearly there's a big infrastructure investment that and

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Rog was alluding to. So that's going into that tech

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 5>spend is you have to upgrade your infrastructure. You can

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 5>use your existing data centers and run those queries and

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 5>that's a big, big tailwind for it spent.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I just asked Bing how much of a problem is

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the rising rate environment in the United States for big

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>technology companies and their spending plans. And Bing says higher

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>interest rates can hurt growing tech companies in three ways. First,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>they increase the cost of borrowing more money to expand

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a business. That's bad news for high growth tech companies

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>which are burning cash with widening losses. Second, it reduces

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>long term estimates for a company's earnings and free cash flow. Third,

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 2>it slows down businesses cash flows and stunts their reinvestment

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>into innovation and growth prosperty.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Good good job being Men Deep Seeing on Around Rock

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and a Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team Ken's our live program Bloomberg

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 4>On Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 6>And the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on demand wherever

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 6>you get your podcasts.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>We have state of the art facilities, and we literally

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>met and I sit at a round table, which means

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we can actually have rounds at tables with smart anamals.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>We just did it with the tech geeks on our agrana,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Man Deep Sing from Bloomberg Intelligence, two of the best

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on the street. Now we do it with the banks.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>We have two other top analysts here, Herman Channey follows

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the regional banks, Neil Sipes. He follows the big boy banks,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the money center banks, along with Alison Williams. We got

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>them here at our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. We're round

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>tabling this thing.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Herman.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you're you're the problem child here in

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the banking space at this First Republic thing. It's down

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>another gajillion percent today, it was down fifty percent yesterday.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Is this thing a going concern? Is this something that

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the fdi SE has to come in and just say, okay,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we're in charge now.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Don't take going concern.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I just did. I just did.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 7>At this point, the bank's running out of options. There's

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 7>been reports from Bloomberg that they're looking to sew up

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 7>to one hundred and fifty or one hundred billion dollars

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 7>in assets. Which I think it's going to be a

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 7>tough We talked about this earlier. They only have about

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 7>fourteen billion dollars capital and any sort of haircut is

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 7>going to eat in that capital, and so it's they

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 7>don't have a lot of good negotiating power at this point.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 7>So it's we're gonna wait to see.

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So what does the FDI see? How does that organization work?

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>How did they decide when to step Are they asked

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to step in? Do they look at the situation say

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we are stepping in?

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 2>How does that work? At this point?

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 7>The regulators are embedded into First Republic over I would

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 7>say the past few weeks a month or so, and

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 7>they're seeing all the numbers that are coming in in

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 7>terms of deposit outflow, in terms of how they're managing

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 7>the balance sheet, so that they have a pulse on

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 7>the situation. And it's really up to their determination that

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 7>if they want to come in and close the doors.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>And Mat I want to bring in Neil Sipes. This

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is a dude we hired as a summer associate in

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Now he's pretty much running the whole place.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, so like Alison Williams, we love.

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>She's kind of the rock star. But my you know,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>she's got people. You can't get through to her because

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>she's got people to kind of shielder. So now we've

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>got Neil Sypes. He's research chalnels covering some of the

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger banks, and.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>He studied in the great state of Ohio.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 8>Is that you're a DA flyer, that's right, that's right,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 8>one of the few.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I was right next door at Antioch College, not studying,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>not studying.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the University of Dayton, home of a great healthcare analyst,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>former bi analyst Michael Manns. Now it's sit investments in Minneapolis.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So nice lineage there of good analyst, research channels, command

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of Uniers of Dayton. You know, talk to us about

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen some of the bigger banks here. How

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>are they performing in terms of just kind of the

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>core banking business as well as their capital markets businesses.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 8>Sure, And I think it is a little bit of

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 8>a difference when you compare it with some of the

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 8>regional peers that have had more idiosyncratic issues for themselves.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 8>And what we've seen is, you know, the larger banks

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 8>have been able to weather this storm a little bit

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 8>better than what you've seen at some of the regionals,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 8>or at least stay out of the headlines in the

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 8>sense that they've been some of these have been the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 8>beneficiaries of some of these deposit flights what we're seeing

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 8>across the industry. It's no question that deposits are on

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 8>the decline, but ultimately some of these have some of

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 8>these larger banks have much more diversified deposit franchises that

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 8>can weather these storms and ultimately have a more diversified

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 8>client base, which ultimately, you know, supports the businesses across

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 8>whether it's investment banking, asset management, wealth management, et cetera,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 8>whereas some of these regionals are a little bit more narrow.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, I like your coverage. You go over some of

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the smaller investment banks, and if I were to go

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the banking world, that's where I would go

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to the evercres, the moluses, maybe even ray j and

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Stefel talk goes out some of those smaller regional investment banks.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>How are they doing? How do they compete against the

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgans and the Morgan Stanleys of the world.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, some of those boutique investment banks, they compete

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 8>specifically in the advisory space, and like you said, that's

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 8>the place you wanted to be. Maybe in twenty twenty one,

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 8>maybe not so much right now, as we've seen deal

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 8>activity pretty much on ice since the beginning of twenty

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 8>twenty two. Keep in mind we were coming off that

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 8>record twenty twenty one. But as we've seen interest rates rise,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 8>we've seen economic expectations sour a little bit, it's become

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 8>a lot more difficult for deals to take place. Confidence

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 8>is lower, market sentiment is weak. When you have volatility,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 8>it's a lot harder for buyers and sellers to come

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 8>together on a price, and ultimately that's going to be

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 8>an issue. Not to mention what we've seen with capital markets,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 8>it's a lot more difficult and a lot more expensive

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 8>to raise.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>That capital Herman in terms of First Republic, obviously, the

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 2>share price is in free fall right now, and it

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>had been grouped together with a number of other regional banks,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>including pac West. Yesterday pack West was also decimated almost

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 2>it was down by like nine percent. Today I noticed

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>pac West bouncing like eighteen percent in the pre market

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's up right now another six percent. Why is that?

