WEBVTT - Tech News: The Rise of the Robocall

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and it is time

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for the news for Tuesday, February twenty one. Let's get

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to it, and we will begin with an update on

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Solar Winds hack, a massive supply chain hack that's

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>had a critically dangerous effect on numerous companies and governmental agencies,

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>with the potential for a lot more damage further down

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the road. Solar Winds makes I T system management software,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the type of stuff that network administrators

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>might use to monitor and control really complicated computer networks.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Hackers likely backed by Russia, compromised a piece of software

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>called Ryan on the Solar Winds side of everything, and

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they inserted malware into the software code for the Orion product.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So when solar Winds pushed out updates to Orion, Solar

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Winds customers who accepted those updates because solar Winds as

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a trusted partner, they unknowingly infected their own systems with

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a trojan type of malware. That attack hit thousands of

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>customers but the hackers actually only followed up with a

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>few dozen of them to further infiltrate and spy on

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>targets that ranged from Microsoft to the United States Department

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security. Now, Microsoft says that after analyzing the

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>code found in Orion, researchers reckon that maybe as many

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>as a thousand or more developers had worked on that

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>malicious code, which itself consisted of four thousand, thirty two

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>lines of code. Now more than a thousand developers, that

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is a truly huge endeavor, something far beyond independent hacking groups.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft president Brad Smith indicated that this sort of attack

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was new to the United States, but Russia had previously

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>employed a similar approach in cyber attacks on systems located

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>inside the Ukraine. If you want to learn more about

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Solar Winds hack, I had a an episode with

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hacker extraordinaire Shannon Morrise she joined tech Stuff. The episode

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 1>is titled the Solar Winds Hack. It published on February one,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and Shannon and I explored the scope of the Solar

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Winds attack and what it all actually means. Spoiler alert,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not good. And now let's switch to a collection

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of stories that I like to call eat the Rich.

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And we've got some more updates on that story of

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Bets and the game Stop stock, this time

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at how the United States government is getting involved,

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so quick refresher. Some hedge funds decided to short sell

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>shares a game Stop. That's when you borrow shares of stock,

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you sell them at whatever the current market value is

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for that stock. Then you buy back those borrowed shares

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so you can return them to the original owner. And

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what your hope is is that the price of the

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>shares will drop so that you make money on the deal.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you sell some borrowed stock for twenty

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>bucks a pop, and you buy it back when it's

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at ten dollars a share. You just made ten dollars

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a share as you return the stock to the person

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you borrowed it from. But a group of independent investors

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>day traders, communicating on forums like Reddit and a subreddit

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>called Wall Street Bets, decided to foil this plan by

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>buying up game Stop shares and encouraging others to do so.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that pushed the price of the game Stop shares up,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not down. Then you had hedge funds freaking out because

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be obligated to buy back those

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>shares they have to in order to return them, and

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>now they would have to pay more money than they

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>made when they sold off those borrowed shares, and the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bets folks kept buying up more stock as

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>soon as it would become available, which pushed the price

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even higher, creating a short squeeze. It hit a high

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of around four three dollars per share. Uh this was

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>well above the twenty dollars a share that it was

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>at before all this happened, and that share price has

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>actually settled off quite a bit. Right now, as a

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>record this it's around fifty two dollars per share, but

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's still more than twice what it was when all

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this started. And the U S House of Representatives wants

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk to a few people about everything that's been

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>going on. Among those people are Steve Hoffman, the CEO

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>of Reddit, and Vlad Tinev, the co CEO of robin

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Hood that's an app that allows its customers, it's users

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy stocks through the app. And also they want

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Keith gil who has the online moniker

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of Roaring Kitty he's been invested heavily in game stuff

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>since back in twenty nineteen, an he posted about it frequently.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The Senate also wants to get involved. They want to

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>determine if there was any manipulation of the stock market

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>going on here. But on the surface, that doesn't seem

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>to be the case, at least not for the price

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to go up. Sure, there were independent investors all working

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>together to buy up shares of stock, but that in

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>itself isn't manipulation. In fact, the Wall Street Bets Crew

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>maintains that hedge funds that short cell companies frequently engage

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in activities that are specifically meant to devalue that company's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>share price. That seems to fall more under the manipulation umbrella.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Also on the table or talks about robin Hood, which

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>famously put a freeze on how many shares of game

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Stop users could actually purchase, and in some cases they

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just stopped anyone from being able to buy game Stop

