WEBVTT - Bacon, Nothing & Tomato

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jetty and know he Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Whether you are moving closer you believe the US is

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>moving closer to striking Iranian nuclear facilities?

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Where's your mindset on that?

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Say that right? You don't seriously think I'm going to

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>answer that question? Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component?

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 3>And what time exactly?

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sir?

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Sir? Would you strike it? Would you please inform it

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>so we can be there and watch. I mean, you

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>don't know that I'm going to even do it. You

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I may do it, I may not do it.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, nobody knows what I'm gonna do.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 4>A reasonably decent response, I think to what do you

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 4>think I'm gonna tell you ahead of time?

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 1>And what are we doing here? Yeah? Yeah, I mean

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>traditionally that was I'm afraid I can't comment on that

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I left his answer better I do

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>too serious? What am I going to tell you? What? Yeah,

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>y'all tell you right away so you can be there

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and watch.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 4>So, if you follow any news, you've probably seen some

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 4>clips of Ted Cruz being interviewed by Tucker Carlson.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It's about two hours long. I watched the.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Whole freaking thing, and except for a couple of spots,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't hard to take in. It was a combination

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of interesting and entertaining. Let me see how many views

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 4>it's got on it so far? Seven million views on

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>his Twitter, and I know he gets multiples of that

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 4>on his own website, where it's actually a little easier

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>to watch, and I think YouTube has it also, so

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what the how many it'd be double

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>digit millions. I'm sure it's over ten million people have

0:01:53.280 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 4>watched it already. So Tucker Carlson has a style of

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 4>arguing with people that is designed to make you insane,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 4>and some of that's on display here. Let's run through

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of Ted Cruz talking a Tucker.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 5>The reason is twofold number one is a Christian. Growing

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 5>up in Sunday School, I was taught from the Bible

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 5>those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 5>curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 5>want to be on the blessing.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Side of things, of those who bless the government of Israel.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Those who bless Israel is what it says, doesn't say

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 5>the government of it as the nation of Israel.

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 7>So that's in the Bible. As a Christian, I believe that.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Where is that?

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 5>I can find it to you. I don't have the

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 5>scripture off the tip of mine. You pull out the

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 5>phone and use it.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It's in Genesis.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 6>But so you're quoting a Bible phrase. You don't have

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 6>context for it. You don't know where in the Bible it is.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 6>But that's like cri theology. I'm confused, what does that

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:56.839
<v Speaker 6>even mean?

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Perfect perfect example of Tucker's incredibly unfair.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>So that's your worldview. You don't know, you don't know

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 4>where in the Bible that is. You don't you know

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 4>which verse it is. But that's your.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Worldview, no context. Oh the way, I thought that was

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fairly weak point by Ted Cruz. But yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree, certainly criticize that in other ways, good faith ways,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But I agree. Let's roll on with that line, Tucker.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Christian. I want to know what you're talking about.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Does where does my support for Israel come from? Number one,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Because Biblically we are commanded to support Israel.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But number two, no, hold on.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 6>You're a senator and now you're throwing out theology, and

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 6>I am a Christian, I am allowed to weigh in

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 6>on this. We are commanded as Christians support the government

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 6>of Israel. We are commanded to support Israel. And what

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 6>does that mean? We're told those who bless Israel be blessed.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But what hold on? Define Israel?

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 7>This is important.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding this majority Christian.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Country to define Israel? Do you not know what Israel is?

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 5>That would be the kind you have asked like forty

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 5>nine questions about.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 6>So that's what Genesis, that's what God is talking in

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 6>the nation of Israel. Yes, and he's so does that

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 6>the current borders the current leadership. He's talking with the

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 6>political instanity called Israel. He's talking about the nation of Israel.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 6>Yet nations exists, and he's discussing a nation. A nation

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 6>was the people of Israel.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He's the nation in Genesis.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Is that the same as the country run by Benjamin

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 6>Netya who raised.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes it is.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, it's not run by Benjamin Netya,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 5>who is a dictator.

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 7>It's it's a democratic But he's the prime minister.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 5>Right, but just just like you know, America is the

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 5>country run by Donald Trump, not actually the American people

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 5>elected Donald Trump.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 7>The same principle of sicily.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Plenty of unfair to go around, because I know, exhausting.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't buy Ted Cruz's the Israel of Genesis can

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 4>be transferred directly to the nation that we support sometimes

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>note support sometimes I mean it seems.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Like half elite.

