WEBVTT - The Lighthouse

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Strange Arrivals is a production of I Heart three D

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>audio for full exposure. Listen with headphones. You want miss

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>changed for me two twenties. Check the other tires for it.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They look okay. Anything wrong? Oh no, nothing's wrong. I

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was just looking at that hitch shaiker. What hitchhiker. He's

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>gone now. I guess he got picked up. Probably, It's

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>funny though I saw him a little while ago while

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>you were changing the tire. Hey, you probably got a

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>left right after we passed him. Probably In the days

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>following December, Lieutenant Colonel Chuck Halt, the deputy base commander,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was asked to write a memo describing the events of

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the three night encounter to give to the Royal Air

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Force representative at R A. F. Bent Waters. The memo

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was sent up to the Ministry of Defense, but Halt

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>never heard anything back. I was relieved to be very

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, and that was I thought at the

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>end of it until two or three years later, whenever

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the memo got released. And then it hit the fan.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Toby Ball and this is Strange Arrivals Episode three,

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The Lighthouse. It hit the fan on October two in

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the English newspaper called The News of the World under

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the headline UFO lands in Suffolk and that's official, the

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>article began, a UFO has landed in Britain and that

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>staggering fact has been officially confirmed. Despite a massive cover up.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>News of the World investigators have proof that the mysterious

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>craft came to Earth in a red ball of light

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at three am on December. You might have noticed that

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they have the date of the first night wrong. Not

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to that later. In addition to the article,

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the paper ran the text of Chuck Halts memo. The

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Rundel Shim encounter was now publicly known. Even if the

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>News of the World's journalistic standards weren't always of the

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>highest quality. The News of the World Sunday tabloid a

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bit like the National Inquiry when they're not quite as bad.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm in mid Path, I'm in English. Amateur astronomers, science

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>writer and UFO skeptic. Redpath read the article and became

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the leading investigator into the encounter. Now, as an

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>amateur astronomer, I always like to try and explain things

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with some celestial event. Because the investigations show that the

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>great majority of UFO cases are actually caused by natural

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and man made objects, and the biggest culprits are usually

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bright stars and planets, satellites, meteors, sometimes aircraft as well.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But I couldn't find anything to explain what this flashing

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>light might be that the airmen had seen among the

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>trees out in Randols from forest. Unable to find an explanation,

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he decided to go to a local source. The area

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is a forest. It's a cultivated forest run by the

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>British Forestry Commission. So I rang their office and I

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the forester, who at that time lived in

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a cottage not very far away from where the m

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and had gone out to investigate. And he said to me,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know of anyone around here thinks

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>anything strange happened back then. And so I said, well,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think it was that must have seen something?

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And he said to me, I think it was the lighthouse.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And I nearly fell off my chair, because despite all

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the talk in the press and everywhere else, no one

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>had ever mentioned a lighthouse. This was the Orfordness Lighthouse

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>on the North Sea coast, about five miles from the base.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It was built in the last of a series of

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>beacons dating back to sixteen thirty seven. It's not there anymore.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>It was torn down in the summer of so I

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thought I have to go out and see this for myself.

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>At the time, Ridpath was doing some work for BBC Television.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>He asked them if he could go investigate. So I

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>went out there with a film crew. We filmed the

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>light flashing between the trees and we interviewed the forester,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>who was man called Vince the Kettle, and I came

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>back pretty much convinced that this explained at least part

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the sighting, which was the flashing light seen between

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the trees on both nights of the event. So this

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first indication that maybe there was another explanation

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for what had happened over those three nights in But

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of course there was more to the encounter than the

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>flashing light. So Ridpath began to look at more of

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the details of the encounters reported by Jim Peniston and

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>John Burrows on the first night and our Halt and

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the others on the third night. He wondered what could

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>John Burrows as supervisor Bud Stephens, have seen on the

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>first night to make him think that something had landed

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in the forest. John Burrows from episode one, we were