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>shares at all through robin Hood. The House will examine

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if robin Hood broke any federal regulations in the process

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of that. As numerous media outlets have shared a major

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund owns a significant stake in Robin Hood and

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Bets Crew has maintained that the app

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is kind of part of a system that rewards the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>wealthy at the expense of everybody else. The U S.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate is also looking into the current state of the

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>stock market in general, and the hearing in the House

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives should take place on February eighteenth, starting at

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>noon Eastern time. They'll also be streaming it live just

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in case you know you're interested in tuning in. Researchers

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Duke University School of Business published a report

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that an elite group of companies are responsible for more

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>than half of all the revenue generated from the ocean economy.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about around a hundred companies responsible for

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>one point one trillion dollars in revenues, or about six

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of all revenue from ocean based economic activities. This is

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>based off data that's actually a couple of years old,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so it might even be more dramatic than that. In now,

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're like me, you might have had a pretty

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rough reaction to that news. I mean, that's an enormous

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of influence with a very small number of organizations.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But luckily for me, the researchers provide a voice of

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>cautious optimism about all this. One of the authors of

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the study has said, quote, one of our biggest challenges

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is to sustain healthy ocean ecosystems as economic use increases

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and climate impacts accelerate. This study confirms that a relatively

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>small number of companies will be central to this challenge

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and have a real opportunity for leadership end quote. So

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with that perspective, you could argue that it's actually easier

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to convince a relatively small number of companies to make

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>some big changes that could have enormous benefits for millions.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Then it would be a lot easier to do that

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>than to try and convince a ton of smaller companies

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that each have a smaller amount of influence and thus

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have a small stake in a very big pool, as

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it were. Companies in the study included oil and gas

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>companies that conduct you know, offshore mining operations, seafood production

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and processing, shipping, cruise tourism, offshore wind companies, and more.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The lion share of that one point one trillion dollars

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of revenue actually falls, into surprise, surprise, the oil and

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>gas company slice of the pie. These companies had a

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>combined revenue of eight hundred thirty billion dollars or of

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. Yoza. Now, will these companies make the

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>major changes to address sustainability challenges? Well, if shareholders demand

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it and pressure the companies to do so, or if

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the leadership of those companies takes these issues like ocean

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sustainability and climate change really seriously. Perhaps I withhold judgment

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>only because I've seen a lot of companies act in

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>short term self interest over long term viability. But I

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>hope the attitude of the researchers us reflect reality. All right,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>how about instead of wealthy corporations, I talked about wealthy criminals,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And yes there is some overlap in that ven diagram,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but I am focusing on people who are engaged in

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>illegal activities and then turning to stuff like cryptocurrency in

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>an effort to launder money so that you know, they

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>can actually use the money they stole. That's the whole

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose of money laundering. You take illegally obtained money, whether

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it was stolen or it came from illegal transactions, you know,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like drug sales, that kind of stuff or whatever, and

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you take that money, you mix it with cash from

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>an otherwise legitimate enterprise in order to hide the ill

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten gains. Now, this gets pretty tricky if you're talking

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>about truly large amounts of money, because regulators noticed that

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. If a humble business, let's say it's

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>literally a launderer, were to brake in, you know, a

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred times more revenue than that normally would, that might

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>raise some eyebrows. But anyway, an analysis company called chain

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Analysis published a report recently saying that fifty five percent

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of all the money laundering happening with cryptocurrency can be

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>traced to just two D seventy block chain addresses. Beyond

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this core group of two D seventy blockchain addresses, you've

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>got another fifteen hundred addresses or so that is responsible

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for sevent of all money laundering in the cryptocurrency world. Now,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>this kind of concentration of laundering could pose a big

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>problem for the batties out there, because with a bottleneck

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrency processing, law enforcement agencies around the world can

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>narrow their focus on some of the most active addresses

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to identify and go after groups of criminals, and if

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency exchanges detect that, they could be targeted for investigations,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they might actually take more proactive steps to enforce anti

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>money laundering policies against users and shut down criminal activity

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of official legal action. One of the things you

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>learned when you start looking into big money criminal enterprises

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is that crime does pay, but it can sometimes be

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>really hard to cash out without getting caught. Over at

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, journalist Cade Mets has written an

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible piece about a movement that has really taken hold

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the tech space, particularly among leaders in Silicon Valley.