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it just that we thought, oh, maybe pack West

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>isn't a doom loop as well, and now we realize

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 2>they're okay.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, they reported numbers yesterday and had some really encouraging numbers,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 7>specifically to deposits, and deposits were down twenty percent through

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 7>March twentieth. They had pre announced that mid quarter, and

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the quarter deposits came back a

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 7>little bit, and then through Friday a deposits came back

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 7>more so. So the fear that that depositive flight was

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 7>happening with with PacWest has been alleviated a bit, similar

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 7>to what has happened with Western Alliance as well. So

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 7>it does seem like the issues really are focused on

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 7>First Republic.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, and look, PacWest had a fifty two week high

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of about thirty bucks a year. They're down to ten,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>so taken down by two thirds. First Republic had a

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 2>fifty two week high of one seventy right, and they're

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>trading for five dollars a year, much worse. But I

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 2>don't understand why yesterday's release prompted, you know, a fifty

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>percent drop and another thirty percent drop today. I mean, yes,

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>they had one hundred billion dollars of outflows in the

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 2>first three months, but they only had one point seven

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of outflows in April, right, So it does look

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 2>like they stemmed the bleeding.

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 7>It looks like they stem the bleeding. But there's overly

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 7>reliance now on higher cost CDs. We're talking four and

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 7>a half five percent CDs that they have to rely on,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 7>and also wholesale funding borrowing from the discount window, borrowing

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 7>from the FHLB that's costly as well. So where though

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 7>the costlyer funding is going to squeeze their margins and

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 7>spur negative earnings for the foreseeable future. So that's really

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 7>what a spooking folks.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Neil has it affected the companies that you cover. I mean,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>it's quite different from Stefel and Evercore obviously First Republic,

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>but they have high net worth individual maybe they have

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>bankers from Stefel in Evercore that got their zero percent

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>mortgages there.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's it's definitely a different story for stephl and

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 8>Raymond James because when you think about these two institutions,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 8>it's more so a wealth manager that owns a bank

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 8>rather than a bank that owns other division.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But I just mean, are there any knock on effects?

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you hearing people from no doubt saying like hey,

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I have a plan, or we're taking assets from them,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>or you know.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Well for sure, I mean you've seen the flight of

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 8>some advisors from First Republic. When you have issues at

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 8>the underlying bank, at someone like First Republic, you ultimately

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 8>see the flight of some of those advisors and ultimately

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 8>those client assets to some of these other competitors. But

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 8>to be fair, the Stefil and Raymond James of the world,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 8>they're also seeing the same issues of deposits perhaps shifting

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 8>between either lower cost bank accounts all the way up

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 8>to those money market funds that are ultimately leaving the

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.479
<v Speaker 8>balance sheet. Steefeil, on one hand, has been very aggressive

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 8>in sharing that interest rate increase with its clients. Others

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 8>perhaps less so when you see those deposits leave the

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 8>balance sheet.

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Herman Chan is such a rock stary.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He had to leave because TV beckond they want to

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on the First Republic. So he just ran,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>literally ran to the TV studio. When Antorres says, get

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in studio, Yeah, get in studio. You do not mess around.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And Torres is a Bloomberg television producer to whom you

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>do not say no.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. So Neil, again you follow some of these

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>regional investment banks, they focus really heavily on advisory work,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as you said, more so than capital markets. There ain't

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>no deals happening, man, What are they saying about the

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>m and A environment out there?

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and they're saying that there's not much happening. And unfortunately,

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, back in January, we were hearing a little

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 8>bit of some positive comments of saying, look, markets had

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 8>turned around a little bit in the fourth quarter and

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 8>that was extending in the first quarter. So there were

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 8>some growing opportunities, some green shoots, so to speak. But

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 8>ultimately what they've said so far this quarter is March

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 8>pretty much canceled that out right, the volatility that we

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 8>saw around banks that spread across broader markets. Yes, we're

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 8>still up on the year, but that inherent volatility and

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 8>ultimately just the lack of clarity as to where monetary

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 8>policy is going to be, how the economy is going

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 8>to look, how inflation is trajecting throughout the rest of

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 8>the year. That's ultimately going to continue away on deal announcements,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 8>which therefore ways on future fees.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, on a scale one to ten, ten being

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the best. How was your experience at the University of Dayton.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, hesitation.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You're a big fan, right, yep?

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. I mean I can't speak highly enough of it.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And you are you a high native?

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 4>I am not.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm a Connecticut native actually. Okay, So I did a

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 8>little quick trip to the Midwest and sort of came back.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 8>But ultimately, I mean it's it's a great you know,

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 8>education there, and they have a student run investment fund yep,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 8>and so they're able to, you know, kind of put

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 8>that hands on experience with analysis.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever get a milkshake at Young's Dairy Farm?

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 8>I did not. I'm not familiar with them.

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Have you not be into Yellow Springs?

