WEBVTT - Peter Orszag

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the most interesting and smartest people running an

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>investment bank today is Peter or Zag. He previously serves

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as head of the Congressional Budget Office, the office in

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a Management Budget, and has a PhD in economics from

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the London School of Economics. I sat down with him

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>his offices at Lazard Freyer to talk about his career

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and also the future of investment banking as Lizard practices it. So,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you have been in the financial service world as an

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>advisor for quite some time, but you also served in government.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about both aspects of your career. But right now,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that has held back and A

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>people say is the regulatory environment.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>In Washington.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>There hasn't been as much M and A activity as

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>some people in the M and A advisory business like

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Lazard would like. Do you think it's the regulatory environment

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>where you think it's high interest rates? What has kept

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>M and A from going forward at the pace that

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe some people think it should be going forward at.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start with what's driving it, sort of the tailwind,

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>So the biotech revolution, ongoing technology. I mean, we're seeing

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a revolution in generative AI, de risking and changes in

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>supply chains and the energy transition.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are some big.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Building blocks that propel deal activity forward. And then on

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the headwinds, I think there have been a few. The

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>rate at which interest rates went up meant that there

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 3>was a disconnect between buyers and sellers on the value

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of the assets. It also meant that financing was challenging,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 3>the financing markets were a little bit more liquid. And

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>then yes, regulatory, but all three of those headwinds have

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 3>been abating. First as interest rates have topped out and

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>now we're debating how quickly they'll come down. And then

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>secondly on the regulatory front, the government has lost some

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>important cases in court. And what that has meant, in

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>turn is that many more boards and C suites are

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>willing to say, you know what, we'll see you in court,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>will litigate for those.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>People that are not really involved in the M and

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>A world of the financial service world. They may not

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>know about Lazard. Tell us about the brothers that started Lazard.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>How did they convert themselves from dry goods sellers to

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>financial experts.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>So the story of Lazard. We're one hundred and seventy

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>six years old. We began in New Orleans three French

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 3>brothers start a dry goods store like many other firms,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and this is documented in a great book called The

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Money Kings. So the Seligman's, the Schieffs and others follow

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the gold rush out to California, realized that lending gold

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to your customers, or shipping the gold back to their

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 3>home countries and then lending on credit to your customers

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>was more attractive than selling the suits and the other

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>dry goods moved back to New York to set up

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>a bank, and then had correspondent banks in our case,

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>in Paris and London, and the rest is history. So

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>it is, And I would say out of all those

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>firms that started that way were the only ones still standing.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Lazard today manages money. You have asset management, and you

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have an M and a advisory business.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And you're a leader in M and a advisory. Tell me,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>when CEOs want to do deals, why do they need

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>an advisor? Because if they're smart CEOs, can't they get

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>together without an advisor? What does an advisor really do

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for smart CEOs when they want to do an acquisition

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or merger?

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think there are several things.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Blizard bankers are known as bankers with convictions,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>so a lot of content, a lot of backbone in

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of saying no, I don't actually think that's a

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 3>good idea. So you know you've been in many of

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>these positions. It is very helpful to have well informed,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 3>smart people who are willing to push back suggest this

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>versus that, etc. I think the role of an advisor

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>is not just the narrow you know, what's this thing worth?

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 3>But do you really want to do this? What's the

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>regulatory implications? How is this going to play from an

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>investor relations and a PR perspective, It's the multidimensionality and

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>having a thought partner or someone who's counsel you.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Could benefit from. That's one part.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>The second part is in many negotiations, it's helpful to

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 3>have a intermediary. It's why often you don't want to

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 3>be your own lawyer. And so I think that's the

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>second part of the advisory role.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So when you call a CEO of a fortune fifty company,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I assume you can get a meeting with that person

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not that hard. So do you always have an idea

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of saying this is a good thing that you might

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>consider doing, or they come to ideas to you, they

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>bring them to you.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>It works both ways.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>But what I like to do with CEOs is to

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>have a broader discussion both about the world and then

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>about what their objectives are. And we present ideas and

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>then sometimes people will say, I'm thinking about this, could

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 3>you work on this with us?