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>But you did say run by Benjamin Nett and Yahoo.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 4>And then when he says Benjamin, I didn't say it

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 4>was a dictator.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 7>What of that?

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Right? He implies something unmistakably, then denies vehemently that he'd

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>implied it a pox on both their houses. So far, well, so.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 4>The thing I took away mostly from it was, uh, Tucker,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 4>going back to a number of times, we have drug

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 4>addicts dying in the streets, So why are we giving

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 4>so much money to Ukraine and Israel? And I just

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 4>do not understand that woke right point of view that

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 4>they're connected in any way, or that what is our

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 4>obligation to drug addicts dying in the street.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't even understand that. Well, there

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are multiple layers of not persuasive to that number one,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just a plain false choice either support Ukraine or

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>help drug addicts in the streets. It's a false choice.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>There are a thousand of million different programs, different priorities,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>different areas where waste, fraud, and abuse happened, that we

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>could free up the money if we if we were

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>motivated to. The second layer is you're making a really

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>good point. It's what are you gonna do? What do

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you what do you so? Even if I accepted your

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>false choice, what's your plan? What are you gonna use

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the money for?

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's we in California have thrown tens of billions

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>of dollars at this and ended up with more drug

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 4>addicts on the street.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It just strikes me as an argument for dumb people.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You want to emphasize domestic concerns over international concerns. That's

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I get that that's a perfectly sound argument.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But then or or a point of view, I happen

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with it for reasons that we've stated many times.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm reminded the old saying you might not

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be interested in politics, but believe me, politics is interested

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in you. You might not be interested in the rest

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world. But believe me, they're interested in us

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and our stuff and our freedom of navigation and our

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>trade and the rest of it, in our land and

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>our resources. And so I just what do you suggest, Well,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a false choice and it's silly.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 4>We played this one earlier, but it is so freaking

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 4>good and it contains one of my favorite phrases that

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I'll probably use the rest of my life.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>They were discussing.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Tucker was accusing Ted Cruz of taking money from a

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 4>variety of lobby groups that lobby on behalf of Israel,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>and so then saying Ted Cruise is in the pocket

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of Israel and does their bidding.

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And that sort of thing. That's where we are on this.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 6>It's just interesting because what you're now describing in a

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 6>very defensive way, I will say, is foreign influence over

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 6>our politics. Now, and you began and it's so transparently

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 6>obvious to everybody. I don't know why you would be embarrassed,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 6>but you've said that you are sincerely for Israel.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe you.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 6>I don't think you have some weird agenda you seem

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 6>to by the.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Way, Tucker, it's a very weird thing, the obsession with Israel. Well,

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about for it. You're not talking about Chinese,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 5>you're not talking about Japanese, you're not talking about the Brits,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 5>you're not talking about the French.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 7>The question what about the Jews? What about the Jews?

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm anti semi now.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 7>Senator, you're just in the JEWETU Tucker.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 5>You're asking why are the Jews controlling our foreign polity?

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 6>That's what you just asked, hardly saying that, and I

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 6>have that that's exactly what you just said. Well, actually,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 6>I can speak for myself and tell you what I

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 6>am said on behalf, not simply of myself, but on

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 6>my many Jewish friends who would have the same questions,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 6>which is to what extent? And it's interesting you're trying

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 6>to derail my questions by following me an anti semi,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 6>which you are.

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 7>I did not, of course you are, and.

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 6>And rather than be honorable enough to say it right

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 6>to my face, I are city squeezy feline way implying it. Well,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 6>just asking questions about the Jews, I'm not questions about

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 6>the Jews.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I have. There's nothing to do with Jews or Judis

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>when it has to a foreign government.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 5>He is an Israel controlling our foreign policy. That's not

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 5>about the you said.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm asked. By the way, you're the one.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 7>That just called me I think a sleezy felie.

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 4>And that happens really early in the two hour discussion,

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 4>so they both bring up the other person's insults regularly

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 4>through the call. You keep calling me and in I

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 4>saim I, no, I didn't you called me a sleezy feline.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I feel like I'm overhearing like a really bitter,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>stupid argument, like it's a food court at a mall

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>or something. And I keep thinking, all right, I gotta go.

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't keep listening to this. Maybe just maybe thirty

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more seconds.