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>driving down towards the skate when he saw something strange

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the sky that he said whened for the forest

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>later was quoted as saying it landed. I contacted a

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine in the British Astronomical Association and he said,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>oh yes. At about three am on that same morning,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a bright fireball had been seen over southern England. Now

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this was a natural's piece of space debris burning up

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>high in the atmosphere, and we know from plenty of

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>past cases that bright fire balls give the impression of

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>something coming to Earth much closer than they really are.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>The firebar was miles up in the sky, probably out

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>over the North Sea, but to Stephens it would have

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>looked much closer, and when it disappeared in the sky

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the trees, it probably looked as though it disappeared

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>into the trees. Remember the confusion caused by Stephen's claims

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that the object had landed in the forest and Peniston's

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>confusion because the forest was too dense for anything to

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>land this fireball explains that as well, there was no

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>indication of a crash because the fireball was never anywhere

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>near the forest. It was an optical illusion. So they

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>went out looking for something because they thought that something

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>had crashed in the forest. They saw something they didn't recognize.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about the light from Orfordness Lighthouse. It was

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the brightest lighthouses in the country out on

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the coast, and from that part of the forest where

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they saw the flashing light, the line of the lighthouse

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>could be seen. I know because I went there. How

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nice to weep myself. But bros and Peniston saw another

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>light as well, one that could not have been the lighthouse.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm James mcgahey. I am trained as an astronomer, retired

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>United States Air Force pilot, was also in the army

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>during Vietnam. I've flown around the world. I have studied

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>UFOs for over forty years and debunked the number of

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>UFO cases and appeared on television. The one thing that

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>did come up originally when they were out there the

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>first night at the end of this time period, when

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they were out there, they saw a white and blue

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>bank of lights through the forest trees from John Brows

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>has written statement following the encounter, read by an actor

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we had just passed a creek and we're told to

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>come back when we saw a blue light to our

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>left in the trees. It was only there for a

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>minute and just streaked away. At four eleven in the morning,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a police car out there. British police cars

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>are not like US police cars. They have a bank

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of flashing white and blue lights on the top which

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were flashing through the forest as they were driving around

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>these forest roads out there. When Burrows and Dennison were

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>out there looking around at lights, and then all of

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they see this bank of white and blue

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lights flashing, which was nothing more than that police car

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.239
<v Speaker 1>in the forest. So for the first night, by this accounting,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you have three different elements, the fireball in the sky,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Orfordness lighthouse and finally the police cars. The first

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>night also left physical evidence. Remember Umber Jim Peniston returned

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to the scene just hours after the encounter and made

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>plaster casts of imprints in the ground. On the third night,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Halt and his group went to the scene with

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a radiation detector and picked up some radiation. First the

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>marks in the ground. Now, my friend the forest who

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Vince the Kettle said, well, yeah, he'd

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>seen these marks as well. They looked to him like

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>rabbit diggings. They weren't very deep, they weren't even in

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>an evenly space triangle, and they were covered with pine needles,

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so they were clearly quite old. There was nothing new

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>or unusual about it. It's soft, sandy soil, so it's

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>quite easy for rabbits to dig in, so he didn't

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>see anything unusual about that either. At the time, the

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>local police concurred that the markings on the ground had

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>been made by forest animals, but Halt didn't know this.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>On the night of when he led a party into

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the forest. Now Colonel Holt was taken up and showing

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>these knocks. He took a guangacounter and a guyac counter

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>operated with him. I just trying to meter. Don't say

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that he can about under ten degrees. The readable about

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>cold clicks, it's a normal background radiation that they were

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>picking up. It's quite clear from Colonel holtz tape. People

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>were trying and tell you that they were elevated readings.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>They weren't. Nick Pope, among others, disputes that these readings

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>were insignificant. On June the physicist Frank Close, who was

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>now an emeritus professor of physics at Oxford University, appeared

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>on a show called Strange but True Live broadcast by

