WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Smaragdus Eyes

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Listener Mail. This is Robert Lamb and this is Joe McCormick,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're back in the mail bag overfloweth it is.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>It is quite hefty this week, so we're gonna be

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>catching up, I assume, for the next few mail Bag episodes.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But Rob, if you're ready, I think I'm going to

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>jump into some messages that we got about the three

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pupiled Eye episodes. Alright, this is from Rob from you.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not having another seth rights in the listener mail

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>type situation. Okay, this is from some other Rob. Rob says,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the second pupil episode, you mentioned the interesting fact

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese word for pupil, and then Rob says

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that this contains the word child, making a connection between

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a small child and the tiny reflected image seen in

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's eye. I might have missed it, but I

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think you mentioned that our own word pupil comes

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>from the same idea. It comes from the Latin pupila,

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>meaning little girl or doll. Comparing a pupil to a

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>child is actually very common cross linguistically The Greek core

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a can mean either girl or pupil. The Irish mac

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>im risk literally means child of the iris. The hebrew

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ishn literally means little man. The Turkish goes bebegie literally

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>means I baby. It's kind of creepy. Um. These are

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not merely translations of a phrase original to one language.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They seem to have been coined independently in many unrelated languages. Apparently,

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in ancient times, the little reflection of yourself that you

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>saw in somebody somebody else's pupil was considered the most

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>remarkable thing about this body part. Thanks for making such

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a great show, rob Ah, Yeah, that's that's a that's wonderful.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know about the the I babies of Turkish there. Um,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's wonderful. Uh. One of the weird the weird

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>coincidence here. I happened to watch the old animated version

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of The Last Unicorn this week, and it's been a

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>long time since I've seen it, and I'd only ever

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>read half of the book with my son. I think

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a library book. We ended up returning it.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say I think, as far as the movie goes,

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>first half much better than the later latter half. First

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>half has all the good stuff with the Mommy Fortuna

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Harpie, and also has the best America songs,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>uh the America songs in the In the second half

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the film, um My Son even noticed that they

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>were not up up to snuff. He was like, why

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is this song so bad? And I'm like, well, which

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>half is his horse with There's no Horse with No

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Name in this. This is post Horse with No Name America.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>This is when they weren't. They don't sound that much

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like Neil Young in this. This is a you have

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you had some real some world good ones. You got

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the last Unicorn theme song It's self. You have Man's Road.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are both really good. But anyway, my point about

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>eyes is there's a there's a whole thing in it about,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the evil unicorn hoarding King Haggard, who is

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>voiced by Marvelous Lee by by Christopher Lee. He has

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing where we have this unicorn that's the

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>script that is a disguised as a human woman in

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the shape of a human woman, and he suspects something

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is up when he cannot see his own reflection in

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>her eyes and later on is she becomes more human,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>She's losing her unicorn nous and becoming more human. He

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>can see his reflection in her eyes. Interesting detail. Yeah,

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's probably, Like I said, I haven't read the

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>second half of the book, but I imagine, uh, the

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>author here is Umu of course, Peter Spiegel. I wonder

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's getting into something about the idea of possession,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>because of course this is a greedy, miserable individual who

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>uh nothing makes him happy and life except occasionally the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's collected all the unicorns but one in

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the world and hitting hitting them away in the surf.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's something about the idea of something that

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>he cannot possess fully, that that he does not see

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>himself in perhaps anyway unicorn fans right in let us know,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, This next one comes to us from It's is.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I guess Baron is writing in. I

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think someone is calling themselves Baron all the Baron rites.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Good evening, this is Baron Eaton and I had to

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>take a moment to at least address the multiple pupils

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for the Irish legends and the link to beauty. The

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>first example that popped into my head is the classic

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Dungeons and Dragons magical item the eyes of and it's

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>items plural, and you would insert the power of the

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>deity here, The baron says. Typically they would be glasses

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>of some sort, monocle, bifocals, or other lenses. Since the

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>lenses would not be purely flat, they could have multiple

