WEBVTT - Judge Blocks Key Migrant Asylum Rule

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>As we have said multiple times, our border enforcement plan works.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 2>It is deterrence, a diplomacy and enforcement. We have seen

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 2>that plan working on lawful border crossing have come down

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to the lowest that we have seen in the past

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>two years.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The Biden Administration's new enforcement plan to reduce illegal crossings

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on the US Mexico border does seem to be working,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just as White House Press Secretary Kareem Jean Pierre said. However,

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that success played no part in a federal judge's decision

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday to block the rule that denies asylum to

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>migrants who arrive at the border without first applying online

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>or seeking protection in a country they passed through. The

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration immediately appealed the judge's order, which is on

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>hold for two weeks. Joining me is immigration law expert

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Leon Fresco, partner at Holland and Knight. How big a

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>blow is Judge Tiger's decision to the Biden administration and

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>its efforts to control the border.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Well. If the decision is allowed to stand, it would

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>be a significant blow to the Biden administration's ability to

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 3>control the border, because right now the Biden administration is

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>using what's called a carrots and six approach along the border,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>which is to say, here are the carrots. Either come

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>in legally through one of our parole programs, or at

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>least apply it to the ports of entry with an

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>appointment at one of our ports so that we know

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.919
<v Speaker 3>you're coming and complain on it. But don't just walk

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>in between the ports through the border illegally where we

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many people are coming on what date,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>We can't plan for it, and it creates chaos. And

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>what it's saying is is if you do do that,

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>we're going to ban you from getting asylum and place

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>you in the expedited removal process. So most people so

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>far have acted in accordance with this charts and stay

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 3>approach and use the carrots space approach because they know

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>that the sticks are there. If the sticks aren't taken away,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>it's unclear whether the benefits of the cats will still

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>be sufficient to dissuade people from coming across the border illegally,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and so if the decision is allowed to stand, it

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>will be a big problem for the Biden administration. As

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>soon as the weather becomes a little less hot on

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the southern border.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The judge said that the rules were not lawful because

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they imposed conditions on asylum seekers that Congress did not intend.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>How So, there's actually two congressional statues and they're in

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent tension with one another. There's a congressional

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 3>statue which is pretty clear and is the one the

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 3>judge is relying upon, which says that it doesn't matter

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 3>whether you crossed legally or illegally, anybody inside the United

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 3>States is eligible to apply for asylum. It is essentially

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 3>written as clear as day that the fact that you

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 3>crossed illegally cannot be held against you for applying for asylum.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>So people might think, well, that means case closed. You

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be able to have an administration ban asylum for

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>people who crossed illegally. But by the same token, there's

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>another statute that Congress also wrote, which says that the

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>administration can, as a matter of discretion, pick any factor

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>that it wants to add to the list of reasons

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>why you can be denied a sylum and it doesn't

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>limit it in any way. And so hence, both the

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration and the Biden administration have said, well, we're

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>going to use the factor that you've crossed illegally after

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>being told not to do it, and in the Biden

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>administration's case, after being given numerous legal alternatives of how

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to do it. So the point is, if you're choosing

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 3>to brazenly cross illegally anyway, when there's a legal way

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to do it, we should be able to use this

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>as a discretionary factor to deny you asylum. And so

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that was the Biden administration's argument. The judge here ruled, well,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not exactly clear that everybody's going to be able

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to have an access point to asylum, and so because

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 3>of that, then we are going to say that the

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 3>statue where Congress says that you can't block asylum based

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>on illegal entry is the one that's the winner here,

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to prevent the Biden administration from having

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 3>this stick that says don't cross illegally.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The judge wrote that while they wait for an adjudication,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>applicants for asylum must remain in Mexico, where migrants are

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>generally at heightened risk of violence by both state and

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>non state actors. Is that true, Well.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>It depends how long it's going to take and under

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 3>what conditions the person is waiting. It is true that

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the longer a person is waiting in Mexico and the

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 3>less resources that the person has, this means it is

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 3>more likely that something bad is going to happen to

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>them in Mexico while they're waiting, which can include having