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 4>There was some reason Ted Cruz was willing to engage

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 4>in this for two hours though. It's a lot to

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 4>commit to an interview, and he had to keep saying

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 4>to Tucker, look, can you be a little less condescending?

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Could you be a little less snarky with everything I say?

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, I wish we had some examples to continue

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 4>to sit there. Well, it was usually when Tucker would

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 4>just make noises, you know, like right, you.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Know that sort of stuff, and say, do you need

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be so snarky. Yeah, I'm here.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm willing to talk about this as long as you

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 4>want and discuss the issues.

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>But I think.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 4>I think Ted Cruz, and I mean I'm not being

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>crass about this. I think he actually sees the division

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 4>in the Republican Party. He's probably going to run for

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 4>president against JD. Vance and try to get the nomination.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 4>He finished second to Trump when he ran in sixteen.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he was the last man standing other than Trump.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I think he wants to continue to be able to

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 4>reach that Tucker crowd, maybe the JD. Vance crowd, while

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>bringing along whoever else to get the nomination. That's the

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 4>only reason I can think that he would put up

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 4>with the snarkiness and the condensation for two hours.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Did did it get to substance in a satisfying way?

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>At times? I mean, because what's frustrating to me and

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to these clips is that they will touch on

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point, but one or both of them, mostly Tucker,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>but both of them will not. They will try to

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>score rhetorical points as opposed to saying, Okay, if I

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hear you correctly, you're advocating this. Here's why where I

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think you're wrong. Well, it's just sword play between the

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>two a couple of guys. That's not cool.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I went into it leaning toward Ted Cruz anyway, and

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't I definitely don't always agree with Ted Cruz.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>When he first came on the scene, read from his book,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 4>thought it was fantastic, but then he got corrupted by

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, DC and everything that happens where you got

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 4>to start playing the game to stay in office, and

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 4>he's done all kinds of things that I hate.

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But I was on his side going into this interview.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So and it felt to me like any attempt to

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 4>get to any substance.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Always got derailed by Tucker. Tucker is the greatest at

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>baiting you into tangents on things, and then you're arguing

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about the tangent, right, He's like, you know, getting back

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to the sword fighting a metaphor and I mean that literally. Uh.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He senses when you are at all a rhetorical threat

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to you, and that's when he employs his various trickery.

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by threat if you're just threatening me?

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're doing is what you're doing threat? Well,

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you just said threat, would you like to rewind the tape.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, why are you being so defensive?

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, You've gotten very, very defensive, And

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder I must have hit a hot spot

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with you or something to be so defensive and then

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to threaten me. You're a graduate of the Tucker Carlson

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>school of bullying. He's really skillful, all of them. I

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was just I was taking all that in and thinking

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be so easy to do, and so then

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>right there, you'd be defending yourself for the next five minutes.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't threaten you, you just did. I think we

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all heard it. We all heard you threaten me well,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, I don't even remember what we

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>were talking. Yes, exactly, yes, wow, he is so good

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at that. Well done. And then he constantly why are

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you getting so defensive? I'm just I'm just I'm curious.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just because you're attacking me over and over again. Dull.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.239
<v Speaker 7>He just called I think a sleazy feline.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, Oh my god, it'd be easy to do. If

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to make enemies for life.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 4>It would be very easy to engage in conversations like

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 4>that with your friends.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>In years since you've been punched in the face, and

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you think that might be enjoyable. Right, more on the way,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are you like Tucker? You stay here?

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I was looking at the text line. A number of

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 4>people really enjoyed my Tucker Carlson impersonation. It's very easy

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 4>to do. You just pick a word or a phrase,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 4>you take it out of context, you try to put

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 4>them on the defensive, and you get really really quiet

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 4>and contemplative while they get madder and madder and.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Hop from angled angled, angle right right, so nobody can

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>follow what you're even talking about, and then you laugh

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. So on a related topic, we got an email,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of emails about the decision whether to join

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Israel in attacking Aroun's nuclear program. That sort of thing,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>including justin the truck driver got a lot of attention,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>had a handful of emails in reaction to that, including

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this from Frank now Our two yesterday he aired an

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic and ageist screed from a listener. I know

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you aired it in an effort to demonstrate you listen

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to a variety of points of view, which is not

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing to do. Well, that's only part of

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the reason we read it. It was also partly just

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to let you or that point of view to know

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're dealing with. But in this case, I think

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you went too far. His Odie's views, totally void of