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I have not.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh, I've driven through it.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he's all business, all the time, all business

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>all the the kids a day.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not out there playing around, they're studying, working hard.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Neil Sipes he's equity research channelist at Bloomberg Intelligence, homegrown,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>home trained, and now he's a rockst Army. Appreciate getting

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a few miutes just time to talk about some of

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>these banks.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 6>Here you're listening to the tape. Cat's are Live program

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 6>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 4>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen Love I Have on Amazon Alexa

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 6>from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>We're bringing now Christelle Rendu de Lin. She's the head

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of investments at Fonto Bell normally in Zurich. She joins

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>us live in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Great to

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>have you here, Christelle. Let me first ask you what

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you make of these markets. You know, we saw so

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 2>much volatility in the first three months and it just

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 2>dropped down to nothing in April. Okay, yesterday we broke

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>out of the range a little on the stock side,

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>certainly not in fixed income. What's going on?

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think, I mean, you just nailed it. We

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 9>are completely in the wait and see mode. The recession

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 9>has been spoken about for about a year and it

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 9>just is not materializing. It's very hard to find strong

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 9>positive news that would you know, put you on risk on.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 9>But at the same time, you know you don't go

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 9>risk off because it's it is just not crumbling down

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 9>or certainly not as fast as people would have it.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, we were all focused so much on

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the FED. It was like Bloomberg surveillance twenty four to

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>seven here until this week. Really, all of a sudden

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>people started to care about caring about earnings and putting

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 2>FED you know, forecasts on the back burner. Do you

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>think we've shifted for good or are we going to

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>go back to our incredible macro focus, you know, as

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 2>soon as we get big economic data on Friday.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it's too soon to write up the

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 9>macrol because actually this is the story. The earnings are

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 9>the realization of what's happening on the macro, and the

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 9>FED has a tough job now it's you know, inflation

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 9>is still there. They still need to go. But you

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 9>see the first cracks in the system. And the whole

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 9>question is, you know, are they just isolated cracks or

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.239
<v Speaker 9>is it a sign of more to come? So I

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 9>think the story is quarely in the macro camp still.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So where do you guys have on topo come down

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on this whole thing? I mean, I think the FED.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the risk is the FED has gone to far,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>will go too far and in fact break this economy.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that the side you've come down on. You think

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a risk here that this is there's gonna be recession,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and it might be more than people are expecting.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the house view is indeed that we will go

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 9>into into recession, not necessarily one that sees on employment

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 9>going to the roof, but one that will be enough

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 9>to stop the FED and potentially bring it onto a

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 9>rate cut cycle. I think personally it's too early to

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 9>go for that. I think they've got a job to

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 9>do and they just can't let go just now. But

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 9>we also history has told us that, let's say, if

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 9>the cracks really materialize, they're gonna take this.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be difficult for the FED to stand up

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to the political pressure. Nonetheless, it does look like they're

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>going well, certainly twenty five basis points more next week. Right,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>do you expect an increase after that? Because inflation looks

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty sticky, and Jerome Powell, if you take him as word,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 2>he is determined to break the back of inflation.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 9>Look, I think the sign for me it hasn't changed

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 9>that they'd like to do as little as possible so

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.239
<v Speaker 9>that they don't break the economy. But they will have

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 9>to do as much as needed to show that inflation

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 9>has turned around. And so at the point that the

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 9>Fed can say this is it, guys, you see inflation

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 9>has durably peaked, then they will step off the pedal.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 2>But when is that? You know, when he has a

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>press conference, reporters are trying to needle him to get

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>him to say something. He just wants to get close

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to two. But does that mean three? Does that in four? Yeah?

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 9>I think they just I think they probably just don't

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 9>know when that is, you know, when we've really reached

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 9>the peak. I don't think it will be a question level.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 9>I think it will be a question of really seeing, Okay,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 9>we can now say the peak is behind us. They've

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 9>done five hundred basis point one shot. That's one of

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 9>the fastest tightening cycles. You've got a few cracks here

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 9>and there. I think when they can stop, they will,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 9>But they want if inflation has not topped.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what are you telling you're coming? You're

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>here in New York, first time you said in almost

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a decade. Yeah, so you're meeting with I'm guessing, shame

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on me in special investors here in New York. You

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sit down with some of the big players here in

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>New York. What are you telling them to do in

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, investments over the next six, twelve,

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 9>So the first thing I tell them is always the

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 9>same thing, is just to start with not only to

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 9>think about investment views, but about the portfolio construction. This

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 9>is the one thing that is never talked about is

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 9>if you get it wrong in your risk appetite, it's

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 9>going to be wrong anyway. So that's the first thing.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Where's your own risk appetite and tolerance to risk? And

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 9>I would go balanced, to be honest, It's not for me.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 9>It's not an environment you go all cash unless you

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 9>think all hell, you know it's going to break loose,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 9>and I don't think we're there. So I don't have equity,

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 9>I don't have fixed income, And I actually think the

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 9>big change is that Treasury will be back in town

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 9>as a safe haven play. They haven't played their role

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 9>last year for obvious reasons, but they will be back.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>You think investors worried about a recession are going to

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>pile back in. I think is that going to drive

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>rates down?

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 9>I don't think they're gonna apply by kin, but I

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 9>think they're not there, and so if we do get

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 9>a recession, we're going to get a serious rady on

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 9>those rates because people I'm not in and I think

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 9>that makes them will still be at plate.