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 3>just random street crime where the person's resources are taken

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 3>away from this. That is very common in Mexico and

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>is likely to occur to anybody who's just sitting around

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>there waiting for months. So that's the question. It's sort

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of a really effectual question, which is the Biden administration

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 3>tries to say, no, one's going to be lingering in

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Mexico waiting for an appointment at the port of entry,

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 3>because we have sufficient number of appointments through our CBP

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 3>one app and through the parole program. But the plane

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 3>has said no, there are still people waiting and they're

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 3>subject to danger. And so because they shouldn't be expected

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to have to wait and have to subject themselves to

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 3>this danger, then again we're going to choose the part

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>where Congress says you don't have to wait outside the

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 3>United States. You can come in and apply for asylum,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to saying that this is a permissible discretionary

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>factor for an administration to use the ban people from

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 3>seeking a silo, which is, hey, there's a legal way

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>that we just created, use that. The only reason you

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 3>would use the illegal way is because you're trying to

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>cause problem for the US government. So the judge doesn't

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>believe that. The judge believe someone using the illegal way

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 3>might be just trying to protect their safety because they

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have a sufficiently quick pathway to avoid having to

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 3>sit there in Mexico and potentially risk being in some

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 3>way harmed by gang members or others.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So leon is this Biden program similar to the Trump

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Remain in Mexico program?

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, it isn't it is. In this sense, Trump did

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>not have a mechanism in play like the CBP one

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 3>app and the parole program that was designed to legalize

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the flow so that they could make the argument that

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 3>it would be a permissible discritiontionary reason to ban people

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 3>from asylum that they were crossing across the border illegally.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 3>Meaning Trump just said stay out, and I'm allowed to

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>tell people to stay out, and if they don't want

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>to stay out and do it through Vexico. I'm allowed

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>to ban them from seeking asylum. So he was making

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the A versus b one versus two binary analysis, and

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I banned some poken, I got banned people from asylum.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>He was trying to make that very binary analysis, whereas

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the Biden administration was saying, no, no, no, this is

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>not a binary analysis. The reason ours is different is

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>because every person can legally access our asylum system, and

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the only reason they would cross illegally is to cause

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>problems for our US government. And if they're doing that intentionally,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>they should face the punishment of being banned from being

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 3>able to speak a sylum. So that's the difference the

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration was trying to make. And the Biden administration

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 3>reasoning was not viewed as credible by the Federal court

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>judge here.

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Biden administration immediately appealed. The appeal will go

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Ninth Circuit, where would you say it may

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>not farewell well.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 3>The Ninth Circuit is now a fifty to fifty court.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>It used to be considered a liberal court because it was.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>But President Trump actually was quite successful in putting in

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>judges in the Ninth Circuit. So now it's a fifty

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to fifty court, it's a court with many judges, and

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 3>so you could easily get three Trump appointees on a panel,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>or you could get three Biden appointees on a panel

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 3>now or three Obama appointees on a panel. So you

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>have no idea what kind of panel you're going to

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 3>be able to get. And so from that standpoint, that's

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>what's going to be complicated in terms of predicting the outcome.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 3>But I will say this, the Trump administration had in

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 3>this litigation, been able to make some headway in the

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Ninth Circuit. They were able to get this decision from

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the same judge as Tigaer overturned, and it was working

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>its way up to the Supreme Court before the Trump

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>administration ended. I don't know how this case would have

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>been resolved, but what I imagine what happened here is

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>that the Supreme Court is probably going to allow the

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration to have this policy. If I had to

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 3>make a prediction, you know, I would say that that

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the Biden administration is going to be allowed to keep

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>this policy in place by the US Supreme Court.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, explain why you think

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court would allow it to remain in place.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 3>First of all, what we've now seen for the last

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>three years of the Biden administration is that the Supreme

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Court has been very deferential to the administration period writ large,

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>with regards to issues of immigration, and it's setting that

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>up not just for Biden, because I don't think they're

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>particularly fond of Biden, let's say, but just because they

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>want this to be the norm for immigration rid lards

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>moving forward, to return it to what had been the