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>facets that would allow the wearer to see into the future,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>see through illusions, and spot hidden treasures. Robb, you have

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced with these things. I don't think I've ever gotten

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to the point where I had eyes of a d

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I have never made these available as a d M,

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and no d M has made them available to me.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But they sound pretty fun. They also sound like maybe

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they're maybe they're a little difficult to we eve into

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a campaign. I don't know, uh I d M s

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and players right in and correct us on that if

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong anyway, the baron continues, the person viewing

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the sears would see multiple irises through the gym, and

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be clear enough to do so. Since the

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>type of gym would be associated with mystical powers and wealth,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it could be easily tied into the idea of a

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>multi pupil human, especially since most things in the early

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Before times were rife with symbolism. It would be a

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>quick way to describe a monocle if you if you

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the words to describe a monocle. Love the episodes.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You all keep giving me great ideas for games, characters

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and monsters. Much appreciated. Well many thanks to the baron. Okay,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So if I understand what you're saying in the second half,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>it's that maybe there would have been a case in

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world where somebody was looking through some kind

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of complex transparent object like a maybe a gym with

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple facets or something that had some refractive properties that

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>caused the eye to appear in multiple surfaces on the

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>gym or lens to the person looking at them, so

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>it might look like they had multiple pupils or multiple irises.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I love this idea as it relates to D and D.

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>As far as relating to to something from actual Irish history,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm intrigued, but I would have some doubts. Uh. The

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>last time I read about this, I think the historical

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>consensus was that spectacles didn't really exist before the Late

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages, though there are some individual objects that have

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>been used as uh sort of uh more more specific

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>case magnification aids and and other visual aids in the

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ancient world. So a few examples came to mind while

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this before we recorded. One is

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these these lenses from around the ancient Mediterranean and Mesopotamia.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Though I think in most cases it's actually debated whether

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>these were really used for magnification purposes, such as for

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 1>reading text or as a craft workers aid, or whether

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they were simply decorative items. Uh. Isn't that what we

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about in our sort of history of lenses episodes on? Yeah?

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We did? Uh? I think more than one episode didn't

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we were we talked about lenses. I know we did

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>one on sunglasses, and by virtue of getting into sunglasses,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>got into the idea of spectacles. Maybe we did an

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>episode on spectacles too. I don't know, it all blurs together. Well,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we've done the telescope and we did sunglasses,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so we addressed lenses in multiple ways. But uh, yeah,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's debate over to what extent some

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of these lens artifacts were actually used for magnification or not.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this still holds up but I

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>also remember reading claims at some point about ancient Romans

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>using glass spheres to magnify small text in manuscripts. And

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of course there's that great story Plenty of the Elder

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>tells about how the Emperor Nero, of course he would

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoy watching people kill each other in the arena, but

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he liked to do he liked to watch it reflected

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in a green gym that Plenty calls a smur agdus.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So to read from the Natural History quote, even when

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the vision has been fatigued with intently viewing other objects,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it is refreshed by being turned upon the stone. And

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>lapidaries know of nothing that is more gratefully soothing to

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the eyes. It's soft green tents being wonderfully adapted for

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a suaging lassitude when felt in those organs. And then

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>later he says, when the surface of the samur agnus

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is flat, it reflects the image of objects in the

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>same manner as a looking glass. The Emperor Nero used

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to view the combats of the gladiators upon a sami agnus.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess one imagines he's like holding up this

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>green gym like a mirror and then looking back behind

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>him at the at the gladiators whacking each other with

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>swords and throwing the nets and stuff. So I don't know.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean a few interesting examples of possible magnification devices, lenses,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>gems and stuff like that that would have been used

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world, though I don't know if any

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff would have ever shown up, would have

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>been known in ancient land. I have to say I

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was immediately reminded of the scene in Disney snow White

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>where Dope the dwarf. Uh, it's kind of it's kind

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of frightening to look at actually now where he takes

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>two giant gemstones and he like lodges them in his

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>eye sockets, and then it makes it look like he