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, the m and a advisory business, you competing against

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>people that have or organizations have large balance sheets. So

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if somebody wants to do it deal, they might say

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to JP Morgan, can you be my advisor? But can

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you also lend me money to do the deal? And

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the same is true with Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sacks.

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't use your balance sheet for that purpose. You

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just use your brain power to kind of say it's

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>a good deal or not a good deal. Is that

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a competitive disadvantage or a competitive advantage?

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's well, let the market speak. What's happened

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>over the past fifteen or twenty years is massive share

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>that went to independent advisory firms like ours that don't

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 3>use their balance sheets to provide the advice, that only

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>provide the advice and don't use their balance sheets. And

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I think to win in that kind of environment, you

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>need to have differentiated content, great ideas, insight into the players,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>an ability to read between the lines on the regulatory

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and other developments, and also deep relationships. You need to

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>be both trusted and discreet.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So you became the CEO in October of twenty three,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think shortly there after you said you one

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the double revenues.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that I actually said that right before I took

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 2>over it before.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you want to double revenues by twenty thirty, right,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So is that realistic? Are you on the path to

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>do that?

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>We're a head of schedule on accomplishing that, and I

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 3>think I think that really reflects the power of Lizard's

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 3>standing in the world, our brand, and what we needed

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>to do is just up our ambition and increase from

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 3>a cultural perspective, our focus on working together.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 2>And we're doing it.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 3>And so you're seeing that in the results I mentioned

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>a record first half. We're really excited about the people

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that we're bringing on, and we're really excited about most

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 3>importantly about what we're able to do on behalf of

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 3>our clients.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, you have an unit here, I guess it's called

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a geopolitical Advisory unit. Do clients pay for that, and

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>are they happy to get that and pay for it

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>or you kind of give it as a service. And

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>do people really care about geopolitical events when they're doing it?

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 3>M and A deals Absolutely, so, I mean in today's world.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's stop back.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>What's happened over the past three or four decades is

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 3>we've moved from an environment in which the oil and

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>gas companies that always operated globally and needed to have

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical insight and maybe a few others had to take

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical considerations into account to a situation today in which

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 3>pretty much every important business decision that is made has

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to take geopolitical issues into account or else you're going

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to go You're going to go wrong. It's a fundamental

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>business need. And Lazard has always been known as a

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>banker plus so people that had the ability to provide

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>insight into not only what the other CEO was thinking,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>but what the prime minister was thinking or the president.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>So these are people who cross those boundaries between business

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and government. So Lazard was always known as having that

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>skill set, and we thought we could professionalize it by

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>bringing in people who have done that for a living

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in different settings. So The short answer is it's very

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 3>much part of Blizard's DNA. We now have a unit

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that's dedicated to it in addition to just the bankers,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and it is a revenue generating activity, but it's also

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 3>something that is a great entree into boardrooms and c

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>suites for our bankers also. So this has been a

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>resounding success.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the biggest geopolitical risk that you think now

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>faces the world in certainly the United States.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 3>I think the fact of the matter is the biggest

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>risk is that the world is changing and we don't

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 3>yet have an intellectual framework that matches this new reality.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have a splintering that's occurring between the major

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 3>blocks of the US and Europe on the one hand, China,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Russia and others on the other, and then some countries

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 3>that are in between the two, and we have not

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>adapted to that new world quite yet. Beyond that, there

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>are flashpoints. There are two hot wars going on in

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Europe and the Middle East with uncle your trajectories on both.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>So there is obviously elevated risk even before you get

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to the traditional well, China invade Taiwan and other things

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 3>that people.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 2>Often talk about.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Many people who are running investment banks, come from Wall Street.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Their whole career, you've been in government. Is there an

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>advantage or a disadvantage in having served in government when

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the job you currently have.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I view it as a significant advantage, and the reason

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>is that it brings a perspective having served in government

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>that is useful in lots of different settings. And it's

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>that multidimensionality, the ability to stitch together pieces from different

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 3>worlds that I think is very helpful. The other advantage

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>that it gives, I believe, is that I have a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of respect and admiration for our senior bankers at Lazard,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and so I view it as my job to do

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>part of the work, but then to hand things off

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 3>to our senior bankers. And I think people who have

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>spent their entire careers doing one thing, the natural inclination

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 3>is to then go do it yourself, and then the

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>problem becomes that you're not providing enough upward movement and

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 3>ability to grow to the senior people. So this is

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 3>a fantastic job, but I think, I hope and I

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>believe that I'm better at it because of what I've

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 3>done before.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your own background as opposed to Azard's background.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So where were you born.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I was born in Lexington, Massachusetts, outside of the Boss.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>What did your parents do?