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what you think about You are an economist.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You got your PhD at the London School of Economics.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That's good.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>We have rates that, you know, relative to the levels

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 2>we saw in the eighties, for example, don't look very high.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.959
<v Speaker 2>But we didn't have this kind of debt load in

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the eighties. Right if you have to refinance, you know,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 2>today's debt versus debt back then, it's way more painful.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Right at the US is now at what one hundred

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and twenty percent debt to GDP. Back in the early eighties,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we were like twenty percent debt to GDP, So five

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>percent now hurts a lot more than maybe seventeen percent

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 2>then did Is that gonna change the the equation?

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it's going to change the equation, And

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 9>I think that's the reason we will not get back

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 9>to the inflation rates that we've had for the last

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 9>twenty years.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>We're not going back to I don't think so.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so. I don't think so and you

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 9>know what I mean, two percent was chosen. It was chosen.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 9>It can't be ten, it can't be six. But does

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 9>it have to be two?

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean we can live with three.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Christa, you're based in Zurich, you're from Geneva, so you

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>are Swiss all the way through. What does it mean

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to an average Swiss citizen that ubs acquired credit? Swiss

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people are telling people are telling me it's a big

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>deal for the average Swiss person.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is a big deal, yeah, because it's the

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 9>two largest banks getting together. So firstly, you know, you'd

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 9>wish it hadn't happened. But secondly, the most important was,

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 9>as always to stabilize market, and that was absolutely key.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 9>You know it from here as well. You cannot let

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 9>crisis of confidence get get in the way. But I

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 9>think the ink is not dry on all of that.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>People are angry, right, people are angry. Angry.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, they're angry because you know, all of that happened

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 9>very quickly in a sense, so the the government's decisions

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 9>happened very quickly, and so you hear a lot of

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 9>political voices saying, you know, we want that you look

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 9>into the competition laws and and and things like that.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think we we.

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Are lots of banks or but these are the two

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>big ones. These are There's nothing else like that, There's

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not I mean, so this is really level.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 2>It's just is do you like Zermatt or Saint Maurritz? Like,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 2>where's the best place to ski for you? East side?

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 2>West side?

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 9>God, that is a really difficult one. You know, I'm

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 9>a mad person, but since I've moved to Zurich, I

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 9>have to say the anger in is wonderful as well.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 9>So I'm gonna draw my joker card.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 2>There's a good question.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, just so many choices there in Switzer

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>met We got a road trip this. Yes, we do

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a remote broadcast from Zurich a couple of days Geneva

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>couple days start.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll put the tick.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 9>Days and we'll hoast you up from Tobol.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You see your guests absolutely. Christo Rendu Day Lindt, head

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of investments for Von Tobel based in Zurich.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Team Ken's Our Line program Bloomberg

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 6>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app or listen

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Sat down to Washington, DC, talk about not being comfortable.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to Nathan Nathan Dean, he's a senior policy

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>house of Bloomberg Intelligence, as well as Emily Wilkins, reporter

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Government. They join us here to get the

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>latest from DC. Nathan, let's start with you here. What

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>does my Congress have to do here? I mean, we've

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>got to continue to pay our bills and you know

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into May here. Give us just the latest

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on this debt ceiling and all that kind of stuff.

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, so obviously you know, the House Republicans

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 10>are coming together with a bill. You know, voter is

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 10>expected later today. But you know, whether this bill passes

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 10>or not, you know, this is represents the first step

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 10>that I think the markets really want to see happen

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 10>in Washington, and that's negotiations. I mean, they want to

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 10>see Congress come together with the White House and get

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 10>this done. So you know, this is one of those

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 10>like chicken before you know, what comes first, the chicken

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 10>or the egg? You know, does Congress negotiate or does

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 10>the market freak out? And both are waiting for the

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 10>other to do something, and you know, at least Congress

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 10>is showing that they're doing something so the market can

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 10>actually start preparing for that.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Emily, let me ask you about the possibility of McCarthy's

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>plan passing. I thought, you know, as a no brainer.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 2>The Republicans all want to be on, you know, one team,

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to take it to the White House

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 2>with this plan. But now I hear that some Republicans

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>are balking because they want subsidies, which totally confuses me

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 2>because I grew up, you know, and Alex P. Keaton

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>card caring Republican, and I thought small government and no subsidies.

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>But why are Republican congressmen wanting to hold onto these

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>government handouts.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 11>Because it's what's good for their district. A lot of

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 11>these lawmakers who want to see more of these tax

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 11>credits on round bile fuels, they come from places where

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 11>ethanol is a big deal because their districts grow a

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 11>ton of corn. You've got Nancy Mace, who has a

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 11>lot of solar producing companies in her district. She wants

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 11>to make sure that those subsidies are there. I mean, yeah, look,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 11>Republicans want to be unified, but what they want even

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 11>more than that is to get reelected. And they know

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 11>that because of the narrow margins, it's easier for them

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 11>to go up and say, hey, we really want this,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 11>and if you want my vote, you have to do something.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 11>That's why we saw changes to the bill made at

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 11>two o'clock in the morning last night to try and

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 11>really firm up support for a potential vote today. But

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 11>we still really don't know if Republicans actually have the votes.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 11>McCarthy said he felt confident, but when you're talking with

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 11>Majority Leader Steve Scalice, he keeps saying the vote will

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 11>be this week, but but he won't commit to bringing

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 11>it to the floor today necessarily.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just so crazy. When I was a kid, the

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party was about small government, free markets, no subsidies,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 2>what no government?

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm into Republican Party that you could fill a

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>show on that.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Emily, you should do a show what happened to the

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party?

