WEBVTT - The People Who Get Covid Twice

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. It's day one and

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety six since coronavirus was declared a global pandemic. Today's

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>main story. We're now learning that having had COVID nineteen

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you can't get it again. We'll discuss what

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that means for stopping the outbreak spread and for the

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>development of a vaccine. But first, here's what happened in

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>virus news today. COVID nineteen could wipe out an estimated

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred million jobs globally. That's a bigger hit to

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the labor market than economists anticipated. According to the International

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Labor Organization, the i l O also predicts a much

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>slower recovery. At the end of this year. The i

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>l O said that global working hours were seventeen percent

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lower than the end of equivalent to almost five hundred

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>million jobs. That's up from four hundred million projected in June.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Johnson has begun dosing up to sixty thousand

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>volunteers in a study of its COVID nineteen vaccine. It's

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the first big US trial of an inoculation that may

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>only require one shot. J and J is the fourth

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine maker to move its candidate into late stage human

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>studies in the US. If enrollment goes as expected, the

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>trial could yield results as soon as the end of

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the year, allowing the company to seek emergency authorization early

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>next year if it proves effective. Finally, the Trump administration

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>has shifted billions of dollars away from public health programs

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for testing and mask funds into its Operation Warp Speed

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccine effort. It's a sign the US government is increasing

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>its focus on a medical solution to the pandemic. The transfers,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>disclosed in the government audit reported by Bloomberg News and

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>described by Congressional Aids, have increased the budget of the

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Warp Speed program to as much as eighteen billion dollars,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>much larger than the ten billion dollar figure the administration

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>has routinely cited in public and now for today's main story,

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists in Hong Kong were ar died last month. What

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>many Headlong suspected could happen. Someone who had recovered from

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen caught the coronavirus again. Since then, about a

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dozen cases of reinfection have been reported worldwide. These cases

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate that a natural infection doesn't lead to lasting protection,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and that the pandemic could persist in the human population.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Senior editor Jason Gale talked to health experts

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about what this means for our ability to stop the

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>virus and to produce an effective immunization. Anecdotes of people

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>being infected by the coronavirus twice have appeared in the

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>media since at least February, but these cases went proven.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>To demonstrate reinfection, scientists have to isolate the microbial culprit

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at each time, check it's genetic, think a print, show

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that each infection was caused by a different virus. Scientists

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong reported the first confirmed reinfection almost a

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>month ago. I asked an infectious diseases physician, he's worked

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of outbreaks, how we should interpret that finding.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dr Tom friedan president and chief executive officer of

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Resolved Saved Lives and former director of both the Centers

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for Disease Control and Prevention and Commissioner of the New

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>York City Health Department. Well, first, we're continuing to learn

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more every day, but it's clear now that reinfection can happen,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>how often it happens, and what the implications are for

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>both natural infection and vaccine induced immunity really are still unclear.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Reinfections have now been confirmed in Asia, Europe, and North

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and South America. That all up, these cases probably number

0:04:54.000 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>less than a dozen, which is reassuring. Right, globally we

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly had more than a hundred million infections. Now if

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen a lot of reinfection, it must be rare,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or you can say, you know, we're really not looking

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and until we look, we're not going to find. I

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think most of us believe that there is some level

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of immunity for some period of time in some people,

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>but those are very vague qualifiers is some ten percent

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or eighty percent, and really until we get better dead

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and we won't know. This first case reported by doctors

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Hong Kong occurred in at thirty

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>three year old nine t worker who had a mild

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>case of COVID nineteen in March last month. He was

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>screened for the coronavirus at the airport after we return

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>from a works trip to Europe. The man didn't have

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>any symptoms, so it was no doubt a surprise when

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the test came down't positive. The fact that he was

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>infected without symptoms suggested to some scientists that his memory

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>immune response prevented any symptomatic disease. In other words, that

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>natural infection protected him from getting the cough soil throughout

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>favor and headache he experienced four and a half months earlier,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't prevent him being infected again. I asked Tom,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is this what we might expect from a subsequent infection

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Sasko et virus. Well, one theory is that

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not likely to get severe disease twice. There is

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a reported case of someone who had mild disease the

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>first time and then moderately severe disease the second time,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and someone else who had moderately severe disease the first

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>time and mild disease the second time. And the theory

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>here is that it's the more severe disease that's more

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>likely to result in protective antibodies. We know that there

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are some people who have very mild disease who don't

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>seem to mount an antibody response, and that may correlate

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>with being able to get infected again. It also seems