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>traditional one hundred years of jurisprudence before the period let's

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>say between nineteen ninety and twenty sixteen, where there was

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 3>a lot of activism in this area of immigration in

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the judiciary. Now they're trying to resort back to the

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>don't sue because the administration has a lot more authority

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>than you think. And I think that will be the

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>case here where I think the Supreme Court will be

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>sympathetic to all of the legal options that the Biden

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>administration is offering people in order to come here legally,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 3>which is the parole program for the CDP one app

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and saying to people if you want to come across

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the border without using any offeasset mechanisms. Then you are

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>going to have to risk that you will be denied asylum.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, there isn't even then a complete

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 3>ban on asylum. If you could prove that your life

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>or safety were in danger in Mexico and that's why

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>you had to cross it, it's an imminent manner, then

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you can even overcome this ban. So it's not even

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>a one hundred percent fan in that situation. And so

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>for that reason, I think the Supreme Court is going

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to have sympathy about it. And for the same reason

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they actually upheld the Trump travel ban back in the day,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 3>they will use that same logic here and uphold the

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Biden transit ban visa via pilumce Leon.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn now to the fight between the state of

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Texas and the Biden administration over migrants crossing the border,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>which is escalating and is now visually represented by a

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot stretch of bright orange, wrecking ball sized tethered

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>buoys in the middle of the Rio Grande, the river

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that serves as the border between the United States and Mexico.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas Governor Greg Abbott defended the state's right to install

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the barrier, issuing his own demand on Fox News.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 3>All about administration has to do is to enforce the

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 3>laws already on the books to prevent people from crossing

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>between the ports of entry.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas will see you in court, mister, President Abbott wrote

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in a letter. White House Press Secretary Kareem Jean Pierre

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>called it another political stunt.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Let the Department of Justice speak to this. They've been

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>very clear last week that they also will see Governor

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Abbott in court for his unlawful actions. We've been very

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>clear about that.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And so the administration sued Texas over the buoys, certainly

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not its first lawsuit against the state. I've been talking

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight and

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>former director of the Justice Department's Office of Immigration Litigation.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Leon tell us about these booys that the federal government

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is suing over.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Well. The federal government is complaining about the floating barrier,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 3>which are about a string of buoys that are between

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 3>about four and six feet a diameter. The orange looking buoys,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>which may streatch for at least one thousand feet between

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 3>the Eagle Path International Bridge and about a couple miles

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 3>south there, and they include some infrastructure designs to anchor

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>it or fix it in the middle of the Rio

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Grand River separating Mexico and the United States there near

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>ego paths, And the idea is that these floating barriers

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>that people won't be able to walk across the river

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 3>in order to get to the United States and evade

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the border patrol so that they can get their bodies

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>inside the United States and avoid the bands that the

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration is trying to do, where they're trying to

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>basically push people back into Mexico and get them to

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 3>use the CBP one app so that they don't have

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to do the whole expedited removal process for these people.

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And what is the claim in this lawsuit? You know

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what law do? They say Texas has broken?

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, so what's very interesting is this is sort of

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty obscure stuff for the immigration world. I'm sure for

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the environmental and natural resources world, this is a very

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>common thing. But obviously, if you're a normal immigration lawyer,

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 3>you don't necessarily deal with everyday the Rivers an Harbor's Act.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 3>But the law that's in play is called the Rivers

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>and Harbor's Appropriation Act. Of eighteen ninety nine, which unlike

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 3>the Immigration Code, which is in Title eight of the

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>US Code, this is entitled thirty three of the Code,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and basically what it says in plain English is, look,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 3>there's navigable waters all around the United States, and the

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>whole point of these is that they're connecting interstates and

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>foreign state commerce. And if you want to build barriers

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 3>that prevent people from using these waterways, then you have

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to get the Army Corps of Engineer's approval to do this.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>You can't just be taking matters into your own hands

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and whatever you want with the waterways of the United States.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the province of the federal government, and so it's

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the position of the Department of Justice, the Environment and

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the Natural Resources Division. And they told this to the