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>logic and historical context and informed by hatred, did not

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>deserve your platform. Thank you for your input. Frank Justin,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the truck driver from Sacramento responds in a way with

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a follow up wisdom of under thirty people explained because

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they know better than older people. The Internet, for all

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>its problems, has done one thing very well, open up

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace of ideas. Previously taboo subjects like Zionism and

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Jewish power are openly discussed. Boomers and younger Gen xers

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are reflexively allergic to this topic and instantly becomes snowflakes,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>calling anyone who talks about this subject hateful, anti Semitic,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and Nazis. And then he goes on for a couple

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of paragraphs explaining how the Jews seek to control the other,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire earth and actually hate Christians in the United States. Oh,

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if that's not what anti Semitic is, I'm not sure

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what the term means.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 4>I got this ze guy complaining about us yesterday kept

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 4>calling this bomers.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>We are gen xers. Yes, proudly so, Robin Beautiful Kentucky writes,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Justin asserts that men under thirty have a clearer understanding

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the boomer. Then Boomer's an older gen x of the

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>state which the world currently finds it Selfie then goes

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on unto subtly to doubt what I consider the basis

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of most deep state and puppet master conspiracy theories, the

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>protocols of the Elders of Zion, the fake document of

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the supposed Jewish plot to take over the world. And

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say that he's right in that people, not

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just men under thirty, are more susceptible to such nonsense

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because they're raised with the Internet, which makes such garbage

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>easily available to the weak minded. Before the Internet, one

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>would actually have to seek out such information. But now,

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with just a couple of clicks, you can sit in

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>front of a screen and have all the twaddle you

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want fed directly to you. It's truly sad that these

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people think of themselves as being open minded or in

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the know, when reality they're just tools for content creators

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to get clicks. Woo twattle.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 4>I say, here's a little breaking news if it's true,

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 4>CNN says Steve Bannet was seen walking into the White

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 4>House this morning. Who would be talking to Steve Bannon.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 4>It's almost gotta be Trump, right, Probably he wants the

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Bannon point of view on all this. If he takes

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 4>the Bannon point of view, we ain't bombing might be

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 4>the opposite.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned, Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm asking about your allegation in the Prime Minister of

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 6>Israel's allegation that.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Killing terrorists is a good thing. Killing people are trying

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 5>to murder Americans is a good thing because if you're

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 5>America first, you want to protect Americans. So taking up

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 5>killing O'samovan Laden was a fantastic But you don't believe

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 5>that they're trying to murder Trump?

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Or yes't it? Yes? But why aren't you calling for

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>military action against Tehran right now?

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Because they're not very effective in terms of hitmen. They're hitmen,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 5>are not very effective, I do think so.

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 6>They're hitman, but not the bad kind, the efficient cond

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 6>What they're saying.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 7>That they're a weak country who is on its knees,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 7>and I think we need.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 6>To and why are we so afraid of them? Why

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 6>are they the biggest threat if they're a week tree that's.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 5>On sneeze because they're trying trying to keep track, they're

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 5>trying to develop. Be a little less snarky. I know

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 5>you're right, that is a problem that I have. I'm sorry.

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Katie your response. He's just such a dick He's good

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>at it.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Ted did a good job of staying pretty calm through

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>That is world class dickery right there. I mean, I

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Was a decent point Tucker was making. So it got

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 4>into the hole and net Yahoo the other day saying

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Iran was behind two assassination attempts on Donald Trump. And

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 4>when I heard that, I thought, what, No, they weren't.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>And then he kind of fudged it a little when

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>he was asked about that Iran has been trying to

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.239
<v Speaker 4>kill Don Trump. That is true and is known, but

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 4>they weren't find those two attacks.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But so I heard that exchange. Yeah, net Yao, who

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was trying to hint darkly but it didn't happen, didn't

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>come on.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 4>But then so Ted Cruz and Tucker got into that

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.479
<v Speaker 4>conversation and Ted crew said, yes, it's well known Iran

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 4>is trying to kill the president of the United States

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and has you know, has sent people over probably in

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the United States. And Tucker's thing was, if they're trying

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to kill the president the United States and we know that,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>why aren't we bombing them already? I mean, you talk

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 4>about an act of war, you're trying to kill the

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 4>president of the United States.