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>has um, you know, multiple irises and pupils per eye,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>like a big, big dope fly. I believe that is

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what the exactly what the baron is suggesting here. All right, anyway,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I am going to read this next message from Taylor.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor says, Hey, Rob and Joe, I just finished listening

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to part two of the Three Pupil Die and unless

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm forgetting something from part one, you missed an opportunity

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to discuss a wonderfully weird example of multiple pupils in nature.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>The genus Annableps, also known as four eyed fish, are

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a genus of fish native to brackish waters in Central

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>America and northern South America. The four eyed fish does

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not in fact have four eyes, but it does have

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>four pupils sort of species in the genus Annibleps spend

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>their life at the surface of brackish estuaries, where they

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>peak above the water to watch for insect prey. When

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity presents itself, the four eyed fish leaps from

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the water to consume inattentive arthropods. However, annibleps are not

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>particularly large like our beloved house cats. These species are

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>both predator and prey and must watch the waters below

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for approaching picene predators. What's a fish to do if

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it needs to keep its eyes in the sky and

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the water at once. Evolution has produced an incredible answer.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Two pupils per eye, or rather one hour glass shaped

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pupil per eye. The constricts in the middle in such

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a fashion that the fish appears to have for pupils.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>When Antibleps rests near the top of the water, the

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>upper halves of its pupils are held above the water

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch for prey, and the lower halves remain below

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the water to watch for predators. The neatest feature of

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this adaptation to me, is that the lenses of the

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fish's eyes are bifocal to account for the different diffraction

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>of light in air and water. This strange fish has

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>split the function of its eyes in half to adapt

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to its liminal place at the surface of the water.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Please check out some pictures of this bizarre fish, and

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for continuing to create weird, wonderful and uh

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>edutaining content to fill the slower hours of my days.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>All the best, tailor, are you not edutained people? I

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>have to say I was not familiar with this fish,

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but I just looked up some wonderful images of it

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and yeah that these eyes are remarkable. It is very

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>much kind of an hour glass said looking situation in

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>many of these shots, where it's as if the an

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>oval shaped pupil has been pinched in the middle, allowing

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a portion above and a portion below the water. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's really cool. All right. Here's one from cat in

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>response to our seven day work or seven day week episodes.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Cat rights high there did I miss the part where

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the mythology Science, my Science boys that's Us by Sam

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about the English names for the days of the week.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I am surprised I didn't hear you at least mention it.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I recall how you mentioned the planetary names a few

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>times Saturday, Saturday, Sunday, Sun, Monday, Moon, but I didn't

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>hear any mention of the other half as the Norse

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>god days Tuesday, Tears, Wednesday, woden or Odin, Thursday, Thor's

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and Friday freya. Some people might be thinking, what planet

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is Thursday? Ha ha. Also I'm curious why use Norse

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gods doesn't seem market related or anything unless it is

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>days of worship. Also why half Roman and half Norse

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>gods love the show? You guys are the best cat,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you cat. Uh. I think the answer here is

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>just the modern English language inherits both Roman and Germanic

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>or Norse cultural influences. So uh, the names of the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>days of the week trace back to Old English or

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Saxon the language of the Anglo Saxons. Uh. You

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>know this is the language that Beowulf is written in,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and this language was also influenced by Roman religion because

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Britain was occupied by Rome for hundreds of years from

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like the first century until I think sometimes in the

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth century a d. So, Saturday still has the name

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Roman god Saturn. You've got you've got that

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Roman influence. I think the Sunday and Monday probably also

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>come from the Roman influence. But then yeah, other days

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the week come from the names of these gods

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that have Norse or Germanic pagan origins. Al Right, if

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we're moving on to the next email, uh, let's see.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into this one, I just want

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to say part of the background for it is. Remember

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Seven Days of the Week, we talked about

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>how there was the scholar who wrote a book on

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the history of the week, and in one of the

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>interviews we read, he speculated that life in which a

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>life in which the seven day week is an important

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>organizing principle might seem subjectively to go by faster than

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>other schemes such as monthly organization or maybe longer market