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>State of Texas before the laws that was filed. Look,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>you have to get approval and a permit from the

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Army Corps of Engineers. You didn't get it. You have

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>to take this down. And Texas said, we won't take

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>this down. We have sovereign authority to protect our border.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And so now this loss has been filed in Austin,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Texas in the federal court seeking injunctive release in the

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 3>form of a court order saying, Hey, Texas, take down

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>these bullies, these barriers, and you'll have to pay to

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 3>do this.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Governor Abbott was anticipating this lawsuit. He sent the President

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a letter on Monday defending Texas's right to install the barrier. So,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as you said, he said that Texas has the sovereign

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>authority to defend its border, and they've been using the

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas Disaster Act as the legal bedrock for some of

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>these measures.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, they believe that they have basically a natural disaster

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>that's going on on the border, which, by the way,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>what's complicated about this is that the border numbers are

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>way down. All of the questions of what was going

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to happen after Tayle forty two was listed have been

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>answered in quite a positive way by the Biden administration.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>But nevertheless, the governor of Texas, Governor abbit is taking

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the position that he's in a state of emergency, and

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 3>that state of emergency permits him under his authority to

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>deter the people coming into the United States because he

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>has the authority to do that. Now he's being sued

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 3>by private actors and now the Department of Justice saying

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that the Texas disaster as of nineteen seventy five doesn't

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>give the authority defined here a lawful immigration was not

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 3>within the definition of disaster and was not intended to

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>be classified as such. So you know, it was meant

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>to basically protect human life and allow Texas to take

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 3>measures to do that, but not for the purposes of

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>basically using immigration as a quarte unquote disaster.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it sound like he has an arguable case.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's basically how this will work. It's one of these

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 3>things where had the case been brought in certain divisions

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, probably Texas would have won. In the district

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 3>court in Austin. It's a little bit more likely that

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the DOJ is going to get an injunction here. The

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Fifth Circuit, depending on the panel, may say that State

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>of Texas can do it or it can't do it,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 3>depending on which panel they get. I can see panels

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>going either way. But I do think once you get

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 3>to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court has been getting

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 3>more and more frustrated with these state efforts to co

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 3>opt immigration law and essentially to say, look, we're tired

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>of what the Biden administration is doing. We're going to

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 3>take matters in our own hands. And if they didn't

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 3>like some of the other stuff, like to remain in

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Mexico stuff and the Title forty two stuff and the

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>prosecutorial discretion stuff. I think that putting barriers in an

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 3>international waterway with Mexico is probably going to be deemed

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to be a bridge too far. So to speak for

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court, I don't think they're going to be

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 3>recessive to allowing Texas to do this because what is

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>basically the limiting principles then on what Texas can do

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Rio grand And that's going to be the problem.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Mesco asked the Biden administration to remove the boys and

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>razor wire, saying it violates treaties. Does that play any

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>part in the Biden administration's lawsuit against Texas.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not in the lawsuits. The lawsuit is just

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>talking about the principle that you need a permit from

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the Army Corps of Engineers. But the larger question of

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 3>why you need a permit from the Army Corps of

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Engineers is because Congress realized there the events like this,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>and again, the Rio brand is covered by the famous

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Treaty of Wataloupe Hidalgo and that's the water that is

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 3>part of both nations, and it's one of these things

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that's a very sensitive issue about Mexico and the United

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>States having sort of joint sovereignty over that river. And

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 3>for that reason, that's just not something that the State

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>of Texas can just get in. Again, you would be

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 3>the point, what is the limiting principles about what Texas

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 3>can do there? Can they put in huge seal things

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 3>that are causing to injure people there? What is the

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 3>limit of what they can they put bombs in the river?

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 3>And so there's all these kinds of questions about where

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the line is and why that's happening. And I don't

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 3>think again, the Supreme Court is going to be very

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>sacious if this case gets to the Supreme Court about

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>what Texas is doing with regards to the Rio brand.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is all part of a larger operation that

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they have to cause, Operation Long Star that also has

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to do with the bossing of people and have to

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>do with sort of this draconian tactics when Texas law

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>enforcement meet people up at the border to try to

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 3>push them back into Mexico. And so this is just

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 3>a larger operation basically designed to create havoc on the

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 3>southern borders.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>And part of that operation includes that razor wire strung

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>across private property without permission, bulldozers changing the terrain. The

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Texas Military Department cleared out kine, which should called invasive,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and change the landscape affecting the river's flow. So why

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't the Biden administration acted on those things as well?