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So that that's what that whole conversation was about. Right, Yeah,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, But again, no, I'm not even going to

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>engage in his bad faith arguments, so waste of time.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Could you be a little less snarky? He said, yeah,

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I probably. Yeah. That was an utterly insincere

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>apology too. It was it was more sarcasm, more snark obnoxious.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So you were, as we went to break the last segment,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned that, Yeah, so Bannon's a trip to the White

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>House might portend what two interesting things.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 4>So Tucker mentions in his two hour long interview with

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Ted Cruz that I listened to the whole thing of they

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 4>got into who likes Trump the most? And Tucker said,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I talked to him last night for a long time,

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 4>and I thought, wow, that's interesting. So that was Monday

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 4>or Tuesday night. He was on the phone with Trump,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 4>who called him kookie Tucker Carlson, and then the CNN's

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 4>reporting that Steve Bannon was seen walking into the White.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>House this morning.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I assume to talk to Trump. I don't know who

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 4>else would be talking to Steve Bannon. So is Trump

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 4>looking for a final Hey, Steve Bannon, explain to me

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 4>why this is a bad idea from somebody?

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Or no, the opposite. So Trump is not looking for

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 1>advice from those people. He's telling him what time it is.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>In a situation where Marjorie Taylor Green and AOC are

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>singing from the same page of music, which is really something,

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump's political bait is at least somewhat divided

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>over the prospect that the US could join Israel's assault.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The White House is trying to tamp that down. In

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>a recent days, White House officials have quietly reached out

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to MAGA influencers, according to people familiar, aiming to explain

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump's possible shift away from a diplomatic solution. They're trying

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to get them on the reservation.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So he was talking to Tucker Carls on the

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 4>phone to say, look, Tucker, this is why we got

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 4>to do it.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Right, and you got to quit your yap. And you

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's doing the same with Steve Bannon this morning. Yeah,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I suspect so yeah, and I'll bet he or jdvans

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Er somebody is hammer and MTG two.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 4>So you said that they're singing from the same playbook,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 4>but you didn't say what their song is. They're both

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Marjorie Taylor Green and AOC against bombing Iran.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, don't get involved in a Middle Eastern war. Yeah. Indeed,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>in fact, MTG I can't remember what she looks like.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any police line bad built bush body?

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's her, right, She tweeted the other day. Anyone

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Israel Iran war is not America first slash MAGA appearing

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on Matt Gates television show Wait a minute, Matt Gates

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>has a television show anyway, So when the kids get

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>out of school, oh boy, uh da da da, Green

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>said a Middle Eastern war will pull America back twenty years.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I am pretty amazed by the people that are willing

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 4>to believe that MAGA is its own separate thing where

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 4>you can bad mouth Trump's decisions and we're our own

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 4>power base. I don't think that's true. I guess we'll

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 4>find out in the next couple of years. I think

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Maggot is Trump.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I would disagree subtly. I think it is a fairly

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>cohesive interest group or a group of voters and writers

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and thinkers in the same way like the open Border's

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>crowd is. And I'm not saying one is as big

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as the other, bigger or whatever, or the gay rights

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>crowd is, or it's a belief it's a belief system.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of I don't know.

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 4>I guess we'll see in coming elections. I don't think

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 4>they'll win any elections. Well, they haven't when unless Trump

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 4>is on the ticket to bring that crowd along. It's

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 4>like Obama. I mean, Obama could win elections because he

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 4>was so popular, but nobody could nobody when he wasn't

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>on the ticket.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>It didn't make any difference. Yeah. Yeah. By the way,

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the White House also reached out to Charlie Kirk conservative

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>activist Bannon clearly and in this article, I'm looking at mentions.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Mark Levin doesn't mention Ben Shapiro, but I know a

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of your woke write types say, yeah, those people

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are just spouting the talking points of the Jews because

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they're about Israel. They're not about the United States, which

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is a hell of a thing to say about Mark

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Levin for instance. Also, and you know what, I've got

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, Matt Gates, in talking to MTG said

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>President Trump rescued the Republican Party from the doom of

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>neo conservatism. I think it's a fair question to ask

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>those folks who want to entangle themselves in an Iranian war,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what's your plan for the day after?