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The pieces titled Silicon Valleys Safe Space, and it's about

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a blog that was called slate Star codex. Gets explains

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that a psychiatrist named Scott Siskin who used the pseudonym

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Alexander, created the blog and used it to write

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of big topics. As Gets says, quote,

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the blog explored everything from science and medicine to philosophy

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and politics to the rise of artificial intelligence end quote.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Now I recommend reading the whole piece over on the

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. Uh They it's really well done, and

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to give a kind of general overview

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>without diving too much into the piece. Much of it

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on a school of thought that many of the

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>leaders in Silicon Valley have been, you know, following or

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to. It's called rationalism, which sounds you know reasonable, right,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean rationals in the name. Ideally, the philosophy examines

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>issues with a sort of scientific approach. The goal is

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to gain an understanding of issues and solutions using a

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>rational line of thinking. But there's a tone that starts

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to pop up in rationalism that I personally find rather troubling,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's a tendency to overlook consequences of certain actions

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>or policies. I detect a tendency for privileged people to

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ignore the effects of their rationalism on those who are

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not part of that privileged class. Free speech is frequently

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>cited as a critical element of rationalism, but there also

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a fail eire to address a problem

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I see, which is that those who have the strongest

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>platform from which to speak freely are those who already

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>enjoy a great deal of privilege. In other words, if

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you aren't one of the lucky few who are privileged,

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>then freedom of speech doesn't mean as much because you

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't given the same platform that allows you to, you know,

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>get your message to be heard. You aren't elevated, and

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>your volume isn't amplified the way the folks who do

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>belong to that class experience. Now you can probably tell

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not totally on board with rationalism. I respect a

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of what it's about in theory, but I also

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have fundamental problems with it in practice. And it's kind

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of why when I talk about critical thinking, I tend

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to pair it with compassion when I advocate it to

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys, my listeners. I find that compassion without critical

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking that's terrible at least some bad decisions that leads

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to magical reasoning. If you don't allow critical thinking and

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you just follow compassion, you're gonna make some bad choices.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But I find that critical thinking without compassion leads to

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions that can have really negative consequences for a lot

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of people. And Gets does a pretty good job of

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>handling this matter with a very objective point of view,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly considering that Gets himself became the target of harassment

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this journalistic endeavor he pursued. So

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if you find my own perspective frustrating because of my

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>own point of view, you should really read the original

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>piece because there's a lot in there, including the way

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that various leaders have treated the concept of artificial intelligence,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and our AI really does post some significant challenges from

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>an ethical and existential point of view, So highly recommend

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you check it out. Okay, we have some more stories

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to, but first let's take a quick break.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>We're back. The Anti Defamation League released a study last week.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>They found videos on YouTube that promote extremist views like

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, white supremacy are still not only found on YouTube,

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but also the site's algorithm is still recommending those videos. Uh,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to have watched other extremist videos, so

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you watch one, you're likely to be recommended others. Now,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this falls into a general problem of algorithms that potentially

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>could be exacerbating radicalization. The purpose of the algorithm ultimately

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is just to keep people on the platform for as

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>long as possible, because more time on the platform means

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>more advertising dollars going to that company, so you want

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to maximize the amount of time people are spending there.

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you click on a video on YouTube, the

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>algorithm will take into account which video you chose and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>then pull up videos with related material In them and

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>serve them up to you. Now. Many years ago, the

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>comedian Patton Oswald had a bit about the DVR device

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>TiVo and how he was having problems with it. According

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to the bit, he said he decided to watch some Westerns,

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and TiVo then interpreted that to mean that what Patton

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really liked were horses, and so suddenly TiVo was automatically

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>recording programs that had anything to do with horses and

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>presenting those two patent as, Hey, you liked you like

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that other horse thing, watch this horse thing. Well, that's

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of what YouTube's algorithm does. If you watch videos

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>about people rescuing animals, you're going to get a lot

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>more of those videos recommended to you. I know, because

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what dominates my YouTube recommendations. But when it comes

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to indoctrine Nation into extremist views, this algorithmic approach can

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>be a huge problem. It's like YouTube is doing the

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>recruitment on behalf of these extremist groups population recommendations with

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>propaganda that persuades more people toward harmful extremist ideas. And

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>also terms like extremism and radicalism are a little too vague.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you can have an extreme view and it's

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily harmful, but we're generally talking about philosophies like

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy that is undeniably harmful. The study found that