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the question is I think they thought that

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>perhaps Texas would make its points and move on, but

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>now they're seeing they're actually going to have to litigate

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>these things. I think depending on how this one goes,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 3>you'll see more of this, And so I do think

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna see more of this. I do think this

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 3>was just the first set, the one that's the largest problem,

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>and I do think guilty others. I don't think they

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 3>wanted to do a bunch of these lawsuits all at once,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 3>but there are certainly others that have to do with

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 3>a trusting federal agent, from being a both to process

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 3>people and perhaps other environmental violations that they're causing that

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>you could see other lawsuits getting filed. But again, I

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>think that the larger problem is the Department of Justice

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to have ten twenty lawsuits against the State

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>of Texas. So Texas is properly, if you think about it,

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>in the political sphere, flooding the zone with as many

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 3>different things as they can do and then trying to

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 3>have the Department of Justice basically either sue them on

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 3>all of them or have the or just keep the

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>fight perpetuating, which is really the only interest of Texas

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>here at the end is to just have this fight

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>go on ad Infinaida.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, there is some blowback over the tactics, including from

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>within Texas, and especially in light of that state troopers

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>account of razor wire leaving asylum seekers bloodied, officers deny

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>migrants water in a one hundred degree heat.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I do think he's getting a lot more criticism about it,

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 3>that is true, from private folks, from people in the

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Department of Public Safety, from people in the Mexican government,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 3>and there's people that are starting to speak out against this.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>But I think at the end of the day, the

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 3>political issue of immigration is just so hot right now

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that I don't see a long term abandonment of this issue.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 3>But I do think it will be very interesting to

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>see long term, the outcome of the parole case, which

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>is sort of the lynchpin of the entire Biden administration

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>border policy, if that's allowed to continue, it's going to

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 3>be very hard. The numbers are what they are, they're

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 3>weight down for the Governor of Texas to keep saying

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a crisis compared to what compared to which month,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to be very hard to say. But

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>if the parole program goes away, then and then the weather,

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 3>which is the other big thing, changes from the record

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 3>heat that we have now to the falls, I do

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>think you'll start to see the numbers starts to go

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>off pretty dramatically, and then that's where you'll start to

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 3>see more of viztforst rather than less.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration has been talking about how the numbers

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>at the border are so low. Do we know if

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the parole program or is it the heat.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a combination of three things. It's the

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 3>combination of the record heat, no doubt, one hundred and

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 3>fifteen degrees on the border right now is absolutely unbearable

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>for anybody to try to make these very difficult tricks

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>all the way through the southern border. It's life threatening.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 3>People know that. But then you take that and compare

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>it to the option of a CBP one app where

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 3>you can make this same claim without having to do

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>all of that. You just show up at the app

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 3>appointment at the Board of Entry, or you can get

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 3>parole for the parole program, or you know that if

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>you do cross the border illegally, you have to do

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the record heat and you'll be put in this expedited

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>removal programs and you might not be able to qualify

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>for asylum anyway. All those things are being weighed at

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>a point where we're now talking about for the first

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 3>time in a long time, first time since I would

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 3>say twenty fifteen. That doesn't count the COVID months where

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 3>we're legitimately at eighty ninety thousand people per month, which

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 3>is a lot less than the two hundred thousand a

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 3>month we were seeing just you know recently, and so

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>we have some pretty dramatic reduction here.

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly a lot of legal action about the southern

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>border lately. Thanks so much for being on the show, Leon,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>As always, I appreciate your immigration expertise. That's Leon Fresco,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a partner at Holland and Knight, and that's it for

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 1>this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>www dot bloomberg dot com slash podcast Slash Law, And

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>remember to to to The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso and

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Bloomberg