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Where did they go?

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 11>Done?

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>The one? Yeah, I mean my dad would still vote

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for Nixon if Nixon ran today.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That's but those I don't know, We'll see, uh So Emily.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>President Biden announced he's running. Kind of an odd way

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it with a videotape. It's like he's running

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, school president.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>But under the radar, under the rax o'clock in the morning,

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>right in the middle of the Fox News Tucker Carlson

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>news cycle, Like so no one would notice. What did

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>they did? They were they trying to sneak it out?

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 11>Emily, Well, we all knew it was coming. We reported

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 11>on the fact that it was coming. Look, I think

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 11>everyone knew for a while that Biden was going to run,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 11>and it was just a matter of kind of making

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 11>it official. Videos are now what all the cool kids

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 11>are doing these days. Saw Tim's got put out one

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 11>out there, and Nikki Haley put one out there, and look,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's a giant shock that Biden's running again.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 11>I just think that he had to make it official

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 11>and get the message out there, because you know, last

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 11>time he was like, look like, you know, I'm running

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 11>kind of as an alternative to Trump, you know, to

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 11>get government back on track. And now the message has

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 11>to be we're finishing the job. And you know, at

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 11>this point, we really it's been interesting, We really haven't

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 11>seen any Democrats yet come out and support Biden, even

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 11>though there are numerous polls out there that show that

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 11>a lot of Democrats are concerned about Biden running again.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 11>They're concerned about his age, they want a fresh candidate.

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 11>But at this point, no one's really come forward that

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 11>seems to have the chance of seriously getting the nomination.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they just think it's a vote for Harris.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you didn't see much of the Tom free

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>op ed in the Times today kind of goes to

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that issue.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 2>So we didn't see much of her at all in

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 2>the video. But I think a lot of people are

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>concerned that a vote for Biden or you know, optimistic

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 2>to vote for Biden is a vote for Harris. I

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know where people fall on that, but you know.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Nathan Speaker, Kevin McCarthy's Speaker of the House, how

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.959
<v Speaker 1>important is the next few weeks for the speaker? Here

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, man, this is a referendum on his leadership,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just point blank.

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 10>Well absolutely, I mean this was something that everybody knew

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 10>was coming. You know, there was going to be a

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 10>piece of legislation where he would need to get his

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 10>party in order, and this is it. And so if

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 10>he can show that he can get all of the

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 10>GOP on board onto this deal, this is a big

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 10>win for him. I mean, this gives him a lot

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 10>more leverage in these negotiations over the dead ceialing. If

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 10>somehow he doesn't, well, then you know, people are going

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 10>to start chipping away at his leadership and their questions

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 10>are going to be asked and so forth. And that's

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 10>what the market doesn't like, and market doesn't like uncertainty,

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 10>and so you know, we are actually just thinking that,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, whether or not this bill passes or not,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 10>I'm sorry. If the bill passes, it's not going to

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 10>go anywhere. I mean, all this is dead on arrival.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 10>But if the bill passes, at least the market can

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 10>take to the point that negotiations are going to start

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 10>in earnest. Now this gives them something to go to

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 10>the White House and say let's start here. So, uh,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, we haven't really seen market angst when it

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 10>comes to the dead healing just yet. You know, as

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 10>the X dat gets closer and closer, you're certainly going

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 10>to see it both on the equity side and the

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 10>fixed income side.

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Do the uh, you know, President Biden mentioned the Mago Republicans.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>He said they want to cut social Security. I'm not

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>sure if that's true. But Emily, what role do does

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the right wing of the party play

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>in this? What role do the you know, Marjorie Taylor

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Greens play in Kevin McCarthy's uh, you know, power in

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the House.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 11>I mean, certainly McCarthy has had to be very diligent

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 11>right about catering to the Marjorie Taylor Greens, to those

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 11>sort of on the conservative side, But at the same point,

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 11>he has not been able to ignore the moderates. And really,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 11>what we had a good reminder of yesterday is that

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 11>it's not just these ideological streams. It is literally any

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 11>group of lawmakers can hold things up. There are four

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 11>Republican members from the state of Iowa. Iowa grows a

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 11>lot of corn, a lot of concern there about biofuels.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 11>All four Iowans were in McCarthy's office yesterday trying to

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 11>get him to make changes on the bill that he

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 11>ultimately did give a little bit of ground on. And

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 11>so you can kind of see that it really just

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 11>takes you and three of your buddies to wind up

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 11>proposing a headache for Speaker McCarthy and to potentially stiny

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 11>really important legislation.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And Nathan thirty seconds left here. Let's assume that the

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>dead ceiling gets done. What's next for Congress? Can they

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>get anything really done here in this environment?

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, I was just going to talk to

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 10>the assault deduction. You know, I'm not going to say

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 10>it's going to get done, but we saw a propos

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've seen statements from Republicans in moderate New

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 10>York and California saying they want to move on this,

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 10>and they can't move on salt deduction until after the

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 10>death cealing. So for those of you in New York,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm not saying it's going to get done, but momentum

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 10>is beginning to tweak a little bit, so keep that

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 10>in mind.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I have one year, eight months, and four days until

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the salt deduction cap is retired.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's now back on my agenda because I'm now once

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>again a homeowner in the great state of New Jersey.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'll talk to my friends down in DC see

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if we can get something done here. Nathan Heggre, I'm sorry,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Dean, thanks so much. Bloomberg Intelligence He covers all

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>that Washington stuff that no one else, really, no one

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>else wants to deal with, but he does it so well.