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>YouTube's algorithm was likely to serve up more videos designed

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to these sorts of world views if you

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>had watched a video already. Now that being said, you

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are not likely to stumble across one of these videos

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and your recommendations without doing some of that work on

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>your own. Google has really been working to limit hate

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>speech on the YouTube platform. That is helping out a bit.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, according to Google, it's reduced the consumption of

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>those types of videos by as much as eighty percent.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you actually do seek out the videos, then

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you can find them, and you might find that YouTube's

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>starts recommending more of them to you, and that remains

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem. I hope to do a more thorough episode

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on this general topic in the future, and I have

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a special guest in mind who might help me talk

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, So stay tuned for that. Parlor or parlay

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer, has returned, the social network ostensibly dedicated

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to free speech, but effectively the place of refuge for

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the far right of the political spectrum Online was homeless

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for a while. That was after Amazon Web Services booted

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the company from their servers. But now the site has

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a new host, a company called Epic E p i

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>K that's also known as a harbor for other far

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>right websites and services that have had a trouble, you know,

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>finding a home elsewhere. While those who have existing Parlor

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>accounts can access the site, the messages that once populated

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the forums before Amazon evicted them, those are not yet back,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so those who are already members can go there. They

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can start you know, posting in forums again, but they

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can't access older threads. Parlor in general has had a

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of changes. Researchers were able to scrape tons of

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>data off of Parlor before it was banished, and there

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>is no shortage of critics who will say that the

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>company has proven to be extremely careless with user information,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people say that Parlor is is

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a doxing tool all by itself. The former CEO,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>John Matt's has said that Rebecca Mercer, who provided much

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of the funds to launch Parlor, fired him earlier this month,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mark Mechler, best known for co founding the Tea

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Party is now serving as interim CEO while the company

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>seeks out a permanent one. It's too early to say

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>if users are going to return to the site in

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>droves or if they will have migrated to other services.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess now it's time for me to talk

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about Clubhouse. And I'm sure most of you have heard

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, and a lot of you may have even

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>used it. Me not so much, not cool like that.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But Clubhouse is an app that launched last March. It's

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>an app that was created by Paul Davison and Rowan

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Seth after they tried to make a podcasting app, and

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>it's really blowing up now after lots of early influencers

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and celebrities embraced the platform. Now I'm still the ground

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>old man who hasn't joined in. But the app creates

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>audio chat rooms, which just makes me think of the

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>old party lines you used to see advertised about all

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff back in the nineties. And you use

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the app to log into, you know, various chat rooms.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You can bounce around if you want, and you're able

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to converse over voice with other users about all sorts

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of things. And some of those users include famous people

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like people like Lindsay Lohan and Elon Musk, and the

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>topics of conversation could be really broad, with some rooms

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to celebrity gossip, some might be dedicated to quantum physics.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty wild stuff. It's an invitation only platform, and

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never received an invite, which is not a complaint.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It's probably for the best. I mean, I record so

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>many podcasts a week. I suspect most people here as

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>much from me as they would like, and in many cases,

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's more than that. Also, there's no Android

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>version of the app yet, but it is on the way,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>according to the company. However, since it is invite only,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that means that clubhouse has a sort of air of

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>exclusivity around it, which automatically makes it more attractive for

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>some people. Plus, in the middle of a pandemic where

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>most of us are stuck at home, it represents a

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>way to chat with other people safely and about all

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of interesting or mundane topics. Everyone wants to be

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in the club they can't get in. I guess I

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know at all. All sounds kind of stressful to me, Honestly,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I mostly end up just being quiet there,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, So an invitation is wasted on me.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>If you have an invitation, give it to someone you

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think would get the most out of it. I guess

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that is what I'm saying. The fact you can just

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>go in there and talk with folks has already led

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>China to say, hey, we don't want that here, because

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government cracks down hard on any form of

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>communication that is outside of its own authority. And Clubhouse

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>is also already at the center of other conversations about exclusion, harassment, misinformation,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sort of stuff that we see on

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>all social networks. Really, I'm not think saying it's it

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>should come as a surprise that it's over at Clubhouse too.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's an issue that has been a problematic for

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>every platform. Now, there have been some pretty nasty stories

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about bullying over at Clubhouse, but I think every social

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>platform faces these issues. It's really how they respond to

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those problems that's worth talking about. And Clubhouse is still

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in the process of formulating its strategy for that, like

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>getting moderators and that kind of thing. I imagine all