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the British TV network i t V three. On it,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he addressed claims about the radiation levels detected by Halt

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and Nevill's. In this clip, he has a Geiger counter

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>similar to the one used on the third night of

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the Ryndshum Forest encounter. This is the British equivalent of

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the standard US Air Force issue, which is used usually

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for measuring huge amounts of radiations like in nuclear blasts

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. All you need to notice is is

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a dial on the front here, and it looks very

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>much like the speedo in your car. Now, the speed

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in your car is great for measuring whether you're exceeding

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the speed limits or not. But you know what it's like,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You're stuck in the traffic jam doing nothing, but it's

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>still flickering at the bottom. We know from the report

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that Colonel Holt made at the time that the amount

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of radiation they thought they were detecting on their machine

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was very very small, not point one. And we've checked

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>with the makers of the U S equivalent, and they said.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Their quote is that this measurement was the bottom reading

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the machine and was of little or no significance

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>at all. So it was not possible with the device

0:12:54.760 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>to measure that small amount. So the radiation readings are explainable.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Halt also brought the star scope, which was essentially a

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>set of night vision goggles. He clearly didn't understand the equipment.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't understand what he did. He was pointing an

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>image intensifier at a tree and said the tree was

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>glowing when he had a flashlight on it. An image

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>intensifier just intensifies the light, doesn't measure anything. It's quite

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:30.599
<v Speaker 1>clear that he pointed the image intensifier at the lighthouse

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>scope that was burned dry. And of course image intensifiers

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>amplify the light twenty thirty thousand times, and a beam

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>every five seconds coming through the image intensifier effectively burned

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the image out totally. It had been so bright. Halt

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>looked through the star scope at a light source. But

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>what evidence is there that it was in fact coming

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>from the lighthouse. Well orfard this lighthouse had a rotating

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>light that did a full rotation every five seconds. Now

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the men then drew Colonel Holt's attention to the flashing light,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing that had been seen on the first night,

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can hear the men say, look, there it

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is straight ahead off my flash light. There it is again,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and there is a five second gap between the there

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it is and there it is again, so we know

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that the light was flashing at five second indivals. On

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>an episode of his Skeptoid podcast on the Rundel Shim encounter,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian Dunning sink a portion of the Halt tape with

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a five second tone to show how the appearance of

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the light coincided with the lighthouses rotation interval. We are

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>using this tape with his permission. Where right at this

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>position here straight ahead and between the sitter it again

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in this case the flashing lights. Well, they never got

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>much closer to it. Colonel Halt said, well, it looks

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's clear off to the coast. So we have

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a flashing light which is in the direction of the

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>orford Ness lighthouse, because we know from where he was

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>standing the direction he was looking. So although he didn't

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>realize what it was at the time, from Colonel Halt's

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>own words, it seems very clear that he was looking

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at orford Ness Lighthouse, as were the m n on

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the first night. But this was not the only strange

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>light that Hal and his group saw. On the third night,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they also saw colored lights down near the horizon. This

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is from the hot tape three or fire that about

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>ten degrees horizon dirtly north through that two strange objects

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>shape colored lights on them that just to be about

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe less in the full circle. There was an Olympic

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>eclipse or something there for a negative. Now, what's bright

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>star like and flashes colors in the sky? Well? Stars.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Hawk was out there until it started getting bright

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, the dawns started coming up, and they

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>were still there, he said. Actually one of them appeared

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to be low over the Woodbridge base, which was towards

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the southwest of him, which was exactly where serious the

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>brightest star in the sky is to be found was

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to be found at that time. And when a star

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like Sirius is low down, the air currents in the

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere make it twinkle. So yes, you will see serious

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>flashing red. You'll see it flashing green, You'll see it

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>flashing white, simply because it's light is being broken up

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>by convection currents in the atmosphere. So just like the

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>first night, the encounter on the third night in this

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>explanation comprises three elements. The lighthouse not understanding how the