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks or something. I think he mainly sided just like

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>letters from the past, in times when the week was

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in ascendancy and becoming more front of people's minds. He

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>said that people seem to be talking more and more

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>often about how the time seems to be flying by.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh though, you know that could be a coincidence or

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just his mistaken impression. And Jacob, in this next message,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>has some great perspective to provide as someone in the

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>rather unique position of having lived under multiple radically different

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>regimes of time. So I love this email. Rob. Did

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to read this one? Sure? Yeah? All right,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>here we go. This one is from Jacob. Jacob says

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the following, Hey, everyone, love the show so far. I

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>hope not to disappoint you. I was introduced to your

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast by an old friend who worked with me and

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>endured the first of the schedules i'll describe below. I

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just listened to the three part series on the seven

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>day week, and towards the end of part three, there

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was some musings on whether or not life seems faster

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when you break it down by week, and I do

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not believe so. So long as there is a cycle,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it seems just as long when averaged over time.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The short version is I've lived on a three week

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle with eighteen hour days instead of twenty four, and

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>now I work a schedule that repeats every thirty five days.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>In the case of the former, I think there was

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some time dilation due to the circadian rhythm wrecking schedule.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>In the case of the latter schedule, any given week

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will very significantly, but over time I think it averages out.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>In Between working these two schedules, I worked a regular

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday, as most Americans do. In the case

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of the former schedule, the three week cycle with eighteen

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>hour days. That was what U S Submarines did on deployment.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>When I was in we didn't even care about the

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour day, instead organizing our lives around three

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sections of six hour watches, yielding an eighteen hour day.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>When I was junior and didn't need to know the

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>date I drove the boat uh. If we were deep,

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I could mark the time by day of day by chow,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and the weeks by a cleaning ritual known as field day.

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>As I got more senior, I had to be cognizant

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of time and date, but rest assured I'd forget when

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I got off watch. If I had no obligations, every

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty one days, you'd stand watch at the same time

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and day as you did before, so the cycle was

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>effectively a three week One weeks seemed long because of

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hour day and the various things that could

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>cut into your sleep, But over time I think twenty

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one day periods would start to blur together the same

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>way weeks do. In the case of the latter schedule,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the thirty five day cycle, that is the modified DuPont

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that is very common across the power system operations world.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>In thirty five days, I'll have worked seven day shifts

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of twelve hours, seven night shifts of twelve hours, and

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>four training days of ten hours. Power Plant operators tend

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to work a similar schedule of twenty eight days without

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the training week. Any given week in that rotation will

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be different from a work perspective, and that will make

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a different schedule for someone's personal life. The average Americans

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>work week is closest to my training week of forty

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>hours in four days with three days off. I also

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have a week where I worked three day shifts and

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>three night shifts with twenty four hours in between, which

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is very different uh compared to the built in weeks

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>off I have within that schedule. By the end of

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>my thirty five days cycle, I think time will have

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>felt similar to five weeks. Yeah, if we were to

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>look at fifteen weeks or a hundred and five days,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the few day walkers on a submarine

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>who don't organize their lives around standing watch will feel

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they spent more or less time on deployment than those

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>who have gone through the five of the twenty one

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>day cycles most of us lived on. I don't think

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>three of my thirty five day cycles would feel any

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>longer or shorter than fifteen of your seven day cycles. Anyways,

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I hope this was or is a useful perspective on

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a show that aired three weeks ago or during the

0:18:54.119 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>week off in my thirty five day cycle. Wow, Jacob, Uh, well,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a great email. I I love the reference

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to the day walkers on the submarine. So if I'm

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding you right, you're saying that, like on a submarine,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there will be people who are living according to a

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>regular twenty four hour day schedule, and then there are

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>other people walking amongst them who are living this this

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hour day cycle. Uh. That sounds chaotic and and

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I almost imagine a kind of like Eloi and Morlock

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>situation imaging Uh, it's great to hear from somebody who

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>has experience on a submarine like this. I'm reminded of

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an older episode that we did call Troubled Sleep in