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>My dad was a MIT math professor at the time,

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and he also ran a consulting firm that my mother managed.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So if your father is teaching math at MIT, I

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>presume you're pretty good at math and.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Not by his standards. Oh no, but I was.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You were good?

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I was. Okay.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Did you get eight hundred year math SAT?

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I did very well on my math sat?

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, So you chose not to go to MIT

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or another school up there called Harvard, but you went

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to Princeton I did, and you got a PhD at

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the London School of that's correct. Yeah, okay, So when

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you got your PhD, what did you decide to do

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with the PhD in economics? You want to go teach her?

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>What did you do when you came back to the

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>States with your PhD?

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually, I had in the meanwhile, in the middle

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 3>of graduate school, and I think it reflects the fact

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 3>that I clearly did not yearn to be a pure academic.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 3>I had spent a year, not quite a year, but

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>a year in Moscow with a team of advisors to

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the government there. And then when President Clinton was elected,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>one of my undergraduate professors, Alan Blinder, called me up

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>and said.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it kind of cold in Moscow?

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Would you like to come join the new Clinton administration

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>at the Council of Economic Advisors?

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 2>Which I did?

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And how long were you in the Clinton administration?

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I did a couple stints, so I did a couple

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 3>of years. I went back and quickly finished my PhD.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I went back in for about a year or two,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>So it must have been accumulatively maybe four or five years.

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>In the Clinton administration. You eventually left and you went

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to Brookings? Is that true?

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>So I left the Clinton administration, I then have the

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 3>shortest tenure of anyone who voluntarily left McKenzie. I went

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to McKinsey in San Francisco. After three weeks I decided

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that was not for me. My younger brother and I

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>then founded an economic consulting firm, which subsequently grew. I

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 3>taught at Berkeley. I then moved to Brookings in two

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>thousand and one.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So eventually the Congressional Budget Office people called you and said,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>can you come up and run the Congressional Budget Office?

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Right the Congressional Budget Office was set up under the

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Budget Act of nineteen seventy four. Correct, since the Budget

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Act of nineteen seventy four, deficits have been going this way.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Budgets had been going with not balanced. Was the Budget

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Act a good idea because we were doing pretty well

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>without it?

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, first I didn't deficits having quick They went up, down,

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and now they're backup. But I think what the Budget

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Act did is it gave Congress better tools. But ultimately,

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 3>these decisions are not going to be up to an

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>agency like the Congression Budget Office.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>They're up to our elected representatives.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Soew the Congression Budget Office as empowering the legislature to

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 3>make decisions, but those decisions are not you know, they're

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>driven by.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Other factors too.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So you're doing that for a number of years,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and then President Obama is elected and he asked you

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the head of the Office of Management Budget. So,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for those who aren't familiar with that, what does that

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>office do?

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's slightly different.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>It sounds similar to the Congression Budget Office, but think

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Congression Budget Office as an independent entity who's

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 3>really analytical. In his job it is to evaluate the

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>costs and implications of legislation and then to testify on

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>those to Congress. The Office Management and Budget does some

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 3>of that, but it also implements the president's policies. It's

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 3>think of it as like a COO type role for

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the government. So the role is complex

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 3>because you're, remember the of the Cabinet, but also a

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 3>member of the White House staff effectively, and the organization

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>is partly analytical but also quite operation. So it's an

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>unusual organization.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>When I worked in the Carter administration, there were two

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>budget directors. One the first one was Burt Lance, and

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a very good friend of Jimmy Carter's, and

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes he would sit at the cabinet room where we're

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>going through budget appeals and he would say, mister President,

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that's Omb's position. Let me tell you my view.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I never did that.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>You never did that. Now, so before the administration was over,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you decided to get it back into the private sector,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and you left OMB to go to City Corp. And

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>can you explain why you go to City Corp? A

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>nice bank and everything, but how did you happen to

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>pick City Corp as a place to go to?