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>specialized equipment they were using worked, and then the misidentification

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the stars. The only thing that's unusual where you

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>don't often get lighthouses involved in in the UFO cases,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the first one I've ever come across. Then, as they

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>moved between the trees, it looked as though the bright

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>light was moving away, zigzagging between the trees in front

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of them, And it's exactly the same kind of effect

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that you get when it seems as though you're being

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>chased by the moon when you're driving in in your car.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't really the light that was moving, it

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>was them that will move in which gave the impression

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the lights receding and zigzagging between the trees. This, then,

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is the skeptical explanation for what happened in rundel Shom Forest.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It seems to offer an explanation for all of the

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>elements over the course of those nights, but it's not

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>actually proof of anything. It's an alternative explanation that doesn't

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>rely on the paranormal. Of course, not everyone accepts the

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>skeptical explanation that we've just heard. I've heard every explanation

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Randal Show inside in and Look, I'm not

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>here to prove to anyone that aliens landed in the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>forest and Randell Show post of the Somewhere in the

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Skies podcast Ryan Sprague. I'm here to try to find

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the truth, and I'm open to any possibility of what

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Randal Show was. But I'm not willing to accept is

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that it was a lighthouse. Was there another way to

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>possibly verify what had happened one way or the other? Well,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this incident involved the military, and where the military is involved,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>there's paperwork after the break. Strange arrivals will return in

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a moment. The r a F. Bent Waters and r

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a F. Woodbridge based complex house nuclear weapons. In a

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>case where an unknown craft or crafts encroached on that complex,

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you would expect to find a mountain of paperwork. Maybe

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that paperwork was classified or remains classified, but you would

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>expect that it would exist. The written statements by Peniston,

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Burrows and others were not in fact official documents. They

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>did not find their way into the Air Force official

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>accounting of this event. The only official document that was

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>produced from this encounter, which Chuck Halts Memo, and that

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>wasn't for the U s Air Force, It was written

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for the British Ministry of Defense. In two thousand, Prime

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Minister Tony Blair signed the Freedom of Information Act, which

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>provided a means for journalists in the public to request

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>official government information. Sheffield Hallam University Associate Professor David Clark.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>At the time, I was working as a news reporter

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for one of the big regional newspapers in the UK

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and the Freedom of Information was coming in and my

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>editor was saying everyone, all you journalists, you need to

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of use this is where it's going to be

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future. It's a great tool for journalists forcing

0:20:54.720 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the government to release the not released. Before Clark realized

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is that he needed to find his own niche a

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>subject that he could focus his attention on now that

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this new information had been made available. So I just thought, well,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what about UFOs. You know, I know that there's this

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>unit at the Ministry of Defense that's existence since the

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties. I know they've got lots of files on

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing that in the past they've always stone wall.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I just thought, well, I'm going to use this legislation,

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and the very first thing I went for was the

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>file on the Randelstrom Forest incident, because up until that

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>point they just said the only thing that they got

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on file was Colonel Holt's memo one page of A

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>four and I just thought that cannot be true. Clark

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>put in his request soon after this new policy was implemented,

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and I really didn't think it would get anywhere. Low

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and Behold, within a few months they said, oh, yes,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we've located a hundred and fifty five page file, and

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we've also gone back and searched to all the other

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>files covering the period of the sighting, and we've found

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of other documents as well, so we've

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>copied those for you. We've added those to the file. Here.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It is big, thick, brown envelope, just dropped through my

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>letter box one morning and I just thought, Wow, I've

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>hit jack pot here. But despite the size of the file,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the contents were disappointing. The file itself was something that

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was assembled later when the story going into the news

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world and It largely consists of Holtz memo,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a few other bits and pieces, and then the rest

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of it is just letters from uthologists and members of

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the public who's seen the story in the newspapers and

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>who were writing in to the Ministry Defense saying what

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>do you know about this? Did the aliens really land?