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's always a good one, that's absolutely necessary.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes people ask questions like they're rhetorical questions. It's not

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a rhetorical question. It's a fine question, and I think

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump would be willing to answer it. I think the

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>question is less.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Needed now than it was a obviously Iraq or you know,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, eliminating Hamas and Gaza, then who's going to

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 4>run it. You can't let Iran get a nuclear weapon,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the end is I think Trump's opinion in my opinion

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 4>on that, And yeah, looking at the next day is

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 4>a very good idea, and should plan is best you can.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 4>But no matter what the answer to that is, they

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 4>can't have a nuclear weapon. You can't let them have

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 4>a nuclear weapon because you haven't answered the question what's next?

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Right. It reminds me in a weird way of our

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>discussion through the decades about illegal immigration, and especially back

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in the day in cal Unicornia, people would say, as

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>if they're asking a rhetorical question and a powerful, devastating question. Yeah,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>who's going to pick the lettuce? And we crafted the

0:25:55.000 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>answer somebody or nobody or a machine. If lettuce picking

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is the tail that wags the entire dog of the

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>United States, were screwed. You've got to enforce the law.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>The one non negotiable is we've got to have coherent

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>immigration policy and we've got to follow it. And if

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it ends up that nobody picks the lettuce and we

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>all have to eat kale instead, or let us just

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>triple the expense or whatever, that's just the one possibility

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>or the one option is untenable. It's unacceptable. That is

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what we meant. Same way, the one unacceptable option is

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the freaking Mullahs having a nuclear bomb and the desire

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to wipe out humanity in the name of their Islamist vision.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, some of you probably remember my

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 4>one man play, A World without Lettuce.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 4>It ran briefly, it closed very quickly. It just didn't

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 4>catch on. I think it needed some songs.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I urge you to rewrite. I should have made it

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>as musical and retro as opposed to. Yeah, so that's

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting that Trump feels like he needs to convince Steve

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bannon and Tucker Carlson before he does this. I wrote

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you a song Bacon, Nothing and Tomato, which you rejected.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll remind you the BNT. Yes, I'll have a BNT

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where And this is the moment in the show Joe

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>could no longer talk about this stuff seriously.

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, that's true. But uh hmm, interesting, I'll be darned.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Trump has been risked on both the risks and benefits

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 4>of bombing fodoh, according to CBS News, Yeah, I assumed that,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 4>and his mindset is that disabling it is necessary because

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 4>of the risk of weapons being produced in a relatively

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 4>short period of time. Sources say, so he seems to

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>have been he's completely convinced.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right. I'm sorry. I had one more thing

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to throw in about Steve Bennon, specifically, He

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday that Trump really needs to articulate his views

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>not just a MAGA but to the American people of

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>why we would get involved in another war over there

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as a combatant. So that was Bennon sending a message

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to Trump, who apparently, excuse me, called for Bennon to

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>come to the White House to talk to him. But

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bannon also said this, and this is yesterday before coming

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to the White House today. He called on supporters to

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>pray for Trump, and he predicted that the MAGA movement

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't fully splinter over ran quote. We don't like it,

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we hate it, but you know, we'll get on board.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, Oh that was pretty get along, ye by

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>his standards. Yeah, yeah, there will be no mutiny on

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the good ship MAGA. According to Steve Bannon, did he

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>walk into the White House looking like a half a

0:28:56.160 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>homeless person? Probably? Yeah, we will finish wrong next.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Whoopie Goldberg on the View just said black people in

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 4>America have it as bad as women in Iran. So

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that's helpful on this Juneteenth. Why she's a moron, she's

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 4>mon or she's being deliberately provocative in a really not

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 4>healthy way.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Does she need the money or the attention. I don't know.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's on. Speaking of getting attention, Tulsy Gabberd, who I

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have called a crackpot, among other things, a clip of

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>her from a hearing congressional hearing in March was getting

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention this week in which she essentially denied.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>She said, according to intelligence, Iran does not have a

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>nuke or blah blah, we're not to play it for you, right,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we're about to play it for you. But then the

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>clip generally after about eighteen seconds ends, and what she

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>said next I thought was really interesting too. So this

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is both halves of it together.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 2>The ICY continues to assess that Iran is not building

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 2>a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Kamani has not authorized

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in two thousand

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 2>and three. The ICY continues to monitor closely if Tehran

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 2>decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program. In the past year,

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>we've seen an erosion of a decade's long taboo in

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Iran on discussing nuclear weapons in public, likely emboldening nuclear

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 2>weapons advocates within Iran's decision making apparatus. Iran's enriched uranium

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>a state without nuclear weapons.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Hm, that is interesting. Why did people leave that It's

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not as dramatic. Maybe they were trying to say, I

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They might have had a couple of different purposes.