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 2>And Emily Wilkins.

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Emily Wilkins.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 2>She is the host of the new program What Happened

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to the Republican hartypen to the Republican Party with Emily Wilkins.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>With Emily Wilkins coming to a station near you.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:43.479
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk restaurants. Here is Emily mentioned. We

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.479
<v Speaker 1>had some some numbers come out from our good friends

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>at Chipotle, Wendy's, all kinds of stuff. Here we check

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in with Mike klen He's a senior restaurant analyst with

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike talked to us about kind of some

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of these fast food restaurants are starting to hear some

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.959
<v Speaker 1>earnings coming out. Chipotle had some good number stock really

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>rallying today on the news. What do you see.

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so we've had just just too so far. Chipotle

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.919
<v Speaker 12>and McDonald's yesterday, and they both did well. And it's

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 12>not really a surprise. They've both been really knocking to

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 12>cover off the balls since the early days of the pandemic.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 12>Chipotle was you know, they had a good quarter. The

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 12>sales trend you know, they be pretty handily, but the

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 12>trends actually only increased about fifty basis points on a

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 12>four year basis. But what was really impressive was the

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 12>margin expansion that they saw. So so they had a

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 12>little bit of a dud with the limited time off

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 12>in the fourth quarter, the garlic Guahillo steak, and they've

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 12>they moved on to chicken out pastor in the first

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 12>quarter and they've they said it was very successful.

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 12>They also did well with their faheta case ideas that

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 12>they were pushing on TikTok, you know, and and avocado

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 12>prices eased a little bit of year over year, and

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 12>you know, add it all up and it turned out

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 12>to be a great, great quarter.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So, Mike, for some of these fast food companies, how

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are they how effective are they able to pass along

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>their their price increases to the consumer.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, we're going to see this year so far, so good, right,

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 12>We're going to see how that how you know about

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 12>ten percent price increases from last year start to you know,

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 12>we're going to see if there's gonna be any more

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 12>pushback this year now that pretty much most of the

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 12>stimulus is going to roll off, you know, the last

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 12>of the stimulus is gonna is coming off. I think

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 12>in May. That's the uh that's the moratorium on student

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 12>loan payments, right and that and that's a big cohort.

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 12>That eighteen to the thirty four year old cohort is

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 12>very big for quick quick service customers. That's a big

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 12>cohort for for them. So, you know, we're gonna see

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 12>if there's if it's going to have any impact. You know,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 12>there's also some other things we're looking at. You know,

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 12>credit card account bounces have have hit record hit record

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 12>highs in the fourth quarter. We haven't had first quarter

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 12>numbers yet. Real incomes have dropped every month for the

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 12>last two years straight. So there's definitely some pressures we

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 12>think around the corner and we'll see, we'll see how

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 12>much consumers push back. But the thing about quick services

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 12>right there, they're a much better space than the full

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 12>service diners because it's a it's a cheaper meal occasion.

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 12>So they'll have some people kind of fall out of

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 12>the bucket, But then they'll also have some middle and

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 12>upper income consumers that that might say, you know what,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 12>I'll skip out in the full service meal and I'm

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 12>gonna visit Chipole or McDonald instead.

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Mike, I'm gonna throw you a little

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of a curveball here.

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 2>It really grinds my gears when I go to one

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 2>of these fast food places or like a salad bar

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and I pay with you know, I use Apple Pay

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>or I or I pay with a credit card and

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:07.959
<v Speaker 2>the counter the cashier turns the little screen around and says, oh, here,

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>just click an option of how much you want to tip?

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to give us fifteen percent, twenty percent,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 2>or twenty five percent. Don't worry, you can also give

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 2>no tip. It's an option. Who allowed these people to

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>put me on the spot like that and make me

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 2>feel like either a jerk or force me to tip

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 2>a fast food worker? Like why is that a thing?

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 12>Because because a lot of restaurant employees are underpaid and

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 12>restaurants are sure you're trying to figure out a way

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 12>to to you know, to.

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Make me pay more for that. Look, why don't they

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 2>just pay their employees more and charge me an extra

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 2>dollar for my big Mac or whatever? It just seems

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>so rude.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 12>Well because of paying that extra dollar. You know, you

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 12>or I might not blink at the extra dollar for

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 12>the meal, but a lot of people will, especially in

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 12>Middle America. So that's that's their their apprehension about that.

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 12>You know, Chipotle mentioned that they that they recently rolled

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 12>out tipping on their apps, right, and the same thing.

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 12>I ordered my son a burrito the other day and

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 12>it was like, would you like to leave? You know,

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 12>eighteen percent? Two percent? You know, uh, and it was

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 12>a pickup order. We were doing the work.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So, well, how does shareholders look at that?

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Mic?

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, our shareholder is happy because Chipotle is getting

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the consumer to foot the bill for Chipotle's employees or

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, is there any concern that consumers are going

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 2>to fight back against this?

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, listen, the consumer can fight back, but just by

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 12>clicking no tip, right, So as long as it's helping

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 12>the restaurant level and operating margins by keeping labor down.

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 12>I think investors like it, right, I mean, Chipotle's getting

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 12>back to you know, they might hit a twenty seven

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 12>percent restaurant margin in the second quarter based on their guidance,

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 12>and that that's that's the level we haven't seen in

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 12>a very long time, since before you know, the e

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 12>coli issues back in like twenty sixteen. So if you

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 12>look at the stock today, up for team plus percent,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 12>I think of Vesta's like it.