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Arcs of Doom. Uh. That was looking at sleep

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>studies pertaining to individuals who served on submarines. Uh. And

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember it being rather fascinating, because, yeah, you're essentially

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this this artificial world set off from the

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>from night and day and the rest of reality, never

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>exposed to sunlight, probably working weird cycles that don't line

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>up with our four programming. Yeah. Yeah, I remember a

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussions in the paper about it, about it

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>being a job that could be both exceedingly boring but

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>also still very stressful due to various factors from the

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>environment to sort of the nature of the mission, etcetera.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, yeah, Jacob, thanks for writing in. All right, Rob,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you ready for a little bit of weird house cinema. Okay,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this first one is from Jane. Jane says hi, Rob

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and Joe, just a quick note to thank you for

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>choosing the abominable Doctor Fibes as the subject for your

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>latest weird house cinema. Growing up in seventies Britain. This

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was a late night staple on TV and it came

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to be one of my favorite, one of my absolute favorites.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>If you hadn't beaten me to it, I was all

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>set to request that you do a Weird House Vincent

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Price trilogy, consisting of fivees one fives too, plus Theater

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of Blood, which I was also thrilled to hear you mentioned.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I watched Theater of Blood again, not two

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, for the umpteenth time, and uh, and it

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was sad to think that now even Diana Rigg is

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>no longer with us. It looked like she was having

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a blast in the role of Vincent Price's daughter. Time

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>flies by too quickly. These movies are filled with so

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>many staples of British cinema, so many familiar faces now

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>long gone. And I was also thrilled that you singled

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>out Terry Thomas. There was no one better at portraying

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a cat or a bounder. I always look forward to

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Weird House Cinema to find out what you've selected, and

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm also trying to catch up with your voluminous back catalog,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the anthology editions. I think that's starring about the episodes.

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We do some octobers of like anthology of horror series

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and talk about science related to those uh those episodes.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>But James says the anthology editions are particular favorites, as

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>those take me back to childhood viewing in the seventies.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>A story from one of these, involving hundreds of razor

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>blades embedded in the walls of a nero corridor still

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>gives me nightmares today. So anything with a hammer, horror psychomania,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>man who haunted himself, quatermass in the pit vibes vibe

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is good with me. And if any of your listeners

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>can point me in the direction of a short film

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that was shown at a film festival in Leeds in

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties that involved a car driving ever downwards

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in an underground parking garage that seemed to lead to hell,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I will be eternally grateful. Thanks again for a great podcast,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>all the best, Jane, Oh absolutely, uh well, I know

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that we have at least we will definitely come back

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to more Vincent Price films, and I do. I did

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just purchase a Vincent Price film for us to discuss

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point, but I'm not sure when will will

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>continue the the Vincent Price cycle. I have an idea,

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>actually robbed, we could do an entire weird house cinema

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>episode just on Vincent Price TV commercials. We easily could.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>There's so many good ones. I figure, at the very least,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime we do a Vincent Price movie, you know, we

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can't just you know, rehash the biography of Vincent Price

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>each time. Each time, it makes sense to instead dwell

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on different commercials that he did, because they're also fabulous.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Um of the other movies that that are mentioned in

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this listener male, Um, yeah, Quatermass in the Pit or

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>let's see what was the US name for that? I

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>want to say, it's like, um, how for many million

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>years to Earth? Um? Yeah, five million years to Earth? Uh?

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This is this one is one I remember as being

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a great film as well with with with kind of

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by modern standards, perhaps unconvincing special effects, but within the

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>context of the film they work really well, just very

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>well done. It was very influential on a lot of filmmakers,

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>including John Carpenter. Oh, that one's got Julian Glover and

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>nice to mention excellent British character actors. You know, he's Uh,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he's Viers and the Empire strikes Back, and he's the

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>bad guy in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of course he's and Masters. Yeah. So anyway, thank thanks

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for writing in Jane. Um. I should also mention that

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>our listener Susan was very enthusiastic for uh the Abominable

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Fibes and did like a running commentary about the

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>episode on our in our Facebook discussion group. That's the

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff to blew your mind discussion module. Uh. If you

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>want access to that, uh, go look it up. But yeah, yeah,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>she she was very enthusiastic about this film as well.