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 4>And was that for the crowd that's trying to work,

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 4>they're not close to a nuke, that's just Netanyahu trying

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 4>to stay in office crowd.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, But and then the crowd that thinks Tulsey's

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a crackpot and or shouldn't be in the administration floated

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that to look at the division within Trump world.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, but in reality, her boss, the President, was asked

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 4>what he thought of what she had to say, and

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 4>he said, I don't care what she thinks. And she

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't in. She isn't in these security meetings. You don't

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 4>have your director of National Intelligence in the big meetings.

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 4>That is a heck of a deal. I don't know

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>how you don't resign under those circumstances.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, me too. I don't know what the DNI

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>does day to day.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 4>It is a is another layer added after nine to

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 4>eleven unnecessary. People always think you got to fix things

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 4>with more layers of people in government and offices.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's unnecessary. There's definitely the danger

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you're suggesting, but it could be like ten people.

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And just because it's an umbrella organization meant to make

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>sure that the CIA is sharing with the FBI, who

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is sharing with the NSA, was sharing with the d

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>i A make sure they're not siloed. Stove piping Jack described,

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>others have described it.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>I was listening to Ken Pollock being interviewed, and he's

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>been in the intelligence agencies forever. I was listening to

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 4>him on a podcast yesterday and it came up and

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 4>he said, the DNA d and I was created. It

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 4>doesn't really have a purpose. It's it's it's hard to

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 4>figure out what they're supposed to be doing.

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So right, that's what I thought, and I was glad

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to hear him say that. It's funny. I forgot my

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>own point. I was driving toward the idea that, you know,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe he doesn't need Tulsi Gabbard in the meetings because

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>she's not the CIA. She's just the person who makes

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>sure the CIA is sharing with the FBON. Right, so

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you have the CIA and the FBI in.

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 4>There, Yeah, that makes sense. Of course, having the president

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 4>say I don't care what you think.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not a good looks. I'm strong, You're ready.

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Katie Green's strong.

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean I've been told I don't care what you think,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 4>and I found it hurtful.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty. Hey, let's

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>get a final thought from everybody on the crew, because

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we care what they think deeply. Let's begin with Michaelangelo

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or technical director. Michael final thought, Yes, support your kids

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>lemonade stands.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 7>Anytime I see a little lemonade stand in the neighborhood.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I pull over Igimo dollar two.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 5>So I will say, though, the quality of lemonade is

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 5>always suspect.

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've had some good stuff and I've had stuff

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that I've had to spit out the windows.

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 4>When Henry did his a couple of years ago, him

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 4>and his buddy, they were fresh squeezed, actual lemons from

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 4>the trees.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It was really good. Oh gimme, Katie Green are esteemed duswoman.

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>As a final thought, Katie, I think you guys will

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be thrilled to know that the band name Ambiguous Genitalia

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is up for grabs, not taken yet let's kick out

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the jams. Huh jack. A final thought, how long well

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>my son and I last at a Dodgers game when

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 1>neither one of us are that interested? Do you think

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there's enough of the old ballpark just between the food

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and the vibe to keep you entertained for a while? Sure?

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Watching people watching? Yeah, you're exactly right, I would hope.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So I have two final thoughts. This is unprecedented. Number One,

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I've called Telsea Gabbert to crank, definition and eccentric person,

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>especially one who was obsessed by a particular subject or theory. Okay,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I see is a crank. And also, streaming is king

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>May this past May last month, first time ever Americans

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>watching television being streamed outnumbered cable and network TV combined.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually surprised he took this long for that line

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 4>to be crossed. Armstrong and Getty rare. I think about

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 4>another grueling four hour workday.

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So many people thanks a little time go to Armstrong

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Egeddy dot com. A lot of great clicks there for you.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Trust me on that. Will we be at war by

0:34:54.400 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this time tomorrow? God bless America. I'm strong and Getty.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>There are two ways to look at this Where shade

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are you? This is a national emergency. Come on, you weenies,

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>grow up.

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 7>Okay for those of you that don't understand.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me say. Let me say one thing.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 6>You're a senator who's calling them about the country.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 7>No, you don't know anything about the country yet I know.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your attention to this matter. Armstrong and

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Getty