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And their response every time is just the standard, Well,

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all we've got is Colonel Halt story. We looked into

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it at the time, our air defense experts decided that

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing to be worried about because they didn't

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>see anything on radar. So that's the end of it

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as we're concerned. So that the entire file

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>just a repetition of that statement whenever they received a

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>letter or an inquiry from the media. In other words,

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing. Later, though, Clark became the official spokesman

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for the government effort to organize and release the UFO

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>files that it had. In this capacity, he was able

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to access all of the surviving files. This let him

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>take another approach to Reyndlssom documentation. He asked to see

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the general file of UFO reports for the whole year

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of Clark says it was a huge file about a

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>foot thick. And the interesting thing from my point of

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>view as an arcadist historian, journalist, is the report from

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Holt was just filed with all the rest of

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the lights in the sky in that file. So his

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>original memo is in the general UFO file alongside all

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the other Mr Son So coming out of a public

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>house in London and saw lights in the sky. The

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>next story is Colonel Hall. Then another story and the

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>guy who was the UFO desk officer at the time,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Simon Weed, and I spoke to him about this and

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>he remembered it clearly and he just said, well, it

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was just another story. We didn't take it seriously. And

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a critical point when looking at the Rundall

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Shim encounter. As we've mentioned before, if a craft, any

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>craft had appeared around R A F. Bent Waters and R.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>A F. Woodbridge basis with nuclear weapons during the Cold War,

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>it should have caused great concern and an intense official reaction,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't. Chuck Halt talks about how we never

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>heard back from the U. S. Air Force or the

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>English Ministry of Defense about his encounter. Why why didn't

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ministry Defense take this seriously? And There is a

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>two page briefing in the files about this, and basically

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what they said was, we didn't take it seriously because

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Halt and take it seriously. We looked at his memo.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Why did he wait two weeks to report it to

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>us in the first place, and why did you get

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>all the dates wrong? If he thought when this was

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>happening that the base a nuclear arm base, was under attack,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't wait until the British based commander came back

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from his Christmas holidays two weeks later. I mean none

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of what I've said here. It says that something didn't happen.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Clearly something did happen, but the time to actually do

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a thorough investigation of it has passed. You can't investigate

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>something that happened forty years ago when all the records

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have been destroyed, and when such elementary mistakes were made

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at the time. He's talking about radar records that were destroyed,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving that question forever unresolved. We've heard the accounts of

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the encounters at Ryndoldshop Forest, and in the next episode

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear more from the witnesses. We've also heard the

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>skeptical explanation for what happened. It's safe to say that

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>neither the original nor the skeptical account have become universally accepted.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The public understanding of what happened is still up for grabs.

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>So you've got this inconclusive situation where people come in

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>with other types of explanations when something seems just completely incomprehensible.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that when you don't have a

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>cultural narrative to explain what happens, then you will often

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have different types of explanations coming forward. My name is

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Deborah Lotonzi Shutka. I am a folklorist and professor at

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>George Mason University in Fifex, Virginia. I have been teaching

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>folklore for over twenty years and my area of specialty

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is narrative analysis. Those types of stories are obviously really

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>great interest to folklore's because it tells us basically how

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a community or a person is thinking about a set

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances. So this is an important point for the

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season. In a situation such as Rendall shown,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where there are two or more narratives about what happened,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>why does one narrative eventually become accepted and what does

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that tell you about the culture at the time. These

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of questions that folklor's are interested in.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Whether the story is literally true or not is beside

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the point again, David Clark, when it comes to people's stories,

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I just prefer to just treat those stories as stories

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and respect them as stories. And to me, it doesn't

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly matter whether they are made up or genuinely believed

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or a real experience, that they are all expressions. I mean,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the case is almost like re enchantment of the world

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in that. Yeah, you kind of explain it all as

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Ian tries to do in down to earth terms. He's

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about Ian Redpath. Yeah, that might be the case.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I can accept that, but it doesn't explain the psychology

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of it. It doesn't explain why people were thinking about UFOs.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's more like a folk story and the

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>fact it took place in a forest as well. Forests

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>are enchanted places in folklore. You know, there's loads and

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>loads of stories in British food wall about people going

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>into forests, getting lost, being led astray by will of

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the whisps. You know, lights that are moving in the

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>distance that people go towards, and the light moves further

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>away and then they end up falling into a bob.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That kind of thing that those forests in Suffolk are

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just read them with stories like that. Folklorets divide stories

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>into categories such as fairy tales, folk tales, and narratives

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of personal experience. The Rundelson Forest encounter is what folkloreists

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>would classify as a legend. Basically, what folklore is, it's

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a body of shared cultural experience that one learns from

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>their parents, their friends, their community. Informally, so, folklore is

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that we learned about life that are not

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>often taught in schools. Among that, probably the most popular

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is the legend, and the legend is a story that

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>generally people tell to one another as if it were true,

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>although the narrative itself calls into question the veracity of

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>what's being told. It's not uncommon for someone to hear

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a legend and then go, did that really happen? So

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that legends are told or shared

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to share different types of experiential or belief knowledge that

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>calls into question the very nature of that knowledge. Think

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about ghost stories. Some ghost stories you hear are very

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>individu ualized I have friends, for instance, who have a

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>neighbor who has stories of lights being turned on at

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>different times of the night. This story will most likely

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>never travel beyond a small circle of friends and friends

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of friends. But then there are also stories that come

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>across that are very traditional folk legends. Probably one of

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my favorite is a vanishing hitchhiker, where a person sees

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a person hitchhiking. They stopped because for some reason they

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>feel compelled to pick up the person. There's very little

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>interaction between the driver and the hitchhiker, and when they

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get to the destination that the hitchhikers has to be

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>dropped off at. Usually the hitchhiker disappears. Wherever I go,

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there he is. Wherever I stop, I see him. No

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>matter how far I travel or how fast, like calling,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he's ahead of me. At the beginning of this episode,

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we heard a clip from a Twilight Zone episode that

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is a version of this tale. I believe You're going

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>my way. In the standard vanishing hitchhiker story, the driver

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>finds out that the person they picked up actually died

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>some time ago, often around the spot where they hitch

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the ride. It's a creepy story and one that when

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you hear it begs the question do you believe in

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>ghosts or the supernatural? One of the things that folk

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>culture often does, especially in the genre of legend and belief,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is that there is a developing performance of rationality. People

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>know that being seen as a believer can automatically cast

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>out on people's stories. I'm Lynn McNeil. I am a

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>folklorist at Utah State University. I run the folklore program there.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I teach folklore there. I work in the folklore archives

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have there. When someone asked you if you

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in the supernatural or the paranormal, you probably think

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of this as a yes or no question, either you

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>believe or you don't, And you also understand that how

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you answer will affect the way the person asking will

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think about you. You know that the quote unquote correct

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>answer is to say no, because that means you are

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a rational person. That you're thinking is based in science.

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>For most people, though, the real answer isn't necessarily yes.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The real answer is something along the lines of the story.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>The real answer to do you believe in ghosts as well? No?

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course not, I mean who would. But after my

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>grandpa died, there was like this one Christmas light and

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it was totally the one that he was always into,

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and it just started blinking like the day after he died,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and it never stopped blinking, and we all just sort

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of knew like that was Grandpa, you know, letting us

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know that he was still there with us for the holidays.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't believe in ghost, but I mean,

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>my Grandpa's in that Christmas life. Like that very paradoxical,

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>very contradictory answer, and that's never on the survey. But

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>when people are surveyed to find out their beliefs about

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the supernatural or paranormal, the questions aren't looking for that

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of complicated answer. They're looking for the person to

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>answer yes I believe or no, I don't believe. When

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the choice, people check the no box. Thissunderstanding of

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>what people will think of you if you express a

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>belief in these things carries over to how stories involving

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the supernatural or paranormal are presented. When someone wants to

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>speak about a supernatural experience they've had, they grow I

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like the word armor over their story in anticipation of

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are going to say, okay, weirdo you clearly

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are an irrational thinker. So we see this performance of rationality,

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this intentional reality testing that takes place, that becomes a

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the story to say, now I thought it

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>could be this, but then I realized it couldn't because

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of this. And I also thought that maybe it could

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be this, but that doesn't make any sense because of X,

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Y and Z. Think about Chuck Halt and how he

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>characterizes his intentions as he sets out to investigate the

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>return of the lights at Rundel shom Forrest. He says,

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>have him made me a distast preparedness off and spend

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>about thirty minutes, and we'll go ohead and take see

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what this is all about. And I wanted the document

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>was nothing there. Whether you believe that Chuck Halt saw

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>unidentified craft in the sky or whether you believe that

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he saw the Orfanist lighthouse and stars doesn't change the

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>basics of his experience. He went into Rundel shop forest

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and saw lights. He tried to make sense of what

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he was seeing and arrived at the conclusion that they

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>were you fos. They end up at this supernatural or

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>paranormal conclusion that for all that it might not be

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>scientifically testable the way that we think of the scientific process.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a rational thought process that they've gone through. And

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>this is something that any folklorist who has done ethnographic

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>work with people on the subjects of belief in the

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>supernatural sees right away is oftentimes these are incredibly thoughtful,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>observant people who themselves don't want to have to have

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>drawn that conclusion, and yet there's no other conclusion for

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>them to draw. Sometimes. The other thing about legends is

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in order for a legend to survive and be successful,

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be a debate about his plausibility, about

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it really happened or not. And that's where the

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>clashes between the different factions who are representing the different

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>characters in this play, which is why I see it,

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and the clash between what they're trying to established and

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the skeptics who are saying it's all nonsense. It was

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a lighthouse and a meteor and all the rest of it.

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>It's that debate, ongoing debate that keeps it alive because

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>once everyone excepts, oh, yeah, it was a lighthouse, and

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we can all go home now and and be happy, No,

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer a legend. It's something that's been explained

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and that we can put to one side and move

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>on to the next thing. And it's not just a

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>dispute between people who do and don't believe that Randolsom

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Forrest was visited by unidentified crafts in as we will

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>see next episode, disagreement among the witnesses over what they

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>saw has grown over the years as new explanations for

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>what happened are put forward. So the reason it's living

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on and it's mutating is because you've got this constant

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of clash going on between the believers and the skeptics,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and even in the believer camp, you've got all these

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>different sort of groups of believers are all trying to

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>assert their version of it, and that's why it's so latent.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>He's one of the most successful UFO legends. In fact,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's almost going to supersede Roswell because the

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>difference with Randelshim is that all the key participants are

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>still alive. You can actually talk to them, whereas no

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one from Roswell. I mean, I know there are sons

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and daughters of people who were there, but really, what

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more can you say about ROSWELLT that hasn't been said.

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>There's an awful lot you can say about Rendel Ship

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't been said Holt, Peniston and Burrows. I'll have

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>more to say things that cast a new strange light

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:39.959
<v Speaker 1>on those three nights in Rundel Shom Forest next time

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on Strange Arrivals. Strange Arrivals is a production of I Heeart,

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>three D Audio and Grim and Mild from Aaron Mankey.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>This episode was written and hosted by Toby Ball and

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>produced by Miranda Hawkins and Josh Thame, with executive producers

0:37:56.239 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams, Matt Frederick, and Aaron Mankey, with voice acting

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>by Jeff Williams and special thanks to Wendy Connors, creator

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Faded Discs archive of UFO related audio on

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>archive dot org. Learn more about Strange Rivals over at

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Grimm and Miles dot com, and find more podcasts from

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.439
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio by visiting the I Heart Radio app,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.