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 2>At Chipotle, it's safe to click no tip because you

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 2>watch them make your food right before they present you

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 2>with the option. But I was at Shakeshack the other

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 2>day and the guy, the cashier was like, how much

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 2>do you want to tip us? We really need your tip.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>We'd appreciate your tip. And then they're gonna make my

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>food after they see what I've chosen, right, So then

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 2>it gets a little bit sketchy.

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 12>So that's a little aggressive, that's a little aggressive.

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 1>One step up in the fast food I'm not you guys,

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what you guys call that, but just

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how's that segment of the restaurant business doing.

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, casual dining, yes, you know, we'll see I mean

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 12>the numbers slowed in you know, in the first quarter

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 12>as the quarter went on, so January, and we had

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 12>some very easy comps based on lapping the Ober krown

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 12>outbreak from last year. We had a couple of weeks

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 12>of that also in February, but then in March that

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.359
<v Speaker 12>went away and SAMs sales only rose, you know, one

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 12>point eight percent across the industry in March. We suspect

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 12>there could be an additional slowing in April, and I

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 12>think part of that could be that trade down that

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 12>we were talking about where customers are saying, you know what,

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 12>I'll save some money on the on the tip and uh,

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, and on drinks and advertisers and desserts and

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 12>we'll just hit McDonald's instead of you know, name the chain,

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 12>Chili's or Fridays or something like that. So we expect

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 12>there to be a lot more pressure on the full

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 12>service chains this year for that reason. And you know,

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 12>we'll see nobody's nobody's reported yet on the first quarter.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 12>So right, we're anxiously awaiting, all.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Right, good stuff. We'll get you back when we get

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>some more results out of those retailers. Mike Klin, he's

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence giving us the lowdown

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on the restaurant biz.

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 6>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:56.040 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Now. I have.

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Had an interesting experience back in twenty sixteen. I won

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of money.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>In a lottery.

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say I won some money, okay, and I thought, uh,

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I want to buy a Rolex watch. I've never had

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 2>one before and I was, I don't know, forty five

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 2>years old. So I went to uh Torneau here in

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the city. I think I'm Madison, right, yeah, yeah, And

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you just walked in and looked at the Rolex watches

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>they had in the shop, and I picked one out

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and I bought it. Okay, easy, pasy, sure you know.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Now fast forward to this week, I'm about to turn

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty and my wife has said, you know, maybe she'll

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>buy me another one. I lost the first one in

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a motorcycle accident. But so I go into Torneau and

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I say, where are your Rolex watches? Oh, we don't

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 2>have any for sale. What Torneau, it's like the biggest

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 2>now it's called Booker, It's like the biggest Rolex dealer

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 2>in America. I said, so, not in this store. Can

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I find one downtown? Is there gonna be one of

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 2>the Westchester? No, there are no Rolexes for sale. They've

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 2>got display pieces that they're not gonna sell. And then

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 2>but what you do is you put your name and

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>number down and I guess you like bribe the sales

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 2>clerk and hope hopefully they call you back in a

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 2>few months to a year and let you buy it. Wow,

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just so weird. And I don't understand if it's

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 2>because demand has shot up, you know, with the stimmy

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 2>checks and the pandemic, or if Rolex is pulling back supply. Anyway,

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to ask an expert, and it just so

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 2>happens they had a watch guy. We have a watch

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 2>guy in Geneva. Andy Hoffman wrote a great piece about

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 2>the outperformance of the Rolex Daytona models. They put out

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a really cool I think white gold or platinum Daytona

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 2>with a with a light blue face that's going for

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 2>like one hundred grand wow, because no one can find

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>them from MSRP. Andy Hoffman joins us right now to

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about this issue. Andy, what do you think is it?

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Are we in just a new era? Has Rolex engineered

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>this perfectly? So the their products are you know, unfindable

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and that drives demand even higher.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, good morning.

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 13>This is a very complex and this is the you

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 13>know question, and this is the question that everyone is asking,

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 13>and indeed your experiences is not unusual. You cannot buy

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 13>most Rolex professional models at retail at manufactured or manufacture price,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 13>and what that has created is a secondary market where

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 13>Rolex watches sell for above the suggested retail price. Indeed,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 13>though Roles certainly says they are have not tried to

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 13>create this situation. They don't want this situation. But at

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 13>the same time, it's very difficult for them to increase production.

0:45:55.880 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 13>They are increasing production marginally. We've written about this. There

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.959
<v Speaker 13>actually have a plans for a major new facility here

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 13>in Switzerland and bull in twenty twenty nine, which is

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 13>quite a way off. But indeed, because demand is so powerful,

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 13>right now and so strong. They're going to build some

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 13>temporary facilities beginning in twenty twenty four and launching in

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty five that hopefully may increase production somewhat and

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 13>maybe bring some relief to people like yourself who would

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 13>like to buy a Rolex at the retailer. But they

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 13>make over a million watches a year, one point two

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 13>million by some estimates, So it's a lot of watches.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I mean, is is it just a Rolex

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>issue or is it just or is it brought it

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>more broadly define a luxury watch issue.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's a good question. It's not just a Rolex

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 13>issue that you know, you cannot buy any new Protect

0:46:55.480 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 13>Philipps models at retail, same with Odomarp Gay, any of

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:06.439
<v Speaker 13>those high demand super hype watches that you know sort

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 13>of came to the forefront during the pandemic. And you're

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 13>right to talk about the stimulus checks in the United States,

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 13>and you're right to to to talk about the pandemic

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 13>because you know, people were stuck at home, they had

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 13>a lot more time on their computer. There's a lot

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 13>of great information out there about luxury watches and sort

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 13>of you know, the whole market kind of it was

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 13>already growing and interest was increasing, but it really changed

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 13>during the pandemic. And it's you guys in the US

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 13>who are really driving this. This too, this is an

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 13>American story.

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wonder about how much I can take Rolex

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 2>at their word when you start to talk about the

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, ultra luxury, the big three vascher On, Constantine,

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Auto Mars or what was the other one, protect Philip.

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's such a specialized market. These are watches

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that only real watch people even know about, right Whereas Rolex,

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, every it's a household name, and they strongly

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 2>suggest Andy, as you know well, that you only buy

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>their watches from authorized dealers. And supposedly they're very serious

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 2>about stopping authorized dealers from leaking their watches onto the

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.439
<v Speaker 2>gray market. But why is it, then that there are

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 2>so many brand new Rolexes in the gray market. I

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 2>just ran a search for the yacht Master forty two.

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a brand new model that hardly any stores even

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 2>have in display, and yet there are two hundred and

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 2>fifty eight unworn inbox with paper examples on Krono twenty four.

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Rolex just brought out a new GMT Master two that's

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 2>being nicknamed the bat Girl because it's like the Batman

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 2>GMT Master, but it's on the Jubilee bracelet. They're brand

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 2>new and Krono twenty four has three hundred and twenty two.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Where is the grain market getting all these watches if

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the authorized dealer isn't selling it to them, or if

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Rolex isn't slipping them out the back door.

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, it's a good question, and it's certainly you know,

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 13>Rules is not a seller to consumer of watches. Authorized

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 13>dealers are, and so the question is what happens at

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 13>the authorized dealer level. And indeed, if you or I

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 13>or a friend of yours has a good relationship with

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 13>an authorized dealer, they may get an allocation for that

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 13>Rolex that they want, and then that person has a choice,

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 13>and you know, the way that the current secondary market

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 13>is they can turn around and sell that Rolex for

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 13>quite a tidy profit because prices on the secondary market

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 13>are higher than at retail, and so that is a

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:53.720
<v Speaker 13>temptation and that is a business for many people. However,

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 13>at the same time, whether it be Rolex or Protec

0:49:56.280 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 13>or Odemar Piguey, all of these Swiss watchmakers try to

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 13>police and try to have oversight over what dealers are doing,

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:10.319
<v Speaker 13>and if they are seen to be selling to flippers,

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 13>they are penalized. I mean, we did an interview with

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 13>Tierry Stern, who's the CEO or the president of Protect

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 13>for Leap. His family owns protect for Leap, and you know,

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 13>he said he buys about two hundred watches on the

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 13>secondary market himself a year, or the company does figures

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 13>out where they're from and figures out if the dealers

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.720
<v Speaker 13>who sold them were selling them to the wrong person.

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 13>So this is a this is a problem that the

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 13>brands recognize and they don't want this to happen.

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Andy, I wonder if we're getting set up for a

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 2>fall here because the demand is so hot and as

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:51.399
<v Speaker 2>you say, a lot of people are just buying them

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and flipping them right away. And I go on the forums,

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the Rolex forum is very popular, and I hear one

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 2>refrain from all of the collectors and enthusiasts. Prices never

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 2>go down. And that's kind of like what we heard

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 2>about home prices in two thousand and seven.

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible, especially as Rolex is preparing to boost production,

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that we finally have a downturn if we enter a

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 2>US recession.

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, and you guys have been around business as long

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 13>as I have, I'm sure, and we know that nothing

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 13>goes up forever. And indeed we've seen prices on the

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:34.319
<v Speaker 13>secondary market already being have been declining for the past year.

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 13>So that Rolex Daytona, that protect Nautilus, that ap Royal Oak,

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 13>prices for those really hyped models are all down anywhere

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 13>between twenty five and and you know, thirty five forty

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 13>percent in the past year. The overall market indexes that

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.240
<v Speaker 13>track them, and indeed, we at Bloomberg have just launched

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 13>something called the Bloomberg Subdial Watch Index, which you'll see

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 13>us generate. It's called it's called the Bloomberg sub Dial

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 13>Watch Index. And this is something that we've created with

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:10.800
<v Speaker 13>the news innovation team uh here and here in Europe

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 13>and with a trader and pre owned dealer in London

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 13>called sub Dial. Check them out. They're they're great, they're

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 13>really cool and and and what they do is they

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 13>scrape the data from you know, thousands of transactions for

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 13>secondary on the secondary market for pre owned watches, and

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 13>they come up with prices and so current market prices

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 13>They're not the only people who do this, but uh,

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 13>they do it quite well, and they've shared the data

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 13>with us. And now we're generating stories and charts and

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 13>things like that so we can track prices.

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we gotta.

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 2>We got to watch guy.

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're gonna call you more often. Yeah, we might

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>even come over to Geneva where you are. We'll do

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>some little primary research.

0:52:58.200 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Ry Zurich.

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 13>I'm in I'm in Geneva.

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm in Niniva, right, yeah.

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, we have friends in Geneva and we've

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>got friends in Zurich. We'll come over, all right, Andy,

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Andy Hoffin, reporter for

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News.

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:15.720
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio