WEBVTT - China's Chip Sector Rally and Amazon's RTO

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from Mahard. We're Innovation

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley NBN.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up China's chip sectors. He's

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 4>a thirteen million dollar rally. We discussed the bets on

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Beijing stimulus.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 5>And Amazon's leaders pushed for a return to offices to

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 5>protect the tech giants.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Culture and a US infrastructure hack American water works. The

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 4>latest target is officials warn of threats from Iran and China.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 3>But first we turn to our top story on.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 4>The markets, which is this Chinese chip maker Semi Conductive

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Manufacturing International SMICK leading that thirteen billion dollars sector rally

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 4>after global investors, but that Beijing will declare more policy

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>or financial support for the industry that is central to

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 4>its geopolitical ambitions.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>It makes Emeni Grafeo Jones us for more.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 5>Look.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Smick is blacknisted for US investors, but this is a

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 4>broad rally in the chip sector over in China.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 6>This is it's not just SMIC that's rallying but that

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 6>stock is up over twenty eight percent just on the day,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 6>up about sixty five percent in the.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Last few days.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 6>And these are shares that have been trading in Hong

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 6>Kong because the stock market actually in the mainland China

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 6>has been closed all week for the holiday. So there's

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 6>a lot of anticipation that when the Chinese stock market opens,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 6>I guess tonight for us in the US, but tomorrow morning,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Tuesday morning in China, that there's going to be a

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 6>florry of bets. So we're seeing now traders kind of

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 6>getting ahead of that. Smaller competitive competitors in the chips

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 6>fake space are.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Also up as well.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 6>Hua Hoang Semiconductor up something like seventeen percent right now.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Investors think that the Chinese government is going to have

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 5>some kind of semiconductor industry specific stimulus. Right, But if

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 5>you look at the Chinese equity market since kind of

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 5>late September, things have been improving. Give us the bigger

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 5>picture of this performance relative to I guess US tech

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 5>or European tech so far in twenty four.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean the bigger picture performance is that Chinese

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 6>stocks overall have pretty much been in a bear market

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 6>since about February of twenty twenty one. So although we've

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 6>seen big gains since late September, when, like you said,

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Beijing did announce fiscal and monetary stimulus, we're still down

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 6>for the year in a lot of these areas. And

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 6>that's right. It's really a big question here what exactly

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 6>are we going to get from China when they do

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 6>have that press conference later tonight tomorrow morning in China

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 6>and when the stock market reopens. There was a note

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 6>from analyst Brent Donnelley and the line of his email

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 6>was China, China, China, China.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>And then he has a point.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he has a point, And his note he said,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 6>how big is a stimulus? Will they even tell us?

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 6>Tonight's China reopening is likely to be spicy, So there's

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of questions about is the government actually going

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 6>to pledge specifically to add stimulus to the semiconductor sector.

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 6>But the bet here in the market right now is

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 6>that they will.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>And also, look, this has been a long hated area.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, positioning has not been long China and indeed

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 4>China techno broadly because people have.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Gotten burned by it in the last two years.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 6>Anyone who's gotten in, like I said back in twenty

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 6>twenty one, is actually still in negative territory. We are

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 6>seeing sentiment start to I guess, come around as one

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 6>would expect, the stock market goes up, ETF flows follow

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 6>So in just the last week we saw about six

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars flowing into US listed China ETF. So even

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, across the globe, investors are trying to get

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 6>in or at least play the momentum right now.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Ex Emily Graffair with the reporting on the market moves

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 5>on China tech. Let's discuss a bit more with Janetarly,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 5>head of market analysis at RBC Brewin Dolphin and your reaction, Janet,

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 5>was to upgrade your call on in the exuities context

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 5>on Asia ex Japan. When you're weighing up the factors

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 5>in the context of China tech, what were the things

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 5>that you were looking at short, medium and long term.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we have been skeptical on China, as many

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>people are, but I think is really how undervalued China

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>has been versus say the US or other development markets,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and also the fact that position.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Has been very light.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean for US, we have been underweight for quite

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a sustained period of time, so I think that is shifting.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think your Chinese market is a very momentum

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>driven and very liquiditive driven, so we have seen both

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>happening and I think we would like to participate in

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this rally.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 7>This probably has more to go.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of Chinese tech, I mean obviously undervalued,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>very unloved versus the US counterpars part. Obviously they're they're different,

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but still we think that there is still much upside

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>potential from here. But haven't said that we I mean

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we just upgraded modestly. I think there's still a lot

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of question mark for the longer term.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Emily's reporting just in that conversation was largely about some

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 5>of the domestic chip names in China. What's your attitude

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>towards the semiconductor sector in mainland China?

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think it is obviously a very state supporter

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sector has been for a while long term wise, so

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense for investors who favor this

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sector given basically I think the new tech, the semiconductor

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>strategic areas of uh, you know those equities have you know,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it should do well given how important that is. But

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we have to understand that a lot of developed

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>economies are likely to steal being skeptical, and you know,

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have restrictions of all sorts of those companies products.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 7>So I would say I would participate in the rally.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it has further to go, but

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be a bit more cautious over a longer term,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and we have to kind of understand where to take

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>profits when when it is necessary.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 4>To that point, Janet, do you think that people are

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 4>protecting to the downside enough? Do we think a lot

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 4>of people are going to get burned once again?

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it is potentially possible.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We have seen that play out before in the previous

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bull market cycle and then a very sharp band market

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in China. We have seen that play out again again.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think it could last for quite

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit. As I said, given how light the positioning,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>how underweight it is for global investors, So I would

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>say it could have further to run in the next

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months at least.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chinese bodies, their heads are tied. They

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>would just have to provide more stillables. But you're right,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there is absolutely a chance for some investors to get burned,

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 7>Why we had to auditor it very closely.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 4>What's been interesting is there's been institutional money flowing in

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 4>David Tepper saying how much he's liking China and also retail.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 4>I want to get your check just more broadly on

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>sentiment towards semiconductors globally technology globally. Where are we seeing

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the optimism still in institutional money or is it now

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 4>sort of retail and we question there for the longevity, I.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Think well, I think for US, for example, we still

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like the global semiconductor sector. Obviously that's mostly US Clay,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a lot of structural supportive drivers

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>behind that. We are very happy to get exposure to

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>those high quality companies.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 7>But I think for.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Institutions, I think it will be very dangerous if you

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>don't participate in the semiconductor That AI related theme, I

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>think what retail investors is. I think once the momentum

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is back, I think that would draw in more participation. Basically,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as interest rates are being cut, the economy continues to expand,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully let's bad news out there on the headlines,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that that could help.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 7>Although we still like the setter pretty much.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We have stayed invested and we continue to encourage investors

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to add in more money when valuations have turned attractive

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of say the past couple.

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Of months, Janet, when you got to your desk this

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 5>morning in London, how big a factor risk was trade

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 5>risk or supply chain risk for technology investors around the world.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, it is part of the consideration given that you know,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the cheap industry is very you know, the supply chain

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>is very complicated, and if there's well widespread trade productionism

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>then obviously that's not great.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 7>But fundamentally the demand is still very strong.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we are a bit more reassured

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>now is that if you look at the polls and

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the the probability of Trump winning the election by betting market,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it has gone down. Obviously it is a very tight race,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but it gives us a bit of comfort to be

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit more positive on the China equity story and

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>also the global semiconductory part. But I think ultimately fundamentally

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is about the demand the long term build up of

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>AI infrastructure and how strategically important that sector is for

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>many sovereigns.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Out there, Jennet, how important therefore, when you sat down

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>was the four percent number on the tenure yield in

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 4>that macro context for these AI bets, Well.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 7>The thing is, yeah, we saw you go back to

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 7>four percent.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think some small to meet cap stocks could be

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>struggling a little bit today, but we still see some

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of the key semiconductor stocks right. Obviously it's very company specific,

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but what we think is, you know, ah, I think, yeah,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>astrong economy, good job market hair Outomley is good for

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the world economy, for the US, for corporate earnings, et cetera.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't look too much into this one day move

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for equities. If they're down or struggling a little bit,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>I will still be quite comfortable to be overweight in

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the US and in the usmiconductor space.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Chanit mely love having you on head of market analysis

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>at LBC Brew and Dolphin.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up, US water infrastructure is under attack. More

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 4>on the latest cyber attack on American water Works. This

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 4>is blue Big Technology. American water Works says it's computer

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 4>networks and systems were hacked.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Now the New Jersey based company.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Which supplies drinking water and wastewater services to fourteen million people,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 4>So that parts of its systems were disconnected or deactivated

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 4>as they worked to contain the cyber attack. From more

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg's Jordan Robertson joins US, Now, we've had warnings

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 4>from governments about this How much how broad is this

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 4>attack from real perspective, Jordan.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, thanks for having me. So, this company that was

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 8>breached is the biggest publicly traded water and wastewater company

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 8>in the US. As you mentioned, it serves some fourteen

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 8>million customers across half of the states in the US.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 8>It's potentially a very big deal, you know. Unfortunately, we

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 8>don't have a lot of details or specifics about this

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 8>particular attack. We just know what the company is disclosed

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 8>this morning in a regulatory filing, which is that a

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 8>victim of a cyber attack, and that it's disconnected or

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 8>deactivated some of its systems. We don't have a lot

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 8>of specifics about the actual attack, but we do have

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 8>a lot of context around attacks against water treatment and

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 8>water facilities in general, which is that the US government

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 8>has been advising for months, in particular that Chinese groups

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 8>have been infiltrating US water systems. Impossible kind of preparation

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 8>for more disruptive attacks. Now, we don't know if this

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 8>is one of those, or if this is some other

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 8>type of breach, but given the context and given the

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 8>size of this water company, it's potentially a very big deal.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us the context?

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 4>As well as the US accusing the China linkt tackers

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 4>of infiltrating networks that operate as well critical US services.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 3>We've got reports in the Wall Street.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 4>Journal on Friday about potentially an attack on well providers

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 4>of Internet of Wireless, but also of US BORBA more broadly.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, what's happening now is a little bit different than

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 8>what's happened in previous years with regard to Chinese hacking.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, for many, many.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 8>Years, the US government has issued warnings about Chinese hacking

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 8>for economic espionage, so industrial espionage purposes, and also just

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 8>regular espionage, you know, spying on government agencies and military

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 8>contractors and things like that. But what the government has

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 8>been warning a while about now is that there are

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 8>using Chinese hackers, particularly a group called volt Typhoon, which

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 8>is the name that cybersecurity professionals have given them of

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 8>kind of pre positioning themselves inside critical networks to conduct

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 8>potentially disruptive attacks at some predetermined point in the future.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 8>In the military, they call this kind of preparing the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 8>battle space. That's a very different type of attack than

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 8>we've seen in the past from some of these Chinese groups.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 8>So that's what the US government has been warning about.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 8>Again in this case, we don't know yet if this

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 8>is related to these Chinese attacks at all, or if

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 8>it's something else, potentially like ransomware. But given that context,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 8>and given that the US government is really ringing the

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 8>bell and really raising the alarm about these Chinese attacks,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 8>it bears paying pretty close attention to this incident to

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 8>see if there's something deeper involved.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Jordan, you're deep on the cybersecurity beat, right, and there's

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>going to be a section of our Bloomberg Technology audience

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 5>around the world that go, they're attacking water infrastructure. So

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 5>speak a little bit more about that water infrastructure and

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 5>do we have any reporting on sort of the competence

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 5>of US companies and US government to defend against it.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, to answer your first question, why attack water companies?

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 8>You know we saw with the attack on Colonial pipeline

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 8>several years ago that you know, you don't have to

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 8>attack an actual pipeline to disrupt the to disrupt critical systems,

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, whether in the US or elsewhere, you only

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 8>have to disrupt their IT systems. In the case of

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 8>Colonial Pipeline, which you know, disrupted gasoline shipments across the

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 8>entire Eastern US, it was their IT system. There's a

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 8>billing system that went down as a result of ransomware attacks.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 8>So there's a lot of damage and a lot of

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 8>disruption that hackers can do by simply disrupting even just

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 8>the IT systems of some of these critical infrastructure providers,

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 8>whether that's electricity providers, whether it's water providers, you know,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 8>kind of whether it's gasoline shipment companies and pipeline operators.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 8>So there's potentially a very great advantage that a foreign

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 8>nation would have could have, you know, if they decided

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 8>to disrupt in that way. And with regard to the

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 8>competence of critical infrastructure providers, We've done a lot of reporting.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 8>The cyber team A Bloomberg's got a lot of reporting

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 8>on this topic. And the answer to your question is

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 8>it varies. You know, the largest companies, the largest electricity

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 8>suppliers in particular, tend to be pretty good at cybersecurity.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 8>They've gotten the message.

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 5>They've got big budgets.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 8>But as you go down that ladder, and you go

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 8>down the ladder of resources in particular, you know, it

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 8>really just varies. There are some very large, critical infrastructure

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 8>providers that are just not as great at protection as others.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Blombergs Jordan Robinson were grateful for that reporting, Thank you. Meanwhile,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Ukrainian hackers say they carried out a cyber attack that

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 5>took down online broadcasts of Russian state TV and radio channels.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 5>According to officials in Kiev, at least twenty Russian broadcasters

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 5>were affected, though claims could not be verified by Bloomberg News.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 5>The disruptions to the broadcasts coincided with Russian present in

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 5>Vladimir Putin's seventy second birthday Caroline.

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Back in the US, ed State, local officials across the

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 4>country are bracing for a range of possible disruptions, including

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>cyber attacks as well as disinformation on ruly crowds, even

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the US elections next month. We're want to

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 4>dig into that with Bloomberg's Jamie Tarabay joining us. You

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 4>went to Arizona. You are focusing on really the computer

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 4>systems in particular around voting in Arizona.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Why remind us.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, Arizona four years ago was the scene of one

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 9>of the biggest flash points in the twenty twenty election.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 9>There is an aspect to what they did at the

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 9>time that they really learned from going forward. And one

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 9>of the first things that they did was look at

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 9>physical security as well as cybersecurity. Of fence went up

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 9>to protect the workers inside, and then they began this

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 9>system of trying to reach for utmost transparency. There's a

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 9>twenty four hour livestream camera that actually doesn't even have

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 9>to work outside of election season, and that is going

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 9>three sixty five days a year, twenty four hours a day,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 9>seven days a week.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 3>They are inviting people.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 9>To come to tour to look at all of the

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 9>computer systems to see that everything is serialized, everything is audited,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 9>everything is tracked. All the networks are air gap so

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 9>they're not actually connected to the internet. Whatever ways people

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 9>might think that there's a possibility that an election or

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 9>that their vote could be hacked, the people in Arizona

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 9>are doing their utmost to really push back and try

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 9>to dispute a lot of those conspiracy theories.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Jamie four years ago, I was there posted on the

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 5>election trail in Maricoba County, and I think it's worth

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 5>just discussing the basics of what we're talking about. It's

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 5>a building, it has windows and bricks and mortar, and

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 5>they're making modifications to it because inside that building they'll

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 5>count votes. Take it from there and run with the

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 5>rest of the story.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 9>To go into this building now and as you said,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 9>four years ago, we literally the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 9>made it into the building. A couple of days later,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 9>one of the people who was a protester in the

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 9>January sixth attack on the Capitol was in the parking lot.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 9>Heavily armed people were in the parking lot. And now

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 9>you cannot get in there without access without a security clearance.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>The room that where all.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 9>The ballots are tabulated is a place where you can

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 9>only go in if you have security clearance. Every single

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 9>every single machine is audited and tracked and checked. They

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 9>have literally done everything they can to get ahead of

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 9>any possible question about any irregularities or any redundancies. I mean,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 9>there's a machine that go that sifts through the ballots,

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 9>and if one of those ballots ways just a little

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 9>bit different.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 5>To the rest.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 9>They basically will you get rid of They'll cancel out

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 9>the batch two hundred before and two hundred after.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 3>They're really doing everything they can.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Here Bloomberg's Jamie Taraba terrific reporting. Thank you very much.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 2>This is a first look inside the world's first humanoid

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 2>robot assembly plant. It's a work in progress. Here Agility

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Robotics is going to manufacture digit in a teal and

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>middle gray bot that walks like a bird. It's sneeze

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>beIN backwards, and it is designed to work at first

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 2>anyway at warehouses, including at Amazon and Gxologistics. The factory

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is on Marshy, former agricultural land on the outskirts of Salem,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Oregon's capital, not the robotics hotspot, but it is up

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the road from Corvallis, an Oregon State university where Jonathan

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Hurst Robotics, the professor, co founded Agility, and of course

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>there is an Amazon warehouse nearby. Agilly's first design was

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>a monopod called Thumper. Later in more sophisticated bots have

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>arms and a head unit for sensors, making them a

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 2>little less creepy. At this facility, Agility simulates work its

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 2>spots are already doing for clients, stacking tote bins at

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Amazon and placing bins on conveyor belts in the case

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 2>of GXO. While I was watching one Digit tried to

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>place a stack of bins on top of another, but

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 2>was off by a small margin, so the new bins

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 2>SATIS kew pass and watch for a few seconds. As

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a software tried to figure out what to do, it

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 2>gave up. Other times it was seamless. Digits, communications systems,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and for sensors live in its head unit, and first

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Agility didn't put heads on the robots. The team started

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>with the goal of building bots able to move in

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 2>human spaces, not ones that looked like us Digit does

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and fingers. Agility's first Digit model started with black paddles

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>capable of lifting totes, and they're adding other end of

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 2>arm devices. The company hopes this building will be able

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to churn out ten thousand robots a year. If we

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>could doing there, we'll take a while. Engineers are still

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>documenting assembly processors, figuring out what tools should go where

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>before they can start mass hiring technicians to assemble the bots.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 2>The first robot assembled year one of Digit's new fourth

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 2>version will be completed sometime this month.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Talking of Amazon, a rare analyst downgrade citing concerns over

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 4>the company's margin trends into next year, saying growth in

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 4>the cloud computing business is unlikely to help much, Whilst

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Fargo Securities cut the stock to equal way from overweight

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 4>and cut a price target from two hundred and twenty

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 4>five to one hundred and eighty three dollars, one of

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the lowest on Wall Street.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 3>ED will have more on that later.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Amazon, which recently decided to bring corporate employees back

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 5>to the office full time, honoring Bloomberg Spencer. SIP sources

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 5>are telling us that there's a reason for that, and

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 5>the reason is culture. Explain that.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so Jesse is saying CEO Andy Jasse is saying

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 10>that new hires, and remember Amazon doubled in size to

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 10>the pandemic, that newly hired Amazon employees just aren't getting

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 10>the chance to learn and understand the culture the way

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 10>they would if they were working in the office, you know,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 10>all week long. They're currently at three days a week.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of what they call coffee badging going on,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, people badging in grabbing a coffee, heading home,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 10>doing the rest of the day from home.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 5>So three days isn't quite enough to have that overlap.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 10>Of people where the younger employees are getting an opportunity

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 10>to learn thirty seconds.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm afraid, Spencer, but this is something Andy Jesse is

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 4>very passionate about.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's what you're saying. You wrote a very long

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 10>note to employees explaining it. And then the pushback on

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 10>he mentioned the word culture multiple times, and then the

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 10>pushback is, oh, well, you're just trying to lay more

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 10>people off and this is a way to further thin

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 10>the ranks. And the true answer is probably a little

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 10>bit of both. They want to help the culture and

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 10>they want to thin the herd a little bit.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>It's always somewhere in the middle. Spenser Soper Blue.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology and Caroline Hyde in

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 4>New York.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 5>And Amed Lovelo in San Francisco. Going to take a

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 5>quick look at markets. It's hard to summarize what's going

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 5>on beyond strong jobs data on Friday for the months

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 5>of September. Kind of pairing back the increments that we

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 5>expect the Federal Reserve to cut rates. Then as that

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 5>one hundred modestly lower, basically flat. The Philadelphia Sembiiconductor Index

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 5>is flat. There is some name single names moving to

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 5>the upside, some of the downside, Bitcoin pushing above sixty

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 5>three thousand US dollars per token. There's lots of analyst

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 5>noise out there. Apple was downgraded by Jeffreys over iPhone

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 5>sales pessimism. The analyst says high expectations for the iPhone

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 5>sixteen in iPhone seventeen are premature. An analyst note Caro

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 5>on an iPhone seventeen that doesn't even exist yet.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 4>One that we're going to be digging in with another

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 4>analyst in a moment. But let's just talk about what

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 4>does and doesn't exist. Bloomberg's Apple whisperer, Mark Kerman is

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 4>with us, and you've been writing over the weekend power

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 4>On as always about the cadence with which Apple gives

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 4>us products and ultimately about a timing mismatch perhaps with

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>what actually is eventually on the market.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 11>You know, I think it's interesting because my point over

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 11>the weekend in my power On column, I think is

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 11>very much connected to what analysts are now seeing.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 11>I think some of these analysts.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Are a little late to the game.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 11>Here, the issue is not necessarily the iPhone sixteen, Apple

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 11>and AI or the iPhone seventeen in a vacuum. I

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 11>think this is a company that is slowly pushing away

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 11>from the momentum and the innovation it had so many

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 11>years under Steve Jobs, in so many years under Tim

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 11>Cook and Johnny I've after Jobs, but now it feels

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 11>like we're at a point where maybe at least for

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 11>the next couple of years, they're running out of these

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 11>these big ideas. They're behind in AI, they're behind in

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 11>mixed reality right, They've been behind in the smart home.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 11>But they do have these core competencies that continue to

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 11>keep the business humming. The iPhone, the iPad, the back,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 11>the Apple Watch. And I think that looking at the

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 11>phone just as the issue is a little bit too narrow.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 11>This is a company that's been searching for a next

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 11>big idea in a next big product category. And there's

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 11>really two sides of the coin here.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 7>One are they going to find.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 5>That in two?

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 11>Does that thing exist? Is there really another iPhone? At

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 11>this point, I'm thinking the iPhone is not really something

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 11>that you're able to replicate right once in a generation.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 11>And I'm not talking about a ten to twenty year generation.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 11>I'm talking about a fifty year generation product, right, And

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 11>so maybe expectations for.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 5>Summer are too high unless it's a different form factor

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 5>from a smartphone, which we'll get into later in the show.

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 5>The umbrella point of your newsletter is that Apple has

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 5>been releasing a new generation of product annually, and it's

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 5>moved away from that. But there were advantages to doing

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 5>it annually. The team knows what's coming, investors know what's coming,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 5>and there's like a holiday PR marketing campaign that can

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 5>go on. Right. What is the advantage of not doing

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 5>it annually? Yeah, go ahead.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's slowly inching away from that, right, And I

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 11>think there's two reasons. One, there's so many products now

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 11>in their pipeline. There's so much stuff. And the way

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 11>that they're functionally organized as an engineering organization makes it

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 11>so every team has to touch basically every new product

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 11>before it's released. There's no iPad division or Apple Watch division.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 11>This is a very cross functionally desig organization. That's the

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 11>way Steve Job set it up. That's why they've been

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 11>so successful.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 11>That leads to product delays, that leads to software delays.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 11>Now they know that's what's happening, and so they have

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 11>to roll these features out over several months. They can't

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 11>just do it at one time, and so Apple Intelligence

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 11>that's rolling out between September and June. Right, it's not

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 11>all coming out in September. It didn't all come out

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 11>last month. It's not all going to come out on

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 11>October twenty eighth when I expect Apple Intelligence to be released.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 5>You saw with the Apple.

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 11>Watch Ultra two, right, they retain that model for two

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 11>years in a row, simply add some new bands and

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 11>a black color option. This year, dive that Apple Watch

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 11>SE wasn't updated. The iPhone SE is updated every two

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 11>to three years. You're seeing the iPad pro now updated

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 11>every year and a half to two years. So they're

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 11>slowly inching away from that annual cycle, which is something

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 11>they just simply couldn't keep up anymore. The good news

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 11>is you're getting more polished products, you're getting bigger upgrades

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 11>generation over generation potentially, and you're getting fewer bugs and

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 11>more unpredictability from Apples. So I think overall it's a

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 11>mixed bag, but I lean towards these bigger generational updates,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 11>being a good thing. The one product that I don't

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 11>think is going to be necessarily impacted by this is

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 11>the iPhone. They are so locked into that twelve month

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 11>cycle on iPhone hardware. You really can't back your way

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 11>out of it. It's too important to the company and

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 11>the stock price. It's marketing in the holiday season, so

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 11>it's really the peripherals around their main breadwinner.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mark Gunman and I would say it is a

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 5>must read power on from the weekend. Thank you very much.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 5>Let's get more and let's talk deeply on Apple. MISSOO

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 5>analyst Jordan Klein is with us, and there's a lot

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 5>of noise this morning from the cell side, Jordan about

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 5>what is iPhone sixteen? Over hype the Jeffreson I even

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 5>mentioned seventeen, which is fictional at this point. It doesn't

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 5>exist at least as far as we know. When you

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 5>sit down at your desk and you get the phone

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 5>calls from clients, how do you react to all of that?

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 12>Well, I mean this is a rite of passage for

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 12>Apple and the investment community. Every Tember October when they

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 12>launch a new phone. Everyone loves to go out and

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 12>do their checks for how long does it take, you know,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 12>to get a phone once you place the order, and

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 12>that's you know, the lead time analysis to trying to

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 12>judge demand.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's kind of nonsense.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 12>I mean, yeah, people like to do those, the press

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 12>and media pick it up, but at the end of

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 12>the day, you won't really know how well this cycle

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 12>is till you know, next spring, and then by then

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 12>everyone's looking at the next version, right, so it's always

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 12>kind of on to the next thing. And I think

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 12>from the standpoint of where I'm focused is no one

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 12>really expects the sixteen to be some game changing iPhone cycle.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 12>It's not going to outperform. I don't think expectations of anything.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 12>It's expected to underperform. That's why the stock's been lagging.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 12>But most importantly is kind of the seventeen, you know,

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 12>the next phone next fall. That would be the second

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 12>iteration of you know, their AI software, which hopefully is

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 12>then going to drive more of a replacement cycle and

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 12>get people excited.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Generally, Could you summarize what investor attitudes are toward Apple holistically?

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 12>They're not good. I think every day you get another

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 12>cell side report that is negative or cautious in terms

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 12>of our checks, suggests demand is weaker than it was

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 12>a year ago.

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 5>The phone isn't selling well.

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 12>They're going to start cutting unit production by December, and

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 12>that permeates across the investment community, and most people are like, yeah,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 12>it's a major stock.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I have to pay attention.

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 12>I have to have some waiting in my portfolio relative

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 12>to my benchmark. But most people just take a view

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 12>that unless I think this product's going to surprise, I

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 12>can underweight the stock and not worry about missing any alpha.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 5>And that's what they're doing.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 12>They're going into other names, particularly the mag seven that

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, the setup looks better. So all I'm saying

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 12>is that the sentiment couldn't be that much worse than

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 12>it is.

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, could be that much worse, but it's actually only

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 4>about four percent off of its record high in terms

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 4>of that share price still worth more than three trillion dollars.

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Is this just going to be sideways trading there? For Jordan,

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 4>we sort of priced in some of that anxiety.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's a great point, and that's kind of what

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 12>I was noting today that you know, who would have

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 12>guessed Apple's shares are up seventeen percent this year. It's

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 12>a little below the market, but it's better than a

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.479
<v Speaker 12>lot of other names, particularly in software. It's better than Google,

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 12>It's actually better than Microsoft. So I think again that

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 12>shows you positioning and sentiment is already down, and every

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 12>time we get a new update or we get closer

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 12>to the earnings report later in October, I think the

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 12>surprise to the downside factor gets more and more priced

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 12>in or expected. So again, yeah, it could be an

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 12>underperformer and a laggard, but I don't think it's going

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 12>to all of a sudden derate and trade down Materially.

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a lot of people who might buy

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 12>the stock of it.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Ever got closer to two hundred dollars Mizooo.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Kline getting a lot calls thanks for answering Areth today. Meanwhile,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 4>hon Hi Tech Day twenty twenty four is kicking off

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow and the company plans to showcase how the group

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 4>has introduced AI applications into their platforms.

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>It makes Anamal Drudez has.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 13>More iPhones that kindle, Nintendo switch even ring doorbells. FOXCN

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 13>is making these and more. Assembling the devices, mostly in

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 13>China has allowed the company to build an enormous business,

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 13>generating nearly two hundred billion dollars in revenue last year,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 13>but the market for many types of electronics and particularly smartphones,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 13>is maturing. Fox Con wants to move up the value

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 13>chain to products that generate better profits. AI servers is

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.719
<v Speaker 13>one area where it's making progress. Sales have risen as

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 13>FOXCN works with the likes of Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 13>on artificial intelligence infrastructure. Semiconductors is another field, with the

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 13>focus right now mostly on older, less sophisticated chips. At present,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 13>these mostly go toward in house needs, including EVS. This

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 13>is an additional space where the Taiwanese company wants to

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 13>compete with a value proposition similar to what a one

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 13>stoled Apple. Fox con can build part or all of

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 13>your car in less time and at lower cost.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 14>We believes that this contractive and design manufacturing service go

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 14>same away as smartphones laptops, so we will have forty

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 14>to forty five percent machumer features.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 13>Goldman Sachs says e the outsourcing could be worth more

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 13>than one hundred and forty billion dollars by the end

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 13>of the decade, but with fox Con still to sign

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 13>on a major customer, its grandest auto ambitions are yet

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 13>to be realized.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 5>That was Bloomberg's Annabel drowlers on on hiblically traded arm

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 5>of the company we all know as Fox Common. Now

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 5>coming up, ar glasses maker x Reel expands its retail

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 5>footprint around the world. We're going to speak to its

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 5>CEO Chizu. That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 5>The lack of a rebuttal in Ubersoft's response to recent

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 5>takeover speculation by Tencent suggests the door is open to

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 5>a potential buyout. How a Bloomberg Intelligence research points to

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 5>potential regulatory hurdles given the current geobilistical backdrop. Let's get

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 5>out to Bloomberg's Benoir Bertilo, who's in Paris and actually

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 5>ben war I think this morning we have heard from

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Ubisoft who have issued a statement about the reporting. Just

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 5>summarize what they said.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so they basically said that the ubisoftis used to

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 15>review its strategic options.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 2>That's options plural.

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 15>And they didn't say more on the report and now

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 15>talks for take a private report with ten cents, but

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 15>they just said that they are indeed basically working on options.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 15>They also said the management was working on its current strategy.

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 4>And remind us of what the strategy might be when

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 4>share price has halved, and that's obviously why perhaps it

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 4>assesses options.

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, they said they would focus on the open world games.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 15>That's a point that's been difficult for them recently because

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 15>they released the Star Wars game that was an open

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 15>world game that didn't work very well, and the next one,

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 15>the big one assa since scret Shadow has been pushed

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 15>back to February. So it doesn't say much on their

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 15>strategic options right now. Just we understand that the talks

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 15>are underway and today actually the company didn't really lose

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 15>the gain that he'd saw on the markets on Friday,

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 15>which says a lot. But now everyone is sort of

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 15>waiting for the next step.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 4>We keep an eye currently. Was just finishing the day

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 4>a little bit lower three point eight percent. Benuir Bertilo,

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 4>Shares of Nikon surging the most in two months, after

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 4>it was disclosed that Esselo Luxotica has taken a five

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 4>point one percent steak now.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 3>According to a.

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Filing, the iewear maker began accumulating Nikon shares in early August.

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 4>The move marks a backing of lens technology as the

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 4>rise of smart wearable emergers now. Earlier this year, Nicon

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 4>said it plans to invest more than six hundred million

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 4>dollars by twenty thirty to bolster it's lenses and.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Other offerings.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Stay in the realm of smart wearables AR glasses make

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 5>at x Reel has announced it will expand its in

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 5>store retail presence offering sales across Europe, Asia and the

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 5>United States. Here with more is chi zoo x Real

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 5>CEO and co founder. And what we're talking about is

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 5>the air to pro and beam, which is basically the

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 5>puck that goes with it to connect whatever compute device

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 5>you want into the augmented reality glasses. Let's start with

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 5>the news, which is you're backing physical retail. Do you

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 5>want people to go into a store, pick up the

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 5>glasses and buy them? Why? Why that strategy?

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 16>Okay, so previously you know our product is available on

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 16>Amazon or some other online channels. Right, this is such

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 16>a new kind of cool gadget. We want the people

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 16>actually can go to their nearby store and try it

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 16>for themselves.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 5>I see that pin on your lapel. Yeah, I know

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 5>where that's from. Meta connect, That's right. So you know,

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 5>I've tried the Orion Meta A glasses. The technology difference

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 5>between what Meta announced last week and what you're doing

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 5>is that basically you can cast another device into your glasses,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't have its own operating system. Yep. How much

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.439
<v Speaker 5>of a limitation is that for you? You know, where

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 5>do you want to take x reel to compete with oryan,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 5>which isn't going to be sold in its current form?

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 5>That's right? Yep.

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 16>So first of all, you know, you have to give

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 16>a lot of credit to Meta and even Snapchat, you know,

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 16>from those big tech companies get into this space. This

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 16>is very important. That kind of validates the future of

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 16>the entire AR market. On the other hand, you know,

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 16>what we are trying to do is can we actually

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 16>deliver some kind of product that people can use.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Today, not the future, not several years ahead.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 16>So that's why the kind of product strategy we're taking is,

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 16>you know, instead of giving a fully spatial computing display

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 16>that is more complicated running their own operating system, can

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 16>we ist provide maybe a spatial display kind of a

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 16>philosophy who can easily use our glasses like air to

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 16>pro like also just look like a sunglasses this way right,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 16>so they can easily plug into your cell phone, your tablets,

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 16>or your even laptop handhold gaming devices. So does instantly

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 16>turned into in my opinion, a much bigger high resolution

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 16>virtual display, and feedback has been phenomenal. I mean I

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 16>saw people actually going from those traditional two D flat

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 16>screens to those kind of virtual displays.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, people are buying these in numbers.

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Four hundred thirty thousand I think was the number we

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 4>shared on the screen. You've got forty seven percent of

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 4>market share. Where are they buying them? Where is the

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.479
<v Speaker 4>consumer for you? Is it more China based, Asia based

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 4>or is it in the US too?

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 16>Actually this is a global footprint. So yes, as you mentioned,

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 16>we're nearly half of the entire global market share, and

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 16>people are using that for media consumption, so they can

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 16>stream like movies and also they can play games. Connecting

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 16>this to steam deck or switch is a good way

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 16>to go. And actually people are even there is too

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 16>laptop for productivity and some other activities.

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so what then of manufacturing? Where are these being

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 4>made At the moment. You are headquartered over in China,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 4>but you are a global company with a global footprint,

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 4>but where exactly are these being supplied from?

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 16>So right now this is a manufacturer actually in the

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 16>same kind of a plant, adds the hypor vision prole

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 16>They're manufacturing in China, and you know, we want to

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 16>leverage that kind of manufacturer capability and the efficiency being

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 16>in China especially, you know, for this kind of a

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 16>new industry at a very elesage.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Chizu y CEO of x Rael, really great to have

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 5>you here with us in San Francisco. A mixed out

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 5>look for Netflix on Wall Street. The streaming giant was

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 5>downgraded to underweight from equal weight of Barkley's, but upgraded

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 5>to overweight from neutral at Piper Sandler. Barkleays is questioning

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 5>the company's valuation as Piper sand gets bullish on momentum

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 5>from its advertising strategy. Netflix reports earnings next Thursday.

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Carol tak into the theaters because boy, it was a

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 4>rough start for the Joker sequel. The Warner brother film

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 4>opened at forty million dollars in sales, much lower than

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the projected sixty million dollars and the film cost, of course,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers one hundred and ninety million to make. Let's

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.479
<v Speaker 4>discussed bluemokes Hannah Miller with what went wrong?

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Why did no one rush to go and see it?

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, so they really gave director Todd Phillips free reign

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 17>with this movie, and it seems like it went a

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 17>bit over the top. There's been a lot of negative

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 17>word of mouth reviews and critics are not liking it.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 17>So we think that cut into people seeing it in

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 17>theaters this past weekend.

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 5>The bar was high because the First Joker almost hit

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 5>one hundred million in its opening weekend and did eventually

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 5>gross a billion. So there's that. If anyone watching bluemog

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Technology saw it and loved it, you know where to

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 5>find us. We welcome your feedback. Is it the whole

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 5>movie theater versus streaming debate, the battle for eyeballs in

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 5>a busy weekend?

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 17>You know, I think we have seen some successes in

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 17>recent months, you know, June two, Beetlejuice, Beetle Juice, you know,

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 17>those were both Warner Brothers movies that did really well.

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 17>You know, there obviously is this fight to get eyeballs

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 17>away from streaming and people back into theaters.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 5>And this was a huge miss.

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 17>You know, people were expecting this to live up to

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 17>the expectations that Joker set in twenty nineteen.

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 5>People also have short attention spans. I think the film's

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 5>more than two hours long, isn't it?

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 2>It is?

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 17>And I think people were taken aback that this is

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 17>a musical that Lady Gaga is going to be singing,

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 17>and there are songs and it's not as gritty as

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 17>maybe the first one was.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>You were saying that to everyone's surprised that it was

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a musical at all. But there is some fist competition.

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 3>People are going and seeing other stuff what has got

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 3>people electrified?

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean people are into the Wild Robot film.

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 17>I think people are kind of looking for more positive

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 17>stuff that they can enjoy go to with their families.

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so it'll be interesting.

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 17>To see, you know, as we get closer to the

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 17>holiday season, how movies fare in theaters.

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 4>And this comes obviously as Hollywood itself reels from strike action.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 4>A lot of that to do with what we talk

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 4>about day and day out artificial intelligence, and they're like,

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 4>where did this movie get made and how and was

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 4>it a synonymous to that issue.

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, So with this film, there was a lot of anticipation,

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 17>you know, around it. It was filmed in New York,

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 17>Los Angeles and even New Jersey. There was a lot

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 17>of excitement. People loved Joaquin Phoenix as the Joker in

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 17>the first one, and I think it just kind of

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 17>got out of proportion. You know, it's very dramatic. There's

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 17>a lot of courtroom drama scenes versus you know, the

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 17>crime that we saw in Gotham in the first one.

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 17>So I don't think it's appealing to people the same way.

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Anamella, resident critic for US and everything about the movies. Now,

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 4>that does it for this edition of New By Technology.

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.439
<v Speaker 5>And yeah recap on the podcast. You know exactly where

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 5>to find it. Big thanks and shout out to the

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 5>team in New York City and the crew out here

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 5>in San francisc Go. This is Bluembo Technology

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 12>M