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>antibodies don't always stick around that long. Last Thursday, researches

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center published a study in

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>which they found more than half of the health care

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>workers who have been infected with sansko vie too and

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>had detectable antibodies in early April didn't have detectable antibodies

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>two months later. The researchers said they didn't know whether

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the decline and antibodies increases risk of reinfection and disease.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It's at least helping us understand what the limitations of

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>immunity against COVID nineteen might be. I think it's unlikely

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that immunity to COVID is going to be as dramatically

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>effective as to say, immunity to measles is. If you

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get measles naturally once in your life, you will in

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all likelihood never get it again. In contrast, if you

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>get influenza or malaria or lots of other conditions, you

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 1>may get them again, but perhaps less Seriously, we really

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know at this point enough about COVID. But what

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>has emerged is that um certain antibodies known as neutralizing antibodies,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do appear that they may be protective and that's why

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we're hopeful that vaccination may be possible, But until that's proven,

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just the theory. There's a possibility that immune protection

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>against the coronavirus might be cumulative. The more times are

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>immune system says the virus, the better and faster it

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>could be in awarding it. Tom says, we don't know

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that for sure, though. Well, there's something called an anamnastic response,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>where when someone is exposed again and again to a

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pathogen it strengthens their immune system. That's one theory, but

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know what the reality is with COVID.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is that there's a wide variety

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of illness. Some people get infected and it's quite mild.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Other people will get infected and they can get severely

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>ill or died, and we're not sure what the difference is.

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the key questions around reinfection is whether someone

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who has called the virus again is capable of transmitting it.

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Some pointed to one example that indicated someone could be

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>infectious and another example that suggested they might not be.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>At this point, um there are theories but no proof.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>For example, someone who has had a mild infection before

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>has very little immunity may behave just the same as

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>someone who is infected for the first time. In contrast,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who was very ill and has a high level

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of neutralizing antibody may indeed reduce their viral load and

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>be less infectious. It's something that we need to figure out.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So what do these reinfections mean for our ability to

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>reach herd immunity where the virus is potential to spread

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>is mitigated by a high level of immune protection in

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the community, all bets are off still um the likelihood

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is that herd immunity is going to involve well over

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>half of the population getting infected, but there's still many unknowns,

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that's important to keep in mind is

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that herd immunity is not a dichotomy. It's not her

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>immunity on off. The more people who are immune in

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a community to slower the virus spreads. What is certainly

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the case is that in all likelihood, getting to herd

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>immunity for COVID in the US would require an infection

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>rate of something like currently we're at about we have

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>two d thousand deaths, So in all likelihood, getting to

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>herd immunity in the US would involve another six hundred

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand deaths. We're talking about more than almost any war

0:10:49.960 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in US history. When does all this slave vaccine for COVID?

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr Chip School, the professor in the Division of Infectious

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Diseases that you see San Diego School of Medicine, says,

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to be careful about going down the AIDS

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hole. As you remember, we're gonna have an age

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and we never got one. But we've done pretty

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>well with ADS, and we did it with drugs, and

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we did it with behavioral changes, and we may be

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in the same boat with Yeah. I mean, these reinfections

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have to give you pause about thinking that you can

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>do better with a vaccine and you can do with

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>natural infection. Chip says previous research with vaccines suggests that

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the immunity isn't long and it may not be the

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>silver bullet many of us being included, hoping it will be.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think it's important to try to UM

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>optimize non vaccine interventions UM and get back to business.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I think we really have to get on with it

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about how to operate in the in the colvid era

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>where the virus is kind of gonna be looking over

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our shoulder for a wild to come. There's so much

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about the coronavirus, including our ability to

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>produce a safe, effective and durable immune response with the vaccine,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But there are things we do know we can do

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to stop the pandemic. While we push ahead with developing vaccines,

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we also have to develop better treatments and keep practicing

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>physical distancing, hand washing, mask wearing, and everything else we

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>can to prevent infections. That was Jason Gale, and that's

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it for our show today. For coverage of the outbreak

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>from one beers around the world, visit Bloomberg dot com

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>slash coronavirus and if you like the show, please leave

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>us a review and a rating on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the best way to help more listeners find our

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>global reporting. The Prognosis Daily edition is produced by Toph

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for foreheads Jordan Gaspoure, Magnus Henrickson, and me Laura Carlson.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Today's main story was reported by Jason Gale. Original music

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>by Leo Sedrin. Our editors are Rick Shine and Francesco Levi.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Francesco Levi is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. Thanks for listening.