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually, I spent a little bit of time at

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the council and form relations, which you know well, just

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what I wanted to do next. I

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>was about to sign with one of Lizard's actually competitors,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>when I got a call from City, which I had

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>not really been considering. And the argument was which I

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 3>found some merit in, you've done other things, including consulting, etc.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>But you've never done bank. If you go to this

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>other firm, you're only doing M and A. If you

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 3>come to us, we've got ten different things you could try.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 3>If you're bad at all of them, that's your fault.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 3>And why don't you kind of get trained and get

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 3>experience across a variety of things and see what you

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>really like.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 2>And that logic made sense to me.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So you eventually went to Lazard about I think two

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen sixteen. Yes, So how did you rise

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>up to be the CEO and a relatively short period

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of time? Were you really good at M and A advisory?

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And to be good at M and A advisory? Do

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to come up with ideas that clients want

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you have to kind of just execute the

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>things that they say they want to do?

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>All of the above on M and a advisory And

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>with regard to my role Atlizard, I think Lizard is

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>a special place. It's a place that has always valued

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 3>people that are useful to their colleagues. So when I

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>came here, my whole goal was, how can I be

0:15:55.200 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 3>useful to you? You banker in industrials, you the banker

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 3>in healthcare, you the banker in technology, And that's what

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I tried to do.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's suppose that next president of the United States

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is a Democrat, and you've served in two Democratic administrations,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Clinton administration the Obama administration. Suppose the next

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>president is President Harris, and she calls you up and says,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I need a Secretary of Treasury who knows Wall Street,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>also knows Washington. You're one of the few people who've

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>worked in Wall Street and also worked in Washington. What

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>would you say if she offered you that job.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I think with regard to the question of returning to government,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>there's neither supply nor to band, So I don't think

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>you're hypothetical is going to happen. But more importantly, I'm

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 3>really excited about what we're doing here at Lazard. We've

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of momentum, and Lazard is a special place.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>It's an important place, and I have a vision of

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>what we'd like to accomplish here that I'd like to

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 3>see through.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take that you're not interested in being Secretary

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Treasury for the time being.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a great, unbelievably great job.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Is ESG seen at high water mark in the United States,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a pushback against it, And do you see

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>clients not as interested in pursuing ESG as before.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a big difference between the United States

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and Europe where there are probably the pendulum is swinging

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 3>back more in the United States, including among investors, than

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>is the case in Europe.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>On some of these topics.

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 3>And again, what we're trying to do at Lizard is

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>see through that and kind of have an underlying north

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>star in terms of where we're going.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Another acronym is DEI, which is a lot of pushback. So,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, do you try to get women African America

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and Latino investment bankers here? Is it hard to do?

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Investment bank is largely still a male dominated profession. I

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>soon is that fair to say?

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 3>More diverse teams produce better outcomes when the problems are

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>not routine. So when you're dealing with a novel issue,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>something that's different out of people's wheelboxes, having multiple different

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 3>perspectives where people are coming at it from angles, produces

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>better outcomes. That's the only kind of scenario where Lizard

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 3>is getting hired. And so from our perspective, having more

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 3>diverse teams, it's not just better work environment and a

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>more interesting dynamic and the ability to tap untapped labor

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 3>pools of people that are highly talented, but also the

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>thought that we're going to be better on behalf of

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 3>our clients as a result.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between advising a president of the United

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>States and advising a CEO. Do you ever say to

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a CEO, Look, I've advised presidents and you're not a president,

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'll give you my advice, or you don't mention

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that you've been an advisor to president.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I think perhaps the most important thing in providing good

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>advice to either a president or a CEO is first,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 3>do your homework, don't you know it is too easy

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>to make things up that never works. And the second

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 3>thing is to have conviction. The number of times I've

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>seen people who say, I'm going to tell the president,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, put them in his place or put maybe

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>her in her place. And then they get into the

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Oval Office and they say, and I one episode really

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>sticks out in my mind on this front, and it's

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>something I try to remember in this job. And it