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that is going to have to change soon. It's gonna

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>have to be less loosey goosey, but I'm sure I'll

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>also do a full episode about Clubhouse in the future,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>so it tuned for that as well. Several financial institutions

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>are now joining initiatives in which they will share intellectual

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>property in the form of patents, all in an effort

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to avoid patent trolls. This stems from a recent lawsuit

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in which a company called U S a A filed

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a patent infringement lawsuit against Wells Fargo, and one the case,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>they received a reward of more than three million dollars

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for a pair of cases. Actually, at the heart of

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the matter was an innovation in which bank customers can

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>deposit checks by taking the photo of the check with

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>their phone and then using their banking app to transfer

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>money to their accounts, something that a lot of banks

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do these days. Now, the whole story behind that is

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty complicated. There was a company called in fact,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a company called me Tech, which Wells Fargo

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>uses for its mobile deposits, and USA A both holding

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>patents related to mobile deposits. So you had Metech with

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>some patents, U S a A with other patents. They

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>got into a big legal battle, they sell it out

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of court, they retain the rights of their patents, and

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>now usa A is going after other financial institutions. So

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions have encouraged a lot of financial institutions to

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>enter into a sort of open source agreement to share

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>i P in an effort to protect themselves against patent

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>infringement cases. The biggest concern our patent assertion entities. These

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>would be patentrols. These are companies that make money by

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>acquiring patents and then they assert those patents against companies

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that are allegedly infringing those patents. Just a quick reminder,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a patent protects an invention of some sort. That invention

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually be a process, not necessarily a thing. For

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the duration of the patent, the holder is the sole

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>owner of that particular implementation of technology. If you want

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to use that tech that approach, you either have to

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to build something else that achieves the

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>same end result but doesn't use the same process as

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the patented technology, or you have to strike up some

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of deal with the patent holder and thus license

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the technology. But patent trolls don't tend to offer licenses. First,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>They get litigious. They aim for big rewards or court settlements,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and that tends to scare everybody else, and it gives

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the patent holder a lot of leverage when they do,

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to negotiate licensing agreements. Meanwhile, critics point

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>out that these patent holders aren't doing anything useful with

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the patents at all. You know, they're not making anything,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>they're not using the patent. They're just relying on it

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>as a cudgel. They're hoarding patents and waiting for the

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to go after someone who appears to be using

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the technology without authorization. And back in the day, the

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>company I worked for, how Stuff Works, was targeted by

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a patentrol that claimed to hold a patent that covered

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>all of podcasting. Now, that particular case never really went

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere for lots of reasons, but that's a story for

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>another day. Hey, when was the last time you answered

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a phone call from an unknown number? For me? That

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>would probably be something along the lines of five years ago.

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And as it turns out, it's probably a good thing.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not alone in my decision to let my

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>phone just ring to voicemail. According to Hya, a cloud

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>services company that caters to customers like a T and

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>T and Samsung. Robo call scams are kind of at

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a peak. The company commissioned a survey, and that survey

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>found that three out of four respondents say they were

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>targeted by at least one phone scammer over the last year. Now,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>these are the types of phishing attempts that are looking

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for personally identifiable information like social Security numbers, bank accounts,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Maybe you're one of those people.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You might get a call from someone claiming to represent

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the I R S and that you need to talk

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to them or face possible fines or worse. That's actually

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a pretty common one. And I know I've received a

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of robo call messages in that Vein the as,

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at least in the old days, they couldn't really detect

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>when voicemail was picking up as opposed to a human,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would get these prerecorded messages and it would

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>always start, you know, like halfway through, because it was

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>already going through my outgoing message. It didn't pause and

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>wait for the beep. So, according to this survey, those

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>who fall for the scam lose on average around a

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty dollars, but some can lose a lot more

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>than that. Meanwhile, because we're in that whole pandemic thing,

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>people have been using voice communication a lot more recently,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and so personal and business calls have nearly tripled in volume. Meanwhile,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the survey respondents say that if it's an unknown number,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't answer it, which makes it harder for a

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimate communication to go through. So if a company does

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>need to make contact with a customer, it can be

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>impossible to get that person to pick up. Of course,

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>if they just leave a legitimate message, that can help

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Now, I don't know about you, but while

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I might get three or four, or sometimes six or

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seven calls in a day, it's very rare that any

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of those will actually leave a message. Now, you might

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>wonder if anyone is actually working on this problem on

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>behalf of consumers, And the short answer is yes. But

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the longer answer is it's a complicated problem. It's not

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>super easy to solve. In the United States, phone companies

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to create a new approach to color i

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>D by June this year and cut back on the

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>practice of spoofing. That's when a caller can use a

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>false color I d to try and make a connection.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not using their own phone number, they have

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>spoofed a different phone number that stands in its place.

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever received a bunch of calls from

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a phone number that's similar to your own, you know,

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>same area code, maybe the same first three digits of

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the actual number, then you've likely seen spoofing in action.

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a common tactic among robo callers. Now, I'll probably

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>do a full episode about spoofing and what steps companies

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>might take cut back on it, but that will be

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for the future, which is where you and I will

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>spend the rest of our lives. Before we get to

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the future, though, we need to take another quick break.

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of the dangers of relying on

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>cloud based services. Now, sometimes the cloud providing those services

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>can go down and then you're at a loss. And

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those scary things that c t

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>o s have to consider. Do you keep all your

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>systems on premises or on prem as the cool C

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>suite folks say, or do you offload some or maybe

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all of those services to cloud based platforms and then

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you rely on other companies to provide a more robust

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and redundant system that you can rely upon. Now, ideally,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>cloud services should be just as if not more reliable,

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>than on pre m systems, but sometimes stuff goes wrong.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Last Friday, stuff went wrong for Notion. That's a company

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that provides cloud based project management services. The company offers

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>up a suite of tools for all sorts of things

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>from managing product development, to product launches, to marketing campaigns

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. Except on Friday, for several hours, the whole

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>thing went down for everybody, which means four million users

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>were not able to access it. So what was going on? Well,

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>according to the company, there was a quote very unusual

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>DNS issue that occurred at the registry operator level end.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Quote that might be a little difficult to parse, so

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>let's break it down. D n S stands for Domain

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Name system, which you can think of as sort of

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the directory for the Internet. It's the distributed decentralized record

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that explains what all those different machines connected to the

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>inner net are and where they can be found. Notion site,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>which is Notion dot s O, has name dot Com

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as the registrars, so that's the company that registered the

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 1>name to Notion. However, Name dot Com works with another

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>company called hexo Net. Hexo Net manages all companies all

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>websites that use the dot s O domain, and hexo

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>net had received word that some nefarious Notion users were

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>creating pages in Notion that were an effort to fish

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>sensitive information off of unsuspecting targets, so they were essentially

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>using Notion as a platform for a delivery system for

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>phishing attacks. Hexo Net contacted name dot com about this,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but Name dot Com was unable to confirm the reports

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with direct evidence. Hexo Net then placed a temporary freeze

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on notions domain in order to sort out the mess,

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>which meant that all of Notion went offline for rebudy.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Hex on Net lifted that freeze later on Friday, But

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the problems with phishing scams and Notion aren't new, and

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as of this recording, the company hasn't really laid out

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>plans externally anyway on how they're going to push back

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>against those fishing attacks, which could mean that this event

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>could repeat itself in the future, which is not a

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>strong way to sell a project management platform if you're

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>saying it might be offline occasionally as these sort of

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>things happen, and now la la Google has a lot

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to answer for in France. Okay, I'm sorry. I can't

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>promise that's going to be the last of the accent,

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's terrible, but a French court has

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>ordered Google to pay a fine of one point three

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>million dollars or one point one million euros because the

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>company's search engine gave misleading rankings about French hotels. And

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's about the most French thing I think I've ever heard.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You mess with French hospitality. You get the taroll by

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the orne. Okay, now now I'm really done. I know

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you've all just sort of cringed yourselves out of existence.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. So that was a mixed metaphor I was giving.

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It was also a terrible pronunciation of French vocabulary. But

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>apparently Google was using one source for ranking hotels in

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>addition to a couple of secondary sources, but they didn't

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>meet up to the high standards of French sensibilities and

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>hotel owners complained to the government, which then investigated the

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>matter and found Google to be deficient and how it

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was ranking results Gail Domage. So now Google has to

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pay this fine and presumably come about ranking these hotels

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in a totally different way. It's such a weird thing

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to to see and it's something that would only really

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>happen in the European Union. On Monday of this week,

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Jagua, the British car company, announced a

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>new plan for Jaguars that's the way we Americans say

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it started. In twenty five, the company's cars will ditch

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the internal combustion engine. Yep. All the Jaguars of the

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>future will all be electric, either with batteries or with

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen fuel cell technology. And a fuel cell is a

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 1>lot like a battery and that it generates electricity through

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>an electrochemical process, but unlike a battery, you have to

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>actually refuel a fuel cell. You have to fill it up.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eventually it runs out of hydrogen and you've got to

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>top it off. On the bright side, the emissions from

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a fuel cell vehicle are primarily heat and water, which

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is a nice change of pace from carbon spewing internal

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>combustion engines. The Jaguar land Rover is to have six

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>new battery electric vehicles by twenty six. Gone will be

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>engines that require either gasoline or diesel, and the company

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>itself plans to be carbon neutral by twenty thirty nine.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It will also mean making some big changes at the

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>company's various manufacturing facilities. Now, Jaguar says it's not gonna

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>shut down their factory in Birmingham, England, but things are

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>going to change substantially there after that facility finishes building

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>out the models that they're making for this year, because

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to do that next year, but

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>presumably that facility will be doing something else that supports

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Jaguar's new vision. Sticking with electric vehicles, Tesla is in

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the news again. You might remember last week when they

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about how China is ordering Tesla to shape up

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>after quality control issues were found with the American built

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla vehicles that were imported into China, whereas the Chinese

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>built ones seem to be okay. Well. Now Germany is

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ordering Tesla to recall more than twelve thousand Model X

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>cars because of a problem with loose trim. The country's

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>motor vehicle regulatory agency, called the k b A, says

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that the molding on the trim can become loose. That

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>means cars might have trim breakoff while they're in motion.

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That represents a has heard on the road, and the

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>recall is for cars that were manufactured between and twenty six.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla had already recalled some nine thousand Model X vehicles

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>in the US for a roof trim issue. No word

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's the exact same thing, and in January, the

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>NHTSA urged Tesla to recall more than one thousand vehicles

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because of a problem with the touch screen interface that

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>access the screen for the rear facing camera. It's also

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the way you control important stuff like if you want

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to defug the windshield, so it could pose as a

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>safety hazard if that fails as well. According to The Verge,

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is quietly testing its x Cloud service through a

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>web browser. With x Cloud, people who have an Xbox

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Game Pass are able to access their games in that

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>pass through a browser. Now playing a cloud based version

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the game through the browser itself, that's sort of cool.

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You would need an Xbox controller connected to whatever device

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was running the web browser, and then you're off to

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the races, particularly if you're playing Fortza. That's a race

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>card joke. The Verge reports that as it stands, it

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like the service is going to be limited to

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>browsers that are built off of Chromium, so that includes

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Edge and you know, Google Chrome. There are apps

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on Android that already allow Android users to access the

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>x cloud services, but this would allow you to do

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it straight through a browser, not with a specific OS.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The Independent reports that Facebook is working on a smart

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>watch with the goal of launching it in two Now,

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as you might suspect, such a watch would lean heavily

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on integrated services from Facebook properties like Instagram, What's Happened,

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Facebook, There's also evidence that it will have

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>some fitness tracking capabilities and integration with some big fitness

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>companies like Peloton. Now the design incorporates a cellular transceiver,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>so assuming that's in this smart watch, you would be

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>able to use the watch to send and receive messages

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>without necessarily having to pair it with a phone or

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Now, considering Facebook's reputation with user privacy

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and leveraging user information to serve ads to those people,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I would personally be a little bit reluctant to strap

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>on a smart watch that's monitoring stuff like my heart

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>rate and my sleeping patterns, because next thing you know,

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd be getting ads for exercise equipment and lavender scented

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>masks and stuff. I mean, at least I would if

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I were still using Facebook. But you get what I mean.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Can Facebook create a must have piece of technology? Well,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the company has tried in the past. Things have not

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really worked out so well. The Facebook phone is one

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the legendary flops in the tech world, and smart

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>watches have frequently fallen short of expectations. So we'll have

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see. And that wraps up the news

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesday, February one. I hope you guys are doing well.

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You'll get another typical episode of tech Stuff tomorrow. I

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys are looking forward to That should be interesting. Uh.

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>They will definitely keep you awake because it's gonna be

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about coffee makers. That's a that's a little teaser for

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what to expect. Well, if you have any suggestions for

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>future topics of tech Stuff, you can let me know

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>by contacting me on Twitter. The handle is text stuff

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>h s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,