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, shout out to that. I don't often peek

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in at the Facebook group, but I did see that

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and Susan, Yeah, I really appreciate your your live blogging

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of the episode. And speaking of the back catalog of

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Weird House cinema selections, I will mention again that that

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>really the best place to see a list of those

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>would be at a blog I maintain, Simuta music dot com.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a very simple blog. There's nothing exciting about this

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>blog other than I have done a post for each

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>episode that we've done of Weird House and Uh, it's

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good las to see what we've done, all right.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>This one comes to us from Aaron. Erin writes in

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and says, Hey, Robin Joe, I meant to message you

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about this a few months ago, but I'm on a

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>workship now listening to old episodes, so it seemed appropriate

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>now that I have time. I was watching an episode

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of Mythic Quest, a series on Apple TV. In it,

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene that has a frantic story writer stuck

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in a closet drinking What is he drinking? The character

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>calls it a rutger Howard port wine, coffee, lots of sugar,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and I seem to remember other ingredients. I couldn't help

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>but think that this has to be a connection to

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a new favorite movie of mine, Split Second. I was

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you guys have ever had a deep cut

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>reference pop out at you in some form of entertainment,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like an article or a movie. Thanks for all of

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the great content. I really appreciate what you do for

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>all of us. Eron, this would be referencing the facts

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that in Split Second, starring your how our Howar's character, Uh,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he has a real sweet tooth, like he's constantly chugging

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>coffee with huge amounts of sugar in it. Though I

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>don't recall him drinking port wine. Um No, but I

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>guess he might have. I just don't remember. No, I

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think that was the thing. He doesn't drink alcohol, right,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>he gave it up. Maybe he had, Maybe he was

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sober now, like he had quit drinking and replaced it

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with copious amounts of sugar and coffee. Or maybe it's

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a maybe this is the thing. Maybe it's so deep

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a cut that it's referring to his character and Split

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Second and some other Rugger Howard role that I'm not

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>familiar with or I've forgotten about, in which he drinks

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of port wine. Either way, that's that's a

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>good choice. Do you remember how later in Split Second

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>like his you know, it's it's sort of a future

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.239
<v Speaker 1>monster buddy cop movie, and the nerd buddy cop they

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>pair him with, he like gets turned into a copy

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of rugger Hower by some traumatic experience, and he also

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>starts to drinking the sugar. He becomes converted, and he's like,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the way now we we we drink sugary coffee,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We eat candy bars, and we carry around big guns.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the character's name. He's like, he's like Rex Power

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>or something. I believe you're thinking of Detective Dick Durkin.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Dick Durkin. That's not exactly that I was thinking. It

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was something more like, uh, I don't know, Johnny Magnum

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or something. Now, Dick Durkin. And of course Ruggar Howard's

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>character is Harley Stone. There's some good names. No, that's

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking. That's what I was Harley Stone, Harley. Yeah,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's got motorcycle plus plus Stone, yeah, plus rock. Dick Durkin.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>That didn't sound right at all, Harley Stone of course.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh and he's got the motorcycle in his apartment. Remember

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>it's in there, and like the guy just sits on it.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>That was a good one. Okay, does that do it

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>for you? I guess that does it. We're gonna go

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead and close up the mail bag, but hey, we'd

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there. What are your

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on current episodes, past episodes, future episode zodes of

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff to blow your mind, weird house cinema, and so forth.

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>You have any responses to just listener mails that you've

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>heard here. Uh, right in with correction suggestions. Everything's fair game.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't have time to to feature all the listener

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 1>mail that comes in on the podcast, but we we

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>do look at everything that comes in, so keep it coming. Huge.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as always to our regular audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and also to our guest audio producer this week, Paul

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>decand really appreciate you stepping in, Paul Uh. If you

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio,

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.