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>was something that I definitely remember when I was in Washington,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 3>which is I was in my mid twenties and I

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 3>happened to be in the Oval Office, which, as you

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 3>know in your mid twenties, is quite a thrill. And

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>there was a discussion with Bob Ruben and President Clinton.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 3>President Clinton said something like, well, we're going to go

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>out and say X and Bob you'll give this speech.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 3>And there are a lot of people nodding their head yes,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 3>like yes, mister President. And Bob said something like, well,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 3>that's terrific, mister President.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>We only have one problem. I can't give that speech.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And President kind of looks out but him quite stunned,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 3>and said, well why not, And he said because I

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's true. And it was a moment when

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 3>he did it in a way that wasn't offensive sort of,

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 3>but he had backbone, he had conviction, and I think

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>those that is what many CEOs. That's what many presidentdence either.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Should want or do want. In an advisor, you have

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 2>a point of view.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>You're respectful, but you're not just riding the wave of

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>what everyone else is say.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So your goal for Lazard is to grow the revenue

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and to keep it as an independent, publicly traded company.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there an advantage of being a publicly traded company

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the business you do because some of your competitors

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>are not publicly traded.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 3>I think the goal is to make Lazard far and

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 3>away I already think it's the best place to work

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street, but far and away the pre eminent

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 3>both financial advisory and in the part of asset management

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that we do firm.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 2>And you could do that either.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>As a public company or a private company. As you mentioned,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 3>some of our competitors or public, some are private. So

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't really view that as the key determinant. Instead,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 3>it is about that ambition to win. It's about conviction

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 3>and about the content.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So today, if somebody says, I want to want to

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>work at one of these kind of firms, a small,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not JP Morgan sized organization, I want to use these

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>skills that I developed to work at a place like

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>those are How does one get hired here? If you're

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in college or business school? What are you looking for

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>when you hire somebody?

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 3>I talk a lot about succeeding Atlizard and our people

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>being commercial and collegial.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>So what do I mean by that? Commercial?

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 3>The ability to go out and act on behalf of

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>our clients effectively. Collegial in terms of being able to

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 3>work together as a team in delivering the best possible

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 3>outcomes for our clients. But beyond that, I think the

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>attributes that we look for and that I seek out

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>in our colleagues, it would be curiosity. You've talked a

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 3>lot about that, resilience and a work ethic and the

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 3>ability to have conviction around your ideas so that you're

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>not just going with the conventional wisdom and playing five

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 3>year old soccer.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Young investment bankers have often said work eighty hours a week,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>ninety hours a week. Why do they do that? Why

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can't they work nine to five and not come in

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a weekends and just say, look, I got to have

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a balanced life and I'm just not going to come

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in at night or on weekends. Why don't they do that?

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Teddy Roosevelt once said that the greatest gift in life

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 3>is the opportunity to do work worth doing. So I

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>think the point here is there are many professions where

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you can't get around the.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Effort part of it.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 3>But what I think our firm requires or o's are

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 3>people who are putting in.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>That effort is three things.

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>The first is the opportunity I talk about practicing at

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>the top of your license to run as far and

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>as fast as you can. One of the exciting things,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 3>for example, about being in government at a relatively young age,

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is you have this sense that, oh my goodness, I'm

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 3>this aged, I'm doing that. And to create that same

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 3>sense of excitement for people entering financial services I think

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>is characteristic of bizarre and it's very important.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's part one.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Part two is, even if you're working hard, you need

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 3>to have some degree of agency and the ability to

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 3>if something else is important in your life, to take

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>time off to go do that. It's one of the

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 3>reasons why here in New York, for example, we still

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 3>have three days a week in the office and two

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>days remote because it eases those trade offs for many people.

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 3>And then the third really important part of this compact

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 3>is the feeling that you're part of something, you know,

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you're working on important things.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>It's not just make work.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>And I think if you put all those elements together,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 3>there are many many people who would rather work, you know,

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>whatever number of hours per week on interesting, important things

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 3>rather than fewer hours on things that are not that interesting.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we're looking for. That's the trade off.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to hear more of my interviews. You

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and download my podcast on Spotify, Apple, or

0:23:58.680 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen